Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/18/2006 Blue Sheet State Legislative Issues TOWN COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION TOWN OF MARANA MEETING DATE: April 18, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: K. 1 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Michael A. Reuwsaat, Town Manager SUBJECT: State Le2islative Issues: Discussion/Direction/Action regarding all pending bills before the Legislature DISCUSSION This item is scheduled for each regular council Meeting in order to provide an opportunity to discuss any legislative item that might arise during the current session of the State Legislature. Periodically, an oral report may be given to supplement the Legislative Bulletins. ATTACHMENTS Legislative Bulletins, Issues 12 and 13, including action alerts on HB 2381 (impact fees and construction sales tax) and HB 2740 (liquor law changes). RECOMMENDATION Upon the request of Council, staff will be pleased to provide recommendations on specific legislative issues. SUGGESTED MOTION Mayor and Council's pleasure. JCB/04/12/2006/IO:42 AM -." '.,. -...........~,...""''",~.--............''''--....~'"-'''-''~~..~..<,~,.."-''''-~.,'''''',,..._,,~,."''- -,.. IN THIS ISSUE Impact Fee Legislation Continues To Move. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 Bill Eminent Domain Discussions Continue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Liquor Bill Passes With Promises Of More Compromise. . . . . . . 2 Bill Mandating Fall Elections For Large Cities Get Final Read . . . 2 Blue Stake Marking Preemption Passes Senate Committee .... 2 Early Ballot Voter 10 Bill Resurrected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Budget Discussion Begin To Get Serious .................. 3 Last Minute Amendment Kills VL T Bill .......... . . . . . . . . 3 League of Arizona ~I~ Cities AND Tovvns Legislative Bulletin is published by the League of Arizona Cities and Towns. FOlWard your comments or suggestions to: League of Arizona Cities & Towns 1820 West Washingtoo Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Phone: 602-258-5786 Fax: 602-253-3874 Email: league@mg.state.az.us Internet: www.azleague.org LEG IS LA liVE BU LLEll N Issue No. 12 March 31, 2006 * ACTION ALERT * IMPACT FEE LEGISLATION CONTINUES TO MOVE HB2381, which makes many changes to how municipalities can charge and use impact fees, passed out of the Senate Government Accountability and Reform Committee on Wednesday with a 3-2 vote despite the opposition of many cities from across the State. The bill was further amended to address some of our concerns that have been debated in our many discussions with the Homebuilders Association of Central Arizona but there are still portions of the bill that are unclear and unacceptable at this time. In particular, the bill continues to place restrictions on the use of local construction sales tax. While progress had been made on the development fee aspects of the bill which deals predominantly with the transparency of the development fee process and reporting requirements, there are fundamental disagreements on the limitations that the bill would place on construction sales tax. While there is still a chance that the bill could be amended on the floor to address these concerns, possibly deleting the construction sales tax language altogether, it is highly likely that the proponents of this legislation will not compromise on sales tax unless they believe such a change is needed to pass the bill which is all the more reason to let your Senators know of your opposition to the bill. ACTION REOUESTED: Please contact your Senators and ask them to oppose HB2381. We have tried in good faith to reach a compromise and have been unable to do so. As currently drafted, the bill creates additional mandates on development fees and places significant restrictions on the use of construction sales tax. * ACTION ALERT * EMINENT DOMAIN DISCUSSIONS CONTINUE After the failure of HCR2031 last week, the many stakeholders opposing broad changes to eminent domain laws and the regulatory takings language gained some traction in their discussions with leadership. HCR2031 failed last week with a 26-29 vote and the deadline to reconsider this resolution has passed. As such, the ongoing discussions are focusing around the SCR1019, which is very similar to the HCR that failed last week. The House committee on Federal Mandates and Property Rights passed SCR1 019 out of its committee on Monday with a 4-2 vote. Much of the testimony dealt with the effects the regulatory takings language will have on Arizona's military installations. Many legislators are unsettled by those provisions in the bill and by the lack of compromise on the issue by the sponsor of the bill. This resolution passed out of committee with the understanding that more changes would be made for the floor. The League, many cities and stakeholders continue to meet with leadership and the sponsor to remove the regulatory language and ensure that the eminent domain language focuses on redevelopment rather than general condemnation. We have also proposed that this language be added to statute with a bill rather than by a voter-approved resolution. Voter protected statutes are very hard to change if needed and the legislature should retain the authority to make changes as needed. In addition, Rep. Farnsworth's eminent domain bill is still moving outside of the eminent domain compromise discussions. HB2736 expands the court's ability to award fees and other expenses and the property owner's ability to receive appraisals at the government's cost in condemnation actions and prohibits a governmental entity from selling or leasing property condemned for ten years. This bill will greatly limit municipal ability to condemn when necessary and will result in substantial expenses to the taxpayer when eminent domain is exercised. HB 2736 also impacts all condemnation actions not just redevelopment. Action Requested: Please continue to talk with your legislators and ask them to oppose SCR1019 in its current form and to support the passage of the League's reform proposal. * ACTION ALERT * LIQUOR BILL PASSES WITH PROMISES OF MORE COMPROMISE The Senate Commerce and Economic Development Committee passed HB2740, which allows restaurants to operate indefinitely with food sales below the current 40% requirement. Overall, this bill works to encourage businesses to circumvent current liquor laws. With this bill, there wi II be no incentive to mai ntai n proper food sales and bar establishments will be encouraged to obtain a restaurant license and operate as a bar until they are notified of an audit, at which time they can use the provisions of this bill to avoid the high costs and stricter laws of obtaining and using a bar liquor license. The bill was amended to address some of our concerns. The language allowing restaurants to obtain a bar license and be grandfathered from the distance restrictions to schools and churches was removed. However, restaurants with sub-par food sales within those distance requirements may continue to operate in noncompliance under their restaurant license at the discretion of the Liquor Department. The amendment also tightened up floor space requirements for these establishments to maintain their restaurant license with lower food sales and extends the city council review period from 60 to 90 days. The stakeholders pushing this bill have agreed to work with the League and the neighborhood associations to address additional concerns with this bill that will be addressed with a floor amendment. The League will continue to represent municipal interests regarding liquor laws and will oppose the bill in its current form. Action Requested: Please contact your Senators and request that they oppose HB2740. BILL MANDATING FALL ELECTIONS FOR LARGE CITIES GET FINAL READ SB1041 , which was amended by the House Judiciary Committee to require cities or towns over 175,000 to hold candidate elections on the fall election cycle, was further amended in conference committee this week. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Waring, refused the House changes and the conference committee accepted the House changes and further amended the bill to clarify when the officials elected under this change will begin their term of office. The League and affected cities worked to have this election mandate language removed but those attempts were unsuccessful. Both houses final read the bill on Thursday. The Senate passed it 29-0, as did the House with a 57-0 vote. The bill now goes to the Governor, who is expected to sign it due to the comprehensive election reforms contained in the rest of the bill. BLUE STAKE MARKING PREEMPTION PASSES SENATE COMMITTEE HB2708, the Homebuilders Association of Central Arizona's bill that prohibits cities from using sewer c1ean- outs to mark the location of sewer lateral lines, passed out of the Senate Commerce and Economic Development Committee on Wednesday with a 5-2 vote. The Homebuilders are claiming that the cost of the additional clean-outs is excessive and they are not intended to be location devices, particularly when cheaper means such as tracing wire or above-ground monuments can be used. Homebuilders also claim that clean-outs cause installation problems for infrastructure that is installed above the sewer lines. However, clean-outs are quite possibly the most reliable locator device available and were recommended by the Maricopa Association of Government's Specs Committee as the marking method of choice in the region. This decision was made relatively quickly as the Legislature mandated last session thata marking method be in place by the end of the year. The Legislature placed a significant additional burden on cities and towns this last year to improve the marking process in the name of public safety. Now the Legislature is scaling back our ability to effectively implement the new marking requirements. The bill now moves on to consideration in the Senate Rules Committee. lEGISLATIVE BULLETIN PAGE 2 March 31, 2006 ~-'~~~-~-""'""",,"",,~,,"",,~'._""".",,".-.~~.", EARLY BALLOT VOTER 10 BILL RESURRECTED The House Appropriations (P) Committee will hear a strike- everything amendment to SB1 067 on Wednesday. While the exact language is not posted yet, we expect that it will be similar to an earlier proposed bill that required voters mailing an early ballot to send in a copy of their picture identification with the ballot. The expected language will also likely require the early ballot board to check each copy of identification against the envelope and make a determination as to whether the vote should be counted. This language will create problems for both the voters and the election officials. Individuals who have difficulties leaving their residence to vote will face the same challenges getting copies of their identification. In addition there are concerns of identity theft associated with mailing a photocopy of a drivers license or other official identification. The League will look over the language once it's posted and address any concerns that will affect municipal elections and citizen's ability to vote. BUDGET DISCUSSIONS BEGIN TO GET SERIOUS The Legislature has begun its efforts to get a budget together for the next fiscal year. There are many individual bills that we have been following that have received some support so far. These bills will be debated during the budget discussion and only a few will move forward. Each house will create a budget that encompasses these topics. It is not clear yet whether both houses are in agreement on a budget or if each will produce its own version. Both houses have to agree on the same version before it can be sent to the Governor for consideration. Property and income tax cuts are two popular concepts that have had many different and conflicting bills run addressing those issues. The many bills that address these issues will be considered and factored into the budget. Some of these bills work to limit property valuation, some work to limit the rate that can be charged, some require elections to increase your property tax collection, and many other ways of regulating municipal property tax collections. The League has been involved in many discussions with Legislator's working on the budget discussion to encourage responsible property tax legislation that does not tie the hands of city officials to develop budgets appropriate for their area. There are bills this session that deal with state shared revenue reductions that could become part of the budget discussions as well. The League has maintained strong opposition to any decrease in state shared revenue for any city and has advocated for an increase in small city funding this session. There are also several proposals that repay monies borrowed by the Legislature from HURF to supplement the General Fund the past few sessions. This money is vital to cities to address the growing need to maintain streets and add new transportation infrastructure to address the additional demands created by our quickly growing population. The League and many cities have worked hard this session to stress the importance of these repayments and we look forward to seeing them in the budget, given the huge expected surplus of state revenue. LAST MINUTE AMENDMENT KILLS VL T BILL A surprise amendment in House Transportation on Thursday would have shifted the cost of a Vehicle License Tax exemption for senior citizens to cities and towns. The bill already had municipalities carrying three-fourths of the cost and the amendment sponsored by Rep. McClure shifted that last quarter to the cities as well. The League is sympathetic to the idea of exemptions for seniors with low, fixed incomes if the cost of the exemptions, estimated at $4-6 million for the first year, would be borne equally among the beneficiaries of the VL T. This type of exemption could also be included in the budget for the State to fund, given the estimated $1 billion surplus for the next fiscal year. To push this mandate off on the cities by removing a portion of their state shared revenues is inappropriate and would have impacted all cities, especially those working within tight financial constraints already. The House Transportation Committee killed SBl149 with a 0-8 vote. LEGISlATIVE BULLETIN PAGE 3 March 31, 2006 IN THIS ISSUE Impact Fee Legislation Expected To Move Next Week. . . . . . . . 1 Liquor Bill Passes With Promises Of More Compromise. . . . . . . 1 Eminent Domain Discussions Continue with Leadership. . . . 1 Inclusionary Zoning Bill Passes The House ............... 2 Website Posting Requirements Bill Passes The House ....... 2 Healthcare Reform Bill Continues To Move. . . . . . . . . 2 Local Construction Codes Bill Passes The Senate . . . . . . . . . . 2 Prostitution Bill Passes The House . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Parking Enforcement Bill Fails In The House ............... 2 HB 2381 Development Fees League Of A:Z. Cities & Towns Opposes HB2740 Liquor; Restaurant License for Grills League of Arizona ~II.~ CItIeS AND Towns Legislative Bulletin is published by the League of Arizona Cities and Towns. Fotward your comments or suggestions to: League of Arizona Cities & Towns 1820 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Phone: 602-258-5786 Fax: 602-253-3874 Email: league@mg.state.az.us Internet: www.azleague.org LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN Issue No. 13 April 7, 2006 * ACTION ALERT * IMPACT FEE LEGISLATION EXPECTED TO MOVE NEXT WEEK HB2381, which makes many changes to how municipalities can charge and use impact fees and construction sales tax, is expected to be heard on the Senate floor late next week. The League's fact sheet on this bill is included in this week's bulletin. Please use it for talking points when speaking with your Senators on this issue. ACTION REQUESTED: Please contact your Senators and ask them to oppose HB2381. We have tried in good faith to reach a compromise and have been unable to do so. As currently drafted, the bill creates additional mandates on development fees and places significant restrictions on the use of construction sales tax * ACTION ALERT * LIQUOR BILL PASSES WITH PROMISES OF MORE COMPROMISE HB2740, which allows restaurants to operate indefinitely with food sales below the current 40% requirement, waits to be heard on the Senate floor. It is expected that this will occur late next week. The stakeholders pushing this bill have agreed to work with the League and the neighborhood associations to address additional concerns with this bill that will be addressed with a floor amendment. The League will continue to represent municipal interests regarding liquor laws and will oppose the bill in its current form. After two neighborhood meetings this past week, there appears to be no agreement reached and many neighborhood groups still have concerns about the impacts this bill will have on their neighborhoods. This bill makes too many changes to liquor laws without time to analyze the consequences. The League's fact sheet is included in this bulletin. Please use it for talking points to speak with your Senators. ACTION REQUESTED: Please contact your Senators and request that they oppose HB2740. EMINENT DOMAIN DISCUSSIONS CONTINUE WITH LEADERSHIP Efforts to adopt a compromise package rather than all of the numerous bills and resolutions that have been introduced on the issue continues to make headway. Senator Tim Bee has agreed to move forward language that will exclude regulatory takings as well as restrictions that have been proposed for traditional condemnation authority and focus the reform efforts on redevelopment authority. Also, the reform will come in the way of a statutory change rather than placing the issue on the ballot. A ballot measure would not put the issue to rest and any needed future modifications would be very difficult to accomplish. Moving the reform effort in this direction has received widespread support from rank and file members of both chambers. While additional safeguards will be provided to property owners creating a more cumbersome process for cities and towns, the reforms will not preempt the ability of municipalities to condemn for slum and blight in addition to keeping the process for traditional uses, such as road construction, intact. Removing the regulatory takings provisions is also significant as they would have severely crippled planning and zoning authority including the land use laws that have been adopted to protect the mission viability of Arizona's military bases. We anticipate action on our compromise package next week and will keep you updated. INClUSIONARY ZONING Bill PASSES THE HOUSE 5B1497 passed third read in the House this week with a 37-19 vote. This bill prohibits a city or town from requiring developers to build a certain number of homes at certain pricing levels often referred to as inclusionary zoning. While incentivizing affordable housing construction, such as providing developers with tax credits, is typically the preferred method, incentives may not always be enough to address housing problems. It is bad public policy to start limiting the means of addressing affordable housing issues with the dramatic population growth and rapidly escalating housing prices that we are experiencing in Arizona. The League continues to be part of the Governor's Affordable Housing Task Force to help develop other strategies for creating affordable living options for city residents and opposes this preemption. WEBSITE POSTING REQUIREMENTS Bill PASSES THE HOUSE 5B1209 passed on third read on Thursday with a 43-14 vote. This bill requires any city with a website to post notice of meetings, as well as all meeting minutes within two days of approval. In addition to the bill placing a mandate on what should be decided at the local level, the League was particularly concerned about the potential burden on smaller cities that maintain relatively static websites limited to basic information about their city. The bill was amended in COW to exempt cities under 25,000 to address our concern that mandates regarding the posting of information within certain timelines will discourage smaller municipalities from creating or maintaining websites. The emergence of websites has provided cities and towns with an additional means to disseminate information to the public and smaller cities need to be able to utilize that tool without mandates on the information made available. While the small city and town exemption is currently in the bill, there is the potential for action to remove it. If the Senate opts not to accept the House changes to the bill, it would likely go to a conference committee where additional changes, including the deletion of the exemption, could occur. We will keep you updated on future developments. HEALTH CARE REFORM Bill CONTINUES TO MOVE 5B1351 is our League Resolution to encourage medical care reforms in order to recruit and retain doctors in Arizona. This bill creates a higher burden of proof if a patient wants to sue for malpractice, which should reduce doctor's insurance costs and overall health care costs. This bill passed the House Committee of the Whole on Wednesday and now waits for a third read vote. lOCAL CONSTRUCTION CODES Bill PASSES THE SENATE HB2136 clarifies that cities and towns may use Construction Manager at Risk (CM@Risk), Design Build and Job Ordering Contracting for bond-financed capital projects. These financial tools are already used by many cities and towns and can help reduce the costs of constructing facilities and infrastructure. This bill passed Senate third Read on Tuesday with a 30-0 vote. The sponsor recommended that the House concur with the changes to the bill made in the Senate. This bill now will be final read in both houses before being sent to the Governor. PROSTITUTION Bill PASSES THE HOUSE 5B1260, which permits city attorneys to initiate abatement proceedings for a nuisance related to lewdness or prostitution, passed the House this week with a 57-0 vote on third Read. This bill will help cities better address the problem of prostitution houses in their neighborhoods and on their streets. PARKING ENFORCEMENT Bill FAilS IN THE HOUSE 5B1269, is a League resolution that allows cities and towns to contract with private companies to enforce city parking laws. It will free up local law enforcement to focus on other duties that better serve the citizens of your city or town. This practice is already commonly used by many cities to enforce disabled parking. The bill, which has already cleared the Senate 25-3, failed its House third read with a 28-29 vote on Thursday. Some members stated that they were confused by the explanation of the bill a member gave on the floor and will change their vote now that they understand the provisions of the bill. There is expected to be a motion to reconsider the bill on Monday and that reconsideration vote should happen sometime next week. LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN April 7,2006 PAGE 2 League of Arizona ~.~ Cities AND Towns 1820 vv. Washington Street -Phoenix, AZ 85007 -Phone: (602) 258-5786-Fa)(: (602) 253-3874 Emai1: league@mg.state.az.us - Website: \vww.a71eague.org HB2381: Development Fees LEAGUE POSITION: The League is opposed to HB2381, municipal planning; fees disclosure because of the new restrictions and mandates the bill would place on the collection and use of development fees and the impractical restrictions placed on the use of local sales tax. BACKGROUND: Impact fees are assessed on new development under the principle that new growth should pay its own way and not burden existing homeowners. Cities and towns assess and use impact fees as vital growth management tools to pay for new public infrastructure required when new development occurs. The League and its member cities have worked with the homebuilders to address specific concerns regarding the use of development fees. However, this bill in its current form makes unacceptable comprehensive and fundamental changes to the way impact fees are determined and used. The homebuilders introduced this language as a strike everything amendment more than a month into the session-without allowing adequate time for cities and towns to evaluate the effect of this legislation on their own local communities. There is legitimate concern regarding possible unintended consequences affecting both sides-cities as well as homebuilders-due to the complexity of these maior changes. While progress has been made on several concepts, there are other significant areas where fundamental disagreements exist. ISSUE: The bill mandates that a developer receive reimbursement for infrastructure if future developments receive beneficial use of the improvements financed with the original development's impact fees. While such a credit plan might be appropriate in some circumstances, it should not be a one-size-fits-all mandate imposed on every future development fee. This would encourage urban sprawl and leapfrog development since developers would be assured of eventually being reimbursed for extending infrastructure far beyond current neighborhoods. Also, under this bill, it is the developers that would be reimbursed, not the new homebuyers who are actually paying the fees. The bill also restricts the use of any revenue raised from differential construction sales tax rates to be spent only on infrastructure projects specific to the new development. While impact fees are currently dedicated to supporting new development, local sales tax is primarily a revenue source for local operating budgets. Such a restriction on the use of sales tax giye homebuilders a special status not provided to any other class of taxpayer. Other restrictions in the bill place arbitrary limits on how much of the sales tax revenue can be used on regional projects-such as a freeway widening- and place an outright ban on the funding of light rail projects. PLEASE OPPOSE HB2381. The bill makes too many major changes too fast, without knowing the impact on new Arizona homebuyers or current residents. It mandates substantial changes to the development fee process, rewards homebuilders for promoting urban sprawl and places far too many restrictions on the use of development fees and local sales tax. APACHE JUNCTION . AVONDAlE . BENSON . BISBEE . BUCKEYE . BUlLHEAD CITY . CAMP VERDE . CAREFREE . CASA GRANDE . CAVE Cll:EK . CHANDlER . CHIND VALLEY . Cl.ARKDAlE . CUFTON COlORADO CITY . COOUDGE . OO1TONWOOO . DEWEV-HUMBOLDT . DOUGLAS . DUNCAN . EAGAR . El MIRAGE . ELDY . FLAGSTAFF . FLORENCE . FOUNTAIN HlLS . FREDONIA . GILA BEND . GILBERT GlENDAlE. GLOBE .GOODYEAR . GUADAlUPE . HAYDEN . HOLBROOK . flJACHUCA CITY. JEROME . KEARNY . KINGMAN. LAKE HAVASO CITY . LrTCfiAElD PARK . MAMMOTH . MARANA . f.lARIOOPA . MESA MIAMI. NOOAlES . ORO VALLEY. PAGE. PARADISE VALLEY. PARKER. PATAGONIA. PAYSON. PEORIA . PHOENIX. PIMA . PlNETOP-LAKESIDE . PRESOOTT . PRESOOTT VALLEY. QUARTZSlTE . QUEEN CREEK SAFFORD. SAHUARITA . SAN LUIS. SCOTTSDAlE . SEDONA . SHOWL(N{ . SIERRA VISTA. SNOWFLAKE. SOMERTON. SOUTH TUCSON . SPRlNGERVlLLE . ST. JOHNS . SUPERKlR . SURPRISE . TAYLOR. TEMPE THATCHER. TOLlESON. TOMBSTONE. TUCSON . WELLTON . WICKENBURG . WILLCOX. WILLIAMS . WINKELMAN. WINSLOW. YOUNGTOWN . YUMA League of Arizona ~.~ Cities AND Towns 1820 W. Washington Street- Phoenix, AZ 85007. Phone: (602) 258-5786 - Fax: (602) 253-3874 Email: league@mg.state.az.us-Website:wl-\.W.azleague.org The League of AZ Cities and Towns OPPOSES HB2740: liquor; restaurant license for grills The League is opposed to HB2740 due to its impacts on neighborhoods and municipal ability to ensure public safety and quality of life. This bill contradicts efforts by the neighborhoods, cities and the Liquor Department to eliminate bars operating under the disguise of a restaurant. Overall, this bill works to encourage businesses to circumvent current liquor laws. With this bill, there will be no incentive to maintain proper food sales and "bar" establishments will be encouraged to obtain a restaurant license and operate as a bar until they are notified of an audit, at which time they can use the provisions of this bill to avoid the high costs and stricter laws of obtaining and using a bar liquor license. · This bill does not address the stated issue regarding restaurants that barely fail an audit due to slightly low food sales (in the high 30% range). The League is amenable to giving these kinds of businesses a limited time frame to increase their food sales to the acceptable level of 40%. Instead this bill allows establishments with food sales as low as 30% to operate indefinitely with sub par food sales within the restaurant license classification. · As amended in CED, this bill still allows the holder of a restaurant license to operate at 30% food sales within the currently required 300ft distance requirements from churches, schools, playgrounds, etc. · "Restaurants" approved by the Director and the local jurisdiction at 39% could then operate at 30% with no penalties and potentially could operate at less than the 30% with no chance of another audit for at least 1 year. · This bill should not apply retroactively to businesses that have already failed an audit. If enacted, this bill should not apply to businesses not currently in compliance with the law that want to change the rules for their benefit. This bill creates a new "class" of liquor license within an existing class, and therefore many new loopholes for business owners to go around the strict bar license laws. These laws and penalties regarding operation and location of these establishments are strict for a reason. The additional "bar" establishments will have negative impact the neighborhoods surrounding them. PLEASE CONSIDER THE IMPACTS THESE ESTABLISHMENTS WILL HAVE ON NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE ADDITIONAL BURDEN ON LAW ENFORCEMENT. WE ASK THAT YOU OPPOSE HB2740. APACfE JUNCTION . AVONDALE . BENSON . BISBEE . BUCKEYE . BULLHEAD CITY . CAMP VERDE . CAREFREE . CASA GRANDE . CAVE CREEK . CHANDLER . CHINO VALLEY . ClARKDALE . CUFTON COLOfl.6.00 CITY . COOLIDGE. COTTONWOOD . DEWEY.HUMBOLDT . DOUGlAS. DUNCAN. EAGAR . El MIRAGE. ELOY . R..AGSTAfF. FLORENCE . FOUNTAIN HIlLS . FREIlONIA . GIlA BEND. GILBERT GLENDALE. GLOBE .GOODYEAR . GUADALUPE. HAYDEN . HOlBROOK . HUACHUCA CITY. JEROME . KEARNY . KINGMAN. LAKE HAVASU CITY . UTCHAELD PARK. MAMMOTH . MARANA . MARICOPA. MESA fotAMl . NOGALES . 0110 VAlLEY. PAGE. PARADISE VAlLEY . PARKER . PATAGONIA. PAYSON. PEORIA . PHOENIX . PIMA . PlNETOP-lAKESIDE . PRESCOTT. PRESCOTT VAlLEY. OOAR1ZSITE . QUEEN CREEK SAFFORO . SAHUARITA . SAN LUIS. SCOTTSDALE. SEDONA . SHOW LOW . SIERRA VISTA. SNOWFlAKE. SOMERTON. SOUTH TUCSON . SPRiNGERVllLE . ST. JOHNS . SUPERIOR . SURPRISE . TAYLOR. TEMPE THATCHER. TOLLESON . TOMBSTONE . TUCSON . WELL TON . WICKENBURG . WIlLCOX . WIllIAMS . WlNKElUAN . WINSlOW . YOUNGTOWN . YUMA