Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2012-044 approving Pima County multi mitigation plan 2012►�:.ol: : � !� �! 1�(►��� RELATING TO EMERGENCY MANAGEIVIENT; APPROVING TI� PIMA COUNTY MUL- TI-JURISDICTIONAL MITIGATION FLAN 2012 WI�REAS the Town of Marana desires to adopt the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional 1V1'iti- gation Plan 2012 ("Plan") ta meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ("DMA2K"); and WHEREAS the Town af Marana has experienced damage from natural and human caused hazards such as drought, flooding, levee failure and wildfire, possibly resulting in damage and/or loss of property and life, economic hardship and threats to public health and safety; and WHEREAS the Plan has been drafted pursuant to Federal requirements, having been devel- aped with research and work done by the Tawn of Marana in association with the Pirna County Mul- ti-Surisdictional Planning Team, for the reduction of hazard risk to the community; and WHEREAS the primary purpose of the Plan is to identify hazaxds that affect the Town ofMa- rana, assess the vulnerability and risk posed by those hazards to community-wide human and structur- al assets, develap strategies far mitigation of those identified hazards, present future maintenance procedures for the Plan, and document the planning process, and WHEREAS the Plan recammends several hazard mitigation actions ar projects that will pro- vide mitigation far specific hazards that affect the Town of Marana, in order to protect people and property from loss associated with those hazards; and WHEREAS upon approval ofthe Plan and approval from the Arizona Division ofEmergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Town of Marana will be eligible ta apply for federal mitigation grant funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYC}R AND �OUNCII, OF TI� TOWN OF 1t�IA,RANA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTICIN 1. The Tawn Council hereby appraves the Pima County Multi-JurisdictionallVfit- igation Plan 2012, attached ta and incorporated by this reference in this resolution as E�ibit A. M�tI2�iNARESOLUT10NN0. 2012-44 JFS/IO112 SECTION 2. The Town's Manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry aut the terms, obligatians, and objectives af the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan 2012. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED by the Mayor and Cauncil ofthe Town ofMarana, Arizona, this 19�` day af June, 2412. �� Mayor d Honea i /1.���_ / /�I.r�.� _ � - � : . • � i - M,�RAN.4 RESOLUTIt1NNQ. 2012-44 ���11�i�11j�� ♦� �� �Q �S ��►�� '� �° �.�e �ORPORAfF : i i �o r' a °� , � : v � � � s ������ i�t►�� .IFSf10/12 / / �.� � lIJIC. � -t�(�l1 �__j' , t �:'.. � Y �T �� ,� / c r � 1 i .�'� - � �tLC!l�l L,��!L i��C?l � ��l��11C-� �� � _ F �y ." ��. ` � . � ) � � ' A { J � � ' / I J J � t ) � �� a / J /) t_C.'�_��.C.�� t,�'�.�� L ! )��' ���/ .,t �: �' Il . ;. ,� : �, . . . . , ., ,.r� �� � . � r .�r -��.��.-�''��> �� ;� ..t��`��:�...a`.���� .q`.�.�5��.l�?..���x�f.�....�.�- � ' f / i �r. .'��.. `�;:��a,�_ ...�Ur w:�"s�:�i�'S?�a�,�...i'"��.! � , �� .�.,.^�a,_, .o :j �� � 3 • � \ � .. � � .. � � .. � : ) - ,+� �_ - � r m . 4 � ''. ' . . � � . + ¢ , �a . ' . .,`;. . . .... `Li" ..1*� "ti .. ��i.J . �S� i r;e� „ .. +' :�'ni"�— _, *F .y ... � .. �. P .. � 1 f���. . . . . - � rt . . �� ,y- . ' � �( � .T'� � p ' r . . , ' ��.3.�.1. . ^ z �f.S� . . . . . .. . � - �� ,;� j �!�? Yt � .: � . •. � I : � - . �r �. . ;, �.ly:. � � - . N ,.. � jyl� . . .. � ,}.;. : � � ;t r� y . ,r ', r �� ��Y +'�' � � . .a� . . � �1x'yr � � . � ?, - ,rv�. �. . .. . t :r, t r ' ,'' , �; , " _ ` �' � �,�� :. „> �>_ , � k . ' ' * ' '�„-" ,".'*b�.,' :. ' � � � tt� _ a i �.. ` � �� s � z � ` �" � � �� � � �� � ��'� � ` � �, �r �� ����:;i �' '�"�'''-� �^=,�.a�ry �a � �.` `"� �.,� : �.�.� �'� '�!� ' a�� c. �� ..� .., ,. � +�'r,k ," �,. � � � � � ' � , � PIMA COUNT'Y MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Across the United States, natural and human-caused disasters have led to increasing levels of death, injury, property damage, and interruption of business and government services. The toll on families and individuals can be immense and damaged businesses cannot contribute to the economy. The time, money and effort to respond to and recover from these emergencies or disasters divert public resources and attention from other important programs and problems. With 43 federal or state declarations, 333 other significant events, and a combined total of 376 disaster events recorded, the four jurisdictions and one tribe within Pima County, Arizona participating in this planning effort, recognize the consequences of disasters and the need to reduce the impacts of natural and human-caused hazards. The county and jurisdictions also know that with careful selection, mitigation actions in the form of projects and programs can become long-term, cost effective means for reducing the impact of natural and human-caused hazards. The elected and appointed officials of Pima County, Marana, Oro Valley, Pascua Yaqui Tribe, Sahuarita, South Tucson, and Tucson, demonstrated their commitment to hazard mitigation in 2005-2006 by preparing the first Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007 Plan). The 2007 Plan was developed through a planning effort that resulted in a multi-jurisdictional plan. The 2007 Plans was approved by FEMA on January 26, 2007, and requires a full FEMA approved update prior to the subsequent five year expiration. The Pascua Yaqui Tribe also participated in the 2005-2006 planning effort and received what was then known as a modified state plan approval that will require updating to a tribal plan. In response, the Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM) secured a federal planning grant and hired JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. to assist the county, tribe and participating jurisdictions with the update process. Pima County reconvened a multi jurisdictional planning team comprised of veteran and first-time representatives from each participating jurisdiction, various county departments and organizations, ADEM, local fire and flood control districts, and the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and Tohono O'odham Nation. The Planning Team met four times during the period of February to May 2011 in a collabarative effort to review, evaluate; and update the 2007 Plan. In addition, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe also met twice within the `same time period to develop the tribe-specific planning elements required for a Tribal Ptan approval. The resulting Pima County Mu(ti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan) will continue to guide the county, tribe and participating jurisdictions toward greater disaster resistance in full harmony with the character and needs of the community and region. The Plan and accompanying Tribal Plan elements have been prepared in compliance with Section 322 of the : Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act or the Act), 42 U.S. C. 5165, enacted under Sec. 104 the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, (DMA 2000) Public Law 106-390 of October 30, . 2000, as implemented at CFR 201.6 and 201.7 dated October, 2007. The Plan identifies hazard mitigation measures intended to eliminate or reduce the effects of future disasters throughout the county, and was . deyeloped,in a joint and cooperative venture by members of the Pima County Planning Team. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ES 1 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS � �:�: . SECTION 1: JURISDICTIONAL ADOPTION AND FEMA APPROVAL ....................................................1 1.1 DMA 2000 Requirements ...............................................................................................................1 1.1.1 General Requirements ................................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Tribal Assurance ........................................................................................................................1 1.1.3 Update Requirements .................................................................................................................2 1.2 Official Record of Adoption ...........................................................................................................2 1.3 FEMA Approval Letter ..................................................................................................................2 SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 2 .1 Plan History .....................................................................................................................................5 2 .2 Plan Purpose and Authority ...........................................................................................................5 2 .3 General Plan Description ...............................................................................................................5 2 .4 Overall Plan Update Process ..........................................................................................................6 SECTION 3: PLANNING PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 9 3 .1 Planning Process Description .........................................................................................................9 3 .2 Previous Planning Process Assessment .........................................................................................9 3 .3 Primary Point of Contact ...............................................................................................................9 3 .4 Planning Teams .............................................................................................................................10 3 .41 Planning Team Assembly ....................................................:...................................................10 3.4.2 Planning Team Activities .........................................................................................................13 3.4.3 Agency/Organizational Participation .......................................................................................14 3 .5 Public Involvement .......................................................................................................................15 3.5.1 Previous Plan Assessment ........................................................................................................15 3.5.2 Plan Update ..............................................................................................................................16 3.5.3 Tribal Definition of "Publid' .....................................................:....♦...........................:............16 3.6 Reference Documents and Technical Resources ........................................................................17 �. SECTION4: COMMUNITYDESCRIPTIONS ............................ ..........................................................19 4 .1 General ...........................................................................................................................................19 ; 4 .2 County Overview .......................................... ....:.... ......... ....................................................19 4 .2.1 History ... ....:..................................................... ......................:..........................................19 4 .2.2 Geography .....:....:...................................................................................................................19 4 .23 Government :.............................................................................................:..............................21 _ 4.2.4 Geology .. ......:........................:.............. ........... ...:..... ......24 ................................................ 4.2.5 Transportation ........................................................................:.................................................24 4.2.6 Climate .........:............................................................ .. ..........24 , _ .... ............................................... 4.2.3 Population ..:�c :.................................... .............26 ...................................................................... 4.2,4 Economy ....................................:.........,...........:.......................................27 ............................. 4.3 Jurisdictional Uverviews ..............................................................................................................29 , 4.3.1 Marana ............................ ......................................................................................................29 ` 4.3.2 Oro Valley ........:.....:....... ......... ......... ..............:..............................................................33 4.3 3 Pascua Yaqui Tribe ............................................:.....................................................................35 � 4.3.4 Sahuarita ...............................................................................:. ....37 ....................................... 43.5 South Tucson ................................................................:.. ...... ..............................................39 4.3.6 Tohono O'odham ..................:....................................................................:........... ....:..::::..:.41 4.3.7 Tucson .... ....:...............:................................. ..41 ....................................................................... SECTION 5: RI5K ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 45 , 51 Hazard Identification and Screening ......... ..................................................................45 � 5.2 Vulnerability Analysis Methodology .........................................................................................48 5.2.1 General .......................................................:..........................:..................................................48 5.2.2 Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) Evaluation .......... .....................................................49 :. 5.2.3 Asset Inventory ......................:.................................................................................................49 : FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page i PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.2.4 5.2.5 5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.3 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 5.3.4 5.3.5 5.3.6 5.3.6 5.3.8 5.3.9 5.3.10 5.3.11 5.4 LossEstimations ..................................................................................................................... 52 Development Trend Analysis .................................................................................................. 53 Environmental Risk and Vulnerability .................................................................................... 53 Consequences/Impacts : ........................................................................................................... 5 5 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Cultural/Sacred Sites .............................................................................. 55 HazardRisk Profiles .................................................................................................................... 55 Disease.................................................................................................................................... 57 Drought................................................................................................................................... 65 Earthquake.............................................................................................................................. 75 ExtremeTemperature .............................................................................................................. 85 Flood/ Flash Flood ................................................................................................................. 91 Hazardous Materials Incidents ................................................................................................ 99 LeveeFailure .........................................................................................................................105 SevereWind ...........................................................................................................................1 l l Subsidence.............................................................................................................................117 Wildfire ..............................................................................:...................................................125 WinterStorm ..........................................................................................................................133 RiskAssessment Summary .........................................................................................................139 SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY ............................................................................................... 141 6.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................141 6 .2 Capability Assessment ................................................................................................................142 6.2.1 Jurisdictional Capabilities ......................................................................................................143 6.2.2 Tribal Pre- and Post Disaster Hazard Management ...............................................................162 6.2.3 Previous Mitigation Activities ...............................................................................................163 6.2.4 National Flood Insurance Program Participation ...................................................................168 6.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects and Implementation Strategy .....................................................169 6.3.1 Previous Mitigation Actions/Projects Assessment ................................................................169 6.3.2 New Mitigation Actions / Projects and Implementation Strategy ..........................................181 SECTION 7: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ........................................................................... 194 7 .1 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................................194 7.1.1 General Planning Team Monitoring and Evaluation ..............................................................i94 7.1.2 Monitoring of Tribal Mitigation Activities ............................................................................195 7.2 Plan Update .................................................................................................................................196 7.3 Incorporation into Existing Planning 1Vlechanisms ..................................................................196 7 .4 Continued Public Involvement ...................................................................................................198 SECTION8: PLAN TOOLS .................................................................................................................. 203 S.1 Acronyms .....................................................................................................................................203 8 .2 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................204 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page ii PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 LIST OF MAPS Maps lA and 1B — Flood Hazard Maps for Pima County Maps 1C through 1H — Jurisdiction Specitic Flood Hazard Maps Maps 2A and 2B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Area HAZMAT Hazard Maps Maps 2C through 2H— Jurisdiction Specific HAZMAT Hazard Maps Map 3A — County-wide Levee Failure Hazard Map Maps 3B through 3D — Levee Failure Hazard Maps for Marana, Oro Valley, and Tucson. Map 4— Severe Wind Event Map Maps 5A and 5B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Area Subsidence Hazard Map(s) Maps SC and 5D — Jurisdiction Specific Subsidence Hazard Maps for Sahuarita and Tucson. Maps 6A and 6B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Wildfire Hazard Map(s) Maps 6C through 6H — Jurisdiction Specific Wildfire Hazard Maps Maps 7A and 7B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Maximum 1-Day Snow Depths Maps 8A and 8B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Maximum 3-Day Snow Depths LIST OF FIGURES Figure4-1: Vicinity Map ...................................................................................................................................20 Fign 4-2: Ecoregions Map .............................................................................................................................22 • Figure 4-3: Community Location and Land Ownership Map ::.............:.......................................................23 Fig ure 4-4: General Location and Transportation Map ................................................................................25 Fig ure 4-5: Employment by Industry in 2008 .................................................................................................27 ` Figure 4-6: Residential Building Permits for PAG Member Jurisdictions for the period ` of 2000 to 2009 .................................................................................................................28 Figure 4-7: Town of Marana Land Use Map 2010 ......... .....:......................................................................30 Figure 4-8: Town of Oro Valley Land Use Map 2010 ....................................................................................34 Figure Pascua �..ocatiun Map ....................................................................................................................36 Figure 4-10: Town of Sahuarita General Plan Land Use Map 2008 .............................................................38 Figure 4-11: City of South Tucson Land Ownership and Locatian Map .....................................................40 I�'igure 4-12: City of Tucson's Generalized Distribution of Land Use Patterns 2001 ..................................42 Figure 4-13: City of Tucson's Generalized Distribution of Land Use Patterns-Legend ............................43 Figure 5-1: Average statewide precipitation variances from a normal based on 1971- , 2000 period ..................... . ........................................................................................66 _, ,. Figure 5-2: Average statewide precipitation variances from a normal based on 1998 - _ 2009 period ......................................................................................................................66 Figure 5-3: U.S. Drought Monitor Map for October 11, 2011 .......................................................................67 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page iii PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Figure 5-4: U.S. Seasonal Outlook, October to December, 2011 ...................................................................68 Figure 5-5: Arizona short term drought status map for February 2009 ......................................................69 Figure 5-6: Arizona long term drought status map for January 2011 ..........................................................70 Figure 5-7: Peak ground acceleration map for a 2% chance in 50 years recurrence ..................................78 Figure 5-8: Pima County PGA map for a 2% chance in 50 years recurrence .............................................78 Figure5-9: National Weather Service Heat Index Chart ...............................................................................86 Figure 5-10: South-Central Arizona Land Subsidence Profiles ..................................................................118 Figure 5-11: Tucson Active Management Area Subsidence Map ...............................................................119 Figure 5-12: PCCWPP extraordinary rainfall year fuel hazards map .......................................................128 Figure 5-13: Weather stations with snowfall statistics within or near Pima County .................................134 Figure 5-1: Past Mitigation Projects in Arizona ...........................................................................................164 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Summary of 2007 Plan review and 2012 Plan correlation .............................................................6 Table 3-1: List of jurisdictional primary points of contact ............................................................................10 Table 3-2: Multi-jurisdictional planning team participants ..........................................................................11 Table 3-3: Planning meetings convened as part of the plan update process .................................................13 Table 3-4: Comparative summary of agency/organization participation in the plan updateprocess ...........:.....................................................................................................15 Table 3-5: List of resource documents and references reviewed and incorporated in the planupdate process ........................................................................................................17 Table 4-1: Climate statistics for select WRCC station locations in Pima County ........................................24 Table 4-2: Population estimates for Pima County jurisdictions ....................................................................26 Table 4-3: Pascua Yaqui Tribal enrollment statistics as of March 2011 ......................................................35 Table 5-1: Summary of initial hazard identification lists ...............................................................................46 Table 5-2: Total Disaster Expenditures for State and Federally Declared Natural Hazard Events That Included Pima County — February 1966 to August2010 ... ......... ..................................................................................................47 Table 5-3: Human and Property Loss Estimates for State and Federally Dectared Naturai Hazard Events That Included Pima County — January 1966 to August 2010 ........................................................................................................47 Table 5-4: Undeclared Historic Nazard Events for Pima County — July 1961 to August 2010 ..................................................................................................................................48 Table 5-5: Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) categories and risk levels ..............................................50 Table 5-6: Asset inventory structure counts by category and jurisdiction as of May 2011 ........................52 Table 5-7c Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) categories and risk levels.................................................................................................................................54 Table 5-8: CPRI results by jurisdiction for disease ........................................................................................60 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page iv PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-9: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for disease ...................................61 Table 5-10: CPRI results by jurisdiction for drought ....................................................................................69 Table 5-11: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for drought ...............................72 Table 5-12: Earthquake PGA, magnitude and intensity comparison ...........................................................76 Table 5-13: CPRI results by jurisdiction for earthquake ..............................................................................79 Table 5-14: Potential exposure and loss from earthquake hazard ................................................................80 Table 5-15: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for earthquake .........................81 Table 5-16: CPRI results by jurisdiction for extreme temperature ..............................................................87 Table 5-17: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for extreme he a t ................................................................................................................................... 8 7 Table 5-18: CPRI results by jurisdiction for flood .........................................................................................94 Table 5-19: Pima County exposure and loss estimates due to flooding ........................................................95 Table 5-20: Repetitive loss property statistics for Pima County jurisdictions .............................................96 Table 5-21: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for flood ....................................96 Table 5-22: CPRI results by jurisdiction for HAZMAT ..............................................................................100 Table 5-23: Pima County exposure estimates due to HAZMAT .................................................................101 Table 5-24: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for HAZMAT .........................102 Table 5-25: CPRI results by jurisdiction for levee failure ...........................................................................106 Table 5-26: Pima County exposure estimates due to levee failure ..............................................................107 Table 5-27: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for levee failure ......................108 Table 5-28: Fujita Tornado Scale ...................................................................................................................113 Table 5-29: CPRI results by jurisdiction for severe wind ............................................................................113 Table 5-30: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for severe wind .......................114 Table 5-31: CPRI results by jurisdiction for subsidence .............................................................................120 Table 5-32: Pima County exposure estimates due to subsidence .................................................................121 Table 5-33: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for subsidence ........................122 Tab1e 5-34: CPRI results by jurisdiction for wildfire ...................................................................................127 Table 5-35: Pima County exposure and loss estimates due to wildfire .......................................................129 Table 5-36: Environmental''�iisk and Vulnerability Irrdex (EVRI) scores for wildfire .............................130 Table 5-37: ,Probability estimates of snowfall depth for various durations and return periods at select weather stations within or near Pima County ................................135 Table 5-38: CPRI results by jurisdiction for winter storm ..........................................................................136 Table 5-39: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for winter storm...............................................:..............................................................................136 Table 5-40: Summary of hazards to be mitigated by each participating jurisdiction ...............................139 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County ................................................................143 Table 6-2-1: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Pima County ..................................................150 Table 6-3-1: Fiscal capabilities for Pima County ..........................................................................................150 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page v PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-2: Legal and regulatory capabitities for Marana .........................................................................151 Table 6-2-2: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Marana ...........................................................152 Table6-3-2: Fiscal capabilities for Marana ...................................................................................................152 Table 6-1-3: Legat and regulatory capabilities for Oro Valley ....................................................................153 Table 6-2-3: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Oro Valley ......................................................155 Table 6-3-3: Fiscal capabilities for Oro Valley ..............................................................................................155 Table 6-1-4: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pascua Yaqui Tribe .....................................................156 Table 6-2-4: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Pascua Yaqui Tribe ......................................156 Table 6-3-4: Fiscal capabilities for Pascua Yaqui Tribe ..............................................................................157 Table 6-1-5: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Sahuarita ......................................................................158 Table 6-2-5: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Sahuarita .......................................................158 Table6-3-5: Fiscal capabilities for Sahuarita ...............................................................................................159 Table 6-1-6: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Tucson ..........................................................................160 Table 6-2-6: Technical staff and personnel capabilities for Tucson ............................................................161 Table6-3-6: Fiscal capabilities for Tucson ....................................................................................................161 Table 6-4: Departments or entities with hazard mitigation, pre-disaster hazard management, and/or post-disaster hazard management responsibilities for Pascua Yaqui Tribe ......................................................................162 Table 6-5: Previous mitigation activities for Pima County jurisdictions ....................................................165 Tabte 6-6: Previous projects in Pima County jurisdictions receiving federal mitigation grantfunding .........................................................:.......................................................168 Table 6-7: Summary of NFIP status and statistics for Pima County and participating jurisdictionsas of August 31, 2011 ..............................................................................168 Table 6-8-1: Pima County assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation'actions/projects ........................170 Table 6-8-2: Marana's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation acfions/projects ..............................172 Table 6-8-3: Oro Valley's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects .........................173 Table 6-8-4: Pascua Yaqui Tribe's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/pro jects ..............................................................................................................175 Table 6-8-5: Sahuarita's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects ...........................177 Table 6-8-6: Tucson's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects ...............................178 Table 6-9-1: Mitigation actions and projects and implementatian strategy fox Pima County............................................................................................................................182 Table 6-9-L• Mitigation actions and projects and imptementation strategy for Marana ..........................183 Table 6-9-3: Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Oro Valley.............................................................................................................................185 Table 6-9-4: Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Pascua YaquiTribe ...................................................................................................................188 Table 6-9-5: Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Sahuarita .......................190 Table 6-9-6: Mitigation actions and projects and implementation strategy for Tucson ...........................192 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page vi PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-1: Pascua Yaqui Tribe planning efforts for future integration .....................................................198 Table 7-2: Continued past and future public involvement activities or opportunities identified by Pima County jurisdictions .....................................................................199 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Official Resolution of Adoption Appendix B: Planning Process Documentation Appendix C: Public Involvement Records Appendix D: Detailed Historic Hazard Records Appendix E: Plan Maintenance Review Memorandums � : FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page vii PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page viii PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 1: �TURISDICTIONAL ADOPTION AND FEMA APPROVAL Requirement §201.6(c)(5): (The /ocal hazard mitigation plan shall include...] Documentation that the p/an has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the p/an (e.g., City Council, County Commissioner, Tribal Council). For mu/ti jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted. Requirement §201.6(d)(3): A/ocal jurisdiction must review and revise its p/an to ref/ect changes in deve/opment , progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit it for approva/ within five (5) years in order to continue to be eligible for mitigation project grant funding. 1.1 DMA 2000 Requirements 1.1.1 General Requirements The Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (the Plan) has been prepared in compliance with Section 322 of the Robert T. Staffard Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988 (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5165, as amended by Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) Public Law 106-390 enacted October 30, 2000. The regulations governing the mitigation planning requirements for local mitigation plans are published under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 44, Section 201.6 (44 CFR §201.6). Minimum requirements for tribal mitigation plans are published under CFR Title 44, Section 201.7 (44 CFR §201.7). Additionally, a DMA 2000 compliant plan that addresses flooding will also meet the minimum planning requirements for the Flood Mitigation Assistance program as provided for under 44 CFR §78. DMA 2000 provides requirements for States, Tribes, and local governments to undertake a risk-based approach to reducing risks to natural hazards through mitigation planning'. The local mitigation plan is the representation of the jurisdictions' commitment to reduce risks from hazards; serving as a guide for decision makers as they commit resources to reducing the effects of hazards. Local pians will also serve as t�e basis for the State to provide technical assistance and to prioritize project funding. Under 44 CFR §201.6 and §201.7, local and tribal governments must have a Federal Emergency Managemen�� Agency (FEMA)-approved local / tribal mitigation plan in order to apply for and/or receive funding under the following hazard mitigation assistance programs: • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) • Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) • Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) �� �� • Repetitive Flood Claims (RFC), at FEMA's discretion • Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) • Public Assistance Categories C— G, applies to Tribes 1.1.2 Tribal Assurance The Pascua Yaqui Tribe will comply with all applicable Federal Statutes and regulations during the periods for which it receives grant funding, in compliance with 44CFR 13.11(c) and the DMA 2000 requirement §201.7(c)(6), and will amend its plan whenever necessary to reflect changes in tribal or Federal laws and statutes as required in 44CFR 13.11 (d). i FEMA, 2008, Local Multi Mitigation Planning Guidance FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 1 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 1.1.3 Update Requirements DMA 2000 requires that existing plans be updated every five years, with each plan cycle requiring a complete review, revision, and re-approval of the plan at both the state and FEMA level. Pima County, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, and the incorporated communities of Marana, Oro Valley, Sahuarita, South Tucson, and Tucson are covered by a FEMA approved multi jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. The Tohono O'odham Nation (TON) also participated in the 2006-2007 planning work, but chose to devetop a stand-alone tribal plan using a separate planning process. The TON Tribal Plan was approved by FEMA in late 2009. The Plan is the result of a planning process performed by the Pima County jurisdictions to update the current multi jurisdictional plan developed in the 2006-2007. It is duly noted that TON participated in the current planning effort, but will not be an adopting jurisdiction as the nation already has their own plan. 1.2 Official Record of Adoption The City of South Tucson was a partial participant in the plan update process, but chose not to complete the process and therefore is not included in this Plan. All other jurisdictions may keep copies of official adoption documents in Appendix A of their copy of the Plan. 1.3 FEMA Approval Letter The Plan was submitted to the Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM), the authorized state agency, and FEMA for review and approval. FEMA's approval letter may be provided on the following page. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 2 Adoption of the Plan is accomplished by the governing body for each participating jurisdiction in accordance with the authoriry and powers granted to those jurisdictions by either the State of Arizona or the federal government. The officially participating jurisdictions in the Plan include: PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 �Insert FEMA Approval Letter HereJ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 3 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 4 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION 2.1 Plan History In 2004 through 2006, Pima County, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, the Tohono O'odham Nation, and the incorporated communities of Marana, Oro Valley, Sahuarita, South Tucson and Tucson participated in a mitigation planning process that resulted in the development of the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (URS, 2007), herein referred to as the 2007 Plan. As previously mentioned, all jurisdictions except the Tohono O'odham Nation formally adopted the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan received official FEMA approval on January 26, 2007 and is nearing the end of the 5-year planning cycle. 2.2 Plan Purpose and Authority The purpose of the Plan is to identify hazards that impact the various jurisdictions located within Pima County, assess the vulnerability and risk posed by those hazards to community-wide human and structural assets, develop strategies for mitigation of those identified hazards, present future maintenance procedures for the plan, and document the planning process. The Plan is prepared in compliance with DMA 2000 requirements and represents a multi jurisdictional update of the 2007 Plan. Pima County and all of the Cities and Towns are political subdivisions of the State of Arizona and are organized under Title 9(cities/towns) and Title 11 (counties) of the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS). The Pascua Yaqui Tribe is a federally recognized tribe, organized and established as a sovereign nation pursuant to the provisions of the Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934. The Pascua Yayui Tribe achieved federal recognition as an established tribe on September 18, 1978 and became recognized as a historic tribe in 1994. In 1988, the tribe's first constitution was approved. The Pascua Yaqui Tribe is governed by a tribal council that is made up of eleven elected officials who are dedicated to the well being and advancement of the tribe as a whole. Accordingly, each of the participating jurisdictions is empowered to formally plan and adopt the Plan on behalf of their respective jurisdictions. Funding for the development of the Plan was provided through a PDM planning grant obtained by the State of Arizonafrom FEMA. JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology (JE Fuller) was retained by Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM) to provide consulting services in guiding the planning process and Plan development. 2.3 General Plan Description The Plan is generally arranged and formatted to be consistent with the 2010 State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (State Plan) and is comprised of the following major sections: Planning Process — this section summarizes the planning process used to update the Plan, describes the assembly of the planning team and meetings conducted, and summarizes the public involvement efforts. Community Description — this section provides an overall description of the participating jurisdictions and the County as a whole. Risk Assessment — this section summarizes the identification and profiling of natural and human-caused hazards that impact the County and the vulnerability assessment for each hazard that considers exposure/loss estimations and development trend analyses. Mitigation Strategy — this section presents a capability assessment for each participating jurisdiction and summarizes the Plan mitigation goals, objectives, actions/projects, and strategy for implementation of those actions/projects. Plan Maintenance Strategy — this section outlines the proposed strategy for evaluating and monitoring the � Plan, updating the Plan in the next 5 years, incorporating plan elements into existing planning mechanisms, and continued public involvement. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 5 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Plan Tools — this section includes a list Plan acronyms and a glossary of definitions. 2.4 Overall Plan Update Process The Plan is the result of a thorough update process that included a section by section review and evaluation of the 2007 Plan by the planning participants. The Plan is similar in arrangement to the 2007 Plan, with some slight modifications to fit the State Plan template. At the onset of the planning process, ADEM printed copies of the 2007 Plan and provided them to each respective jurisdiction as a working document for their review and use during the planning process. This way the jurisdictions could keep their original 2007 Plan intact and unmarked. Digital versions of the 2007 Plan were also made available to planning team members for further distribution as needed. The Planning Team reviewed each section of the 2007 Plan during the first meeting, wherein the plan's purpose was explained, sections were discussed, and the plans' relation to the DMA 2000 requirements were summarized. Use of the 2007 Plan provided the seed material for subsequent discussions on how to update and improve the Plan. Planning participants were requested bring their working copy to every meeting as the team stepped through each stage of the update process and reviewed each 2007 Plan section in greater detail. Table 2.1 summarizes the review and analysis of each section of the 2006 Plans and generally describes what changes were or were not made and why. Additional details of that process are also discussed in the following sections of this Plan as appropriate. Tabte 2-1: Summary of 2007 Plan review and 2012 Plan correlation 2007 Plan 2012 Plan Section Section Review and Chan es Descri tion 2007 Plan to the 2012 Plan 1 Executive � Executive Summary was moved to be located prior to the Table of Contents. Summa • Plan format changes were made to make the Plan more compatible with the 2007 State Plan format. 2 1 • Moved 2007 Plan Section 2 discussions to 2012 Plan Section 1. • Expanded section to include the Tribal Assurance and a description of the update re uirements. 3.1 1.1.1 . Removed discussion on Growin Smarter as it is not directl tied to DMA 2000 3.2 2.2 • Text edited to reflect the u date rocess and tribal re uirements 3.3 2.3 • Chan ed text to be more concise. • Reorganized planning team participation and organization sections 3.4 3.4 . Added a new section to address agency/organization participation and changes between the 2007 Plan and 2012 Plan. • Redistributed the various sub elements of Section 3.5 to the 2012 Plan sections. Various o 3.5.1 through 3.5.4 are now summarized in Section 3.4 3.5 (See o 3.5.5 is now 3.5 Description) 0 3.5.6 is now 3.6 0 3.5.7 is now addressed in Section 6 �� � 0 3.5.8 is now eliminated 4 4 • Generall have ke t the same information, 'ust rearran ed somewhat FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 6 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 2-l: Summary of 2007 Plan review and 2012 Plan correlation 2007 Plan 2012 Plan Section Section Review and Chan es Descri tion 2007 Plan to the 2012 Plan • The whole structure of the risk assessment was revised to provide a hazard based approach to the subsections. The planning team felt this would make the plan easier to understand and follow. • Each hazard profile and vulnerability analysis was carefully reviewed and updated to reflect either more current or totally new data. 5 5 • Several hazards have either been dropped or combined into a new classification to generally follow the hazard list produced with the State Plan. • Asset inventories were updated and refined to make them more complete and current. • New sections pertaining to environmental risk and a consequence/impacts evaluation have been added to address EMAP re uirements. • A review of the goals and objectives subsection resulted in a significant change to much simpler goals and objectives. Reasoning for the changes are summarized in Section 6.1 • The first table of the capability assessment was reformatted to provide an "at-a- glance" summary of the elements and the departments responsible for their maintenance. 6 6 • Tables summarizing previous mitigation activities for each jurisdiction were provided to document past mitigation activities • Section addressing the NFIP program was added in compliance to requirement changes from the 2007 Plan to the 2012 Plan • Each mitigation action/project in the 2007 Plan were reviewed and assessed by the respective jurisdiction. Tables summarizing the results are provided • Planning team chose to combine the data in Section 6.4 into one table to have all the details of the new miti ation actions/ ro'ects in one table. • Reorganized the subsections as follows: 0 71.1 and 7.1.2 are now 7.1 0 7.1.3 is now 7.2 0 7.1.4 is now 7.3 0 7.1.5 is now 7.4 • In general, the review of this section highlighted the lack of plan maintenance actually performed and forced a better definition of future efforts. It is � � anticipated that a multi jurisdictional plan will provide the platform for a more regular review. _ • Added text to discuss review past plan maintenance activities and reasons for successes/failures. • Identified the need to expand Section 73 to provide a better explanation of plan incorporation by each of the jurisdictions. • Identified a need to provide more definition and specificity to the approach in Section 7.4. Revised to be more specific in the types and schedules of future ublic involvement o ortunities. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 7 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 8 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 3: PLANNING PROCESS §201.6 (b): Planning process. An open public invo/vement process is essential to the deve/opment of an effective plan. In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters, the planning process shall include: (1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval; (2) An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-pro�t interests to be involved in the planning process; and (3) Review and incorporation, if appropriate, of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information. §201.6(c)(1): (The plan shall include...J (1) Documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved. This section includes the delineation of various DMA 2000 regulatory requirements, as well as the identification of key stakeholders and planning team members within Pima County. In addition, the necessary public involvement meetings and actions that were applied to this process are also detailed. 3.1 Planning Process Description ADEM applied for and received a PDM planning grant to fund a multi jurisdictional effort to review and update the 2007 Plan. Once the grant was received, ADEM then selected JE Fuller to work with the participating jurisdictions and guide the planning process. An initial project kick-off meeting between ADEM and JE Fuller was convened in September 2010 to begin the planning process, outline the plan objectives, outline the anticipating meeting agendas for the planning efforts, and to discuss the new plan format and other administrative tasks. A total of four multi jurisdictional planning team meetings were conducted over the period of February through May 2011, beginning with the first meeting on February 3, 2011. Two separate tribal planning meeting were also conducted with the Pascua Yaqui Tribe officials on April 12 and May 18, 201 l. Throughout that period of time and for several months afterward, all work required to collect, process, and document updated data and make changes to the plan was performed, culminating in a draft of the Plan. Details regarding key contact infor►nation and promulgation authorities, the planning team selection, participation, and activities, and public involvement are discussed in the following sections. 3.2 Previous Planning Process Assessment The first task of preparation for this Plan, was to evaluate the process used to develop the 2007 Plan. The previous planning process involved selecting a representative from each jurisdiction in Pima County to serve as a lead contact for a steering committee. Each lead identified a jurisdiction-level local planning group that included decision-makers from police, fire, emergency services, community development/planning, transportation, economic development, public warks and emergency response/services personnel within their jurisdiction. The local planning group assisted the leads in execution of the various planning elements and the leads brought this information to the steering committee meetings. Homework assignments were given at each of the steering committee meetings, and the homework was completed by the local planning group and returned to the study contractor for compilation into the 2007 Plan. A conclusion of the assessment was that the prior planning process was sufficiently effective and would basically be replicated for the updating of the Plan. The proposed planning process was presented and discussed at the first multi jurisdictional planning team meeting to verify the planning team agreement. Less than half of the planning team members were returning members from the 2007 Plan steering committee and were familiar with the prior planning process. No objections or alterations were raised or suggested. 3.3 Primary Point of Contact Table 3-1 summarizes the primary points of contact identified for each participating jurisdiction. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 9 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 3-1: List of jurisdictional primary points of contact Jurisdiction Name De artment / Position Address Phone Email Office of Emergency 33 N. Stone Pima Coun Jeff Management and Homeland Suite 1490 � Guthrie Security / Operations Tucson, AZ 520-798-0600 jeff.guthrie@pima.gov Mana er 85701 Police Department, Homeland 11555 W. Civic Center Steve Dr., Bldg B. Town of Marana Johnson Security and Intemal Affairs / Marana, AZ 520-382-2034 sjohnson@marana.com Sergeant 85653 Town of Oro Charlotte Police Department / Regional ll000 N. La Canada Dr. Valley Ackerman Emergency Response Planner Oro Valley, AZ 520-229-4950 cackerman@orovalleyaz.gov 85737 4631 W. Calle Torim Pascua Yaqui Andre Pascua Pueblo Fire andre.matus2@pascuayaqui- Tribe Matus Department / Fire Chief Tucson, AZ 520-879-5723 nsn.gov 85757 315 W. Sahuarita Center Town of Edward Police Department / Regional Way 520-344-7003 epope@ci.sahuarita.az.us Sahuarita Pope Emergency Response Planner Sahuarita, AZ 85629 City of South none none provided none provided none provrded none provided Tucson rovided Office of Emergency 300 S. Fire Central Place City of Tucson Jan Management and Homeland Tucson, Arizona 520-837-7380 jan.mclay@tucsonaz.gov McLay Security / Emergency g5701 Mana ement Director 3.4 Planning Teams Two levels of planning teams were organized for the development of this Plan. The first was a Multi- Jurisdictional Planning Team (Planning Team) that was comprised of one or more representatives from each participating jurisdiction. The second was an optional Local Planning Team. The role of the Planning Team was to work on the coordination, research, and planning element activities required to update the 2007 Pian. Attendance by each participating jurisdiction was required for every Planning Team meeting, as the meetings were structured to progress step-by-step through the pianning process. Steps and procedures for updating the 2007 Plan were presented and discussed at each Planning Team meeting, and assignments were given as necessary. Each meeting built on information discussed and assignments given at the previous meeting. The Planning Team also had the responsibility of liaison to Local Planning Team(s), and was tasked with: • Conveying information and assignments to the Local Planning Team • Ensuring all requested assignments were completed fully and returned on a timely basis. • Arranging for review and official adoption of the Plan. The function and role of the Local Planning Team was to: • Provide support and data • Assist the Planning Team representative with assignments • Make planning decisions regarding Plan components • Review the Plan draft documents 3.4.1 Planning Team Assembly At the beginning of this planning process, the Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (PCOEM) organized and identified members for the Planning Team by initiating contact with, and extending invitations to, all incorporated communities and Indian tribes within the county limits. Other entities that were subsequently invited to participate are discussed in Section FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 10 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 3.4.3. The participating members of the Planning Team are summarized in Table 3-2. Returning planning team members are highlighted. Table 3-2: Multi-jurisdictional planning team participants Jurisdiction / Department / Position Name Or anization Plannin Team Role Town of Oro Valley / Police Jurisdictional Point of Contact Char Ackerman Department Emergency Planner Lead coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant Charles Barclay Arizona Department of Superintendent Planning Team participant Trans ortation / Tucson District Robert Bereiter Town of Marana / Police Emergency Planner Planning Team participant De artment Local Plannin Team resource Town of Marana / Development Planning Team participant Keith Brann _ En ineerin Town Engineer Local Plannin Team resource Lindy Brigham Southern Arizona Buffelgrass Executive Director 1'lanning Team participant Coordination Center / Local Plannin Team resource Bret Canale Town of Marana / GIS GIS DB Analyst P�anning Team participant Local Plannin Team resource Anna Casadei Town of Sahuazita / Planning & Senior Planner Planning Team participant Zonin De artment Local Plannin Team resource Pima Association of Planning Team participant Paul Casertano Operations & Safety Lead Govemments / Plannin Local Plannin Team resource Dan Contomo Marana Unified School District CFO Planning Team par[icipant /CFO Dane Crouse Drexel Heights Fire District / Battalion Chief Planning Team participant O erations Local Plannin Team resource Brian Delfs Avra Valley Fire District / Fire Fire Chief Planning Team participant De artment Local Plannin Team resource Andy D'Entremont Pima County / Office of Planner Planning Team participant Emer enc Mana ement Local Plannin Team resource Tohonon O'odham Nation / Jurisdictional Point of Contact Sandra Espinoza Office of Emetgency Hazard Mitigation Specialist p��ning Team participant Mana ement Jane Fairall Town of Marana / Legal Deputy Town Attorney P��ning Team participant Local Plannin Team resource Tucson AirpoR Authority / Planning Team participant Jordan Feld p�annin De artment Director Local Plannin Team resource Pima County / Office of Planning Team participant Griselda Moya Flores Emergency Management and Administrative Support Local P►anning Team resource Homeland Securi Pima County / Office of Planning Team Primary Point of Contact Jeff Guthrie Emergency Management and Operations Manager Jurisdictional Point of Contact Homeland Security Lead coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant City of Tucson / Po►ice Jurisdictional Point of Contact Barb Harris Department - Office of Emergency Planner Joint coordinator for LPT Emer enc Mana ement Plannin Team artici ant Pima Gounty 7 Flood Control Planning Team participant Thomas Helfrich Manager District Local Plannin Team resource Town o£ Marana / Police Sergeant / Emergency Jurisdictional Point of Contact Steven7ohnson Lead coordinator for LPT DeparUnent Coordinator Plannin Team artici ant Paul Keesler Town of Oro Valley / permitting Manager P�anning Team participant Develo ment Services Local Plannin Team resource Jim Kress City of Tucson / Fire Captain Planning Team participant De artment - EM / HS Local Plannin Team resource Arizona State Land Department planning Team participant Brian Lauber / State Forestry Division - District Forester Local Planning Team resource Tuscon District Tucson Airport Authority / Planning Team participant Rafael Leon Sound Insulation Program Representative Local Plannin Team resource FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 11 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 3-2: Multi-jurisdictional planning team participants Jurisdiction / Department / Position Name Or anization Plannin Team Role Michael Losada Tucson Airport Authority / Corporal P�anning Team participant Police De artment Local Piannin Team resource Pascua Yaqui Tribe / Pascua Jurisdictional Point of Contact Andre Matus pueblo Fire Department Fire Chief Lead coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant City of Tucson / Office of Emergency Management Jurisdictional Point of Contact Janet McLay Emergency Management Coordinator Joint coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant Town of Oro Valley / Wate� Planning Team participant Mazk Moore Utili - En ineerin Design Reviewer Local Plannin Team resource Lee Muscarella Golder Ranch Fire District / Battalion Chief Planning Team participant Su ression Local Plannin Team resource Scott Ogden JE Fulled Hydrology & Project Manager / Senior Consultant Geomo holo , Inc / En ineer City of Tucson / Office of Jennifer Pegnato Emergency Management and Sergeant Planning Team participant Homeland Security / Police Local Planning Team resource De artment Town of Sahuarita / Emergency Jurisdictional Point of Contact EdPope Response Planner Lead coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant Jose Rodriguez Town of Oro Valley / DIS - Engineering Division Planning Team participant En ineerin Mana er Local Plannin Team resource Pima County / Office of Planning Team participant Lisa Romero Emergency Management and Administrative Support Local Planning Team resource Homeland Securi Pascua Yaqui Tribe / Planning Team participant Jim Rosovich Contractin Procurement Contracting Officer Local Plannin Team resource City of Tucson / Police Jim Schneden Department - Homeland Sergeant Planning Team paRicipant Securi Local Planning Team resource Lisa Shafer Town of Marana / Planning Planning Director P��ning Team participant Local Plannin Team resource Pima County / Office of Planning Team participant Nicolas Siemsen Emergency Management and Program Coordinator Former Jurisdictional Point of Contact Homeland Securi Rural/Metro Fire District / Fire Planning Team participant James Stoltenberg De artment Deputy Chief Local Plannin Team resource Pima County / Office of Management level support for planning Liz Temple Emergency Management and Compliance Officer effort, Mitigation strategy development Homeland Securi T. Vanhook Town of Marana / Community Director Planning Team participant Develo ment Local Plannin Team resource City of South Tucson / Public Jurisdictional Point of Contact Henry Vega Works Director Lead coordinator for LPT Plannin Team artici ant Jim Vogelsberg City of Tucson / Planning & Administrator Planning Team participant Develo ment Local Plannin Team resource Pima County / Office of Planning Team participant John Wisner Emergency Management and Program Coordinator Local Planning Team resource Homeland Securit Arizona Division of Emergency Management level support for planning Susan Wood Management / Mitigation Planning Manager effort, Mitigation strategy development Division Lists of Local Planning Team members and their respective roles, for each jurisdiction, are provided in Appendix B. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 12 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 3.4.2 Planning Team Activities The Planning Team met for the first time on February 3, 2011 to begin the planning process. Three more meetings were convened on about a monthly basis to step through the plan review and update process. Planning Team members used copies of the 2007 Plan for review and reference. Following each Planning Team meeting, the Point of Contact for each jurisdiction would convene meetings with the Local Planning Team as needed to work through the assignments. Two tribal planning meeting meetings were convened with officials from the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to review and update the tribal plan elements required per 44 CFR §201 J. Table 3-3 summarizes the Planning Team meetings along with a brief list of the agenda items discussed. Detailed meeting notes for all of the Planning Team meetings are provided in Appendix B. There are no details of the Local Planning Team meetings. Table 3-3: Planning meetings convened as part of the plan update process Meeting Type, Date, and Location Meetin A enda • INTRODUCTIONS / GREETING Planning Team Meeting . MITIGATION PLANNING OVERVIEW No. 1 • CURRENT MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW February 3, 2011 • PLANNING PROCESS a. MJ Planning Team Roles Pima County b. Public Involvement Strategy Abrams Building • RISK ASSESSMENT Tucson, AZ a. Hazard Identification / Profiling b. Asset Inventory • NEXT MEETING DATES • ACTION ITEM SUMMARY • EMAP ELEMENTS • ACTION ITEM REVIEW/STATUS • HAZARD PROFILING Planning Team Meeting a. Finalize Hazard List No.2 b. CPRI March 8, 2011 • CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT a. Jurisdictional Capabilities Pima County b. Prior Mitigation Activities Abrams Building c. NFIP Participation and Status Tucson, AZ d. Repetitive Loss Properties • EXISTING MITIGATION ACTION/PROJECT EVALUATION • PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES • MEETING ENDING a. Review of action items b. Next meetin reminder/verification Planning Team Meeting • ACTION ITEM REVIEW/STATUS No. 3 . PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES a. Monitoring and Evaluation March 8, 2011 b. Plan Update c. Plan Incorporation Pima County d. Continued Public Involvement Abrams Building • GOALS AND OBJECTIVES REVIEW/UPDATE Tucson, AZ . MEETING ENDING a. Review of action items FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 13 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 3-3: Planning meetings convened as part of the plan update process Meeting Type, Date, and Location Meetin A enda Planning Team Meeting . ACTION ITEM STATUS REVIEW No. 4 • VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS REVIEW • MITIGATION ACTION/PROJECTS AND IMPLEMENTATION May 26, 2011 STRATEGY • MEETING ENDING Pima County a. Next Steps Abrams Building b. Action Item Summary Tucson, AZ • INTRODUCTION • MITIGATION PLANNING OVERVIEW Tribal Planning Team • TRIBAL ASSURANCES Meeting Nos. 1 and 2 . AGENCY COORDINATION April 12, 2011 • PLAN INTEGRATION May 18, 2011 • PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT • CULTURAL/SACRED SITE WLNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Pascua Pueblo Fire • CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Department a. Summary of technical staff and personnel capabilities Tucson AZ b. Summary of fiscal capabilities , c. Summary of departments/entities with pre- and/or post-disaster hazard management responsibilities • MITIGATION STRATEGY PROGRESS ASSESSMENT 3.4.3 Agency/Organizational Participation In addition to the adopting jurisdictions listed in Section 1.2, several agencies and organizations that operate within or have jurisdiction over small and large areas of Pima County were invited to participate in the planning process. Following the first Planning Team meeting, invitations were extended to several entities via both email and letter, to provide an opportunity for participation in the planning process. Copies of the various email and letter invitations are provided in Appendix B. The following is a partial list of the various agencies/organizations invited: • Arizona Department of Transportation • Arizona Division of Emergency Management • Arizona State Land Department • Avra Valley Fire District • Drexel Aeights Fire District • Golder Ranch Fired District • Marana School District • Pima Association of Governments • Pima County Department of Environmental Quality • Pima County Department of Transportation • Pima County Sheriff's Office • Pima County Wastewater Management • Pima Regional Flood Control District • Tucson Electric Power Company • Tucson Unified School District • University of Arizona • Raytheon Corporation • Rural/Metro Fire District • Southern Arizona Buffelgrass Committee • Southwest Gas • Tucson Airport Authority Table 3-4 summarizes the organizations and agencies that participated in the 2007 Plan and their comparative participation in the 20ll plan update process. An explanation of the differences between the two lists is also provided where appropriate. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 14 An integral part of the planning process included coordination with agencies and organizations outside of the participating jurisdiction's governance to obtain information and data for inclusion into the Plan or to provide more public exposure to the planning process. Much of the information and data that is used in the risk assessment is developed by agencies or organizations other than the participating jurisdictions. In some cases, the jurisdictions may be members of a larger organization that has jointly conducted a study or planning effort like the development of a community wildfire protection plan or participation in an area association of governments. Examples of those data sets include FEMA floodplain mapping, the community wildfire protection plans, severe weather statistics and incidents, and the Pima Association of Governments. A summary of the resources obtained, reviewed and compiled into the risk assessment are summarized at the end of each subsection of Section 5.3 and in Section 3.6. Jurisdictions needing these data sets obtained them by requesting them directly from the host agency or organization, downloading information posted to website locations, or engaging consultants. 3.5 Public Involvement 3. S.1 Previous Plan Assessment The pre-draft public involvement strategy for the 2007 Plan included a press release that was sent to two local newspapers, the Arizona Daily Star and Tucson Citizen, as well as all area radio and television stations. Both newspapers published the press release. The County provided an e-mail address, telephone number, and a physical mailing address requesting interested citizens to participate in the planning and adoption processes. No- post-draft strategy was discussed in the 2007 Plan. However, the only way to promulgate the 2007 Plan was to go through a public meeting process wherein the resolutions of adoption would have been presented before the various council and board of supervisors meetings. The details of those meetings are not summarized in the 2007 Plan, but typically would some form of advertisement of the meeting agenda two to four weeks in advance of the council/board meeting. There were no records of any public comment on the 2007 Plan adoption process. The Planning Team discussed the prior public involvement actions and concluded that the strategy used was sufficient, but should probably be augmented with more web-based technology for the update. Also, since any formal council/board action has a built-in public notification and comment opportunity, the Planning Team chose to continue using this process as one of the post-draft mechanisms for getting the Plan before the publia FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 15 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 3.5.2 Plan Update Pre-draft public involvement and input to the planning process was encouraged cooperatively among all of the participating jurisdictions using the following strategies: • Pima County will: o Post a notice to the county website. o Issue a press release similar to what was done for the 2007 Plan. o Coordinate the provision of links to the county's website with each jurisdiction once the website is up and running. • Town of Marana will: o Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. o Publish an article/public notice in their local newspaper. • Town of Oro Valley will: o Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. • Pascua Yaqui Tribe will: o Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. o Publish an article/public notice in their local newspaper. o Provide an announcement on the local radio station • Town of Sahuarita will: o Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. o Publish an article/pubiic notice in their local newspaper. o Presentation/announcement at the Chamber of Commerce "For Our Cities" event. • City of Tucson will: o Post a notice to city's website with a link to the county's. Contact information provided on the websites and notices will at a minimum include a name, email, and phone information for the primary jurisdictional contact plus a link to the Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Any comments will be addressed as appropriate and routed to the Planning Team Primary Point of Contact. To date, there have been no questions, concerns, or responses received from the first round of notices from the general public. The post-draft public involvement will include a second round of newspaper announcements and updating of the websites, to include specific instructions for obtaining or viewing a draft of the plan. All of the notices, postings, and articles encouraged review and comment of the draft Plan by the public. Interested citizens were also encouraged to participate in the local community adoption process which, depending upon the jurisdiction, may have included a public meeting and a formal public hearing. Copies of the pre- and post-draft public notices, web pages, and newspaper notices are providedin Appendix C. 3.5.3 Tribal Definition of "Public" The Pascua Yaqui Tribe has formulated the following statement to define "publid' for the purposes of this planning effort to satisfy the Tribal Planning requirements: "All residents of the Pascua Yaqui Reservation, as its boundaries may be revised from time to time. " FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 16 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 3.6 Reference Documents and Technical Resources Over the course of the update planning process, numerous other plans, studies, reports, and technical information were obtained and reviewed for incorporation or reference purposes. The majority of sources referenced and researched pertain to the risk assessment and the capabilities assessment. To a lesser extent, the community descriptions and mitigation strategy also included some document or technical information research. Table 3-5 provides a reference listing of the primary documents and technical resources reviewed and used in the Plan. Detailed bibliographic references for the risk assessment are provided at the end of each hazard risk profile in Section 5.3. Other bibliographic references are provided as footnotes. Table 3-5: List of resource documents and references reviewed and incorporated in the plan update process Referenced Document Resource or Technical Source T e Descri fion of Reference and Its Use Website Data Reference for demographic and economic data for the county. Used for community AZ Department of Commerce and Community descriptions Profiles Data and AZ Division of Emergency planning Resource for state and federal disaster declaration information for Arizona. Also a Management Resource resource for hazard mitigation planning guidance and documents. AZ Department of Water Technical Resource for data on drought conditions and statewide drought management Resources Resource AzGDTF , and dam safe data. Used in risk assessment. AZ Geological Survey Technical Resource for earthquake, fissure, landslide/mudslide, subsidence, and other Resource eolo ical hazards. Used in the risk assessment. AZ Model Local Hazard Hazard Guidance document for preparing and formatting hazard mitigation plans for Miti ation Plan Miti ation Plan Arizona. AZ State Land Department Data Source Source for statewide GIS coverages (ALRIS) and statewide wild�re hazard profile information Division of Fores . Used in the risk assessment. AZ Wildland Urban Interface Report Source of wildfire hazatd profile data and urban interface at risk communities. Used Assessment 2004 in the risk assessment. AZ Workforce Informer Website Source for em lo ment statistics in Arizona. Bureau Net (2010) Website Source for NFIP statistics for Arizona. Database Census Bureau Website Source for 2010 Census demographics Database Federal Emergency Technical and Resource for HMP guidance (How-To series), floodplain and flooding related NFIP Management Agency P�anning data (mapping, repetitive loss, NFIP statistics), and historic hazard incidents. Used Resource in the risk assessment and miti ation strate HAZUS-MH Technical gased data sets within the program were used in the vulnerability analysis. Resource National Climatic Data Center Technical Online resource for weather related data and historic hazard event data. Used in the Resource risk assessment. National Weather Service Technical Source for hazard information, data sets, and historic event records. Used in the risk Resource assessment. National Wildfire Technical Coordination Grou 2010 Resource Source for historic wildfire hazard information. Used in the risk assessment. Pima Association of GIS Data Source for demographic and 2010 Census block level data. Governments Pima County Multi- Hazazd FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan that is the subject of the plan update process. Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan See Section 2.4 for further discussion Miti ation Plan 2007 Office of the State Website Reference for weather characteristics for the county. Used for community Climatolo ist for AZ Reference descri tion. Standard on Disaster/Emergency Standards Used to establish the classification and definitions for the asset inventory. Used in Management and Business Document the risk assessment. Continui Pro rams 2000 State of Arizona Hazard Hazard The state plan was used a source of hazard information and the state identi�ed Miti ation Plan 2010 Miti ation P►an hazards were used as a startin oint in the develo ment of the risk assessment. USACE Flood Damage Report Technical Data Source of historic flood damages for 1978 flood. Used in the risk assessment. (1978) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 17 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 3-5: List of resource documents and references reviewed and incorporated in the plan update process Referenced Document Resource or Technical Source T e Descri tion of Reference and Its Use USACE Flood Damage Report Technical Data Source of historic flood damages for 1993 flood. Used in the risk assessment. 1994) US Forest Service Technical Data Source for local wildfire data. Used in the risk assessment. US Geolo ical Surve Technical Data Source for eolo ical hazard data and incident data. Used in the risk assessment. Westem Regional Climate Website Data Online resource for climate data used in climate discussion of Section 4 Center World Wildlife Fund 2010) GIS Data Terrestrial ecore ions database used in the eneral coun descri tion. Zillow Technical Data Source for assigning general residential structure replacement wsts by region with the coun . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 18 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 4: COMMUNITY DESCRIPTIONS 4.1 General The purpose of this section is to provide updated basic background information on Pima County as a whole and includes information on geography, climate, population and economy. Abbreviated details and descriptions are also provided for each participating jurisdiction. 4.2 County Overview 4.2.1 History Pima County is located in southern Arizona and encompasses 9,184 square miles. The second largest of the four original counties, Pima County was created by the first territorial legislature for Arizona on November 8, 1864. As originally constituted, Pima County included almost the entire portion of the United States originally acquired from Mexico in the Gadsen Purchase. Over time, portions of Pima County were carved off to create Maricopa, Pinal, Cochise, and Graham Counties. Originally named for the Native American tribe inhabiting the area, evidence of the human settlement of Pima County dates back over 9,000 years. The Hohokam inhabited the area until the 1500s when they mysteriously disappeared. The Tohono O'odham were the next to settle the region and concentrated along the Santa Cruz and Gila Rivers. The arrival of the Spanish in the 1690s marked the first European peoples to establish settlements in the area. Missionary and explorer Father Eusebio Francisco Kino established the San Xavier del Bac mission, which still stands today as one of the preeminent examples of 18th century missionary architecture in the world. Throughout the 1700s the Spanish continued to settle throughout southern Arizona. In 1775, the Tucson presidio was built to protect settlers from raiding tribes of Apaches. Residents of the fort began to refer to it as the "Old Pueblo", which still remains today as a nickname for Tucson. Rapid growth in the region occurred in the mid-1800s with the discovery of silver and gold and the arrival of prospectors from Mexico. W ith the expansion of mining and ranching in the late 1800s, Pima County continued to witness increasing populations as new residents migrated to the Tucson region settling in proximity to major transportation corridors. Slowly, development moved eastward from Tucson until abutting with federally owned land resulting in a trend reversal with new growth occurring to the northwest. 4.2.2 Geography Pima County is located in the south-central portion of the State of Arizona, as depicted in Figure 4-l. The county limits generally extend from longitude 111.430 to 114.944 degrees west and latitude 31.846 to 32.192 degrees north. Pima County lies within the Basin and Range Physiographic Province, characterized by northwest- trending mountain . ranges separated by alluvial basins. Separated by the Tucson and Sierrita Mountains, a large portion of Pima County lies in two alluvial basins: Avra Valley to the west and the Tucson basin in the east. The regional drainage network, primarily formed by the Santa Cruz River and its tributaries, is dry for a majority of the year except during the spring runoff or from heavy storms. Varying in elevation from desert valleys at roughly 1,200 feet to the 9,185-foot peak of Mount Lemmon, the county is home to diverse plant and animal communities. Numerous mountain ranges ring the Tucson basin, including the Santa Catalina, Rincon, Empire, Santa Rita, Sierrita, and Tucson mountains. Two cactus forests traverse the county — Saguaro National Park to the northeast and Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in the southwestern portion. In addition, the County is home to the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge nestled along the western boundary of the county and the Coronado National Forest in the eastern portion of the county within the Santa Catalina Mountains. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 19 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Figure 4-1: Vicinity Map FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 20 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Other major natural features include Tortolita Mountain Park, Tucson Mountain Park, Colossal Cave Mountain Park, Cienega Creek Natural Preserve, and Agua Caliente Park. The geographical characteristics of Pima County have been mapped into three terrestrial ecoregions , which are depicted in Figure 4-2 and described by the following: • Chihuahuan Desert — this ecoregion is typical of the high altitude deserts and foothills and is found in much of the southeastern portion of Arizona. Elevations in this zone varies between 3,000 to 4,500 feet. The average temperatures for the Chihuahuan Desert tends to be cooler than the Sonoran Desert (see below) due to the elevation differences. However, like its lower elevation cousin, the summers are hot and dry with mild to cool winters. • Sierra Madre Occidental Pine-Oak Forest — this ecoregion is predominant to mountainous regions in southeast Arizona with elevations generally above 5,000 feet. The average temperatures tend to be cool during the summer and cold in winter. • Sonoran Desert — this ecoregion is an arid environment that covers much of southwestern Arizona. The elevation varies in this zone from approximately sea level to 3,000 feet. Vegetation in this zone is comprised mainly of Sonoran Desert Scrub and is one of the few locations in the world where saguaro cactus can be found. The climate is typically hot and dry during the summer and mild during the winter. Land ownership within Pima County is divided between Indian Reservation (42%), Private (14%), U.S. Forest and Bureau of Land Management (12%), State Trust Land (15%), and other public lands (17%). Figure 4-3 represents the land ownership in Pima County. 4.2.3 Government The governmental and administrative affairs of the unincorporated areas of Pima County are directed by a five-member Board of Supervisors with each member elected from a designated district to serve a four-year term. The chairperson is selected by the Board from among its members. Other elected officials, often referred to as constitutional officers, are the Assessor, Clerk of the Superior Court, the Constables, County Attorney, Recorder, School Superintendent, Sheriff, and Treasurer. Presiding judges are appointed from elected members of the judicial bench. Because of Arizona's constitutional provisions and the requirements promulgated by Arizona Revised Statutes, the government of Pima County is organized to have a direct and indirect relationship with the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors has direct control over the County's general government functions; community services; indigent defense; medical, health, and welfare services; and public works functions. These broad functions include the County's internal governmental administrative/ management activities; maintenance and construction of the County's sewerage and sanitation infrastructures; County streets, roads, and bridges which comprise the County's transportation infrastructure; natural resources, parks, community centers, recreational facilities and libraries (in cooperation with the city of Tucson); and numerous clinics. Indirect relationships are maintained with the elected officials. The Board of Supervisors appoints a County Administrator to be responsible for the general direction, supervision, administration, and coordination of all affairs of the county. Each of the five municipalities in the county (Marana, Oro Valley, Sahuarita, South Tucson, and Tucson) are governed by council-manager form of government, with an elected Council consisting of seven members, including a mayor and vice mayor and an appointed town or city manager. The Pascua-Yaqui Tribe is govemed by an elected tribal council. Each of the municipalities and the tribal community are described in more detail in Section 4.3 below. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 21 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Figure 4-2: Ecoregions Map FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 22 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 23 , ,,,,;, Figure 4-3: Community Location and Land Ownership Map PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.2.4 Geology Pima County is comprised of a complex geology reflective of a history of faulting and folding of the earth's crust. The mountains include sedimentary, metamorphic volcanic, or intrusive igneous rock, or a combination of the three. The alluvial basins consist of well-consolidated sediments eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges with caliche, or hardpan, underneath. Caliche is formed as calcium carbonate and deposited within the soil through water seepage. 4.2.5 Transportation As shown in Figure 4-4, several major roadways support both local and transportation needs. Interstate 10 provides connectivity with the Phoenix metropolitan area to the north and Interstate 19 with Mexico to the south. Several other State and US highways, most notably Arizona State Highways 85 and 86, coupled with key Indian Routes provide local and regional access throughout southern Arizona. Pima County is host to four municipal airports providing commercial and general aviation service to the region. In addition, the county is home to the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson. Davis- Monthan Air Force Base currently has approximately 6,000 military personnel stationed on base and employs 1,700 civilian persons. 4.2.6 Climate For the majority of Pima County, the climate is typical to the Sonoran Desert areas of the state and is characterized by abundant sunshine, a long summer, mild winter, low average annual precipitation, relatively low humidity, and generally light winds. In the relatively small areas of the county above 4,000 feet mean sea level, the climate tends to be more moderate. Climatic statistics for weather stations within Pima County are produced by the Western Region Climate Center and span records dating back to the early 1900's. Locations of reporting stations within or near Pima County are shown on Figure 4-2. Table 4-1 lists some partial climate statistics for several of the weather stations located within the county. Average temperatures within Pima County range from near freezing during the winter months to over 100 degrees Fahrenheit during the hot summer months. The severity of temperatures in either extreme is highly dependent upon the location, and more importantly the altitude, within the county. For instance, temperature extremes in the foothill communities will generally be about ten (10) degrees less than those in the valley communities. z Most of the data provided and summarized in this:plan are taken from the WRCC website beginning at the following URL: http://www. wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA. html FOR bFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 24 � 1! ! 9a ..+-r � .. . . �'y'J .`_ ' �'"" Y/ ''v, 5 ._* �! y , ` , . - e. � y �. f � g. � � .;; f'�Y � � t ,: c. � a / �� p 3c.�a'+ I.�,—I . A.�w y, , +r � v `. �t p� � I . � ' L 4�i� , s� � � ` a� � � � t'� W ���s� `�t � 7l F � T '� & # T� x� Y3 � �� ., � h � i r' � � a _ ;� � �� �` '�`� �?�` �� r �a, .� , �: � , � _��� '���r��'yrtm � .X,.w : Y �''C�.,'� ��ka��� a�"�,� ��.��'i i�T"�-rn� . � � � � , a�� � � �rv�v # a �� � `� ; a�:,,,, 5 � , �' �. , . + s � - , �_ � �...d +v•r�i_ ._. . w'� s�',. .�.,._r. ,. _,_. ..+3k.T.L;'.$,"."' �� a.t �...... w �. �� � � r w� z �: ..� t� '� ,.�- �T � a d � '� c p � x ' �, qr r.t ,: J � ,�'.. �� �5� J �1 t 1� t i n "f Y ( �v� § . .� '� �� � "�` k, .� 1� <. �; � �` �, � a � ' �a � x r - � � _� � �- � � � v �� e � d y ���u, �� � a > a ,'� i f � '�,� � ,ay I°'� b �F� � h � ri� � � ;� ¢� d �s� ?�....� L �y �� '� � .> � . � .,. �.�. � r. �S " � dk �, k i = �: � .� ±t�.�r .,..,q �� � �' � . . .,,�._� .., �� .� �. . �;� _.�+ � M Y � 1 =,� � ! � a ""a + � ,r� �, �,'��+-': 9 � a � ` ��#� � s'a " `�' ��� r� � �,'y' � � � `�{� �°i�. � . . � �. < u� � � � � . '-"�A�, f,tl�' . -.�+. �t. _ . ,2�� 3 Y ?� ; ,. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Precipitation throughout Pima County is governed to a great extent by elevation and season of the year. From November through March, storm systems from the Pacific Ocean cross the state as broad winter storms producing mild precipitation events and snowstorms at the higher elevations. Summer rainfall begins early in July and usually lasts until mid-September. Moisture-bearing winds move into Arizona at the surface from the southwest (Gulf of California) and aloft from the southeast (Gulf of Mexico). The shift in wind direction, termed the North American Monsoon, produces summer rains in the form of thunderstorms that result largely from excessive heating of the land surface and the subsequent lifting moisture-laden air, especially along the primary mountain ranges. Thus, the strongest thunderstorms are usually found in the mountainous regions of the central southeastern portions of Arizona. These thunderstorms are often accompanied by strong winds, blowing dust, and infrequent hail storms. Average wind speeds are similar across Arizona, averaging approximately 6 to 9 miles per hour annually. Pima County generally experiences average wind speeds at approximately 8 miles per hour. However, significant variations can exist throughout the year, as evidenced by Tucson's statewide record of 71 miles per hour ma�cimum-recorded wind gust. The surrounding mountains and topography of the region influence wind velocities and directions in the Tucson basin. 4.2.3 Population In 1775, Pima County's population was slightly more than 3,000. By 1920, the population had grown to over 20,000. According to the 2010 Census, 980,263 residents now call Pima County home, which reflects a growth of 16% since the 2000 Census. The majority of the citizens still live in the incorporated communities or reservation portion of Pima County. The largest community is Tucson. The two incorporated cities and three towns are geographically located in eastern portion of Pima County. The other unincorporated communities and ptaces located throughout the county are usually situated along a major highway and are mostly comprised of only one structure or landmark. Table 4-2 summarizes jurisdictional population statistics for the participating jurisdictions and un-incorporated Pima County. Table 4-2: Po ulation estimates for Pima Coun 'urisdictions Jurisdiction 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020 ima Coun 666,880 843,746 980,263 1,175,967 1,271,912 Tribes, Cities and Towns Marana 2,187 13,566 34,961 60,809 72,915 Oro Valle 6,670 29,700 41,011 50,222 54,134 Pascua Yaqui Tribe 2,412 3,315 3,745 - - Pascua Pueblo Reservation Sahuarita 1,629 3,242 25,259 57,367 71,479 South Tucson 5,093 5,490 5,652 5,761 5,743 Tohono O'odham Nation 2,750 2,799 9,051 - - Tucson 405,390 486,699 520,116 597,568 624,671 Uninco arated Coun 247,540 305,049 340,468 404,240 442,969 • Figures for 1990 and 2000 (1980 - 2008 Historicad Estimates: http://evww.arcommerce. com/econinfo/demographics/Papulation+Estimates.html • Figures for 2010 from AZ Dept of Commerce's Ari.-ona Workforce Informer, as accessed at: http://www.workforce.az.gov/?PAGEID=67&SUBID=255 • Figures for 2015 and 2020 AZ Dept of Commerce's Arisona Workforce Informer, as accessed at: http: //tiv�vw.workforce. az.gov/?PAGE7D=67&SUBID=257 • 2010 Pascua Ya ui Trtbe and Tohono O'odham Natlon estdmates om 2010 Census Block data 3 Office of the State Climatologist for Arizona, 2004. Partially taken from the following weblink: http://geography. asu.edu/azclimate/narrative.htm j$ �jJ,��( FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 26 nru�ottxr a �twr, mc PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.2.4 Economy The metropolitan Tucson area, located in the eastern portion of Pima County, is the center of economic activity for the County. As of August 2011, the county-wide labor force was estimated at 484,311 with an unemployment rate of 8.4%. A majority of workers in Pima County are employed in the educational services, health care, and social assistance sector of the economy, followed by arts and entertainment, and then professional, scientific and management as illustrated in Figure 4-5. The labor force is reflective of the influence of tourism, academia, and the retirement population in the Tucson metropolitan area. Figure 4-6 is a graphic prepared by the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) depicting the residential building permits issued by member jurisdictions for the ten year period of 2000 to 2009. Elltp�lt� � �1N�t�y �Ili EOti�1� � �—� � � 20ll , source: Figure.4-Sc Employment by Industry in 2008 4 Source: Arizona Dept of Commerce Offtce of Employment & Population Statistics website at: http://www.azstats.gov/pubs/labor/specrates2011.pdf �� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 27 nt�t�r a �oto�r. me A 5 10 13 � 25 30 ���+�r���a�� PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Source: PAG, 2011 Figure 4-6: Residential Building Permits for PAG Member Jurisdictions for the period of 2000 to 2009 „�� �R FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 28 fIT�UG'f d fCV10R�tlOLC�41'. IIK PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3 JurisdictionalOverviews The following are brief overviews for each of the participating jurisdictions in the Plan. 4.3.1 Marana Nestled along Interstate 10 approximately 1 mile northwest of Tucson (see Figure 4-7), the Town of Marana experienced dramatic growth in the past decade as a result of aggressive annexation policies and the development of master-planned communities. Founded in 1881, in conjunction with the development of rail transportation, Marana solidified itself as a destination with its appearance on Southern Pacific Railroad maps in 1890. Although ranching and the railroad dominated the community prior to World War I, the post-way war years brought significant change to the region with the implementation of extensive agricultural irrigation systems and the development of cotton farming. Other substantial factors in Marana's development were the location of Marana Army Air Field (now Pinal Airpark and Evergreen Air Center) and the removal of the downtown business district due to the widening of Interstate 10 in the early 1960's. In March of 1977, the Town of Marana incorporated with an area roughly 10 square miles. Governed by a seven member Town Council consisting of a Mayor and six council members elected for four-year terms, the Town utilizes a Council-Manager form of government. The Town Council appoints a Town Manager responsible for the daily operation of town services and the orderly administration of affairs. Although a majority of Marana's topography is flat, much of the area is designated as floodplain. In addition, the existing Town boundaries include portions of the Tortolita and Tucson Mountain foothills that are dominated by slopes exceeding 15%. The development constraints posed by these environmentally sensitive lands provide the potential for natural open space and habitat conservation areas to balance with the urban development occurring. Several riparian features, including major wash crossing in the Tortolita Fan and the Santa Cruz River provide natural wildlife habitat for diverse species native to the Sonoran desert. Although witnessing substantial urban growth during the past decade, Marana continues to hold onto its agricultural and ranching roots and serves as the main trade and transportation center for the surrounding rural periphery for the eastern portion of Pima County. As illustrated in Table 4-2, the 2010 Census population of Marana is 34,961. With residential development continuing to rise, this population is forecasted to grow to nearly 72,915 by 2020. Marana's General Plan, adopted on December 7, 2010, reflects a community preparing for unprecedented future growth. Marana's Land Use Map defines a pattern of growth sensitive to the natural environment and reflective of the Town's goal to preserve and protect natural habitats. The Marana General Plan designates a majority of northeast Marana as environmentally sensitive, best suited for less intense uses such as low density residential development or open space. Low and medium density residential in proximity to environmentally sensitive areas provides a transition to more intensive commercial and industrial uses located in proximity to major transportation corridors including Interstate 10 and the Marana Northwest Regional Airport. As of August 2011, the civilian labor force was 16,894 with an unemployment rate of 7.7 percent. In 2008, there were approximately $1.4 billion of taacable sales in the town. New building permits issued in 2008 were 259. 6 5 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2005 6 http://www.azcommerce.com/doclib/commune/marana.pdf FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 29 . , m�a�a����twr, mC PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 MA RA NA 2010 General Plan !� 1.D Land Use � �� � c���a � ��� � i.,oc�aa � Rural Dautty Reeltlsndal � Low OeMity RositknliM 1� Mediwn De�trity RasidenNel � Hlph DensNy ReefdeMial � M9sler PI9n ArN � MWced RutN � PmlcslOpen Bpece I� PublfcllmUtuponel � Riven, AAapr Wuhes, end �relnapaways 8p�ald Plannlnp Ann � avra vauey Eauem com,naccron � YanpHine Ro.d Q Na ExNn�Wn ol Urban Ssrvkys (Runl Dsmity ResidanUd) � Plannlnp Ara� Baundary �w Merane Town LImNs PimalWnal County Bowidary .�. 0 1 2 � J � 6 INM wa onwmer. tti m.n awwwwo.nr.w� ma erw�rm �a n° � mr wa.a a w. w..w� n.wewi�aro uw � n rw.wr.wa aa �m�rw. m�aa sasw ra m�mw. b.w� hm � ub�im r� h�wpenblry M n uw. M.n.»a onnn» rw.�a wwoww�.w. OuM� MIMM MY.d �T' OM�rPMM b�^I'b tlYp YIOYM, KMM!. MiqOMM, a mropu�tlll bmpW.4MN!^Y W n01WM�ObMM.ilaul.a y)uAW. �r�Y91w�N W W nnikimMMre01P� II�OWM. V4pq01PYYW NV� lPq VNmtO ORwntllMw 1yNip j� �� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 30 , �macxt.�r c �a�xccx,t, �nc Figure 4-7: Town of Marana Land Use Map 2010 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The Town's reputation for a business-friendly environment with no city properiy taJCes has lead to substantial recent investment in economic development activities. Although agriculture remains a major force in Marana's economy, a recent influx of residential and commercial development has occurred due to its location between Phoenix and Tucson along I-10 and the Union Pacific Railroad, a business-friendly government and no town property taaces. To the south, adjacent to Tucson, is a new commercial business district. Continental Ranch/Peppertree Ranch Industrial Park has several new tenants and new industrial properties will soon be available at Marana Northwest Regional Airport. Marana's major private employers include Arizona Portland Cement, Costco, Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Lowes, Sargent Controls & Aerospace, and Tucson Ready Mix. Major public employers include the Marana Unified School District and the Town of Marana. Marana's planning area encompasses approximately 228 square miles in Pima and Pinal Counties. Existing land uses include natural undisturbed desert, improved drainage areas, agriculture, recreational lands, residential, commercial, and industrial development. A majority of the Planning Area beyond the Town boundaries is undeveloped. Marana's Town limits reflect the many changes and l I transitions that have occurred since its incorporation. I Marana's rural heritage is reflected in traditional I' �,.y4 '' ��� family farms and agricultural activities that continue .�- _�" on many acres of land historically used for agriculture. Older, low-density residential and `�� commercial development was located west of �'`' �" Interstate 10 (I-10), in and near the traditional Town area where many Marana pioneer families settled. This northwest part of Marana began a transition to a more densely populated area in early 2000. At that time, the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owl was listed as an endangered species, which limited development in much of the area east of I-10. This shifted the development focus to the farm fields in northwest Marana. The extension of bank protection along the Santa Cruz River to Sanders Road took many of the farm fields out of the floodplain and opened them up to development opportunities. The extension of close to six miles of sewer lines in 2003 brought urban services to the northwest area. By 2010, there were more than 4,000 new lots platted in this developing part of the Town and close to half of those lots had constructed homes. The new growth brought approximately 5,000 new residents to this once rural area. The northwest area is the number one growth area for Marana, with more than 17,000 additional lots entitled in this area. Marana's planning area includes natural areas, such as the Tortolita Mountain Alluvial Fan in the northeast, which provide physical constraints that limit development. Characterized by steep slopes, natural drainage ways, native vegetation and floodplains, this area provides natural undisturbed open space and habitat for a multitude of plant and animal species. The Town has proactively moved to direct new growth and development away from the fan to other more appropriate areas. The Town of Marana 2010 General Plan indicates that residential development is the predominant land use, occupying more than 50% of the total land area. The residential categories provide a range of densities within each designation. However, the maximum density cannot always be achieved because of land use policies or physical constraints. Commercial and industrial uses may potentially accommodate a wide range of uses. The new,Twin Peaks Road extension and Twin Peaks/I-10 freeway interchange has created access and provided infrastructure to new areas previously unavailable for development. Related to this, Tangerine Road, from La Canada Drive to I-10, is currently in design for the expansion of up to six lanes which will facilitate the expected growth in three activity centers in the region: 1. TheTangerine Road/I-10 Activity Center; 2. The Tangerine Corridor Activity Center; �� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 31 "' nror�p�ir c �c�n�RC�o[o�'r. �nt PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 3. The Dove Mountain Activity Center. The new Tangerine Road will eventually connect to a fully planned, new Tangerine/I-10 freeway interchange. These roadway projects will allow for the capacity necessary for future growth in the area as well as provide better circulation and connectivity in the community including access to the Town of Oro Valley. At the Marana Regional Airport, a future focal point of the town's local economy, continual upgrading and expansion of the facility has added value to the airport and to the Town's ability to attract commerce. The recent addition of road and utility infrastructure in the 1-10 area directly east of the airport will attract new businesses to the Town while others will be attracted to the airport because of its business-class jet capabilities, convenient location and access for business or pleasure. �� �'�jr,j,�R FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 32 iITDR�Cx'i d �{�i', i(K PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3.2 Oro Valdey Located between the Santa Catalina Mountains to the east and the Tortolita Mountains to the northwest, Oro Valley is located six miles northwest of the Tucson city limits. Other nearby communities include the Town of Marana to the west and the unincorporated community of Catalina to the north. Oro Valley serves as a gateway to regional parks, sharing its eastern border with Catalina State Park and the Coronado National Forest. These areas provide vast recreational and natural open space opportunities for the community and are integral to the Town's identity as a community known for its integration of residential uses within the natural Sonoran Desert and as a resort area as illustrated in Figure 4-8. Major access to Oro Valley is provided via lnterstate 10, located approximately 12 miles to the west, and State Route 77, or Oracle Road, which runs north-south through the Town, and is the original transportation corridor linking Tucson with the Phoenix metropolitan area to the north. The Town was incorporated in April of 1974 and operates under a Council-Manager form of government, which includes a mayor and six council members elected at large. The Mayor is directly elected while the Vice Mayor is selected by the Council from among the six Council members. As illustrated in Table 4-2, the 2010 population of Oro Valley is projected at 41,01 l. With residential development continuing to rise, this population is forecasted to grow to nearly 54,134 by 2020. Presently, the community relies on residential growth and development to stimulate economic opportunities, which results in vulnerability to fluctuations in the real estate market. Oro Valley's larger employers include: Ventana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, the Hilton El Conquistador Golf & Tennis Resort, Oro Valley Hospital, Town of Oro Valley, Amphitheater School District, Fry's Food and Drug Store, Wal-Mart, Target and Kohl's. Oro Valley is emerging as a regional center for the biotech industry, with Innovation Park, featuring medical and biotech campuses. The Town of Oro Valley General Plan, adopted by the Town Council on June 15, 2005, and ratified by the Oro Valley voters on November 8, 2005, supports the themes of maintaining low-density residential character while permitting a compatible mix of land uses and preservation of the natural Sonoran desert through the implementation of a well connected system of natural open space. Rural and low-density residential and open space uses predominate throughout the community, comprising 36.5% and 26.9% of the planning area, respectively, and tend to follow natural features and provide buffers to environmentally sensitive areas from high intensity uses. Commercial uses concentrate along Oracle Road, providing easy access to residential neighborhoods and resulting in a linear pattern of higher intensity uses. As of August 2011, the civilian labor force was 19,637 with an unemployment rate of 5.9 percent. In 2008, there were approximately $830.2 million of tarcable sales in the town. New building permits issued in 2008 were 227. � � http://www.azcommerce.com/doclib/COMMUNE/oro%20valley.pdf �� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 33 tir�tc�tcxr a ac�av�otC,w�'. mc PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 ��yMmxxswnNTUwCawml.z.iiArtf ' , �� �'�j�� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 34 nTDRCXC7G'f d G#Q�W90lCXTi . liK Figure 4-8: Town of Oro Valley Land Use Map 2010 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3.3 Pascua Yaqui Tribe The lands of the Pascua Yaqui became part of the United States in the 1870s. Calling themselves the Yaquis, the first modern settlements of these descendents from the ancient Uto-Azteca people, were near Nogales and South Tucson. Over time, the Yaquis spread out, settling north of Tucson in an area they named Pascua Village and in Guadalupe near Tempe. Retaining their religious and cultural ways of life, the Yaquis began calling themselves the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and accepted political integration into American society during the 1950s. In 1952, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe was annexed by the City of Tucson. In 1964, Congress transferred 202 acres of desert land southwest of Tucson to the Pascua Yaquis who were looking for an area to preserve their tribal identity. Members of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe relocating to the reservation, struggled to secure federal recognition for the tribe until finally being recognized in 1978. The Tribe acquired an additional 690 acres in 1988. In 1994, the tribe's status was changed from a created tribe to an historic tribe. Today, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe is scattered throughout eastern Pima County and includes several small communities. These communities include Yoem Pueblo in Marana, Old Pascua in Tucson, Barrio Libre in South Tucson, and the Pascua Pueblo, a 1.87-square mile reservation located southwest of the City of Tucson as represented in Figure 4-9. According to Tribal sources, the population as of November 2011 for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe within Pima County communities was 4,592. Table 4-3 summarizes enrolled Tribal membership by the various Pascua Yaqui communities located both within Pima County and outside. Table 4-3: Pascua Yaqui Tribal enrollment statistics as of March 2011 No. of Enrolled Pascua Ya ui Communities Members • Pascua Pueblo (Reservation) • 3951 • Old Pascua (Tucson) • 418 • Barrio Libre (South Tucson) • 174 • Yoem Pueblo (Marana) • 49 • Guadalupe (Maricopa County) • 3,313 • High Town (Chandler) • 74 • Penjamo Pueblo (Scottsdale) • 171 • Elo /Coolid e Pinal Coun • 256 Totat within Ya ui communities 8,406' • Outside of Yaqui Communities • 9,446 • In Arizona (Outside of Yaqui Communities) • 9,737 • Outside the State of AZ • 1,681 Total Active Membershi 1'7,852 The Pascua Yaqui Tribe operates two casinos within Pima County, the 40,000 square foot Casino of the Sun and the 75,000 square foot Casino del Sol. Other tribal enterprises include the brand new Sol Casino Hotel and Convention Center, which includes 215 rooms and a 20,000 square foot ballroom, the Anselmo Valencia Amphitheater 4,470 seat open-air concert venue, and the Del Sol Marketplace. �� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 35 ' nroa�ar e �cwr. uK PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 , j$ �'�j,j�R FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 36 qYDR�OQT G C�C�4RGiICtC1Ga".I�C Figure 4-9: Pascua Location Map PIMA COUNTY MULTI—JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3.4 Sahuarita The Town of Sahuarita is the southern-most incorporated and newest jurisdiction within Pima County. Sahuarita was incorporated in 1994 and the Town population has increased 669 percent during the period between the 2000 and 2010 Census estimates. Situated along Interstate 19 approximately 15 miles from the City of Tucson, Sahuarita share portions of its southern border with the retirement community of Green Valley and its northern border with the Tohono O'odham Nation. Unincorporated Pima County surrounds the remainder of the Tow to the west and east. The Town of Sahuarita is known for its semi-rural setting with a mixture of master planned communities in contrast to the historical agricultural production sill largely occupying he east portion of the community. Bounded by mountain ranges within the Santa Cruz Valley, Sahuarita's resident are governed under a Council-Manager form of government, which includes a seven-member Town Council consisting of a Mayor and six Council Members elected at-large for overlapping terms of four years. Sahuarita encompasses 30.5 square miles of area. The primary transportation corridors through the Town are Interstate 19 and the Tucson Nogales Highway (SR 19B) providing connections with the metropolitan environs of Tucson to the north and the Mexican board to the south. Paralleling the Tucson Nogales Highway, natural development constraints abound in Sahuarita as the Santa Cruz River and its associated floodplain effectively bisect the Town into eastern and western segments. As illustrated in Table 4-2, in 2000 the population of Sahuarita was 3,242. With expanses of available land and residential growth, the population increased to 25,259 per the 2010 Census. These new population figures represent a significant growth not only to the community, but in the Sahuarita's population percentage within Pima County. By 2020, it is the Town of Sahuarita is expected to represent almost 5.6 percent of Pima County's population as compared with only 0.38% in 2000. In addition to population, Sahuarita has also experienced economic growth yet a majority of full-time employees travel to the great Tucson area or are employed in service related facilities in Sahuarita and Green Valley. Agricultural production, in particular the pecan orchards owned by the Farmers Investment Company, and with a growth in area mining operations of Freeport McMoRan and ASARCO, still provided the basic Town employment. Other Town major private and public employers include Frye's, Safeway, Wal-mart, Ross Stores, American Home Furnishings, the Desert Diamond Casino — an operation of the Tohono O'odham Nation, and the Sahuarita School District and Town of Sahuarita. There is a small light industrial park on Duval Mine Road and business parks are in the evaluation/planning states. Carondelet has purchased land and will be announcing the specific types of ambulatory health care serviced that will become available in Sahuarita. Ratified by Town residents on May 20, 2003, the Sahuarita General Plan reflects a community striving to preserve its rural character while realizing continual growth pressures. Over 50 percent of the land within the planning area is listed as Future Development Area. Although legally developable, demand is achieving the point to be high enough to warrant additional investment in these properties within the planning cycle of the General Plan. Growth area will be encouraged in the eastern portion of the Town and consist of a land use pattern emphasizing a mixture of uses. T'he future development plan stresses the importance of encouraging employments opportunities by designating 12.8 percent of the planning area's acreage to development of opporlunities focusing on light industrial, office, research, and warehousing activities. These areas are expected to develop in the northern portion of the Interstate 19 corridor. Transitional to these usages are areas allocated for medical density resident and missed-use development providing flexibility in the design of concentrated areas allowing residents to live close to employment centers. The Land Use Plan from the General Plan is provided as Figure 4-10. As of August 2011, the civilian labor force was 1,884 with an unemployment rate of 7.8 percent. In 2008, there were approximately $705.2 million of taxable sales in the town. New building permits issued in 2007 were 847, as compared to the 164 permits granted in 2000. 8 http://www.azcommerce.com/doclib/COMMLJNE/sahuarita.pdf j� � FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 37 ' m�cxr a �tt�r, m� PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PI.AN 2012 �• Nmw .m.y�.w� /�Mqrnoa..„� s �o-w . e 4rn y �� 1' .Fwurls ' m.n i �m�n O F Pw'�Fl+�M4�.rwN�r7as �� �Mf 4w�ri� u WYp Ilq+wa WrK Hx�n r amW«�mowir.. MMM W w iu+[tinMxMruw Ic�MW✓Yr4r .er1?wM1�WVafw -Mp'. .unp.✓I4YUnn1� -IpFGUnle'MH4W - r �w � Mw� � n���w � Mx9•nt rynitIX+N�py�s+VauvN _14w�na w. � [��Wv w�qrppiyilxN Ir M+w.r ra«.w nw w e. n.n. e mw ��.. N R'�E !i Figure 4-10: Town of Sahuarita General Plan Land Use Map 2008 j$ �'�j,T,�� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 38 am�cxocir a r�cn�tKxo�. 3nc PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3. S South Tucson Surrounded by the City of Tucson, the City of South Tucson is a one square mile community just south of historical downtown Tucson nestled between the junction of Interstates 10 and 19 as represented in Figure 4-11. Rich in ethnic heritage, this small community services a population of which 83 percent are Mexican-American and 10 percent are Native American. Developed as a suburban community to Tucson, South Tucson enjoyed a colorful history after being incorporated in 1936, unincorporated in 1938, and reincorporated in 1940. In 2000, the population of South Tucson was 5,490 as illustrated in Table 4-2. Although relatively small growth (0.42% through 2020) is projected for the future, South Tucson will continue to provide an increasingly diminished percent of Pima County's overall resident population. This pattern is reflective of the strong growth throughout eastern Pima County and the City's inability to gain in available land mass. Similarly, South Tucson's small labor force is forecasted to parallel the Town's population growth by comprising a smaller share of the region's employment opportunities. The City of South Tucson updated their General Plan in 2002. Although not mandated to contain Growing Smarter elements due to their small size, this information was incorporated into the 2002 revision to provide consistency with other municipalities in the region. As of August 2011, the civilian labor force was 2,616 with an unemployment rate of 22.6 percent. In 2008, there were approximately $86 million of taxable sales in the City. New building permits issued in 2008 were 14, as compared to the 24 pertnits granted in 2000. � 9 http://www.azcommerce.com/doclib/COMMUNE/sahuarita.pdf FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 39 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 40 Figure 4-11: City of South Tucson Land Ownership and Location Map PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 4.3.6 Tohono O'odham The Tohono O'odham Nation has prepared the FEMA approved Tohono O'odham Nation Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan. A complete description of the Tohano O'odham Nation characteristics is summarized in that plan and will not be reproduced here. 4.3.7 Tucson The City of Tucson, Arizona's second largest and oldest city, serves as the focal point for political, economic, and cultural activity for Pima County. Prior to the establishment of the first Spanish mission in 1700, San Xavier del Bac, and the arrival of the Spanish Conquistadors, various Native American tribes including the Pima, Hohokam and the Tohono O'odham inhabited the area presently occupied by the City of Tucson. Founded in 1775, Tucson began as a Spanish military garrison to protect settlers from Indian raids from nearby tribes. Receiving independence from Spanish colonial rule in 1821, governance of the area passed to the Republic of Mexico and remained part of the State of Sonora until 1854 when it became part of the United States with the Gadsden Purchase. Formally incorporated in 1877 with an area of 2 square miles, the City of Tucson presently includes 226 square miles and is the nation's thirtieth most populous City. Fueled by the availability of cheap and abundant land, Tucson experienced rapid growth in the 1950s following World War IL Much of this new growth, however, occurred outside the city limits leading to a widespread lineal development pattern. Surrounded by unincorporated portions of Pima County, Tucson completely surrounds the City of South Tucson and is in close proximity to the smaller communities of Marana to the northwest, Oro Valley to the north, and Sahuarita to the south. A mayor and six City Council members representing various wards within the City govern Tucson. Operating under a charter form of government, the Mayor and City Council set policy to be carried out by an appointed City Manager and other city officials. Known for its natural beauty, Tucsods natural environment is characteristic of the Sonoran Desert with diverse habitats and conditions ranging from low land deserts to the highlands of the Santa Catalina and Rincon Mountains. In addition to the rich biodiversity of the region, the close proximity of the Mexican border and the presence of the University of Arizona and the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, which draw residents from throughout the United States as well as from other countries, influence the City's cultural diversity and tradition for cultural heritage preservation. As depicted in Figure 4-12, Tucson's primary transportation corridors are Interstates 10 and 19, which provide accessibility to distant urban locations and a well-developed arterial network providing connectivity within the metropolitan area. Tucson International Airport, providing commercial air service and Ryan Airfield, serving business and general aviation traffic, provide additional transportation service to Tucson. The City of Tucson has experienced tremendous growth since its incorporation over 125 years ago. Illustrated in Table 4-2, this growth has lead to a current population of just over 520,000 people, which represents 53% of the county according to the 2010 Census. Regardless of its role as the regional focal point, Tucson's relative position as the population center will slow in the future as other incorporated jurisdictions and unincorporated communities in the urban periphery absorb a larger share of the regional growth. As the regional economic engine, Tucson comprises 73.1% of the county's employment. However, by 2030 this figure is expected to drop to 60.9%. As of August 2011, the civilian labor force was 261,699 with an unemployment rate of 9.3 percent. In 2008, there were approximately $10.8 billion of taxable sales in the City. New building permits issued in 2008 were 795, as compared to the 6,086 permits that were granted in 2000. lo http://www.azcommerce.com/doclib/commune/tucson.pdf FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 41 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 n's Oen�raltxed bu�an of Land a P� a • a �� Figure 4-12: City of Tucson Generalized Distribution of Land Use Patterns 2001 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 42 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Approved in December of 2001, Tucson's General Plan reflects a community that is responding to the diverse nature of its residents and natural character of the region as represented in Figure 4-12 and 4-13. The plan anticipates that new growth will be accommodated primarily through infill development; higher density, mixed-use activity centers; and corridor planning to reduce the peripheral sprawl. Tucson is positioning itself to take advantage of its distinct natural setting by clearly separating urban uses from rural and natural resource-based areas. Economic development activity will be encouraged to locate transportation hubs along existing transportation corridors including Interstate 10, Interstate 19, the Southern Pacific Railroad, and airports. As an alternative to the lineal pattern of commercial development, small-scale neighborhood commercial centers will be focused at major street intersections with regional centers positioned in mixed-use activity centers. �.r.�r 41t i�:II ;i��.. � i� ��� r fll: f k 1 `� ! a at#:tileki MrKi,���s�.s.9x?breES�s:e��k�czscat�:e�� A:�bicz.a�.s�affiJ.ae+�&'�R ti�a'Crl iYc3eryiirlF�.t+�b"{lrYGw?13�23d 'tllf$���s'+y%ttk�2k23fr'Yd!# �Cl:S'1RA7�f� =1v�,l�L�' �M �ar.taas«zt'ac+��s rvst+sqr.r,a x� r� �va» ft.4 �'�1.c�a.ravah+y.srs�a xa trv�.t�Ytir��s 'stzptmstixa�:t-a+�tmx�eamx�lrzt� r.W.e!fmme+ca�cx�cn xk nTrnitai.�. a0. �rrx�rcrc�ta a�zr+� �C�tt:r?a�N �r �e��tarox+�,sN-��a�sua a r.s a�r,o �.s�sscusma„r.»>tm�:r.aria� �.3:ai'm Y�SfS9t23MaRlP.'J �S"@SM'S'�4x.R2K.. ^ 'E R5}i�jk rg]HSA;3Q'Jm.xt!lVpli�; � �+ iE.rtc�.rr8:'fi�. �ri�:e �-'��Y�atY.11AKY4sa��; ■ 3:#��S ��CF:fiskfuacS�sLa'4N�iSb�.lrSiSF�sY4�+7a1�titCSSe i1.a�.Inc,rrs,�T([ti'Gint �Nlrn'K•.�N�4�T;["!#�'ibY!l�SA'bk'i`#PbCYR'KMkYi?tt@r.'C�:P.a.'fiCAC',N T1Cl�MlY'illft'd 7fAf.`&�ES9lg!?6t�'#�9ty�l6Tt R4�3lIE{:S9�M19S'..RaAt9'¢B^.'SY..fTTi]E� d�ltl9!.T��71M iY.iG.S'F iSfg^.-�Ti3iA?SC�.if�kL!':�:�'k�Yaffi&136s]i3�Ei 1�:4!C145F?� ■ �3Cf%�4i�.'� �e�niblidfrlsatrkxx�Aa2aGaYR*�'�f �;4�1'x�lp�ly�all�ex�kCRcptraa�Ytk�M1 St1r�'o�[4YY�Y9:1'i!b'4 W4+iG'�YA�ti � �V99f Co'[af:A1F;Q-p5.?&46itiT`!P4`,Y£HF.Pd: rasr�n,r�cw:.s��asec�ra�m� rsniva ■ assr�rrs� 3i`M.��y tis5:sac'rr..+salr�:=cavtztVxFT-Ywwts�i6'ig+".Y't;ai�x75Y:!ct£�exaRr•.! -ritr'��a�r!�tl•N,'.Xteit�c�t3rtxeo'3�e�#r�a:issri� Slstqydnc�a�tA�rar � 6 u.a�cx,rftus�as:x,►ac.au�r.aaritx.�an�:sa.i'a'gzucy:z�-htc��t�er4 * * j s}�r'�Ta�u � 1 �� � ..�, i Nqras�arda_�mdnr�Aefi�+.a�asaew: helM�e'Qa+r� tYr�+`#y tsfa�ees 4� Y �.��'36w�N:Ya'kh'4'�Y.;ie�.#1dFSNr.3C286yY•:Tdt ■ ?`^F^ a �kY=,TnF1i1TlS8 �9A!'T@:"YRJ+kSA�Cfi�1iC�4E?kl:T!2?�': N.t°K&�9X54S��T��"•k f Wf6N93�11i�s C� v7A�xa+ffi1pe.7�:3r Ce%�yaca 'wra;fA�r pctar @�aew!� �h.mscCw6rlic nS' irxtlanfKa��.er :.rxc,t� ize� c u^�a�3a:.b ii�r�t k 1��at r.ats�ssa�tl:rrrnw3 rtqd�r,�a� �� xuktRa'r�kept `�tbrlEi,��l�Ifid"'a4vY.��sr3N:2etc91Yx11ei0a�+1C'riNRTi@:c`fi:3 ? s��Y.x�c`firNiilYS3� t�t�1�aVJRiaLt3 kmtr�g�i�f4l�blb�Aprt19RS:'brt"IMAifAK�trS:.7�AiEf.TW'*'Ifl9t M'!!�$m�EwY�scmdl�na'e'ny�)t t�k�!.wtcR+Lf'6!tS7�1^-+'�?3R�fREp�'=SMir.��Kx. R�.# �� 2b w S�fR.tx. ssaah.t�tAr+.aaGa�ariat.•ytir4�T�3`*�^,a3e� �eeP�rs�vmreqaWt q€a8 sio� � ■ � :qo�ti ttl �RS�:ts P: m)Y.r tiF.3:� rr,+crir;tY zY:. t u� � Fln': a�fr S�+ �ra o�r s���nqx�e.rxne �e amExsselre,QtLSmcra�Y�rbfreffitr�eY5la�avY s� T.^ � ?sVac••KSx7tt9r�c+fiert Q ClaY7r�t�4 Vca81�? 4T+{akrffiIem�dA[xf i�kYrxt2e W.hcrr �'r.�aN!� r.yp'(�. ta;utt:�E#x ktk[r+:`ttdl��lE�s?.slf IE�g'ee�6'c:�c$�Sa;ti�7aae#&;t�` htlr.ea�rrt�4�c fara¢€7altr,a�a°at�Cer Ra�csss: atcv'ssd:�ds; erprrrerErRS€RC W�ia,^s�a. r petltYtx[t�17't9YMa�'G•]Yi��f!�fffi+eT WinnY�i4s.Re'd3i Yte�sePi�?SGM ] 46'CEY{r�y� Yi t'L�]AttYltfQM4•.itl1S?!i�1+iCC9oEYE ik�:-34y.��:.Rl�Ui�SYtT3�XY�fYF4PS!l'l'.4�Si'BP .�,<�c� �a5�t#xagsu�`ti=�z[t..�rr�sce:r�:t3t:�ozaea�u;trmi�`a�n.°aal.�ai est,rqPa ^r A+rstra�a x�>}�cer.�sysr.z atnra�-xas+ccuie qb xr. �tila:l+.�NY�.�i4e+�tttrsaaW'r9t' e a - �tucxien..wbsrauLF�`71e16Atisk�b�s�:ae7kr. 'b+a'�i€Y!r6fti,YYYBC:%KS`?�''r6�t+a;.'1+'�',reY7P�J�7i!A4Y�t+F Rfi�si�x#.YE'COPG�aY3Ki$�F:: ttt�.:B�7G6q9tr4f�P�C[amXt9F?k�'�[gAt3c '_EAry�$E�T9:YCIE��1#�k+t7Tjt%VBL.=At�k; C,pT�tAFt1Pl"X`SSePYat�3�E��M3411t4t�870.s� 7J�osGVieDtPa_:Ay.:Ya'.�kdit4RF.&' fiRJ6Q"xf1C�3iYY7CY;[�f€i{#HS'SJj1lE"fid�y'$j'�A�5+?G�b`��?.Y.B&SSliI�MO• FCt�t1.9'.1H m��ar�dn,+cnaew.nvto�lx�s�sc«s�iur+:a�f „cw�,src�wu► Scr.rt�h�xckinc# Figure 4-13: City of Tucson Generalized Distribution of Land Use Patterns-Legend FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 43 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 44 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION S: RISK ASSESSMENT §201.6(c)(2): (The plan shall include...] (2) A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce /osses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide su�cient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. The risk assessment shall include: (i) A description of the rype, location, and extent of al! natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the pro6ability of future hazard events. (ii) A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of.• (A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; (B) An estimate of the potential dollar /osses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate; (C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. (iii) For multi jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment section must assess each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the entire planning area. One of the key elements to the hazard mitigation planning process is the risk assessment. In performing a risk assessment, a community determines "whaY' can occur, "when" (how often) it is likely to occur, and "how bad" the effects could be'�. According to DMA 2000, the primary components of a risk assessment that answer these questions are generally categorized into the following measures: Hazard Identification and Screening Hazard Profiling Assessing Vulnerability to Hazards The risk assessment for Pima County and participating jurisdictions was performed using a county-wide, multi- jurisdictional perspective, with much of the information gathering and development being accomplished by the Planning Team. This integrated approach was employed because many hazard events are likely to affect numerous jurisdictions within the County, and are not often relegated to a single jurisdictional boundary. The vulnerability analysis was performed in a way such that the results reflect vulnerability at an individual jurisdictional level, and at a countywide level. The entire Risk Assessment section of the Plan has been reformatted and revised to comport with the State Plan template. 5.1 Hazard Identi�cation and Screening Hazard identification is the process of answering the question; "What hazards can and do occur in my communiry or jurisdiction? " For this Plan, the list of hazards identified in the 2006 Plan were reviewed by the Planning Team with the goal of refining the list to reflect the hazards that pose the greatest risk to the jurisdictions represented by this Plan. The Planning Team also compared and contrasted the 2006 Plan list to the comprehensive hazard list summarized in the 2010 State Plan to ensure compatibility with the State Plan. Table 5-1 summarizes the 2006 Plan and 2010 State Plan hazard lists. �� National Fire Protection Association, 2000, Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs, NFPA 1600. 12 ADEM, 2007, State ofArizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 45 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-1: Summary of initial hazard identification lists 2007 Pima Coun Plan Hazard List 2010 State Plan Hazard List • Dam Failure • Disease • Dam Failure • Drought • Drought • Extreme Heat • Earthquake • Flooding • Extreme Heat • Hail • Fissure • HAZMAT . Flooding/Flash Flooding • Lightning . Landslide / Mudslide • Subsidence • Levee Failure • Thunderstorm • Severe Wind • Tornado • Subsidence • Tropical Cyclone • Wildfire • Wildfire • Winter Storms • Winter Storm The review included an initial screening process to evaluate each of the listed hazards based on the following considerations: • Experiential knowledge on behalf of the Planning Team with regard to the relative risk associated with the hazard • Documented historic context for damages and losses associated with past events (especially events that have occurred during the last plan cycle) • The ability/desire of Planning Team to develop effective mitigation for the hazard under current DMA 2000 criteria • Compatibility with the state hazard mitigation plan hazards • Duplication of effects attributed to each hazard One tool used in the initial screening process was a historic hazard database. With this update, the historic hazard database developed for the 2010 State Plan was obtained and records pertaining to Pima County were parsed out and compiled. The resulting database was reviewed and revised to separately summarize declared disaster events versus non-declared events. Declared event sources included Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (PCOEMHS), Arizona Division of Emergency Management (ADEM), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Non-declared sources included Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), National Weather Service (NWS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), United States Geological Survey (USGS), the United States Forest Service (USFS), the National Wildfire Council Group (NWCG) and others. Both data sets were updated with additional hazard events that have occurred since the State Plan data was compiled or were deemed by the Planning Team to be relevant to dataset. The declared events database represent the period of February 1966 to August 2010. The undeclared event database has records dating back to the early 1960's, with the majority of the records representing the past 25 years. For the undeclared events database, the following filtering criteria were applied to limit the records to relevant occurrences: • 1 or more fatalities • 1 or more injuries • Any dollar amount in properly or crop damages • For wildfires, all the following must be met: 0 100 acres or larger, and o Any reported amount for firefight costs, and o Any reported damages to structures • A significant event to a community regardless of the above criteria FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 46 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Three tables are used in this Plan to summarize the historic hazard events. Tables 5-2 and 5-3 summarize federal and state disaster declarations that included Pima County, with Table 5-2 showing only state and federal disaster expenditure data provided by the ADEM Recovery Section, and Table 5-3 summarizing fatality, injury, and property damage estimates obtained from many of the sources previously mentioned. Table 5-4 summarizes all non-declared hazard events specific to Pima County, that met the filtering criteria. When reviewing Tables 5-2, 5-3 and 5-4, the following should be noted: 1) Hazard categories in all tables follow the updated hazard categories discussed in the following paragraphs; 2) Events in Tables 5-2 and 5-3 are generally not duplicated as events in Table 5-4; 3) If a hazard is not listed, that means there were no events reported for that hazard that fit the criteria above. Table 5-2: Total Disaster Expenditures for State and Federally Declared Natural Hazard Events That Included Pima Coun — Februa 1966 to Au ust 2010 Arizona Declared Events That Included Pima County Janua 1966 to Au ust 2010 No. of Total Ex enditures Hazard Cate ories Events State Federal Disease 7 $ 1,738,895 $ - Drou ht 3 $ 226,440 $ - Floodin / Flash Floodin 12 $ 42,334,412 $ 333,683,342 Flood / Severe Wind 1 $ 16,158 $ 10,879,002 Hazardous Materials Incident 3 $ 1,611,337 $ - Severe Wind 1 $ 14,238 $ - Wildfire 17 $ 6,369,936 $ 5,907,407 Notes: - Damage Costs are reported as is and no attempt has been made to adjust costs to cunent dollar values. - Onl a ortion of the re orted ex enditures were s ent in the sub�ect coun . Source: ADEM - Recove Section, October 2010 Table 5-3: Human and Property Loss Estimates for State and Federally Declared Events That Included Pima Coun Janua 1966 to Au ust 2010 No. of Recorded Losses Hazard Declarations Fatalities In'uries Dama e Costs $ Disease 2 0 0 $0 Drou ht 8 0 0 $300,000,000 Floodin / Flash Floodin 13 39 1087 $904,837,000 Hazardous Materials Incident 3 0 0 $0 Severe Wind 1 0 2 $230,000 Wildfire 17 0 0 $38,100,000 Notes: - Damage Costs are reported as is and no attempt has been made to adjust costs to current dollar values. Sources: ADEM, FEMA, USDA, NCDC, AFMA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 47 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-4: Undeclared Historic Hazard Events for Pima Coun — Jul 1961 to Au ust 2010 No. of Recorded Losses Hazard Records Fatalities In'uries Dama e Costs $ Floodin 68 13 9 $22,052,000 Hazardous Materials Incident 42 28 61 $262,200 Li htnin 18 3 16 $511,000 Severe Wind 183 3 101 $28,926,200 Wildfire 20 0 30 $66,100,000 Winter Storm 2 3 0 $0 Notes: Damage costs include properry and crop/livestock losses and are reported as is with no attempt to adjust costs to current dollar values. Furthermore, wildfire damage cost do not include the cost of suppression which can be quite substantial. Sources: ADEM, NCDC, NWCG, NWS, USFS Detailed historic hazard records are provided as digitat files on CD and in printed form in Appendix D. The culmination of the review and screening process by the Planning Team resulted in a revised list of hazards that will be carried forward with this Plan. Several of the hazards in the 2007 Plan list may be better described as storm events wherein the effects of the storm may pose exposure to multiple hazards. For instance, hazards associated with a Thunderstorm or Tropical Cyclone may include flooding and severe winds in a single event. With the direction of ADEM, the Planning Team chose to eliminate these "hazards" and account for their impacts in other categories. Similarly, the predominant perceived hazard associated with Tornado is the associated damaging high winds. Therefore, ADEM has decided to account for the wind related hazards associated with these events into a new category named Severe Wind. Flooding caused by these atmospheric events are addressed in the Flootling/Flash Flooding category. The Planning Team also chose to follow the State's lead and split Dam/Levee Failure into separate categaries since each is handled differently regarding regulation and mitigation. The Planning Team has selected the following list of hazards for profiling and updating based on the above explanations and screening process. Revised and updated definitions for each hazard are provided in Section 5.3 and in Section 8.2: • Disease • Drought • Earthquake • Extreme Temperature • Flooding/Flash Flooding • Subsidence • HAZMAT • Wildfire • Levee Failure • Winter Storms • Severe Wind 5.2 Vulnerability Analysis Methodology 5.2.1 General The following sections summarize the methodologies used to perform the vulnerability analysis portion of the risk assessment. For this Plan, the entire vulnerabitity analysis was either revised or updated to reflect new hazard categories, the availability of new data, or differing loss estimation methodology. Specific changes are noted below and/or in Section 5.3. For the purposes of this vulnerability analysis, hazard profile maps were developed for Earthquake, Flooding/Flash Flooding, Fissure, Levee Failure, Subsidence, Wildfire and Winter Storm to map the geographic variability of the probability and magnitude of exposure risk as estimated by the Planning Team. Hazard profile categaries of HIGH, MEDNM, and/or LOW were used (except for Earthquake and Winter Storm) and were subjectively assigned based on the factors discussed in the Probability and Magnitude sections below. Within the context of the county limits, the other hazards do not exhibit significant geographic variability and will not be categorized as such. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 48 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Unless otherwise specified in this Plan, the general cutoff date for new hazard profile data and jurisdictional corporate limits is the end of May 2011. 5.2.2 Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) Evaluation The first step in the vulnerability analysis (VA) is to assess the perceived overall risk for each of the plan hazards using a tool developed by the State of Arizona called the Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI). The CPRI value is obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four (4) categories for each hazard, and then calculating an index value based on a weighting scheme. Table 5-5 summarizes the CPRI risk categories and provides guidance regarding the assignment of values and weighting factors for each category. As an example, assume that the project team is assessing the hazard of flooding, and has decided that the following assignments best describe the flooding hazard for their community: • Probability = Likely • Magnitude/Severity = Critical • Warning Time = 12 to 24 hours • Duration = Less than 6 hours The CPRI for the flooding hazard would then be: CPRI = [ (3*0.45) + (3*0.30) + (2*0.15) + (1 *0.10)] CPRI = 2.65 5.2.3 Asset Inventory A detailed asset inventory was performed for the 2007 Plan to establish a fairly accurate baseline data- set for assessing the vulnerability of each jurisdiction's assets to the hazards previously identified. The asset inventory from the 2007 Plan was updated to reflect the current critical and non-critical facilities potentially exposed to hazards. Details of the update are discussed later in this section. The 2010 State Plan defines assets as: Arry natural or human-caused feature that has value, including, but not limited to people; buildings; infrastructure like bridges, roads, and sewer and water systems; lifelines like edectricity and communication resources; or environmental, cultural, or recreational features like parks, dunes, wetlands, or landmarks. The asset inventory is generally tabularized into critical and non-critical categories. Critical facilities and infrastructure are systems, structures and infrastructure within a community whose incapacity or destruction would: • Have a debilitating impact on the defense or economic security of that community. • Significantly hinder a community's ability to recover following a disaster. Following the criteria set forth by the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office (CIAO), the State of Arizona has adopted eight general categories that define critical facilities and infrastructure: 1. Communications Infrastructure: Telephone, cell phone, data services, radio towers, and internet communications, which have become essential to continuity of business, industry, government, and military operations. 13 ADEM, 2003, Arizona Model Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, prepared by JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. 14 Instituted via Executive Order 13010, �Ciich was signed by President Clinton in 1996. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 49 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-5: Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) categories and risk levels CPRI De ree of Risk Assigned Index �'eighting Category LevelID Description Value Factor Unlikely ■ Extremely rare with no documented history of occunences or events. 1 . Annual robabili of less than 0.001. Possible . Rare occurrences with at least one documented or anecdotal historic event. 2 . Annual robabili that is between 0.01 and 0.001. o Probability 45 /o Likely . Occasional occurrences with at least two or more documented historic events. 3 . Annual robabili that is between 0.1 and 0.01. Highly Likely . Frequent events with a well documented history of occurrence. 4 ■ Annual robabili that is reater than 0.1. Negligible . Negligible property damages (less than 5% of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). . Injuries or illnesses are treatable with first aid and there 1 are no deaths. ■ Negligible quality of life lost. ■ Shut down of critical facilities for less than 24 hours. Limited ■ Slight property damages (greater than 5% and less than 2 25% of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). . [njuries or illnesses do not result in permanent disability and there are no deaths. ■ Moderate quality of life lost. Magnitude/ . Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 day and Severiry less than 1 week. 30% Critical . Moderate property damages (greater than 25% and less than 50% of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). ■ Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and 3 at least one death. . Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 week and less than 1 month. Catastrophic ■ Severe property damages (greater than 50% of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). ■ Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and 4 multiple deaths. ■ Shut down of critical facilities for more than 1 month. Less than 6 hours Self explanatory. 4 Warning 6 to 12 hours Self explanatory. 3 Time 15% 12 to 24 hours Self explanatory. 2 More than 24 hours Self ex lanato . 1 Less than 6 hours Self explanatory. 1 Duration Less than 24 hours Self explanatory. 2 a 10 /o Less than one week Self explanatory. 3 More than one week Self ex lanato . 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 50 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 2. Electrical Power Systems: Generation stations and transmission and distribution networks that create and supply electricity to end-users. 3. Gas and Oil Facilities: Production and holding facilities for natural gas, crude and refined petroleum, and petroleum-derived fuels, as well as the refining and processing facilities for these fuels. 4. Banking and Finance Institutions: Banks, financial service companies, payment systems, investment companies, and securities/commodities exchanges. 5. Transportation Networks: Highways, railroads, ports and inland waterways, pipelines, and airports and airways that facilitate the efficient movement of goods and people. 6. Water Supply Systems: Sources of water; reservoirs and holding facilities; aqueducts and other transport systems; filtration, cleaning, and treatment systems; pipelines; cooling systems; and other delivery mechanisms that provide for domestic and industrial applications, including systems for dealing with water runoff, wastewater, and firefighting. 7. Government Services: Capabilities at the federal, state, and local levels of government required to meet the needs for essential services to the public. 8. Emergency Services: Medical, police, fire, and rescue systems. Other assets such as public libraries, schools, businesses, museums, parks, recreational facilities, historic buildings or sites, churches, residential and/or commercial subdivisions, aparhnent complexes, and so forth, are typically not classified as critical facilities and infrastructure unless they serve a secondary function to the community during a disaster emergency (e.g. - emergency housing or evacuation centers). As a part of the update process, each community was tasked with determining which of the previously identified "non-critical" assets, if any, were deemed critical by the community. The remaining "non-critical" assets were deleted from the database. New facilities were also added as appropriate and available. Each community was also tasked with making any needed changes to the geographic position, revision of asset names, updating replacement costs, etc. to bring the dataset into a current condition. The updated asset inventory is attributed with a descriptive name, physical address, geospatial position, and an estimated building/structure and contents replacement cost for each entry to the greatest extent possible and entered into a GIS geodatabase. The 2007 Plan used a combination of the Asset Inventory and HAZUS�-MH data to represent the critical facilities for Pima County jurisdictions, however, those data sets were not available for use with this update. The Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (PCOEMHS) coordinated with regional emergency planners from each jurisdiction to prepare a database of critical facilities and infrastructure. Each jurisdiction was given the responsibility for making the decisions regarding which and how many assets would be reported. Updates included changes to the geographic position, revision of asset names, updating replacement costs, etc. Table 5-5 summarizes the facility counts by category provided by each of the participating jurisdictions in this plan. It should be noted that the facility counts summarized in Table 5-6 do not represent a comprehensive inventory of all the category facilities that exist within the county. They do represent the facilities inventoried to-date by each jurisdiction and are considered to be a work-in-progress that is to be expanded and augmented with each Plan cycle. 15 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, HAZUS� FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 51 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-6: Asset inventory structure counts by category and jurisdiction as of May 2011 � � � � a „ °' � � m ° i 3 ' � o � � o � � � a '� C� v � � C+ p � °' �3 � � q � v � G a� u C e � p � � •� a�+ . v � �+'' Q„ L� v' G� G�i y � C� v' (, q ++ � v. Sr �i � � r,�„ d o a�i a�i �•.�, L ..�. � � C ^O ^p � o C W > ' � ee p s. a� �>' � v� W V1 � � � � a�i � County-Wide Totals 1603 29 105 0 572 115 171 129 750 0 12 0 0 0 Marana 142 5 14 22 b 34 23 13 7 25 0 9 0 0 0 Oro Valley 29 1 0 0 6 64 4 9 19 0 0 0 0 0 Pascua Yaqui Tribe 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 Sahuarita 16 1 0 0 19 15 3 4 18 0 0 0 0 0 South Tucson 1 0 0 0 6 0 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 Tohono O'odham 31 0 4 0 57 3 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 Tucson 686 12 20 0 220 26 93 41 527 0 0 0 0 0 Unincorporated Pima 694 10 66 0 229 48 52 59 144 0 0 0 0 0 a— Assets listed under these categories have been determined to be critical per the definition of this Plan by the corresponding jurisdiction. b— These were not included in asset inventory database but are reported here to acknowledge their existence and need for inclusion to the database at the next Plan u date. 5.2.4 Loss Estimations In the original 2007 Plan, losses were estimated by either quantitative or qualitative methods. Where applicable, quantitative methods employed the loss estimating algorithms coded into the HAZUS MH� program, or statistically based estimations using historic data. Where quantitative information or standardized software was lacking, a more qualitative evaluation was made on the basis of each hazard's characteristics. Loss estimates for this Plan will be similar in scope and detail to the 2007 Plan, but will reflect current hazard map layers, an updated asset database, and the use of Census 2010 block level data for estimating the human and residential structure impacts wherever possible. HAZUS MH� currently includes data sets that are based on 2000 Census information. Upon review by the Planning Team, a decision was made to use more current 2010 Census Block data instead. The procedures for developing loss estimates are discussed below. Economic loss and human exposure estimates for each of the final hazards identified in Section 51 begins with an assessment of the potential exposure of critical infrastructure, human populations, and residential structures to those hazards. Estimates of critical assets identified by each jurisdiction (see Table 5-5) are accomplished by intersecting the asset inventory with the hazard profiles in Section 5.3. Human or population exposures are estimated by intersecting the same hazards with the 2010 Census Block data population statistics. Additional exposure estimates for general residential buildings within the county is also made using the residential housing counts reported in the 2010 Census data. Replacement costs for the residential housing counts were estimated by geographical area within the county, using July 2011 mean home sales data published by Zillow Real Estate. The neighborhood data published by Zillow� was correlated to the 2010 Census block data using the Census Places boundaries. All areas outside of the Census Places boundaries was assigned a county-wide mean. Combining the exposure results from the critical asset inventory and the 2010 Census database provides a fairly comprehensive depiction of the overall exposure of critical facilities, human population, and residential building stock and the two datasets are considered complementary and not redundant. 16 Zillow website at the following URL: httu://www.zillow.com/local 281/ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 52 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Economic losses to structures and facilities are estimated by multiplying the exposed facility replacement cost estimates by an assumed loss to exposure ratio for the hazard. The loss to exposure ratios used in this Plan update are summarized by hazard in Section 5.3. It is important to note the following when reviewing the loss estimate results: • The loss to exposure ratios are subjective and the estimates are solely intended to provide an understanding of relative risk from the hazards and potential losses. • Potential losses reported in this Plan represent an inherent assumption that the hazard occurs county-wide to magnitude shown on the hazard profile map. The results are intended to present a county-wide loss potential. Any single hazard event will likely only impact a portion of the county and the actual losses would be some fraction of those estimated herein. • No attempt has been made at developing annualized loss estimates, unless otherwise noted in Section 5.3 It is also noted that uncertainties are inherent in any loss estimation methodology due to: • Incomplete scientific knowledge concerning hazards and our ability to predict their effects on the built environment; • Approximations and simplifications that are necessary for a comprehensive analysis; and, • Lack of detailed data necessary to implement a viable statistical approach to loss estimations. Several of the hazards profiled in this Plan will not include quantitative exposure and loss estimates. The vulnerability of people and assets associated with some hazards are nearly impossible to evaluate given the uncertainty associated with where these hazards will occur as well as the relatively limited focus and extent of damage. Instead, a qualitative review of vulnerability will be discussed to provide insight to the nature of losses that are associated with the hazard. For subsequent updates of this Plan, the data needed to evaluate these unpredictable hazards may become refined such that comprehensive vulnerability statements and thorough loss estimates can be made. 5.2.5 Development Trend Analysis The 2007 Plan development trend analysis will require updating to reflect growth and changes in Pima County and jurisdiction boundaries over the last planning cycle. The updated analysis will focus on the potential risk associated with projected growth patterns and their intersection with the Plan identified hazards. 5.2.6 Environmental Risk and Vulnerability The three environmental elements of air, water, and soil, are specifically evaluated with respect to the exposure and impact risk posed to those elements, by each of the Plan hazards. Similar to the CPRI discussed in Section 5.2.2, Table 5-7 is a summary of the impact categories, descriptions and index values that are used to address the environmental risk. Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (ERVI) is calculated similar to the CPRI with a minimum possible value of 1.00 and a maximum possible value of 3.40. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 53 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-7: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) categories and risk levels Environmental EVRI Index Weighting Element Cate o Level ID Descri tion Value Factor Applies to Unlikel Extremel rare. No documented histo of occurrences/events. 1 Probability Possibl Rare occurrences with at least one documented or anecdotal historic event. 2 ALL THREE of Impact Likel Occasional occunences with 2+ documented histaric events. 3 45% ELEMENTS Hi hl Likel Fre uent events with a well documented histo of occurrence. 4 Negligible Negligible impact. 1 Magnitude/ Limited Moderate impact. Special population groups may experience effects. Unlikely to impact general public. 2 30% Severity Critical Si nificant im act. General ublic likel to ex rience effects. Caution re uired. 3 AIR Catastro hic Severe im act. Unsafe for eneral ublic. Evacuation re uired. 4 < 1 month Self explanatory. 1 Im �act /�f 1— 3 month Self explanatory. � 10% p 3— 6 months Self explanatory. 3 Damage > 6 months Self explanatory. 4 Ne li ible Ne li ible im act/disru tion. 1 Magnitude/ LimiTed Minor im act/disru tion. No threat to ublic, caution limited. Possible remediation re uired. 2 0 Severity Critical Moderate impacUdisruption. Consumption may require special handling/preparation actions. 3 30 /o Remediation likel . WATER Catastro hic Severe im acUdisru tion. Not safe for consum tion/a icultural uses. Remediation re uired. 4 < 1 month Self explanatory. 1 Im �ac�t /�f 1— 3 month Self explanatory. 2 10 /o p 3— 6 months Self explanatory. 3 � Damage > 6 months Self explanatory. 4 Ne li ible Ne li ible im act/disru tion. 1 Magnitude/ Limited Moderate im acUdisru tion. No remediation re uired. 2 0 Severiry Critical Si ificant im act/disru rion. Recove likel with remediation. 3 30% Catastrophic Severe impact/disruption, rendered non-productive/unusable far agriculture and/or development for 4 SOIL extended eriod of time or indefinitel . < 1 month Self explanatory. 1 m�act /�f 1— 3 month Self explanatory. � 10 /o p 3— 6 months Self explanatory. 3 � Damage > 6 months Self explanatory. 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 54 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.2J Consequences/Impacts: This section provides an assessment of the consequence and impacts posed by an occurrence of the hazard, to the following sectors: Public — the public in general Resnonders to the Incident — a discussion of the hazard impacts/consequence posed to officials and individuals responding to or during the hazard. Continuitv of Onerations/Deliverv of Services — an assessment of the hazard impact/consequence to state agencies and delivery of state level services. Environment — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences of the hazard on the environment. This will compliment the previous "Environmental Risk & Vulnerability" section. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences to the Arizona economy and financial condition. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences to the public's confidence in the ability of the state to effectively govern and maintain governance during and after the hazard event. 5.2.8 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Cultural/Sacred Sites Like the assets listed above, cultural and sacred sites are of high priority to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and special attention is needed when considering hazard mitigation of these areas. Because of their cultural importance, these sites require special attention and protection. The Tribe's practice is to not share the location of these sites and areas. For this reason these sites and areas will not be included in this Plan. The Pascua Yaqui Tribe will ensure within its internal planning efforts that these sites and areas are included in their mitigation activities. 5.3 Hazard Risk Profiles The following sections summarize the risk profiles for each of the Plan hazards identified in Section 5.1. For each hazard, the following elements are addressed to present the overall risk profile: • Description • Aistory • Probability and Magnitude • Vulnerability o CPRI Results o Loss Estimations o Development Trends o EVRI o Consequences/Impacts • Sources • Profile Maps (if applicable) Much of the 2007 Plan data has been updated, incorporated and/or revised to reflect current conditions and Planning Team changes, as well as an overall plan format change. Historic discussions for each hazard are limited to state and count impacts, unless broader discussions are warranted. County-wide and jurisdiction specific profile maps are provided at the end of the section (if applicable). Also, the maps are not included in the page count. The reader is referred to the Tohono O'odham Nation Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (TON Plan) for all risk assessment information pertaining to the Tohono O'odham Nation. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 55 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 56 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.1 Disease Descriqtion A disease is a pathological (unhealthy or ill) condition of a living organism or part of the organism that is characterized by an identifiable group of symptoms or signs. Disease can affect any living organism, including people, animals, and plants. Disease can both directly (through infection) and indirectly (through secondary impacts) affect people, animals, and plants. Some diseases can directly affect both people and animals by infecting both. The most hazardous disease threat is the occurrence of an epidemic, which is a disease that affects numerous people, animals, or plants at one time. Of great concern for human, animal and plant health are infectious diseases caused by the entry and growth of microorganisms in another living organism. Some, but not all, infectious diseases are contagious, meaning they are communicable through direct or even indirect contact with an organism infected with the disease, something it has touched, or another medium (e.g., water, air). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), during the first half of the twentieth century, optimism grew as steady progress was made against infectious diseases in humans resulting from improved water quality, sanitation, antibiotics, and inoculations (CDC, October 1998). The incidences and severity of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, typhoid fever, smallpox, polio, whooping cough, and diphtheria were all significantly reduced during this period. This optimism proved premature, however, for a variety of reasons, including the following: antibiotics began to lose their effectiveness against infectious disease (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus); new strains of influenza emerged in China and spread rapidly around the globe; sexually transmitted diseases surged; new diseases were identified in the U.S. and elsewhere (e.g., Legionnaires's disease, Lyme disease, toxic shock syndrome, and Ebola hemorrhagic fever); acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) appeared; and tuberculosis (including drug-resistant strains) reemerged (CDC, October 1998). In a 1992 report entitled Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified the growing links between U.S. and international health, and concluded that emerging infections are a major and growing threat to the U.S. An emerging infectious disease is one whose incidence in humans has increased during the previous decades or threatens to increase in the near future. Emerging infectious diseases are a product of modern demographic and environmental conditions, such as global travel, globalization and centralized processing of the food supply, population growth and increased urbanization. In response to the threat of emerging infectious diseases, the CDC launched a national effort to protect the US public in a plan entitled Addressing Emerging Infectious Disease Threats. Based on the CDC's plan, major improvements to the US health system have been implemented, including improvements in surveillance, applied research, public health infrastructure, and prevention of emerging infectious diseases (CDC, October 1998). Despite these improvements, infectious diseases are the leading cause of death in humans worldwide and the third leading cause of death in humans in the U.S. (American 5ociety for Microbiology, June 21, 1999). A recent follow-up report from the Institute of Medicine, entitled Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response, notes that the impact of infectious diseases on the U.S. has only grown in the last ten years and that public health and medical communities remain inadequately prepared. Further improvements are necessary to prevent, detect, and control emerging, as well as resurging, microbial threats to health. The danger posed by infectious diseases are compounded by other important trends: the continuing increase in antimicrobial resistance; the US' diminished capacity to recognize and respond to microbial threats; and the intentional use of biological agents to do harm (Institute of Medicine, 2003). The CDC maintains a list of over 50 nationally notifiable diseases. A notifiable disease is one that, when diagnosed, health providers are required, usually by law, to report to State or local public health officials. Notifiable diseases are those of public interest by reason of their contagiousness, severity, or frequency. The long list includes such diseases as the following: AIDS; anthrax; botulism; cholera; diphtheria; encephalitis; gonorrhea; Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome; hepatitis (A, B, C); HN (pediatric); Legionellosis; Lyme disease; malaria; measles; mumps; plague; polio (paralytic); rabies (animal and human); Rocky Mountain spotted fever; rubella (also congenital); Salmonellosis; SARS; Streptococcal disease (Group A); Streptococcal toxio-shock syndrome; Streptococcus pneumoniae FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 57 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 (drug resistant); syphilis (also congenital); tetanus; Toxio-shock syndrome; Trichinosis, tuberculosis, Typhoid fever; and Yellow fever (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 2, 2003). In addition to diseases found only in humans, there is also significant concern about diseases that affect both humans and animals, known as zoonotic diseases. There are approximately 40 zoonotic diseases, including the following: rabies; tuberculosis and brucellosis; trichinosis; ringworm; giardiasis; and Lyme disease (Will, April 2002). Pima County is also very active in fighting the spread of the West Nile Virus through the control of mosquitoes. In Pima County, the Pima County Health Department seeks to prevent infectious diseases from entering the county and control those that are endemic or have already entered. Of particular concern to the County Health Deparhnent are new pandemic diseases, such as SARS, new strains of HIV, new influenza strains such as the most recent H1N1 threat, botulism, and bio-terrorism pathogens such as anthrax, smallpox, ar chemical attacks of sarin or VX gas. As a component of the Pima County Health Department, the Disease Control division seeks to reduce the incidence of disease morbidity and mortality in Pima County through the identification of community health problems, compilation of health statistics, and development of appropriate intervention programs. Special attention is paid to epidemiology, HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, in addition to preventive programs such as immunizations and well women services. Diseases affecting animals and plants, particularly livestock and agricultural products, are also of major concern, as they can affect the supply and quality of human food supplies, potential economic consequences, and impact foreign trade. According to the National Animal Health Emergency Management System (NAHEMS), an animal health emergency is defined as the appearance of disease with the potential for sudden negative impacts through direct effects on productivity, real or perceived risks to public health, or real or perceived risks to foreign countries importing from the U.S. (Lautner, April 18, 2002). A division of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is responsible for protecting and promoting U.S. agricultural health, administering the Animal Welfare Act, and carrying out wildlife damage management activities. Major programs within APHIS relating to disease are Veterinary Services (VS) and Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ). Veterinary Services protects and improves the health, quality, and marketability of animals, animal products and veterinary biologics by (i) preventing, controlling and/or eliminating animal diseases, and (ii) monitoring and promoting animal health and productivity. Among other activities, Veterinary Services conducts surveillance on national animal diseases, foreign animal diseases, emerging animal diseases, and invasive plant species. Most of Veterinary Services efforts are targeted at diseases on the Organization Internationale des Epizooties (OIE) "A" list or "B" list. The OIE is the international standard setting body for animal health and international trade. OIE categarizes animal diseases in two classes: "A" list (most serious) and "B" list (less serious). The "A" list contains transmissible diseases that have the potential for very serious and rapid spread, irrespective of national borders, are of serious socio-economic or public health consequence, and are of major importance in the international trade of animals and animal products. Diseases on the "A" list include the following: Foot and mouth disease; lumpy skin disease; bluetongue; African harse sickness; classical swine fever; vesicular stomatitis; rinderpest; contagious bovine pleuropneumonia; Rift Valley fever; sheep pox and goat pox; African swine fever; and highly pathogenic avian influenza. The `B" list diseases are transmissible diseases considered to be of socio-economic and/or public health importance within countries and are significant in the international trade of animals and animal products. This list currently includes over 100 diseases (Organization Internationale des Epizooties, January 9, 2003). The Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) program safeguards agriculture and natural resources from the risks associated with the entry, establishment, or spread of animal and plant pests and noxious weeds. Several thousand foreign plant and animal species have been established in the United States over the past 200 years, with approximately one in seven becoming invasive. An invasive species is an alien (i.e., non-native) species whose introduction does, or is likely to, cause harm to the economy, environment, or human health. Invasive plants, animals, and pathogens have often reduced the economic productivity and ecological integrity of agriculture, forestry, and other natural resources. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 58 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The Arizona Department of Agriculture (ADA) and Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) are primarily concerned with plant, livestock and wild animal diseases and infections. These agencies focus on diseases listed on the Office International des Epizooties (OIE) disease "A" list. The OIE develops standards and guidelines for use in protecting against incursions of diseases or pathogens during trade in animals and animal products. The ADA and the AGFD are concerned with animal-to- animal diseases, as well as diseases transmitted from animals or arthropod vectors to humans. As a part of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (Pima County, 2002), Pima County identified and characterized a list of invasive, non-native plant and animal species that require attention. In that report, Pima County's most serious invasive species problems were identified to be: • Invasive African and Mediterranean grasses that present severe fire hazards to the Sonoran Desert ecosystem that did not evolve with fire and cannot survive with intense fires. • Bullfrogs that eat native frogs, fish, snakes, and even bats and birds they catch flying over the water and cra�sh that devour other aquatic plant and animal life, leaving streams with little life other than crayfish and algae. • Saltcedar that invades riparian systems and displaces native plants while offering little benefit to most wildlife. • Africanized bees that threaten humans and animal life. Many other hazards, such as floods, earthquakes or droughts, may create conditions that signiftcantly increase the frequency and severity of diseases. These hazards can affect basic services (e.g., water supply and quality, wastewater disposal, electricity), the supply and quality of food, and the public and agricultural health system capacities. As a result, concentrations of diseases may result and grow rapidly, potentially leading to large losses of life and economic value. In addition, since the anthraac attacks following the terrorist attacks on September 1 l, 2001, the threat of terrorism using disease to infest humans, animals, or plants, is of growing concern. This is particularly true of those capable of disrupting the human or animal food chain. Historv In Pima County, there have been seven disaster declarations (Presidential, USDA, or Gubernatorial disaster or emergency declaration) due to disease, as shown in Tables 5-2 and 5-3. There were no identified fatalities or injuries associated with these events as recorded. Major infectious disease outbreaks in Pima County that affected humans and animals include the following: • In 1918 the Spanish influenza pandemic entered Arizona resulting in a great number of deaths, although the exact number is undocumented. • In 1952, large numbers of influenza cases were reported throughout Arizona, including Pima County, although no death statistics are available. • In 1975, a Rabies quarantine was issued for Pima County. • On May 18, 2002 the Arizona Game and Fish Deparhnent placed an emergency ban on the importation of live hoofed animals (e.g., deer and elk) into Arizona due to a fear of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). CWD is a disease closely related to "mad cow disease" in cattle and scrapie in domestic sheep and goats, but also affects deer and elk (Arizona Game and Fish). • On January 8, 2003, the Arizona Department of Agriculture issued an Administrative Order implementing procedures to prevent the introduction of Exotic Newcastle Disease (END) into Arizona. END is a contagious and fatal viral disease affecting domestic, wild, and caged poultry and birds, and is one of the most infectious diseases of poultry in the world. On February 5, 2003, Governor Napolitano dedared a state of emergency to contain END threatening Arizona's poultry. The US Secretary of Agriculture, Ann M. Veneman, signed declarations of extraordinary emergency with respect to END in Arizona on February 7, 2003 (United States Department of Agriculture, February 12, 2003). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 59 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Pima County has been subject to a number of major infestations, the largest of which is still affecting the state and region (pine bark beetle). Further details on these infestations are given below: • Exotic and imported ants are listed on the Arizona Department of Agriculture website as "Arizona's Most Unwanted Pest". Some people are allergic to the sting and in some cases may cause death. Fire ants are also known to out compete and drive away local native ants (Arizona Department of Agriculture). • Arizona periodically experiences major grasshopper infestations. Four infestations have resulted in State declarations of emergency in the last quarter century (Arizona Division of Emergency Management, March 6, 2003). • In 1996, a Karnal Bunt wheat plant disease disaster was declared. Other undeclared plant disease events include the citrus disease red scale in 1942 (Arizona Division of Emergency Management, March 6, 2003). • On May 22, 2003, Governor Janet Napolitano declared a State disaster and a state of emergency due to the ravages of the pine bark beetle on the state's farests. An estimated 2.5 million ponderosa pines and 4 million pinon pines were killed by the pine bark beetle in Arizona in 2002-2003. The last significant bark beetle outbreak in Arizona occurred from 1951 to 1956. The bark beetles are killing so many trees for two reasons, first the farest has too many trees and second the trees are very dry. Overcrowded forest conditions coupled with drought lead to the high probability of beetle attack. The forests of Arizona have been able to survive in relatively dry conditions because in past centuries low intensity fires helped to maintain a low density of trees in the forest. In the past century, however, fires have been controlled allowing many forested areas to become overcrowded (DeGomez, Apri123, 2003). Probabilitv and Ma�nitude The probability and magnitude of disease, particularly an epidemic, is difficult to evaluate due to the wide variation in disease characteristics, such as rate of spread, morbidity and mortality, detection and response time, and the availability of vaccines and other forms of prevention. A review of the historical record (see above) indicates that disease related disasters do occur in humans, animals, and plants with some regularity and severity. There is growing concern, however, about emerging infectious diseases as well as the possibility of a bioterrorism attack. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Disease CPRI results for each jurisdiction are summarized in Table 5-8 below. The wide variation in disease characteristics makes evaluation of the vulnerability of people, animals, and plants difficult to analyze. Preventable diseases and injuries are studied and vulnerability assessments have been made. However, a highly contagious and severe disease, such as smallpox or a new strain of influenza, could swiftly kill large numbers of people and incapacitate critical facilities (e.g. hospitals). Although the vulnerability to people, animals and plants is valuable and desirable information for emergency planning purposes, a vulnerability assessment of the healthcare infrastructure would be invaluable in assessing the ability of hospitals, public health deparhnents, clinics, urgent care centers and the like to ensure continued health care in all of Pima County should FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 60 Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 any one healthcare support system become inoperable or overwhelmed. Systems that should be included in a future vulnerability assessment study would include, but would not be limited to, local and outside pharmaceutical suppliers and their alternate sources, means of delivery, and timeframe; local laboratories and their alternate sources, means of delivery, and timeframe; general and specialized medical suppliers and their alternate sources, means of delivery and timeframe; and local military medical and hazardous materials support and possible alternate resources from the private sector to include means of delivery and timeframe. Likewise, an animal equivalent, such as foot-and-mouth disease, could result in the destruction of numerous animals and cause tremendous economic impacts. The Arizona Department of Agriculture has identified numerous systemic, administrative, or organizational vulnerabilities that currently affect disease prevention in Arizona. Some of the more compelling factors that influence these vulnerabilities in Pima County include the following: • Inspection services at all ports. No port has an animal inspector; most ports are manned by the Motor Vehicle Division and plant health inspection personnel who assist the Animal Services Division by visualizing animal health papers, without examining the animals. • Safeguarding the food supply by inspecting commercial trucks destined for areas both inside and outside Arizona's borders. • Continued observation of barder crossings for animals arriving from Mexico after their USDA inspection. • Create and enforce animal identification plan for cattle and horses in the United States. • Prevent the illegal smuggling of fighting birds, pet birds, and other poultry; as well as meat products. • The importation of shell eggs to the United States without USDA approval. • Biosecurity at Arizona dairies, feedlots, and poultry producers. Vulnerabilitv — Development Trends Population growth in the county will increase the amount of people exposed to disease. Development within the county may also increase the risk of introducing or propagating invasive species if not monitored and regulated. Pima County citizens have taken an active role in mitigating disease and invasive species through numerous public and private programs, and will continue to do so. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-9 summarizes the EVRI assessment for disease. Table 5-9: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for disease EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 Overall EVRI Score 0.85 Vulnerabilitv — Consequences/Imaacts Public — Pandemic and infectious diseases create a serious threat to public health as they may affect a large percentage of the population, regardless of health condition, age or location. These potentially hazardous conditions affect humans, domestic animals, and livestock (food supply). People who work with infected persons/populations (health care workers) are especially vulnerable and should take FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 61 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 precautions, such as, vaccination/inoculation, personal protective equipment (PPE), etc. Sickness and death may occur if proper precautions are not taken. Responders to the Incident — Emergency response personnel, workers and volunteers may be subject to potentially hazardous working conditions when working with people infected with pandemic and infectious disease. Emergency medical service, fire/rescue and law enforcement personnel must wear appropriate PPE. Such safety gear may make first responders susceptible to heat exhaustion or heat stroke when working in hot conditions and/or while performing strenuous activities. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — There is a serious threat to Pima County's ability to continue the functioning of government operations and services due to potential extensive absenteeism. Since pandemic and infectious disease may infect large numbers of the working, adult population, childcare for sick, school-aged children, who may not be permitted to attend school, may pose attendance issues far government employees. If employees stay home to care far their sick children, this also increases their exposure increasing vulnerability to infection. Emergency services may be affected due to absenteeism in the ranks of first responders. Environment — There is little potential for direct environmental impact by pandemic and infectious disease, unless the event results in a large number of decedents and dead animal carcasses to be disposed of. Temporary internment of human remains (per Pima County Mass Fatalities Plans) may be necessary as would be the mass disposal of animal remains. Environmental impact could potentially affect air quality, soil and water if proper planning protocols for storage, burial and/or disposal of human and animal remains are not adhered to. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Pima County government may be impacted financially by a pandemic and infectious disease event due to the expense of staffing emergency response and non-emergency, essential functions during high absenteeism and overtime costs associated with keeping well-personnel working to continue to provide necessary government services. Additionally, tourism, service industries, recreation/sports and agriculture will be affected. Impact is directly linked to magnitude and duration of the event. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — The confidence of Pima County residents in the governance offered in this matter of public health will remain high due to the various educational, prevention and treatment information and programs that have been offered to the public. Plans exist for the distribution and dispensing of inedical supplies and services to respond to an outbreak of pandemic and infectious disease. Pima County is well supported by state and federal assets which are pre- positioned for deployment in time of need. Each year as the flu season approaches, public health messages will continue to be provided to the region through extensive coverage in the TV/radio/print news media, public health clinics and social networks. Pima County residents will be notified of available mass prophylaxis, i.e. influenza vaccinations, by both public and private sources. Treatment will be accomplished through the public/private partnership between Pima County, the local media and private healthcare providers. Government employees will continue to be offered annual preventive treatment for pandemic influenza to increase their resistance to perceived and seasonal health threats as a proactive measure. The Pima County Health Department maintains active disease surveillance in conjunction with the Arizona Deparhnent of Health Services (ADHS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Sources• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Public Health Response. URL at: httn://www.cdc.�ov/ncidod/emergplan/summarv/summarypdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994, Addressing Emerging Infectious Disease Threats. URL at: ftn://ftp.cdc.eov/pub/infectious diseases/emergplan/pdf/emergplan.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. May 2, 1997, Facts About Disease Case Definitions. URL at: http://www.cdc.eov/od/oc/media/fact/cases.htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, October 1998, Preventing Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Strategy for the 21st Century. URL at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/emergplan/plan98.pdf FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 62 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, January 7, 2003, CDC Finds Annual Flu Deaths Higher Than Previously Estimated. URL at: http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressreUr030107.htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 2, 2003, Summary ofNotifiable Diseases, United States, 2001. URL at: http://www.cdaeov/mmwr/PDF/wWmm5053.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 8, 2003, CDC Confirms Nation's First Human Case of West Nile in 2003. URL at: http://www.cdaeov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r030708.htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 17, 2003, Update to SARS Case Definition Reduces US Cases by Half. URL at: http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressreUr030717a.htm Lautner, Beth, April 18, 2002, What is the National Health Emergency Management System (NEHMS)? URL at: http://aphisweb.aphis.usda.gov/vs/training/laumer.pdf Pima County, 2002, An Ir�vasive Species Management Program for Pima County, Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. URL at http://www.pima.$ov/cmo/sdcp/reports%SCd26%SC 136INVSP.PDF Profile Maps No profile maps provided. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 63 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 64 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.2 Drought Descrintion Drought is a normal part of virtually every climate on the planet, including areas of high and low rainfall. It is different from normal aridity, which is a permanent characteristic of the climate in areas of low rainfall. Drought is the result of a natural decline in the expected precipitation over an extended period of time, typically one or more seasons in length. The severity of drought can be aggravated by other climatic factors, such as prolonged high winds and low relative humidity (FEMA, 1997). Drought is a complex natural hazard which is reflected in the following four definitions commonly used to describe it: • Meteorological — drought is defined solely on the degree of dryness, expressed as a departure of actual precipitation from an expected average or normal amount based on monthly, seasonal, or annual time scales. • Hydrological — drought is related to the effects of precipitation shortfalls on streamflows and reservoir, lake, and groundwater levels. • Agricultural — drought is defined principally in terms of naturally occuning soil moisture deficiencies relative to water demands of plant life, usually arid crops. • Socioeconomic — drought associates the supply and demand of economic goods or services with elements of ineteorological, hydrologic, and agricultural drought. Socioeconomic drought occurs when the demand for water exceeds the supply as a result of weather-related supply shortfalL It may also be called a water management drought. A drought's severity depends on numerous factors, including duration, intensity, and geographic extent as well as regional water supply demands by humans and vegetation. Due to its multi-dimensional nature, drought is difficult to define in exact terms and also poses difficulties in terms of comprehensive risk assessments. Drought differs from other natural hazards in three ways. First, the onset and end of a drought are difficult to determine due to the slow accumulation and lingering effects of an event after its apparent end. Second, the lack of an exact and universally accepted definition adds to the confusion of its existence and severity. Third, in contrast with other natural hazards, the impact of drought is less obvious and may be spread over a larger geographic area. These characteristics have hindered the preparation of drought contingency or mitigation plans by many governments. The effects of drought increase with duration as more moisture-related activities are impacted. Non- irrigated croplands are most susceptible to precipitation shortages. Rangeland and irrigated agricultural crops many not respond to moisture shortage as rapidly, but yields during periods of drought can be substantially affected. During periods of severe drought, lower moisture in plant and forest fuels create an increased potential for devastating wildfires. In addition, lakes, reservoirs, and rivers can be subject to water shortages that impact recreational opportunities, irrigated crops, and availability of water supplies for activities such as fire suppression and human consumption, and natural habitats of animals. Socioeconomic effects include higher unemployment and lower land values. Insect infestation can also be particularly damaging impact from severe drought conditions. Historv Arizona has experienced 17 droughts declared as drought disasters/emergencies and 93 drought events (droughts affecting multiple years are recarded as a distinct event for each year affected). Figures 5-1 and 5-2 depict the most recent precipitation data from NCDC regarding average statewide precipitation variances from normal. Between 1849 and 1905, the most prolonged period of drought conditions in 300 years occurred in Arizona (Jacobs, 2003). Another prolonged drought occurred during the period of 1941 to 1965. The period from 1979-1983 appears to have been anomalously wet, while the rest of the historical records shows that dry conditions are most likely the normal condition for Arizona. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 65 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Between 1998 and 2008, there have been more months with below normal precipitation than months with above normal precipitation. �5 �� ���� 50 � �� v� � 4 �».�,����* � 2$ � YBar Natio�al Cima�c Dam C�nter! NESOIS / NOAA O '� ! Aeoys Alormd ! Babw fJ�nd •—• ppmd ,� Figure 5-2: Average statewide precipitation variances from a normal based on 1998-2009 period FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 66 r'igure 5-1: Average statewide precipitation variances from a normal based on 1971-2000 period. ARIZONA Staitewide Precipitation Mormal & Departure: Jan 1998 to Sep 2009 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Probabilitv and Ma�nitude There is no commonly accepted return period or non-exceedance probability for defining the risk from drought (such as the 100-year or 1% annual chance of flood). The magnitude of drought is usually measured in time and the severity of the hydrologic deficit. There are several resources available to evaluate drought status and even project expected conditions for the very near future. The National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-430) prescribes an interagency approach for drought monitoring, forecasting, and early warning (NIDIS, 2007). The NIDIS maintains the U.S. Drought Portal�� which is a centralized, web-based access point to several drought related resources including the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) and the U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook (USSDO). The USDM, shown in Figure 5-3, is a weekly map depicting the current status of drought and is developed and maintained by the National Drought Mitigation Center. The USSDO, shown in Figure 5-4, is a six month projection of potential drought conditions developed by the National Weather Service's Climate Prediction Center. The primary indicators for these maps for the Western U.S. are the Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index and the 60-month Palmer Z-index. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PSDI) is a commonly used index that measures the severity of drought for agriculture and water resource management. It is calculated from observed temperature and precipitation values and estimates soil moisture. However, the Palmer Index is not considered to be consistent enough to characterize the risk of drought on a nationwide basis (FEMA, 1997) and neither of the Palmer indices are well suited to the dry, mountainous western United States. Figure 5-3: U.S. Drought Monitor Map for October 11, 2011 17 NIDIS U.S. Drought Portal website is located at: http://www.drou�¢ov/oortaUserver.pdcommunitv/drou� ovg /202 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 67 Source: http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 U.S. �*��nai Dr OU� ht Outlook °� � �a�ndenc�y 6t�r� � V�iid Perioi! � ' VsFd O�o�r b- aer�oab�ar 3l,1�Df 1 ' - �'�, O�cta�b�r � 2D'!'I ,,,, "�. . } � . .+�+ i� �ht � a ,� � K�Y: � o�� �t� � � °'o,.�'c �.�, �. � � � � � ��R � �� � „�,�... E�7 � ��" - t�p�ols �g�ae rrieac � on qera�o � � s�E- s� :r.��gtarega �t arq GMew�nka� m�c �e! � — ar�+� ra�a�a smm� — cas�rt de amur�a�etry ��e in� a� a� t� a�a►at. uee c�uuo�, �ir �i�a�x —� aa oopa —t� � me al�aed!mp s� ere�. � eJoou�t u�eer� aee�u S. �gr��r. ��e g�a.'i �pe�s� as�s ��ey �t � a y-,ra�egoq 1rt m�e t]raugtit rieenmr �aaa�. �n ao r�rt �' �u e� Source: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/expert_assessmenUseasonal_drought.html Figure 5-4: U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook, October to December, 2011 In 2003, Governor Janet Napolitano created the Arizona Drought Task Force (ADTF), led by ADWR, which developed a statewide drought plan. The plan includes criteria for determining both short and long-term drought status for each of the 15 major watersheds in the state using assessments that are based on precipitation and stream flow. The plan also provides the framework for an interagency group which reports to the governor on drought status, in addition to local drought impact groups in each county and the State Drought Monitoring Technical Committee. Twice a year this interagency group reports to the governor on the drought status and the potentiai need for drought declarations. The counties use the monthly drought status reports to implement drought actions within their drought plans. The State Drought Monitoring Technical Committee defers to the USDM for the short-term drought status and uses a combination of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), evaporation and streamflow for the long-term drought status. Figures 5-5 and 5-6, present the most current short and long term maps available for Arizona as of the writing of this plan. The cunent drought maps are in general agreement that Pima County is currently experiencing a abnormally dry to extreme drought condition for the short term and in a moderate drought condition for the long term. Figure 5-4 indicates that the drought conditions are projected to persist or intensify for Pima County over the next few months. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 68 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 U. S. Drt�c�l��t# IUf+D�rltc?r �Af�ZOrt� � r� c� � c.e� � s�.�� ��.�t � s2.e1 ��s��2 ��.za �cw� o.ai e�ss s�.� <2.$� t�.� �,sr rOror2m, inr.) 3� 11ga 12.T8 87.22 60.% 3lt20 15.� 4.83 107t'I240i� maRF � vaa► a1:40 68,SQ 32.45 O.QD 0,04 O.OQ o,a� I�.ea I se�.7� I a.et I 15,34 I 1,sr i��� I�a.00 I eo.ao � 1e,sa I�.� I�,ua I a,00 �, on�on � �j�+•�� "; .`. nf t1�u5�Mt- Yod�ea � os �t • Ea�planal . ��• � TIt@ (?fGfl�hll�pili�pf �S 01R Gp�p�RS. � GOl►f�OfLB /lh4r Vd►Jl. �'� �GGGV1�pifl� Ap9N �J1rlpl�ilj+ �tsl' �3f http:!ldr�o�iEot.unl.rdu Clctober 1 i, 2011 Yaid T a.ar. iE'�T � �r�r �.wc�rr.or+r . �iN��jl, QCIO�M'/�. �l'� Source: http://www.adwr.state.az.us/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/Drought/DroughtStatusMonitorPU.htm Figure 5-5: Arizona short term drought status map for August 2009 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 69 Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Drought CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-10 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 ... . . . F e . . � �� .� � � _.-. CAP�►vueciuc� �U�� ��'� � �.,,.Uri� fi@TIl"! Drought St�tu� Uata Thr+a� Jwr� 3Qth, 201 t � � l��n� D�ought Pr�paredr�ss P�+n IVlonitanng Techn�ca� �ommi�e •���.m�,�..��. �����w.������������ �� Source: ADWR, 2010, Arizona Drought Monitor Report - January 20L0 Figure 5-6: Arizona long term drought status map for July 2011 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 70 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations No standardized methodology exists for estimating losses due to drought and drought does not generally have a direct impact on critical and non-critical facilities and building stock, except perhaps water supply systems. A direct correlation to loss of human life due to drought is improbable for Pima County. Instead, drought vulnerability is primarily measured by its potential impact to certain sectors of the County economy and natural resources including: • Crop and livestock agriculture • Municipal and industrial water supply • Recreation/tourism • Wildlife and wildlife habitat Sustained drought conditions will also have secondary impacts to other hazards such as fissures, flooding, subsidence and wildfire. Extended drought may weaken and dry the grasses, shrubs, and trees of wildfire areas, making them more susceptible to ignition. Drought also tends to reduce the vegetative cover in watersheds, and hence decrease the interception of rainfall and increase the flooding hazard. Subsidence and fissure conditions are aggravated when lean surface water supplies force the pumping of more groundwater to supply the demand without the benefit of recharge from normal rainfall. According to the 2010 annual report of the Pima County Local Drought Impact Group, the following drought impacts were noted: • At Cienega Creek, groundwater levels in three wells have dropped as much in the last year as they have in the last 15 years. Stream reaches are also shorter and the surface water volume is lower. • Despite the warm, wetter summer weather patterns in eastern Pima County, water utilities continue to see a change in the peak high demand day. Usually occurring in mid- to late-June, the peak high water use day occurred in August and the peak was lower than in previous years. • For ranchers, impacts to stock ponds and grasses continue to indicate drought conditions. From 1995 to 2010, Pima County farmers and ranchers received $1.6 million in disaster related assistance funding from the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) for crop and livestock damages (EWG, 2011). Over $1.3 million of those funds were received during the time period of 2000 to 2005, which corresponds to the most severe period of the current drought cycle for Pima County. Other direct costs such as increased pumping costs due to lowering of groundwater levels and costs to expand water infrastructure to compensate for reduced yields or to develop alternative water sources, are a significant factor but very difficult to estimate due to a lack of documentation. There are also the intangible costs associated with lost tourism revenues, and impacts to wildlife habitat and animals. Typically, these impacts are translated into the general economy in the form of higher food and agricultural goods prices and increased utility costs. Vulnerabilitv — Development Trends Population growth in Pima County will also reGuire additional surface and ground water to meet the thirsty demands of potable, landscape, agricultural, and industrial uses. It is unlikely that significant growth will occur in the ranching and farming sectors given the current constraints on water rights, grazing rights, and available range land. Pima County maintains a drought management website with drought related information and updates, and also facilitates the Pima County Local Drought Impact Group (LDIG), which is comprised of water providers and local, state, and federal agencies. Pima County has also developed a Drought Response Plan and Water Wasting Ordinance '$ that is administered and enforced through the Pima County Health Department for unincorporated areas of the county. 18 A copy can be seen at: httn://www.nima.gov/drou�?ht/PDFs/Drou�ht Ordinance.pdf FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 71 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Drought planning should be a critical component of any domestic water system expansions or land development planning. The ADTF is also working cooperatively with water providers within the State to develop System Water Plans that are comprised of three components: • Water Supply Plan — describes the service area, transmission facilities, monthly system production data, histaric demand for the past five years, and projected demands for the next five, 10 and 20 years. • Drought Preparedness Plan — includes drought and emergency response strategies, a plan of action to respond to water shortage conditions, and provisions to educate and inform the public. • Water Conservation Plan — addresses measures to control lost and unaccounted for water, considers water rate structures that encourage efficient use of water, and plans for public information and education programs on water conservation. The following are the major water providers that operate within Pima County and have developed System Water Plans with specific recommendations and requirements during times of drought: • Tucson Water • Marana • Metro Water • Flowing Wells Irrigation District • Oro Valley • Community Water Company of Green Valley Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-11 summarizes the EVRI assessment for drought. Table 5-11: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for drought EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Limited > 6 months 1.45 SOIL Unlikel Limited > 6 months 1.45 Overall EVRI Score 1.25 Vulnerabilitv — Conseauences/Imnacts Public — There is little direct environmental impact to public safety and health due to the existence of drought conditions. Indirect impacts are more likely and are typically seen in the form of damage to the environment which could impact agriculture, food supply and the economy. Responders to the Incident — Drought is not the type of situation that typically requires an incident response element so there is little impact on them due to environmental factors. Continuity of Operations / Delivery of Services — There is little threat to Pima Counry's ability to continue the functions of government operations and services. Environment—Drought results in conditions which are conducive to fires by creating ample fuel in the form of dry grasses and trees. Drought may cause an increase in flooding potential with less ground vegetation to intercept rainfall and impedes the absorption of water into the ground to recharge the aquifer. Subsidence may be a secondary effect of drought as increases in ground water pumping exacerbate subsidence. Econoinic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Pima County's economy could be negatively impacted by drought in several ways. Agriculture: crop losses and increased irrigation costs may result in food supply shortages and higher food costs. Loss of revenue from recreational/tourism activities FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 72 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 related to or dependent upon water resources, such as, golfing, fishing, boating, or hunting. Higher feed and water costs associated with livestock production may result in a reduction in the food supply and higher food costs. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Drought planning has been an on-going effort in Pima County and the State of Arizona. Pima County's Emergency Response and Recovery Plan (ERRP) has a Drought Annex which will guide emergency response to any drought emergency. The ERRP supports the Arizona State Emergency Response and Recovery Plan (AzSERRP) and the Arizona Drought Preparedness Plan (ADPR). Sources Arizona Department of Water Resources, 2010, Arizona Drought Monitor Report - January 2010 Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2009, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update, DRAFT. Environmental Working Group's Farm Subsidy Database, 2011, http://farm.ewe.orgpro d� etait•php?fips=04019&progcode- dis&vr=mtotal Federal Emergency Management Agency,1997, Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment — A Cornerstone of the National Mitigation Strategy. Jacobs, Katharine and Morehouse, Barbara. June 11-13, 2003. "Improved Drought Planning for Arizona," from Conference on Water, Climate, and Uncertainty: Implications for Western Water Law, Policy and Management http://www.water.az.eov/gdtf/contendfiles/06262003/Improved Droueht Plannin�for AZ 6- 17.pdf National Integrated Drought Information System, 2007, National Integrated Drought Information System Implementation Plan, NOAA. NIDIS U.S. Drought Portal website is located at: http://www.droueht. gov/portal/server.pUcommun ity/droueht.gov/202 NOAA, NWS, Climate Prediction Center, 2010, website located at: http://www.cpc.ncen.noaa.eov/products/expert assessment/seasonal drought.html Pima County, 2011, Drought Management Website: http://www.�ma.gov/drought/index.html Profile Maps - No profile maps are provided. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 73 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 74 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.3 Earthquake Description An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain within or along the edge of the Earth's tectonic plates. These rigid tectonic plates, some 50 to 60 miles thick, move slowly and continuously over the earth's interior, where they move away, past or under each other at rates varying from less than a fraction of an inch up to five inches per year. While this sounds small, at a rate of two inches per year, a distance of 30 miles would be covered in approximately one million years (FEMA, 1997). T'he tectonic plates continually bump, slide, catch, and hold as they move past each other which causes stress that accumulates along faults. When this stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, an earthquake occurs, immediately causing sudden ground motion and shaking. Secondary hazards may also occur, such as surface fault ruptures, ground failure, and tsunamis. While the majority of earthquakes occur near the edges of the tectonic plates, earthquakes may also occur in the interior of plates. Ground motion is the vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake caused by the radiation of seismic waves. The severity of vibration generally increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter of the earthquake. Additional factors, such as soft soils, can further amplify ground motions. Ground motion causes waves in the earth's interior, also known as seismic waves, and along the earth's surface, known as surface waves. Seismic waves include P(primary) waves and S(secondary) waves described as follows: P(primary) waves are longitudinal or compressional waves similar in character to sound waves that cause back-and-forth oscillation along the direction of travel (vertical motion), with particle motion in the same direction as wave travel. They move through the earth at approximately 15,000 mph. S(secondary) waves, also known as shear waves, are slower than P waves and cause structures to vibrate from side-to-side (horizontal motion) due to particle motion at right-angles to the direction of wave travel. Unreinforced buildings are more easily damaged by S waves. Surface waves include Raleigh waves and Love waves. These waves travel more slowly and typically are significantly less damaging than seismic waves. Seismic activity is commonly described in terms of magnitude and intensity. Magnitude (M) describes the total energy released and intensity (I) subjectively describes the effects at a particular location. Although an earthquake has only one magnitude, its intensity varies by location. Magnitude is the measure of the amplitude of the seismic wave and is expressed by the Richter scale. The Richter scale is a logarithmic measurement, where an increase in the scale by one whole number represents a tenfold increase in measured amplitude of the earthquake. Intensity is a measure of how strong the shock is felt at a particular location, expressed by the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale. Another way of expressing an earthquake's severity is to compare its acceleration to the normal acceleration due to gravity. If an object is dropped while standing on the surface of the earth (ignoring wind resistance), it will fall towards earth and accelerate faster and faster until reaching terminal velocity. The acceleration due to gravity is often called "g" and is equal to 9.8 meters per second squared (980 cm/sec/sec). This means that every second something falls towards earth, it's velocity increases by 9.8 meters per second. Peak ground acceleration (PGA) measures the rate of change of motion relative to the rate of acceleration due to gravity. For example, acceleration of the ground surface of 244 cm/sec/sec equals a PGA of 25.0 percent. It is possible to approximate the relationship between PGA, the Richter scale, and the MMI, as shown in Table 5-12. The relationships are, at best, approximate, and also depend upon such specifics as the distance from the epicenter and depth of the epicenter. An earthquake with 10.0 percent PGA would roughly correspond to an MMI intensity of V or VI, described as being felt by everyone, overturning unstable objects, or moving heavy furniture. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 75 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-12: Earthquake PGA, magnitude and intensity comparison PGA Magnitude Intensity % Richter MMI Descri tion MMI <0.17 1.0 - 3.0 I I. Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions. II. Felt only by a few persons at best, especially on upper floors of buildings. 0.17 — 1.4 3.0 - 3.9 II - III III. Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck. Duration estimated. IV. Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motorcars rock 1.4 - 9.2 4.0 - 49 IV - V noticeably. V. Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable ob'ects overturned. Pendulum clocks ma sto . VI. Felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight. 9.2 — 34 5.0 - 5.9 VI - VII VIL Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable damage in oorl built or badl desi ned structures; some chimne s broken. VIII. Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, 34 - 124 6.0 - 6.9 VII - IX monuments, and walls. Heavy furniture overturned. IX. Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildin s, with artial colla se. Buildin s shifted off foundations. X. Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent. >124 7.0 and higher X ar XI. Few, if any (masonry) structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. higher Rails bent greatly. XII. Damage total. Lines of sight and level are distorted. Objects thrown into the air. Jource: W alct, cluitor►ano, Heaton, and Kanamori, 1999. One of the secondary hazards from earthquakes is surface faulting, the differential movement of two sides of a fault at the earth's surface. Linear structures built across active surface faults, such as railways, highways, pipelines, and tunnels, are at high risk to damage from earthquakes. Displacement along faults, both in terms of length and width, varies but can be significant (e.g., up to 20 feet), as can the length of the surface rupture (e.g., up to 200 miles). Earthquake-related ground failure, due to liquefaction, is another secondary hazard. Liquefaction occurs when seismic waves pass through saturated granular soil, distorting its granular structure, and causing some of the empty spaces between granules to collapse. Pore-water pressure may also increase sufficiently to cause the soil to behave like a fluid (rather than a soil) for a brief period, causing FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 76 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 deformations. Liquefaction causes lateral spreads (horizontal movement commonly 10-15 feet, but up to 100 feet), flow failures (massive flows of soil, typically hundreds of feet, but up to 12 miles), and loss of bearing strength (soil deformations causing structures to settle or tip). Historv Seismic activity occurs on a regular basis throughout the State of Arizona, although most go undetected. Although rare, damaging earthquakes impacting Pima County have been recorded in the past as follows: • The earliest recorded earthquake affecting Arizona, and possibly the largest, occurred in 1830. With an estimated Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) of IX recorded at San Pedro, AZ, approximately 25 miles west of Tucson, the earthquake would have caused massive damage to built structures (ADEM, March 1998). In 1887, the Sonoran earthquake caused significant destruction in southern Arizona towns, including Tucson, and was one of the largest earthquakes in North American history. The earthquake was caused by the reactivation of a basin and range normal fault that is similar to other faults in Arizona (DuBois & Smith, 1980). The epicenter was located approximately 100 miles south of Douglas, Arizona, along the Pitaycachi fault in Mexico, and caused great destruction at its epicenter. The earthquake was so large that it was felt from Guaymas, Mexico to Albuquerque, New Mexico. It is estimated variously to have been an intensity VII and magnitude 7.2 earthquake. In Arizona, water in tanks spilled over, buildings cracked, chimneys toppled, and railroad cars were set in motion. An observer at Tombstone, near the Mexican border, reported sounds "like prolonged artillery fire° (ADEM, March 1998; Bausch & Brumbaugh, May 23, 1994; USGS, Sept. 12, 2003; Univ of AZ). With the increase in development, if such an earthquake occurred today it would cause extensive damage in southeastern Arizona (Jenny & Reynolds, 1989). Proba bilitv/Ma�nitude Probabilistic ground motion maps are typically used to assess the magnitude and frequency of seismic events. These maps estimate the probability of exceeding a certain ground motion, expressed as peak ground acceleration (PGA), over a specified period of years. For example, Figure 5-7 displays the probability of exceeding a certain ground motion, expressed as PGA, in 50 years in the Western United States. This is a common earthquake measurement that shows three things: the geographic area affected (colored areas on map below); the probability of an earthquake of each level of severity (e.g., 2% chance in 50 years); and the severity (PGA) as indicated by color. Note that Figure 5-7 expresses a 2% probability of exceedance and, therefore, there is a 98% chance that the peak ground acceleration displayed will not be exceeded during 50 years. The use of a 50-year return period is based on statistical significance and does not imply that the structures are thought to have a useful life of only 50 years. Similar maps exist for other measures of acceleration, probabilities, and time periods. It is useful to note that according to the USGS, a PGA of approximately 10% gravity (0.10 g) is the approximate threshold of damage to older (pre-1965) dwellings or dwellings not made resistant to earthquakes. The 0.10 g measure was chosen because, on average, it corresponds to the MMI VI to VII levels of threshold damage in California within 25 km of an earthquake epicenter. Figure 5-8 provides a more detailed view of the 2 percent, 50-year PGA map for Pima County. As demonstrated by this map, the central portion of Pima County has a PGA that ranges between 0.06g and O.IOg. The eastern third of the county is within the O.lOg to 0.12g range. T'he western portionof the county ranges from 0.08g to 0.16g with the highest PGA values occurring along the Yuma County and Mexico border. Overall, PGA values for Pima County are low in comparison with other counties within the State, and especially in areas of high population. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 77 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 o�uicc. vov�, �vvo Figure 5-7: Peak ground acceleration map for a 2% chance in 50 years recurrence Figure 5-8: Pima County PGA map for a 2% chance in 50 years recurrence FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 78 Source: USGS, 2008; JEF, 2011 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 In general, the risk of seismic hazard in the urbanized portions of Pima County are relatively low; however, denser populations, existence of high rise buildings, existence of unreinforced masonty buildings, and the lack of earthquake awareness among its population elevate the risks associated with seismic activity. The rate of seismicity in Pima County has historically been low, with the area's most recent quakes originating in San Luis in 1976 (M 6) and Baja, Mexico in 2010 (M 7.2). The largest impact of an earthquake on the metropolitan area would be the economic impact from a catastrophic southern California earthquake, which would disrupt approximately 60 percent of Arizona's fuel and 90 percent of Arizona's food goods. The Tucson metropolitan area could also be significantly affected by a major quake in the Yuma or Northern Arizona Seismic Belt (NASB). A repeat of the 1887 earthquake would result in significant damage to Arizona's population centers, particularly where development is located on alluvial plains and steep slopes. It should also be noted that although the small earthquakes occurring in Pima County are of low seismic risk to buildings, the repeated shaking could eventually cause structural damage. In unstable areas, small earthquakes may also trigger landslides and boulders rolling off mountain slopes (Jenny and Reynolds, 1989). Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The 2007 Plan estimated seismic related losses to general residential and commercial buildings using the HAZUS-MH� program. As of the writing of this Plan, the HAZUS-MH� database has not been updated to reflect the 2010 Census data and is therefore unchanged since the 2007 Plan analyses were performed. Accordingly, the 2007 Plan residential and commercial loss estimates for earthquake will be carried forward with this Plan for the next 5 year cycle. By the end of that period, FEMA will have updated the HAZUS database to reflect current building counts. It is noted that all residential and commercial loss estimates are determined using the HAZUS database, which is based on 2000 Census data. The critical facility and population exposure estimates will reflect the 2010 Census information and the . The earthquake hazard assessment utilized the HAZUS-MH software model including the following data: 100-, 250-, 500-, 750-, 1000-,1500-, 2000-, and 2500- year return period USGS probabilistic hazards. Developed for FEMA by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), HAZLTS-MH integrates earthquake hazard modeling with GIS technology to determine the following annualized loss estimates for each jurisdiction: The aggregated population at risk at the census block level, The aggregated exposure and building count at the census block level for residential and commercial occupancies, and, The critical infrastructure at risk. The earthquake risk assessment performed for Pima County did not explore the potential for collateral hazards such as liquefaction or landslide. However, losses associated with these ground failures would have been negligible given the level of shaking expected for Pima County (i.e., not enough strong shaking to trigger significant ground failure). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 79 Earthquake CPRI results for each jurisdiction are summarized in Table 5-13 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The annualized loss estimates developed represent the average of all eight of the modeled return periods (100-year through 2,500-year events). Table 5-14 provides a breakdown of potential exposure and losses due to annualized earthquake events by jurisdiction. Approximately 980,263 people may be at risk from earthquake hazards within Pima County. Annualized losses associated with earthquakes in Pima County may be expected to cause $3.1 million in damage to residential buildings and $310,000 in damage to commercial buildings. These anticipated losses are expected to equate to a counTywide loss-to-exposure ratio of less than 0.0007. The largest potential annualized losses to jurisdictions in Pima County include the City of Tucson and the unincorporated portions of Pima County. Together these jurisdictions account for $2.6 million in residential losses and $273,000 in commercial losses equating to 84 percent and 88 percent respectively of the total losses countywide. Table 5-14: Potential exposure and loss from earthquake hazard Residential Commercial From 2007 Plan From 2007 Plan Critical Facilities Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential Exposed Building Loss Exposure Loss Building Loss Exposure Loss Facility Exposure Jurisdiction Po ulation Count x$1000 x$1000 Ratio Count x$1000 x$1000 Ratio Count x$1000 Marana 34,961 5,525 $130 $805,901 .00016 60 $8 $108,214 .00007 272 $765,099 Oro Valley 41,011 13,920 $170 $2,350,794 .00007 26 $7 $58,925 .00012 68 $395,165 Pascua Yaqui Tribe 3,745 646 $5 $46,231 .00011 2 Negligible $2,308 .00022 16 $311,366 Sahuarita 25,259 1,290 $64 $188,135 .00034 9 $3 $18,133 .00017 76 $278,952 South Tucson 5,652 1,161 $31 $201,073 .00015 21 Negligible $39,180 .00001 19 $48,227 Tohono O'odham 9,051 2,541 $86 $291,786 .00030 14 $14 $29,234 .00048 108 $234,840 Tucson 520,116 135,602 $1,408 $23,218,546 .00006 1,682 $179 $3,267,100 .00006 1,625 $6,467,814 Unincorporated 340,468 116,590 $1,256 $16,064,814 .00008 441 $94 $975,375 .00010 1,302 $3,449,956 Total 980,263 277,275 $3,150 $43,167,280 .00007 2,255 $310 $4,498,469 .00007 3,486 $11,951,419 Vulnerabilitv - Development Trends In general, the earthquake risk in the identified growth areas of the Pima County jurisdictions is at the barderline of the 10% g PGA, which as previously stated, is the approximate threshold of damage for older (pre-1965) dwellings or dwellings not made resistant to earthquakes. The Throughout the county, new development is typically regulated to be in compliance with current building codes that will provide for more stable seismic designs of new construction. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 80 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-15 summarizes the EVRI assessment for earthquake. EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of 1VIagnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 Overall EVRI Score 0.85 Vulnerabilitv — Consequences/Imnacts Since there have been no recent earthquakes of significance in Pima County, this is considered to be a lower priority threat. There were two powerful documented earthquakes which occurred in the 1800's, one which was centered 25 miles east of Tucson and another centered in Mexico (See hazard profile). Had either of these occurred in the now heavily populated and developed Tucson/Pima County metro area, the resulting damage and injury could have been markedly more severe. The Tucson/Pima County metro area has buried utilities (electric, natural gas, fuel), water and sewer lines, and ground transportation routes (vehicular, rail) and thoroughfares that, if compromised, could negatively impact local, interstate and international transportation and have economic impact far beyond the local area. Public — Earthquakes pose a threat to the public both directly and indirectly. The effects may be more pronounced in the developed areas of Pima County as compared to rural communities. It will be important to make sure that isolated communities are included and prioritized in any response and recovery efforts. Responders to the Incident — Response to damage areas is likely to be made more difficult by earthquake damage and may be complicated by aftershocks. Responders may face challenges due to unfamiliarity with earthquake response because of low frequency of exposure such conditions. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — Actual earthquake damage may occur in widespread areas and especially those more vulnerable to seismic shifting, such as, the downtown area due to its multi-story buildings. If this downtown area were to suffer damage, it could result in the loss of vital government services as much of the downtown office space is local, county, state and federal government. The loss of utilities, water/sewer, communications, transportation and other critical infrastructure and services could significantly impact community disaster resilience, emergency response activities and both short and long-term recovery. Environment — It is not anticipated that there will be a significant impact on the environment unless there are fires or releases of hazardous materials. Ground shaking may result in damage in the form of surface rupture and liquefaction causing subsidence or sink holes. Economic /Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Though the threat of earthquake is considered to be relatively low based on historical data, the local and regional economy may be impacted as the population of the greater Pima County/Tucson area is now over 1 million. It is likely that jobs may be lost as businesses are damaged and may not recover. Damage to critical infrastructure may impede recovery efforts. If transportation routes are damaged food and other consumable goods may not be deliverable and, if utilities are interrupted, food supplies may spoil creating further hardships for the community. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Speed of emergency response, efficiency and communication are critical to maintaining public confidence during and after any emergency or disaster. The effects of earthquake are destructive and disruptive to jurisdictions and aftershocks may continue after the immediate quake has passed. Power outages are likely and travel may be hindered due to damage, debris and blocked roads. Sharing information and details with the public about a FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 81 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 power outage, for instance (damaged or complete loss of equipment as opposed to simple repair) allows residents to better understand why it may take an excessive amount of time before power and services are restored. Keeping the public well informed as to the extent of damage, status of repairs and providing realistic expectations may have a positive impact on the public's confidence level. Lack of communication can be mistaken for lack of action, resulting in frustration, anger, and unrest. Sources Arizona Earthquake Information Center. Northern Arizona Universities seismic network: httn://www4.nau.edu/�eolo�v/aeic/aeic.html Arizona Integrated Seismic Network. Eight broadband seismometer — see http://www.azgs.az.�ov/fema award.shtml for locations and access to daily records. Beyer, Scott, and Pearthree, P.A., 1994, Bibliography of earthquake hazards in Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-03, 44 p. DuBois, S.M., and Smith, A.W., 1980, The 1887 earthquake in San Bernardino Valley, Sonora; historic accounts and intensity patterns in Arizona: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Special Paper no. 3, 112 p. DuBois, S.M., Smith, A.W., Nye, N.K., and Nowak, T.A., Jr., 1982, Arizona earthquakes, 1776-1980: Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Bulletin 193, 456 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:1,000,000. Geologic Map of Arizona. 2000, Product of the Arizona Geological Survey, Online at: http://www.azes.az.gov/services azgeomap.shtml Pearthree, P.A., and Calvo, S.S., 1987, The Santa Rita fault zone: Evidence for large magnitude earthquakes with very long recurrence intervals in the Basin and Range province of southeastern Arizona: Seismological Sociery of America, Bulletin, v. 77, no. 1, p. 97-116. Earthquake Hazards Program, 2009, US Geological Survey online at: http://earthquake. uses. gov/hazards/nroducts/conterm inous/ P.A. Pearthree and D.B. Bausch, 1999, Earthquake hazards in Arizona: AZGS Map 34, text and map, scale 1:1,000,000. � P.A. Pearthree, compiler, 1998, Quaternary fault data and map for Arizona: AZGS OpenFile Report 9824, 122 p., scale 1:750,000, 1 disk. P.A. Pearthree and others, 1996, PlioQuaternary faulting and seismic hazard in the Flagstaff area, northern Arizona: AZGS Bulletin 200, 40 p., 2 sheets, scale 1:50,000 and 1:100,000. D.B. Bausch and D.S. Brumbaugh, 1994, Seismic hazards in Arizona: Flagstaff, AZ Earthquake Information Center, 49 p., 2 sheets, scale 1:1,000,000. S.M. DuBois and others, 1982, Arizona earthquakes: AZGS Bulletin 193, 456 p., scale 1:1,000,000. DuBois/A.W. Smith, 1980, The 1887 earthquake in San Bernardino valley, Sonora: Historic accounts & intensity patterns in AZ: AZGS Special Paper 3, 112 p. Arizona State University, May 26, 2003."Earthquake information for the State of Arizona & the world." http://activetectonics.la.asu.edu/e-auakes/ Bausch, Douglas B. and David S. Brumbaugh, May 23, 1994. Seismic Hazards in Arizona —Arizona Ground Shaking Intensity & 100 yr Acceleration Contour Maps, Online at: .http://www4.nau.edu/ eg olo�v/aeic/stateren.t�ct Jenny, J.P, and S.J. Reynolds, 1989. "Geologic Evolution of Arizona" in Arizona Geological Society Digest, No. 17. Petersen, Mark D., Frankel, Arthur D., Harmsen, Stephen C., Mueller, Charles S., Haller, Kathleen M., Wheeler, Russell L., Wesson, Robert L., Zeng, Yuehua, Boyd, Oliver S., Perkins, David M., Luco, Nicolas, Field, Edward H., Wills, Chris J., and Rukstales, Kenneth S., 2008, Documentation for FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 82 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128, 61 p. US Geological Survey (USGS): • February 7, 2003, "Definition of %g — What is the relation to Building Damage?" http://geohazards.cr.usgs. eov/ea/faqparm02.htm1 • September 12, 2003, "Earthquake History of Arizona." http://wwwneiacr.uses.gov/neis/states/arizona/arizona historv.html Wald, David J., Vincent Quitoriano, Thomas H. Heaton and Hiro Kanamori,1999. "Relationship between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Motion and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California" in Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 15, No. 3, 557-564. httn://nasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/pubs/re reg ss/regress.html Profile Maos No Profile Maps provided FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 83 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 84 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.4 Extreme Temperature Descriution Extreme temperatures on either the cold or hot side of the thermometer can occur within any area and can often have adverse impacts on the health and welfare of a community or region. These extreme temperatures can impact people, pets, plants and infrastructure such as power lines and above and below-ground pipes throughout the area. Extreme heat is the combination of very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions that exceed regionally based indices for perceived risk. According to the National Weather Service, heat is the leading weather-related killer in the United States and has killed more people than lightning, tornadoes, floods and hurricanes combined in the last 10 years. The major human risks associated with extreme heat are as follows: • Heat Cramns: May occur in people unaccustomed to exercising in the heat and generally ceases to be a problem after acclimatization. • Heat Svnco�e: This refers to sudden loss of consciousness and is typically associated with people exercising who are not acclimated to warm temperatures. Causes little or no harm to the individual. • Heat Exhaustion: While much less serious than heatstroke, heat exhaustion victims may complain of dizziness, weakness, or fatigue. Body temperatures may be normal or slightly to moderately elevated. The prognosis is usually good with fluid treatment. • Heatstroke: Considered a medical emergency, heatstroke is often fataL It occurs when the body's responses to heat stress are insufficient to prevent a substantial rise in the body's core temperature. While no standard diagnosis exists, a medical heatstroke condition is usually diagnosed when the body's temperatare exceeds 105°F due to environmental temperatures. Rapid cooling is necessary to prevent death, with an average fatality rate of 15% even with treatment. Extreme cold is normally associated with northern climates and regions, but in reality is much like extreme heat in that it is relative to what is considered normal cold temperatures for a region. In Arizona, sustained, below freezing temperatures can prove to be dangerous and damaging. For example, economic losses due to frozen crops, downed power lines, or burst pipelines can be significant. Sustained conditions of freezing temperatures can also pose a dangerous health risk to people and their animals. Historv Extreme temperature events occur in Pima County on a regular basis, but the damaging events typically occur during the summer and winter months. The following are examples of documented past events: • According to a report prepared by the Arizona Dept of Health Services (ADHS, 2010), a total of 624 heat related deaths have occurred in Pima County over the period of 1992-2009, with the majority occurring between 2000 and 2009. • Deaths of illegal immigrants in the desert areas along the Arizona-Mexico border are also attributed to extreme heat. In 2005, roughly 80 migrants died in the Tucson sector alone from heat exposure, while more than 180 total deaths occurred from heat exposure along the border (Guido, 2008). • In February 201 l, record breaking cold blanketed the southern portion of Arizona. Temperatures in Pima County ranged from 15 to 20 degrees and with the wind chill factor, the estimates went as low as zero degrees. Across the county, individual water pipes were either frozen or burst, closing businesses, schools, and government buildings. Freezing temperatures shut down some Tucson Water pumps overnight, leaving over 1,000 homes and business without water service. About 14,000 natural gas customers in Tucson's Rita Ranch and eastern Foothills had gas service shut-off FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page $5 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 due to low main line pressures emanating from Texas. The City of Tucson opened two shelters for those without heat and dozens of area schools were closed (Tucson Sentinel, 2011). Probabilitv and Magnitude There are no recurrence or non-exceedance probabilities developed for extreme temperature events in Arizona or Pima County. Table 4-1 in Section 4 of this Plan, provide example normal and extreme temperature ranges for various weather stations within the county. In general, extreme temperatures vary from normal by 10 to over 30 degrees, with highs that exceed 110 degrees and lows extending into the 5-10 degrees Fahrenheit range. One indicator of the degree of danger associated with extreme heat is the Heat Index (HI) or the "Apparent Temperature". According the NWS, the HI is an accurate measure of how hot it really feels when the Relative Humidity (RH) is added to the actual air temperature. Figure 5-9 is a quick reference chart published by the NWS that shows the HI based on current temperature and relative humidity, and levels of danger for HI values. It should be noted that the HI values were devised for shady, light wind conditions and that exposure to full sunshine can increase HI values by up to 15°F. Also, strong winds, particularly with very hot, dry air, can be extremely hazardous. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 86 Figure 5-9: National Weather Service Heat Index Chart PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations Losses due to extreme heat or cold primarily occur in the form of death and illness for people and animals, and infrastructure damage that is primarily associated with extreme cold. There are currently no statistical analyses for projecting heat or cold related deaths in the State, however, ADHS does track data and monitor trends and other factors to determine if a statistical significance exists. Past history would indicate that multiple deaths due to extreme heat are highly likely, and especially for illegal immigrants that attempt to cross the Arizona deserts during the summer months. The homeless and low income populations are particularly vulnerable to extreme temperatures due to the increased exposure to the natural elements and decreased ability to compensate in the form of heating and cooling apparatus. Property and infrastructure damages are typically associated with hard freezes. Vulnerabilitv — Develoament Trends Growth in Pima County over the past five years has significantly increased the amount population and infrastructure exposed to extreme temperatures. There is also an increased demand on resources such as power in summers and natural gas in the winter. The primary intersect of extreme temperature hazards and future development of the county is in the general increase in population and infrastructure that would be exposed. Advanced building codes requiring adequate burial depth of water lines are generally being used and enforced. Over the past two decades, as the metropolitan area has dramatically grown in size the "urban heat island" effect has developed, which cause temperatures in the center of inetropolitan areas to become much warmer than those in rural areas. The concrete and asphalt of urban areas retains the heat of the day, and releases it slowly as compared to the surrounding desert terrain, which cools much quicker at night. As development continues to occur within Tucson and its environs, heat conditions will continue to increase. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-17 summarizes the EVRI assessment for extreme heat. Table 5-17: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for extreme heat EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 Overall EVRI Score 0.85 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 87 Extreme Temperature CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-16 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Consequences/Imaacts Public — Extreme temperature conditions result in threats to public health and safety. This potentially hazardous condition affects humans, domestic animals, livestock and agriculture. People who work outdoors are especially vulnerable as are the ill and elderly. Sickness and death may occur if proper precautions are nottaken. Responders to the Incident — Emergency response personnel may be subject to hazardous working conditions when working in extreme temperatures. Law enforcement and fire personnel who must wear heary and restrictive safety gear may become susceptible to heat e�austion or heat stroke. Continuity of Operations / Delivery of Services — There is little threat to Pima County's ability to continue the functioning of government operations and services unless there are major power outages or water/gas service interruptions. Environment — If the duration of an extreme temperature incident continues for an extended period of time, there will be a corresponding increase in energy consumption with a resulting environmental impact. Other impacts to plant and animal life can also alter the local environment. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Pima County may be impacted financially by extreme temperature in the areas of tourism, service industries, recreation/sports and agriculture. Extended closures of businesses and industry that are forced by a loss of services may also have a short term economic impact. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Although Pima County residents usually become acclimated to the high temperatures associated with life in the desert, it is still incumbent upon governmental and private agencies to prepare for extended periods of extreme high and low temperatures. Cooperative response programs and planning to include cooling or heated stations and shelters will bolster the confidence of the public in their respective jurisdictions. Sources AZ Dept of Health Services, 2004, Prevention Bulletin, Volume 18, No. 4, http://www.azdhs.gov/diro/pio/nreventionbulletin/j u1v04.ndf FEMA,1997, Multi-Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment — A Cornerstone of the Nat' 1 Mitigation Strategy. Guido, Zack, 2008, Anticipating Summer Heat — A Look at the Impacts and Extreme Temperatures in the Southwest, Southwest Climate Outlook, May 2008 Issue, University of Arizona, CLIMAS, http://www. isne. arizona.edu/cl imas/forecasts/swartic les.htm 1 Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Division of Disease Control, Office of Epidemiology and Data Services, 2009, Heat Caused and Heat Related Death Occurrences in Maricopa County, http://www.maricopa.eov/Public Health/EPI/ndf/heab2008annualreport.pdf Mrela, C. K., Torres, C., 2009, Deaths from Exposure to Excessive Natural Heat Occurring in Arizona, 1992-2009, Arizona Department of Health Services, available a the following URL: htta://www.azdhs. eov/plan/report/heat/heat09.pdf NASA, 2010, NASA Assets Provide Orbital View to Study Phoenzx Heat Waves, http://www.nasa.eov/centers/johnson/home/phoenix heatwaves feature�rt.htm National Weather Service, Warning and Forecast Office — Phoenix, 2009, http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/psr/seneral/safe /heat/ Tucson Sentinel, 2011, articles at the following URLs: httn://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/020311 tucson water freeze/cold-shuts-down- some-tucson-water-pumps/ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 88 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/020311 heat shelters/cold-nueblo-thousands- without-heat-c ity-onens-she(ters/ University of Arizona Library, Books of the Southwest website portal is located at: http://southwest.librarv.arizona.edu/azso/bodv.l div.3.htm1 Profile Mans — No profile maps are provided. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 89 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 90 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.5 Fdood / FZash Flood Descriation For the purpose of this Plan, the hazard of flooding addressed in this section will pertain to floods that result from precipitation/runoff related events. Other flooding due to dam or levee failures are addressed separately. The three seasonal atmospheric events that tend to trigger floods in Pima County are: • Tropical Storm Remnants: Some of the worst flooding tends to occur when the remnants of a hurricane that has been downgraded to a tropical storm or tropical depression enter the State. These events occur infrequently and mostly in the early autumn, and usually bring heavy and intense precipitation over large regions causing severe flooding. • Winter Rains: Winter brings the threat of low intensity; but long duration rains covering large areas that cause extensive flooding and erosion, particularly when combined with snowmelt. Summer Monsoons: A third atmospheric condition that brings flooding to Arizona is the annual summer monsoon. In mid to late summer the monsoon winds bring humid subtropical air into the State. Solar heating triggers afternoon and evening thunderstorms that can produce extremely intense, short duration bursts of rainfall. The thunderstorm rains are mostly translated into runoff and in some instances, the accumulation of runoff occurs very quickly resulting in a rapidly moving flood wave referred to as a flash flood. Flash floods tend to be very localized and cause significant flooding of local watercourses. Damaging floods in the County include riverine, sheet, alluvial fan, and local area flooding. Riverine flooding occurs along established watercourses when the bankfull capacity of a watercourse is exceeded by storm runoff or snowmelt and the overbank areas become inundated. Sheet flooding occurs in regionally low areas with little topographic relief that generate floodplains over a mile wide, Alluvial fan flooding is generally located on piedmont areas near the base of the local mountains, such as the Tortolita Fan, that are characterized by multiple, highly unstable flowpaths that can rapidly change during flooding events. Local area flooding is often the result of poorly designed or planned development wherein natural flowpaths are altered, blocked or obliterated, and localized ponding and conveyance problems result. Erosion is also often associated with damages due to flooding. Another major flood hazard comes as a secondary impact of wildfires in the form of dramatically increased runoff from ordinary rainfall events that occur on newly burned watersheds. Denuding of the vegetative canopy and forest floor vegetation, and development of hydrophobic soils are the primary factors that contribute to the increased runoff. Canopy and floor level brushes and grasses intercept and store a significant volume of rainfall during a storm event. They also add to the overall watershed roughness which generally attenuates the ultimate peak discharges. Soils in a wildfire burn area can be rendered hydrophobic, which according the NRCS is the development of a thin layer of nearly impervious soil at or below the mineral soil surface that is the result of a w�y substance derived from plant material burned during a hot fire. The waxy substance penetrates into the soil as a gas and solidifies after it cools, forming a waxy coating around soil particles. Hydrophobic soils, in combination with a denuded watershed, will significantly increase the runoff potential, turning a routine annual rainfall event into a raging flood with drastically increased potential for soil erosion and mud and debris flows. Historv Flooding is clearly a major hazard in Pima County as shown in Tables 5-2 through 5-4. Pima County has been part of 13 disaster declarations for flooding, with three of those declarations occurring in the past five years. There have been at least 68 other non-declared events of reported flooding incidents that met the thresholds outlined in Section 5.1, 25 of which occurred in the last five years. The following incidents represent examples of major flooding that has impacted the County: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 91 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 During August and September of 1983, nearly seven inches of rain fell, saturating the soil around the Tucson metropolitan area. These conditions were exacerbated when a surge of moisture from Tropical Storm Octave, which was located offthe central Baja California coast, moved northeast across the area. The result over a four-day period were torrential rains ranging from five to nine inches, causing flooding in Tucson and southeast Arizona. Bridges in the area, including all spanning the Santa Cruz River except one, were damaged or partially washed away. Additional damage occurred along the other watercourses throughout the area. Several buildings fell into Rillito Creek due to bank erosion and extensive damage occurred to agriculture in Marana. Cost estimates (using 1984 dollars) to repair and mitigate flood damage were estimated at $105.7 million. Four deaths in Eastern Pima County were attributed to the flood. In late December 1992 - early January 1993, a series of winter storms produced record breaking precipitation amounts and severe weather across much of Arizona. Heavy rains combined with melting snowpack caused heavy flooding of both local washes and regional rivers within Pima County. Nearly every community and city within the county was impacted by the storms at some level. Most of the heavy damage was associated with the Gila, San Pedro, and Santa Cruz Rivers. According to the USACE Flood Damages Report, the total public and private damages from the 1993 floods were estimated to exceed $12 million in Pima County alone. The flooding prompted a federal disaster declaration (FEMA-977-DR- AZ) for almost the entire state. On August 14, 2005 and August 23, 2005 intense heavy rains caused significant damage to public infrastructure throughout Pima County. The severe runoff resulted in damages to numerous roads, traffic lights, water well fields, berms, crossings, and police vehicles. After over an inch of rain fell across a large portion of the Tucson Metro Area, some locations with more than two inches, several roads became flooded, closed, and impassable. In addition to all the flooded roadways, several trailer homes located in the southern portion of the Tucson Metro Area, were flooded and surrounded by rising water. Rescue teams evacuated several people from these homes. Brawley wash was out of its banks and flooding roadways causing them to be impassable. Over $260,000 in damages were estimated (NCDC, 2010) In late July and early August 2006, several areas of the state were struck by severe storms and flooding during the period of July 25 to August 4, 2006. Tropical moisture poured into Southeast Arizona, saturating the ground at most locations. As rainfall continued, additional runoff quickly filled rivers and washes, exceeding bank full capacities and flooding homes and businesses as well as nearby roads. Some roadways were washed away due to the strong flood waters. Lots of flash flooding occurred throughout the Tucson Metro Area due to saturated grounds and extremely heavy rainfalL Numerous road were closed due to flooding throughout the entire Metro Area for many hours. A USGS stream gage was destroyed by flood waters in Rincon Creek. Additionally, there were numerous swift water rescues and car stranded in flooded roadways. It was estimated that nearly 100 vehicles were flooded. Several rivers running through the Tucson Metro Area flooded on July 31, 2006. The Rillito River flooded with water over the cement banks near podge Bou(evard. Additionally, the Rillito River was over bankfull just east of the Swan Road Bridge. River Road near La Cholla Road was flooding from the Rillito River. Sabino Creek was out of its banks and houses were flooded near Sabino Canyon and Bear Canyon. Below is a listing of some of the damage, but not all, caused by the flooding and an estimate for the cost of repairs: o Sabino Canyon Recreation area road and facility damaged, $100,000 o Forty homes and businesses flooded, $1,200,000 o One home destroyed due to flooding, $150,000 o Water main broke near the Mt. Lemmon highway, $20,000 o Catalina Highway road washed away, $50,000 19 US Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, 1994, Flood Damage Report— State ofArizona — Floods of 1993 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 92 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 o Agricultural irrigation system damaged, $500,000 o Cement plant flooded, $400,000 o Gravel pit flooded, $30,000 o General infrastructure damage, $500,000. The flooding prompted a federal disaster declaration (FEMA-1660-DR-AZ) for Gila, Graham, Greenlee, Pima, and Pinal Counties. Total disaster expenditures exceeded $13.6 million (ADEM, 2010; PCRFCD, 2011). ■ On February 19, 2008 a state of emergency was declared for Pima County for flooding and damages due to 8.5 inches of precipitation that fell in and around Mt. Lemmon within Pima County in less than a 24-hour period. Damages to roads left residents stranded in their homes, limited access to food and medical assistance and damaged potable water supply lines, which impacted transmission and distribution of potable water to homes. The rainfall and snowmelt created conditions that threatened the health and safety of residents and exceeded the capabilities of Pima County. Several people in Tucson needed to be rescued from flowing washes. Damages were estimated to exceed $770,000 (NCDC, 2010). • In January 2010, sixteen hikers were trapped on Sabino Canyon Trail at approximately 11 AM on January 21 st after the stream rose above its banks, covering low water crossings. The San Simon and Vamori Washes in the Tohono Oodham Nation rose 1-2 feet out of their banks during the evening of January 21 st. Several other washes flowed out of their banks, resulting in barricaded roadways near Saguaro National Park East and West, including East Tucson and Avra Valley. A motorist was trapped in the Canada del Oro Wash near Rancho del Lago at approximately 7 AM on January 22 requiring a swift water rescue. Storm-wide damages were estimated at $300,000 (NCDC, 2011). A presidential disaster was declared (FEMA- 1888-DR-AZ) for several counties and Indian tribes in the state including Pima County. ■ In July 2010, torrential rainfall across portions of eastern Pima county resulted in numerous reports of flash flooding in the Tucson metro area. Flash flooding was observed on Tanque Verde Creek with a peak depth of 11.69 feet at Tanque Verde Guest Ranch. Approximately 30 homes on Barbary Coast Road, Gold Dust Road, and Kitt Carson were flooded. Numerous swift water rescues were performed in the Tucson metro area, near the county fairgrounds, in the Recon Valley area, and on the Old Spanish Trail in the Hilton Head Ranch area. Damages were estimated to exceed $500,000 (NCDC, 20ll) Numerous other flood related incidents are summarized in the historic hazard database provided in Appendix D. Probabilitv and Maenitude For the purposes of this Plan, the probability and magnitude of flood hazards in Pima County jurisdictions are based on the 1% probability floodplains delineated on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), plus any provisional floodplain delineations used for in-house purposes by participating jurisdictions. FEMA has recently completed a map modification program to update the FIRMs for the County into a digital FIRM (DFIRM) format. The effective date for the new DFIRM maps is June 16, 2011. DFIRM floodplain GIS base files were obtained from FEMA and are the basis for the flood hazard depictions in this Plan. Two designations of flood hazard are used. Any "A" zone is designated as a HIGH hazard area. MEDI(JM flood hazard areas are all "Shaded X" zones. All "A" zones (e.g. — A, A1-99, AE, AH, AO, etc.) represent areas with a one percent (1%) probability of being flooded at a depth of one-foot or greater in any given year. All "Shaded X" zones represent areas with a 0.2% probability of being flooded at a depth of one-foot or greater in any given year. These two storms are often referred to as the 100-year and 500-year storm, respectively. Maps lA and 1B show the flood hazard areas for the entire county and the general Tucson Metropolitan Area, respectively. Maps 1C through 1H present flood hazards for each of the incorporated jurisdictions and the Pascua Yaqui Tribe. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 93 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The estimation of potential exposure to high and medium flood hazards was accomplished by intersecting the human and facility assets with the flood hazard limits depicted on the profile maps. Loss estimates to all facilities located within the high and medium flood hazard areas were made based on the loss estimation tables published by FEMA (FEMA, 2001). Most of the assets located within high hazard flood areas will be subject to three feet or less of flooding. Using the FEMA tables, it is assumed that all structural assets located within the high hazard areas will have a loss-to-exposure ratio of 0.20 (or 20%). A loss to exposure ratio of 0.05 (5%) is assumed for assets located in the medium hazard areas. Table 5-19 summarizes the critical facility, population, and residential housing unit exposure and loss estimates for the high and medium flood hazards. In summary, $268.8 million and $21 A million in critical facility related losses are estimated for high and medium flood hazards, for all the participating jurisdictions in Pima County. An additional $1.09 billion and $146.8 million in high and medium flood losses to 2010 Census residential housing units is estimated for all participating Pima County jurisdictions. Regarding human vulnerability, a total population of 57,745 people, or 5.95% of the total population, is potentially exposed to a high hazard flood event. A total population of 32,361 people, or 3.33% of the total population, is potentially exposed to a medium hazard flood event. Based on the historic record, multiple deaths and injuries are plausible and a substantial portion of the exposed population is subject to displacement depending on the event magnitude. It is duly noted that the loss and exposure numbers presented above represent a comprehensive evaluation of the County as a whole. It is unlikely that a storm event would occur that would flood all of the delineated high and medium flood hazard areas at the same time. Accordingly, actual event based losses and exposure are likely to be only a fraction of those summarized above. Furthermare, it should be noted that any flood event that exposes assets or population to a medium hazard will also expose assets and populations to the high hazard flood zone. That is, the 100-year floodplain would be entirely inundated during a 500-year flood. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 94 Flooding CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-18 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-19: Pima County exposure and loss estimates due to flooding ` FLfl�3�1 HriZARI} Pascua South £+�P�SU� / LdS� Marana Oro Valle Ya ui Tribe Sahuarita T 101 37.13% $392,077 $78 ,415 39 14.34% $97,998 $4,900 132'h ; ; , L6 ' : '; . �f�, " ' ' 19: ���ZS 7 16 23 0 101 5.30% 100.00% 30.26% 0.00% 6.22% $9,248 $311,366 $130,337 $0 $232,604 $1,850 $62,273 $26,067 $0 $46,521 3 0 1 0 70 2.27% 0.00% 132% 0.00% 4.31% $19,510 $0 $5,300 $0 $205,158 $976 $0 $265 $0 $10,258 Unincorporated 89 6.84% $270,652 $54,130 24 1.84% $94,179 $4,709 Total 337 9.79% $1,346,284 $269,257 137 3.98% $422,146 $21,107 5,311 1,617 3,675 782 3 21,290 25,067 57,745 15.34% 3.99% 100.00% 3.11% 0.05% 4.09% 7.36% 5.95% 7,755 621 16 726 0 16,314 6,929 32,361 22.40% 1.53% 0.44% 2.89% 0.00% 3.14% 2.03% 3.33% 2,163 829 892 286 14.84% 4.13% 100.00% 2.71% $538,834 $282,310 $187,175 $60,416 $107,767 $56,462 $37,433 $12,083 2,987 313 0 292 20.50% 1.56% 0.00% 2.77% $744,063 $106,706 $0 $61,686 $37,203 $5,335 $0 $3,084 1 10,140 0.05°/a 4.41% $180 $1,798,046 $36 $359,609 0 7,488 0.00% 3.25% $0 $1,328,512 $0 $66,426 10,361 6.52% $2,573,291 $51 4,658 2,984 1.88% $695,271 $34,764 5.64% 14,064 3.22% t,936,238 $146,812 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 95 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Reaetitive Loss Properties Repetitive Loss (RL) properties are those NFIP-insured properties that since 1978, have experience multiple flood losses. FEMA tracks RL properties and in particular to identify Severe RL (SRL) properties. RL properties demonstrate a track record of repeated flooding for a certain location and are one element of the vulnerability analysis. RL properties are also important to the NFIP, since structures that flood frequently put a strain on the National Flood Insurance Fund. FEMA records dated January 2010 (provided by ADEM in April 2010) indicate that there are 12 identified RL properties in Pima County and a total of 25 separate claims. Building and content loss payments for those 12 properties totaled approximately $460,000. None of the payments have occurred within the last five years. Tabie 5-20 summarizes the RL property characteristics by jurisdiction. Table 5-20: Repetitive loss property statistics for Pima County jurisdictions No. of No. of Properties Total Jurisdiction Oro Valley Tucson Unincorporated Pima Source: FEMA, 2010 Vulnerabilitv — Develoament Trends For most Pima County jurisdictions, adequate planning and regulatory tools are in place to regulate future development. Challenges with new growth will include the need for master drainage planning and additional floodplain delineations to identify and map the flood hazards within the growth areas where no mapping currently exists. Vulnerabilitv— EVRI Table 5-21 summarizes the EVRI assessment for flood. Table 5-21: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for flood EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Critical < 1 month 1.45 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 1.75 Overall EVRI Score 1.35 Vulnerabilitv — Conseauences/Impacts Public — As demonstrated by Pima County's past flood events, the impact to the general public is typically property damage and loss, injury, and in some cases, death. Of the 13 State and/or federally declared flood events that included Pima County, it is estimated that approximately 39 persons were killed and 1,087 injured 20 . Without proper mitigation, education, and enforcement of a community's floodplain management regulations, these numbers could increase, especially given the county's record growth in population. Several of the deaths, injuries, and rescues associated with flooding often take place when citizens attempt to drive across high or moving waters. Other factors in flood related injuries, illness and death include disease as a result of unhygienic conditions and water-borne diseases. 20 The number of deaths and injuries attributed to Pima County only is not known. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 96 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 In Pima County, most populated areas are located outside mapped floodplains, however, it is estimated that approximately 57,745 people, or 5.95% of Pima County's population, are located within high flood hazard areas. Responders to the Incident — Flooding is one of Pima County's top hazards and clean-up activities following floods often pose hazards to workers and volunteers involved in the effort. Potential dangers include electrical hazards, carbon monoxide exposure, musculoskeletal hazards, heat or cold stress, motor vehicle-related dangers, fire, drowning, and exposure to hazardous materials. Because flood disaster sites are unstable, clean-up crews might encounter sharp debris, biological hazards, exposed electrical lines, blood or other body fluids, and animal and human remains. Responders are prone to the same dangers the general public is, but at a higher level as they may be putting themselves in harm's way by performing rescue activities. It is anticipated that in the case of a significant/large scale flood event, emergency responders would be well prepared with protective equipment such as hard hats, goggles, gloves, life jackets, and other necessary equipment. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — It is not anticipated that flooding will significantly affect continuity of Pima County government; based on historical experience. There may be an impact on the delivery of services due to impassable roadways and damaged infrastructure that may physically hinder response to calls for emergency services and provision of routine government services. Several government and emergency service facilities within Marana and the Pascua Pueblo are located within high hazard flood zones which may impact those communities ability to provide services during a severe flood event. It is likely that any disruptions or delays in delivery of services will be of short duration and restoration will be a major priority. Environment — Flooding may have an impact both negatively and positively. Erosion may wash away soil and leave agricultural areas barren and it may deposit rich soil in other areas enriching otherwise infertile areas. Aquifers may be recharged. Water supplies may become contaminated by sewage if water treatment plants are overcome by flood waters or due to the danger of sewage/pollutants being introduced into international waterways which flow through Pima County. Contamination of water affects public health, the food supply and pets, livestock and wildlife. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Recovery and rebuilding costs, decline in tourism, impact on businesses and local economy are just a few of the real and potential hardships of flooding in Pima County. The extent of the damage will depend on factors, such as, the areas affected and duration of the event. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Speed of emergency response, efficiency and communication are critical factors to maintaining the public's confidence during and after a flood. The effects of flooding are destructive and disruptive to jurisdictions and often continue for some time after the immediate event. Power outages are common and traveUmobility may be affected by flood waters, debris and blocked/impassable roads. There may be initial periods when government may have less resources than needed due to the magnitude of the pressing needs of communities demanding services. As gradual progress is made, initial public demands will be met and recovery may begin. Emergency public information release is critical to keep the communities aware of what has happened, how it is affecting the community and what is being done about the situation. Reports of extent of damage, status of repairs and restoration of services and infrastructure contribute to a sense of healing and recovery with a positive effect on the publids perceptions of the effectiveness of Pima County government. Effective and timely communications leads to realistic expectations while a lack of communications can be misinterpreted as lack of action, unpreparedness or incompetence resulting in anger, fear or mistrust FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 97 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update, DRAFT. FEMA, 2001, Understanding Your Risks; Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses, FEMA Document No. 386-2. U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center, 2010, Storm Events Database, accessed via the following URL: http://www4.ncdc.noaa.eov/c�i-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent�storms U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, 1994, Flood Damage Report, State of Arizona, Floods of 1993. Profile Maas Maps lA and 1B — Flood Hazard Maps for Pima County Maps 1C through 1H — Jurisdiction Specific Flood Hazard Maps FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 98 � ' I� � ,� . i � i I i��ti � i � Nation PIMA �' � :. ��, _ �. �. W T �� n � 'Q � Se� 'the Tohona O'qdham Na#�on � u.�>�-��'� Legend Flood Hazard Rating � 100 Year Flood - High Hazard 500Yeat Flood - MediumNazard 85 Mu1tI Hazarcl Mitigaticn Pfan for �.�`rv'�� � ' Haza�rdProf�le�nfarm�tion�, �' � �+•�'� , . �� " � M r;,- ���� �i . ; � �; a��` i e � � � � , d , �M�rr.._ , Legend Community Roads ..�. ���� City of South Tucson Unincorporated � Interstates .._. City of Tucson � Indian Reservation � Highways �:5: 4���� Town of Marana —•••— Major Watercourses � Town of Oro Valley ,��� Town of Sahuarita 0 5 10 20 Miles liiiliiil Sources: FEMA,12/16/2010; ALRIS, 2010; JEF, 2010; Pima County, 2010 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 1A Pima County Flood Hazard Map as of April 2011 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3. 6 Hazardous Materials Incidents Descriation The threat of exposure to Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) in our modern society is prevalent nationwide and throughout Pima County. HAZMAT incidents can occur from either point source spills or from transportation related accidents. In Pima County, the primary areas of risk associated with HAZMAT incidents are located near or along storage / manufacturing facilities, major roads and rail lines, and pipelines that transport hazardous substances. These substances may be highly toxic, reactive, corrosive, flammable, explosive, radioactive or infectious, with potential to contaminate air, soil, and water resources and pose a serious risk to life, health, environment and property. HAZMAT incidents can result in the evacuation of a few people, a specific facility, or an entire neighborhood(s) depending on the size and magnitude of the release and environmental conditions. The Arizona State Emergency Response Commission (AZSERC), established by Arizona Law (Arizona Revised Statutes-Title 26, Chapter 2, Article 3) is tasked with the implementation of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) in Arizona. Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC) are appointed by AZSERC, as required by EPCRA, first to design, then to regularly review and update a comprehensive emergency plan for an emergency planning district. There are 15 LEPC's in Arizona - one in each county. State statutes and Sections 311 and 312 of EPCRA set forth hazardous chemical storage reporting requirements and thresholds for facilities possessing hazardous materials. The legislation requires that facilities staring or producing hazardous materials in quantities that exceed a defined Threshold Planning Quantity (TPQ), submit an annual chemical inventory report (Tier II Hazardous Chemical Inventory Form) to AZSERC, the appropriate LEPC, and local fire deparhnent, by March 1 of each year. Facilities holding an Extremely Hazardous Substance (EHS) at quantities exceeding the Threshold Planning Quantities (TPQ) must provide the notifications as well as a representative to participate in the county emergency planning process. For the purposes of this Plan, the Planning Team chose to focus only on those HAZMAT facilities and chemicals that are classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as extremely hazardous substances (EHS) Typical EHS materials transported and stored routinely in the county include chlorine gas, sulphuric acid, and hydrogen flouride. Historv According to the National Response Commission database, there are at least 42 reported incidents of HAZMAT releases that have occurred since 1991 within Pima County that involved at least one injury/fatality or some amount of property damage. Many of the incidents were tied to vehicular accidents involving passenger vehicles, semi tractor trailers, and/or railroad cars. The following incidents represent examples of hazardous materials incidents that have occurred in Pima County: • In December of 1997, a tractor trailer rig carrying 8,000 gallons of ethylene glycol rolled over spilling approximately half of the load. One injury was reported (NRC, 2011). • In March of 1998, a 55 gallon drum of molybdenum pentachloride fell off the back of a truck and was struck by 2 passenger vehicles releasing approximately 7 cubic feet of the material. One injury was reported (NRC, 2011). • In June of 1998, a half-inch natural gas distribution line was ruptured at a mobile home and ignited into an open natural gas flame. The mobile home was destroyed with damages estimated at $100,000 (NRC, 2011). • In April of 2005, a railcar released an unknown amount of sulphuric acid causing a railroad employee to become sick. The release was due to a faulty gasket (NRC, 2011) • In July of 2006, four locomotives and six railcars carrying hydrochloric acid derailed. The locomotives remained upright, but the railcars all turned over on their sides and hydrochloric acid was reported as leaking. One injury was reported (NRC, 2011). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 99 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 • In September of 2009, 500 gallons of asphalt was spilled from a tanker truck and entered a storm drain that ultimately drains to the Santa Cruz River. Approximately $2,000 in damages was reported (NRC, 2011). Probabilitv and MaEnitude There are no known probability statistics regarding HAZMAT incidents for Pima County. Typically, the magnitude of impact from a HAZMAT incident can be projected by using models such as ALOHA and CAMEO with assumed incident characteristics such as chemical type and source amount, spill location and amount, release time and rate, surface type, temperature, humidity, wind direction and speed, chemical stability factors. Those modeling efforts, however, are beyond the scope of this Plan. For the purpose of this Plan, the Planning Team chose to establish two (2) hazard classifications, high and medium, for profiling EHS hazards. High hazard exposure areas are assumed to be located within a one-mile radius or offset of any Tier II EHS facility, roadway and railway transportation corridor where EHS materials are known to be stored or transported on a somewhat regular basis. Similarly, the medium hazard exposure areas are assumed to be located within a second one-mile wide band that is offset from the High hazard area. All other areas are considered to be Low hazard. Maps 2A and 2B show the HAZMAT hazard areas for the entire county and Tucson Metropolitan area. Maps 2C through 2H show the HAZMAT hazard areas for each jurisdiction. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The estimation of potential exposure to high and medium HAZMAT hazards was accomplished by intersecting the human and critical facility assets with the HAZMAT hazard limits depicted on Maps 2A through 2H. Table 5-23 summarizes the critical facility, population, and residential housing unit exposure to the high and medium HAZMAT hazards. No losses are estimated for this hazard. In summary, $11.2 billion and $366.6 million in critical facilities are exposed to high and medium HAZMAT hazards, for all the participating jurisdictions in Pima County. An additional $94.4 billion and $1.94 billion in county-wide Census 2010 residential housing units are estimated to be exposed to high and medium HAZMAT hazards. Regarding human vulnerability, a total population of 945,139 people, or 97.4% of the total county-wide population, is potentially exposed to a high hazard HAZMAT event. A total population of 20,977 people, or 2.2% of the total population, is potentially exposed to a medium hazard HAZMAT event. It is recognized that EHS incidents typically occur in a single localized area and do not impact an entire county or community at one time. These numbers are intended to represent the collective community or county-wide exposure. Actual losses for an individual incident are likely to be only a fraction of the numbers presented here. Because of the nature of this hazard, structural damage is highly unlikely and decontamination costs related to replacements cost would only be a small fraction. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 100 HAZMAT CPRI results for each participating jurisdiction are summarized in Table 5-22 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-23: Pima County exposure estimates due to HAZMAT Marana I Oro V 269 98.90% $764,814 $0 3 � 110% $285 $0 131 99.24% $438,755 $0 0 0.00% $0 $0 Pascua South Yaaui Tribe Sahuarita Tucso� 4 76 19 1,603 25.00% 100.00% 100.00% 98.65% $222,516 $278,952 $48,227 $6,462,354 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 0 0 17 75.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.05% $88,850 $0 $0 $4,985 $0 $0 $0 $0 34,160 40,163 154 22,193 5,593 520,130 98.67% 99.03% 4.19% 88.27% 100.00% 99.95% 394 361 3,521 2,595 6 236 1.14% 0.89% 95.81% 10.32% 0.11% 0.05% 14,257 19,767 97.83% 98.57% $3,550,650 $6,735,120 $0 $0 255 263 1.75% 1.31% $63,407 $88,587 $0 $0 50 8,864 2,112 230,081 5.61% 84.03% 100.00% 99.97% $7,615 $1,873,283 $452,144 $40,791,306 $0 $0 $0 $0 842 1,440 0 76 94.39% 13.65% 0.00% 0.03% $U9,560 $304,256 $0 $13,964 $0 $0 $0 $0 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Unincorporated Pima Counri Total 1,119 3,221 85.94% 93.58% $3,022,273 $11,237,892 $0 $0 85 117 6.53% 3.40% $272,522 $366,642 $0 $0 322,746 945,139 94.73% 97.37% 13,864 20,977 4.07% 2.16% 151,124 426,255 95.04% 97.46% $40,999,837 $94,409,955 $0 $0 5,912 8,788 3.72% 2.01% $1,295,202 $1,944,976 $0 $0 Page 101 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Development Trends As the wlnerability analysis indicates, nearly 100 percent of Pima County population and infrastructure is exposed to some level of EHS threat. That exposure will only worsen as development increases. It may be advantageous to pursue designating certain roadways as EHS corridors to limit the exposure, and establishing buffer zones along corridors known to be frequent EHS transport routes. Development of high-density population land uses such as schools, nursing homes, aparhnent complexes, etc., should be discouraged within these zones. EHS facilities that have potential for critical or catastrophic HAZMAT releases should be located on flat topography and take care to protect against negative climate and microclimate conditions; utilize shading from excessive sun in warm climate and/or other best management practices. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-24 summarizes the EVRI assessment for HAZMAT. Table 5-24: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for HAZMAT EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Possible Limited < 1 month 1.60 WATER Possible Limited > 6 months 1.90 SOIL Possible Limited > 6 months 1.90 Overall EVRI Score 1.80 Vulnerabilitv — Conseauences/Imqacts Public — Hazardous materials present a significant, potential hazard to public safety/health and the environment when misused or released in an uncontrolled manner, such as, in the case of a transportation or production accident. Pima County has an extensive highway system comprised of two (2) interstate highways and a major rail line, both of which are connected to an international border. There is a large amount of HAZMAT which passes through the County on a daily basis. This includes an international airport which transports and transfers air freight. Underground gasoline, jet fuel and natural gas pipelines also run through Pima County with a large tank farm. There are various forms and types of HAZMAT, i.e. solids, powders, liquids and gases, each presenting unique and varying degrees of concentration and toxicity. Contact and ingestion of toxic vapors or consumption of contaminated foods or water are the principle means of injury to the public. Radiation is another threat which may or may not be associated with terrorism. Radioactive materials are present at hospitals and are transported through the County by the Deparhnent of Defense. Other impacts are indirect and may involve the closure of roads, schools, hospitals, businesses and government facilities. During such closures, public safety responder access may be impossible or delayed. There may also be economic damage as industry and commerce are affected. Responders to the Incident — HAZMAT situations are very dangerous and must be managed directly by highly trained and certified technicians. HAZMAT teams must wear protective equipment in order to conduct rescues, decontamination, mitigation and clean-up activities. Proper disposal and containment is crucial to remove these materials from the site and to prevent further injury and environmental damage. At any stage of HAZMAT operations, responders are subject to potentially lethal exposure to agents and chemicals which may cause lethal, acute and chronic injury and disease. Fires, explosions and toxic plumes are also very real threats to responders and the citizenry alike. Continuity of Operations / Delivery of Services — Pima County's ability to continue the functions of government operations and services may become threatened depending on the incident locale and duration. Public safety responders may be hindered in their ability to access those requesting or FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 102 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 needing services because of road closures and/or hazardous conditions requiring special equipment to permit access. Environment — Threats to the environment involve contact contamination and ingestion hazards by humans and animals and the danger of contamination of watersheds, livestock and agriculture affecting food supply. These effects may be of short duration while other incidents affecting water may become a long lasting problem. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Pima County's economy could be negatively impacted by HAZMAT incidents in several ways: • Agriculture: crop losses through damage and contamination may result in higher consumer prices and/or supply shortages, locally and regionally. • Recreation/Tourism: loss of revenue from the service/hospitality industry and recreational activities related to or dependent upon natural resources, such as, golfing, fishing, boating, hunting or general tourism. • Livestock: higher feed and water costs may result in a reduction in the food supply and higher food costs Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — HAZMAT planning has been an on-going effort in Pima County and the State of Arizona. Pima County's Emergency Response and Recovery Plan (ERRP) has a HAZMAT Annex which will guide emergency response to any HAZMAT emergency. The ERRP supports the Arizona State Emergency Response and Recovery Plan (AzSERRP) and the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) plans. Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. National Response Center, 2011, database obtained from website. URL at: http://www.nrc.uscg.mil/nrchp.html U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996, North American Emergency Response Guidebook Profile Maos Maps 2A and 2B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Area HAZMAT Hazard Maps Maps 2C through 2H— Jurisdiction 5pecific HAZMAT Hazard Maps FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 103 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 104 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.6 Levee Failure Descriation FEMA defines levees as man-made structures, usually earthen embankments, that are designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices to contain, control or divert the flow of water so as to provide protection from temporary flooding (FEMA, 2009). National flood policy now recognizes the term "levee" to mean only those structures which were designed and constructed according to sound engineering practices, have up to date inspection records and current maintenance plans, and have been certified as to their technical soundness by a professional engineer. FEMA has classified all other structures that impound, divert, and/or otherwise impede the flow of runoff as "non- levee embankments". In Pima County, these "non-levee embankments" might be comprised of features such as roadway and railway embankments, canals, irrigation ditches and drains, and agricultural dikes. Currently there is no State or Federal Levee Safety Progratn and no official state or federal levee inventory. It is anticipated that FEMA will institute a National Levee Safety Program in the near future. By design, a levee and many non-levee embankments increase the conveyance capacity of a watercourse by artificially creating a deeper channel through embankments that extend above the natural overbank elevation. Upon failure, floodwaters will return to the natural overbank areas. FEMA urges communities to recognize that all areas downstream of levees and embankments are at some risk of flooding and that there are no guarantees that a levee or embankment will not fail or breach if a large quantity of water collects upstream. Mechanisms for levee failure may include seismic events, extreme wave action, leakage and piping, overtopping, and material fatigue. Failure by overtopping could occur due to an inadequate design capacity, sediment deposition and vegetation growth in the channel, subsidence, and/or runoff that exceeds the design recurrence interval of the levee. Failure by piping could be due to embankment cracking, fissures, animal boroughs, embankment settling, or vegetal root penetrations. Historv Levees (certified or not) have been used in Pima County for over a hundred years to protect communities and agricultural assets from flooding, as weil as to facilitate the delivery and removal of irrigation water. These levees range from simple earthen embankments pushed up by small equipment to large engineered embankments lining both sides of a watercourse. The structural integrity of levees with regard to flood protection and policy has been discussed at a national level since the early 1980s but was elevated to a high priority after the collapse and breach of the New Orleans levees after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. There are no documented failures of certified levees within Pima County. Non-levee embankment failures, however, occur on a regular basis and the risk posed by the many uncertified embankments in the county's inventory is great. Probabilitv and MaEnitude There are varied probability or magnitude criteria regarding levee failure due to variability in levee design, ownership and maintenance. For flood protection credit under the NFIP, FEMA has established certain deterministic design criteria that are based on the 1 percent (100-year) storm event and a corresponding minimum freeboard requirements. Federally constructed levees are usually designed for larger, more infrequent events that equate to 250 to 500 year events plus freeboard. Recent recertification procedures proposed by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, require that a certifiable levee have at least a 90% assurance of providing protection from overtopping by the 1% chance exceedance flood for all reaches of a levee system with a design freeboard height of at least three feet. For levees with less than three feet of design freeboard, the assurance is increased to 95%, and no certification will be made for levees with less than two feet of freeboard unless approved via a waver process. This assurance is only for containment (overtopping failure) and does not include probability of failure by any other mode (USACE, 2007). All of the FEMA certified levees within Pima County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 105 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 are designed to safely convey the 100-year event, with a factor of safety provided by a minimum additional freeboard of 3 feet. The recent DFIRM data provided by FEMA delineates recognized levees within the county and provides a special flood zone designation of "Shaded Zone X— Protected by Levee" for areas that are protected by a levee, but otherwise subject to 100-year flooding should the levee fail or be removed. For the purpose of this Plan, the Planning Team chose to identify the special levee protection zones as the high hazard areas of levee failure. It is recognized that this initial hazard area assignment will require further analysis to account for the failure impact areas of the many non levee embankments. The currently identified high hazard levee failure zones are indicated on Maps 3A — 3D, which depict the county as a whole, and the incorporated limits of Marana, Oro Valley, and Tucson. No other jurisdictions have levees or high hazard zones identified within their incorporated or reservation boundaries. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations There are no commonly accepted methods for estimating potential levee related losses. Many variables including storm size and duration, as well as location, size, speed, and timing at which a levee breach forms, all contribute to the potential for human and economic losses. Accordingly, no estimates of loss are made in this Plan. Potential exposure of human and facility assets to the high hazard levee failure areas will be estimated instead. Table 5-26 summarizes the critical facility, population, and residential housing unit exposure to high levee failure hazards. In summary, $66.6 million in county-wide critical facilities are exposed to a high hazard levee failure. An additional $135.5 million in county-wide 2010 Census residential housing units are estimated to be exposed to a high hazard levee failure. Regarding human vulnerability, a total population of 2,777 people, or 1.54% of the total county-wide population, is potentially exposed to a high hazard levee failure event. Should a levee structure fail suddenly, it is plausible that death and injury might occur. It can also be expected that a substantial portion of the exposed population is subject to displacement depending on the event magnitude. It is duly noted that the exposure numbers presented above represent a comprehensive evaluation of the County as a whole. It is unlikely that a storm event would occur that would fail all of the levees at the same time. Accordingly, actual event based losses and exposure are likely to be only a fraction of those summarized above. Vulnerabilitv — Development Trend Analvsis With the new focus on residual downstream risk for the land-side of levees and a general refocusing of national levee regulation and policy, it is likely that new and old developments in these areas will need to be revisited to determine if additional measures are necessary for adequate flood protection. Many structures located downstream of non-levee embankments are being re-mapped into Special Flood Hazard Zones. New developments should be evaluated to determine if sufficient protection is proposed to mitigate damages should the upstream structure fail. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 106 Levee Failure CPRI results for each jurisdiction are summarized in Table 5-25 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 107 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-27 summarizes the EVRI assessment for levee failure. Table 5-27: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for levee failure EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Critical > 6 months 1.75 SOIL Unlikel Critical > 6 months 1.75 Overall EVRI Score 1.45 Vulnerabilitv — Conseauences/Imuacts Public — Proper floodplain management is a critical consideration in mitigation against loss of life and property. Levees are an important part of the plans to protect people, homes and vital infrastructure, not only in Pima County proper, but also in other local cities and towns. The greater Pima County area is experiencing increases in population and a corresponding development of supporting infrastructure resulting in greater potential harm should extraordinary flooding overwhelm the levee system. In this case, dangers to public health include standing water which increases the breeding of mosquitoes which spread the West Nile Virus, contamination of drinking water, and improper treatment of and/or release of sewage into waterways. Responders to the Incident - Following a levee failure event, responders would face the same basic hazards as the public. They must, however, drive emergency response vehicles, operate equipment and work for extended periods in hazardous conditions caused by severe weather and flood conditions. Dangers include exposure to heat/cold, rain, driving hazards, drowning, fire, electrical hazards, biological hazards, and hazardous materials. During emergency operations, it is anticipated that workers and volunteers will be well-equipped with personal protective equipment and other safety gear that offer protection from injury, exposure to health hazards and which increase their visibility, such as, hard hats, gloves, high visibility vests, respirators, flotation vests, eye protection, etc. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — It is not anticipated that complications due to levee failure will significantly affect the continuity of Pima County government. There may be an impact on the delivery of services due to impassable roadways and damaged infrastructure that may physically hinder response to calls far emergency services and provision of routine government services. Barring a major incident, it is likely that any disruptions or delays in delivery of services will be of short duration and restoration will be a major priority. Environment — Levee failure may impact the environment negatively by creating new flood pathways through alteration of natural watercourses. Erosion may wash away soil leaving agricultural areas barren. Other areas may lose grasses and vegetation which provide natural erosion mitigation. Water supplies may become contaminated by sewage if water treatment plants are overcome by flood waters or due to the danger of sewage/pollutants being introduced into waterways. Contamination of water affects public health, the food supply and pets, livestock and wildlife. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — The failure of levees would result in negative impact on local commerce and would affect the mobility of the community and transportation routes which permit restocking/resupply of store inventories of items necessary for recovery, such as, water, food, construction materieL The extent of the damage will depend on factars, such as, the areas affected and duration of the event. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Speed of emergency response, efficiency and communication are critical factors to maintaining the public's confidence during and after a flood. The after-effects of levee failure may be destructive and disruptive to jurisdictions and often continue for some time after the immediate event. Power outages are common and travel/mobility may be affected FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 108 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 by flood waters, debris and blocked or impassable roads. There may be initial periods when county government may have fewer resources than are needed due to the magnitude of the pressing needs of communities demanding services. Over time and, as progress is made, initial public demands for services will be met and emergency response will begin to transition into the recovery phase. Emergency public information is critical to keep the communities aware of what has happened, what is happening, and what is going to happen. In addition, they must be apprised of the impact of events, how they are affecting the community and what will be done to recover from the situation and the time table of return to pre-event conditions. Reports of extent of damage, status of repairs and restoration of services and infrastructure contribute to a sense of healing and recovery with a positive effect on the public's perceptions of the effectiveness of Pima County government. Effective and timely communications leads to realistic expectations while a lack of communications can be misinterpreted as lack of action, unpreparedness or incompetence resulting in anger, fear or distrust of government. Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update. FEMA, 2001, Understanding Your Risks; Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses, FEMA Document No. 386-2. FEMA, 2009, Web page at URL: http://www.fema.gov/nlan/prevendthm/lv intro.shtm#3 USACE, 2007, Certifrcation of Levee Systems for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) — DRAFT, ETL ll 10-2-570. Profile Maos Map 3A — County-wide Levee Failure Hazard Map Maps 3B through 3D — Levee Failure Hazard Maps for Marana, Oro Valley, and Tucson. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 109 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 110 . �,�' .. ,.. �aN�.4.,�s�o,�.A,p;�wY,�.� � r . Tohono„,O�dham Nation M' See Lhe Tahonts O�odharn Nation PIMA ���ti Hazard,�M►tigation Plan for �� � M�zard�rofile,ir�Torm�ticin . ���s��"?�" � '' \ 85 �� �� S�� M� '��,;; �'� r � �,� �� .� :, m �_ � ���£ i ��� _ � �"� ' :r r � � . � .. � ,,. � .: �:._ ... .� �. ri � �, .� , �., .. ,.. Legend � Levee Levee Hazard Rating � High Hazard Legend Community Roads � .�. ��� City of South Tucson � Unincwporated ! Interstates .._. 1�� � City of Tucson � Indian Reservation � Highways : ����� Town of Marana —•°— Major Watercaurses � �TOwn of Oro Valley Town of Sahuarita � 0 5 10 20 Miles ( 1 f I � I I 1 � Sources: FEMA,12/16/2010; ALRIS, 2010; JEF, 2010; Pima Coun[y, 2010 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 3A Pima County Levee Failure Hazard Map as of April 2011 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.8 Severe Wind Description The hazard of severe wind encompasses all climatic events that produce damaging winds. For Pima County, severe winds usually result from either extreme pressure gradients that usually occur in the spring and early summer months, or from thunderstorms. Thunderstorms can occur year-round and are usually associated with cold fronts in the winter, monsoon activity in the summer, and tropical storms in the late summer or early fall. Three types of damaging wind related features typically accompany a thunderstorm; 1) downbursts, 2) straight line winds, and infrequently, 3) tornadoes. Downbursts are columns of air moving rapidly downward through a thunderstorm. When the air reaches the ground, it spreads out in all directions, creating horizontal wind gusts of 80 mph or higher. Downburst winds have been measured as high as 140 mph. Some of the air curls back upward with the potential to generate a new thunderstorm cell. Downbursts are called macrobursts when the diameter is greater than 2.5 miles, and microbursts when the diameter is 2.5 miles or less. They can be either dry or wet downbursts, where the wet downburst contains precipitation that continues all the way down to the ground, while the precipitation in a dry downburst evaporates on the way to the ground, decreasing the air temperature and increasing the air speed. In a microburst the wind speeds are highest near the location where the downdraft reached the surface, and are reduced as they move outward due to the friction of objects at the surface. Typical damage from downbursts includes uprooted trees, downed power lines, mobile homes knocked off their foundations, block walls and fences blown down, and porches and awnings blown offhomes. Straight line winds are developed similar to downbursts, but are usually sustained for greater periods as a thunderstorms reaches the mature stage, traveling parallel to the ground surface at speeds of 75 mph or higher. These winds are frequently responsible for generating dust storms and sand storms, reducing visibility and creating hazardous driving conditions. A tornado is a rapidly rotating funnel (or vortex) of air that extends toward the ground from a cumulonimbus cloud. Most funnel clouds do not touch the ground, but when the lower tip of the funnel cloud touches the earth, it becomes a tornado and can cause extensive damage. For Pima County, tornadoes are the least common severe wind. Historv According to Tables 5-2 and 5-3, Pima County has had one state / federal declaration involving severe winds. Table 5-4 indicates that at least 183 other severe wind events that meet the criteria listed in Section 5.1, have occurred. The combined economic loss of those events is over $29.2 million to property and agriculture in the last 50 years, and there were at least 3 deaths and 103 injuries, with most being related to dust storm related accidents on Interstate 10. In reality, severe wind events occur on a significantly more frequent basis throughout the county, but do not always have reported damages associated with every event. For example, a total of 119 thunderstorm related and 1 tornado related severe wind events were noted in the NCDC database for period of April 2006 through April 2011. However, not all of those events had reports of damages, fatalities, or injuries associated with them. The following are examples of documented past events that have occurred in the last five years: • In July 2006, a thunderstorm over eastern portions of the Tucson Metro area produced strong winds which downed a 125 foot tall tree onto an aparhnent complex on Speedway Boulevard near Kolb Road. There were no injuries but eight families were evacuated from the aparhnent complex so that repairs could be made. Damage was estimated at the time to be about $350,000 (NCDC, 2011). • In October 2006, a nearly stationary FO tornado caused damage to a trailer, parked at a residence on Avra Valley Road in Marana, AZ, by blowing it onto its side. Also, a few homes near the intersection of West Avra Valley Road and North Anway Road experienced minor damage. Damages were estimated at $13,000 (NCDC, 2011) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 111 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 • In July 2007, approximately 100 trees were uprooted and knocked down at Oro Valley Country Club on Greenock Road due to a wet microburst. An additional 30 trees were uprooted at a nearby shopping plaza at Oracle Road and 1 st Avenue. The uprooted trees caused roof damage to several houses. The storms also blew off part of a roof at the Blue Moon stables in Oro Valley. Damages were estimated to exceed $150,000. (NCDC, 2011). • In July 2007, two mobile homes were destroyed and a traditional home partially destroyed in the Ventana Section of the Tucson Foothills. There were two uprooted trees at Grant Road and Kolb Road in Tucson and an estimated 60 mph gust due to thunderstorms in Tucson. A roof also collapsed at a furniture store near 22nd street and Wilmot road. In addition, these thunderstorms knocked down about 20 power poles near Palo Verde Road and Irvington Road. There were 18,000 customers without power in the Tucson area. Damages were estimated to exceed $225,000 (NCDC, 2011). • In August 2008, extensive wind damage occurred on the north side of Tucson due to a microburst. Reported damages included 28 power poles knocked down (including a dozen at River Road and Dodge Blvd) resulting in 35,000 customers without power, some for an extended period as much as two days. Damage was also reported at the Jewish Community Center near River Road and Alvernon Way. There was also roof damage to numerous businesses and hundreds of trees knocked down.. Damages were estimated to exceed $2.5 million. (NCDC, 2011). In June 2009, severe thunderstorm downburst winds caused significant damage at Three Points. Several mobile homes and nearby sheds were either heavily damaged or destroyed. A more substantial brick veneer building was also damaged, with varying degrees of roof damage reported to several homes in Three Points. Several large trees were uprooted completely. Winds from this severe thunderstorm were estimated to be near 85 mph. Three Points Fire reported one injury was received by flying glass, after winds blew out a house window. Damages were estimated to exceed $150,000. (NCDC, 2011). • In August 2010, local broadcast media reported up to 3 dozen trees damaged or uprooted in Rancho Vistoso neighborhood. A few ceramic roof tiles were also blown off homes. In addition, a NWS Employee reported several trees down in Dove Mountain with one tree leaning up against a home. There was only slight tile damage to the home. Also, local broadcast media reported trees and power lines down in Marana at Interstate 10 and Marana/Trico Road as well as a roof ripped off a mobile home. The Marana Airport also sustained damage. Two small airplanes were ripped from their tie down chains and were flipped over while another plane was blown into a field. A large hangar door was blown off its tracks and a few other hangars also sustained light damage. In the same area, several power poles and lines were downed on Twin Peaks Road east of N. Sandario Road. Damages were estimated to exceed $100,000. (NCDC, 2011). Map 4 is a depiction of historic locations and severity of severe wind events impacting Pima County over the period of 1952 to 2010. Data points are plotted based on coordinate information provided in the NCDC database and are not intended to represent the actual extent of impact for the particular event. Probabilitv and Maenitude Most severe wind events are associated with thunderstorms as previously mentioned. The probability of a severe thunderstorm occurring with high velocity winds increases as the average duration and number of thunderstorm events increases. The average annual duration of thunderstorms in Pima County ranges from 80 to 90 minutes and is among the longest in the nation (ADEM, 2004). According to the NCDC database records for the past five years, Pima County averages about 25 severe wind events a year For that same five year time period, approximately $5.8 million in damages were estimated. The NWS issues a severe thunderstorm watch when conditions are favorable for the development of severe thunderstorms. The local NWS office considers a thunderstorm severe if it produces hail at least 3/4-inch in diameter, wind of 58 mph or higher, or tornadoes. When a watch is issued for a region, residents are encouraged to continue normal activities but should remain alert for signs of approaching FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 112 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 storms, and continue to listen for weather forecasts and statements from the local NWS office. When a severe thunderstorm has been detected by weather radar or one has been reported by trained storm spotters, the local NWS office will issue a severe thunderstorm warning. A severe thunderstorm warning is an urgent message to the affected counties that a severe thunderstorm is imminent. The warning time provided by a severe thunderstorm watch may be on the order of hours, while a severe thunderstorm warning typically provides an hour or less warning time. Based on the historic record, the probability of tornados occuning in Pima County is limited. Tornado damage severity is measured by the Fujita Tornado Scale, which assigns a numerical value of 0 to 5 based on wind speeds, as shown in Table 5-28, with the letter F preceding the number (e.g., FO, Fl, F2). Most tornadoes last less than 30 minutes, but some last for over an hour. The path of a tornado can range from a few hundred feet to miles. The width of a tornado may range from tens of yards to more than a quarter of a mile. Table 5-28: Fu'ita Tornado Scale Cate o Wind S eed Descri tion of Dama e FO 40-72 mph Light damage. Some damage to chimneys; break branches off trees; push over shallow-rooted trees; dama e to si n boards. Moderate damage. The lower limit is the beginning of hurricane speed. Roof Fl 73-112 mph surfaces peeled off; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; movin autos ushed off roads. Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; F2 113-157 mph boxcars pushed over; large trees snapped or uprooted; light-object missiles enerated. F3 158-206 mph Severe damage. Roofs and some walls tom off well constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest u rooted; cars lifted off round and thrown. F4 207-260 mph Devastating damage. Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown off some distance; cars thrown and lar e missiles enerated. Incredible damage. Strong frame houses lifted off foundations and carried FS 261-318 mph considerable distance to disintegrate; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100- ards; trees debarked. Source: FEMA, 1997. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The entire County is assumed to be equally exposed to the damage risks associated with severe winds. Typically, incidents are fairly localized and damages associated with individual events are relatively small. Based on the historic record over the last five years, it is feasible to expect average annual losses of $1.0 to $1.5 million (county-wide). It is difficult to estimate losses for individual jurisdictions within the County due to the lack of discrete data. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 113 Severe Wind CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-29 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Develoament Trend Analvsis Future development will expand the exposure of life and property to the damaging effects of severe wind events. Enforcement and/or implementation of modern building codes to regulate new developments in conjunction with public education on how to respond to severe wind conditions are arguably the best way to mitigate against losses. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-30 summarizes the EVRI assessment for severe wind. Table 5-30: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for severe wind EVRI Cate o Eavironmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 Overall EVRI Score 0.85 Vulnerabilitv — Consequences/Impacts Public — The term "severe winds" encompasses a wide array of threats, i.e. microbursts, tropical cyclones, tornadoes, gustnados, and severe thunderstorms. Severe wind conditions have resulted in injury, death and damage by falling trees, poles, debris and/or collapsing structures. Indirect impacts may be injuries or death due to power outages and accidents. Responders to the Incident — Responders face threats of blowing and falling debris as well as downed power lines, hazardous driving conditions, and collapsed structures during search and rescue and recovery operations. Exhaustion may become a factar when warking extended shifts in hazardous conditions while performing strenuous emergency and rescue duties. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — There is a potential threat to Pima County's ability to continue the operation of government services for periods of time. this depends upon the severity of the event, time of occurrence and duration. The negative effects of limiting government services and its ability to respond are usually short term and can be due to shortage of resources, impassable roads, downed power poles/lines, power interruptions and any associated flooding. Environment — Severe winds can cause environmental harm by indirect means such as fires and release of hazardous fumes resulting from damage to structures. Winds can cause damage to tress, plants and agricuiture. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Damaging winds occur every year in Pima County causing monetary losses due to damage of property, inventory, vehicles, lost wages, death and injuries. Property losses in Pima County due to severe winds over the last 5 years alone totals more than $6 million, and that does not account for less tangible economic losses such as lost wages and non- production due to power outages or damaged structures. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Pima County emergency response agencies will continue to respond to severe wind events as promptly and efficiently as possible. Emergency operations centers will be activated as needed to coordinate response, rescue and recovery operations. Most wind events are of short duration and in most cases the community will be restored to pre-event status within hours. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 114 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2004, State of Arizona All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update. Changnon, Jr. 5.,1988, Climatology of Thunder Events in the Conterminous U.S., Part I.• Temporal Aspects and Part II: Spatial Aspects, Journal of Climate, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 389-405. U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center, 2011, Storm Events Database, accessed via the following URL: htto://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/c�i-win/wwc�i.dll?wwevent�storms Profile Maos Map 4— Severe Wind Event Map FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 115 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 116 85 Legend 7ornado (Fujita Scale) � FO (40-72 mph) • F1 (73-112 mph) • F2 (173r157 mph) High Winds (mph) � 50-�2 0 �3-ioo Community a�. ���� City of Sou1h Tucson Unincorporated �.= � Cily of Tucson � Indian Reservation �� �� Town of Marana Roads � Town of Oro Valley � Interstates �.�. Town of Sahuarita � Highways � �` ��'��':�w� Alo H��..�, � :` ,; :� � �r��*Tohono�0�'dham Nation PIMA ��= �e Tohano 4'.odMam Nation � Mult� Hazarii M�trgatioo�la�i for � HWy HazardPrafile.fnforma;ian Vp wTu��"�"'�'� � ���� �� �� , ��: � '_ � ava';x,samr� � ��w . .'. . �. �.�,�'� �� � % � ��^ , rt , . � , . r.,����".""�+�..._ �=.�-,�t. : 0 5 10 20 Miles liiiliiil Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 4 Pima County Severe Wind Historic Hazard Map 1952 - 2010 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.9 Subsidence Description Subsidence occurs when the original land surface elevation drops due to changes in the subsurface. Causes of subsidence include, but are not limited to, removal of fluids (water, oil, gas, etc.), mine collapse, and hydrocompaction. Of these causes, hydrocompaction and mine collapse tend to be localized events, while fluid removal may occur either locally or regionally. The main cause for subsidence in Pima County is excessive groundwater withdrawal, wherein the volume of water withdrawn exceeds the natural recharge. Once an area has subsided, it is likely the ground elevation will not rise again due to consolidation of the soils, even if the pumped groundwater is replaced. Subsidence causes regional drainage patterns to change. Impacts include unexpected flooding, storm drain backwater, reversal of channel and sewer system drainage patterns, and damages to infrastructure both in the subsurface (water, sewer, electric lines, well casings, etc.) and surface (roads, canals, drainages, surveyed benchmarks, etc.). Subsidence also causes fissures to develop along tension cracks that form at the edge of the subsiding area and over shallow pinnacles of bedrock. Land-use areas that are predominantly agricultural tend to experience the most intense subsidence due to groundwater based irrigation practices. Subsidence is not, however, restricted to only rural areas since exponential population growth also places great demands on groundwater. Historv In an article published in the University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center's Arroyo (Gelt, 2002), the following observations were made regarding subsidence in the Tucson Basin: "A recent study indicated that the subsidence rate in parts of the Tucson basin is increasing. If this, in fact, is occurring, then the event might presage a development expected by some geologists; i.e., subsidence as a growing problem in urban areas in Arizona. Subsidence has been detected in certain urban areas of the state. It has occurred for example in sections of the Phoenix metropolitan area. And even some of the subsidence in the Casa Grande area may be attributable to urban groundwater use. That subsidence is occurring in Tucson has been recognized for a period of time. The concern now is that the Tucson subsidence rate is increasing. The damage and disruption to be expected from extensive subsidence occurring in a large metropolitan area thus gain dmportance as an issue. Research has demonstrated that between 1947 and 1981, the Tucson basin ground surface dropped 3 millimeters (twelve-hundreds of an inch) for every meter of water loss. Recent research conducted by John S. Sumner, Universiry of Arizona professor emeritus of geosciences, and graduate student Michael A. Hatch indicates that between 1987 and 1991 the surface of the Tucson Basin dropped an average of 24 rrtillimeters (about an inch) for every drop of one meter in the water table, with subsidence ranging from half an inch to 2 inches. The water table under Tucson has been dropping about one meter or over three feet a year since the 1940s. Hatch points out that if the average subsidence rate in the Tucson basin of a half-inch to two inches per year continues for the next 30 years, much of the basin will settle about a foot during that time. Some areas might even subside up to four feet. Sumner and Hatch further suggest that the subsidence rate may be increasing because of a loss of elasticity within the basin, the result of various subsurface developments. Because of the consistent groundwater pumping within the area, the water table might have dropped below the clay layers. Without the water, the clay particles are compressed more tightly by the weight of the overlying rocks, and their water storage capaciry is thus permanently reduced. Subsidence would then be inelastic because the sinking of the ground surface is permanent. Recharge would not reverse the process. " FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 117 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Active subsidence has been occurring in certain areas of Pima County for over 60 years and is primarily due to groundwater overdraft. By 1980 ground-water levels in the southern areas of the state had declined at least 100 feet in many locations and between 300 and 500 feet in some specific areas (Carpenter, 1999). Figure 5-10 illustrates profile estimates of ground subsidence in several south- central Arizona locations. In a study performed by the USGS (Carruth et al, 2008) for the Tucson Active Management Area (TAMA), estimates of subsidence for the 18 year period of 1987 to 2005 indicated a range of 0 to 5 inches of subsidence has occurred in the Tucson Basin area. Figure 5-11 is an excerpt from that report showing the mapped areas of subsidence. There are no documented losses directly attributed to subsidence in Pima County. o- ta.,d 5�r�d�e. 1952-1442 10 - (fe+st} � �� � �woa�a r�, sa�. i sssy Flarquaha4� � � ����nF��� : - Fkain � . �'+1�+'e,t��S � . Riv:e.r B; ARfZONA �� +� - / � ,� �� �. g �_ �e / :� � Watersle�rel dec6ne East Sa7c Fk�utieer �Basia9 �'than i00 feet '� pR� � O SO Ni . � 3t . .. . � O 50 Km t .:, . � t?icar_ho Basm � � " . • casi�Grande - � � .. '�if �!t Avra r,�"" 5 �� �'� Valfey ^^• 'v .. � � � � 5�n S�mon ��. .�°" � ��� W"illr_�..�sc � Yalley. a Tucscn �� 835�r ' � � � . � .. \ � /5ts�ie#d Bas:+ Pim:lw Baai� Avra Va1ey Tu6on Basin \ �1 �� p____ _ vr.. _ _., _ _ _ __ .,;-_ - - O Land _ land subsidence. shsidence, 1952-1492 3 - - - _ 3 i952-1980 (feet} (feat) 12 �� � or.� u� ana oma:. �v?8� ------- �noa�ao ram nr,�ersar► �9sa. �saq} � 2 >ource: USGS (Carpenter, 1999) Figure 5-10: South-Central Arizona Land Subsidence Profiles FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 118 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Figure 5-11: Tucson Active Management Area Subsidence Map FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 119 Jource: UJCiS (Carruth et al, 2008) PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Probabilitv and Maenitude There are no statistical probability estimates for subsidence. The magnitude of land subsidence has been detected over the years using surveying techniques such as differential leveling and high accuracy Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying. In the early 1990's, scientists began to use a satellite based technology called Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and interferometric processing (InSAR) to detect land surface elevation changes. InSAR has been developed into a highly reliable land subsidence monitoring technique that has been utilized by ADWR since 2002. ADWR has identified numerous subsidence features around the State and continues to monitor the extent and rates of these features on an annual basis (ADWR, 2010). In Pima County, ADWR monitors the Green Valley and Tuscon geographical areas using InSAR. The Planning Team reviewed and chose to use the zones currently being monitored by ADWR to depict the subsidence hazard for the county. Areas defined by ADWR as active subsidence areas were mapped as high hazard zones and all other areas were assigned a low hazard. The high hazard subsidence zones are presented on Maps SA — SD. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The estimation of potential exposure to high hazard subsidence areas was accomplished by intersecting the human and facility assets with the subsidence high hazard limits depicted on Maps SA — SD. No losses are estimated for facilities located within the high hazard subsidence areas due to lack of appropriate loss-to-exposure data. Table 5-32 summarizes the critical facility, population, and residential housing unit exposure to high subsidence hazards. In summary, $1.12 billion in county-wide critical facilities are exposed to a high hazard subsidence. An additional $7.94 billion in in county-wide Census 2010 residential housing units are estimated to be exposed to a high subsidence hazard. Regarding human vulnerability, a total population of 107,152 people, or 11.04% of the total county-wide population, is potentially exposed to a high hazard levee failure event. It is unlikely that death and injury would result from subsidence, however, secondary impacts related to fissures and flooding may pose additional risk. Vulnerabilitv — Develoament Trend Analvsis As ADWR continues its mapping and tracking programs, more data will become available for use in regulating future development. Public awareness of the hazard is a key element to any effective mitigation measure, as well as the need to slow the depletion of groundwater sources. New regional drainage features and structures should always refer to the maps in this plan to determine the need for special design considerations that address subsidence. FOR OFFICIAL U5E ONLY Page 120 Subsidence CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-31 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 121 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-33 summarizes the EVRI assessment for subsidence. Table 5-33: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for subsidence EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Limited > 6 months 1.45 SOIL Unlikel Limited > 6 months 1.45 Overall EVRI Score 1.25 Vulnerabilitv — Conseauences/Imaacts Public — There is little obvious direct impact to public safety and health due to the issue of subsidence. Fissure and flood damage are the most likely indirect/secondary impacts. The lack of proper drainage may result in standing, stagnant water which could become a breeding medium for water and insect borne disease. The ground water supply could become contaminated resulting in a health emergency. Responders to the Ineident — Subsidence is not the type of situation that typically requires an incident response element. It is more likely that a response will be to a safety concern about a fissure or other indirect effects on roads and infrastructure damage. Continuity of Operations / Delivery of Services — There is little threat to Pima County's ability to continue the functioning of government operations and services. Environment — Due to the surface elevation drops caused by subsidence, the resulting environmental threat is generally associated with flooding and potential contamination due to entry of floodwaters directly into ground water through fissures. Subsidence can also cause fissures which may render properties and land unsuitable for habitation or agriculture. A long term threat is the elevation dropping and reducing or compressing the aquifer holding capacity permanently for the Pima County area. This could significantly impact sustainability of animal life and vegetation. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Pima County's economy could be impacted by subsidence by creating new areas prone to flooding, infrastructure damage and fissures. Flooding is an indirect result of subsidence but it is expensive to respond to and recover from. If the aquifer becomes compromised by either contamination or reduction in capacity to replenish itself, there could be a significant impact on business and residential development and investment. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Pima County has emergency plans which will be implemented to mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from subsidence and its indirect/secondary effects. In any emergency or hazardous situation, the public will look to government for assistance and guidance. Pima County has an Emergency Response and Recovery Plan (ERRP) created to work with its community partners and other local governments to minimize the impact on this community and to increase the public's confidence. Sources AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc., 2006, Earth Fissure Risk Zone Investigation Report, Powerline and Vineyard Flood Retarding Structures, Pinal County, AZ, prepared for FCDMC under Contract FCD 2004C503, Work Assignments 1&2. Arizona Department of Water Resources, 2010, land subsidence website at: http://www.azwater.gov/DWR/ContendFind bv Prosram/H d� rolo�v/land-subsidence-in- arizona.htm Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2009, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update, DRAFT. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 122 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Arizona Land Subsidence Group, 2007. Land subsidence and earth fissures in Arizona: Research and informational needs for effective risk management, white paper, Tempe, AZ, . http://www.azgs.az. eov/Earth%20Fissures/CR-07-C.pdf Carpenter, M.C., 1999, Land subsidence in the United States, South-Central Arizona: Earth fissures and subsidence complicate development of desert water resources, [Galloway, D., Jones, D.R., and Ingebritson, S.E., editors], USGS Circular 1182. Carruth, R.L. Pool, D.R., Anderson, C.E., 2008, Land Subsidence and Aquifer Compaction in the Tucson Active Management Area, South-Central Arizona-1987-2005, as accessed at the following URL: http://cals.arizona.edu/AZWATER/awr/1ea38059-c0a8-0164-OOb5- 7927a2dcfU93-uses-supp lementj anfeb08-final. pdf#xm I=httn://ag3.calsnet.arizona.edu/c� b in/texis/web inator/search/xm Ltxt?querv=subs idence&pr–azwater&prox=paee& rorder-500&rpro x=500&rdfrea=5 00&rwfreq=500&rlead=500& sufs=0&order–r&cq=& id=4e9ad6802 FEMA, 2001, Understanding Your Risks; Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses, FEMA Document No. 386-2. Gelt, J., 1992, Land Subsidence, Earth Fissures Change Arizona's Landscape, Arroyo Volume 6, No. 2, published by the University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center, as accessed at the following URL: http://cals.arizona.edu/AZWATEWarrovo/0621and.html Profile Maus Maps SA and SB – County-Wide and Tucson Metro Area Subsidence Hazard Map(s) Maps SC and SD – Jurisdiction Specific Subsidence Hazard Maps for Sahuarita and Tucson. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 123 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 124 I � ` �� �r , GILA : ( � ,�' � [ €� . . $� V �¢,e � f r � j .: �� . i � � � r � h �j r � � �' ' ` . � o- : _ � . . `. , i++ a ,.,w � - � �MARICOPA ��r. f �.�, �u�r�i rr�r . � PINAL �, ,.. '�� � , � � k , � ;_,� �. �t �� �� < '� � � (A �M .. , . � �I �� :��;; < �� �� ���rM���� � ""�� *�#' ' �,.., . exi � �" � ��Ili�n�Oflff�i����� YUMA � � 1 � � <, :, � a. '�a" i' , �er�a�e�aw ,.. . � � . Marana�� � .". �x< �. . j �, . . �.�,i � lO . � �. � . 4 . . ' ' . ., , ' `y , , � � � o ` Oro,,;,,�all r�� , ..,�.� s." ` ,�+. - 9�0 2 , < a . . .. � . � . . �� .. . .. ... .L' � . '. .. . ': . � �. . � 'S'� y � ;' . .. � � . .. . . �.. ..., ., S.r. .. . . .. � "# q y . . . . . .� � . . j(�k .,,.. .$, ..� � ..,,: �. . .� . � A,.+� F , � Unincorporated , Nr�����-a, „ Tucson � r ,� ; � .. . � _ 4,.�. � So th Tu � ,, � � � � ��'`�' ��� � Tohono,,0'dham Nation � � � � �� � �. .r.; . �,. .; ^ PiMA See the 1'ohono Q'odham Nation y . �Pascu aqui'Nation �' "' r ,. �-�,,:;,� •� , ' Nlulti-Hazard M�tigation Plar� for � � „W � " �` ���` � � '� �� � � � HazardProfile Information � ' � � � W tacsan�Al » . � .,- .. -:' , t , " � . ,. � ^, ., . � 85 " ; . � $ s Sahuarita � ,� ��� }, '� � �, � � r .., ., � � �. . , w ; ' ' i�'y�" � > Uninc_orporated R cocH� f y N . � � r vt£ :� % �, � � � ,r �m ♦w9�'„4�7 �t �` � : .. ... * Z � M ty.�. ' 'e2� � . -i ✓"'G fg +� �"• d ^ ���� � �� �� �) +k `u' '#'. ' � °r � � � � N' , ^ f ' � ... �' . y � � ` �, ^{ � �. � *. � i 1 �. .� . . ' = T � ��,� 1 T� °�t` 3. 7 {. ". � � . + , . .. � r ��: . , . � - . ` ' .` " � � r ��.s . � ,� � � M' { js � � y.� . � , , � UZ� {�'� .ad`. NTA CR . dy � �"� � '� � � �� � �� � � � � Legend ' � � � � �" " ,�, Mexico . :,� = i , � �" �'�.� � Subsidence Hazard Rating � "�i,�; i' : ` �*�'�� - � ���� High Hazard ` r �-„` x _ �'. � , � � , x �� �:.. � .... x — _ _—_ �� ' , ' � � . � , ," s. p � � �' Xy „ „. .� �� p .� a� � '� ,� � F # �;� a p"""" �'� ' " � �- ' , . , � ct�`- " . ±', t . ,y.� . . � - f A � J .,d� . � ± „ y �;.� � _' �, . �x° , � , F .i ;/ ' !^ Legend LQPAZ MARI PA ' GILA APACHE tr Community R08C�S REENLEE Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Miti ation Plan ��� � City of South Tucson Uninwrporated � Interstates v MA : � � RAHAM � � Map 5A � �.�:� City of Tucson � Indian Reserva[ion � Highways Pima County � ��_ � Town oF Marana � 5 � � 20 Miles P�MA H � E Subsidence �� � Town of Oro Valley L � ������ I MB kko sanlia k z Hazard Map , ' ' Sources: ASLD, 2010; ALRIS, 2070; �' i' � (�� � Town of Sahuari[a JEF, 2010; Pima County, 2010 ,''.i I aS Of May 2�� � PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.10 Wildfire Description A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels, exposing and possibly consuming structures. They often begin unnoticed, spread quickly, and are usually signaled by dense smoke. Wildfires can be human-caused through acts such as arson, campfires, or the improper burning of debris, or can be caused by natural events such as lighming. Wildfires can be categorized into four types: • Wildland fires occur mainly in areas under federal control, such as national forests and parks, and are fueled primarily by natural vegetation. Generally, development in these areas is nonexistent, except for roads, railroads, power lines, and similar features. • Interface or internti,x fires occur in areas where both vegetation and structures provide fuel. These are also referred to as urban-wildland interface fires. • Firestorms occur during extreme weather (e.g., high temperatures, low humidity, and high winds) with such intensity that fire suppression is virtually impossible. These events typically burn until the conditions change or the fuel is exhausted. • Prescribed fires and prescribed natural fires are intentionally set or natural fires that are allowed to burn for beneficial purposes. The following three factors contribute significantly to wildfire behavior and, as detailed more fully later, they can be used to identify wildfire hazard areas: • Topography: As slope increases, the rate of wildfire spread increases. South facing slopes are also subject to greater solar radiation, making them drier and thereby intensifying wildfire behavior. However, ridgetops may mark the end of wildfire spread, since fire spreads more slowly or may even be unable to spread downhill. • Fuel: Wildfires spread based on the type and quantity of available flammable material, referred to as the fuel load. The basic characteristics of fuel include size and shape, arrangement and moisture content. Each fuel is assigned a burn index (the estimated amount of potential energy released during a fire), an estimate of the effort required to contain a wildfire, and an expected flame length. • Weather: The most variable factor affecting wildfire behavior is weather. Important weather variables are temperature, humidity, wind, and lightning. Weather events ranging in scale from localized thunderstorms to large fronts can have major effects on wildfire occurrence and behaviar. Extreme weather, such as high temperatures and low humidity, can lead to extreme wildfire activity. By contrast, cooling and higher humidity often signals reduced wildfire occurrence and easier containment. Wind has probably the largest impact on a wildfire's behavior, and is also the most unpredictable. Winds supply the fire with additional oxygen, further dry potential fuel, and push fire across the land at a quicker pace. The frequency and severity of wildfires is also impacted by other hazards, such as lightning, drought, and infestations (e.g., Pine Bark Beetle). In Arizona, these hazards combine with the three other wildfire contributors noted above (topography, fuel, weather) to present an on-going and significant hazard across much of Arizona. If not promptly controlled, wildfires may grow into an emergency or disaster. Even small fires can threaten lives, resources, and destroy improved properties. It is also important to note that in addition to affecting people, wildfires may severely affect livestock and pets. Such events may require the emergency watering/feeding, shelter, evacuation, and increased event-caused deaths and burying of animals. The indirect effects of wildfires can also be catastrophic. In addition to stripping the land of vegetation and destroying forest resources, large, intense fires can harm the soil, waterways and the land itself. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 125 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Soil exposed to intense heat may lose its capability to absorb moisture and support life. Exposed soils erode quickly and enhance siltation of rivers and streams thereby enhancing flood potential, harming aquatic life and degrading water quality. Lands stripped of vegetation are also subject to increased landslide hazards. Historv Wildfires have a prominent history in Pima County. According to Tables 5-2 and 5-3, Pima County has been included in 17 state and/or federal wildfire disaster declarations. For the period of 1980 to 2008, data compiled by the Arizona State Forestry Division for the 2010 State Plan update indicates that at least 164 wildfires greater than 100 acres in size have occurred in all of Pima County. There have been 3 wildfires that have burned more than 10,000 acres in the last ten years, and are described below in chronological order: In May of 2002, the Bullock Fire started in Bullock Canyon in the Catalina Mountains on the Coronado National Forest. The �re started on May 21 st and continued through June l Oth. It was suspected to be human induced. The fire burned 30,563 acres along with 2 cabins and several outbuildings. The residents of Summerhaven were evacuated on May 25th and Catalina Highway closed on May 22nd. The fire also threatened Mt. Bigelow which had several telecommunication towers and 2 telescopes, however, fire fighters were able to contain the fire a half of a mile away. The entire fire fight costs were estimated to be $143 million (NWCG, 2010). In June of 2003, the Aspen Fire was started by human causes on June 17, 2003 and burned for about a month on Mount Lemmon, which is part of the Santa Catalina Mountains located in the Coronado National Forest north of Tucson, Arizona. The fire burned 84,750 acres of land, and destroyed 333 homes and businesses in the community of Summerhaven. Electric lines, phone lines, water facilities, streets and sewers were also damaged. Total property damages were estimated to exceed $66 million. Fire fight costs were estimated to exceed $17 million, and the Forest Service spent an estimated $2.7 million dollars to prevent soil loss. The losses in terms of timber for future lumber was estimated at $33 million. In 2002, the year before the fire started, Congress had been requested to allocate about $2,000,000 to cover the implementation of fire prevention measures in the Coronado National Forest. However, that allocation was reduced to about $150,000 in the Congressional budget process. A presidential disaster declaration (FEMA- 1477-DR) was made on July 14, 2003. (ADEM, 2008; NWCG, 2010 and Wikipedia, 2008 at: �://en.wikipedia.ors/wiki/Aspen Fire ). In June of 2009, the Elk Horn Fire was started by human causes and an area 26 miles southwest of Three Points, Arizona. The fire started June 11, 2009 and was contained on June 22, 2009. T'he fire burned a total 23,440 acres with over $1,070,000 in fire suppression costs and 5 reported injuries related to fire fight efforts. There have been 26 wildfires in excess of 100 acres for the period of 2002 to 2009. Map 6A and 6B provides a graphical depiction of the 100 acre plus wildfires for that period. The Planning Team recognized that the declared disaster and historic hazard data collected and summarized in Section 5.1 does not adequately reflect the true cost of a wildfire. Particularly, the cost of wildfire suppression efforts to prevent structure and human loss. For example, a realistic damage estimates for the two residences and five outbuildings destroyed by the Bullock Fire would likely be less than $250,000. However, the suppression costs for the Bullock Fire exceeded $14.3 million Furthermore, the County, State, Forest Service, and other agencies spend millions of dollars every year in wildfire mitigation in fuel treatment projects. Probabilitv and Magnitude The probability and magnitude of wildfire incidents for Pima County are influenced by numerous factors including vegetation densities, previous burn history, hydrologic conditions, climatic conditions such as temperature, humidity, and wind, ignition source (human or natural), topographic aspect and slope, and remoteness of area. Wildfire risk for Pima County was mapped based on the data developed for the Pima County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (LSDI, 20ll). Pima County and participating jurisdictions and organizations developed the Pima County Community Wildfire FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 126 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Protection Plan (PCCWPP) to help local governments, fire departments and districts, and residents identify at-risk public and private lands to better protect those lands from a severe wildfire threat. The PCCWPP identified two models of wildland fuel hazards to represent a typical year of rainfall and an extraordinarily heavy rainfall year to present a range of wildland fuel hazards across the County. Each model divided the fuel hazard into three categories; high, medium and low and accounted for previous burn areas and the major buffelgrass concerns. The extraordinary fuels hazard map from the PCCWPP is shown in Figure 5-12. The high, medium and low fuel hazard risks were adopted by the Planning Team to represent the high, medium, and low wildfire risk in this Plan. Maps 6A and 6B show the wildfire hazard areas on a county-wide basis and the Tucson Metro area, respectively. Maps 6C through 6H show the wildfire hazard areas for each of the jurisidictions. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations The estimation of potential exposure to high and medium wildfire hazards was accomplished by intersecting the human and facility assets with the wildfire hazard limits depicted on Maps 6A — 6H. Loss to exposure ratios of 0.20 (20%) and 0.05 (5%) were assumed to estimate losses for all facilities located within the high and medium wildfire hazard areas, respectively. Table 5-35 summarizes the critical facility, population, and residential housing unit exposure and loss estimates for high and medium wildfire hazards. In summary, $0.41 and $1.27 billion in county-wide critical facilities are exposed to a high hazard subsidence, with estimated losses of $82.8 and $63.3 million, respectively. An additional $2.89 and $10.87 billion in county-wide Census 2010 residential housing units are estimated to be exposed to a high and medium wildfire hazard. Census 2010 residential housing unit loss estimates for the high and medium wildfire events are $578 and $543 million. Regarding human wlnerability, a total population of 25,448 people, or 2.62% of the total county-wide population, is potentially exposed to a high hazard wildfire event. Similarly, 112,750 people, or 11.62 percent of the total county-wide population is exposed to a medium wildfire hazard. Typically, deaths and injuries not related to firefighting activities are rare. However, it is feasible to assume that at least one death and/or injury may be plausible. There is also a high probability of population displacement during a wildfire event, and especially in the urban wildland interface areas. It is noted that these exposure and loss dollar amounts do not include the cost of wildfire suppression which can be substantial. Far example, a Type 1 wildfire fighter crew costs about $1 million per day to operate. It is also noted that the loss and exposure numbers presented above represent a comprehensive evaluation of the county as a whole. It is unlikely that a wildfire would occur that would impact all of the high and medium wildfire hazard areas at the same time. Accordingly, actual event based losses and exposure are likely to be only a fraction of those summarized above. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 127 Wildfire CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-34 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Source: Pima County CWPP (LSDI, 2011) Figure 5-12: PCCWPP extraordinary rainfall year fuel hazards map FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 128 EXTR/1C?RC►INARY YEA�tS FUEL HAZARD PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 129 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv — Devetoament Trend Analvsis By its very definition, the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) represents the fringe of urban development as it intersects with the natural environment. As previously discussed, wildfire risks are significant for a sizeable portion of the county. Any future development will only increase the WLJI areas and expand the potential exposure of structures to wildfire hazards. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-36 summarizes the EVRI assessment for wildfire. Table 5-36: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for wildfire EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Hi 1 Likel Catastro hic 3-6 months 3.30 WATER Hi hl Likel Limited 1-3 months 2.60 SOIL Hi hl Likel Critical 3-6 months 3.00 Overall EVRI Score 2.97 Vulnerabilitv — Consepuences/Impacts Public — The impact to the general public from wildfire is usually found in the farm of injuries (burns), illness (smoke inhalation and psychological) and death. As populated areas become threatened, evacuations of people, pets and livestock may be necessary which creates the need for shelters to be opened. Responders to the Incident — The probability and likelihood of injuries to responders is very high. They face the same kinds of threats to their health and safety as the public but to a much greater degree due to their response activities putting them close to the most dangerous areas. Physical and mental exhaustion may become a factor should an event last for an extended period of time. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — Delivery of services may be interrupted depending upon the magnitude and the duration of a wildfire event. If power, transportation routes or other critical infrastructure are damaged, this could have a significant impact on the ability to deliver and the public's ability to gain access to government and public services. The shifting of priorities by govemment and public safery agencies could result in delayed response times to calls reporting criminal activity and requests for medical crises. Larger jurisdictions (Pima County and City of Tucson) typically have more resources with which to assist smaller jurisdictions and may be called upon to do so should a jurisdiction require additional assistance. Environment — Wildfire impact lasts long after the fires are extinguished. Vegetation and trees are no longer present in burn areas to retard the erosion of rain waters or snowmelt and to permit a gradual absorption of the water into the ground and aquifer. Flooding is therefore a predictable hazard with downstream siltation as another consequence. Wildfires and the resulting effects harm wildlife, soil, water and appearance of the land for many years. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — Wildfires are expensive to fight and can create hardships on the entire community. Lives are disrupted, extra expenses are incuned, businesses lose revenue and employees, homes/businesses destroyed, and vital infrastructure is lost or damaged requiring costly rebuilding. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Prompt, organized and pre-planned response is critical to maintaining the publids confidence. Keeping the public well informed is important as is keeping the media informed of actions taken, situation updates and requested actions to be taken by the public to promote safe evacuations, establishment of shelters and general assistance to facilitate the safe response of public safety workers. After the situation is stabilized, and as recovery begins, it is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 130 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 still very important to keep the public informed of the extent of damage and status of repairs to both establish reasonable expectations and to aid in planning activities. Effective governance will be demonstrated by taking timely and effective actions and telling the public about it, how it impacts them and what they can expect Pima County government to do about it. Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update. Fisher, M., 2004, Arizona Wildland Urban Interface Assessment, 2003, prepared for the Arizona Interagency Coordination Group. http://www.azsf.az.eov/UserFiles/PDF/Arizona%20W i Idland%20Urban%20Interface%20Assess ment%2005MAR04.pdf Logan Simpson Design, Inc., 2011, Pima Counry Community Wildfire Protection Plan (DRAFT) National Wildfire Coordination Group, 2010, Historical ICS 209 reports at: http://fam.nwcg.gov/fam- web/hist 209/renort list 209 White, Seth, 2004, Bridging the Worlds of Fire Managers and Researchers: Lessons and Opportunities From the Wildland Fire Workshops, USDA Farest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-599, March 2004 Profile Maps Maps 6A and 6B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Wildfire Hazard Map(s) Maps 6C through 6H — Jurisdiction Specific Wildfire Hazard Maps FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 131 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 132 ,y � n�un un�awrvr4.ni �,ynUU�c. " �" 'PAINTED � �TRACKS � . y ` i �� � ,� PEELEV GILA :�.� " Sauale � � Gile R :.� � f HALFV MILLS . C '..- Mw t� �.�, 4 . o . ". MIDIAN MIlLS� �' � � � ...'j ' .*' "/ „'t . $` '� °� ' '..� � .. 1 � �'�' � , �. d�,' wPR � �y . ] ,� �� PICACFIORESEVOIR CNAPMAN - s`s'6. ,� � y �` x �. : I �20QD � , �. . � � � �.� NOIVJOE ��� � �� ,�,�: �� ��u PINAL� �� �, i � . � . ... .. �;76 g ���. ��������� � .� . Y" f N � � MARICOPA Hp�q� � � .. '�i#�� � � - .w•s � � . �? �rISOMBREM �TOI,'r' �": � . 'r` . � m `�"'° � .? I • p ! :� �) �� , ,��` �FOSTER . , o � � � 4 ., . n � � ��. , ��, � ` �'�. r > Gddweter ���. � ��u��� Z ' ���s "� � � ""�,� I ° ,��F t G a�€ �^` � CRATER,. ' � .. .�`� � ��wrrr�������ii� -Y. � � �Orxle HIII �'}., RED,NGTON �� V Yl1MA .'� � � � '��� M15SLE ,�� � �«.„' r . � .:: � . ` � . '-�. . �r��+�nt� . ^,�..'" **, '.. .. :�,. ' ' ' Cottonwootl ' . ;...- � " �.. .. Marana a � �' AZ-AZS-03-01B1 � ` ��S o` Qro �all q . a = B K i a� � �� Gr j � ,g. I g � � L^ Ta de �reek F n r ue Ve �c 4 HE 2 e �: .' �. '� . . � � ' ., # . , N iuc � . �� � ' . ' nA,OHWy u��Tohono .O'dham Nation !""'���� �� piMA See the To�ono O'�dh�m Nation .�` � scua Yaqui Nati `� n��eav �����- ,,:�'� _��., Multi Hazarcl M�tigation Plan,for � „ ; �*.� �� ,�. .. , . . .. , • W tucson A s-. .; �� ;� F _. u HazardProfile,lnf,ormation , cu�nnrso 85 �� ° - - � '� < - � ,� � �bmwe . rita F �JB ` ...� .. : G �.._' "'– � o -1000 �, *' � ° ,�" w* � .. PE � 1,001 - 10,000 je , * � v � 10,001 - 500,000 " � Wildfire Hazard Rating � � � F� � Hi9h � r�s � �.r� � Medium �� ;�� � ;.� M@XICO ' �� � �.,� ; LOW a .�, � �, � ;�. � y:$ . �,,, ;.' . �� . .� ' '. " ��' � '' ".. �- ± r ��' #'�:` �. Note: The extraordinary fuel hazard layer was used from the Pima Counry CWPP for this Plan „��� g: L@9@IICI LAPA2 MARI PA ILA. Community Roads n�� A I L ( � � City of South Tucson Unincorporated � Inters[ates .:�:� �._.: City of Tucson � Indian Reservation � Highways �,�, Town of Marana —°° Major Watercourses 0 5 � 0 2� MII2S P�MA � TOwn of Oro Valley � I I I � I 1 I � �X SA T R ��� Town of Sahuari[a Sources: ALRIS, 2010; JEF, 2010; GACC, 2010; i cni �mi , .. .. �� � ; � SAL�ERO' ' ��ELGMI � "• '� y r��C" " • . � . � �LGIN . 4 . �� � ; �: �JELKS �..,.,^,�.- �> ilte Tank MISSION . i SANTA CRUZ ' �v �� �R k � f �, s rtrnNl ! a �,; - � # � AZTEC��; �,.° � r � . .�5 Fresno , ,� 1 uevo ,� � � � � � � �. T � �A Bar ; ` �'+�'� �-� � � a� �,, . ` ,w;A�pMp�UTTLEAlAMO a ���""WILLOW� f �� F � � _ �',� LOCMIEI': I .. .,., I �:�,�� :) r . SAN RAFAEL """' r ` San'AMOnIO . � � .a;d"� ¢r r � ; F �g t �'r Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 6A Pima County Wildfire Hazard Map as of May 2011 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.3.11 Winter Storm Descriution Severe winter storms affect many aspects of life in the county including; transportation, emergency services, utilities, agriculture and the supply of basic subsistence to isolated communities. U.S and state highways have produced numerous fatal multi-car accidents due to heavy winter snowfall and icy road conditions. Heavy snowfalls can also leave motorists stranded in their vehicles with potentially disastrous results like hypothermia and carbon-monoxide poisoning. Significant winter storms can also hinder both ground and air emergency services vehicles from responding to accidents or other emergencies. Remote areas and communities can be easily cut-off from basic resources such as food, water, electricity, and fuel for extended periods during a heavy storm. Extremely heavy snow storms can produce excessive snow loads that can cause structural damage to under-designed buildings. Agricultural livestock can also be vulnerable to exposure and starvation during heavy winter storms. Freezing Rain is formed as snow falls through a warm zone in the atmosphere completely melting the snow. The melted snow then passes through another zone of cool air "super cooling" the rain below freezing temperature while still in a liquid state. The rain then instantly freezes when it comes in contact with the ground or other solid object. Because freezing rain hits the ground as a rain droplet, it conforms to the shape of the ground, making one thick layer of ice. Sleet is similar to hail in appearance but is formed through atmospheric conditions more like Freezing Rain. The difference is the snowflakes don't completely thaw through the warm zone and then freeze through the cool air zone closer to the ground. Sleet typically bounces as it hits a surface similar to hail. Sleet is also informally used to describe a mixture of rain and snow and is sometimes used to describe the icy coating on trees and powerlines. Sleet and freezing rain can cause slippery roadway surfaces and poor visibility leading to traffic accidents, and can leave motorists stranded in their vehicles with potentially disastrous results like hypothermia and carbon monoxide poisoning. Heavy sleet or freezing rain can produce excessive ice- loads on powerlines, telecommunication lines and other communication towers, tree limbs, and buildings causing power outages, communication disruptions, and other structural damage to under- designed facilities. Historv For the majority of Pima County, winter snow is unusual and winter storm events are rare. The heaviest winter snows usually occur at the higher elevation areas of the Santa Catalina, Baboquivari, Rincon, Whetstone, and Santa Rita Mountains and foothills. The following are highlights of the more prominent winter storm events impacting Pima County: • In November 1958, 6.4 inches of snow fell across the Tucson metro area and caused auto accidents, stranded people, dropped power lines, knocked out telephone service, closed highways and paralyzed air travel. Three boy scouts were stranded in snow near Madera Canyon in the Santa Rita Mountains south of Tucson. Their bodies were not found for two weeks. The heavy snow also closed the highway to Mt. Lemmon, marooning about 35 weekend vacationers (NWS Tucson, 2011). • In December 1971, 6.8 inches of snow blanketed the Tucson metro area after midnight. The heavy snow snarled traffic, closed the airport, downed power lines and damaged or destroyed 3000 trees, some of them 20 years old. Slush on the runway forced the closure of the Tucson International Airport and cancellation of flights between 6 AM and 11 AM. At the time, the airport did not own a snow plow (NWS Tucson, 2011). Probabilitv and Ma�nitude � Snow level measurements are recarded daily across the United States and can be used to estimate the probability and frequency of severe winter storms. In Arizona, there is a 5% annual chance that snow depths between zero and 25 centimeters will be exceeded, a snowfall probability that is among the lowest in the nation (ADEM, 2009). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 133 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The NCDC has compiled snow climatology statistics for Arizona and the rest of the conterminous 48 states, using historic data from National Weather Service cooperative observer sites for the period of 1948 to 1996 (NOAA/NCDC, 1998). The NCDC used these data sets to develop 1-, 2-, and 3-day, 10- , 25-, 50-, and 100-year recurrence interval snowfall depth estimates for each of the statistically eligible stations. There were six stations for which statistics were calculated in or near Pima County and the results are summarized in Table 5-37. The station locations are shown on Figure 5-3. It is notable that none of the stations are located on Mount Lemmon, which would be expected to have the greatest potential for snowfall depths in the county. 21 Those stations with sufficient continuous data. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 134 Figure 5-13: Weather stations with snowfall statistics within or near Pima County PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 5-37: Probability estimates of snowfall depth for various durations and return periods at select weather stations within or near Pima County Snowfall Amount, in inches Non- Non- Snowfall Return Period Observed Zero Missing Duration 10- ear 25- ear 50- ear 100- ear Maximum Data Data �fation; ARLt�:,4tCA; Eic�r = 3,62Q FT; Feriod of Reieord: �956=1996 ;; 1-da 3.8 5.4 6.8 8.3 6.5 31 41 2-da 4.3 6 7.4 8.9 6.5 31 41 3-da 4.6 6.4 7.9 9.5 6.5 31 41 Au ust-Jul 7.8 11.2 14.2 17.5 13.3 30 38 Stat�vit: KIT"�'' F�.AK; Ele�`.= 6,79Q F"�'; Per�oc�:��IteeQ�d ,,19+�1�-199fr 1-da 13.3 � 16.9 19.5 22 19 35 36 2-da 16.7 21.4 24.9 28.3 25 35 36 3-da 18.5 24.9 30.1 35.7 31.5 35 36 Au ust-Jul 46.9 61 71.9 83.3 77.5 22 22 Stati�n:, �AN"T� �`A:EXP--�1�tGE� Ele� = 4,3�T0 k"'I'� Perickd t�€ Reca��c�* "19aQ=� 9►�5 ,;, 1-da 4.7 7.8 ll 15.1 10 24 46 2-da 4.9 8.2 11.6 16 10 24 46 3-da 5.1 8.7 12.6 17.7 12 24 46 Au ust-Jul N/A N/A N/A N/A 24 17 21 SC��eon.. S�Ajt�� 7',�Y� Etev, 3,82`4 F'I'; Period of Recurd:1950e-1�9J�G ,;:< 1-da 4.6 7.5 10.4 14.1 12 29 46 2-da 4.7 7.6 10.5 14.1 12 29 46 3-da 4.7 7.6 10.5 14.2 12 29 46 Au ust-Jul N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 17 27 ; S�t��n: '�'�TGS(?�T' W�EJ :�Ic�v, = Z,584 FT; �!eriod arf Reeor�:" 19�199� 1-da 2.4 4.4 6.7 9.8 6.8 23 49 2-da 2.7 4.9 7.4 10.8 6.8 23 49 3-da 2.7 4.9 7.4 10.8 6.8 23 49 Au ust-Jul 3.5 6 8.7 12.3 6.8 23 47 „;Staricsn. URAC� Z SE, EIe� = 4,51Q FF�'; Periad of ltecord ;�9��199!6 ;- 1-da 9.5 12.8 15.3 18 15 38 47 2-da 11.1 15.4 18.9 22.7 18 38 47 3-da 11.6 16.4 20.6 25.2 19 38 47 Au ust-Jul 22.9 32.3 40.4 49.7 41 30 31 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 135 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The NCDC also maintains a snow climatology data set that contains ma�cimum 1-day, 2-day, and 3-day duration snow depths at various weather stations across the nation (except Hawaii). The data reflects the maximum depth of snowfall recorded as of 2006. Maps 7A and 7B represent a county-wide and Tucson Metro graphical depiction of zones of historically maximum 1-day duration snowfall depths. Maps 8A and 8B are similar, only depicting zones for the historically maximum 3-day duration snowfall depths. Bordering gage stations in California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico were also used to ensure that no boundary effects were created. Vulnerabilitv — CPRI Results Vulnerabilitv — Loss Estimations There are no standardized methods for estimating losses associated with winter starm events and none are made for this Plan. From a historical perspective, both human and infrastructure losses could be expected with any major winter storm event, and especially regarding traffic accidents and human exposure. This is especially true in Pima County since significant snowfall events are rare and the population in general are likely not going to be prepared for such an event. Vulnerabilitv — Development Trend Analvsis Winter Storm effects as they relate to snow and ice, will not pose much of a risk to most future development within Pima County. Development of areas above 6,000 feet are at greatest risk, but those areas are well outside of the urban core of the Tucson metro area. Enforcement and/or implementation of modern building codes to regulate new developments in conjunction with public education on how to respond to hazardous winter conditions is probably the best way to mitigate against such losses. Vulnerabilitv — EVRI Table 5-39 summarizes the EVRI assessment for winter storm. Table 5-39: Environmental Risk and Vulnerability Index (EVRI) scores for winter storm EVRI Cate o Environmental Probability of Magnitude / Duration of EVRI Element Im act Severi Im act / Dama e Score AIR Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 WATER Unlikel Ne li ible < 1 month 0.85 SOIL Unlikel Ne li ible > 6 months 1.15 Overall EVRI Score 0.95 Vulnerabilitv — Consequences/Impacts Public — Winter storms bring snow, rain, ice and freezing temperatures which are uncharacteristic for the region. Some parts of Pima County may be more affected, such as, Mount Lemmon and some rural areas at higher elevation, and therefore may become isolated because of transportation routes being closed. 'This impacts public health and safety as responders may have access difficulties. On the other FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 136 Winter storm CPRI results for each community are summarized in Table 5-38 below. PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 hand, the public may not be able to leave to seek services. In this situation, the public's capacity to shelter in place is very important thus permitting responders to prioritize rescues and life saving activities rather than providing daily sustenance and support. Responders to the Incident — Responders face the same hazards as does the general publia They must, however, drive emergency vehicles in dangerous driving conditions and work in extreme environmental conditions while conducting rescues and providing other services. Exposure, hypothermia and fall injuries may occur as well as exhaustion if the event lasts for an extended period of time. Road closures may force different modes of patient transport to be employed and may also interfere with responder access to patients or victims. Continuity of Operations /Delivery of Services — Delivery of services may be interrupted depending upon the magnitude and the duration of a winter storm event. If power, transportation routes or other critical infrastructure are affected, this could have a significant impact on the ability to deliver and the public's ability to gain access to government and public services. The shifting of priorities by government and public safety agencies could result in delayed response times to calls reporting criminal activity and requests for medical crises. Larger jurisdictions (Pima County and City of Tucson) typically have more resources with which to assist smaller jurisdictions and may be called upon to do so should a jurisdiction require additional assistance. Environment — There is minimal risk of damage to the soil, air and water related to winter storms. Some flooding may occur as a result of snow melt if the accumulation is great enough. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — There is little negative economic impact due to winter storms. Chemicals to spray on roadway surfaces to deter the formation of ice, is an expense borne by local jurisdictions. Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — Prompt, arganized and pre-planned response is critical to maintaining the public's confidence. Keeping the public well informed is important as is keeping the media informed of actions taken, situation updates and requested actions to be taken by the public to promote safe evacuations, establishment of shelters and general assistance to facilitate the safe response of public safety workers. After the situation is stabilized, and as recovery begins, it is still very important to keep the public informed of the extent of damage and status of repairs to both establish reasonable expectations and to aid in planning activities. Effective governance will be demonstrated by taking timely and effective actions and telling the public about it, how it impacts them and what they can expect Pima County government to do about it. Sources Arizona Division of Emergency Management, 2010, State of Arizona Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update. National Weather Service, Flagstaff Forecast Office, 2011, web information accessed at the following URL: httn://www.wrh.noaa.gov/f�z/safetv/criteria.php?wfo=fez NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, 1998, United States Snow Climatolo�, TD-9641 U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center, 2010, Storm Events Database, accessed via the following URL: http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cQi-win/wwcei.dll?wwevent�storms U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center, 2010, U.S. Snow Climatology Project, accessed via the following URL: http://www.ncdc.noaa. �ov/ussc/USSCApnControl ler?action=man Profile Mans Maps 7A and 7B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Maximum 1-Day Snow Depths Maps 8A and 8B — County-Wide and Tucson Metro Maximum 3-Day Snow Depths FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 137 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 138 ' �ila BendCana� 5 i 3 `�. 'f � �' �0 '� - � f * �� .� � . � . . .. ; ��� ��A�����/ �. . .. .. . � MARICOPA �� . � . .. � ��. #, . . . . . . � ur� � ��� � :..... 4. . . �����A����/���� ��' . � . . ... . YUMA ' �� (�?3 ^ �c ci�n 5 �n � . � ` �O°h. ��AH . 0 �' � � �� .. a . .. ���. . . . ,. 3., : . .� : � � . . . � � � �� �`� � . ■�\li� Y#� . . . �Tp � � PINAL 6.5 � �`x, �n �� . . � �� ���' N �, �O I �;�� 0 � � � ' _ d� +�� � � ��`'45 1�� ����. . ` � � . 2 ` r � q � Y, �`�w, �: �'f+";. ��. .... ..__ . � . . ``;, q � �� .,. �+-�..,. 3 ; "�✓,r �. � :'�: : - . . . . . x�` < x `""` � �r �€ � �, � � � � � ti�`. � �r � x � ' :� x .�; � � , . � ; � �� #� �� � ' s� 5 �; � � ,� y � > �` " � � : � Unincorpor�ated ,. NT��so�A;oHwY Tohono Q.'dham Nation �` � � ; ��;� � � �� PinnaSee che.Tohono O odham Nation� ''�-�-. :: � �� �, � ;'�,, Mu1ti-Mazard Mitigation Plan for' r �, � � � �� � � � � ��� H�zar�IProfile Info�ation;� f � 85 ,., 5 �,R �a �f �s �r��,� ,�,� � � � � Legend � MaxSnowDepths O 9.1 - 12 � 27.1 - 30 � 45.1 - 48 Max 1 Day Snow ��z.i - ie � 30.1 - 33 48.1 - 51 IIIGh@5 �15.1-18-33.1-36�51.1-54 �0-3 �18.1-21�36.1-39054.1-57 �3.1-6 �21.1-24�39.1-42057.1-60 �6.1-9 �24.1-27�42.1-45 Legend Community Roads ..�. ���� Ci[y of South Tucson Unincorporated = Interstates .._. ����� City of Tucson � Indian Reservation � Highways .._. ���� Town of Marana —•••— Major Watercourses ■ � Town oF Oro Valley :3 ���� Town of Sahuarita � Mexico 0 5 10 20 Miles � I I I � I I I � � : �,. � : . ^*' � ;, i� �<,.. �� �s ' o� a?y o, x'�,, .w.aF,s� 5.�8�6 SANTA CRUZ 7 �.__ �; e j�^"i: E ' ��, I. �. "; � ` `3"A . Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 7A Pima County Winter Storm 1 Day Maximum Snow Depth Map _;�'°"".. . . . � �da,BendCan� U ' � . � i . . . � �,3.,�3 �. . . . . . � . ``.,,�C��o . GIL'A a . . ,� ' � . , "� -,., .,..a"�`2.5 j �`.� O � ""`�° �'' i 0 } � r � " � � a �' ` r � 4 4 I � .� ��i�+ " d � �n�u���/ ww �� 4`�*� �n� I MARICOPA j ' �� PINAL Fi.5 0, � �, 3 .._.:- r, �, � �°�. , �� 1 � O GRAHAN � f � �,, ,,�.-�'"*, p ` , �, k , � , �nr�� S .� a� � �' ' 1 I . { f 4.. � .. .. : � ��ow������nY . . � ',,2�iLP . . . (;� � � ; � � M�� § T YUMA !�� � . � � . .. . � ., t � � a '`w, . " :� . �x�r��� �. �. � ., <�w�`..a.: ' ,� � ' � � � � ,�>� ,� � Marana �., ; � �. a � � „ . > . r. �, '� � ; s �, � �, ,�"��`�: `� °' 0 _ :+, ._ ,� : _� t . . , � t " ' �' k '' a � �o� � f O V � � .'�.." �.:. 4�'..��}�� 4'�, � R � `°� � 3. � � � v� ��;`,� ��, *"�t 3'� �<;��"O , � �. 'lo +' . . . . . . . . . . . �'"' a = � . . . .. ., � . : . . � � ;.,_ �"� : � . � � � � .. .. . . . � ` �� �reek �� � -�� � S �� . ' :; 5 y �� '� � ��f� �j "W i ., ° �': � .: . . . �'� . � :��, �� � w� ` Ta�que Verd ,� <. <„ ., ..., % � , � �� , � e' � � � Unincorporated '' ,< ,= o�.A, „�, , Tucson �� < � � � � ' � � � �� � �� ,: : N Ty�s ,� �€ � � , o an �,���� ,.�"'" y "' » �Tohono am Nation � South � s <� � � �� �� TM ��,; ��� Y���,,� �< . ;' I�ascua«Yaqui Nation ,` �: ,� �� ; ._ ., . �,:.� Pinna See �the Tohc►no O'f�dk�am �lafion �� �; u,v�,�,�. �:.� �.� �.� ��� " �, ., �� . _ �° ���� � � - . �r:" `�^ � ^; , � MuILi-Hazarc► Miti�ation. Pian for` � � HazardprQfile inf,ormation; 85 '� 5 ' �=���' �'�� s5r.i�r � . . . . . . . . . . . ��'. . . �� . . . . Legend • MaxSnowDepths � 9.1 - 12.0 27.1 - 30.0 � 45.1 - 48.0 Max 3 Day Snow � i2•i - is.o � 30.7 - 33.0 � 48.1 - 51.0 IllCheS �15.1-18.0�33.1-36.0 51.1-54.0 �0.0-3.0 �18.1-21.0-36.1-39.0�54.1-57.0 �3.1-6.0 �21.1-24A�39.1-42AQ57.1-60.0 �6.1-9A �24.1-27A�42.1-45A�60.1-63.0 Legend Community Roads ..�. ���� City of South Tucson Unincorporated = Interstates .._. City of Tucson � Indian Reservation � Highways 4 :'?�S (���� Town of Marana —°•— Major Watercourses �� �� Town of Oro Valley (��� Town oF Sahuarita � Mexico 0 5 10 20 Miles liiiliiil Ui 19 w,� . � a s"�" : '�+ : . � - - � � '� < + " � "' s }6'8 9.66 �� � F� � �~'..`� SANTA CRUZ �> G a� � o �e� '"`-`o� �'`C,�`� ,. � '� a �.� � 5��� F,. . � Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Map 8A Pima County Winter Storm 3 Day Maximum Snow Depth Map PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 5.4 Risk Assessment Summary The jurisdictional variability of risk associated with each hazard assessed in Section 5.3 is demonstrated by the various CPRI and loss estimation results. Accardingly, each jurisdiction has varying levels of need regarding the hazards to be mitigated, and may not consider all of the hazards as posing a great risk to their individual communities. Table 5-40 summarizes the hazards selected for mitigation by each jurisdiction and will be the basis for each jurisdictions mitigation strategy. Table 5-40: Summary of hazards to be mitigated by each participating jurisdiction � � i •� � � � ,� �= � o �+ � y CC F �C� r3 C y V1 � � �. G�' y � G�I � ,� i+ L � O L � E � N > °' � "° g Jurisdiction " ` CQ '� °' � � °' � w w a v� �n Unincorporated Pima County x x x Marana x x x Oro Valle x x x x x x x Pascua Ya ui Tribe x x x x x x Sahuarita X x x x x South Tucson No Data Provided by Jurisdiction Tohono O'odham Nation See the Tohono O'odham Nation Multi-Hazard Mitigation P/an Tucson x x x x x FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 139 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 140 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY §201.6(c)(3): (The p/an shall inc/ude...] (3) A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's b/ueprint for reducing the potential /osses identified in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities, policies, programs and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing too/s. This section sha/l inc/ude: (i) A description of mitigation goa/s to reduce or avoid /ong-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. (ii) A section that identi�es and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particu/ar emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. (iii) An action p/an describing how the actions identified in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the /ocal jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a specia/ emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs. (iv) For multi jurisdictiona/ p/ans, there must be identifiab/e action items specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approva/ or credit of the p/an. l he mitigation strategy provides the "what, when, and how" of actions that will reduce or possibly remove the community's exposure to hazard risks. According to DMA 2000, the primary components of the mitigation strategy are generally categorized into the following: Goals and Objectives Capability Assessment Mitigation Actions/Projects and Implementation Strategy The entire 2007 Plan mitigation strategy was reviewed and updated by the Planning Team, including a major re- organization of the mitigation strategy elements into this multi jurisdictional plan format. Specifics of the changes and updates are discussed in the subsections below. 6.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals and Objectives The 2007 Plan goals and objectives were developed using the 2004 State Plan goals and objectives as a starting point. Each jurisdiction then edited and modified those goals and objectives to fit the mitigation planning vision for their community. An assessment of those goals and objectives by the Planning Team and the Local Pianning Team for each jurisdiction was made with consideration of the following • Do the goals and objectives identified in the 2007 Plan reflect the updated risk assessment? • Did the goals and objectives identified in the 2007 Plan lead to mitigation projects and/or changes to policy that helped the jurisdiction(s) to reduce wlnerabiliry? • Do the goals and objectives identified in the 2007 Plan support any changes in mitigation priorities? • Are the goals and objectives identified in the 2007 Plan reflective of current State goals? A copy of the 2010 State Plan goals and objectives was made available to the Planning Team for use during the assessment. During the review/discussion of the 2007 Plan goals and objectives at the planning team meeting, the following comments were noted: • Several jurisdictions noted that many of the 2007 Plan goals and objectives were either irrelevant to hazard mitigation or extremely unclear and vague. • It was noted that a lot of time and energy was expended identifying all of the goals and objectives and subsequent actions, many of which never made it to implementation. In general, the effort was perceived as wasted. zz State of Arizona, 2004, State ofArimna All Hazard Mitigation Plan, prepared by URS. Z3 FEMA, 2008, Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 141 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 • The planning team liked the relative simplicity and flexibility of the 2010 State Plan goal and objectives, and liked the idea of investing time and energy only in identifying mitigation actions/projects that have a likely potential of being implemented over the next cycle of the Plan. As a conclusion to the discussions, the Planning Team chose to completely drop the current list of goals and objectives in favor of preparing a multi jurisdictional template of goals and objectives that are closely based on the 2010 State Plan. Accordingly, one goal and four clear objectives were established and will be used by all participating jurisdictions, as follows: � GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural or human caused hazards. ♦ Objective l: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. ♦ Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. ♦ Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. ♦ Objective 4: Increase public awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. 6.2 Capability Assessment While not required by DMA 2000, an important component of the Mitigation Strategy is a review of each participating jurisdiction's resources in order to identify, evaluate, and enhance the capacity of local resources to mitigate the effects of hazards. The capability assessment is comprised of several components: ✓ Legal and Regulatory Review — a review of the legal and regulatory capabilities, including ordinances, codes, plans, rnanuals, guidelines, and technical reports that address hazard mitigation activities. � Technical Staff and Personnel — this assessment evaluated and describes the administrative and technical capacity of the jurisdiction's staff and personnel resources. ✓ Fiscal Capability — this element summarizes each jurisdiction's fiscal capability to provide the financial resources to implement the mitigation strategy. ✓ National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Participation — the NFIP contains specific regulatory measures that enable government o�cials to determine where and how growth occurs relative to flood hazards. Participation in the NFIP is voluntary for local governments, but the program is promoted by FEMA as a basic first step for implementing and sustaining an effective flood hazard mitigation program, and is a key indicator for measuring local capability as part of this assessment. � Prior Mitigation Actions — the final part of the capability assessment is a summary review of prior mitigation actions and/or projects that have been completed over the last five or so years. The Planning Team reviewed the information provided in Section 6.1 of the 2007 Plan, and specifically Tables 6-1 through 6-24. 'The Planning Team chose to generally keep the format of the tables summarizing the administrative, technical, and fiscal capabilities. A new table was developed to summarize the legal and regulatory capabilities by better summarizing and identifying the codes, ordinances, plans, and studies/reports used by a jurisdiction, as well as identify the appropriate agency/department with responsibility for maintaining and updating those documents. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 142 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 6.2.1 Jurisdictional Capabilities Tables 6-1-1 through 6-1-6 summarize the legal and regulatory mitigation capability for each participating jurisdiction. Information provided includes a brief listing of current codes, mitigation relevant ordinances, plans, and studies/reports. Tables 6-2-1 through 6-2-6 summarize the staff and personnel resources employed by each jurisdiction that serve as a resource for hazard mitigation. Tables 6-3-1 through 6-3-6 summarize the fiscal capability and budgetary tools available to each participating jurisdiction. Each of these three tables are listed below by jurisdiction. No tables are provided for South Tucson or the Tohono O'odham Nation. Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Description Responsible Department/Agency Hazard Mitigation • 2006 International Building Code • 2006 International Property Maintenance Code • 2006 International Fuel Gas Code • Development Services • 2006 International Plumbing Code • Facilities Management CODES • 2006 International Mechanical Code • Department of Environmental • 2005 National Electrical Code Quality • 2006 International Energy • Natural Resources, Parks & Conservation Code Recreation • 2006 International Residential Code • 2006 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code • Pima County Code of Ordinances • Title 7, Environmental Quality • Title 8, Health & Safety • Facilities Management • Title 9, Public Peace, Morals & . Wastewater Management Welfare . Department of Environmental ORDINANCES • Title 15, Buildings & Quality Construction • Regional Flood Control • Title 16, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Ordinance District (2010) • Health Department • Title 17, Air Quality Control • Title 18, Zonin • Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007) • Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (1984) • Drainage and Channel Design Standards for Local Drainage Manual (1984) . Development Services PLANS, MANUALS, . Technical Policies (Interpretation of � Regional Fiood Control and/or GUIDELINES the Title 16 and Other Regulatory District Documents — see below): • 001 Completion of elevation Certification-Qualification (2006) • 002 Erosion Hazard Setback Reductions to <25 feet (2006) • 003 Minimum Construction FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 143 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Description Responsible Department/Agency Hazard Mitigation Standards for MHs (2010) • 004 Design of Flood Venting (2006) • 005 Minimum Requirements for Walls and Fences (2007) • 006 Erosion Protection for Fill Pads (2007) • 007 Applicability of the Detention/Retention Requirements (2006) • 008 Minimum Standards for Security Barriers (2006) • 009 Design of Landscaping in Basins and Channels (2006) • 010 Rainfall Input for Hydrologic Modeling (2007) • O11 Permitting for Accessory Structures (2009) • 012 Permitting of Existing Improvements (pending) • 013 Regulation of Shaded Zone X Classifications (2009) • 014 Erosion Protection of Stem Wall foundations (2009) • O15 Hydrologic Model Selection for Peak Discharge Determination (2007) • 016 Hydraulic Model Selection for Floodplain Delineation (2007) • 017 Acceptable Methods for Channel Design and Scour Calculations (pending) • 018 Acceptable Model Parameterization for Detertnining Peak Discharges (2011) • 019 Standards for Floodplain Hydraulic Modeling (pending) • 020 Anchoring Requirements for Sheds and Tanks (pending) • 021 Use of Flood Resistant Materials Below the RFE (2008) • 022 Allowable Uses of Enclosed Areas with Flood Openings (2009) • 023 Allowable Uses of Enclosed Areas with Flood Openings (2009) • 024 Avoiding Riparian Habitat- Re uirement endin FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 144 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Description Responsible Department/Agency Hazard Mitigation • 025 Sand and Gravel Permitting Guidelines (pending) • 026 Interim Regulated Riparian Habitat Mitigation Standards and Implementation Guidelines (2010) • 027 Protective Measures for Private Vehicular Access (pending) • 028 Pre-Ordinance Agricultural Berms, Channels and Stock Ponds (pending) • 029 Electrical Facilities That Are Considered "Critical Facilities" (2010) • Sonoran Conservation Plan • Pima County Sustainability Program • Pima Coun Com rehensive Plan • 1999 Flood Insurance Study, Pima County, Arizona, Unincorporated Areas • FEMA DFIRM Maps (FEMA, Effective date of June 2011) • Special Floodplain Studies (see below) • 1983 Special Study 02 — Critical Watershed Management Plan Ruthrauff Road Area • 1986 Special Study 03 — Flecha Caida Flood Improvement Study • 1986 Special Study 04 — Tucson Mountain Basin Study • 1986 Special Study OS - . Regional Flood Control STUDIES Highlands Wash Basin District Management Plan Report • 1987 Special Study 06 - Riverside Terrace Basin Management Plan • 1988 Special Study 07 - Ventana Canyon Estates, Erosion Setback Limits • 1988 Special Study 08 - Millstone Manor No. 6 • 1988 Special Study 09 - Sutherland Wash, H&H Report • 2009 Special Study 10 - Lee Moore Wash Basin Management Study • 1989 Special Study 11 - Green Valle Draina ewa No.9 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 145 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Hazard Mitigation Description Responsible Department/Agency • 1989 Special Study 12 - Valley View Wash, Flecha Caida Flood Phase 2 • 1990 Special Study 13 - Holladay Street & Forrest Avenue Watershed Study • 1990 Special Study 14 - Southwest Basin Management Study • 1990 Special Study 15 - Black Wash Drainage Analysis • 2004 Special Study 16 - [Upper] Canada Del Oro Wash Letter of Map Revision Study • 1992 Special Study 17 - Fortyniner's Interior Drainage Improvements • 2010 Special Study 18 - Soldier Wash and its Tributary • 1992 Special Study 19 - Tortolita Mountains Geomorphic Assessment • 1993 Special Study 20 - Valencia Wash Basin Management Study • 1992 Special Study 21 - Upper Carmack, South Branch, Sub- Basin Management Study • 1992 Special Study 22 - 27 Mile Wash Flood Plain Delineation Study • 1993 Special Study 23 - TanqueVerde Creek Management Study • 1993 Special Study 24 - Tortolita Area Basin Management Plan • 1993 Special Study 25 - Mt. Lemmon Culvert Study • 1994 Special Study 26 - Southwest Basin Management Study Ph. II Part A • 1995 Special Study 27 - New Tucson, Units 21, 22, 23, 24 & 27, Erosion-Hazard Setback Analysis for Unit 23 • 1994 Special Study 28 - Hydrology/Hydraulics Report for Demetrie Wash • 1989 Special Study 29 - San Joa uin Estates Flood lain FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 146 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Hazard Mitigation Description Responsible Department/Agency Status Hydrology Report for San Joaquin Estates • 1994 Special Study 30 - Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report for Palo Verde Ranch • 1996 Special Study 31 - Brawley Wash Floodplain Study • 1996 Special Study 32 - New Tucson Units 26, 28, 29 & 30 • 1995 Special Study 34 - 49ers Country Club Lots 315 to 324 • 1999 Special Study 35 - Earp Wash • 2009 Special Study 36 - Camino Real Wash Letter of Map Revision • 1999 Special Study 37 - Camino de Oeste Wash • 2000 Special Study 38 - Sahuarita Basin Management Study • 2000 Special Study 39 - HEC-1 and FLO 2-D Models for Finger Rock Wash • Special Study 40 - Mission Wash Study far FEMA • 1999 Special Study 42 - Brawley Wash Primary Flood Corridor Study • 1995 Special Study 43 - Idle Hour Wash Letter of Map Revision • 1983 Special Study 44 - Central Arizona Project (CAP) Tucson Aqueduct • 2003 Special Study 45 - Summerhaven Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis • 2007 Special Study 46 - Sheet Flood Mapping for Unincorporated Pima County • 2003 Special Study 47 - Silverbell Trails Estates • 2008 Special Study 48 - Hacienda Sol Wash Floodplain Analysis • 2007 Special Study 49 - Diamond Bell Ranch Hydrology • 2008 Special Study 50 - Floodplain Study for Flecha Caida Ranch Estates #9 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 147 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Description Responsible Department/Agency Hazard Mitigation • 2008 Special Study 51 - Floodplain Analysis far Tanuri Wash • 2004 Special Study 52 - Emergency Evaluation Study Report on the July 29, 2003, Flooding in Ajo, Arizona • 2010 Special Study 53 - Floodplain Mapping of the Woodland Wash and its Tributaries • 2010 Special Study 54 - Floodplain Mapping of the Geronimo Wash and its Tributary • 2010 Special Study 55 - Flecha Caida LOMR Technical Data Notebook • 2010 Special Study 56 - Craycroft Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping of the Craycroft Wash and its Tributary • 2010 Special Study 57 - Old Grandad Tank Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping of the Old Grandad Tank Wash and its Tributary • 2010 Special Study 58 - Wentworth Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping of Wentworth Wash and its Tributary • 2010 Special Study 59 - Castle Rock Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping of Castle Rock Wash and its Tributary • 2010 Special Study 60 - Trails End Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping of Trails End Wash and its Tributary • 2011 Special Study 61 - Picture Rocks Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 S ecial Stud 62 - West FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 148 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-1: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Pima County Regulatory Tools for Hazard Mitigation Description Responsible Department/Agency Speedway Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 63 - Camino de Oeste Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 64 - Del Cerro Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 65 - Roger Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 66 - Sweetwater Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 67 - Unnamed Wash 1 Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Mapping • 2010 Special Study 68 - Ventana Canyon Wash and Esperero Wash Technical Data Notebook for Hydrologic and H draulic Ma in FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 149 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-2-1: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Pima Count Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land � Development Services, DOT, RFCD, Wastewater, Solid management practices Waste, Natural Resources and Parks Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to � Development Services/ DOT / Wastewater buildings and/or infrastructure Planner(s) or engineer(s) with and Development Services / DOT / RFCD / Wastewater, Natural understanding of natural and/or human- � caused hazards Resources and Parks, Health Department Floodplain Manager � RFCD / Dev Services Surveyors � DOT/ RFCD / Natural Resources and Parks Staff with education or expertise to Dev Services, DOT, Facilities Management, Health, Comm assess the community's vulnerability to � Services, Sheriff, Natural Res/Parks, Risk Mgmt / RFCD hazards Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS � Development 5ervices, DOT, RFCD, Wastewater, Facilities Mana ement. Sheriff, Natural Resources/Parks Scientists familiar with the hazards of � Health Department, Wastewater, Medical Examiner, Sheriff the communi Emergency manager � OEM, Sheriff Grant writer(s) � OEM, Dev Services, Health Department, Cultural Resources Table 6-3-1: Fiscal ca abilities for Pima Coun Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Communi Develo ment Block Grants Yes Ca ital Im rovements Pro'ect fundin Yes Authori to le taaces for s ecific u oses Yes Fees for water, sewer, as, ar electric service Yes Impact fees for homebuyers or new develo ments/homes Yes Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes Incur debt throu h s ecial ta�c bonds Yes FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 150 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-2: Le al and re ulato ca abilities for Marana Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Miti ation Description De artment/A enc • Marana Town Code • Land Development Code • 2006 International Building Code with amendments additional IBC Amendments • 2006 International Residential Code with amendments additional IRC Amendments • 2006 International Mechanical Code with amendments . Planning CODES • 2006 International Plumbing Code with . Engineering amendments (adopted 07/O1/2007) • Fire • 2006 International Energy Conservation Code with amendments • 2006 International Property Maintenance Code with amendments • 2005 National Electrical Code with amendments • 2006 International Fire Code with amendments ado ted 08/21/2007 • Resolution 2003-141 — IGA with Pima County: Assist with Review & Update of Marana's Emergency Operations Plan • Resolution 2006-12 — Adopting of Emergency Operations Plan • Resolution 2006- 174 — Approving & ORDINANCES, Authorizing Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional • Police RESOLUTIONS Hazard Mitigation Plan • Council • Resolution 2010- 99 — Subgrantee for funding • Town Manager — 2010 State Homeland Security Program (references emergency operations in the 3` paragraph) • Ordinance 85.05 — Enacting the Emergency Operations/Disaster Plan for the Town of Marana • Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard PLANS, MANUALS, Mitigation Plan (2007) . Police and/or GUIDELINES . Town of Marana Emergency Operations Plan 2006 STUDIES . . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 151 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-2-2: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Marana Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land � Dept of Public Warks, Subdivision Engineering Dept. management practices Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to [� Dept. of Public Works, Manager Construction Mgmt. Div. buildings and/or infrastructure Planner(s) or engineer(s) with and Dept. of Public Warks, Manager Environmental Engineering understanding of natural and/or human- � Div. caused hazards Floodplain Manager � Dept of Public Works, Subdivision Engineering Dept. Surveyors � GIS Dept Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS Q GIS DeptJGIS Manager and Staff Scientists familiar with the hazards of the communi Emergency Management Coordinator � Police Department Grant writer(s) � Community Development Table 6-3-2: Fiscal ca abilities for Marana Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Communi Develo ment Block Grants Yes Ca ital Im rovements Pro'ect fundin Yes Authori to le taxes for s ecific u oses Yes Fees for water, sewer, as, or electric service Yes Fees for water Impact fees for homebuyers or new develo ments/homes Yes Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes Incur debt throu h s ecial tax bonds Yes FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 152 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-3: Le al and re ulator ca abilities for Oro Valle Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Miti ation Description De artment/A enc • International Building Code (2006) • International Residential Code (2006) • International Plumbing Code (2006) • International Mechanical Code (2006) • International Energy Conservation Code (2006) � • International Property Maintenance Code . Development and CODES (2006) Infrastructure Services • International Fire Code (2006) (DIS) • International Fuel Gas Code (2006) • National Electrical Code (2005) • Americans with Disabilities Act Accessible Guidelines (1998) • Oro Valley Zoning Code, Revised (2011) • Oro Valley Town Code, Chapters 6, 7, 15 & 17 • Town of Oro Valley Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Ordinance (2005) • Town of Oro Valley Storm Water Management and Discharge Control • Golder Ranch Fire ORDINANCES Ordinance, Article 15-24 (2008) District • Environmental Sensitive Lands Regulations, • DIS 27.10 (2011) • Zoning Code adopted by Ordinance includes: Hillside Development Zone, 24.2; and Ai ort Environs Zone, 24.8 (2011) • US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Highway Administration, "State Standard 7- 98 Watercourse Bank Stabilization" • Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007) • Pima County DOT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual • Town of Oro Valley General Plan (2005) • Capital Investment Plan (2010) • Pima County Regional • Town of Oro Valley Subdivision Street Flood Control District Standards • City of Tucson PLANS, MANUALS, • Pima County — City of Tucson Standard • Golder Ranch and/or GUIDELINES Specifications and Details for Public • DIS Improvement Projects (2006) • Finance • City of Tucson Standards Manual for • Water Utility Drainage Design and Floodplain Management • City of Tucson Design Manual • Storm Water Ready Plan • Drainage Criteria Manual (2010) • Drought Management Plan • Catalina Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2007) • Pima Coun Navi able Waters and Flood FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 153 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-3: Le al and re ulato ca abilities for Oro Valle Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Miti ation Description De artment/A enc Plains • Town Water Utility Drought Policy • Town Water Utility Emergency Response Plans • FEMA Flood Plain Maps (2011) • FEMA Flood Delineation Studies (1999) • Town of Oro Valley Town Wide Drainage Study (2008) • Pima County Flood Control District Flood Plain Studies • FEMA • Canyon del Oro Wash LOMR (2008) • Pima County Regional STUDIES • Lomas De Oro Wash (2008) Flood Control District • El Conquistador LOMR (2010) • DIS • Big Wash (OV marketplace LOMR) (2010) • Local Pima County Wash studies a) Arroyo Grande, 2009 b) Linda Vista/Logan's Crossing, 2010 c) Highlands Wash, 2011 • Evaluation of emer enc routes FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 154 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-2-3: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Oro Valle Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land � Development and Infrastructure Services management practices Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to � Development and Infrastructure Services buildings and/or infrastructure Planner(s) or engineer(s) with and Development and Infrastructure Services understanding of natural and/or human- � Oro Valley Police Department caused hazards Water Utility Floodplain Manager � Development and Infrastructure Services Surve ors Staff with education or expertise to Development and Infrastructure Services assess the community's vulnerability to � Oro Valley Police Deparhnent hazards Water Utility Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS � Development and Infrastructure Services Scientists familiar with the hazards of the communi Emergency manager � Oro Valley Police Deparhnent Grant writer(s) � Various departments Others � Town staff trained in NIMS and ICS Table 6-3-3: Fiscat ca abilities for Oro Valle Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Community Develo ment Block Grants Yes Ca ital Im rovements Pro'ect fundin Yes Authority to levy taxes far specific purposes Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, electric service, yes and stormwater Impact fees for homebuyers ar new yes develo ments/homes Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes Incur debt throu h s ecial tax bonds Yes FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 155 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-4: Le al and re ulato ca abilities for Pascua Ya ui Tribe Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Miti ation Description De artment/A enc • IBC 2006 • Fire Department CODES • IFC 2009 • Facilities and Housing • NFPA Standards 2009 Department ORDINANCES • Zoning Ordinance (similar to Pima County) • Land Deparhnend • Reference coun and state ordinances Development Services PLANS, MANUALS, ' Salt River Wildland Fire Management Plan (2011) • Fire Department and/or GUIDELINES • p�ma County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard • Land Deparhnent/ Miti ation Plan 2007 Develo ment Services • Environmental and Floodplain Studies for new • Land Deparhnent/ STUDIES facilities. Development Services • Endan ered S ecies List stud Table 6-2-4: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Pascua Ya ui Tribe Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with Land Department/Development Services — Director knowledge of land development and land � management practices Procurement Department — Construction Manager Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in Facilities and Housing Department — Director, Inspectors construction practices related to � procurement Department — Construction Manager buildings and/or infrastructure Planner(s) or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human- � Fire Deparhnent — Fire Chief caused hazards Floodplain Manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to � Health Department — Risk Manager hazards Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS � Land Department/Development Services — GIS Analyst Scientists familiar with the hazards of the communi Emergency manager � Police Deparhnent — Police Chief Grant writer(s) � Tribal Grants/Contracts Staff resources in several PYT departments and programs, working under the auspices of the tribal council, collectively provide hazard mitigation for the Tribe. The PYT also, when necessary, hires consultants or works with outside public agencies to conduct the necessary technical studies and analyses to determine both risk and mitigation alternatives. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 156 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-3-4: Fiscal ca abilities for Pascua Ya ui Tribe Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Communi Develo ment Block Grants Yes Capital Improvements Project funding Yes Developed based on availability of funds. Rollin 5- ear basis. Authori to le taxes for s ecific u oses Yes PYT does not have the legal capability to impose fees. These fees Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service No are all imposed by non-Tribal utility providers. The Tribe would have the authority to tax these utility service fees, but currentl does not. Impact fees for homebuyers ar new PYT has the legal capability to develo ments/homes NO im ose fees but currentl does not. Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes The Tribe has this capability, but the taaces collected by the Tribe are Incur debt through special tax bonds Yes probably not sufficient, and never will be sufficient, to support bonds based upon those possible tax streams. Other: Grants, Inter-governmental Agreements and Specific Planning and Yes Pro'ect Grants Current and past financial sources available to the Tribe for hazard mitigation planning and projects include potential disaster and mitigation funds through FEMA (Public Assistance, HMGP, and PDM funds), programs established through the Indian Self Determination Act (Public Law 93-638), casino and tribal enterprise revenues, and various departmental operation budgets. Other potential sources of funds may include the U.S. Department of Interior (Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Deparhnent of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Service), and the U.S. Deparhnent of Agriculture (U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service), State of Arizona (Governor's Office of Economic Development, Arizona Department of Transportation, Arizona Department of Housing, Arizona Department of Health Services), Pima Association of Governments, and other federal, state and local sources. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 157 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-5: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Sahuarita Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Mitigation Description Department/Agency • Planning & Building Safety • Sahuarita Town Code - current through Ordinance � police 2011-051, passed March 28, 2011 • Public Works CODES • 2006 Series of International Codes (Chapter 15.05 � Green Valley of the Town Code) as amended • 2005 National Electric Code as amended Fire District • Rural Metro Fire District • Floodplain Management Ordinance (Chapter 14.05 . public Works ORDINANCES of Town Code — Ord Nos. 2006-09 § 3, 2006-15 § � Water 1, 2006-15 § 2, and 2006-15 § 3) Reclamation • A uifer Protection ermit #103602 • Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007) • Town of Sahuarita General Plan (2003) • Specific Plans • Madera Highland (2003) • Planning & PLANS, MANUALS, ' Quail Creek (Amended 2000) Building Safety and/or GUIDELINES ' Rancho Sahuarita (Revised 2010) • Public Works • Sahuarita Town Center and Santa Cruz River • Police Corridor Sub Area Plan (2008) Department • Strategic Plan for Economic Development (2009) • Capital Improvement Plan (5-Year Rolling Plan Updated Annually) • Strate ic Plan for Emer enc Pre aredness 2011 ST`tIDIES • None • None Table 6-2-5: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Sahuarita Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land � Public Works Director, Planning Director, Building Official management practices Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to � Public Warks Director, Building Official buildings and/or infrastructure Planner(s) or engineer(s) with and public Works Director, Planning Director, Building Official, understanding of natural and/or human- � caused hazards Emergency Planner Floodplain Manager � Public Warks Directar Surveyors � Contract firm, Public Works Director Staff with education or expertise to public Warks Director, Planning and Building Safety assess the community's vulnerability to � hazards Director, Emergency Planner Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS � Contract Firm for Planning and Public Works Department FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 158 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-2-5: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Sahuarita Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Scientists familiar with the hazards of � the communi Public Works Director Emergency manager � Emergency Response Planner Grant writer(s) � Police Department, Public Works, Parks and Recreation De artment, Office of the Town Mana er Table 6-3-5: Fiscal ca abilities for Sahuarita Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Communi Develo ment Block Grants Yes Multi-year CIP Program to include Capital Improvements Project funding Yes Sahuarita Road redevelopment includin edestrian under ass Authori to le ta�ces for s ecific u oses No None Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Yes Sewer connection/hook-up fees, no other for Town Impact fees for homebuyers or new No None, see "other" below develo ments/homes Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes Onl when necessa Incur debt throu h s ecial tax bonds No None Other/Construction Sales Tax Yes Levied for each new home built in communi FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 159 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-1-6: Legal and regulatory capabilities for Tucson Regulatory Tools for Responsible Hazard Mitigation Description Department/Agency • 2006 IBC with local amendments (w/la) • 2006 Tucson Building Code (w/la) • 2003 ICC/ANSI A 117.1 (w/la) • 2006 IRC (w/la) • 2006 IEBS (w/la) • 2006 IECC (w/la) • Development and CODES • 2006 IMC (w/la) Planning Services • 2006 IFGC (w/la) • 2006 IFC (w/la) • 2006 IPC (wJla) • 2005 National Electrical Code/NFPA-70 (w/la) • 2006 IPC (w/la) • Tucson Land Use Code ORDINANCES • Tucson Code of Ordinance • City Manager • City Manager • Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard • COT Office of Mitigation Plan (2007) Emergency Mgt. • 2001 Tucson General Plan (beginning revision) & Homeland Security • 2007 City of Tucson Emergency Operations Plan � p�ma County / PLANS, MANUALS, (currently being updated) COTOEMHS and/or GUIDELINES • 2004 Design Standards Manual for Water . Tucson Water • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) . Tucson Fire Regulations . Pima Association • 2005 Supplement to the PAG Uniform Standard of Gov'ts. • Third-party Plan Review Policies and Standards . Various De artments • Development & • FEMA DFIRM Maps Planning Services STUDIES • Dam Safety Studies and Emergency Action Plans ' Parks & Recreation • Flood Insurance Studies (FIS) . Development & Plannin Services FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 160 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-2-6: Technical staff and ersonnel ca abilities for Tucson Staff/Personnel Resources � Department/Agency - Position Planner(s) or engineer(s) with Planning Dept. — Principal Planner, Planner II, Planner III knowledge of land development and land � Water Services — Superintendents, Project Engineers, Civil management practices Engineers, Project Coordinators, Principal Engineering Technicians, Princi al Planners Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in Street Transportation Dept. - Civil Engineers construction practices related to � Water Services — Superintendents, Civil Engineers, Project buildings and/or infrastructure Coordinatars, Principal Engineering Technicians Planner(s) or engineer(s) with and Planning Dept. — Principal Planner, Planner II, Planner III understanding of natural andlor human- � Water Services — Superintendents, Civil Engineers, Principal caused hazards Engineering Technician, Hydrologist Floodplain Manager � Street Transportation Dept. - Civil Engineer III Surveyors � Street Transportation Dept. — Survey Teams Staff with education or expertise to Water Services — Environmental Programs Coordinator, Civil assess the community's vulnerability to � Engineers, Water Quality Inspectors hazards Information Technology Services — Info Tech Analyst/Programmers and Info Tech Specialists Fire Dept. — Fire Protection Engineer Personnel skilled in GIS and/or HAZUS � Police Dept. — Senior User Technology Specialist Street Transportation Dept. - Info Tech Analyst/ Programmer II and Senior GIS Technician Water Services De t. — GIS and Senior GIS Technicians Office of Environmental Programs — Scientists familiar with the hazards of � Environmental Quality Specialists the community Water Services — Chemists, Environmental Quality Specialist, Laborato Technician, Environmental Pro rams Coordinator Emergency manager � Tucson Office of Emergency Management Fire Dept. — Fire Captains and Grant Manager Grant writer(s) � Planning Dept. — Principal Planner, Planner II, Pianner III Police Dept. — Police Research Analysts Public Transit, Division of Trans ortation Table 6-3-6: Fiscal ca abilities for Tucson Accessible or Eligible to Use Financial Resources Yes, No, Don't Know Comments Housing, Community Services, Community Development Block Grants Yes and Water Services ro'ects Ca ital Im rovements Pro'ect fundin Yes Authori to le taxes for s ecific u oses Yes Fees for water, sewer, as, or electric service Yes Water and Solid Waste Fees For new developments inside impact Impact fees for homebuyers or new fee areas-zones only. The Impact developments/homes YeS Fees are charged to new develo ments. Incur debt throu h eneral obli ation bonds Yes This excludes the Water De artment Incur debt throu h s ecial tax bonds Yes Excise (sales) taxes FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 161 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 6.2.2 Tribal Pre- and Post Disaster Hazard Management In addition to Tables 6-1-4, 6-2-4, and 6-3-4, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe is required to summarize and evaluate pre- and post-disaster hazard management to satisfy the §201.7 Tribal Planning capability assessment requirements. Accordingly, Table 6-4 summarizes hazard mitigation and pre- and post-disaster hazard management practices and roles that are currently accomplished through several Pascua Yaqui Tribe departments and programs. Table 6-4: Departments or entities with hazard mitigation, pre-disaster hazard management, and/or post- disaster hazard management responsibilities for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe De artment or A enc Hazard Miti ation and/or Disaster Mana ement Activities • General emergency oversight Office of the Chairtnan . General develo ment oversi ht Tribal Council • Final approval for all pre-disaster planning, projects and funding allocation for re- and ost-disaster hazard mana ement activities. • Regulates land use and development including zoning and flood management. Land Department • Lead planning department for all tribal development including flood control, transportation, and other physical improvements on the reservation. • Shared emergency management role with Police Department • Emergency response and mitigation responsibilities regarding fire and HAZMAT. • HAZMAT awareness and operations, but not technical response for Fire Department removal or clean-up. • Wildland fire awareness and operations • CERT Team collaboration • Part of the AZ Mutual Aid Compact (AZMAC) • (Pima Coun Fire Chiefs mutual aid a reement. endin • Control of disease and outbreak incidents • Dispensing of inedication and anti-viral vaccines through points of distribution and points of dispensing. Health Department • Public awareness and public service announcements in collaboration with the local radio station. • Conduct training for hazard related issues and incidents • CERT Team collaboration • Shared emergency management role with Fire Department • Response and mitigation for many of the human-caused hazards related to Police Department the civil population and terrorism • Enforcement of tribal law • Partici ates in a re ional SWAT team • Maintain and operate heavy eyuipment for response to disaster related needs Facilities Management . Maintain electricians on staff • Responsibility for emergency shut-off of water mains • Maintain a 24/7 on-call ca abili • Emergency and other purchases Procurement Department . Maintenance of emer enc enerators Indian Health Services — . Emergency response and post-disaster needs assessments for mitigation Office of Engineering and Environmental Health and recovery. BIA • Mutual aid cooperative agreement with PYT for fire response and financial assistance. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 162 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 The Pascua Yaqui Tribe has several programs and policies in-place to provide for effective hazard mitigation, as is summarized in Tables 6-1-4, 6-2-4, 6-3-4 and 6-4. The Tribal Planning Team performed an evaluation/assessment of the information summarized in Tables 6-1-4, 6-2-4, 6-3-4 and 6-4, and noted the following regarding successes, gaps, opportunities and changes over the last plan cycle: • Regarding pre- and post-disaster hazard management policies, programs, and capabilities, the tribal planning team: o Identified a need for the development of an emergency response plan. o Identified a need for additional resources to adequately respond to a human-caused incident at the AVA entertainment facility and casino. o Found that the current mutual aid agreements were proving effective in providing additional response capacity o The management of flood related hazards is by far the most prominent hazard mitigation need for the Tribe due to the reservation being wholly situated within a 100-year floodplain and subject to regular flooding. There is a serious need for flood control related funding and projects. • There has been no significant change in the Tribe's policies related to development in hazard prone areas over the 2007 Plan cycle other than to regulate to the 100-year floodplain using the data and recommendations of the Master Drainage Study summarized in Table 7-1 (See Section 7.3 of this Plan). • Specific hazard management capabilities of the tribe that have changed since approval of the previous plan include: o New BIA, Pima Fire Chiefs, and SWAT cooperative/mutual aid agreements have been developed. o The Master Drainage Plan summarized in Table 7-1 was completed and became available for flood management use. o CERT teams newly were organized in 2008 Upon receipt of a presidential disaster declaration, the Tribe will work with FEMA to develop two post-disaster hazard management tools: 1) a Public Assistance Administration Plan, and; 2) a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Administration Plan. Both plans will be used by the Tribe to identify the roles and responsibilities of the Tribe in administering the FEMA Public Assistance (PA) and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs (HMGP), and to outline staffing requirements and the policies and procedures to be used. A result of developing these plans, as well as preparing this Plan, will be to further focus Tribal resources on the importance of hazard management and mitigation planning. 6.2.3 Previous Mitigation Activlties During the last planning cycle many mitigation activities have been accomplished by the jurisdictions within Pima County. Table 6-5 provides an updated summary, by jurisdiction, of recent mitigation activities performed over the last planning cycle or generally within the last five to ten years. Table 6-6 identifies projects within Pima County that used federal mitigation grant funding for past projects. Figure 6-1 is a graphical depiction of past federally funded mitigation projects in the State tracked by ADEM. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 163 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Source: ADEM, 2010 Figure 6-1: Past Mitigation Projects in Arizona FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 164 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-5: Previous mitigation activities for Pima County jurisdictions Responsible Completion Jurisdiction Pro'ect Name Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Cost Fundin Source De artment Date This program is utilized to purchase flood- and erosion-prone land. By acquiring floodprone land, the District reduces future General Obligation Pima County Floodprone Land $9,800,000 Pima County losses on these parcels and eliminates the need for structural Bonds and TaY Regional Flood Ongoing Acquisition Program flood control improvements. During the period 2006-2010, 58 Levy Control District arceLs (1,291 acres) were urchased. Pima Counry in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Arroyo Chico Multi-Use Engineers (ACOE), has undertaken a multi-phase project to Pima County Pima County Project — Phase 2A reduce frequent flooding of residential, commercial and $20,000,000 ACOE and Tax Regional Flood December 2008 (Cherry Field Detention industrial areas along Arroyo Chico. At completion of all Levy Control District Basin) phases, 1,048 structures will be removed from the 100 year flood lain. A regional detention basin was constructed to collect and Pima County Mission View Detention concentrate sheet flow in an area of limited conveyance. This 97 General Pima County gasin was done to reduce repeated residential and street flooding. $g>900,000 Obligation Bonds Regional Flood June 2010 A roximatei 44 homes are rotected from floodin . Control District A detention basin was buiit along Earp Wash to mitigate Pima County Eazp Wash Detention residential and commercial flooding problems. The project 97 General Pima County Basin attenuates downstream peak flows and improves drainage $2>400;000 Obligation Bonds Regional Flood April 2008 conve ance. Control District A detention basin was built on a tributary to Gibson Arroyo in Pima County Pima County Ajo Curley Detention Ajo, Arizona. The detention basin eliminates flood flows onto $1,400,000 04 General Regional Flood April 2008 Basin Curley School property and attenuates peak flows downstream Obligation Bonds Control District on Gibson Arro o. Silverbell Road from Constructed 5 new lanes of roadway, sewer mainline, waterline Transportation 2008 Marana Cortraro to Ina re lacement and ma'or draina e im rovements $Z3.5 Million Series Bonds Public Works Twin Peaks Construction of a uaffic interchange, road improvements (that RTA, South Benefit public Works, Marana Improvements included major drainage elements) from Linda Vista to the town $81 Million Impact Fees, PAG, ADOT 2010 limits, and the Twin Peaks brid e General Funds CoRaro Road from Grants, PAG, Marana UPRR to Staz Grass Roadway and corresponding flood control improvements $82 Million Transportation Public Works Road Funds Marana San Lucas Flood Wall Construction of a flood wall $6,000 Utility Operating Developer 2011 Funds Thornydale Road from General Fund, Marana Orange Grove to Santa Roadway and corresponding flood control improvements $202 Million Transportation Public Works Cruz River Fund, Hel Loan Marana Lon Adams Drainage Project to address parking lot drainage $3,000 General Fund Operations & Maintenance Northwest Fire Drainage ditch repair of a small and overgrown channel. The Marana Drainage Repair concrete channel on the north and west edge ofthe property $165,000 N/A N/A takes the flow from under the I-10 and surroundin ro erties. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 165 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Marana Picture Rocks Reservoir $260,000 Utility Impact Fees Utility Department Mazana 1422-8, Berry Acres Land Acquisition $426,11 ].00 HMGP Public Works 2003 De artment Oro Valley �-inda Vista West lnstall Gabion Rock bank proYection to divert water from $120,000 PCRFCD DIS June 2011 Draina e Im rovements floodin the road and houses down radient Lomas De Oro Channel Install 3000 feet of Rock Gabion Bank Protection; Install all FEMA, ADEM, Oro Valley Stabilization Pro ect weather box culverts crossin on Lucero Road. $1,550,000 pCRFCD DIS June 2011 Lambert Lane All Oro Valley Weather Crossing at Install all weather con arch crossing on Lambert Lane $975,000 PCRFCD DIS Dec 2007 Hi hland Wash Oro Valley La Canada Road Bridge Install Bridge over the CDO Wash at La Canada Road $3,250,000 PCRFCD DIS Sep 1984 Oro Valley �'�den La Canada Road Widen the Bridge over the CDO Wash at La Canada Road $3,500,000 Town CIP DIS Apr 2005 Brid e Oro Valley First Avenue Bridge Install Bridge over the CDO Wash at First Avenue $3,920,000 PCRFCD DIS Sep 1985 Oro Valley Widen First Av Bridge Widen the Bridge over the CDO Wash at First Avenue $2,500,000 Town CIP DIS Nov 2006 Oro Valley Poinsettia Road Installed culverts, drainage channels and diversion berm to $ � 30,000 Stormwater Utility DIS Maz 201 I Draina e Im rovements eliminate roadwa floodin and debris issue. Fee Nazanja Road All Installed box culverts to eliminate a dip crossing and road Oro Valley Weather Crossing at flooding hazard. $800,000 Private Funds DIS Maz 2006 Hi hland Wash Tangerine Road All Installed several box culverts to eliminate dip crossings and Oro Valley Weather Crossings from $2,500,000 Town CIP DIS May 2004 La Canada to 1" Avenue road flooding hazards when road was widened. Oro Valley Improve Drainage in Constructed and expanded several drainage ways throughout $460,000 PCRFCD DIS May ZO10 Oro Valle Estates this subdivision to eliminate road floodin issues. Oro Valley CDO Bank Stabilization Constructed a soil cement levee from Oracle Road to La Canada $8 520,000 PCRFCD DIS Dec 1987 Drive. Oro Valley Bank Protection Oracle Stabilized the bridge banks at the CDO wash. $8,520,000 PCRFCD DIS Dec 1987 Road Brid e over CDO Oro Valley Pusch View Bridge Install Bridge over the CDO Wash at Pusch View Lane $8,460,000 Town CIP DIS Nov 2006 Oro Valley Rancho Vistoso Bridge Install Bridge over the Big Wash at Rancho Vistoso Blvd $2,600,000 PCRFCD DIS Dec 1993 Oro Valley B�g W�h Bank Constructed a soil cement levee from Tangerine Road north on $�,500,000 Private Funds DIS May 2004 Stabilization Bi Wash a roximatel ]000 feet. Annual project for the past three yeazs to mitigate the potential Parks and Sahuazita Pig Weed Project for fire hazazd at town Park, neaz Quail Creek. Pig weed is $3240.00 Town General Fund Recreations Dept. June 2011 removed annuall . General Plan for Town has included policies related to Planning and Sahuarita Floodplain Efforts discouraging development within identified floodplain areas to None None Building Safety May 2009 miti ate dama es in event of a flood. Landscape standards of Zoning Code was changed to include Extreme Heat Planning and Sahuazita Mitigation effort landscaping standazds to requiring shade provision to reduce None None Building Safety May 2009 local heat island effect FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 166 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Construction of drainage channel. Drainage channel routes Sahuarita Floodplain Efforts water away from the pazk. The recharge basins & park were $3 million Wastewater fund Public Works June 2008 also elevated to brin the area out of the flood lain limits. An area of town has experienced flash flooding in the past from Sahuarita Flash Flooding Efforts a breakaway wash. Town build up a berm along the north end None None Public Works Aug 2008 and built walls around structures. The SWRF currently has the ability to store 4 chemicais on-site for the treatment process. Each chemical has a specific storage Sahuazita Chemical Storage area and procedures in order to protect the staff. Staff is trained $9,000 General fund Public Works July 2009 in chemicals handling and MSDS sheets for chemicals are on file at the wastewater lant and aze located on the Town's server City of Tucson Milagrosa Hills Restore Waterline $217,371 HMPG Water June 2007 City of Tucson Avra Valley N Simpson $ 41,000 HMPG Water June 2007 Farm Ciry of Tucson Alamo Wash Re-bank $854,533 HMPG Transportation June 2007 City of Tucson Seneca@Rainbow Vista Bank Gabion $289,870 HMPG Transportation June 2007 City of Tucson Alamo Wash N of 5` , Bank Gabion $181,631 HMPG Transportation June 2007 W of Ruston City of Tucson Houghton — Speedway Replace concrete; grade control structure $781,847 HMPG Transportation June 2007 to Broadwa FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 167 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-6: Previous projects in Pima County jurisdictions receiving federal mitigation grant funding Federal Cost Non-Federal Year Year Total Cost Share Cost Share A licant Pro'ect Title Pro'ect T e Be un Eoded x$1,000 x$1,000 x$1,000 Pro ram Pima County 9��'� I, Emergency Rapid EOC upgrade 1997 2000 $47,000.00 $35,250.00 $11,750.00 HMGP Res onse Pima County 977-15, Video Down Link Down link from airbome source to 1998 2001 $130,000.00 $9'7,500.00 $32,500.00 HMGP (5% EOC Pima County (5��) 4, MitigaYion Plan Mitigation Plan 1998 2001 $134,000.00 $100,500.00 $33,500.00 HMGP Town of Marana 1422-8, Berry Acres Property Acquisition 2002 2003 $426,111.00 $319,583.25 $106,527.75 HMGP 6.2.4 National Flood Insurance Program Participation Participation in the NFIP is a key element of any community's local floodplain management and flood mitigation strategy. Pima County and the 6 other incorparated jurisdictions participate in the NFIP. Joining the NFIP requires the adoption of a floodplain management ordinance that requires jurisdictions to follow established minimum standards set forth by FEMA and the State of Arizona, when developing in the floodplain. These standards require that all new buildings and substantial improvements to existing buildings will be protected from damage by the 100-year flood, and that new floodplain development will not aggravate existing flood problems or increase damage to other properties. As a participant in the NFIP, communities also benefit from having Flood Insurance Rate Maps (F1RM) that map identified flood hazard areas and can be used to assess flood hazard risk, regulate construction practices and set flood insurance rates. FIRMs are also an important source of information to educate residents, government officials and the private sector about the likelihood of flooding in their community. Table 6-7 summarizes the NFIP status and statistics for each of the jurisdictions participating in this Plan. Table 6-7: Summary of NFIP status and statistics for Pima County and participating jurisdictions as of August 3l, 2011 Current Number Amount of Community NFIP Entry Effective of Coverage Jurisdiction ID Date Ma Date Policies x$1,000 Flood lain Mana ement Role Pima Coun 040073 2/15/1983 6/16/2011 2,546 $579,900 Mana ed throu h PCRFCD Marana 040118 8/1/1984 6/16/2011 325 $85,073 Provides flood lain mana ement for the town Oro Valle 040109 12/4/1979 6/16/2011 90 $27,187 Provides flood lain mana ement for the town Pascua Ya ui Tribe --- --- --- --- --- Not a Partici ant in the NFIP Sahuarita 040137 6/30/1997 6/16/2011 30 $8,450 Provides flood lain mana ement far the town South Tucson 040075 1/31/1979 6/16/2011 1 $175 Ci defers flood lain mana ement to PCRFCD Tucson 040076 8/2/1982 6/16/2011 2,052 $423,498 Provides flood lain mana ement for the ci Source: http://bsa.nfipstat.com/reports/101 l.htm (8/31/2011); FEMA Community Status Report in NF1P (2/16/2011) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 168 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 6.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects and Implementation Strategy Mitigation actions/projects (A/P) are those activities identified by a jurisdiction, that when implemented, will have the effect of reducing the community's exposure and risk to the particular hazard or hazards being mitigated. The implementation strategy addresses the "how, when, and by whom?" questions related to implementing an identified A/P. The process for defining the list of mitigation A/Ps for the Plan was accomplished in three steps. First, an assessment of the actions and projects specified in Section 6.4 of the 2007 Plan was performed, wherein each jurisdiction reviewed and evaluated their jurisdiction's specific list. Second, a new list of A/Ps for the Plan was developed by combining the carry forward results from the assessment with new A/Ps. Third, an implementation strategy for the combined list of AlPs was formulated. Details of each step and the results of the process are summarized in the following sections. 6.3.1 Previous Mitigation Actions/Projects Assessment The Planning Team and Local Planning Team for each jurisdiction reviewed and assessed the actions and projects listed in Tables 6-27 through 6-33 of the 2007 Plan. The assessment included evaluating and classifying each of the previously identified A/Ps based on the following criteria: STATUS DISPOSITION Classification Ex lanation Re uirement: Classification Ex lanation Re uirement: "No Action" Reason for no ro ress "Kee " None re uired "In Pro ress" What ro ress has been made "Revise" Revised com onents "Complete" Date of completion and final cost of "Delete" Reason(s) for exclusion. ro'ect (if a licable) Any A/P with a disposition classification of "Keep" or "Revise" was carried forward to become part of the A/P list for the Plan. All A/Ps identified as "Delete" were removed and are not carried forward in this Plan. The results of the assessment far each of the 2007 Plan A/Ps is summarized by jurisdiction in Tables 6-8-1 through 6-8-6. It is noted that there are no Tables 6-8-xx provided for South Tucson or the Tohono O'odham Nation. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 169 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-1 Pima County assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation • Office of Emergency Develo a Shelter in Place educational ro ram. Management In Web site is being developed and this 1 3.B.2 p p g . Staff time progress Keep information will be shared from this site • 12 months, on oin • Transportation 2 3.B.1 Develop a Mass evacuation strategy Department Complete Delete pCOEM completed an evacuation plan • Staff time in July of 2008 • 18 months • Development Services Pima County Comprehensive Plan Review & Modify Pima County Comprehensive Plan & Department update has been rescheduled to 2015. 3 l.A.l Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. . Staff time No Action Delete No really mitigation related and will be • 24 months deleted. The ordinance has been modified to • Pima Regional Flood enhance the compliance enforcement 4 S.A.7 Enforce Flood & Erosion Hazard Ordinances Control District In Kee process by including civil penalties. • Staff time Progress p Ambiguous portions of the ordinance • Ongoing have been clarified to better assess if com liance has been achieved. Annual reports are submitted to FEMA • Pima Regional Flood to certify flood mitigation activities. Participate in Community Rating System to reduce Control District In Our score has improved during the 5- 5 S.B.1 Insurance premiums . Staff time Progress Keep year cycle. The current CRS rating is • Ongoing Class 5 which provides up to a 30% reduction in flood insurance rates. • Office of Emergency Pima County OEM has built a hospital 6 12.B.2 Provide leadership role to hospital preparedness Management Complete Delete preparedness committee and meetings • Staff time • On oin are monthly. On going • Office of Emergency Maintain a Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT) Management Pima County has the Azl DMAT team � 12•C•2 to support disaster operarions • Staff and Volunteer Complete Delete in place. On going time • On oin FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 170 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-1 Pima County assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Develop & implement multi-agency exercises & drills • Health Department Pima County Health Department 8 9.B.2 related to outbreaks of communicable illnesses & vector • Staff and Volunteers In Kee conducts a variety of exercises and drills control. time Progress p related to outbreaks. This is an on-going • 2.5 months, on oin activity. • Office of Emergency Management PCOEM has a multi year planning 9 4.B.1 Identify exercises for community needs. . Staff and Volunteer Complete Delete calendar in place and updates it time annually. On going • 40 hours • Office of Emergency Management PCOEM builds and conducts exercises ]0 4.B.2 Develop exercises for community needs. • Staff and Volunteer Complete Delete as needed. time This will be on-going • 2 months er exercise • Office of Emergency Train agencies and community groups involved in Management PCOEM builds and conducts exercises 11 4.B.3 exercises. • Staff and Volunteer Complete Delete as needed. time This is on-going • 3 da s er exercise • Office of Emergency Management PCOEM builds and conducts exercises 12 4.B.4 Conduct exercises in the community. . Staff and Volunteer Complete Delete as needed. time This is on-going • 1-3 da s er exercise FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 171 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-2 Marana's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Provide training to the applicable Town of Marana . Town of Marana 1 LC.2 departrnents on the adopted hazard mitigation plan and . None provided In Keep The town adopted plan was provided to its re uirements. Progress all deparhnents for review. q • Ongoing • Town of Marana Berry Acres residents were advised of Provide public outreach to increase awareness of . None provided In- the potentiai for flooding in their area 2 2•B hazards and opportunities for mitigation actions. • Ongoing when funding Progress Revise �d of the opportunity for land purchase is a�ailable to mitigate the problem Develo a mass evacuation strate for the Town of • Town of Marana p �' In- Will be part of the current revision of the 3 3.B.1 Marana • None provided progress Keep Town Emergency Operation Plan • 12 months The Town of Marana will continue to plan for, design, . Town of Marana Flood, Road realignment, culverts, 4 5.A.4 and construct appropriate flood control structures for .$133,330,000.00 I° Keep drainage repair, flood channel, new public safety and damage reduction. � progress Ongoing overpass, drainage etc. Encourage bridge or culvert construction where roads In- 5 5.A.5 �e susceptible to flooding. • SEE #4 ABOVE progress Keep SEE #4 ABOVE The Town of Marana will continue to artici ate in the • Town of Marana p p In- Action/project will be revised to be more 6 S.B1 National Flood Insurance Program. • None provided progress Revise specific. • Ongoing The Town of Marana will continue to participate in the • Town of Marana/Pima Berry Acres: Where possible and 7 5.C.1 Flood Prone Land Acquisition Program so we acquire County In- financially feasible in coordination with properties located in flood hazard areas. •$426,111.00 progress Keep Pima County. • Ongoing SEE # 2 ABOVE Establish intergovernmental agreement between the We have an agreement with NW Fire to Town of Marana and the Fire Management Division of . Town of Marana provide the Town with fire service. 8 6.A.1 the State Land Department for assistance in the . None provided Completed Keep They have and agreement with State Fire provision of emergency services within each other's . 6 months department for wild land fires along with jurisdictions. other fire districts. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 172 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLt1N 2012 Table 6-8-2 Marana's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Continue to ensure the involvement of industry, Fire Town of Marana is involved in the Districts, Law Enforcement and other key stakeholders • Town of Marana In _ LEPC thru MPD and Northwest Fire 9 11.A.1 �n the Town of Marana Local Emergency Planning • None provided ro ress Keep District. The PD is the lead Department Committee. • Ongoing p g and over sees the LEPC. NW Fire is a member of the Plannin Committee Work with Regional Partners to develop and maintain a • Town of Marana database of schools, hospitals, and other key facilities . None provided In- 10 11.B.1 within a one-mile radius of HAZMAT facilities and Delete This is currently auailable thru CAMEO • 12 months then progress make that database available to responders. ongoing Table 6-8-3 Oro Valley's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation The General Plan is reviewed on an Review existing Oro Valley General Plan and zoning annual basis, with significant changes code to determine how these documents help limit . Planning and Zoning made only once a year. The next development in hazardous areas. Modify with additional Administrator In General Plan update is due in 2015. 1 1.A.1 guidelines, regulations, and land use techniques as . None provided progress Keep Zoning codes regulate development on necess within the limits of state statues, while also hazardous slopes and hillsides, and � • Ongoing flood lain ordinances limit. These respecting private property rights. P codes and ordinances are updated re ularl . Oro Valley does not have a Local Oro Valley Local Emergency Planning Committee will . police Department Emergency Planning Committee but provide training to applicable Oro Valley Planning and LEPC Representative In does have a representative on the 2 I.C.2 Development deparhnent staff of the adopted hazard � Revise None provided progress regional Local Emergency Planning mitigation plan and its requirements • 1 month, ongoing Committee. They attend regular meetin s and a licable trainin s. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 173 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-3 Oro Valley's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation • Police Deparhnent Emergency Town developing mass evacuation strategies 3 3.B.1 Develop a mass evacuation strategy for Oro Va11ey Management In Revise that correlate with existing Pima County and Coordinator progress State evacuation plans. • None provided • 12 months, on oin • Police Department Emergency Town developing a shelter-in-place 4 3.B.2 Develop a Shelter in Place edueational program Management In Revise program that correlates with existing Pima Coordinator progress County and State plans. • None provided • 6 months, on oin Implementation and progress of this Town of Oro Valley Department of Development and mitigation action is tied to securing Infrastructure Services will continue to work with and . Town Engineer funding first. It is dependent on the throu h Pima Coun Re ional Flood Control District In Pima County Regional Flood Control 5 S.A.2 �pCRFCD) to acquire property located in the FEMA 100 � None provided progress Revise District bonds. Appraisal of the • Ongoing ro e and bud et limitations will yeaz flood plain P P rh' g determine the time table for purchasing of ro e • Planning and Zoning Support the under grounding of new transmission line Administrator, Implementation and progress of this construction and use of inetal power utiliry poles as Building Official & mitigation action is tied to securing 6 7.A.2 replacements for existing wooden poles or when above Town Engineer No action Revise funding first. This project is currently ground installation is required . None provided on hold waiting a future funding source. • On oin • Police Deparhnent Offer, throu h the De arhnent of Emer enc Emergency g p g y Training to Police Department Mana ement, basic wea ons of mass destruction Management � � 2'A' � g p � Coordinator Complete Delete personnel and other Town personnel is WMD) courses to Town employees and the public ongoing. • None provided • On oin FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 174 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-4 Pascua Yaqai Tribe's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost • Proposed Comp ID Name Descri tion Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Review existing building codes to determine adequate protection from new development in hazard areas. A resolution with an option to adopt the Where feasible and necessary, modify codes to help • Tribal Council latest codes as they are available, was 1 � B� mitigate hazards imposed on such development within . None provided In Progress Keep approved in 1997. Accordingly, the the limits of the Pascua Yaqui Reservation, while also . 18 months, ongoing Tribe maintains the most current series respecting private property rights adjacent to the of codes. Reservation. Continued coordination between Pascua Yaqui Tribe, Pima County departments, municipalities, Pima . Transportation Association of Governments, and other agencies in the Director Coordination has been maintained with 2 1.D1 development and maintenance of accurate geographic . None provided In Progress Keep those departments on a regular basis. information system information for those hazard areas • Ongoing identified in the adopted hazard mitigation plan. • Fire Department — Pro-actively seek availability of Pre Disaster Mitigation Fire Chief Will do this on a project specific basis, 3 2.A. l and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funds. . None provided No Action Delete as appropriate • On oin • Fire Department — Procurement and Development has Develop a Mass Evacuation strategy for Pascua Yaqui Fire Chief been doing this on an incremental, 4 3.B.1 Tribe. • None provided In Progress Revise facility-by-facility basis. Revise to • 12 months develop a formalized document and lan. Continue the existing intergovernmental agreement . Fire Department — PYT currently does not haue an IGA between the Tribe and the State Forestry Department for Fire Chief with State Forestry Division, but has 5 6.A.1 assistance in the provision of emergency services within . None provided In Progress Keep communicated with State Foreshy each other's jurisdictions. . Ongoing Divsion to investigate opportunities. • Fire Deparhnent — Perform periodic assessments to identify infrastructure Fire Chief Project is too vague and needs more 6 7.B.1 vulnerabilities to severe weather. . None provided In Progress Delete detail. Will completely reformulate action/project as appropriate. • On oin FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 175 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-4 Pascua Yaqui Tribe's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost • Proposed Comp 1D Name Descri tion Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Conduct and enhance environmental and PYT PHEP Program currently has an epidemiological surveillance activities in those areas IGA with ADHS for PHEP (Public identified as being of high public health importance and Health Emergency Preparedness) for related to environmental factors such as;, food safety and epidemiological surveillance activities protection and vector control activities. Surveillance high risk of communicable diseases and activities must include the idenrification of investigation opportunities of vulnerabilities and environmental factars that may outbreaks. With Indian Health Service contribute to the transmission of the communicable • Epidemiology Center we have our environmental factors such diseases associated with the o eration and resence of Director as; food safety and protection of the 7 9.B1 p p . None rovided In progress Keep environment on the PYT reservation. these facilities in the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, as well as the P implementation of preventative action which may be • 6 months, ongoing The PYT PHEP Program has a strong applied to reduce or eliminate the potenrial for collaborarion and communication with transmission of communicable illnesses. Develop and ADEM (Arizona Department of improve the system of coordination and communication Emergency Management), ADHS of these findings, trends and observations with other (Arizona Department of Health federal, state and local agencies that haue similar or Services), Pima County Health related interest. Department and the Tueson LH.S. Indian Health Services . Promote development of Tribal Emergency Response • Fire Department — Committee TERC to develo lans and coordination of Fire Chief 8 11.A.4 � � p p . None rovided No Action Delete No anticipated activity. resources. P • 18 months, on oin Over the last Plan cycle, PYT has • Fire Department — received approximately 5 DHS grants Obtain Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Fire Chief totaling over a half million dollars, for 9 12.C.1 funding to purchase necessary equipment. • None provided In Progress Keep various needs such as barricades, EOC • Ongoing upgrades, communications and records mana ement s stems, and others. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 176 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-5 Sahuarita's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation • Police Department Promote Child Drowning Prevention programs •$30,000 plus Staff Changes in staffing and budgets restricted a focused effort. Will l 12.A.3 throughout the Town. time No Action Keep continue to seek implementation with • 0.25 FTE for 24 Fire Department months, on oin improve upon existing capabilities to warn the public of . police Department Moved over to conduct same effort but emergency situations by initiating a system to test the . Staff time using the AENS systems. New system 2 3.A ability of local emergency managers to activate the . 0.25 FTE for 6 Completed Revised implemented and regularly tested in Emergency Alert System (EAS). months community Brochures and other Pima County Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards, and . po�ice Department public information material distributed potential opportunities for mitigation actions. Make Pima . Staff time annually at Fiesta Sahuarita information 3 2•A County's public information material sheets, websites, . 0.25 FTE for 24 Completed Keep booth, and through mitigation brochures, and media outlets available. months community/Neighbarhood Watch meetin s and will continue Sponsor, under LEPC guidance, an annual exercise • Police Department Semi-Annual simulated exercise 4 ll.D.2 simulating response to a large-scale F�AZMAT incident. • Staff time Completed Keep conducted with all members of PD • 0.25 FTE for 2 days through training effort. Will continue. • Public Works Continue to cooperate with the Arizona Department of Department Program in place with Public Works 5 10.B.1 Transportation in their assessment of existing Town- •$100,000 plus Staff Streets Department consistently time Completed Delete working with ADOT for continual owned bridges far their susceptibility to geo-hazards. assessment of town-owned and newly • 0.25 FTE for 12 built bridges. months • Police Department Received free Emergency Response Provide Emergency Response Guidebooks to all Fire and .$1Q000 plus Staff Guidebooks from Pima County at every 6 11.D.1 Law Enfarcement vehicles. time Completed Delete new printing, last one 2009 and • 20FTE for 2 hours distributed to all vehicles. Continued coordination between Sahuarita's departments, regional municipalities, Pima Association • GIS Manager of Governments, and other agencies in the development •$50,000 plus Staff Budgetary considerations ha�e caused 7 1.D1 time No Action Delete the elimination of GIS Manager and no and maintenance of accurate geographic information backfill of position. All GIS efforts system. Information for hazardous areas is to be • 0.25 FTE for 48 stopped indefinitely identified in the adopted hazard mitigation plan. months FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 177 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-5 Sahuarita's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost ID Name Descri tion • Pro osed Com Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Explore policies to ensure reclaimed water lines are • Public Works Studied in jurisdiction and committee 8 8.B3 installed to provide reclaimed water to common areas for Department No Action Delete recommended as "Not financially all new development plans. •$20,000 beneficial to communi • 9 months � � Use reclaimed water where feasible and utilize other • Public Works Parks all use water reclamation 9 g.g.l alternative water sources such as passive and active Department Completed Delete Processes and Town Wastewater plant harvesting where appropriate. •$10,000 improved by $lm to use reclaimed • On oin water • Public Works Mandate where appropriate, the use of desert landscaping Deparhnent Both Town code and Town General 10 8.A.1 and Best Management Practices for irrigation for all . Staff time Completed Delete Plan mandate best management Town facilities and projects. . 0.25 FTE for 3 irrigation for all Town facilities. months Table 6-8-6 Tucson's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost • Proposed Comp ID Name Descri tion Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Identify funding source and construct two bridges and 50 box culverts with 380 back-up power units for signalized intersections at high flood hazard crossings in City of • Department of 1 S.A.1 Tucson limits in accord with the COT Department of Transportation No Action Keep Unable to do any construction due to Transportation 5-year plan. If a box culvert cannot be •$70,000,000 lack of funding. constructed an automated warning device, consisting of • 18 months a banicade, signs and flashing lights would be installed. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 178 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLA1V 2012 Table 6-8-6 Tucson's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost • Proposed Comp ID Name Descri tion Date Status Dis osition Ex lanation Develop a mass evacuation strategy for the City of Tucson to include installing back-up battery power at all 380 signaled intersections in the City of Tucson (e.g. • Public Warks De artment Evacuation plan written by in-house 2 3.B1 The units would allow the signals to fully function for 4 p Completed Delete staff. Signal back-ups denied by State hours and provide all-way flashing red lights for an •$10,000,000 additional6 hours. This would eliminate the need for • 18 months, ongoing 3 years in row. officers at eaeh intersection). Tucson Water, a division of the Utility Services The project is approximately 15% Deparhnent, will secure its assets and facilities by • Utility Services De artment complete and the City has installed 3 12.A.6 implementing actions, in phases, as identified in the p In Progress Keep approximately $3 million in secarity Federally mandated Water System Vulnerability •$91,727,000 Assessment completed in October 2002. • 1-4 years measures, upgrades and monitoring equipment. Promote disaster-resistant water delivery system by constructing redundant water transmission lines (e.g. • Tucson Water 4 LC.3 The Utility and the community will be less susceptible to Employees In Progress Keep Department funding the entire project, loss of water delivery due to natural or man-made •$26,960,000 which is about 1/3 done. disasters). • 1-3 years Promote the use of effluent and reclaimed (gray) water harvesting for appropriate applications (e.g. Reduce the Project is approximately 80% complete possibility of damage and losses due to a drought on the • Tucson Water with approximately $5 million 5 8.B.1 Colorado River by completion of the following capital Employees In Progress Delete expended. Projects are completed as projects: Norris/Main Avenue Reclaimed Transmission •$7,903,000 money is available. City chose to no Main, Broadway/Columbus Reclaimed Transmission • 1-3 years longer carry project in the Plan. Main, La Paloma Reservoir, Houghton Road Booster). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 179 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-8-6 Tucson's assessment of previous plan cycle mitigation actions/projects • Lead Agency • Proposed Cost • Proposed Comp ID Name Descri tion Date Status Dis osition Ex Ianation Work with the Arizona Geological Society and U.S. Geological Survey on projects that mitigate geo-hazards (e.g. Continue the feasibility study with the AZ Geological and U.S. Geological Surveys Water Plan 2000-2050.Construct second recharge facility to be • Tucson Water Staff Department in partnership with the 6 10.A.1 known as the Southern Avra Valley Recharge and •$51,180,000 In Progress Keep Arizona Geological Survey, CAP Recovery Project (SAVSARP). The utility could then • 5 years currently constructing facility. use its entire allotment of Central Arizona Project water and provide capacity for recharging additional water supplies. Construction will take 5 years). Continue assessing vulnerability of potential terrorist targets and share information among law enforcement agencies. (e.g. The following capital projects will reduce . Tucson Water Staff Study completed in 2011 at a cost of 7 12.B1 the possibility of such damage and losses. / Facility .$5,684,000 Complete Delete $500,000. Identified approximately Access & Security Project, La Entrada Building . 18 months, ongoing $23 million in retrofits. Looking at Improvements, SCADA Communications upgrade and funding for 2014 to start. SCADA System Improvements). FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 180 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 6.3.2 New Mitigation Actions / Projects and Implementation Strategy Upon completion of the assessment summarized in Section 6.3.1, each jurisdiction's Local Planning Team developed new A/Ps using the goals and objectives, results of the vulnerability analysis and capability assessment, and the planning team's institutional knowledge of hazard mitigation needs in the community. The A/Ps can be generally classified as either structural or non-structural. Structural A/Ps typify a traditional "bricks and mortar" approach where physical improvements are provided to effect the mitigation goals. Examples may include forest thinning, channels, culverts, bridges, detention basins, dams, emergency structures, and structural augmentations of existing facilities. Non- structural A/Ps deal more with policy, ordinance, regulation and administrative actions ar changes, buy-out programs, and legislative actions. For each A/P, the following elements were identified: • Description — a brief description of the A/P including a supporting statement that tells the "whaY' and "why" reason far the A/P. • Hazard(s) Mitigated — a list of the hazard or hazards mitigated by the A/P. • Community Assets Mitigated — a brief descriptor to qualify the type of assets (existing, new, or both) that the proposed mitigation A/P addresses. • Estimated Costs — concept level cost estimates that may be a dollar amount or estimated as staff time. Once the full list of A/Ps was completed to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Team, the team then developed the implementation strategy for those A/Ps. The implementation strategy addresses the `priority, how, when, and by whom?" questions related to the execution and completion of an identified A/P. Specific elements identified as a part of the implementation strategy included: • Priority Ranking — each A/P was assigned a priarity ranking of either "High", "Medium", ar"Low". The assignments were subjectively made using a simple process that assessed how well the A/P satisfied the following considerations: o A favorable benefit versus cost evaluation, wherein the perceived direct and indirect benefits outweighed the project cost. o A direct beneficial impact on the ability to protect life and/or property from natural hazards. o A mitigation solution with a long-term effectiveness • Planning Mechanism(s) for Implementation — where applicable, a list of current planning mechanisms or processes under which the A/P will be implemented. Examples could include CIPs, General Plans, Area Drainage Master Plans, etc. • Anticipated Completion Date — a realistic and general timeframe for completing the A/P. Examples may include a specific target date, a timeframe contingent upon other processes, or recurring timeframes. • Primary Agency and Job Title Responsible for Implementation —the agency, department, office, or other entity and corresponding job title that will have responsibility for the A/P and its implementation. � Funding Source — the source or sources of anticipated funding far the A/P. Tables 6-9-1 through 6-9-6 summarize the current mitigation A/P and implementation strategy for each participating Plan jurisdiction. Projects listed in italics font are recognized as being more response and recovery oriented, but are considered to be a significant part of the overall hazard management goals of the community. No Tables 6-9-xx are provided for South Tucson or the Tohono O'odham Nation. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 181 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-1: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Pima Coun GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s RFCD / Enforce Flood & Erosion Hazazd Ordinance in Flood Both $1 High Regulatory On going Floodplain Flood Control tax acwrdance with the NFIP. million Management Levy Division Implement NFIP tasks such as LOMR submittals, RFCD / Planning maintaining a county-wide map repository, Flood Both $600,000 High Regulatory On going & Development Flood Control Tax performing master drainage studies, and Levy coordinatin to insure the di ital ma is correct. Division RFCD / Arroyo Chico Multi-Use Project— Phase 2B $133 September, Flood Control Tax (Basins 1, 2& 3) Flood Both million High CIP 2013 Engineering Levy & USACOE Division Levee Operation �CD / Inspection and preventative maintenance on levees Levee Failure Both $50,000 High & Maintenance On going Infrastructure Flood Control Tax as needed. Manual Management Levy Division Develop and implement multi-agency exercises Health Disease Departmental and drills related to outbreaks of communicable (Response) (Response) Staff Time High Plans 12 months Department, Grant Funds illnesses and vector control. Director Pima Counry Offtce of � Emergency Develop a Shelter in Place Plan (appendix to Pima All (Response) Staff Time High Departmental 24 months Management and Grant Funds Counry Emergency Operations Plan). (Response) P[ans Homeland �as available) Security, Director Participate in Community Rating System to reduce RFCD / Planning Flood Control Tax insurance premiums. Flood Both $50,000 Medium N/A On going & Development Levy Division FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 182 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-2: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Marana GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastrucYure from natural and hwnan caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation Chroughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planniug Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Soarce s Provide training to the applicable Town of Marana Emergency departments on the adopted hazard mitigation plan All Both $500 High (None identified) 2012 Management General Fund and its requirements. Coordinator Conduct a public education campaign to increase awareness of natural hazards by distributing ADEM and Pima Couoty mitigation flyers at Community community events and public gathering All Both $500 High (None identified) 2014 DevelopmenY General Fund oppoRunities, as appropriate. This will be Director accomplished semi-annually by Community Services. The Town of Marana will continue to plan for, Grants, design, and construct appropriate flood conttol Development TranspoRation Flood Both $133M High CIP 2018 Services/General structures for public safety and damage reduction. Manager General Fund, Bonds, etc Encourage bridge or culvert consttuction where roads are susceptible to flooding. This will be Development accomplished as parC of the Planning Process when Flood Both Staff Time High (None identified) 2016 Services/ General General Fund Developers apply to build in Marana. Manager The Town of Marana will conCinue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program by Development reviewing applications for buildings, ensuring they Flood Both Staff Time High (None identified) 2016 Services/ General General Fund aze properly designed. Manager Rattlesnal:e Pass from Saguaro Springs to Twin $29.8 Public Works / Transportation Peaks Road. Flood Existing Million High CIP 2018 Director Fund, General Fund Barnett Linear Park and Flood Control — Construct General Fund, a 3-mile channei along Baznett Road to mitigate $16.5 Public Works / the drainage and flood hazard from the SanYa Cruz Flood New Million High CIP 2016 Director Future MMPC River Bonds FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 183 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-2: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Marana GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the inwrporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima County. Miti atioo Action/Pro'ect Im Iementatioo Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsi6le for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Development Transportation Ina Road Bridge — Remove and replace the Ina $17.5 Fund, HURF Road bridge that crosses the Santa Cruz River Flood New Million High CIP 2016 Services / Bonds, General Director Fund Ina Road Improvements from Silverbell Road to I- Transportation 10 — widening of Ina Road to 4-lane section with $16.5 Public raised median, sidewalks, and drainage Flood New M ���� on High (None identified) 2016 �lyorks/Director Fund, Federal im rovements Grants Tangerine Road Corridor - provide a minimum of 4lanes with raised medians, drainage improvements, sidewalks, ADA facilities, multi- $95.5 Public Works / RTA, Future Bond use path and lanes, Traffic Signals, Right-of-Way Flood New Million High CIP 2019 Director Money acquisitions, Utility relocations, Marana Water line extensions, and sewer modifications and additions. Ina Road TI — lower I-10 and wnstruct a new Public Works / Flood, overpass that will span both I-] 0 and the UPRR ADOT 5-Year Director HAZMAT, $65.0 tracks. Project will mitigate flood issues and also Existing High Plan and RTA 2018 ADOT, RTA Traf�c Million improve access that will reduce accidents and Accidents Plan in coordination HAZMAT incidents with ADOT Wildfire, Utility UPRR and Tangerine Road HAZMAT New $133,200 Medium (None identified) N/A Department / Grant Funding Director The Town of Marana will continue to participate in Development Grants, the Flood Prone Land Acquisition Program so we Flood Existing Staff Medium NFIP 2016 Services/ General Partnership w/ acquire properties located in flood hazard areas. Compliance Manager Pima County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 184 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-3: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Oro Valle GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the inwrporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Ageucy Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Town wide Develop, implevtent, and update a mass Emergency A77 emergency AnnuaDy, General Fund and evacuation strategy for Oro T�alley (including (Response) �Response) Staff Time High management ongoing Management and grant training and exercising). DIS ro ram Develop, implement, and regularly update a Town-wide All emergency Annually, Emergency General Fund and She[ter in Place educational program (including (Response) �Response) Staff Time High �anage�nent ongoing Management grant training and exercisiny�. ro ram Pima County Health Dept.; West Nile Virus Program Continued testing of IGA with Pima Stormwater Annually, Stormwater mosquitoes for West Nile Virus. If a positive Disease Both $5,000 High County Health Utility, and result, the area is sprayed. Dept. ongoing Utility Arizona Dept. of Health Zoonotic Diseases Buffeigrass Program actively educates and Staff and General Fund, Buffelgrass Annual, removes buffelgrass in public areas across the Wildfire Both Volunteer High Eradication Plan ongoing DIS grant, and Town. Time volunteer time Regulazly update wildland-urban interface plans Wildland Urban Annual, Golder Ranch and educate communities about fire hazards. W�ldfire Both Staff Time High Interface ongoing Fire District Golder Ranch Widening of LambeR Lane between Pusch View Lane Bridge and La Canada Dr. will include Flood Both $8M High DIS Engineering Sept. 2013 D1S Pima Association drainage improvements to eliminate roadway Governments floodin and debris. Extreme Public education and outreach about protecting Annual, Oro Valley pipes and irrigation systems from freezes. Temperatwe, Both Staff Time High ongoing Water Utility Water Utility Fees Winter Storms Applicable Hazmat training and exercising for first Staff Time Oro Valley responders; as well as participation in multi- and Annual, Police General Fund and agency regional hazmat and decontamination �ZMAT Both Training High ongoing Deparhnent and Grant Funds teams. Costs Golder Ranch FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 185 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-3: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Oro Valle GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 4: Increase ublic awazeness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal �urisdictions within Pima County. Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementatiou Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority For Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Town wide Develop, implement, and update a mass Emergency All . emergency Annually, General Fund and evacuation strategy for Oro Valley (including (Response) (Response) Sta,�J"Time High �anagement ongoing Management and grant training and exercisin�. DIS ro ram Develop, implement, and regularly update a Town-wide All emergency Annually, Emergency General Fund and Shelter in Place educationa! program (including (Response) (Response) Staff Time High management ongoing Management grant training and exercisin�. � ro ram Pima County Health Dept.; West Nile Virus Program Continued testing of IGA with Pima Stormwater Annually, Stormwater mosquitoes for West Nile Virus. If a positive Disease Both $5,000 High County Health ongoing Utility Utility, and result, the area is sprayed. Dept. Arizona Dept. of Health Zoonotic Diseases Buffelgrass Program actively educates and Staff and General Fund, Buffelgrass Annual, removes buffelgrass in public areas across the Wildfire Both Volunteer High D[S grant, and Town. Time Eradication Plan ongoing volunteer time Regulazly update wildland-urban interface plans Wildland Urban Annual, Golder Ranch and educate communities about fire hazards. W�ldfire Both Staff Time High Interface ongoing Fire District Golder Ranch Widening of Lambert Lane between Pusch View Lane Bridge and La Canada Dr. will include Flood Both $8M High DIS Engineering Sept. 2013 DIS Pima Association drainage improvements to eliminate roadway Governments floodin and debris. Extreme Public education and outreach about protecting Temperature, Both Staff Time High Annual, Oro Valley Water Utility Fees pipes and irrigation systems from freezes. Winter Storms ongoing Water Utiliry Applicable Hazmat training and exercising for first Staff Time Oro Valley responders; as well as participation in multi- and Annual, Police General Fund and agency regional hazmat and decontamination HnZMAT Both Training H ongoing DeparGnent and Grant Funds teams. Costs Golder Ranch FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 185 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-3: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Oro Valle GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people xnd property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribai jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazazds. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions wiYhin Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the incorporated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated /JobTitle Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completiou Kesponsible for Fanding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Ranldn Im lementation Date Im lementation Soarce s Town Cistern Project includes the addition of TOV cistems across the Town campus, water collected Conservation and Annual, DIS, Water, and General Fund and will be used for Town landscaping. Landscaping Drought Both $12,000 High Sustainability ongoing Pazks Private Funds will be lanned around the xerisca in conce t. Pro ram Water Utilry Continue to develop, expand, and implement a Drought Annual, Drought Response Plan to address potential or Drought Both Staff Time High Response Plan Water Utility General Fund long-term drought conditions. (currently in ongoing draft form Town of Oro Valley Stormwater Utility will � continue to Manage Pubiic [nformation Aetivities. • Monitor and maintain elevation certificates Storm Water Staff Time NFIP CRS* • Provide FEMA map 'rnformation service Annually Utility, EM, Storm Water • Conduct outreach projects to increase public Flood Both and SW Medium Criteria and ongoing Permitting Div., Utility Fees awareness of flooding hazard promote flood Utility Fees Guidelines TOV Library insurance in general • Provide Flood rotection information Conduct Floodplain Mapping and Regulatory Activities. • Manage/prepaze LOMCs* for FEMA designated floodplains • Generate and collect additional (local) floodplain Staff Time NFIP CRS, Annually Storm Water Storm Water maps and information Flood Both and SW Medium • Promote and enforce open space preservation Utility Fees ESLO ongoing UYility Utility Fees • Enforce and augment regulatory floodplain standazds • Manage town wide floodplain data • Oversee stormwater mana ement ro ram Conduct Flood Damage Reduction Activities • Organize floodplain management planning doc. SCaff Time NFIP CRS, SW • Investigate acquisition and relocation of flood Annually Storm Water Storm Water prone properties Flood Both and SW Medium Maintenance ongoing Utility Utility Fees • Conduct and manage drainage system Utility Fees SOP maintenance FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 186 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-3: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Oro Valle GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused 6azards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazazds and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect � Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Fuodiog Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Conduct Flood Preparedness Activities Annually Storm Water Storm Water • Coordinate flood waming program w/PCRFCD Flood Both Staff Time Medium NFIP CRS ongo�ng Utility Utiliry Fees • Monitor levee safety for OV's certified levee Oro Valley Emergency Management wiil provide Town-wide All Town training to applicable Town staff on the adopted All Both Staff Time Medium emergency Annually, Departments and General Fund and hazard mitigation plan and its requirements. management ongoing Emergency grant ro ram Mana ement Review existing Oro Valley General Plan and zoning code to determine how these documents help limit development in hazazdous areas. Modify Low (due Annually, with additional guidelines, regulations, and land All Both Staff Time to annual Town procedures DIS General Fund use techniques as necessary within the limits of review) ongoing state statues, while also respecting private property ri hts. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 187 �: };, PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-4: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Pascua Ya ui Tribe GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and properiy in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the incorporated, uninco orated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Cammunity Planning Primary Agency AsseCs Mechauism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Lm lementation Source s Review existing building codes to determine adequate protection for new development in hazard Drought, Follow * azeas. Where feasible and necessary, modify codes Land Earthquake, community Ongoing and to help mitigate hazards imposed on such Both Staff High Development General Fund Flood, development Continuous * development within the IimiYs ofthe Pascua Yaqui Severe Wind plan Tribal Council Reservation, while also respecting private properly ri hts ad'acent to the Reservation. Continued coordination between Pascua Yaqui Tribe, Pima County departments, municipalities, Follow Pima Association of Governments, and other *Land community Ongoing and agencies in the development and maintenance of All Both Staff High development Continuous Development General Fund accurate geographic information system p �� Tribal Council information for those hazard areas identified in the ado ted hazard miti ation lan. In cooperation with ADEM Tribal Liaison will condzrct a pubdic education *Fire & Police Develop a Mass Evacuation strategy for Pascua campaign to Departments Yaqui Tribe and formali�e in a published document All Both Staff time High increase Continuing *Land and General Fund awareness of Procurement natural hacards Departments by distributing ADEM mitigation flyers at ublic events Contt'nue the existing intergovernmental *Fire agreement betrveen the Tribe and the State Department Forestry Department for assistance in the Wildfire Both Staff time High Annual Review Continuing *Attorney Genera/ Fund provision ofemergency services within each General's O�ce other's 'urisdictions. *Tribal Council FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 188 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-4: 1VIiti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Pascua Ya ui Tribe GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and humaa caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and properry in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awazeness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im Lementation Strate Comrounity Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Raukin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Conduct and enhance environmental and epidemiological surveillance activities in PYTPxEpr�o�'�m those areas identified as being of high public cwrenlly ltas an IGA with ADHS for PHEP health importance and related to (P�bi;� Heai,� environmental factors such as;, food safe Eme`be°°Y •� Praparedness)for SC1Cl pI'OteCtlOCI a.TlCi VeCtOT COritT01 8Ct1V1t1CS. epidemiobgical .SUNe1��3I1Ce SCt1VLt10S 111USt 111CIUd0 t}l@ � siuveillanoeactivities hiyh risk of 1C�0T1t1f1Cat1011 Ot Vll1110Tab111t1CS 1T1C1 communicable diseasas EriV1TOriTlleritSl faCtOTS t�lat TT18. COtttClbUtf YO and investigation Y oppoRUmt�es of tlle tT3T1Sll11SS10T1 Of t}le COIT1T1lUll1CSbIC outbreaks. Withlndian * diseases associated with the o eration and Health Service we Epidemiology p Disease Both N/A High have our OngOing Center Director General Fund pTCSeriCe Of Y�'1050 fSC111Y10S 1R Yll@ P8SCU8. emironmental factors Yaqui Tribe, as well as the implementation such as; food safety and protection of the of preventative action which may be applied emironment on the to reduce or eliminate the tential for pYT `�0rva°°°.'7'e � PYT PHEP Program transmission of communicable illnesses. � a S«on� Develop and improve the system of `°°86°�v°° 8°a communication with coordination and communication of these nnEM, nnxs, r�ma findin s, trends and observations with other co�ac xeaia, g Department and [he federal, state and local agencies that have Tu�son i.H.s.� ma�� similar or related interest. xeaicn serv��es�. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 189 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-5: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Sahuarita GOAL: Reduce or etiminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazazds. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the incor orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Ageucy Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Respousible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Ranldn Tm lementatiou Date Im lementation Source s Promote Child Drowning Prevention programs Drowning go� $3,000 and High N/A May 2012 Police Open throughout the Town. staff time Communications Continued adherence to AAC R18-9 fbr reductions HAZMAT Existing $15,000 High Waste Water March 2012 Public Works Waste Water Fund in pollutant discharge at Town Aquifer. Updating of Waste Water Department contingency HAZMAT Both Stafftime High Waste Water Mazch 2012 Public Works None and emergency plans Continue annual updating of Town Storm Flood Existing Staff Time High Water Master January 2013 Public Works None water/Flooding Pollution Prevention Plan Plan Continue use of permiY process from Corp of Engineers to streamline maintenance and bank Flood Existing Staff Time High Army Corp On going Public Works HERF Funds stabilization efforts when needed Southem Arizona Buffelgrass removal mapping Wildfire Both Staff Time High NA May 2012 Public Works T.O. Nation Grant Implement Vector Bome Illness prevention Disease September Public Works program through mosquito abatement (Pandemic) Both $10,000 High NA 2012 Parks and Rec General Fund Updating of ripazian ordinance to protect various species that reduces erosion to mitigate flooding Flood Existing $300 and Medium NA December Planning and General Fund potentials and also reduces development in flood staff time 2011 Zoning rone areas FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 190 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-5: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Sahuarita GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and properry in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdicYions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the inwrporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ublic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima County. Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible For Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Continued Controlled Bums on Town Property Wildfire Exiting $Z,000 and Medium Green Valley January 2012 Fire Department General Fund stafftime Fire Public Works Review, Update and Modify NFIP requirement and make appropriate modifications to Flood Plain Flood Both StaffTime Medium FEMA PCRFC January 2013 Public Works None Ordinance Educate the public to increase awareness of hazards, and potential opportunities for mitigation Emergency Emergency actions. Make Pima County's public informatlon All Both Staff Time Medium Prepazedness July 2012 None material sheets, websites, mitigation brochures, Strategic Plan Management and media outlets available. Landscape code amendment requiring vegetation Extreme $300 and December Planning and adjustment in developed areas to reduce the heat Temperatures Existing staff time Medium None 20ll Zoning General Fund island effect Develop and Implement internal emergency Al! (Response) Sta,�Time Medium NA May 20/2 Public Works None response procedure (Response) Improve upon existing capabiltties to warn the Emergency public of emergency situations by initiating a A!! (Response) $5, 000 Medium Management �anuQry 2p/3 Emergency General Fund system to test the abiliry of local emergency (Response) Committee Management mana ers to activate the AENS s stems. Develop and Implement an interoperable Emergency Adl Management, communications beriveen all emergency-related �Response) (Response) Sta,/j'Time Medium N/A January 2013 Local Fire None departments District FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 191 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-6: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Tucson GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: Increase ubiic awareness of hazards and risks that threaten the incor orated, uninco orated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima Coun . Miti ation Action/Pro'ect Im lementation Strate Community Planning Primary Agency Assets Mechanism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsibie for Fuoding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementatiou Source s Identify funding source and wnstruct two bridges and 50 box culverts with 380 back-up power units Ongoing for signalized intersections at high flood hazard effort with DepaRment of crossings in City of Tucson limits in accord with $100 long-term Transportation / the COT Department of TranspoRation 5-year Flood, Both million, High CIP horizon. Streets Grant Funds plan. If a box culverC cannot be constructed an Severe Wind Administrator automated warning device, consisting of a Staff Time Schedule and Streets Chief barricade, signs and flashing lights would be dependent Engineer installed. uponfunding Tucson Water, a division of the Utility Services � DeparCment, will secure its assets and facilities by On-going Water Water System implementing actions, in phases, as identified in Terrorism, with full Department / the Federally mandated Water System Vandalism Existing $20 million High Vulnerability completion by Water Engineer Operations Budget Vulnerabiliry Assessment completed in October AssessmenY 2020 & Operations 2002. Promote disastervresistant water delivery sysYem Water by constructing redundant water transmission lines On-going Department / $7.9 with full Water (e.g. The Utility and the community will be less All Both High Operations Budget susceptible to loss of water delivery due to natural million completion by Administrator or man-made disasters). 2020 Maintenance & O erations Work with the Arizona Geologicat Society and U.S. Geological Survey on projects that mitigate geo-hazards (e.g. Continue the feasibility study Ongoing with the AZ Geologicat and U.S. Geological Drought, effort with Surveys Water Plan 2000-2050.Construct second Earthquake, long-term Water recharge facility to be known as the Southem Avra Subsidence, Both $512 H horizon. Department / Operations Budget Valley Recharge and Recovery Project other geo- million Staff (SAVSARP). The utility could then use its entire hazards. Schedule allotment of Central Arizona Project water and dependent provide capacity for rechazging additional water upon funding su lies. Construction will take 5 ears . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 192 PIMA COLTNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 6-9-6: Miti ation actions and ro'ects and im lementation strate for Tucson GOAL: Reduce or eliminate the risk to people and property from natural sud 6uman caused hazards. Objective 1: Reduce or eliminate risks that threaten life and property in the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Objective 2: Reduce risk to critical facilities and infrastructure from natural and human caused hazards. Objective 3: Promote hazard mitigation throughout the incorporated, unincorporated, and Tribal jurisdictions within Pima County. Ob'ective 4: lncrease ublic awazeness of hazards and risks that threaten the inco orated, uninco otated, and Tribal urisdictions within Pima County. Miti ation Action/Pro'ect lm lementatiou Strate Commanity Planning Primary Agency Assets Mec6anism(s) Anticipated / Job Title Hazard(s) Mitigated Estimated Priority for Completion Responsible for Funding Descri tion Miti ated Ex/New Cost Rankin Im lementation Date Im lementation Source s Re-direct drainage canal at Barrio Viego to prevent Transportation Grant Funds, continued repetitive losses. Flood Both $425,000 High 2013 Dept / Project General Fund, Administrator PCRFCD In compliance with the NFIP, the City of Tucson Development and will continue to require the prepazation and Floodplain Annual - Planning Deparhnent submittal of a CLOMR or CLOMR-F for all Flood Both Staff Time High Ordinance Ongoing Services Budget and Fees proposed development within FEMA delineated Department / for Developers S ecial Flood Hazazd Areas Director The Town of Tucson will maintain compliance Development and with NFIP regulations by enforcement of the Planning current floodplain management ordinance through Flood Both Staff Time High Floodplain Annual - Services Department review of new development located in the Ordinance Ongoing Department / Budget flood lain and issuance of flood lain use ermits. Director Improve floodplain administration under the NFIP Development and program by sending inspectors into the field when Planning Department we receive a flood waming t�om the National Annual- Flood Both Staff Time High Best Practices Services Budget and Weather Service, to assess bridges, washes and Ongoing Department / Information other critical infrastructures within the City of Tucson. Director FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 193 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 7: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES §201.6(c)(4): (The p/an shall inc/ude...] (4) A plan maintenance process that inc/udes: (i) A section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, eva/uating, and updating the mitigation p/an within a five-year cyc/e. (ii) A process by which loca/ governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation p/an into other p/anning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement p/ans, when appropriate. (iii) Discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the p/an maintenance process. §201.6(d)(3): P/ans must be reviewed, revised if appropriate, and resubmitted for approval within five years in order to continue to be eligib/e for HMGP project grant funding. According to the DMA 2000 requirements, each plan must define and document processes or mechanisms for maintaining and updating the hazard mitigation plan within the established five-year planning cycle. Elements of this plan maintenance section include: Monitoring and Evaluating the Plan Updating the Plan Implementing the Plan by Incorporation into Other Agency or Jurisdictional Planning Mechanisms Continued Public Participation Pima County and the participating jurisdictions recognize that this hazard mitigation plan is intended to be a "living" document with regularly scheduled monitoring, evaluation, and updating. Section 7 of the 2007 Plan outlined specific steps for plan maintenance. A poll of the Planning Team indicated that few formal reviews or maintenance occurred over the past five years. The 2007 Plan was referenced / reviewed by the county for the identification and development of mitigation grant applications during the 2006 flooding disaster declaration and again in 2010 for buffelgrass mitigation actions/projects. The Town of Oro Valley also reviewed the 2007 Plan as a regular part of their own HMGP application investigations. Reasons for the otherwise lack of formal review were discussed by the Planning Team, and included: • Lack of funding and staff time available to allocate to the task • Perceived lack of practicality and or usefulness beyond keeping eligible for grants. • Lack of a Plan champion within each community • Staffing changes / turnover wherein the maintenance requirements and even existence of the Plan was not communicated • Lack of Plan awareness by departments outside of the emergency management community. Recognizing the need for improvement, the Planning Team discussed ways to make sure that the Plan review and maintenance process will occur over the next five years. The results of those discussions are outlined in the following sections and the plan maintenance strategy. 7.1 Monitoring and Evaluation 7.1.1 Gener-al Planning Team Monitoring and Evaluation Switching to a true multi jurisdictional plan will aide in the Plan monitaring and evaluation by the consolidation of information for all county jurisdictions into one document. The Planning Team has established the following monitoring and evaluation procedures: • Schedule — The Plan shall be reviewed on at least an annual basis or following a major disaster. The Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 194 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 (PCOEMHS) will take the lead to reconvene the Planning Team on or around the anniversary of the official FEMA Plan adoption date ADEM has also committed to help with reminders to the County as a double accountability. • Review Content — One month prior to the Planning Team review meeting, a reminder questionnaire will be distributed to each jurisdictions' Point of Contact by PCOEMHS and will be returned by each jurisdiction within a minimum of three weeks. The questionnaire will be comprised of the following questions: o Hazard Identification: Have the risks and hazards changed? o Goals and objectives: Are the goals and objectives still able to address current and expected conditions? o Mitdgation Projects and Actions: Has the project been completed? If not complete but started, what percent of the project has been completed? How much money has been expended on incomplete projects? Did the project require additional funds over the expected amount or were the costs less than expected? During the annual meeting, each jurisdiction will have the opportunity to provide a report to the group summarizing its review of the Plan. The report will include their responses to the above questions and any other items specific to their community. Documentation of the annual meeting will include notes on the results of the meeting as well as more specific information on the reasoning for proposed changes to the Plan for the next update cycle. Copies of the annual review report will also be included in Appendix E. A formal presentation of the status of the goals, objectives and A/Ps will be made to each jurisdiction's board or council following the review meeting. The action will be informational only and will not require a formal action on the part of the board or council unless a major update to the Plan is proposed prior to the next five year update. 7.1.2 Monitoring of Tribal Mitigation Activities This section describes the Pascua Yaqui Tribe's strategy for reviewing and assessing the progress of the mitigation goals and actions/projects (A/Ps) identified in this Plan. Unless otherwise directed or warranted, the goals and objectives' review will coincide with the annual overall plan review and update schedule. Goals will be assessed using a subjective approach and a summary of the assessment will be included in the annual review memorandum. The A/Ps and the corresponding implementation strategies for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe are identified in the Plan's mitigation strategy. For each annual review and plan update, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe will coordinate with the agencies identified for each A/P, to assess the implementation status of the identified A/P and generate a brief inemorandum summarizing the status of each project using the following criteria: Current Status of Action/Project - Assign a`No Action', `In-Progress' or `Completed' status as appropriate Project Disposition — Assign a`Keep' or `Drop' to identify future disposition of action/project Exnlanation - Provide a description of the current project status including date of implementation, challenges faced, percentage completed, funding sources used, etc. The implementation and progress of the A/Ps will be monitored by the Pascua Yaqui Tribe on at least an annual basis as described in Section 7.1.1. For FEMA supported projects, progress reports will be submitted to FEMA on a quarterly basis, or as required throughout the project duration. The degree of quarterly reporting will be dependent upon the type of A/P, its funding source, and the associated requirements. At a minimum, the quarterly report shall address: ✓ Project Completion Status ✓ Project Challenges/Issues (If any) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 195 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 ✓ Budgetary Considerations (Cost Overruns or Underruns) ✓ Detailed Documentation of Expenditures Upon completion of projects, the project location will be visited and final results viewed and documented. Closed projects will then be monitored for effectiveness in the intended mitigation. FEMA supported project closeouts will include an audit of the A/P financials as well as other guidelines/requirements set forth under the funding or grant rules, and any attendant administrative plans developed by the Pascua Yaqui Tribe. 7.2 Plan Update Accarding to DMA 2000, the Plan requires updating and approval from FEMA every five years. The plan updates will adhere to that set schedule using the following procedure: ✓ One year prior to the plan expiration date, the Planning Team will re-convene to review and assess the materials accumulated in Appendix E. ✓ The Planning Team will update and/or revise the appropriate or affected portions of the plan and produce a revised plan document. ✓ The revised plan document will be presented before the respective councils and boards for an official concurrence/adoption of the changes. ✓ The revised plan will be submitted to ADEM and FEMA for review, comment and approval. 7.3 Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms Incorporation of the Plan into other planning mechanisms, either by content ar reference, enhances a community's ability to perform hazard mitigation by expanding the scope of the Plan's influence. A poll of the participating jurisdictions revealed that success of incorporating the 2007 Plan elements over the past planning cycle into other planning programs, has varied. Ways in which the 2007 Plans have been successfully incarporated or referenced into other planning mechanisms for each jurisdiction are summarized below: Pima Countv• • The 2007 Plan is cited in the Annual Recertification and 5-yr Cycle Verification of the Community Rating System. • Referenced during the following processes; Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Basin or River Management Planning efforts. • Used as reference material for the update of the Pima County Emergency Operations Plan Marana • Used by the Town of Marana during the update of the Emergency Operation Plan beginning in March 2010. • Used as a reference for identifying of natural and man-made hazards in the Towds General Plan.. Oro Vallev • Used by the Town of Oro Valley during the update of the Emergency Operations Plan, beginning in September 2010. • Used by the Town of Oro Valley during the development of other emergency plans (such as evacuation plans, Standard Operating Procedures, shelter in place programs, public outreach opportunities, etc.), beginning in September 2010. • Used as a reference for the profiling of natural and man-made hazards as referenced in the Town's General Plan. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 196 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 • Used as a reference for hazards mentioned in the Open Space and Natural Resource Conversation section of the Town's General Plan. • Some of the 2007 Plan mitigation A/Ps correlate to the Town's Capital Improvement Projects program Pascua Yaqui Tribe • None Provided Sahuarita • No specific references or incorporation of the 2007 Plan was reported by Sahuarita. However, hazard mitigation has been historically referenced in the 2004 Town of Sahuarita Emergency Operations Plan and Town Code Chapter 13.20.040 Tucson • Used as reference material for the update of the 2006 Emergency Operations Plan • Referenced by the City of Tucson Intranet and in the Tucson Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Newsletter. In all of the above instances, the 2007 Plan was found to be beneficial, and especially with regard to the critical facility inventories, vulnerability analysis results, and the mitigation strategy. Obstacles to further incorporation of the 2007 Plan for some of the communities were generally tied to: • A lack of awareness of the 2007 Plan by departments outside the emergency management community The relative "newness" of the 2007 Plan with regard to other, more commonplace planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or general plans. • No real opportunity for incorporation of reference of the 2007 Plan (e.g. — very little other planning being done by a community). Typical ways to use and incorporate the Plan over the next five-year planning cycle, discussed by the Planning Team, included: • Use of, or reference to, Plan elements in general and comprehensive planning update documents. • Addition of defined mitigation A/Ps to capital improvement programming. • Inclusion of Plan elements into development planning and practices. • Resource for developing and/or updating emergency operations plans. The Plan will continue to function as a standalone document subject to its own review and revision schedule presented in Sections 7.1 and 7.2. The Plan will also serve as a reference for other mitigation and land planning needs of the participating jurisdictions. Whenever possible, each jurisdiction will endeavor to incorporate the risk assessment results and mitigation actions and projects identified in the Plan, into existing and future planning mechanisms. At a minimum, each of the responsible agencies/departments noted in Tables 6-1-1 through 6-1-6 will review and reference the Plan and revise and/or update the legal and regulatory planning documents, manuals, codes, and ordinances summarized in Tables 6-1-1 through 6-1-6, as appropriate. Specific incorporation of the Plan risk assessment elements into the natural resources and safety elements of each jurisdictions' general plans (county comprehensive plan) and development review processes, adding or revising building codes, adding or changing zoning and subdivision ordinances, and incorporating mitigation goals and strategies into general and/or comprehensive plans, will help to ensure hazard mitigated future development. In addition, an implementation strategy outlining assignments of responsibility and completion schedules for specific actions/projects proposed in this plan are summarized in Tables 6-9-1 through 6-9-6. Table 7-1 presents a list of current planning efforts for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe that are either related to, referenced in, and/or are parallel to this Plan. It is the Pascua Yaqui Tribe's intention to integrate information as described below to ensure correlation of common planning elements. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 197 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-1: Pascua Ya ui Tribe lannin efforts for future inte ration Integration Author Document Description Characteristics/Mitigation O ortunities Owner • Minimize incompatible land uses The Planning • Provide a balance of land uses that Center The objective the master land use plan preserves and enhances the is to provide a current document that neighborhood, support in-fill Pascua Yaqui reflects the growth and changing needs strategies, promote economic Tribe's Master Land of the Pascua Yaqui pueblo , serves as a development, and protect pascua Yaqui Use Plan guide for decision makers. environmentally and culturally significant resources. Tribe This plan was adopted in 2004. • No planned area development project will be allowed within 200 feet of an waterwa . The master drainage study/ is a critical • Minimize the flooding and drainage component to the Tribe's economic problems Tetra Tech, Inc. Master Drainage Study N being, as well health, safety and • No development zones set aside for for Pascua Yaqui Tribe eneral welfare of the communi Reservation g h' conveyances of floodwaters Pascua Yaqui • Construct regional storm water Tribe This plan was adopted in 2004. retention facilities The Tribal Council is conside�ing . Reduce the effects of natural hazards The Planning adopting a zoning ordinance to regulate on life, property, and infrastructure, Center and encourage the most appropriate . Require pre-development and post- Zoning Ordinance uses of land. develo ment h drolo and ro osed P Y gY P P Pascua Yaqui This plan is currently pending council storm water management or drainage Tribe a roval. mitigation PYT Public Health and Emergency Addresses response and prepazedness Preparedness and regarding public health issues and Pima County Health outbreaks. Identifies mitigation • Used for mitigation of outbreaks on Public Health and measures to reduce the spread of an interagency basis. De t. Emergency disease. • Interagency awareness and � Preparedness Response Plan communication. Jointly owned This plan was last approved in 2007 • Source for Disease related and is currently in the process of being between PYT and updated. Pima Counry 7.4 Continued Public Involvement The Planning Team reviewed Section 7.1.5 of the 2007 Plan and discussed the challenges and successes regarding the identified continued public involvement strategy. Ali of the participating jurisdictions were successful to varying degrees, in their efforts to elevate hazard mitigation awareness in the general public and community on an ongoing basis. Pima County and participating jurisdictions remain committed to keeping the public informed about the hazard mitigation planning efforts, actions and projects. Table 7-2 summarizes successful public involvement efforts previously conducted by the participating jurisdictions, and proposed activities for public involvement and dissemination of information that shall be pursued whenever possible and appropriate. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 198 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-2: Continued past and future public involvement activities or opportunities identified by Pima Coun 'urisdictions Jurisdiction Public Involvement Activi or O ortuni Past Events• • Made available to the public a flood hazard map internet tool (Flood Hazard Parcel Search) for properties in unincorporated Pima County • Conducted public outreach through open-house meetings for new "L" Series FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs) • Provided brochures regarding flood hazards and flood mitigation on the RFCD website and at the RFCD office • Distributed flood hazard and safety information and brochures at public events (Earth Day, Fiesta Grande Street Fair, Earth Science Day, etc.) • Annually mailed "Your Property is in a Mapped Flood Zone" brochure to everyone in a Pima mapped floodplain for properties in unincorporated Pima County County • As new floodplain mapping occurred, provided information to those affected via brochures and the RFCD website for properties in unincorporated Pima County • Annually provided flood safety brochures to Tucson Water utility to include in monthly bills • Provided flood information at community meetings after a flood event, new floodplain mapping affecting a large number of people, or on request for properties in unincorporated Pima County • Conducted public outreach in schools upon request Future Onportunities: • It is anticipated that all of the past activities listed above will be continued with next Plan cycle Past Events: • Conducted public outreach through open-house meetings for new "L" Series FENIA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs). • Provided brochures regarding flood hazards and flood mitigation on the Town of Marana website and at the Town of Marana Municipal Complex. • Provided letters to Town of Marana residents affected by the new "L" series FEMA flood insurance rate maps. The letters were to reflect the residents' specific situation. • Participated with the Buffelgrass Management Action Committee, which provides; education and outreach to Town staff and the community; map and monitor buffelgrass and foundation grass location; control with herbicide treatments; and volunteer s to help pull the grass. This will be a continuing effort. • During the 2010 General Plan, the Town Emergency Management Coordinator distributed Marana brochures on hazard mitigation and individual preparedness as part of public outreach. Future Opaortunities: • Continue to pursue the past activities listed above, as appropriate. • Provide information to the public through participation in the Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) on hazardous materials. • Provide floodplain related hazard and mitigation information to targeted properties in high risk areas. • Plan to provide flood hazard outreach annually to residents of the Town of Marana located within the flood plain. • Create brochures for building within the flood plain. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 199 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-2: Continued past and future public involvement activities or opportunities identified by Pima Countv iurisdictions Jurisdiction Public Involvement Activi or O ortuni Past Events: • Regular Public Service Announcements through our Tribal Radio Station • Distribution of flyers among other tribal deparhnents Future Ounortunities: • Maintain a permanent website that will include a copy of the current Plan, allow stakeholders to comment on mitigation planning efforts, respond to citizen inquiries, and comment on development plans as well as other mitigation efforts. • Develop and provide brochures regarding threats on our Hazard Mitigation website Pascua • Provide for hazard mapping profiles on Google Earth Yaqui Tribe . Conduct public outreach in schools to educate students on the various natural and manmade hazards • Include a specific mitigation planning related agenda item for LEPC meeting. • Make available the mitigation brochures and other information produced and provided by the Arizona Division of Emergency Management, at the Town Hall and Town Library. • Annually provide a news release to local news media related to mitigation activities and floodplain management. • Annual presentations to boards and councils summarizing annual review findings on the hazard mitigation plan and summarizing noteworthy mitigation activities. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 200 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-2: Continued past and future public involvement activities or opportunities identitied by Pima County _jurisdictions Jurisdiction I Public Involvement Activitv or Past Events: • Participated with the Buffelgrass Management Action Committee, which provides: education and outreach to Town staff and the community; map and monitor buffelgrass and fountain grass locations; control with herbicide treatments; and volunteer to help pull the grass. Ongoing efforts. • Participated with the OV Buffel Busters, a group of anywhere from five to fifty volunteers that every second Saturday of the month pull buffelgrass in specific areas. • Performed Stormwater Utility Department public presentations to the community about how the Town preserves and protects the community's natural and built environments in the wake of heavy rains, flooding, and other water catastrophes. Public participation is encouraged. • Distributed Floodplain Management brochures at public information distribution locations throughout Town offices and departments, and at neighborhood meetings sponsored by the Town. • Annually provided floodplain related hazard and mitigation information to targeted properties in high risk areas. • Conducted public outreach meetings when re-mapping of floodplain areas is conducted. Future Opportunities: Oro Valley • Continue to pursue the past activities listed above. • Provide information for the Oro Valley Vista, an e-newsletter for the Town of Oro Valley about summer monsoons, fire season, buffelgrass, and other hazards. • Develop a section on the Town's website that includes information about hazards, mitigation planning efforts, and other mitigation related activities. • Conduct community presentations throughout the year to educate homeowners about flooding and other Plan hazards, as well as about community preparedness, and emergency management activities. • Make available the mitigation brochures and other information produced and provided by the Arizona Division of Emergency Management. • Participation in, and distribution of, hazard mitigation planning materials as appropriate. • Conduct annual presentations to boards and councils summarizing annual review findings on the hazard mitigation plan and summarizing noteworthy mitigation activities. • Provide a news release to local news media related to mitigation activities and floodplain management. • Conduct public outreach in schools to educate students on the various natural and manmade hazards • Expand public education opportunities for buffelgrass and fountain grass through HOAs and other private nroperiv owners. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page ZOl PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Table 7-2: Continued past and future public involvement activities or opportunities identified by Pima Coun 'urisdictions Jurisdiction Public Involvement Activi or O ortunit Past Events• • Manned an information booth at the annual Fiesta Sahuarita one day event for the past 4 years • Manned an information booth at the annual Pecan Festival two day event for the last 5 years • Conducted multiple neighborhood watch group meetings with Hazard/EOP materials discussed/distributed • Solicited public input at Town Council meetings concerning Planning and Building code Future Opaortunities: • Fiesta Sahuarita - will continue with information booth and hand out brochures over next plan Sahuarita cycle • Pecan Festival - will continue with information booth and hand out brochures over next plan cycle • Continuation and expansion of Neighborhood Watch groups involvement • New project working with Anza Trail School on emergency planning • New project working with Sahuarita School District on emergency planning • Town Council recent approval of Town Strategic Plan for Emergency Preparedness initiating a multitude of ineetings with functional needs groups, residents, businesses and all stakeholders • Hazard Mitigation presentations and committee at newly formed group "Far Our Cities Sahuarita", which represents all community stakeholders and will include multiple public meetin s and citizen in ut Past Events• • Manned an information booth at the annual Safety Day at the Casino del Sol • Manned an information booth at the Lowe's Safety Day • Interaction with various community groups • Met with Commission of Disabilities • Conducted a Fire Prevention Education Program (includes contacts in schools) Future Opportunities: Tucson • Continue to pursue the past activities listed above. • Expansion of outreach to various community groups for inclusion/information • Meeting with City of Tucson department leaders to reiterate the value of public involvement in EMHS activities, including MJHMP issues • Contact through LEPC meetings and activities • CIKR contacts during Threat and Vulnerability Assessments • Contact with citizens, businesses and other Non-Government Organizations during "Are you Ready" and preparedness activities FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 202 PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 SECTION 8: PLAN TOOLS 8.1 Acronyms A/P ......................Mitigation Action/Project ADEM ...............Arizona Division of Emergency Management ADEQ ................Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADWR ...............Arizona Department of Water Resources AGFD ................Arizona Game and Fish Department ARS ...................Arizona Revised Statutes ASCE .................American Society of Civil Engineers ASERC ..............Arizona State Emergency Response Commission ASLD ................ Arizona State Land Department ASU ...................Arizona State University AZGS ................Arizona Geological Survey BLM ..................Bureau of Land Management CAP ...................Central Arizona Project CAP ...................Community Assistance Program CFR ................... Code of Federal Regulations CRS ................... Community Rating System CWPP ................Community Wildfire Protection Plan DEMA ...............Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs DFIRM ..............Digital Flood Insurance Rate DMA 2000 .........Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 DOT ...................Department of Transportation EHS ...................Extremely Hazardous Substance EPA ...................Environmental Protection Agency EPCRA .............. Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act FEMA ................ Federal Emergency Management Agency FMA ...................Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program GIS ....................Geographic Information System HAZMAT ..........Hazardous Material HAZUS-99 ........Hazards United Statesl999 HAZUS-MH ......Hazards United States Multi-Hazard IFCI ...................International Fire Code Institute LEPC .................Local Emergency Planning Committee MJHMP .............Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan MMI ..................Modified Mercalli Intensity NCDC ................National Climate Data Center NDMC ...............National Drought Mitigation Center NESDIS .............National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service NFIP ..................National Flood Insurance Program NFPA .................National Fire Protection Association NHC ..................National Hurricane Center NIBS ..................National Institute of Building Services NID ....................National Inventory of Dams NIST ..................National Institute of Standards and Technology NSF ....................National Science Foundation NOAA ...............National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NRC ...................National Response Center NWCG ................National Wildfire Coordination Group NWS ..................National Weather Service PAG ................... Pima Association of Governments PCOEMHS ........ Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security PCRFCD .............Pima County Regional Flood Control District FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 203 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 PSDI ..................Palmer Drought Severity Index RL ......................Repetitive Loss SARA ................ Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SRLP ................. Severe Repetitive Loss Properties SRL .................... Severe Repetitive Loss SRP .................... Salt River Project UBC ...................Uniform Building Code USACE ..............United States Army Corps of Engineers USDA ................United States Department of Agriculture USFS .................United States Forest Service USGS .................United States Geological Survey VA ...................... Vulnerability Analysis WUI ...................Wildland Urban Interface 8.2 Definitions The following terms and definitions are provided far reference and are taken from the 2007 State Plan with a few minor modifications. AiuzoNa HAZARns Dam Failure A dam failure is a catastrophic type of failure characterized by the sudden, rapid and uncontrolled release of impounded water. Dam failures are typicaily due to either overtopping or piping and can result from a variety of causes including natural events such as floods, landslides or earthquakes, deterioration of foundation or compositional materials, penetration by vegetative roots or animal burrows, fissures or improper design and construction. Such a failure presents a significant potential for a disaster as significant loss of life and property would be expected in addition to the possible loss of power and water resources. Drou�ht A drought is a deficiency of precipitation over on extended period of time, resulting in water shortage for some activity, group or environmental sector. "Severe" to "extreme" drought conditions endanger livestock and crops, significantly reduce surface and ground water supplies, increase the potential risk for wildland fires, increase the potential for dust starms, and cause significant economic loss. Humid areas are more vulnerable than arid areas. Drought may not be constant or predictable and does not begin or end on any schedule. Short term droughts are less impacting due to the reliance on irrigation and groundwater in arid environments. Earthquake An earthquake is a naturally-induced shaking of the ground, caused by the fracture and sliding of rock within the Earth's crust. The magnitude is determined by the dimensions of the rupturing fracture (fault) and the amount of displacement that takes place. The larger the fault surface and displacement, the greater the energy. In addition to deforming the rock near the fault, this energy produces the shaking and a variety of seismic waves that radiate throughout the Earth. Earthquake magnitude is measured using the Richter Scale and earthquake intensity is measured using the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. Fissure Earth fissures are tension cracks that open as the result of subsidence due to severe overdrafts (i.e., pumping) of groundwater, and occur about the margins of alluvial basins, near exposed or shallow buried bedrock, or over zones of differential land subsidence. As the ground slowly settles, cracks form at depth and propagate towards the surface, hundreds of feet above. Individual fissures range in length from hundreds of feet to several miles, and from less than an inch to several feet wide. Rainstorms can erode fissure walls rapidly causing them to widen and lengthen suddenly and dangerously, forming gullies five to 15- feet wide and tens of feet deep. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 204 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Floodine Flooding is an overflowing of water onto normally dry land and is one of the most significant and costly of natural disasters. Flooding tends to occur in Arizona during anomalous years of prolonged, regional rainfall (typical of an El Nino year), and is typified by increased humidity and high summer temperatures. Flash flooding is caused excessive rain falling in a small area in a short time and is a critical hazard in Arizona. Flash floods are usually associated with summer monsoon thunderstorms or the remnants of a tropical storm. Several factors contribute to flash flooding: rainfall intensity and duration, topography, soil conditions, and ground cover. Most flash flooding is caused by slow-moving thunderstorms or thunderstorms repeatedly moving over the same area and can occur within a few minutes or hours of excessive rainfall, or a quick release from a dam or levee failure. Thunderstorms produce flash flooding, often far from the actual storm and at night when natural warnings may not be noticed. Landslide / Mudslide Landslides like avalanches are massive downward and outward movements of slope-forming materials. The term landslide is restricted to movement of rock and soil and includes a broad range of velocities. Slow movements, although rarely a threat to life, can destroy buildings or break buried utility lines. A landslide occurs when a portion of a hill slope becomes too weak to support its own weight. The weakness is generally initiated when rainfall or some other source of water increases the water content of the slope, reducing the shear strength of the materials. A mud slide is a type of landslide referred to as a flow. Flows are landslides that behave like fluids: mud flows involve wet mud and debris. Levee Failure / Breach Levee failures are typically due to either overtopping or erosive piping and can result from a variety of causes including natural events such as floods, hurricane/tropical storms, or earthquakes, deterioration of foundation or compositional materials, penetration by vegetative roots or animal burrows, fissures, or improper design, construction and maintenance. A levee breach is the opening formed by the erosion of levee material and can form suddenly or gradually depending on the hydraulic conditions at the time of failure and the type of material comprising the levee. Severe Wind Thunderstorms are characterized as violent storms that typically are associated with high winds, dust storms, heavy rainfall, hail, lightning strikes, and/or tornadoes. The unpredictability of thunderstorms, particularly their formation and rapid movement to new locations heightens the possibility of floods. Thunderstorms, dust/sand storms and the like are most prevalent in Arizona during the monsoon season, which is a seasonal shift in the winds that causes an increase in humidity capable of fueling thunderstorms. The monsoon season in Arizona typically is from late-June or early-July through mid-September. Tornadoes are violently rotating columns of air extending from a thunderstorm to the ground. The most violent tornadoes are capable of tremendous destruction with wind speeds in excess of 250 mph. Damage paths can exceed a mile wide and 50 miles long. The damage from tornadoes is due to high winds. The Fujita Scale of Tornado Intensity measures tornado / high wind intensity and damage. Tropical Storms are storms in which the maximum sustained surface wind ranges from 39-73 mph. Tropical storms are associated with heavy rain and high winds. High intensity rainfall in short periods is typical. A tropical storm is classified as a hurricane when its sustained winds reach or exceed 74 mph. These storms are medium to large in size and are capable of producing dangerous winds, torrential rains, and flooding, all of which may result in tremendous properly damage and loss of life, primarily in coastal populated areas. The effects are typically most dangerous before a hurricane makes landfall, when most damage occurs. However, Arizona has experienced a number of tropical storms that caused extensive flooding and wind damage. Subsidence Land subsidence in Arizona is primarily attributed to substantial groundwater withdrawal from aquifers in sedimentary basins. As the water is removed, the sedimentary layers consolidate resulting in a general lowering of the corresponding ground surface. Subsidence frequently results in regional bowl-shaped depressions, with loss of elevation greatest in the center and decreasing towards the perimeter. Subsidence can measurably change or reverse basin gradients causing expensive localized flooding and adverse impacts or even rupture to long- baseline infrastructure such as canals, sewer systems, gas lines and roads. Earth fissures are the most spectacular and destructive manifestation of subsidence-related phenomena. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 205 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Wildfire Wildfire is a rapid, persistent chemical reaction that releases heat and light, especially the exothermic combination of a combustible substance with oxygen. Wildfires present a significant potential for disaster in the southwest, a region of relatively high temperatures, low humidity, low precipitation, and during the spring moderately strong daytime winds. Combine these severe burning conditions with people or lightning and the stage is set for the occurrence of large, destructive wildfires. Winter Storm Winter storms bring heavy snowfall and frequently have freezing rain and sleet. Sleet is defined as pellets of ice composed of frozen or mostly frozen raindrops or refrozen partially melted snowflakes. These pellets of ice usually bounce after hitting the ground or other hard surfaces. Freezing rain begins as snow at higher altitudes and melts completely on its way down while passing through a layer of air above freezing temperature, then encounters a layer below freezing at lower level to become supercooled, freezing upon impact of any object it then encounters. Because freeing rain hits the ground as a rain droplet, it conforms to the shape of the ground, making one thick layer of ice. Snow is generally formed directly from the freezing of airborne water vapor into ice crystals that often agglomerates into snowflakes. Average annual snowfall in Arizona varies with geographic location and elevation, and can range from trace amounts to hundreds of inches. Severe snow storms can affect transportation, emergency services, utilities, agriculture and basic subsistence supply to isolated communities. In extreme cases, snowloads can cause significant structural damage to under-designed buildings. GENERAL PLAN TERMS Asset Any natural or human-caused feature that has value, including, but not limited to people; buildings; infrastructure like bridges, roads, and sewer and water systems; lifelines like electricity and communication resources; or environmental, cultural, or recreational features like parks, dunes, wetlands, or landmarks. Buildin� A structure that is walled and roofed, principally above ground and permanently affixed to a site. The term includes a manufactured home on a permanent foundation on which the wheels and aacles carry no weight. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Systems or facilities whose incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on the defense or economic security of the nation. The Critical Infrastructure Assurance O�ce (CIAO) defines eight categories of critical infrastructure, as follows: Telecommunications infrastructure: Telephone, data services, and Internet communications, which have become essential to continuity of business, industry, government, and military operations. Electrical power systems: Generation stations and transmission and distribution networks that create and supply electricity to end-users. Gas and oil facilities: Production and holding facilities for natural gas, crude and refined petroleum, and petroleum-derived fuels, as well as the refining and processing facilities for these fuels. Banking and finance institutions: Banks, financial service companies, payment systems, investment companies, and securities/commodities exchanges. Transportation networks: Highways, railroads, ports and inland waterways, pipelines, and airports and airways that facilitate the efficient movement of goods and people. Water supply systems: Sources of water; reservoirs and holding facilities; aqueducts and other transport systems; filtration, cleaning, and treatment systems; pipelines; cooling systems; and other delivery mechanisms that provide for domestic and industrial applications, including systems for dealing with water runoff, wastewater, and firefighting. Government services: Capabilities at the federal, state, and local levels of government required to meet the needs for essential services to the public. Emergency services: Medical, police, fire, and rescue systems. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 206 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Disaster Miti�ation Act of 2000 (DMA2K) A law signed by the President on October 30, 2000 that encourages and rewards local and state pre-disaster planning, promotes sustainability as a strategy for disaster resistance, and is intended to integrate state and local planning with the aim of strengthening statewide mitigation planning. Emer�encv Preqaredness and Resaonse (EPR) Directorate One of five major Department of Homeland Security Directorates which builds upon the formerly independent Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). EPR is responsible for preparing for natural and human- caused disasters through a comprehensive, risk-based emergency management program of preparedness, prevention, response, and recovery. This work incorporates the concept of disaster-resistant communities, including providing federal support for local governments that promote structures and communities that reduce the chances of being hit by disasters. Emereencv Response Plan A document that contains information on the actions that may be taken by a governmental jurisdiction to protect people and property before, during, and after a disaster. Federal Emereencv Mana�ement Aeencv (FEMA) Formerly independent agency created in 1978 to provide a single point of accountability for all Federal activities related to disaster mitigation and emergency preparedness, response and recovery. As of March 2003, FEMA is a part of the Department of Homeland Security's Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) Directorate. Flood Insurance Rate Maa (FIRM) Map of a community, prepared by FEMA that shows the special flood hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. Freauencv A measure of how often events of a particular magnitude are expected to occur. Frequency describes how often a hazard of a specific magnitude, duration, and/or extent typically occurs, on average. Statistically, a hazard with a 100-year recurrence interval is expected to occur once every 100 years on average, and would have a 1% chance — its probability — of happening in any given year. The reliability of this information varies depending on the kind of hazard being considered. Geo�raphic Information Svstems (GIS) A computer sofiware application that relates physical features on the earth to a database to be used for mapping and analysis. Hazard A source of potential danger or adverse condition. Hazards include both natural and human-caused events. A natural event is a hazard when it has the potential to harm people or property and may include events such as floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunami, coastal storms, landslides, and wildfires that strike populated areas. Human-caused hazard events originate from human activity and may include technological hazards and terrorism. Technological hazards arise from human activities and are assumed to be accidental and/or have unintended consequences (e.g., manufacture, storage and use of hazardous materials). While no single definition of terrorism exists, the Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as "...unlawful use of farce and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." Hazard Event A specific occurrence of a particular type of hazard. Nazard Identification The process of identifying hazards that threaten an area. Hazard Miti�ation Cost effective measures taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk associated with hazards and their effects. Hazard Pro�le A description of the physical characteristics of hazards and a determination of various descriptors including magnitude, duration, frequency, probability, and extent. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 207 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 HAZUS A GIS-based nationally standardized earthquake, flood and high wind event loss estimation tool developed by FEMA. Mitigate To cause to become less harsh or hostile; to make less severe or painfuL Mitigation activities are actions taken to eliminate or reduce the probability of the event, or reduce its severity of consequences, either prior to or following a disaster/emergency. Mitigation Plan A systematic evaluation of the nature and extent of vulnerability to the effects of natural hazards typically present in a defined geographic area, including a description of actions to minimize future vulnerability to hazards. 100-Hundred Year Floodplain Also referred to as the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) and Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). An area within a floodplain having a 1% ar greater chance of flood occurrence in any given year. Plannin� The act or process of making or carrying out plans; the establishment of goals, policies, and procedures far a social or economic unit. Probabilitv A statistical measure of the likelihood that a hazard event will occur. Promuleation To make public and put into action the Hazard Mitigation Plan via formal adoption and/or approval by the governing body of the respective community or jurisdiction (i.e. — Town or City Council, County Board of Directors, etc.). 3 Data The Q3 Flood Data product is a digital representation of certain features of FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) product, intended for use with desktop mapping and Geographic Infarmation Systems technology. The digital Q3 Flood Data are created by scanning the effective FIRM paper maps and digitizing selected features and lines. The digital Q3 Flood Data are designed to serve FEMA's needs for disaster response activities, National Flood Insurance Program activities, risk assessment, and floodplain management. Repetitive Loss Propertv A property that is currently insured for which two or more National Flood Insurance Program losses (occurring mare than ten days apart) of at least $1,000 each have been paid within any 10 year period since 1978. Risk The estimated impact that a hazard would have on people, services, facilities, and structures in a community; the likelihood of a hazard event resulting in an adverse condition that causes injury or damage. Risk is often expressed in relative terms such as a high, moderate, or low likelihood of sustaining damage beyond a particular threshold due to a specific type of hazard event. It also can be expressed in terms of potential monetary losses associated with the intensity of the hazard. Substantial Dama�e Damage of any origin sustained by a structure in a Special Flood Hazard Area whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceeds 50% of the market value of the structure before the damage. Vulnerabilitv Describes how exposed or susceptible to damage an asset is. Vulnerability depends on an asset's construction, contents, and the economic value of its functions. Like indirect damages, the vulnerability of one element of the community is often related to the vulnerability of another. For example, many businesses depend on uninterrupted electrical power—if an electric substation is flooded, it will affect not only the substation itself, but a number of businesses as well. Often, indirect effects can be much more widespread and damaging than direct effects. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 208 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Vulnerabilitv Analvsis The extent of injury and damage that may result from a hazard event of a given intensity in a given area. The vulnerability analysis should address impacts of hazard events on the existing and future built environment. Vulnerable Populations Any segment of the population that is more vulnerable to the effects of hazards because of things such as lack of mobility, sensitivity to environmental factors, or physical abilities. These populations can include, but are not limited to, senior citizens and school children. Goals General guidelines that explain what you want to achieve. Goals are usually broad statements with long-term perspective. Obiectives Defined strategies or implementation steps intended to attain the identified goals. Objectives are specific, measurable, and have a defined time horizon. Actions/Proiects Specific actions or projects that help achieve goals and objectives. Implementation Strategv A comprehensive strategy that describes how the mitigation actions will be implemented. GENERAL HAZARD TERMS Fuiita Scale of Tornado Intensitv Rates tornadoes with numeric values from FO to FS based on tornado winds peed and damage sustained. An FO indicates minimal damage such as broken tree limbs or signs, while an FS indicates severe damage sustained. Liauefaction The phenomenon that occurs when ground shaking (earthquake) causes loose soils to lose strength and act like viscous fluid. Liquefaction causes two types of ground failure: lateral spread and loss of bearing strength. Modified Mercalli Intensitv Scale The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale is commonly used in the United States by seismologists seeking information on the severity of earthquake effects. Intensity ratings are expressed as Roman numerals between I at the low end and XII at the high end. The Intensity Scale differs from the Richter Magnitude Scale in that the effects of any one earthquake vary greatly from place to place, so there may be many Intensity values (e.g.: IV, VII) measured from one earthquake. Each earthquake, on the other hand, should have just one Magnitude, although the several methods of estimating it will yield slightly different values (e.g.: 6.1, 6.3). Monsoon A monsoon is any wind that reverses its direction seasonally. In the Southwestern U.S., for most of the year the winds blow from the wesdnorthwest. Arizona is located on the fringe of the Mexican Monsoon which during the summer months turns the winds to a more south/southeast direction and brings moisture from the Pacific Ocean, Gulf of California, and Gulf of Mexico. This moisture often leads to thunderstorms in the higher mountains and Mogollon Rim, with air cooled from these storms often moving from the high country to the deserts, leading to further thunderstorm activity in the desert. A common misuse of the term monsoon is to refer to individual thunderstorms as monsoons. Richter Ma�nitude Scale A logarithmic scale devised by seismologist C.F. Richter in 1935 to express the total amount of energy released by an earthquake. While the scale has no upper limit, values are typically between 1 and 9, and each increase of 1 represents a 32-fold increase in released energy. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 209 PIMA COUNTY MULTI_ JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Appendix A Official Resolution of Adoption PIMA COUNTY MULTI-TURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Appendix B Planning Process Documentation W. Scott Ogden From: Jeff Guthrie [Jeff.Guthrie@pima.gov] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 1:26 PM To: W. Scott Ogden Subject: FW: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update This is the Emergency Mangers from the local jurisdictions. Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tucson, AZ 85701 520-798-0600 From: Jeff Guthrie Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:26 PM To: Andre Matus; (jennifer.peQnatoCaltucsonaz.aov); (tjohnstonCa�ci.sahuarita.az.us); charles.kmetCc�tonation-nsn.aov; David Azuelo; frank.duarteCa�sheriff.pima.gov; Jan Mclay; Jason Larter; Jim.SchnedenCa�tucsonaz.QOV; Larry Anderson (landerson@southtucson.org); Pat Quinn (Pat.Ouinn@Tucsonaz.gov); seastone@uapd.arizona.edu; Steven Johnson (sjohnsonCalmarana.com); Teachout, John; terrence.fordCaldhs.gov Cc: Mike Hein; 'Susan Wood' Subject: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update In 2005, Pima County and its incorporated jurisdictions, in conjunction with the AZ Division of Emergency Management (ADEM), developed the Pima CountyMu/ti-7urisdictiona/Hazard Mitigation P/an (the Plan). The Plan was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K) and identifies mitigation measures to eliminate or reduce the effects of future disasters. The DMA2K states that all states, tribes and local jurisdictions must have a FEMA approved mitigation plan to be eligible for federal mitigation grant programs. The County's original Plan expires Jan 25, 2012, at which time an updated approved Plan will be required to maintain grant program eligibility. To assist us in updating our Plan update, ADEM obtained a grant and is assuming the 25% match to the grant. Therefore, there is no financial obligation to Pima County or the local jurisdictions, we must simply participate in meetings and provide information for the Plan. ADEM along with a contractor will be assisting us through the entire process and will be responsible for assembling the final product. This is where you come in... Pima County would like its incorporated jurisdictions and Tribal partners to be part of the Plan update process, which is beginning at this time. You are strongly encouraged to join the Planning Team to ensure your city/town remains in the Plan and grant eligible. During the planning process, the jurisdictions' most threatening hazards/locations will be identified and discussed as well measures to mitigate the efFect from future disasters. The ideal Planning Team members are made up of representatives from the following areas from each participating city/town and county: Public Works Planning/Zoning/Development Engineering Police/Fire Once the Planning Team members are identified, I anticipate scheduling the first planning meeting for February 3 and two follow up meetings one month apart. The Plan is intended to be complete in three 4 hour meetings held at the Pima County EOC. Due to the low number of ineetings, it is imperative each jurisdiction is represented at each meeting and information is provided as required. Therefore, it is necessary to assign team member responsibility within your community to those that can make the meeting commitment and remain throughout the entire process. Please determine your community's representatives and ask that they save the date. Please send me their contact information no later than January 21 Thank you in advance for your participation in this very important plan update. Jeti Guthrie Operations Man� Pima County CNfic� of �mergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tucson, AZ 85701 52Q-79&0600 �.,Pima Gounty ��►OEM J�nuary 18, 2011 Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 33 N. Stone Ave, Tucson AZ 85701 `' (520) 798-0600 Office (520) 243-7550 Fax �� Y Dear Community Stakeholder: I write to you today to request the benefit of your comments and guidance to revise the Pima County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (the Plan). The Disaster Mitigation Act of2040 (DMA2K) mandates that all states, tribes and local jtzrisdictions have a FEMA-approved Mitigation Plan to be eligible to receive funding from federal Mitigation Grant Programs. In 2005, Pima County and its incorporated jurisdictions, in conjunction with the Arizona Division of Emergeney Management (ADEIVI�, developed the current Plan and obtained Plan approval by FEMA as required by DMA2K. The current Plan expires on January 25, 2012, by which time an updated Plan must be in place in order to remain eligible for Mitigation Grant Program support. I am very pleased to inform you that ADEM has obtained grant funding for a subject matter expert to provide consulting to our community for Plan review; ADEM is also covering the 25% match to the grant. Pima County is now initiating the process to review and update the Plan. I invite your jurisdiction to participate in the Planning Team that we are developing to ensure that you are reflected in the Plan and thus remain Mitigation Grant Program eligible. While this is, of course, of benefit to your community, perhaps of greater importance is the opportunity during the planning process to identify the principal threats to your jurisdiction and develop actions that you can take to mitigate those threats to the lives and property of your constituents. Typically, the ideal Planning Team members are representatives with expertise in the areas of Public Works, Planning/Zoning/Development, Engineering, Law Enforcement and Firefighting. Please determine your community's representatives in these fields and ask that they make themselves available to participate in the initial Planning Meeting scheduled for February 3`�, 2011 at the Pima County Herbert K. Abrams Building located at 3950 S. Country Club Rd. (at the carnex of Ajo Way and Country Club Rd.) in conference room #1108. Please provide JeffGuthrie, Operations Manager, with contact information for your representatives by January 21�`. He may be reached at 243-7560 or via email at Jeff.Guthrie@pima.gov. In addition to the initial Planning Meeting on February 3`�, I anticipate that two follow up meetings one month apart will be necessary. Each of these three meetings is anticipated to take faur hours. It is imperative that you are represented at each meeting and that your entity's information is made available as required. Accordingly, I ask that you assign team member responsibility to those who can make these meeting commi�nents and remain on the Planning Team throughout the planning process. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to working with you and your representatives on this very important task. Please contact me if you have any questions, or if I can be of service. Sincerely, , , ,,; i , , „ �' i ' Mike Hein, Director Pima County pffice of Emergency Management W. Scott Ogden From: Jeff Guthrie [Jeff.Guthrie@pima.gov] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 1:32 PM To: W. Scott Ogden Subject: FW: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Regional planners Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County �e of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tucson, AZ 85701 520-79&0600 From: Jeff Guthrie Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:12 AM To: Andrew D'Entremont; Edward Pope; Barbara Harris; Robert Bereiter Subject: FW: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update This is the email that went out yesterday. Ptease pass this to Char. Thanks Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County Of'fice of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 13Q W. Congress, B level Tuc.son, AZ 85701 520-798-0600 1 From: ]eff Guthrie Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:26 PM To: Andre Matus; (iennifer.pegnato(a�tuaonaz.gov); (tjohnstonCa�ci.sahuarita.az.us); charles.kmetCa�tonation-nsn.gov; David Azuelo; frank.duarteCa�sheriff.pima.gov; Jan Mclay; Jason Larter; Jim.SchnedenCa�tucsonaz.gov; Larry Anderson (landerson@southtucson.org); Pat Quinn (Pat,Quinn@Tuaonaz.gov); seastone@uapd.arizona.edu; Steven Johnson (sjohnson@marana.com); Teachout, John; terrence.ford(u�dhs.gov Cc: Mike Hein; 'Susan Wood' Subject: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update In 2005, Pima County and its incorporated jurisdictions, in conjunction with the AZ Division of Emergency Management (ADEM), developed the Pima County Mu/ti-7urisdictiona/ Hazard Mitigation P/an (the Plan). The Plan was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K) and identifies mitigation measures to eliminate or reduce the effects of future disasters. The DMA2K states that all states, tribes and local jurisdictions must have a FEMA approved mitigation plan to be eligible for federal mitigation grant programs. The County's original Plan expires Jan 25, 2012, at which time an updated approved Plan will be required to maintain grant program eligibility. To assist us in updating our Plan update, ADEM obtained a grant and is assuming the 25% match to the grant. Therefore, there is no financial obligation to Pima County or the local jurisdictions, we must simply participate in meetings and provide information for the Plan. ADEM along with a contractor will be assisting us through the entire process and will be responsible for assembling the final product. This is where you come in... Pima County would like its incorporated jurisdictions and Tribal partners to be part of the Plan update process, which is beginning at this time. You are strongly encouraged to join the Planning Team to ensure your city/town remains in the Plan and grant eligible. During the planning process, the jurisdictions' most threatening hazards/locations will be identified and discussed as well measures to mitigate the effect from future disasters. The ideal Planning Team members are made up of representatives from the following areas from each participating city/town and county: Public Works Planning/Zon ing/Development Engineering Police/Fire Once the Planning Team members are identified, I anticipate scheduling the first planning meeting for February 3� and two follow up meetings one month apart. The Plan is intended to be complete in three 4 hour meetings held at the Pima County EOC. Due to the low number of ineetings, it is imperative each jurisdiction is represented at each meeting and information is provided as required. Therefore, it is necessary to assign team member responsibility within your community to those that can make the meeting commitment and remain throughout the entire process. Please determine your community's representatives and ask that they save the date. Please send me their contact information no later than )anuary 21 Thank you in advance for your participation in this very important plan update. Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tucson, AZ 85701 520-79&0600 3 W. Scott Ogden From: Jeff Guthrie [Jeff.Guthrie@pima.gov] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 1:30 PM To: W. Scott Ogden Subject: FW: Invitation to Attend: Pima County Hazard Vulnerability Planning Meeting This is the school districts. Sorry for the piecemeal information but it was sent out by others in our office depending on responsibilities Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tueson, AZ 85701 520-798-0600 From: Jillian Bradshaw Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:17 AM To: )eff Guthrie Subject: FW: Invitation to Attend: Pima County Hazard Vulnerability Planning Meeting From: Joen Painter [mailto:JPainter@tabletoptelephone.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:23 AM To: Jillian Bradshaw Subject: RE: Invitation to Attend: Pima County Hazard Vulnerability Planning Meeting Thank you for the information. I will make sure that either I am in attendance at the meeting or our Superintendent, Bob Dooley. Dr. Joen Painter Principal AUSD 520-387-7602 Those who are lifting the world upward and onward are those who encourage more than criticize. -Elizabeth Harrison, educator (1849-1927) _. ... _ From: Jillian Bradshaw [mailto:Jillian.Bradshaw@pima.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:42 AM To: jpainter@tabletoptelephone.com; rfederico@avsd.org; jking@avsd.org; conniholderman@amphi.com; pharris@amphi.com; cbermude@amphi.com; mgemma@amphi.com; dwalker@amphi.com; mnelson@amphi.com; kcorner@amphi.com; bweigold@amphi.com; conniholderman@amphi.com; aheinemann@amphi.com; egalaz@amphi.com; mbejaran@amphi.com; bstoner@amphi.com; ggault@amphi.com; fl�epler@amphi.com; afarley@amphi.com; awichers@amphi.com; tcall@amphi.com; Ihaller@amphi.com; dkuhn@amphi.com; jlansa@amphi.com; ahannah@amphi.com; mgunderson@cfsd.kl2.az.us; jmarrs@cfsc.kl2.az.us; Irathert@cfsd.kl2.az.us; blorimer@cfsd.kl2.az.us; cnichols@cfsd.kl2.az.us; tkolter@cfsd.kl2.az.us; jsherrill@cfsd.kl2.az.us; mleeder@cfsd.kl2.az.us; kboling@cfsd.kl2.az.us; sickes@dsd39.org; pattonl@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; shinns@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; brunenkj@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; WeIIsP@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; twohillc@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; bonnerb@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; balla@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; lealholt@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; swand@flowingwelis.kl2.az.us; thiffaults@flowingwells.kl2.az.us; tallen@iobusd40.org; jeddy@iobusd40.org; M.M.Tumer@maranausd.org; G.S.Schmidt@maranausd.org; D.A.Johnson@maranausd.org; S.J.Poling@maranausd.org; D.L.Linsalata@maranausd.org; N.L.Paddock@maranausd.org; E.R.Abrams@maranausd.org; L.R.Prouty@maranausd.org; J.W.Doty@maranausd.org; A.S.Murphy@maranausd.org; P.A.Cadigan@maranausd.org; P.).Beine@maranausd.org; P.A.Harcus@maranausd.org; J.J.Meek@maranausd.org; E.C.Armenta@maranausd.org; S.J.Siedschlag@maranausd.org; J.M.Damore@maranausd.org; D.L.Luce@maranausd.org; mneish@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; croman@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; jlehmkuhl@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; tsteward@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; draulston@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; kshiba@sahuarita.kl2.az.us; tbmaz2001@yahoo.com; rayc@susdl2.org; wila@susdl2.org; johnb@susdl2.org; johnr@susd12.9rg; dawnm@susdl2.org; debrae@susdl2.org; tomh@susdl2.org; emmac@susdl2.org; debrab@susdl2.org; bobm@susdl2.org; eneidao@susdl2.org; pamb@susdl2.org; herbs@susdl2.org; lindas@susdl2.org; lilyd@susdl2.org; stevep@susdl2.org; pamelac@susdl2.org; eddiei@susdl2.org; artm@susdl2.org; valeriel@susdl2.org; ralphn@susdl2.org; lyopp@tanq.org; gmiller@tanq.org; scenters@tang.org; ganderson@tanq.org; stuart.baker@tusdl.org; Heather.mace@tusdl.org; rachel.kundrat@tusdl.org; lindsay.loebig@tusdl.org; david.quan@tusdi.org; Joseph.hermann@tusdi.org; Cathryn.DeSalvo@tusdl.org; Diane.Quevedo@tusdl.org; Richard.Romero@tusdi.org; Larry.Chilgreen@tusdl.org; Chad.Knippen@tusdl.org; Carolyn.Eldridge@tusdl.org; Sabrina.Cruz@tusdl.org; Epifano.Guerrero@tusdl.org; Ruben.Diaz@tusdl.org; John.Howe@tusdi.org; Rex.Scott@tusdi.org; Linda.Armijo@tusdl.org; Frank.Armenta@tusdl.org; Lisa.Langford@tusdl.org; Joyce.Dillon@tusdl.org; Pearl.Miller@tusdl.org; Deborah.Anders@tusdl.org; Carolyn.Eldridge@tusdl.org; Lisa.McCorlcle@tusdl.org; Kathryn.Martin@tusdl.org; Catherine.Comstock@tusdl.org; Charlotte.Patterson@tusdi.org; Jesus.Celaya@tusdl.org; Robert.Mackay@tusdl.org; David.Overstreet@tusdl.org; Helen.Grijalva@tusdl.org; Helen.LePage@tusdi.org; Juanita.Condit@tusdl.org; Andrew.Kent@tusdl.org; John.Heidel@tusdl.org; Paula.Godfrey@tusdl.org; Kathleen.Scheppe@tusdl.org; Anna.Rivera@tusdi.org; )onathan.Ben- Asher@tusdl.org; Shannon.Mckinney@tustl.org; Carolyn.Eldridge@tusdl.org; Kathy.Bolles@tusdl.org; Maryann.Jackson@tusdl.org; Jimmy.Hart@tusdl.org; Cheri.LaRochelle@tusdl.org; Janet.Jordan@tusdl.org; David.Dodge@tusdl.org; Dan.Weisz@tusdi.org; Pamela.Clarridge@tusdl.org; Ana.Gallegos@tusdl.org; Margaret.Scott@tusdl.org; Pat.Flores@tusdl.org; Sheila.Govern@tusdl.org; Jerry.Holmes@tusdl.org; Mary.Mercado@tusdl.org; Paul.Deweerdt@tusdi.org; Jerry.Gallegos@tusdl.org; Paul.Thompson@tusdl.org; Terri.Polan@tusdl.org; Yolanda.Nunez@tusdl.org; Rosanna.Ortiz-Montoya@tusdi.org; Carolyn.Eldridge@tusdi.org; Mary.Anderson2@tusdl.org; Elizabeth.Redondo@tusdi.org; Julie.McIntyre@tusdl.org; Don.Calhoun@tusdl.org; Heidi.Aranda@tusdl.org; Victoria.Callison@tusdl.org; Robert.Mackay@tusdl.org; Tina.Isaac@tusdi.org; Robert.Mackay@tusdi.org; Kathryn.ManleyCrockett@tusdl.org; Robert.Mackay@tusdl.org; Marco.Ramirez@tusdl.org; Patricia.Dienz@tusdl.org; Holly.Leyman@tusdl.org; Ruben.Diaz@tusdl.org; Kim.Babeu@tusdl.org; Marcos.Quijada@tusdl.org; Elizabeth.Minno@tusdl.org; Robert.Pitts@tusdi.org; Cricket.Gallegos@tusdl.org; Stephen.Trejo@tusdl.org; Jose.0livas@tusdl.org; Valerie.Payne@tusdl.org; Terry.Ross@tusdl.org; Sam.Giangardella@tusdi.org; Jonathan.Hanson@tusdl.org; Julie.Laird@tusdl.org; Jim.Christ@tusdl.org; Kerry.Vega@tusdl.org; Oscar.Dotson@tusdl.org; Epifano.Guerrero@tusdi.org; Daniel.Erickson@tusdl.org; Epifano.Guerrero@tusdi.org; Maria.Figueroa@tusdl.org; Barbara.Kohl@tusdl.org; Abel.Morado@tusdl.org; Roman.Soltero@tusdl.org; Elizabeth.Moll@tusdl.org; Debbie.Summers@tusdl.org; David.Ross@tusdl.org; John.Bellasario@tusdl.org; Ignacio.Ruiz@tusdi.org; Norma.Flores@tusdl.org; Leah.Dardis@tusdl.org; Wade.McRae@tusdi.org; Robin.Dunbar@tusdi.org; Stacie.Emert@tusdl.org; Aaliyah.Arrocha-Samuel@tusdi.org; Kristine.Hansen@tusdl.org; Maria.Marin@tusdl.org; )onathan.Ben-Asher@tusdl.org; woodj@vail.kl2.az.us; penat@vail.kl2.az.us; brysond@vail.kl2.az.us; mortensonm@vail.kl2.az.us; finch5@vail.kl2.az:us; dabneyk@vail.kl2.az.us; emeryl@vail.kl2.az.us; wrightm@vail.kl2.az.us; graffk@vail.kl2.az.us; steyerm@vail.kl2.az.us; donaldsonm@vail.kl2.az.us; chesebroughj@vail.kl2.az.us; MTSHAW81@aol.com; maryann@academyadventures.com; ams@amstucson.org; aotes-principal@qwest.net; spear@at.tuccaxmail.com; aotms-principal@qwest.net; alctucson@msn.com; alctucson@msn.com; alctucson@msn.com; ccampuzano@guerreroschool.org; moses5555@aol.com; Alicia.Alvarez@leonagroup.com; cbraren@amerischools.org; charlenemarie72@yahoo.com; judybiz@worldnet.att.net; cmcgarvey@basistucson.org; dmoser@basistucson.org; Beginningacademy@yahoo.com; btridico@calliollin.com; tcarino@calliollin.com; Icothrun@canyonroseacademy.com; bjeppson@cardenoftucson.org Cc: )eff Guthrie Subject: Invitation to Attend: Pima County Hazard Vulnerability Planning Meeting Good Moming- A� Pima County Office of Emergenc�r Management and Homeland Security begins a new planning cycle for rovisiona to the Pima GouMy Multi-Juriadictional Hazard Mitigatiort Plan, input from educational insbtutions beeomea crit� to the overalt success of the program. Please see the attached invitation ftom Director Mike Hein. We invite you to join us in this planning endeavor. Thank you- Jeff Guthrie Operations Manager Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security 130 W. Congress, B level Tucson, AZ 85701 520-798-0600 JG: jmb W. Scott Ogden From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments Good afternoon, Griselda Moya-Flores [Griselda.Moya-Flores@pima.gov] Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:28 PM Ursula Kramer; Suzanne Shields; Chris Cawein; Charles Matt Matthewson; Jean Voelkel; David Cummings; Lauren Eib; Priscilla Cornelio; Steve Kreienkamp Jeff Guthrie Hazard Mitigation Plan HazardVulnerabilityPlanning_2011.pdf It is time for us to revise the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Please see attached memorandum from Mr. Hein. Thank you. Griselda Moya-Flores Administrative Specialist Pima County Oifice of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Phone: (520) 243-7545 Fax: (520) 243-7550 W. Scott Ogden From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Good afternoon, Griselda Moya-Flores [Griselda.Moya-Flores@pima.gov] Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:31 PM Randy Ortlinghaus; Reland Kane Jeff Guthrie Hazard Mitigation Plan HazardVulnerabilityPlanning_2011.pdf It is time for us to revise the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Please see attached memorandum from Mr. Hein. Thank you. Griselda Moya-Flores Administrative Specialist Pima County O�ce of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Phone: (520) 243-7545 Fax: (520) 243-7550 Memorandum JE Fuller/ Hvdrolo�y & Geomorphology, Inc. MEETING DATE: February 3, 2011 MEETING TIME: 9:00 AM — 1:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: Pima County Abrams Building Tucson, AZ DISTRIBUTION: Meeting Attendees FROM: W. Scott Ogden - JEF RE: Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Team Meeting No. 1 ATTENDEES: Char Ackerman — Oro Valley Emergency Planner Charles Barclay — ADOT Superintendent Robert Bereiter — Marana Emergency Planner Keith Brann — Marana Town Engineer Bret Canale — Marana GIS Analyst Anna Casadei — Sahuarita Senior Planner Paul Casertano — PAG Ops & Safety Lead . Dan Contomo — Marana USD CFO Dane Crouse — Drexel Heights Fire Battalion Chief Brian Delfs — Avra Valley Fire Chief Andy D'Entremont — Pima County OEMHS Planner Jane Fairall — Marana Deputy Town Attorney Jordan Feld — Tucson Airport Authority Planning Director Griselda Moya Flores — Pima County OEMHS Jeff Guthrie — Pima County OEMHS Operations Manager Barb Harris — Tucson OEM Emergency Planner Thomas Hellfrich — Pima County Regional Flood Control District Mgr Steven Johnson — Marana Police Sergeant/Emergency Coordinator Paul Keesler — Oro Valley Permitting Manager Jim Kress — Tucson Fire Captain Brian Lauber — ASLD Forestry District Forester Michael Losada — Tucson Airport Authority Police Corporal Andre Matus — Pascua Yaqui Tribe Fire Chief Janet McLay — Tucson OEM Emergency Management Coordinator Mark Moore — Oro Valley Water Utility Design Reviewer Lee Muscarella — Golder Ranch Fire Battalion Chief Scott Ogden — JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. Jennifer Pegnato — Tucson OEMHS Police Sergeant Ed Pope — Sahuarita Emergency Response Planner Jose Rodriguez — Oro Valley Engineering Division Manager (Continued on Next Page) Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 1 JEFuller, Inc. 2/3/2011 Lisa Romero — Pima County OEMHS Jim Schneden — Tucson Police Sergeant Lisa Shafer — Marana Planning Director James Stoltenberg — RurallMetro Fire Deputy Fire Chief Liz Temple — Pima County OEMHS Compliance Officer T. Vanhook — Marana Community Development Director Jim Vogelsberg — Tucson Planning & Development Adminstrator Susan Wood — ADEM NOTE: No Representative from South Tucson AGENDA 1. INTRODUCTIONS / GREETING 2. MITIGATION PLANNING OVERVIEW 3. CURRENT MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW 4. PLANNING PROCESS a. MJ Planning Team Roles b. Public Involvement Strategy 5. RISK ASSESSMENT a. Hazard Identi�cation / Profiling b. Asset Inventory 6. NEXT MEETING DATES ACTION ITEM SUMMARY DISCUSSION Agenda Item 1• • J. Guthrie opened meeting with a brief explanation of the purpose for the meeting and then introduced S. Ogden of JEF. • S. Ogden explained the role of ADEM and JEF regarding the update process. • S. Ogden asked each person at the meeting to introduce themselves and note whether or not they were involved with the development of the current multi jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan (Plan). • It was noted that the City of South Tucson was not represented. J. Guthrie will follow-up with them to ensure they understand the importance of attendance. A�enda Item 2: • S. Wood distributed presented an overview/review of the DMA2K mitigation process and purpose for preparing a mitigation plan. The discussion included a review of impacted grant eligibility. � p. 2 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 1 JEFuller, Inc. 2/3/2011 A�enda Item 3: • S. Wood led a section by section overview of the 2007 Pima County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007 Plan). Highlights of the discussion and comments included: o Plan format will change slightly to reflect a version that is more compatible to the format of the current State of Arizona Mitigation Plan. o Non-Arizona related information in the 2007 Plan will be removed. o Some folks were returning members from the 2007 Plan effort, but most were new to the process. o During the review of the community profile descriptions, S. Wood indicated that drafts of that section (new Plan Section 4) will be provided for editing and customizing by each jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction was encouraged to edit the existing text (except demographic data, which JEF will update) and make it reflect their community. She also encouraged each jurisdiction to add some text discussing the agricultural, mining, and tourism aspects as pertinent or relevant. o Details of Sections 5, 6, and 7 and their updates will be discussed later in the meeting today and in subsequent meetings. o A Tribal Annex will be created for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to satisfy FEMA's Tribal Mitigation Plan requirements that are additional to the local planning requirements. A�enda Item 4a• • S. Ogden led a discussion / presentation of the planning team roles and responsibilities including: o The primary point of contact (PPOC) o The community representative o The local planning resources (other staff, outside agencies, business, school, non-profit reps, etc. contacted or referred to). • Jeff Guthrie of the Pima County OEMHS was identified as the PPOC. The community representatives were identified as follows: o Unincorporated Pima County — Jeff Guthrie o Town of Marana — Steven Johnson o Pascua Yaqui Tribe - TBD o Town of Oro Valley — Char Ackerman o Town of Sahuarita — Ed Pope o City of South Tucson —(Not Present — TBD) o City of Tucson — Barb Harris and Janet McLay S. Ogden reviewed a list of possible local resources that the PPOC may invite to future meetings or coordinate with at the jurisdictional level to accomplish the various update tasks. S. Ogden presented a template for each jurisdiction to use during the planning process for documenting the local resources involved in the plan update outside of the main planning team. p. 3 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 1 JEFuller, Inc. 2/3/2011 A�enda Item 4b: • S. Ogden led a discussion/presentation of the public involvement requirements of DMA2K. • S. Ogden directed the team's attention to Section 3.5.5 of the 2007 Plan to review the public involvement effort done at that time. To the best of the team's knowledge, there were no significant responses from the public. • The planning team discussed various options for pre-draft public involvement including newspaper notices, general public announcements, council/board briefings at a working session, and web page postings. The following strategies were identified: o Pima County will: ■ Post a notice to the county website. ■ Issue a press release similar to what was done for the 2007 Plan. ■ Coordinate the provision of links to the county's website with each jurisdiction once the website is up and running. o Town of Marana will: • Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. ■ Publish an article/public notice in their local newspaper. o Town of Oro Valley will: ■ Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. ■ Look into the possibility of doing an informational briefing for the Town Council. o Pascua Yaqui Tribe will: ■ Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. ■ Publish an article/public notice in their local newspaper. ■ Provide an announcement on the local radio station o Town of Sahuarita will: � Post a notice to town's website with a link to the county's. Publish an article/public notice in their local newspaper. Presentation/announcement at the Chamber of Commerce "For Our Cities" event. o City of Tucson will: ■ Post a notice to city's website with a link to the county's. Once the draft plan is ready, a second round of newspaper announcements will be used and the website notice will be updated with specific instructions for obtaining a draft of the plan. � ADEM has developed template language for the county and other jurisdictions to use in the web and newspaper announcements. JEF will provide the template to the planning team via email. A�enda Item Sa: • S. Ogden presented an overview of what a risk assessment is and its purpose in the overall scheme of mitigation planning. He discussed the approach that the planning team will ultimately step through to update Section 5. p. 4 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 1 JEFuller, Inc. 2/3/2011 • The planning team reviewed the list of hazards previously evaluated in 2007 Plan as well as a comprehensive list of hazards identified in the 2010 State Plan. S. Ogden explained several of the 2010 State Plan hazards and how they related/differed from the 2007 Plan hazard list, including: • In the 2010 State Plan, the hazard categories were redefined to reflect the damaging element of the hazards. For example, a thunderstorm or a tropical storm event primarily cause flood and wind damage, so those two categories were eliminated and the damaging elements of those events were profiled in the Flooding/Flash Flooding and Severe Wind categories. • S. Ogden presented the results of a historic hazard event search and database compilation performed by ADEM and JEF that looks at declared and undeclared hazard events. JEF will provide copies of the Excel spreadsheets to the planning team for updating and closer review, as appropriate. • The planning team reviewed the hazard lists and historic records and discussed which hazards could be eliminated off-hand and which should be evaluated further. The following is a brief summary of that discussion: o As a reminder, S. Ogden reiterated that for each hazard profiled, the Plan must include at least one mitigation action or project to address mitigation of that hazard. o Several planning team members wanted to profile all of the hazards and develop a risk assessment that could be used for other planning documents such as an emergency operations plan. S. Ogden reiterated that as long as each hazard profiled had at least one meaningful mitigation action/project, then that would be OK. o Disease — discussed whether this should be included in the Plan if it is already addressed in other planning documents developed by the county. The team concluded that the hazard should remain and reference other documents as appropriate. o Several of the hazards were possibilities, but the planning team wanted to have an opportunity to review with others not present at this meeting to determine if the hazard should be evaluated further. The conclusion of the discussion established that the following hazards will be profiled and assessed for vulnerability: o Dam Failure o Disease o Drought o Extreme Heat o Flooding / Flash Flooding o HAZMAT o Levee Failure o Severe Wind (includes microbursts, tornados, dust storms, gustnados, etc.) o Wildfire o Winter Storm p. 5 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJAMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 1 JEFuller, Inc. 2/3/2011 The Planning Team will conduct further research and investigations to decide if the following hazards will be considered as well. The Planning Team will respond with a decision by no later than February 25th: o Earthquake o Fissure o Lightning o Subsidence Agenda Item Sb• • S. Ogden led the Team through a review of Sections 5.5.3 and 5.5.4 which summarizes the asset inventory data that was used/developed for the 2007 Plan and how it was used in the 2007 Plan vulnerability analysis. Nobody in attendance at the meeting was aware of any data files that may be available from the 2007 Plan effort. It appears that the majority of data was taken from the HAZUS-MH database. • S. Ogden presented a working definition for defining/identifying "critical" assets and some general categories and examples of what might be included. The ultimate identification of what is "critical" will be the responsibility of each jurisdiction. • S. Ogden provided a spreadsheet and guidance document for cataloging critical assets for each jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction shall compile a list of critical assets identified by that jurisdiction using the template spreadsheet and provide to JEF for use in the vulnerability analysis. A�enda Item 6• • Next meetings are scheduled as follows: o Planning Team Meeting No. 2, March 8 2011, 9am to lpm, Pima County Abrams Building, 3950 S. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ o Planning Team Meeting No. 3, April 14 201 l, 9am to lpm, Pima County Abrams Building, 3950 S. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ ACTION ITEM SUMMARY: ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE 1-1 J• Guthrie will follow up with City of South Tucson J. Guthrie officials to confirm artici ation status 2/25/11 JEF will email electronic version of Local Resources List ,TEF 1-2 template to each jurisdiction to track contributors to the [2/11/11] lan u date. Each jurisdiction shall record and document all people All Jurisdictions 1-3 contacted or involved as a planning resource at the local [prior to draft] level, usin the tem late rovided b JEF 1-4 JEF will email Section 4- Community Descriptions to all JEF �urisdictions for review and u datin . 2/11/11 p. 6 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Ptanning Team Meeting No. JEFuller, Inc. � 2/3/2011 ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE All jurisdictions are to review and update their respective Community Description, as appropriate and desired. 1-5 Jurisdictions are encouraged to consider including All Jurisdictions Agriculture, Mining, Manufacturing, and Tourism in their [3/4/11 ] descriptions as appropriate. JEF will update demographic information, so those tables and fi ures ma be i nored. JEF will provide a sample public notice prepared by JEF 1-6 ADEM to the planning team for use in the website and [2/11/11] news a er announcements. 1 _� All local jurisdictions will perform the pre-draft public All Jurisdictions involvement activities summarized in A enda Item 4b 3/4/11 JEF will provide digital copies of the historic hazard 1EF 1-8 database files to the planning team for review and update �2/11/11] as needed. All jurisdictions are to review and update the historic All Jurisdictions 1-9 hazard database as appropriate and desired by the [3/4/11] communit . All jurisdictions shall evaluate the following hazards and decide whether to keep them or not: • Earthquake 1-10 • Fissure � All Jurisdictions • Lightning [2/25/11] • Subsidence A keep or drop decision shall be communicated to JEF by the due date. JEF to provide asset inventory template worksheet and JEF 1-I 1 instructions to all jurisdictions for their use in compiling a �2�11/11] critical asset invento All jurisdictions shall compile a list of critical assets, to be All Jurisdictions 1-12 determined by the jurisdiction and provide the completed [3/4/11] worksheet to JEF p. 7 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan � � PiR;� C+au�skY MtuIG-J�rt�adac�:�.iaral fia3�artl Miti�,htKarr PV;�nrbcr�g Mee�l�ir.� Clate; F�t�4n.�ary 3, 249 t �°r°.� �crr''� �"� rz Mv �, f� h +� � M� �t .�c � c � 1 � � 1=� � � �j �i x� .#! e�� �� 'S�' c'�'�n� a'�" �t'� ; �c� - �`��t nr a _. � �/�'r�'^�'Jv.vN . . .. . . �"� . . f � ��`� `.`C� �' ���za�.�. ;��� ��..��.�.��`��� ���.�.-���� �`�t��P �T�`���� �f.�'�t��c�� �?�'��e�.u�r�r. �hi�l"�.��i�r�,; �rm,��,�t`+' �t��rf;��, _ ��-7�f�� � -�iz� ,���....��r�'.,rv�r "�i'...Fr.�e �`�.� ����� '���� �� ,�� ��.�:�� �.,�:�°�-���. . ��������:: �� -�r��-� ���� ,���� � � �,�'�`�`�` ,�� � ��°: �".��`�.�f r�'l+�k. ��°J�, r� t�r� ���t�- G���°r �#� > � ��,, . N._ � � i�, c �f,.� �.�S��t�c r:'�.+�r ��� 5"T.�x � �`'�t ; �.°�vrr��?��<dGa�/fr'r�t�2 -�du f . q o: .�.,.1!p� 1'»�{„-' �`W,,,,,�. �:... ¢-'"�'+L �..+ �,:;- : �. f .Y ats�.. � �r f 1 .�, . �,.. �LL_ " 7 #. P.,» i �+ , .;; • -- . x �, �. ,� - �« � �, r'a�.�,.�° �. _ __ s t�r���z;N � r*os�-S' .n;`�P !�-..°'.� ��'_�»r�tt:��S�.�r-�����r-� "^ , � � , ,, ii ..�« ., _ - �.. �� �-r �,',�rVr�L.t... � + v�a � � .�' � �:.� �:i: a � � t��'He..�,1 `���i.. t���'�- _.. __ krC.�tA r,e�q � � r��c� r �ac � L.�rk* „ �, � � . . �, y �t` "z�`r"" �'sa.+'.',�+...a".,k-..�` �.x. L �, . �,.,��,,.,,r.-� �1.`�i. ,.' , � .. ... .. � ... ... c��,r�•'�,f�F � . S�''��'' ''�k��+'' f�' '/ Y x ( '� "';;°�� .'t'�-LS''✓( .;�i^C''�>� %�: r'' . „ , �. `� �" � ,.-°;' , ' � ; � , . .. P. _ _ � . _ .. . _ ._ . r } �� o� . '� � �� e. cr`A �-r i ' .. � i� W �. . . , v� � � .�.,4_; � r�,,�3 "-.'� y , i' w �"' � .:",� _ ° �,` � . �' `", � , , � + _ _ ,. - � " � .�"� . ' � � � , ��•J� �,?,a�.� �C� : �;._.. . . (.,�. �'j:% � . . ... . ��i ?r,�� ?� 1 � ��" ��'f �£ .... . . ... + �.I 'i3ct���w.. `s ,t � x ?'S�. .._. _ . . , a . . �a4-`° _ ' d„""�'„ N�r ��:,�' n( " `� . :�� ;° ��:=�.a1�S��€.� �{���i�� � �E �� �M� c; � � �.::: � _', r°�.. +� �=�-�t f .:� � C �'r' � ���`1,��..�d +� _" - ,��# '� � �v,4� � ,e.� " �j , _ �- < " � /� ,�,+� „t � p M- ...e` r�^' ,} t _ �. a � " :. c,� t �r � }~t:. � ' : f.ig"" if��f ',..�.t` �.. f�f . .... ..... ..... . ��..! ������1..'^r�i�'<rf +'�,�'�Y ... ,r���l�^rfr+. ^{"�.x�� ....� � f ��,� /��C `?�..7�f.�(;.�.�',V!� ..*ITr������ P���� ... f . . . . �" . . �L-f ,t•' � _ .. /� � a . F � € t � a � �f / J, , e _ / a�z t.. [x.;, i..rv,.�,e/� �. . c�.. ?c "°a�w.`4 tc `v.'. �..,_ �.TC'�i,°�:`4C7,-.!' .. ... .. ��s��. �. ..t =••,P � � i��+'� ��`> Cl� �;{'�t.``fh'e.�[F �.. .r a``t.�' "`Sr , - i^ . ... .... . : . . ... . . . . w` « 4 .- " +. .... . .-�- , ,*/�, � )^�. � .� p/ a •• n.,Jk.�S � �, ...r=� �� �' � _,.fi � �h.:«. f � � J...C��� �� f '�?+- l . ,��1 _ n c c� �: r= S� r��. i �.. t�r � h-°r, ,. ��. r a e � t� � a .�-.. � r s'�fxi � e t.,t ✓ Cfr _� . r r+�, � ,.° �. .. � - . � ni . `.z r.. e",,. orc,y. .y.z �,� .. � t.J- , � ,� -� . — �` _ ��� `"���CC.�'�°"� ���u�1 er,, �'r` �C`�trz- tt��--- ����f''tt`7rrt� �-��;7�,. 7, r p_�� - �r,. t +c�lfall;!!:'f t`�`rrc�. � *.,. '��' "�� �,�'tf ij"�'.� jJ� {� l�ttei �"i` i�er✓/�i�f('�t`rltra . G'u'�t fi , � � . � �� ,�.- .� ��J���" ei7r°u�:*ard< l� � i .. . �3 r 7�� ���lJ/''.t �� �zs°r� .- �'� � . �°� . �` r �i�"� a �t �� l ' ,� �?�"tG"rr' r�'-�,�k' ,` - -,� ,::� r' � � l �y � le t �r�z-�f.�.� ���'" r��'rl,��` �' � � J _r,�'� �r �` � l; �lxa�rl��"s ��t°r"rar�rrrk G.a��+kt � � � ,,.,.�J�e.sr" �.ry.c'fl:.r'2 ,`�/�» �r' �.+'c �:dfr..e�r '__� j � •- „c, � r.::'•r� ',�rr �'�`�..a�c� �'H'ri- �`�? '�"'S�G ,.,ld�w*w ,�rt ,�.�« . . r � m j ;. g :! �, .. y' �*�{ ,�'��4:.a"�{ ## ` ,''.�^. i 4' '"° � . _.. ...... ...... .. ..... . . . . . �,,� � � � ,� ,� �.a`:,,. � ,z .�.s;` . � � r .f 4 ;:# �;:f � � � r . , , . -, . .,�,. Y ;. > ' >" -� .` t °� : s , < k! § � � .. . .. . . .... . , , �. .. � � �. , �.., t` ,� , . . . il ., , � .. r� .,, , p� . . . r � S �. '"" * � � ,.. , . .� .. �c, �, ��* ; , y , _. �• , , , � ' i' p , am {,,� � } . � t a zY' a S �,.' �,' ,J 4 i 5 .p {' , . n ,...' � . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . , % .. . .. � i'MN . � y �j. P i � r°. . ` ' �. , � t � '. *.. ,�,,,,. }�� � + t .,�. , { t `. � , - . . .' ' _ _ c' � ; • �°� � rt .r „ , :.�+.� � � � r � ���� � � Ari�ana Dlvision of Eme�gancy ManagamenC 3C�'. o r l (-"; c „ �,y `�" � tS k"1iLLBR `,w".,�.�..� �+t4'a,:ur e �diz�esn7z��x n. P�ma Cauntyr Maltt-Juers�fle.3Aanai N�cd Mrc�gr,tYoh Fl�nrnrsg tvi�Ytr7g C3att�: FeFsru�ry �� 2f71 i � ' '-^"�.`;eti e%��,t^' ��°A��,���, ` a''�/,,,," f �" . ` � C'.�"'.";e ���Y.y��r..._ G;�.:.%,��_ ���:, y i�.t�..f r'��, a�..�� {�-�'�Y".. ..,,.-�,-,. ,w:i C"" '"""-, .� -Y , c ,. . ^' '` , �;, _,�. l. �,,t . � ' , _ n. � ' » i r'. 1.,,.x v Y,��„_ ' � �. J „ k � �{� . i:r' �� . .. ., m .1+� � f _, . ,�., < � ; .. .... '�' c..r< 1 �`.;'�n ;.-^ � .. � t','" .. . . _:.�.. n� �>' �,v.:... __ ...x P[.� �.�� � - ...._ ,-_� �� . � �: i; , `. � ,_,.P . . '�e�.arr�- �1`�-t2����- > T�,,..rM ,�' 1"1�r-,c-,� t�''.�� _ C� ,.ir�rc�. �tc..,nc�c` ��'2-�c:``=�� _ r ���- ��, c�.�. .� �p�` �t eRt,, ic�;°�:.°�-ra '�.,, rtc f �.t�. �� �f� ��e.tp"�:i� t;,�;:1` ..� `� 7'j� .��. ;�7-t93`t ��rn�s`..,y.�. _���� �' "�s'.;+�, < [.�r �. � ��lu� t��;�.F3�v�.�1 , ��G Vut�� �'� "���. t���j �}'���4�. Pi�a���r �?�;- �S�ti-I 7�t�-4'�utv ��c-�c�r���i ��t.,�ccl.Ie�� �� , ��� � � �c�, ��'.5� � �`rm,.��� �-t�-�`'�•-uG-� _ �"3� �38�- __ --�- ,Jtr�,��C� i�:.z���-#�`� � , f . `n �/- F-,�..L,SA.�� .�.r L �� �GV` �GI`� �. ?'�`�",��c.: �'r j ��'i"�"��. ��'�'�«. ,t°�i��„' SLt:.i�...�' s/.::�ta��+��-��"V ... . .. . _. ..... . � . . . .. . . .. _ c..� t`i,,. . ""s � � . � . �ilsc:J.v.�,.� Z.°�At�,� 11�.�. �L� ,�ulr��.= C � � ��W-��ti.�. _. � " _ fhh !. i.sr�i� � � r�, �,.�,.t . �, �:� . . � �; � � � . , � ._ , - x J r ; � r ,, ,. � � , > -. -' i �^ �:'=%:' i ,✓ � ' ���� �� � F �,-+ *��..r . x�� r �: � �"'+ . , . �•...., d '.t::"'`.. ! ,..�iY. .I"` .�v� ,,,�,.t.r /�`W r� x rs.;�'..v..� U , r 1�� " i'�� � '7r:« ^'��.g e G rV� �� � r � � i .. r , .. . � �. � ` " . � , . , � � F �.�. w . � � ` ,�'�����- �,� m.�C ���.� � �7, � � � ��2 j ��Cw:� � ���% � ���;���. ; ��� '`�. � ���Ff�IG=�1 �` �.��° �e , `� -�—.� � ��� � �` ��� ��`����!,�t�fr� C�-��� ��,��. �� .�- � � . _ � � - � � . . w � r ' _ ° >� ��r ` ,, �t" tGE�� �dtt��'�',r �� � `�� }"Gr � � �r � /��;��5�-�. �W,, �-5��' Y ���! �r3l� �a, r �>,�l���°tr �?�z5�':���;. _ T�`"'K- t'r�G � �S55ot. o� �IG� ' �tvtAlC� ii���� b'� �,cr.ukl ��'�. ��� ��t"�t� fFi i� ��7'"°::�..� ���.r'�Y%"GL ��-`:`fp l�'p�L` `J ��,�'° i ��: �}�c` r''� ✓�.af.vs°�r. `°' . . f?�+;�` C'1,�i� ,iii°�.-}^'�i 5,�:%�^s;� :ix�, 7,Y.,:*..��..�cG? . : � . � I . � �'"" . . . .. - � 1 ...e'..eff+92��°,� `��ytsiYV�..�Y't- ,�` "" . , w 1 t yh " �� � � � �'��} � '� �� r,-� 1".3L � t? Y'� ��c'�}v1; rt + `1 �'�� . �"u,;� ' ���� t� "`�.� +n'�, � `�1 `a`F�'� e'� �` r f �'`r �} i� '�,�(_„ : J I k+"`t �c�.{ �k i�. evr.� ��'�t.K >w.�� Gl`�...� � � �1 n �.. � -�. } � , � ) .- . _ ,,.: 4 . r _ r` n .., , -- • , J �..�1°acc.-a �....�C d t�� � r�iVi:�t �s-�_l�at � +^? . �?�r,�,4�. ,�',�fZs` t'a.�'i<.-sR=�..... "'•�,."^::+ �,.�>.Y"` zj.�`J.�`h"1"� ,�,�c't �..�' ./$t ���'�F`t� � . . . _ . _ . . �_. . . . . . .. pr�oea Olvisiun of Ema�pency Idanagement ...._ ...._. ..... . .... _._.... . . �� � Memorandum JE Fuller/ Hvdrolo�v & Geomorpholo�v, Inc. MEETING DATE: March 8, 2011 MEETING TIME: 9:00 AM — 1:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: Pima County Abrams Building Tucson, AZ DISTRIBUTION: Meeting Attendees FROM: W. Scott Ogden - JEF RE: Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Team Meeting No. 2 ATTENDEES: Char Ackerman — Oro Valley Emergency Planner Robert Bereiter — Marana Emergency Planner Paul Casertano — PAG Operations & Safety Lead Andy D'Entremont — Pima County OEMHS Planner Jeff Guthrie — Pima County OEMHS Operations Manager Barb Harris — Tucson OEM Emergency Planner Steven Johnson — Marana Police Sergeant/Emergency Coordinator Janet McLay — Tucson OEM Emergency Management Coordinator Scott Ogden — JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. Ed Pope — Sahuarita Emergency Response Planner Jose Rodriguez — Oro Valley Engineering Division Manager Liz Temple — Pima County OEMHS Compliance Officer Henry Vega — City of South Tucson Public Works Susan Wood — ADEM NOTE: No Representative from Pascua Yaqui Tribe AGENDA 1. EMAP ELEMENTS 2. ACTION ITEM STATUS REVIEW 3. HAZARD PROFILING a. Finalize Hazard List b. CPRI 4. CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT a. Legal-Regulatory, Staff, and Fiscal Capabilities b. Past Mitigation Activities c. NFIP Participation d. Repetitive Loss Properties 5. EXISTING MITIGATION ACTION/PROJECT EVALUATION 6. PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 7. NEXT MEETING DATES ACTION ITEM SUMMARY Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Plma County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 2 JEFuller, Inc. 3/8/2011 DISCUSSION AEenda Item 1• • S. Wood presented elements for EMAP accreditation that will be added to the updated Plan. The additional elements will include: o Environmental Risk and Vulnerability: The hazard risk is evaluated with respect to three environmental elements; air, water, and soil. An evaluation risk matrix tool was used to assess the risk posed by each hazard to environmental elements. o Consequences/Impacts: This section provides an assessment of the consequence and impacts posed by an occurrence of the hazard, to the following sectors: ■ Public — the public in general ■ Responders to the Incident — a discussion of the hazard impacts/consequence posed to officials and individuals responding to or during the hazard. ■ Continuity of Operations/Delivery of Services — an assessment of the hazard impact/consequence to state agencies and delivery of state level services. Environment — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences of the hazard on the environment. This will compliment the previous "Environmental Risk & Vulnerability" section. Economic / Financial Condition of Jurisdiction — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences to the Arizona economy and financial condition. ■ Public Confidence in Jurisdiction's Governance — a general discussion of the impacts/consequences to the public's confidence in the ability of the state to effectively govern and maintain governance during and after the hazard event. The elements will be addressed at a county-wide level and do not need to be. Several jurisdictions were not interested in performing the additional effort and the EMAP accreditation. Only Pima County expressed an interest in having the EMAP elements in the Plan. S. Wood clarified that these will only be evaluated at a county- wide level and do not have to be jurisdiction specific. She also stated that the EMAP elements do add value to the Risk Assessment. • S. Wood and S. Ogden to coordinate with Pima County on how to get this information completed. Agenda Item 2• • S. Ogden reviewed the status of pending action items assigned at Meeting No. 1. The following, were noteworthy discussions: o Several communities requested that Community Description file (for Action Item 1-5) and the Undeclared Hazard Event database (for Action Item 1-9) be resent. p. 2 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 2 JEFuller, Inc. 3/8/2011 o Action Item No. 1-7 - Need to change Pima County status to complete. Sahuarita website posting is up as of today (3/8/11) and an article is expected from the local paper within a week. o Action Item No. 1-12 — The due date for this item has been revised to 3/18/1 L Agenda Item 3• • S. Ogden presented the list of hazards that resulted from the poll of jurisdictions per Action Item No. 1-10. Each hazard was reviewed to check on which communities planned to provide mitigation actions/projects for that hazard. The polling results were: o Dam Failure — Pima County only o Disease — Pima County only o Drought — multiple jurisdictions o Earthquake — Pima County only o Extreme Temperature — multiple jurisdictions o Flooding / Flash Flooding — multiple jurisdictions o HAZMAT — multiple jurisdictions o Levee Failure — multiple jurisdictions o Lightning — WILL BE DROPPED o Subsidence — multiple jurisdictions o Severe Wind — multiple jurisdictions o Wildfire — multiple jurisdictions o Winter Storm — Pima County only • S. Ogden presented the CPRI, explained the purpose of the tool, and walked through a demonstration calculation. • Each jurisdiction is to complete a CPRI assessment of each of the above hazards using the CPRI worksheet that S. Ogden will send with other meeting follow-up materials. A�enda Item 4a• • S. Ogden led the planning team in a review of the 2007 Plan's capability assessment and distributed worksheet examples for discussing. He explained that the new Plan will include the same material, but will be reformatted somewhat to change presentation of the legal and regulatory tools. The format and data needs of the new table was discussed and outlined. • The format of the Administrative and Technical Capacity table and Fiscal Resource table will remain unchanged except for new table numbers. • S. Ogden will pre-populate and distribute a worksheet file containing the updated tables to each jurisdiction using the 2007 Plan information as a starting point. Each jurisdiction was directed to review and revise/update each table as necessary. A�enda Item 4b: • S. Ogden led the planning team in a discussion of documenting prior mitigation activities as a part of the overall capability assessment. p. 3 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 2 JEFuller, Inc. 3/8/2011 o The Capability Assessment portion of the updated Plan will be expanded to include 2 new sets of data will be added to. o The first will be a paragraph summarizing prior mitigation activities involving HMGP or PDM funds that are currently tracked by ADEM. o The second will be a table summarizing past mitigation activities that have been completed by each jurisdiction over the past 5 years. S. Ogden reviewed the HMGP/PDM projects from ADEM that were done in Pima County. S. Ogden reviewed the format of the worksheet for summarizing past mitigation activities that have been completed by each jurisdiction over the past 5 years and talked through an example. JEF will provide a worksheet for each jurisdiction to document past mitigation activities. May include past projects, outreach, studies, etc., funded by any source (not just grants). Agenda Item 4c• • S. Ogden presented a table showing NFIP participation statistics and insurance data that was current as of February 2011 and November 2010, respectively. • Each jurisdiction was polled with regard to management roles and the data was recorded in a table that will ultimately be included in the Plan. E. Pope (Sahuarita) was unsure of the town's management role and will have to check with others at the town. Agenda Item 4d: • S. Ogden presented a summary of NFIP repetitive loss property information that was provided by FEMA through ADEM and was current as of January 2010. • S. Wood is currently working with ADWR to get an updated repetitive loss database and will distribute that data to the planning team via S. Ogden once it is available. Agenda Item 5: • S. Ogden led the planning team through a review of the 2007 Plan's current list of mitigation actions/projects (A/Ps) and explained the data presented in Section 6.4. • S. Ogden explained that a part of the plan update process will include an evaluation of the 2007 Plan's mitigation actions/projects. • S. Ogden explained the process that the planning team will use to evaluate the action/projects listed in Section 6.4 and provided examples of the evaluation worksheet. S. Ogden will compile the initial data from the 2007 Plan into worksheets specific to each jurisdiction and wi11 send the worksheets to each jurisdiction for completion. Agenda Item 6• • S. Ogden requested that the planning team read and review Section 7 of the 2007 Plan and be prepared to discuss what has happened over the past 5 years and what the team wants to do for the next 5 years. p. 4 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 2 .TEFuller, Inc. 3/8/2011 • S. Ogden also provided copies of the FEMA crosswalk that is used to grade the Plans so the planning team can see what questions need to be answered. Agenda Item 7• • Next meetings are scheduled as follows: o Planning Team Meeting No. 3, April 14 2011, 9am to lpm, Pima County Abrams Building, 3950 S. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ o TENTATIVE - Planning Team Meeting No. 4, May 26th, ZO11, 9am to lpm, Pima Couniy Abrams Building, 3950 S. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ. J. Guthrie to confirm availability of the facility. ACTION ITEM SUMMARY: ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE S. Wood and S. Ogden to coordinate with Pima County on S. Wood, S. Ogden, 2-1 getting the EMAP components added to the Plan Pima County [3/18/11] 2-2 S. Ogden to resend Community Description and S. Ogden Undeclared Historic Hazard Warksheet to lannin team 3/11/11 2-3 S. Ogden to send CPRI worksheet to planning team S. Ogden 3/11/11 2-4 Each jurisdiction is to complete a CPRI assessment of all All Jurisdictions the identified hazards and return to JEF. 4/7/11 ] S. Ogden will prepare and distribute worksheet files 2 5 containing the updated capability assessment tables S. Ogden to each jurisdiction using the 2007 Plan information [3/11/11] as a startin oint. 2-6 Each jurisdiction is to review, edit and complete the All Jurisdictions ca abilit assessment and return to JEF. 4/7/11 2 � S. Ogden to send the Past Mitigation Activity worksheet S. Ogden to the lannin team. 3/11/ll Each jurisdiction may complete the worksheet summarizing past mitigation activities that have been 2 accomplished by each jurisdiction over the past 5 All Jurisdictions years. May include past projects, outreach, studies, L4/7/11] etc., funded b an source not 'ust rants . E. Pope (Sahuarita) to check with others at the town 2 9 and report on the floodplain management role of E. Pope Sahuarita under the National Flood Insurance [4/7/11] Pro ram. 2-10 S. Ogden will prepare and distribute Existing Mitigation S. Ogden Action/Pro'ect Evaluation worksheets to each 'urisdiction. 3/11/11 2-ll Each jurisdiction shall complete the Existing Mitigation All Jurisdictions Action/Pro'ect Evaluation worksheet and return it to JEF 4/7/11 p. 5 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 2 JEFuller, Inc. 3/8/2011 ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE Planning team shall review Section 7 of the 2007 Plan and 2 12 be prepared to discuss what has happened over the Planning Team past 5 years and what the team wants to do for the [4/14/11] next 5 ears at Meetin No. 3 p. 6 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Pam� C+aunty 6itaEU•JuriSd�CtitmaE H;tz,�r'�C h1RagsYiart �'l�nr7in� Ad[r�ttng CraEC+, 0.Aar�tt 8, 3tt11 �harAC:kerman � Tcnvncatt}roVaitey� PaliceDtqrarlmant ErnotgatscyPl��iner 520243-7664 520�7�3-1�W#i rar�c�rman�cuova�9feyazgov f`haetes Bdrelay Rr�un� C�a�iartm�rnt cal Trares�aetaai�n 7ucsszn E�istr�r.K S+aperinaemderrt 62t�3£!it-d2 i4 'u:�C!•28�-diU:�:3 c3ratt3ay e�}i �dnk.yoa R�at�arS 8vroster ,. 7s�wn at Mdrana Palac:�: f.k3�aarrrent �ma�gerr��y P1anKwr 520�382-2�67 rUere+�er�nmaraaa.cam K�ifM.Brann �.Tt}wwrx ut hM1arana ; • Engcru�wartg i�awn Erryar�e+. �24- . . k4r�Rn�marana.can Bret GanaEe 7c�wn [rt Ma�an� Gi`a Gd5 D#3 Anelysi b?U-3$7-t882 br�rta9g�nt�tranB,COni Anna Casads�a Tvwn iit Sahu�eita ' Fiarinsrig $ Zonin j C]y�{aartmt�na S�niat Pl�ranrtr a244a322�88.54 acacatl� . . . . . . �u sahu�uii�.az.us PauN Cas�aiana `�`� Pcma Assoctat�ran at Gaverr�mvnts plann�rrg �rat±ans 8 Set[rty t.ead _ S2Q�792 pcess�rtano[a}µagnet or� r � K � � L7an Ccsnkat+�o Mara�ia Ursfiiesi Sc�teool L1i�Erie,! ��.C��C7 CFb 520-682-475k}� 52i1-a04-82?S� �.j�cmriturnca�maranauSd.Ory ���, C9a�?e Crt?usa Urax�S N�slyh�s Fice U�str�i;t Op�r.�flau+s ��ttai�on Gt»�f 62t1-A 7t-12ti2 dcrawse�droz�lfuu.r�i , _. _ _. _ _. Brian 4�»t� A�ra'�lai3�y Fas L�ts9riGS Fira CSSp�rlment _ f�ce �hf€ft 52U-¢'#�l,i't65 52tM4&1-2554 bclods�aYtircr wg An�7y p'Enlrem�t ��,1 Pima Coun1Y C)tfi� ot Emerg�arrey k�9an.�csnsant PC;annur 520-243 T565 520->65-4 t2d andrew.denlr�tmot+C�+ma.gav Jan� F�ta Taxn ni Marana C��r� 6:��ruty Tcawa A(twney 524-�-i€fa1 _ �t�+reti�marar��earrr ��: �r,� �rC�°�, �°� . a���id ru�on �a���a tw��,«��y as�nniag rm�artm�nt c��v�a�. sar�-sra���,s ��d�u,�auvon.r,� GriseEda Mq a Floras p�ma C�sunt (N��cta v� E+nery�yy Managem€rnt �nd Hom�d�nei � .. y . _ _ . ..... . .. . � �� � :56cuniy 5'16-798-944�I. �r�selda.maya.liare5�pama.�v Jetf fiavthne .�'';`��"l Parna Cqunty Office of Emeryencyr Managrt.ment :�nef tioma�an�S ...... ..,.. :..,. ' . �, ... . .. ...... ��Ser.,urcty ��ratiansNkanac,ycv �a24�T9f4�06fi70 : �eSt.S4lh�rat+�P�rnagov Barb N�ms _ 'Cvt of T�csrnsr �F'a�ar�€s t7�pattment - CNfr�ecri�rnarqancy _ � _. y M�rn;oysmerit Ercacsrger�cy Pl.�r�nc,a 524837-7�Ctt G20 #aarMro�a,hrarrs��tucsc�t+at.gav ��homc�s FWItCriC�.h �..PEn�i Gmunty Fkwd CcFntm6 O�s9nc4 ... � . ..... . _.. . . . Mana{}sr . . � � 52G-243-1HSSD ��.524-�44�363T ' tra�s� helHr4ch�Aar,l.plma.gs�v 5teven Jnhnsvn � ....Town af Marana Pc�ltctt C'�apurirneni ... . .. . . .. .. .. . .. Surgca�.ni t �morgaacy Caard,n�U�r 52t7-382•2934 �.520-471-0292 . .sjohrrson�marana.rwm .. . . .. ... . ... .. . � >.s ,_d... Paui K�esler 7bwn oC dro Valtey Dtvc�opmc�nt 9arv�c� P�cmdfing 4Auna�ee . 529-225�-4�i } 520-906-42]4 pkec�iier�aravalkt�yaryouv JIm Kr�ss ;City.at Tucson �� Frr� Depanm�nt _ EM i �NS .. .. .. . . . ... C;��kai�.. ._... ... .. . � �a2U�837'.T;iBa . .... .. . �. . . . gmn kratss�turSCtrtaz gav .. . ... . . flrian LaUt�ar Anzor�� �tpta C 8nd DePartmerit StaEe FoceSU'Y' D�wtsiaa <TuSGOn Dis4eict Ci srncl Ftrru�[er _ ��6-6�8-5480 � 25�� 52tl-44A-S315 hAanf�t+bc�r�azst.gaa Michael Luaat�a 'Tuct�orw AiFport Auttwrlky. . .. �.: Potwc� CYr�p�.�rtm�rit . ... ..... ... .... �r9�caE _ ..... .. . . ",�0-57�Hi8� 52CY�87q-G2F� rnS�t�7aQtur,.�ona�rpc�tl.nrg . .. . . . . Arr�f€� Mstaas� �. F*asr.ua. Yaqu9 7riLie �:Pascua Puahb Fue De�rartnk�nt ..... . �'�,a CRecai .. ... 52t7-878��72G1� .... . 5�E[t-282-IN�J andre�..matu��p�scwayaqur-risn�..gov .. .-�, K . . . . . ... . . .. . ..... ._. . � .._. . .. .. ..... .. Jart�YMcl.�y '���} �,: `. .Catyoffiu�son �,CnTir.�afEm�{,�ncyM�n�nent Em�r tt ►AAan- cn�ner+s " � . 4� Y � 4t�ararC,�sts�e bP{a-d37-�:38(! 3'2Q-3+�rJ-di�5�a �n.mcl3y�ttrest�n�gov h�ltirk Mtsorta 7o�un uC f7ra V3lley i'Vaiczr Li9diiy. Eng6nu�aritty Ctcsiyn �Ana=:c+w�e 52q-22�8417 62p-�r31��9F34p mmaw�om�valleyaz {7pv Ltnc MusCa�nita GuEU#sr Ranch Flre Gi�trti;t Su�pr�yss�n BaFWlwrr �;,r�;rt( 5�G-825•5f111 K2f1-23S•Sa�F�a 4reiwscarec4l�ltleeranckefircp,arg ��� � � ArFZana Dfvia�on�of Emergency�Manapoma�Yk �'At`� �+4vt"�'�'�.�.�:. oaw: ►,�a�cr, �, za i, Pima Ccwnly hhul#i-,lura6diclic,nal Hazar� MniyaGan Rl�nning M�eGraq . . Jen�iier Peynato Gry of 7uison C�d(Icca o� �m�rtS�nwy ManagamsnPand Homeiarrcl Sarg��t 520-837-7A83 �ennif;�.pra�naio�kucsanaz.�sv Secur+ty t Patfcts [�p�nrr+w+i � _ EdPop� �.l° � Town�fSahuanta Emer��ncyReavensn P4�ru�er 520-347-70t1� 520-343-StOt s�huat�a,ea.us .las� Ftadrlgi�az �� Town oi Ora Vall�y _ _ DIS - Enqi��unny Ergine�ring CJrvi�on Manae,ger S�D�229�4672 52&9�1997 �rodrtgttez�orovaUeyaz,�o+r 4k3a�ROmero _. ... ..... . . . .. � Rima County .. . .. . . ... ... ..pfC��ce nf Enteay�ency MAC�agr�ment ar� liame4�nd .. . ... ....... .... ..... .52iQ-7 ...... . . . .... ima.rom�m�p�me.�av ..... ..._. . . . .. ;SSCUnty � ` . Jim S�hn�den C1y n[ Tu�m palkae D�prarkment - FVanetantl5ecurity Srt�rgtu�rrk 52tN837�T383 :52a429-24ft7 pm schn tur.�€srtaz.gc�w t Isa Shafi�tr Tawn ot Ma�ana Riannin� Ptanni�g tAre�tar S2G-392-2Rd�J 520-'&75-71� Ishafep�trt�arana,aam Jama� Stoit�riltc�rg RurrailAAatrct �rre pisinc4 Fk5 �P�riment DeP�+h+�tueaf 520�2�7-36pv S2CF237-1�39 jamas_stWte�'�Gefg�+meuo,c;nr�s. C1ff�e saf �me{geracy Managemeart ansi Hc,me�and Liz temyle � P,�sre County :weurqy Gtam�a6ance Chiicar _ 52d•243-7644 S2p-�49-4t)87 . E�mP�P��9�+' T. Vanhaok Tuwr� oi Marana Cammuntry Revdayri+caeri q�rQCttar 52tl-3N,2-1� 52q-94A�4i�i4 lumataaak�mararra:wm J�m �tagei6berg Gity af 7srasort Planrtdng 8�v�ktpm�i Aclmirats�rata 5��i37'-4A+$ I6m.Y ¢ySucganaz:gav �5ue�n Wewd ° Araona prvrcron ot Emergency Mana�r.vnerst fN�trc�a�t� t}iws�an P4;�eet�ir+g Man�g�r 6fl2-p86l-P5i8- susan,woudQ7�aadema,gov ��$coK�4yden� � ;.IE Fullar/ HytirWogy tl� G�tSmerrPholq9Y. 4t�c . . . .. .. . .... Prpjec6: hdar�&gk+ i SEUt±ot �n�ewHr 4&tF�-222•57i7. . . 4�2#k7-3,"i9dt� sbMlt�jefialler.own ... � � j��C�t� � M �uca wz0 J�ai �l�".. k�e� ✓,�'_ �' _ S"2�r °'� 7�s ` rsu i.l _ �d��2 t� S ow�i - fuc # ck, • v v�� , Ariaone Dlviei0fl af Emerg�sncy 1Aanayemant .' 1 � � 1kfA:�74Y 4 :. ., tlK: �pAR�► �dtraT'y �/�.t+�i� Jur.S . �G 2� �r�� �Gvr� ._.? i �j(/ ..j- }'� � �,�,�,''� / J ��+5 C 4 � �l� �;,, : / �+, �G /� � — `� �� !,( � �t,�a M � �''� .�,� ��.4 ► 1 .-�� ; ���; ��;-. s���.,�7��: s r-� t , t��h1 ^w , �%�s' 2�a.,J,..xc,:.�,��;:s� --�s-.:...� ' j c`% v! `��r�2.tC�` ��-�t(� t„��� �:� �% -- �7q - SI�.� C���'rt�{ rC�f-. � �,�?��t y �.�� �' �.S r�Ct't�L�`f � l`? 5 �� , � �-? �,- k�C�-�. � Sd-� . �i5 - s �4/ t�+b�-``e``� . �i,r�.cc,.in..�-P�-sc.�.�,�.�{�, ti -�,cs�u _ �i�v Memorandum JE Fuller/ Hydrologv & Geomorphology, Inc. MEETING DATE: April 14, 2011 MEETING TIME: 9:00 AM — NOON MEETING LOCATION: Pima County Abrams Building Tucson, AZ DISTRIBUTION: Meeting Attendees FROM: W. Scott Ogden - JEF RE: Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Team Meeting No. 3 ATTENDEES: Char Ackerman — Oro Valley Emergency Planner Robert Bereiter — Marana Emergency Planner Lindy Brigham — Southern AZ BufFelgrass Coordination Center Exec. Director Andy D'Entremont — Pima County OEMHS Planner Sandra Espinoza — Tohono O'odham Nation OEM Hazard Mitigation Specialist Jeff Guthrie — Pima County OEMHS Operations Manager Barb Harris — Tucson OEM Emergency Planner Tom Helfrich — Pima County Regional Flood Control District Manager Steven Johnson — Marana Police Sergeant/Emergency Coordinator Rafael Leon — Tucson Airport Authority Program Representative Scott Ogden — JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. Ed Pope — Sahuarita Emergency Response Planner Nicolas Siemsen — Pima County OEMHS Program Director John Wisner — Pima County OEMHS Program Director NOTE: No Representative from South Tucson AGENDA 1. ACTION ITEM STATUS REVIEW 2. PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE5 a. Monitoring and Evaluation b. Plan Update c. Plan Incorporation d. Continued Public Involvement 3. GOALS & OBJECTIVES REVIEW/UPDATE 4. NEXT MEETING DATES ACTION ITEM SUMMARY Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Fima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 3 JEFuller, Inc. 4/14/2011 DISCUSSION A�enda Item 1• • S. Ogden reviewed the status of pending action items assigned at prior meetings as of April 13, 2011. There were no significant or noteworthy discussions and the status report is included at the end of these notes. Agenda Item 2a• • S. Ogden led the planning team in a review of Section 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 in the 2007 Plan and the stated monitoring and evaluation goals. • A poll of each jurisdiction was conducted regarding past plan monitoring and evaluation activities. All reported that no formal monitoring and evaluation activities were performed per the prescribed procedures in the 2007 Plan. • Reasons for not doing the monitoring and evaluation were mostly due to: o Staffing issues - changes in personnel, turnover, insufficient numbers. o Lack of continuity to the 2007 planning team and follow through during staff changes. o Lack of a perceived practicality on the part of the plan. o Lack of plan champion that would take the responsibility for initiating the activity. o Lack of plan awareness and perceived usefulness. The 2007 Plan was briefly reviewed and referenced during the following activities: o Plan was evaluated during the development of a PDM grant application by the County, TAA, and the SABCC, to mitigate wildfire hazards due to Buffelgrass. o The Plan was referenced to develop mitigation projects for HMGP grant applications following the 1660-DR disaster in 2006. o Oro Valley reviewed the Plan as a part of investigating projects for the DR-1888 and DR-1940 disaster HMGP. A new monitoring and evaluation schedule and scope was discussed with an acute awareness of the lack of action over the past 4 years. The following was the result: o ADEM will commit to initiating/prompting the need for review on or around the anniversary of the Plan approval date. ADEM will contact the Pima County Emergency Management Program Coordinator with the reminder. o The Pima County Emergency Management Program Coordinator will then contact the Emergency Management Representative of every participating jurisdiction and convene a review meeting. Each Emergency Management Representative will be reminded to review Section 7.1 of the Plan and come prepared to discuss and document the review. o The scope of the review will address the following questions and sections of the Plan: ■ Hazard Identification: Have the risks and hazards changed? ■ Goals and objectives: Are the goals and objectives still able to address current and expected conditions? p. 2 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 3 JEFuller, Inc. 4/14/2011 ■ Mitigation Projects and Actions: Has the project been completed? If not complete but started, what percent of the project has been completed? How much money has been expended on incomplete projects? Did the project require additional funds over the expected amount or were the costs less than expected? o A brief inemorandum will be used to document the reviews conducted over the next planning cycle and will be included in an appendix placeholder. Agenda Item 2b• • The planning team reviewed the plan update strategy of Section 7.1.3 in the 2007 Plan and chose to revise the section to make it less complicated and clearer in scope and schedule. The following are the resultant changes: o One year prior to the plan expiration date, the Planning Team will re- convene to review and assess the materials accumulated in Appendix E and the Plan itself. o The Planning Team will update and/or revise the appropriate or affected portions of the plan and produce a revised plan document. o The revised plan document will be presented before the respective councils and boards for an official concurrence/adoption of the changes. o The revised plan will be submitted to ADEM and FEMA for review, comment and approval. • Responsibility for initiating the update process will fall to the Pima County Emergency Management Program Coordinator. A�enda Item 2c• • The planning team reviewed Section 7.1.4 of the 2007 Plan • A poll of the jurisdictions was conducted to identify ways in which the 2007 Plan was either incorporated or referenced into other planning mechanisms within each jurisdiction. Other than those items already discussed in Agenda Item 2a, no other occurrences were known. Reasons for the lack of further incorporation success were discussed and were found to be similar to the reasons for the lack of plan maintenance. The planning team concluded that a greater awareness of the plan was needed and that hopefully a more regular review of the plan would help in the awareness and implementation of the plan in other planning mechanisms. It was also noted, that due to the significant staff reductions of participating jurisdictions, there is really not all that much other planning being done. Each jurisdiction will investigate both past incorporation/reference occurrences and also formulate anticipated future opportunities and return a list to JEF. A�enda Item 2d• • The planning team reviewed Section 7.1.5 of the 2007 Plan and discussed the status of the stated continued public involvement activities as follows: p. 3 Pima Gounty Multi-Jarisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 3 JEFuller, Inc. 4/14/2011 o Website Posting of 2007 Plan — the website posting of the 2007 Plan was never accomplished by the county. Tucson maintained an intranet webpage for the 2007 Plan, but no publically accessible webpage. o Annual Review Press Releases — since the annual reviews were not done, no press releases were issued either. o Plan Copy Distribution — some copies were distributed among departments/divisions of each jurisdiction, but in general, not as thoroughly as anticipated. Other public involvement activities that included some element of hazard mitigation were discussed and generally included: o LEPC meetings o Public meetings related to NFIP activities (release of the new DFIRMS, LOMRS, new FIS delineations, etc.) o Wildfire and Firewise related public presentations and information dissemination. o Water conservation awareness campaigns and information o Participation in local events, the county fair, and other special events. � Each jurisdiction will provide a list of both past and future opportunities for continued public involvement. Agenda Item 3: • S. Ogden led the planning team in a review and discussion of the 2007 Plan's goals & objectives (G&Os). He also presented and reviewed a copy of the State Plan's goals and objectives for the team to use in ensuring compatibility between the state and local Plans. • The planning team discussed both sets of G&Os and the following are highlights of that discussion: o Several jurisdictions noted that many of the G&Os were either irrelevant to hazard mitigation or extremely unclear and vague. o It was noted that a lot time and energy was expended identifying all of the G&Os and subsequent actions, many of which never made it to implementation. In general, the effort was perceived as wasted. o The planning team liked the relative simplicity and flexibility of the State Plan G&Os, and liked the idea of investing time and energy only identifying mitigation actions/projects that have a likely potential of being implemented over the next cycle of the Plan. • The planning team ultimately chose to drop all of the 2007 Plan G&O&As and adopt a slightly modified version of the State Plan's G&Os (modified to reflect a local jurisdictional view). p. 4 Pima County Muiti-Jurisdictionat Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planndng Team Meeting No. 3 JEFuller, Inc. 4/14/2011 Agenda Item 4• • The next and last meeting is scheduled as follows: o Planning Team Meeting No. 4, May 26th, 2011, 9am to lpm, Pima County Abrams Building, 3950 S. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ. ACTION ITEM SUMMARY: ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE Each jurisdiction will investigate both past 3-1 incorporation/reference occurrences and also All Jurisdictions formulate anticipated future opportunities and return [5/20/11 ] a list to JEF Each jurisdiction will provide a list of both past and All Jurisdictions 3-2 future opportunities for continued public involvement �5/20/11] over the next lan c cle. p. 5 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of Apri17, 20ll � � a z � z '' F F � z o Q a z ] o � a � H � a � o � � o F � � a ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION �_ J. Gutlnie will �Follow u�� with Ciry of Soutll Tucson �1. Gutlide C NA NA NA NA � NA �� AIA ���g�> >- Contact made by i Guthrie via e�naiL Received response fi'om off cials to confirm participation status [2/25/ll j � i,v�v Anderson of South Tucson. JEF will emai] elech�onic version of Local � � � � � � 1-2 Resources List tem�late to eacl� jurisdicrion to track �2/11 1 1] NA N,� � NA �1vA � NA NA� NA • 2/1 Ul l- Data and files se�rt by email contributors to tlie �Ian u �date. � � � y . w; Each judsdicrirn� shall record and docmnent all _ � � ;`��� � °„ 5� �. ; people contacted or involved as a planning resource All Jurisdictions �� IP IP IP IP IP IP IP • rs< at the local level, using the template provided by [prior to draft] ;- JEF .iCP will emai] Section 4- Community Descrip[ions JGF 1-4 � NA NA ��NA NA ��NA DIA� � NA • 2/11/I1-llata and files senP by e�nail to all �unsdicdons for review and u�datin =. [2/] 1/11] �� All jurisdictions aze to review and update their respective Community Description, as appropriate and desired. Jurisdictions are encouraged to consider including Agricu(ture, Mining, All Jurisdictions • 2/15/] 1- Pima Counry provided edits. 1S Manufachuin and Tourism In their descri dons as C NC C NC NC NC NC g, p [3/4/11] . 3/4/1 I- Oro Valley provided edits. appropriate. JEF will update demo�Raphic infonnation, so those [ables and hgures may be i>nored. JEF will }�rovide a sauiple public notice �repared JEF � 1-6 �by .�DEM to die plaiming team for use in the NA NA NA NA� NA NA NA . 2; I 1/11 - Data and files sent by email [2/17/11] websire �u�d news a�er announcements. � • 2/8/i l- Pima County websi[e notice is posted and press release was sent out. °>�'� � � � • 2/28/11 - Marana website is up and ru�ning. Newspaper nodces will be =" �r All local jurisdictions will perfonn the pre-draft provided at Mtg No. 2 on 3/8/11. ublic involvemenC activities summarized in All JudsdicGOns C C C NC C NG C • 3/4/I l- Oro Valle website is u Town chose not to do tlie council �,.�» k<<� Aganda Item 4b [3/4/11] prasentation at this t�me. p � '- 4,'� • 3/8/11- Sahuarita website notice is posted and E. Pope was interviewed "''' by tlie local paper and will send copy when die paper comes out. • 3/9/ll - Tucson website notice is osted and linked to coun site. JEF will ��rovide di�ntal copies ofthe Iiistoric �� ]-8 liazard database files to tl�e planniug tea�n for �?/11 11] ��� � NA NA NA NA NA NA • 2/71/ll -llata and files sent by email review and u �date as needed. All jurisdicCions are to review and update the All Jurisdictions • 3/8/11 - Pima County confinned notliing to add aC Meeting No. 2 1-9 historic hazard database as appropriate and desired [3/4/l1] C NC C NC NC NC NC � 3/14/11 - Oro Valle res onded witli noUiin � to add. b die conununi . � � Y P � ST , v ��� ;.,� ; (NC) Not Complete (IP) In Progress (C) Complete (NA) Not Assigned Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of April 7, 2011 W � a z � z a � F o z � a a a o o � d H � � � a Q d � F o � � o a � a ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION ' All jurisdictio�is shall evalnate d�e following liazazds and decide whedier to keep them or not � � . Eanhquake � , • Pissure All Jurisdic[ions • 2/25, 71 — I ima Counry, Oro Valle}�, Sahuarita �rovided responses C�� C� C � C�� C� � C C' • 2/28/ll — Tncson ai�d Mara��a provided responses • Lighmiug L�����1 �l � � . 3/8/11 — Final lis[ of hazards was decided at Mtg. No. 2 • Subsidence �� A keep or drop decision sliall Ue communica[ed to J6F bv tl�e dne date. JEF to provide asse[ inventory template worksheet 1-I1 aud instructio��s to all jurisdictioi�s for their use in � N.A� NA �� NA NA NA -NA NA • 2/11/11 — Data and files sent by email compiling a cri[ical asset inventory [2/1 ]/l l] � • 3/8/11 — Nicolas Siemsen sent a working copy of the asset inventory. All jurisdictions sliall compile a list of critical All Jurisdicaons Will complete with communities and deliver in the next 2 weeks. 1-12 assets, to be determined by the jurisdiction and [3/18/l iJ � C C IP C C C • 3/18/11— Nicolas Siemsen sent apdated working file. provide the completed worksheet to JEF • 3YL9/11 — Maraoa sent asset inventory. • 4/6/11 — Nicolas Siemsen rovided final data set. S. Wood and S. Ogden to coordinate with Pima S. Wood, S. Ogden, Pima 2-1 County on getting the EMAP wmponents added ro Counry NC NA IvA NA NA NA NA . the Plan 3/18/l t S. Ogden to resend Cotnmuniry Description and g p€deu 2-2 Undeclared Historic Haza��d Worksheet to planning [3/i l/1 1] ��� N,� ��NA NA NA ��� NA NQ �• 3/8/11 �- Seut via emai] to plaiming team team S. Ogdei� 2-3 S. Ogdei� to send CPRI worksUeet to planning team �, �,� 1 � NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • 37] 0/11 — Sent via email to pl��uivg team • 3/17/ll —Pima County provided CPRI Each jurisdiction is to complete a CPRI assessment All Jurisdictions � � C NC NC NC NC • 3/29/11 — Marana provided CPRI of all the identified hazards and retum to JEF. [4/7/ll] . q/'7/I 1— Oro Vall rovided CPRI S. Ogden will prepare and distribute worksheet files couYai��ing Che updated capability assessment tables S. Ogden 2-5 NA � NA N�1 NA� NA � N.� �N.§ �• 3/10/11 — Seut via email to la�miu team to eacli junsdiction using d�e 2007 Plan u�formauon [3/11/ll ] p � as a startin = oint � � � Each jurisdiction is to review, edit and complete the All Jurisdictions NC NC C NC NC NC NG • 4/7/11 — Oro Valley provided completed worksheet ca abili assessment and retum to JEF. 4/7/ll S. Ogden to send the Past tvlitigation Activity S. Ogdei� 2-7 NA:� NA� � NA N� �� NA �� Nta NA '• 3/] 0/1 ]— Sent via email to planning team worksheet to tlie lannin = team. �3/] Vl l � STATUS � : � (NC) Not Complete (IP) In Progress (C) Complete (NA) Not Assigned Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of April 7, 2011 w z H H Q o � z a � �' z o �, a x � o U � > � a � ] � � O U � O F m � a ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION Each jurisdiction may complete the worksheet summarizing past midgation activities diat have All Jurisdictions 2-8 been accomplished by each jurisdiction over tlie [4/7/11] NC NC C NC NC NC NC • 4/7/11— Oro Valley provided a completed worksheet past 5 years. May include past projects, outreach, � smdies, etc., funded b an source (not 'ust >rants . � � E. Pope (Sahuarita) to clieck with others at the town � 2 9 and report on tUe floodplain management role of E. Pope �,� ;.�A NA N;1 NC NA NA . Salivariha under the NaTional Flood Insurance [4/7/11] Pro �rvn. S. Ogden will prepare and distribute Existing S. O*den � 2-10 Mitigation Actioii/Project Evaluatiou worksheets to ���� 1 l � �NA � NA NA NA � NA� � NA � N� • 3/10/11 — Sent via emai] to planning team each 'ttrisdic[ion. ��' ,�' • 3/17/7 7— Pima Counry sent partially completed fonn. Shcl need Each jurisdicuon shall complete Nie Existing All Junsdictions responses from other deparhnents. ��� ��? and�returu itto1JE�o,ect Evalua[ion worksheet [4/7/11] �P NC IP NC NC NC NC � 4/7/11 — Oro Valley provided a first cut at worksheet. JEF provided comments and sent back to OV for com Ietion. Planning team sliall review Section 7 of the 2007 Plan and be prepared to discuss what has liappened Planning Team Z-� 2 over tl�e past 5 years and what the team wants ro do [4/14/11 ] IP IP IP IP IP IP IP for tlie next 5 ears a[ Mee[in No. 3 STATUS ��<:° �� (NC) Not Complete (IP) In Progress I (C) Complete I(NA) Not Assigned 4 KEY � � £ � . � Pun� Coun[y MulthJur7adictana! Hazard Mifipatrorr Pfan�i:ng M�ceiici@ tr� �nav rtu �._ ,__..,.Vt :haries 8arctay rown s�r e��, uau�� �a cn rumstn PWar�s C3�aparfm�ni . . . _ ... ... _ , ,�._ . _ ... Anzcna Dapartmenf of Trans�wrta:iun Tu�on Ckst€ict ; Tnwrw ut Mar�na RoGca Oeparun�nt Twm o� M�ranee Devebpmeat - Eriqiruse� i£mergenr,y Ptanner 8�panniendani Em�eeaaY PSanna� �,'�PAVfl �.flj�t7lf,�E� 520•3+13-7�&4 Et ...: __.... � ... .._. :�_. 6�(Y3d&41id i5 _,��_ _ . .L:. 3�-392-2QS7 t}ata"Agrrit i<, 201Y . ...__.-.. F.b _.._ _.—,� . ,.. , . n . ...��.�. .. �.,.. , , _ ,t , .._ ....�� . , __.__ .._.. ... . � �t83�'i�f7�6�. 7�D1Y71CYfIr�2Y�X43 G'� :�}1v �."L��•.�5�"�9� �� �d?�. � .� .C�M1 . ___.._ ,...... �,_ , ._...._ .». ..�.._... __. � ... , .._..,-».. . _..,. ......, �. _,.., ,. , .., . _. ...._.._,...,_.__,.. �tru9 C�adei eTwvn o( Sahuerfta �laccrang 8 Zan(rcg tha�ZarUn�tst Sen,or C+iac�ner 520�822�88,�i�t ac.tssadurl�a.sa�uarsta.az:vs .,.. , . _ .._ w_. , .� �� _ , ,. _.�_._�_ �.�..�... , ,� ,, , __ .. , ,.,.._„_,.�._ . _ _,_., � _ __.. _ Paur �aserkasw Pmea Assor, ot Gov�asnmxnt� P€�nning t7E+m�tWps 8 5afasy l.oad fi2q-7E2• 1�83 ; P� P�4� �5t , .. , �� _ , . . � � ,. , , , „, „� , , �., , ,. _ .,o � _ , P , _ _ ,.., , __ _ . _ __. ��.. .,�.. __ __ ,.�,_ _.... .�_.v -,� , . .._ � _.__ . . _ O�r?Gmlam�v MaranaUn�tna�iSdivopUrsUict CFfl C�i7 Es�D•692-4t5G ,520-4W-8275 id.�.c�rskxt�merenausd.org . .. ��..�.. �_ _ .__.. _ _ „___�_� .__. _ �,..,__ ._ ____ a. __ . , __ . �,�._�. �_._._ Ctaraa Grauss Lkaz� h{au�hts F�ee C7+st»cd 61p€uai+ans �sdtaat4an Chi�f �-�I7f-1262 dcr dreusNue.nei � , _ _ . _ _ , __�__ _ _ �_ .�. . , _. � _.� , � _, � _ — _ 6ru� Det€s Avr� Vs�ey Fie� CHsU#�t �`fre T rn�enti 'Fue Chhi�t' S2U�582-3?55 520<481��554 N�Fs�avFVe.org _� � _� ���� � � � � ._ __. ��. �.. �_ _ _ ... , �� _ -____. _._ _,._ ,_, , .. _ __ �.--- Artdy D'EnGer�acu�l E Puna Caunty t7Ni�s ad F:rhrarg�ncy �tanaqarr�ent 'planner SZ(1�2A3-75�5" 520-4G5-4128 andreu�e.d�ruaniqnt�pima.gov � ,._ ,. , . __,.,_, __ � .____��__ _ _ _.. �___ _,.__ ._. ... __ _ , � _ _ �. _ � J�neFi�iraN �TawnotMar�rra � � � G�! #tl�ur�TuwnAtracne�y+ ,"a2q-�8,7-1a�1 �f�irai�,�mar�us�.czun . .,. � ,. __.,. , __�. .. , � ..,_> . ,_ ...,. ,. .. _ .. _., �, _... � _.. _ �u_ .._..__._ , , __ , , ,_ .�. . ,__ _ __ _ Jar#an FaM Tuesnn 74rpwY E1uth�uFty Platsnlrig [fnpartmgni i�a�ctrar 520-573�51IS i utetdQ�tursona+rpnrt twg _ ,� _._,. ..„ _ � , ..,, . < ____ __ _ _ .,_, _, __. _ _ _ _ .._ C?Nur,� a1 Em��c�' Ma��a9emxrnt ssnd Nametenn i Grtcedda fi�pya �Wres P(m� CsauMy �� &2�t-7EiWiFi06 grissid�.moy� iku po!t �H� „ µ_.. Jc�H Gukh6W Pvr�� Gouoty _ . . �, Atfiw oi Em _. .._ � . ._. . _ , Qrgency Ma�+ag�nank �nC Naneiactd G�eraNarrs Ma rg � Snr.urdy ��57!i� 520-788�1K7 ie13 gut pima yKw _ ._______ _...__ ,, . . , _ _„_.� .� . _ _. __ _ ,__ _ .. __�_�.� _,_. ___ __ . .._ _ _ _. __.-- Aolk:ra C1e�suYmnf+i - CNftca r�1 �rtrergencY 9a+b Harr+s ��y ufl'ucsotr �,��� �Eme!4��cY �'tanrser K2t9-S37-75t1i 5Til-?F�a1280 bsrbar8.tianl�tuesoriaz.puv __ / _ J � . — _ . � �.__ _ _ _.,_,. _. � _ __ Tlwmas kkdttrtch ��jy Fu�al Gaun�y Fioad Contrc�f D�str�c0. fstanaper 520-3A3-185U 52it-444-3G37 tnm.h+�Jftrich�r7Cd.plm�.gav ' __ , ,. �"]� � _ _- — .. __ _ _ .. _. _ -- bteven Jahrrsvn ���� Tpwn of Marans PaCi� Chiparfme�tl �ye�rant! �rrtergertcy Gs,ordirtsNN 520-382�2034 92q-R7�-U282 �iahn Bt�Yra G�m _ . __.._...,..,_, _ _ � _. _� _.. _ _ .. ., _. PaW itaasier� � Tawrr rsf Orti Vd7(�y � Uest�+opment 3e+vit�ars �Permitlmg Managac 5�q-�29-48i 1 �20-9i�f1-42Ttl pk �arova��ytiz.�yov _ _ ., „ _ .� _..._ e _ _ _� _ .w,.� _ ,.. � . _�. . d�t KreS9 � � � pdry'o# �uc�rs � � Flt� Dr�parlment� EM t MS G�p�+n � ,52t1-837-7`384 - j�tn kr _ _. � �w�onez.pou ,. . ,. _ . , _ T._ _ __ _ . .. _ __ ___._ . _ . _ _ 8r�zn Laubei` Aritan� Stata Land q�p�ritn�ri! S�atu �csr�sSry p4wsikn • Tuactsn Ciislnct qt��sd FaresCer 62C!»&28 x 2p+� 524-4A4�931 � Drlanl�u �f.�ov �, . . � _ _. . . _ __ .. .. . . � � _ __ _ _ _ . � . _ .e , du _ _ �___— _ _ __ __ . Rataet LeP� �� Tucson Air�an A�thantY Saurid huuluiion Program F2aPcesenEanve 620-573-5��8 52t1•245•OB88 dean�tus+:snn�Yr�art.wg _ _.—,__ .. _., _._, , ., �� _ ______�. _. � �_._�. . w ,,,, _ _._.._- M+�spet Los;a�ia Tucson A�rpart Aufhran:y Pof(ce ()apatim.enf Cnrtsarai 520-573-9182 5�i1-&7`b.U2d�8 mlasada�tuuaerna�rgwri.or� _ . _ _ __ _ — - -- � v__ ... Areclte RIaWS Paacue Ya�r�ul Triba &�aswu P�ebiti Ffra Dap�r;rnenk F7w� ChiB( 520�87&�724 528-282-050fl a�slrs:matus2��scua,+Jaqui-rrxn:gm+ _ .. .. _ _ H..m., _ . ._. _. _. _. . _ ___ . ..__ k_.. __ dbnet MclaY Cptgrol xu� tS�r� n! Emar�nncy Managrsmrtani Finar�r;r�cy Maneg�m�nt CaorCUaatar 52i3-837•1�80 52Q��4H-S755 Jan,mcla .�ov _ _ �_ _ h_a _ _.. �._ . _.._ ._ ._. Manc�� r�w�nrcrrous�ie�, w����u�na�-�ri�t��i+�� a�r�nrteW+�er �zazz�sar� �zo-e�l�eao m�xaoP v��ey�z.�r Hri:vna D#vleian af Emarpa�y Managsm�nt , �. �. 3�ima Covnty Mu111-Juris�fct'snrtai Ftazarri Mtt�gai§mn t'Oann'r?1q 4Ao�r'.ing tfietxs' Apr�f t�, �011 _... ._—_ a^e ..__.._.......m_ �,.µ�..:_,.,_ ,._ Lae Mt�c�tstta qald� aancM �ir� Disit+d Sup�ars�s��n tiatl.a�kr� Grqlz+f �2tY z�?1ri �;?fy�3�.6aqS Pmuscar��gut�l�rr��chCrr�,or� _ ._.. _ _ �__ _ _e _� . _ � .... _ __ _ �d �.�� �.�,� __ 5c�4t p�dan JE F�aStt++'� flydre�dog�r & L��prn�r�rF^aitr�Y. Ir�c P�p�x:t tdan��pr e 5R>n�r�r �nqa��ker 4#4t�-�7�-5?s 7 d�?1-?49.'�Mb,�79 � s+ztft�j�rlu?fer c�rn � _. . . �� _ _ . _ w... _.._ _. _ _. _. w .._.... _ w,. . _. � ,1ertn�ler Pegnato Ckq ts1 Tucss�n ��z� at Em�gency Mar.e�arne�l ancf i#rame.��»7 ,eer ���rnt �»2b-837-7Ab� , S�;ur:1y t k�blic+a [Jrpnnmx�nt � tenntfa�.�sgn:ates�tuc�rsnax gdv , .,,,_ _ __ _. _ _ ..... _ :_ .. _ _ __., _ Ed Popa Ymm trP Sahudnl� Emergen�y Rcrs4san�c Fl3nnnr S��-3�7-70t13 �2€�-�:S-�t�4 �p� ',�huarNa �+z.us �� _. _ ,.v . _ ._ �._ __� _ _ __ �___ � _ _, .. _. —_ _ __. ... Jose Rodriguez ` Tmern t�f CNn V�Ri�y DkS •�nglne9rfrnt Enyintsertng D�v�s§�n M�++,-age�r 52t1-2?n-a8t2 S�iY�6-193T jrodri�uez�rova — _ � _ . _ ; _ .. . _. � __ _ _ , _, . . � __ �, � Usa Ftrame�ro Plrr+s Counly C3N�d c+i Fm�rgc�ncy Manz+}�m�nt anu� Hiametzarad 52fi�t98-UFi0t3 � ___ _... Securtty &s�.ra+tt�paana av . _ ..._. �_ __ _ ____�_ __.... ___ _ _. _ J�m SChrx;don CFYy o1�Tueso� PatfC@ f3�r:�rtrYfartR • `�14sme+€�r2t 5�5curr�r .; 52Q$37�X38� 5�0-d�N�-2ANx �jtm sr.hn�+den�jtUCarana2.qtiv .. ..�.�,.. .. _.. „u. . .. ._. ._. _. .,..., _ ..., ..._. , __- _,,..__ _ . ._.. .._. _. .... .. .:.__ .. „ .. __. . ... ' . .... _._ l sa Shaiar 7vwn at A4arana p�annfnQ #�Icanninq Duertnr 520•382-2.&A9 §2D-4�7 s-Y?t3q lsheter�mnr�rta cnm __ . . _ _ _. _, _ _ �_ .. �N_ _. _ : _. _ �.._ dames Stal�enOgr9 RuraVMekra F�rd tli�Vfct FGVr, C'krspa�#m�M t�t*�rry Ch��,+# �2t} 2S}7 �6t7S3 52U��;3?=1�i�li ]rsmec atoMank+erq�rrt+�iracom m_ _ _._._ _ ..._.. i _ , _e _ �.._.�_ _..�w_ � _ . _�_ a,,MW.. _ _ _ _ Liz Temp�e � Plma Cnun C�icra of Emer��en�;y F,9ansg�tm�rr2 rond Hramt��and � 5ar,ur4Ey Gssmpl4anta G7lfc�r 52D-243.7#tAA 52p�3A9-4Q87 (dtXakrdth.PensplQ�D£ma.�av _ _ __ . _ _ �_ __ � _ � _ _� ��.._ _ .. ,_ , > >_ ... .... ,. �_ . T Vanhook �7own nf M�ran� �arnmun%! O�vc*tuvt�nc�rtk bir€>�Par *�16-3P2-i9C�9 S2p-�ap-tiTB"i5 tuarnetscrk�Maran� wrsY __n.._.� _____ _�. _ � ___. _ . —� _ _._ __ �.__. ., ,.. � ��� �. Ne^ry V�+9g City at ScfuEh Tuc�€on P'�tbl�c WOtks 5?f9•77t�-nn1? —_ 520-445-74p? hYeg�f�ssutltlue�an.+�g __ _ __ _ _� _ .�.___�. _ �__.,�,.. ....,.._ Jim Vogelsberg Ciry of Tuts�nn Planriirn,� 8 L7�velopmnr+l �;mdnislraCc�r 52�-83?-d926 �im.vogelsb��g�tu��s �py� _ _ _ _ _ _ , _. _...._. . _ _ __ _ �_>_._. _�__ .. __ __ � w.. . _ . � �__ Susan Wood lunmrta L7ivise�m �ef Em�trg�ncy �nager�eni Mit;gxt4on [�visian F'fannir� Manager 602-4dk4-B518 su�ara uwsnrt��de�ma:pov _._ �^ ._ .._. . .._ . a3 .. _.. .. . :. . . ' ..... . . ; : ... �.. .._. { ' r - �. -_. . ... ., . . _.. .. .., t• �J f t�"�!n!�. . �.5�+�4�a.fix"i�°'tr'4� dt.c� �r'z�r.sr �:r�.+ vi� � �C'3to �30'7 �`�S5'2.S'41, {tw�.!Drt�"�� �!N�1�+-tS�r7t.5!�"'� t� Ni � �d�s ` "�jeY'+►LS_� . t _C� � �'t � �'�`� ., � cr? a.rr�: [.�r�-� i�t�':. ,��ts�2N3-7s�'t `'S2a-94�cs-s3�t . _ _ _ .n .,.___ ._ ,�r _ ����.5;.5i�tflftif'.��,�itrt�4y�a•r �� .. �anc�tA �x +ncxc� Tc�Vw,� C�md1�� � 4+on ° bC rv� -� �,� _� °�.L,' _ �,_,_. _ (� /� �q�MC1 ('i9,l� C , at`_..Szf}_'?�3`3 £'t`�p� � �J�O �1'7'?f�`� �— _ . � ,�.r,. `3�... , �ndr��4sp:nv 7 ��,���+�#a`r,�nr+���ot `!0!1� �JCS�L� ._..__tiY►t� �'�'�"�'.���.�"i�'�.".. ,. . ��reth►t,, ro��±1a��.�� ,s�" Arbtons Dfvlsfpn o1 Emsr�e�y Il��ttagetnenf �� •e..; Pima County MultlJunstlidional Hazgrtl MiUgation Plan Date: May 18, 2011 Pascua Yaqui Tribe - TAbal Annex Planning Meeting � ame Ju N e aniudon hrt/pWisb re ne e11 Phone -MaB ress .�tvW. (�d5ovrcN 'PRSCu.�- ���qu, /r��jF_ ; �2acunr_hriNr � �oaryL�'7 i(�s"'zo/d37 ozy� J�,.�, f��s��.rw ��.s�-Yx4w NS� poi/ 2n�1=� G�a.cc.in_ ' P�se...,n. �.�w.._(��., I _ -- __ �n ���' __ 5'� —._ �P.�+bdw-i,a!�a .Ki .ko% o�i��. ��'U,2 ,.-_�as�_ya�u.t.lrr�al��a.l�.--.-�Pal�k �j.��f- _ _.__.��'.�E+P Cnorc�t��--�o)�Lg-lir�y��J�o-�s�a'G�ra�.�'C������- .�✓ SOt�_�Y RSt�ER� Fwcstarxes I Co»+n+wusty s,,ilPr,Rr ma�vnr,�R _.-- �f�547G �.�6o-S7o6 __ _ Ilt-� � . ( I3�3u� y�T.�. -- L�+�c� -- — _ ; D� S�✓• l��i�►- _ �id tP791�L`� f�d�a31 ts1 �� .�r���t&se� yx�nsr� e� • x,lr- L� tJu.v __v_. _1�'asc�.a y�' Iritx — �nr�lima�_ ___ � -D�«b✓ _ �' man�rta.e•nu � ui-nsr►.�_ r'�23�?q ��¢L3�,_�tc7.�1S��t� i pasu�a� _ �v�Oeo�{- Gi l�0e11 �Gxeu�`_�a��� l� ��v/;�t1g� �. 4��� t�7_ 1��n� 6�v� �Io �S3- 5�+85,�'Z� yz�ld$�'f.(1��rrf ,l/��uu��;-n�u�Q ___-_ -_ __ __ _ �- --- +- _ --- -- __ '- _ �- _- - - � i � � � . _ - - _ _ __ ; _ _-- _ _- _ : -- _ __ � _-_-- -- ___ _ � i , __ ___ _ _ _-- -- � __ __ � _ _ _-- --- i _ _ _ _ _ -- _ ._ i ----- --._ --- __ _ __ __ 1 _ _ _.- _. _ _-_ __ ____ _, __ __. _ _ ____ _ , _ ._ _. I � � � I _ - _ � __ � _ _.. _-- _ _- -- --- - --- -- - ---- ----__ __. _- _ _. -_ --- --- _--- -- ,---- __ __ � � _--- - ___ _- _ - I -- -- _ ; _ _-_ _ _ ._ .___ _ � --- - -- - _ __ _ � -- � : 1 � ' _--- _--_ - _--__--- - -_- i -- _ � ._ � - � --- -- _ ; ---- _ _.. - _ I _ ; _ _ _ ___ _- - __ ( -- - -- - _- __ _. ___ -- � _ __- , i � � __ . � _ _ ,_ _ , ,_ ; - -; ; ; � -- -- � -- _ _ _ ___ __ :___ __ _ - __ _. ._ _ ._. i _ � A�izona Division of Emargeney Management � e� � N er� Out, nC Memorandum JE Fuller/ Hvdrolo�y & Geomorpholo�y, Inc. MEETING DATE: May 26, 2011 MEETING TIME: 9:00 AM — NOON MEETING LOCATION: Pima County Abrams Building Tucson, AZ DISTRIBUTION: Meeting Attendees FROM: W. Scott Ogden - JEF RE: Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Team Meeting No. 4 ATTENDEES: Char Ackerman — Oro Valley Emergency Planner Robert Bereiter — Marana Emergency Planner Lindy Brigham — Southern AZ Buffelgrass Coordination Center Exec. Director Andy D'Entremont — Pima County OEMHS Planner Sandra Espinoza — Tohono O'odham Nation OEM Hazard Mitigation Specialist Jeff Guthrie — Pima County OEMHS Operations Manager Barb Harris — Tucson OEM Emergency Planner Tom Helfrich — Pima County Regional Flood Control District Manager Steven Johnson — Marana Police Sergeant/Emergency Coordinator Rafael Leon — Tucson Airport Authority Program Representative Andre Matus — Pascua Yaqui Tribe Fire Chief Jan McLay — Tucson Emergency Management Coordinator Scott Ogden - JE Fuller/ Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc. Ed Pope — Sahuarita Emergency Response Planner Jim Rosovich — Pascua Yaqui Tribe Contracting Officer NOTE: No Representative from South Tucson AGENDA 1. ACTION ITEM STATUS REVIEW 2. VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS REVIEW 3. MITIGATION ACTION/PROJECTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 4. NEXT STEPS ACTION ITEM SUMMARY Pima County Mutti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 4 JEFuller, Inc. S/26/2011 DISCUSSION Agenda Item 1• • S. Ogden reviewed the status of pending action items assigned at prior meetings as of May 23, 2011. There were no significant or noteworthy discussions and the status report is included at the end of these notes. Agenda Item 2• • S. Ogden presented results of the vulnerability analysis that included an overview of the hazard profile mapping, base data, and various summary tables showing exposure and loss estimates for the critical facilities, population, and general HAZUS based residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. The following are general notes of the planning team discussions and comments: o Questions were raised regarding the critical facilities and why there are so many cell towers and nothing for other facilities such as the railroad trestles, Kinder Morgan pipeline, or the fiber optic lines traversing Pima County. S. Ogden responded that JEF was using the data provided by the county and assumed that the data provided was the planning teams' final list. JEF will include any other data if it is provided. o Concerns were expressed that the data would appear represent a greater vulnerability of critical facilities to HAZMAT than to say Flooding, when the logical conclusion is that there is little vulnerability of structures to HAZMAT versus Flood related concerns. S. Ogden explained that there are two levels of numbers, exposure and loss estimates. The truth is that there are significantly more structures exposed to high hazard HAZMAT areas, however, there are no losses estimated for those structures. There are, however, losses estimated for critical facilities exposed to Flooding. o J. Guthrie noted that the county is nearing the completion of a countywide CWPP and will check with their contractor to see of the county-wide fuels hazard layer is available for use. There was also a desire to make sure that hazard area determinations included consideration of the buffel grass. o The planning team noted that population counts were extremely low for several of the communities. S. Ogden explained that the base data sets from HAZUS that were used are based on 2000 Census Data. Several team members noted that they believed 2010 Census redistricting data was available at the block level. S. Ogden was not aware of the data and will use the 2010 data if it can be obtained. o Winter Storm data is missing a data point for Mt. Lemmon and hence the max snow depth bands are probably not correct. S. Ogden will see if there is a way to adjust the data for this anomaly. • The planning team requested digital copies of the VA workmaps. S. Ogden stated he would place them on the ftp site once the various items were adjusted per today's discussions. � S. Ogden requested that the planning team review the VA results and respond with any addition comments. p. 2 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Notes — Pima County MJHMP- Planning Team Meeting No. 4 JEFuller, Inc. S/26/2011 Agenda Item 3: • S. Ogden reviewed the process of updating the overall mitigation strategy and specifically the mitigation action/project formulation and implementation strategy. • S. Ogden led a review/explanation of the various categories of possible mitigation actions/projects and presented information from the 2010 State Plan summarizing various sources of grant funding that may be used for hazard mitigation. • S. Ogden presented the table/worksheet that will be used to document the actions/projects and implementation strategy. JEF will provide a copy of the table with the actions/projects from the 2006 Plan that were designated as "Keep" or "Revise" already entered. • Each jurisdiction was instructed to complete the worksheet per the guidelines discussed during the meeting and provide to S. Ogden. • S. Ogden also explained the new requirement that each jurisdiction participating in the NFIP program, must include at least one mitigation action/project that addresses continued compliance with NFIP requirements. S. Ogden provided a sheet of example of NFIP compliance mitigation action/projects for reference and/or ideas. Agenda Item 4• • Action Items for this meeting are summarized below. • This was the last meeting. The next steps will be to finish all outstanding assignments, and get the draft of the Plan completed and in review with the State and Planning Team. ACTION ITEM SUMMARY ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE 4-1 Planning Team to review VA results and respond with any All Jurisdictions comments/corrections to S. O den 7/1/11 4-2 S. Ogden to upload the VA workmaps to the JEF ftp and S. Ogden send note to lannin team informin of their availabili . 6/24/11 JEF to pre-enter the "Keep" and "Revise" designated projects from the Existing Mitigation A/P Evaluation into ,TEF 4-3 the Mitigation Action/Project and Implementation [6/10/11] Strategy worksheet and send the worksheet to each res ective 'urisdiction. Each jurisdiction shall complete the Mitigation Action/Project and Implementation Strategy worksheet, ALL Jurisdictions 4-4 including the addition of any new Mitigation A/Ps and at ��/g/11 ] least one A/P addressing NFIP compliance, and return it JEF p. 3 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of May 23, 2011 � �, z W F � O � a z .`'a o, a � o O V CC � < � E " U d a� x ,� a � � � �' � F � � a ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION J. Gu[hiie will follow up with Ciry of Soutl� Tucson J. Gnthrie • 2/8/] 1— Contact made by J. Gut�hrie via email. Received res�onse from 1-1 C N.a NA NA NA NA NA officials to confirn7 aiYicipation s[anis [2/25/11] Lan � Anderson of Soutli 'Pucson. JEF will email electronic version of Local � � � �� � l-2 Resources List te�uplate to each jurisdiction to track �� NA� NA � NA � NA NA � NA NA • 3/i l/11 — Data and files sent by email contributors To die lan u date. [2/11/11] y Each jurisdiction shall record and document all people contacted or involved as a planning resource All Jurisdictions • 4/13/I I— Marana provided completed document at Nie local level, using the template provided by [prior to draft] �P C IP IP C 1P IP . 5/20/11 — Sahuarita provided completed document JEF � a JEF' will email Section 4- Commwiity Descriptia�s .IEF � NA�� I�iA � NA � NA NA �� �NA Ni1 • 2/] 1/ll — Data and files sent by ernail ro all urisdicYions for review and u datin >. [2/11/11] � All jurisdictions aze to review and update their respective Cottununity Description, as appropriate . 2/l5/ll — Pima County provided ediu. and desired. Jurisdictions aze encouraged to . 3/4/i l— Oro Valley provided edits. consider including Agriwlture, Mining, All Jurisdictions 1-5 G� � C� C NC �� C� NC C�� • 4/l3/11— Marana provided edits. Manufacturing, and Tourism in their descriptions as [3/4/11 ] . 4/13/i l— Tucson provided edi[s. appropriate. JEF will update demo�aphic . 5/5/1 I— Sahuarita provided edits. infomiation, so tliose tables and figures may be i ored. JF,F will provide a sam�le }�ublic uotice prepared � � 1-6 by ADEM to die planning team for use in tl�e � ��� l � � NA NA � t�7A � NA lYA �NA NA �• 2/] ]/11 — Data a��d files sent by email website and news a�er announcements. � • 2/S/11 — Pima Counry website notice is posted and press release was sent out • 2/28/11 — Marana website is up and running. Newspaper notices will be All localjurisdictions will perfomt the pre-draft provided at Mtg No. 2 on 3/8/11. All Jurisdictions • 3/4/11 — Oro Valley website is up. Town chose not to do the council public involvement activities summarized in C C C C C NC C Agenda Item 4b [3/4/11] presentation at this time. • 3/8/I1 — Sahuarita website notice is posted and E. Pope was interviewed by the local paper and will send copy when the paper comes out. • 3/9/11 — Tucson website notice is posted and linked to counry site. • 5/2/11 — Pascua Ya ui Tribe has website u. JEF will �rovide digital co}�ies of d�e histonc � � 1-8 hazard database files to the planning team for [�/ll 11 ] �A NA NA � NA NA NA � NA �• 2/1 ]/11 — Data and files sent by email review and n date as needed. STATUS (NC) Not Complete I (IP) In Progress I (C) Camplete I(NA) Not Assigned KEY Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of May 23, 2011 � z F�"., W F d O � z ,`', a � F o � a ] Q � � � o U � o �' � � a ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION • 3/8/11 — Pima County confirmed nothing to add at Meeting No. 2 AII jurisdictions are to review and update tfle All Jurisdictions • 3/14/I 1— Oro Valley respo�ded widi nothing to add. 1-9 historic l�azard database as appropriate and desired C C C C C NC NC • 4/13/11— Marana responded wi8i noHiing to add. b the communi [3/4/11] � Y tY 4/14/11 — Sahuarita responded wiUi notlung to add. • 5/ l8/11 — PYT res onded with nothin to add. „,, ' AII jurisdictions sliall evaluare d�e followin� � � �?�� 4t hazards a��d decide whetlier to keep tl�em or not � � � * � s ; • EaiYliquake � r'; �� � • 2/25/11 -- Pima Counry, (7ro Valley, Salmarita provided responses , vr • Fissm'e All JunsdicCions ��" :* � C C� � C � C C � C � C� • 2�28/1 ]— 7licson and Marana provided responses �, • 1,iglihiing [_/25/I1] � �� � . 3/8;11 —� Final IisT ofhazards was decided at Mtg. iVo. 2 � �, �� • S�ibsidence � � � v �' � A keep or drop decrsion slia1l be communicated to � � � � � JEF bv the due date. 1EF to �rovide asset inventory template worksheet 1-11 and instructions to al] jurisdictions for tl�eir use io ���� � 1 �� NA NA NA NA NA � NA NA . 2/] 1;11 — Data and tiles sent by emai] compiling a critical asset inveiitory � • 3/8/11 — Nicolas Siemseii sent a working copy of tl�e asset iuventory. All jurisdictions shall com�ile a list of crincal � Will complete witli communities and deliver i� the next 2�veeka � AII Jurisdictions � • 3/18/77 —Nicolas Sieuisen sen,t u}�dated wa'king file. 1-1_ assets, to be detennined by Yhe jurisdictio�� and ���� 8 �� l � C C�� C C � C �C �� �C � 3/29i 11 — Marai�a sent asseY invenCOry. provide the com�leted workslieet to JEF � � • 4/6/1 l— Nicolas Siemsen provided final data set. � � � • 4/12/11 — PYT rovided lisY at Tribal Aunea mt No. 1 S. Wood and S. Ogde�i to coordinate witli Pima S. Wood, S. Ogden, Pima � � 2-1 Counry ou getting t9ie F,MAP components added Yo Counry C NA NA � NA NA � NA NA • 4/7/11 — S. Wood provided EMAP template to .i. Giitl�iie tlie Plau �3/18/11 � S. Ogden to resend Commimity Desc�iption and S. Ogden 2-2 Uncleclued fiistoric Hazard � orksheet to planuing � � �� �� NA NA� �� NA NA NA NA NA . 3B/1 I— Sent via emai] to plam�i��g tea�n team � � � S. O �dei� 2-3 S. Ogden to send CPRI worksheet to planni�g team 3/11/I 1 NA NA NA NA NA N;�. NA . 3/l0/11 — Sent via email to }�lanuing team �*� >; " ' • 3/17/11 — Pima Counry provided CPffi '` �„%;? , ` • 3/29/I1 — Marana provided CPRI �€� � Eacli jurisdic[ion is to comple[e a CPR[ assessment All Jurisdictions C C C C C NC C ' 4/7/11— Oro Valley provided CPRI of all the ideutified liazazds and retum to JEF. [4/7/11 ] • 4/12/11 — PYT provided CPRI aT Tribal Annex Mtg No. 1 t "'K �y �a • 4/13/l l— Tucson provided CPRI � t��� > • 5/5/ll — Salivarita rovided CPRI STATUS ��: s ..><, � �� � � � � � � � � � � ,�G� �� < ��,,,�w •' � (NC) Not Complete (IP) In Progress (C) Complete (NA) Not Assigned ��. Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of May 23, 2011 0 F �» H d o o z Q a a � o d Q �" U d Q p '~ IS E. F '�., o, � � U �' � m � 0. ITEM RESPONSIBILITY NO. DESCRIPTION DUE DATE EXPLANATION S. O�den will �repare aud dishiUlite worksl�eet files 2 � containiug tlie «pdated capabiliry assessment tables S. Ogden NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • 3/10/11 — Sent via email To plaiining team to eachjurisdiction usii�gt1�e2007 Plan infonnation [3/] L!Il] � as a startiv � oi��t. • 4/7/l 1— Oro Valley provided completed worksheet • 4/12/11 — PYT completed capability assessment at Tribal Annex Mtg No. 1. Each jurisdiction is to review, edit and complete the All Jurisdictions IP C C C C NC C ' 4/12/I 1— PCRFCD provided its portion of tl�e Uninc Counry's capability capability assessment and return to JEF. [4/7/i l] assessment. • 4/13/11 — Mazana provided completed capability assessment • 4/13/11 — Tucson provided completed capability assessment • 5/9/1 I— Sahuarita rovided com leted ca abili assessment S. Ogden to send the Past Mitigatiou Acdvity S. Ogden �� � � � , 2-7 NA� NA NA NA NA NA NA • 3/10, ll—Sent via email to pla�muig Yeam workslieet to tl�e lauuing team. 3/ll /I 1 � � Each jurisdiction may complete the worksheet • 4/7/ll — Oro Valley provided a completed workslieet summariziug past mitigation activities that have All Jurisdictions • 4/12/11— PCRFCD provided a list of projects 2-8 been accomplislied by eacli jurisdiction over tlie [4/7/11 ] �P C C NC NC NC C � 4/13/11 — Marana provided list. past 5 years. May include past projects, outreach, . 4/13/I1 — Tucson provided list. studies, etc., funded b an source (not 'ust �rants). E. Pope (Sahuaritaj to check wirli otliers at tl�e town and report on tl�e flood�lain manageroent role of E. Yope • 4/14/11— Per PCRFCD, Sahuarita manages iTs own floodplain. E. Po}�e 2-9 NA N� NA Nr1 C` NA NA Sah'ua�'ita tmder the National Flood Insurance [4/7/1 l] � will ve�ify. Pro �ram. S. Ogden will pre�are and distiibute Existing S. Ogdeu 2-JO Midgation Acfiou/Project Fvaluation worksheets to , � NA� � NR � N� � NA� Nr� � NA NA�� • 3/10/11 -- Sent via email to pluming team eacl� �urisdic[ion. � � � � • 3/17/11— Pima County sent partially completed form. Still need responses from other departments. • 4/7/i l— Oro Valley provided a first cut at worksheet. JEF provided Eacl� jurisdiction shall complete Uie Existing comments and sent back to OV for revision. Mitigation Action/Project Evaluation worksheet All Jurisdictions C IP IP NC NC NC IP • 4/13/11— Mazana provided first cut. JEF provided comments and sent and return it to JEF � � � back to Mazana for revision • 4/14/ll - Tucson provided first cut at Mtg No. 3 via paper copy. JEF provided comments and sent back to Tucson for revision. • 4/21/11 — Pima Coun finalized form and is com lete now. Planniug team shall review Section 7 of the 2007 � � Plan and be prepa�'ed To discuss what has hap�ened Planning Team , 2-1 � over tl�e past 5 years and whaY die tea�n wants to do [4/14i 11] C �� � � C �C �� C �` C C� • 4,14/1 I— Discussed at Mtg No. 3 for the next 5 years at Meetin = No. 3 � � STATUS (NC} Not Complete I (IP) In Progress I (C) Complete I(NA) Not Assigned KEY Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update — Action Item Status Report as of May 23, 20ll � '" � a o � z '' - ~ � z � a a a o O Q � F Q ¢ � � � F � a � o U � O H � � a�. ITEM RESPONSII3ILITY NO. DESCRIPTTON DUE DATE EXPLANAT[ON °� • 5/]0/11 — Sahuarita provided a completed list. ` Each jurisdiction will investigate both past . 5/17/ll — Oro Valley provided a completed list May add to or refine � incorporation/reference occurrences and also All Jurisdictions IP NC C NC C NC NC later. ; fonnulate anticipated &iture opportunities and [5/20/11] '� ` retwn a list Co JEF • 5/20/11 — PCRFCD provided their portion of the list ;,�, ; � . �"�, Each jurisdiction will provide a list of both past and • 5/17/1 I— Oro Valley provided a completed list. May add to or refine AllJudsdicrions �;�` future opportunities for continued public [5/20/11] IP NC C NC NC NC NC later. involvement over the �ext plan cycle. • 5/20/11 — PCRFCD rovided their ortion of the list STATUS ,'" � N,Y �� ,.��'�:�� � ) P � �� � � ) g � � �� � ) P � �� � ) � ��, ,�� ,,�.� �, �c NC Not Com lete P In Pro ress C Com lete NA Not Assi ned % , Pima County Mutti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigatlon Planrnng MeeUng Da1e: May 26, 2011 Char Ackerman f,�/ �/� / �Sown at Oro VaBey Police DepartmeM Emergency Planner b20.2437564 520-730-49Q8 cackertnan(t�oravaNeyaz.gov ���l�n _ CharlesBarclay RrizonaDepartmen[oTTrenspoAatan ���.7ursanbistricl Suparir�tendent �520388-4214 ;520.289fiO33 ,cb9rclay(�aztlot.goa _. _,_ _-- ; _ _ __ ___ _-' - i ;,--_ -- - Rober[ Berelter � Town of Mardna 'POIiCe Depadment Emergency Planner � �520.382-2057 ; Irbereiter�marana.com �-�— --- —. ..._. ; ..__.-----.. __.- ___.____._. __ ._._:_ _. __�.._. .. I - -_.. Keith Brann Town of Marana. pevelopmeM.-.Engineering Town Engineer� 520-382-?829 ��k6rann�marana.com . .. . . � . . � . . Southern Ahzona BuHelgress Coordinalbn . . _ Lindy Brigham CeMer �����Executive Direetor 520-826-8307� 524855-2599 Ilindy.bHgham�buNelgrass:org ��. �._._-..- . --. .. _.-._.. ..--� --.. . _.__ .__ ; _.. ---. . .. --- _.._. _ � . _--- Bret Canale Town of Marana `GIS IGIS DB Anayst 520-382-7992 'bcanale�marana.can _ ., _ � ._— _ —_ ---. -_._ � _ _ -- -- i --- _. � ____ Anna Casadei �Town of Sahuarlla �Plannirg 8 Zoning DepaAment iSenior Pla�ner 52U$22-6854 I acasadei�ci.sahuarita.az,us � - Paul Casertano Pima Associalbn o/ Governments Planning IOperatans 8 5efety Lead 520-792-1D93 pcasertario�papnet.org _ -- _. . `- - . _..—._ Dan Contomo Marana Unfied School Disirice� CFO�� CFO� �520-6H2-4756. 520-404-8275 d.J:oontortp�maranausd.org • . . . . _ . ...._... -- -------- . __.._ , ._ —_._ ....------- . Dane Crouse Drexel HeigMs Fire Distrid Operatlons Batlalion Chfei 520-471-1262 dcrouse�drexeHire.net Brian Delfs Avre Vaney Fire District. IFire Department Fhe Chiet 1520.682-32�55 �520-481-2554 tideHs�aWire.org _..... - - ...----- :.:__ ._. .,.---_ . _,,. _-. . !. - .. __. ... _.� . Mdy D'EMremont �, Pima County Otfice of Emergency Ma�agemeM P�anner 52a243-7565 520-485-4128 antlrew.denhemont�pima.gov ._._-- ' --- -- _..—_._. ... . _ .. . ._—_. _.. . ---.__... Santlra Espinoza Tohonon 0'odtiam Nalioh Office of Emergenq Manag�nent Hazard MBigalion Specialist 520-383-8905 520-471-77U9 sandra.espinoza�lonatfon-nsn.gov � --_ �� � _. . .- ___. Jane Fairaq Town bf Marana Legel Deputy Town Attomey 520-382-7941 jfairail�marana.mm - ----- j .._----. _. .__----� . . __--- ,_ _. _ .. .... �-. __ � .. � . . . __.---_. _---... . Jotdan Feld iTucsoa Airpart Authority ��Planning Department i Direda� 520-573-5115 I jfeltl(Htucsonairporl:org .. ---....... i� �-----� - . . ___.— .___—_ ' ....__'_._. _._—_._. �. OfficeofEm --- + --'_ Grlselda MoyaFlores Pima County er9ency ManegemeM and Homefarxi ~ Sewhty 520.798-0800 igriselda.moya.11ores�pima.gov Jeff GWhrie �� PIma�COUn �� � Emergency Management and Haneland �� ' ty Operations Manager �520-798-0600 !letF.guthrie�pima.gov Se curiy ---- -.— __ ' - ___ . —_ _ _— Police DepartmeM - OTfice of Emergency � � BafiHarris Ci ofTucson i Em � ty IManagemeM �9��YP�anner i 52D-837-7501 520-784-1280 Ibeibara.harris�tucsanaz.gov _ . _._ __. _ _ . i .._ ._ _..... _. _ _ Thomas Helfrich ina� County �Flood Control District Manager 524243-1850 520-4443837 �tom.heMACh�rfcd.pima.gcw Steven Johnson, ���Town of Marana Police DepaNnant SergeaM / Emergency CoordinaWr b20-382-2034 �520-471-0282 sjobrsai(�marana.com .�. .. ,. .._�:_-- _ . _ . . . � _._ __ .._,.. �--. ._ .. ..—. ;. -_ . __ Paui Keesler ITown of Oro Valley DevebpmeM 5ervices �,Pertnitdng Manager 520-229-4811. i520-90&4270 pkeesler�orovalleyaz:gov Jim Kress �City oi Tutson Fire Departrnent - EM / HS iCaptain 520.837a384� � jim.kress�NCxooaz.gov Brisn Lauber iNr'¢ona Sfate.Land DepartmerN ;�State. Forestry Division- Tuscon District �Dislric[ Forester � 52U-82&5480 x 204 � 520-4C49315 brlanlauber�azsf.gov -. . . . � ------' � --- ------.. . _ _-- — ..— ......-- -- I -.. ..__ __. ...._. .... Rafael�Leon � Tucson Mrport.A�thority !Sound Insulation IPro9rem RepreseMaiivs � '��,520-245-0699 ;�t¢on�tuscaonairpwl.org . .__. ._ . . . ��, ...:. _. ��. _ ._ . � _, �, ... ... . ' � . ., Michael Losada Tucson Airport Authoriry Police Deparlmenl �Corporaf �5205738762 5?0-87D-0286 �mlosada�qtucsonairpoA.org _ _ _ _ . _ -- ; _ _ _ i _._..., _ ArWte Matus Pascua Yaqui Tribe Pascua Pueblo Fire Department Fhe Chlef �520-879�5720 520-282-Od�9 �'andre.matus2�pascuayaqui-nsn.gov � � Adzona Dlvlaton of Emergency Management ��a� ���-� Pima County� Multi-JUrisdiclional Hazard MRigation Planning MeeFing K McLay c btoore Muscare110 1 Ogden iifer Pegnato i Pope ree Rodriguez ;a Romero n Schneden sa Shafar coias Siemsen James Stoltenberg Liz Temple i, Vanhook iry Vega Vogelsberg Date: May.26, 2071 � City of TucSOn O(fiCe�pf EmergenCy Management ,.Emergency Management Caordinator 520-837-7380 �520-34&8755 jan.mclay(�tucsonaz:gov Town af Qro Valley Water Utilrty Engineenng Design Reviewer 520-229-5017 � i52U-631-4940 mmoore@orovalleyaz.gov. � ' — ------_ . - --�---� ..... ... --- _ . ..---__.. Golder Ranch Fire Distrlct Suppression � �BattaAon Chief 520-825-5911 'S2Q-235-5445 ImuSCa+ella�goldenanchflte.org _.— . _._—. --- -_� _ . .--- �-- — .. � . _._.__.. � ..---.— ____.... ...'---�-�-�- JE Fulled Hydrology & GeomorpAOlogy, Inc �Projed Manager / Senior Engineer 480-222-5717 '480-2993394 scott@jefulleccam City otTucspn �aelof E �li Oe nmenement and HomeWnd SergeaM I520-637-7483 ; jennifer.pegnato�lucsonaz.gov �9 �Y 9 --- � � � p ...—. __. ..... . _�_ - ��.,. .........._—. __. 3 �('y f �—__ � TownofSahuaiita — Emer en Res onse — Planner 152094i.7003 520-343-9101 iepope@ci.sabuanta.az:us� i 9 �Y P . — + ---- . ____ ____ Town of Oro Valley �DIS - Engineering Engineering Division Manager 520-22&4872�� 520-946-1837 �jrodriguez�orovalleyaz.gov I �Office of Emergency Managemem and Homeland �� �Pima Counry S �� 520-798-0600 Itisa.romero�pima.gov� � � . ....-----_ _ . . .----.:.. . ....—_. ._�__ . .. --- — _..... __.. __. ...------._. . ��Ciry of Tucson Police Department - Homeiand Secunty :Sergeant �520-837-7383 520-429-2482 Ijimschneden�tncsonaz.gov --. . ._—..._ _--_... . _----.. ....... -- 1 �---_... .__----- -- .....{ . . ._._._.. .. : _._�_-.. . Town.ofMa�ana Planning IPlanningDirector 520-382•2849 526-975-7769 Ishafe�marana:com Pima Caunt '�� oF Emergency Managemen4and Homeland I � � � Y �Security '�,Pro9ram Coordinator �520.243-7589: �520-940-6301 nicolassiemsen�pima.gov . _ —___ _ RurallMetra Fire District Flre Oe artrnent De � � � p puly Chiei 520.297.3600 520-237 1939 �ames stottenberg�rmetro com _ .__.....___ _. _�.__ �-.._.__ _ —___ ___�.. _ ---- _ --- Pima Courrty CrtlCe of Eme�geocy Management antl Homelantl Compliance OHicer 520-243-7844� ,520-349-4087 elizabeth tem I ��ri� p e�pima.gov ......_... _ .� . ... ...____.. �. .i.. _..------_. ._. TownoiMardna ��CommunttyDevelopment �Director ;520-382-1909 ��:520-940-D786 tvanFrook@marana:com -----..... - -----._... . � . — . . . .- � ----_ :. .._.._ ....--�---- �City of South Tucson Pu61ic Works i520-7740032 . �hvega�soWhtucson:oig .. __. .,._. . , . �...-----.__.. . _ __.. .. _ . .__.__ '�, ...:..._ _ .. ,� � � . . . -__ .._...._ .. Cityof Tucson jPlanning & Development AdminisUator 520-837-4928 �jim.vogelsberg@tucsonaz.gav �� �ohn Wisner .Pima Couny �O�ceotEYnergency Managemen(and Homeland P��m Coordinator 520-79B-0B00 � 520.395-5560 �john.wrsner�pima.gov� � SecuriH � - ---- ----__ _ .— ----.. _- - — _ _—_ � � _,_— iusan Wood ���,Arizona Division oi Emsrgency Management Mitigation Division pianni� Manager ,,602-4fi4-6618 '�susan:wood(�ezdema.gov .. ...... ._ � � ----- --__. _._. . � � � ,er.RwloYIGII �1wi.��i�0ic r i ���AS�-� l��''�! ��i r . ' µ � !�n�C�Q �a17 � y 5 � ° - �J7�d��-- �✓�iscv.+ I I I R � ' Lour�cr� � �r _ s�+'i� _ _ , � - � _ 8795 �l ' I __ _. _; _— . � � � �� �Arizona Division of Emergency Management . ����d� uqq�CwY. u�c PIMA COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Appendix C Public Involvement Records Marana, AZ - Official Website . � ,,�. A���n� WELGOM E How ao �...z` ' Thank you for visiting the Town of Marana Web site. We hope that CAAG 208 Plan Amendment �; in touring our site you can learn about us, what we do and the services we provide to our citizens. PAG 208 Plan Amendment !. Employment Maps Public Records Request Purchasing Public Auction Document Cente� Archives Traffic Alerts Citizen Request Tracker Public Hearings S�AitC�i E'`7 Marana Municipal Complex 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ 85653 P:520-382-1999 F:520-382-1998 Contact Us � Map /' �������. �� #�. � Cik'�CfR!ti5 d. #,I# �..7 SIGSi€�T�4N5 Accessibilitv Information Marana is a relatively new municipality, incorporating in 1977 to control our most valuable resource — water. Although the Town is young, Marana has a rich history, and heritage preservation is one of our priorities. With our unique location between Tucson and Phoenix, Marana is an attractive community dedicated to maintaining a friendly environment where people can work, shop, live and play. Welcome all, Mayor Ed Honea and the Marana Town Council _�4� ` � � �— ^ � �" � � . a � � R � Home � Email � Site Map � Printer Friendly � Leaal NoGces � Powered by CivicPlus Page 1 of 1 Tue, Mar. 8 Town p�imary election Tue, Mar. 15 Pole Bam Presentation Thursday from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. at Wheeler Taft Abbett Library. The library is located at 7800 N. Schisler Drive. Read on... Town seeking volunteen to assist police The Marana Police Department is recruiting residents and business owners who want to assist as part of the Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) program. Read on... Town updati�g hazard mitigation plan Hazard mitigation planning is the process used to identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with disasters and to develop long-term strategies for protecting people and property in future hazard events. Read on... COAkitIT7ED 7!� 17� FUiL9HE ... MtSP/�PFDBY http://www.marana.com/ 2/28/2011 N � 3 � Z A � � � W � N I � .a t N 'C O . N �� � ... � ... I � .� F.: Q � .,� ,.- � ■.:. M ,.. a.� y a � E E E � � C C O > a � °' W w W a a N N � a -o a R..---- m C O a d L Y � > Q�� d t Q ��R :.�� � � c a� F' 2 "E a a E � � '`-' � Q a z a $ � a � � e � a . a' � � � u� � x d � .L Q M U y � � � � cu�irnm� � I� N 'V UQO j M M 3U �do � � m�N � ��� �� �� � W �� � ��RM � '�+.i � � � � � 0 N � 00 N N �I'1 N N I I � H� � C`• � � � � y � � � V .; U � 0 U � F�r � � � � � � Marana, AZ - Official Website Page 2 of 3 Home Posted on: February 18, 2011 Town updating hazard mitigation plan The process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy for breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage and a framework for developing appropriate mitigation projects. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), state, county, local and tribal governments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving mitigation grant funds. In order to meet the requirements to ensure continued assistance eligibility, a planning team comprised of representatives from the Town of Marana, Oro Valley, South Tucson, Sahuarita, Tohono O'odham Nation, Pascua Yaqui Tribe, City of Tucson and Pima County will be meeting regularly to update the current hazard mitigation plans for the participating jurisdictions. The planning team anticipates having a plan draft in August, at which time public access to the plan will be provided with the opportunity to comment. The primary areas of work/focus in the plan development are: Identify hazards that may impact or have impacted the community Develop a profile of the most relevant hazards Assess vulnerability to hazards Establish goals and objectives for hazard risk reduction/elimination Develop actions/projects to achieve goals and objectives Need additional information or have questions? Please contact: Sgt. Steven W. Johnson Town of Marana Police Department 11555 W Civic Center Dr., Bldg B, Marana AZ 85653 sjohnson@marana.com Previoua Next ° Town seeking volunteers to Tour of the Tucson Mountains assist police coming back to Marana Othe News in Home Small business open house Thursday Posted on: February 28, 2011 Town seeking volunteers to assist police Posted on: January 27, 2011 Tour of the Tucson Mountains coming back to Marana Posted on: February 9, 2011 Town newsletter online Posted on: August 2, 2010 Opening for citizen advisory commission http://www.marana.com/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=225 2/28/2011 Marana, AZ - Official Website Accessibiliri Information Posled on: January 10, 2011 Page 3 of 3 FBO�i�O���'fk�tle�AYeOit�s � Powered by ivicPlus Posted on: January 26, 2011 MPD o�icer eams award Pos�ed on: January 25, 2011 Tovim Manager �arr� �MA desig�atbn Posted on: January 19, 2011 2010 G�ral Plan Posted on: January 13, 2010 ���� �� .., N�SPI�Ef►1�1fQ1JRM�1 http://www.marana.com/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=225 2/28/2011 ..�..r.;`�..:. ['� 9 �� Y��4.: � i: ���� ': , , � ���� K :..`�.� ' �� ,CH 2� ; , ���� '' - {�idl£�t'.'Il ` '� : �{�' �•., ���� �a�rt�i�►ar��r� 1 H HAZARD MITIGAT-��NN PLAN UPDATE 'Ihe towns of Marana and Oro Valley will join representatives from South Tucson, Sahuazika, Tohono (?o+dhar�� Nation, Pascua Yaqui Tribe, City of Tucson and Pima t',ounty as part of a plan- ning team that will meet regularlv fo help update the ways in which local agencies znitigate natural and manmade hazards. Communities will be respon- sible for updating their own plans, wh�ch were previously approved by P��v1A. Hazard mitigation plaru�ing is used to iclentifyrisks an�l vu.lner- abilitees associated with disasters u�ci to develop long-term strategies for protecting peapl� arad pr�p- Qrtv in future hazard events. 7he process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy for break- ing the cycle of disaster damage, reconstxuctian and repeated dam- age, and develops a tramework for appropriate mirigation projects. Gommittee members will ad- dress ways to aler� the public;about such disasters as floads, haz:ardaus rnaterials spills and severe winds, said Marana police Sgt. Steven )ohnsQn. On� such tocal is the website www.mystateusa.cam, an emergenry alerCing system that provides inforrnation about seuere weather conditions and evacuation rs�utes. The Disacter MitigationAct of 24Q0 requires lacal, count}; trihal and state govexnanenls to have FF.MA-approvedplans in order to b+e eligible for federal hazard mitigatian grant funds. Theplan focuses an an areas mast #hreaten- ing ha•c.�rds and establishes a strat- e�v to reduce or eliminate #he risk frorn those hai.ards tQ thc peo�le and property of Yima (;ount�: "lhe team anticipates havin� a pla,n draft in Angust, at which tim� the public will have the apportu- nity to cornment. Quality Pre-Qwne�d' Furniture: Ethan A�len • Lexingtan Thomasw�l�e • Bernhardt and Facbry Direct Furnitur� FOR CC1MS►�GNMENT CALL: 4 22r� Sr 4 � 3 ,� �������� .+.' lfxi ad Q � .� "_'_l�"_. �"'�""""".� www.homestyfeqc�lleries.com Residents Town Government Business Online Services Visitors > Home Paae > Town Government > Police Department > Executive Officer > Homeland Security Homeland Security Hazard Mitigation Plan Update The Town of Oro Valley is participating in a Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. Hazard mitigation planning is the process used to identity risks and vulnerabilities associated with disasters and to develop long-term strategies for protecting people and property in future hazardous events. For more information, please refer to the Pima County website at www.qima.qov or contact Char Ackerman at cackerman�orovallevaz.qov. Homeland Security The Oro Valley Police Department along with the Town of Oro Valley are committed to the safety and protection of its citizens and employees. With the events of September 11, 2001, the Oro Valley Police Department established the Town of Oro Valley Office of Emergency Management. The goal of this division is to provide employees of the Town of Oro Valley the proper training and equipment to maintain our high level of service in any type of man-made, technological or natural disaster that it may be confronted with. This includes Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE), National Incident Management System (NIMS) and series of exercises to strengthen the response and decision-making capabilitiss of Town personneL The duties and responsibilities have grown since 2001 to consist of the following: Develop the departments Critical Incident Response Guide Develop the departments Major Action Plan Organize and facilitate departments Continuity of Operations Plan Train department members and other town staff in the Incident Command System Develop table top exercises to train town personnel, and outside agencies, in the proper response to major emergencies and disasters Conduct threat and risk assessments evaluations of Town buildings and critical infrastructure Apply for and manage Homeland Security grants Serve on the following state and local committees: Local Emergency Planning Committee Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Steering Committee Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Training and Exercise Committee Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center Southern Region Terrorism Liaison Officer (TLO) Coordinator Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Oro Valley Citizen Corps Council Assist outside organizations prepare emergency/disaster plans Oro Valley Police Department � 11000 N. La Car�ada Drive, Oro Valley AZ 85737 (520) 229-4900 � (520) 229-4979 fax O 2008 Town of Oro Valley � Copvriaht-Disclaimer-Privacv Policv � Site Maq �--w-� - - - - ��� I�r _��:-�,.� -- _ .. ��!ih;x,� :� .._, � � � �� T � „� -___.____T _ __—_ - - - __-_ _ _ .. ----- --------- - ---- ---.� X � ,,� �-- _ � c� :� � � �' - "�" - ''. �'t � - � wo �odoed ,� ' cn� . � n„m�:,k �� „� �;r� � ,i s�a a�. ,� ____ _ __.__—�._____ _ _ — — --- — — — __._ y� F�na ; � �' . ..,., . -,: _ - �; F.ee rae�t �e , rne aa aw,4�:oe� movr� e� cooyte a�aos � �.�aaQumcnane �; Yanoo! �ou� �, � _��� ia � +i � F �� .. _______._ i�Rl�6cent.,,_ �,_...w_: . . �..• � � C��.. 1 Lt05 EPICHIM ANtAW • Home . __._ _ .... _ . .._. _ . • Govemment __ _ + Departments _ . ....... . . ... . .. .. ... _ .... s Culture _.. .._ .. . _..: .... � Employment _. . _.. • Contact _....... __... • Search __ Pascua Yaqui Tribe Operu Southem Arizona's Largest Fire Station June3 28.123 Square Fooi Facility is Newest and Larg�t Fiie Shrtion in Tucson (Tucson, Ariz) — June 1, 2004—On Thursday June3,2004 the Pascua Yaqui Tribe opens Tucson's newest and largest fire station in Southem Arizona The new Pascua Pueblo Fire Station #1 is 26.125 square feet and has four fire tiuck bays to hoid three brand new pubNc safety vehicles including a new ambulance. a new pumper fire truck and a 100 foot aerial ladder truck. The 26_ 125 square foot fire station building was built with faderal graM funds and Tribai support made possible with gaming revenue. The new fire station includes the benefits of hanng a stata of the art puWic safery facility in the Southwestern Tucson region vrithout raising taxes. The Pascua Yagui Fire DepartmeM will senAe the Pascua Yaqui Reservation but future p�ans may include using the new tacility as a regional training center that couW beneffi the entire greater Tucson community. The new fire station vnli support quicker response time to regional public s�ety incideMs- The new training capability could further improve rapid response to local emergency situations. — - �!�'�`i --- - -- � �- paye. �.. . � �: . �t - �.-. . " PUBLIC SAFETY � Police _ _ _ + Fire Departrnent • Hazard Mdigatio� Update + Explorer Progra�n • Sex Otfender Registry Home I Fire Department Fire Department W Tuesday 08 September20D9 R9�19 $ adminisHatof Pascua Yaqui Tribe and Pima County Begins Work on Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Posting April 29, 20ll Hazard mitigation planning is the process used to identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with disaster and to develop long-term strategies for protecting people and property in future hazard events. The process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy for breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage and a framework for developing appropriate mitigation projects. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), state, county, local and tribal governments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving mitigation grant funds. In order to meet the requirements to ensure continued assistance eligibility, a planning team comprised of representatives from the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and Pima County will be meeting regularly to update the current hazard mitigation plans for the participating jurisdictions. The planning team anticipates having a plan draft in the fall of 2011, at which time public access to the plan will be provided, with the opportunity to comment. The primary areas of work/focus in the plan development are: ➢ Identify hazards that may impact or have impacted the community ➢ Develop a profile of the most relevant hazards ➢ Assess vulnerability to hazards ➢ Establish goals and objectives for hazard risk reduction/elimination ➢ Develop action/projects to achieve goals and objectives. Additional Information & Questions Please contact: Kelly Gomez Land Office Director Pascua Yaqui Tribe 7474 S. Camino de Oeste Tucson, Az. 85757 520-879-6350 Andre Matus Fire Chief Pascua Pueblo Fire Station 4631 W. Calle Torim Tucson, Arizona 85757 520-879-5720 Pima County, AZ I , �� II, '; ■ Pima CouMy Teleplxx�e Listing ■ Admini�tr�ia� ■ Community Devebpm.nt ■ F�qncare ■ .k,sticx and ca,rt�t ■ Public Wwks ■ E-Govemmer�t Serv� ■ E-CaovemmeM Forms ■ FrequeMly asked Qus�ia�s ■ Business � Communiry Reaources ■ Courts fl Legal Services ■ County Jobs ■ Employmerri Assistance ■ Family, Hea� 8 EnviranmeM ■ Improvement DisUicts � Lica�ses 8 Permits ■ Liv�g in Pima Canry ■ Parks, Rmaeation 8 Tourism ■ Pubi� Safety ■ Suppat Smrica t Taxes ■ Tr�sportatian ■ Vote� IMormation ■ Your �ocal Govemment ■ A Civaie � Pima Coueriy's DowMOwn Tucson Parking C,ara9es Weicome to . Pima County, Arizona Marana Conf�ca�t►n of CouMy Wu�awatar FaciliWs tl�rough �enate Blll 1771 ■ Senate Bill 4171 � County Administrator Hudcelberry's January 26, 2011 Memorandum to the Board of Supervisors Regarding Impacts of Senate Bill 1171 ■ County Administrator Huckelberry's January 31, 2011 Memorandum to the Board of Supervisors Regarding Bond Financing Difficufties with Senate Bill 1171 ■"Marana wastevvater move illegal, crostly, hartnful to regional planning," County AdminisVator Huckelberty Speciai to the Arizona Daily Star — February 4, 2011 ■"SB 1171 wast�water plan will hHp adv2mce Marana's goals," AAarana Mayor Honea Speaal to the Ariacma Daily Star — February 4, 2011 ■ County Administrata's February 8, 2011 AAemorandum to th� Board of Supervisors Regarding Maeana Mayor Honea's February 4, 2011 Special to the Ariaona Daily Star ■ Board of Supervisors Chairtnan Ram6n Valadez' January 26, 2011 Correspon�nce fo State Senator Frank Antenori Outlining Pima Counry's Commitmsrtt to the Provision of Wastewater Services to AAarana Pima Couetiy k�!ffi-3p�ti�s Cons�rva�Cn Plan (MSGP) In early December 2010, Pima Ca�ty s�mitted an Adm'a�iatrative Draft of the INuiti- Species Conserva�on PI� for tive roview by tM U.�. Fish and VYldlife Service (USFW3). Once Pima County �d the USFWS agree to the terms and cor�itions of !he Pcsnnit, tl�e Co�r wiN have achieved a sigra�Cant milesEOne in providing regulatory certair�ty for the County and muct► of tlu devefopmeM community wrilh regard to the compli�oe with the �ndangered Species Act. ■ Pima County Mutti-Species Conservation Plan Page 1 of 7 � �,►���. _� ■ The most up to date information on wh�n service wiH be restond � your nephborhood is avaitabb � swgas.com ■ On behaH � g�s Pima County Baard o( S�pervisa�s, Charman Ramon Valadez Manked Pima Caunty res�ts tar th�ir p�ience and resilience during the receM days. Moro... Tr�xra Cau�NMg Rpauc�s� ■ Resources iw tr�ma and oV� to�es related to crisis incl�ing hNp � dsaling with stress, �xiety �d the grieving procesa... : �� ■ Pima County St�ium DisVict and Kino Community C�ter Proposed Fee ■ Puna County Begins Work ai Haaard Mitiyation Plan Update... ■ Pima C CoHabw�es urith ths University d Arizona Cdhge oi Pharmacyr to Seek National Instilute of Mental Heefth Research Gt�t... ■ Proposed Fee Increase - Pima County Fwansic Scc�nc�e Center _., ..__�_ ___ C1NTM�1k � lmagin� E3nabr Tuwan � Help shape our region'a future, tak� Va surv.y... Twnam�oc HiN Propos�d Cot�otldation Pwar► ■ Novemb�r 23, 2010 lettsr from Dr. Robat Sheftm, Preaidatt of The universily of Ar�a�a, confirtni� the univKSiry's coltaboration u� Me ruia tacilR�r ca�aokdation pl� ta Tumamoc Hill. ■ C«,rny ndmmi�a�s Letter Datb Novemb�r 17, 2010do President Shekor� Reyarding Tumamoc HiN Comrtwnic�iais Facilitus � County Admu�istrator3 November 16, 2010 Memorandum to Ms Board - Summary of Public Meefings � Tumartwc Caisolidation PI� http://www.pima.gov/ 2/9/2011 Pima County Begins Work on Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Posting 2-8-11 Hazard mitigation planning is the process used to identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with disasters and to develop long-term strategies for protecting people and property in future hazard events. The process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy for breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage and a framework for developing appropriate mitigation projects. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), state, county, local and tribal governments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving mitigation grant funds. In order to meet the requirements to ensure continued assistance eligibility, a planning team comprised of representatives from Pima County, Marana, Sahuarita, Oro Valley, City of Tucson, South Tucson, Pasqua Yaqui, Tohono O'odham Nation and the University of Arizona will be meeting regularly to update the current hazard mitigation plans for the participating jurisdictions. The planning team anticipates having a plan draft in August, 2011), at which time public access to the plan will be provided, with the opportunity to comment. The primary areas of work/focus in the plan development are: ❖ Identify hazards that may impact or have impacted the community ❖ Develop a profile of the most relevant hazards ❖ Assess vulnerability to hazards ❖ Establish goals and objectives for hazard risk reduction/elimination ❖ Develop actions/projects to achieve goals and objectives Additional Information & Questions Please contact: Jeff Guthrie Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Jeff.Guthrie@Pima.Gov Sahuarita Begins Work on Hazard Mitigation Plan Update �� ; V. ' �� t �s�� � r-� � ♦ >t � i� Tuesday, March 8, 2011 ��, � �, z � � t'j` � Ii .�,;;r+ j a,- � � ; � Sahua�ita Beglns Work on Hazsrd Mitiyatlon �lan Updab ., ._.... _ ..... , Hazard mitigation planning is the process used to identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with �OM� a�+ �� search... disasters and to develop long-term stra[egies for protec[ing people and property in future hazard �� ` �� �� ����-� ' events. The process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy fo� breaking the cycle of �/� . disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage and a fremework foC developing appropriate �y��.� mitigation projects. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K), $tate, county, local and ��— . "` �,, a�<•�. �� tribal govemments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for �� �... receiving mitigation grant funds. �I ��� I In order to meet the requirements to ensure continued assis[ance eligibility, a planning team Cy�t � I comprised of representatives from the Town of Sahuarita along with rep2sentatives from Pima � M���� ,� County, Tucson, Marana and Oro Valley will be meeting regularly to update the current hazard N�Wi ARAht _ avin§-a-�Van-AFaft — . Page 1 of 1 I� �� ��Y � N�YVN�EM Af� I in December of 2011 at which time public access to the plan will be provid d, with the opportunity �� '.. to comment. i �rrip G11qr The primary areas of worWfocus in the plan development are: j at11AN1lt CM�K ��e,� �� i`ti�� Identify hazards that may impact or have impacted the communiry I ��� � S �vr �� . �^� Develop a profle of the rcrost relevant hazards , � TQYYM COd� �r- Assess vulnerability to hazards � TT � � ��� hy CNlft FiM ������� -"`-� Establish goals and objecGves for hazard risk reductlon/elimination , �� . c � .. . � -..r Develop adions/projecks to athieve goals and objetGves I ������ �� � �� � . � � Flnd US M1 _ _ _. _ _.-- . __... � ----- F�e 1.�,�1. .. Additional Information & Questions I . �7VUR � Please contact: — — - -- March 20�1 � � Ed Pope SunMOnTueWed,Thu Fri Sat .: � �a� � � Town of Sahuarita _ .� ��� .��• Regional Emergeocy Response Planner 6 ` 7 $ 9, 10 11 12�` �• Sahuarita Police Department � �����!1�17� � 13 �4 15 16.17 18 19�. . � 520.344-7003 20� 21 22: 23� 24 25 2BE ' ��:: C113flflE��� � .� "'— � . . ', 27> � 29 30?. 31 , � `� I . .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .,; �.. i __ _____�_�— -- -- '� � "t� I� � D ... 8HRRC ... ..I http://www.ci.sahuarita. az.us/index.php/announcements/334-sahuarita-begins-work-on-haza... 3/8/2011 Sahuarita Begins Wark an Haaard Mi#igation Plan Update Hazard mitigation planning is the pr�cess used to identify risks and vulnerabilities assaciated with disasters and to devetop long-term strategies for pratectPng peaple and praperty in future hazard events, The process results in a mitigation plan that offers a strategy far breaking the cycle of disaster damage, reconstructior�, and repeated damage and a framework fo� develaping appropriate mitigation projects. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act af 2000 {QMA2K), state, county, local and tribal governments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard rnitigatian plan as a candition for receiving miti�ation grant funds. In order to meef the requirements to ensure continued assistance eligibility, a planning team comprised of representatives from the Town of Sahuarita along with representatives from Pima Gounty, Tucson, Marana and �ra Valley witl be meeting regularly to update the current fiazard mitigation plans for the participating jurisdictians. Thre planning team anticipates hauing a plan draft in Dec�mber af 201 �, at which #ime public access to the plan will be pravided with the opportunity ta comment. The primary areas of workffocus in the plan development are: •'r lden#ify hazards that may irnpact or have impacted the community ❖ Develap a prafile af the most relevant hazards ❖ Assess vulnerability to hazards ❖ Establish g4als and objectives for hazard risk r�cfuctiondelimination •:• Develop actions/projects to achieve gaals and objectives Additional Informatian & Questions Piease contact: Ed Pope Town of Sahuarita Regional Ernergency Response Planner Sahuarita Police Departmen# Epope�ci.sahuarita.az.us 5�d-31t4-70d3 Fetttured Artist .�- HaZARD C11N�INUEp FROhk PAGE AI Planner, Sahuarita's goal i��irrors that of other com- munities contributing in• formaiiun far the statew ide plan: io pr�vide emet�gen- cy-operati�ns plans, train- in� and exercise.; ta pre- pa�•e r�5ponde��s, azld he1� ensure cantinuitp �E' �;rital public facilities follawing a disaster. '�a'ahuarita's l6- page working draft is un- dergoing additions, edits and reviews almost daily to meet the September dead- line, should the proposed FtiMA bud�et cuts take ef- feet, Pnpe said. Sahuarita's plan isn't developing from snratch but invr�lves updatin.g its portion of the stflte's ex- isting Hazard Mitigation : �tan frdm 2005, Pope said. Revisions reflect techn�- '�o�ical advancemants naw .auailable to public entities, i�drticularly in the �lobal- positianing system realm, Pruviding tnuch greater g�ograi�hic detail than be- fo��e, he no#ect. Th�S is help- �ul in rapidly pinpointin� ai d repairit�g vital public facilities aad restaring kel # �� � �� T H E � , � �il resaurces affected by a di- saster. Contributing ta the �lan are repre;entatives in the to«�n's Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Hu man Resc�nrces, Planning and Zoning and Police de- p�rtmer�ts. C}riginalIy �lated for d December unveiling, Sahuarita'S pla7i clraft is expecled to be read.y for public reviev� by late 3uly or Au�ust. Meetin�s will be announced. FoIlowing the public re- view process, Saht�arita's plan will be sent ta the Ari- zona Ueparfinent of L•'rr►er- gency hZanagement to be ....,,.. �AHl1ARITA - _ � , , �;, �� w � � part of the sfate's mulii- jurisdictic�nal Hazard b4at% gatian P1an, whiGh R'OUId then be cleared h,y the Gov- ernar's OfFice, and from there, sent to FEMA for its cansideration. F.cen if the federal bud�et cuts come al�out and �lanners Inse their thircl ,y�ar of funds to wurk �n �eveluping disas- ter-mitigation strategies, Pope said he tuauld follow thraugh to see that Sahua- rita's pian is in order sp the town will be better pre= pared if disaster hits. "' We'li get, evervthing don� the best we can," he said. Green Valley to sQe ma►ck disnster drill A mock-disaster drill simulating a hazardous- material spili'w�il begin at 8 a:m, Saturda,y at Gree:n Valley Recreation's Santa Rita Sprin�s Svcial Center on ti ia Riu Fuerte, and last abaut four hours. 'Phe drill will involve a "shelter•in-place" ernergen- cyrespons�e exercise, dur- ing �i'hich an estimated ,,0 to Ei0 participating volunteers will �o door ta daar to in- form resicients ax �otential dangers, as well as hand out ._. � � � � 7 � � • �" � � � � � � "„� � �� informatir�nal brachures on rlisaster preparedness. They will be wearin� vests, helz�aets and badges iden- tifying them as emerg�ncy res�onders. The drill isamong varic�us exercises cc�nducted peri> odicaily ta help train einer- g�ncy responders far an actuai esnergenc5° I}rill par- ticipants include state�certi� f'ied emergency responders as well as citizen'volunteers certif�ed through a federally mandated course of study offered by the Greater Green Valleyehapterof tl�enation- at Communitg Fmergenc,y' Response 7`eam. IIVEDNES�AY MARCH 9, 2011 Vol. 6 No.14 r� w x _ The citizen volunteer training invalves a 20-haur courye that includes in- struction �n personai and community preparedness, f'ire safety, €'irst aid, searcht resc;ue practic:es, ancl a m�ck-incident exercise, This is tollowed i�y monthly sessiuns on additianal'ta�- ics, and periodic exercises such as Sakurday's. The 2�- haur course, affered free, is ,presented twice a year and whenever else thera are enough sttidents to �ill a class,lKerr said. '1'he next is slated for fall. Far mnre information, cc�ntact Kerr at 399•123�. � oa�i���`����°'����:o:���.���cra� ai a°�' � � o c�.t � .-�', � �s,,,, '� ° ' y � v :� � �,�", y p � ;;, Cs, � ,-; p � � .� ;,; ° r� �c > � ro ° .,�� a o x ,� 2 �' ° o w � .�,� � � b 'oo a � �p�s��.���y��'.,c�uv o�..� �.ccw�. �.-'�js1 c�7�v �,�ca�°p r��y,�y, ja cES,���rl�����+,0�� � C y . .'" r� C7' . ?i 4" �� �� Ol �4 CS p` p O ,� � L�a V O � W � �++�.. +�+ . L+ �•-� � �' Q 'C� � ..-�+ � C�.6 � ,� tCi V ~ � L+ ft� � � "" '�+ a"i � +.+ .� . 'G ai �V G + �- L + 4 f�+ 89' U� �" 7-�. fy •S3 N � 6�. �:�r+n,o-a, s.`��w'c�..,ar���mra�n.�c,c�i�w' x � a.i c� � � � � � �+ .�C � ,� 4.` � :d � v '� „" « � '� c�i � � v w p �o ,� cs � •.. o :..� .r ,,, ;� o �«• � A •�I ... v � C?v�,..,�,� • � � � .�.� � y a� � �� G� o wr s�.� � o � ��,, ��„ � a�Q � � 'c1 :� +. ...' � � aB � o..�, _.,. � m�. c�s 0.� .sa c� .�. ts, tw as �I v� W NI �' � s � � � � � u, ar sn Go. '� '� x., .... � , y ��.r .-� . 'n�� � 0 � C. V � � 1'�" C y � d '�' q � y : � L � G r�'' i � l..'Ti ni � �� � ,,,�, � '.. � cq A •C � 3 � 'f'�' � s�-� � t1Y ^��' 3�. ' b a�i � �^�f ,� �syz�.�a�i °��� ���� u �s :� � '� .� . � � a� � � .� su �c �r H � � �-+ ,� ,� � � Q+ `�' ..�-� � � l'�� p+ � � sry � +�+ � � � S�. A �'.�+� � La y '«Ni ° °��i�� a�i'��d� � �� � on o� o.�rl. a a v, i -- c `�'.` a �,° �r "� � w r d n� �;�-+ o � ey �.-� ,� c. .w y � � C "� ,U, N .— r� i �� � ^ r "'� �y y � � �p.'� �� O a�+ �� r�j •� O� � �-+ > � N�. � � � �' � ��r+ :+ > a d f�+/ �.'"�r � 4�.� O � c� � �+" L+ � �' � SH � ?4 . .� �i+ eK� :.-, t� GY a tn tII :v� � C, m ..,�+ +"��+� :� RJ .� R3 � dA.� (y ��: Z GREEN VAttfY tOEY�S & SUN www,gvnew3.com WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, �� 1 � ::,v����,�:.��.�k :::��.���.��� �{� .. � �ahuarita worl�s o�. .emer �ncv lans ., � � � �y �fty BottemiUer Special ta the Green Yalley News Town officials are work- ing to make Sahuarita's 30.5-square miles and 25,000 residents tess likely to fall ta the whims of Mothex Na- ture in the event of'a disas- trnus event. Representatives fram several depArtments are drafting an inclusive,.state- wide Hazard Mifiigatian l�lan to ward off the worst bf windstorms; drou�ht, floodin� or any other pa- tential threat -, natural or manmadc — thAt might af tlict the area. The plan is required for Sahuarita and oiher corn- munitiss to qualifY fox fed- eral grants to help prepare in advance for the unexpeet- ed: and, should it �trike, minimize injury, death, property damage, and eco- nomic loss. Off�cials w�nt to move the planning prc�cess through required chann�ls c�uickl}; given recent talk �f federal budget cutsthat could tap as much �s a full �ear off the origirralthree-year funciing �riginally,approvea far the t�sk, stapping the futidiilg clark 5e�at. 30, the end of the cui �scal vear. Nationally, the cuts pro- posed by: President Ubarna to trim �illions from the overall 2011 federat hudget wt�uld inciade $425 rn311ion in Pre•�isaster Mitigation grants through the Federal Ernergency Managem�nt A�encY (��NjA). Accordin� to Fd Po�e, Sahuarita's Regional Erner- gency Response Planner, Sahuarita's goal mirrors that c�f other communities contributing information for the statewide- plan: to provide emergency-opera- tions plans,'training and exercises ta prepare re- sponders, and help ensure cantinuity pf vital puhlie facilities.following a disas- ter. Sahuarita's 2Fi-page w�ork- ing draft is undergoing ad- ditic�ns, edits and reviews alrnost daily ta meet the September deadline, shc�uld the proposed FEM�, budget cuts tal:e effect, Yope said. Sahuarita's plan isn't developing from scratch but involves apdating its portion of the state's exist- ing Hazard M:itigation Plan from 2qo5, P��e said. Revisions retlect techno- logical advancements now availabie to public entities, particularly in the gl�bal- positianing system realm, praviding much greater geagraphic detail than be- fore, he noted. This is helpful in rapidly pinpointing and repair- ing vital public facilities �tr�d restoring l��y resot�r�- es affected by a c�isaster: Contributing to 'the plan are representatives in the town's Public F�orks, Parks and Recreaticm, Human RPSOUrces Pldnning anci Zoning and Police depart- ments. Originally slated far a De- cember unveiling Sahuari- Mock disaster drili cames to GV A mock-disaster drill simulating a tiazardous- rnaterial spi11 will begin at 8 a.m. Saturday at Green Valley Recreation's SAnta Rita Springs 5acial Cen- ter on Via kio F'uerte, and last About four hours. The drill Will involve a "shelter-in-place" emer- gency-response exercise, during whiCh an estimat- ed 5Q to 60 participating volunteers will ga doorto dao.r to inform residents af potential dangers, as well as hand out infarma- tional brochures on disas- ter preparedness. They will be wearing vests, he1- mets and bad�es ident�fy- ing them as emergeney respondara. The drill is amang vari- ous exercises conducted periotlically to help train emergency resgonders for an actual emerg�ncy. Drill participants inciude state-certified emergency responders as weA as citizen valunteers certified fhroagh a fed- erally rnandated eourse of study off'ered by the Grea#ex Green Valley chapter af` 'the national Communi�� Emergency Response Team. The citizen volunteer trAining invoives a 2,0- hour course that includes instruction on personal and community prepared- ness, fire safety, first aid, search/reseue practices, and a mnck-incident ex- ercise. This is foilawed by manthiy sessions on ad- ditional topics, and pE- riadic exercises such as Saturday's. " • The 2p-hour course, of- fered free, is presented twice a year and wheneder else there are enough stu- dents ta fill a class, Kerr said. The next is slated f�r fall. �or information, cun- tact Kerr at 399-2234. • — KiMy 6ottamilier ta's pla[i rlraft is expected fo be ready for public review by late July�r August. Nieet ings will be announced. Following the pu6lic re- view process, Sahvarita's pian wili be sent tn the Ari- zona T3epartment �f Fmer- $e�ncy Mariagement tca be part of the state's rnulti-ju- risdictionat Hazard Mitiga- tiQn Plan, which wauld then be cler�red bv the Governor's ati4n. Even if the federal bud- get cuts come about and planners lase th�ir third year of funds to wark on developing disaster-mitiga- tion strategies, Pope said he x�auld fdllow through to see that Sahnarita's plan is in order so the town will be better prepared if disaster hits. "Wf!'1� vnt ncrurvrh+�++� Emergency Management � The Official Website for the City of Tucson, Arizona EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Page 1 of 2 Welcome to the City of Tucson Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Local Emergency Management Day to Day Info • The City of Tucson Joins Pima County and Other Local Governments in Hazard Mitigation Planning • Partner Site - Tucson Urban Area Security Initiative - a Regional Automated Emergency Notification System • Emergency Preparedness for Individuals with Disabilities - Adopted from W. Virginia (pdf� • 8 Signs of Terrorism Video • TOEMHS - March 2011 Update (pd� Follow Ready.Gov's Preparedness Twitter Federal Region 9, including Arizona - Live Updates • FEMA, Cal EMA approve $52,864 for Imperial County agencies to aid in winter storm disaster recovery Pasadena, CA. - Three Imperial County public agencies are being granted $52,864* in Public Assistance (PA) funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) for disaster recovery associated with the severe winter storms that swept the state in January and February. • FEMA, Cal EMA approve $105,727 For Siskiyou County Agencies To Aid In Winter Storm Disaster Recovery Pasadena, Calif. -- Four Siskiyou County public agencies are being granted $105,727 in Public Assistance (PA) funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) for disaster recovery connected with the severe winter storms that swept the state earlier this year. • FEMA, State Pledge $84,953 To Calaveres County Agencies To Aid In Winter Storm Disaster Recovery Pasadena, Calif. -- Two Calaveras County agencies are being granted $84,953 in Public Assistance (PA) funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) for disaster recovery associated with the severe winter storms that swept the state earlier this year. http://cros3.tucsonaz.gov/emergencymanagement 3/9/2011 Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security (520) 798-0600 (PCOEMHS) �... Page 1 of 1 :�_..___.. .��.r_ � _�.. n__ _ .. .,�_ _.v_ . .xti� _ �. _ ,____ .� _._ A__.. �__._�.,._ __ _... _. .. _ _.... _.. . . . _.... . _._. � � : �.i Assesaols ORce � Review the 2nd Draft Relesse of ttie Pima Counly Hazard Mitigation Plan � �^. Boe'd oPSupervisors G�' �:� Clark oftAa Boa�d { : �'.... _......._..._. ......,..__ ... ............ ................ ................ ................. ............... ...._..._.._. ... ..._....._.. .._........_.. ! ? County Adminiauetor Pima County Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security � Elccliona � I Facililies Mansgemrnt � 1 Finance & Risk Managemenl . � � . . 1 Human Resources ��� Pima County Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Secunty (PCOEMHS) is the local, federally mandated program '�� Oflice oP Emergency Mmagement &`� Federal . � of the Fedeal Emergency Management Age�y (FEMA�. �� Homeland Sccurity ; PimaCountyRecorder � S �� e �� ProcurementDepaNnent OEMHS is an eMension of the Anzona Slate Division of Emergency Management and the Arizona State Department of ; Treasurer's O�ce �, E Homeland Security '� � ' � County � ' OEMHS works to prevent the loss of life and reduce property damage due to man-made, technological and naNral distasters. i!. � OEMHS provides professional emergency management services that inGude Prevention, Proteetian, Response and Recovery . '. activities. OEMHS also assists municipalities and local govemments with developing plans to ensure the highest level of � . preparedness �� . ENTER SITE ' http://www.pima.gov/OEMHS/index.shtml 11 /8/2011 Pima County Arizona - Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security - Prepar... Page 1 of 2 E� � ~r�i��n� `��� �.e Preparedness Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A planning team comprised of representatives from the Pima County, Oro Valley, Sahuarita, Tucson, Marana, South Tucson, Pascua Yaqui, Southern Arizona Buffelgrass Coordination Center and Tucson Airport Authority has been meeting regulariy to participate in a hazard mitigation planning process. The purpose of this process is to develop a multi-hazard mitigation plan for the participating entities according to The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K). The DMA2K requires all local, county, tribal and state governments to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan in order to be eiigible for certain federal disaster mitigation funds. This plan focuses on the area's most threatening hazards and provides a strategy to reduce or eliminate the risk from those hazards to the people and property of Pima County. The first draft of the Pima County Hazard Mitigation Plan has been completed and is ready for public viewing and comment. The Plan may be viewed at http://www.pima.gov/OEMHS from November 1 st until November 10th. For more information please contact Jeff Guthrie at the Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security, 798-0600 or Jeff.Guthrie�Pima.gov Download the Pima County Multi Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation 2011 Draft Plan (27mb) ,� Planning makes it possible to manage the entire life cycle of a potential crisis. Strategic and operational planning establishes priorities, identifies expeded levels of pertormance and capability requirements, provides the standard for assessing capabilities, and helps stakeholders learn their roles. The planning elements identify what an organization's Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) or Emergency Operations Plans (EOP) should inGude for ensuring that contingencies are in place for delivering the capability during a Iarge-scale disasiec To this end, Pima County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security continually updates and improves iYs spectrum of planning documents to ensure that the population of Pima County is safer from natural and man-made disasters. Planning Guidance Documentation ■ The National Response Framework Brochure ,�} , ■ The National Response Framework FAQ ,}� ■ The National Response Framework Document ;�j The National Response Framework The National Response Framework, and iYs corresponding Emergency Support Functions, as well as Support and Incident Annexes, presents the guiding principles that enable all response partners to prepare for and provide a unified national response to disasters and emergencies —from the smallest incident to the largest catastrophe. This important document establishes a comprehensive,. national, all-hazards approach to domestic incident response. The Framework defines the key principles, roles, and structures that organize the way we respond as a Nation. it describes how communities, tribes, States, the Federal Government, and private-sector and nongovernmental partners apply these principles for a coordinated, effective national response. it also identifies special circumstances where the Federal Government exercises a larger role, including incidents where Federal interests are involved and catastrophic incidents where a State would require significant support. The Framework enables first responders, decision makers, and supporting entities to provide a unified national response. Pima County has updated all of iYs plans to mirror the principles and practices laid out in the National Response Framework, ensuring that the Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security is ready to respond to local, regional and national incidents. ■ Assessofs Office ■ Board of Supervisors . c�erk or me eoara ■ County Administrator ■ Eleaions ■ Facilities Management ■ Finance & Risk Management � Human Resources � Office of Emergency Management 8 Homeland Security ■ Pima Counry Recorder ■ Prowrement Department ■ Treasurer's ORce http://www.pima.gov/OEMHS/prepare.shtml 11 /8/2011 Pima County Arizona - Office of Emergency Management & Homeland Security - Prepar... Page 2 of 2 Ail-hazards Pianning Theory All-hazards planning is built upon scalable, flexible, and adaptable coordinating structures that allow for ; planning documents to be useful for both the expected and unexpected incidents, as they arise, no matter the size, scope or complexity. Encouraged from within Federal doctrine, such as the National Response Framework, all-hazards planning has become the preferred method and is in use across all Pima County planning documents. How our plans make the community safer Local police, fire, emergency medical services, public health and medical providers, emergency management, puWic works, environmental response professionals, and others in the community are often the first to detect a threffi or hazard, or respond to an incident. They also are often the last to leave an incident site or othervvise to cope with the effects of an incident. The local senior elected or appointed �cial (the mayor, city manager, or county manager) is responsible for ensuring the public safety and welfare of residents. In today's world, senior o�cials and their emergency managers build the foundation for an effective response. They organize and integrate their capabilities and resources with neighboring jurisdictions, the State, NGOs, and the private sector. Increasingly, businesses are vital partners within communities wherever retail locations, service sites, manufacturing facilities, or management offices are located. NGOs and not-for-profit organizations also play a key role in strengihening communities' response efforts through their knowledge of hard-tareach populations, outreach, and services. Recognizing this, Pima County Office of Emergency Management makes every effort to ensure that planning documentation includes all aspects of the local level of response to and recovery from inadents, small and large, when it creates is planning documents. In doing so, it can be insured that the actions made before, during and after a disaster are the best possible given the situation, helping to save lives and protect property wRhin the region. Planning Partners Pima County works Gosely with all of the jurisdidions within its borders to ensure,that plans are consistent and organized. �'� � �,� :i.�r. ��! p � � ��;� _, � � q � � it1 '� � � � i : �� i ' _ � �.�� �.. �� � .,a ` , ■ FEMA Planning Information ■ Arizona Division of Emergency Management Planning Informffiion __ _ _ http://www.pima. gov/OEMHS/prepare. shtml 11/8/2011 Marana, AZ - Official Website • �e y oniine epCperie �onail our',: � „ r..t # *�".� ,w�w.� ..;,, . �+a►�m� ` � WELCOM E How do i...� � Thank you for visiting the Town of Marana Web site. We hope that CAAG 208 Plan Amendment ` Ill t0Uf7n9 OUf S118 y0U C8f1 188f11 8b0Ut US what we do and the " services we provide to our citizens. PAG 208 Plan Amendment Employment & Marana is a relatively new municipality, incorporating in 1977 Maps � to control our most valuable resource — water. Although the Town is young, Marana has a rich history, and heritage preservation is QnlinePermiUProject Status � one of our priorities. �th our unique location between Tucson and Phoenix, Marana is an attractive community dedicated to maintaining a friendly environment where people can work, shop, live and play. Public Records Request Purchasing Public Auctio� Document Center Archives Traffic Alerts Citizen Request Tracker Public Hearings ����� � Marana Municipal Complex 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ 85653 P:520-382-1999 F:520-382-1998 Contad Us � Map J /""` GOMp1E'Mi3, .f'1� � � 'Gfl!eCER*�+. 41� � � ftiS��ES119�F AccessibiliN Information Welcome all, Mayor Ed Honea and the Marana Town Council G�me learn abc�ut yourT��,��n. .�C3106 US �Ci ���rch �t332 f�r �� T r'��i���' ` �wx��:a . -' � �. ��.�e �� � � '� � �4a�u�trt�rt�`tf �O�t�ect`i� �Iici; her� for n��r� ini6m�atian � � �ild t4 fl�� GU� �?UF Siif4`�V� Home � Email � Site Map � Printer Friendly � Leaal Notices � Powered by ivicPlus Page 1 of 1 Sig� In Thu, Nov. 17 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting Wed, Nov. 30 Planning Commission meeting Senrices is working to resolve the problem. Hazard Mitigation Plan open for public comment A team including representatives from the Town of Marana, Pima Counly Office of Emergency Planning and Homeland Security and other regional jurisdictions has been meeting to participate in a hazard mitigation planning process. Read on... EI Tour coming through Marana The 29th Annual EI Tour de Tucson's route includes Marana when the race is run Nov. 19. Motorists should expect delays along the course for much of the day. Read on... (.�i1NIlTED TO TNF FIliuIEE ... IJySPA41E118YOURli1S� http://www.marana.com/ 11/7/2011 — - — - - _._, _. _ � • �C� .�:� � marana.com.�� �- :� '�' 1 t,� X ►� � � �- _... -- - � = _._..___ __._�._. __.. �..._�� � � . � �: � "� _------ �� ; ` ._______.�-----.____________�__ _____.._.____. . __. _.___ _ ______ _ _ v. _._ _� .__ _ _� . � ._._� _._ _ FAe �dt View Favari0es Tads F� _. _ . _.__ _.._ _ _ =_ - � ,,/� ----- - - _ � _ _._.. -- ",� �[� (�`•� Y:� Gp rr � 7 � � y'� � W BOOkmdfla� � 11Jb10daEd � GF1e[k � 'a� AufiDL�i[ � �`' ': . d! » $e{tinqg� ;,;� Fawo�res � ;� � , _. u - . '� �� ra� �; �� arx a �ted �,t�t �; c�o� n� ,� � MaaQuesc ►+ome � r�,00! c�o� � , �� �. . . - >< - ' f�a c.ax,ec�n4... � '_. . � . � �, � a� - ��h - �o� - �, " .....�.� F�It d01,.? CJ1AG 208 Pl811 Ame�tat PAG 208 �an �M Enipbyntent �Rg - e�s P�iic Recrords Request P�xtha�ng W�bGc Auction Document Center archives Traf�c Nerts Citizen Re�est Tracker Pub�c Hearings SEARCF! � � FAarana IAunicipaf Complex 11555 W. Ciaic Center Drive Marana, RZ 85653 P:520-382-1999 F:520-382-1998 . Contad Us ( Map '� # f G8MME4►TS, �.�i►+ .��J-�'1 $�"CC O?K wne o���n��s � c��r���v�r � �av�s � ��v � co��unurr You are here: Homs > News Flash tiome Posted on: Novemtrer 1, 2011 Hazard Mitigation Ptan open far public comment A#eam including represeniatives from the Town of Marana, Pima County Office of Emergency Planning and Homeiand Security and other regional jurisdictions has been meeting to participate in a hazard mitigation planning process. Starch � ��� � ( All categories _w� � � 7aols The purpose of this process is to devetop a muttf-hazard mitigaUon plan for Pima County and the Town of Marana that adheres to The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K). The QMA2K requires all � Gaiegories {ocal. county, tribat and state g�vemments to have a FEMA-approved '±�� cateqories hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible for certain federal � °me disaster mitigatfan funds. This pkan f�uses on the area's most threatening hazards and provides a strategy to reduee or eliminate the risk to the people and property ot the Town of AAarana. The first draft of the Pima County Mutti-Jurisdktional Hazard Mftigation Plan has been completed and is ready for putrlic viewing and comment. The plan may be viewed at #he link trelow or at the Marana Municipal Complex. 11555 West Civic Genfer Drive, Monda�r through Fr�day, 8 a_m. to 4 p.m. until Nov 9_ For more iniormaTion, please contact Sgt_ Steve Johnson at 382-2034 or sjohnson@marana.eom. Additionaf Infa.: Rrevious Next Phones down at aperadons EI Tour coming thraugh Marana �:entQr Oth*r News in Hom* � �� .' �# ttsgc • W. Scott Ogden From: Steve Johnson [sjohnson@MARANA.COM] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 10:36 AM To: Shad Bustamante Cc: W. Scott Ogden Subject: RE: Hazard mitigation plan Shad, Thanks Steven Johnson, Sergeant Marana Police Department Day Shift Supervisar 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Bldg B. Marana, AZ 85653 (520) 382-2034 Office (520) 382-2004 F� sj ohnsonn,marana.com From: Shad Bustamante Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 8:33 AM To: Steve Johnson Subject: FW: Hazard mitigation plan Sgt. Johnson, I am not sure if you already received the information below from Rodney. Thanks, Shad Bustamante Engineering Aide Town of Marana 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, Arizona 85653 (520) 382-2600 Office (520) 382-2644 Fax From: Rodney Campbell _ _ _ __ _ Sentc Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:32 PM To: Shad Bustamante Subject: RE: Hazard mitigation plan I sent this to both the Marana Weekly and Explorer and posted it on KOLD's web site. A team including representatives from the Town of Marana, Pima County Office of Emergency Planning and Homeland Security and other regional jurisdictions has been meeting to participate in a hazard mitigation planning process. The purpose of this process is to develop a multi-hazard mitigation plan for Pima County and the Town of Marana that adheres to The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA2K). The DMA2K requires all local, county, tribal and state governments to have a FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible for eertain federal disaster mitigation funds. This plan focuses on the area's most threatening hazards and provides a strategy to reduce or eliminate the risk to the people and property of the Town of Marana. The first draft of the Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan has been completed and is ready for public viewing and comment. The plan may be viewed at http://www.marana.com/DocumentView.aspx?DID=5184 or at the Marana Municipal Complex, 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. until Nov. 9. For more information, please contact Sgt. Steve Johnson at 382-2034 or sjohnson(a�marana.com. From: Shad Bustamante Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:04 PM To: Rodney Campbell Subject: RE: Hazard mitigation plan Rodney, Can you do me a favor when you get a chance and send the information you provided to news outlets, as well as a screenshot of our website informing the public about the Hazard Mitigation Plan to Sgt. Johnson for documentation purposes. Thanks, Shad Bustamante - Engineering Aide Town of Marana 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, Arizona 85653 (520) 382-2600 Office (520) 382-2644 Fax From: Rodney Campbell Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 12:59 PM To: Shad Bustamante Subject: Hazard mitigation ptan I sent it to the Marana Weekly and Explorer to post on their web sites and added it KOLD's neighborhood news section on its site. Rodney Campbell Town of Marana Public Information Officer Office of Strategic Initiatives Phone: (520) 382-i936 www.marana.com Marana -- Home of the PGA TOUR World Golf Championships - Accenture Match Play Championship (Feb. 20-26, 2012) Want updates? Follow the Town of Marana on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook. To ensure compliance with the Open Meeting Law, recipients of this message should not forward it to other members of the Council. Members of the Council may reply to this message, but they should not send a copy of the reply to other members. _� _ _ __ __._ _ _ . -- — -- ---- ------ , y; . :i . `,-' �'� t- �_— ---- ... `! n, t X P - _.._ _._... .__. ____ ..... ._.. .._. .._ .__ _... _.__. ..__ __... ._. 6k ,53t - Y� F�tes I0-° � _- ---. � — , _ ____. _ . � , __. — i - -- -� --� -- � -- - � -- x 6ac;� G,- _ � co �. � � � ' '+9 - fl e�s' � in �odoed � ci,� . y a� . ';, , ; � j s�a m. :r � ��- __ ___ �, __ � __ ___ ,_ ____ _._ �_____ ,,.; Fr,arttes , � . �. . . . . - �; r+x rabnd �' , r,ee aa 6uimioed Irttanet �; GQOgIe hteps �; MapQ+rst riome � ra�wor Graws �, � — - , ._._ .... ___.. ....._ .'�a�ok:e�+mert ...... .. . ; � ' � � � - �• S�etv- racb- y�• � ��u�"' � Calendar � Job OpportuniUes � Comments � Email Subxriptlon � Printer FrienOy � � -- --- -- ��'c�t�tzr.�.���r� oKer ��cr�tu�c, _��� � � [ � _—�— -- se'rc�`,. � �,"�• c�trt� c cr�ttrt�uttit)', c7t�t• /��ttrre. -- �1 a�1 � > Hom� Pa¢e a i�wn Gavemmenl s poYCe Depa�bneM Police Department . . . . .. � » Fuil Yiew ���m�"���� �f`,1 .!�1 ko y8lley, AZ - erms r i;,e �� Lambert -- -- � Desect Greens tt A1 Oro UsNey � � ca `� 2 Qro Va�fap �: 1'ovmhomes Estatos �Yro V�dIIBy ,�� � �:... Th� ColprtY ���.,,� th.e Rr � ■, � At O�o Vallty L�J . � � � �� la Re .. xpi MapaataCd0liCoogle-Terms��f�!.�sa � �,.•,��g� Perio� (tla��s) 3 30 � Gime 7Ypes ��;j ..� � Find FA�s � Take the Cftizen Survev � Obia[n a POfice Req�rt cJtizen Axvey � Job O000nunRies r Get Finqero^ntetl � Fintl cnme stats � Ftntl Commonitv Events � Find Canmunrtv Proorams � Read the Crime Fighter + ggqister,'UOdate Reverse 9! t . � Contact OVPD. Clkk on t r e tor in(ormation.. Know Your Town's Budaat This daumeM has two pages of tacts and numbers to help you knaN your Town's budget. tt has a question and answer (� i � tnaemec t� - , � its�e - �-�--- -- -------- --- � ��`� �.:��.04'Pd.Of9 � V �_ M' C5 x 1 x' x G°"gk'=�,_ ---- "'- w .. � 6� �r - � - . �t eoa�_ � ii�n�ea I �' aKd� - �e wa� ra � - , i� s�,a m_ .; : � xeu�. ---�__�_ __--- - —______.---- ----- _ _ _____ , _ _ �-- — - --- ---- ------ 5� FdPa�� [ 51 �-�--, ...-_ - j�Bj Frcerwcoei �; Fr«aa atxiritedLrtenec �j Googlen�eps � MapQustHane � ranoot cra+as e�. �., . __.___ ___._ .___._._ �4ao�Q �ene^e — � ' EJ µ�6 ' eax - �rer - r� ' �' � CizK on €xolorzrs tot in/omiation. Know Your Town's Budaet This documeM has twa pages oT facts and numbers to help you know your Town's budget It has a question and answer romwt on one page, with expendnure reaucnons, emcienc�es, pdkies and a t�ne�ine on me other tt Es a great giance. with concise explanatbns atrout the budget For aaGttronal Inlormatlon. vistt Fv +-� z qaacted euaget. For mwe iMortnatia� on the poike DepartmeM butlget vistt Know Your Potfcz DeoartmenPS Butlqei. _. .__._ ..___ _._.____._._._..-----. _----- ----- ....... .__ ___. Multi-Ha�M Nlitiqation Plan � A p�anryng team compr�setl ot representat�ves trom me 7own o► oro vauey, Pima county onice oi Emergency ManagemeM anA Hometantl Securriy and other regional juristlicUOns met regularty ro partkipate in a hazard miUgation pianning praess- The purpose of this process is to develop a mutti-hazartl mitigatlon plan for Pima County according to tMe Disaster Mi[fgation Act of 2000 (DN1A2K). The Disaster Mttigffiion Act requires all laal. county. tribal and state govemmCMS to have a FEMA 3pproved ha7artl mRig2tion plan in ortler to bC eligible tor certain fCderal disaSter mitigation funds. This plan tocuses on the area's most threatening hazartls antl provides a sirategy to retluce or eliminate the nsk to the people antl property of tMe Town o[ Oro VaHey. The first tlraR of the ��ma C�crnry M1r�r�t�-JCrr�scT+rt�o,na,° Hazar� A:frtrg�GOn Prah was completed and is ready tor publk viewing and commerK. The plan may be reviewed unlll Novemtrer �0. 2011. For more informaQOn, please contact Char Ackerman at (520) 229-4950 or by email. Upcoming Events November 9 , 2011 �igifat Child !denUflr,atian Dec�ember 1a , 2011 �igllal �hiitl Ideniifi�caiurn Decemtrer 1i, 2011 oispose-n-r oro Vailev January 70, 2012 ce�r rra�nina Jai�Uary 11, 2012 oiaita� chiid iaeni�ecatian January 28, 2012 �isnase-a-^;ted Oro vauey February 18, 2012 Disoose-A-P o�a Vallev Niarch 14, 2012 ��gitar cni�d iaen€irica�ion M8[Ch 24, 2012 Ois�ose-A-Metl Oeo'Jailey pPfil 21, 2012 �isnose-a-�,ted �ra t�atkey May 9, 2012 JiottaF Cnha ��ent�flcation May 19, 2012 �isoase-A-�ted oeo vatrey June 16, 2012 oisQase-A-htea aro vansy� July 11, 2012 a�qna� un[�a iaent;rcatlon July 28, 2012 Disoose-o,-tited o€o vauev AUyuSt 25, 2U12 Dis; ose-A-^eted Cra va!iey September 12, 2012 ��ai�a� cnna iaeo�,rcacia� September 22, 2012 ��snas�-a-��ea ero waE�ev 8ctober 2d, 2012 Disoese Oro VaileK November 14, 2012 E�igitar cni�o �dentkr:ca;�on Deeember 15, 2�12 o�soase-a-r.iea �ro variev Vision Sfatement 5eek Excellsnce, Ramain Vigilanf, MvoJve Communify, Enforcement Mission Statement We, the members af the Oro Valley Pokce Departmen� are deahcated to providmg excellenf servrce through partnerships tlrat 6udd hust prevent crime and promote a safe envFrarment to enhance the quality of (ife. _, _._ _ _ ._ j�' � me�.net a� . 4 nsx. ` Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A planning team comprised of representatives from the Pascua Yaqui Tribe and the Arizona Division of Emergency Management has been meeting regularly to participate in a hazard mitigation planning process. The purpose of this process is to develop a multi-hazard mitigation plan for the Pascua Yaqui Tribe according to The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (OMA2K). The DMA2K requires all local, county, tribal and state governments to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible for certain federal disaster mitigation funds. This plan focuses on the area's most threatening hazards and provides a strategy to reduce or eliminate the risk from those hazards to the people and property of The Pascua Yaqui Tribe. The first draft of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe Hazard Mitigation Plan has been completed and is ready for public viewing and comment. The Plan may be viewed at 7474 S. Camino de Oeste or at http://intranet/departments/fire/default.aspx from November 10 2011 until Monday November 28 2011. For more information please contact Kelly Gomez at 879-6350. ,�_ _ � �_w_______ _ � � * I � ' safwarita az.us „' ; � _ � __ --____--- _____ __ ----� i� � __�__-----._�_ . _ . -- --- -� p " � __ _ _. ___ �_ --- _ __ _ y ;; Favwites ;� Tnwn of Sahuarita, .�'izona � �. �� �� �� � � � *?ont„ tic;e?*r_-zx. �..'7u ..:�..� #IIMd . � Mnouacemerits CurrMt NtwS � ���� NErr! Arth7re New31lEttr Arch:ivt •L MewsieEtrr Sign--up iP?MI 301 W� NcpOtt � "�y - SYWI"N[�' 1 . r � � f � �.#i.ii�:tCci. � F�f1d 44 �D_R ���4J174J� vYatelt our ���1� chmneM 9ahaaMta� AE ���� '3'�kfc�a2 r;.�e s o.4c e n> � Lmi �, S ....,.,. ,. ..... =t3r_s p&v�v? a3i �r^:4xA?�.'!�3.�4a 4S�' �T PDEO Public Hearina on ASARCO Permit Revisian S�t For Nov. 1 S. 20 f i sms �r�sr. � Ar::. .>���. ,. ."�22, a,.;.a �z,srt x',",:s�Ym�.r. A c�.�:�.rre�a w ur'r Yv�.+� hcC n o-�ES:t s a :o- - nx'"t T�5^�.".� W:. I5. 8711, e'�+x sC'Y3: ? 4s.4W_7 RT• a i�. �:x �^s.1Aw :M �oama''1[ e:-f.x ry �^?x�1pc'arsaa!t:x•is, ^sa'�'sa*:.a. Town Council Seeks New Parks and R creatiort Commission Mem er 'ne aatc srys 0.a_-as+'s+ a-,.�:za-i �aa�a raa.r .?.r � h. �:�. _v...m s.-t.� .::�. a+a a rar 2713. }il: _L4.G'�V:3i:'•T.LV h. L b+Y�••+.3' .G'T,. L!'.G^ _.5.. � ^.+� �:J�a s:Y�n e. :�� a� a:Y:"a'l:�Sa x'x Trn�.'� •�v�.cr� a� :.e amtic a*dy rx•sY_a� tl= :i* �^'A_'LCF'Y�^•!`.+t:'iy �A :?G Jd'+fi 81"X ��*Y.1 �G]0'^^��.Y.. �. � 33 'p• .!1 ;Y 4: �5 3� M�. �aY.f 9Nl�d�T2.. �.:II"K.'�.. . �Y�� Zps-=�l11 Z•Ai? yi�. S,tY.G �i3}ry >3, !'tl QL?Y"G`�d.61 �LS':N'- NDTIGE OF PUB�IC HEARING `t_'+IIC£ IS =e's0.3`f vZv"s 7 TiATr-E T'7 �til:..:F� ea4;iL.RI'S Y.A":?tPvG nk3 23?ii'Yst�.ttYUai. i';iT� '..73� 4�.r&1F=��RfA'r'u��*; MOftQAY, DE{EM8ER3. Zfl3f A70RJ1FTEASf30P.M. T ��?G.t]fix: A T� SL CATY�-; .ra S: �`c^* : a�?' 1't'7' D�; aiM '�-'�nsi bai � m ld7&7 rs, u C b'FGS !�'�M.¢'a)�.'^!e� .�n1"' sas i,�w....� :'x4�F0 6'a✓. tfF :"K �T.% � ti]a'Y.a 7 3].un!a s'YGK ."..e Aal: �T.C'.Sn tt; aX°SOV`'z a"�iI4'ir}3^`G'.21��ei . Tx � s�sn'c7 �w . x xii at :'e',s�;^f ._y�, �m�cs, 3T5 sS. :=.:s?r,a• a :rr.s x4ar :�rtr.stc' A>L�}'G '::�St' IDC�1' . S:M D'3Si:.. '�: %;� �it 0..`•'a611� IIS' '�T. tif C.'A'?+CS'. L•d �.SRYa 'rt ri ]G '7'*'-n E1 rs�¢':�mxe' :� r�k :i�se =SAI7-3�-�a7 . +n' i33S 3a. '+i"3C+!S.O�. £�� ���x�. '3a:r.m� S K . °vrh ° �a9�,ib.:,a RU'a : :'t� 6. uYr�:.�� "J;s�si31 M :a"�i i 8+b'33$$. . ;+.�nzcu�—z�-nax*>t'�m.r.,c�a„ � . . Sahuarita in Final Phase of 7own Hazard Mitigation Plan Updating ^tlnt� �� � 8a�ds 6 Cn�sfians� Cikizen9' E�tltrilti¢ Etono�ric DtvelepmEn4 Quick F6et9 rs�s,e�+tstrs�tofs vetunt�er ttp�partunititl � '�" r ��' � / A-Z SCrviCe 1.i34� AHtndm R Minutb Ilrem Mter_tting 4�ues CBMtKk 118 CA.nst*vvetibn Updetes Darc'iin+tnk C�niCr fYiY�{ �fAtl �IQ�d�tO1t9 P6iiCt S�rvite! ProturtoiCnt Ray co�rt r�ees aepatt a streeb Vrabidan Spib6k Up 5&huar.ita Sun Shuttie Sitrmdp Tbwn C6dE ;� !-3 �� � �+`�* z�e xs: zM�=tie ,raR"iz: !�te'raR�a cu sa!r:». �.a ras 70li m�h�v}� xr.c:aa: :re u<:nbor.?,�e ��aa*'�r'+C 3ro;m Jra:>3 �=� s:6-�x n-zans u'u._h:v. s�."C:tn�sr' �tsa�: a!�`C+ZO;Y�t �+a't ot.:7ii 7+'s �.'an. v�"Y=a z�.+rH yaypt:� n�G�s° :Cn t�s. s i1e a�xm: �6di n.'�5y'r!"y :::i¢ mht �.se^+e2n�::.P!ss asa�::C� m✓'2 � �xY ac'te+rv'.'mn a�xs: a*.n x�te.bs� a^Yc^+. :'..-rr�:s t- r. °e:T's: :x;'+�3'e a^?a�ua-� a�.1 :sc:* �rox .e :b' :xn� tu e c,�.. uns�,^ Mx 7�..c v::'ve:a� �a=. t �13], z:�e. �un.:a. �ca: ans �•= �3YL,^�TtlftT. SY 'G4S'1: �A 'idYE i .FE44 ',L�iS:Cv�i ?5CA'� m �GpT":» �d'� 8L i LO!.fC:A!1 4T �CG1".:�y .°�.:�3'IY.t'12^1?iCL. � ... �. .. . . :...... , .. _ . _. _ .......... _:.::..... �:�-� > u a. -., __.-, a ° ' � % ; � � i D � � �aK �• � satu�arib.az.us ... W�r,. _'_ _..� :�. ., .�,v�,, �iil�E -- ±�I . _ ,� ���� x� -- — -, � F� i=S� h firrel Pt+ae� of7own+�ard �on Pin... ( � � � , .,. :�.. :; � : rlY"!'�'.`��&"1 . . . � Manday, Novembsr 21, 20ii. . �� ����� � Sahuarita in F"x�a! Pha�e of Town Hazard Mitigation Wan � uvdat�9 ��.��. . � For thQ Rast twelv� mo�s; Mr� Town aP Sahw�Ca has baan adiv�ly participaGnq �in ths ��� �� collaborativ� varking group �pdating Nr StsH of Arizona Multi-Jurisdictional .Hazsrd � � �. � Mitigation plan of� 2612. This plan. which ts only updated every tan Years, is Fhe process u��d to iderrtify riska and v�inwab�liti�s assx�atsd with any potantial7own diaaat�n snd M davebp bng-tertn strategies for.protecting the peaplt of. Sahusrka� and their preperty. � for such Eutura avQnts. Und¢r tha �isastw Mitigation Nct of 2000, staN, county, local and i r �t`ii ,� r.'� at� � ;��� Y �� � �W���i31" I __ _ � F ebook Waod► an You � • � � C�lillfll� �.... .. tribal govammanK an riquirtid W hsv� a FEMk approv�d hazard midgation pian as� a condition for rncaiving mitigation gnnt funds, The pfimary areas of worWEocus in� the� plan devebpment aree �: 3de�r b�azards dut may inpaet o� iaw imp�drl tbe war�xly =�'�' Devdop a profde of�t�rmast rdevawt haardt "«�"' /►s�esa vdne��ailylo Y�ards � ���orj.�„�ra��a,�k�� :� o.+�n ��o� eo �. yo� �a os�a� In ordar W mawt tFre requ'rr:merds a�d to ansu�e continued usistarrc� �liqibility, a planning. tsam tompriud af npruantatives from the Town af Sahuarib abnq with Pima County, Tucson, Marana. Oro Vailey and the� State of Arizona f}epartment of Em<rgQMy Manaqommt (ADEM} havs be�n maating regularly to updatw� the curreM haasrd mitigation plans for the a!I jurisdidiens veMin tb! county. Also participating. in this proc�s has been mambers arFd repns�irtativam oF the Sahwrita Town Council. Town Mansgari Offiea, Publie Works D�partment, Wanning and Building Department and tlle Parks and Recr�atlon Depatbnent The krst drsR of the Stat�/pima CountylSahuarita Hazard Mitigation Pla� Fas been �� complated and Is raady�for public viav4ng. and commQnt. The Plan may b� viawed and � �.�� svailabl� for comrrrtnt 6om Nowmb�r 21 through D�mbK 6, �2011. For viswing or additional inFarm.ation contad Ed Pope, tF�� Town oE Sahusrits Emer�gtney Respor�se Plannor from 7c00sm to 4:OOpm, Monday thmugh Friday at ths contacts listed b�elow. � � Ed Pope Town of Sahusrib Regional Emerqanq R=sEOOnsa Planner 320-344-7003 Sgarch cisahu�rita.ax.us Q � � ; y`�. � � ! � ; m � �' � ( � �ora Sahuarita in Final Phase of Town Hazard Mitigation Plan Updating For the past twelve months, the Town of Sahuarita has been actively participating in the collaborative working group updating the State of Arizona Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan of 2012. This plan, which is only updated every ten years, is the process used to identify risks and vulnerabilities associated with any potential Town disasters and to develop long-term strategies for protecting the people of Sahuarita and their property for such future events. Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, state, county, local and tribal governments are required to have a FEMA approved hazard mitigation plan as a condition for receiving mitigation grant funds. The primary areas of work/focus in the plan development are: ❖ Identify hazards that may impact or have impacted the community ❖ Develop a profile of the most relevant hazards ❖ Assess vulnerability to hazards ❖ Establish goals and objectives for hazard risk reduction/elimination ❖ Develop actions/projects to achieve goals and objectives In order to meet the requirements and to ensure continued assistance eligibility, a planning team comprised of representatives from the Town of Sahuarita along with Pima County, Tucson, Marana, Oro Valley and the State of Arizona Department of Emergency Management (ADEMj have been meeting regularly to update the current hazard mitigation plans for the all jurisdictions within the county. Also participating in this process has been members and representatives of the Sahuarita Town Council, Town Manager's Office, Public Works Department, Planning and Building Department and the Parks and Recreation Department. The first draft of the State/Pima County/Sahuarita Hazard Mitigation Plan has been completed and is ready for public viewing and comment. The Plan may be viewed and available for comment from November 21 through December 6, 2011. For viewing or additional information contact Ed Pope, the Town of Sahuarita Emergency Response Planner from 7:OOam to 4:OOpm, Monday through Friday at the contacts listed below. Ed Pope Town of Sahuarita Regional Emergency Response Planner E�ope@ci.sahuarita.az.us 520-344-7003 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-TURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Appendix D Detailed Historic Hazard Records Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigatio Plan - 2011 State and Federally Declared Events That Included Pima County Janua 1966 to August 2010 No. of Recorded Losses Hazard Declarations Fatalities Injuries Damage Costs ($) Dam Failure 0 0 0 $0 Disease 7 0 0 $0 Drou ht 8 0 0 $300,000,000 Earthquake 0 0 0 $0 Extreme Heat 0 0 0 $0 Fissure 0 0 0 $0 Flooding / Flash Flooding 13 39 1087 $904,837,000 Hazardous Materials Incident 3 0 0 $0 Landslide / Mudslide 0 0 0 $0 Levee Failure 0 0 0 $0 Severe Wind 1 0 2 $230,000 Subsidence 0 0 0 $0 Wildfire 17 0 0 $38,100,000 Winter Storm 0 0 0 $0 Notes: - Damage Costs are reported as is and no attempt has been made to adjust costs to current dollar values Historic State and Federal Declarations � Page 1 of 1 Pinw Counp� Multi-Jurisdictional Ha�ard Mitiy,ationPlan � Stah uf Araooa Declaration Federal Prcsidential Declarutiun Date Nazurd Stah PCA No. Es odilures Datc ID Ea �eodilures Couoties Affttted Dexri Nioo .. Fi��,as; <u�dr mm a.mH � m.� n�wa �.mia a�o� w� w� �o �zs i„�nn. oraN �� �y �aaa orn�:o�. Fa<�� �aa�. r.om.��c.o,a� � aoomre �o��w 2/21/1966FIoodin 7FIashFloodin � $13.67304/30/66 2l7-DR $3236,221GraMm.G�eenlee.Mariwa,Pima.Pinal ���rm�a,�wxr���n�to.����_. 6/IS/1972�FIoodin /FlashF{oodin� $I6.I5807/03/72 3i3-DR $I0,87Y.W2 Marico� PimaP�ml m��em,�.�t��nu��n dYZB/1973 Wildfire $36.71R Statewide � 1/7/]971 Servicelnlertu tion � � $II9.028 SWtex'ide t��o��sn�mnRe 1Y22/1975 Wil�rc SRg23 Sta[ewide 9/2/1977 Infeslauon State�vide �e�•=a�=��+aad��a���� . �x-sw: r.w��+�sw�r�w�.�.,�,�mr��mr�orm:.Vr.��.�a,n��rcn�oams+��m<s.m,c���as.�r<aNw���m.���¢.<u<.�a:.�w�i�o��.�n..�w�em�s�u . . � ��rv.r.�.� N� rvi,..�....�n��R ���: aW.n,.se a�a E��w �� a a� x a u�nm,...���x a�, a� rv�;rvieno�.,m�w�. �w:�,.>w �,�earWmuMtrnw� ,�e,..�rc�� �w.�aw<.w...irvr,mu;w,m enue.. nawnsa.mns<mAm>, lU/9AY77 Tro iculSronn/Huricene S29S322 Il/OJ/77 SJO-DR� Pima.Pinal.SantaCruz w��a,.,�as,m�c.�co�e�. � � ll'arm rtmpera�wce accompvtied L�' lu:a�y rvn I"Jlcd rtnmoin CchinE all o(�I�e Ovnr on �Im ]al� vu1 VaJe Hivna md (wced laba volwux ofwwlf io bv rcleanW. lltia aa Ilu: lugexi Oaw ul waer Juwn iM1e Salt nixa Ib91. 1Te relea'ed wa�.x ovuAaweJ ilu cFamcl vW Ilrotl�tl rcvdn�tial mn aM IsmJm�e. Duriryy Ne nune penod iux pasni�g mvr �Au swc uwW Oaah Oaotlin6a�G daVUCYmi. 9.53 i�u:My ofniNill occwredauMl I.emmon. (NeNows ol �AU Gta IUVer �Iw�W �wcanuW . IM0.20M a�reu of IwMad'ui SWTa�d Velley.lNc RIIIIW C�eeA, Ponla�o and Tanquo Vadv Crv�W In Tuena� xme ma badiWl. ToW Jamvgu wm ry�proxMawly 565.9 . � nullion.ofwkchYlJmiWUnwa�annbwedwM1iariwVaCOwu�'aloM.Tlwu�andcothmezwuedamag�dvu1l16M1mnenweredesv�'edAimeiha�],OWproplvludw � n�.n.airaa.�a row n=�d= ws� im:v ti��e.. � e��!.m�oow rw��n -mr «m� �.�n:.m�.��. � m�wi.,�., ���nn aw w,� �rvn«dc. ns �w�. �ww x wk�: so�. Exo-.,aa.ao� or�ae�uny-n�n,nu�y mm: s.rs : � �.!zan�.w�+kfim.,uwr...�o�.nw��wwuora�«w�a���ve�mw.�uw�m.w�oa�dw�<�.��amaR������.rm dxooccwrcdduuyiaiyutioucunelnwnmNSfUnofmaimarva,andalw�yvibuun�reofNvC.IlallivuraMQueenC`uot. LdooNcuunp�viJc.TOWUamagccosb:SJ] � milliw:T3.lmi14un-RViJnnia1,Y16mJlion-public,&Imilliw�-a�ivWUUC,E).nmiWOmintlunmal,$O.ISmY4wrcommerviil. "kloodllvwycR�ym528FeMUery6 3/2/197%Floodin /FlashFloodi $-1R5,71A03/Ol/7R 351-DR $(7.122.627 Statewide mu.:nis�xo�iw.��.oeaooa�mn�.,�:ow.�wry,M=�^.�%�.�c���ce�r<n,co�n���a.m�trcrm�ctimeyeauz.ou. Jl21/1978 Wil�re S1I.52% S4cewide tl/3Uh97x PriwnProblcm $i25 Stare���ide �'�»m��+rc+A . rdi����x mr.w���k a�w���. ,�;W�.,,.�.. m� n..a.�,m �� ��.,�n„ �b�nzmn. r�in oRd�v��� �.� wm ie.a w�� i ��n ��� me �ow�vmm Nar:� s�wna��.iem � �n;a� �r,�,�. �� ��� �o m�n� �� uw M.miw nw�um� �wnn�.,s� onro��. n uB�.,�.-o or� ��im �ow�nvo. re�.w �ro. s m�n.�. ��h: �»m� onn� GJa, ]dt V�erdc, Akua Friq UN N'Ytisy m4liule Calarado Hiven, an wcll an a mvnbm W niajor vibwnex, e�pen�xed vnµudly laryc JinuAub�n. �� �W��g �ax � wiN �he mw� siy�ufic:xt damaGCe ivcluded Ne I�tYo HollywuuA Uiurict nca SaRwG vM majorportiwis ofUUm:an, CliQOq Wwluw, and 0.'Ytiams.INmngm were � mated et ii9.B50,qp. �0 Ycople die and �howa�r.uc Ivd M1umel�nn. Sevcrc Jamege �o mrJe anJ briJgex. t'm Aluriwpa Cowuy, i Geuly 5�6.3 mYtion-puNiv aM SS � milllon�nyncW�we loxnax extimamd �"Floud Damryc R�R yon, I'AOU�ux Nleu'updila� Are. Oecemba l9)b YIoW', Nwembcr 1919, II.3. Tmry Corys ofEve&�wan, 12/16/I978.Floodin /Fl;iehFloodiu $19U9.1Y812/21f78 570-DR $113,561.122 Sta[cwide rivaicA.mv�rs�`xnz.on7 � J/l6/1979 Wit�re S20;,2U7 Slatewide 8/21/IY79 Discase $58 Pima ����P�a 9/25/LY79 Haz.a�dousMaterialsh�cident SI.11S.7U2 Pima ��+��1��a�� 6/2/1980 Wil�re $29%.Nii Smtm�ide 7/6/U80 SearohandRescue SN.305 Pima s.��,r.n�arz.��.«�R,ew,�xa�;s..ameT�,k.rrx�u�.oaurydimw��ou 3/31/IY81 Ha7aMousMalerialslncidenl $i92.635 SWtew�de � G/26/1981 Wil�rc SW[eWlde 6l3U/IY81 Wildfire $236,901 � Sta[e���ide 6/30/19R2 Wildfire � $i'J2.G35 SlelcN'ide ITS auNmn Floods of IYN3. impicW niwm e�ma'vu. inuluJmg Nwe frvvn Ilwiauw (%UVe, camn�heovy ew� ov�w.lrieo�w MwyS e IO-Iww Pe�lod BouNemt.4rizwa an }'avapai aMAloM�a Cowum arc pNCWatly 1rardAit Svvurc llmdiry5 ocvwN N Twnun Clifwn aW SaQaeL Pounwn fa�alitiun aod 9)5 inj�ei� wcrc uuibweO �o �I�e Ilwdi�. Ai Icae� lpN� Amm�mn wxre IeH le�rymmily Iwmcluex. Uamage uuma�cJ a� S3I0 million in �oJay's val�e (2001). Recwd walerlwda in �he ]uma ('rur, (:ila, San Pvv4u vul San Framiw:.o Rivere cono-ibu�edlo M1ea�}' �lwiling Nai�wide. (:rceNx Cuunq' wm Nt MM. Pomagev in Cli�lon alo�w werc overT20 miliion rvhe�e Mohave.A ache,Yava ai,Gila,Gratiam,Gree�dee.Pinal, 'vw".""'mus+�n�.;��.�wrRu.,w>m:�a�.��z.i�n�enn�ann��ea.wra<am��.umwx<..in�:c�mo�:wnw.,��m��r,u:smeem�w5m:�m� P P n,rev..,m�y�arv�re��i�zm�..rn�.�.�.�aWen�usor.;u<a.,�ti��wvro��.•=w.ye�re.m���ne��a,oa��s.a��dawm�mu;u<.�:n<adnayse 912R/19R3 Tro icalStom�/Huricane $863283 IU/Oi/83 $13.436.L4R PimaSantaCnu.Coclrisc,Nacao �nmm�,nr s�n�a�,��. 03A7/1987 Wil�ee EUZSLD Slalewide �w�a�aeha�w�w�m 03/3UIY8"/ Hazarclo�sMaterialslncidenl Slalex�ide OR/12/19R7 Dcou ht EUZ7AU $13.911 Mariw a.Pima.Pinol swin.+�nd�o+d.a l2/21/IY8%Misecllaneous EUZHTS $129.G2{ SWfeN�ide mnrrsim,�,w�..snnom 03/17/IYYU Wil�re EUFIR Shulewidc �wwn�wrr��u�srMr � Mohave,Gila,Pima,Pinal,Ya��apai,GralumCoco�wro. �„��,,,a,��,,,,;,,,�,,,,,�w 0`)N7/19Y0 Floodin /FlashFloodin EUZ90] $1.175.0+40 l2/OGI'lU 883-DR $5.875202 Marico a � �a�an<..��aaa��.�.. inreru.�e.w�:mai. 6l25/1992 Nliscella�reous 1200A Statewide �a���h�� wuyy Imuary a�d kiJauvy IY93, wiiuerrtln d�vding damage nccumd fiom wu�ter xiwms asnuvutcdwiN iM1e EI Nino Vhe�rvmenai. Theac+lomn Iluoiie�waknhe6u � Nrvugl�owAnz�n bvdumpngcx rvofallv�awusWat wa�NeaJavWin aeWwwR.t mclivwcnlwkvitl�cs <rlary5�art ug P'iw uxadvemaWomdama �o aadongnomullYdl'wadwewreEavaxLyW.Y ��Wudhinw�I��Llyp�. hlanytloodYmenYUnchainelaandre�ie� rcxerv B win3exrc�uiueJemagein+omecaen(e.g.,YVmedRoc4Nesm.�Wrepillway). Ntiwwttty,�MPrcniduuJeclereJamjmfe4rd�4xu�erNa�6eedfetleNfiw&�'mWiM1 public and pnra[c ryop�rlY louen (or ell nfAniwa'e tiHem couMes. Dama6un wae wWeeprtaA unC xigrvficanl, impncYng �n'er IW commxuY<s. Twal P�w a�W O1/08/1993 Floadin /FlashFloodin 930U3 $30,072,157 Ol/l9/Y3 Y77-DR $10A.069.362 Staten�de r ���nioa.�o.���amwoumuuo�n�wo@m�.,ueom�a�ywes�wa��re�.,n<aem<xeac.oe.0�umu,apa�,�sva;aoeMm�a,�vvs�. 09/09/I9Y3 Wil�re 91002 S2W.000 Spte�cide suawlmwaar �v.esd�-smo�.�a�p.nmom 10/l;/1991 Wildfirc 'ISOU3 $6W.W0 SWicm�ide �w�w<k�rv �����xv�m=��� 03/l3/I9Y6 Infes[a�on 9G003 $796.156 State�vide �a��k���w� � - OS/l6/1996 Wil�ro 9W04 SI.WU.729 S�ste���ide w<�ao..aar .��w-si.,���aa;ponm�b O6/1Y//1996 Drou ht 9G005 $211A9Y SWtewide UI/20/I999Infestatlon 9Y(101 $177.702 SWtewidc xea���w�near�.�.���r��r � OS/06/199Y WildFire 99U01 $3.891 Slatex°ide w�w��,.um.�aw:<m��oo>. Historic State and Fedcral Disaster Decia(alions Page 1 of 6 Pina Counly Multi-JurisAictional Ha� ard Miligation Plan SMCeoYArizooaDttluration Dama EslimaYi:s Dafe Huard Fatali[iu lo'uriee Pro ceT Cm �/Li��estock Tnml Sourcer Huarvl Gwk U� 2/2J/196G Floodin �/ Flash Floodin EU ADEM. 2008; Tucsoi� NWS, 2008 a� hlt ://n��cm�.�crh.noan. or/hcc/h �dm/Iloodhis. h: Ploodin / Flash Floodin 6/15/1972 Floodin / Flash Floodin Y8 noU,oVO 58,UOU,000 ADEM. 2V08 Floodin �/ Flash Floodin � 4YL8/1973 WildCim � � � SUADEM,2UU% Wildfice 1/7/1Y73 Sen�ice luterru tion � 30 ADEM. 200R Se�vice Intcrtu lion 4/22/I'J7i Wi1Mrc 3U ADEM.20U8 WildFire H/2/1Y?7 [nfestatlon 50 ADEM_20U8 Disensc IU/)/1'Y77 Tro ica1S[ocm/Huricanc SU,200000 $15,20�000 ADEM.200R;TucsonNW5.2008athtt J/e�s�c.wdi.noaa. ov/L�vGhydro/[loodtus. I� Floodin /FlashFloodin ADEM.200k, TucsonNWS.2U0Natht[p://wutirnrrh.no:w.gov/nrc/Irydro/11ooNiis.php; AFMAFIOOdHappens, 3/2/t978Eloodin�/FlnshFloodin 4 $(i.Y0U,0U0 565,900,OOOFa1L2UO3 Floodin•/FlashFloodin i/21/U78 Wildfire 50 ADEM.20US Wildfire I I/3U/1978 Prisofi Problem 50 ADEM. 200R Pnsm� Problcm ADHM.2UOft; Tucso�WWS.2U08athttp:/hcww.w��h.noaa.govft��cPoydm/Ooodhis.php; AFMAFIOOdHnppens, 12/IG/1978 Floodin�/FlashFloodin� lo 539,Sio,000 83�.RSO,o00 Fa112003 Floodin /FlashFloodin 3/16/197Y WiIM�e go ADEM.20U8 Wildlire 8/21/U79 Disease 50 ADEM, 2008 Discuse 9/25/197') Hazallous Mnteriuls Incident $0 ADEM, 2008 Hazardous Materiuls Incideu[ G/2/IDRU Wil�rc $o ADEM.20UR Wildlirc 7/6/1980 Seamh nnd Rewue 50 ADEM_ 200R Seuch and Rescue 3/3Ul')Sl Haza�dous Marerials lncident 5o ADEM. ZOON Haz�cdoua Materials Incideut 6/2G/1)81 Wil��c $0 ADEM.2U11R Wildlirc 6/30/I981 Wil��e So ADEM.2U0% Wildf e 6/30/tv&2 WiINre $0 ADEM, 200R Wildf e 9Y1R/1J83 Tro icalStonn/Huricane l4 97> 5370,oW,oOO $370,000,000 ADEM.2008 Floodin /blashFloodiu� U3/17/19%7 Wil��e $U ADEM.20U8 Wildfire 03/3I/19%7 H,�zacdous Mmecials Incidenl 50 ADEM. 2U08 Ha�aMous Materi;Js Incident OS/12/19%7 Drou�ht $0 ADEM.2008 Dro� I�l � 12/21A9%8 Miscellaueous $n ADEM.200R Miscellancous 03/17/IY9U Wil�re � $0 ADEM.2U�8 Wil�re U9/07/1990 Floodiu �/ Flash Floodin 3 So ADEM, 200R Eloodiu �/ Flash Floodin • 6/25/19Y2 Miscellaneous $0 ADEM,2U08 Miseellaneous Ol/OA/19H3 Floodin�/FlasliFloodin 8 172 5330,UOU,o00 57qlwo,000 84W,00qo00 ADEM.2008 � Floodin /FIas6Floodin 0')/oY/LY93 WildCue 50 ADEM,20o8 WiIdC c IO/Il/1993 Wi1Mre �0 ADEM.2008 Wi1dGre 03/13/L9H6 InfeaWtlon $0 AUEM.200R Disease OS/16/199G Wildflrc YoADEFL2WN Wildfire 06/07/199G Drou h[ $U ADEM. 2008 Drou �ht OU20/1999 Infestalion $0 ADEM, 2008 Diseuae OS/06/1999 Wil��c 50 ADEM.200R Wildfire Hismric Sla[e and Fcdernl Disaster Declarauons Pa�;e 2 of C Pima Cowu}' Mulu-ludsdicuoml Hnvard Mitigalion Plan State of Arvooa DeJxratloo Fedcral Pr yiJeotial Declaration Date HuaM StatePCANa Ex nditurey Date ID Ex eoditum Coun[ieYAtTectal Dexrirtion rr.e v9Mw: su�<im �n��anic�uqs�TCy, cec�.rca �wa z3, �9YV: Lnd oeo��rhatw� naas��ry5owy mamea emuoa vulyfawa ww�, auwu<x uia.veam ao�... TheJr��c mWagcrc .prupmYanGli�x ackoftlu:u a. Tlua oclama u�Ambevn cnJNlol OOl.aniM1iai nulla - ' uofAeizon ' Yrc�unJngdlwtimUSO.\Pmefu�o�IRr.1 auRanclmnUau��R{�f,�lfiondr)�PCdunoPualailtiawnknrvww�ud�Iwepraga�mduBiynud�oaneNaimpac � ufNivne'edrou��m� ra�uM1i�iMwq�vWWex wWrc e.Cuv.laielh:eliWlu�1 ucdrJrv��ileclua wihv�e eii�a . � . . ' ' ' ic.lwl fWVrtl roviaw�aocaa tlut cW�mwuiu� in iXC II.S. DqwXman o AvycrMwtiwi W� �izww ny}icWtum caWJ 4��fylor Nouphl as�ixuncv- 1M Idlowing ar M1riefdanaiPUmu'ofiAUilwnawaisu��cc0 �a5�nfarwlueF.�i�mu�anchunmaY9�lln':'monranclonyuporatia�s�Iw�wtiu�Utixymrrc4uca�M1crdxiz<s�onspuuvlo ywr puiurc condiumn m�d Ixk ol wakr Jue m Ne Nou�l can m�ivu capiul yaim �ar JeCCmu:M if Ihwc lu:rds x rvplaccG wi�itin M�o 1��, acwMinp iu iAC InicmW ue. Y is recommendN Nai Iwi�esva �wuW� Weirla� xP�cia4z� ar ihe IR� fm IuMvr �cwla. For mo�c i�Jum�mioq conwe� lue I.me, Axmua�c (%rcc�w af �wmdSVnricvaDi�ixion.a�(N12�SSL36n.lML'5U.1NawilNe.wwceComuera eeM1UnceivMmi�WialS6mJliwJuougJ�iivEme�g�nryWaleeahed Ymyrem (F,WI') io uea� Nrv�- v�d luy5-�mm Jamayc i� rnyulvM vW croylaud duc �o dmuyM. RancM1Cn andlwmen w�r�.�ai�c lireuid mue�ume lo Imylrn�nn recov � wvr �Au� �vill rcwJ rwud mdreduce Ihe Juue� offu�urc llaoNny anG erwim�iuzirM1r. F�rmmc iN�rtmatiut coMact \til:c SmmmuvJle. S�a�e Conerv'aUmtis4 a� [H2) 2XU-NBIO.'11w:lISOA Fum Sarviws Agancy Mx umuyuncy druu�� annlntcnca luvis avaJablo. kormaru � �ma4m4 wn�a�.Y Caorga —0ando, U9D�U'FSA SI'eta Exuculiv<Oircc�m.al(L1121W0.5RW..1 m'nNyx�MerandlownwwpackmallYMWCIedNnsiMe'xroncl�inylnGUktryUUaloppm�uPVecm�iiu�.Swmmavw Iuvn improvW mngulaMn Woo�oW An Aw Amordiny �u �M1O USDA Anzona Aa,�'cvl�ued S�mi.+tiea eerv�ov, ae o[AUg. 1; rango aM pm�wr uunAtiui� wae rcpune� an p:nrnt puor.21 µrv.�n fav.39 pucrn� 6�A �. µrcmt uavcllcm.,U mw:h ae 99 perce�V of,�ii�ms'e v�ups an irtigurq ycnerell)' mitiepw� shonimn drw�t 6/23/199Y Drou ht 9'JWG Slatm�idc Me��a- GIICA�IAN DLCI.ANIi3 PI:NNSYI.V�MA, Lt AW10N{ ('OIIM'IY:S AD IJISAS fTR AIt[AS ANO ANNOUN('CS AODI'RONAI, pROl1OIIT A9SIS'fANCE kel�aDeNO.0)3i.99,14'.YSI¢r'(:l'OV.�1uy�d13.IM9 AgncWwreS�x�c�u��OUn(:IicAmwioJa��JvclarcdallaflYmiS)'Waoaam113�iwnuesinAnzwav ayneW�wtlAxaa��aaremJUC�oJrou�t'ITvMCIUaYimmsAUf uminJ�acarcanvMallww6w"�"����icseli�blvfwemergrncylowtinhres�loa�svWo�hu IuhulPcovarlorscrfiwnNVJroupht InNle.ow,lotlaY'xdnvxi�JVelvationyipliuvloAW�.�^�tinFCawNm.GlliCxuM1am,t'�maNnaM � �lohrvu. u.Nma.ILUI.� uCw �4}'u� ..11eueliyiWe.4w:aweNeS' andYum tic6mmAanilruAy A ache.Cochise.Cownino.Gil.�.Gralam.Greenlce, emi r�. . c 4e �i 4 � � N w�.n r- � v� a �� �,.m.�ia.�..� �om�n�: P I�c. pro�imi�y w iAc . n tif mia Ud:nvart, LiJian4 tiemucky., W achuev is, A4.hgan NevaJa Motle IaWM \�e�m�nq a�ul I-�+h.Leo 8/13/1999 Dmu ht OR/13/9H USDA Marico , Molave. Nava'o. Pima. Pi�al, Sania Cmz Yuvli ai u�� ro�nm�+�x���r��� �+�%� .�� OS/L6/1999 Floodin /FlashFloodin 2W01 Pima cwmyn�,nnooao�..cn�=y UI/US/2000 Sen�ice Intertu tion 21N105 523.073 Slatc«°ide Y�F C.LI(xblAN DECL,\Bf:9'1 ANVANA COIIMIY.] AGRICULTURAI, DI3.4SIitR Alth:.�e: K'mNmgron, ]Wy 1'1, 2MN� � Ap�icWiwc Socrvwry Oen CdlcWw� IWay IucJu nuf:�n 'sl5awo uvaldina� xduewOeough�.m �ef nJ�m� avvWt?iceiyhbon me�uJirySCw�n inUlaM1, co amI C'oluraJO, etipiFle frt emeB��Y low-im�tuxt loaro. "Mmm�n aW rnu:hers m An �nu aev cayeneming real NOicWtie��A e Year Jue �o drouyM,' aaid �i�'.tic4man. "I.SUA emuyune)' IoxJmercst lome me a�'v4vble w M1eIP W�� � ewn aomc ol �Ae'v lueeun." (:Gclman'e Ciran�er Oev'IaraYOn vovm ) of.4iewa'n l5 �:,lpavhq c'u.M1iu, (:rWUm, c'aeadeq Yima, ILW wW SanuCiuc Four oNm cwtiyuuw An�uw cowtin al�o ve cm'ered q ilu: decluauw (('.J; A4ncope, Na�ajo anA Yumal mW IM1C�d'orc me cllgibla fm No xvne bunoGie. (NAacanti6W� aaunYen in New Maxico u�c Gvw, CIMIq Cmv�l, Ititlalgq �ici:'uJuy, avd Sa�lwn ur.5an luan wuniY � U�M vW �4rnleruma ww�i� in Lolundu aee i�uludvJ in �RC declaa4im as contixWLL+cow�ien.litis denignaYUnmaAo'v�difiW GmilY+izW fam� iv�oN�xinuryaiE:aW �exeliyjblcfinemerymcYlow ntlouuGumL'S�APwm meliyjWec uAa�� ci�imomhrroapylY�ar IwmuFZCh luun applicatiun in e�mxldcrtd o LL iia w.n mcmq iekiryy i�uu xcoW�l liw n.teut oflo�uaa xcuelry avalleNa, ropnYmm� abJity, and uiher e1ipJEilit>' ic9Nmneiuc ll5p,\ W�uiousl>' apyrv�ed cmeryrnc3 M1a>ing a�W greunK M ��nxrv'aYOn Renerv'e Program acreayv. proviGny avnisunre b opprovM p'uducv�e wl�oae P���e M bee Apacl�e. Cockiise. Graham. Grccnlcc. Pima. Pi�ul. Smue Ctui, �«Mm.a M e�,� N. eo. r�nnu wo�ano�. r.mu:n �r=wani m�o- io�a e� s�;« a �d=� o�.��� wrndm� 072I12U00 Dmu hl 07Y21/00 USDA Gila Mariw a Naca'o. Yuma nnv��iwww.�.��+.+w�r�n.�a. wJcmw wmplvrdevulopvOw �wMwea. `u�.n�aCOw unGmveGloNemuWv�dx�whwentlTeNUnJerslmmiMuudyusiliuv�a� er60 mi eust�aw<dwidcxprvadeleclncpowerou�ayeain�hv(rila0e�ularweoWhW.�joinww�tKmal'wuuy.InNeimmeNateciJaeeMxa,ih'utyu�t 2lOM� p�l��a JowM4 ��d Jirtyviwe bYkv polen Jow�6 A subsvuw� wax damagcG m well an �cleplim�v lives. Thu reponW wirvlywt nf66 knxs wex recwded a �M: [:Ja SmdmwuciWl vryan a102i5. An Ne b�� �N movW fuNer�o ihu wuN aud swNU�s�. a u�W of Iw Pox'cr ryla wem Ww-n overa� �upuneA by �M1e.lrizena WLtic 0%/l7/20U1 Thmiderslortn/Hi hWind 22001 $II805 Marico a.Pima ;.�.emom�r��R��+=���m�wn��u�i�sm��.. 3 c�0��� fvmonun Inudcm, lh�vud S.kP���r 12.21N�1: Tmona� anxAn iN1iuW u� variaw laauwu acrmx No UvwJ Siuns poweJ xirytificatl �hrca� �o We ci�iz�m 9/12/2001 Terrocism 22002 $3A70.3270Y/12/OL Sptewide orws��w�,� IO/16/2001 Terrorism 22003 $7,32t Statewide ���nwwnx=�a 'E�E1L\N UCSIGN,\I!S NtIZnNA.�vS DRUU41fT I�IS.{y'�}K utF..\, (:m��mor IfWI a�d Vcum:m'COw I�irc Nc.w aM Ansess Damayc in I'rcxcoi� Natiwul �mes� .�: rxotn�.e,.v�... wy i�, zaa—.+x��w�w.�. s,:��mr nM a� v<��.o ��r d:v m� mu.. dm. ornn,oti �.. a.��� �e.uk..,rc> �. acm��,uo� OS/17/2002 Dmu ht ��A7/02 USDA State�cide ma4mndwmbnnereanamnchzrsimnaJimelyWiaFlcfuvUSDdemc�ymcy(vmlowuduowlosxeoawWbyINaugM1�tlusyw�. J�o, uu�Finhl�epvunantpiew ncyM1anm�ilwlmpmu noftivaM1oo[adaumils(e.g.,Ot<ranYCLL)LhoAnwu aro[CM1nrwe 5/IS/2002 Disease Stnte�vide u��o:.�.��tew�y ewmm�v.�,ked�.�.n�ioanw��aoowmti..��t��,�uo.w.�.�+owa��o�w��vn�aewm�are,.r.m�.�a��u. N�UNI'ES F.!iPANSION OF CRI`E\�rt�:0.4ENCY tL\11M: AND CR,1'/IN(: PItO(:RMtyUR µ'tqTHF.R-5"fIUCALN STAIES, WASIW(ZUN, JWy� Am A1. Vmemu� �udav ryqov<d t%nu�v�n for Cmuuvatiw� Itr.verve Proylam untt�v�Y �S�Y �� P��6 �a�ewide, maki�g ill CNYpaticipantainN�nenuMnbaaull}'eli•yldefw�luuemoge�u�.rmcmwv. VrnemuialxouidUSOAwilluvwrmWrc�uvYOnfeenwmcowagedwwtio�afluyiu Cvmen v�d nnJwn in immv&at� mcd "Ihou�Rt md xevurc wmtlu� c�n�Jiuonv have MWnal luy ulocks vW gazing Ivwis aww �M1e cuwury,"xvd l'vmnan. "Ifiis apryoaal PN�iJCx imm<�timv reticf iu tiv�.viak V��rn and encwuayca �retiuns o[Ray fo producen xlw �w:d immuAiai� aryixmnu"11� I%apprm'eJ xla�cs ue: ColmaJu, 4eu�yja.IJaho. Kmnaq �tirviwoy �iwilm; Ncbrvvk; Ncx� �Ievco, NmN Caroli�u �YmW UaVuiq OIIaLums SouN Cardw, SouN IJako�; Tc.uu, Ilwli, Vvyytia and W'y�mwg.�WLON.4 F.UNffRJ PACINC CATASIRtiPilt... A'�vu�a olGtlaln ue a,�inS �+� � Imwa 5om iM liaee�od imlus%alone IaAYear 07/IIY2002 Drou ht 07/ll/OZ USDA Stalewidc wwno�ww,�dornrw�wM.... . �xrveenw�es�c*�r�escouNneuwnwzoN,�c.weoiw�n,'resnsewvuccm�.a�sorsns�xeaxEns,��mo�wow,r��a�ak��n�nm R�xeiv� Fiucgu�cy Faem Lw�u: l4'ASFON6T(M, JWy Itl, 2UO2—In wmuwi� eQOna �oe�0�d�<emnyemy duae�cr decla�miwu in arean Iti� M1arG Ey aMers<weulLer . candiumu..lkncWU�m Saniuy :\nn hl. VnKman �a0.m�' deuyvkd cuwuo in.�izwy c'atifunu; iewix wW 4'ifgirva o agricWnval Aaex�vt arcn. llrin daig�ution mel:dGnn�uWruncherowi�hloxnaimmWi�uulY���blcfwllp'DAame�cnc�'(ETnfamlwuw. llproa�dafummvWw�chcnwiwM1 � mw:h nw:dW .naixuro� �o arovtt Wm �Ixxe wecal Jinaxim,"eaid Veneman "N'e <omimw �u uWitt all e.w�iuy auihuntia io proHde relief for x'calMralneFin area." 07/iR/2002 Drou�n 07/18/02 USDA Marico a.Pima.Pinal inlhel'ohono0'ONiamNalion mM�.nmd�ow,i�m,�an�i�ow�u«�ureraiw��aoewmN��w��.m<ap���yaw.�varea.e�ei�m��.0 r�re.� nr.imem���n�r -.u,.wm �rme o�-s�x �� ���n�� m� m�ia..smN ow nwe n,�e n.� mro�on a;m u� �v� x,n u�..xm. im� mo a.ma�o�.�u 5/Z/2003 WildCre 23003 $2,37K.020 Statewidc wom«w� rucson , �;.��a, �a h� �nc.w.owyw.h,. �� nwma abno,cre. taa3 w��� orL+oe. aoa aewrm�•alxo nomo. enu n�.;uvcr. orm� �,�wn orsummUnm���. u:m+y<. w 6/l9/20U3 Wil�a 23003 $L1RIA8l 7/11/2003 1177-DR $5.9117.51Y/ Pima.Pinal d��ww..d�a�-� ��+�=�romu�..�.nre�uam�.��mw<esa.i�w�mu,^,.Etr<a�w��on�w�.e�wsn�W�,a��am�eW��a,����..,a.,w���sz.� )/23/2001 h�fesC�tion 25003 519712L I.aPnz,Piuw,SaufaCruz,Yuma Mw�a��+�e.e�ayem�wa�y The JailY ��at w puM14c M1eilN mO Wep' Wm Ihe guµ�,., vo>'uns md o�uax ��aycJ N dury5awn cnmwl azu�iun ix uwxewg vW.lrizu�a van mlo�crx'vtfar Mc fiwWrd yoa'vmmu�t �o du Ihu'vjoU. This Gativa�on dlows iha xtatn vgc�wius an� lucd yuvammwn wl�ltin tlrt aoWNax aECOOl�isq Pim> Svuu Crvz vuI Yumn ro pa[mm 8/15/2W5 BordcrSeeuritv 2GU01 $1.500AfH1 Cocltiu,Pima,SanlaCfur Yunw =�iemm..uii���e���MU,��au<..�a��«p�w�ndm.�ae,r��y.�w�w<en�nuowno.aR. H/3/2005 Misr.ellaneous 2G003 Y/l2/2U05 32i1-EM 55.121.732 Smlewide e,�«vx.iu.,w����wm���uQ�aa��m�.�i��ow�.orr�w�.,�wrnuw �a, za�s �.a�� z3, zas w.,�». n.ny .a� �,�<e s;�w:�,m am�� �� omu� w.a.wccu�.� uw�om nm. c„�. m<s«�.w��rRama N � Jamageaw raaib,o-adcli¢�qwa�awAfieldn,4cmmn,cmxungn,a�dpo4cevrluvlm.:llMruu'amimhufnin&IlacrwsaluyeW��ofllrel'uwonM1fetra n.e., �� i�.e �»unmor� w� iw� ekm, ae��r.i n„m u«.o„<n�aea. ���.e4,�a;mv�:,d�. m,m�eM m,n uu now.a �o,awnye,.r��ra vw<. mmee ��no . muM.�wn�n�wo�orin�r�d�onmwnr�:..wo�.nowmanmkw.�wxauydw,s ar�.�.�.w+mn=�x�,�we�.r.�e�q��x��no�e.uao�ierw,.nw 9/1(2005 Flood" /FlashFloodin� 2(Wi $25G.9�8 Pima rn+n,k:ne�a,wwmk.a.,aw,y.�,�.����e<�,�,w..,wo. ima�rn.�r �z zinw, � cW-�w y:d:��a,o.,�RS=My a� m� a��� ww.. ��..�.o.eeam.ma w�ma.�m.n„o�..��x= ��w�+an�.,�a� e,m�� rc�om<a �.;iarR �.��wa �u�.i�oaM�w��.'vaurex�arm.rnezws. w;�ati«m<���� u.�aRw�a,anuww .bn m, �.ro .ww w e um �.ow�e a r�nm.wiwn �rn> a�i..,� w%;a�a s:w.aw r�ep<�ew����na�wus �o �ne nn�oo. avw �w um.nm�i. oa«orsiazu xm<.m.,w �w n,;�ow ud.�w 2/22/2006 Wil�re 26W6 $192.3Y0 S�nle���ide orEm�euynu�as�n�a � Histodc SWte and Federal Disaster Dcdarauons ' . Page 3 of G Pinm County MuI6-Jurisdicuonal Haracd Miugalion Plan Stah nf Ariznna Dularutinn Dama e Estimuh:v � Date Hnzard Fatalities ln'uries Pro xm Cm dLivestock TnWI Sources Hazard Lm�k U � 6/23/19Y9 Dmu �ht g�U ADEM. 2008 D�w �ht R/13/199') Drou �ht iu ADEM, 2008 Dron ht 0&/16/19yy Fluodin / Flash Floodi� $0 ADEM.2008 Floodi �/ Flash Floodin 01/US/20�0 Scn•ic.. Lnerru tion � �o ADEM.2�U8 Sen�ice Intenu tion U7/21/2000 Drou �ht go ADEM. 20U8 Droo �ht ADEM, 2U08 UN/17/2UOIThundeatom�/HihWind 2 S23qooa g23o.000NCDC,2UU8 SevercWind 9/72Y21101 Terrorism $0 ADBM, 2008 Tenorism lU/16/2U01 Tcrrunsm go ADEM.2UOft Tecronsm Oi/17/2VU2 Drou ht $o ADEM.2008 Drou �Irt 5/18/201Y2 Discusc $0 ADEM.2008 Discasu 07/11/2002 Drou ht � $3ooA0�000 $30oDOq0oo ADEM.2008 Drou hl 07/lR/ZUO2 Dro� ht 5U ADEM.2008 Drou hl 5/2/2003 Wil�re ,�oADEM,2008 Wildfiro 6/192003 WildlSre $3x,IO0p(Nl �38,l00,00o Wiki �dia.2008aG hu ://en.wiki in.o �ciki/As en Fire Wil�re 9/23YL00� Infesiafiou �o ADEM.2V08 Diseasc 8/15l2W5 Bocdec5ccurilr $0 ADHM.2008 BorderSecueitV 9/3l2UO5 Misccllaneooa go ADEM.200R Miscellaneous ADEM, 200R 9/16YL005 Floodin�/FlashFloodin $11U,000 �IIU,OOO NCDC,20U8 Floodu �/FlushFloodin 2/22Y2006 WildFire ,�o ADEM.200R W���j� Historic Stale and Federnl Disastec Declawtions Page J of 6 Pima County Multl-Jurisdicfional Har.�rcl Mitigalion Plan State of Ari�ooa Declaratioo Fedcral Pn.vidcotial Declaratiuo Date Hazanl StatePCANn. E: �nditures Datc ID Ex�eoJituns CountieeAff�hd Dea�.ri�tion . � l:la�a�'.wineeQnlu�xlwmcriNix�atiw�-1Tc(Aa�S-u'�tleJShupxMUtaixalnown�vcwrolrl'ellaf iiAOU.aM1anena�datcau+cxe���dvcmvsvucM1:xl'icne's Nee.ue ofp{ay�x, almw�d laafxuurcq nlFulfu awar[ WcaMVr ka(scmch, v�d ci�u �migmud cWorvnlx, iRO� IFrcawnNn vieFJiry� o[w'�m, uws vd oiM1ut yyiwl�uril unG halleWYVtl in�unNaa ax wWl es public IaWecvpcx.'liu Glmn�'-���eO hv M1evn duwcied'u� Nizow i� e nma� 1sMa�ed IaLimi in �hecity o[Siuno Viaiu, Coek'ae lwxry. 6/23/2006 [MCSlation � 26W8 §713.W0 Cochise_Marico a,Pima.Pinel.SanmCm�a,Yuma 'rno.m.�.+���v���a�or.a�w�w.n„sce�r�o��e�u�e000-=p.,mN�mMSM�r.am�w�s��sn�wn�m�.. � � �.�.�..�.a�,.��r�.miew<.<ew«:ny<n�rre.e�.a��en��.u�a�a�nov�oaor�wyxs��.a��.�a,z�.s �a�d.���w�a . � a�oew�iwy.ii.xw�.m.�wm�ow�«nWareuamw��m.�.um���,�wn.m:a�w..nws<now�a.e.,�ae�r�u.�,w,:xu�ww.«w�w�rrwm:rwiiwcen.�or � m� sa.,n xo.a u�ee�. x��e x�a��<u �., «u, x�,a �.m nw�u�s G� � xm�w w.�<.. au�� cre�..,, �w �� �i. ww� a�ano�ee H<.� nooaea ��. s.m��o � and HearCary'on. R iw' is a liwung ofsume uf�he Jamaye. M1ut wl all. cau+eJ LJ' Ne �]oWiny and an e�imve 6rihe u�n� o[ rcV+u": SaN�w CanY�� Rarcauon a n roW and tau4ry damaguq SIUO.OW kun> Mmen mE Fu.ws'aes �loWe4 51,3q1,OW (T�e Aumc M«vy'ed Gue In �1WJin& S150,fNp Wa�r mvn beu4 �u:ar Ne AI�. I<mnon Itighx�a1', 8?O.UW ('aWina I�waY rwd waeM1cG awaY. SSO.IXN1:1yricW�wal imypcun n)'e�em damayeq TS(Nlpll� Cunem dm llaWu4 5lM1.O�XI Grwel ry� poode4 S3qW04e�u.2a1 uJraxwc�wc Jamuye, SS�YJ uM WiN Mryiu1 muuwrc µ�wing inw Sowlrcm� NizuN, sevatl Gays oCrv�Jdl prccchd �M1c IWy llni wrni. tViN p,rowW� xawuieJ a m�xt bcatiom. Jw adNUmW niNall lhu fe0 on �he 31s� had a M1u� timc miaLiryS i�uu �he �ramd v�d win15' �>'ed v rwwO.Itivon and u�axlnv 8/8/20fKFloodin�/FlashFloodin 27U01 $2J2GJ10 Y/7/20�IG6U-DR $13.C,31,G98Gila.Graham,G+ee�dec.Pima.Pi�ul a w.ki y enoam,,,ao��«n.w:rwi,m�m�n��.ymnw�re.,aww<u.,.�<ver.��a..s��.�.o�aw.>ew�rew�n�aaw,ya�mme»w��sn�ew.m�. o� r<n,�ar iv, zane, nw�or���a�y wa, ma�.a ro. Mm. cow y ro. n�ews Ne a.�s� a� w es ��hw orvreGNu�� w� wi w.�a aro�a nn. �.��� wiNinNmaCOw��Yi�losilu�a2J-Iwwpttiud DvwyvxwroaCSlvXreniJCM.xVandedin�hurlwmatimiicdacevvnwfaWaWmedic9ssaialanceand�t+nuguJ qiLLhlc wa�er xuplrl) lines, wNCh imPac�W tra�umiaaiw and Jis�nhiiwi ofyoWWe wnleriu homes. lhc rvNall m�d snoumelt cru�eA ewNtimu tlu111vea1medNe healN 2/19/2008 Floodi /FlazhFloodin 28W3 $2W.W0 Pima mas�rawra.�a���a�a�«aeam.�.wm����,,,re�.c�wr.s�.�,aivwrmmr��»�Mea�emun.e,��as�now�wamo�. ]v�mry 20l(i Savere Wuibr SW�m:OU lunuery2l, 21110 Ne Govrnwr deelued an emersaicy Im signi6wu cumdativcprccipiution oo�yrlN wiN N�wludK and hea�y w�a u�� iywan ix- zz. zoio. ih.. �i�.r.mm mn�o rcw�ain��i: or.�owr� v�e.�s��r�.m u�w w��e.� e,o-�� aws<. io w�ouo nwin nna enn y�ou Fenmuy � I, xnm,n,monaa mdwuiw� wm drMa m wdwc iwsuaim oomwa.. comntnr �ludu.w wmo Mo�nry c�noww, C'b, cru:Neo, �. w, �liuhavc. \avalu.11ma. Nnal aM }'na{vi a+well a� Nu ciR a[l'ww. lT]vu�U2J,201UNc4ovemusubminvJar<quen�InNaPrnxidwtlfuranEmoguncyllmWVtionu�suppunofllfeewlai�J�igaF bNnuliwwo[�hcHopllibu und �avajo Nalimu.11ux x�us a comPlux im:iduu imd�iny nv� viM1a. iMtt cow�lien uiG ar<ry laryc Se�yfayhicd a�va. PR.vihn� UM1amn JeclarN an emeryw�cY on Jwuury2J,?010 nn4 auNOni.cd �ader9 rclia[ande��eovary assi.wwce fur Nu aticoiN arca. �Tc imc�ui�Y �(�y 5iiwiiw� ove1wFJmcd laal mdwwiN cm:�µu�ry rcepmulvn.'Ihc f:�'cmw xubmincd a m4�� for\UIaU+'a�vr IhclaruYm� o� FcFwrv 16, 2111U and Ne ITesi4m myw�E�d w� Alavh 1N, 2010 b�� a�m�iny PoFlic Azeistvrce fm Nwe couuticx mW �ibd w¢am W� me� EE�IA'n pa caryla imW�� �kri; wltich eo: ayache m, Cila (in+wduv. La Pu{ Muluve,.�'nv Jo arid}'ev:yiv Cowuex and �u Dila Nivu InGanCUmmwlq', liopi TrIM1e, I.'weJo ^Ielimy Su�CUIm . Apazhc lolim�o n uMam Natiun y�J WLi�v hluunuim.4WChc Tnbe.'ILe I'rcnideih also aypr�'W .Li�w e�v4�*� fa Nc HaraN Atiuyation Crcan� Proy{em.lTe �wrYOn � k� �ChC.COCO�11t10,Ci���,rsICC1�CC��.�}�'rl'l.,M�RCO �, ^fWepeogamNa�idmaGea�'aJable�aallcowtiesaudpWitivdsubJi�iniannxu¢wiJeuaMwunlnNb�MFTLThia�W�'+m�nilaamaAnavvilabl<i�ilrcl'nIW P P �Joi�ucdwh Nisemvry�rnv5'u�d�hryxJlevhadmwx�vTJ�cupro�amui�M1JireciFn4rWaavinh�welianFF.MA. 1/?1/2010Win[cr5lomi 20IU2 51A17.89i 3/18/20(ODR-1888 $IJ,210.903Mohacc,Nsrva'o.PimyPuial.Yarai,Cih�ofYuma �n�-co�.,w:,�. Hisloric State and Federal Disasler Declara¢ons Page 5 of 6 Piroa Counq� Multi-Jorisdictionnl Harecd Mitigntiou Plau StateofArizoaaDeclarniion Dama eES[imutes Dah Haia�vl FatvliHes Io'uries Pro er ' Cro dLi��e�hn�k Total 5ounxs HnzaN Lon6 U � 6/23/2006 trScstaGOn $0 ADEM. 200R Disaasc ADEM, 2008 ftBl200G Floodin / Elash Floodin $5,000,0(10 SiDUO,000 NCDQ 200R Floodii �/ Flash Floodin ADEM, 2U08 2/1')/2UU8 Floodin�/FlnshFloodin $777,000 5777.o0U NCDC.20U% Floodin /FlashFloodio� Il2112010WinrerStorm $oADEM.2U10 Floodin /FlashFloodiu Historic Statz and FeAeml Disaslec Declarations Page G of 6 Pima County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Pima Coanty Undeclared Events July 1961 to August 2010 No. of Recorded Losses Hazard Records Fatalities Injuries Damage Costs ($) Dam Failure 0 0 0 $0 Drought 0 0 0 $0 Earthquake 0 0 0 $0 Fissure 0 -0 0 $0 Flooding 68 13 9 $22,052,000 Hazardous Materials Incident 42 28 61 $262,200 Landslide/Mudslide 0 0 0 $0 Levee Failure 0 0 0 $0 Li htnin 18 3 16 $511,000 Severe Wind 183 3 101 $28,926,200 Subsidence 0 0 0 $0 Wildfire 20 0 30 $66,100,000 Winter Storm 2 3 0 $0 Notes: Damage Costs include properiy and crop/livestock losses and are reported as is with no attempt to adjust costs to current dollar values. Furthermore, wildfire damage cost do not include the cost of suppression which can be quite substantial. Sources: ADEM, NCDC, NWCG, NWS, USFS Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 1 of 1 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigatiou Plan - 20ll Da[e Hazard Description In November 1958, 6.4 inches of snow fell across the Tucson metro area and caused auto accidents, strended people, dropped power lines, knocked out 16-Nov-58 Winter Stonn telephone service, closed highways and paralyzed air travel. Three boy scouts were stranded in snow near Madera Canyon in the Santa Rita Mountains south of Tucson. Their bodies were not found for two weeks. The heavy snow also closed the highway to Mt. Lemmon, marooning about 35 weekend vacationers (NWS 27-Ju1-61 Severe Wind 27-Au =-64 Severe Wind 16-Au �-69 Severe Wind In December 1971, 6.8 inches of snow blanketed the Tucson metro area after midnight. The heavy snow snarled tra�c, closed the airport, downed power lines 8-Dec-71 Winter Storm and damaged or destroyed 3000 trees, some of them 20 years old. Slush on the runway forced the closure of the Tucson International Airport and cancellation of flights between 6 AM and 11 AM. At the time, the airport did not own a snow plow (NWS Tucson, 2011). 23-Jun-74 Severe Wind 23-Jun-74 Severe Wind 16-Ju1-84 Severe Wind 19-Ju1-84 Severe Wind Hazardous APARTMENT COMPLEX/ EXPLODED APPARENTLY DUE TO NATURAL GAS;PIPEL[NE incident;Material was NATURAL GAS;the amoun[ was 0 7/25/1991 Materials Incident UNKNOWN AMOUNT 24-Au -91 Severe Wind Hazazdous TRUCK / INVOLVED IN ACCIDENT;MOBILE iuciden[;Material was OIL_ DIESEL;Yhe amount was 240 GALLON(S) 1/3t/1992 Materials Incident 06-Ju1-92 Severe Wind Roads, bridges, l�omes and businesses suffered considerable damage in Pima County beginning on the 7th. A new all-time record of 4.81 inches fell in Tucson, eclipsing the 4.00 inches in 1916. Numerous rescues were made tluougliout the county as motorists tried to ddve vehicles through creeks, or low spots. Several 07-Jan-93 Plooding tliousand peopte were isolated in their homes as tlood waters from die Rillito River cut off all roads. A weather-related crash in Tucson left 7 people hospitalized. Phone service in parts of Tucson was interrupted on the 8th. There were at least 15 road closures around Tucso�. Two major bridges over the Santa Cniz River were closed. 08-Aug-93 Severe Wind A 65-foot power pole feil, knocking out power to some 3,600 customers. Some 3,400 resideuts in Green Valley were also lefr without power as storms hit that area. 09-Aug-93 Severe Wind Roofs blown off, trees uprooted, and power interrupTed to some 20,000 cusYomers. Power poles were snapped by higli winds on the west side of t�e city. Winds reached as hi �h as 60 m h at the National Weather Service in Tucson. 13-Aug-93 Severe Wind Higli winds iu south Tucsou resulted in power poles downed and some broken wiiidows on W. Valencia. Close to 2 inches of rain fell that resulted in some minor street floodin �. 21-Au =-93 Severe Wind Ve stron � winds dama �ed roofs and sna ed ower oles in the northwest aR of the cit . Street floodin � was also re orted. Hazardous AUTOMOBILE DROVE INTO SIDE OF TRAIN STRIKING FRIEGHT CAR RESULTING INEXPLOSION/TYPE OF SIGNALING DEVICES 8/23/1993 Matenals Incident UNKNOWN.;RAILROAD NON-RELEASE incident;Material was ENGINE STARTER FLUID;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT 07-Mar94 Severe Wind This weak tornado touclied down briefly in t6e 4800 block of East Third and took off paR of a roof. One observer said it sounded like a freight train as it moved tUrough Nie neigl�borhood. A trampoline was lifted and carried into the next yard. Trash cans were thrown about, with one landing 10 houses away. 20-Jun-94 Severe Wind Thunderstorm winds damaged five I�omes, destroyed a ramada aud ca�nper, and snapped large tree limbs on [he southwest side of Tucson. Also, a man was bniised b half inch diameter hail durin = t6e storm. 28-Jun-94 Severe Wind Thunderstorm winds ri ed off art of a roof, damaged a block wa]], and blew down a ine tree. 20-Ju1-94 Severe Wind Severe thunderstonn winds to led a 64 foot tail ham radio tower that was cemented ten feet into the �ound. Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 1 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Locafion Fatali[ies Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source NWS Tucson, 16-Nov-58 WinterStonn Tucson 3 0 $0 $ $� 2011 27-Ju1-61 Severe Wind 0 1 $250,000 $0 $250,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Au -64 Severe Wind 2 9 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 l6-Au *-69 Severe Wind 0 0 $250,000 $0 $250,000 NCDC, 2010 8-Dec-71 WinterStonn Tucson 0 0 $0 $0 $Q NWS Tucson, 20ll 23-Jun-74 Severe Wind 0 0 $2,500 $0 $2,500 NCDC, 2010 23-Jun-74 Severe Wind I 40 $250,000 $0 $250,000 NCDC,2010 16-Ju1-84 Severe Wind 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 19-Ju1-84 Severe Wind 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 7/25/1991 Materials Incident 1 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 24-Au �-91 Severe Wind 0 2 $250,000 $0 $250,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 1/31/1992 Materials Incident Slo,000 $0 $10,000 NRC, 2010 06-Ju1-92 Severe Wind 0 1 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Jan-93 Flooding Tucson 0 7 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Aug-93 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 09-Aug-93 Severe Wind 0 0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-93 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 21-Au -93 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 8/23/1993 Materials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 07-Maz-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC,2010 20-Jun-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 28-Jun-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $500 $0 $500 NCDC,2010 20-Ju1-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazazd EvenYS Page 2 of 48 Pima County Mulri-Hazard Mirigarion Plan - 20ll Date Hazard Description � 28-Ju1-94 Severe Wind Winds from a tliunderstorm microbmst blew down neazly a dozen power poles, ripped sliingles off roofs, downed trees, blew a mobile home off its foundation, a�id overhimed a tractor trailer. An off dut NaCional VJeatlier Service em ]o ee recorded wind *us[s [0 65 m h. A Yornado touched down on Cl�e Hill Top area of nortl�west Tucson. The tornado travelled in a west-noRhwest direction, and its wid[h varied from about a yazd to 28-Ju1-94 Severe Wind 50 yards. The 7700 blocks of Soledad and Redwing Circle were paRicidady hit hazd. A back porch and much of the roof of one home was destroyed, an entire roof was removed from another house and scattered in neazby yards, two lazge evaporative coolers were thrown into a backyard swimming pool, azid large trees were uprooted. Also, cars were damaged by flying debris, windows were shattered, a�id a brick wall was tlattened. A microburst caused damage to two motels in western Tucson. The Days Inn Motel recieved about $1OQ000 da�nage when severe winds tore most of [he roof off Ol-Sep-90. Severe Wiiid 96 rooms, and knocked a lazge eucalypYus tree into the comer of the motel. Some water damage ffom lieavy rain was also involved. Tlie Pueblo Motel, a quaRer mile south of the Da s Inn, sustained about $50,000 dama e when a ortion of t6e roof coverin � four rooms was lost. 25-Se -94 Li �IiCnin � One uian was killed, and two others in'ured b a li �htnin � strike, while cam in �. Tlie tUree men were la in � cards inside a Yent (M250 02-Jun-95 Severe Wind A dust devil, with winds near 70 mph, overtumed a mobile home and slammed a shed into a pickup truck. Damage was near $2Q000 azid Uie mobile home was destro ed. Skies were clear dwin � the event. A thunderstotm rapidly developed north of Tucson on the west side of tl�e Sa�rta Catalina mountains. The sCOnn produced a 60 mph wind gust and oue-half inch 30-Ju1-95 Severe Wind bail just nortliwest of Tucson. It proceeded noRhwest with a downburst occurring near Interstate 10 at tUe Marana exit. The downburst winds estimated at 60 mpl� caused neaz zero visibility in blowing dust and sand. Tlvee sepazate accidents on both sides of Interstate 10 involved 21 cars, injured 24 people and caused about $70,000 in ro ert dazna =e. All dama �e was to vehicles on hrterstate 10. Thunderstorms moving through the Avra Valley AirpoR brought downburst winds Hiat damaged 20 airplanes, two of which were completely deshoyed. A 5,000 07-Aug-95 Severe Wind batlon tank containing 2,000 gallons of water was moved over 2,000 feet. Many hanger doors were blown in. Winds also ovedurned a mobile home and tore a roof off a second mobile home. Two children in the second mobile home, ages five months and 12 years, were slightly injured. Winds were estimated at 74 mph at the Avra Valley Airport. Damage was estimated at $4 million at the airpoR and $50 thousand to tlie mobile homes. A series of sVOng thunderstonns moving through Tucson brought widespread damage. Many power po(es were knocked over with roofs torn off some buildings. 11-Aug-95 Flooding As much as four inches of rain accompanied these stonns. Some areas received three-quarters incli hail. Washes in the azea were running near bank full. One woman attem tin � to drive throu •h a wash was swe t to her death. F43 VE A series of strong thunderstonns moving through Tucson brought widespread damage. Many power poles were knocked over with roofs tom off some buildings. l l-Aug-95 Severe Wind As mucli as four inches of rain accompanied these stonns. Some areas received tluee-quarters inch hail. Washes in tlie azea were running near baiilc full. One woman a[tem tin to drive thron h a wash was swe t to her death. F43 VE OS-Jul-96 Severe Wind Strong thwiderstorni winds caused $350,000 damage to gliders and structures at Avra Valley glider airport. 07-Ju1-96 Severe Wind A thunderstorm moving througli a remote azea knocked down 25 power poles cutting power to Amado. Power in Amado was out fo 36 hours following tl�e wind dama •e. A mobile home was also overturned and demolislied near Sahuarita. A strong thunderstorm moved througli the Tucson azea wiUi wind related damage. A small shed was blown through a fence and destroyed. A roof was blown off a 08-Ju1-96 Severe Wind double wide mobile home and carried across neighboring homes. Roofs were blown off and windows blown oat of trailers. At Tucson Interna[ional Airport, 4 airplanes were damaged and the roof was blown off a hanger. One to two feet diameCer trees were snapped. A spotter 6SE of Tucson measured a 57 Kt wind. The 82 Kt wind from tlii s storm was recorded at Davis Monthon Air Base. 09-Aug-96 Flooding Washes flooded aud impassable. Tree limbs broke� due to higli wind in Ajo. Telephoue li�es down due to high wind in the town of Why. Several people stranded due to roads cut b runnin • water. 14-Aug-96 Severe Wind Strong winds blew a carport aod awning off a mobile home in the Picture Rocks area west of Tucson Mountain. Roof blown off a mobile home on Vegas Drive. l4-Au �-96 Severe Wind 65 to 70 m h wind �usts ri ed a roof off a home, caused tree dama =e and ower outa �es in Tucson. 16-Aug-96 Severe Wind 63 kt wind gust reported neaz Wilmot and Golf Links road. Roof blown off a home, structural damaged to an Elementary school, tree damage and power lines down. Visibili[ was near zero in blowin = dusT across most of southeast Tucson as the storm moved in from the east. 21-Au *-96 Li �htnin � Woman struck b li *htnin � inside her house while vacnmin >. 22-Au *-96 Severe Wind Roof blown off a church and a brick fence blown over on Cra croft road. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 3 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 201 l Damage Estimates Date Hazard Loca6on Fa[alities � Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 28-Ju1-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Ju1-94 Severe Wind to 12 0 0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 NCDC, 2010 O1-Sep-94 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Se -94 Li *hMin 1 2 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 02-Jwi-95 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 30-Ju1-95 Severe Wind Mazana 0 24 $70,000 $0 $70,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Aug-95 Severe Wind Tucson 0 2 $4,100,000 $0 $4,100,000 NCDC, 2010 11-Aug-95 Flooding Tucsan 1 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 11-Aug-95 Severe Wind Tucson 0 0 $5,000,000 $0 $S,OOQ000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Jul-96 Severe Wind AVRA VALLEY 0 0 $350,000 $0 $350,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-9G Severe Wind ARIVACA JCT 0 0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Ju1-96 Severe Wind �DMA)DAVIS 0 0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 NCDC, 2010 MONTHAN A 09-Aug-96 Flooding �STERN PIMA 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 COUNTY 14-Aug-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Au �-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $150,000 $0 $i50,000 NCDC, 2010 16-Aug-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 NCDC, 2010 21-Au -96 Li �htnin GREEN VLY 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 22-Au *-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 4 of 48 Pima CoiwYy Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 20ll Date Hazard Description Heavy rain from thunderstomis liit die Tucson area with flash flooding in many waslies. The southwest side and nortlieast side of Tucson were hit l�azdest. One 27-Aug-96 Flooding fireman was injured while checking if a car that had been washed off FTarrison Road had anybody in it. The Ajo az�d Mission Road areas received 2.5 inches of rain in 45 minutes. 29-Au �-96 Severe Wiod A 52 kt wind �ust caused tree dama �e. 29-Au *-96 Severe Wind Stron � wind blew sl�in �les of roofs at Marana Ai ort. Three ower oles blown down on Trico road. Between 0500 and ] 000 am very lieavy tliunderstorm rainfall produced widespread flash flooding over the Tucson Metro azea. 35-40 rescues were made of people 03-Sep-96 Flooding g��ded in flooded washes, and 250 storm relaYed emergencies were reported to city and counry Fire Departments. Nmnerous roads were closed, while some roads and water lines were washed out. One home near River Rd and Dodge Blvd was tlooded wifli 6 inches of water and 2 incltes of mud. As much as 5 inches of rain fell in a 2 1/2 hour eriod in Nie foothills of the Sa�ita Catalina Mountains. 03-Sep-96 Severe Wind Thunderstonn winds estimated in excess of 40 mph blow down telephone poles neaz Country Club and Beuson. Five skuctural fires due to lighMing were also re orted. 25-Sep-96 Flooding Several swift water rescues were made of people stranded in the rising waters in streets and washes. Flooding reported at the iiitersection of Pantano and Irvin �ton. 25-Se -96 Severe Wind 25-Se -96 Severe Wind Wind related tree dama e was re orted in Starr Pass. Dama �e to trees and business si is occurred near Sixth Ave and A'o Rd. 07-Ju1-97 Severe Wind Thunderstonn winds downed several ower lines, blew a sto li �ht down, sna ed a 30-foot Palm tree in half, and s lit a 15-foot hi h tree in two. 07-Ju1-97 Li hfiin • Li ditnin � struck a house and staRed a fire. Hazazdous METER STAT[ON / WAS STRUCK BY A VEHICLE;PiPELINE incidenT,Material was NAT[.IRAI.. GAS;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT 7/23/1997 Materials Incident � 28-Ju1-97 Severe Wind Tl�understorm winds blew the roof off of a market, dazvaged tlie roof of the First BapUst Clmrch, and uprooted or snapped tUe limbs off of 5-8 trees. 29-Ju1-97 Severe Wind Tliunderstorm winds blew a wall down and bent some metal i in �. 07-Aug-97 Lightning Lightning started a fire at a condominium complex. 08-Au �-9� Severe Wind Tl�understorm winds blew down several ower lines. 08-Au �-97 Severe Wind Tliunderstonn winds caused roof dama e to two buildings and several si �ns were blown over. 13-Au �-97 Li �htnin A 72 year old man suffered burns on his ri *ht le � and elvis when li �htnin � struck nearb . l3-Aug-97 Severe Wind Thunderstonn winds gusting to 78 kts snapped a power pole knockiug out power to 1700 customers and toppled a tree onto a house. O1-Se -97 Severe Wind Thunderstonn winds dama �ed the roof of the lii �h school and trees were u rooted ihrou �6ou[ town. Tliunderstonn winds blew down several power Iines and trees in the east part of Tucson. A 6 foot brick wall was damaged by a falling tree. The winds blew the 13-Sep-97 Severe Wind roof off of one home. A woman was injured when she was struck by lightning. Heavy rains from U�ese thunderstonns caused tlooding of several streets in east Tucson with several vehicles tra ed in tlie waters. Thunderstorm winds blew down several power lines and trees in the east part of Tucson. A 6 foot brick wa11 was damaged by a falling tree. Tlie winds blew the 13-Sep-97 Severe Wind roof of'f of one home. A woman was injured when slie was struck by liglihiing. Heavy rains from these thunderstonns caused flooding of several streets in east Tucson with several vel�ieles tra ed in the waters. Hazazdous TRACTOR TRAILER (MC305 & PUP TRAILER) ROLLED OVERTANK CAPACITY: 8000 GALLONS TOTAL;MOBILE incident;Material was ETHYLENE 12/20/1997 Materials Incident GLYCOL;Yhe amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOLJNT Hazardous TRACTOR TRAILER (MC305 & PUP TRAILER) ROLLED OVERTANK CAPACITY: 8000 GALLONS TOTAL;MOBILE incidenY,Material was GASOLINE: 12/20/1997 Materials Incident AUTOMOTIVE (IINLEADED);the amount was 4000 GALLON(S) Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 5 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estiroates Date Hazard Locafion Fatali6es Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 27-Aug-96 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Au �-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Au �-96 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 03-Sep-96 Flooding TUCSON 0 2 $500,000 $0 $500,000 NCDC, 2010 03-Sep-96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Sep-96 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Se -96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 2 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 25-Se -96 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 20I0 07-Ju1-97 Severe Wind TIICSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-97 Li �htnin • TUCSON 0 0 540,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 7/23/t997 Materials Incident I $0 $0 NRC, 2010 28-Ju1-97 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $7,000 $0 $7,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-97 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Aug-97 Lightning A�T N INTL � p $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Au �-97 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Au �-97 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $3,000 $0 $3,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Au •-97 Li *li[nin TUCSON 0 l $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-97 Severe Wind TUSCON RYAN 0 0 $7,000 $0 $7,000 NCDC, 2010 FLD ARPT 01-Se -97 Severe Wind SAHUARITA 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Sep-97 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 13-Sep-97 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $1Q000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 12/20/1997 Materials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 12/20/t997 Materials Incident I $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 6 of 48 Pi�na Counry Multi-Hazazd MitigaUon Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description � Hazardous TRACTOR TRAILER (MC305 & PUP TRAILER) ROLLED OVERTANK CAPACITY: 8000 GALLONS TOTAL;MOB]LE incide�iY,Material was OIL: t2/20/t997 Materials [ncident D[ESEL;tlie amount was 50 GALLON(S) Hazardous LOCOMOTIVE: SP 8151 STRUCK A VEHICLE / TYPE OF VEHICLE IS UNKNOWNTHE VEHICLE IS ON FIRE UNDERNEATH THE 1/U/1998 Materials Hicident LOCOMOT[VE;RAILROAD NON-RELEASE incide�tMaterial was 0[L: DIESEL;the amount was 0 i7NKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous ABANDONED SSGAL DRUM/ 7CUFT OF MATERIAL SPILLED FROM DRUM (WHICH MAYHAVE FALLEN FROM A VEffiCLE) AND WAS HIT BY 2 3YL6/1998 Materials Incident CARS;MOB[LE incident;Material was MOLYBDNUM PENTACHLORIDE;ttie amount was 7 CUBIC FEET Hazazdous 5 INCH DISTRIBUTION PIPELINE / CAUSE IS UNDER INVESTIGAION / A F[REAT A MOBILE HOME 1GNITED A NATURAL GAS LINE / AN ONG G/t 1/1998 Materials Incident FIRE ENSUED;PiPELINE incident;Material was NATURAI. GAS;the amount was 0 LTNKNOWN AMOLJNT 23-Ju1-98 Floodin � Tluee l�omes sustained water dama �e and the occu ants had to be tem oraril evacuated. A cou le of streets were also flooded. 09-Aug-98 Flooding A man was killed when he was caught in a flooded wash and drowned in the east part of Tucson. Sheet flooding was reported in central Tucson. M35IW 11-Aug-98 Severe Wind Tl�understomi winds blew down a tree in the eastern portion of Tucson and blew off a podion of a roo£ Heavy rains from diese thunderstorms caused widespread road closures in tlie southeast art of Tucson and water was re oRed u to car doors at 6th street and Tucson boulevazd. 21-Aug-98 Severe Wind Thmlderstorm winds estimated at 60-70 mph by fire deparhnent personnel blew down several trees, one of which was about GO feet tall. One of the trees blew onto the atio of a liouse dama �in the atio roof and watl. Two distinct lines of severe tlmnderstottns swept tlirough much of southeast arizona from tlie norfheast during the mid-afYemoon To eazly evening hours. A high school student from Rincon High School in Tucson was injured from flying debris and taken to a local hospital. Numerous reports of trees blow down were received, some up to 2 feet in diameter. Eighteen power poles on the soutliwest side of Tucson were blown down leaving more than 20,000 customers without 28-Aug-98 Severe Wind power and causing tl�e evacuation of about 200 people from homes and businesses along West Ajo Way due to downed power lines. One of tUe downed power poles sparked a roof fire at Moreliana Fruit Bazs causing an estimated $85000 of damage. A roof was blown off a trailer and a 20 foot tree blown onto a tnick near Fort Thomas. Several repoRs of roof damage in tucson were received. Winds blew a shed away and a 15 foot tree down in Benson. A wind gust to 64 mph was recorded at the University of Arizona. Power outages were reported in Rio Rico. OS-Sep-98 Severe Wind Severe thunderstorms rolling northwazd tlirough eastern Pima County and southeast Pinal County packed winds estima[ed up to 65 mph tlsat knocked down some li �l�t oles at Coun C1ub and Grant roads in Tucson and blew down some trees in Oro Valle . Hazardous HOUSE FIRE / CAUSE iINKNOWN / THE GAS COMPANY WAS CALLED TO TURN OFFLINE / DISTRIBUTION LINE;PIPELINE incident;Material was t t/23/1998 Matedals Incident NATURAL GAS;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT RESULTING IN THE LOSS OF GASOLINE AND MOTOR OIL;MOBILE incident;Material was GASOLINE: 2/3/t999 Materials Incideut AUTOMOTIVE (UNLEADED);the amount was 10 GALLON(S) Hazardous MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT RESULTING IN THE LOSS OF GASOLINE AND MOTOR OIL;MOBILE incident;Material was OIL, M1SC: MOTOR;the 2/3/1999 Materials Incident amount was 12 QUART(S) Hazardous FILTERING SYSTEM / THE CALLER STATED THE RP HAS HAD SEVERAL RELEASESOF BERYLLIUM IN THE PAST DUE TO FILTER FAILURE / 5/13/1999 Matenals Incident MINOR RELEASES DAILY;FIXED incident;Material was BERYLLIUM;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous TANK CAR / CAR IS VENTING;RAILROAD inciden[;Material was AMMONIA, ANHYDROUS;tiie amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOiTNT 6/l8/1999 Materials Incident 27-Jun-99 Severe Wind Trees blown down and minor roof dama *e on a house Histodc Undeclared Hazard Events Page 7 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 201 I Damage Estimates Date Hazard Locafion Fatalities Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source Hazardous 12/20/1997 Materials Incide��t 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous t/t7/1998 Matierials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 3/26/1998 Materials IncidenY 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 6/I1/1998 Materials Incident $100,000 $0 $100,000 NRC, 2010 23-Ju1-98 Floodin � MARANA 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 09-Aug-98 Flooding TUCSON 1 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 I l-Aug-98 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 2l-Aug-98 Severe Wind GREEN VLY 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Aug-98 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 1 $150,000 $0 $I50,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Sep-98 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous 11/23/1998 Materials Incident 1 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 2/3/1999 Materials Incident I $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 2/3/1999 Materials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous 5/t3/1999 Materials lncident 25 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous 6/t8/1999 Materials Incident 2 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 27-Jun-99 Severe Wind GREEN VLY 0 0 $10,000 $0 $1Q000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 8 of 48 Pima Counry Mul[i-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 20] l Date Hazard , DescripHon OS-Jul-99 Severe Wind W11'ds in tUe area also blew down small trees and power lines resulting in a few power outages. Lightning strikes were reported to liave struck houses, trees, and injured a ma�� talkin � on the tele hone. 06-Ju1-99 Floodin � Eleven eo le needed to be rescued from their cars after flood waters en =ulfed Cliem. 07-Ju1-99 Severe Wind Stron � winds in the 7'ucson azea caused extensive roof dama �e and knocked out ower to a lar �e section of north and nortlieast Tucson. 10-Ju1-99 Severe Wind W�nd damage in the Tucson area downed numerous power lines. Some street flooding repoRed in Tucson as well as Oro Valley. Stonn da�nage is unknown exce t for house tire caused b li �litnin � sfike. 13-Ju1-99 Floodin � Several main streets closed. Six to Seven inches of rain fell in tl�e headwaters of Sabino aud Bear Canyons on the south slopes of tl�e Catalina mountains eazly in the morning. At one point 2 inches of rain in 20 roinutes was recorded by a remote rain gage. Most of the rain fell over a three hour periof between 3 am and 6am. The river gage on Sabino Creek where the creek comes out of Uie mountains rose from 214 CFS at 6:15 AM to a peak flow of 10,600 CFS at 8:30 AM. The flow of 10,600 is the Uighest summer flow recorded by this rain gage whicl� has a history back to 1932. Tlie resulting food washed out much of the recreational facilities along tlie creek at the 15-Ju1-99 Flooding Sabino Canyon Recreation area. Between 10 and 20 people were evacuated by helicopter after being trapped wlien the water rose after tl�ey had entered the canyon. A large section of U�e Catalina Highway was washed out where the highway crosses the headwaters of Beaz Canyon. The higliway was clsoed for 2 weeks after beiug washed away. The only otlier road to the top of tlie Catalina Mountains is a back wuntry road suitabie for 4 wheel drive only. Several hundred campers were trapped on themouutain due to the main road being closed including about 170 boy and girl scouts. A�rangements were made to smooflt the back country road to allow residents and visitots alike access off the mountaia Several residence alon � Bear and Sabino Creek were flooded as the water filled the Ylood lain 24-Ju1-99 Severe Wind 26-Ju1-99 Floodin � Man roads im assable with several houses flooded. 27-Ju1-99 Li htnin � An eleven eaz old boy was struck while talkin * ou a ay hone, onl receivin � minor in'uries. 19-Au �-99 Severe Wii�d Hi •n winds blew over a mobile liome and tore a roof off of a liouse. Lar �e hail broke a sk li �lit in another liome. 27-Aug-99 Severe Wind Moishtre from Hurricane Bret helped i�mite severe tliunderstorms in tlie Tucson Intemational AirpoR area. Tliese storms produced Ueary rain, pea size liail and hi h winds that knocked over two ower oles. 31-Au �-99 Severe Wind 19-Sep-99 Severe Wind A severe thunderstorm produced marble sized hail and higli winds which uprooted 40-60 foot trees. Also some minor flooding damaged a swimming pool and the interwr of a week-old Porsche. Hazardous THE MATERIAL SPILLED FROM A HOLDING TANK DUE TO A RUPTORED SITE GLASS. AN EMPLOYEE WALKED INTO THE SITE GLASS 3/t5/2o00 Materials Incidei�t CAUSING IT TO RUPTURE.;STORAGE TANK incident;Materiat was SODNM HYPOCHLORITE (15% OR LESS;the amount was 300 GALLON(S) Hazazdous V22 OPS SPRAY /AIRCRAFT CRASHED DUE TO UNK CAUSES/ INCIDENT UNDER INVESTIGATION;AIRCRAFT incident;Material was JET FUEL: JP- 4/8/2000 Materials Incident 5(KEROSENE, HEAVY);the amount was 971 GALLON(S) 22-Ju1-00 Floodin � Several cars stranded in low water crossin �. Man streets flooded a�id im assable in Tucson foot6ills noRh and northeast of town. 22-Jn1-00 Severe Wind 6 ower oles sna ed in remote azea on east side of Tucson. Power out in some areas for 3G liours. 27-Ju1-00 Severe Wind 9 ower oles to led on south side of Tucson. OS-Au >-00 Li �htnin Li 6tnin > started fires in utilit oles and a mid town laund . OS-Au =-00 Severe Wind Roof dama �e and trees blown down in Catal ina. Blowin � dusC reduced visibilities and sto ed traffic o� Interstate 10 near tlie Pinal count line. 13-Au �-00 Severe Wind Power lines blown down. (3-Aug-00 Severe DVind Wind reported at Ryan Ai�eld. TwQ aireraft at Ryan airfield suffered damage from tl�e wind. 13-Au *-00 Severe Wind Several mibile home trailers blown off their fonndations. Several totall destro ed. 14-Au �-00 Severe Wind Power oles blown down near Or *an Pi e Cactus National Monument. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 9 of 48 Pima County Mul[i-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 20ll Damage Estimates Date HazarJ Locafion Fa[aGties Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Datn Source OS-Jul-99 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 1 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 06-Ju1-99 Floodin � TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $2Q000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-99 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 5200,000 $0 $200,000 NCDC, 2010 10-Ju1-99 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Ju1-99 Floodin TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 15-Ju1-99 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $10,000,000 $0 $10,00Q000 NCDC, 2010 24-Ju1-99 Severe Wind DAVIS 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 MONTHAN AFB 26-JuI-99 Floodin � TUCSON 0 0 $40,000 $0 $4Q000 NCDC, 2010 27-Ju1-99 Li �hfiin � TUCSON 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 19-Au �-99 Severe Wind TOCSON 0 0 $80,000 $0 $SQ000 NCDC, 2010 27-Aug-99 Severe Wind A�T N INTL 0 0 $20,000 $0 $2Q000 NCDC, 2010 3l-Au -99 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $SQ000 NCDC, 2010 19-Sep-99 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $2,500 $0 $2,500 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous HAYDEN-UDALL 3/15/2000 Materials Incident WATER t $0 $0 NRC, 2010 TREATMENT Hazazdous 4/8/2000 Materials [ncident 19 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 22-JuI-00 Floodin • TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 22-Ju1-00 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Ju1-00 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $IOQ000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Au -00 Li �hMin � TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Au -00 Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Au �-00 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 l3-Aug-00 Severe Wind TUSCON RYAN 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 FLD ARPT 13-Au�-00 Severe Wind VAIL 0 0 $100,000 $0 $1OQ000 NCDC, 2010 14-Au �-00 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 10 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 20] 1 Da[e Huard Description 29-Aug-00 Flooding Several intersections under water. Part of Costco Roof collpased under weight of water. As mucli as 2 incltes rain fell in less than one hour. Some areas received .5 inches in ] 0 minutes. Power lines blown down vicinity Limberlost and Oracle roads. Tree blown down onto three veUicles on west Speedway road. 10-Sep-00 Severe Wind Strong tliunderstonns moved through the central and north part of Tucson. Raiu amounts exceeded 1 inch in 30 minutes at some locations. Hail froi�i pea size to I inch re orted as well. The east side of Tucson was untouched b this stonn. Road closures due to flooding across Tucson area. Primarily Tanque Verde wasli and Pantano wash areas. There were potholes caused by heavy rain resulting in several flat tires on E. Valeneia Road iu Rita Rancl�. Alsq there were several high water rescues conducted in eastern Tucson. Deep upper level lrougl� over 11-Oet-00 Flooding Nevada on die lOth moved over souUieast Arizona tluougU the 12th. The system was able to tap into moisture from the remnants of Tropical Stonn Olivia wliich resulted in large amounts of rai�� and flooding. Early morning on the ll[h, deep convection (witU -65 to -70C cloud tops) developed. Isolated tliunderstonns exploded across souUieast Arizona. The low level center of Olivia passed throagh CocUise county between 09Z and 12Z on tl�e 12th which ended the l�eavy rain. Hazazdous THE MATERIAL WAS RELEASED FROM A TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCK DUE TO A ROLLOVER. THE DRIVER OF THE TRACTOR TRAILER to/16/200o Materials Incident TRUCK FELL ASLEEP AND ROLLED DOWN A CANYON INTO A CREEK.;MOBILE incidenY,Material was ETHYLENE GLYCOL;the amount was 0 iJNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous THE MATERIAL WAS RELEASED FROM A TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCK DUE TO A ROLLOVER. THE DR[VER OF THE TRACTOR TRAILER 10/t6/2000 Materials Incident TRUCK FELL ASLEEP AND ROLLED DOWN A CANYON INTO A CREEK;MOBILE incident;Material was OIL, MISC: MOTOR;tI�e amount was 1 CUP(S) Four [eenage boys were struck by lighMing. They were playing in a pazk when it started to rain and decided to get cover under a nearby Iree. Three of tlie boys were slightly injured and one boy was in critical co�dition. Second string of stortns that was ]ocated west of sotl�em California on the 17t1i and moved across 19-Oct-00 L[ghming Northern Sonora Mexico on the 19th. The ground was already saturated from the previous storm system on the 11 th. Heavy raiu up to tUree inches fell across soutUeast Arizo�a due to cell training aliead of the system. Tliere were several reports of pea size and dime size hail from Bisbee and Sierra VisYa in Cochise coun . There waas also ea size Uail re orted in the Tucson Metro area. 20-Jun-O 1 Severe Wind A severe Yhunderstorm prodaced damaging wiuds that brought trees and power poles down on the east side of Tucson. Down trees daznaged two cazs and portions of a rooPfrom a 4[h story buitdin were blown off due to Uie stron � winds. 22-Jun-01 Severe Wind Trees blown down by thunderstonn wind. 02-Ju1-01 Severe Wind Peak wind gust recorded at Tucson Internatioual airport. There was also roof damage reported by a spotter on south side of Tucson. Green Valley fire department rescued two cars from flooded areas uear Green Valley. One driver and 3 passengers were rescued from caz in 2 feet of water on OS-JuI-Ol Flooding Esperanza Bh�d near Interstate 19. The second swift water rescue occured at La Canada and W Esperanza Blvd where 4 people were rescued from a stalled car in a foot of water. Tlie coo erative observin � site in Green Valle received 1.92 inclies of rain in AO minutes. Strong wiuds from the thunderstonns weakened a roof on West Mossman Road on the soutliwest side of Tucson. A[ 1230 MST the roof wllapsed from OS-JuI-Ol Severe Wind accumulated water and several rooms were flooded with up to 2.0 incl�es of water. At 1250 MST, a spotter reported peak wind gust of 70 mpli using liand lield anemometer on the noRheast side of Tucson. He also re oRed ea size hail. There was a swift water rescue, when a driver was waslied a quarter of a mile downsteam in a wash located noRh of Kolb Road in Sahuarita. Also, there was a 16-Ju1-01 Flooding faznily on Tatanka Lane that had to take refuge in a tree wlien the home becvne flooded. Flooding along Sahuazita Road between Hougl�ton a��d Wilmot was also re orted. Hazardous THE CALLER REPORTS THAT THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS DiIMPING WASTE OIL, GASOLINE, DIESEL, AND CAR BATTERIES ON H1S 7/16/2001 Materials lncident PROPERTY, CAUSING PEOPLE IN THE AREA TO BECOME SICK. CALLER STATED THAT RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS A VIOLENT PERSON. OWNS A GLTN ;FIXED incident;Material was WASTE OIL;the a�nount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOLJNT Hazazdous THE CALLER REPORTS THAT THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS DUMPING WASTE OIL, GASOLINE, DIESEL, AND CAR BATTERIES ON HIS 7/t6/2oo1 Materials Incident PROPERTY, CAUSING PEOPLE IN THE AREA TO B�COME SICK CALLER STATED THAT RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS A VIOLENT PERSON. OWNS A GUN ;FIXED incident;Matenal was 0[L, FUEL: NO. 2-D;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous THE CALLER REPORTS THAT THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS DUMPING WASTE OIL, GASOL[NE, DIESEL, AND CAR BATTERIES ON HIS 7/16/2oot Materials Incident PROPERTY, CAUSING PEOPLE IN THE AREA TO BECOME SICK. CALLER STATED THAT RESPONSIBLE PARTY [S A VIOLENT PERSON. OWNS A GLTN ;FIXED incident;Material was CAR BATTER[ES;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 11 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard � Loca6on Fatalities Injuries Proper[y Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 29-Aug-00 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 10-Sep-00 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 NCDC, 2010 11-Oct-00 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous 10/l6/2000 Materials Incident MOLINO CANYON 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous 10/16/2000 Mate�als Incident MOLINO CANYON 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 19-Oct-00 Lightning TUCSON 0 4 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 20-Jun-01 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 22-Jun-01 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 02-Jul-Ol Severe Wind ��S)TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 INTL ARPT OS-JuI-Ol Flooding GREEN VLY 0 0 $90,000 $0 $90,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Jul-01 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 16-Jui-O] Flooding SAHUARITA 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous 7/16/2001 Materials Incident RESIDENTIAL 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 7/l6/2001 Materials Incident RESIDENTIAL 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 7/16/2001 Materials Incident RESIDENTiAL 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 12 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 20l 1 Date � � Hazard Descriplion Hazardous THE CALLER REPORTS THAT THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS DUMPING WASTE OIL, GASOLINE, DIESEL, AND CAR BATTERIES ON HIS 7/16/2o0t Materials I�cident PROPERTY, CAUSING PEOPLE IN THE AREA TO BECOME SICK. CALLER STATED THAT RESPONSIBLE PARTY IS A V]OLENT PERSON. (OWNS A GUN);FIXED incident;Material was GASOLINE: AUTOMOT[VE (ONLEADED);the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOONT Hazazdous THE CALLER STATED THAT 2 BULK CHEMICALS WERE ACCIDENTLY MIXED TOGETHER WffiCH CAUSED A RELEASE OF CHLORINE.;FIXED 7/17/2001 Materials Hicident incident;Material was CHLORINE;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT A microburst caused 5 power poles to snap and 2 mobile home to collapse between Drexel and Valeucia Roads on the soudi side of Tucson. Also tliere was minor 18-Jul-O] Severe Wind damge to cars by wind blown construction panets at the Tucsou Internatioual airport. A spotter neaz tlie area recorded a peak wind gust of 60 mph on a hand held a�emometer. 24-JuI-O] Severe Wind Strong winds from a severe thunderstorm in Kohatk, 20 miles west of Eloy, damage cansed to 4 homes by teazing the roofs off. A reporter witnessed one roof bein * hurled 80 ards and in urin � one erson. M14IW Severe thunderstonns produced rainPall rates of lialf of an inch in 30 minutes wliicli flooded several streets in Tucson Metro area. Spotters in the Tucson Mountains repoded 1.46 iuches of rain in 25 ininutes. At approximately 1300 MST, two boys were playing iu a wash on die corner of South Campbeil and East 31-Ju1-01 Flooding Irvington Roads. The 14 year old boy was swept under by the rising waters t6rougli a 24 incl� diameter pipe a half a mile downsueam before rescued 17 minutes later. The boy was in critical eondition and died 4 days after the event occurred. Also, tliere was a swift water rescue on Campbell and Benson Higliway at 1345 MST. A[ 1230 MST, pima county dispatch reported a 8 inch diamter hee blown down in a residental area. A spotter reported a measured wind gust of 58 mph at 1240 MST. Severe thunderstorms produced rainfall rates of half of an inch in 30 minutes whicli flooded several sueets in Tucson Metro azea. Spotters in tlie Tucson 31-Ju1-01 Severe Wind Moun[ains reported 1.46 inches of rain in 25 minutes. At approximately 1300 MST, two boys were playing in a wash on tl�e corner of Soutli Campbell and East Irvington Roads. The 14 year old boy was swepT under by the rising waters through a 24 inch diameter pipe a half a mile downstream before rescued 17 minutes later. The boy was in critical condition and died 4 days after the event occurred. Also, there was a swift water rescue on Campbell and Benson Highway at 1345 MST. 07-Au �-Ol Severe Wind Stron � winds from a severe thunderstorm ri ed roofs off of 5 l�omes in the Gu Vo area (40 miles west of Sells). 12-Au �-01 Severe Wind Dama �in � winds from a severe thunderstomi downed 4 ower oles near A o. Heavy rains from a severe thunderstonn caused several problems in tlie Mazana, Oro Valley, and northwest Tucson area. At 1535 MST, a spotter reported a foot 13-Aug-O] Flooding of water gathering azound his home in Mazana. Another spotter neaz Dove mountain repoRed 333 inclies of rain for the stonn total. By 1540 MST, a spotter in Oro Valley reported .95 inches of rain in 20 minutes. There were also four swift water rescues on Star Pass Blvd. in northwest Tucson at 1545 MST. This severe thunderstorm also caused strong winds, knocking a 65 foot ham radio tower down on the east side of Marana and diere were several reports of pea size 13-Aug-01 Severe Wind ��ail. Heavy rains from a severe thunderstorm caused several problems in tl�e Marana, Oro Valley, and nortliwest Tucson area. At 1535 MST, a spotter repoRed a foot of water gathering arowid liis l�ome in Mara�ia. Another spotter near pove mountain reported 3.33 inclies of rain for the stonn total. By 1540 MST, a spotter in Oro Valley reported .95 incl�es of rain in 20 minutes. There were also four swift water rescues on Staz Pass Blvd. in northwest Tucson at 1545 MST. 13-Aug-01 Lighming Tlie severe thunderstonn that moved through tlie Marana azea produced several lightning strikes. One in particulaz triggered a house 6re on Dove of Peace Place in Marana. Thunderstorms developed over tlie Tucson mountains causing several washes to flood in noRliwest Tucson. At 1815 MST, a spotter repoRed that he had to pull 14-Aug-01 Flooding liis car over due to flooding ou Camino del Cerro Road. By 1820 MST, pima county dispatcli reported a swifr water rescue at the intersection of Sweetwater and Sliverbell roads. AY 1845 MST, police closed Sliverbell Road between Ina and Camino del Cerro roads due to overflowi�g washes. They also closed Davis and Ruthrauff roads. ] 6-Aug-Ol Severe Wind Stron � winds from a severe thunderstonn ri ed tlie roof off a home in Pisinimo and also knocked ower lines down. A severe [liunderstorm developed over the Catalina mounCains and moved over Oro Valley and noRliwest portions of Tucson. At 1720 MST a spotter reported 17-Aug-Ol Severe Wind �neasnred wind gust of 60 mph. On La Cholla Blvd, 3 power poles were downed from damaging winds and there were tiles blown off a home in Oro Valley. Power was cut off on the northwest side of Tucson throughoat most of the night. A1 1815 MST, a spotter reported .75 incli diameter hail and various reports of pea size Uail. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 13 of 48 Pima County Mulri-Hazazd Midgation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Location Fatali6es Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source Hazazdous 7tt6/2oot Materials Incident �SIDENT[AL I $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous 7/17/2001 Materials Incident 2 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 18-Ju1-01 Severe Wind SOUTH TUCSON 0 0 $58,000 $0 $58,000 NCDC, 20I0 24-Jul-Ol Severe Wind KOMELIK 0 l $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 31-Ju1-01 Flooding TUCSON 1 0 $15,000 $0 $i5,000 NCDC, 2010 31-Jul-Ol Severe Wind TUCSON 0 9 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 07-Au �-Ol Severe Wind GU VO 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 12-Au �-01 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $8,000 $0 $8,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-O] Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-01 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-01 Lightning MARANA 0 0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Aug-01 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 16-Au -01 Severe Wind PISINIMO 0 0 $12,000 $0 $12,000 NCDC, 2010 17-Aug-Ol Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 14 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 20l 1 Date Hazard Description 17-Aug-0l Severe Wind Damaging winds from a severe tliunderstorm ripped a roof off of a liome in the Sahuarita azea. There were also 13 power poles downed by s[rong wiuds at Pima Mine Road and Old No �ales Hi �hwa . Heavy precipitation from a tliunderstorm neaz Vail caused [he Pantano Wash to rise 6 feet iu less than a hour. At 2330 MST, rapidly rising and moving water reached Hanison Road in southwest Tucson. Harrison Road was flooded with a foot to a foot az7d a half deep. Around tliis time, there was a swift water rescue in 29-Aug-O l Flooding µ'hicli a driver was trapped in her car. Rescuers had to smash the window to get tlie driver out and tlie car was carried downstreazn by the rapidly flowing water. Rain gages near Cienga creek and Interstate 10 indicated 232 inches of rain had fallen and the rain gage near Vail and Pantano wash received 1.85 inclies. Several roads were also closed near Clossal cave whicl� received 2.86 inches of rain in one and a half liours. On tlie following morning at 0900 MST, water from die Pantai�o wasl� flowed into the Rillito wash closing two roads on the northwest side of Tucson. Hazardous THE CALLER IS REPORTING AN OVER PRESSURE SITUATION DUE TO VANDALISM AT A REGULATING STATION.;PIPELINE incident;Material 10/5/2001 Materials Incident was NATURAL GAS;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT 20-Apr-02 Wildfire Center Fire - an unlmown caused fire bumed an azea 45 iniles soutl�west of Tucson, Arizona. The fire started April 2Q 2002 and was controlled April 28, 2002, and burned a total of 1,117 acres with over $1,305,000 in fire su ression costs. 14-May-02 Wildfire Distillery Fire - a lighfiing caused fire burned an area 5 miles northeast of Vail, Anzona. The fire started June 21, 2008 and burned a total of 7,950 acres witli over $1,750,000 in fire su ression costs. The Bullock wildtire started iu Bullock Canyon in die Catalina Mountains, part of the Coronado National Forest The fire started on May 21 st and continued tluough June lOYh. It was suspected to be human induced. The tire burned 30,563 acres along with 2 cabins and several outbuildings. Tlie residents of 01-hui-02 Wildfire Summediaven were evacuated o� May 25th and Catalina Higliway closed on May 22nd. The fire also threatened Mt. Bigelow which had several telecommunication towers and 2 telescopes. However, fire fighters were able to coutain tlie fire a half of a mile away. The entire fire fighting costs was estimated to be 143 million dollars. 12-Ju1-02 Severe Wind Thunderstorms moved across central Tucson producing damaging winds. The K-mart srore received structural damage due to the strong winds on Broadway and Kolb roads. A line of thunderstorms extended from Marana, tlirough Tucson, to Green Valley. A majority of the damage from tlie thunderstonns occurred on the south side of Tucson. First reports of ca�ne in from Tucson International Airport with hail size of 3/8 incli in dia�neter at 530 pm MST. A spotter on tlie south side of Tucson recorded peak wind gust of 79 mph with an anemometer at 530 pm MST. Between 540 pm and 610 pm several reports of damage flowed into the NWS oftice. A cl�imney was blown off the roof of Davis Monthan AFB. Several large trees were blown down in Kennedy Pazk near Mission Road and west Ajo Road. Another 14-7u1-02 Severe Wind report of a large tree was blocking the intersection of Grant and First Avenue, witli a metal parking liglit pole bent over in the street. A roof was blown off a house on the south side of Tucson. Five power poles were knocked down on North Greasewood Road, with another 10 power poles downed on Valencia and Mission roads. Tluoughout Hie city, a total of 25 power poles were reported knocked down by the strong winds. The Tucson [nternational Aitport received .96 inches of rainfall throughout tlie event, witl� a spotter receiving 117 inches on tlie south side of Tucson. There was only one report of a swift water rescue on Santa Claza near Interstate 10. Hazardous THE CALLER IS REPORTING A SINGLE TRACTOR TRAILER ACCIDENT, DRNER LOST CONTROL OF VEH[CLE.;MOBILE incident;Material was 7/I 8/2002 Materials Iucident OIL, MISC: LUBRICATING;H�e amowit was l5 GALLON(S) 26-Ju1-02 Severe Wind A severe tlmnderstorm moved through Green Valley and Salivarita area, producing damaging winds. Tlie strong winds knocked down a power pole causing a ower outa �e for several liours. The stonn also roduced over an inch of reci itation. However, there were no re orts of floodin >. 02-Aug-02 Flooding �Other round of thunderstorms produced heavy rainfall over Uie town of Arivaca. A spotter repoRed 3 inclies of rain, with water flooding into his liouse a[ 410 m MST. An automa[ed >au �e in tlie azea recorded 2.09 inches of rainfall between 330 m and 430 m MST. Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 15 of 48 Pima Couury Mulk-Hazard Mitigation Pla� - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazrrd Location Fatalilies Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 17-Aug-01 Severe Wind SAHUARITA 0 0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Aug-01 Flooding VAIL 0 0 $4,000 $0 $4,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous ORACLE RD. AND l0/5/2o0t Materials Incident RANCHO VISTOSO �50,000 $0 $50,000 NRC, 2010 BLVD. 20-Apr-02 Wildfire GACC, 2010 14-May-02 Wil�re GACC, 2010 O1-Jun-02 Wildfire MT LEMMON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010; GACC,2010 12-Ju1-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $2Q000 NCDC, 2010 14-Ju1-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $72,000 $0 $72,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous 7/I8/2o02 Materials Incident I-lo WESTBOUND t $0 $0 NRC, 2010 AT MILEPOST 234 26-Ju1-02 Severe Wind GREEN VLY 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 02-Aug-02 Floading ARIVACA 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 16 of 48 Pima Co�mty Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Descrip[ion . A merger of two stonns created a severe thunderstomi producing heavy rainfall across Tucson as it moved noRhwest at 10 mph. This storm noC only produced damaging winds but also was one of Ihe largest flash flooding events during the monsoon season. At 459 pm MST, Davis Monthan AFB recorded a peak wind �,nist of 69 mph. Between 500 and 530 pm MST, several reports of wind damage flowed into tlie NWS office. Reports of power poles downed in locations such as Limberlost Road and Oracle, Tanque Verde and Sabino Canyon were mentioned. In all 8 power poles were downed across Tucson causing a loss of power for OS-Aug-02 Flooding 18,000 people, inc(uding Tucson Internafional Airport. There were 22 reports of toppled hees, including one tliat fell on top of a mobile home. Tliere was roof damage to the EI Dorado Hospital, portions of a roof ripped off of Bobo's Restaurant, and restaurant sign blown down at Grant and County Club. Not only was this stonn severe but it also caused flash flooding. Rainfall aznounts ranged from .79 inches at Tucson International Airport to 22l inclies at Alamo Wash at Glenn Avenue. Most of the rain fell witUin one hour. A NWS employee reported flooding at Craycrofr soutl� of Sunrise, Synder and Ventana wasli, and Sunrise at Sabino Can on. A s otter re orted five feet of water at the intersection of Grant and Dod e, with stores bein flooded. Another s otter re oRed two feet of water A merger of [wo stonns created a severe thunderstorm producing heavy rainfall across Tucson as it moved northwest at 10 mph. Tliis storm not only produced dainaging winds but also was one of the largest flasli floodi�ig events durin� tlie mousoon season. At 459 pm MST, Davis Monthan AFB recorded a peak wind gust of 69 mph. Between 500 and 530 pm MST, several reports of wind damage flowed into the NWS office. Reports of power poles downed in locations such as Limbedost Road and Oracle, Tanque Verde and Sabuio Canyon were mentioned. In all 8 power poles were downed across Tucson causing a loss of power for OS-Aug-02 Severe Wind 18,000 people, including Tucson International AirpoR. There were 22 repoRs of toppled trees, including one that Fell on top of a mobile home. There was roof damage to tlie EI Dorado Hospital, portions of a roof ripped off of Bobo's Restattrairt, and restaurant sign blown down at Grant and County Club. Not only was Uiis storm severe but it also caused flash flooding. Rainfall amounts ranged from .79 inches at Tucson InCernational Airport to 221 inches at Alamo Wash at Glenn Avenue. Most of tlie rain fell widiin one hour. A NWS employee reported flooding at Craycroft south of Sunrise, Synder and Ventana wasli, and Sunrise at Sabino Can on. A s otter re orted five feet of water at the intersecdon of Grant and Dod �e, with stores bein � flooded. AnotUer s otYer re oded two feet of water 07-Aug-02 Flooding A slow moving thunderstorm produced 6eavy rainfall in the Tucson area. Automated gauges reported 125 to I.5 inches of rainfall near Kolb and Golf Links. A swift water rescue occurred on Broadwa and Prudeuce on tlie east side of Tucson at 1242 am MST. 09-Aug-02 Severe Wind A severe thui�derstorm produced damaging winds across nortlieast side of Tucson. A spotter �eported mail boxes blown down and several tree tops snapped neaz Catalina Hi •Uwa and Hou l�ton Road at 515 m MST. This stonn also roduced ea size hail. A siyiiticant increase in moisture moved over souUieast Arizona from Tucson east. Tlie 12Z KTUS sounding indicated a precipitable water value of 1.75 inches, which inereased from .81 inclies from tlie OOZ sounding. Tl�e cape was also very impressive, with the somiding indicating 5900 J/kg at 12Z. Combining the extremely unstable atmosphere witli significant moisture increase and a 90 knot jet streak moving over the azea between 18Z and OOZ, severe weather exploded over tlie greater Tucson area by 100 pm MST. 28-Aug-02 Severe Wind The first weather report of the day was a 58 mpli peak wind gust from a thunderstorm over Ryan Field Airport. By 150 pm MST, the first repoRs of one inch diameter in size hail was reported in central Tucson. Reports then started flowing into Uie office of hail ranging from 95 to 3.0 inches in diameter. Several cazs were damaged due to the large haiL One spotter repoRed 3.0 inch in diameter size hail broke the car windshield at 230 pm MST. Flash flooding also occurred on the northwest side of Tucson and also in Mazana. Several dmnderstonns were developing one right after tlie oHier over the same area between 400 and 600 pm MST. Tan erine Road was barricaded at 600 m throu �h 700 m MST due [o the ra idl flowin > water across several of the low I in di s in the road. After 800 A severe diunderstorm moved over Tucson producing damaging winds and flasli flooding. Strong winds knocked down a line of power poles along Kolb Street between 22nd Street and Speedway. Winds also toppled a] 00 foot eucalyptus tree onto a house located on East Broadway and Kolb Street. Along witli 06-Sep-02 Severe Wind damaging winds, this storm also produced heavy precipitation. Rainfall amounts ranged from near an inch at several gages in central Tucson to 20 inches on the northeast and northwest portions of tlie city. Most of the precipitation fell wiUiin tlie first 30 minutes of flie event. Tucsou Intemational Airport also recorded b6 inches of reci itation for the entire event. Tucson dis atch re orted several streets flooded. A severe thundersrorm developed over tlie greater Tucson area producing damaging winds, hail, and flash flooding. Hail size ranged from 1.5 inches in dia�neter at tlie University of Arizona to one inch in diameter across Tucson and Marana. A spotter in central Tucson recorded a peak wind gust of 60 mph and the ASOS at 10-Sep-02 Severe Wind the Tucson International Airport recorded a peak wind gust of 54 mph. The strong winds also knocked down a power pole which left 2300 customers without power. The winds also overtumed a mobile home located on Old Vail Road. There was also widespread flash flooding, with rainfall rates of gneater than a l�alf of an inch in 30 minutes. Several roads were closed due to flooding whicli included Sahuazita, Overton and La Cholla roads at Canada del Oro wash, and Davidson. Hazardous THE CALLER STATED THAT THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION IN A MOBILE HOME PARK AND THERE ARE THREE TRAILERS THAT IS 11/5/2002 Materials Incident INVOLVED.;PIPELINE incident;Material was NATURAI. GAS;tlie amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 17 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Loca6on Fatalities Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source OS-Aug-02 Flooding SOUTH TUCSON 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Aug-02 Severe Wind SOUTH TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Aug-02 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $3,000 $0 $3,000 NCDC, 2010 09-Aug-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Aug-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 06-Sep-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 10-Sep-02 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $64,000 $0 $64,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous t 1/5/2002 Materials Incident 3333 NORTH 3 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NRC, 2010 FLOWING WELLS Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 18 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description Hazardous THE CALLER REPORTED EMPLOYEE COMPLAINED OF IHALATION OF RELEASE FROM TANK CAR THAT LAST CONTAINED 1/9/2003 Materials I�cident TOLUENE.;RAILROAD incident;Material was TOLOENE;d1e amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazazdous CALLER IS REPORTING MATERIAL RELEASEU FROM A FUEL TANK ON A TANKER TRUCK DUE TO A TRANSPORT ACCIDENT.;MOBILE 2/8/2003 Materials Incident incident;Material was MIXTURE OF DIESEL AND OIL;the amount was 8000 GALLON(S) Hazazdous THE CALLER STATED THAT AN APARTMENT FIRE WAS THE RESULT OF A NATURAL GAS LEAK.;PIPELINE incident;Material was NATURAL 3/16/2003 Mate�ials [ncident GAS;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT 13-May-03 Wildfire AZ-AZS-03-0181 Fire - a hwnan caused fire bumed an area near the Town of Rediugton, Arizona. Tlie fire started May 13, 2003 and was conholled May 20, 2003, and bumed a total of 153 acres with over $75,000 in fire su ression costs. 20-May-03 Wildfire Anvil Fire - an unknown caused fire burned an azea by Highway 286 uodh of Tluee Points. The fire started May 20, 2003 and was controlted May 21, 2003, and burned a total of l60 acres with over $1 Q000 in fire su ression costs. Aspen Fire - a human caused tire that burned an area northeast of Tucson, Arizona to M[. Lemmon; including Puscl� Ridge Wildemess Area. The fire started hme 17-Jun-03 Wildfire 17, 2003, aod burned a total of 86,000 acres with over $16,40Q000 in fire suppression costs. Tivee hundred residences and seven commercial structures were destro ed. 17-Jun-03 Wildfire Helen's 2 Fire - a lighming caused fire bumed au area in or near Tucson, Arizona. Tl�e Sre started June 17, 2003 arid expected contaimnent was June 30, 2003, and bunted a total of 3,498 acres with over $3,636,000 in fire su ression costs. The Aspen wildfire started on June 17th in the Catalina Mountains by an unknown liiker on the Maishall Gulch and Aspen Loop traiL The Fire was 6rst observed on tlie south face portion of Marshall Peak arouud 7000 feet. On June 19th, winds increased across Southeast Arizona with tl�e highest winds recorded at Hopkins RAWS site (souYh of Catalina Mountains). Sustained winds of 23 lmots (26 mph) and gusts up to 42 knots (48 mph) were recorded at Chis site for one hour during Ol-Jul-03 Wild6re tl�e aftemoon. The combination of strong winds and low relative liumidity pushed the fire northeast into Uie town of Swmnerliaven on top of Mt. Lemmon. Numerous structures were destroyed includi�g the Alpine Lodge, Pima county transpoRadon faeitiry, Post Office, and many others. In ali Nie fire consumed a total of 84,750 acres azid 333 structures lost. Damage estimates indicated total poperty damage was $66 million, supression costs were $16 milliion, and loss of trees and resouroes were $33 million. A severe thunderstorm produced damaging winds. A spotters reported an awning blown off a�i apartment building on Sth Street and Alvemon Road. Several large trees were also blown down on 22nd Street and Columbus Road. A spotter recorded 63 mpli wind gust on Old Spanish Trail and Freeman Road. Interstate IO was 12-Ju1-03 Severe Wind closed for four hours near Kolb Road due to downed power poles. Scattered tliunderstonns devetoped over the White Mountains eazly in the aftemoon. Outflow from these thunderstorms helped initiate convection over tlie Catalina and Rincon Mountains, on the north and east side of Tucson. These stonns then moved west across the cit , roducin dazna *in � winds and flash floodin =. A line of severe thunderstorms moved across Tucson producing damaging winds. Tlie strongest wind gust of 64 mpli was recorded at Davis MontUan AFB at�59 13-Ju1-03 Severe Wind Pm MST. TUe Tucson Intemational AirpoR recorded 58 mph and the a�emometer located at the rooftop of the University of Arizona building recorded 78 mph wind gust. Damage reports included an awning torn off a house at Sth Street and Alvernon and several liouses reported roof damage. Tucson City of Communicatious re orted 2 downed ower oles alon Beaz Can on near Golf Links and Hou hton Roads. 20-Ju1-03 Severe Wind A strong thunderstorm developed over the Rincon Mountains aud moved west across Tucson. Shong wi�ds lrnocked down 10 power poies along Houghton Road between Broadwa and S eedwa . 24-Ju1-03 Severe Wind A severe thunderstorm developed east oY'Oro Valley diuing flie evening and moved northwest across the town. Tlie thunderstonn produced damaging wiuds, which knocked down several hees in the Oro Valley area. Severe thunderstonns developed over the area and produced damaging winds and flash flooding. Tucson city of commuuication reported 15 downed power poles on West Manville Road near Nortli Reservation Road adn Sauguazo National Park West Tlie newspaper also repoded a mobile I�ome blown of stands and several 25-Ju1-03 Flooding buildings with roof damage. This storm also produced heavy rain. There was 2 feet of waster on Magee azid La Cholla Roads and was closed. Two care were stranded in tlie Canada del Oro Wasli uear La C6olla and the Omni Tucson National Golf ResoR. Another car was swept near a mile down Uie Canada del Oro Wash near La Cholla. There were no in uries re orted. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 19 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 201 ] Damage Estimates Date H�¢ard Loca6on Fatalities Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source Hazardous 1/9/2003 Materials Incident EtAILYARD 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 2/8/2003 Materials Incident STATE ROUTE 86, 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 MILEPOST 131.4 Hazardous 3/16/2003 Ma[erials Incident APARTMENT 1 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NRC, 2010 13-May-03 Wildtire GACC, 2010 20-May-03 Wildfire GACC, 2010 15 17-Jun-03 Wildfire GACC, 2010 17-Jun-03 Wildfire 9 GACC, 2010 Ol-Jul-03 Wildfire SUMMERHAVEN 0 0 $66,000,000 $0 $66,OOQ000 NCDC, 2010 12-Ju1-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Ju1-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $12,000 $0 $12,000 NCDC, 2010 20-Ju1-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $1Q000 NCDC, 2010 24-Ju1-03 Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Ju1-03 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 20 of 48 Pima Counry Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description Severe thwiderstonns developed over tl�e area and produced da�naging winds and flash flooding. Tucson city of communication reported 15 downed power poles on West Mairville Road near NoRli Reservation Road adn Sauguazo National Park West. The newspaper also repoded a mobile home blown of stands and several 25-Ju1-03 Severe Wind buildings with roof damage. This storm also produced heavy rain. Tliere was 2 feet of waster on Magee and La CHolla Roads and was closed. Two care were stranded in Che Canada del Oro Wasli near La Cholla and the Omni Tucson National Golf Resort. Another car was swept neaz a mile down tUe Canada del Oro Wash near La Cliolla. There were no in'uries re orted. 28-Ju1-03 Severe Wind Pima dis atch re oRed stron • winds, from a i�earb [hunderstorm, ushed a vehicle off the road alon * Interstate 19 and Arivaca Road. 28-Ju1-03 Severe Wind A severe thunderstonn moved across Vail during the evening, producing damaging winds. A spotter reported 70 mph winds and half of an iuch rain in 30 ininutes. Tucson olice re orted severa( down ower oles alon � Interstate 10 ueaz Vail and Wentworth. A tliunderstonn moved througl� the town of Ajo around 800 pm MST, producing heavy rain which resulted in a flash flood. Ajo police repoRed 2.�5 inches of 29-Ju1-03 Flooding Precipitation after the event occurred. IC was estimated tha[ near 4.0 inches of precipitation feel i� 45 minutes over tlie Phelps Dodge area. Most damage occurred near Gibson Wash, wiUi 2nd Avenue bridge overtopped by 3 feet of water. The railroad was also overtopped. Fences were downed due to rushing water and several road were washed out In all 673 land arcels were flooded and one swift water rescue erformed. A severe thunderstorm moved across the city of Tucson during evening, producing strong winds and heavy rain. Tucson police repoRed several roads closed due 29-Ju1-03 Flooding ro flooding. Tucson In[ernational AirporC recorded 1.49 inches of rain during this event. Drexel fire depamnent repotted 10 swifr watet rescues. One swift water rescue occurred near Ajo Highway and Old Ajo Highway, whe� a veliicle was swept away in 5-7 foot deep water. There was only one l�ome flooded neaz Drexel Hei �hts. Preci iYation =a *es across the cit ran >ed from 0.50 inches ro I.5 inches. A severe thunderstonn moved throngli the city of Tucson, producing da�naging wind. Tucson city of Communication reported two power poled dowiied. There 29-Ju1-03 Severe Wind were several reports of tree down across the city, witl� one near Grant Road a�id Pazk Avenue and another at 1 st Aveuue and Tangerine. Tlie newspaper reported a 12x60 foot mobile home fli ed on its side. Sever thimderstorrns moved thro�gh the Tucson area also produced heavy rain that caused flooding. Tlie automatic gage aT Ve�tazia Canyon and Sunrise Road 23-Aug-03 Flooding rewrded 1.03 inclies during tl�e eve�t. A spotter reported Che golf course at Loew's Ventana Cauyon Resort had considerable damage due to the flooding. The wash overto ed iPs banks azid flooded cart atUs and fairwa s. 23-Aug-03 Severe Wind Severe thunderstonns moved west across Tucson metro area producing damaging winds. Several spotters reported 60 mph wind gusts across Tucson. A spotter on tlie northwest side of Tucson re orted a 30 foot hee knocked. Tliunderstorms produced heavy rain in tlie late evening in Tucsoa Some azeas received .75 to 1.5 incl�es of precipitation in 20 minutes. At 101S pm MST, Pima 24-Aug-03 Flooding Counry dispatch reported tnultiple cars stalled in the underpass at Stone Ave. due to the six feet of water. A swift water rescue was perfonned wiCh no injuries re oRed. 26-Aug-03 Severe Wind A severe thunderstonn developed over the Rincon Mountains and moved west into Tucson. Eight power poles were downed at Ft. Lowell Road. One of the poles fell on a car travelin on the road, but no in'uries were re orted. A microburst neaz the crossroads of Speedway and Pantano caused a roof to be partially tom off of a home a�id blown several hundred feet onto tUe roof of a 22Jun-04 Severe Wind °eighborin� liome. A weak low presswe system off die western coast of Baja pulied moistare from Mexico norCliwazd into southeast Arizona. This inerease in moisture lead to the development of isolated showers and fliunderstonns over Hie eastem zones of southeast Arizona, including eastem pima county, in the afrernoon and evenin = of June 22nd. 11-hd-04 Severe Wind A power pole was dovh�ed by thunderstonn wind gusCS neaz Ylie iutersection of River a�d Oracle. High pressure east of Arizona forced moisture into t6e area from tlie east and soutl�, whicli ►ed to the develo ment of isolated aftemoon and evenin � t6understonns. Hazardous CALLER STATED THAT DRIVER OF SEMI TANKER TRUCK SWERVED TO AVOID AN ONCOMING VEHICLE CAUSING THE TRUCK TO 7/U/2004 Materials Incident OVERTURN AND CATCH ON FIRE AND RELEASE GASOLINE.;MOBILE incident;Material was GASOLINE: AUTOMOTIVE (UNLEADED);the amount was 8900 GALLON(S) 19-Ju1-04 Severe Wind Fire deparhnent reported that roofing had been blown off of a building and a power pole was downed near die intersection of Silverbell a�d El Camino Del Cerro. Law enforcement reported that thunderstonn wind gusts up to 55 knots had dowved 5 power poles on Route 85 between mile marker 45 and 47. An outflow from 24-Ju1-04 Severe Wind a large complex that developed in Northern Mexico pushed moisture north into southeastern Arizona. This moishire lielped to promote the development of heavy rainin thunderstonns across the area. Historie U�dec(ared Hazazd Events Page 21 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 20ll Damage Estimates Date Hazurd Location Fatalities Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 25-Ju1-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $55,000 $0 $55,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Ju1-03 Severe Wind ARIVACA 0 0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Ju1-03 Severe Wind VAIL 0 0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-03 Flooding AJO 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-03 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Aug-03 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Aug-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $I,000 NCDC, 2010 24-Aug-03 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 26-Aug-03 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 22-Jun-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 11-Ju1-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous STATE ROUTE 85 7/U/2004 Materials Incident MP � 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 19-Ju1-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $3,000 $0 $3,000 NCDC, 2010 24-Ju1-04 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 22 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mi[igation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description Law Enforcement reported about 5 power poles had been downed on the northwest side of Tucson. Newspapers repoded that the same stonn caused a tree to be downed on a home on Ederbrooke Road, and an NWS employee repoRed that another tree was uprooted and across Ina Road be[ween La Cholla Road and La 27-Ju1-04 Severe Wind Canada Road. With a jet diving into northem portions oY'Arizona, moisture and dyna�nics were sufficient for strong stonn development The storni prediction center had issued a severe thuuderstomi watch for portions of Soutlieast Arizona due to these favorable conditions. A weak impulse was embedded in the flow overhead, along wid� better shear which all helped to lead to severe tliunderstonn development. The stonns were producing heavy rai� and gusry winds in excess of 55 MPH. Tlie winds were strong euough to knock down power poles and uproot trees in Nortliern Pima County. 28-Ju1-04 Severe Wind Law Enforcement re orted ower lines downed 'ust to the west of downtown Tucson and 3 miles S W of Tucson. O1-Au *-04 Severe Wind Stron � thunderstorm winds caused the ower lines at the 39th block of 16Ch Avenue To be downed. 03-Aug-04 Flooding High water in the Canada Del Oro wash caused several low lying roads Co be flooded. A vehicle was stuck in one of diese low lying areas due to the high water. OS-Aug-04 Flooding Si�nii6cant rainfall over tl�e southeastem side of Tucson caused nonnally dry washes to be filled widi water and low lying roadways to be flooded. Two vehicles (one truck and one motorcycle) where stuck in the Pantano wash at Harrison Road. Both drivers were rescued by die Tucson Fire Department. 13-Au -04 Severe Wind Trained s otter re orted that ower lines had been blown down b a thunderstorm wind >ust. 13-Au -04 Severe Wind Law enforcement re orted that several ower oles were downed b thunderstorm wind rusts on Oran �e Grove Road near Thorn dale Road. 16-Au �-04 Severe Wind Mobile home was tumed over and dama ed b stron = thm�derstonn winds in Three Points. Hazardous . A PASSENGER CAR STRUCK A NATURAL GAS METER CAUSING A RELEASE OF NATURAL GAS TO THE ATMOSPHERE.;PIPELINE 4/15/2005 Materials Incident incident;Material was NATURAL GAS;the amount was 0 iJNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous SULFC7RIC ACID RELEASED FROM A RAIL CAR DOE TO A BAD GASKET RESULTING IN A EMPLOYEE INJURY.;RAILROAD incident;Material was 4Y29/2005 Materials I�cident SULFURIC ACID;the amount was 0 iTNKNOWN AMO[JNT Hazazdous DUE TO A MOTOR VEH(CLE ACCIDENT DIESEL RELEASED FROM A DUMP TRUCK ONTO THE ROADWAY.;MOBILE incident;Material was OIL, 5/4/2005 Materials Incident FUEL: NO, 2-D;Che amount was 120 GALLON(S) Hazardous THE CALLER IS REPORTING A HOUSE EXPLOSION CAUSED BY A RELEASE OF NATURAI, GAS.;PIPELINE incident;Material was NAT[7RAL S127/2005 Materials Incident GAS;the a�nount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT The body of a 70-year-old man was found in a Cemetery in Tucson on Sunday, May 29, 2005. The man was killed by lightning on Saturday nigl�t wUile visiting a 28-May-OS LighMing �avesite at the cemetery. Moisture moving into Arizona from nortliern Mexico helped to generate thunderstonns across portions of Souflieast Arizona throughout a 5 day period towards the end of the month of May. Severe storms developed along several boundaries that moved through Southeast Arizona throu �l�out the 5 da time frame. M700T High pressure centered over the soutliem plains lielped to maintain enough moisture across Southeast Arizona to prompt tl�e development of showers and thunderstorms. Although most storois stayed over higher terrain and were non-threatening, one U�understorm d�at developed in Central Pima County caused wind damage and produced significant rainfall in the emmrumity of Queens Well (which is about 27 miles to the Nortlieast of the community of Sells). 23-Jun-OS Severe Wind The Queens Well rain gage reported 0.74 inch of rain in 25 mii�utes as the thunderstonn moved through the area. Additionally, several residents reported wind damage to their propedy including; damage to a scteen door, an uprooted tree, roofing damage on several homes, and damage to a ra�nada. Based on the above damage reports the wind gusts was most likely not in the severe criteria aud was es[ima[ed to be about 43 knots (49 mph). The thunderstorm was shorted lived lasting only about 25 minutes. 07-Jul-OS Severe Wind A thunderstonn that moved through the Soudieast side of the Tucson Metro Area caused some damage as estimated wind gusts of 50 mph (43 knots) moved across the area. Tlie winds blew a ower line off its ole as well as blew a street si n down. Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 23 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date HazarJ Location Fa[alities Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 27-Ju1-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $8,000 $0 $8 NCDC, 2010 28-Ju1-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $I,000 NCDC, 2010 O1-Au �-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 03-Aug-04 Floodiug TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Aug-04 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $8,000 $0 $8,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Au �-04 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Au �-04 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 16-Au �-04 Severe Wind THREE PTS 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazardous 4/15/2005 Materials Inciden[ 2 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous MILEPOST 985.7 / 4/29/2005 Materials Incident GILA 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 SUBDIVISION Hazardous 5/4/2005 Materials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazazdous 5/27/2005 Materials Incident 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 28-May-OS Lightning TUCSON 1 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 23-Jun-OS Severe Wind SELLS 0 0 $4,500 $0 $4,500 NCDC, 2010 07-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 HisYoric Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 24 of 48 Pima Cowity Multi-Hazard MiUgat�ion Plau - 2011 Date Aazard Description 17-Jul-OS Severe DVind A thunderstorm o�� the Nortl�east Side of d�e Tucson Metro Area caused high winds, up to 58 mpli, whicli blew a large tree over at tlie i�tersecYion of Swan Road and Sunrise Road. 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind A large tree was downed by strong tliunderstorm winds onto the roadway south of River Road on 1 st Avenue. Also large tree limbs fell onto tlie roadway along 1 st Avenue for several blocks. 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind Thunderstorm associated winds blew down tl�ree ower oles near Grant Road and Interstate 10 in Tucson. 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind Shong thunderstonn winds caused power poles a�d power lines to be downed at the intersection of Ist Avenue and Limberlos[ Road. Also a large tree was blow� down causin � dama>e to ao a artment com lex. 18-hil-OS Severe Wind Thunderstorm winds associated with a severe thunderstorm caused a large Eucalyptus tree to be blow� over onto a home causing severe roof damage to that home. Another liome nearb which was under construction also liad wind dama =e. 19-Jul-OS Severe Wind Thunderstonn winds caused nwnerous large tree limbs (6 inches in diameter) to be downed on the roadway near Harrison Road and Catalina Highway. Strong thunderstonn winds (most likely a microburst) caused severe damage to several trailer horoes and several vehicles in tUe Town of Marana neaz Avra Valley 20-Jul-OS Severe Wind Road. Three trailers had da�nage, while three others were completely destroyed, including one being thrown onto a vehicle, and aiiother beivg wrapped azound a tele hone houe. There were no in'uries. 21-Jul-OS Severe Wind Two lar �e tree branches broke off of an Eucal tus tree due to stron � winds estimated 50 m h) in the Picture Rocks area. 25-Jul-OS Severe Wind A severe dmnderstonns rolled across the southeast side of tlie City of Tucson causing several power poles to be downed, trees to be blown down, and a�i estimated wind �usts of 75 m h 65 knots . Three of the ower oles were alon * Soutli WilmoY Road. Flash flooding caused several roads to flood ou the Southwest side of the Tucson Metro area. Tliis tlooding caused several road closures including: Camino Verde Road at Valencia Road Camino de La 1'ierra Road at Valencia Road Valencia Road and Ajo Highway 27-Jul-OS Flooding Westover Road tiom Valencia Road to Drexel Road Mission Road from Valencia Road to Drexel Road Due to the flooded roadways there were also four swift water rescues perfonned during this flash tlood event The Drexe] Heights Fire Department pulled two cazs out of the intersection of SoutU Camino Verde Road and West VaLencia Road; a sporC utility veliicle out of tlie flood waters at Soutli Camino Verde Road at West Ajo Way; and a car with a man and child inside out at South Camino Verde Road and West Arrow Road. There were no injuries. 27-Ju1-05 Severe Wind A lae >e tree was blown down b stron � thunderstonn winds estimated to be 60 m h at the Tucson Mall on North Oracle Road in Tucson. 27-Jul-OS Severe Wind Stron * winds, estimated to be 65 m h(56 knots caused four ower oles to be downed at Manville Road and ReservaGOn Road. A swifr water rescue was perfonned by the Tucson Fire Department on South Highland Avenue neaz die University of Arizona after a woman's caz got stuck in the 29-Jul-OS Flooding tlooded roadway. The water was more Uian 2 feet deep wlien the woman attempted to drive tluough tlie flooded area. Rainfall amounts over tliree quarters of an inch and ea size hail were re oited with this stonn. � 29-Jul-OS Severe Wind Stron � thunderstorm winds, estiinated to be about 60 m h 52 knots downed a ower ole on Wet�nore Road near Orac(e Road in Tucson. Two Yo four inches of rainfall near tl�e Village of Sells, caused several of the washes in the area to flood. A vehicle entered into the Artesa wasli, which at tl�e time 02-Aug-OS Flooding was mm�ing very high with waCer, and becauie stuck. Family members tried to get everyone out of the car and to safery but a one-year-old girl could not be rescued aud was later found downsheam. Fl VE 04-Aug-OS Flooding Heavy rain across the Tucson Metro Area caused several roads to be flooded and closed. Wilmot Road be[ween Andrada Road and Sahuarita Road was closed due to floodin �. There were four swift water rescues across t]ie Cit of Tucson. 04-Aug-OS Severe Wind A severe thunderstonn over the Tucson Meno Area caused damage in several azeas, inciuding a power pole snapping near North Pantano Road and East Speedway Boulevard, ]eaviog 10,000 customers without power. Additionally, power lines were downed at the intersection of Oracle Road and Wetmore Road. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 25 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 20] 1 Damage Estiroates Date Hazard Loca6on Fa[alifies Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 17-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,200 $0 $1,200 NCDC, 2010 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $22,500 $0 $22,500 NCDC, 2010 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $23,500 $0 $23,500 NCDC, 2010 18-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $26,000 $0 $26,000 NCDC, 2010 19-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,500 $0 $I,500 NCDC, 2010 20-Jul-OS Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $175,000 $0 $175,000 NCDC, 2010 21-JuI-OS Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $38,500 $0 $38,500 NCDC, 2010 27-Jul-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC,2010 27-Jul-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $3Q000 NCDC, 2010 29-Jul-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-05 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $7,500 $0 $7,500 NCDC, 2010 02-Aug-OS Flooding SELLS I 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 04-Aug-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 04-Aug-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 26 of 48 Pima County Mulri-Hazard Mitigatiou Plan - 20ll Da[e Hazard Description Hazardous THE CALLER IS REPORTING A 55 GALLON DRUM OF CONCRETE SEALER SPILLED OUT OF THE BACK OF A TRAILER DUE TO UNKNOWN 8/5/2005 Materials Incident CAUSES. TWO EASTBOUND LANES OF I-10 WERE SHUT DOWN FOR A MAXIMUM OF 2 HOURS. THE HAS BEEN REOPENED. ONE INDIVIDUAL WAS SENT TO THE HOSP[TAL;STORAGE TANK incident;Material was CONCRETE SEALER;the amount was 480 POUND(S) 06-Aug-OS Severe Wind An off duty NWS employee reported U�at several large trees had been uprwted and broken at their bases by strong thunderstorm winds. Also two structures had shin �les taken off their roofs. 07-Aug-OS Severe Wind A severe thunderstonn which moved across the Tucson Metro Area caused several large trees and power lines to be downed across the city. Also there were �mdti le re orts of roof dama �e. Significant rainfall across the Tucson Metro Area caused several roads to be flooded requiring several swift water rescues. A few of Ute roads tliat were closed due to flooding included but were not limited to: Wilmot Road from Sahuarita Road to Andrada Road Old Vail Connection east of Old Nogales Highway Summit Road east of Old Nogales Higliway 09-Aug-OS Flooding Old Ajo Highway from San Joaquin Road to Ajo Highway Overton Road at the Cauada Del Oro Wash Three swift water rescues were perfonned thtoughout the Tucson Metro Area wl�ich included rescues at the following locations: The Rillito Wash neaz the Tucson Mall St. Ma 's Road neaz Interstate 10 ] 4-Au -OS Floodin • Hea rain caused flooded roadwa s which led to a swift water rescue in a flooded wash near The Villa �e of Selis. There were no in'uries. 14-Aug-OS Flooding Road flooding in Town of Tluee Points caused a veliicle to become stuck in a flooded roadway, leading to a swift water rescue and the drowning of a 3 yeaz-old little bo . Also, mud and water flooded a residential �ara �e, aod Brawle WasU tlooded Mile Wide Road. M3VE 14-Au >-OS Severe Wind A strong thunderstorm caused a lar e fence to be blown down. 15-Aug-OS Severe Wind Strong tlmnderstorm wind gusts (possibly a microburst) knocked down I S power poles along Grant Road, one woman was cauglit in her vehicle witU energized wires on to of it. 22-Au �-OS Floodin � A car becazne stuck in the intersection of La Canada Road and Casa Verde Road in the Cit of Green Valle due to floodin �. Heavy rainfatl across the southem portion of the Tucson Metro Area as well as in midiown, caused several roads to be flooded. A car was sYUCk in a wash under 23-Aug-OS Flooding the Stone Avenue underpass, and tUe Stone Avenue underpass was tUen closed due to l�igU flood waters. Another car was stuck in a tlooded roadway near Cam bell Road and Drexel Road. Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 27 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Loca6on Fatalities lujuries Proper[y Crop/Livestock Total Data Source Hazardous I-10 EASTBOUND, 8/5/2005 Matenals Incident L I MILE SE OF � $0 $0 NRC, 2010 DAVIS MONTHAN AFB O6-Aug-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $7,000 $0 $7,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Aug-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 09-Aug-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Au -OS Floodin � SELLS 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Aug-OS Flooding THREE PTS 1 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Au �-OS Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 15-Aug-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 NCDC, 2010 22-Au �-OS Floodin � GREEN VLY 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Aug-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $]0,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 28 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 201 ] Dah Hazard Description After over an inch of rain fell across a Iarge portio� of tl�e Tucson Metro Area, some locations with more tliau Iwo inches, severat roads became flooded, closed, and impassable. In addition to all the flooded roadways, several trailer l�omes located in the southern portiou of the Tucson Metro Area, were flooded and surrounded by rising watec Rescue teams evacuated several people from these homes. Brawley wasi� was out of its baziks and flooding roadways causing them to be impassable. Below is a list of some, but not all, of the roads tliat were closed due to flooding: Kinney Road from McCain Loop Road to nortli of the Desert Museum Pump Station Road from Avra Valley Road to Silverbell Road El Trio Road From Cocio Road to Pump Station Road 23-Aug-OS Flooding Missiou Road between Valencia Road and Drexei Road Old Ajo Higliway from San Joaquin Road to Ajo Highway Ovedon Road at the Canada Del Oro Wash Bonney Avenue north of Benson Highway Andrada Road at WeutwoRh Road Wilmot Road from Sahuarita Road to Andrada Road Fort Lowell Road at the Agua Calien[e Wash Snyder Hill Road between Sandario Road and San Joaquin Road Soliders Trail at the Agua Caliente Wash Limberlost Road at the Agua Caliente Wash Avra Valle Road at Trico Road Ol-Sep-OS Flooding Heavy rain over Central Pima County caused Route 19 to be closed from roilepost 10 to 20. Additionally, a vehicle was shick in a wasU along Route 19. 06-Oct-05 Severe Wind A Cl�widerstonn producing strong winds moved through the southwest side of Tucson causing six power poles to be knocked down along Old Nogales Highway at Ai ort Road. Over 4000 eo le were witliout ower for over an hour due to tlie downed ower oles. Hazardoas CALLER STATED THERE WAS A RELEASE OF MATER[ALS FROM A GAS METER DUE TO A TRUCK THAT HIT THE BUILDING DUE TO 11/5/2005 Materials Incident OPERATOR ERROR FROM THE TRUCK DRNER. TRUCK INFORMAT[ON UNKNOWN, ALSO UNKNOWN IF TRUCK DRIVER WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL.;PIPELINE incident;Material was NATURAL GAS;the amount was 0 UNKNOWN AMOiJNT 02-Jun-06 Severe Wind A dry microburst caused 7 power poles to snap and damaged 2 otliers forcing a dozen liomes to be evacuated as power lines draped across diem. No one was in ured and tliere was minimal dama �e to the (iomes. A tliundersto�rn complex developed over the city of Tucson knocking down and damaging power poles in three separate locations. The storm also produced 03-Jun-06 Severe Wind blowing dust reducing visibility to near zero in many locations. Approximately 30 power poles were damaged or snapped causing more than 24,000 customers to lose owec Fortunatel , there were no ma'or in'uries re orted. A series of Hiunderstorms marohed across die greater Tucson metropolitan uea Irnocking down power poles, producing golf ball sized hail and creating blowing 06-Jun-06 Severe Wind dust. Approximately 10 power poles fell in 5 differeuY locations damaging two vehicles and closing a portion of Interstate 10. Neither Uie lazge hail nor the reduced visibili froin blowin � dust s arked an re oRs of in u or dama =e. 25-Jun-06 Severe Wind A thunderstorm outflow caused ower liues to be knocked down leavin � about 2600 homes without ower. 27-Jun-06 Severe Wind A thunderstorm outflow caused ower lines to be knocked down leavin tlie entire town of A o without ower. 29-Jun-06 Severe Wind A thunderstorm ontflow caused dama e to auelin � of a mobile and ad acent fencin =. Ol-Jid-06 Severe Wi�d A stron thunderstorm wind =ust caused a 2 foot diameter, 40 foot tall tree to be sna ed in lialf 5 miles west soudiwest of the Town of CaYalina. Hazazdous THE CALLER REPORTED THAT FOUR LOCOMOTIVES AND S[X RAILCARS DERAILED DUE TO 1 JNKNOWN REASONS. ALL FOUR 7/2/2006 Materials Incident LOCOMOTIVES t1RE IN THE UPRIGHT POS[TION AND THE RAILCARS ARE LYING ON THEIR SIDES. THE LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT IS REPORTING THAT HYDROCHLORIC ACID IS LEAK;RAILROAD incident;Material was HYDROCHLORIC ACID;tI�e amount was 0 iJNKNOWN AMOUNT Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 29 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Location Fatalifies Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 23-Aug-OS Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 Ol-Sep-OS Flooding SELLS 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 06-Oct-OS Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $45,000 $0 $45,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous 1 I/5/2005 Materials Incident � $200 $0 $200 NRC, 2010 02-Jun-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $90,000 $0 $90,000 NCDC, 2010 03-Jun-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $300,000 $0 $300,000 NCDC, 2010 06-Jun-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $105,000 $0 $105,000 NCDC, 2010 25-Jun-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Jun-06 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Jun-O6 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $3,500 $0 $3,500 NCDC, 2010 Ol-JuI-OG Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 Hazazdous Materials Incident �ION PACIFIC 7/2/2006 RAI[.ROAD MILE 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 POST 1000 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 30 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Descripfion 04-Ju1-06 Severe Wind A strong tliunderstorm on the Southeast side of the Tucson Metro azea downed several trees due to strong winds. The Tucson Fire Deparhnent reported trees downed at die intersection of Trvin �ton Road and Kolb Road as well as neaz Vail Road at Interstate 10. An iutense thunderstonn over the souU� and southeast portion of the Tucson Metro Area brought strong winds that caused several azeas of damage. Four 15 to 20 OS-Jul-O6 Severe Wind Poot tall trees were downed neaz Kotb Road and Golf Links Road. Large trees were also downed causing roof damage near Wilmont Road and 29th Street. Additionally, three power poles were snapped along North Larrea Lane near tl�e iutersection of Cloud Road and Pantano Road. About 7,000 customers where without ower. A H�understonn over eastem portions of the Tucson Metro area produced sffong winds which downed a large (125 foot tall) tree onto an aparnnent complex on OS-Jul-06 Severe Wind Speedway Boulevard near Kolb Road. There were no injuries but eight families were evacuated from tlie aparhnent complex so that repairs could be made. Dama>e was estimated at the time to be about 350,000 dollazs. Several members of the public along with trained spotters reported numerous streets flooded and several railroad w�derpasses flooded and closed due to very heavy 07-Jul-OG Flooding rainfall. Additionally, the broadcast media reported a vehicle was trapped in rising water in Arroyo Cliico wash. Also, a car was submerged in water at tlie Stone Avenue railroad unde ass. 07-Ju1-06 Severe Wiud Stron = thunderstorm winds caused several5 to 10 foot trees to be downed in the Cit of Oro Valle . 07-Ju1-O6 Severe Wind A stron � thunderstonn wind �ust caused ower lines to be downed neaz S eedwa Boalevard and Wilmot Road. 07-Ju1-06 Severe Wind A thundersCOnn wind gust over the Tucson Metro Area caused a metal roof to be tom off of a bnilding which in tum sliced tlirough a nearby power line. 13-Ju1-O6 Severe DVind Ve stron � tliunderstorm winds caused several ower oles to be downed in the Villa �e of Sells, alon • with several trees. 14-Ju1-06 Severe Wind Thunderstorm wind gusts on tlie south side of Uie Tucson Metro Area caused a�i awning to be blown off a I�ome and onto nearby power lines. Additionally, debris U�at was icked u b the wind caused dama �e to an ex osed �as line. Local Tucson Law Enforcement reported tl�at lightning had started several trees on fire in an east side neighborhood. An upper Ievel high over the four comers 18-Ju1-06 Lighming �egion kept Arizona in a moist flow. Tl�is influx of moisture helped to enhance thunderstonn acCivity on tl�e 18th of July 2006. Paotano Wash at Hou �hton Road recorded 0.75 of an inch of rainfa]] on tl�is da . 18Ju1-0G Severe Wiud A member of the local ublic re oRed a lar =e tree downed b a stron � thunderstonn wind �ust on the soutl�east side of the Tucson Metro Area. 18-Ju1-06 Severe Wind The local broadcast media reported tliat strong tlmndersCOrm wind gusts downed several power poles in die Canmunity of Avra Valley. Additionally, a caz window was blown in while drivin alon � Interstate ] 0 near the CoRaro Road exit in the Town of Mazana. 29-Ju1-06 Flooding Numerous roads were closed due to flooding across die Tucsoo MeCro Area. There was also a report tliat tliere were several swift water rescues on the east side of the Tucson Metro Area due to vehicles becomin • s[uck in flooded roadwa s. Historic Ondeclazed Hazard Events Page 31 of 48 Pima Counry Multi-Hazard Mitigatiou Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Location Fatalities Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 04-Ju1-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-Jul-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $23,000 $0 $23,000 NCDC, 2010 OS-JuI-OG Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $350,000 $0 $35Q000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 07-JnI-06 Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Ju1-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $4,000 $0 $4;000 NCDC, 2010 13-Ju1-06 Severe Wind SELLS 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Ju1-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $3,000 $0 $3,000 NCDC, 2010 18-Ju1-06 LigUfiing TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 18-Ju1-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 18-Ju1-06 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $24,000 $0 $24,000 NCDC, 2010 29-Ju1-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 32 of 48 Pima County Mulri-Hazazd Mirigation Plau - 2011 Lots of flash flooding throughout the Tucson Metro Area due to saturated grounds and extremely heavy rainfall. Numerous road were closed due to flooding througliout the entire Metro Area for many hours. A United States Geological Sociery stream gage was destroyed by flood waters in Rincon Creek. Additionally, diere were numerous swift water rescues and car shanded in flooded roadways. It was estimated that nearly 100 vehicles were flooded. Below is a list of some, but not all, of t9ie roads tliat were closed due to flooding: Alvernon Way south of Sahuarita Road Ca�nino De La Tierra nortli of Valencia Road Ca�nino Loma Alta north of Old Spanish Trail EI Tiro Road west of Cocio Road Fort Lowell Road at the Agua Caleinte Wasli Harhnan Lane from Linda Vista Boulevazd to Cortaro Fanns Road La Cholla Boulevard at Uie Canada Del Oro Wash 31-Ju1-06 Flooding Limberlost Road aC Uie Agua Caleinta Wasl� Linda Vista Boulevard from Hartman Lane to Caznino De Manvia Manville Road between Reservation Road and Avra Valley Road Manville Road west of Sandario Road east of Reservation Road Old Spanisli Trail at Tliundediead Ranch Road east of Colossal Cave Overton Road at the Canada Del Oro Wash Pump Station Road between Avra Valley Road and El Tiro Road Pump Station Road between Silvebell Road and Avra Valley Road River Road west of Alvernon Way Sahuarita Road from Alvernon Way to Houghton Road Sandario Road from Ajo Higl�way to Manville Road Siivebell Road west of Cocio Road Suyder Road between Kolb Road and Sabino Canyon Road Soliders Trail at tl�e Agua Calie�ta Wash Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 33 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Loca6on Fatalities Injuries Properly Crop/Livesmck Total Data Source 31-Ju1-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $750,000 $0 $750,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 34 of 48 Pima County Mulri-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazurd Descriplion Several rivers running through the Tucson Metro Area t7ooded on .luly 31, 2006. The Rillito River flooded wiHi watet over the cement banks near podge Boulevard. Additionally, tlie Rillito River was over bankfull just east of tlie Swa�i Road Bridge. River Road near La Cholla Road was flooding from the Rillito River. Sabino Creek was out of its banks and liouses were flooded near Sabino Canyon and Beaz Canyon. Below is a Iisting of some of tl�e damage, but not all, caused by the flooding and an estimate for the cost of repairs: Sabino Canyon Recreation area road and facility damaged, $100,000 FoRy homes aud busiuesses flooded, $1,20Q000 One home destroyed due to flooding, $I50,000 Water main broke near Ihe Mt. Lemmon highway, $20,000 Catalina Higliway road washed away, $50,000 Agricultural irriga[ion system damaged, $500,000 Cement plant flooded, $40Q000 31-Ju1-O6 Flooding Gravel pit flooded, $30,000 General infrastructure damage, $500,000 With tropical moisture pouring into Southeast Arizona, several days of rainfall preceded the July 31st event. With grounds saturated at most locations, the additional rainfall N�at fell on tlie 31 st liad a hazd time soaking into the 6ROUnd and mainly stayed as runoft'. Rivers and washes quickly filled to aod over bazilcfull, flooding l�omes and businesses as weil as nearby roads. Some roadways were washed away due to tl�e strong flood waters. Below is a Iisting of rainfall a�nounts for some locations: U OF A CAMPUS 1.17 � DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB 1.23 TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1.90 AVRA VALLEY AIRPARK 1.07 SANTA CRUZ R[VER AT INA RD 0.67 SANTA CRUZ R/VALENCIA RD 126 CDO WASH/CORONADO CAMP 1.50 DAN SADDLE 1.06 Severe storms moved Hirough the Tncson Metro Area staRing around 7 pm MST (1900 MST). These storms dropped over an incU of rain at the Tucson [nteroational Airport. Around 8:40 pm MST (2040 MST) reports of flooded roadways became widespread. A National Weatlier Service Employee reported OS-Aug-06 Flooding roadway flooding at the intersectioo of Park Avenue and 6th Street. The broadcast media reported flooding along Sahuarita Road, South of Tucson, with a wuple of cars stuek in the flood waters. Additionally, anoClier five cazs became stuck in Nie tlooded intersection of East 22nd Street and South Tyndall Avenue where the water was reported to be over a foot deep and moving very rapidly. Also, a newspaper article reported that two homes were flooded due to an over flowing wash at South 2nd Avenue. 08-Au *-O6 Severe Wind Stron � tl�understonn wind �usts over the Cit of Tucson caused four ower oles to be downed at 36th Street and For •eus Avenue. A severe Yhunderstonn over the Ciry of Tucson produced strong winds that caused sibmificant damage. Roof damage was repoRed on a home neaz the intersection 08-Aug-06 Severe Wind of Park Avemie and 36th Street. Large hees were downed along Ajo Road. Roof damage was also sustained on six aparhnents on Soudi 7th Avenue. Additionall , a roof colla sed on a liome at 32nd Street and 7t1� Avenue. A strong thunderstonn over southwest Tucson caused significant damage due to strong winds. A trained spotter reported that several trees were uprooted at 08-Aug-O6 Severe Wind Country Club Road and Valencia Road. Additionally, the media repoRed that 7 seven power potes were down along Old Nogales Highway. Also, 5 trees were re orted bein � u rooted alon � Aviatio�� Hi =hwa at Coun Club Road. 13-Aug-06 Severe Wind A strong (60 mph, 52 knot) thunderstorm wind knocked down five power poles in U�e Town of Ajo at a sub station causing a widespread power outage. Tlie power was re orted to be out in the Towns of A�o, Whe , a�id Lukeville. 14-Aug-06 Flooding The intersection of Snyder Road and CaYalina Highway was flooded and impassable. A vehicle became stuck on the intersection and a swift water rescue was erformed to rescue the occu ants of the vehicle. Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 35 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Location � Fatalifies Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total � Data Source 31-Ju1-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Aug-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Au -06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Aug-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Aug-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $62,000 $0 $62,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-06 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $37,000 $0 $3'7,000 NCDC, 2010 14-Aug-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 36 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard MirigaYion Plan - 20ll Date Hazard Description 16-Aug-06 Flooding Lee Street at Nie Alamo Wash was cbsed due to flooding of the roadway. Water was two feet deep at crest Additionally, a car was stalled iu the intersection of Sth Street and Sahara Street due to floodin �. 2l-Aug-06 Severe Wi�id The local newspaper reported that three large trees were uprooted in the Town of Green Valley. One of the large trees fell onto a caz, causing damage to the car. One of the oCher trees fell onto a buildin �, causin � some dama *e to the buildiu �. 21-Aug-06 Severe Wind Strong thunderstonn wind gusts caused a large billboard and power lines to be downed onto cars near the intersection of 22nd Street and Kolb Road. 23-Aug-06 Severe Wiud A severe Uiunderstorm produced very strong wind gusts. Tliese wind gusts caused significant damage, with eight power poles being downed on Mission Road. Additionally, several mobile homes were dama �ed and some were knocked ot�'their foundations on A'o Wa near Mission Road. 02-Sep-06 Flooding Law Enforcement repoded tliat two cazs were stuck in a wash crossing just north of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument due to fast moving flood waters. 07-Sep-06 Flooding A wunYy official reported that Highway 86 was closed at the Sikul Himath Wash due to flooding. The bridge at this wasli was overtopped causing large volumes of water to flow across Hi liwa 86. Additionall , a swift water rescue was erformed on Route 19 due to a flooded roadwa . Extremely l�eavy rainfall across the Tucson Metro Area on the morning on September 7th prompted widespread flash flooding. Numerous roads across the Tucson Metro Area were impassable and closed due to flooding. Additionally, at least ten vehicles became stuck in different low water crossings tluoughout the city. Nmnerous swift water rescues were perforrned. One man was killed when he was swept downstream by flood waters. Tlie man was first spotted in tlie Rodeo 07-Sep-06 Flooding Wash at the intersection of Soutl� Fletcher Avenue and East Irvington Road. His body was later discovered 15 miles downsCream. Rainfall amounts througliout the Tucson Metro Area ranged from ti�ree quarters of an inch to almost two inches. Tl�e Tacson Intemational AirpoR recorded 1.14 inclies of rain. M'?I W A neazly stationary tornado caused damage to a trailer, parked at a residence on Avra Valley Road in Marana, AZ, by blowing it onto its side. Also, a few homes 08-Oct-06 Severe Wind near Uie intersection of West Avra Valley Road and NortU Anway Road close to the Town of Marana, AZ experienced minor damage.Upper level cut-off low pressure centered over San Diego, CA pulled sub-[ropical moisture northward into Arizona which resulted in scattered showers aud Chunderstomis across southeastern Arizona. 27-Dec-06 Severe Wind A microburst caused powec lines to be knocked down and damaged a s6ed in Kinney Estates.An isolated severe thunderstonn developed along tlie leading edge of an u er level low ressure a roachin = Arizona. 17-Mar-07 Severe Wind A microburst brought down seven power poles in Tucson along Irvington Road between Camino Seco and Harrison leaving about 2675 structures without powecA weak mid level disturbance combined wifli record heat caused a storm which roduced a microburst. 28-Apr-07 Wildtire Fagan Fire - a lighhiing caused tire burned an area 2 miles south of Corona de Tucson. Tlie fue started April 28, 2007 and was controlled May 6, 2007, and burned a total oY 536 acres with over $160,000 in fire su ression costs. Flash tlooding from Uiunderstonns caused a veliicle to be swept into fast moving water at Nodh Bobcat Ridge Trail and West Ina Road on the northwest side of 16-May-07 Flooding Tucson. The vehicle was washed downstream for about 200 feet before coming to a stop on a bank.An increase in low level moisture combined wiUi a weak upper level disturbance and generated isolated thunderstonns across the Tucson azea. Tliese storms produced heavy rainfall and flash flooding. 17-Jun-07 Wildfire Buena Fire - a hwnan caused fire bumed an azea 9.5 miles nortlieast o€Higltway 286/Arivaca Road Junction. The fire started June 17, 2007 and containment ex ec[ed June 18, 2007, and burned a total of 1,151 acres with over $110,000 in fire su ression costs. 27-Jun-07 Wildfire Mansfield Fire - a lighming caused tlre bumed an azea 8 miles northwest of Patagonia, Arizona. The fire started June 27,2007 and expected containment was July 4, 2007, and bumed a total of 860 acres with over $500,000 in fire su ression costs. A strong thunderstonn caused damage on the nortli side of Tucson. Winds caused damage at the Rillito racetrack to stable roofs and bent beams on the OS-Jul-07 Severe Wind ��randstand. Power lines were also blown over at tlie intersections of Campbell Road and Roger Road, Stone Road and Roger Road and at Stone Road and Country Club RoadMoist easterl monsoonal flow caused isolated tliunderstorms over Uie city of Tucson. 7-Ju1-07 Wildfire Alambre Fire - a lightning caused fire that bumed an area 12 miles east of Sells, Arizona. The 5re startad July 7, 2008 and was controlled July 24, 2007, and burned a total of 7,267 acres wi[h over $2,340,000 in fire su tession costs. Historie Ondeclared Hazard Events Page 37 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Location Fatalifies Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 16-Aug-06 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 21-Aug-06 Severe Wind GREEN VLY 0 0 530,000 $0 $3Q000 NCDC, 2010 2l-Aug-O6 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $45,000 $0 $45,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Aug-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $105,000 $0 $105,000 NCDC, 2010 02-Sep-06 Flooding AJO 0 0 $15,000 $0 $I5,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Sep-06 Flooding SELLS 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 07-Sep-06 Flooding TUCSON I 0 $80,000 $0 $80,000 NCDC, 2010 08-Oct-06 Severe Wind MARANA 0 0 $13,000 $0 $13,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Dec-06 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $15,000 $0 $I5,000 NCDC, 2010 17-Maz-07 Severe Wind WILMOT JCT 0 0 $56,000 $0 $56,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Apr-07 Wildfire 1 GACC, 2010 16-May-07 Flooding CORTARO 0 0 52,000 $0 $2,000 NCDC, 2010 U-Jun-07 Wildfire GACC, 2010 27-Jun-07 Wildfire GACC, 2010 OS-Jul-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $75,000 $0 $75,000 NCDC, 2010 7-Ju1-07 Wildfire GACC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 38 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description Approximately 100 trees were uprooted and knocked down at Oro Valley Country Club on Greenock Road due to a wet microburst. An additional 30 trees were l8-Ju1-07 Severe Wind uprooted at a nearby shopping plaza at Oracle Road and t st Avenue. The uprooted trees caused roof datnage to several liouses. The storms also blew off part of a roof aC the Blue Moon stables in Oro Valley.A moist eastedy flow due to high pressure over the four corners combined with daytime heating to cause severe thunderstorms with stro� � winds. 19-Ju1-07 Severe Wind A tree was downed across Tanque Verde Road near Uie Pantano Wash.Abundant monsoonal moisture caused numerous thunderstonns across much of Southeast Arizona. 19-Ju1-07 Severe Wind Power lines were luiocked down along Miracle Mile Strip in Tucson.Abundant monsoonal moisture caused numerous tliunderstonns across much of Soutlieast Arizona. A trained spoYter reported an estimated wind gust to 60 mpl� in Green Valley. On Abrego drive in Green Valley there were two downed trees and a huge pecan 19-Ju1-07 Severe Wind tree was uprooted neaz tUe entrance to La Posada off Continental Road. In addition, five power poles were downed on Hawk Road east of Canoa Road in Green Valle .Abundant monsoonal moisture caused numerous thunderstorms across much of Southeast Arizona. 20-Ju1-07 Severe Wind A tin roof was blown off of a Carport at Santa Rosa Ranch on the Tohono O'odham Nation due to strong winds from tliunderstonns.Runoff from excessive rainfall on July t9th caused waslies Co flow across tlie Tucson Metro area In addition, new thunderstonns developed later in the day across Cochise County. Two mobile homes were deshoyed and a haditional home partially destroyed in the Ventana Secdon of the Tucson Foothilla There were two uprooted trees at 21-Ju1-07 Severe Wind Grant Road and Kolb Road in Tucson and an estimated 60 mpU gust due to Uiunderstonns in Tucson. A roo£ also collapsed at a fumiture store neaz 22nd sheet and Wilmot road. In addition, tliese Himiderstonns knocked down about 20 power poles near Palo Verde Road aud Irvington Road. There were 18,000 customers witl�out power in the Tucson area.Daytime l�eating in combination with a moist flow caused thunderstonns to develop across Soudieast Arizona. Localized areas in the midtown of Tucson had over one inch of rainfall causing flash flooding. A caz had been swept nearly 100 yazds down Rodeo Wash east of 23-Ju1-07 Flooding NorHi Avenue and West Irvingtou Road. One stalled caz was trapped under several feet of water in the Stone Avenue nnderpass near downtown. There was also a swift water rescue near Kleindale and Tucson Boulevazd. A[ Fort Lowell Road and Nodh Mountain Avenue several vehicles were happed in flooding waslies.Strong thunderstonns caused high winds and excessive rainfall tl�roughout tl�e Tucson Metro azea and a dust stonn in Pinal County. 23-Ju1-07 Severe Wind Microburs[ near Tangerine aud Interstate 10 in the Gladden Farms neighborhood caused some lree and roof damage.Strong thunderstorms caused high winds and excessive rainfall throu �hout the Tucson Metro azea and a dust storm in Pinal Count . Twelve power poles were knocked down due to strong winds along Houghton Road nort6 of Valencia Road leaving 1400 customers without power. There was 23-Ju1-07 Severe Wind also a 60 foot tree uprooted in Tucso�i due to a wet microburst.Strong thunderstorms caused high winds and excessive rainfall throughout the Tucson Metro azea and a dust storm in Pinal Coun . Thunderstonns across the city of Tucson caused scattered wind damage including:�Several trees down on Golf Links Road between Swan Road and Craycroft Road. �A downed power line at Grant Road and Alvernon Road. �A downed tree wliicli fell on a caz at Williams Center near Broadway Boulevard and Rosemont 24-Jn1-07 Severe Wind Road. �Several large trees downed on Swan Road nortl� of Sunrise Road �A 70 foot tree blew down onto Nie side of the Broadway East Community Center neaz Broadway and Wilmot.�Moist soutlierly tropical flow over Arizona due to an area of low pressure off the California coast caused tliunderstonns and flash tlooding across SoutUeast Arizona. 27-Ju1-07 Severe Wind PON'er poles down neaz Golf Links and Pntdence in Tucson.Strong and slow moving thunderstonns widi heavy rain and strong winds moved tluough portions of [l�e Tucson area causing flash flooding and wind damage. 27-Ju1-07 Severe Wind Strong winds from a thunderstorm knocked down about 201arge power poles along North 11th Ave�ue south of Speedway Blvd. in Tucson.Strong and slow movin � diunderstotms witlt heav rain and stron r winds moved throu h ortions of the Tucson area causin � flasli floodin � and wind dama =e. 28-Ju1-07 Flooding Sinkhole in road occurred at River Road and Crayerofr Road.Strong and slow moving thunderstorms caused excessive rainfall, flash flooding and wind dunage across po�tions of Southeast Arizona. 28-Ju1-07 Severe Wind Over a dozen trees and at least two power lines were downed near Fort Lowell and Dodge Blvd.Strong and slow moving thunderstonns caused excessive rainfall, flasli floodin and wind dazna �e across ortions of Southeast Arizona. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 39 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Locafion FataGfies Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 18-Ju1-07 Severe Wind ORO VLY 0 0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 NCDC, 2010 19-Ju1-07 Severe Wind FLECHA CAIDA 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 ESTATES l9-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 NCDC, 2010 19-Ju1-07 Severe Wind GREEN VLY 0 0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 NCDC, 2010 20-Ju1-07 Severe Wind SELLS 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 21-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $225,000 $0 $225,000 NCDC, 2010 23-7u1-07 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Ju1-07 Severe Wind RILLITO 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 23-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 5100,000 $0 $I00,000 NCDC, 2010 24-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUSCON 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 COONTRY CLUB 27-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $200,000 $0 $200,000 NCDC, 2010 28-Ju1-07 Flooding FLECHA CAIDA 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 ESTATES 28-Ju1-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $17,000 $0 $17,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclazed Hazard Events Page 40 of 48 Pima Counry Multi-Hazazd Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Description Numerous streets flooded in downtown Tucson inc(uding the 4th avenue shopping district witli many businesses flooded. Six people were rescued at Alvemon 31-Ju1-07 Flooding Road and Interstate 10 in flood waters. Isolated rainfall amounts of 2-3 inches occwred from Davis-Montl�ao Air Force Base to the South side of Tucson.Strong thiuiderstorms in Eastem aud Central Pima Coun[ due to abnndant monsoon moisture extensive flash floodin �. 31-Ju1-07 Flooding One person drowned in a car that go[ swept into Rodeo Wash neaz east Irvington Road.Strong thunderstonns in Eastern and Central Pima County due to abundant roonsoon moisture extensive flash floodin =. Large wall of water moved down seven falis in Beaz Ca�ryon. About 50 people sought higher grouud and many of those needed to be rescued by helicopter.Strong 04-Aug-07 Flooding thunderstorms produced heavy rainfall over the higlier tenain of the Catalina Mountains. Tliis heavy rainfall produced a flash flood which moved downstream into Bear Canyon and tlie populaz Seven Falls area causing Iwo fatali[ies. Flash flooding also occuaed in tl�e Wl�etstone azea of Cociiise County. 10-Aug-07 Severe Wind Power lines were reported down at Oracle road and River road.Severe tliunderstonns occurred across Eastern Pima County produciug considerable wind daznage and flash floodin on the northwest side of Tucson. 10-Aug-07 Severe Wind Seven to ten trees downed at Ina road and La Ca�ada road. Trees were up to 12 incl�es in diameter.Severe tl�understonns occurred across Eastem Pima Comity roducin cousiderable wind dama �e and flash floodin on the northwest side of Tucson. Nwnerous trees were downed due to stroug thunderstorm winds in the vicinity of Oracle road and Ina road. Lazgest tree was abouY 6 inch diauieter and the oNiers 4 10-Aug-07 Severe Wind to 5 inches in diameter.Severe tliunderstonns occurred across Eastern Pima County producing considerable wind damage and flash flooding on the noRhwest side of Tucson. t 1-Au =-07 Severe Wind Roof blown off house in To awa.Monsoon thunderstonns roduced a microburst over the Tohono O'odham Nation. A suspected illegal immigrant was struck and injured by lightning while traveling tluough the desert of tl�e Altar Valley near Sasabe. Three of his companions 13-Aug-07 Lightniug were also sUocked when the bolt hit the ma�� who suffered minor injuries.A severe thuuderstonn caused extensive damage to a �eighborhood near Eloy in Pinal Count . Meanwliile, southwest of Tucsou, li �htnin > shuck a sus ected i11e �al immi =rant in the Altar Valle . 15-Aug-07 Severe Wind A roof was blown off a house near Irvington road and sunset road.An eady morning thunderstorm caused wind damage on the Soudiwest side of Tucson. 24-Aug-07 Severe Wind Several power poles and a lree were reported down near 22nd street between Swan Road and Columbus Road.Scattered tliunderstorms across Southeast Arizona caused hail and wind dama �e in Tucson and flasli floodin * in No *ales. Ol -Sep-07 Severe Wind � off duty National Weather Service employee reported several large tree limbs broken near Ina Road and Mona Lisa Road.Monsoonal moisture produced severe thunderstonns with wind dama e on the NoRhwest side of Tucson and east of A'o in Western Pima Count . O1-Sep-07 Severe Wind �ON'er lines were downed east of Ajo causing a complete power outage across Western Pima County.Monsoonal moisture produced severe thunderstonns widi wind dama *e on the NoRhwest side of Tucson and east of A'o in Western Pima Coun . Localized amouuts of tainfall in excess of 8 inches occurred on Mk Le�mnon causing extensive flooding az�d rock slides. Several people in Tucson needed to be 27-Jan-08 Flooding rescued from flowing washesA trough of low pressuce off the Westem U.S. coast helped transport abwidant moistuce into SouYheast Arizona. Heavy cainfall occurred in the mountains causin � floodiu � in the Catalinas and stream floodin � in Gree�lee CounC . 9-May-08 Wildfire Solano Fire - a liwnan caused fire bumed an area 20 miles east of Sells, Arizona. Tlie fire started May 9, 2009 and bumed a total of 2,545 acres with over $1,325,000 i� fire su ression costs. 23-Jun-08 Wildfire �lite Tank Fire - an unknown caused fire bwned an area 10 miles east of Town of Arivaca, Arizona. Tlie fire started June 23, 2008 and expected contaimnent was June 29, 2008, and burned a total of 8,135 acres with over $777,300 in fire su ression costs. 26-Jun-08 Wildfire Chimenea WFU Fire - a lightning caused tire bumed an azea 12 miles east of Tucson, Arizona and 13 miles northeast5 of Vail, Arizona. The fire started June 26, 2008 and bumed a total of ] 20 acres with over $75,000 in fire su ression costs. Two to three inches of rainfall occurred in the border town of Lukeville, Arizona. This caused flooding and damage to private property, businesses and 12-Ju1-08 Flooding government offices with water several feet high. A report from officials at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument stated a recently built fence along the international border exacerbated the flooding as a result of the fence acting like a dam and stopping the normal progression of water through the border. 13-JU1-08 Severe Wind Davis fvlonthan Air Force Base recorded a gust to 64 mph as the result of a wet microburst. Nearby damage just east of the base included 13 power poles downed and a roof blown off a home and onto several cars in the vicinity of Escalante Road just to the east of Kolb Road. Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 41 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Da[e Hazard Locafion Fatalities Injuries Properly Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 31-Ju1-07 Flooding TUCSON 0 0 $100,000 $0 $100,000NCDC,2010 31-Ju1-07 Flooding TUCSON 1 0 50 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 04-Aug-07 Flooding TUCSON 2 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 10-Aug-07 Severe Wind CASAS ADOBES 0 0 $10,000 $0 $1Q000 NCDC, 2010 ]0-Aug-07 Severe Wind CASAS ADOBES 0 0 $10,000 $0 $I0,000 NCDC, 2010 10-Aug-07 Severe Wind CASAS ADOBES 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 1 l-Au �-07 Severe Wind TOPAWA 0 0 $15,000 $0 $I5,000 NCDC, 2010 13-Aug-07 Lighming SASABE 0 4 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 15-Aug-07 Severe Wind DREXEL HGTS 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 24-Aug-07 Severe Wind TUCSON 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 O1-Sep-07 Severe Wind CASAS ADOBES 0 0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 NCDC, 2010 O1-Sep-07 Severe Wind AJO 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 27-Jan-08 Flooding SUMMERHAVEN 0 0 $777,000 $0 $777,000 NCDC, 2010 9-May-08 Wildfire GACC, 2010 23-Jan-08 Wildfire GACC, 2010 26-Jun-08 Wildfire GACC, 2010 12-Jul-OS Flooding Lukeville 0 0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 NCDC, 2010 1 Mile East of 13-Ju1-08 Severe Wind (dma)davis 0 0 $135,000 $0 $135,000 NCDC, 20I0 Monthan A Historic UndecLared Hazard Events Pa�e 42 of 48 Pima County Muiti-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Descrip[ion . 19-Ju1-08 Flooding A vehicle was found near 15th Avenue and Mable Street where a man had been swept away due to flash flooding. EPISODE NARRATIVE: A mesoscale convective system developed across Southeast Arizona resulting in heavy rainfall and flash flooding. 22-Ju1-08 Liglitninb An 18 year old man was struck by lightning and injured while working on the roof of a house. EPISODE NARRATIVE: Strong to severe thunderstorms developed across ortions of Southeast Arizona resultin in lar e hail and flash floodin . 3-Aug-08 Flooding Swift water rescue was attempted at Sells Wash near Sells. The vehicle was washed away attempting to cross wash. Three people died and two were rescued. 3-Aug-08 Severe Wind A roof was partially blown off a house east of Sells. 7-Aug-08 Lightning Lightning sparked a fire in a vacant home on the southwest side of Tucson near West Valencia and South Mission Roads. EPISODE NARRATIVE: Strong thunderstorms with locally heavy rainfall developed across Southeast Arizona resulting in flash flooding, sporadic wind and lightning damage. Extensive wind damage occurred on the north side of Tucson due to a microburst. Damage reported included 28 power poles knocked down including a dozen at 13-Aug-08 Severe Wind River Road and Dodge Blvd resulting in 35,000 customers without power, some for an extended period as much as two days. Damage was also reported at the Jewish Community Center near River Road and Alvernon Way. There was also roof damage to numerous businesses and hundreds of trees knocked down. Hazardous CALLER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A TWO VEHICLE COLLISION BETWEEN A TRACTOR TRA[LER AND ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE s/23/2008 Materials Incident TRACTOR TRAILER WAS A HAZMAT CHARACTER. THE SECOND VEHICLE WAS A TOW TRUCK. THE TRACTOR TRAILER SWERVED AROUND THE TOW TRUCK CAUSING THE ACCIDENT.;MOBILE incideut;Material was OIL: DIESEL;the amount was 100 GALLON(S) Hazardous CALLER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A TWO VEHICLE COLLISION BETWEEN A TRACTOR TRAILER AND ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE 8/23/2008 Materials Incident TRACTOR TRAILER WAS A HAZMAT CHARACTER. THE SECOND VEHICLE WAS A TOW TRUCK. THE TRACTOR TRAILER SWERVED AROUND THE TOW TRUCK CAUSING THE ACCIDENT.;MOBILE incident;Material was N[TRIC ACID;the amoimt was 1 GALLON(S) 31-Aug-08 Flooding A swift water rescue occurred along Highland ave. at Arroyo Chico. Numerous streets in the city of Tucson were also impassable. 11-Sep-08 Flooding A swift water rescue occurred on Sahuarita Road between Wilmot Road and Kolb Road. 16-Feb-09 Lighming A suspected illegal immigrant in the Altar valley was struck by lightning and suffered minor injuries. 28-Mar-09 Wildfire Fresnal Fire - a l�wnan caused fire burned an azea I S miles southeast of Sells, Arizona. The fire started Mazcli 28, 2009 and expected contaimnent was April 1, 2009, and burned a total of 237 acres witli over $75,000 in fire su ression costs. 29-May-09 Wildfire Melendrez Pass Fire - a lightning caused fire bumed an area 10 miles east of Green Vatley, Arizona. The fire started May 29, 2009 and was controlled June 6, 2009, and burned a total of 5,800 acres with over $45Q000 in fire su ression costs. 11-Jun-09 Wildfire Elk Horn Fire - a human caused fire burned an azea 26 miles sonthwest of Three Points, Arizona. The fire started Jime 1], 2009 and expected containment was June 22, 2009, and burned a total 23,440 acres with over $1,07Q000 in fire su ression wsts. Severe thunderstorm outflow winds tore a portion of the roofing material off a strip mall store near the intersedion of Grant and Campbell. The debris from the 29-Jun-09 Severe Wind roof blew into the parking lot, but resulted in no injuries. Winds from the same thunderstorm uprooted trees at the intersection of Pantano and 22nd Street, and damaged an awning on a mobile home. One woman and one child received minor injuries after a tree limb fell on them on the 1800 block of Mission Road. A I r fll n w vhi Historic Undeeiared Hazazd Events Page 43 of 48 PIMA COUNTY MULTI-TURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Appendix E Plan Maintenance Review Memorandums Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estiroates Date Hazard Locafion F•rtalities Injuries Property Gop/Livestock Total Data Source 22 Miles East 30-Ju1-10 Flooding North East of 0 0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 NCDC, 2010 Tucson 2 Miles North 15-Aug-10 Severe Wind North West of Oro 0 0 $100,000 $0 $]OQ000 NCDC, 2010 Vly 24-Au 10 Li hfiin � 4 Miles North East 0 0 g � �' of Oro VI $100,000 $0 $100,000 NCDC, 2010 24-AU 10 Severe Wind 4 MilesSouth of 0 0 g Sabino $85,000 $0 $85,000 NCDC, 2010 Historic Undeclared Hazard Events Page 48 of 48 Pima Coimty Multi-Hazard Mitigatioii Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Descriplion Torrential rainfall across portions of eastern Pima county resulted in numerous reports of flash flooding in the Tucson metro area. Flash flooding was observed on Tanque Verde Creek. The flow of the creek peeked at 11.69 feet at Tanque Verde Guest Ranch, resulting in the flooding of approximately 30 homes on 30-1u1-10 Flooding Barbary Coast Road, Gold Dust Road, and Kitt Carson. Additionally, numerous swift water rescues were performed in the Tucson metro area, near the county fairgrounds, in the Recon Valley area, and on the Old Spanish Trail in the Hilton Head Ranch area. EPISODE NARRATIVE: Numerous thunderstorms formed within a very moist atmosphere over southeast Arizona, producing heavy flooding rainfall at many locales. Many creeks, washes and rivers experienced heavy runoff Local broadcast media reported up to 3 dozen trees damaged or uprooted in Rancho Vistoso neighborhood. A few ceramic roof tiles were also blown off homes. In addition, a NWS Empioyee reported several trees down in Dove Mountain with one tree leaning up against a home. There was only slight tile damage to the 15-Aug-10 Severe Wind home. Also, local broadcast media reported trees and power lines down in Marana at Interstate 10 and Marana/Trico Road as well as a roof ripped off a mobile home. The Marana Airport also sustained damage. Two small airplanes were ripped from their tie down chains and were flipped over while another plane was blown into a field. A large hangar door was blown off its tracks and a few other hangars also sustained light damage. In the same area, several power poles and lines were downed on Twin Peaks Road east of N. Sandario Road. 24-Aug-10 Lighming After a majority of the thunderstorm activity had started to wind down, lightning struck a house in Oro Valley. The house then caught fire causing extensive dama e. Thunderstorms developed over eastern portions of the Tucson area around 2:30 pm MST. Storms slowly moved to the east at around 5 to 10 mph dropping heavy rainfall and putting out thunderstorm winds in excess of 60 mph. The first reports of damage were received at 3 pm on the east side of Tucson. Several 24-Aug-10 Severe Wind tree limbs were downed on Columbus Blvd, with a few power poles down on 6th street. At 3:09 pm, reports were received of several street signs down in the La Paloma Estates. By 3:15 pm, reports were coming in from the media about several roofs damaged in eastern sections of Tucson. Also around 3:15 pm, spotters reported several large trees downed in east Tucson, including trees down on 22nd St and Broadway Blvd. A large was blown into an election polling station building near S. Alvernon and E. Benson Highways in southern Tucson. Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 47 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Date Hazard Loca6on FataliNes Injuries Property Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 30-Jun-09 Flooding z Miles North 0 0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 NCDC, 2010 West ofThree Pts 30-Jun-09 Severe Wind Three Pts 0 1 $150,000 $0 $ISQ000 NCDC, 2010 15-Ju1-09 Wild6re GACC, 2010 Hazardous 7/24/2009 Materials Incideut I10 EASTBOiJND 1 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 Hazardous 9/10/2009 Matenals Incident �-lo WB c�i EXIT $2,000 $0 $2,000 NRC, 2010 252 @ TUCSON, AZ 26-OcU09 Wildfire GACC, 2010 21-Jan-10 Flooding 25 Miles South 0 0 $10,000 $0 $1Q000 NCDC, 2010 East of Tucson 3 Miles East of 10-Ju1-10 Liglrtning (dma)davis 1 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 Monthan A 17-Ju1-10 Severe Wind 5 Miles North 0 0 $55,000 $0 $55,000 NCDC, 2010 West of Vail 2 Miles South 20-Ju1-10 Lightning South East of Casas 0 0 $80,000 $0 $80,000 NCDC, 2010 Adobes 30-Ju1-10 Flooding 1 Mile South South 0 0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 NCDC, 2010 West of Naviska Historic Undeclued Hazazd Events Page 46 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Date Hazard Descripiion . Heavy thunderstorm rainfall of 1 to 2 inches fell in only a 30 minute period near State Highway 86 and Three Points. Significant flooding of washes and low water 30-Jun-09 Flooding crossings occurred. The Three Points fire department reported several roads were washed out and impassable in the Three Points area. The local law enforcement reported a swift water rescue was performed near the intersection of California and Worden Roads at approximately 9 PM MST. Severe thunderstorm downburst winds caused significant damage at Three Points. Several mobile homes and nearby sheds were either heavily damaged or 30-Jun-09 Severe Wind destroyed. A more substantial brick veneer building was also damaged, with varying degrees of roof damage reported to several homes in Three Points. Several large trees were uprooted completely. Winds from this severe thunderstorm were estimated to be near 85 mph. Three Points Fire reported one injury was r 'v I rwin I w h 15-Ju1-09 Wi(dfire San Juan Fire - a liuman caused fire bumed azi azea soudi of Kitt Peak, west of Sells, Arizona. Tlie fire started July 15, 2009 and was controlled Juty 21, 2009, and burned a total of 9,200 acres with over $305,000 in fire su ression costs. Hazazdous CALLER REPORTED A TRACTOR TRAILER CAUGHT ON FIRE HAIJLING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DUE TO iINKNOWN REASONS.;MOBILE 7/24/2009 Ma[erials Incident incidentMaterial was UNKNOWN MATERIAL;Uie amount was 0 LJNKNOWN AMOUNT Hazardous ASPHAI.T SPILL FROM TANKER TRUCK (INFORMATION PROVIDED VIA WEB REPORT). MATERIAL ENTERED A STORM DRA[N WHICH IS A 9/l0/2009 Materials Incident TRIBUTARY OF THE SANTA CRUZ RIVER. HOWEVER, NO MATERIAL REACHED THE RNER.;MOffiLE incident;Material was ASPHALT;the amount was 500 GALLON S 26-Oct-09 Wildfire Tluee Peaks Fire - a human caused fire bumed an azea 10 miles noRhwest of Sasabe, Arizona. The fire started October 26, 2009 and was controlled November 6, 2009, and burned a to[al of 5,750 acres with over $195,000 in fire su ression costs. Sixteen hikers were trapped on Sabino Canyon Trail at approximately 11 AM on January 21st after the stream rose above its banks, covering low water crossings. The San Simon and Vamori Washes in the Tohono Oodham Nation rose 1-2 feet out of their banks during the evening of January 21st. Several other washes flowed out of their banks, resulting in barricaded roadways near Saguaro National Park East and West, including East Tucson and Avra Vailey. A motorist was trapped in the Canada del Oro Wash near Rancho del Lago at approximately 7 AM on January 22nd. A swift water rescue was performed to rescue the strended 21-Jan-10 Flooding motorist. EPISODE NARRATIVE: An exceptionally strong Pacific storm system impacted southeast Arizona, producing a wide variety of weather. Widespread heavy valley rain and higher elevation snow affeded all of southeast Arizona. Additionally, the storm produced a significant wind event, with strong and damaging winds reported at many locations, along with areas of blowing dust. Heavy rainfall and melting snowpack produced some flooding of area streams and washes, and the combination of heavy snow and strong winds produced blizzard conditions on the highest elevations at times. Also, several severe 10-Ju1-10 Lightning Two men were injured due to a lightning strike on a golf course. One man suffered life threatening injuries, which he Iater died from. Another man was about 50 feet away, and received a milder shock from the lightning strike. Severe thunderstorm winds caused damage across southern portions of Tucson. A trained spotter reported several trees downed near Rita Ranch at 5 PM MST. Power lines were reported down by the winds at two different locations near the Tucson International Airport. Thunderstorm winds ripped the roof off a mobile 17-Ju1-10 Severe Wind home near the intersection of Interstate 19 and Valencia Road. In addition, several other trees and power lines were downed by the thunderstorm winds across southwest portions of Tucson. One of these trees was downed on a residence. A lightning strike caused a house fire during the early morning hours of July 20th. The lightning strike likely occurred around 1 AM as storms impacted north Tucson, with the sparks smoldering in the roofs insulation until a neighbor noticed the fire spreading around 5 AM. The fire resulted in extension damage to the 20-Ju1-10 Lightning home before the fire was extinguished. EPISODE NARRATIVE: High pressure aloft was centered over central Arizona on July 19th. Numerous thunderstorms rotated around this upper high, and affected much of southeast Arizona during the afternoon and evening hours. Afternoon and early evening storms impacted mainly Cochise and Santa Cruz counties, with late evening and early morning storms impacting the Tucson metro area. Neavy rain caused poor visibility and ponding of water on Interstate 10. The driver of an automobile lost control of vehicle in the rain and crashed into a semi- 30-Ju1-10 Flooding tractor trailer which had slowed to under 15 mph because of the rain. The driver of the automobile died at the scene. In addition, heavy rain caused a berm to breach which flooded an e uestrian center. Ha and feed used for horses at the facilit was ruined. Historic Undeclazed Hazazd Events Page 45 of 48 Pima County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan - 2011 Damage Estimates Da[e Hazard Loca6on Fatalities Injuries Proper[y Crop/Livestock Total Data Source 19-Ju1-08 Flooding 1 Miles North East � 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 of Emery Park 22-Ju1-08 Lightni�g 1 Mile North of 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 Sahuarita 3-Aug-08 Flooding 1 Miles South West 3 0 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 of Wickchoupai 1 Mile East South 3-Aug-08 Severe Wind East of Chiawuli 0 2 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 Tak 7-Aug-08 Lighming 3 Miles South of 0 0 $210,000 $0 $210,000 NCDC, 2010 Drexel Hgts 4 Miles North 13-Aug-08 Severe Wind North East of 0 0 $2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000 NCDC, 2010 Tucson Hazardous Materials Inciden[ I 10 WEST BOUND, 8/23/2008 AT CORTARO 2 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 ROAD Hazardous Materials Incident I 10 WEST BOUND, 8/23/2008 AT CORTARO 2 $0 $0 NRC, 2010 ROAD 31-Aug-OS Flooding 5 Miles South of 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 Pantano 5 Miles North 11-Sep-08 Flooding North West of 0 0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 NCDC, 2010 Helvetia 16-Feb-09 Lighfiing $ Miles North 0 1 $0 $0 $0 NCDC, 2010 West of Las Guijas 28-Mar-09 Wildfire GACC, 2010 29-May-09 Wildfire GACC, 2010 ll-Jun-09 Wildfire 5 GACC, 2010 29-Jun-09 Severe Wind 1 Mile North West 0 2 $16,000 $0 $16,000 NCDC, 2010 of Tucson Historic Undeclared Hazazd Events Page 44 of 48