Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Agenda Packet 03/16/2004
MOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 13251 N. Lon Adams: Road March 16. 2004 - 7 :00 p.m. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. Vice Mayor Herb Kai Council. Member Jim Blake Council Member Patti Comerford Council Member Tim Escobedo Council Member Ed Honea Council Member Carol McGorray Town Manager Mike Reuwsaat Welcome to this Marana Council Meeting. Regular Council. Meetings are usually held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Marana Town Hall, although the date or time may change, or Special Meetings may be called at other times and/or places. Contact Town Hall or watch for posted agendas for other meetings. This agenda may be revised up to twenty -four hours prior to the meeting. In such a case a new agenda will be posted in place of this agenda. If you are interested in speaking to the Council during Petitions and Comments, Public Hearings, or other agenda items, you must fill out a speaker card (at the rear of the Council Chambers) and deliver it to the Clerk in advance of the agenda item you wish to address. It is up to the Mayor and Council whether individuals will be allowed to address the Council on issues other than Announcements, Petitions & Comments, and. Public Hearings. All persons attending the Council Meeting, whether speaking to the Council or not, are expected to observe the Council Rules, as well as the rules of politeness, propriety, decorum and good conduct. Any person interfering with the meeting in any way, or acting rudely or loudly will be removed from the meeting and will not be allowed to return. To better serve the citizens of Marana and others attending our meetings, the Council Chamber is wheelchair and handicapped accessible. Any person who, by reason of any disability, is in need of special services as a result of their disability, such as assistive listening devices, agenda materials printed in Braille or large print, a signer for the hearing impaired, etc., will be accommodated. Such special services are available upon prior request, at least ten (1.0) working days prior to the Council Meeting. For a copy of this agenda or questions about the Council Meetings, special services, or procedures, please contact Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk, at 682 -3401, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ACTION MAY BE TARN BY THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. Amended agenda items appear in italics. Posted no later than March 12, 2004 by 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the Marana Town Hall, Marana Police Department, and the Marana Development Services Center.. ❑ 1 TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 13251 N. Loa Adams Road March 16 2004 - 7 :00 p.m. L CALL TO ORDER t 11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE IV. ROLL CALL V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA VI. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES Minutes of the March 2, 2004 Council Meeting VII. CALL TO THE PUBLIC — ANNOUNCEMENTS — INTRODUCTIONS — UPCOMING EVENTS At this time, any member of the public is allowed to address the Town Council on any issue not already on tonight's agenda. The speaker may have up to three (3) minutes to speak. Any persons wishing to address the Council must complete a speaker card (located at the rear of the Council chambers) and deliver it to the Town Clerk prior to this agenda item being called. Pursuant to the Arizona.. Open Meeting Law, at the conclusion of Call to the Public, individual members of the Council may respond to criticism made by those who have addressed the Council, may ask staff to review the matter, or may ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda. VIII. STAFF REPORTS UL GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. CONSENT AGENDA The consent agenda contains agenda items requiring action by the Council which are generally routine items not requiring council discussion. A single motion will approve all items on the consent agenda, including any resolutions or ordinances. A Council Member may remove any issue from the consent agenda, and that issue will be discussed and voted upon separately, immediately following the consent agenda. 1. Resolution No. 200423 Relating to public safety; authorizing the Town to take all actions necessary to receive highway safety grant funding through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety for a Marana Police Department traffic enforcement vehicle (Richard Vidaurri) 2. Resolution No. 200424 Relating to final plat approval; authorizing the approval of a final plat resubdivision for The Gallery, Parcel 4A, submitted by Tortolita Properties, L.L.C., for a 32 -lot single family detached home subdivision on 31.55 acres located in the Dove Mountain Specific Plan Area (Kevin Kish) 2 TOWN OF MARE+INA, ARIZONA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 13251 N. Lon Adams Road March 16, 2004 - 7:00 p.m. 3. Resolution No. 2004 -25 Relating to final plat approval; authorizing a final plat for Gladden Farms Block 3 on approximately 11 acres, consisting of an 814ot single family residential subdivision in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately a half mile west of the New Lon Adams Road (Kevin Kish) 4. Resolution No. 2004 -26 Relating to final plat approval; authorizing a final plat for Gladden Farms Block 4 on approximately 15 acres, consisting of a 47 -lot single- family residential subdivision in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately one -third mile west of the new Lon Adams Road (Kevin Kish) 5. Resolution No. 200430 Relating to housing; authorizing the Town of Marana to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima County for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and Home Investment Partnership Program (Dan Groseclose) 6. Resolution No. 2004 -29 Relating to street naming; naming "Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive" and designating a portion of the .Marana Town Center parcel as Civic Center Drive public right-of-way (Farhad Moghiml) 7. Resolution No. 200428 Relating to housing; authorizing the Town of Marana to enter into a purchase agreement with Samuel H. and Gertrude A. Vickroy to purchase a lot for the Town of Marana Home Program (Dan Groseclose) 8. Resolution No. 200431 Relating to real estate; abandoning of a portion of the one- foot no access easement and public drainage easement on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51(Farhad Moghimi) 9. Resolution No. 200433 Relating to final plat approval; approving the Marana Golf Continental Ranch Final Block Plat B. COUNCIL ACTION 1. Resolution No. 200435 Supporting the Pima County Board of Supervisors' call for a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancement (Mike Reuwsaat) 2. Formation of a Town Manager's committee to be known as the Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee (Mike Reuwsaat) 3. Ordinance No. 2004.05 Relating to annexation; annexing into the corporate limits of the Town of Marana that territory known as the Camino de Oeste annexation comprising approximately 319 acres of land on the east side of Interstate 10 centered on Cortaro Farms Road and bisected north to south by Camino de Oeste Road (Dick Gear) 3 TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 13251 N. Lon Adams Road March 16, 2004 -- 7 :00 p.m. 4. Resolution No. 2004 -32 Relating to development; approving the staff proposal for implementation of Gladden Farms Blocks 11 and 12 Building Height Regulation Exception Condition 2, regarding building separations (Kevin Kish) 5. State Le islative Issues - Discussion/Direction/Action regarding all pending bills before the Legislature (Mike Reuwsaat) C. MAYOR AND COUNCIL'S REPORT D. MANAGERS' REPORT X. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS XI. ADJOURNMENT Bobby Sutton, Jr., Mayor 4 PLACE AND DATE Marana Town Hall, March 2, 2004 I. CALL TO ORDER By Mayor Sutton at 7:01 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Led by Mayor Sutton III. INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE A moment of silence was observed. IV. ROLL CALL COUNCIL Bobby Sutton, Jr. Mayor Present Herb Kai Vice Mayor Present Jim Blake Council Member Present Patti Comerford Council Member Present Tim Escobedo Council Member Present Ed Honea Council Member Present Carol McGorray Council Member Present STAFF Jaret Barr Interim Development Services Admin. Present Frank Cassidy Town Attorney Present Jocelyn Bronson Town Clerk Present Attached is a list of public attendees. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Upon motion by Council Member Blake, seconded by Council Member McGorray, the agenda was unanimously approved. 1 y�Y 7' ' _0 VI. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES Upon motion by Council Member McGorray, seconded by Council Member Blake, the minutes of the February 17, 2004 Council Meeting and the minutes of the February 17, 2004 IDA /CHODO Study Session were unanimously approved. VII. CALL TO THE PUBLIQANNOUNCEMENTS Frank Cassidy introduced the newly hired legal secretary, Camille Desimone. Ms. Desimone comes to the Town from the City of Tucson and brings many years of legal secretarial experience to the Town Attorney's office. Ora Harn reminded the Mayor and Council of the upcoming America's Walk for Diabetes being held at 7:00 a.m. on April 24, 2004 at Painted Sky Elementary School in Oro Valley. Ms. Harn introduced Nina Simmons, Area Manager and Walk Coordinator for the Southern Arizona Diabetes Association, who provided additional details regarding the walk's registration process. Ms. Simmons commented that last year's walk effort by volunteers from the Town of Marana was a huge success and she encouraged everyone to participate again this year. Ms. Harn reported that a challenge to the Town of Marana from Oro Valley had been received regarding this charity walk. She said that Mayor Loomis, an honorary chair along with Mayor Sutton, had challenged Marana to match all efforts from Oro Valley associated with America's Walk for Diabetes. Ms. Harn suggested that a team from Marana be formed and that the challenge be accepted. She predicted that Marana could meet and beat the number of walk participants and money raised than from the Oro Valley team. Steve Temple, representing the Western Heritage group, spoke before the Council. He thanked the Town for the purchase of the new rodeo arena and acknowledged the outstanding support from Tom Ellis, Parks Superintendent, and the Parks and Recreation staff for all of the hard work put into this project. He said that his group's mission was to extend the western heritage to the Marana and northern Pima County youth involved in equestrian events. He said that he was ready to kick off that effort on Founders' Day. Mr. Temple presented the Mayor with the Western Heritage Foundation's First Mayor's Buckle, an award the group planned to keep as an ongoing effort associated with the Founders' Day rodeo events. 2 , Mr. Temple said that he hoped the first buckle awarded p p e would be displayed at the new Marana Municipal Complex as part of the Western Heritage Foundation's contribution to the preservation of the western lifestyle. He invited everyone to the rodeo events being held during the Founders' Day festivities on Saturday, March 13th. He noted that the events were primarily youth oriented and that the area youth would always have first priority for the use of the arena. Council Member Comerford introduced Justin Manning and Jordan Flayer, both from Boy Scout Troop #209, and congratulated the young men for their achievement of reaching their Eagle Scout status. She said she was very proud of their hard work and community involvement associated with the merit badges. VIII. STAFF REPORTS There were no questions regarding the staff reports. IX. GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items scheduled for the consent agenda. B. COUNCIL ACTION 1. Presentation by LTC Louis H. Jordan, Jr., Deputy Brigade Commander of the Western Army National Guard Aviation Training Site (WAATS). LTC Jordan spoke before the Council about the Western Army National Guard Aviation Training Site (WAATS) at the Pinal Air Park. He highlighted the proposed expansion of WAATS, the new missions for the site, and how the general community would be affected. He gave a brief history of the WAATS, commonly known as the "Gunfighter University" throughout the Army National Guard. He noted that the beautiful weather in southern Arizona was a major reason for the training site location. He explained that the program was established to train National Guard aviators and that over 9,000 pilots had completed the program with a combination of over 85,000 accident -free training hours. He noted that the 1 -285f Attack Helicopter Battalion (AHB), which flew 35,000 hours annually in training for war time missions, was also located at the WAATS location. LTC Jordan described WAATS' current mission as conducting U.S. Army directed aviation training, conducting other NGB (MACOM) directed aviation training, and conducting regional simulation support. 3 LTC Jordan stated that WAATS, at the Silver Bell Army Heliport, focused on attack, scout, and counter -drug mission training which was key to homeland security. He listed some of the aircraft used in the training as well as the air space available for the training process. He concluded his presentation by thanking the Mayor and Council for their continued support of the WAATS operation. There were no questions from the Council. 2. Resolution No. 2004 -20 Authorizing the Town Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the purchase of the transmission tower located at 5100 W. Ina Road for sixty - seven thousand five hundred dollars (Roy Cuaron) Mr. Cuaron spoke before the Council regarding this item. He explained that Town staff had been working with Southwest Transmission Cooperative, Inc. (SWTransco) for over seven months in order to purchase the transmission tower located at the Marana Operations Center (MOC). He explained that a need for a transmission tower was discovered during the implementation of the Towns Wide -Area Network (WAN) system and that the Town held a leasehold interest in the MOC tower. The finance director said that the revenue from the leasehold would be used for the $1,700 monthly purchase payment to SWTransco and that there would be no budget impact on the Town with this arrangement. He explained that the note was at 6% interest with a payoff within 40 to 42 months. He mentioned that SWTransco would share in the risks /lease income for fifteen years. He recommended authorization for the purchase of the transmission tower at 5100 W. Ina Road. Upon motion by Vice Mayor Kai, seconded by Council Member Blake, Resolution No. 2004 -20 was unanimously approved. 3. Resolution No. 2004 -21 Agreement for Construction of Water Facilities and Provision of Water Utility Service known as the Studebaker Drive/Sunset Ranch Estates Extension Project of the Continental Reserve Water System (Brad DeSpain) Mr. DeSpain presented this item before the Council. He explained that the proposed agreement was for a small extension off of the Continental Reserve water system which provided the water service for Sunset Ranch Estates, a 34 -acre subdivision west of Continental Reserve. 4 ; ✓�Y a F.; Mr. DeSpain said that a six -inch main was extended approximately 900 feet to a well site where meters were installed to bring the new customers into the Town of Marana's water system. He said that the 500 gallon pressure tank, cable, and submersible pump already in place were now property of the Town and that the four new customers paid all Town costs for the installation process. Upon motion by Council Member McGorray, seconded by Council Member Blake, Resolution No. 2004 -21 was unanimously approved. 4. State Legislative Issues Discussion/Direction/Action regarding all pending bills before the Legislature (Mike Reuwsaat) Mr. Barr commented that no new action had occurred since the last Legislative report and that there was no update to present at this time. C. MAYOR AND COUNCIL'S REPORT Council Member McGorray reported that she and Council Member Escobedo had represented Marana by riding in a vintage carriage in the 2004 Tucson Rodeo Parade. She said that she and Council Member Escobedo had thoroughly enjoyed the experience. She noted that Tammy Reyes had made perfect arrangements for the Marana officials' parade experience and that Ms. Reyes' efforts eased the trip to downtown Tucson during the busy Fiesta de los Vaqueros activities. Council Member Escobedo reported that Mayor Sutton and former Town Manager Mike Hein had recently played golf together in the Tucson Open Golf Tournament. He said that it was especially enjoyable because the other golfer in their threesome was Phil Slocum, who eventually ended up winning the tournament. Council Member Comerford reported that she and Council Members Blake and McGorray had accompanied Mike Reuwsaat and Frank Cassidy to the Governor's State of the State address. She said that she was impressed with Governor Napolitano's speech and with the way the Governor graciously took comments and questions from the audience afterwards. s g � D. MANAGERS' REPORT There were no reports given at this time. X. UPCOMING EVENTS There was no discussion of upcoming events. XI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Escobedo asked that the topic of a Teen Advisory Council be placed on the next agenda. XII. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Council Member Escobedo, seconded by Council Member McGorray, approval to adjourn was unanimous. The time was 7:38 p.m. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Town Council meeting held on March 2, 2004. I further certify that a quorum was present. Jocelyn Bronson, Town Clerk • 6 N OF 1 7 9 . 7 gRIZONP STAFF REPORTS TO COUNCIL Building Parks & Rec • Town Clerk Planning Court Police Finance - v/ PW /Engineering Human Resources Water • } �pW N p� PUBLIC STORKS • 1 7 9 7 STAFF REPORT gR10 p1P ............................. March 2004 Capital Improvement Projects ( Staff Report for the The following are capital improvement projects in design. month of February) Ina Road Roadway Improvements Ina Road Bridge Improvements - Bridge Capital Improvement 1 - 1 -10 to Silverbell Road over the Santa Cruz River Projects in Design This project consists of roadway improve- This project consists of constructing a new ments including design and reconstruction bridge over the Santa Cruz River south of Capital Improvement 5 to widen to four lanes with multiuse lanes, the existing bridge. Construction will also Projects In median island, curb, curb and gutter and include rehabilitating the existing Grade Construction sidewalk installation, drainage improve- Control Structure, extending the soil ce- Recently Completed 6 ments, landscaping, signal modifications, ment/concrete floor protection to include Projects artwork and street lighting. Project is 1.1 the new bridge, reconstructing the soil Traffic Division Report 7 miles in length. cement bank protection on the east and west side of the Santa Cruz River. The Environmental 8 reconstruction of the bank protection will Planning Projects Estimated construction time: To be deter- mined include provisions for a pedestrian path. Estimated construction time: To be Status: 404 Permit application has been determined • submitted. First year of Pygmy Owl Survey has been completed. The Traffic Impact Status: The bridge improvement plans, PUBLIC WORKS Analysis, Phase I Environmental Site As- DCR, Bridge Selection Report, Bridge sessment, Archaeology, the amended Stability Analysis and the amended Bridge MISSION AND VALUES Bridge Inspection, Bridge Stability Analysis, Inspection Report have been submitted to The Marana Public Works Grade Control Stability Analysis, Bridge ADOT, Phoenix office, for their initial Selection, Location and Geotechnical (for review and comments. The 90% plans are Department is committed to Traffic Signals) reports are complete and expected to be submitted by the second providing quality service by have been accepted; NPPO Plan has been quarter of 2004. The ACOE permit is ex- consistently delivering and accepted and Draft Access Management pected to be complete by the second maintaining reliable, safe Report is on hold at this point in time. Ac- quarter of 2004. public facilities with a cess Management acceptance letters have productive, respectful and been received by the consultant from the ethical workforce. " abutting property owners. The Town had Our operating values are: submitted 75% improvement plan comments . Satisfaction to the consultant in December of 2003. Re- visions to be submitted to the Town in mid- • Respectful February. • Communication • Reliable • Productive • Quality • Ethical • Consistency • Service • Safety • • Integrity • Commitment s s March 2004 Capital Improvement Projects in Resign (continued) • DCR for the Ina Road Corridor Project Twin Peaks Interchange This project will involve the development of a Design Con - This project consists of environmental clearances, DCR cept Report to improve Ina Road and the area south of Ina and 15% plans for the corridor alignment, Phase I; final Road between Thomydale Road and Camino Martin ex- design for TI, grade separated railroad structure and tending to Orange Grove Road. connection to the roadway system to the east, Phase Il. Status: The Statement of Qualifications (SOQ's) were Estimated Construction Time: 2006 received in October of 2003. Panel evaluations were re- ceived in December of 2003. The SOQ's will be held for Status: The Town is in receipt of the Drainage Report, six months; at that time the Town may award a contract. AASHTO Design Criteria, Initial Site Assessment, Initial Traffic and Existing Hydraulic Conditions Reports; they DCR/Design for Honea Heights Roadway Improve- have been distributed to the appropriate parties for their ments review and comment. The completion of the DCR/ This project will involve the development of a Design Con- Environmental Assessment and 15% Improvement plans cept Report and subsequent construction plans for road- is expected by the fourth quarter of 2004. The consultant, way and drainage improvements for Honea Heights subdi- URS Corporation is still in the process of collecting data for vision, located between Sanders and Sandario Roads, a variety of tasks associated with the various reports and between Moore Road and the Santa Cruz River. design related to the project. Town staff and the consult- ants are planning for the second open house scheduled for Status: The Statements of Qualifications have been re- March 22, 2004. Town staff and the consultant are prepar- ceived and a consultant has been selected. The Notice to ing for the Safety Day at Twin Peaks Elementary School Proceed should be issued in the second quarter of 2004 scheduled for March 27, 2004. following approval of the scope of work and contract nego- tiations. District Park Bank Protection This project consists of providing bank protection along the Honea Heights Sewer Improvements west bank of the Santa Cruz River from Ina Road to • Cortaro Road. Phase I of the project will be from Cortaro This project consists of connecting the Honea Heights Road to the Yuma Wash. subdivision to Pima County Wastewater Management Department sanitary sewer. The project plans have Status: Tetra Tech is the design engineer. Revised phas- been approved by all jurisdictions and will be con- ing plans are expected back from the engineer by the first structed by Pima County. The HCS connections will be quarter of 2004. An individual 404 permit application has coordinated and designed as a part of the Town's Ho- been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers and is an- nea Heights Roadway Improvements Project. bcipated by Spring 2004. Phase I Construction is antici- pated to begin in July 2004 and is anticipated to be com- Status: Pima County will go to bid approximately the pleted by the first quarter of 2005. 1 Quarter of 2005. Santa Cruz River Corridor Trail Sandra Road, Phase II Pavement Extension This project consists of providing a DCR and design for the This project consists of extending the paving from path alignment, landscaping and irrigation and parking Sandra Road and Sunshine Lane to the north for an facilities for the linear path located on the levee of the additional 1/4 mile. This would address rights -of -way Santa Cruz River from the end of Phase I alignment to Gladden Farms. and drainage issues. Status: Design completion is targeted for the second quar- Status: Town will negotiate and complete the design ter of 2004. The construction is anticipated to be complete contract with EEC, Inc. as soon as the Scope is by the first quarter of 2005. revised. • Page 2 PUBLIC WORKS t March 2004 Capital Improvement Projects in Design (continued) Thornvdale Road Improvements /Orange Grove Road To Silverbell Road Improvements CDO Wash Cortaro Road to Ina Road This project consists of reconstructing Thornydale Road from This project consists of reconstructing the roadway to Orange Grove to the CDO Wash along with the reconstruction/ four lanes with curb and gutter, multipurpose lanes widening of the approach roads; sidewalks, curb, curb and and sidewalks, and providing for a continuous center gutter, traffic signal modifications, drainage facilities, median turn lane, sanitary sewer system construction and islands, street lighting and art work. intersection improvements at Ina/Silverbell, which Estimated construction time: To be determined includes a new traffic signal system. Status: The 75% improvement plans have been received with Estimated construction time: Third Quarter of 2004 90% plans expected the first quarter of 2004. 100% plans are Status: Environmental, Biological, DCR, Geotechnical expected in the second quarter of 2004. The Phase I Environ- Report, Pavement Design Summary, Archaeological mental Site Assessment, Cultural Resources, Drainage and and Drainage reports are complete and have been Geotechnical (for traffic signals) Reports have previously been accepted. The 404 Permit application has been sub - accepted. The reports will be updated to account for the new mitted to the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and is project limits as necessary. expected to be complete within the second quarter of 2004. Third year of Pygmy Owl Survey has been com- Santa Cruz River Shared Use Path, Phase I and II pleted. ACOE is still in the process of reviewing the This project consists of the design and construction of a 14' plan as submitted by Old Pueblo. The Town is in re- wide paved asphalt path from Cortaro Road to Coachline Blvd. ceipt of the final Sanitary Sewer Basin Study and the via the El Rio Park development. Two pedestrian bridges pro- study has been accepted by both the Town and vide major drainage crossings for the path. PCWWM. The sanitary sewer plans have been re- viewed by PCWWM and revisions are being com- Phase I consists of building a shared use path between Cor- pleted. Comments on the 90% plans have been com- taro Road and Twin Peaks Road in the over bank and interme- pleted and returned to the Consultant for incorporation diate bank areas of the Santa Cruz River. Phase 11 consists of into the 100% plans. 100% plans are expected to be a continuation of the shared use path in Phase I from Twin completed by the end of the first quarter of 2004. End • Peaks to El Rio Park. Each phase is partially funded under of construction is expected to be complete by the third ADOT's Transportation Enhancement Program. Construction quarter of 2005. A public open house was held on will need to be completed such that the ADOT funds are prop- January 15, 2004. erly tracked; however, design can be completed as a single project. Town of Marana. Northwest Marana Town Center Design and Development Estimated construction time: Second Quarter of 2004 Three projects are ongoing to master plan and estab- lish the layout, ambience and design standards of the Status: The Environmental Determination (ED) has been ac- Northwest Marana Town Center. cepted by ADOT. In late April 2003, the Town selected Castro Engineering for the path design and Structural Grace for de- Northwest Marana Town Center. Master Plan sign of the pedestrian bridges. The 100% plans are scheduled Pr °-L for submittal by the first quarter of 2004. The artistic concepts This project will provide Master Plan Services for fur - for the project have been presented and endorsed by the ther planning and conceptualization to set design and Mayor and Council, Marana Parks Committee, the Public development standards to facilitate the urbanization of Works Arts Project Committee, the Continental Ranch and the Northwest Marana Town Center. Sunflower Homeowners Associations, an HOA public meeting, the Construction Committee and the Building Committee. End Status: Durant Group and McGann and Associates of construction is targeted for the fourth quarter of 2004. continue the master planning of the rest of Ora Mae Harp District Park and the areas south of the park and Municipal Complex. The Town will work with land owners and developers for further use of the Town Center land. Selection of designers is currently under consideration for the concept design of the greenbelt and linear park that will follow the current Barnett Road route and also provide storm water relief to di- vert water away from the Town Center. Page 3 PUBLIC WORKS March 2004 Capital Improvements in Design (continued) Town of Marana Municipal Complex (Marana DCR for Camino de Manana/Dove Mountain Extension "MuniPlex ") This project will involve the development of a Design Concept This project consists of the design and construction of a Report for the possible realignment of Camino de Mariana new Town Government Complex and will integrate the from its intersection with Linda Vista Boulevard to an align - Muniplex and surrounding facilities with the Ora Mae Ham ment with Dove Mountain Boulevard at Tangerine Road. Park which will eventually abut a linear greenbelt park that will run from 1 -10 to the Santa Cruz River. This linear park Status: The Town has selected a consultant and a scoping will also serve as a relief conduit for excess water from the meeting has been completed. The Notice to Proceed should Tortolita Mountain fan run off. be issued in the first quarter of 2004 following approval of the scope of work and contract negotiations. Status: During February, D.L. Withers, the CM, placed more interior concrete slab as well as the dais base Moore Road Improvements inside the Council Chambers in Building A, and more This project consists of providing 24' wide chip seal with concrete slab inside the administration building. Sub- graded shoulders and at grade drainage crossings. The pro - stantial completion date is targeted for November 2004. ject limits are from Camino de Oeste to Thomydale Road. Masonry work remained on hold. Excavation, reinforce- ment and concrete were placed for the circular wall Status: The Notice to Proceed was given to the design con - running from the building to the sidewalk entries on sultant on October 23, 2003. The Preliminary Design Report is Civic Center Drive. Underground work and concrete expected in April of 2004. The final construction package is foundations were poured in the generator yard. Layout expected in June of 2004. Design is estimated to take five and grading for roads and parking lots, including area months while beginning of construction is yet to be deter - lighting, began with import soil due to arrive March 1, mined. 2004. More Structural Steel was received and erection on Building B, including plumbing, bolting and welding DCR/Deslan of Barnett Linear Park and Flood Control nearly complete and steel corrugated deck laid in place pro J ect on the second floor. Steel erection began on the courts --- • and justice section of Building B/C and was substan- This project will involve the development of a Design Concept tially completed by the end of February. Erection of Report and subsequent design of Barnett Linear Park and Steel on Building A is scheduled to begin in early Flood Control Project. The project consists of utilizing the ex- March. Substantial completion is targeted for October isting Barnett Roadway alignment for a major outlet channel/ 2004. linear park from I -10 to the Santa Cruz River. A model of the project is located in the Town Hall for viewing. Status: The Town has selected a consultant and a scoping meeting has been scheduled. The Notice to Proceed should Northwest Marana Town Center, Roads. Infrastructure be issued in the first quarter of 2004 following approval of the and Offsite Improvements scope of work and contract negotiation. This project will design and construct the offsite utilities, roads, landscape, and other infrastructure and establish the layout of the main Town Center corridors. Status: During February, Conceptual Drawings for the extension of Marana Main Street north of Grier Road were received from WLB and are under review by Town staff. Excavation and installation of potable and non - potable water on Marana Main Street and Civic Center Drive began in early February. TEP completed the installation of new power poles and overhead power relocation on Grier Road to accommodate the new construction that will take place on that road. The old poles are to be removed after Qwest and Comcast complete their relocation. Substantial completion is tar - geted for the fourth quarter of 2004. Page 4 PUBLIC WORKS March 2004 Capital Improvement Projects In Construction The following are capital improvement projects in construction. • Linda Vista Boulevard Tangerine Road/fhornydale Road Intersection This project consists of chip sealing approximately 314 Improvements mile of roadway from Camino de Marina east to This project consists of roadway widening, intersection approximately Hartman Lane. modifications and signalization, and drainage improvements. Status: The construction contract has been completed Status: Southern Arizona Paving has been awarded the by Pima Paving, punch list work is in progress. construction contract. Construction is scheduled to begin in the latter part of March 2004. The design engineer, Tetra Twin Peaks and Scenic Drive Intersection Improve- Tech, will perform construction administration and the con - ments struction is anticipated to continue through September 2004. This project consists of relocating the current Scenic Drive intersection with Silverbell Road to the south to line up with Twin Peaks Road at Silverbell Road. This is a safety improvement that provides direct access to the future Linda Vista/Twin Peaks traffic interchange at 1 -10 through Twin Peaks Road. The project will include installing culverts, paving, curb and gutter, and signing and striping improvements. This project also has a wa- terline lowering and landscaping improvements. Status: The Notice To Proceed for construction was completed in October of 2003. Construction began mid October and is expected to run through mid April 2004. Tangerine Road - Breakers to Thornvdale Road • Improvements This project consists of drainage improvements and repaving of portions of Tangerine Road. The Town has decided to pursue a maintenance oriented program for the road and Tetra Tech generated construction plans for advertisement. Status: Southern Arizona Paving began construction in November 2003 with Tetra Tech as the design engi- neer, performing construction administration for the Town. Construction is anticipated to continue through mid April 2004. Page 5 PUBLIC WORKS March 2004 Recently Completed Projects Cortaro Road Improvements, Sllverbell Road to 1 -10: Completed February 2003 Wade Road: Completed February 2003 Continental Ranch Neighborhood Park: Completed February 2003 Coyote Trails Elementary School Park and Parking Lot Addition: Completed February 2003 Santa Cruz Corridor Trail: Completed April 2003 Costco Street Lighting: Completed May 2003 Sandra Road Bus Turnaround: Completed June 2003 Emigh Road Driveway at Marana High School: Completed June 2003 Cortaro Road Realignment: Completed July 2003 2003 Pavement Preservation: Completed July 2003 Coachline Boulevard Sidewalks: Completed October 2003 Ell Rio Park: Completed January 2004 i s Cortaro Road Improvements E ti 1 n.F Continental Ranch Neighborhood Park • m.m�mrrmmrmra m Page 6 PUBLIC WORKS March 2004 Traffic Division Report � � Cortaro Road Traffic Signal Coordination Study Speed Zone Studies on Ina Road and Thornydale In order to improve the traffic flow on Cortaro Road be- Road tween Silverbell Road and 1 -10, a study will be conducted These studies will determine whether the regulatory speed to determine how the progression of traffic between those limits currently posted on these roadways are appropriate two points can be enhanced. Kimley -Horn and Associates, based on the existing traffic conditions. The speed zone in conjunction with ADOT, will be reviewing the need to studies considered the current traffic volumes on these modify the signal phasing and timings at the Cortaro streets, the prevailing vehicular speeds, the accident his - Road/1-10 Frontage Roads Intersections. They will also be tory on both roads, and the existing access management looking at the need to improve the coordination between conditions on the roads. The result of the study revealed the signals at Silverbell Road, Arizona Pavillions Drive, that the 45 mph speed limits currently posted on these and at the 1 -10 intersections. It is expected that the study roadways are appropriate for the prevailing traffic condi- will result in a smoother and safer traffic flow along this tions. heavily - traveled section of Cortaro Road. Compliance Studies at Railroad Crossinas New Traffic Signal and Sign Standards Compliance studies are being conducted at the Union Pa- To ensure uniformity in signal design and sign installation cific Railroad crossings on Ina Road and on Cortaro at Town signalized intersections, we are working with Kim- Farms Road. These studies will determine how many mo- ley -Horn and Associates to develop new traffic signal and torists are stopping their vehicles on or too close to the sign standards. These standards will supplement the Pima tracks. "Before" studies will be conducted while electronic County Signal Design and Sign manuals which the Town variable message boards are posted advising motorists currently uses in the preparation and review of signal not to stop on the tracks. "After: studies will be performed Design plans and sign installations. We anticipate that the following the removal of the variable message boards to new standards will be ready in the near future and will see whether the boards themselves served as deterrents. help greatly to provide uniformity and consistency at our The long -term intent of these studies is to develop strate- signalized intersections. gies to reduce the number of motorists stopping on the tracks. • Juan Batista de Anza National Historic Trail Signs At the request of the Traffic Division, the Operations and Traffic Signal at Silverbell Road -Wade Road Intersec- Maintenance Division has recently installed auto route tion signs commemorating the Juan Bautista de Anza National A traffic signal study conducted at the Silverbell Road - Historic Trail, which traverses the Town. (The trail actually Wade Road intersection found that the installation of a stretches from Nogales, Arizona to San Francisco, Califor- traffic signal is warranted at that location. It is expected nia). Approximately 30 signs have been installed along that the signal will be designed during this fiscal year and Silverbell Road, Avra Valley Road and other roadways to will be constructed next fiscal year. The signalization help guide motorists who wish to follow the trail through should make this a much safer intersection for motorists the Town. exiting Wade Road, pedestrians crossing Silverbell Road as well as emergency vehicles entering the intersection Safe Routes to School Program from the Northwest Fire /Rescue District's station on Wade The Traffic Division has recently initiated a Safe Routes to Road. We are currently in the process of selecting an en- School Program. The program's goal is to develop educa- gineering consultant that will be responsible for designing tional, engineering and enforcement tools with which to the signal. help provide safe trips for elementary and middle schools students on their way to and from school. The program Warning Beacons at the Avra Valley Road– Sandario will develop a documented process so that those immedi- Road Intersection ately involved with the program (traffic engineering staff, A traffic signal warrant study was conducted at the Avra police, school administration staff, teachers and parents) Valley Road — Sandario Road intersection. The results of all understand the procedures and their respective roles in the study found that a traffic signal is not recommended at the process. Twin Peaks Elementary School has been the intersection at this time. However, in order to enhance chosen as a pilot school for the program. We have met the safety at this location, flashing warning beacons will be with the school's principal, the school's Police Resource installed on the Side Road warning signs currently posted Officer, and the Marana Unified School District's Director on the Avra Valley Road approaches to the intersection. It of Operations to begin the process of organizing a Safe is expected that the warning beacons will help greatly to Routes to School Committee, which will be responsible for better alert motorists about the approaching intersection. • overseeing this program. At this time the required beacon assemblies have been purchased and the project is under design. Page 7 PUBLIC WORKS i March 2004 Environmental Planning Projects Tres Rios del Norte Arizona Pollution Discharge Elimination System This project is a cooperative effort between the City This project was initiated by a federal mandate in which of Tucson Water Department, Pima County Flood Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Control District and the Town of Marana in conjunc- was given primacy. Six minimum control measures tion with the United States Army Corps of Engi- have been defined for compliance. The minimum con - neers. This purpose of this study is to evaluate ap- trol measures are as follows: proximately an eighteen mile stretch of the Santa 1. Public Education and Outreach Cruz River from Prince Road to Sanders Road for 2. Public Involvement and Participation projects such as habitat restoration, water supply, 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination flood control and recreation. 4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control 5. Control of Post - construction Site Runoff Status: The Town of Marana has prepared a com- 6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping ment letter to the Army Corps of Engineers on the 50% Draft F4 Document. These comments will be Status: The Town of Marana has actively been working submitted for inclusion into the F5 Document. The with PAG to get public involvement on a regional level. F4 conference is scheduled for November 18, 2003 PAG is working with local jurisdiction on the develop - in Phoenix. ment of an Outreach Connection web site. This site is being developed to enable water educators in the Tuc- Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area son region to share information about their outreach The vision of a National Heritage Area designation and education efforts. Pima Association of Govern- for the Santa Cruz Valley in southern Arizona is ments (PAG) and the University of Arizona's Sustain - gaining momentum due to a convergence of local ability of semi -Arid Hydrology and Riparian Areas efforts to conserve natural resources and open ( SAHRA) are working jointly on this effort. SAHRA has spaces; to preserve historic structures and archaeo- agreed to develop the web site, to host it on their site, • logical sites; to educate the public about the history and to provide technical support for the site. Each of and cultures of this region; to increase national rec- the participants will update their information on a regu- ognition of the region; to develop heritage tourism lar basis, so that the website stays current and use - and bring other economic benefits to local communi- able. PAG would coordinate the website users so that ties; and to improve cultural ties across the U.S.- the site is maintained and so that new users are in- Mexico border. formed about the site. This website will focus on water resources and water quality outreach and education. Status: The Town of Marana showed support of the application and designation of the Santa Cruz Valley The topic for the next Stormwater Working Group Heritage Area by passing Resolution No. 2003 -133 Meeting will be to develop a plan for regional outreach at the Town Council Meeting on October 21, 2003. and deciding what activities to pursue. The funds from PAG's Federal Highways Administration that may be used for this purpose must be spent before the end of June. Procedures are beginning to be development for resi- dent concerns, comments and requests for information. A scope of work has been developed for the mapping of the storm sewer system. Once the Town has an As- Needed Civil on board this scope of work will be given to the company for implementation. 0 Page 8 PUBLIC WORKS TOWN OF MARANA MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM DEPARTMENT REPORT For: February 2004 MADE EVERY DROP COUNT 4 Date: March 8, 2004 MARANA mil\ TOWN OF MARANA TEAM WORK — Is all staff working together in outstanding ways, with extraordinary cooperative effort to accomplish ordinary tasks TO: Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. Town Council Mike Reuwsaat, Town Manager FROM: Water Department Staff SUBJECT: February 2004 Department Report Update DATE: March 08, 2004 CUSTOMER INFORMATION 2266 Number of Customers Billed in February 84 Number of Disconnects in February 95 Number of New Connects in February 35 Number of New Services with Meter Installation 17,712,972 Total Gallons sold in February 30.15 Acre feet pumped (non -trust wells) Picture Rocks, Happy Acres, Palo Verde, Airport, Sky Diving Center, Continental Reserve and Hartman Vistas 29.22 Acre -feet wholesale water purchased (trust wells) Marana, La Puerta, Oshrin, Falstaff, Honea, and Cortaro Ranch (325,851 gallons = acre foot) • DAILY OPERATIONS 1. 210 Blue Stakes completed in February. WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS BEING NEGOTIATED 1. Repaired line break on Hartman and Cortaro. 2. Repaired water service on Grier Rd. 3. Repaired two poly service lines in Cortaro Ranch. 4. Repaired a mainline at Cerius Stravenue and Cortaro. 5. Repaired a mainline at Price Ln and Sagebrush. 6. Inspected water line installs for the Town Center, Gladden Farms block 11, Gladden farms Well and Studebaker Drive. 7. Coordinating approval of construction for the Gladden Farms Water System. 8. Potholed for 3 new services at the airport. 9. Tested 2 backflow devices. 10. Fabricated aluminum covers for all electronic flow meters. 11. Paul and Jerry went to the ASUA seminar for four days in Laughlin. 12. Sal and Mitch went to a disinfections class in Bisbee. 13. Planning the non - potable water system for the Town of Marana. OTHER 1. Purchase of Type II Non - Irrigation Rights for parks and other needs. 2. Managed Recharge Project is operational, credits are accruing. Recovery plan discussions are starting up. We will keep you informed of progress. 3. Pilot water treatment of Picture Rocks system is installed and operating. Will keep you informed as it progresses. 4. Non - potable system design stages is complete and is being presented to developers. For use in North Marana. 5. La Puerta well is in discussion with Cortaro - Marana Irrigation District. Possible trade, equipment well 36n for them. 6. Non - potable system and storage is in the discussion, and draft design stage, for the east side of 1 -10, from Tangerine Rd. to the Pinal County line. 2 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF M ARANA , 4 `7 INFORMATION AV � MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 1) TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL - FROM: Richard Vidaurri, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -23 Relating to public safety; authorizing the Town to take all actions necessary to receive highway safety grant funding through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety for a Marana Police Department traffic enforcement vehicle. DISCUSSION The Marana Police Department in an effort to minimize and prevent speed related traffic collisions and injuries, conduct investigations involving impaired drivers, and to enhance the overall traffic and pedestrian safety plan of the Town of Marana, is recommending authorization to take all actions necessary to receive highway safety grant funding through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety for a Marana Police Department traffic enforcement vehicle, including funding for overtime involving special detail enforcement. It is vital for the continued safety of the citizens of Marana for the Town to seek an additional traffic enforcement vehicle and related equipment for its traffic safety and enforcement unit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2004 -23. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -23. 0 H:\F'rankC\20040316 Council Mtge 3LU GOHS DUI Grant - MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-23 RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY; AUTHORIZING THE TOWN TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO RECEIVE HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANT FUNDING THROUGH THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY FOR A MARANA POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE. WHEREAS, it is essential for the Town of Marana, Pima County, Arizona, to include a traffic enforcement vehicle, and related equipment, to its current traffic safety motorcycle unit for the safety of the citizens of the Town of Marana; and WHEREAS, federal funding assistance may be available to the Town through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety's Fiscal Year 2004 -05 Highway Safety Plan for a traffic enforcement vehicle and overtime; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Town of Marana to seek funding through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety for a traffic enforcement vehicle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chief of Police of the Town of Marana is authorized to take all actions necessary or desirable to seek and obtain grant funding Town through the Governor's Office of Highway Safety's Fiscal Year 2004 -05 Highway Safety Plan for a traffic enforcement vehicle for the Town of Marana. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16' day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyl C. Broason, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney • H:\FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg\Resolution 2004 -34 DUI Grant.doc OWN COUNCIL TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 2 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Kevin Kish, Interim Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -24: Relating to final plat approval; authorizing the approval of a final plat resubdivision for The Gallery, Parcel 4A, submitted by Tortolita Properties, L.L.C., for a 32 -lot single family detached home subdivision on 31.55 acres located in the Dove Mountain Specific Plan Area. DISCUSSON: This application is being heard by Town Council with no recommendation from the Planning Commission as stipulated in the Dove Mountain Specific Plan, Development Review Procedures. This is a resubdivision of a Final Plat first heard by this Council on November 19, 2002. The owner has requested a resubdivision of the property , to add lots, reconfigure the street, and add some open space to the plat. The ro'ect is a 32 -lot subdivision on 31.55 acres. It is located in the Ba'ada portion P J J p of the Dove Mountain Specific Plan, north of The Gallery Parcel 3. It runs along both sides of Sunset Gallery Drive, and is surrounded by golf course. All of the applicable provisions pertaining to the approved land use within the Specific Plan are met in this project. The subject property is designated "LDR" (Low Density Residential) per the Dove Mountain Specific Plan. Minimum required lot size is 6,000 sq. ft., but the lots are much larger, showing the largest at 53,329 square feet and the smallest at 24,546 square feet, whereas the average lot size provided is 31,131 sq. ft. The project consists of lots 1 through 32 and Common Areas "A "(which is .47 miles of private road) and `B -1" through "B -6" (Landscaping, Drainage, and Utility Easements), which will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. All streets will be constructed to applicable Town Standards. All of the lots will be on public sewer. This project is subject to compliance with the Dove Mountain Conservation Plan regarding native plants, wildlife and other natural resources found at Dove Mountain. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of The Gallery Parcel 4A Reuubdivision. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -24. H:\FrankC\20040316 \Gallery Parcel 4A 2 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE FINAL PLAT RESUBDIVISION FOR THE GALLERY, PARCEL 4A, SUBMITTED BY TORTOLITA PROPERTIES, L.L.C., FOR A 32 -LOT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME SUBDIVISION ON 31.55 ACRES LOCATED IN THE DOVE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. WHEREAS, Tortolita Properties, L.L.C., is the owner of approximately 31.55 acres located north of Dove Mountain Boulevard, in portions of Sections 14 & 23, Township 11 South, Range 12 East, and has applied to the Town of Marana for approval of a Final Plat for that property, which consists of a 32 -lot single family detached home subdivision, including lots 1 through 32 and Common Areas "A" and `B -1" through "B -6 "; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that the resubdivision of the • final plat for The Gallery, Parcel 4A, meets all applicable requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that The Gallery, Parcel 4A, Final Plat, submitted by Tortolita Properties, L.L.C., for a 32 lot single family detached home subdivision on 31.55 acres located north of Dove Mountain Boulevard, in portions of Sections 14 & 23, Township 11 South, Range 12 East, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16 day of March 2004 Mayor Bobby Sutton Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney • H:\FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg\Reso re Gallery Place 4A TOWN OF MARANA MARANA Planning and Zoning Department •/ 3696 W. Orange Grove Road ♦ Tucson, AZ 85741 (520) 297 -2920 Fax: (520) 297 -3930 PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Variance 12r Final Plat ❑ Specific Plan Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Development Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Other ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Significant Land Use Change ❑ Native Plant Permit r ~r 2'-- - G Z ":DATA RE UIRED g Assessor's Parcel 218 -37 -0390 thru 218 -37 -0650 General Plan Designation Specific plan Number(s ) (To be confirmed by staff I Gross Area (Acre /Sq. Ft.) Current Zoning 31.55 AC/ 1,374,384 sf (To be confirmed b staff) Dove Mtn. LDR I Development/ Proposed Zoning Project Name The Gallery Parcel 4A Resubdiv. same Project Location Dove Mountain; Portions of sections 14 &23, T1 1s, R12e Description of Project 32 lot single family residential subdivision Property Owner Tortolita Properties LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Cor ration Street Address City State 14000 Dove mountain Blvd. Marana AZ Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E -Mail Address 85653 744 -2555 744 -3323 Contact Person Phone Number Art Powell Applicant Rick Engineering Company Street Address _ City State 1745 East River Road Suite 101 Tucson AZ Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E -Mail Address 85718 795 -1000 322 -6956 BPaton @Ricken inee iny. Contact Person Phone Number com � Bruce Paton Agent/Representative Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E -Mail Address Contact Person Marana Business License No. I E _ . A[1TH07iTI00E 1'R'��?1TER� i I, the undersigned, certify that all of the facts set forth in this application are true to the best of my knowledge and that I am either the owner of the prope r that I have been authorized in writing by the owner to file this application. (If not owner of record, attach en authorizati n rom the owner.) Print Name of A lican ent Si afore Date `' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. K N - O 51 -3 Date Received Receipt No. X 1 ,529 CRW No. Received By *ee Amount 3 . - ts� 09n2102 The Gallery ® Parcel 4A M A Al % N'A TOWN OF MARANA 7 \� 3 S FFS The Gallery A' Parcel 4A f. RX z 41 A v � � yy d I M r A resubdivision of a 32 -lot single family subdivision on 31.55 acres within the Dove Mountain Specific Plan. ©loot in evNemg Comm t p • y y � 1Y m �.7y•- •m�'�iZn � °y g29 �N� 1a�$ C H 0w D m yi'i >C ° y> 01�+lO >y -- y M r2$r� y QQ � C m < m i1N p ° n w m >m - rn CZ v yy +TrD_ p m > z D NrC . i_ I yyy O n N D ;_Z_ rN y y y y Zm Cy CO p Z o Vy>ZZ E D2 A m N RImzmZ _ mZ$ S/_ =Im m ) C CS_ err O O y �r Z y sc m gm� w <'ppl yD <O wC f1 \T > D �A D_Z �2Z �$ y y - O m } ► / . 1 . � I hi •4� A _.� Z vr. -{r Sym 2 m y ° VI ) ' s" p m y °O m < Vf1 ° �1 C N y0 T p r AO )�f >y N r ; ) r rt10 > z r 1 -1 O 6 FY m rt�r u m Dy= p m p =�mi i r -.: 0200 > Z to 1 y S 9 y -2A f _4 NyN X00 C m o m o m N III .T - C C C i ° m r o o K > y y214�p�� D p y� m i ; > � N i W9m yT $Y10 <C < >'U1 = ><Z ;I NC2 Z p Z 2 - Of O- 9SZ0> CIO �sOm 1 SN I1IG> $y C �O Oy Z� N A> C \ yl y_ mw Aa mS SCI �p N ° r2 p S =�i y TSO mDV1 p ° S D � NZ S_UO L >H C 2 .+ m O ANN ` �) m - °" R �y �m r m r > y ° C H/ 2toyn. fAI . m. O SrN< O �AZ C Z� < AZ. �O T_m i �f Z NNN U + > & zsw 2 !4 mN �=.1ry vyDf�l�� - IO =T ° - Zx <m >rm Z ' m 2 -IrO�' >12 r0� 1 NmZ c� mmm tm O $rm >-1• C > m_O S 09 7l In 9 i O 2r0 O A y C/ -` 2 r^ S S .. v i 2 mr O. ` N �CfmZw2 w N = yN m 'O ' y r2C 0 m r °m m9T !� >SC 1 }2 NS mmy r� rN Z.9 0 N_TmT ` �j� N� y y Z Y.1 77 >> � �l' 8 iy 0> p 00 < > w-c 'flrN y r m Nym rl�l 0 9 O y Or m pyp S . T I z�� m$Dpp Z2TyO O ~ I x +11 S 11H i7 / 22 StrO Y1 �m • mm ��Z <Cf O< 02 2� NK zS 11'IZ`S S •�a0 OG! DO 1/1 m �y■ n• W O�yCp,1� iCO > ° 90 T yyp pA >SmZD_�pN pppmT p 9 Z °_ °y> 00 m KD 9 a Z y p miTm "11 'pit 0 y g -ITS y�I�O y 2 p > D T N VCm1 m1w yy �i fZ I�m T >yS1 mi G C 2 ZN y ZZ O - lY l y C r p LL >m i CjT s2r x 0 1 NZ iw 9 1 1 1 1 Ir N mil« 7 f N N Y1 O Z am H y9_ y r.. mm rC>pTpNyy `y'Ay 2 y pp. Tz y >r - W °Cg§ y< ' i/ Nrppt11N 2pp ^ m y W W y N: :02 . - 2 T Z r m�0 m.1 Z m m v i wp �1 zd ° r �m m OwS OsD -y Z m m Ip 1 N $oty N 2y 0- •Ni'fmdw m %D$ y0 y S ARM p A m m Zm 2 >m p O N9 �y NO 2 S X.S A y > R A y'a y S�. ib rmp 9N_ N21 ; m l Mm m 0 i _ •C. V C - T 1 �0� ; �D < f mS 0 H m ! •.. m �1 N S mmp mNz�.< z. T _ Z Il/ff p N w NS_O yOTTO y•+S �A =I C O'$$ m K ON r Cf w w w O p r yym Zm 8 rm mCf00m N� u l�il� G Zyl� N) O)2 p 01y1A to A� > m > y °�1 ` +D O O K a0 mw Cl >i70`1 70 y2 GOm� ° TS m Oyy ' .0r T i7 O z N r Sm 9 O+ A� Zw rS . .. N y m J y OA rO >-1 Z m0 m Zr S y� 2 yy Q <-i m r O+ t't Cf W ul y `I C�rrmw2SG1 >1<nS � SR C 1Or mO Z A 1 ar w m y 0 1r Z$ -4 C 1 m y +D p m > m -Im r -11 Sr rm ) ; S T m `( SCI N O> -I r m > p y p i lp ll s 20C - p i yf mm ll 0 mwS =z'Yl mmy �p�p C<< r z mT {II ,y Zz mN KS T o m 3 r rn 0 Ox $m z�O-Iy$yppO ZO >r0.pp9 ffmyny m2� 2TCC r Z wO mT C mm = mm O° � N � . y mi �� W >_ V1 w +1 A� 9 yfn 2'llry zzz �mZ>�O Tm S m m �pp p Z.�r [ O• y l w n m V1'� t RI + v_m OZ <D mT> T< m ° - 1 $ A -�i' C T l! CC wr$s w m i•� mm � � ~ K ° m m r $ mm MA or $ � A H X1 C� Sm Yp - l ma mO 7 O< yC Ir'w Cfm m y a myOm y _ �l T rr •'NCy yRl O w. �Snp 9 VNi - MM p NI + r0 m 2 �0T 0 0 01 H ' l'f y1 �- m S00 >s ' m T. N°O m m C mm 2TT� MC rNr ••y m i lr��T.1j p ea�In l _ �_r m $ p o yy =Z �d > m $ M R r i � w :�! A 2yH = C9°2S Z< < «< C� =NC Rl y N m O3i n mZ� �1 'O I 0 '..' < 1 y 2 H>Q m S y m ) yy ppp >y $ C x mx 4A'�Z Oy mlry wq O m Oym �Im s p w +1 1 r2N= K w O S, =I I fr/I O SrN- '� ao 111v _zw$ r wmT m O N � r pbo ¢ cmz+ of� S 0 7 m2m C W _ A n` Z _ A S 'n ill y 10 °i =+IN2 G7 Zo low �m ~ m r rn M 1 3m- O _ I�'Ts Z � � r m a ' a 3w $$� a 9az w �; 1. —I am m w 9n> -------- •------ - - - - -, O Ld a T ` I I g I..I r �7 �.r . � --- ...-- . - - - - -- 1 _ a ga l N _ I 1 dd l3 Y 1 - rr - - = j rn m m v w m uwl m 1 A pq " I �' cn m 1 1 n - 41 a c Ta` vin I:I ; •n p m i O v Cll 1 0 21 x r p p •�-� l am' 1 1 �n 1 °m z m w / C °_ m i CD i `II � `1 s N 1 1 ,p IV 1 'C_ 1 a ?c ^ 3.n z 31 "+ s ,� LTl m �t ��F I C4 ° A I p , '° ° Q CLER u ' 5 = m �' -_ 1 0 1 A Y �R�V Z = C -l vl f I N 30 L l� M N I f w H�33 to ) 1 J % `Q S I A� 'ry A a 1 l0, fur > a 1 Z u gg ^' b. In I - - - - - -- -- - --d in z iri u Cl, m r"li X N 1 w u�i z m ra 63 -< - u �•.(� 1 I I -A � A s f 0 i --- - - - - -- - Cft al Y �+1 oay • A P wxr � w$�r C) I N+ It = r � y 3 ��� Q'• g A � yy m � I I p roY i" y I fl �C-i mC • 2 �. N �_ y <� i�r S yZllir m � � < 2 ° p m wy v O -� +rw•1 Qim v 3i �1�10SO i°l A i y � '0 1 m FE m S y S 9 D m s m __ yarp� Z $. m u+m •900° C r $< ma, ® t� m + - zm y= �O �f�rmi I m w n v Iil C �r H \ 3 m v > m o m o Aim go � yy w Atte �]'w °m 3y �0. IZII Cm / a � !l � g• � o O K 201 O T 2 N N> MW m s z m I y z m i M •O w w ! .-�'e, _ O I'Y O m IP .9 O 7D }gt O S N O < ym I In F��O w nc3� =r mj C Iw o r v C p � m N .I ` � •Ot $ J � rl $i v > j � Ip '►'1 W lcsnI B OOK PAGE C-209 A4 Engh[d9 m11p>ry J \B sp, ' 9 t3 m d m - H \\ \\ CR \ W m r \ I °�� o •�,� N co p> , '•93 N 01 1 360.60' 114.12' 197.47 163.13 a N Co CL m \ \ Fl3I 0 >� 13SNne A. �� d �� � A� S' �,de•. � , ��d+ � 690 • HIV a -4 W o �i � '�o •• so ' � � 47 Z71 i Z6�E6. FL9q �? CAl tTl b q p z k $F a l l qAt L F (Al F H y 1j .9I. .._ • 9ll'li ` • G q `�' •� w w v \\ ♦ W ( N • a a � ro •* r r0 � N S r' b N m a u -- 1] io r - ` C > C � m $� 01 m m O�� �m V _ y _° im Mn I -' OO V ° s cw 'D s BOOK PAG i - - - — I I i oc = as elm awvy Gim Ft r •FL9 ~� � � � ` FL 1j r 4 w Yl�i v + + � � J2j 2 • •'`••. � o m •,�... _ e u n • � H m J27 2) n m • a + e � O v ± r ' w � -•1 L 1 y tlC •. a + +\ l2 p• 19' H /titi 4..09.' a N 15 114.72' N 01'3 1 1 3 63 1 N C, N \\ 0 Y at °a te w to Xg CL N T O d Y V % VII N�� � F�, �• W � FS 9y �; r� O m ; O N A �` I" B9 N c 9 y 5 In ( asNns o : ' • 1N r�9p, (do 8 CA A'Aa N m \S F`' a . L35 t51 CS2 ` 3 s. pf. ` fiU11 a a wi "v Q a N S 21.4 9 C4 4 T I •, O y m r N h co to in ' 7 1 /66 \\ — -' — // 55 1j VS F C53 • — BV�i \ \ ± O W F L6g \ 136.50' 136.51' FL 52 •• FLSf AC14 6 O, L47 N L911 _ 1 . S 00 52 M 353.51 s I a i a Z 1j .. °�'+ p a � ♦` O 3- FL63 9 \ 50 LOiV•00 N 1 I I z 1 2T 1 A � x T a � T 11 -C3 Ga 2N - - t rrL O I w > csto m a�M r l i , sQ�m > a == o Q O a N R[mv J m � C NT • BOO P AGE i 1 0202 ft p o ' " Camay r �_ r'- � �_ j�_ �_ �r'- �_ � �_ ����r"- eT- �r"- ����r�- �rT- ���'• �= ���r= r�- r�- ��rT- ���rT- r�-'- ��i- r�- r= r�• r� 1 ��'= ��������������rT-�r� -���i- W ei- t= ��r= ���r����r= �_f_�_� rT- �i= �r��1r 1 - o O ppppOpp00p O bO�lAw)WN�O1 VO +OfOOrTt�llj WN + 01 P Om JTV WN ObO omwa WN+ OPP+ �PNAWN +O.O�JOWfNJ•Ww +OiN00�PtNi�i WN +O.ObJO.wa WN +Obb.IPwa WN+ O O�IbwaWN +0100 rbITa WN +S } a 222 [. 2 T.1 22ZYZZ2222a2ZZ pp 2Z222222 NNNNNNNNNNN2Nf /�1AN{N�,..I1NNNNppNNCpNN wppN t/NwfANNN NNNNNNNN222222 Z822ZZN2ZaZ22ZZ2Z22 C2p Gp 22 O 2 p 2ZZZ2Z2222f I r 1is1 OQ�pp •�11N .4 i i i�v PT.2 .1 Oe+ �. b • 1 �t +1 +VW14a qt w ilt w i • 10t:b�O P • e 6 o : + p iON p N mo °c) �wwowtwr•1mN0004a�wg �O�W1 + pp T Ctb NIDWOt N� +N . . . O © 'J� q ONwbbtOa N + NW Nam WI TmP bw aqA + A pp lwjl{aj1NN.laNO�NYaaONJWa•N WN aNmO t 1D� _ _ _ _ _ Nt08 �IaTQ i 10A00NNOA at SIN N + =i - S N 1 - - - - - - IW ?NTNWTW WbNN + N8m NT 0 +a+ 9 I l _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . _ O _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - - - 111 - D )aa +awNa +A +w + +O +W WNNO +wNWpOw W) +W WtTNOaaaw aw W000 Wp Owa AwwwN + + + +p >aOAONW +w W + +Oa +NNNNNi5r .. N+ NWaw)WWNA�.'afYtYOw1M' pwwtll n N sN ;b + +pbOwp +10 i i i a ii+iww ;NQ1 ;O ;Np :PNP O00 ; ............... a .... i i i a . a .. .. i ii0000 -� X10 100 �Sb ;�m ; :P-• em O;m e s ii i0 i a SN+ + ~ iR1ZE =In1 RI rt11. 11 1 11 1 1RIrt11 1 1TInf.11n1.'Ii =1 TTI11TTR11n1111 Zi am ZZ b ZZ Z Z Z Z2i b1 ZI*, R11n 1.111Ii ZiA/1n1 Ziiil.lAi R1R11T11 1811. R1T1.tA1 rtIT![ifl11.11 R11nii(1 R11 Z Z �aA +w +W ma JA WNw AwaaN+ +Nab +W)Wpp jPtOa NN + +W +aPa -.1Wb WW + +W + + +a + +NNN� aWOlw))NNNrw N) +N N +41 +W +Nw <W +rNW1.�N+1+1rN A1�p�aPNWT)Wwp� N 00010wwW bP0lONmbW +a +)m�100 1 0?.NO . 0lmpwaw01P +01DONa1010a W�10Y1 Oe 2121 Y1 �1 �1N +OpJ -10b0 W10 +rOfOb Wb APP0. 00+ �100f100f11b0+ bYl+ tMmwb 1 + Oa +.Iw + +1oa �Ibb +w +�Gw App Jm as +N ++ NAwOaaabW m +m �10010JW10bp ArW p +w +N{J101010Wp W +N10+ ANPW+ A�IW +b ab �1PN{�,1Wt/1N10NaAp w N WN +bA astJ�[J�N .11Daw - +b0110NwN +NN WOb�1NWONwbW+1 a1 010r {pNO)awbblOwWOWN +10 + +mwa- .14maN �101411'W�1- �A01 +w TfD +WV +NwaNp�10+NNOOT�IW +�I�INNP)W Ob01MNtObw10NTW �1D^�IDO -`N ?O Ww01•J +N+ O r Z Oy01 SYN+ Z M 30 '111 =Zy ZN pN p pNpZZpp r- t +�O $yN1�1NWp Z ■.. r + $WYINN PN Z WI b N N + N M _ O ) t N 1 2 r a F U w•w�utn ° 1 -l p O IZ ?*� rQ. � aO�A• Z -d W I `� \ e 7 5 ma \\ F •° c6 >. � z (Al CR b \ \ • •b Fl7 2 ^� va vl Pt _ s N �O • ) 4 w w H� W ` \'• •• FC �� W 7 h fAl � �'^ � W �. , • ?), ?l 511. a c G3 X' 2 E c o P it t3 7 •L �'�l��a .o •A .n c m tA g In til N .tx 1 g ' I �f076338•E 1 55.71' 0 28'36- R,43T7.SY ci C14. l u C- i u N 07.16'x• E i1 a ` 1 61.96' C1 p= 10'93'15' C2 N _ m M �T1=I4 _ -_ _ n--�-_ _ - _ G1 x 5 0 7 . 16 37 101.1 w (PRIVATE STIffiET) CA A 20T5t3 Sf Q �� -- ` L1E 1 �l { L'066.17' 0 10 W R4422.50' Ga f � f• � �' a b `a d+ YII � ` ►TI o� � � rnd d r :� .�• r N'H ON W N > ''3 o F � S� ? � p cV1 S • • uNi y�� ! -h (Ai ••�, w r� �'r 4� z y 3 O N • ,� po w I Lo � �?g s �. • FC7j fi � r (!1 � � •• o��s � i� yr rn N to c -{ s W sn O 0% M 1 FCgS to -1 INn$ N (Al FL6_3 �E calyd^� ' om n ^ i� n 3' n 6i. N. ffiS u n S1 Y 0o'• NY1 L' wN�om�G. N. aw� n ".. E N ;F +w' 8f3£3A1 a .'i: + €i �+ AouP; 1' Pa'a;,�1'w� =` `' oNP•+ N) � 1 P<Z r ONi+ �PPNi q��E3 "dS�� di�.a.eY�oS &ea 6 i Ba'o RR�am�3= a Z P8r'oom�lol"�S$ SYrYNSSi3$3gNS $ ° m= ; ..kk . �E'8`cC'PS$Pow�i� auYfBPG3uP "oB �we� Z $00 � 2�� a 'P636.B6'•_ a .Nw�B S�8$ 1;- $N�eww`S•Yma.d Yoo "-Pi �. Neadwd 6 :kY3�'L'►75�L ° -md �w'omN o I ;M m m Ns�NN M M °131 $F1 S aY8u uPY me$8» +oE. a m -1 < �� � b Na � ♦ w 9_W w 198 Wss g88888g88888•a' pa P+ww� r m BOOK PAGE i y l TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA , DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 3 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Kevin Kish, Interim Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -25 Relating to final plat approval; authorizing a final plat for Gladden Farms Block 3 on approximately 11 acres, consisting of an 81 -lot single family residential subdivision in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately a half mile west of the new Lon Adams Road DISCUSSION: Gladden Farms Block 3 is located within the Gladden Farms development. The site is located directly south of Moore Road and approximately a half mile west of the new Lon Adams Road, within Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East. This Final Plat consists of 81 single - family detached home lots on 20.84 acres. Included in this subdivision are Lots 1 through 81 and Common Areas "A -1" to "A -5 ", "B -1" to "B -2" and "C -1" to "C -3 ". This project is zoned R -7, which requires a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet. The smallest lots are at 7,410 square feet and the average lot size is 8,183 square feet. This project has the potential to contain both single and two -story homes. Currently, no model plans have been submitted for this subdivision. Gladden Forest has done the platting on this Block and will sell the platted lot to an independent builder. The maximum height of the two -story homes will be 25 feet. The subdivision is limited to 30% or three two - story homes along Gladden Farms Drive and three two -story homes along Moore Road. General notes 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 address the Town Council concerns with regard to height and aesthetics. These notes restrict the overall number of two -story homes to a maximum of 50 %, with no more than two consecutive two -story homes adjacent to one another or on comer lots, fence returns placed near the back of the homes to allow for more front yard landscaping, no two homes with the same elevation or color scheme shall be permitted adjacent to one another and the plat must abide by the amendment to Title 5 of the Land Development Code Section 05.10.11.G. The necessary Avigation Easement for Block 3 has been accepted by Town staff and will be recorded with the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -25. H:\FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg \Gladden Blk 3 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-25 f A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING A FINAL PLAT FOR GLADDEN FARMS BLOCK 3 ON APPROXIMATELY 21 ACRES, CONSISTING OF AN 81 -LOT SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 11 EAST, DIRECTLY SOUTH OF MOORE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY A HALF MILE WEST OF THE NEW LON ADAMS ROAD. WHEREAS, on D ecember 4, 2001 the Town of Marana adopted Resolution 2001 -155 approving the Final Block Plat for Gladden Farms, Book 55 Page 60; and WHEREAS, Gladden Farms L.L.C. is the owner of 20.84 acres within the Gladden Farms Block 3 boundary generally located in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately a half mile west of the new Lon Adams Road; and WHEREAS, Gladden Farms, L.L.C., has applied to the Town of Marana for approval of a final plat for 81 single- family detached home lots on the 20.84 acres, including lots 1 through 81 and common areas "A -1" to "A -5 ", "B -1" to "B -2" and "C -1" to "C-3"; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have considered the application at the regular Town Council meeting held March 16, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that the final plat for Gladden Farms Block 3, meets all applicable requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the T own o f Marana, Arizona, that the Final Plat for Gladden Farms Block 3, submitted by Gladden Forest LLC for an 81 -lot subdivision located directly south of Gladden Farms Drive and approximately a half mile west of the new Lon Adams Road, in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16 day of March 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney HAFrankC\20040316\Resolution Gladden Block 3.doc Gladden Farms Block 3 Final Plat MARANA CASE NO. PRV -03051 TOWN OF MARANA Town Tow Park /. � ,Hall ark BARNETT �> I r Farm Field Five im Subdivision 2 L MOO • • ' Block 4 Subject Property `•; •: • BIOS r Block 3 �•. ::• ",•;:; r j Honea Heights a N A 800 0 800 1600 Feet REQUEST A request for final plat approval of an 81 lot single family home subdivision on Block 3 of the Gladden Farms Development, within Section 34, T11 S and Range 11 E. ®gem fu n o - com pppp po pmyy p po p V r�p1 po w N ♦ W NO •.I w w a u N �I ; Z t Iq �!� wN�r..1 y y A-f Sr > S S i S f.1 i 7 R i ll Ilia ��_a s �a � - M� RISK n 2 p . A _ �r .�" p N yY. p � R � > >r o o > Q p p N � y .�N p _ s ,�l �N _0 �1 So 9 1 r w 'O � Z�� � �'.•.�� �f� ygN =yS� � �+1 .+ i 1g �Iwg � N 4 � H wrlA � y ~ r �� r N > N $ =gym m�e : -� I > is �> i� :� � 3F�2pi�o _ G� 'a' .w o N �" s> r R iiiLirzaRa.-�c �•- � $ �p�ws N.c `. $'.•= r � $ l� Q � sr 1 .. - e�ws > v S AS ~ � 9 7i w `►�'T[� � Z 54;; -. -A 3g r Z < N a °•i a f3 � ni a - a Q Z . s a ° < = p yy ` �Qy51 l y G p$ �_In 1.1 �C •� �'�1 y ^' "t'� 1�1`w. R1 $ AaIO N riTi' �� S N O tea fn r N N In `� p ° r � CIA Al�� -' �g +.y > s,r y NC Qp" O O yN w4bVbb�.O1yNMMM=s� �E fO pr K -y Hr = y�/eey�tt� = t �ypr > 1 ~ S y' y� `l " p � > Iq �j �1 l�Ir r�i '.I ' T K N y 0 15 I.I � $ ,i„ N_ G O Z N y IF 1R y 4 Ill i � r $ �"�� �$" "$ •� i" '5 5 K Z$ N \y KKK O 3. III ���111 a 1�.1 O s r T f p Q >° r ... N rR fI1T� �> w . M � c 5S = f y N +� a p riz N � u `� ' $� ' VTo '�'N� 8• �" -4 �3's— c A y e rM rR Ti pp� - T r N _ s Q � , y s �� All f�f1{ y 1 ; ooNyp ti �. +yyl H ~�� I�r r Z e� sOi x .'30 ~" �1Np1 y rs N��N���= SZ � p��- �� � ��� � `�'Q�•� a "C �0�� -�N � s ��Z r� >1 /� r_ ` � pr ��YyII1 (/N� � \M y� �vNNNN'mm y N p y�'l .*�1 Zy.y $ 8 �QQsi . i0_i T '•1 fi � p: I Q mi ` �r7Os r �N N• �� y � H r. KH �1 > £ y � w > Oi I�1• S . < Cm1� V M � V � � �• > s a °� ���� } "� • "` � �_� �� Q � $C ~� � w - Z �� 0If_ �gQ� s 666 p y p ]yam y I p y� $y!�� Y s oil 3 .2 Q ayz �W e`� i Ni• M-1 o� mi '„ �A�?�� _iTMw AI i N _ y� fr V fi ��'�� s/ � f � i 9 Off w1 �y `... 1�5 w N � '" INm 19 is A M RM $r ego Bra p" U i �v ^ O N' P Sys aN Z xg Hop �� mood =� s »_ o c� SRI ; - $ N p n # o � � sN11 K xx_ 0 851 i; 4' >i o S$ q� Z a " F h Q$ 40 �='w�r_ Ig N � lei a -rim .. . ' _ iTf r�� �' F 8 T� y � � � wallix 'n'� �Nt• r�0> O n `2 - � D yr �7{ 7R > ¢ y _ �j jg j � a ;_ y $ a _ � p a r 0 st x . C7 w / 2 N1.1 rI' r _NXam II o f N a l .�� g p q- j jAjVq FR IV ! 'Ro �� 9 $� _ N �n �no`Q. r Rc !� ris VR~ -' 'fit >$I u-c i l 1 2 1 ~ p a �_� 1 1H i � 0 p 9F LS °� 3F °�$ o yp j'�� �� W � J I I r JN i a 0 t ee c po • ►r'i}�� 1 310 9 1 CD o M DFU $ M 4c $ > ♦ ��� w N W OD ot f9 M = < x " � 0111 k 1 " a ` . "d . �WA � iwc $ 0 2Rl C C7 AAA �4f�t� eZ�N � A.� �r � . � �� > • p � La Eva x 40 1 AMC .� _7 y� 1�1 1 M�'� ` f �� T i Z v _� ff 2! r r T f • • ice' \ - ^~ NN •t 1b0• 11 AN O Cl yy ~ z �Nn e � A l j �~ IQ P i Nil O 1 �Iq X_� 1_ -� N 10 • p m > Irsq� I Q ICI m $ Q " ° .:A! M OC • � $ s � Ln$ ov ►y g a a 21, ` -f° 3231 '"v • � o rc ~ gyp' I " Q r pe N Y> 40 Ip. -9 A .. 77 Oc am iu t O / 111 f t Yi \ r I (jt t- d Y ca m i L, g \ ' a 1 � � 1 � u,1� ,6C'11611. f , LO P. AN _ MS9,w.CN " r1f, a dam h. R ''�t•� �� i $ 1 �, — - {•�i3' --� � ` °b ' a. � , t� sir .•' i . 'f 111Qppp O W �i, N+ ELI a � Q •� \ u M N P T Y \ QD O w Y►13 ss,lo.ss I ► ". _ CIE w•ru 3.ss,►o.ss I '_ I ,w•r ►►� ,00,aN $ ,1o•r t 3,ao,00.oN i � g N N 8 N y r � p 1x ,ix ( �i I ,t: ,t2 I JN VP W f t Mb ,I O♦ W Ie� , I N v u — _ w CA "C-2 1560 SF 3 - GDfw to 9l IlIMI yo . sc to.sc t 13HMLS I j I N MAN �[ - — W rTr y' 1 - -- ;+ i J011 3.00 opm v � • t ► � P„ � ^' � � I i N � D u ni y ry ( W01 US, N °-C Y Y Y �� I ► b i _ z Ili A. S y N 4 M NN H L' I CA RB-2m 4w SVIL Iva IIII I ii Q SS ►7 NA1!!t! y�1NtA0 / � J i133WT ,0!• "1 3.00,OO.OM. Q I I 9}3 ,► LL a q tx OSt 1 SL 61S 14 NA N r 91 \ �`wQ ,5 1 1S•L�SK 1S �i'' —�. i ` ` , . i N .0 \` ; ' -11'w Z9'CC t!•CS 00 ,01'to U'Stt L001WAN lei 3 ►S K.OS_ •d / � �= 4 ° � � 4y .19 'c1C OD,OO.pI ,9xt R (it ta t3 A U4 mg s a s� moo �s » A > .� i y:JA ! I P f.y 0 CA rr _rrrrr��rrrrrrrrrr NNN`My AJII� . t !� YYN ��y7.' , NaW Nr HM MNH NH N NNN N � f'�SW4r 7y1� t 11 1 `` � Z O�IAMa WNrpY �IbN�WNr z ^.~ lrRt�+IV 7 _ Q Z q NZNZZZ ���1 la l =ZZ=NN2N NZ ZZNZZ ZZ2MZ=NNNN ZNZN=N= � g� Ob00,1 y� a� S i F y ` �� � • y T � Q � ' g y " p L , ' y 4 ': � = T�L4 i'YI �.'�iB�R� '. ' � N /� `( iNM�f1.MNNN oMNr 3V iy�� {" '� OO a +pN �N NN y� N C l Ci' ` �' pppp ee oop • {{,,�, . �pp • yy�� • .{� Z b NO p N{1'Y�W pNpNH wyilO WsNO N ; w.1..... yy J O MWSNN��iM 'r+ { Z bt.'e Qi YQSNWyB wO +N w�li Z, '; A RRRIII s W \1 \� mw,fLnm�mmm a mfi �+rmfmfmi !a ilfm� mm�fLn�i�im f�rhimam g Z ' A ` Z s �� � � S �/� ` i �/. , AiTi�b."+ N ip ON O + "' 0.►00+ 04 1rs�0i�1 N O vY1 b•.I�N N�tY.IO{II y O � C p>s w rHS qq i NO ass ..IS OWoiSaS��1 ���Ib..,�1 ', NY1 + O 8w � aN V N NN+IWT $888$8 BOOK PAG y 4 �� JOMj{INr O. Y$ . IOVIafINSHV��ISOSO• 1�N� Wi�i�b' �e'l �wu�au� .J•Or������N +SM�Jw�afYN +��yO ��Y�i�WN +p�i y�fi � +� +�Y0 X11 M.�WNrp SJSNa�N+ � A R. C a � ' N 3` py{ a � y Y �y � ly w � wr p u'7C � ri y R y Yi { : a + { ' � {�1 .' � :.:` T S L� i y . � � uku ' � p ��".'R'��. i ' p t p i't' + S ° Jfl a lajj��w ' 1 i ,1 Jpa iI00ZO� P,r ;,Y3ititRStBppiR�RititRStSt$ NagSY3 °`3' r.Hw +04Q�Q�N�nNY�w0.0� Qa 4�1y 4waf V' ii+ aiYWwSldal "M��Os + +{iii'i�NOwY�N Y".: xo �� 'bwf5 Y33fdF3$„ $ Y� �f�7CS88�bi8S�8888S885Z �8'L i;fd`5��� `��'3�� �`r.�8o �I . ........ � �`�.... Z f NrNYJ 0 0 �O{�y1N W .V y iwpa Z p T�.' p ssia STSTCTZ�s� r WN a ONSMt pSSSS�ppSp�4�pp14 y00 Y,pepsvt Va, ` .�pppSy1r��.� O . 1Y�N � VI1NNO ±O.N0 pp 0 I 0 I�ff Nw �l y { V {�1����pp JW + + p�p��N Y 1�� i y J y1 .ai ,��11a 0 a p {{//Oppp VMMNZ 0 1 , Mt�NH ryV { ++a S F. p iyJH±HOp�p OHOHOsOHOPOJ •SOW H +i WyyJV +JJ�I +JWNHO V4iTMWWl11 rNtIN�Sr Np rNf/ +4VIJW iNJ.1_1aySNSrS$Si > p1� ww t�/ y� �� 1p� pp 1�� 1 q� y p }}pp��pp __pp ++�� y{/�� O .�11 yyy yy��yO�{{�1�IppO�N N + ♦♦JyO11 I10 O NNV 4 N W + N a w y j 1>• rMNQ1,. . . . . . +{. . . . . .. . aTNNta11NYNf�Yair:�VM����Vf��O V�1�0 0000��{ 1111 + +.N.� N .I V4 us sssssssss sag ssgssss s sssHHSHSsssgsss $ aHSHSs sass sasass�ssssss�ss$ssssHssH sssssgsssH .... ... 8g$ss8ss8s D X b 03 0 sc uc ass,w C3 pq SS AA ic IN f � '- � • try"' _ � e � t f J � .• �� ♦sue L._� � -- --- � - S st,w.ss I � LZ �� � u.•rrl ►.s tr. .o � � t►a I. '' � � rtta • t � two •ru sc,w•ss it Is Ab 940 X . Iry ea io '�, � 'b� .ani �" ; *� �' � w.ss tt at•lonrt � S W O X Z+ 0. $ 8 0 8 S q` T � s` s � N D \,► u � \� \ 6 fi S vs- i _ b to y b $ fib Ut Avg m fail N m p w� AAA s $Nei ao ar � 1 1 P - N N R- p 4CIT s A 35t'JI."4il3r'S +: C = ♦ M r N w ry t�, 3 '� �\ ♦ (h M b rq � ;i A �. � � ♦ ........ W� �' '� � \ . � b W 1 >. .� �'�'.I'i�'�i3'�Y,w:1��L' 4 44 . A z • r 8Y:S1R:3i84�� S S .... A A gS88H$HHSHB ' rn tJl - -- - - BOOK PAG 1 TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 4 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Kevin Kish, Interim Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -26: Relating to final plat approval; authorizing a final plat approval for Gladden Farms Block 4 on approximately 15 acres, consisting of a 47 -lot single - family residential subdivision in Section •34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately one -third mile west of the new Lon Adams Road. DISCUSSION: Gladden Farms Block 4 is located within the Gladden Farms development. The site is located directly south of Moore Road and approximately one -third mile west of the new Lon Adams Road, within Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East. This Final Plat consists of 47 single- family detached home lots on 14.91 acres. Included in this subdivision are Lots 1 through 47 and Common Areas "A -1" to "A -6 ", "B -1" to 6 B -2" and "C -l" to "C -2 ". This project is zoned R -8, which requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. The smallest lot is 8,524 square feet and the average lot size is 9,329 square feet. This project has the potential to contain both single and two -story homes. Currently, no model plans have been submitted for this subdivision. Gladden Forest has done the platting on this Block and will sell the platted lot to an independent builder. The maximum height of the two -story homes will be 25 feet. The subdivision is limited to 30% or three two- story homes along Gladden Fames Drive and three two -story homes along Moore Road. General notes 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 address the Town Council concerns with regard to height and aesthetics. These notes restrict the overall number of two -story homes to a maximum of 50 %, with no more than two consecutive two -story homes adjacent to one another or on comer lots, fence returns placed near the back of the homes to allow for more front yard landscaping, no two homes with the same elevation or color scheme shall be permitted adjacent to one another and the plat must abide by the amendment to Title 5 of the Land Development Code Section 05.10.10.G. The necessary Avigation Easement for Block 4 has been accepted by Town staff and will be recorded with the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -26. h:\FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg \Gladden Blk 4.doc MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING A FINAL PLAT FOR GLADDEN FARMS BLOCK 4 ON APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES, CONSISTING OF A 47 -LOT SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 11 SOUTH, RANGE 11 EAST, DIRECTLY SOUTH OF MOORE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY ONE -THIRD MILE WEST OF THE NEW LON ADAMS ROAD. WHEREAS, on December 4, 2001 the Town of Marana adopted Resolution 2001 -155 approving the Final Block Plat for Gladden Farms, Book 55 Page 60; and WHEREAS, Gladden Farms L.L.C. is the owner of 14.91 acres within the Gladden Farms Block 4 boundary generally located in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, directly south of Moore Road and approximately one -third mile west of the new Lon Adams Road; and WHEREAS, Gladden Farms, L.L.C., has applied to the Town of Marana for approval of a final plat for 47 single - family detached home lots on the 14.91 acres, including lots 1 through 47 and common areas "A -1" to "A -6 ", "B -1" to "B -2" and "C -1" to "C-2"; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have considered the application at the regular Town Council meeting held March 16, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that the final plat for Gladden Farms Block 4 meets all applicable requirements.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that the Final Plat for Gladden Farms Block 4, submitted by Gladden Forest LLC for a 47 -lot subdivision located directly south of Gladden Farms Drive and approximately 1/3 mile west of the new Lon Adams Road, in Section 34, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16` day of March 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney H:\FrankC\2004316 Council Mtg \Gladden Blk4.doc A. Gladden Farms Block 4 Jim MI Final Plat MARANA � ['I CASE NO. PRV -03052 TOWN OF MARANA J t � Town EPark Hali /'0 i — ---- - - - - -- BARNETT -0 0 Fam, Freya Five " �M Subc ivWon MOO RE Block 3 Block 5 - -j , Subject Property 0 o { Block 4 ( M Honea Heights i N A 11 800 0 800 1600 Feet REQUEST A request for final plat approval of a 47 lot single family homes subdivision on Block 4 of the Gladden Farms Development, within Section 34, T11 S and Range 11 E. O r y » N j Y N r � » • H • V1 � W N O ERR R . 17i R< R il R �i R g# ° " S = Z i --9� R S $ N � a��l g$ o N A $119A r $ A r rs y sr ° R� E -4 AM 3 1 141° Q ''�"• '� 5 1( � � � HIM Rw �.3 if�'riR�RR r � � airz M = � `" 8 R Pf F p A� gyiass p Q � - + a� . ■ M M r r •� ;ii�i>w'•�f� ��� =Q �� �e ���3$ r `° -t s • � pQQ Aj � A K{. ` `. �n Q¢ ��-`• �� � �'"-w� � s �E �" X3' 1'• y1n ^ ri p 9, .. r� U1 _•. ° R t »�..�..._ � �' �aa > e�'"��0� -'v ��•• �F ��_� -� '�• s��nss �� ^�� ���� S���o�� � �� �o �^ �� � t�i :� p �"N� i� • � '� �{^ �R 't. �� � �AI 4� �` � #R C y� •�• 8 °i.l�y �r� S'RSR � y� N�� ��N 8 � $_w N M � r i O ;� � = � po T � y y y � ����t ���a �$ � � = ���°°g y � � ����€ ��� � _ • �`� R s ��3i p � a i � � s " A xy� � R S • y K � � w � ° : ° •„� "'� i y S O$a y ••• V_ ••1 � � � __ f�l .. N N 11.11 yy11 Op oy �11O i y 1]m1�1 •- -�.1 ff Af ����•1•I�Oy» �9 � ��y SR S �� i 9N $�yr ST 1T��1 y S y ��� 8 • C ♦ � _Cyyy ZZZp Rii i i .y 9 S S N_ R y o YN yV • _�r• 8 S? Iq lap 5 x I mNy 1.1 yc ism 111 111111111y 111111y1ig { +� p��I11 S�es ���ii y 9 p _° w 1 AS y fpw xy _r ^I ss R >$ ;j i g N = N » m =T Tr• y p - •I/R�� �y .7. iS CR "O �pp.i N 1 p s w " y i l�s�lpONt +ppp�fly�I Y$ Q TR i�[IT.1 qg � • O �8 RZ NOw p p q O « y 3��Ft= i •I AI 33 i�N Pft �OI � p r 3i�� ^ � >� IZI �� ttt111S��� •N< -y� <� Lir1�IS�" 11 N v ill a Egg .y. ` r N - � =: T ff y • O ii.�. •v Y E gg O 1 N y L 111 a 4t NN yii — I S 8 1� = Q r M+ IR qt A li! � 8fi y R N 10 O 7 � . � a a . s1_- $a i-_ _ -• v UP 19 M 6- A Egg $a ASIER R;i��l � z � NR s� a � i n R � 0 its o $� � �� if ;1 ; e a M 9 � y O .. ` zo �'� z veer." t N� an 1 •_ �,�1 � s�W 1 y (i $ O $_� � � N R S g v a vp r 3 •, 01 R � !f • t �i ., �i p p s y }s /� T Vr s S� ~y }��1 r111.y..c »S y orN i Zfll iyys NP C » M N 1.1S N- •I _ Nr��'p 11 . ^�113 R � �N7�1 �y I•1 ��1 � � N O.N.1111 9 � 8 N � . O I V r ^ c �� {ir NSO �� - I gag = 1 Sisi =w r a yy =s r "ara8 1'�1� !y '� =�r$ �F r g $ ni i iw 8 v H plyy i$$$R ;_111 1 �i ii- gc: °^ i � nNIR yL IR "1 $'i.. °_� : ?. w a z � I-EPIS Q # i1 i_z I - - y� ; r i Its 1s1�1 � ��» w_ +1 � c M I r wy1 y R R`zi ... wiR � Al ...� � '� � ,,,•u � r- »-I IA � r �•�•.�s_ l81�Iwl C v 2 ZOC9f i T� �r _ a y • N r 9ii � O N A P_$NA Rol ill ;y 4 i n C �• N ,1 s y1 y ti NT�R - IK O N r SI.IS �� r us y A Af 111111 7 1.1 Q 1.1Q -S $ pO PA r.11 a A R w M d d N y yy �...,,,.1 g r�S � p � p � Z � iI �► f .7 Z N�� = S y�yR C�� Q w x CD 30 30 r l > $ a $ is CD TT3 •• � � R 9 40 A n f`7 N y ,1 • 111 40 ±1 ej N + ` N�•• SI IA � � � �I+ In � I Ali � 0 i yN _ a -w OR �/K N �_ Al I p V Z w �� �(tiy5 _�i wok w1. fi is 30 y__ rA s F �w v may�y` MCA p ss = a wi w s o i� BOOK PAG won P i I 1lIaWN + �OpOb9p0p00ftP 0J.0101Jr01r.0I0J.010.0. ^p0 ^wp0S0u0{01� �NO�aai j# O�Of1,�, O��, Wy�O,�ryWWIn.. WWpOpNNNnNNNfrylfpl tpf / f_ln�lr[1ffnl7,ffYOrw<OII�4N+ SM rwN1YN+ .OAJAN ♦WN +OOSJ N+WN +St98 JS{11 N!:93OR21Ti♦W�rSr�j JAN ♦ WN+ -- i ♦WN +p+wrwN ♦WN +Q p N.�rNN 2N N ZZZZZZ yy ++ {{yy =qy� {,1 z y !� N RilYNwt. +4�S�IYNNNS ��Nyyy�NYOM� :0(220 : +0011 �YSwOOS i Nq NNNNNN NN +NO P m�WS NWYI � ' j! WpON� Qn ♦NOOn O yy `N ♦ pWppWYNp 1�N,�jrNNOWa.i ♦�yN� r1 .yr�.lpp� ..� .� �p . pr p .lpiprp.�ry.�yr�� .p�Wrfyr�Wap. f r .-f T Y • gpp \ p� r�/.1pr p _ ♦2 Yw O+ Nw. M itl000wwSw0 ♦ n ±Of,OVwwsN$ w,�N +N OSIVCNO +NW �NtMiYWUWWriIfYW Aw. °AOJOWwSw ♦� O • t \ t t \ \ \ • \ t f e a \ • • f ............. • \ f • `•� t \ ... • . a t • \ • t • t t t \ 1 • t \ \ f \ \ \ . t \ a a \ . a \ t \ • \ t t \ Z O �� 2Nw NNANNNYN JrrJ N M N♦y1W WI/�AA y{yy � S S..r. S i N +�M ♦W41YIW ♦a ♦♦ � � JI.pNpNONrOaWw wOOp - ww f�Nyl�� �Jrr�I�IJrrrJrJNp pM�.f/W / 2N.IrrONMr+rr 2222 M.♦, ppy1 Jr A♦ pi�pp to r= N +I g S 1,12 OAyy pppp pp NN +Wr ♦{�p�pµy / A ♦ NM22Jw a NN�AMN$JNJYN Y 1O$M 2S •OJMrA Y4 ♦ WO W Y ♦AZN2rNNOVYN.w,arr ♦N ♦SrNNM +2 O ,� yww M __ _ Yil• ' y1t�Iy1 pqp p �� f�I11� t} 1 p� / p� y p ylp�tyl �I1{�1 ��Y�tr rO JArA�ISdp .Yi p pa0p0p0p +pwtRNMpN Np0p0p0�0p0002ApA22 0 U= OONpOpa pUpNWNrpM�rNNYpr�O�NIWp1pAYNOpOtP � 00 $$$ 0 0$ $$00000$$00$$000$$00000000 O N O O ta CL N t y a o CIt M -M u' 3.K —OS o�O ^ °- ---------------- - - - - -- r-------- - - - - -- o — f�• � ` � � " �"� �9►�.� 1 �� � � 1. `1 N om— / iai• � W � �y� ,�•� � // � � N M 11 wr Y 1 ` ' 1 61 M r£ ►S 3 �jy ' yL w p 1 O N ' ►yi r11 1 �; 1 4 .> • 1 1 N► Oo' ►►► 3 et pcA1s , 1•pµ 3.►z CD r M r' s 1 1 ro N Cjj Qr d 1 t ► •rN N 14 .'i ITI. `a y ►,0o•0► 3 £z,s¢.�s fg 1� vv 1 .sit 1 1 4 1 4 o 8' IR 1 1 fio - ! g _ ' " ,►z I ,i1 r►► ao u.as oI� ai o ; tyt 0o•►tt t► LEA" 1 r �f 14 ►� 6r► 00 oo.OS w • 3.00 W.Os a ,00 o► ADM ,OVK I i N� II► sz r1► ti ZL.9s I� I 9 o N 9 W 'iE 81 3. S t i xl sq DALE DU" IID Oo'00 3".81" I w•►►► LS K.O3 o :: � � � tst ►u a �.as D�fIYEiwel S7 ET1 31K.t1' � 8 � �N I 9 ► J IR • 1 OtY ltolpti tyt •n1 a,cl.osl �S s is .b-4. w�• +-lot .Z « "' • I l 8 8 A£0• 3f0o,004N I 91 ' ► �yry W a I a t 1 4 r 'I Nra•sa�llwm'IR► 18 ,a•ut 3600,0O.ON I s I M 1 4 1 tool r- 1 4 I• , rW34 10 1OLOS 1 ��► Q p �� t ir — �- 06''LT — L — , ,£0'!Ot !S ►f.OS y� � 3tt.00 tM N j y+� � 110'00''WPEE 401.24' fFllLl L STREETI nlvr. �• � a� y S SC,v a � � � I � _ Ce~• 1 � 11 do I r, I , Z,T.01• ! ! ! w . • r i4 1 011 d�rryy •' M 1100 OO 449. t' MAW! OV 1 I I l i • + Z 6Z NNN``Nrt.tNNCNt �t.Go err. A, A JL I I I rI'�rri��r�NIr1N.r►WN� Y� Pt I MJANaYNr �1 1 s I � 1 0 „ I wrwWaWN� N N yy z M O y� I p I I w A I I ` 2 ZNZNZ � Q r NMNZ.'< O in to d t . .� p t . - ... = A Z II 0 OY N NN N ./ Vl 1... ,•-. • • rW00$PMr 1_ Z 1 C 1•rss.�,ns asw,Nm sss,ns g � . �� � � I ssm,nmsms � . \.� � MI� Z r ' I NNrrpN NN p�� r Z Q (,� rJ OrNOOn1Y,M y .'1' � •••1 ` � W+000± Ni�NJ iN YY a V' . q g ... ± �♦SSS =S: r S O I' I TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA D ATE: March 16, 2004 A AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 5 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Dick Gear, Community & Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -30 — Relating to housing; authorizing the Town of Marana to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with Pima county for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and home Investment Partnership Program DISCUSSION: The Town of Marana and Pima County desire to continue their intergovernmental agreement covering the successful CDBG and Home investment partnership programs. The County and Town have determined it is in the best interest of the residents of the Town of Marana that housing and community development activities be performed . jointly in accordance with the provisions of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2004 -30 to authorize the Town to enter into an IGA with Pima County for the purpose of continuing the CDBG and housing investment partnership programs. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -30. A:Trank02004031604Council Mtg\Bluesheet CDBG IGA with Pima County ADMIN/SRG/03/11/2004 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-30 RELATING TO HOUSING; AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PIMA COUNTY FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the County and Town may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -951, et seq.; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to enter into an intergovernmental agreement in order to meet the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, the County and Town desire to engage in housing and community development activities as authorized under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, the County and Town do hereby find and determine that it is in the best interest of the residents of the unincorporated areas of the County and of the Town of Marana that housing and community development activities be performed jointly in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recommends that expenditures of funds for each purpose be on an Urban County basis; and WHEREAS, it is mutually beneficial to each of the parties hereto for the County to administer and execute the provisions of the intergovernmental agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter provided and subject to local ordinance and State and Federal law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The intergovernmental government between the Town of Marana and Pima County attached to and incorporated by this reference in this resolution as Exhibit A is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Exhibit A and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized to attest thereto for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 3. The Town Manager, Town Attorney and other Town staff are hereby authorized to undertake all other tasks required to carry out the terms, obligations, and objectives of said Exhibit A. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16th day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney FC /cds HAFrankC\20040316\Counci1 Mtg\PC CDBG Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING ` EXECUTION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF MARANA FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. WHEREAS, County and Town may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -951, et seq.; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to enter into an Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement in order to meet the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, County and Town desire to engage in housing and community development activities as authorized under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, County and Town do hereby find and determine that it is in the best interest of the residents of the unincorporated areas of the County and of the Town of Marana that housing and community development activities be - performed jointly in accordance with the provisions of this � greement and that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recommends that xpenditures of funds for each purpose be on an Urban County basis; and WHEREAS, it is mutually beneficial to each of the parties hereto for the County to administer and execute the provisions of the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter provided and subject to local ordinance and State and Federal law; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, as follows: 1. The Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the Community Development Block Program and Home Investment Partnership Program is hereby approved; and 2. The Chair of the Board of Supervisors -is hereby instructed and authorized to sign the Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement for the Pima County Board of Supervisors. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THIS DAY OF , 2004 PIMA COUNTY, A Body Politic & Corp ATTEST: Chair, Board of Supervisors Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: eputy County Attorney Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between Pima County and Town of Marana for the Community Development Block Grant Program and ` Home Investment Partnership Program This Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement made and entered into this day of 2004 by and between the County of Pima, a body politic and corporate of the State of Arizona, hereinafter referred to as "County," and the Town of Marana, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona, located within the boundaries of the County of Pima, hereinafter referred to as 'Town." RECITALS A. WHEREAS County and Town may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -951, et seq. B. WHEREAS it is necessary to enter into a Cooperative Agreement in order to meet the _ requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments. C. WHEREAS County and Town are individually authorized by law to engage in housing and community development activities. D. WHEREAS County and Town do hereby find and determine that it is in the best interest of the residents of the unincorporated areas of the'County and the Town that housing and community development activities be performed jointly in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recommends that expenditures of funds for such purpose be on an Urban County basis. E. WHEREAS it is mutually beneficial to each of the parties hereto for County to administer and execute the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the Agreement for Management and Implementation of the CDBG Program and HOME Program Agreements entered into by the parties, which Agreements are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter provided and subject to local ordinance and State and Federal law. NOW, THEREFORE, County and Town, pursuant to the above, and in consideration of the matters and things hereinafter set forth, do mutually agrees as follows: 1. Pima County, as an Urban County, is hereby designated as the sponsoring agency to administer and implement the plan and program for housing and community development activities for each of the participating parties to this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments, the laws of the State of Arizona, and the terms and conditions provided herein.. In this respect, the Town agrees that the County is hereby delegated the power to plan and undertake community development projects within its jurisdiction and will have the final responsibility for selecting all CDBG and HOME projects in accordance with the approved Community Development and Housing Consolidated Plan pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91. 2. It is understood and agreed that the County as the Grantee is to take the final responsibility and to assume all the obligations of applicant for assistance under the provisions of said Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments, the three -year certifications as required by HUD, subject to change in legislation or regulations and the Consolidated Plan. 3. The County and Town agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. 4. The County and Town do not have the power to veto or otherwise restrict or withhold the support given by the County or the Town to the activities proposed in the Consolidated Plan for any program year covered by this Agreement. In the event that any participating member entity does not comply with a federal prerequisite in order for funds to be expended in such area, then said entity's share shall be expended within all or any portion of the area served by the member entities who qualify under the provisions of said Act. 5. It is understood that in order to qualify for funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and subsequent amendments, it is necessary that a Consolidated Plan be submitted to and approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. All parties hereto agree to abide by the terms and conditions of an approved Consolidated Plan for housing and community development activities as submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Upon executing the Agreement the Town agrees not to apply for CDBG funds from the State of Arizona Small Cities Program, and may not participate in a HOME consortium except through the Urban County during the period in which it is participating in the Urban County's CDBG Program. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any manner the powers of any of the respective parties to initiate and complete a local project within their respective jurisdiction with their own funds. 6. The 1st day of July 2004 , shall be the effective date of Agreement, which shall remain in force for three years. This Agreement covers CDBG and HOME Program funding for Federal Fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007. This Agreement may be amended to extend the term of Agreement in order to complete activities funded but not completed, or to expend program income received during the three years covered by this Agreement. 7. The Town and the County recognize that the County shall be the governmental entity required to execute any grant agreement received pursuant to Consolidated Plan, and that the County shall thereby become responsible thereunder for the proper performance of the plan and program. The Town agrees that it shall fully cooperate with the County in all efforts hereunder and that they will assist in doing any and all things required or appropriate to comply with the provisions of any grant agreement received by the County pursuant to the Act and its regulations. 8. All records of the County or Town related to this Consolidated Plan and any projects undertaken pursuant thereto shall upon reasonable notice, be available for inspection by HUD, County, and/or Town auditors, during normal business hours. 9. This Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assignees. Any assignment of Agreement shall be void without the consent of the other party. 10. Pursuant to the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the parties hereby agree to direct their Community Development Block Grant and HOME Program resources toward the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities; principally for persons of low- and moderate - income. 11. County and Town will take all required actions necessary to comply with the Urban County's Certification required by Section 104(b) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and other applicable laws. County shall not fund Town if the Town does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction. County and Town agree to affirmatively further fair housing within County and Town. Town shall take no actions to impede the County's-actions to comply with County fair housing certification. 12. County and Town have adopted and are enforcing policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non - violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. . 13. The parties agree that a fully executed amendment or amendments to this Agreement shall be entered into as required or necessary to implement a detailed and formulated plan and program as contemplated hereunder or for the purpose of complying with any grant agreement received or the regulations issued pursuant to the Act. Failure by either party to adopt an Amendment to this Agreement incorporating all changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation Agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the Urban County is scheduled shall automatically terminate this Agreement following the expenditure of all Community Development Block Grant and HOME funds allocated for use in the Town's jurisdiction. 14. Pursuant to 24 CFR 570.501(b), the Town is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement fora written Agreement set forth in 24 CFR 570.503. _ 15. The County, as the CDBG grant recipient for the urban county has full responsibility for the execution of the community development program, for following its Consolidated Plan, and for meeting the requirements of other applicable laws (e.g., National Environmental Policy Act, Uniform Relocation Act, Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Sec. 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and for affirmatively furthering fair housing). County shall be held accountable for the accomplishment of the community development program, for following the Consolidated Plan, and for ensuring that actions necessary for such accomplishment are taken by Town. 16. The parties acknowledge that A.R.S. § 38 -511 requires that notice of A.R.S. § 38 -511 be included in every contract,of a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and that both parties must comply with all applicable provisions of Arizona Executive Order 75 -5, as amended by Executive Order 99-4 [relating to non - discrimination]. THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Cooperative Agreement to be executed the day of 2004 PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TOWN OF MARANA Chair, Board of Supervisors Mayor ATTEST: ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Supervisors Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: - - i Dire &ornniunity Services Dept. Pursuant to A.R.S. §11 -952, the undersigned, Pursuant to A.R.S. §11 -952, the undersigned, Pima County's legal counsel has determined Town of Marana's legal Counsel has determined that the above Agreement is in proper form that the above agreement is in proper form and is and is within the powers and authority granted within the powers and authority granted under the under the laws of the State of Arizona to Pima laws of the State of Arizona to the Town of Marana. County. Paula Wilk Typed Name of Legal Counsel Typed Name of Legal Counsel 7 Signature of Legal Counsel 7re 07l co unsel • OPINION OF DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF MARANA FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM I am an Attorney at Law admitted to practice in the State of Arizona and a duly appointed Deputy County Attorney for the County of Pima. I have examined the Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the Community Development Block Grant Program and Home Investment Partnership Program entered into by and between the County of Pima and the Town of Marana, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and I am of the opinion that the Agreement has been duly authorized by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Pima in accordance with State and local legal requirements. I am further of the opinion that the names and provisions of the agreement are authorized under • state and local law and that Pima County is authorized to enter into this agreement pursuant to state and local law. To the best of my knowledge, there is no pending or threatened litigation affecting the implementation of the Cooperation Agreement or the ability of the County of Pima to be the applicant for funding as a Urban County under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. Deputy County Attorney Civil Division TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: A. 6 TO: Mayor and Council FROM:. Farhad Moghimi, P.E., Director of Public Works/Town Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -29 Relating to street naming; naming " Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive" and designating a portion of the Marana Town Center parcel as Civic Center Drive public right -of -way. DISCUSSION: Town staff is requesting the naming of the new streets " Marana Main Street ", extending from Grier Road to Civic Center Drive and "Civic Center Drive ", extending from Barnett Road to Lon Adams Road. "Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive" will serve as attractive gateways and "main" streets for the Town's Northwest Marana Town Center. As indicated by their names, these streets are meant to evoke the close -knit community and civic character of the Town's magnificent new governmental complex. Marana Main Street and Civic Center Drive will serve as pathways into Marana's appealing and exciting future. "Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive" are located in Northwest Marana. See Attached Exhibit "A ". The names "Marana Main Street and "Civic Center Drive" have not previously been utilized within Pima County. Moreover, Pima County Addressing has already approved the proposed naming as of January 5, 2004. See Exhibit "B ". To clearly delineate the public rights -of -way for Civic Center Drive staff is requesting a portion of the Marana Town Center parcel be accepted as right -of -way as designated within the Real Estate Exchange and Development Agreement (Parcel 6) recorded in Docket 12154, Page 2148. Said area of Civic Center Drive right -of -way is legally described in the attached Exhibit "C ". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Mayor and Council accept the street naming of "Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive" along with designation of the portion of Marana Town Center parcel as public right -of -way for Civic Center Drive. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -29. H:\ADMIN \BLUESHElABLUESHEE \2004 \Bkxzheet SUeet Naming - Marana Main SWeet doc PW /FM/MMF:03 /11/04 t MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, N AMING " MARANA M AIN S TREET" A ND " CIVIC C ENTER D RIVE" A ND DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE MARANA TOWN CENTER PARCEL AS CIVIC CENTER DRIVE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. WHEREAS, the Town desires to name " Marana Main Street" and "Civic Center Drive ", as more fully depicted on the location map attached as Exhibit "A" to and incorporated in this resolution by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Pima County Addressing Division approved the proposed name on January 5, 2004, see Exhibit `B" attached to and incorporated in this resolution by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Town desires that a portion of the Marana Town Center parcel legally described in Exhibit C attached to and incorporated by this reference in this resolution be designated as public right -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, naming " Marana Main Street" and Civic Center Drive ", more fully depicted on the Location Map attached as Exhibit A and designating a portion of the Marana Town Center parcel as public rights -of -way for Civic Center Drive as legally described in Exhibit C. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16` day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney H:\ADMIN \RES LIST\Resolutions \2004 \Resolution 2004 -29 (Marana Main Sheet Naming).doc l (1)� �� ° O VU' 6 2E•- c: L co v a)c +' o U) v U C O N ( ; ;!ll������ ry • � t tq K( LL C C 4 . ^. a3 `° 0 O a) •� /y ``' 1 C VV EXHIBIT A O cc L 1 ! I t I t i - 3 - -- - - - -- _ - �_ �i -- _ vi 1 - i i : faajj! u ieW eue a r` 4 � , f - - - i i 3 S _ = E ..... ... I , iP?; ;72",.7tS i1;P..- .` k(,i'.;, ti. M3, Cis IdYLfh3a1f11 l-C:�^c'SC�L.[..ft .:� -Yf :. NdYI ^n '" n .•C??L '� ,: ,'.:7'. K}t p EXHIBIT B PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ADDRESSING DIVISION 201 N. stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 -1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 7406370 January 05, 2004 Traffic Engineering Division Town of Marana 36% W. Orange Grove Rd Tucson, AZ. 85741 ' Attention: Monica Moxley bear Monica; Because of the location and the circ umstances of the proposed roadway to be named "Marana NU i n if i have agreed an the use of "Street" for the suffix. This is a one -Bute agreement only, as the use of "Street" is reserved for east -west streets and must be uniform in all of Pima County. In the same location, I have also approved the use of "Citiir Center Drive, When the street names have been approved by your Town Councff and recorded, please provide copies to we so we can update maps and records. If there is anything else you need, please feel free to call we at 740 -64$0. Sincerely, Ka y filarks Addressing Official _. Post-it* Fax Note 1 Daw v7 To t From Lrt.s? L co. Co phone 't Phono # -7 _ D D __.. —. _H:uIraffc Dena tm n r_Mxnat Stea a�a .:�3 � M ;,. - - .... ... .' x�_. ...._ _S sAL'SCI,:OOn 20k Y C iMara , ""3.n str?w� tiara ng„dac - November 12, 2002 WLB No. 19W4S�-G001 -1003 W I e W :ILEGALS11890491ROW- Parcel6.doc G roup EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION MARANA TOWN CENTER TOWN RIGHT -OF -WAY (PARCEL 6) All of that portion of Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 27, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast carver of said Northwest Quarter (NW 114) of Section; THENCE S 89 °18'66" W, (S 89 °62'08+1 W recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230), along the South line of said Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) a distance of 496.69 feet,* THENCE N 00 ° 36 1 55" W, (N 00 °0343" W recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230), a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 25.00 feet: Forth of said South line, also being the North fight-of-way line of Barnett Road; THENCE S 89 (S 89 recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230), along said right- of-way line a distance of 484.00 feet, to the Southwest comer of a parcel recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230; THENCE N 00 9 3555" W, (N 00 °03'43" W recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230), along the Vilest line of said parcel, 918.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE: 8 45 0 33'12" E, 8.81 feet; THENCE along a non tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 85.00 feet, a central angle of 65 °49'44", a radial line through said point bars N 33 0 2626" W, for an arc length of 97.66 feet to a point; THENCE N 44°2648" E, 102.23 feet; i THENCE along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 495.00 feet, a central 2 angle of 12 °54'58 ", for an arc length of 111.59 feet to a point of non - tangent line on the North fine of the parcel recorded in Docket 11081, Page 1230; THENCE N 89 °18'55" E, along said line a distance of 277.03 feet to a point cusp of a tangent curve concave to South; i THENCE along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 405.00 feet, a central angle of 44 °52'08 ", for an arc length of 317.16 feet to a point of tangency; Page 1 of 2 �, November 12, 2002 WLB No. 199049 -CODs -1003 W e W. Parcel6.doc B Group THENCE S 44 °2648" W, 133.60 feet; THENCE along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 44.00 feet, a central angle of 48 °22'50 ", for an arc length of 37.15 feet to a point of reverse curvature, THENCE along said reverse curve to the right, having a radius of 90.00 feet, a t -ntral angle of 96 °4640 ", for an arc length of 151.99 feet to a point of reverse curvature THENCE along said reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 44.00 feet, a central angle of 48 °22'50", for an arc length of 37.15 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE S 44 °26`48" W, 18.63 feet; THENCE N 00 °36'55" Vhf, 231.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 1.21 acres, more or less. Prepared by: THE WLB GROUP, INC. 2221# LACK A. Jack A. Buchanan, RLS : IStJCfU1N1-A ; JAB.teg L i Page 2of2 W! 6�X. pro act No.199049 - -0001 -1403 t I 01 - 6-2=2 0 N:\ 19 9- 0 ROW.DWG T G RIFS P DAD L 30' EXHLBIT "C i PROPOSED ROAD WA Y i IMPOSED .ROAD TAL 7.98 A C.) DKT.11674 PG-4152 Hamm PARCEL 4 SEE EXHI p l Apa--tm--n , t .LTD Repo e 1 P. PIRCEL 7 ! 5.7 AC. p.o,B FAR 7 0.18 .A1�'. �' NW 114 PAR- SECTION 27 f)KT gN4.8 PARCEL 5 PG.1408 1 P, 0.B .Reyh er 1 PAR-4, 0.87 A: PARCEL 6 TOWN RIGHT—OF—WAY co rp _ 4 25' DKT.11081 PG,120,3 1 484,00' BARN= ROAD 496.6 .SIT T4 SHOW PRtPGSED RIGHT -OF - Y i" =300 , ffrnw� The MA&4NA TOWN CENTER SECT -ION 27, T. 11 S., R 11 K., G S.R M., Grc�u s� P M COM'Y, ARI,2O NA t TOWN TOWN COUNCIL OF MEETING MARANA INFORMATION DATE: MARCH 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 7 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Dan Groseclose, Housing General Contractor SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -28 Relating to housing; authorizing the Town of Marana to enter into a purchase agreement with Samuel H. Vickroy and Gertrude A. Vickroy to purchase a lot for the Town of Marana Home Program. DISCUSSION: The Town of Marana has an opportunity to purchase a lot located in the Honea Heights area of Marana. The lot currently has a burned out mobile home located on the site. The owners are willing to sell the lot for the appraised price of $14,000.00 less $2,000.00 for clean up. Once the lot is cleaned up, a recently purchased double wide mobile home will be placed on the lot and sold as part of the Town's HOME Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2004 -28 to authorize the Town to enter into a Acquisition Agreement with Samuel H. and Gertrude A. Vickroy to purchase the lot for $12,000.00. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -28. H:\FrankC\200403161B1uesheet re Marana Main Street.doc MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-28 RELATING TO HOUSING; AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF MARANA TO ENTER INTO A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH SAMUEL H. AND GERTRUDE A. VICKROY TO PURCHASE A LOT FOR THE TOWN OF MARANA HOME PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Town of Marana desires to engage in housing and community development activities as authorized under the Town of Marana HOME Program Regulations; and WHEREAS, Samuel H. and Gertrude A. Vickroy own and desire to sell real property located on Moore Road, identified as Pima County Assessor Parcel #217- 50 -017A; and WHEREAS, the Town of Marana desires to purchase and develop the lot for its HOME Program to be sold to low to moderate income citizens through the Town's First -time Homebuyers Program; and WHEREAS, the continuation of the HOME Program would greatly benefit the citizens of the Town of Marana and would be in the Town's best interest. ,NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Acquisition Agreement between the Town of Marana and Samuel H. and Gertrude A. Vickroy attached and incorporated by this reference in this resolution as Exhibit A is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest to, said Exhibit A for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 3. The various Town officers and employees are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16 day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney FC /cds H:\FrankC \040316Council Mtg \Vickroy.doc 2 ACQUISITION AGREEMENT This Agreement is made by and between Samuel H. Vickrov and Gertrude A. Vickrov (the "Owner") and the Town of Marana, a municipal corporation (the "Town "). 1. Property and Acquisition Amount. The Owner is the owner of the property described on Exhibit "A ", including all improvements located thereon (the "Property"). The Town has determined the need to acquire the Property by its power of eminent domain. In lieu of court proceedings and further to its power of eminent domain, the Town agrees to acquire the Property for Twelve thousand dollars ($ 12.000.00) (the "Acquisition Amount "), subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. 2. No Personal Property. The parties acknowledge that no personal property is being acquired under this Agreement and that no personal property is located on the Property being transferred. 3. Risk of Loss for Damage to Improvements. Owner shall be responsible for the risk of loss for any and all damage to the improvements prior to close of escrow. 4. Warranty Deed. The Owner shall deposit into escrow a warranty deed conveying to Town title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and subject only to those matters identified on Exhibit "B". 5. No Salvage. The Owner shall not salvage or remove any fixtures, improvements, or any portion of the Property prior to closing. 6. Escrow and Prorations. The Acquisition Amount shall be payable in full at closing. The date of closing shall be used for proration of rents, property taxes and other similar costs, and assessments due for improvement districts shall be paid in full by the Owner prior to closing. 7. Security Interest. Monies payable under this Agreement may be due holders (the "Lienholders ") of certain notes secured by mortgages or deeds of trusts, up to and including the total amount of unpaid principal, interest and penalty on the notes, if any, and shall upon demand by the Lienholders, be paid to the Lienholders. Owner shall obtain from the Lienholders releases for any fee transfer for the Property. 8. Possession and Closing. Possession shall be given to the Town on date of closing. Closing shall be on or before the later of (a) 30 days after the date this Agreement is approved by the Town Council or (b) 30 days after receipt of all necessary releases from lienholders. Paae 1 EXHIBIT A 9. Water Rights. The Owner agrees to assign and hereby transfers, effective upon closing, to Town any water rights certificated or claimed appurtenant to the Property owned by Owner. Owner shall execute documents reasonably necessary to effect such transfer. 10. Environmental Representations. Owner hereby represents and warrants that, to the best of Owner's knowledge, no pollutants, contaminants, toxic or hazardous substances, wastes or materials have been stored, used or are located on the Property or within any surface or subsurface waters thereof; that no underground tanks have been located on the Property; that the Property is in compliance with all Federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances; and that no legal action of any kind has been commenced or threatened with respect to the Property. 11. Environmental Indemnification. The Town and the Owner agree that neither party is assuming any obligation of the other party relating to any potential liability, if any, arising from the environmental condition of the Property, each party remaining responsible for its obligations as set forth by law. 12. Environmental Inspection Rights. Owner shall permit Town to conduct such inspections of the Property, as the Town deems necessary to determine the environmental condition of the Property. If the investigations reveal the presence of contamination or the need to conduct environmental clean up, Owner shall conduct a clean up of the Property adequate to bring the Property into compliance prior 'to Closing or Town may terminate this agreement. 13. No Leases. Owner warrants that there are no oral or written leases on all or any portion of the property. 14. Broker's Commission. No broker or finder has been used and Town owes no brokerage or finder's fees related to this transaction. Owner has sole responsibility to pay all brokerage or finder's fees to any agent employed. 15. Closing Costs. Expenses incidental to transfer of title, including title reports, recording fees, escrow fees, releases and Owners Title Insurance Policy, shall be paid 100% by Town. 16. No Sale. Owner shall not sell or encumber the property before closing. 17. Conflict of Interest. This Agreement is subject to A.R.S. 38 -511, which provides for cancellation of contracts by Town for certain conflicts of interest. 18. Survival of Representation and Warranties. All representations and warranties contained herein shall survive the closing for a term of ten years. P=rick ') 19. Entire Agreement. This signed document shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties and no modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both parties. The performance of this Agreement constitutes the entire consideration by Town, including all just compensation and severance damages to the remainder property and shall relieve the Town of all further obligation or claims relating to the Property. SELLER: / ✓ / / t/ i caner Owner Date: Z - L( - O `1 Date: Z Y Tax ID # or SS # ? Alf -OW7 Tax ID # or SS # ZSl –2-6 BUYER: TOWN OF MARANA BY: Michael A. Reuwsaat, Assistant Town Manager ATTEST: , A C. Bronson, Tea- -Clerk FO sidy, T n Attorney Paae 3 EXHIBIT A • 12545 W. Moore Road, Marana, Arizona 85653 Further identified as Pima County Assessor Parcel # 217- 50 -017A Legal Description: N2 OF E74' W400' S242.5' N272.25' OF NW4 NW4 .22AC SEC 33 -11 -11 • Page 4 TOWN COUNCM TOWN MEETING OF INFORMATION MARANA DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. A. 8 -f TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Farhad Moghimi, P.E., Director of Public Works/Town Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -31 Relating to real estate; abandoning a portion of the one - foot no- access easement and public drainage easement on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51. DISCUSSION: Phylip and Nidia Eloisa Jones have requested that the Town abandon a portion of the one -foot no- access easement, legally described in Exhibit A, on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51, located at 6656 W. Calle Lorensita, Tax Parcel No. 226 -30 -2080 as recorded with Pima County Recorder's Office in Book 48, Page 58. Mr. and Mrs. Jones have also requested the abandonment of the public drainage easement, legally described. in Exhibit B, on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51. The abandonment of the one foot no- access easement will 1 al ow Mr. and Mrs. Jones to construct a circular drive. The Town of Marana Traffic Engineering Division has completed a review of the location of the proposed circular drive. Their investigation of this matter revealed that the new driveway location should not present any substantial traffic safety or operational problems. Due to the low- volume and lbw -speed nature of Via Atascadero, the potential for conflicts between vehicles exiting or entering the driveway and vehicles on Via Atascadero is not expected to be significant. Stopping sight distances along Via Atascadero to the driveway were found to be adequate. In addition, the distance from the Via Atascadero / Calle Lorensita intersection to the proposed driveway was found to be adequate and in accordance with the Town's Land Development Code. Based on the above, the Traffic Engineering Division found no traffic operational or safety reason to deny the application for the access easement abandonment at Lot 92. Staff has posted public notice of abandonment of a portion of the one -foot no- access easement and public drainage easement from December 1, 2003 through January 5, 2004. Staff has also publicly advertised the proposed abandonment in the Territorial Newspaper. There has been one public objection to the proposed abandonment by Mr. and Mrs. Bower. The Traffic Engineering Division and the Engineering Division has evaluated the concerns submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Bower and determined the proposed abandonment will not have any adverse effects on the traffic within the area nor create any alterations of drainage. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Council abandon a portion of the one foot no- access easement, legally described in Exhibit A, and the public drainage easement, legally described in Exhibit B on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51, located at 6656 W. Calle Lorensita, Tax Parcel No. 226 -30 -2080 as recorded with Pima County Recorder's Office in Book 48, Page 58, subject to the following conditions: • Reservation of a perpetual easement for all existing public utilities /sewers within the abandonment area. • Natural drainage shall not be altered, disturbed or obstructed without written approval by the Town of Marana. The property owner, successors and assigns will accept all responsibility for the control, maintenance, safety and liability of the land described in Exhibit C. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -31. FC /cds H:\FrankC\20040316Counci1 Mtg\Lot 92 Drainage Easement Abandonment MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-31 RELATING TO REAL ESTATE; ABANDONING OF A PORTION OF THE ONE -FOOT NO ACCESS EASEMENT AND PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON LOT 92 OF CONTINENTAL RANCH, PARCEL 51. WHEREAS, an application for abandonment of a portion of the one -foot no access easement and the public drainage easement on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51, located at 6656 W. Calle Lorensita recorded with the Pima County Recorder's Office in Maps and Plats Book 48, Page 58 has been submitted to the Town by the property owners, Phylip and Nidia Eloisa Jones; and WHEREAS, the definition of "public right -of -way" or "right -of -way" in A.R.S. § 48 -4475 includes highway, street, road, alley or other right -of -way of a governmental entity; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have authority pursuant to A.R.S. § 28 -7215 to extinguish public easements by resolution; and WHEREAS, the Town of Marana holds the one -foot no- access easement and the public drainage easement; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that a portion of the one -.foot no- access easement and the public drainage easement on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch, Parcel 51, located at 6656 W. Calle Lorensita recorded with the Pima County Recorders Office in Maps and Plats Book 48, Page 58, should be abandoned as shown on the attached Exhibit A and legally described in Exhibit B and C (the "Subject Abandonment "); and WHEREAS, notice of the Subject Abandonment has been posted on the property and published in the appropriate manner; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that the Subject Abandonment is of no monetary value due to its location and degree of fragmentation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that the Subject Abandonment is hereby abandoned based on the following conditions: 1. A perpetual easement shall be reserved over the Subject Abandonment in conformance with A.R.S. § 28 -7210 for existing: a) sewer, gas, water or similar pipelines and appurtenances b) canals, laterals or ditches, and appurtenances C) electric, telephone and similar lines and appurtenances. 2. - Natural drainage shall not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed without written approval by the Town of Marana. The property owner, successors, and assigns shall accept all responsibility for the control, maintenance, safety, and liability of the land described in the legal description attached as Exhibit C. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16 day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney H:\FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg\Resolution 2004 -31 2 Phylip Lee 3 Nidia Eloisa Jones 6656 W Calle Lorenska Tucson, AZ 85743-8105 September 22, 2003 WLB No.191047 A001 -1003 W:I1-EGALS\9 910471LOT92 -ABAN AOC The EXHIBIT A G e roup LEGAL DESCRIPTION ABANDONMENT OF V NO PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PARCEL 51 CONTINENTAL RANCH (LOT 92) A strip of land 1.00 foot wide within Lot 92 of Parcel 51 Continental Ranch, recorded in Book 48 of Maps and Plats, Page 58, within Section 34, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Saft River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, lying adjacent to and contiguous with the Northwesterly of the following described line: BEGINNING at most Easterly comer of said Lot 92 and the Westerly right -of -way line of Via Atascadero, being a point of curvature of a tangent curve concave to the Southeast, a tangent line bears S29 °00'00' W, THENCE Southwesterly along the arc of said tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 225.00 feet, a central angle of 12 °34'13 ", for an arc distance of 49.36 feet to the POINT OF TERMINUS. Prepared By: THE WLB GROUP, INC. , F \ 12214 �A } JACK A. BUCHANAN \ y Jack A. Buchanan JAB :teg N. S• k' Page 1 of 1 It r Y EXHIBIT B Phylip Lee 3 Nidia Eloisa Jones WLB project No. 191047 — - 951 - 1030 6656 W Calle Lorensita 09— 2 -2003 N:\191047\PAR5I\LOT- 92— EXBT.D Tucson, AZ 85743 -8105 91 92 0 0 0 0 ry o' 1' PUBLIC NO ACCESS ESMT BEING ABANDONED, o, i 93 4 �°�% o 1' PUBLIC NO ACCESS ESMT TO REMAIN �, W � q ENS IT A L0. �v EXHIBIT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION OF ABANDONMENT OF 1' NO PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT WFFH N LOT -92 PARCEL 51 CONTINENTAL RANCH BOOK 48 M &P,PAGE 58 SECTION 34, T. 12 S., R. 12 E., G.S.R.M., f=40' The WLB Group Legal Description Exhibit C PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT A Public Drainage Easement, more particularly described as follows: Being all of the Public Drainage Easement, shown in Continental Ranch Parcel 51, Lot 92, as recorded in Book 48 of Maps and Plats at Page 58, thereof in the Office of Pima County Recorders, Pima County Arizona. ., F�: Jeffrey J. Bower & Maria D. Bower 7691 N. Via Atascadero Tucson, Arizona 85743 Phone (520) 572 -2425 y: 7- December 3, 2003 Town of Marana Development Center, Engineering Department 3696 W Orange Grove Rd. Tucson Arizona 85741 Case Number: RWA0310 -001 Dear Engineering Department: This letter is our response for your review of the project of Abandonment of 1' No Access Easement and the public drainage easement on Lot 92, as established by Continental Ranch Parcel 51 subdivision plat record with the Pima County Recorder Office in Book 48 Page 58, Town of Marana Project No. RWA0310 -001. We cannot support the approval of the request to abandon a public drainage easement without a plan to replace the drainage capacity that it being abandoned. As you know, the drainage in the Richmond Estates sub- division has not been the best. Houses in the area in which Lot 92 resides were built after 2000. The rainfall since 2000 the period after which houses in this area of the sub - division were built has been below normal. The full need and capacity of the drainage system in this area of the sub - division has not been tested. It does not seem to make sense to change and reduce the capacity of the drainage system which the Town of Marana required Richmond America engineer and to put into to place. We also would like to know who will be responsible for maintaining the public drainage pipes under Lot 92, if the public drainage easement is abandoned. This has a direct impact on our property, Lot 91 down hill from Lot 92 and support by this Public Drainage System. It has also been reported to us that Lot 52 is having problem with the Public Drainage system. It has been back up since the drain was cover on Lot 92. It seems that the Town of Marana has already abandoned this easement by allowing the drain on Lot 92 to be covered and not maintaining the system to meet the needs of the other residence of this area Richmond Estates sub - division. On the issue of abandonment of the 1' No Access Easement, at a minimum we would like the first 20 feet of the 1' No Access Easement running from our lot, Lot 92 and the easterly corner of Lot 92 to be maintained. We don't support added a second drive entrance to be put on Lot 92. Lot 92 is a corner lot. It is on the corner of Calle Lorensita and Via Atascadero. When the Lot 92 was developed, Richmond America was not allowed to put in a circle drive because of this situation. It is our understanding that the building ordnances of the Town of Marana would have to been waved to allow the approval of the additional drive entrance. If this is the case, it does not make sense to approve the abandonment of the 1' No Access Easement without also be required to approve the wavier. We don't support granting the wavier. Thank you for your consideration, I hope the Engineering Department will agree with our comments and disapprove the request to abandonment the Public Drainage Easement and a portion of the 1' NO Access Easement on Lot 92. Jeffrey J. Bower Maria D. owe I s I MARANA TOWN OF MARANA • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER February 2, 2004 Jeffrey J. Bower and Maria D. Bower 7691 N. Via Atascadero Tucson, AZ 85743 RE: RWA0310 -001; CR Parcel 51, Lot 92 Proposed Abandonment of the Public Drainage Easement and a portion of the one -foot (1') No Access Easement. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bower: Thank you for submittal of your concerns regarding the drainage issues associated with the request for abandonment of the drainage easement and a portion of the 1' No : Access Easement on Lot 92 of Continental Ranch Parcel 51. The original purpose of the drainage easement was to allow access to maintain the culvert crossing under the roadway. The two pipes crossing under lot 92 are entirely on private property and outside of any drainage easement and are required to be maintained by the property owner. The basin on lot 92 was not designed for storage capacity, it was to slow the velocity of the water coming from the road culvert so that it could easily pass into the two -pipe system and be passed under lot 92. This feature has been retained by the installation of the junction box. As there was little capacity for retention in this basin, there is no significant increase to flows downstream. A trash rack was installed on the upstream culvert opening across from lot 92. This will potentially help keep the drainage system functioning. This should not significantly backup water onto lot 52, unless. the racks have been covered with debris. As part of the Town's maintenance these systems are checked and cleaned routinely. Prior to approving the covering of the culverts and installation of the junction box and trash rack, a drainage statement was provided by a licensed hydrologist and was 3696 W. ORANGE GROVE ROAD 011 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85741 1• PHONE: (520) 382 -2600 i FAX: 297 -3930 r reviewed by town staff. The statement supported the placement of the structure and the conclusion was based on current standards and practices. The Town of Marana appreciates your concerns regarding this issue and we will continue to monitor the changes to make sure they perform as designed. In response to your concerns about the traffic safety in the area of the proposed driveway, our Traffic Engineering Division has completed a review of the location. Their investigation of this matter revealed that the new driveway location should not present any substantial traffic safety or operational problems. Due to the low- volume and low - speed nature of Via Atascadero, the potential for conflicts between vehicles exiting or entering the driveway and vehicles on Via Atascadero is not expected to be significant. Stopping sight distances along Via Atascadero to the driveway were found to be adequate. In addition, the distance from the Via Atascadero /Calle Lorensita intersection to the proposed driveway was found to be adequate and in accordance with the Town's Land Development Code. Based on the above determinations, the Traffic Engineering Division found no traffic operational or safety reason to deny the application for the access easement abandonment at Lot 92. In accordance with the above explanations, the Town of Marana Engineering Division finds no reason to reject the application for the abandonment of the public drainage easement or the portion of the one -foot (1') no access easement as requested by property owner of Continental Ranch Parcel 51, Lot 92. For further assistance, please feel free to contact our office at (520) 297 -2920. Sincere , Myrlene Francis Engineering Aide cc: Farhad Moghimi, P.E., Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Kevin Thornton, P.E., Engineering Division Manager Fernando Prol, Traffic Engineer Dave Wostenberg, Engineering Aide Phylip and Nidia Jones RWA0310 -001 File MA�A A TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA 11 7 INFORMATION MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX.A.9. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Kevin Kish, Interim Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -33 Relating to final plat approval; Approving the Marana Golf Continental Ranch Final Block Plat. DISCUSSION Marana Golf Inc. is requesting the approval of Marana Golf Continental Ranch subdivision plat, which is a 354.34 acre multi-use development Final Block Plat located north of Cortaro Road, west of Interstate 10, south of an island of unincorporated Pima County, and east of the Santa Cruz River, within the Continental Ranch Specific Plan Area. The Block Plat consists of four blocks, with the following uses and acreage: Block 1 consists of 181 acres of golf course under the designation "R/R" (Residential Recreation), Block 2 consists of 97 acres of sand and gravel mining under the designation "AEP" (Aggregate Extraction and Processing), Block 4 consists of 20 acres of commercial under the designation " *C" (Freeway Commercial), and Block 5 consists of 33 acres of single family residential under the designation "MHD" (Medium High Density). In addition, a 10.46 acre linear trail will be built and dedicated to the Town along the western boundary of the site along Block 1. The subdivision currently has frontage provided by Arizona Pavilions Drive to the south and the I -10 frontage road to the east. The eastern access onto the frontage road will ultimately serve as the access for the trucking and mining operation. The southern access will serve the eventual single family residential development. Access points for commercial uses within Block 4 will most likely come from the I -10 frontage and internal circulation through the review and approval of the future development plans. Pedestrian circulation along the western boundary of the proposal area will be achieved through the construction of a public trail. The trail design will be generally consistent with the existing Town of Marana trail to the south of the proposal area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2004 -33. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Resolution 2004 -33. Bluesheet Marana Golf Final Plat doe } MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-33 RELATING TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL; APPROVING THE MAR.ANA GOLF CONTINENTAL RANCH FINAL BLOCK PLAT. WHEREAS, Marana Golf Inc. is representing the owners of 354 acres within the Continental Ranch Specific Plan generally located in Sections 22, 26, and 27, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, is east of the Santa Cruz River and West of Interstate 10; and WHEREAS, Marana Golf Inc. has applied to the Town of Marana for approval of a final block plat for Marana Golf Continental Ranch, creating Blocks 1, 2, 4, and 5 on the 354 acres; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have considered the application at the regular Town Council meeting held March 16, 2004; and • WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council have determined that the final block plat for Marana Golf Continental Ranch meets all applicable requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that the Marana Golf Continental Ranch final block plat is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this l6 day of March 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney • Resolution 2004 -33 Marana Golf Final Plat.doc r P .PP P P P P PO P P ? P v fYN P P P :APP ♦ v N� 11 9 1 1 1 P q :3 P WX Hal I a logo all '2 s g�$ gill 1 11 1 a � 2 s ¢ �'_ a e < 1 11 : AS I M I I s A s € ?c 2 €$ li P it s* ,so to i I y I� � � 1 I I I' ( � �► tog I N I C y 0 � � h II // yl �� J ill a X R e gin ff66 '144=9 hug u = � o -az — g $� rq plh aj re \eeo�y,.aywl�wn ow�rPWaF- +r -+-aa - ;F I ss s$sy � I o 8 iC ` J � as o a g q N \ / m I oil I lot - // v m W sit I _ I ° o ib r C n 7C WIW spy R� wx. -+ - ��a�" ) b. rr nr4j�n a n�n� 2 t a - , aaaaa � 11 m ~ a. b � ti •. � a � In cn C� cn -c <n to cn cn cn cn 1 ar+� �' Cn zC�� a cn to- w OO a H Al rn p � O ~ V 2 ^ t � \�eeomV.t+w�► cat<VP\aa.f- +a -ze.v IN Co Im u Q I( y (+ m o 0 f g A r I � N z z M m� y 1 s z C, i m °m� Z m O ' t ca rn !I Eli w • — z o !' Oo O� I 11 co z / /' > t A Z { i! i if CO 0 cA if o 11 O o €! y . Acn ( o AEI / \ > mm In X / m , i -or rn o t u(n.-4 CA ' A C W i! w �4 C cl if O »r m N < G] - i ' V C CO I ` W I I i f O — ^i ° z > C < I I �> m m rrnn IE u Z o� I to m i m m N ii v m > Z m y m > I ,r a � Q! m > x !f J ;€ / Ai / ;m m / >0 X cn. 1 O z.� Ci to / U rw C / / Iz m % 1� IIR / v / A / Iri O � �fi IT�� • a a a xn o O m XO // h N , m m a o Ln �� '12'.•2 fi -� �IZ N n / 0 I Z r Ln } � $14y z / I z m ^ D BIZ ~ / / O;a �I T W / I / v K-\>IPWIV ICOWARAMA • o I N�9 13pp35 pZ My 0 W / / GUM -u o O r0 ° ° o •' � ZJ;9''?+ � . �y . L SY 3 � v ,i � ,r i oy ° m Z I ' ✓ 4 � N �d �Z I / / / m 55 j / / / co D� m ��.�' �✓ rp �R�rz Al ahoy, / ig ; ly / ✓ i O . 3 L�y s 3 �C59 SZ $ ✓ ✓ 5 g9� id a ►! p4 \ o o n ' �a�o� f j `• ' WN u m morn OJrZ ; a m z y r N +i U , I -00 j 'V OD O > m c 1 /' /� 9� �O� ZZ co 0 J C C) O D (� F / 1/ A. A m N z ° i v m o� o 1 p i 7 X DM � N rri S . y 0 W � I ;mp A W 7 m N R . > cn T. C �� /0Ot`S,. I mm C v < m m oto o y r m �, D R y 0 / r I pyI D r� Z rr I o � rn ° D ` I m 10 m Z N m � y m z y 1O I v N / r� � zno D . (Arr i n o+nm \ I w 3 m o o c v __ LA FF5 U m \ t r _ m O ✓ r�+ q� � I n ¢ al at vm u 1 m : Iw �.0 Wtn� D� m} AU (n y .j \ Apy N j a> y `.. 0 c� c�i a z \ En CT per. �(�s \�S ZJS.,_ y / _ r;'•=q f' m V ° �ZO m °- o 0 C 48, B Al l O I ° ca r X83 6' / •� D D 0 u v -<� I I 9`q S. 'y c V Of U A W N �. � I yti f *1 ti� N N ' D O U O v 0 1 `'�° ° ° ° z N C A Ra i N G A C mo�mmAo p �p5� Sq• ��S► ° o ° A ° w W i C. 3 4Z L4 �a1 i A O U N t0 O ,00'SS£=a m' �C, _ cn O � U L �� I .(y/• A I N � (G O A D u C rn � o 0 U too a `a� y C m o - c m % o :d z 0 00 0 O z m s ; _ M Z p V 90 r 4. iV 03 cc M \tEOM KSY ARAMA GOOF— FP -4,dA 4 I�= I , II i to N • >�o b z 0 r / i Z / I m n a 0> z gZL�S� / / Oai 1 ZZ I / Z / 0 w / 0 rn m z ^ N C A II rn o -+ co co'A CO Dmm0 W vm D v r "-° Dz vn O NIA, y � Z z i I m �C m �poz ZM P.. : :I ZZ I F5 r m m ~ r Z y� m f Yy , a S I 9 �V z a 4 0.60N r M.. r 9l "60Z ZJp 0 , ?ZC CA Jim " a m �► �a � >oN ova I vN R- In rn vm _ � z;o Z „40 M lg'61-Z co rn ni o v rn m C t oy mo° z� C)n � Ao0 \\ Q` I NICE V1 Z N v �`+� ^Ia K. CC) mw C) m >z ys 0IN j m -' rn� Zw 0 - r_ i G) N mC + >� n m -00 C = > " ;iv e {Q A R, I co � I:. , / co �xrr °m A.or�+ w� m M �7 n I 0� 6. R• c� v>i V 9-9 p cam vc Nm Ln Y• c� �� ` ' ?'` m 00 Ln 68 ££8 /' 00 p0'Oyll = a a `' Sss mss!' 8 Pt\„wm\UNaNK4RAw, oais%IP\oar- fr -se.o F ass aassr s Q , i B 40.60" , I I 14_, _,'602 Aj II! Q f r i E• �. � III q,`• v _. m / r j I I F I F I - m ^ } wr \fj P o S I r X = Cj I f t NCI � m c I ! all 0> mu W u� I 0w � y /i / Z a a z m R ��AC� �� 9 4p4 <_ Y 88 Ir ft < A1:61 ?c� Z rte• / ; r / / \. o� x MA En > 4 N (.o 0� Ainf A S m El me y 6 6� s� C) •O i 1 % \\ , I OS- ro m Cum No f i I i I / / � `�• ` \ � / /-•. Op � .�- 4•Z££g� y c3m ��� It z z i s ° S ECTIO N LINE A N 0 z• m - - z �• A V z 4 _ _ \ `\ S74 b1 73.w Qv' Z i" c p c v i ��, 52 i33 4r=• -23'19 01" / A O a \ 7 ' S "W�� > - PJ U ° 'j'�p - x mN w 11 m �i0 0 o com m mu, 0 we 00> c0 z �� ;,fJ a �O p ti NN z � ) m �� rn c3m O fn WN - ' (' J T > u �Y[ N z _ a R =1026 03' - ;0 24 5.53' z f� rn M m `4d 9` ay sr4 ►ij �o II �fPVe�IC\aass o � , 0 1� / r Q XK .o 2 n7 n Q rn QQ / V � \ieewtWna�lve�w,► ao�i*\aaf�r• -e.a.p a V m 00 / / O1 0 O MK) .O a y / / �m N O �y ; mm vy • / Dz >;o 0 Qn �;o �>rn �� / Cp yzC / < C fzi / / � D� m / Z N N V mn rn V � C. N 0�/ / N N m / V/ o �m 2 / 0 i o 0 o / Z /. /. / 1 / 2 ti / _ a D N 0 D / 10 (T ` f D m z m L, > a O z Z 0 V J9 6L9 M "ZO,".00N / p N X > X / f ME En mU) / m. cn� z m ocn 'i - i o ,m L' ° ca xm ?K m a� Ln LP A m � ASP �� rnm m N z y OD m z Vl� G C :, m �'y \p• �. N� Ui z V INO� ,y �\ aZ c m P�DZ 503'31 23 "W 6 e T o co 510-05' 570.05' NO337 '23'E 291.48' r •' 00£ ° � - °o cn O CA L Z 6 Ks L l RUM A � ARM n c y" a O 00 >F °,9 �- ,G`o'o` 7� Cd�� $ 10 rn �• w y � � 4 , s4`s� V cv r V � * \U MUMKSWAR" aaY%P\QMF- fr -7-ao R I w TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA ; INFORMATION MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. B. 1 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Michael A. Reuwsaat, Town Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -35 Supporting the Pima County Board of Supervisors' call for a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancement. DISCUSSION On February 3, 2004, the Pima County Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. 2004 -18, calling a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancements. The Town of Marana participated in an extensive public input process through the County Bond Advisory Committee identifying and prioritizing projects county wide which are recommended to be funded through these bonds, if they are passed. Dan Sullivan was our representative on the County Bond Advisory Committee. Eleven projects proposed for $28,350,000 in bond funding will provide direct community benefit to Marana citizens. These projects are funded with $15,550,000 in general obligation bonds and $12,800,000 in sewer revenue bonds. The eleven projects proposed for funding, which are described in greater detail on the attachment, include neighborhood reinvestment for Honea Heights; relocation of the Ina Road Tire Facility; sewer expansion to serve the Marana Northwest Regional Airport; capital improvements for the Cultural and Heritage Park, Continental Ranch Santa Cruz River Lineal Park, Tortolita Trail system and De Anza National Historic Trail Restoration; expansion of the Marana. Wastewater Treatment Plant; the new Library at Cortaro and Silverbell; and preservation funding for the Marana Mound and Los Morteros sites. These projects will significantly improve the quality of life for Marana and Pima County residents and will provide the sewer capacity needed to support growth in northern Marana and employment opportunities at the Marana Northwest Regional Airport. If implemented, these projects will provide direct community citizen benefit and will address anticipated capital improvement needs of our community. Other projects such as the county -wide regional emergency radio system and open space acquisition will indirectly benefit Marana citizens through the enhancement of public health, and safety and will advance the balance of development and the environment. Town staff is forwarding to Council this resolution supporting the Board of Supervisors' call for the May 18, 2004 bond election recognizing that the projects proposed for funding with the bonds proposed in the upcoming May 18, 2004 bond election will provide significant direct and indirect benefits for the citizens of Marana and Pima County and that it is appropriate for these requests for bond authorization to be forwarded to the voters for consideration. Michael Hein, Deputy County Administrator, will be in attendance to answer any questions about the upcoming bond election. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council support the Pima County Board of Supervisors' call for a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancement. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Resolution No. 2004 -35. BLU 040316 Bond Election Resol.doc -2- 3/11/2004 10:12 AM FJC 4 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-35 SUPPORTING THE PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' CALL FOR A SPECIAL MAY 18, 2004 BOND ELECTION ON SIX QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS FOR SEWER SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT. WHEREAS, the Pima County Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. 2004 -18 on February 3, 2004, calling a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancements; and WHEREAS, the Town of Marana participated in an extensive public input process through the County Bond Advisory Committee identifying and prioritizing projects county wide which are recommended to be funded through these bonds if passed; and WHEREAS, eleven projects proposed for funding totaling $28,350,000 will provide direct community benefit to Marana citizens, consisting of $15,550,000 in general obligation bonds and $12,800,000 in sewer revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the eleven projects proposed for funding include neighborhood reinvestment for Honea Heights; relocation of the Ina Road Tire Facility; sewer expansion to serve the Marana Northwest Regional Airport; capital improvements for the Cultural and Heritage Park, Continental Ranch Santa Cruz River Lineal Park, Tortolita Trail system and De Anza National Historic Trail Restoration; expansion of the Marana Wastewater Treatment Plant; the new Library at Cortaro and Silverbell; and preservation funding for the Marana Mound and Los Morteros sites; and WHEREAS, these projects will significantly improve the quality of life for Marana and Pima County residents and will provide the needed sewer capacity to support growth in northern Marana and employment opportunities at the Marana Northwest Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, other projects such as the county -wide regional emergency radio system and open space acquisition will indirectly benefit Marana citizens through the enhancement of public health and safety. Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Marana recognize that the projects proposed for funding with the bonds proposed in the upcoming May 18, 2004 bond election will provide significant direct and indirect benefits for the citizens of Marana and Pima County; and THEREFORE, BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Marana supports the Pima County Board of Supervisors' call for a special May 18, 2004 bond election on six questions related to the issuance of general obligation bonds for public improvements and sewer revenue bonds for sewer system enhancement. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney i Resolution 2004 -35 special bond election.doc 2 3/11/2004 9:56 AM FJC c� z 3 Cd 0 w 0 Cd M 0 m cd m 4-4 0 t- 4-4 4-4 4-4 0 ,w ci o uu 0000 uuuu a,HaaF- +F�HHwaaa 0 w � O V ~ • O U O O O X000- O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a p N N N N N N N U U U U 4 �A A A \p � �+ X0000000 O C) C) 00000•. .. NNN awaa, V i � O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0< 0 0 .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 La 'S ®0000W) 0000 M O ®r10o00t�N'n C5 w � �64�696�]69696�969�69 c1' O � O 0 � � O is Cd O 0 O O c � 0 Z N c U H o �o co i `� o 'b � a �.� o x y cn o Q p., cd -• cn O O x-cs� C o �� a o ca cd � �x� a 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Project Title Honea Heights Reinvestment Package Project Scope Roadway and right -of -way improvements within the low - income Colonia of Honea Heights. This project in a component of the ongoing infrastructure targeted at this neighborhood. < Removing the homes from individual septic systems onto the northern Marana sewer system is underway. Project will consist of approximately five miles of pavement, ten streetlights and two miles of sidewalks Project Benefits The sidewalks and streetlights will enhance the look of one of the oldest and poorest neighborhoods in Town of Marana as well as provide increased security. The roadway repaving will repair damage to streets during the construction phases of the Honea Heights sewer project. Geographic The prima beneficiaries of the Honea Heights infrastructure primary g Distribution of improvements are the 200 low - income residents of this Colonia Benefits neighborhood. Mandated Service The only continuing Pima County mandate from the general infrastructure upgrades to this neighborhood would be with the sewers stem, and this is not a component of this bond project. Total estimated Costs Planning/Design: 150,000 Construction: 1,500,000 Right -of -Way: 50,000 Other Costs: 300,000 Total 2,000,000 Estimated Revenue Bond Fund 500,000 Sources Marana General Fund 1,500,000 Total 2,000,000 Estimated Project This project is tentatively scheduled to begin within the next Duration and Schedule one to three year period, and require approximately one year to reach completion. Intergovernmental The sewer phase discussed is a joint venture and IGA between Agreements the Town, Pima County and the Rural Development Agenc Project Management Project management will be by the Town of Marana Estimated Future The maintenance of the infrastructure improvements O &M Impacts accomplished by this bond project will be the normal Town - related responsibilities. 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Project Title Ina Road Tire Facility Relocation Project Scope The scope encompasses the planning/design and construction of a new county waste tire facility in a new location away from residential and commercial development Project Benefits The Town's mission, with regard to partnering with Pima County to relocate the Ina Road Waste Tire Facility, is to act on behalf of the health, welfare, and safety of the constituents in the area. Although the Town and the County feel it is important to offer a tire waste facility within close proximity to its constituent users, the development and urbanization of the area has made the current tire facility better suited for a different area. This project will benefit users and residents. Geographic The facility is used by constituents of all municipalities and Distribution of unincorporated Pima County Benefits Mandated Service No services will be further mandated from Pima County or other jurisdictions that doesn't already exist at the current site. Total estimated Costs Planning/Design 120,000 Construction 1,200,000 Land Acquisition 100,000 Relocation 80,000 Total 1,500,000 Estimated Revenue Bond Fund 1,500,000 Sources Total 1,500,000 Estimated Project Planning and Design FY 2004 Duration and Schedule Construction FY 2005 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental agreements will be executed between the Agreements Town of Marana and Pima Coun Project Management Project management will be by Pima Coun Estimated Future Estimated O & M impact is consistent with the current facility O &M Impacts 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet PROJECT TITLE SEWER EXPANSION TO MARANA REGIONAL AIRPORT Project Location Town of Marana — Intersectio of Moore and Sanders Road to Avra Valley Road. Project Scope This project will install 19,800 LF of new sewer line to include; 11,000 LF of gravity sewer main, 7,800 LF of forced sewer main, and 1,000 LF of DIP sewer main. A small pump station would be installed at the transition of gravity to forced sewer main. The new sewer line will be connected to the existing sewer line on Moore Road. The sewer line will run south from the intersection of Moore and Sanders Road to Avra Valley Road. The sewer line will then run east on Avra Valley Road to the Marana Regional Airport. Public Benefits This project will allow existing residents and businesses in this area to connect to sewer. The sewer line will provide the needed infrastructure to attract businesses to the Marana Regional Airport as an employment center for the surrounding area. New businesses will provide jobs and stimulate economic growth for the community. Geographic The primary beneficiaries of this project will be the residents of the Town of Distribution of Marana and the residents of Pima County. As new businesses locate in the airport Benefits employment zone new employment opportunities will be made for the entire County. Direct and indirect economic benefits will be countywide. Mandated Service This project will not further mandate functions of Pima County or any other urisdictions. Total Estimated The estimated cost to design this project is $300,000. The estimated cost to Costs construct this project is $2,500,000. Estimated Revenue Bond Funding is the revenue source. Sources Estimated Project Design would start in year 2 of the bond and construction would occur in year 3 Duration and of the bond. The design, bid and award process would take one year to complete. Schedule Construction would take 90 -120 days to complete. Intergovernmental There will not be a need for any intergovernmental agreements to implement this Agreements project. Project Pima County will be responsible for managing the project from design through Management construction. Estimated Future O Pima County will own and operate the completed project. The estimated & M Impacts additional annual operation and maintenance cost of this project would be less than $10,000. Pima County would be responsible for these cost and they would be funded through connection fees and through monthly sewer fees. 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Information Element Description of Information Project Title Cult ural and Heritage Park Project Scope The scope encompasses the planning/design, construction, restoration of over 120 acres of open space into 100 acres of open s ace, passive recreation and celebration of heritage. Project Benefits The Town's mission with regard to its heritage and cultural resources is to preserve, celebrate and appreciate the cultures and history of the Marana area. This park will attempt to recreate some of what has been lost while at the same time creating a new civic and museum district for the residents of the area to utilize. The park is slated to include a farmers market, an amphitheatre, museums, a community garden, a working farm and public buildings for civic groups. Geographic The location of the park is central to the Town of Marana but of Distribution of close proximity and benefit to unincorporated county residents Benefits on the east and west of the town and for City of Tucson residents who live in the northern portions of the city. Mandated Service No services will be further mandated from Pima County or other jurisdictions. Total estimated Costs Planning/Design 1,200,000 Construction 7,000,000 Administration 715,000 Total 8,915,000 Estimated Revenue Bond Fund 1,000,000 Sources Town of Marana C.I.P. 1,250,000 Town of Marana Impact Fees 5,000,000 Community contributions 715,000 Total 8,915,000 Estimated Project Planning and Design FY 2005/06 Duration and Schedule Construction FY 2005/10 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental agreements will be executed between the Agreements Town of Marana, The Arizona Historical Society, and Arizona State Land Office. Project Management Project management by Town of Marana Estimated Future Estimated O & M impact to Town of Marana is $350,000 / year. O &M Impacts 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Project Title Continental Ranch Santa Cruz Linear Park System Project Scope The Santa Cruz Linear Park scope encompasses planning/design and development of recreational opportunities and facilities along the Santa Cruz River Corridor from Marana's northern boundary at Barnett Road to its southern boundary at the confluence of the river and Rillito Creek. The particular area of focus in this project is through the Continental Ranch area near the new district park site at Cortaro and Silverbell roads. Project Benefits The benefits of the project include providing active and passive recreational opportunities the length of the river corridor. This includes trail development linking existing neighborhoods and facilities together and providing uninterrupted bicycle, equestrian, and pedestrian use throughout the system. The linear park system offers excellent opportunities for facilities and activities to memorialize, celebrate and interpret Marana's rich pre historic, early historic and present day culture. The linear park will play a critical role in the future preservation and enhancement of natural open space, wildlife habitat, and wildlife movement corridors. Development of public facilities related to recreation within the linear park include picnic areas for community gatherings, trail heads, wildlife observation blinds, interpretive sites, ball fields, nodes, equestrian facilities and enclosed dog parks are a critical part of the linear park development and the focus of this bond. . Geographic The location of the Santa Cruz Linear Park system primarily Distribution of benefits the citizens of the Town of Marana, and neighboring Benefits Pima County. Trail linkages throughout the system will enable access into the area from other trails associated with other drainages throughout the metropolitan area. Interpretative sites will invite visitors from all over into the system. Mandated Service No services will be further mandated from Pima County or other jurisdictions. Total estimated Costs Planning and Design 950,000 Construction 7,030,000 Administration 1,425,000 Public Art 95,000 Total Cost 9,500,000.00 Estimated Revenue Bond Funding 4,000,000 Sources Town of Marana CIP 5,500,000 9,500,000 Estimated Project Planning/Design FY 2005/06 -06/07 Duration and Schedule Construction FY 2007/08 - 2011/12 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental agreements between the Town of Marana Agreements and Pima County have been executed Project Management Town of Marana Estimated Future O &M impacts to Town of Marana 274,500.00 / year. O &M Impacts 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Information Element Description of Information Project Title De Anza National Historic Trail Restoration Project Scope The scope of this project encompasses the restoration of 24 miles of the Juan Batista De Anza National Historic Trail as it runs through the limits of the Town of Marana along the west bank of the Santa Cruz River from Barnett Road, south to Sunset Road. Project Benefits Benefits of the project include recreation opportunities for hikers, equestrians, and mountain bicyclists. The historical significance of the trail dates back to 1775 -76 when Juan Bautista de Anza led a group of colonists from Horcasitas, Sonora, Mexico to found a presidio and mission for New Spain at San Francisco Bay. The route became an overland trade route connecting farms in Mexico to mines in California. This section of the trail is part of a 1200 mile endeavor involving 19 counties in two states to construct a continuous trail from the Arizona- Mexico Border to San Francisco, California. Geographic The benefits associated with the De Anza Trail include residents Distribution of of the Town of Marana and surrounding Pima County and Benefits hikers from around the country as this is part of the National Park Service National Trail System. Mandated Service No services will be further mandated from Pima County or • other jurisdictions. Total estimated Costs Planning/Design 50,000 f� � Construction 1,125,000 Administration 225,000 Total 1,500,000 Estimated Revenue Bond Funding 750,000 Sources Town of Marana CIP 750,000 Total 1,500,000 Estimated Project Planning/Design FY2006/07 -07/08 Duration and Schedule Construction FY2008/09 -09/10 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental agreements have been executed between the Agreements Town of Marana, Pima County, and the National Park Service. Project Management Project management will be by Town of Marana Estimated Future Estimated O &M to Town of Marana $75,000.00 /yr O &M Impacts Y 2004 Bond Election Project Fact Sheet Project Title Tortolita Trail System Project Scope The scope of the Tortolita Trail System development encompasses the planning/design, construction, renovation of over 30 miles of new and existing trails associated with the Tortolita Mountain range and Town of Marana's Tortolita Preserve. The trail system is located within the boundaries of the Town of Marana and on neighboring state and county owned land. Project Benefits The benefits of the project include recreational opportunities for hikers, equestrians, and mountain bicyclists by providing access into the 3,245 acre Tortolita Mountain Park and 2400 acre Tortolita Preserve. Facilities include blinds for wildlife observation, scenic overlooks, interpretive signs for natural resource education, and picnic ramadas. Pima County has a planned Trailhead to be located at the southern end of the trail system off Tangerine Road, and Cottonwood Properties, developer of Dove Mountain is building a trailhead at the north end of their development off Dove Canyon Pass. Geographic The location of the Tortolita Trail System is of primary benefit Distribution of residents of the Town of Marana, Oro Valley, and Pima County. Benefits Cyclists and hikers from across the state and visiting the region will be drawn to the System. . Mandated Service No services will be further mandated from Pima County or other jurisdictions. Total estimated Costs Planning/Design 145,000 Construction 1,087,500 Administration 217,500 Total 1,450,000 Estimated Revenue Bond Fund 1,200,000 Sources Town of Marana C.I.P. 250.000 Total 1,450,000 Estimated Project Planning and Design FY 2005/06 -07/08 Duration and Schedule Construction FY 2008/09 -11/12 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental agreements have been executed between the Agreements Town of Marana, Pima County, and Arizona State Land Office. Project Management Project management by Town of Marana Estimated Future Estimated O & M impact to Town of Marana is $65,000.00 / O &M Impacts year. II Ww x• �� � COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE PIMA COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL CENTER 130 W. CONGRESS, TUCSON, AZ 85701 -1317 (520) 740 -8661 FAX (520) 740 -8171 C. H. HUCKELBERRY County Administrator January 30, 2004 The Honorable Robert Walkup, Mayor City of Tucson P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726 -7210 Re: Answers to Issues and /or Questions Regarding the Proposed May 2004 Bond Election ' Raised Through Council Offices or the Mayor's Office Dear Mayor Walkup: First, I would like to thank you for providing me with a copy of questions raised by individuals either to Council offices or your office. These questions are answered in the attached material. We would appreciate it if you could see that the individuals who raised the questions are provided with the appropriate answers. Many of the questions show a basic misunderstanding of the bond issue and program. However, it is important that these misunderstandings be cleared up, and I believe the attached information will do much to eliminate misinformation and /or confusion regarding the program. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these answers. Sincerely, c. C.H. Huckelberry County Administrator CHH /jj Attachment c: The Honorable Chair and Members, Pima County Board of Supervisors James Keene, Manager, City of Tucson Chair, Vice Chair and Members of the Pima County Bond Advisory Committee Jim Barry, Executive Assistant to the County Administrator Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond. Package (These responses are available at the County's website - www.pima.gov - then click on the link for the "May 18, 2004 Bond Election ") I. Ballot Question 1- Public Safety and Justice Facilities 1. Why is only $2.3 million for DM Land Acquisition in the "Public Safety" package and $7.7 million in the " Open Space" package? Shouldn't the entire $10 million for DM Land Acquisition be included in the "Public Safety" package? The County Bond Advisory Committee voted to allocate $10 million to prevent urban encroachment on Davis Monthan Air Force Base. In a later vote, the Committee voted to include $7.7 million of that amount under the functional category of "open space," which the Committee set at $180 million, and to include the remaining $2.3 million under the category of City of Tucson requests. The County Bond Advisory Committee never included this $2.3 million under their functional category of "public safety." The summary documents describing the Committee's recommendations clearly include the entire $10 million under the open space category, showing recommended funding for open space at $182.3 million. County bond counsel and the County Administrator only recommended including the Davis Monthan land acquisition under the open space question. The Davis Monthan Land Acquisition allocation of $10 million to prevent urban encroachment on Davis Monthan is included in the bond issue under the open space question. It is not included under public safety primarily because legal counsel has provided the opinion that the County does not have enabling legislative authority to acquire lands for Davis Monthan for the purpose of public safety, however, the County does have statutory authority to acquire open space specifically for the purpose of preventing urban encroachment on Davis Monthan; hence the location of the Davis Monthan land acquisition question. 2. Why was the City of Tucson portion of the Consolidated Court building reduced from $45 million to $41 million? Should we fund a proiect like this with a built -in shortfall? We should fund the whole project and get it done. The County Bond Advisory Committee closely questioned staff regarding cost estimates. Committee member Gomez was specific and deliberate in his discussions regarding uni -price costs associated with County versus City facilities and felt that the amount could be requested even more than the amount ultimately settled on by the Bond Advisory Committee of $41 million. The County faces similar situations in every bond issue, where citizen advisory committees question prices and costs developed by staff sometimes accurately, sometimes not. Committee member Sheafe moved, and the Committee approved, that the amount of the Municipal Court project to be funded with County general obligation bonds be reduced by $4 million, a reasonable estimate of the residual value of the property on which the structure currently exists, which City staff says will be demolished after the new facility is open and operational. Mr. Sheafe and others on the Committee believed that the existing property would serve a better economic function for the downtown if it were sold for private use. The final result is that if the facility is built and funds are short, additional funding would need to be provided by the benefitting local government entity sufficient to build the facility or the facility would be rescoped to fit the available funds. Page 1 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package II. Ballot Question 2 - Open Space and Habitat Preservation 1. Could we see a map of the specific parcels that will be purchased with this $180 million? The map should also show who the owners of the parcels are. The report of the Conservation Bond Advisory Committee contains a very clear map of priority acquisitions for the funds allocated; the specificity of property identification was discussed and debated by the Conservation Bond Advisory Committee. The Committee deferred from specific parcel identification for a number of reasons, primarily associated with price negotiations. The categories are: open space acquisitions related to habitat protection, community "signature properties," and Davis Monthan Air Force Base. A number of properties have been earmarked for acquisition by the County Bond Advisory Committee within the City of Tucson. Those include the Kino and 36th Street property, 36th Street /Tucson Mountain Park corridor and Agua Caliente Wash. 2. How much of the land that would be purchased with the $135 million for "Habitat Preservation" is owned by the State Land Department and other governments? There are no lands owned by other governments proposed for acquisition in the recommendations of the Conservation Bond Advisory Committee, except parcels owned and controlled by the State Land Department. The Conservation Bond Advisory Committee identified private land and State Land properties that had high biological values, dividing each category into high priority and secondary priority properties. The Committee's recommendations included 963 private parcels, totaling 108,153 acres and 808 State Land parcels totaling 549,312 acres. The State Land Department properties have received low priority for acquisition due to uncertainties related to, as indicated in Question 3, State Trust land reform and the entire issue of whether or not the Arizona Preserve Initiative is viable due to withdrawals of the conservation related sales such as Tumamoc Hill. 3. The State Land Department and Governor Napolitano are forming recommendations that would allow for conservation of State Trust Lands. Does it make sense to decide now which lands local government will purchase when those lands may be set aside for conservation anyway? State Trust land reform is simply a legislative concept. Numerous concepts have been proposed before and have failed at the ballot. Waiting to conserve precious resources based on State Trust land reform would be unwise, however, it is also important to understand that the present open space acquisition program does not conflict in any way with any State Trust land reforms that have been proposed. In fact, the State Trust land reforms that have been proposed are very beneficial to Pima County and complement the conservation program, however, there will be no funds spent on State Land acquisition in conflict with State Trust reform. Page 2 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package 4. How much is still unspent from previously approved Pima County Open Space bon packages? $7.2 million remains from the 1997 open space bond program. Of that amount, $1.4 million has been reserved for the Tumamoc Hill acquisition and approximately $5.8 million for Arizona Preserve Initiative matching funds for Tortolita Mountain Park expansion. The API reserved bond authorization has been targeted to the easterly side of Tortolita Mountain Park north of Oro Valley. As the Arizona Preserve Initiative continues to fall apart, we are uncertain as to whether or not State matching funds through the Arizona Preserve Initiative will be available to match these funds. In any event, County bond funds continue to be pledged toward this expansion of Tortolita Mountain Park as originally conceived in the bond implementation plan for the 1997 bond program. I11. Ballot Question 3 - Parks and Recreational Facilities 1. Could we see a map of the specific Parks and Recreation improvements? A t hese projects widely distributed throughout Pima County? The specific Parks and Recreational Facilities improvements proposed, as well as all proposed projects, are as indicated in the attached map. They are widely distributed throughout Pima County, and are concentrated most heavily inside the City of Tucson and within the other incorporated jurisdictions. Only a small amount of funding is available for the rural and unincorporated areas of Pima County, which have been largely bypassed with these improvements. 2. Will the specific amounts for each project be identified -or will the funds be "lumpe together" and the Board of Supervisors will decide which proiects get funded at a later date? The question is somewhat misleading with regard to projects getting funded at a later date. The practice of the Board is to determine specifically which projects get what funds long before there is an election. For the May 18, 2004 election, project specific bond allocations for Parks projects have been known from the beginning. The County Bond Advisory Committee recommended specific project -by- project funding for Parks projects, with the exception of recommending that the City of Tucson and Pima County allocate lump sums between eligible projects. Pursuant to the December 9, 2003 meeting, the Board Chair wrote to Mayor Walkup requesting that the City of Tucson allocate a lump sum among eligible projects prior to the Board's adoption of the resolution calling the election. The County Administrator's transmittal memorandum recommended project -by- project allocations as requested by the City of Tucson and project -by- project allocations, with increased bond funding, for County projects. These recommendations, as well as project -by- project allocations to Parks projects in other jurisdictions, were the basis for arriving at the $96.45 million amount approved for Question 4, Parks and Recreational Facilities, and were implicitly incorporated in the Board's approval of Page 3 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package that ballot question. We expect that the County's publicity pamphlet for the May 18, 2004 bond election will identify each and every project that is anticipated to be constructed if the bonds are approved. Similarly, the County's Bond Implementation Plan ordinance for the May 18, 2004 bond election will also provide very detailed, specific information on each and every project anticipated to be funded if bonds are approved. That is the purpose of the bond implementation plan. The specific project amounts, description, scope, timing of improvements and other factors are identified in the Bond Implementation Plan and will guide development of the project if approved by the voters. 3. Was the Eastside Senior Center omitted from the Bond. Package? If so, why? At the City of Tucson's request, Question 4 includes a $6 million bond allocation for an Eastside Sports and Senior Center. We have no reason to assume the City will ask that this project be deleted from the bond package. 4. How much is still unspent from previously approved Pima County Parks and Recreation bond packages? Pima County voters, through the 1997 bond election, have approved $131.4 million in Parks projects, $52.7 million of which were approved in the 1997 election. Of the $131.4 million in previous authorizations, there is a remaining authorization of $18.5 million from the 1997 program. Current planning for a potential bond sale in late spring of 2004 could include $14 million to $16 million from this remaining authorization. IV. Ballot Question 4 - Public Health and Community Facilities 1 . Is it wise to bundle together hospital, neighborhood re- investment performing arts centers and library projects all under the same ballot question? On the advice of bond counsel, hospital, neighborhood reinvestment and other public buildings such as performing arts centers, community centers, and libraries were placed under the same ballot question (Question 5, Public Health, Safety, Recreational, and Cultural Facilities) on the May 20, 1997 ballot. Question 5 received 57 percent voter approval. Projects and programs by voter question are not designed to be organized for political purpose such as the question implies. They are organized based on what is Legally permitted under Arizona law, reviewed and approved by independent bond legal counsel. 2. For what purpose are the additions to Kino Hospital? What services does Kino provide now, and how would that change if this bond package is approved? The bond proposal would allow for expanded psychiatric treatment facilities at Kino Community Hospital, separate from the Hospital itself. Presently, the Hospital provides limited community benefit for the purpose of medical health services. The Page 4 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package County is in the process of negotiating the turnover of Kino Hospital to University Physicians, Inc., the largest non - profit physicians' group in southern Arizona and the backbone of the University of Arizona Medical Education Program. Kino Community Hospital is not directly included in the 2004 bond election, except through associated or collaborating facilities such as the Public Health Center and the initial investment for a separate inpatient psychiatric facility (described previously) connected to the Hospital. The Kino management initiative undertaken by the Board will transition management and control of the Hospital to University Physicians, Inc. for the primary purpose of significantly increasing healthcare opportunities for the residents of Pima County. The Hospital today does not significantly provide services for the surrounding service population, primarily due to _a shortage of physicians and other health science professionals. The County, in collaboration with the University of Arizona and University Physicians, Inc., is embarking on a partnership plan that envisions significantly improved and expanded healthcare opportunities at Kino, as well as expanding the fundamental medical teaching mission of the University of Arizona. Arizona is last in the number of nurses per capita, 49th in the number of pharmacists per capita, 43rd in the number of physicians per capita, and last in the number of public health officials per capita. These statistics portray an ominous shortage of healthcare professionals to care for our population, particularly as it ages. Therefore, the proposed mission change at Kino Community Hospital combines a short -term vision of significantly expanding community access to Kino Community Hospital with a long -term vision to provide the opportunity for the University of Arizona to significantly expand their teaching mission and hence increase the basic healthcare capacity of this community. 3. What are all the existing funding sources for Kino Hospital? How does this compare to the way Maricopa County funds its community hospital? Kino Community Hospital has been funded through a combination of medical charges and related fees, as well as General Fund subsidies. This is the exact same way in which Maricopa County funded its community hospital up until their recent initiative to approve a sales tax to fund a significant component of the operating cost of the Maricopa County Medical Center. 4. Why was the Wilmot Library funding reduced from $10 million to $7 million? The Bond Advisory Committee did not question the $10 million cost estimate for the Wilmot Library project. Chris Sheafe again questioned whether County general obligation funds alone were necessary to rehabilitate or replace the Wilmot Library. Following the Sheafe analysis, the Committee felt strongly that the existing Wilmot Library could in fact either be reused, avoiding the cost of land acquisition,.or was an asset with a value of at least $3 million that could be marketed and the proceeds allocated to design and construction of a new library. Hence the Committee decided on a 16 to 0 vote to reduce the cost of the Wilmot Library from $10 million to $7 million. Page 5 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package V. Ballot Question 5 - Flood Control Improvements 1 . Flooding issues continue to affect roadway access through streets in the central part of the City of Tucson. Many of these areas are in Supervisor Elias' district. Why are there no City of Tucson proiects in this package? The flooding issues, particularly related to roadway access, are not particularly pressing flood control matters. Flood control investment generally relates to the public investments that insure that property and lives are not endangered by flooding. Street flooding is typically a nuisance problem that occurs sporadically throughout the year and typically a very short amount of time on any particular day. Large portions of the City of Tucson, similar to everywhere else in Pima County, do not have storm drains since Tucson is considered to be an arid environment where storm drains are generally few and far between. The Bond Advisory Committee addressed this issue by including funds for urban drainage. The City of Tucson is certainly eligible to submit projects for funding through the urban drainage program. 2. According to the City's analysis, for many years City of Tucson residents contributed over 60% of the Flood Control District's revenues, but received only about 25% of the Flood Control District's proiect expenditures. How will you Persuade City taxpayers' support for additional District expenditures outside the City of Tucson? The issue associated with funding by the Flood Control District and the City of Tucson is a myth that has been perpetuated by continuing misinformation on the matter. Numerous studies have been completed that indicate that, while the City constitutes about 46 percent of the tax base of the Flood Control District, it has received over 50 percent of the Flood Control District capital improvements and or funding. It should be remembered that City annexation policy had been to avoid crossing major watercourses such as the Rillito and even portions of the Santa Cruz River for decades, leaving the Flood Control District to install flood control and major bank stabilization along these watercourses, allowing the City to then annex the areas and avoid these infrastructure costs. These annexed improvements become part of the investment the Flood Control District allocated as a benefit to the City of Tucson since, had the improvements not been made, it is questionable whether or not the City of Tucson would have annexed across the particular major watercourse. VI. Ballot Question 6 - Sewer System Revenue Bonds 1 . The Tucson Citizen reports that a maiority of the Board of Supervisors is requesting an outside audit of the County Wastewater Department. Is it wise to pursue Sewer System bonds before the audit is completed? The County last asked for voter authorization for sewer system bonds over six years ago. At that time the major focus was to provide treatment capacity in areas already under development. Outside funding sources such as state or federal grants Page 6 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package for sewer projects are virtually non - existent, and a major source of funding for major capital improvements is sewer revenue bonds. The projects proposed for the 2004 sewer system bonds have a greater emphasis on rehabilitation. These projects are necessary and vital to maintaining the integrity of the sewer system. Failure to fund these projects will result in more sanitary sewer overflows, violations of state and federal environmental permits, and potential catastrophic failures of the sewer infrastructure. An annual financial statement audit was completed by the State of Arizona, Office of the Auditor General in November of 2003. The audit reported that the Wastewater Management Department's cash reserves were depleted during fiscal year 2003 with the investment of a substantial amount of funding for sewer construction projects. In addition, the loss from the State Treasurer's Local Government Investment Pool was also noted. These unanticipated costs resulted in .a def'ic'it cash balance of $12 million for fiscal year 2003. To eliminate the cash deficit, the Department borrowed $10.9 million from the General Fund and $2 million from the Department's Solid Waste Division. The retirement of this debt will be undertaken while addressing the debt burden imposed by the proposed 2004 bonds. 2. Sewer rates have increased quickly and at a high rate over the last few years. Where have the funds been spent? Would proposed additional increases in rates make selling the bonds more difficult? Rates have been increased four times in the last five years and the average rate increase in those five years was 3.8 percent. Even so, the sewer rates in Pima County are among the lowest in the nation. A survey by the City of Phoenix conducted in March 2003 shows Pima County sewer bills fourth lowest among 18 cities in the Southwest. A survey by Black & Veatch Corporation in 2003 shows Pima County sewer bills sixth lowest among 49 cities throughout the United States. Furthermore, a financial survey conducted by the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies says the average residential sewer bill in the United States is $19.58 per month, compared to Pima County's $13.11 sewer bill. Pima County's sewer bills are 33 percent lower than the national average. The three major expenditure categories for the Wastewater Management Department are operating and maintenance, debt service, and capital improvements. In the last three years, operating and maintenance expenses have increased from $36.4 million (fiscal year 2001), to $39.2 million (fiscal year 2002), to $46.4 million (fiscal year 2003). However, $2.4 million of the fiscal year 2003 increase was the result of emergency repairs to the Northwest Outfall Sewer that was crushed on September 7, 2002. Debt Service has increased an average of 8 percent in the last three years from $1 1 .8 million in fiscal year 2001 to $13.6 million in fiscal year 2003. However, construction in progress has increased from $38.3 million in fiscal year 2001, to $73.9 million in fiscal year 2002, to $136.2 million in fiscal year 2003. This increase is a result of several large Page 7 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package construction projects: the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility Expansion and Process Improvements, Randolph Park Water Reclamation Facility, Green Valley Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion and Northwest Outfall Sewer Rehabilitation. In the past the Department was criticized for having a large cash balance in the system development fund. The Department's response was that these funds were programmed for capital improvements. Now that several capital improvements have been constructed (or close to completion), combined with the unplanned expenditures for the Northwest Outfall Sewer repair and rehabilitation, the Department is once again under criticism, this time for not having a cash balance. Sewer revenue bonds are paid back with revenues from the sewer system. Therefore, if there, are insufficient revenues, bonds are not sold. Bond rating agencies look to communities that have the political and local support to repay the increased debt from bond sales. Failure to increase rates on a regular basis may actually increase interest rates on sold bonds because of uncertainty of rate increase support in the financial market. 3. Supervisor Elias has rightly expressed concern about sewer fees paid by inner city residents subsidizing new development in the more affluent areas of the County. Has Pima County used funds paid by City of Tucson residents to subsidize urban sprawl development in the Northwest and outside the City limits? If so, what percentage of total department revenues has been spent on supporting new development? What percentage has been spent maintaining existing infrastructure inside District 5 and in the total City of Tucson? The argument that sewer fees are subsidizing new development in more "affluent" areas is unsubstantiated. A review of the CIP project locations would show few CIP projects in the "affluent" areas. Developers build the public sewer infrastructure and pay sewer connection fees. These fees were raised significantly by the Board last year (three -12 percent increases each in April, July and September, 2003). The County sewer system is operated as a regional system, therefore, operating expenses are used to maintain the overall existing infrastructure. If anything, the sewers in the inner -city areas are more costly to maintain because these sewers are older and require more preventive maintenance, and have been the areas where sewer rehabilitation work has taken place. In March of 2002, staff prepared an information memorandum listing the wastewater projects in District 5. VII. General Questions 1. All elected officials want a bond package that is in the best interests of the.City of Tucson, all the cities and towns and all of Pima County. Does the $556 Bond Package address the most critical needs faced by the Greater Tucson -Pima County community? For example: Page 8 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package • The AZ Daily Star reports that only 10% of our region's maior roads have handicap- accessible sidewalks. • The County has said that our roads "may be in poorer condition and more deficient in capacity to accommodate existing travel than ever before." • The City Manager reports that per- capita library spending in Pima County is about 45% lower than the national average ($3.07 vs. $5.57). • Tucson recently lost a Level -One Trauma Center We agree wholeheartedly that the bond package should be in the "best interests of the City of Tucson, all cities and towns and all of Pima County." We would add the Tohono O'odham and Pascua Yaqui communities to this list. To the question of whether the County bond package addresses "the most critical needs faced by the Greater Tucson -Pima County community," the Arizona Daily Star for one, has answered "Yes." In an editorial on Sunday, December 7, 2003, the newspaper called the Bond Committee's recommendations a "solid bond proposal" and urged the Board of Supervisors to approve it. In a second editorial, on Tuesday, January 20, 2004, the newspaper again urged the Board to "approve the bonds," and said that the "money is urgently needed for many projects throughout the county, and the package is fairly balanced to serve residents throughout the region." The Citizens Bond Advisory Committee also believes it produced a balanced, fair and affordable package of recommendations. The 19 members of this Committee, as well as the Conservation Bond Advisory Committee and Neighborhood Reinvestment Advisory Committee, came from throughout Pima County. In fact, more than one -half of these committee members were residents of the City of Tucson. Regarding the specific community needs mentioned, Pima County was clear from the outset that the general obligation bond packages would not include transportation funding. No one doubts the urgency of meeting our regional transportation needs, but general obligation bonding is not the appropriate funding mechanism for meeting these needs. On libraries, I would simply note that for the current fiscal year, the Pima County Library District increased its contribution to fund operation and maintenance of the library system by $736,486 over and above its agreed upon contribution of 50 percent. By increasing our contribution, Pima County firmly supported libraries, while at the same time the City was decreasing its contribution for the same year. Page 9 Answers to Questions Regarding the Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package We are fully aware that the region lost a Level -One Trauma Center. Pima County is the only local government, outside of the Tohono O'odham Nation, that directly funds the provision of healthcare, so we were acutely aware of and prepared to help with saving this trauma center. Loss of this center is the strongest argument in support of the bond funding to strengthen and expand the County's public health complex at the Kino Campus. 2. What will Pima County do to assure the public that the proiects listed in the bond package will be completed on -time and on- budget? How will Pima County convince the public that it is accountable and trustworthy? Pima County is the only local government with a "Truth in Bonding" ordinance of the breadth and detail passed by the Board of Supervisors in 1997. The Board of Supervisors has already approved two bond implementation plan ordinances, for the two 1997 bond elections, and is now writing the ordinance for the May 18, 2004 bond election. The County Administrator has stated on several occasions that he expects the bond ordinance for this election to run over 200 pages. County staff will work with all of the local jurisdictions in writing this ordinance. The ordinance will: a) list every project that we intend to fund if the bonds are approved; b) detail the scope, benefits, costs, funding sources, schedules, and expected operation and maintenance costs for every project; c) detail mechanisms for enhancing accountability over the successful model from the 1997 ordinances; d) discuss timing of bond sales and how commitments to keeping property tax rates level or declining will be met; e) identify jurisdictional responsibilities for implementing projects and identify the needs for intergovernmental agreements; f) establish procedures for managing projects for which actual costs are going to be greater than costs estimated in the ordinance; and g) establish procedures for publicly amending projects when circumstances require. Pima County will produce and publish semi - annual progress reports on the 2004 bond election, as well as continue to publish the progress reports on the 1997 bond programs. The ordinances and reports will all be made available on the County's website and whenever requested by the public. CHH /jj January 30, 2004 Page 10 PCGS 1128104 ep n i SAHUARO AJO - GILA BEND HIGHWAY �RD n rn 9 H ( CEDAR ST. lA,y,� N DF \ N a �ld o 0- j N MCP wECC N0. 7 9 oa R / / SANDERS RD O Tp �1O �rJ (70 m2rJ co SANDARIORD ag O �N 30., r S�� pa� a s ;Z j n CA (p r ti� Z �• rb s tr CID w m 3�0 Q �C a a' 33 0 Z3 � C �'m cD ? / O uo to m ° m zi W Q O O. Q WADE RD C z 0 CMO. VERDE GERHART RD x N m , H -4 y K z HARTMAI LN. =`' JOSEPH /�+O� P 0 r < ;p,. . DEOESTE 3 z Mlss'0 q a p t/I $ a > THORNYDAL RD. N O 33 Fn y o o g WH = n ° CARDINAL "" ? _ 5 �' a 0 '•�� z r " GREASEWOOD RD" m T n z 71 ° ° m - LAC BLVD.w T z _... . � ._ a LA CANADA D is I�� m ' 12TH AVE: ;6TH AVE.. > - 15 1 O E AVE. NOGALES HWY. I f b 1ST AVE. AVE A PARK .AVE. z D PBFt AVE M T 0 V R COU YCLUBRD. V z � ALVERNO WAY ALVERNON WAY z .•. m r t ONT OC m ° Tvv AGO z SWAN RD m zo Z \� 0 R( r„ g .D pAgkyl C190 CRAYCROFT RD rn Q z WILM T RD. ; �+IT C/j T , WILMOT RD. m 0 m KOLB R _ D. O �p PANTA O,RD. � r Z °e S41 tp Cleek9� 0 A CAMINO SECO '. O BEAR CA ON RD. O HARRISON RD. 9 �. 9 oy" ` 'ti9 Z F © OUGHTON R ° z e ® HOUGHTON RD. ,r m El ° 9 POMBdE W ro C ° FREE AN RD. m SOLDIER TRAIL WENTWORTHRD A� D '00 O ^O WENTWORTH m { - ° CAMINO LOMA ALTA n Oz a mr 9 � o g �1'i O r0N q4 � r 0 v > r r-3 G7 Q � 2004 Pima County Bond Pr CD 00 00 0 0000 O 000 O 000000 0 o O o OO 0O0 0 coo 0 00 00 O 0000 o 000 0 000000 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 coo 0 00 00 0 00o0 0 000 o 000000 o O o O 00 coo o 000 0 66 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 l_:d 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5 666 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 O 000U) O CO -0 0 000000 0 o O O 00 000 O coo L O N LO LO O LO r 0q:T O N f- LO O O fl_ 0 0 0 N O O O O O CO coo O O N O r r r r Cl) r LO Llj cd Il N M d• Ln ( O V Ln M L!) N r. N O O Q) r Ct N r N N r r r LA 60 vw a as C m Q L p a m U a cm c cz2 co 0) c U m fl U CO cn c .2'5 C/) _ > p p Z C U o + m N cn ca E o o () as m W cis U o c ar W � C 0 O J c c_0 LL �« CO -0 LL m J CD 0 (D p E o c c a z o o~ c m as R. E a � n ca m - r m o o c c�n 0 0 - c co O c o m m c U (n U Q U L U a) m ._ } p 0 a) a) U �Ea)E m z o>Q a) o Y = Z c m C ca Z L p H + cn m c o 3 ca E Y 3 m v n aQi -1 o- o a) OUN p o m� U cOm m U cnw m °U m aa)) U a) •,= Y C C C` C O C U O ,,.., U C -0 O z , c O t m ' = -`- CO - X a) N m of U) Q CC se _ �s ED O0TzM >a) o :— - a °- za U N m �Y � C's N a _Q (n ; cn o N 0aC c > m C O~ Win- �- Q m0UJ I- Q p C0 -0 Y 0) >, cri cU ._ C C' -J p p U E 'C LL i m Z m cn C m W LL LL LL Z >> E CD L m C Q. Cf) N CO a C a) C m a) a) 0 0 p U -. a) Y CU «= cn� p c ' c rn. l-L. > > C > a oa,.� c UUU Cl- `- �Y O N C '' U m a) ca a)L'O S+ z � .. - 0 L - U > ddQ > � 7 p� m _ 'i m e Ta O O J m 4) -- C -- N a N N 0 N O o O N U a) a) m > >~ C° c ca c -c' : - U a _ o 3 0 0>- EU E> E - 0 c M� i o c >UOCm - - oaw 2 c 3 E _n � c c a) O m is - �- m o m N Y U U m U m a m ca a U m c a) �, m m m m m m o E cts > •2 7 5 u-) E 0+ O m W cS > E R o� m 7 0 0 0 a O LO _1 O U W Z O O 0" c m w m m m ~ a) J p O a) p Q C V p m m m O_ p p 0 O O Q m m m ca p m An W O O c� Z m m m N O +� 0 oC cc c am = Z��O�1- _ L��?�VU� m wcncnOCC/) UH aOC m�u)M f-U�a c c C�Z���� $ 3 3 2 C7 2 m M 000 O�-N OM d LL) > O W Z - O r N MMd �d d d J�ct� r N M m co I , wm r m ,= N aM V 6 (OW r w - r r c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 co 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O O O 000000 OOLOOOOOomoomoom or 00 0L()0 Ln00 LoLo 000000 0 0 O o L1)000LA "t 1,- I-0r0w0r- , mo(Drr LON LO LO ONOf-00N(OCO O O Il_ � � M (C) N� N C9 M N N r r M M M N N r M N N r N (O u (O r C' r N N r E a) U) x O L 3 3 m >' a) a) ; (D p O C � Cn Q m a) C C C O U_ Q , C _ C - c ° U O p U C m� m ::3 O Cc C a) M __ O L O :3 Y O C o L U C - m C O C +' O) •- i m C .- a-, a c a o a) + a) = a) o Lr o - C m LL -� a) m U a 0 =3 Ca I co E E U p >, U L m - C C + 0) . c cn C o % a) O, W a) +' N a ° +- E c Q L m � m a U)° a o - L ca a U u� cn a o_) 0 cz Y -� m �) O . m O .. _ O cn m �_ c_n co U cn cr o o ' 3 W a) Y Y J O x c`a ca 3 C O y m °2S a) m 7 a +. +. O c L «- m` a s a) m m Y m N CES o �U'� W o �m U E ° aa) �� Z `� O �m ° � °� ai ° N co (nn� a �a-0 m. = � p} a c Q Ea a a a) pmt �= E c'QC '�s LL o c c Co c - C/) � O m '� U pp cn j c� U c a) U a�i o a o c L m 3 � .o m Y ? o U c E ami CO n a o m m o �c U c 3 E C (? c O o- U m L m 2 O Ln - ca w cn ° w U .- rn E O m o m cn cn c U cz -� U U U) } m m m C o) ._ E E m o a) ._ L c > �. - O C L c C C L C - c U O m (n cq p J c V- a) m fn Q U) LZ c E 00 a) J ch o CO o ° U) > o m C a 3 Q p o cn > a m o o m .c ° w a) OC a o g m_ F u) o Q U U L m .� c _ CL U :r C U u) c p - o f p a) ._ L cu C Y a L a) U - CL Ln +_. m C U m m ;_, a) I- � Q � > a) C U) a) F- >+ U � � > }' � ` U x c '_' U a) O (n =3 +- � > c _1 c 3 '_ ° a) N _ m cam E ca > m m O O Lo 0) m LL p m '� N O j N O N c o � o U n O ca ��� U rn r- J •C m Z 0+ m m Q) U c -- a) L m LL a) u) O a) --' 7 x c m o c m a) CO a . p ca J a) E L o o a o C U Q Z c .0 i cn cn Li p m ° - _ c rn c ° W m CTj a DEc caM000c -° a00 :3mUo0Q. as.?ai= _c_ ° �� �0000�� �c m UZ m U -�F- wUa >Jmao m (� m�UU� m�cc YLLm o W —z as 0C D Cc O r N M 4 6 (6 r a S- M m O r- N M 4 Lo 6 f-� M 6 O r N M 4 6 6 1 r N M Ct 6 6 U r N M 4 to Or.� CO m r r r r r r r r m r r N N N N N N N N N NUM M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 O O O 0000 ,N 00000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O O O O O O o O 0000 M 000 00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O O O O O O O O 0000 O O O 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 666 O O O O O O O O 6666 O c o 0 0 o c 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 00000 o o O O o 0 O 00000000000000 000LD Lf)CV Occ 0co00M O o LO ON0 co �. r Ln r N r r N M r O f 0 Ln r L() O N r LO N N M r O O r r r r 0: r N r N O • � �, � Ei? fR EA U c� U (1) ° (1) E a) m o � a ttl a _ as a_ o aJ U) c a) a) O a cc a) w U tY o v n w m E in c o Q� O C p m a) 2 a c c c CU a) Z U �. a) o �. > C o a) w Ln c cn Ln a) Q +� E A `'H m u' Q °gym O o SaUo�N ° Z �7� W c° w o Q a m w m m� Lm U O 02 _ cn x �c a) C c N �- p C c m U W O U a) _ Q m C w a , - 2 " ^"` p a ' Y °- m a C3) m m U U N Y > > .� a) a m W a) a) a -' Q O m > Q J O a) O E Y z .0 Q E Q U p U) j a) c o cm U) a°�ia co i w oa c co W m _ U 2 c E E cW ° m N m 75 Z) Q � ,o z L a) m co C c a m m U� U E m � j m m a C a) c w m 2 ca ca O i.l f d m U- O c U v (n >> N a) d N Q - m a) a) 0 0 m (D O O m M O m o m p m c 2 2 2 Co w 0 U > c a o o .- o L W c c° 00 o c"ao oU a)2 �?�wcn2 m•� o c O J �>,JU Ei°O� 3 ?:Ir yin c OA a ~ n o o o o '� o c 12 _ w a N a Q ca c m ° p CC O C L cLn p° O c c a a) L O E v) Q C O i i U a >> L +m+ 2 O N 2 LL E Q) J ca O tT a N m Cl ;� O m m O m m m m 0 0 0 0 m� c 0) m 0 m 0 U� N N m C O�� E m O p ca H . .c .E O z W a m o a z'E 2 S z a a m F- � LL sv ;CCI Q O N M 4 L (6 r c6 O . w O Z r O N M 4 V Q> U r N M Ln (O f� 00 o) r r r r r r r r r r m r N M 0 4 U (O 1" w z �sJ'" Questions Regarding Proposed 2004 Pima County Bond Package L Ballot Question #1— Public Safety and Justice Facilities I. Why is only $2.3 million for DM Land Acquisition in the "Public Safety" package and $7.7 million in the "Open Space" package? Shouldn't the entire $10 million for DM Land Acquisition be included in the "Public Safety" package? 2. Why was the City of Tucson portion of the Consolidated Court building reduced from $45 million to $41 million? Should we fund a project like this with a built -in - shortfall? We should fund the whole project and get it done. - U. Ballot Question #2—Open Space and Habitat Preservation 1. Could we see a map of the specific parcels that will be purchased with this $180 million? The map should also show who the owners of the parcels are. 2. How much of the land that would be purchased with the $135 million for "Habitat Preservation" is owned by the State Land Department and other governments? 3. The State Land Department and Governor Napolitano are forming recommendations - - - -that would allow for conservation of State Trust Lands. Does it make sense to decide now which lands local government will purchase when those lands maybe set aside - -- - - for conservation anyway? 4. How much is still unspent from previously approved Pima County Open Space bond packages? ._III.. _ ..Ballot Question #3- -Parks and Recreation Facilities 1. Could we see a map of the specific Parks and Recreation improvements? Are these projects widely distributed throughout Pima County? , 2. Will the specific amounts for each project be identified —or will the funds be "lumped together" and the Board of Supervisors will decide which projects get funded at a later date? 3. Was the Eastside Senior Center omitted from the Bond Package? If so, why? 4. How much is still unspent from previously approved Pima County Parks and Recreation bond packages? IV. Ballot Question #4-- Public Health and Community Facilities 1. Is it wise to bundle together hospital, neighborhood re- investment, performing arts centers and library projects all under the same ballot question? 2. For what purpose are the additions to Kino Hospital? What services does Kino provide now, and how would that change if this bond package is approved? 3. What are all the existing funding sources for Kino Hospital? How does this compare to the way Maricopa County funds its community hospital? 4. Why was the Wilmot Library funding reduced from $10 million to $7 million? V. Ballot Question #5 —Flood Control Improvements 1. Flooding issues continue to affect roadway access through streets in the central part of the City of Tucson. Many of these areas are in Supervisor Elias' district. Why are there no City of Tucson projects in this package? 2. According to the City's analysis, for many years City of Tucson residents contributed over 60 of the Flood Control District's revenues, but received only about 25% of the Flood Control District's project expenditures. How will you persuade City taxpayers' support for additional District expenditures outside the City of Tucson? VI. Ballot Question #6— .Sewer System Revenue Bonds 1. - The Tucson Citizen reports that a majority of the Board of Supervisors is requesting an outside audit of the County Wastewater Department. Is it wise to pursue Sewer System bonds before the audit is completed? 2. Sewer rates have increased quickly and at a high rate over the last few years. Where have the funds been spent? Would proposed additional increases in rates make selling the bonds more difficult? 3. Supervisor Elias has rightly expressed concern about sewer fees paid by inner city residents subsidizing new development in the more affluent areas of the County. Has Pima County used funds paid by City of Tucson residents to subsidize urban sprawl development in the Northwest and outside the City limits? If so, what percentage of total department revenues has been spent on supporting new development? What percentage has been spent maintaining existing infrastructure inside District 5 and in the total City of Tucson? VII. General Questions 1. All elected officials want a bond package that is in the best interests of the City of Tucson, all the cities and towns and all of Pima County. Does the $556 Bond Package address the most critical needs faced by the Greater Tucson -Pima County community? For example: • The AZ Daily Star reports that only 10% of our region's major roads have handicap - accessible sidewalks. • The County has said that our roads "may be in poorer condition and more deficient in capacity to accommodate existing travel than ever before." • The City Manager reports that per- capita library spending in Pima County is about 45% lower than the national average ($ vs. $5.57). • Tucson recently lost a Level -One Trauma Center 2. What will Pima County do to assure the public that the projects listed in the bond .package will be completed on -time and on- budget? How will Pima County convince the public that it is accountable and trustworthy? Thank you to Pima County and the Pima County Bond Advisory Committee for your work on this proposed bond package. Board of Supervisors Approved Ballot Questions - January 20, 2004 Approved Bond Question Allocation General Obligation Bonds Question 1 Sonoran Desert Open Space and Habitat Protection; Preventing Urban Encroachment of Davis 174,300,000 Question 2 Public Health and Community Faciltiies 81,800,000 Question 3 Public Safety and Justice Facilities 183,500,000 Question 4 Parks and Recreational Facilities 96,450,000 Question 5 River Parks and Flood Control Improvements 46,200,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 582,250,000 Sewer Revenue Bonds Question 6 Sewer System Revenue Bonds 150,000,000 2/5/04 Page 1 of 7 Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects Allocat 2004 General Obligation Bond Questions Question 1 Sonoran Desert Open Space and Habitat Protection; Preventing Urban Encroachment of Davis Monthan Air Force Base Total Question 1 174,300,000 Question 2 Public Health and Community Faciltiies Public Health Facilities Kino Public Health Center 25,000,000 Teresa Lee Health Clinic 2,000,000 New Psychiatric Hospital 12,000,000 Sub -Total Public Health 39,000,000 Other Facilities Animal Care Center 3,000,000 Roy Place Commercial Bldg Restoration 800,000 Green Valley Performing Arts Center Phase 2 4,000,000 Mt. Lemmon Community Center 1,000,000 Amado Food Bank Kitchen 300,000 Sub -Total Other Faciliities 9,100,000 Neighborhood Reinvestment Neighborhood Reinvestment 20,000,000 Housing Reinvestment 10,000,000 Sub -Total Neighborhood Reinvestment 30,000,000 Ina Road Tire Relocation 1,500,000 Page 2 of 7 012104BOSApproved.xlsDetails 2/5/04 Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects Allocation County -Owned Museums Arizona Sonora Desert Museum - Auditorium 1,000,000 Arizona Sonora Desert Museum - Gray Water 200,000 Pima Air and Space Museum - Hangar 1,000,000 Sub -Total County -Owned Museums 2,200,000 Total Question 2 81,800,000 Question 3 Public Safety and Justice Facilities Regional Public Safety Communications System 92,000,000 New Justice Court/Municipal Court Complex 76,000,000 Rehabilitation of Old Courthouse 4,500,000 Corrections Jail Security Project 3,000,000 Interagency Victim Advocacy Center 6,000,000 Juvenile Court Build -Out 2,000,000 Total Question 3 183,500,000 Question 4 Parks and Recreational Facilities Cultural /Historic Resources Bond Program Empirita Ranch Buildings Rehabilitation 400,000 Canoa Ranch Buildings Rehabilitation 2,700,000 Anza National Historic Trail 3,750,000 Fort Lowell Acquisition & San Pedro Chapel 3,000,000 Helvetia Townsite Acquisition 100,000 Steam Pump Ranch Rehabilitation 2,000,000 Binghampton Historic Buildings Rehabilitation 800,000 Marana Mound Community Site 2,000,000 Page 3 of 7 012104BOSApproved.xlsDetails 2/5/04 Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects Alloc Dakota Wash Site Acquisition 750,000 Coyote Mountains Sites Acquisition 800,000 Honey Bee Village Acquisition 1,000,000 Performing Arts Center Rehabilitation 682,000 Valencia Site Preservation 100,000 Los Morteros Preservation 100,000 Pantano Townsite Preservation 50,000 Ajo Curley School Historic Art Institute 500,000 Dunbar School 1,218,000 Sub -Total Cultural /Historic Resources Bond Program 19,950,000 Parks /Recreation Pima County Parks Flowing Wells Community Center 3,500,000 Southeast Regional Park /Shooting Range 3,500,000 Sports Field Lighting of Existing Fields 3,000,000 Curtis Park - Flowing Wells East 2,250,000 Catalina Community Park 2,000,000 Dan Felix Memorial Park - Pegler Wash 1,750,000 River Bend Park 3,000,000 Mehl- Foothills Park 2,000,000 Rillito Race Track 2,250,000 Kino Public Sports Field Lighting 650,000 Feliz Paseos Universal Access Park 1,000,000 Picture Rocks Pool 2,000,000 Sub -Total Pima County Parks 26,900,000 City of Tucson Parks Page 4 of 7 012104BOSApproved.AsDetails 2/5/04 Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects Allocation Eastside Sports Complex and Senior Center 6,000,000 Northside Community Park 5,500,000 Southeast Community Park 6,000,000 Houghton Greenway 1,400,000 Julian Wash Linear Park 3,700,000 Arroyo Chico 1,000,000 Atturbury Wash Sanctuary Land Acquisition and Expansion 2,000,000 Pantano Linear Park, 22nd St south to Michael Perry Park 2,700,000 Rio Vista Park River Park 1,500,000 Sub -Total City of Tucson Parks 29,800,000 Town of Marana Parks Regional Heritage and Cultural Park 1,000,000 Tortolita Trail System 1,200,000 Town of Sahuarita Parks Anamax Park Multi -Use Ballfield 500,000 Bicycle Lane on Sahuarita Road 1,500,000 Town of Oro Valley Parks Naranja Town Site Park 3,000,000 Sub -Total Parks /Recreation 63,900,000 Libraries Marana Continental Ranch New Library 4,500,000 Oro Valley Library Expansion 1,100,000 Wilmot Branch Library 7,000,000 Sub -Total Libraries 12,600,000 Total Question 4 96,450,000 Page 5 of 7 012104BOSApproved.AsDetails 2/5/04 r Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects Allocation Question 5 River Parks and Flood Control Improvements Floodprone and Riparian Land Acquisition 5,000,000 Urban Drainage Infrastructure Program 8,281,000 City of South Tucson Projects 1,719,000 Tohono O'Odham Nation Drainage Improvements 1,500,000 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Black Wash Flood Control Improvements 1,000,000 River Parks and Flood Control Santa Cruz River, Ajo to 29th St 14,000,000 Santa Cruz River, Grant to Fort Lowell 2,700,000 Rillito River Linear Park Completion 3,000,000 Santa Cruz River in vicinity of Continental Ranch 4,000,000 Canada del Oro River Park, Thornydale to Magee 5,000,000 Sub -Total River Parks and Flood Control 28,700,000 Total Question 5 46,200,000 Total 2004 General Obligation Bond Questions 582,250,000 Page 6 of 7 012104BOSApproved.xlsDetails 2/5/04 Y Approved Projects by Ballot Question Recommended Bond Question Projects A llocation 2004 Sewer Revenue Bond Question Question 6 Sewer System Revenue Bonds Rehabilitation and Repair Roger Road WWTP Rehabilitation 20,000,000 Miscellaneous Conveyance System Rehabilitation and Repair 15,000,000 Augmentation /Addition of Conveyance Capacity Santa Cruz Interceptor, Prince to Franklin 25,000,000 Roger Road WWTP to Ina Road WPCF Plant Interconnect 23,000,000 Tanque Verde Interceptor, Craycroft to Tucson Country Club 5,000,000 Marana Regional Airport Sewer Connection 2,800,000 Enhanced Processing - Regulatory Ina Road WPCF - Denitrification 17,000,000 Ina Road WPCF Central Plant and Electric Upgrade 12,000,000 Ina Road WPCF Laboratory and Office Building 9,000,000 System Treatment Capacity New Marana WWTP Expansion 10,000,000 Miscellaneous Water Reclamation Facilities 4,000,000 Mt. Lemmon Sewer System 7,200,000 Total Question 6 150,000,000 Page 7 of 7 012104BOSApproved.xlsDetails 2/5/04 EXHIBIT A 03/16104 7L-i 4 , 4:E Civic Center Drive RNETT ROAD .f Figure 3.1 Voter - Approved Bond Authorizations: 1974 to 1997 T pe Amount Date Question General Obligation 17,225,000 Health Care/Treatment Facilities Sanitary Sewer /Disposal Facilities General Obligation 19,095,000 Public Safety Facilities General Obligation 2,000,000 General Obligation 3,275,000 February 5, 1974 Government Support Facilities General Obligation 7,205,000 Street/Bridge Improvements Parks /Recreation /Open Space General Obligation 9,910,000 General Obligation 4 Green Belt/Open Spacer &3 210,OOD� . .._." ..._�.�...u�,.a, w ..� 25,110,000 Corrections Facilities General Obligation Transportation Corridors General Obligation 18,100,000 Highway Safety General Obligation 5,000,000 � z June 5, 1979 y ,. SUBTOTAL �4821000O Flood Control I Flood Control District 20,60 000 Sewer Revenue 21 Sewer Revenue�;�� ma TOTALAPPR01/ED. X90 310 000'', � General Obligation 12,500 Highway Safety Major Highway Improvement General Obligation 47 February 5, 1980 �� W SUBTC?TAL 60,000 000'. 12 000 Sewer Revenue Sewer Revenue ?OTALAPPROUED7 _,�_���� General Obligation ' 6 1 100,000 November 2 1982 (Sanitary Landfills Sewer Revenue 10,000,000 Effluent Reuse /Sewer Improvemet�� ��, �70TAL 6 =M_ qp General Obligation 63,800,000 February 21 1984 (Flood Repair /Reconstruction /lmp o ement �� , TOTAL APPRQUED 01 X 83 80D 000 °`r �„ Obligation 5,000 I May 21, 1985 H19hway Safety I Sewer Revenue 10,000 Sewer Repair /Replacement Traffic Safety/Transportation Improvements General Obligation 64,300,000 Park Development/Recreation General Obligation 28,000,000 Law Enforcement/Public Safety /Courts General Obligation 23,850,000 Land Acquisition /Flood Control General Obligation 24,900,000 May 6, 1986 Libraries /Pubic Facilities General Obligation 13,650,000 Solid Waste Disposal General Obligation 10 700 000 �; k ��� SUBTOTAL65 400 fT0f4� 3x Sewer Revenue 54,000,000 (Sewer Repair /Replacement x r x ;tom TOTAL APPROVED 219 400,000 .,?ww�...,,. �.5� .General Obligation 42,0 00,000 Juvenile Detention and Court Facilities Public Safety, Law Enforcement and Superior Court General Obligation 50,000,000 General Obligation 52,650,000 Parks /Recreation /Open Space Sonoran Desert Open Space and Historic Preservation General Obligation 36,330,000 May 20, 1997 Public Health, Safety, Recreational and Cultural Facilities General Obligation 42,000,000 Flood Control Improvements General Obligation 21,500,000 General Obligation 12.500,000 Solid Waste Improvements s SUBTOTAL� 980,000 System Revenue Bonds Sewer Revenue 105 000 000 Sewer. v TOTAL APP ROVED361,980; HURF Revenue Bonds 350,000,006 November 4 1997 (Transportation Bond Improvement Plan r } TOTAL APPROVED 350,000,000`= <. 1,255,700,000 .. TOTAL ALL BONDS APPROVED 671,700,000 TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS APPROVED 213,400,000 TOTAL SEWER REVENUE BONDS APPROVED 350,000,000 TOTAL HURF REVENUE BONDS APPROVED 20,600,000 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BONDS APPROVED 2" F'.',CIPIBGIJGS' JSF.EFt F',JrD E,G? ^OG3Figure 1 .zls Summary of Bond Election Results: 1974 to 1997 Election Issue Vote Result Yes No February 5, 1974 Health Care/Treatment Facilities 73% 27% Sanitary Sewer /Disposal Facilities 70% 30% Public Safety Facilities 60% 40% Government Support Facilities 52% 48% Street/Bridge Improvements 68% 32% Parks /Recreation /Open Space 62% 38% Green Belts/Open Space Passed' June 5, 1979 Correctional Facilities 51% 49% Transportation Corridors 61% 39% Highway Safety 57% 43% �Ma1or Ar#erra( Highway and„Stree�„provemen s# �'��' . J °l � a � 5'( �~ Bridges /Flood Control ,,..w 57% 43% Sewer Revenue ' 70% 30% February 5, 1980 Highway Safety 51% 49% Major Highway Improvements 51% 49% Sewer Revenue 60% 40% November 2, 1982 Sanitary Landfills G.O. 68% 32% Sewer Revenue 68% 32% Approve Higher Interest rates on 1979 and 1980 Bonds Passed' February 21, 1984 Flood Repair /Reconstruction /Improvements 54.3% 45.7% o �:Sevver Reverue = ��. �`. �� ��` �` ... � � • � ;� ; �"`� � �� � . k X49 /n,. � <..;M 5TM1 November 6 1984 RtllttoPantano May 21, 1985 Traffic Safety Improvements 65% 35% Sewer Repair /Replacement 65% 35% May 6, 1986 Traffic Safety 66% 34% Park Development/Recreation 62% 38% Law Enforcement/Public Safety /Courts 70% 30% Land Acquisition /Flood Control 61% 39% Libraries /Public Facilities 63% 37% Solid Waste Disposal 70% 30% Sewer Repair /Replacement 69% 31% May 20, 1997 Juvenile Detention and Court Facilities 70% 30% Public Safety, Law Enforcement and Superior Court 66% 34% Parks 65% 35% Sonoran Desert Open Space and Historic Preservation 68% 32% Public Health, Safety, Recreational, and Cultural Facilities 57% 43% Flood Control Improvements 51% 49% Solid Waste Improvements 62% 38% Sewer System Revenue Bonds 54% 46% November 4, 1997 Street and Highway Revenue Bonds 59% 41% Actual results not available. F iUsers,Jtm EarrY\WPW1MGIP \E0ND5`,20Ga Elections \030804. wNd 2004 Pima County Bond Program Ma y 18 2004 Election flRTOLIT m o ' M PARK 0 m s �QQ ® �ewD 77 MOORE RD '7— U M ORE RD ® TALINA 1 STATE . MARANA TANGERINE RD TANGERINE RD. ORO VALLEY PARK Q; o w C ¢ M o r tE W _ NARANJA DR. �gY AVRA VALLEY RD L er 3 = w m as U ° m LAMBERT LN. 10 w CORO o a NA WIN TIONAL T PEAKS RD 1 E LINDA VISTA 2 FOREST 5 ¢ o HARDY RD Cc D CORT.0 Rq O s9 czar MAGEE ¢ m g RD. pP _ z INA RD. a 1 P ��RERpC KSR ( SKYLINE DR.Q W , SUNSET RD m ( < SUNRISE DR. 00 J s � � 1 ° O Q Io SNYDER RU RD. a le ,GAMINO DEL CERRO RAUFF SG7ARO Z e d z o �o NATIOiAL % 1, H e`� W� WETMORE RD. RD. O� a cc 1 ..� • PARK �. PRINCE RD. '® �' :' � '� .✓_" .�,.�....: P. GOREf RD. FORT LOWELL RD. m e t �tri P.�P ...�..�'_' 44 PTER I I 1 •�' G r; n > a o �' ...... •.,. 1 '�' IRON 60D HILLS DR. �, 1 • > GRANT RD. 3 ¢ TANOUE VERDE RD. r z t 1 Cree F� r o w ° z ¢ 4 u e de a SPEE WAY B VD. w o Q z 1 ¢ ¢ ° °¢ o °¢ 4 w ¢ w o o w z 3 Z— •,�, ��pq0 .Tlif ON �. . LL1 .lT♦f Z.. BROADWAY 3 p a cc _ w o LL NIT ° 22ND SL '.. SAGUAR(} PARK S T H GOLF LINKS RD. NATIONAL .' \ 4 ,TUCSON o o TUCSON PARK a `\�q�� BOPP RD AJO WAY` , 'm ' ESCALANTE RD. > ui W B P 1 W �- IRVINGTO RD a a a 2 S 0 `,. IRVINGTON RD SNYDER HILL RD a > o I EL RD. o El 0 = a VALENCIA RD. � • 1 86 `LOS R EALES RD. o O LOS REALES `` VALENCIA RD. O Zhcon Creek, 2 ® ti a a r9 ci I ® TOHONO aODHAM p HUGHES ACCESS RD o ' O a Q COLOSSAL NATION CAVE SAN XAVIER DISTRICT 19 3 � 4 a PARK �O OLD VAIL CONNECTION p z U v COLOSSA 'm' CAVg R� 2 CIENEGA CREEK AWN '` NATURAL RD M s z x Tq)A ti 0 PIMA MINE RD s D z U 3.1 AND DA RD t x MINERAL HILL RD ® MIA SAHUARITA RD HELMET PEAK RD , SAHUARITA RD 1 7WIN5URES RO U W Z V I a 1ST. SL 2ND 4p PO 3 r Z5 �� o J,P � LU " SOLANA AVE. Y m p0, o SANTA RITA CORONADO tiFtir ° EXPERIMENTAL ESPEMNZA ® NATIONAL A� v� AJO�TU01�� q <q p RA�NGK AND . P�?R +P 0 �a 85 WILI2IME AREA s 86 a 0 0 � o h EMPI ;MEGA M R, OU CE ..ti v Z CONSERVATION r AREA U Z ro ue MIN �j ARIVACA RD M OT E a o>! Pima County Board of Supervisors: Sharon Bronson, Chair, District 3; Ann Day, District ] � Ram6n Valadez, District 2; Raymond J. Carroll, District 4; Richard Elias, District 5 Pima County Administrator: Chuck Huckelberry Question 1: Sonoran Desert Open Space and Habitat Question 4: Parks and Recreational Facilities (Con't) Protection; Preventing Urban Encroachment of 59 -4.12 Performing Arts Center Rehabilitation 682,000 Davis-Month Base 60 -4.13 Valencia Site Preservation 100,000 61 -4.14 Los Morteros Preservation 100,000 Community Open Space Parcels 62 -4.15 Pantano Townsite Preservation 50,000 1 -1.1 Sweetwater Preserve $ 13,000,000 63 -4.16 Ajo Curley School Historic Art Institute 500,000 2 -1.2 Camino de Oeste 2,000,000 64 -4.17 Dunbar School 1,218,000 3 -1.3 Dos Picos 1,000,000 Parks and Recreation 4 -1.4 Tortolita Mountain Park API 7,000,000 65 -4.18 Flowing Wells Community Center $ 3,500,000 5 -1.5 Tucson Mountain Park API 1,000,000 66 -4.19 Southeast Regional Park/Shooting Range 3,500,000 6 -1.6 Catalina Conservation Easements 1,000,000 67 -4.20 Sports Field Lighting of Existing Fields 3,000,000 7 -1.7 Canoa Ranch 3,000,000 68 -4.21 Curtis Park - Flowing Wells East 2,250,000 8 -1.8 Los Morteros 1,000,000 69 -4.22 Catalina Community Park 2,000,000 9 -1.9 Carpenter Ranch 1,000,000 70 -4.23 Dan Felix Memorial Park- Pegler Wash 1,750,000 10 -1.10 Tortolita East Biological Corridor API 10,000,000 71 -4.24 River Bend Park 3,000,000 11 -1.11 Catalina State Park API 5,000,000 72 -4.25 Mehl- Foothills Park 2,000,000 12 -1.12 Colossal Cave Expansion 6,000,000 73 -4.26 Rillito Race Track 2,250,000 13 -1.13 Painted Hills 4,500,000 74 -4.27 Kino Public Sports Field Lighting 650,000 14 -1.14 South Corridor 2,100,000 75 -4.28 Feliz Paseos Universal Access Park 1,000,000 Bond Allocation for Community Open Space Parcels (Not Less Than) 37,300,000 76 -4.29 Picture Rocks Pool 2,000,000 Jurisdictional Open Space 77 -4.30 Eastside Sports Complex and Senior Center 6,000,000 City of Tucson 78 -4.31 Northside Community Park 5,500,000 15 -1.15 Agua Caliente 5,000,000 79 -4.32 Southeast Community Park 6,000,000 16 -1.16 36th Street Corridor 5,000,000 80 -4.33 Houghton Greenway 1,400,000 17 -1.17 Habitat at 36th and Kino 1,000,000 81 -4.34 Julian Wash Linear Park 3,700,000 Town of Oro Valley 82 -4.35 Arroyo Chico 1,000,000 18 -1.18 Kelly Ranch 2,500,000 83 -4.36 Atturbury Wash Sanctuary Land Acquistion and Expansion 2,000,000 Town of Sahuarita 84 -4.37 Pantano Linear Park, 22nd St south to Michael Perry Park 2,700,000 19 -1.19 Santa Cruz River Open Space 1,500,000 85 -4.38 Rio Vista Natural Resource Park 1,500,000 Bond Allocation for Jurisdictional Open Space (Not More Than) 15,000,000 86 -4.39 Regional Heritage and Cultural Park 1,000,000 Davis - Monthan Environs Open Space 87 -4.40 Tortolita Trail System 1,200,000 20 -1.20 Davis - Monthan Environs Open Space (Not More Than) 10,000,000 88 -4.41 Anamax Park Multi -Use Ballfield 500,000 Habitat Protection Priorities 89 -4.42 Bicycle Lane on Sahuarita Road 1,500,000 21 -1.21 Southeastern Corridor Project Area (34 %) 38,000,000 90 -4.43 Naranja Town Site Park 3,000,000 22 -1.22 Santa Cruz Basin Project Area (20 %) 22,000,000 Libraries 23 -1.23 Altar Valley Project Area (19 %) 21,000,000 91 -4.44 Marana Continental Ranch New Library 4,500,000 24 -1.24 Avra Valley Project Area (4 %) 5,000,000 92 -4.45 Oro Valley Library Expansion 1,100,000 25 -1.25 Tortolita Mountains Project Area (10 %) 11,000,000 93 -4.46 Wilmot Branch Library Replacement 7,000,000 26 -1.26 Tucson Basin Project Area (5 %) 6,000,000 27 -1.27 San Pedro Project Area (8 %) 9,000,000 Total Question 4 $ 96,450,000 Bond Allocation for Habitat Protection Priorities (Not More Than) 112,000,000 Total Question 1 $174,300,000 1 River Parks 'The number of Community Open Space projects identified is in excess of the number that can Improvements be purchased with the $37,300,000 allocation of bond funds. This provides necessary flexibility Flood Control during the property acquisiton process. Individual acquistion amounts for each Community Open Space project will not reasonably exceed cost estimates. 94 -5.1 Floodprone and Riparian Land Acquistion $ 5,000,000 95 -5.2 Urban Drainage Infrastructure Program 8,281,000 96 -5.3 City of South Tucson Projects 1,719,000 Question e a Community 97 -5 Tohono O'Odham Nation Drainage Improvements 1,500,000 98 -5.5 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Black Wash Flood Control 1,000,000 Public Health Facilities River Parks 28 -2.1 Kino Public Health Center $ 25,000,000 99 Santa Cruz River, Ajo to 29th Street 14,000,000 29 -2.2 Teresa Lee Health Clinic 2,000,000 100 -5.7 Santa Cruz River, Grant to El Camino del Cerro 2,700,000 30 -2.3 New Psychiatric Hospital 12,000,000 101 -5.8 Rillito River Linear Park Completion 3,000,000 Other Facilites 102 -5.9 Santa Cruz River in Vicinity of Continental Ranch 4,000,000 31 -2.4 Animal Care Center 3,000,000 103 -5.10 Canada del Oro River Park, Thornydale to Magee 5,000,000 32 -2.5 Roy Place Commercial Building Restoration 800,000 33 -2.6 Green Valley Performing Arts Center - Phase 2 4,000,000 Total Question 5 $ 46,200,000 34 -2.7 Mt. Lemmon Community Center 1,000,000 35 -2.8 Amado Food Bank Kitchen 300,000 Neighborhood Reinvestment 1 Revenue 36 -2.9 Neighborhood Reinvestment - Countywide 20,000,000 37 -2.10 Housing Reinvestment - Countywide 10,000,000 Rehabilitation And Repair Ina Road Tire Relocation 104 -6.1 Roger Road WWTP Rehabilitation $ 20,000,000 38 -2.11 Ina Road Tire Relocation 1,500,000 105 -6.2 Miscellaneous Conveyance System Rehabilitation and Repair 15,000,000 County Museums Augmentation of Conveyance Capacity 39 -2.12 Arizona Sonora Desert Museum - Auditorium 1,000,000 106 -6.3 Santa Cruz Interceptor - Prince to Franklin 25,000,000 40 -2.13 Arizona Sonora Desert Museum - Gray Water 200,000 107 -6.4 Roger Road WWTP to Ina Road WPCF Plant Interconnect 23,000,000 41 -2.14 Pima Air and Space Museum - Hanger 1,000,000 108 -6.5 Tanque Verde Interceptor Craycroft to Tucson Country Club 5,000,000 109 -6.6 Marana Regional Airport Sewer Connection 2,800,000 Total Question 2 $ 81,800,000 Enhanced Processing Regulatory Compliance 110 -6.7 Ina Road WPCF - Denitrification 17,000,000 111 -6.8 Ina Road WPCF - Central Plant and Electrical Upgrade 12,000,000 Question 1 112 -6.9 Ina Road WPCF - Laboratory and Office Building 9,000,000 System Treatment Capacity 42 -3.1 Regional Public Safety Communications System $ 92,000,000 113 -6.10 New Marana WWTP Expansion 10,000,000 43 -3.2 New Justice Court/Municipal Court Complex 76,000,000 114 -6.11 Miscellaneous Water Reclamation Facilities 4,000,000 44 -3.3 Rehabilitation of Old Courthouse 4,500,000 115 -6.12 Mt. Lemmon Sewer System 7,200,000 45 -3.4 Corrections Jail Security Project 3,000,000 46 -3.5 Interagency Victim Advocacy Center 6,000,000 Total $150,000,000 47 -3.6 Juvenile Court Build -Out 2,000,000 Total Question 3 $183,500,000 Grand Total $732 1 Parks Cultural and Historic Resources 48 -4.1 Empirita Ranch Buildings Rehabilitation $ 400,000 49 -4.2 Canoa Ranch Buildings Rehabilitation 2,700,000 50 -4.3 Anza National Historical Trail 3,750,000 51 -4.4 Fort Lowell Acquisition & San Pedro Chapel 3,000,000 52 -4.5 Helvetia Townsite Acquisition 100,000 53 -4.6 Steam Pump Ranch Rehabilitation 2,000,000 54 -4.7 Binghampton Historic Buildings Rehabilitation 800,000 55 -4.8 Marana Mound Community Site 2,000,000 56 -4.9 Dakota Wash Site Acquisition 750,000 57 -4.10 Coyote Mountain Sites Acquisition 800,000 58 -4.11 Honey Bee Village Acquistion 1,000,000 3/15/04 TOWN COUNCIL N MEETING TowN OF MARANA , INFORMATION MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. B. 2 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Michael A. Reuwsaat, Town Manager SUBJECT: Formation of a Town Manager's committee to be known as the Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee DISCUSSION During the Study Session conducted on January 13, 2004 to review the potential formation of a Regional Transportation Authority with -the ability to implement a half -cent sales tax for regional transportation, The Mayor and Town Council voted to "investigate the benefits and implications of a h alf -cent T own s ales t ax d edicated t o s ub- regional t ransportation i mprovements w ith t he addition of adequate citizen input." To provide the desired citizen input, the Town Manager is forming a Manager's committee; to be known as the Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee, to identify and evaluate significant local transportation projects with regional significance. The Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee will also evaluate the potential implementation of a local half -cent sales tax to fund these transportation needs. The Town Manager will consider the recommendations from the Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee in the formulation of staff recommendations. Attached you will please find a list of community members whom have agreed. to serve on this committee. Your additional recommendations are welcome. The composition of this committee is intended to represent both the residents of the community and the business community. ATTACHMENTS A list of community members who have agreed to serve on the Marana Citizens' Transportation Committee is attached. RECOMMENDATION This is for your information only. SUGGESTED MOTION No action is required. Council members' suggestions about other potential Committee members are welcome. BLU 040316 Local RTA.doc 3/11/2004 10:52 AMFJC s f i PROSPECTIVE MEMBERSHIP OF THE MARANA CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE The following is a partial list of those people who have indicated their willingness to participate on the Marana Citizens Transportation Committee. Dan Sullivan, Chair Greg Wexler Dave Parker Ed Stolmaker Michael Osborne Eloise Brown Dan Post Bill Hallinan Paula Meade Jim Shiner Kathleen Longnecker Richard Purcella • W TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA 7 INFORMATION MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. B. 3 A TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Dick Gear, Community and Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 2004.05 Relating to Annexation; annexing into the corporate limits of the Town of Marana that territory known as the Camino de Oeste Annexation comprising approximately 319 acres of land on the east side of Interstate 10 centered on Cortaro Farms Road and bisected north to south by Camino de Oeste Road. DISCUSSION The Town Council conducted a public hearing for this annexation on December 16, 2003, and staff is now requesting Council action. The Town has received signed petitions representing over fifty percent of property owners and over fifty percent of the real and personal property value. The 319 acres are zoned Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch) which will translate into the Town as R -144 and Pima County SH (Suburban Homestead) will translate into Town of Marana R -36 zoning. All notification requirements have been properly complied with for this annexation. The annexation meets the requirements of A.R.S. § 9 -471 (annexation statute). This is the final step of the annexation process for the Town Council. According to annexation requirements, a thirty day waiting period occurred after the original blank petition was recorded on November 26, 2003, and the annexation petition was mailed out on December 26, 2003. The Council may now approve the ordinance annexing the area into the Town of Marana. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 2004.05, relating to the Camino de Oeste Annexation. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Ordinance No. 2004.05. BLU Camino de Oeste Annexation doc r a MARANA ORDINANCE NO. 2004.05 RELATING TO ANNEXATION; ANNEXING INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF MARANA THAT TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE CAMINO DE OESTE ANNEXATION COMPRISING APPROXIMATELY 319 ACRES OF LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 10 CENTERED ON CORTARO FARMS ROAD AND BISECTED NORTH TO SOUTH BY CAMINO DE OESTE ROAD. WHEREAS, petitions in writing, accompanied by a map of the real property sought to be annexed have been filed and presented to the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, signed by the owners of more than fifty percent of the value of the real and personal property and over fifty percent of the persons owning real and personal property that would be subject to taxation by the Town of Marana as shown by the last assessment of said property, said property being contiguous to the Town of Marana, and not now embraced within its limits, asking that the property be annexed into the Town of Marana, and to extend and increase the corporate limits of the Town of Marana so as to embrace same; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, desire to approve the annexation petitions and extend and increase the corporate limits of the Town of Marana to include said territory, which is approximately 319 acres; and WHEREAS, the Camino de Oeste Annexation is an area within portions of Sections 25 and 36 within Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona; and WHEREAS, the petitions set forth a true and correct description of all the exterior boundaries of the entire area proposed to be annexed to the Town of Marana and had attached thereto at all times an accurate map of the territory desired to be annexed; and WHEREAS, no alterations increasing or reducing the territory sought to be annexed have been made after any petition was signed by any owner of real and personal property in such territory; and WHEREAS, the zoning classification of the property prior to annexation was Pima County Zone SR (Suburban Ranch) and Zone SH (Suburban Homestead). In order to establish original Town of Marana zoning without permitting densities or uses that are greater than those permitted in Pima County, the properties will translate to the R -144 and R -36 zones respectively in the Town of Marana's Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the provisions of A.R.S. § 9 -471, and all amendments thereto, have been fully observed; and WHEREAS, proper and sufficient certification and proof of the foregoing facts are now on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Marana, together with a true and correct copy of the original petition referred to herein, which is on file in the Office of the County Recorder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that: 1. The territory known as the Camino de Oeste Annexation is annexed into the Town of Marana and that the present corporate limits are extended and increased to include the described area. 2. A copy of this Ordinance, together with an accurate map of the territory hereby annexed to the Town of Marana, certified by the Mayor of the Town, shall be forthwith filed and recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Pima County, Arizona. 3. The zoning classification of Pima County Zone SR (Suburban Ranch) and SH (Suburban Homestead) within the annexed area is hereby changed to Town of Marana Zones R -144 and R -36, respectively. 4. On file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Marana, Arizona, are those certain documents, known as Exhibits A and B, which are recorded and hereby referred to, adopted, and made a part of this Ordinance, describing and illustrating the Camino de Oeste Annexation area. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 16th day of March, 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 2 Ordinance 2004.05 for Camino de Oeste.doc ` a - I°� °v ao °aiina°o °a000004 a0 ° ° °° a OOOda d s 0011 °{1a00A �Of o °oe�se ' , rj v aoa °° ° °s °o ao 0�dI11101 °0 a a °o°°ao p 00 ONE aovoao o ► d• ° a 04 ® soon 000 0� Sol IS0` � � � vo aaoomoaeoDl s oeo e 0 �a�000004 '' '' 00000vov�omo°o°oaa ►� O °sae 0 I�00011�0 O� 00 dQO� a e O�PO��O oe, • ��� ®� �� a SAO O� 4� °a f oO�O'�OOo �� � °d a °��iiiieacoo � arecaoQ ° ► � � o aQaaaaa d ®.0��000� �/' � �OL at11CCICD017a\� ° aooioia i ` too LEGAL DESCRIPTION CAMINO DE OESTE ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MARANA EXH I E31T E3 PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, SAID PORTIONS BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25 WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, SAID INTERSECTION BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE MARANA TOWN LIMITS AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 90.22; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO A LINE 30.00 FEET 'WESTERLY' OF: AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 -8 OF VISTA OESTE ESTATES; A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 45 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 75, RECORDS OF SAID PIMA COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND SOUTH LINE AND DEPARTING SAID MARANA TOWN LIMITS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SUNSET POINTE, LOTS 1 -111, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 38 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAID PIMA COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF SUNSET POINTE; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF STAR GRASS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SUNSET POINTE LOTS . 112 -267, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 40 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 16, RECORDS OF SAID PIMA COUNTY; SAJOBSU592\3592- 1112 \CM0 DE OESTE ANNEX.doc LEGAL LOG NO. 851 Page 1 of 3 THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, AND CONTINUING ALONG A SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID EASTERLY LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 4.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF SUNSET POINTE, LOTS 112 -267; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF PIMA FARMS ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 6899 AT PAGE 846; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, TO A NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 11 -20 OF HERBERT TERRACE, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 43; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROLONGATION, A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20 AND THE SOUTH RIGHT - OF -WAY LINE OF SAID PIMA FARMS ROAD, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF HERBERT TERRACE; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID HERBERT TERRACE; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG A NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 =10 OF SAID HERBERT TERRACE, A'DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PIMA FARMS ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DOCKET 6899 AT PAGE 846; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT -OF WAY LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF THE AFORESAID SECTION 25; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT DRAINAGEWAY ADJACENT TO LOTS 62, 63, 93, 94, 96 AND 97 OF OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 31 -113, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 27 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 26, RECORDS OF SAID PIMA COUNTY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 31 -113; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 43 OF SAID PLAT OF OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 31 -113; S:U0BS\3592\3592 -1112 \CM0 DE OESTE ANNEX.doc LEGAL LOG NO. 851 Pao 2 of 3 THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE AND • CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 42 OF SAID PLAT OF OSHRIN PARK LOTS 31 -113, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 42 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 29 OF OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 1 -30, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 25 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 67, RECORDS OF SAID PIMA COUNTY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 29 AND CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY- LINE. OF LOTS 30, 10 AND 9 OF SAID OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 1 -30, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 9, 8 AND 7, OF OSHRIN PARK, LOTS 1 -30, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF CORTARO FARMS ROAD, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25;. THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, TO A LINE 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • 21781 #I WEL_Lzo d SCNLDEMAN(; at n 8 A Q' ON P J MICHAEL L. SCHLOEMAN, R.L.S. S:U0BS\359213592- 1112 \CM0 DE OESTE ANNEX.doc LEGAL LOG NO. 851 Paae 3 of 3 r TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA INFORMATION �►Z MEETING DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. B. 4 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Kevin Kish, Interim Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2004 -32: Relating to development; approving the staff proposal for implementation of Gladden Fauns Blocks 11 and 12 Building Height Regulation Exception Condition 2, regarding building separations. DISCUSSION Gladden Farms Blocks 11 and 12 have approval to exceed the 25 -foot building height to a maximum height of 27 -feet, subject to eight conditions. One condition requires that the building separation be increased from the required 15 -feet to a minimum of 20 -feet where a house exceeds twenty -five feet in height. The following is how the building separation will be implemented for Gladden Farms Blocks 11 and 12: Single Story Home to Single Story Home 15 -Foot Separation Single Story Home to Two Story 15 -Foot Separation (25 -feet or less) Single Story Home to Two Story 15 -Foot Separation (over 25 -feet) Two Story Two Story 15 -Foot Separation (25 -feet or less) to (25 -feet or less) Two Story Two Story 20 -Foot Separation (25 -feet or less ) to over 25 feet) Two Story Two Story 20 -Foot Separation over 25 -feet to over 25 -feet This will provide the development with additional building separation where you have a massing concern with 2 two -story homes that would be located adjacent to each other. This will allow greater flexibility in the development of Gladden Farms in placing appropriate homes adjacent to each other, and with the proposed mix of homes will meet the intent of the requirements and create a better aesthetically pleasing community. RECOMMENDATION Planning taff recommends approval of this implementation for g pp p conditional number 2, regarding building separations. SUGGESTED MOTION i I move to approve Resolution 2004 -32. -2- H:1FrankC\20040316 Council Mtg\Building Heigbt Exception Clarification MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2004-32 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING THE STAFF PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF GLADDEN FARMS BLOCKS 11 AND 12 BUILDING HEIGHT REGULATION EXCEPTION CONDITION 2, REGARDING BUILDING SEPARATIONS. WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003 the Town of Marana adopted Resolutions 2003 -66 and 2003 -67 approving the Preliminary Plats with a building height increase for Blocks 11 and 12 of Gladden Farms; and, WHEREAS, on November 4, 2003 the Town of Marana adopted Resolutions 2003 -105 and 2003 -118 approving the Final Plats for Blocks 11 and 12 of Gladden Farms; and, WHEREAS, Staff seeks approval of its proposed implementation of Gladden Farms . Blocks 11 and 12 building height regulation exception condition 2, regarding building separations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the T own o f Marana, Arizona, approving the following implementation of Gladden Farms Blocks 11 and 12 building height regulation exception condition 2, regarding building separations: BETWEEN HOME TYPES SEPARATION Single Story Home Single Story Home 15 feet Single Story Home Two Story (25 -feet or less) 15 feet Single Story Home Two Story (over 25 -feet) 15 feet Two Story (25 -feet or less) Two Story (25 -feet or less) 15 feet Two Story(25 -feet or less) Two Story (over 25 -feet) 20 feet Two Story (over 25 -feet) Two Story (over 25 -feet) 20 feet PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, • this 16' day of March 2004. Mayor Bobby Sutton, Jr. ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney • Resolution 2004 -32 Building Height Exception Clairfication.doc 2 r. i TOWN TOWN COUNCIL OF MEETING MARANA INFORMATION DATE: March 16, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: IX. B. 5 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Michael A. Reuwsaat, Town Manager SUBJECT: State Legislative Issues Discussion/Direction/Action regarding all pending bills before the Legislature DISCUSSION: This item is scheduled for each regular Council Meeting in order to provide an opportunity to discuss any legislative item that might arise during the current session of the State Legislature. Included here is Legislative Bulletin No. 7. RECOMMENDATION: Upon the request of Council, staff will be pleased to provide recommendations on specific legislative issues. SUGGESTED MOTION: None required. ADMIN /JCE03 /1 ll200411:45 AM um 0 LEGISLUIVE BULLETIN Issue No. 7 February 27, 2004 IN THIS ISSUE Late Breaking News From the House and Senate Floor Late Breaking News From the Three bills with major impacts to cities and towns were considered on the House and Senate Floor ........1 House and Senate floor late Thursday afternoon. In the House, HB 2400: Vested Property Rights and HB 2401: Municipal Annexation; Procedures were Another Attack on Eminent debated on the floor and the Senate considered SB 1043: Municipal Business Domain ..................... 2 Location Incentives; Rebate. Arson Resolution Passes the To begin with the good news first, the Senate amended SB 1043 to make it Senate .................... 2 less severe than originally proposed. As initially drafted, SB 1043 would have penalized cities and towns providing tax incentives to retail business by League Annexation Resolution deducting the amount of the incentive from that city or town's state shared Moves Forward ............... 2 revenue. The amendment proposed by the bill's sponsor, Senator Jack Harper, no longer penalizes cities and towns by taking away their shared revenue. Bill Creating a "First Responders The amendment requires cities and towns to make a finding that the pro - Fund" Passes Two House Committees ..................2 posed incentive will raise more revenue than the amount of the incentive and that in the absence of the incentive, the business would not have located in Municipal Recount Bill Passes the city or town. The amended version of SB 1043 will be voted on before the Unanimously ................. 3 full Senate next week. As for the bad news, both HB 2400 and HB 2401, Representative Farnsworth's Pr End to Cities and Towns two bills that severely impact municipal land use policy both cleared House Presence at the Legislature' ...... 3 debate and are ready for a final vote in the House, however both bills were Sex Offender Clustering Bills amended. HB 2400 establishes a vested right for any property for four years if Update ..................... 3 the owner has submitted a site plan that conforms to the zoning requirements at the time of submission (no city approval of the site plan is required) or for Military Preservation Bills Status two years if a zoning application by the property owner has been approved by Report ...................... 4 a municipal or county body. Representative Farnsworth's amendment pro - vides a definition of vested property rights as the right to undertake and complete the development and use of property under the terms and condi- tions of a specific site plan. His amendment also removed the clause that League of Arizona would have retroactively granted vested property rights to any property that would have acquired this right prior to the effective date of the bill. City's AND .1. omin_J' HB 2401 was also amended by Representative Farnsworth on the floor yester- Legislative Bulletin is published by the League of Arizona day. As originally written, the bill would have increased the required num- Cities and Towns. Forward your comments or suggestions to: bers of signatures on an annexation petition from 50% to 80% which applies League of Arizona Cities and Towns to both the requirement for signatures by value and by number. His amend - 1820 W. Washington Street ment changes the petition signature requirement to 60 %. Thanks to Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Phone: 602- 258 -5786 Representative Pete Hershberger for speaking against this bill on the floor. Fax:602- 253 -3874 E -mail: league@mg.state.az.us We would like your input on the impact of these amendments. We will con - Internet: www.azleague.org tinue to update you on the progress of these bills for the final votes next week. Page 2 i Issue No. 7 February 27, 2004 Another Attack on Eminent and charge a convicted arsonist for the cost of the investi- gation and emergency services required as a result of the Domain fire. Thanks to Senator Jay Tibshraeny for his hard work in There was another battle in the Legislature's war on cities and support of this legislation. SB 1242 moves to the House of towns' eminent domain authority yesterday in the House Representatives next. Federal Mandates and Property Rights Committee. HB 2539: Eminent Domain; Attorney Fees; Appraisals is sponsored by League Annexation Representative Leah Landrum - Taylor in response to an eminent Resolution Moves Forward domain issue she had been working on with the City of Phoenix. Despite the fact that she admitted in her testimony On Wednesday the House Utilities and Municipalities Committee that the City had addressed the issue in a "professional and car- gave approval to HB 2164: Municipal Annexation; Petition. This ing way ", she still felt the need to introduce this bill. bill results from a League resolution and would simplify the annexation petition signature requirement by excluding personal HB 2539 would allow attorney's fees and expenses to be award- property, with the exception of utility infrastructure, from the ed to the property owner against a government entity if the owners of a majority of the property valuation signature require - final judgment exceeds the government entity's offer by 10 %. ment. The bill passed by a vote of 5 -3 with Representatives The bill would include all governmental entity's condemnation Randy Graf, Bill Wagner and Ray Barnes voting no. actions, including actions by the state, counties and cities and towns including the construction of streets and other public Thanks to Representative Steve Huffman for his work on this facilities. This legislation would significantly raise the costs for legislation. The bill needs to clear the House Federal Mandates taxpayers to fund public projects and would discourage govern- and Property Rights Committee before it can be considered by mental entities from undertaking necessary projects for public the full House. Please call your representatives and let them health, safety and general welfare. know to vote in support of HB 2164. During the committee hearing Representatives Downing, Bill Creating a "First Landrum - Taylor and Farnsworth spoke in favor of the bill. Responders Fund Passes Representative Ted Downing left the House Judiciary Committee of which he is a member, to attend the Federal Two House Committees Mandates and Property Rights Committee hearing to support HB 2539. In his testimony, Representative Downing alleged Representative Bill Wagner has introduced legislation (HB 2670) that in eminent domain cases, the rights of Arizona citizens that proposes to create the First Responders Fund through a have less rights than citizens in China. 4.5% surcharge on residential subscription television service providers. The Fund would benefit cities, towns, counties, fire This legislation appears to be on the move, as it is supported by districts and Indian tribes by granting funds for fire and rescue a contingent of representatives from both parties. It was departments' equipment and training, local law enforcement assigned to only the Federal Mandates and Property Rights agencies' emergency management, and communication and Committee, so it will be considered by the full House of response needs relating to homeland security in Arizona. Representatives next. Please call your representatives and let them know of your opposition to HB 2539. This week in the House of Representatives, HB 2670 passed the House Commerce & Military Affairs Committee and the Public Arson Resolution Passes the Institutions & Counties Committee. Pursuant to direction from the League's Executive Committee at last Friday's meeting, the Senate League will be supporting this legislation. HB 2670 needs to SB 1242: Arson; Emergency Responses; Investigations; Costs pass one final committee, the Ways & Means Committee, before passed the Senate this week by a vote of 23 ayes and 6 nays. consideration before the full House. This bill, which is a League resolution, allows a judge to assess - CONTINUED ON PAGE 3 Legislative Bulletin is published by The League of Arizona Cities and Towns, 1820 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. Phone: (602) 258 -5786. Fax (602) 253 -3874. Email: league @mg.state.az.us. Visit us on the Internet at www.azleague.org. Issue No. 7 February 27, 2004 + all 14 Page 3 An identical measure has been introduced in the Senate. SB Harper, voted against it after hearing testimony. The one "yes" 1148: First Responders Fund; Subscription Television is spon- vote, Senator Jim Waring, indicated that he was supporting the sored by Senator Jack Brown. SB 1148 passed the Senate bill in order to "send a message ". Rest assured Senator Waring Government Committee and is still waiting consideration by that a very clear message was received based on your vote. the Senate Finance Committee. Since this bill failed so badly in committee, we are not expect- ing it to resurface, but the League will be monitoring for this Municipal Recount Bill bill should the subject rear its ugly head again. Passes Unanimously SB1244 passed its only Senate Committee this week and should Sex Offender Clustering go straight to a final vote in the Senate since it was never Bills Update amended in committee. This bill, sponsored by Senator Jay Tibshraeny, is a League resolution that specifies that an auto- The House Judiciary Committee this week had 5 bills on its agenda all designed to alleviate problems associated with the matic recount will be conducted for a city or town election when the vote separation is less than 10. This is the current law residential clustering of sex offenders in neighborhoods. These as it applies to counties and their subdivisions. concepts, which are supported by our League Resolution, also have legislative support, obvious by how many bills are being Until a recent incident between Youngtown and Maricopa heard. However, there are still many questions and concerns County, municipalities had always been included in automatic that members share regarding what happens after these bills recounts. The language simply adds us to the current statutes. are passed. Several previous legislative efforts were thwarted We would like to Thank Senator Tibshraeny for his sponsorship due to civil rights protections of the offenders that continue to and Senator Jim Weiers for hearing the bill in Judiciary where it pose challenges for some of this year's pending legislation. received unanimous approval from the committee members. Here is a breakdown of the bills and where they are going next. An End to Cities and Towns HB 2135, sponsored by Representative John Nelson, would Presence at the Legislature? mandate lifetime probation for any person required to register as a sex offender that failed to do so. Mandatory lifetime proba- Under an amendment to a bill considered by the Senate tion for failure to register for any reason, without a review Government Committee this week, local government and other process, was a concern for many who voted to keep the bill alive public employees would be prohibited from lobbying the with the notion of amending it later. The bill needs House Legislature on behalf of the city, town or public employer. The Appropriations Committee approval next. amendment to SB 1279, proposed by Senator Jack Harper, HB 2214, a bill that adds luring a minor for sexual exploitation to would have also prevented city, town and other public agency the list of dangerous crimes against children, was held at the employees from participating on legislative study committees if request of Chairman Steve Tully, who is also the sponsor. Lack of the committee is studying statutory changes to a city, town or time this week requires the bill to pass House Judiciary next week. agency. The legislation would have essentially placed a gag order on local government and state agency officials as appar- HB 2418, a bill which originally drafted mandated that a bond ently, according to the bill supporters, the legislature does not be posted by any property owner who rented to more than 3 need their input when deciding on bills that local governments registered sex offenders at $100,000 for each registered sex and state agencies will be implementing. offender was amended with a striker. The new language states We are pleased to report that the Senate Government that any person who rents to more than 3 registered sex offend - Committee recognized that this was an unfeasible idea that ers shall be considered a slumlord and will fall under those unfairly targets local governments and state agencies and the established fines and guidelines. The bill must pass House amendment and bill failed by a vote of 1 -8. The proposal was Commerce and Military Affairs next. so bad that even the amendment's sponsor, Senator jack CONTINUED ON PAGE 4 0 Legislative Bulletin is published by The League of Arizona Cities and Towns, 1820 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. Phone: (602) 258 -5786. Fax (602) 253 -3874. Email: league @mg.state.az.us. Visit us on the Internet at www.azleague.org. Page 4 1 Issue No. 7 February 27, 2004 HB 2452 requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect making recommendations to the Legislature that will pre - fees paid by registered sex offenders when they go in for their serve the long term viability of military gunnery ranges, currently mandated yearly identification card or drivers license and allow for potential development in outlying areas. and to transfer those fees into the Sex Offender Monitoring Additionally, the Committee must submit a report with recom- Fund. This fund had been swept in the recent past. The bill mendations to the Governor and Legislature to December 31, ` needs to get House Appropriations Committee approval next. 2004. This bill was brought forth for the protection of Florence's military gunnery range. Repeal Date: June 30, 2005. HB 2602 increases notification requirements regarding all levels passed the House, awaiting committee assignments in the Senate. of sex offenders and requires notification to any place where children congregate on a regular basis. The increased notifica- H. 2134. NATURAL GAS FACILITIES; RESTRICTIONS. tion requirements apply to local law enforcement agencies and Defines "natural gas storage facility" and stipulates that a nat- may be a concern for some cities or towns. The bill must pass ural gas storage facility shall not be located within three miles the House Utilities and Municipalities Committee next. of the border of a municipality, airport or military airport. Defines "border of a municipality" to include the border of any Another bill to note is one that was reported in last week's land annexed by the municipality. Exempts a city or town that Bulletin, SB1307 prohibits more than three registered sex by ordinance or resolution has adopted provisions restricting offenders on probation from living in the same structure or natural gas storage facilities that are at least as stringent as the within a one - quarter mile radius of another sex offender. The restrictions in this chapter. This bill may possibly be amended bill will next go to Senate Committee of the Whole. to include only Maricopa County. Amends Title 49, We will continue to monitor and report on all these bills. We Environment. Assigned to House Utilities e'r Municipalities would like to thank Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon and (U&M) and Natural Resources & Agriculture (NRA). Passed Councilmembers Claude Mattox and Greg Stanton for testifying U&M, not heard in NRA yet. on a number of these issues as well as Representatives John H. 2139. COUNTIES; MILITARY BASE PRESERVATION. Nelson and Deb Gullett for working on these issues. Allows counties to acquire development rights to preserve real property surrounding military installations in order to Military Preservation Bills maintain and encourage open spaces. Amends Tide 11, Status Report Counties. Assigned to Rules only. There are several bills this legislative session that deal with mili- H. 2140. MILITARY TRAINING ROUTES. Original bill tary preservation in one aspect or another. As requested at last expands the definition of "military airport" to include military week's Executive Committee meeting, we are providing a listing training routes. The strike- everything amendment to HB of all the military preservation bills being considered at the 2140 requires the Commissioner of the Arizona Department of Legislature. The protection of the mission viability of our mili- Real Estate to provide public disclosure of land under a mili- tary installations was voted a priority resolution for the second tary training route. The State Land Department is responsible year in a row and we will continue to support legislation directed for preparation and dissemination of a map of the training toward that purpose. We will also continue to monitor these bills routes as well as their legal description. Amends Title 28, and keep you informed as they go through the legislative process. Transportation. Passed Utilities er Municipalities with the Below are the bills by number and short title as well as a brief strike - everything amendment. Also passed Commerce and description and quick update on where each is in the process. Military Affairs, not heard in Federal Mandates and Property Rights yet. H. 2055. MILITARY GUNNERY RANGE; STUDY COMMIT- TEE. Creates the 12- member Joint Legislative Study H. 2141. SPECIAL ROAD DISTRICTS; TECHNICAL COR- Committee on Military Gunnery Range Preservation. The RECTION. The original bill was a vehicle. The strike- every- duties of the Committee include reviewing federal and state thing amendment to HB 2141 provides disclosure regard - laws that impact the use of land in the vicinity of the range and ing the Luke - CONTINUED ON PAGE 5 • Legislative Bulletin is published by The League of Arizona Cities and Towns, 1820 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. Phone: (602) 258 -5786. Fax (602) 253 -3874. Email: league @mg.state.az.us. Visit us on the Internet at www.azleague.org. r Issue No. 7 February 27, 2004 1 4 14 Page 5 • Air Force Base Auxiliary Airfield #1 by delineating the Airfield Office), to ensure any proposed land use changes impacting on a map prepared by the State Land Department. The amend- military installations are addressed by cities and towns in their ment further clarifies accident potential zones, clear zones, as general and comprehensive plan processes, adding notification well as high noise and accident potential zones. Additionally, it to the public report that makes purchasers aware that their conforms pertinent dates if land becomes territory in the vicin- property is in the vicinity of a military installation and creating f ity of a military airport in the future. Amends Title 28, a Military Installation Fund. Amends Title 9, Cities and Towns; Transportation; Title 32, Professions and Occupations and Title Title 11, Counties; Title 32, Professions and Occupations; Title 37, Public Lands. Passed Utilities & Municipalities with the 41, State Government and Title 43, Taxation of Income. strike - everything amendment. Also passed Commerce and Assigned to Commerce and Military Affairs, Federal Mandates Military Affairs, not heard in Federal Mandates and Property and Property Rights and Appropriations, not heard anywhere yet. Rights yet. H. 2662. MILITARY AIRPORTS; MILITARY TRAINING H. 2538. MILITARY BASE PRESERVATION; CONSIDERA- ROUTES. Defines military training route as low -level military TION. Prohibits a municipality or county from combining the flights that may be as low as 100 feet above the ground at consideration of military base preservation with any other mat- speeds in excess of 250 knots indicated air speed. Passed ter in a referendum for a vote of the citizens. Contains an Commerce and Military Affairs, also assigned to Federal emergency clause. Amends Title 9, Cities and Towns and Title Mandates and Property Rights. 11, Counties. Same as S. 1397. Passed Federal Mandates and Property Rights, next to House Floor. HCM. 2011. LUKE AIR FORCE BASE PRESERVATION. House Concurrent Memorial 2011 requests the United States H. 2605. MILITARY AIRPORTS; LAND USE PLANNING. Congress authorize the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to Amends law to incorporate recommendations of the Governor's prepare and execute a land trade between the.United States and Military Facilities Task Force which include expanding the abil- the landowners of vacant and farm land within the 65 Ldn • ity of counties to manage growth and development in areas Noise Contours and Accident Potential Zones of Luke Air Force impacted by military installations, expanding the definition for Base. Further, the Memorial requests the Arizona Secretary of "military airports ", incorporating work that has already been State to transmit copies of the Memorial to the President of the accomplished by the joint Land Use Studies conducted around United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Luke and Davis Monthan, repealing the post action reporting Representatives and each Arizona Congressional Representative. requirement of local jurisdictions to the Attorney General's There are amendments being worked on to include other bases Office and replacing it with a compliance check by the around the state. Passed Commerce and Military Affairs, also Department of Commerce (in an expected strike - everything assigned to Federal Mandates and Property Rights. amendment this check is transferred to the Attorney General's . Legislative Bulletin is published by The League of Arizona Cities and Towns, 1820 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007. Phone: (602) 258 -5786. Fax (602) 253 -3874. Email: league @mg.state.az.us. Visit us on the Internet at www.azleague.org.