The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/12/2010 Study Session Agenda PacketJ J` ~~~~ tCxpw. ~'A>: N114ASi. MARANA TOWN COUNCIL STUDY SESSION NOTICE AND AGENDA 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Council Chambers, October 12, 2010, at or after 6:00 PM Ed Honea, Mayor Herb Kai, Vice Mayor Russell Clanagan, Council Member Patti Comerford, Council Member Carol McGorray, Council Member Jon Post, Council Member Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member ACTION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. Revisions to the agenda can occur up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. Revised agenda items appear in italics. The Council Chambers are wheelchair and handicapped accessible. Any person who, by reason of any disability, is in need of special services as a result of their disability, such as assistive listening devices, agenda materials printed in Braille or large print, a signer for the hearing impaired, etc., will be accommodated. Such special services are available upon prior request to the Town Clerk at least 10 working days prior to the Council meeting. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/POSSIBLE ACTION Resolution No. 2010-98: Relating to the Marana Municipal Airport; approving and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a grant amendment with the Arizona Department of Transportation (Grant No. ESS80) extending the expiration date to December 31, 2010 (T VanHook) Presentation: Relating to Environment; presentation on the results of the Town of Marana's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory (Jennifer Christelman) Discussion regarding HB2246 and the Town Council's ability to regulate the use of consumer fireworks within the Town limits as of November 30, 2010 (Caine Sklar) Presentation: Relating to Capital Improvement Projects; update on the Twin Peaks Interchange and Twin Peaks Road/Camino de Mariana Ribbon Cutting/Celebration Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 1 of 49 (Ryan Benavides) Presentation: Relating to Technology Services; providing a presentation and update on the redesign of the Town of Marana Internet Website (Deb Thalasitis) Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3), Council may ask for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter listed on this agenda. ADJOURNMENT Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 2 of 49 ~,. ~...~ ~~ 1:~4Y ~! fS.f P'Dh4 11555 W. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, MARANA, ARIZONA 85653 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, October 12, 2010, 6:00:00 PM To: Mayor and Council Item D 1 From: T VanHook ,Community Development Director Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable Subject: Resolution No. 2010-98: Relating to the Marana Municipal Airport; approving and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a grant amendment with the Arizona Department of Transportation (Grant No. ESS80) extending the expiration date to December 31, 2010 Discussion: In January 2005 the Town executed a grant agreement (ADOT Grant Number ESS80) with the Arizona Department of Transportation to fund the environmental study required to acquire nearly 250 acres of land at the Marana Municipal Airport for the Runway Protection Zones of the extended Runway 3-21, Runway 12R-30L, and Runway 12. Although much of the work was completed during the initial funding period, delays with reviews required by the Federal Aviation Administration and other unforeseen setbacks did not allow the Town to fully expend the allocation prior to the June 30, 2010 deadline. Per the Town's June 1, 2010 request, ADOT is offering an extension of the grant agreement through December 31, 2010. Staff are working with consultants to ensure that the ADOT funded portion of the project is completed on or before the end of the proposed extension. Financial Impact: Match for the project has been included in the CIP for 2010-2011. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: Type: O Airport - _ADOT E5S80_Amendment_Resolution_9- ADOT E5S10 Amendment Resolution Resolution zoo ol~ l.doc ~ Grant Amendment_5_Time.pdf ~ Amendment 5_E5S80.pdf ADOT E5S10 Amendment ADOT E5S10 Amendment Cover Letter Exhibit Exhibit Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2010-98 approving and authorizing the Town Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 3 of 49 Manager to execute a grant amendment with the Arizona Department of Transportation (Grant No. ESS80) extending the expiration date to December 31, 2010. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2010-98, authorizing the Town Manager to execute a grant amendment with the Arizona Department of Transportation (Grant No. E5S80) extending the expiration date to December 31, 2010. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 4 of 49 MARANA RESOLUTION N0.2010-98 RELATING TO THE MARANA MUNICIPAL AIIZPORT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A GRANT AMENDMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (GRANT NO. ESS80) EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE TO DECEMBER 31, 2010 WHEREAS, A.R.S. § 28-8411 authorizes the Town Council of the Town of Marana to undertake all activities necessary to acquire, establish, construct, own, control, lease, equip, improve, maintain, operate and regulate an airport; and WHEREAS, the Town of Marana executed a grant agreement on January 11, 2005 with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) to fund an environmental assessment on nearly 250 acres of land at the Marana Municipal Airport for the Runway Protection Zones of the extended Runway 3-21, Runway 12R-30L, and Runway 12; and WHEREAS, ADOT is offering an amendment to the grant agreement extending the expiration date until December 31, 2010 to allow the Town to complete work started under the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, that the Town Manager is authorized to execute a grant agreement amendment and take any appropriate actions required to complete the requirements for funding under ADOT Grant No. ESS80. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 12th day of October 2010. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 5 of 49 Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal Planning Division Aeronautics Group Airport Development Reimbursable Grant Agreement Amendment Number 5 AMENDMENT to the Airport Development Reimbursable Grant Agreement ESS80 dated January 19, 2005, between the STATE OF ARIZONA, acting. by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, through its Multimodal Planning Division (the "State") and the Town of Marana, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona ("the Sponsor"). AGREEMENT The Airport Development Agreement dated January 19, 2005, is amended as follows: 1. Paragraph 4 of the Obligations is replaced by the following: The State's obligation to provide funds hereunder expires upon completion of the efforts required herein or December 31, 2010, whichever is earlier. 2. All other provisions of the Airport Development Agreement remain applicable and unchanged except as herein modified. 3. This Airport Development Agreement Amendment is effective upon the signature of the representative of the State. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 6 of 49 Page 1 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized respective officers. STATE: State of Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal Planning Division By: Title: Jennifer Toth, Director Date: WITNESSED BY: Signature: Print Name: Date: Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 7 of 49 SPONSOR: Town of Marana Marana Regional Airport Signature: Title: Date: WITNESSED BY: Signature: Print Name: Date: Page 2 of 2 ~rizc~n~ ~e}~~r~rr~en~ of Tr~r~~p~+~r~~tiran Multimodal Planning Division nQ~~- 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3213 Janice K. Brewer Governor September 24, 2010 Jennifer Toth Division Director John S. Halikowski Director Ms. T Vanhook Community Development Director Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ 85653 Re: Airport Development Grant Agreement - EA for Land Acquisition ADOT Grant Number ESS80 Marana Regional Airport Via email Dear Ms. Vanhook: Attached herein, you will find Amendment Number 5 for ESS80. This amendment will extend the expiration date to December 31, 2010 as requested. Please print, sign, and return two copies of the amendment to my attention. Upon execution by the ADOT, a fully executed copy will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at KPotts@azdot.gov or (602) 712-7597. Sincerely, z~~~ s. ~~ Kenneth S. Potts, A.A.E. Airport Projects Planning Manager Attachments (1) Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 8 of 49 ~~ ~~~~jj '~~~~ i 1 11555 W. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, MARANA, ARIZONA 85653 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, October 12, 2010, 6:00:00 PM To: Mayor and Council Item D 2 From:. Jennifer Christelman ,Environmental Engineering Division Manager Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable Subject: Presentation: Relating to Environment; presentation on the results of the Town of Marana's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Discussion: Resolution 2009-131 authorized Town staff to coordinate with Pima Association of Governments (PAG) to complete a greenhouse emissions inventory for the Town of Marana. The presentation will provide the results of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory completed by for the Town of Marana and the efforts on reduction. Financial Impact: The inventory was completed by PAG. The future work on energy efficiency and conservation will be completed using the funding provided through the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Grant. ATTACHMENTS: Name: ^ Greenhouse_Gas Emissions_Councl_Presentation.ppt Description: Type: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Backup PowerPoint Presentation Material ~ PAG_Final_Rept_Marana Greenhouse_Gas_6 22_10.pdf Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report Backup Materia4 Staff Recommendation: None Suggested Motion: None Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 9 of 49 .. ~ Y Y ~ ! .. 'J rL~ ~ f 4 „1 i ~i 3 =xM f w~;~1 ~ ,. x ». r ,. ,. ~ .. -~'-- O p"^"'" '. 4. ~ 1 ~~ ~~~ f ~.:_»~ }~ ~ ~ j. Y~, ~ ~ ~~ _ ~..r.. L ,~ x ~ > ~ ^ ~ ~t ~ Y L ~~~._:° ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ .:.,~ .. O ~ W ~ ~"".,.. to Cy . :. ~ ~ k ~ ~ •F•+ _~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ M ~~ ~F 'i ~~ I O ~ O ~ ' ~~ b V = ~' L ~~~ . ~:: R ~ ~~ -~ ~: ~, ~ =-1~~` ~' ~~ t r y~ 1 ~ ~ '' " ~ ~ ~; ~t . s~ r? ~ ~ *`j >~ x ~ ~ ~ y~n~ y , ,* v ~,1~ ~~ . ~~ k ~ ~"in . s C ' ~ ~~ s ~~» 'ia » i ~ ~~ ~. ~~ .,. ~' ~~ ~. ., y. ~?? k. ~ . . _~ ~ YA ~~~~ t r.. r ~~ ~ 3 .. ..1' 4' ~" ; ~w»yp, y . ~: ~ ~> $j I ~, .. t'. 0 m 0 0 N N 0 N N lV d O O N N ,,~ ~- ~e..~;~,., ;~ ~_ °_~= °, ~. ~. . ~ ~ E .. . ~' _~n, F ~~- 5 .~L =~ ~~ ~~ ~ } ... 3 ~ _. ,.. ~ v ~.,,,;~. ~~~ 4 ~:_ r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ i \ r ~ L .~ ~ ~ N L ~ ~ r L ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~:~~~ O *' ~ ~ o ~ ~ r V O_ O N '~ O N d O O N ~; ~_ ~fi :. ~;3 n °= ::. ~I € ~.~ "g ~:~' , ;_ s ~ ,~.~=:A -,.: ~. ~~~F,~~ >?' ~. s~,: k'k~.. .. ~ ~T t. ~~~: ~> ~ ~` V/ /^WT, ^V/+ W ^ N ~(~+ 'L O i C M ~ ~ - ~ _.. V/ rn O N d O N N ,~~~~ ;- ~~s ~r, ,. ~,~.. _.. ._ ,~~ _~ ~. ~ h~ ., ~ ~- ~.. ..~ ~ .. ~:% ~, ~ +~ Lti ? ~n ~.. s~ ~,~.~ E `~a~~; s~- ~~ . _ ~. .~ 0 ^~A i L ~ _ ~ .~ O v ~t K ~, L ~ ~ ~ ~~ W ~ ~ C ~ ~ 'Q~ V O ~ TQ~ \ / ~ v 0 a~ d 0 0 N N 0 ~ r V ; ~ o Q M •u.+ .~ •i o ~ ~ r,-~ o N (~ ~ ~ r .E.+ Z 0 m d 0 0 N N N ~~. e~. ~; -_~$ ~ ~: _ _ ~ ~_~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~. ~, ,~ s ~_ ~ ,;; -~= g , £ ~._ . ~.,~ '` ~ Wig 4-~ . ~~ 4 __, h ( ~ ~_ ~~ k ~~F- -,;~,,, ;~ ~~..W~~aa~ r ne .ate .. ~ ~ ~ u ^. f~ ~ ~~', ~ w ~_J ~ y ~ ~~ ~wwk ~ _. . ~ ~` P.. _ t ~°#-+9'4 - ,.... n... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~R ~: rr.~ `~ ~ b g a ~~~ " ~ ~'~ k¢. h w a ~4~ ~ ~ ~nY ~~~ ~~ 0 r N N ~``<s ~~~~ ~' _,~~.-r; ~\: ~~ r_ ~~-~ ~ - ~_ ~ ~_ ___. .•lg ~,~,- as C.~ '< h. ~,k ~Dw "l~ ~ ~ti~ `~ ` ~ ~ ¢~ '~ ~*^a ~f }. p € n° ~.ti t f {~^ '. ~~ -; 3 5. , .i . W I 6 f M. ~1'ri ~ p~ ,¢`< x. ' ~R1'ff(61 _ nn # W ~E% ~ a11. ~" ~ ~ ~ r ~ P~~ M'~ ny~ ~ 3:;-r ~~ ~~n" 4 ~ ..8 r R. g F- sgy~Y3~ x ,Y: J-a4:X r ..~ . e. + ~ Ys '.'~..~ J' y dx... a~ ~ ~; 2 ~^ 4 r ~ .Y': d ` ~ yam, ~ _ ~ ~ Y'. n~ ~' n; Rry1 W .~ s. ~ ~U ~9 .. ~ ~ ~ E ~ 7 ~; I ~ <_ ~K# qq ~ ~~°d ~ s{{t Q~ R N ,_ ' 't " , . ` F, G,`'.. ~ < ~:-: E.: Obi .. .., '': ~, 5~4'•' i'% n ~ _.:'j . - ~ '. rr: .. ~~? K ~ Y ~ 3~ •• i'~',.• 4 ,' ~ yyH 1 3!..~ :«. ~.... ~ TIC 1~ ~~„A ~r~ _ v ~ w »: ~~~ F June 2010 Pima Association o Governments Study SessifFYt'-~{3c[ober 12,~{l~A-page 19 of 49 PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Chair Ned Norris Jr. Chairman Tohono O'odham Nation Member Robert Walkup Mayor City of Tucson Member 2010 REGIONAL COUNCIL Vice Chair Jennifer Eckstrom Mayor City of South Tucson Member Ed Honea Mayor Town of Marana Member Treasurer Satish I. Hiremath Mayor Town of Oro Valley Member Robert Valencia Vice Chairman Pascua Yaqui Tribe Member Ramon Valadez Stephen W. "Steve" Christy Lynne Skelton Supervisor Representative Mayor Pima County Board of Supervisors AZ State Transportation Board Town of Sahuarita MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Fred Stevens, Project Specialist, Tohono O'odham Nation Enrique Serna, Manager, City of South Tucson Jerene Watson, Interim Manager, Town of Oro Valley Richard Miranda, Deputy Manager, City of Tucson Gilbert Davidson, Manager, Town of Marana Francisco Valencia, Secretary, Pascua Yaqui Tribe Chuck Huckelberry, Administrator, Pima County Jim Stahle, Manager, Town of Sahuarita James Zumpf, Asst. Director of Statewide Planning, ADOT - Multimodal Planning Division Todd Emery, Ex-Officio Member, ADOT-Tucson District Engineer EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Gary G. Hayes DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Andy Gunning AIR QUALITY PLANNING STAFF: Lee Comrie, Air Quality Planning Manager Susanne Cotty, Air Quality Planner June 2010 Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 20 of 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................................................................................................3 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................... ...........................................................................................4 1. Executive Summary ..................................................... ...........................................................................................5 2. Introduction ................................................................... ...........................................................................................5 3. Project Objectives ........................................................ ...........................................................................................6 4. General Methodology ................................................. ...........................................................................................6 5. Detailed Methodology and Preliminary Results ...........................................................................................8 A. Marana Community ...........................................................................................................................................8 B. Marana Government Operations Inventory ............................................................................................14 6. Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Comparison of Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector 2007 and 2008 ...................10. Figure 2.2008 Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector ....................................................................12 Figure 3.2008 Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source ...................................................................12 Figure 4.2008 Marana Government GHG Emissions by Sector ..................................................................14 Figure 5.2008 Marana Government GHG Emissions by Source ................................................................15 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Marana Greenhouse. Gas Emissions (metric tons COze) and Energy Use (million Btu) 2007 and 2008 ..............................................................................................................................................................11 Table 2. Marana Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons COze), Energy Use (million Btu) and Expenditures (dollars) 2008 .........................................................................................................15 Table 3. Summary of Marana Government's Recycled Waste Activity and Emissions and Energy Savings 2008 ......................................................................................................................................................17 APPENDICES Appendix A. Data Sources Appendix B. Population Estimates Appendix C. Emission Factors for Electricity Use Appendix D. Marana Community Data Inputs Appendix E. Waste Characterizations Appendix F. EPA's WARM Model GHG Emission Factors for Alternative Management Scenarios Appendix G. Town of Marana Government Inventory Data Inputs Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 21 of 49 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Numerous representatives from various organizations have contributed to the production of this report and their efforts are greatly appreciated. We extend a special note of thanks to the Marana staff for their contributions. Additionally, various members of Pima Association of Governments, Pima County, Tucson Electric Power (TEP), Trico Electric Cooperative, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Southwest Gas, Marana Regional Airport and the Arizona Department of Commerce -Energy Office, provided data and guidance in compiling this report. A full list of contributors is contained in Appendix A. In addition, we'd like to thank the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for continued access to the CACP emissions model. PAG would especially like to thank Jennifer Christelman, Marana's Manager of Environmental Engineering Division, for her assistance in the planning and coordination of staff resources needed to complete this project. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 22 of 49 LIST OF ACRONYMS Btu British thermal units CACP Clean Air and Climate Protection model CHa Methane COz Carbon dioxide COze Carbon dioxide equivalents DOE Department of Energy EIA Energy Information Administration (department within DOE) GHG Greenhouse gas GWh Gigawatt hours (1,000,000 KWh) HFC Hydrofluorocarbons ICLEI International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change KWh Kilowatt hours MMBtu Million British Thermal Units MWh Megawatt hours (1,000 KWh) Nz0 Nitrous oxide PAG Pima Association of Governments PFC Perfluorocarbons RCI Residential, Commercial and Industrial sectors SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride TEP Tucson Electric Power USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WARM EPA's Waste Reduction Model Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 23 of 49 4 1. Executive Summary The Pima Association of Governments' Regional Council approved a resolution directing PAG staff to conduct a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory for eastern Pima County. Upon completion of the initial Regional GHG Inventory (PAG, 2008), representatives of Marana's government expressed an interest in joining regional efforts to estimate GHG emissions. Subsequently, PAG staff in cooperation with Marana staff developed inventories for its community and government operations. This report presents initial estimates of historical and current anthropogenic GHG emissions for 2007 and 2008 for the Marana community (hereinafter referred to as the Community) and the 2008 emissions for its government operations (hereinafter referred to as the Government). Due to lack of actual data, some of the 2007 and 2008 values are estimates based on recent energy use data and are heavily weighted by Marana's population data. It is included here at the request of Marana staff. These estimates are intended to provide town stakeholders with a preliminary understanding of past and current regional GHG emissions and to serve as a basis for analyzing and designing possible mitigation plans and strategies. Marana's population has more than doubled from 2000 to 2008, and, from 2007 to 2008, the population grew by 5 percent with an estimated concurrent 9 percent increase in GHG emissions. By comparison, eastern Pima County's population grew by less than 1 percent and its emissions decreased by almost 2 percent, over this same two-year period. Modeling analyses conducted for 2008 estimated that the Community produced about 842,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (COze), about 5 percent of eastern Pima County's total. Community transportation and energy use were the largest contributors to GHG emissions. Transportation emissions were 63 percent of the 2008 total, almost entirely the result of personal and commercial vehicle use. In 2008, the combined energy use by the residential, commercial and industrial sectors was 37 percent of total emissions; of these emissions, 88 percent resulted from electricity use. Emissions generated by all electricity use comprised 32 percent of the 2008 total while natural gas contributed 4 percent. Waste-related emissions were a minor contributor to total emissions, generating less than 1 percent of 2008 emissions. In 2008, Government operations produced about 8,400 metric tons of COze, representing about 1 percent of the total Community emissions. Facility energy use (58 percent) and vehicle fleet emissions (17 percent) were the chief sources of emissions with employee commuting generating 14 percent of the total. Energy used in water handling and public lighting and waste generation each produced less than 10 percent of 2008 emissions. Electricity was the major form of energy consumed and was responsible for 68 percent of Government emissions in 2008. 2. Introduction This report presents estimates of 2007 and 2008 Community and 2008 Government anthropogenic GHG emissions, using generally accepted principles and guidelines contained in the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP) 2003 software for local GHG emissions. These estimates are intended to Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 24 of 49 provide town stakeholders with an initial understanding of current regional GHG emissions to guide in analyzing and designing GHG mitigation strategies. Three major greenhouse gases are included: [carbon dioxide (COz), methane (CHa) and nitrous oxide (Nz0)], as in the eastern Pima County and Tucson (hereinafter referred to as City) GHG inventories (PAG, 2008, 2009 and 2010). These greenhouse gases are emitted largely from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, gasoline and diesel. Emissions of these individual greenhouse gases are expressed as COzequivalents (COze), indicating the relative contribution of each gas weighted according to its relative contribution to global climate change. Unlike the state and national inventories, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) are not included. Local fluorinated hydrocarbons emissions are expected to represent a very small proportion of total greenhouse gases. 3. Project Objectives In October 2007, the PAG Regional Council approved a resolution to conduct a GHG emissions inventory for eastern Pima County. The goal of this resolution is to provide GHG emissions inventories to assist the jurisdictions and government agencies in assessing emissions and serve as a resource in developing GHG reduction strategies. Upon completion of the initial Regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Marana officials expressed an interest in joining regional efforts to estimate GHG emissions. Subsequently, Marana staff cooperated with PAG to develop Community and Government inventories. This inventory is not meant to be a precise accounting of GHG emissions but is designed to provide a resource for Community planning in the future. It is important to note that this report has not been validated by an independent party and is not a tool designed for developing regulations. Care also should be exercised in comparing the results of this inventory to those done by other communities since the sources analyzed and/or the greenhouse gases included are likely to be different. 4. General Methodology Communitylnventory To prepare the Community GHG emissions inventory, three major emission sources were considered: energy consumption, transportation and waste generation. Energy use was segregated into residential, commercial and industrial sectors' electricity and natural gas use. Transportation from on-road vehicles was disaggregated by vehicle type and fuels used. Waste totals were factored by disposal method and composition. In addition, aviation fuel use from Marana Regional Airport and Community propane consumption are included in the report. Local data and emissions factors were used whenever possible. Assumptions used in compiling the data and estimating emissions are detailed in Section 5. Using the CACP model and emission factors, as appropriate, GHG emissions were estimated for 2007 and 2008. Due to lack of historic information, some of the 2007 and 2008 data inputs are based on recent estimates of energy use and are heavily weighted by Marana's population data (Appendix D). It is included here at the request of Marana staff and serves as an approximate baseline, tracking the impact of the Community's growth on GHG emissions over this period. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 25 of 49 Local energy use, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and waste data from 2007 and 2008 were entered into the model and converted to COZe emissions using specific emission factors or coefficients. These emission factors specify the amount of greenhouse gases produced per unit of energy used, miles traveled and waste generated. Annual electricity emission factors were calculated using emissions data from TEP generating resources and were supplied by TEP staff for 2007 and 2008 (Appendix C). These factors were applied to TEP use data to determine COZe for the various years. Trico emission factors were supplied by Arizona Electric Power Cooperative staff for 2007and 2008 (Appendix C). These factors were applied to Trico's use data to determine COZe emissions. Emissions from TEP and Trico electricity use are combined by sector and labeled "Electricity" (Table 1), but separate consumption values are detailed in Appendix D. To evaluate emissions from natural gas consumption, usage data was entered into the CACP model which converts therms of natural gas into COze emissions, using coefficients from the Department of Energy's Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Guidelines at http~/lwww.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/flash/flash.html. Emissions from natural gas and electricity use are based on end-use energy consumption, not on the emissions resulting from the production of that energy. For example, emissions from electricity consumed by residential, commercial and industrial sectors are reported, not emissions due to combustion of fuel at electric generation facilities. Emissions from on-road vehicle fuel use are calculated for gasoline and diesel. Data are entered as VMT per year for each type of vehicle by fuel type. Model default fuel economies for each vehicle/fuel combination are used and are based on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) Energy Data book and Tellus Institute research. Default emission factors depend on the type of fuel used and are derived from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) data and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines. The CACP model estimates emissions resulting from waste disposal in landfills located within a jurisdictional boundary. Marana however, does not have landfills but sends its waste to Pima County's landfills for disposal. Therefore, Community emissions attributed to wastes represent those from generation, not disposal. The waste emission factors used in this inventory were from an EPA evaluation, updated in August 2002. GHG emissions and energy reductions resulting from waste diversion were estimated using EPA's Waste Reduction Model (WARM) (USEPA, 2009). The model uses alife-cycle approach accounting for emissions avoided in producing replacement materials (upstream) and disposal- related emissions (downstream). Calculations are based on a comparison of the COZe emissions and energy use that would be incurred if materials were landfilled and the savings realized through alternative waste management practices (e.g. recycling, composting). Emissions generated by aviation gasoline and Jet A use at Marana Regional Airport were determined using Department of Energy emission factors (EIA, 2009). Propane use emissions were estimated using factors imbedded in the CACP model. Emissions generated from these three sources are evaluated separately and included in the "Other" category. PAG's Air Quality Planning staff prepared these analyses in close consultation with representatives of Marana, TEP, Trico and Southwest Gas. Additionally, PAG's transportation Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 26 of 49 '] planning and technical services staff, and representatives from Marana Regional Airport and the Arizona Department of Commerce provided data for this report (See Appendix A for a complete list of contributors). Technical guidance was provided by the ICLEI staff who, in cooperation with the National Association of Clean Air Agencies and Torrie Smith Associates, developed the inventory software used in this report. Government Operations Inventories To prepare the Government GHG emissions inventory, three major emission sources were considered: energy consumption, on-road vehicle use and waste generation. Additionally, the Government inventory includes expenditure data for each source category, as available. Electricity and natural use data, as applicable, for facilities, water handling and public lighting are provided for 2008. All energy use data were compiled and analyzed using the CACP software, as in the Community inventory. Electricity emissions from TEP and Trico are combined in the facilities, water and public lighting categories and labeled "Electricity" (Table 2), but separate consumption values are detailed for each utility in Appendix G. On-road vehicle travel included VMT by the Government fleet and employee commuting, and were disaggregated by vehicle and fuel type. Gasoline and diesel emissions generated by the Government fleet and employee commuting are included. As in the Community inventory, emissions generated by Government vehicle travel and employee commuting were determined using the U. S. Department of Energy's Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Guidelines' coefficients http:llwww.eia.dae.ov/aiaf/16051f1ash/flash.html. As in the Community inventory, waste data were factored by disposal method and composition and emissions were estimated using EPA's emission factors. Government recyclables tonnage was provided but a detailed description of the materials was not included. Therefore, Government recyclable materials were characterized using the most recent data available from City curbside collections (Gibson, 2009). PAG's Air Quality Planning staff prepared these analyses in close consultation with Marana town staff. 5. Detailed Methodology and Preliminary Results The CACP model is designed to include government emissions within the community inventory but provides the option of examining government operations separately providing a more detailed analysis of government-generated emissions. Therefore, two inventories are described in this section: the Marana community (Community) and Marana government operations (Government). A. Marana Community Residential, Commercial and Industrial (RCI) Sector Energy Use Energy use for the RCI sectors includes natural gas and electricity only. Other fuel sources such as heating oil and wood are not included in this inventory. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 27 of 49 8 The residential sector is based on household energy use for activities such as heating, cooling and lighting. The industrial sector includes energy use by mining and agriculture and incorporates activities such as manufacturing, production and factory operations. The commercial sector encompasses fuel and electricity used in non-residential buildings such as schools, hospitals and retail facilities. Government-owned facilities and institutional activity also are included in this sector. RCI electricity consumption data totals for 2007 and 2008 were submitted by TEP and the corresponding emission factors (Appendix C) were applied to use data to estimate emissions. TEP electricity consumption data is aggregated into customer classes based on average annual energy use, not necessarily by customer operations. Therefore, the industrial class may include some large commercial operations, and the commercial class may include some small industrial operations. Trico staff submitted electricity use data by District total for 2007 and 2008. Using GIS mapping techniques, PAG Technical Services staff determined that Marana occupied 17 percent of the area in Trico's District 1 for both of the inventory years. Based upon guidance from Trico staff and Marana's estimated portion of Trico's District 1, the following methods were used to estimate Trico electricity usage: • Total Marana usage was estimated using 17 percent of District 1 electricity consumption for each of the survey years; • Total Marana District 1 electricity use (KWh) was segregated by sector as follows: residential (66 percent); commercial (29 percent) and industrial (5 percent), corresponding to the Trico usage patterns in eastern Pima County for 2007 and 2008; • Trico emission factors (2007 and 2008) were applied to the use data to estimate annual emissions. Southwest Gas staff provided RCI natural gas use data for 2008 and 2009. To estimate 2007 residential use, the 2008 residential use (51.1 therms/capita) was applied to the 2007 Marana population level (Appendix B). To estimate 2007 commercial natural gas consumption, an average per commercial customer rate was developed using 2008 Marana's Southwest Gas data (15,427 therms/customer/year). Based upon the 13 percent increase in the commercial Southwest Gas customer number from 2008 to 2009, the rate was held constant and projected backward to 2007. Using this method, we estimated there were 279 commercial Community customers in 2007; the average commercial therm rate/year was applied to the 2007 customer estimate. No reliable method could be devised to estimate 2007 industrial natural gas use due to only one reported industrial customer and its 150 percent increase in use from 2008 to 2009. Thus, the industrial natural gas consumption was held constant for 2007 and 2008. Given the absence of certain data and the methods used to estimate energy consumption, caution should betaken in deriving detailed inferences from the 2007 to 2008 trends in GHG energy-related emissions (Figure 1). However, the estimated trends in RCI energy use can serve as possible surrogates for reflecting energy-related emission impacts of Marana's rapid population growth from 2007 to 2008 (Table 1). Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 28 of 49 9 RCI electricity and natural gas use emissions were 37 percent of total 2008 Community emissions. Of the three sectors, residential and commercial users were the largest contributors to energy emissions (Figure 2). Electricity is the major source of energy and represented 32 percent of all 2008 emissions, while natural gas contributed about 4 percent (Figure 3). Figure 1. Comparison of Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector 2007 and 2008 1,000,000 0 r .L 800,000 a+ GJ £ 600,000 N ~° 400,000 N aEi 200,000 d N Q 0 V 2007 Year 2008 Transportation Residential Energy Use Commercial Energy Use Industrial Energy Use Waste Generation On-Road Transportation Emissions from on-road vehicle activity are reported here; travel and fuel use by nonroad vehicles and equipment (tractors, bulldozers and lawnmowers) are not presented in this report. Information on Community VMT for 2007 and 2008 were developed using PAG's travel demand forecasting model. PAG's current travel model is a standardized four-step procedure model that covers trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice and traffic assignment. Based on the ICLEI's staff recommendations, the U.S. average CACP model defaults were used to apportion the local vehicle mix.' Specifically, 93 percent of the vehicles were assumed to begasoline-powered and 7 percent were assumed to be diesel. From 2007 to 2008, private and commercial vehicle VMT increased by 10 percent, resulting in a 9 percent increase in GHG emissions. Nationally carbon dioxide transportation emissions dropped by 6 percent over this same period (EPA, 2010). Due to higher fuel prices and the recent economic downturn, one might expect to see a similar trend in the Community as observed nationally. However, the 2007-2008 increases in Community VMT and emissions reflect the transportation model's lack ofsensitivity toshort-term economic changes such as fuel cost and employment fluctuations. Pima County staff provided Marana Rural Transit VMT data for 2007 and 2008 by fuel type. Over this two-year period, Rural Transit VMT decreased by 10 percent, resulting in a 12 percent drop in emissions (Table 1). Overall, transportation-related emissions increased by 9 percent from 2007 to 2008 and were 63 percent of the 2008 total (Figure 2). Marana's relatively high fraction of transportation emissions ' Model default vehicle mix: Gasoline: auto (full-size)-8.5 %; auto (mid-size) 18.7%; auto (compact/subcompact) -33 %; light trucks/SUV/pickup - 32.4%; motorcycle - 0.4 %. Diesel: auto (compact/subcompact) - 0.3%; light truck/SUV/pickup -1.3%; heavy truck - 5.2%; bus - 0.2% Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 29 of 49 1 Q can be attributed to the amount of Interstate travel that occurs within the Town's boundaries. A significant portion of the urbanized region of I-10 (16 miles) lies within the Marana jurisdictional limits and this travel is assigned to Marana by the transportation forecasting model. Since Community per capita energy use is comparable to that of the County, transportation emissions assume a relatively larger portion of the total due to the impact of apportioned I-10 travel. Gasoline was the predominant transportation fuel and contributed 53 percent to 2008 emissions, while diesel contributed a smaller amount, about 11 percent (Figure 3). Table 1. Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons COZe) and Energy Use (million Btu) 2007 and 2008 2007 Zoos Percent COZe COZe Change (metric (metric COze 2007- tons) MMBtu tons) MMBtu 2008 Residential Energy Use Natural Gas 9,239 1 E,4,840 9,660 172,348 5 Electricity 122,800 482,157 121,198 480,903 -7 Residential Total 132,039 646,997 130,858 653,251 -1 Commercial Energy Use Natural Gas 24,129 430,500 27,734 494,827 15 Electricity 72,723 285,845 96,032 381,843 32 Commercial Total 96,852 716,345 123,766 876,670 28 Industrial Energy Use Natural Gas 76 1,354 76 1,354 0 Electricity 53,503 210,792 50,862 202,592 -5 Industrial Total 53,579 212,146 50,938 203,946 -5 Transportation Private & commercial vehicle use 487,522 6,270,775 532,799 6,855,208 9 Other Transportation 49 627 43 562 -12 Transportation Total 487,571 6,271,402 532,842 6,855,770 9 Waste Generation Total 4,307 3,444 -20 Total 774,348 7,846,890 841,848 8,589,637 9 Other Aviation Gas 124 1,750 120 1,697 -3 Jet A 229 3,200 223 3,154 -3 Propane 3,047 45,295 3,058 45,460 0 Shaded areas represent estimated values Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 30 of 49 11 Figure 1.2008 Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector Waste Generation <1% Transportatior 63% Residential Energy Use ~% Commercial Energy Use 15% Industrial nergy Use 6% Figure 2.2008 Marana Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source Diesel Waste 11% ~ < 1% Electricity ~ ` 32% ~~< Natural Gas Gasoline 4% 53% Waste Community waste data for 2007 and 2008 were not available. To estimate the Community's waste production, annual landfilled totals from the Ina, Sahuarita, Tangerine and Los Reales landfills were tabulated and used to estimate per capita County waste generation for both survey years. County waste per capita for 2007 and 2008 were 0.891 short tons and 0.748 short tons, respectively? These values were applied to Marana's 2007 and 2008 population levels to estimate Community waste generation. Wastes were characterized using the average waste composition from the four County landfills and Arizona and California waste studies (Cascadia, 2003; Cascadia, 2006) (Appendix E). z 2008 EPA estimated U.S. per capita trash generation as 0.82 short tons/person/year http://www.era.aovfosw/nonhazlmnicis~al/gui~sfmsw2048rpt.pdf Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 31 of 49 i 2 Community waste emissions were a small component of GHG emissions, contributing less than 1 percent to the 2008 total (Figure 3). Community recycling data were not available. Other Emissions from aviation gas, Jet A and propane use are shown in Table 1 as "Other" but are not included in the figures or in the total emissions to coincide with the protocol in PAG's Regional GHG Inventory (PAG 2008, 2009 and 2010). Consumption data for these three fuels are shown in Appendix D. Aviation Fuels: Aviation Gas and Jet A Aviation gas and Jet A use data were submitted by Marana Regional Airport staff for 2007 and 2008. Based upon airport GHG studies and Tucson International Airport staff recommendations, only 10 percent of the total aviation gas and Jet A were used to calculate emissions generated in the Community airshed. This 10 percent represents the fuel used during the landings and take- off (LTO) phase. EIA's emission factors for aviation gas (COz: 8.31 kg/gallon; CH4: 7.26 g/gallon; N20: 0.09 g/gallon) and for Jet A fuel (COz: 9.57 kg/gallon: CH4: 0.27 g/gallon; NzO: 0.32 g/gallon) were used to determine combustion emissions from fuels used at the Marana airport. Individual GHG emissions were entered into the CACP model and are reported as COze totals. Emissions from fuel use are reported as total COze by fuel type (Table 1). Both aviation gas and Jet A emissions dropped by 3 percent over this two-year period. Propane State propane sales data for 2007 and 2008 were obtained from the Arizona Department of Commerce -Energy Office (2009). As suggested by Energy Office staff, population data were used as a surrogate to determine Community propane use from state sales totals for the various inventory years. Emissions were estimated using a propane coefficient factor contained in the CACP model. Propane use and resulting emissions increased by less than 1 percent from 2007 to 2008 (Appendix D, Table 1). Marana Community Inventory Synopsis Community GHG emissions rose by an estimated 67,500 metric tons from 2007 to 2008, representing a 9 percent increase. Transportation and energy use emissions were the major sources of emissions. From 2007 to 2008, Community VMT increased by 10 percent and was responsible for generating 63 percent of emissions in 2008. However, this increase in VMT and resulting emissions may be an anomaly due to the insensitivity of PAG's transportation model to short-term economic factors. Gasoline was the major transportation fuel used and was responsible for 53 percent of 2008 emissions; diesel combustion emissions were a minor component of fuel use and contributed 11 percent to the total. Private and commercial vehicle use are responsible for virtually all of these transportation emissions since currently Marana is not served extensively by public transit. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 32 of 49 13 Energy use by the RCI sectors was another significant source of Community emissions, contributing 37 percent to the 2008 total. Community residential and commercial energy consumption produced approximately equal amounts of GHG emissions. Electricity was the major energy source and was responsible for 88 percent ofenergy-related emissions. Emissions associated with Community solid waste generation represent a small fraction of emissions, contributing less than 1 percent to the 2008 total. B. Marana Government Operations Inventory Emissions generated by Government operations for 2008 are summarized below. A detailed list of data inputs for the Government inventory can be found in Appendix G. Energy Use In this section, energy use refers to activities such as water pumping and treatment, the heating, cooling and lighting of Government facilities and public lighting. Emissions from Government facilities, water pumping and public lighting energy use are presented separately in Table 2 and in Figure 4, but are combined when comparing emissions by energy source (Figure 5). Facility Energy Use Marana staff supplied facility electricity and natural gas use and expenditures data for 2008. These emissions are a significant source of Government emissions, contributing 58 percent to the 2008 total (Figure 4). Almost all of these energy-related emissions (99 percent) can be attributed to electricity use. Figure 3.2008 Marana Government GHG Emissions by Sector Public Lighting 5% Water Energy use Waste 6% Employee Commute- 14 Vehide Flee 17% Facility Energy Use 58% Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 33 of 49 14 Figure 4.2008 Marana Government GHG Emissions by Source Diesel Waste 3% <1% Gasoline 28% Natural Gas 1 % Electricity 68% Table 2. Marana Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions (metric tons COZe), Energy Use (million Btu) and Expenditures (dollars) 2008 2008 C02e (metric tons) MMBtu Cost (dollars) Facilities Ener Use Electrici 4,850 19,275 497,318 Natural Gas 46 819 15,117 Facilities Ener Use Total 4,896 20,094 512,435 Water Ener Use Electrici 485 1,871 58,001 Natural Gas 0 0 0 Water Energ Use Total 485 1,871 58,001 Vehicle Fleet Gasoline 1,213 15,729 n.a. Diesel 251 3,195 n.a. Vehicle Fleet Total 1,464 18,924 Emplo ee Commute Total 1,146 14,793 Public Li htin Total 383 1,522 50,230 Government Solid Waste Total 16 2,663 Grand Total 8,390 57,204 623,329 0 = no use n.a. =Data not available Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 34 of 49 I S Water Energy Use Government staff provided Marana Municipal Water (MMW) electricity use and expenditure information for 2008. MMW is not the sole provider of water to the community since Marana water users also are serviced by Tucson Water, Cortaro Water Users Association, Metro Water, Oro Valley Water and others. All Tucson Water energy-related emissions are included with the City of Tucson's government emissions and the other water providers' emissions are included in their respective Communities' commercial electricity and natural gas consumption emissions. Unlike other local jurisdictions, the government's water energy-related emissions were a minor source of GHG emissions (6 percent) (Figure 4), which is not unexpected since MMW provides services to less than 15 percent of the Marana community (Beem, M. personal communication, 2010). Public Lighting Government staff provided street and traffic electricity use and cost data for 2008. Public lighting emissions were a small component of the Government's emissions, contributing 5 percent to the annual total (Figure 4). In 2008, electricity use by facilities, water pumping and public lighting was the major form of energy consumed and was responsible for 68 percent of Government emissions; natural gas emissions from facility use represented 1 percent of the 2008 total (Figure 5). On-road Vehicle Travel Vehicle Fleet Government staff provided VMT and vehicle and fuel type data for 2008. Emissions from Government fleet vehicle travel were responsible for 17 percent of total emissions. Employee Commute PAG's Travel Reduction Program (TRP) began in 1989 to reduce carbon monoxide levels and traffic congestion in the Tucson metropolitan area. The program requires PAG staff to survey all employers who have 100 or more employees at one site. The last survey was conducted in 2007 and this data was used in this report. Marana employees' daily drive-alone, one-way VMT survey data was used to calculate annual round-trip VMT for 2007. As recommended by ICLEI staff, a model default vehicle mix was used to characterize Government commuting patterns a Employee commuting contributed 14 percent to 2008 Government emissions (Figure 4). Gasoline was the predominant fuel used in the Government fleet and in employee commuting and was responsible for producing 28 percent of the emissions; diesel consumption by fleet vehicles generated 3 percent of total emissions (Figure 5). s Commuter vehicle fleet mix: Gasoline -Auto: full-size/SUV/Pickup (36.4 percent); Auto: mid-size (18.8 percent) Auto: compact/subcompact (44.8 percent) Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 35 of 49 16 Government-generated Solid Waste Government staff submitted waste tonnage for 2008, and it was characterized using information from a Tucson government study (Hughes, et al, 1993) (Appendix E). Waste emissions were a small component of Government emissions, contributing less than 1 percent to the 2008 total. Government Operations'Diverted Wastes Recycled waste totals were submitted by Government staff for 2008 (Table 3). Since a description of Government's recyclables was not provided, the materials were characterized using the most recent local recycling data available (Gibson, D., 2009) (Appendix E). Emissions and energy savings were estimated using the EPA's WARM model (USEPA, 2009) the model's emission factors can be found in Appendix F. Table 3. Summary of Marana Government's Recycled Waste Activity and Emissions and Energy Savings 2008 Recycled COZe Saved MMBtus Government Collections Waste (metric tons) Saved (metric tons) 2008 14.9 47 332 Marana Government Sepsis In 2008, Government operations generated approximately 8,400 metric tons of COZe, about 1 percent of Community emissions. Over half of these emissions were from facility energy use, with electricity comprising 99 percent of these energy emissions. Vehicle fleet travel (17 percent) and employee commuting (14 percent) were other significant sources of emissions. Water (6 percent) and public lighting energy use (4 percent) and waste generation (less than 1 percent) were responsible for the remainder of 2008 GHG emissions. 6. Conclusions In 2008, the Marana community produced 842,000 metric tons of GHG, about S percent of eastern Pima County's total. From 2007 to 2008, Community GHG emissions rose by approximately 9 percent corresponding to a 5 percent rise in population growth. As in the County and City inventories, transportation and energy use, closely linked to population levels, contributed significantly to GHG emissions. However, the relative proportion of the Marana's emission sources was notably different from the County's and City's, due to the impact of I-10 associated- travel within Marana's boundaries. County and City GHG inventories estimated transportation emissions at about one-third of the 2008 total (PAG 2008, 2009 and 2010) while transportation emissions for Marana were almost two-thirds of the total. Marana's relatively high fraction of transportation emissions can be attributed to the sizable portion of the urbanized I-10 that lies within Marana's boundaries and is assigned to Community by the transportation forecasting model. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 36 of 49 1'] In 2008, Marana per capita energy use was comparable to the County's and City's consumption rates. However, Marana's relative proportion of energy use emissions (37 percent) was dwarfed by the large contribution from transportation. Government operations produced about 8,400 metric tons of COze, representing about 1 percent of the 2008 Community emissions. As with the Community inventory, the Government inventory exhibited similarities and differences as compared to other government inventories in the Tucson region (PAG 2008, 2009 and 2010). Similar to other jurisdictions, Marana's government facility energy use was a major contributor to GHG emissions. Electricity was the main energy source for its operations and was responsible for the majority of Government's emissions. Likewise, Government's vehicle fleet, employee commuting, public lighting and waste emissions were minor contributors to the total emissions as in other regional jurisdictions. Unlike other local government inventories, Marana's water-related energy use emissions were responsible for a small portion of its 2008 total. In Marana, the municipal water department services about 15 percent of the Community, thus using less energy and producing relatively lower GHG emissions. The majority of Marana's water delivery and wastewater treatment is provided by other jurisdictions. This report provides GHG emission estimates for the Marana community and government operations for 2007 and 2008. It provides baseline information and identifies the major sources of community and government emissions. The report can serve as a guide to assist the Town and government agencies in evaluating emissions and assist them in developing programs and policies to reduce GHG emissions. References Cited Arizona Department of Commerce, Energy Office. First Sales of Petroleum Products into Arizona for Consumption. 2009. htt :ffwww.azcommerce.com/doclib/ener f etrosales. df Arizona Department of Economic Security. Population Estimates for Arizona's Counties, Incorporated Places and Balance of County. 2009. ht~:!lwww.azcommerce.comfdoclibleconinfo/FILES/estimates1980 2008.x1s Beem, M. Marana Municipal Water Department. Personal communication. 2010. Cascadia Consulting Group Inc., Characterization of Waste from Single-family Residences. Report for the City of Phoenix Public Works Department. 2003. Cascadia Consulting Group Inc., Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for Selected Industry Groups. Contractor's Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2006. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy. Fuel Emission Factors. 2009. htt :ffwww.eia.doe. ovfoiaff 1 b05 excel Fue!°1o20Emission°Io20Factors.xls Gibson, D. City of Tucson. Personal communication. 2009. Hughes, W.W., Tani, M., Aller, S. and Rathje, W.L. A Characterization of the Solid Wastes of City of Tucson Governmental Agencies. 1993. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 37 of 49 1 g Pima Association of Governments. Regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory. 2008. ham://www.a net.orgfdocuentsfAirfGreenHouseGas-2008-11-Inventory.r~df Pima Association of Governments. Regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory Addendum and Appendices. 2009. tt : www. a net.or (documents Air GreenFiouseGas-2009-10-Addendum. df tt :/(www. a net.or /documents Air Greeni•ioseGas-2009-10-A endixRevisions, df Pima Association of Governments. Regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990 to 2008.2010. U. S. Census Bureau. 2008. httta:f/www.census.ctOVfpoestfstatesftablesfl°~ST-ST2008-0.x1s U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2008. htt :ffwww.e a. ovlosw/nonhazfmunici alf alas/msw2008r t. df U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Waste Reduction Model (WARM). 2009. h~:ffwww.epa.slovfcliatechangefw c~dfwastelcalclatorsflNarm ome.htrt~i U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:1990-2008. U.S. EPA # 430-R-10-0062010.2010. htt :ffe a. ovlclimatechan e emissions usinventor re ort.html Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 38 of 49 ) 9 h v .~ 0 N m +. R k C N Q. Q. a Study ; O ~ n O O -p C N ~ ~ in 00 O ~ T ~ C "O O ^ O ~ ^ v O O O ~ fO O ~ ~ O O ~ v O N i V ~ C O N N O N ~ N O C iJ ~ R i ~ Q Q ~ ON ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +' c O i Q 10 ~ "O N Ci ~ Y o c ~ aao ~ ° ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ,mo ~ ~ i ~ V O N t C ^ ~ ~ c C O ro ^ i Q p O d a Q p "O ~ O o o O~ o~ C C O - C f6 ~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~ c vv c ~ o ~ m o o v v ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 000 v v ~; .~ v F a, °o °° O O ~ E ~~ O ._ N ~. O O N ++ N~ n N O ~ a1 ~ C C 7 ~n O N v i w ~ '~ C Q of ~ N >~ O ~ ~ 9 i ~ ; 0 0~ ~ *' ~ O O ~ Y~ V ~ ~ • • ~ v ~ O ~ 'O R ~ v i O O H ~ N N ~ ~ O ~ ~ i i O i _ ~ , a +' ~ O p ~ v i v i V C >. v ~ ,~ o ~ ~ C :~ ~ R t0 v i 3 3 v ~ ro ~ ~ ~ 'O 'O c c a-+ v i OJ v ~., ~ + .+ ~ ~ w ~"~ C ~ H N~ OO OO ~ ~ O1 ' w N Y 3 to C U O ' F - R O O O O O i > p C ~ ~ V1 Vf a+ a+ T ~+ V +..r p N ~ p Y .~ (Q cC C ~ N N O- Q lp. lH f0 7 7 C ~ C ~ V Y C ~ ~ E v v o~ c c ~~ `° c c u u c c v~ c a+ G1 O O ~ ~ f0 (C r\ r\ ^ O O aJ a+ a+ N N W O N i v a u v +~ ~ W 'i '% N N R ~ o 0 0 O O O __ N R u N v v GJ G1 > Q > p a u W > Q = W ~--- f- ~- l.7 Z c ~ G N N N ~ ~ W W W V' LJ' ~ ~ lJ - >' } W Q O Q i N Q N F_ W ~+ 3 = a ~ V v Z W N ~ ~ _ ~ ~ p N i ~+ E ~ G i' Z = f~C Q d v i N _v Z - ~ i C W ~ r. O 'G N N ~ C Q O O ~ t ~ F- G [ . U ~ N Z i d O N V ~ Q i= ~ C w >. of W ~ ~ y ~G N ~ O ~ O ~ v ~ ~ = . = ~ v~ ~ a C s c 0 W Z u L ~ 4 W 0 . O V p N .n t O u N +~ ~ ~ a; o ? p L ++ a ; ' ; ' V R ~ ~ ° w a w ~ a O ~ $ ~ ~ :~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q c ~ Q ~ a = o, u ~ vv ~ A Y ~~ a ~ ~ R ~Q ~ ~Q ~ d ~ W I-~ °o ~ o o d ~ ~~ '° ~~ ~ 01 C Q N ~~ ~ _ aT+ >+ ~ ~ v- O w V O ~ w w V O w O Z ~ N d ~ V C 3 ~ O~ Z C C +.+ O C Y C ~ ~ p Q t0 p ~ i~ v1 V ~ U ~ Q ~ a ~~ D H F- W O ~ Q I- w H H IW- ~ N~ N rp d~ 0 L~ Q~ u v o ~ ~ v 0 " ~ C i1 +'' N ~- - O ai ~ C C H t~ m C f C N O > 2 N p fl .Q Q ~ ~ ~ a Q ~ N p~ V v ~ i v ~ t O v i ~ v i N }} A Y C ~ C = V ~ V -p N s ,.~ ±~ o O ^ Y C ' C ' ~ C ' C ' N U! O v of N - ~ Y 'S NO ? Y -p ! ~ ~ ~ OC ~ ~ C R C C ~ Q C ~ OC C ~ ~ Q C -~ ~ ~ H to -~ to - i ~ i N > ~ ~ ~ N ~ OJ V p ~ V y 3 j U ~n ~ N 3 ~ ~ p ~~.+ N • ?~ N O N ~ H ~ ~ N ~ 3 v 3~ H N _~ H N °' °' V ~ L 0 0 0- O c o a ~ L p _ ~ ~ v c d v ° u o ,,, v m , ~ ~ ~ a ~ c +~ c d ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ C C i G! V ~+~ G1 - _ ~ ~' ~ .` ~ W N W =~ .n C C N N p~ w ~ C ~ N 01 ~ _ O W C A L i ~ V v N C ~~ i ~ ~ O _ ~' N .~ ss on O $er 12+;~Q~O ~ ~ t 39 c~4~ a ~ 2 a ¢ 0 ~ > w a o ~ l 7 v i Appendix B. Population Estimates 2000, 2007 and 2008 Eastern United Pima States4 Arizonan Countyb Maranab 2000 282,194,308 5,130,632 814,468 13,556 2007 301,621,157 6,500,194 968,423 32,274 2008 304,059,724 6,629,455 973,462 33,744 Appendix C. Emission Factors for Electricity Use 2007 2008 Lbs. COze per MWh Tucson Electric Power' 1908.4 1887.5 Trico Electric Cooperative8 2024.8 2003.6 4 U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. http:Ilwww,census,c~ovlpo{aest/stateslta bles/NST-irST2008-01.x1s s Arizona Department of Commerce. 2009. htt :f verww.azcommerce.comldoclib/econinfo FILES estimates1980 2008.x1s e Based on Arizona Department of Commerce data for Pima County and applied an allocation factor (0.96) to represent Eastern Pima County ' Based on emission and generation data representative of the fuel type/plant type combinations used by TEP to generate electricity; data supplied by TEP staff. $ Based on emissions and generation data representative of the fuel type/plant type combinations used by Trico to generate electricity; data supplied by Trico staff. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 40 of 49 21 Appendix D. Marana Community Data Inputs 2007 2008 Residential Energy Use Natural Gas (therms) 1,648,396 1,723,476 Electricity (GWh) TEP 132 130 Trico 10 11 Commercial Energy Use Natural Gas (therms) 4,304,996 4,948,271 Electricity (GWh) TEP 80 107 Trico 4.2 4.7 Industrial Energy Use Natural Gas (therms) 13,542 13,542 Electricity (GWh) TEP 61 59 Trico 0.7 0.8 Transportation (miles per year) Private and commercial vehicle travel 832,770,456 914,923,611 Rural Transit 70,327 63,251 Waste Disposal (short tons per year)9 28,745 25,228 Other (gallons per year) Propane 497,750 499,559 Jet A 23,700 23,363 Aviation Gasoline 14,560 14,116 Shaded areas represent estimated values 9 2007 and 2008 waste totals were based on Pima County waste per capita data and 2007 and 2008 Marana populations Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 41 of 49 22 Appendix E. Waste and Recyclables Characterizations Waste Categories Construction and demolition 10 Paper products Food wastes Plant debris Wood/textiles All other wastes Government 1z Paper products Food wastes Plant debris Wood/textiles All other wastes Residential 13 Paper products Food wastes Plant debris Wood/textiles All other wastes Commercial 14 Paper products Food wastes Plant debris Wood/textiles All other wastes Private self-haulers 15 Paper products Food wastes Plant debris Wood/textiles All other wastes Percent Composition City of Tucson Recyclables" Percent Composition 3 Glass 14 0 Aluminum cans 1 1 Cardboard 15 20 HDPE 2 76 Newspaper 33 Mixed paper 8 Pet 3 15 Tin cans 3 4 Unrecyclable 21 37 6 38 Average waste composition from Pima County landfills 2007 2008 Paper products 10 10 18 Food wastes 9 8 17 Plant debris 25 29 28 Wood/textiles 8 8 3 All other wastes 47 44 34 28 26 2 11 33 7 1 5 22 65 10 Based on Detailed Characterization of Construction and Demolition Waste. Cascadia Consulting Group. 2006. " Represents City of Tucson recyclables stream; based on personal communication (Gibson, D, City of Tucson. 2009). '~ Based on A Characterization of the Solid wastes of the Tucson Governmental Agencies. Hughes, W. et a1,1993. 13 Based on Characterization of Waste from Single-family Residences for the City of Phoenix Public Works Dept. Cascadia Consulting Group. 2003. "Based on Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for Selected Industry Groups. Cascadia Consulting Group. 2006. 15 Based on a Statewide Waste Characterization Study- Contractors'Report to the California Board. Cascadia Consulting Group. 2004. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 42 of 49 23 Appendix F. WARM model per metric ton estimates of GHG Emissions for Alternate Management Scenarios (EPA, 2009) aterial GHG Emissions per Ton of Material Source Reduced (MTCOzE) GHG Emissions per Ton of Material Recycled (MTCOzE) GHG Emissions per Ton of Material Landfilled (MTCOZE) GHG Emissions per Ton of Material Combusted (MTCOzE) GHG Emissions per Ton of Material Composted (MTCOzE) Aluminum Cans -8.29 -13.67 0.04 0.06 NA Steel Cans -3.19 -1.80 0.04 -1.54 NA Copper Wire -7.41 -4.97 0.04 0.06 NA Glass -0.58 -0.28 0.04 0.05 NA HDPE -1.80 -1.40 0.04 0.91 NA LDPE -2.29 -1.71 0.04 0.91 NA PET -2.11 -1.55 0.04 1.07 NA Corrugated Cardboard -5.59 -3.11 0.33 -0.66 NA Magazines/third-class mail -8.66 -3.07 -0.33 -0.48 NA Newspaper -4.89 -2.80 -0.89 -0.75 NA Office Paper -8.01 -2.85 1.76 -0.63 NA Phonebooks -6.34 -2.66 -0.89 -0.75 NA Textbooks -9.18 -3.11 1.76 -0.63 NA Dimensional Lumber -2.02 -2.46 -0.52 -0.79 NA Medium Density Fiberboard -2.22 -2.47 -0.52 -0.79 NA Food Scraps. NA NA 0.68 -0.18 -0.20 Yard Trimmings NA NA -0.34 -0.22 -0.20 Grass NA NA 0.15 -0.22 -0.20 Leaves NA NA -0.58 -0.22 -0.20 Branches NA NA -0.52 -0.22 -0.20 Mixed Paper, Broad NA -3.54 0.27 -0.66 NA Mixed Paper, Resid. NA -3.54 0.19 -0.66 NA Mixed Paper, Office NA -3.42 0.38 -0.60 NA Mixed Metals NA -5.26 0.04 -1.07 NA Mixed Plastics NA -1.52 0.04 0.97 NA Mixed Recyclables NA -2.88 0.08 -0.60 NA Mixed Organics NA NA 0.15 -0.20 -0.20 Mixed MSW NA NA 0.37 -0.13 NA Carpet -4.03 -7.23 0.04 0.37 NA Personal Computers -55.97 -2.27 0.04 -0.20 NA Clay Bricks -0.29 NA 0.04 NA NA Concrete NA -0.01 0.04 NA NA Fly Ash NA -0.87 0.04 NA NA Tires -4.01 -1.84 0.04 0.09 NA Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 43 of 49 24 Appendix G: Marana Government Data Inputs 200 8 Facilit Energ Use Electricity- KWh; natural gas -therms Dollars Natural Gas 8,293 15,523 Electricity TEP 4,758,768 465,618 Trico 288,716 31,700 Water Ener Use Natural Gas 0 Electricity TEP 255,231 26,808 Trico 292,892 31,193 Vehicle Fleet Miles/year Gasoline 1,756,444 n.a. Diesel 143,556 n.a. Emplo ee Commute 76 Miles/year Gasoline 2,072,819 Public Lighting Electricity - KWh Electricity TEP 420,969 46,495 Trico 24,884 3,735 Government Solid Waste Short tons/year 113 n.a. n.a. -Data not available 0 - No use 16 Employee commuting data from PAG's 2007 employer survey Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 44 of 49 25 ~,'~, ~~~~ ~~ ~t!NM~>~RAfi.~ 11555 W. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, MARANA, ARIZONA 85653 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, October 12, 2010, 6:00:00 PM To: Mayor and Council Item D 3 From: Laine Sklar ,Assistant Town Attorney Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable Subject: Discussion regarding HB2246 and the Town Council's ability to regulate the use of consumer fireworks within the Town limits as of November 30, 2010 Discussion: House Bi112246 becomes effective on November 30, 2010. The bill authorizes the statewide sale of certain types of fireworks, defined as "consumer fireworks," to people over the age of 15. While the Town cannot limit the sale of fireworks within the Town limits, it can limit the use of fireworks within the Town limits. The Town can choose to provide no limits on the use of consumer fireworks, or can limit the location or time of their use up to and including an outright prohibition on the use of consumer fireworks within the Town limits. For example, the Town could prohibit the use of consumer fireworks completely, or prohibit their use except on July 4th and December 31st, or the Town could permit the use of consumer fireworks year-round between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. The amount of regulation is entirely in the Council's discretion. Should the Council choose to limit the use of consumer fireworks within the Town limits, the Council would need to designate a violation as either a civil or criminal offense and establish any minimum, maximum, or mandatory penalties the Council feels are appropriate. If the Council chooses to take no action, then as of December 1, 2010, there will be no restrictions on the use of permissible consumer fireworks within the Town limits. Staff requests feedback from the Council concerning whether the Council would like to limit the use of consumer fireworks in any manner. Should the Council wish to limit the use of consumer fireworks, Staff requests the Council direct staff to proceed in drafting an ordinance pursuant to the Council's decision. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: Type: No Attachments Available Staff Recommendation: Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 45 of 49 None. Seeking Council input and direction. Suggested Motion: Council's pleasure. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 46 of 49 ~.~~. ~~~N ,<.p.,, $s~~~. 11555 W. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, MARANA, ARIZONA 85653 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, October 12, 2010, 6:00:00 PM To: Mayor and Council Item D 4 From: Ryan Benavides ,Assistant Public Works Director Strategic Plan Focus Area: Commerce, Community Building, Progress and Innovation, Recreation Strategic Plan Focus Area -Additional Information: Commerce Center: Build upon the unique combination of assets to attract and maintain career- oriented commerce. Community Building: Create a safe community with a strong sense of place where diverse people are motivated to be involved and feel connected, needed and appreciated; Create a sense of community identity and "community place" Progress and Innovation: Encourage excellence and innovation within the community and the same from projects being proposed by developers and those looking to invest in Marana Recreation Capital of Arizona: Identify, undertake and/or complete planning processes for parks, open-space, and recreation facilities; Ensure that future developments, land-use and projects protect and showcase the Sonoran Desert and all its inhabitants Subject: Presentation.__ Relating to Capital Improvement Projects; update on the Twin Peaks Interchange and Twin Peaks Road/Camino de Marana Ribbon Cutting/Celebration Discussion: Tom Ellis and Ryan Benavides will present Council with details on the upcoming celebration events scheduled for the completion of the Twin Peaks Interchange and Twin Peaks Road/Camino de Marana Projects to take place on November 13th & 18th. ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: Type: No Attachments Available Staff Recommendation: For informational purposes. Suggested Motion: For informational purposes. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 47 of 49 ''""'~~ IY1~~~~ ~~~~ r~~~ ~,x~ ~»~, 11555 W. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, MARANA, ARIZONA 85653 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, October 12, 2010, 6:00:00 PM To: Mayor and Council Item D 5 From: Deb Thalasitis ,Assistant Town Manager Strategic Plan Focus Area: Progress and Innovation Strategic Plan Focus Area -Additional Information: Action Strategy: Leverage the use of technology in communicating with residents and employees. Subject: Presentation: Relating to Technology Services; providing a presentation and update on the redesign of the Town of Marana Internet Website Discussion: A presentation of the design concept and a mock up of the proposed layout will be presented by town staff and representatives from Westward Vision, a consulting group hired to help with the Website's graphics and branding. The design and operation of the town's website will be brought in house to provide more functionality and flexibility while increasing integration with existing enterprise databases. The new website will provide an opportunity to add needed functions to provide better information to community and visitors as well as to leverage the Website as a marketing tool for the Town. Expanded capabilities will allow staff to update content and imagery on a regular basis and integrate new functional features as they become relevant to town operations. New functions may include the use of social media, on-line services, video streaming, and the dynamic promotion of special events. Financial Impact: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Name: Description: Type: No Attachments Available Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the design concept and proposed layout as presented and direction to move forward with the development of the Town's new Marana.com website. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 48 of 49 Commission Recommendation - if applicable: N/A Suggested Motion: I move to direct staff to continue development of the proposed Website design presented this evening. Study Session -October 12, 2010 -Page 49 of 49