Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/18/1994 Regular Council Meeting MinutesDATE: January 18, 1994. PLACE: Marana Town Hall, and Marana Jun/or High School Auditorium By Mayor Ora M. Ham. Time: 7:09 P.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Led by Mayor Ora M. Ham. m. INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE Moment of silence. IX. ROLL CALL Ora M. Ham Sharon Price Tom Clark Ed Honea Betty Hordgan Herb Kai Helen Key Mayor Vice Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member (excused 10:20 P.M.) STAFF: Hurvie E. Davis Sandra L. Groseclose Gerald M. Flarmery Daniel Hochuli Mick Mathieu Town Manager Town Clerk Planning Administrator Town Attorney Town Engineer 123 members of the public. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Tom Clark and can'ied unanimously to approve the Agenda with two changes: Public Hearing IX-D to come before IX-A, action item XI-F to precede Order of Business Item XI-A, Recess to relocate to Marana Junior High School Auditorium. Time: 7:1 l P.M. Reconvene. Time: 7:40 P.M. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Betty Horrigan and carried unanimously to amend the Agenda motion, by moving Public Hearing Item IX-D to come before IX-A, to drop Public Hearing Item IX-C as it is inappropriate and move Item XI-F to follow IX-D. Dan Hochuli clarified the motion to the public. VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting. October 19. 1993 A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price a~d carried unanimously to adopt the minutes of October 19, 1993. VII. PETITIONS AND COMMENTS Ted J. Widger, Sr., PO BOX 1090, Marana: Commented that Tortolita Rd. is the worst road in Marana. Ray Honea, 12540 N. White, Marana: Objected to politicians that put up recall signs all over Marana. VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Ora Ham presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. & Mrs. Kelly for their donation to the Town. IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Replaced with Item IX-D. l~. Rezoning Of Property. Located South Of Tangerine Road. East Of I-!0 And West Of Thornydale From "C" To "VC" Village Commercial. MF-1 Multi-Family And R-6 S~ngle Family Residential. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Tom Clark and carried unanimously to enter into Public Hearing on Item IX-A Rezoning of Property Located South Of Tangerine Road, East Of 1- 10 And West Of Thomydale From "C" to "VC" Village Commercial, MF~I Multi-Family and R-6 Single Family Residential. Gerald Flannery gave summary, noted that Staff received several calls of objection to the proposal and residents and project representatives are present. (#1) Carl Winters, Winters & Associates, 270 N. Church Ave. Tucson, representing New World Development: Referred to map, pointed out the 511 acres of the Tangerine - Thornydale area and the zoning for that 511 acres. One part is for commercial, another is for apartments, and the rest is for housing. He spoke of past and present Marana zoning schemes. Explained what a "significant land use change" is, that New World is asking for a rezone and not a land use change. Said the Zoning Conunission would allow no more than 4 units per acre (4-RAC). He compared local and regional General Plans for the area to the New World proposal. There is a 15" sewer line down Camino de Oeste to the treatment plant; it has the capacity for the development. Everyone within 600' of the proposed development area was notified. A member of the audience complained that Mr. Winters has exceeded his 5 minutes. Mayor Ora Ham explained that Mr, Winters is making a presentation and not expressing an opinion. Mr. Winters concluded, explaining that Marana has strict landscape regulations and New World would comply with them. 3 (#2) Joe Lachowicz, 5000 Camino de Manana, Tucson, AZ 85741: He lives near the proposed development area and said that he is concemed that the lush desert vegetation will be destroyed like a previous New World Homes development on Thomydale. This is a matter of quality of life. The housing density of the area affects that quality. The proposed development is not appropriate. (#3) Janice Mitich, 11115 W. Anthony Dr., Tucson, AZ 85743, on Marana Governing Board: She said that if the proposed development goes through, the increase in population would require an additional four elementary schools and one junior high school. Currently, there are only funds for one elementary school. Funding is based on the previous year*s attendance. She suggested that the sites for the schools be donated by New World. Mayor Ora Harn wondered whether Ms. Mitich was speaking for the Board or as an individual, Ms. Mitich said she was speaking as an individual Board Member. (g4) Tim Blowers, 15951 N. Como Rd., Tortolita Mountain Homeowners Association: Lives two miles from proposed development area. He said that he is for larger lots with more preservation of natural vegetation. He suggested that the proposal go back the Zoning Commission or even that the proposal be withdrawn. He is not sure that there is sufficient sewer capacity. (#5) Paul Larson, 8750 N. Moison Dr.: As a resident near the proposed development, he said that he did a plant count of the area and calculated the total population there to be 281,000. 21,000 were greater than 4" in diameter and 9000 mesquites, 8400 ironwoods, 23,000 palo verdes, 12,700 saguaros. Given the plant diversity and density in the Tangerine - Thomydale area, 4-RAC on the 511 acres would make it impossible to preserve or relocate such a large quantity of vegetation. (#6) Dave Wibel, 11071 N. Paisano: Lives near the proposed development. Said that when he moved onto his property, housing density was at a minimum 0.303-RAC, or one house for every 3.3 acres. 4-RAC is incomprehensible. Development housing is bad for property values; there is crime. He said that he would support any recall effort in order to stop the New World development. 4 (#7) Daniel P. Dolata, 10500 N. Oldfather, Tucson, AZ 85741, President, Lambert - Naranja Homeowners Association: Said that the Association voted to request that thc New World proposal be sent back to the Planning Commission because there was insufficient public input. Not everyone in the proposed development area was notified. Also, he said that "leapfrog" development was taking place, where entire chunks of undeveloped land near past developments were bypassed, sometimes by several miles, and isolated undeveloped land, such as the Tangerine - Thomydale area, was targeted for construction. The proposal is contrary to the development style of the area (0.303-RAC), and it is in violation of Title 20 of the Marana Native Plant Code. And on a more practical level, it would place a huge financial burden on Marana to provide public services to such a large development. Also, the State of Arizona does not plan to substantially improve the Tangerine and Thomydale transportation corridors for about 20 years, so about 8000 people packed into the proposed development would have to travel on roads that are already at capacity. Because local and state governments are not yet ready to do the road improvements, bonds and taxes would have to be raised. New World, Mr. Dolata said, should place its development closer to 1-10 where transportation corridors already exist. (#8) Doug Koppinger, Conservation Chairman, Tucson Audubon Society, 6737 E. Opatas, Tucson, AZ: He said that several homeowner's groups asked him to attend this meeting and provide comments on wildlife and habitat issues. He agreed with past speakers, thought it would be difficult if not impossible for New World to relocate the established vegetation, and recommended that thc proposal be sent back to the Planning Commission, or rejected. (#9) Bill Schisler, 12561 N. White Ave, Marana: He said that he recognized that the country lifestyle of this area would make way for development in the future, the Westinghouse sewer system is inadequate. Septic systems in the area would contribute to nitrates in groundwater. Gerald Flannery said that one-acre lots would have to have a septic system. (#10) Myra Tuggle, 3731 W. Flying Diamond: She lives near the proposed development, said that Thornydale area is already at capacity. Also, the quality of life for past residents as well as future ones will be impacted. She asked how wildlife and the environment would be protected, and how the zoning process works. Gerald Flannery explained the zoning process, said that the New World proposal is only a rezoning and not a significant land use change. State statute on notification by property owner and public hearing is in Title 9-462.04. That Title sets 300' as the notification range where residents adjacent to the potentially rezoned property have to be informed. New World notified residents within a 600' range, well within Title 9 requirements. The Planning Administrator went on to state that all nearby residents had been sent notices, contrary to Mr. Dolata's statements. He has a mailing list at his office. Also, by law, of residents within 150', if 20% or more object to the zoning or rezoning, then a 3/4 affirmative vote by the Council would be required to approve the zoning. However, most of the objections to the New World proposal are beyond the 150'. Ms. Tnggle asked if there was some sort of plan of intent that the public could look at to get the information that they needed. Mayor Ora Itarn responded, saying that people could come to the Town and request to see the plans. In Marana, the plans are required to be specific and detailed. Gerald Flannery clarified his previous statement on the 20% objection, saying the 20% objection protest should be filed in writing against the proposed amendment, and the amendment will not become effective unless 3/4 of the Council vote to pass it. Ms. Tuggle asked whether there is a specific plan, and Gerald Flannery said that there is one on public record. (#11) Mary Ann Redmond, 10981 N. Camino de Oeste, Tucson, AZ 85741: She lives near the proposed development, and corrected Mr. Winters' statement about Westinghouse. She mentioned that desert wildlife frequently visits her property. She hoped that the desert would be preserved. (#12) Eve Ladd, 3100 W. Lynne Pl., Tucson, AZ 85741: She said that schools in the area are already overcrowded. She came to the area for its desert ranch lifestyle and opposes the proposed development, (#13) Jeff New, 10650 N. Oldfather, of the Lambert - Naranja Homeowners Association: He expressed his concern on the proposed New World development's effects on flooding. Said that water flow in the area washes would increase over 200% after the area is developed. He recommended that the proposal be postponed until all flood concerns have been dealt with. (#14) Loren Loftin, 4747 Camino de Manana, Tucson, AZ: Said that he lives near but not close to the proposed development. He prefers the country lifestyle but recognized that development would occur. Had concerns about sewer capacity and fresh groundwater. He recommended that the proposal go back to the Zoning Commission. (#15) Tom Harding, 1501 Comanche Way, Tucson, AZ, of Tortolita Mountain Homeowners Association: He spoke about taxes and the cost to residents: police, schools, road maintenance. (#16) Ted J. Widger, Sr., owner of Arbor Tree & Cactus Nursery, PO Box 1090, Marana, AZ 85653-1090: He returned to say that he has done plant salvage for New World, that there is not the budget to do the salvage and relocation of all the native plants in the proposed development area. (#17) Marti Magarian Dolata, 10500 N. Oldfather Dr., Tucson, AZ 85741: She commented on zoning, said that the 150' notification range for rezoning (see statements of #10 Myra Tuggle and Gerald F!annery, above) is too small for such a rural area. She does not see why such a high density urban~style development is doing out in the country. The people who want a country lifestyle should be taken into consideration, too. The 0.303-RAC rural style should be maintained. Ms. Dolata polled the Council members on whether they lived in high-density housing areas and the Council indicated that they did not. (#18) Lan Lester, President, Tortolita Mountain Homeowner's Association, 4003 W. Turkey Ln,, Tucson, AZ 85741: He said that the local residents were not sufficiently notified of the rezoning proposal by New World Homes, reiterated that "leapfrog" development was occurring. (See comments of #7 Daniel P. D01ata, above.) He said the cost of infrastructure upgrades would stress the taxpayer. Mr. Lester said that with the proposed development, all that land will be covered by streets, houses, and buildings. If all those structures cover the land, then rainwater will have to go elsewhere, into the washes. The washes would have to be reinforced to handle the increased nmoff. (See comments of JetYNew, above.) (#19) Paul Hall, 3641 W. Potvin Ln., Tucson, AZ 85741: Said that it is ironic that an award was given at the start of the meeting to people who donated trees to the Town when many thousands of native plants on the 511 acres of the proposed development are at risk for destruction. He doubted that the rezoning was not a significant land use change. (See statements of #10 Myra Tuggle and Gerald Flannery, above.) He said that he is representing about 40 people and hopes to represent many more to oppose the rezoning. He promised to fight the Council legally. He realized that his statement is aggressive, but thought it was necessary. He encouraged the Council to send the proposal back to the Zoning Commission. (#20) Ray Honea, 12540 N. White, Marana, AZ 85653: He returned to speak, saying there have been inaccuracies in previous statements, that he has been in Marana for many years, was on the first Council and was Chairman of the Planning Commission, was on Board of Directors Trico Electric Co-op, and he owned a water company, so he knows about water issues, nitrates and septic tanks in the Marana area. He said that the water table is over 300' down in Honea Heights, far below septic tanks. The nitrates come from Santa Cruz effluent from Tucson. On taxes, he said it was mobile home density that caused problems. They do not provide a good tax base. It was the lower class mobile homes in one area that enabled the more affluent people to have their country ranch homes on one house per 3.3 acres or better. The Thomydale area has been and still is somewhat of a slum area with no good tax base of taxpaying property owners, A good tax base will pay for the infrastructure improvements and public services. Mr. Honea said that development will help wildlife such as at the Arthur Pack Golf Course because of all the irrigation watering. (#21) Neale Allen, 3530 Sahuaro Divide, Tucson, AZ 85741: Lives near the development area, said that they moved there for the desert environment. He would prefer lots of 1 to 3.3 acres. (#22) Joyce Minatra, 3801 W. Oasis Dr., Tucson, AZ: Lives one mile south of the New World property. Said that she has lived in the L.A. area and has seen high density areas. She has seen the 1993 Marana Flood and washes filled with rainwater runoff. She wants development to use larger lot sizes like ones already in the area. (#23) Maria Iannone, 10707 N. Camino Central, Tucson, AZ 85741: Opposes the proposed development. Compared Long Island, NY, to Marana, where high density development occurred in a rural area, said that the problems of urban areas will happen here. (#24) Manny Simoes, 7312 N. Oleander Vista, Tucson, AZ 85704: He said that he and his family own collectively about 40 acres near thc development, and he hopes that the Council makes the right decision. (#25) Ron Wyckmans, 3680 W. Potvin Ln., Tucson, AZ 85741: Lives about a mile from the development. He said that the 300' notification distance is much too small for this type of development. It should be more like a mile to a mile and a half. He said that New World is doing the development purely for profit to the detriment of the community, and that Marana should maintain its rural quality. (#26) John Welty, 11020 N. Camino de Oeste, Tucson, AZ 85741: He said that the New World development stemmed from the previous Hartman Hills development and rezoning, that a similar situation occurred, where the Council sent the Hartman proposal back to the Zoning Commission then the Council later approved the mzoning. County and Marana land use plans do not consider present land use. The Council should send the rezone request back to the Planning Commission. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carried unanimously to close the Public Hearing. Time: 9:50 P.M. XI. F. Rezoning Of Property. Located South Of Tangerine Road. East Of 1-10 And West _Of Thornydale From "C" To "VC" Village Commercial. MF-I Multi-Family and R-6 Single Family Residential. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carried unanimously to return to the Planning Commission for further public hearing at their February 23, 1994 meeting Item XI-F Rezoning Of Property Located South Of Tangerine Road, East of 1-10 And West Of Thomydale From "C" To "VC" Village Commercial, MF-1 Multi-Family And R-6 Single Family Residential. Ed Honea commented on the conduct of the guest speakers, said he did not approve of threats made. Mayor Ora Harn concurred with Ed Honea's statement. Jeff New of the Lambert Naranja Homeowner's Association said that the people who made threats did so out of fear rather than malice. Paul Hall apologized for his conduct. Recess. Time: 9:55 P.M. Reconvene. Time: 10:20 P.M. Helen Key - excused. B. Replaced by Item IX-A. A. Appeal By Nate Newberry_, Representing PuRe Homes, Of A Planning Commission's Decision On December 15. 1993 Denying A Request For Front Yard Setback Reductions A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carried 6-0 to enter into public heating on Item IX-A Appeal by Nate Newberry, Representing Pulte Homes, Of A Planning Commission's Decision On December 15, 1993, Denying A Request For Front Yard Setback Reductions. Time: 10:23 P.M. Nate Newberry deferred his presentation to Order of Business, Item XI-C. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carried 6-0 to come out of Public Hearing on Item IX-A. Time: 9:24 P.M. C. Proposed Annexation To The Town Of Marana Known AS Exeter II Annexation Thornydale Road South Of Tangerine Road. Removed from Agenda. B. Rezoning Of Property. Located South Of Linda Vista, East Of 1-10 And West Of Hartman Lane From E To R-6 Single Family Residential A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carried 6-0 to enter into Public Hearing on Item IX-D Rezoning of Property Located South Of Linda Vista, East of 1-10 And West Of Hartman Lane From E To R-6 Single Family Residential. Time: 10:24 P.M. Bill Schisler, 12561 N. White Ave., Marana 85653: He gave a summary of the situation, recommended that a buffer be placed around the property. Frank Cermack, 4994 W. Didion Dr., Tucson, AZ 85741: Recommended that the commercial - industrial area be closer to 1-10. Carl Winters, representing the applicant, 270 N. Church Ave., Tucson, AZ 85701: Described the property. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Sharon Price and carded 6-0 to exit Public Hearing on Item IX-D. Time: 10:33 P.M. X. STAFF REPORTS - On File A. Engineer's Report B. Police Report C. Public Works Report D. Magistrate's Report E. Building Official's Report F. Recreational Site Manager's Report G. Financial Report H. Planning and Zoning Administrator's Report L Legal Department's Report J. CDBG Report XI. ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Request For Financial Assistance - United States Parachute Team Hurvie Davis gave summary, said the request was to promote tourism and help the community, and introduced Ms. Tee Brydon. Tee Brydon introduced herself, said that among various civic charities and organizations, she is a grandmother and a skydiver. She is the head of a competition team to go to China in May. The Marana area is a good place for skydiving practice and competitions. She is seeking financial assistance to cover travel expenses to India and China. 3_3_ Hurvie Davis said that no money was allocated for this request, and there is no budget surplus. The Ina - Thomydale annexation is not yet resolved and the funds derived from sales tax are or may not be available. He is for promoting Marana, however. Mayor Ora Ham asked whether CDBG (Community Developoment Block Grant) funds can be used. Hurvie Davis said that the CDBG situation must be examined to see whether funds can be obtained. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Betty Horrigan and carried 6-0 to delay a decision to the next Council Meeting until the Town Accountant can determine whether funds are available. B, Proposal For Legislative Representation - Mr. Scott Alexander Scott Alexander, introduced himself, said he was a long-time area resident, and has served 6 years in the Arizona House of Represeutatives and chaired the State Government Committee, and 4 years in the State Senate where he chaired the State County Municipal Affairs Committee. He has been a professional lobbyist since 1974. He said Marana should do something to protect itself from Tucson, to help with sewers, flood control. Gave a description of lobbyists, said that if Marana is represented by a lobbyist in the State Legislature, the legislators would have to take Marana into consideration when considering a bill or an amendment. Getting access to the legislators is important. Credibility is essential. With the client, goals are defined, an action plan is made. His office has detailed information on legislatures; their schedules are in his computer system. Mr. Alexander stays connected to his clients with a pager and a cellular telephone, and a laptop computer with fax and modem. He works at all government levels from state to local. Herb Kai asked about Mr. Alexander's fee schedule. Mr. Alexander said his fee is usually $150/hr.; however, he prefers annual contracts. Mr. Alexander recommended that Marana subscribe to the "Arizona Capitol Times" in order to better informed on State government. 3.2 C. Appeal By Nate Newberry_, Representing PuRe Homes. Of A Planning Commission's Decision On December 10. 1993. Denying A Request For Front Yard Setback Reductions Gerald Flannery gave summary, said there are two issues: the setbacks, and the setbacks' effects on parked automobiles in regards to blocking pedestrian traffic. Nate Newberry restated that PuRe is asking for a reduction of setbacks from 20' to 17'. The other ~ssue is the exact placement of the sidewalk in relation to a lot and the street. PuRe has two proposals. Proposal A allows for a setback of 17' from the right-of-way, with the house being moved 3' closer to the street. In the original plan, there is a 4' sidewalk that is 3' from the angled curb. Pulte wants to eliminate the 3' separation of curb from sidewalk so that the front yard is not reduced in size while the backyard is enlarged by 3'. The purpose is to meet the demand of consumers for a larger backyard that arose after the Continental Ranch Specific Plan was devised. Proposal B leaves the separation between curb and sidewalk, but reduces it by one foot. Nr. Newberry stated that the amendment to the Specific Plan would apply only to Pulte's part of Continental Ranch, Parcels 18 and 12-B. He addressed the issue of parked vehicles, stating that Proposal A retains the original 20' driveway. Proposal B leaves an 18' driveway (17' setback + the one foot taken from the sidewalk and curb separation). An extended length private vehicle can still fit in the driveway. Ed Honea said that he examined Pulte's development, said that 20' is essential for parking a vehicle in a driveway. He also looked atNew World's houses and their 15' driveways, and said that even compact cars stick into the sidewalk. He has no objection to moving the sidewalk to the curb, however that would be unique to Continental Ranch. Proposal B would be unacceptable. Sharon Price said that she talked with homeowners in the area, and the people said that sidewalks joined with the curbs are preferable to shorter driveways. Proposal B would be unacceptable. Tom Clark said that he toured the Pulte area, compared the sidewalks/curbs to other developments where angled curbs that are joined to sidewalks invite motorists to park their cars partially in the street and partially on the curb and sidewalk, which is illegal. Also, children bicycle and skate on the sidewalks, although that, too, is not allowed. Mr. Newberry suggested that Pulte could make the sidewalks 5' wide, leaving a one foot separation from the curb. 3_3 Mick Mathieu, Town Eng'meer, said that a 5' sidewalk with a curb separation could be done where, at driveways, the sidewalk joins the curb and then returns to the separation after the driveway. This method is a compromise between Pulte's need and the need for safe streets and sidewalks. There is still the shortened driveway, but separations of sidewalk from curb are maintained except at the driveways, to give the driveways a little bit more room. Tom Clark lamented that the Zoning Commission was not present to explain their reasoning for denying Pulte's request. Mick Mathieu said that the Commission did not like the request because of the setback variance. The Specific Plan called for 20' and that is how it should remain. Gerald Flannery pointed out the Commission's Resolution 93-05 which contains the reasons for their decision. Tom Clark questioned reason #3 of Zoning Resolution 93-05 that stated granting the revision would create an adverse environmental effect, generally, on Continental Ranch. Gerald Flannery replied, saying that the quality of life would be impacted. Sharon Price said that she has a problem with Mick Mathieu's compromise; it makes for winding twisting sidewalks instead of straight ones and the sidewalks could be dangerous for small children at play. A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Tom Clark and carried 6-0 to move the sidewalks to the curb and to make the sidewalks 5' wide, allowing for a 20' driveway. Tom Clark wondered whether changing the sidewalk width to 5' would detract f¥om the house. Mr. Newberry replied that the elimination of the separation between sidewalk and curb will enhance the house's appearance because the separation would have to be maintained by the homeowner. D. Rezoning Of Property Located South Of Linda Vista. East Of 1-10 And West Of Hartman Lane From E To R-6 Single Family Residential A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Herb Kal and carried 5-I with Sharon Price voting n__Q, to approve the rezoning of property located south of Linda Vista, east of 1-10 and west of Hartman Lane from E to R-6 Single Family Residential. Dan ltochuli said that a typographical error made Ordinance 94.02 look like the zoning change was from E to R-l_6. A "1" was accidentally added. He recommended that Ed Honea amend his motion to include the correction to Ordinance 94.02. E__. Consideration Of Proposed Annexation To The Town Of Marana Known As The Exeter II Annexation Thornydale Road South of Tangerine Road A motion was made by Ed Honea, seconded by Betty Horrigan and carried 6-0 to direct Staff to file a blank annexation petition for Exeter II. Mayor Ora Ham explained that the petition must be filed before the matter can be brought to Public Heating. E- Rezoning Of Property_ Located South Of Tangerine Road. East Of I-!0 And West Of Thornydale From "C" to "VC" Village Commercial MF-1 Multi-Famil.v And R-6 Single Family Residential Sent back to Planning and Zoning Corm~ission for further consideration. (see page 9) G__. Summer Park And Swim Program Betty Horrigan said she is asking for $25,000 in CDBG funds. Last year's program lost money because it was not a free program. If it cannot be a free program this year, there should not be a swim program. Mayor Ora Ham said she supports the progran~ and would like it to continue. ~. Mayor's Report Deferred to another meeting. L Town Manager's Report No report. Written report to follow. Xll. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tom Clark wanted the Producers Cotton water ditch hazard placed on a future agenda. 3_5 XIII. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Sharon Price, seconded by Betty Horrigan and carried 6-0 to adjourn. Time: 11:53 P.M. AUDIO TAPES OF THE MEETING ARE AVAILABLE AT THE MARANA TOWN HALL CLERK'S OFFICE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a tree and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of the Marana Town Council held on January 18, 1994. 1 further certify that a uo mw 7 . SLG:clm H:\MINUTES\COUS'qCIL\ 1994\01 - 18-94.MIN