Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/07/2007 Council Agenda Packett �wN Q� ARizoN�' COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA Council Chambers 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 856 53 August 7, 2007, at or after 7 :00 p.m. Ed Honea, Mayor Herb Kai, Vice Mayor Council Members Russell Clanagan Patti Comerford Tim Escobedo Carol McGorray Roxanne Ziegler ACTION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. Revisions to the agenda can occur up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. Revised agenda items appear in italics. AS A COUR -TESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE TURN OFF OR PUT IN SILENT MODE ALL PACERS AND CELL PHONES Welcome to this Marana Council meeting. Regular Council meetings are usually held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Marana Town Hall, although the date or time may change, or Special Meetings may be called at other times and/or places. Contact Town Hall or watch for posted agendas for other meetings. This agenda may be revised up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. In such a case a new agenda will be posted in place of this agenda. If you are interested in speaking to the Council during Call to the Public, Public Hearings, or other agenda items, you must fill out a speaker card (located in the lobby outside the Council Chambers) and deliver it to the Town Clerk prior to the convening of the meeting. All persons attending the Council meeting, whether speaking to the Council or not, are expected to observe the Council Rules, as well as the rules of politeness, propriety, decorum and good conduct. Any person interfering with the meeting in any way, or acting rudely or loudly will be removed from the meeting and will not be allowed to return. To better serve the citizens of Marana and others attending our meetings, the Council Chambers are wheelchair and handicapped accessible. Any person who, by reason of any disability, is in need of special services as a result of their disability, such as assistive listening devices, agenda materials printed in Braille or large print, a signer for the hearing impaired, etc., will be accommodated. Such special services are available upon prior request to the Town Clerk at least 10 working days prior to the Council meeting. Copies of the agenda are available the day of the meeting in the lobby outside the Council Chambers or online at www.marana.com by linking to the Town Clerk page under Agendas, Minutes and Ordinances. For questions about the Council meetings, special services or procedures, please contact the Town Clerk, at 382 -1999, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Posted no later than August 5, 2007, 7:00 p.m., at the Marana Municipal Complex, the Marana Operations Center and at www.marana.com under Town Clerk, Agendas, Minutes and Ordinances. " of NA: A Rrzo��► COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA Council Chambers 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 August 7, 2007, at or after 7:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATIONIMOMENT OF SILENCE C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA D. CALL TO THE PUBLIC At this time any member of the public is allowed to address the Town Council on any issue not already on tonight's agenda. The speaker may have up to three minutes to speak. Any persons wishing to address the Council must complete a speaker card located outside the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Town Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, at the conclusion of Call to the Public, individual members of the council may respond to criticism made by those who have addressed the Council, may ask staff to review the matter, or may ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda. E. PRESENTATIONS ANNOUNCEMENT SIUPDATE S PROCLAMATIONS —City of Tucson F. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS G. MANAGER'S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS H. STAFF REPORTS GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS I. CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda contains items requiring action by the Council which are generally routine items not requiring Council discussion. A single motion will approve all items on the Consent agenda, including any resolutions or ordinances. A Council Member may remove any issue from the Consent agenda, and that issue will be discussed and voted upon separately, immediately following the Consent agenda. ,*N 0 r � � q A; y_ 7 4 RIZOt 4 COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA Council Chambers 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 August 7, 2007, at or after 7:00 p.m. 1. Resolution No. 2007 -132 Relating to Water Service; approving and authorizing the execution of the agreement between the Town of Marana and Nicholas Homes for construction of water facilities under private contract for Farm Field Five (Brad DeSpain) 2. Resolution No. 2007 -133: Relating to Water Service; approving and authorizing the execution of the intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and the University of Arizona to extend membership in the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona (Brad DeSpain) 3. Resolution No. 2007 -134: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a final plat for Ruby Tuesday (Kevin Kish) 4. Minutes of the July 10, 2007 special meeting and the July 17, 2007 regular meeting. J. COUNCIL ACTION 1. Ordinance No. 2007.18: Relating to Economic Development; establishing procedures for permitting of special events; amending Marana Town Code Title 10 (Health and Sanitation) by adopting Section 10 -6, and establishing an effective date (Cedric Hay) Resolution No. 2007 -135: A resolution of the Town of Marana, Arizona, declaring as public record that certain document entitled "Special Events Ordinance" adopted by Ordinance No. 2007.18, filed with the Town Clerk; and declaring an emergency (Cedric Hay) 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2007.19: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a rezoning to create The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan (Kevin Kish) 3. Resolution No. 2007 -136: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a town addressing manual to assist town employees in providing addressing services to the citizens of Marana (Joe Lettrick) 4. Resolution No. 2007 -137: Relating to Facilities; establishing guidelines and procedures for the naming of town -owned facilities (Josh Wright) 5. Resolution No. 2007 -138: Relating to Community Development: Granting Discretionary Funding in the amount of $5,000 to the Mountain View High School Teen Court, a student -run grassroots organization, to support development of their Mock Trial program. (T. VanHook) �QwN o ! 7 9 7 4 RIZOS� , COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA Council Chambers 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 August 7, 2007, at or after 7:00 p.m. K. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES 1. The - Council sitting as the District Board for the Gladden Farms Community Facilities District; approval of the minutes of the July 17, 2007 District Board meeting. 2. The Council sitting as the District Board for the Vanderbilt Farms Community Facilities . District ; approval of the minutes of the July 17, 2007 District Board meeting. L. ITEMS FOR DISCUS SIONIPOSSIBLE ACTION M. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38- 431.03 (A )(3), Council may ask for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter listed on this agenda) Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38- 431.03(A)(3),(4),(6) and (7) for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning water rights issues and to consult with and instruct the Town Attorney and the Town Manager concerning the 1979 intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and Pima County relating to sewer service within the Marana town limits and to direct the Town Manager and Town Attorney with respect to that agreement (Frank Cassidy) N. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Notwithstanding the, mayor's discretion of what items to place on the agenda, if three or more council members request an item to be placed on the agenda, it must be placed upon the agenda for the second regular town council meeting after the date of the request (Marana Town Code, Title 2, Chapter 2 -4, Section 2 -4 -2 B) O. ADJOURNMENT ��T /ON Pl'�L cty of ry�$oo WHEREAS, the City of Tucson commemorates this as the 232nd year since its founding on August 20, 1775, when E1 Presidio San Agustin del Tucson was established in what is now downtown Tucson; and WHEREAS, Tucson has thrived over the years despite the. hardships of the natural environment by attracting resources and development to the Greater Tucson Region that have benefited all of northern Pima County; and WHEREAS, Tucson and Marana share many cultural roots, from the earliest Hohokam. settlers along the Santa Cruz river to the immigrants who came to mine, .ranch and - farm the land; and WHEREAS, the Town of Martina and the City of Tucson enjoy' a strong relationship as both communities work' to improve the quality of life for citizens throughout the region; and WHEREAS, the partnership between Martina and Tucson will continue to thrive as we come together: to address the transportation planning, resource allocation and economic development challenges of the region to benefit both Tucson and Martina residents. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the, Mayor and Council of the Town of Ma�eana, do hereby commemorate and recognize the birthday of Marana's neighbor and partner �igast20.2G10�`— Gty of rxgott. Dated this 7� day of August, 2007. ayor Ed Honea ATTEST: .Tocelvn C. Bronson. Town ('1Prk � o TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF MARANA MEETING q INFORMATION MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: 1.1 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: C. Brad DeSpain, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2007 -132: Relating to Water Service; approving and authorizing the execution of the agreement between the Town of Marana and Nicholas Homes for construction of water facilities under private contract for Farm Field Five. DISCUSSION Nicholas Homes desires to install on -site and pay for off -site water facilities to provide water service to their property known as Farm Field Five. Pursuant to an agreement between the Town of Marana and Nicholas Homes the developer will construct the on -site water facilities and will pass ownership of these facilities to the Town; the Town will then provide water service to Farm Field Five. ATTACHMENT(S) Agreement N 19 3COL410101 - 3 1 �l1 1430 The Utility Commission and Staff recommend approval of the execution of the agreement between the Town of Marana and Nicholas Homes for construction of water facilities under private contract for water service to Farm Field Five. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to adopt Resolution No. 2007-132. BL U Farm Field Five 07130120073:49 PM 14PM MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-132 RELATING TO WATER SERVICE; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MARANA AND NICHOLAS HOMES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER FACILITIES UNDER PRIVATE CONTRACT FOR FARM FIELD FIVE. WHEREAS, Nicholas Homes desires to install on -site and pay for off -site water facilities to provide water to Farm Field Five; and WHEREAS, Nicholas Homes desires to arrange for the provision of water service to and within Farm Field Five; and WHEREAS, Marana is willing to provide water service to and within Farm Field Five in accordance with Title 14 of the Marana Town Code and in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Nicholas Homes agrees to the construction of water facilities for Farm Field Five; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council find that the terms and conditions of the Agreement are in the best interest of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Agreement for Construction of Water Facilities Under Private Contract between the Town of Marana and Nicholas Homes, attached as Exhibit A to and incorporated here by this reference, for construction of water facilities, is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and the Town Clerk in hereby authorized and directed to attest to, said Exhibit A for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 3. The various Town officers and employees are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 7 th day of August 2007. Ed Honea, Mayor ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney RSO 070807 WSA Farm Field Five Rso 2007 -132 Z APM 07/30/2007 TOWN OF MARANA AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 'DATER FACILITIES UNDER PRIVATE CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement ") is entered into by and between the TOWN OF MARANA, an Arizona municipal corporation (the "Town "), and NICHOLAS HOMES, an Arizona corporation referred to as (the "Applicant "). The Town and the Applicant are sometimes collectively referred to as the "Parties each of which is sometimes individually referred to as a "Party." RECITALS A. This Agreement is entered into and authorized pursuant to Title 14 of the Marana Town Code as it may be amended from time to time (the "Marana Municipal Water Code "). B. The Applicant desires for the Town to provide water service to the land described and depicted on Exhibit A attached to this Agreement (the "Subject Property "). C. To secure water service from the Town for the Subject Property, the Applicant pro- poses to install those certain water infrastructure improvements referred to in this Agreement as the "Applicant- Installed Facility." D. The required plans, specifications, and materials for the Applicant - Installed Facility have been approved by the Town. E. The Applicant desires that the Town take ownership of, operate, and service the Appli- cant- Installed Facility. F. The Town is willing to accept the Applicant - Installed Facility and permit it to be con- nected to the Town water system provided it meets Town standards and the work is done in accor- dance with Town requirements. AGREEMENT Nov, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. General I.1 .Applicant installation of the Applicant- Installed Facility. The Applicant has designed and shall install, at Applicant's own expense, the water infrastructure improvements as depicted in Plan No. ENG -0305 -001 as approved by the Town and on file in the office of the Town of Marana Water Utility (the "Facility Plan "). The water infrastructure improvements depicted on the Facility Plan are referred to in this Agreement as the "Applicant -- Installed Facility," and shall conform to the design standards of the City of Tucson Water Department and the Town of Ma- Fann Field Five WSA - 1 - 51251200714:41:39 AM rana Municipal Water Code and special specifications and details as approved by the Town and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The Facility Plan shall include a plan note iden- tifying the Applicant- Installed Facility as a new water facility and shall show any and all altera- tions to the existing water system. Construction and installation of the Applicant - Installed Facil- ity in accordance with the Facility Plan, including without limitation all labor, materials, equip- ment, supplies, and tools required for the construction and installation, is referred to in this Agreement as the "Work." 1.2. York by licensed contractor. The Work shall be performed by a contractor properly li- censed by the State of Arizona as determined by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors. In addi- tion to any other contractor's license classifications required by the Arizona Registrar of Con- tractors, the contractor shall hold contractor's license classifications A. A -12 and A -16. 1.3. Payment of connection fees. Before any service connections are made from the Town's water system to the Applicant- Installed Facility, the Applicant shall pay to the Town the connec- tion fees and any other fees required by the Marana Municipal Water Code. 1.4. Fair -share water delivery infrastructure contribution. The Applicant shall pay its fair share of the costs of water projects that directly serve the Property, currently estimated to total $324,580.31, determined as follows: 1.4.1 33.34% of the total cost of the Civic Center Loop water main project. 1.4.2 33.34% of the total cost of the Ora Mae Hare Park to Lon Adams water main project. 1.4.3 33.34% of the total cost of the sixteen -inch water main from Civic Center Loop to Clark Farms Boulevard to Sandario Road. 1.5. Anticipated cost per meter. The total charge for each five - eighths -inch water meter to be installed on the Subject Property is currently anticipated to be $360.00. This fee is in addition to impact fees. The Applicant agrees to waive any reimbursements by the Town. 1.6. Applicant- Installed Facility acceptance by Town. No service connections shall be made from the Town's water system to the Applicant - Installed Facility until the Applicant - Installed Facility has been accepted by the Town in accordance with the Marana Municipal Water Code. 1.7. Frontage requirement. Any property connecting onto a water main shall have a mini- mum of fifteen feet of frontage on that main. A water easement or other utility easement shall not constitute frontage for purposes of this paragraph. 1.8. Meter application requirements. A meter application will be accepted only if the prop- erty to be served fronts the waterline. only one water meter application will be allowed per legal description unless the property owner can provide the Town with plans indicating the type of improvement or development taping place on the land that justifies more than one meter. If any portion of the property served by the water meter is sold, the owner of the portion of land that fronts the water main shall have all rights associated with the water meter unless other arrange- ments are made with and approved by the Town of Marana Water Utility prior to the sale. Faun Field Five WSA 2 5/25/200714:41:39 AM 1.9. Applicant's certification. Execution of this Agreement certifies that the Applicant has reviewed the Facility Plan and all other specifications applicable to the Work and has approved and agrees with the location of all service lines. 1.10. Termination for lack of Work. Approval of the Facility Plan shall lapse and this Agree- ment shall terminate if more than one year has passed since the date of this Agreement and the Work has not begun, or if the Work is discontinued for a period of one year. 2. Engineering and Inspection 2.1. Registered civil engineer. When the cost of the Work exceeds $12,500.00, the Applicant shall employ a registered Civil Engineer to design, lay out, establish control lines for and certify the layout of the Work according to the Facility Plan. 2.2. Town inspector's authority. Any inspector authorized by the Town shall have full in- spection authority over the Work. 2.3. Inspection provisions. The Applicant shall furnish the Town's inspector with all facilities reasonably necessary to inspect the Work. The Work shall be subject to Town inspection at all times. Defective work shall be corrected in a manner satisfactory to the Town's inspector. In- spection by the Town is for the purpose of ensuring compliance with plans and specifications only. The Town makes no guarantee as to the safety or engineering soundness of plans prepared by Applicant or any contractor. 2.4. Payment of Town inspector's overtime cost. If scheduling by Applicant's contractor rea- sonably requires the Town's inspector to work overtime, the Applicant or Applicant's contractor shall pay the Town for any additional salaries, expenses or employee benefits relating to the overtime. For purposes of this paragraph, overtime is any time over 40 hours worked in a seven - day work period, any time over eight hours worked Monday through Friday, and any time worked on weekends and legal holidays observed by the Town. 3. Preconstruction Procedure 3.1. Request to begin construction. The Applicant shall submit a written request to begin con- struction to the Town five working days before the Work is to commence. 3.2. Construction permit. This Agreement shall be completed, signed and notarized, and re- turned to the Town prior to issuance of a construction permit for the Work. 3.3. Start and completion of the Work. No portion of the Work shall begin until the Town has issued a construction permit specifying the starting date and a reasonable time for completion. 3.4. Progress of the Work. The work shall be commenced and carried on at such points and in such order as maybe directed by the Town. 3.5. Materials sampling and testing. Materials shall be available for sampling and testing by the Town prior to being used in the Work. Materials that fail to meet Town specification shall be removed from the site. Fann Field Five WSA 3 51251200714:41:39 AM 3.6. Permits and approvals. The Applicant shall, at Applicant's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the Work, pay all fees and comply with all laws, ordinances and regula- tions relating to the Work. 4. Construction 4.1. Applicant's presence on site. The Applicant, or Applicant's designated agent, shall be present at all times during performance of the Work. The name of the Applicant's designated agent and the contractor performing the Work shall be furnished to the Town before the Work begins. Instructions given by the Town to the designated agent shall be deemed to have been given to the Applicant. 4.2. Competence and diligence. The Applicant shall employ only competent and efficient la- borers, mechanics or artisans on the work, and the Applicant agrees to perform the work dili- gently to complete the work on or before the completion date given in the notice to proceed. 4.3. Paving. The Applicant shall identify and locate all water valves prior to paving and set valve boxes to final grade after paving. 4.4. Alterations to the existing Town water system. The Applicant shall, at Applicant's ex- pense, make any and all alterations to the existing water system either on -site or off -site necessi- tated by paving, drainage, or other improvements caused by the development of the Subject Property. 4.5. Worksite safety. The Applicant shall require all contractors and subcontractors perform- ing any portion of the Work to comply with all safety requirements of the occupational Safety and Hazards Act as set forth by the Federal Government and as implemented by the State of Ari- zona. The Applicant or its contractors shall be solely responsible for all fines or other penalties provided for by law for any violations of the occupational Safety Hazards Act. 5. Dedication 5.1. Transfer of the Applicant- Installed Facility to the Town. Upon the Town's final accep- tance of the Work, the Applicant shall at no cost grant, bargain, sell, convey, transfer and deliver to the Town the Applicant - Installed Facility free and clear of all liens, claims, charges or encum- brances. 5.2. Two-year warranty. The Applicant guarantees the Work to be free from all failures due to poor workmanship or materials for a period of two years from the date of the Town's final ac- ceptance of the Work. 5.3. other conflicting construction prohibited. The Applicant shall not construct or allow the construction of any utility, building, or other improvement that would interfere with the opera- tion or maintenance of the Applicant - Installed Facility. 5.4. Applicants obligation to maintain finished grade. The Applicant guarantees that all ser- vice lines, meters, and meter boxes on the Subject Property will be to finished grade and that Applicant will remain responsible for raising or lowering said services as required until the Sub- ject Property is fully developed. Farm Field Five WSA 4 51251200710:41:39 AM 5.5. Acceptance by the ' The Town shall accept title to and take possession of the Ap- plicant- Installed Facility when the Work has been completed to the satisfaction of the Town. Subject to the Applicant's continuing obligations under this Agreement, the Town shall operate and service the Applicant - Installed Facility after taking over possession of it under this para- graph. 6. Miscellaneous 6.1. Indemnity. Applicant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Town, its Mayor and Council, officers and employees, boards, committees and commissions from and against any loss, claim, suit, demand, cause of action, or liability of any nature, including but not limited to damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, arising or alleged to have arisen, in whole or in part, out of any negligent act or omission of Applicant or any contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any person employed directly or indirectly by any of them in the performance of the Work or in the operation of the Applicant- Installed Facility. 6.2. Binding effect. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties. 6.3. Consent required for assignment. Applicant may not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Town. 6.4. Cancellation for conflict of interest. This agreement is subject to A.R.S. § 38 -511, which provides for cancellation in certain instances involving conflict of interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the last date set forth below their respective signatures. Fann Field Five WSA 5 5/25/200710:41:39 AM TowN : THE ToWN of MARANA, an Arizona municipal corporation Ed Honea, Mayor Date: ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Clerk APPROVED AS To FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney A PPLICANT: Nicholas Homes, an Arizona Corporation, By: Gar J ua�, Dire for of Land Development Date: •23 0 STATE OF A IZONA J SS County of Pima The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on J��n c �. b Gar Jouas, g Y Y Director of Land Development of Nicholas Homes, an Arizona corporation, on behalf of the cor- poration. My commission expires: � �- -- 60 Farm Field Five WSA Notary P6blic Notary Public {Arizona Maricopa County My Comm. Expires Mar 22, 2008 5/25/200714:41:39 AM EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP OF THE DEVELOPMENT WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION Farm Field Five WSA 1 5/25/2007 l 0:41:39 AM �0W N 0 TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF MARANA MEETING 9 INFORMATION` 4 Qzo to MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: I.2 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: C. Brad DeSpain, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2007 --133: Relating to Water Service; approving and authorizing the execution of the intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and the University of Arizona to extend membership in the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona. DISCUSSION The Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona (Water CASA) is designed to improve the efficient use of the region's limited water resources, implementing effective conservation measures and rate designs, protecting community aesthetics and quality of life by promoting attractive, low - water -use landscaping and improving water resources management in general. Water CASA employs and utilizes staff experienced in planning, development and evaluation of water conservation measures and programs, and related water resource management, and research and publication in these areas. The Town is currently a member of Water CASA and this intergovernmental agreement extends our membership. The baseline funding will be provided by annual contributions from members. The annual contribution is calculated by assessing a base fee, an assessment based upon the service area population, and an assessment based upon the acre -feet of water delivered. The annual membership contribution for the Town of Marana for fiscal year 2008 will be $7,542. ATTACHMENT(S) Intergovernmental agreement RECOMMENDATION The Utility Commission and Staff recommend approval the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Marana and the University of Arizona to extend membership in the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to adopt Resolution No. 2007 -133. BL U Water Casa FY08 07130120074:24 PM APM MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-133 RELATING TO WATER SERVICE; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MARANA AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TO EXTEND MEMBERSHIP IN THE WATER CONSERVATION ALLIANCE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA. WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona (Water CASA) and the Town share a common goal in the area of efficient use of the region's limited water resources, implementing effective conservation measures and rate designs, protecting community aesthetics and quality of life by promoting attractive, low- water -use landscaping, and improving water resource management in general; and WHEREAS, the Water CASA is designed to allow municipalities in Southern Arizona to share experience, skills and information and to benefit from economics of scale in water conservation efforts; and WHEREAS, funding for the Water CASA comes from annual contributions from member fees, calculated by assessing a base fee, an assessment based upon the service area population, and an assessment based upon the acre -feet of water delivered; and WHEREAS, the membership fee for the Town of Marana, for fiscal year 2008, Will be $7,542- and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Town Council have determined that the Town's membership in the Water CASA is in the best interest of the residents of the Town of Marana. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Marana and the University of Arizona, attached as Exhibit A to and incorporated here by this reference, to extend membership in Water CASA, is hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 2. The Utilities Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Exhibit A for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 3. The various Town officers and employees are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE -MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 71h day of August, 2007. Ed Honea, Mayor ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney RSO 070807 Water CASA 08 RSO 2447 -133 Z APM 07/30/2007 INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEMBER AGREEMENT Between the TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA and ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS for the UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Tucson, Arizona to extend membership in the WATER CONSERVATION ALLIANCE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA This Agreement is made pursuant to the Arizona Revised Statutes § 11 -951 et.seq., between the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona, hereinafter called the UA, and the Town of Marana, Arizona, hereinafter called Member. The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute § 15 -1525. Member is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute §§ 9 -240 and 11 -951. 1. INTRODUCTION The Town of Marana, Arizona, for its Municipal water Department, (the Member) and the college of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at the University of Arizona (UA), Tucson, share common goals in the areas of efficient use of the region's limited water resources, implementing effective conservation measures and rate designs, protecting community aesthetics and quality of life by promoting attractive, low- water- use landscaping, and improving water resources management in general. In furtherance thereof, the organizations have developed experienced staffs which are involved in the planning, development, and evaluation of water conservation measures and programs and related water resource management, and research and publication in these areas. The Member and the college of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, each believe that the establishment of a more formal relationship, to be known at the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona (Water CASA), will enhance their abilities to continue and expand these activities through the hiring of qualified conservation specialists, sharing of analyses and experiences, and cooperating with other interested parties to achieve greater effectiveness and economies of scale. Therefore, the Agreement is established between the Member and the University of Arizona for membership in Water CASA, to provide a basis for collaborative efforts. 2. PURPOSE The primary purpose of Water CASA shall be to provide water conservation and planning services to participating municipal water providers and other parties of interest in southern Arizona. Water CASA is designed to: i. improve the effectiveness of municipal water conservation efforts through close collaboration between UA and the Member; ii. join with others to share experience, skills and information and benefit from economies of scale in conservation efforts; and serve as a focal point for cooperation in developing and managing conservation- oriented research grants and pilot projects. 3. SCOPE OF WATER CASA Water CASA represents a cooperative link between professional staff of the member organizations and the University of Arizona . Water CASA will concern itself with improving water resource management practices of its members. As focus areas, WATER CASA will concentrate on: i. exterior residential water conservation measures; Ii. impacts of development and trends in new construction on water demand and conservation potential; iii. effects of conservation measures on wastewater systems and public health issues; and iv. other areas as determined by the Board. This link will be between the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture of UA and the Member. The parties intend through this agreement to use Water CASA as a vehicle available to any large municipal water provider or other interested organization pursuing program evaluation or applied research within the scope of this center's mission. Plan of Work may be revised. Brad DeSpain, Department Manager, is the official authorized to approve and modify such description for the Member; Val L. Little is the 0) official authorized to approve and modify such description for UA. 4. STRUCTURE of WATER CASA Water CASA will consist of the Board, the Director, and faculty, staff, students, administrative and clerical support personnel drawn from the college of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, and the UA in general. WATER CASA Board A. The Board of Water CASA (the Board) will have the following responsibilities: (1) to maintain cooperation between the sponsoring member institutions; (2) to create and maintain the highest standards of work; (3) to review and approve the policies and priorities of Water CASA; (4) to evaluate programs and activities; (5) to review and approve the Water CASA budget and fiscal management; ( to adopt appropriate by -laws, and modifications, as necessary for the operation of Water CASA; (7) to evaluate Water CASA Director; (8) to make recommendations for filling a vacancy in the position of Water CASA Director, and for hiring or filling a vacancy in the professional staff responsible for carrying out programs; and (9) to review and recommend revisions to this Agreement. B. The Board shall consist of the following: (1) one representative selected by each municipal water provider Member of Water CASA; (2) one representative of any other organizations interested in the work of Water CASA and materially supporting and participating in Water CASA activities, admitted as a Member at the discretion of the Board; and 3 (3) the Director of Water CASA, who will serve as anon- voting member. C. The chairperson of the Board shall be elected by the members of the Board from the Board's membership and shall serve a one -year term. The Chairperson may be elected to consecutive terms. D. The Board shall meet no less often than quarterly upon the call of the Chairperson. More frequent or additional meetings shall be held when called by the Chairperson or by a majority of the members. E. Board decisions shall be by majority vote of those members present and voting. Meetings shall be conducted in conformance with Robert's Rules of order. The Director of Water CASA A. The Director will be a UA staff member assigned to the college of Architecture and Landscape Architecture to be appointed in accordance with procedures to be established by the UA and Water CASA, and approved by the Board. The Director shall be evaluated annually by the Board. B. The responsibilities of the Director are to: provide program leadership and contribute actively in the programmatic activities of Water CASA; (2) review all work products produced by Water CASA personnel; (3) prepare an annual report of activity, program results, fiscal review, following year proposed joint activities and following year proposed Water CASA budget for presentation to the Advisory Board; (4) manage and administer Water CASA in a manner consistent with applicable UA, municipal, county, state and federal laws, regulations, policies and guidelines; and (5) maintain accountability for all funds supplied to Water CASA. �• ' ' �:4 1 Baseline funding for Water CASA will be provided by annual contributions from member organizations, and used for purposes consistent with the budget approved by 4 the Board. The annual contribution from member municipal water providers shall consist of a minimu m pro rata amount collected from each member plus an amount based on the municipal provider's annual water deliveries. The annual contribution formula for municipal water providers is $4,000 plus an amount per acre -foot of annual water deliveries. The formula will be adjusted annually by the Board so as toprovide an adequate baseline budget for Water CASA. For fiscal year 2008, the formula will be $1.80 per acre -foot. aid to the University of Arizona as a single jump sum within 60 Contributions shall be p Y days of the date upon which this Agreement is signed and annually thereafter. p g Contributions b members other than municipal water providers, if any, shall be y Y determined on a case-by-case basis b the Board in a manner that reflects the interests of the member in Water CASA's activities and programs. The annual membership contribution for Town of Marana, for Fiscal Year 2008 will be $ 7, 1 542. 6. POLICIES General policies of Water CASA are: A. Al! members of water CASA shall have free access to all water CASA work p roducts, compilations of data and information, and other materials. B. No classified or confidential work will be performed by Water CASA. Efforts will be made to disseminate the results of evaluations, pilot projects, and applied research with other entities that may benefit from the J pp information. C. Work performed on behalf of Water CASA by UA faculty, staff and students shall be subject to applicable academic policies and standards. D. Contracts, grants, or other agreements entered into pursuant to this memorandum shall contain appropriate provisions relating to Equal Employment opportunity and Non - Discrimination. 7. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS Each member organization takes full financial responsibility for implementing its obligations under this agreement. Each Party's ability to perform under this Agreement is contingent upon funding authorization. In addition to the process described in Section 6 concerning financial support to the University from Member organizations, each Party shall be free to enter into agreement with WATER CASA or the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture to 5 provide additional water resource - related services of benefit to the individual Party. Such work will not be subsidized by the operating budget of Water CASA. This Agreement shall not be construed as limiting the ability of any member organization to contract with or enter into any sort of agreement with other organizations to provide water conservation and planning services. 8. PERIOD OF AGREEMENT The period of this Agreement shall be for one year from the effective date of this agreement. The Parties may extend this period upon their mutual agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon Go days advance written notice. g. OTHER AGREEMENTS In the event any grant or cooperative agreement is issued in association with this Agreement, the terms of such grant or cooperative agreement shall control and any inconsistency between any such provision and any provision of this Agreement shall be resolved in accordance with said grant or cooperative agreement. 10. APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement shall be governed solely by Arizona law for all purposes including, but not limited to, determining the validity of this Agreement, the meaning of its provisions, and the rights, obligations and remedies of the parties. 11. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may not be assigned, in whole or in part, by either party without the prior written approval of the other party to this Agreement. 12. STATE OBLIGATION The parties recognize that the performance by the Arizona Board of Regents for and on behalf of the University of Arizona may be dependent upon the appropriation of funds by the State Legislature of Arizona. Should the Legislature fail to appropriate the necessary funds or if the University's appropriation is reduced during the fiscal year, the Arizona Board of Regents may reduce the scope of this agreement if appropriate or cancel the Agreement without further duty or obligation. The Board of Regents agrees to notify the other party as soon as reasonably possible after the unavailability of said funds comes to its attention. Should the Agreement be canceled or its scope materially reduced to a level that Water CASA Board decides is no longer useful, the University of Arizona shall refund to the Members on a pro rata basis all unspent contributions. 13. ARBITRATION The parties agree that any dispute arising under this agreement involving the sum of 6 $30,000 or less in money damages only shall be resolved by arbitration pursuant to the Arizona Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST This Agreement is subject to the provisions of A.R.S. § 38 -511 and the State of Arizona may cancel this contract if any person significantly involved in negotiating, drafting, securing or obtaining this contract for or on behalf of the Arizona Board of Regents becomes an employee in any capacity of any other party or a consultant to any other party with reference to the subject matter of this contract while the Contract or any extension hereof is in effect. 15. NON - DISCRIMINATION The parties agree to be bound by applicable state and federal rules governing Equal Employment opportunity and Non - Discrimination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties do hereby execute this Agreement effective as of the date later in time indicated below. University of Arizona Board of Regents print or type name Town of Marana Approved as to content: print or type name Brad DeSpain, Manager Municipal Water Department Date Date 7 The Attached intergovernmental agreement, which is an agreement between public agencies, has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -952 by the undersigned Assistant Attorney General who has determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Agreement represented by the Attorney General. DATED this day of The Attorney General Assistant Attorney General , 2007 The Attached intergovernmental agreement, which is an agreement between public agencies, has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -952 by the undersigned legal representative of the Town of Marana, Arizona, who has determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Agreement represented by the Town of Marana Attorney. DATED This day of Town of Marana Town of Marana Attorney. , 2007 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT DETERMINATION AGENCY NAME: AWARD: AMOUNT: PURPOSE: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 1 DEPARMENT Town of Marana Upon filing with the Secretary of State $7,542. Water conservation Alliance Membership College of Architecture & Landscape Architecture. The undersigned has determined that the foregoing agreement is in proper form and within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to the Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona. Dated this day of , 2007 2 University Attorney 9 1.0v o� TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA INFORMATION -t RIZO MEETING DATE. August 07, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: I.3 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Kevin Kish, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2007 - 134: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a final plat for Ruby Tuesday. DISCUSSION Re nest The applicant, Ruby Tuesday, is requesting approval of a Final Plat to allow for the resubdivision of Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 2 of the Continental Ranch - Business Park commercial subdivision into two lots on approximately 2.68 acres within the Continental Ranch Specific Plan. Location The subject property is located on Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 2 of the Continental Ranch - Business Park Final Plat, at the northeast corner of Arizona Pavilions Drive and Cracker Barrel Road. Zoniny Information The land use designation for the area is C* (Freeway Commercial) per the Continental Ranch Specific Plan. The Freeway Commercial designation allows offices, medical/healthcare facilities, restaurants, financial i nstitutions and a variety of commercial uses. Lot 1 will be 60,070 square feet and Lot 2 will be 55,668 square feet. There is no minimum lot size for parcels within the Freeway Commercial land use designation. Transportation and Access This project will have one reciprocal access easement for both lots off of Arizona Pavilions Drive. An additional access off Cracker Barrel Road may be allowed for Lot 2 upon review and approval by the Town of Marana Traffic Engineering Department. Development Plan A development plan for a Ruby Tuesday restaurant which will be located on Lot 1 is under review. 080707 PRV -07059 Ruby Tuesday FP TC ATTACHMENTS Summary application, location map, plat reduction and partial development plan reduction. RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the application for compliance with the Land Development Code and the Continental Ranch Specific Plan. The final plat is in conformance with all required development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the Rudy Tuesday Final Plat. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Resolution No. 2007 -134. -2- 080707 PRV -07059 Ruby Tuesday FP TC MARANA RESOLUTION NO, 2007-134 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZINNG A FINAL PLAT FOR RUBY TUESDAY. WHEREAS, the Town of Marana approved and adopted the specific plan for the area known as Continental Ranch on April S, 1988 (Ordinance No. 88.09), located within the corporate boundaries of the Town of Marana, Arizona; and WHEREAS, the Town of Marana approved the Continental Ranch - Business Park Final Plat (Book 44 Page 37) on February 4, 1997 by Resolution 97 -08; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Ruby Tuesday, has applied to the Town of Marana for approval of a final plat allowing for the resubdivision of Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 2 of the Continental Ranch - Business Park Final Plat into two lots on approximately 2.68 acres; and WHEREAS, the Marana Town Council, at their regular meeting on August 7, 2007, determined that the Ruby Tuesday final plat should be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that the Ruby Tuesday final plat is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 7 th day of August, 2007. ATTEST: Ed Honea, Mayor Jocelyn C. Bronson Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 05/15/2007 16:07 40551621. SRN PAGE 01/01 21 ,Gl PINE D assessor's Pal Number(s) TOWN O F NL4RANA MAR A plannin Departrne _. Gross A rea (Acr /Sq, Ft,) 1 1555 w. C ivic C enter Dr, Mam AZ 85653 _... .�.. (520) 382 - 26N Fax-- (520) 382 -2639 { PrQ1eot Lori PLANNING & ZONING APP Descript of Project, o Preliminary Plat o General Plan Amendment o Variance Final Flat o Specific Plan Amendment o Conditional Use Permit o Development Plan o Rezone /Specific Flan o Other _ o Landscape Plan o Significant Land Use Change o Nativc Plant Permit o Minor Land Division 21 ,Gl PINE D assessor's Pal Number(s) Zj 05l 14 Otncral I Plan Designation To be confmned sta _ __ _ i Gross A rea (Acr /Sq, Ft,) I 1 Cunvnt a ng To be onfm�d by -qaM Development(Project Name Proposed Zoning PrQ1eot Lori � �q VOL ■ra+ � Circek-er Ecto Descript of Project, Property Owner , . IV Q ica� T TifUz J#ts vr4%*%ce C o Street Address 1 15Q5 0 c State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E Add ress T UC - . , SOW% A& � Contact Person Phone Nwnber 61 ire' Applicant ... KJ64 ve -a Y - b5A Sdrect Address Vk4rt\ S-f T ep"+* city Mate dip bode Phone Number Fax Numbcr E - Mail Address OAL I Re -!�Lv it Contact Person i Phone Nurnberg, 3 7T !V7 75 Agent/Representative r r W C IO , Ae- r S treet Address � � �� �� • city 010alkomp State Z Code 7S(04 Phonc Number &6#1VZ.040 Fax Number E -Mail Address * WS*.7W% Contact Person ,� C o o � o 'down of Marena s u ine icen N B usines s sS �, se o _ 1, the undersigned, certify that all of the fats set forth in this application are true to the best of my knowledge and that i am either the owner of the property or that I 114 b=F1 4uth0riccd in writing by the cwner to file this appllcati d check]{st. of owner of record, .attach written authorization from the owner.)` 1� C� r A e f / 1 7 107 Print Name of A licant/A cnt Si ature IDatc X-t 1"lA t3 FILES\Review Check] istlApplication.Joc May 2005 MARANA TOWN OF MARANA Final Plat for Ruby Tuesday PRV -07059 A request for approval of a final plat to allow for the resubdivision of Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 2 of the Continental Ranch- Business Park Final Plat into two lots. The Ruby Tuesday Final Plat is on file and available for viewing from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday excluding holidays, at the office of the Town Clerk, 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, AZ 85653. MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PLACE AND DATE Marana Municipal Complex DATE: JULY lo, 2007 A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL By Mayor Honea at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL Ed Honea Herb Kai Russell Clanagan Patti Comerford Tim Escobedo Carol McGorray Roxanne Ziegler STAFF Mike Reuwsaat Gilbert Davidson Jim DeGrood Frank Cassidy Jocelyn Bronson Mayor Vice Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Town Manager Excused Deputy Town Manager Present Assistant Town Manager. Present Town Attorney 'resent Town Clerk Present B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE Led by Mayor Hone.. He asked that everyone remember Mike Reuwsaat as he is in Tucson Heart Hospital having some tests done. C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Upon motion fy : ouncil Member Comer cord seconded by Council Member Escobedo, reversing of items .6 and 7 was unanimously approved. D. CAL TO THE PUBLIC ........... David ........... .. ITales addressed :Council and asked that Council Member Escobedo step down for the good off` the town. He stated the town Council wants to raise the bar on developers, police department and town employees. To do so it must first raise the bar with the town Council. He talked about the m ayor and his position. E. PRESENTATIONS 1. Discussion and direction concerning proposed implementation of Town of Marana procedures related to addressing previously done for the Town by Pima County Development Services (Joe Lettrick) Mr. Lettrick addressed Council to provide an overview of a proposed addressing ordinance that they will be bringing back to Council. Historically, the town has contracted and relied on addressing services to be provided by Pima County Development Services. The county MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 had an annual addressing servicing agreement with the town to provide addressing service at a cost of more than $20,000. In 2006, the county reviewed its addressing service costs based on a full recovery cost model that would have increased our annual addressing service costs to more than $1 00,000 annually. The addressing contract was not renewed in 2006. Town staff started reviewing the possibilities of performing its own addressing. In March, 2007, they approached Pima County Development Services with the intent of performing our own addressing for the town. In May, 2007, town management sent a letter of understanding to Pima County Development Services notifying them of our plan, to assume addressing responsibilities as of July 1, 2007. The proposed addressing ordinance they are presenting is to ensure that town addressing is performed by the town for the town in the standardized format. Mr. Lettrick also stated thatucurrently we have annexed two square miles into Pinal County and the intent is if we need to address into those two quare miles thatwe would extend the Pima County addressing grid into those two square miles and address accordingly. Looking at long term annexation growth into Pinal County we'd need to re- evaluate what we would want to do with an addressing grid using either final or Pima County's addre :ng grid and they each have a grid format. Council Member Escobedo asked i f there would be any problem with Pinal County. Mr. Lettrick stated he spoke with them last week. and nothing has been finalized, but they have started communication. In Pinal County all the un- incorporated areas use one grid. All the cities and towns use their own addressing grid which causes a bit of concern when those towns or cities try to annex into those county areas and basically everybody would have to be re- addressed. Pir .a County has a consistent grid across the entire county. Upon motion by Council Member Comerford, seconded by Council Member McGorray, staff was directed to brr to Cor for adoption the ro osed revisions relating to p p g addressing services. to be handled by the town's GIS staff was unanimously approved. F. ACTION/DISCUSSION . ........ 2. Resolution No. 2007 '*124 Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a preliminaty plat for 11 arana 59 (Barbara Johnson) Vice Mayor Ka declared a conflict of interest. Mr. Kish addressed Council and stated this item was continued from the meeting of May 16 and June 5 During the June 5th meeting, Council directed staff to get an independent traffic analysis which has been conducted. In response to traffic conditions along Hartman Lane the town contracted with an independent engineering firm to study the segment of Hartman Lane. Mr. Kish introduced Alejandro Angel who will give a presentation on the report. Mr. Angel addressed Council and discussed the findings of the report. The objective was to take a comprehensive look at the area between whipsnake and Eaglestone which is 2 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 approximately 2000 feet. There are six side streets in there with various levels of spacing between them. Even though everything on the west side of the road is in Marana jurisdiction, the road and all the properties on the east side of Hartman Lane are in Pima County. They collected daily traffic volumes and peak hour traffic volumes in this area for everyone of the side streets. The peak periods were between 6:30 and 8:30 a.m. and 430 and 6:30 p.m. They evaluated the travel speeds in the area. They performed an analysis of the crash records they received and went out to the field several times to verify the conditions. They forecasted future conditions and identified improvements. The first findings were made in relation to the roadway conditions. The road is two lanes and it has a continuous left turn lane north of Cottonmouth. There are curbs and sidewalks on the east side of the road. There is none on the west side. If you have to brake for a car in front of you there is no shoulder on the east side to go into. There is no street lighting and the pavement markings need some improvement.. If you are driving Hartman Lane the side visibility meets all the requirements of all the engineering standards, but as you're driving northbound sometimes you lose cars as. they go into the dip. The dip is right next to the drainage pipe on the east side of the roadway. At several of the side streets there is vegetation that limits the visibility of drivers coming out of the subdivision, in particular, Eaglestone and Cottonmouth. They counted approximately 7,200 cars south of Overton. They adjusted the volumes for seasonal variation. They came up with 7,300 vehicles south of Overton and a little over 5,700 vehicles per day once you get north of Overton. They couldn't look at school traff c because school is not in session, but they did estimate the traffic from DeGracia u g a traffic engineering book and it is approximately 300 vehicles a day on Hartman. They found seven crashes in the last two years. The majority of those were rear -end. collisions. The crash rate today is higher than the Pima tatty average. Travel speed is 35 mph. During the peak period the average speed is about 40 mph. The 85 percentile speed which is a common measure of faster speeds on the roadway they found that the 85 percentile speed is more than 45 mph. During some periods it gets up to 50 mph real early morning and about mid -day. They assumed traffic. growth of`. e percent for the region and they added the traffic from Maras 9. They came up.. with 6,000 cars per day north of Overton and 7600 cars per day south of Overton. They evaluated the Pima County turn lane warrants based on the l Tana 59 trip generation and e did it based on the true generation book as the precious study had ddne, but they also did it based on actual field conditions and trip nerations at the existing g subdivisions and none of the cases met the warrants as identif by Pima County. Some streets did meet warrants for right turn lanes and those two streets were Eaglestone and Overton. The first recommendation is to trim the vegetation, Cottonmouth and Eaglestone, to improve the visibility. Re -stripe the roadway and add markers to improve the lane delineation. This is important because there is no street lighting. Police enforcement coupled with community education. Consider providing dedicated right turn lanes at Overton and Eaglestone. Because there so many access points closely spaced it would be beneficial to have a continuous left turn lane all the way from whipsnake to Eaglestone on the south. The warrant isn't met, but there are a lot of factors that combine to make it a good idea, limited visibility, crash history, speeding, no shoulders, and no street lighting. There is 90 feet of right of way. Coordinate implementation with Pima County because they are in the right of way. Because of the presence of the elementary school there needs 3 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 to be coordination to determine if any pedestrian devices are needed. That should be evaluated based on the number of students using it and funding availability. Council Member Clanagan asked to have the crash ratio explained. Mr. Angel stated the crash rate is important as there is a higher than average rate. It is within one standard deviation of the average. Even though number wise it is a lot more than the average as relative to all locations. It is not really high. Most of the crashes are rear -end and rear -end generally result in property damage as apposed to head -on or angle collisions which result in injuries or fatalities. Therefore, they are weighted heavier than rear -end collisions. Most jurisdictions look at when evaluating which improvements to make is what's the cost effectiveness of the improvements. It leaks at travel speeds and volumes. Some crashes are correctable and can be eliminated with an engineering or enforcement measure. Ms. Johnson addressed Council and addressed .the recommendations. The first one was to remove and trim vegetation near Cottonmouth and Eaglestone to improve visibility and stated that has been done. Regarding re- stripping the roadway and adding raised pavement markers, Ms. Johnson stated they have taken care of re- stripping the roadway. However, they have to meet with Pima County at a management level because they are going to ask them to make some corrections that are not mandated by warrant and they are going to ask the county to take care o f that because in our IG A we do not have the authority. They began police enforcement last week and will continue that to closely monitor that location. With the dedicated right turn lane at Overton and Eaglestone and the continuous left turn ne on Hartman, they will be asking the county to invest in that street, also, the implementation of the improvements with Pima County and the DeGracia Elementary School pedestrian enhancement to try and enforce that issue through a logical conclusion. On the basin at Overton and Hartman, she contacted the county and they agreed to open the basin: uP pn wr:tG the start of the monsoon. They are working on it and it is mot complete yet. Council Member Esvbedo asked Mr. Cassidy to elaborate on what the conditions are on this prod ect. Mr. Cassidy stated that the subdivision review process is a ministerial process. Any denial would have to be based on a particular requirement not having been met in terms of a code requirement. There are some conditions to approval. Those conditions highlight existing requirements in our code. Denise Howard, 9051 Hartman Lane, addressed Council and stated her property borders the south portion. One of her concerns was the traffic and her other concern was the water runoff after they blade the property that doesn't increase more flow onto her property. She stated there is a ridge and she requests that those houses be single story. She stated having a two story home on the ridge that is quite elevated would devastate the sky line. G! MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY lo, 2007 Julia Corty, 5421 W. Cottonmouth Street, addressed Council and asked that when the developer comes up to speak that he make a record of his home address. She stated that is required in the preliminary plat so it is already a matter of public record. She stated there is a community in Marana where the monsoon rains fall so hard that the land is washed away and the streets overflow with the flooding waters over the curbs and costs thousands of dollars in damage each year. Developers argue over who is responsible for paying for this damage. When the residents of the community leave to go to work they find Hartman Road closed because it is flooded and there is no ingress or egress during the monsoon season leaving them trapped in their homes. She stated the total land for this project has not been surveyed for cultural and archeological resources. She stated appropriate notifications under 060202A 1 G of the Marana .Land Development code has not taken place regarding the adjacent municipalities namely Pima County. Pima County has not been appropriately notified of the projected projects impart on water drainage in a timely manner sufficient to allow them to respond to the issues. Thi S . 1s especially true of the water drainage and storm water systems. As late as yesterday when she spoke with the director of :Pima County Public Works that individual had no knowledge of this development. additional time is needed to get written recommendations from Pima County as provided by the ordinance. She stated she does not know if plans were submitted to cable compar es, school districts, and Pima County offices as required by the ordinance. She stated much as been made to this decision being a ministerial act. However,. ven ministerial acts require notice and due process. She stated according to ARS 9453.1:7 indicates a municipality can require the posting of performance bonds to assure installation of required drainage, flow control, and improvements ; meeting. established minimum standards of design and construction. She stated the town can dis# pprove of this preliminary plat under Title 6 section 020205 if there is adverb topograp or periodic inundation. She stated the town can also require special grading and drainage. requirements. She stated consultation needs to take place with the county flood rural district regarding the construction of streets and land established as being sub et to periodic inundation. She stated the town has more than sufficient justific Ation to deny this plat. She stated that if the plat is approved she wants the following conditions: an adequate water and drainage plan and consultation with .. .. Pm.a. County. A full heologeal and cultural resources review and make that a contingency. Require bond for the cost of the water and drainage issues. Require consultation with the Army Corp of Engineers regarding 404 issues. She stated to Grow Homes that. she has 1.0.0ked at their website. The website talks about working with neighborhoods .d enriching communities. She asked for them to work with the residents of this area and return phone calls. Evelyn Manuel addressed Council and stated she is a member of the Tohono G' Gdham Nation. She states she has done research on this project. She lives on the reservation ten miles west of Sells. She is requesting a full archeological study because if there are archeological artifacts, as well as cultural artifacts those should be preserved. Council Member Clanagan asked if the members of the Tohono G' Gdham Nation issued a resolution on behalf of this project. E MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY lo, 2007 Ms. Manuel stated no because they are waiting on the archeological study. When it comes to the Cultural Affairs office and if there is significant findings then it comes to the council for recommendation and then from there they issue a resolution. She is not aware if a full archeological study was done. Mr. Davidson stated the archeological component is an element that has not been overlooked and will not be overlooked. It is a part of the governmental process. While the preliminary plat may be approved that does not exclude the responsibility for the applicant to do the full studies that may be required by the federal.. and state government. Ms. Johnson stated our archeologist has been in touch with the Tohono O' Odham. Ms. Johnson stated they have made sure they have highlighted the 404 requirements for this project. They do have to work through the Corp of Engineers, ft..404 which brings in both the state and federal processes and will bring in the Nation. Mr. Davidson stated the applicant is taking a:.inherent risk as they move forward with the plat if they do find something of valuable substance that causes the plat to be changed they have to go back through a process. Ms. Johnson stated at this point in time the owner is obligated to deal with the 404 issues through the Corp of Engineers, state and federal system. Th . owner is obligated through that process to deal with a full archeo.log.l study. The owner cannot move dirt until he gets the clearance. Those clearances include everybody frog the State Historic Preservation Office to the Nation and to other interested parties. Mr. Kish stated there will be. assurances. They are typically done with the final plat. Prior ..... .. ........... to that if a gadrg permit is issued there will be a bond associated with the permit for the site work. They do a distribution of applications. They go to all the jurisdictions, all the utility companies, flood. control district, Pinta County Transportation Department, the school dis etc. They have all been notified of this project through our processing of applications and...distributioir.on it. There was concern with building height adjacent to Ms. Howard's property on the yo side. With that the Council could suggest that perhaps lots 5 -15 be restricted to single stories. Those would be the lots running along the souther boundary. Mr. Cassidy.ktated since this is not a rezoning case that he didn't think we have t ..... .. authority to r c the number of stories unless there is an existing requirement that says .. .. . . ..... . .. ..... . ........ . .. .. ... . there is a certain 'tory limitation. That cannot be imposed at this time. Mr. Dish stated that would be correct that the only restriction would be through the residential design standards and the limitation of the number of two stories for the project itself. Council Member Escobedo asked does a survey mean the same as a full study. Ms. Johnson stated according to the archeologist when she says she wants a full archeological workup, study or survey that's all the same thing. R MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 Mr. Cassidy stated the existing code, Title 20 of the Land Development code, is very clear about those requirements and there is going to no question about it. Court Gettel, 5645 N. Via Salerosa, Tucson, Az, owner of Marana 59, addressed Council and stated to his understanding the Army Corp and the archeological does not have to be complete before tentative plat approval, but will be a condition upon grading/final plat. He stated he has been at the plat process for two years and he has done everything required. He asked for approval. Council Member Clanagan asked the applicant if he had beery in contact with the neighbors that have tried to contact him regarding this P. ' ect. Mr. Gettel stated Grow Homes is not part of this project so they hay. never contacted him. He stated no one has contacted him individually. Upon motion by Council Member Comerford, seconded by Mayor Honea, Resolution No. 2007 -124 subject to staff conditions was approved 4 -2 with Council Members Clanagan and Escobedo opposing. 3. Resolution No. 2007 -125 Relat n o Economic Development; establishing Core Values for Economic Development within the Town of M rana (Jim DeGrood) Mr. DeGrood addressed Council regarding a set of core values that the recently formed Business and Economic Development Advisory Commission is recommending that Council consider for adoption. They believe this is one of the first steps in developing our economic blueprint for the town. The core values that the commission has recommended are first to partner with business. That the town will be proactive in addressing the evolvin needs of the tt i ess 6q.mmunitv hrough an open dialog and a spirit of g ..... .. .... pa nng ....::.... The second is realistic business incentives. The town is in a competitive business . .. environment and must ide alistic business incentives to make Marana a world class place do business. The third is to develop a first class work force. The Town believes in developing a world glass work force and will collaborate with educational institutions of all types ad levels to ensure all work force needs can be met. The fourth is to recruit, attract, and ret diverse employment opportunities. The town will partner with other economic organizations engaged in economic development to leverage resources and maximize opportunities to create a strong and diverse business community. The fifth is a livable community. The town will create a climate to encourage a wide range of living opportunities for all and a unique sense of place. The sixth is the highest level of customer service. The town will provide expeditious and effective responses to business needs. Council Member Clanagan noted that Mr. DeGrood has accepted a position with PAG and will be leaving in a few weeks. He wanted to thank Mr. DeGrood for his commitment and devotion to the town and his personal mentoring. 7 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 Upon motion by Council Member Escobedo, seconded by Council Member Comerford, Resolution No. 2007 -125 was unanimously approved. 4. Presentation on the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan and development Agreement (Kevin Kish /Frank Cassidy) Mr. Kish addressed Council and stated this presentation is intended to familiarize Council with the proposed Specific Plan and Development Agreement prior to the public hearing. Marana Spectrum is located at the southwest corner of Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard. The plan is to create a power center or lifestyle center, regional center, commercial retail center in this area. The center will contain a number of major retailers, various smaller retailers and national /regional retailers, restaurants.. and a proposed movie theater. The power center will also have a main street . concept in it. he main street area contains various minor shops intended to create a village atmosphere . workability functions, gathering points, a place for outdoor entertainment, and some outdoor seating. The site is approximately 170 acres. The scenario ,.focuses on the regional opportunities. Camino de Manana runs on its northwesterly side, Linda Vista Boulevard which will be realigned and I -10 on the south. The developer feels it i a great location because of the connectivity and the new interchange coming in to be abbe tv have that regional draw. The approved Cascada plan sits to the north of the project area: The plan is evolving and maturing in what the needs are, what the opportunities are and how to address the dynamic market that is in retail and commercial bus e s. Currently they are looking at approximately 1,300;000 sq. ft of retail area for this 170 acres. The permitted uses are a hotel or a motel, hotel that could be a multi- story. This has the opportunity to have both. One of the unique things they are looking at is the opportunity for residential, but the rest entia wou on y e 1`n a: main street concept where a residential units are only allowabte on ..&:- second o third store of a retail /commercial center. In a commercial .. ............. .. development they are not looking at a need to have minimum lot areas. As part of the .... . ecific plan they are going to be adding public art installed within the project. They have the new panels going .in on Cortaro Road and this will have some public art component, as weld. Within the plan..-they have their design guidelines and standards within it. The design standards will be equal or better than our commercial design standards. Mr. Cassidy stated the development agreement which is still being negotiated. The development agreement provides that for all public infrastructure being provided by the developer the town will reimburse the developer out of sales tax generated from the site and it's 45 percent of the sales tax would be used for reimbursement and 55 percent stays with us. They are discussing to what extent construction sales tax is used as part of the reimbursement. At this point, the town staff and management has directed to only provide for construction tax reimbursement to the extent the developer funds any portion of the transportation improvement project beyond those elements that are needed to serve this project. The reimbursement the way it is written at this point is it goes for 15 years and begins when there is substantial construction in place. There has to be substantial construction started basically within three years after the interchange is completed. ►N MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 Council Member McGorray asked if we had made a financial arrangement on the 55145 percentage on any other shopping centers or entity. Mr. Cassidy stated they conceptually discussed that with other groups. There is a reimbursement provision in the Arizona Pavilions area. He believes it is a 50150. State law was recently rewritten to provide that in any agreement of this type there has to be a finding made by an independent party and paid for by the town and not reimbursed by the developer that the town gets a greater benefit than the developer. Vice Mayor Kai stated we need to make sure during the negotiations of a positive net return to the town. He stated we need to have a system that sa 9 that we are not going to pay for parking lots or street lights inside the development, but if they are for public benefit that they would be reimbursed. Mr. Kish stated they have identified what specific improvements are to be made so there is a generated list that identifies what improvements would included und that reimbursement schedule. Mr. Cassidy stated all the improvements we have identified are public improvements. He would say the one item that would be arguable is that under. the agreement as drafted is if the developer makes an environmental mitigation contribution which it does not require the developer to make if that is made it is reimbursed. Any impact fees that are paid by the developer would be reimbursable through the 45 percent. Those impact fees that apply to commercial at this time are water connection fees, etc. Transportation impact fees do not apply to commercial. The point of the mitigation fee would be to fund ..... .. mitigation actirs so their feeling was that in fact was a direct public benefit and should be reimbursable. Council U �n�r. Clanagr stated we need to include facilities for law enforcement ...... .... response within its projed onsite station that can be manned if necessary 24 hours a d ay to handle calls for s ervi ce th is going to be generated by a development of this size. Mr. Kish stated they will be finalizing the development agreement and specific plan and coming 'back in August for presentation and consideration by Council. 5. Presentation on Northeast Benefit Area transportation impact fee (Jim DeGrood) Mr. DeGrood addressed Council and stated he is bringing a potential new transportation benefit area for roadways that is currently not within any area that we have a development impact fee for. They are looking at the northeast area. It is bound by the Pinal County line on the north. The town limits line on the east and by the Lambert Lane alignment on the south. To the south of Lambert Lane is the south transportation benefit area which is generating funds for the new Twin Peaks interchange project. On the east side it is bounded by I -10 or the Central Arizona project canal. To the west of the Central Arizona project canal is the northwest Marana area where there is a development impact fee in place. Most of the town is within one transportation impact fee area or another. r,� 9 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 There would still be an area that would be outside of anything they've identified an impact benefit area for. That is an area north of Avra Valley Road and south of the Santa Cruz River. They have some concerns about the northeast area. There are a number of environment issues. They have some question about what the ultimate land use make up will be in the area. They know they have some major transportation corridors that cut through there and they are going to have some major financial obligations as a result of the needs to develop those corridors. Projects that are not yet under construction, but they do have entitlements for are Cascada, Foothills, Hartman Hills and Tangerine Hills. They are corning up with about 14,000 potential dwelling units within that area of which about 10,700 would be new or currently not in place. Northeast transportation issues are significant. They have to find funding for arterial roads. They have to define what Tangerine Road will be in the future. Tangerine Road crosses many jurisdictions, ADOT, the town, Pima County, Oro Valley all have an interest. This is a RTA identified project, as well. There are two major RTA projects in this area Tangerine Road from La Canada Drive west to I -10, Camino de Manana/Dove Mountain realignment also. When the RTA was approved it was approved with the understanding we would be bringing forward substantial.. local funds to augment the RTA funds in the development of these roads. They are looking at about 30 percent of the costs of these roads at a minimum coming from local funds as identified in the RTA as impact fee funds. Traffic volumes if developed as per the preferred the land use plan they will be looking at between a four and six lan.e roadway on all of Tangerine, Dove Mountain Boulevard, the extension down to the Twin Peaks interchange being between either an unpleasantly busy two lane road or four lane road: Tie RTA is only providing funding to build the first two Ian es. .Lambert Lane is a roadway that will need to be developed and is incorporated in their transportation model. It is not funded exclusively by this transportation model. They are currently designing the Dove Mountain/Camino de Manana extension. They expect it to be underway in construction towards the end of the construction of the Twin. Peaks hterehangc. There is no impact fee that covers this area. The RTA requires a local match for the funding of both Tangerine and Camino de anana. They are looking at Tangerine Road's link through the town being a six lane facility. They are looking at a connection road that runs basically between Avra Valley Road d Tangerine Road. That will serve commercial uses. Lambert Lane will have a lot of bene for areas outside of the town so we are only looking at 30 percent of the cost of that roadway coming from impact fees. Within the town is Thornydale Road between Naranj a alignnent end Tangerine Road and that will need improvements. It will see substantial use from people other than our residents so it is only a portion of that coming from impact fees. They are looking at a need in this area based on growth outside of the area and within of about $229 million worth of infrastructure. Of that, they are recommending that $79 million come from impact fees. They are recommending we look at an impact fee that is no higher than $6,872 per new residential dwelling unit. They recognize that certain land uses don't have as much impact as a single family detached house would. Age restricted communities do not generate the kind of traffic that a single family mixed neighborhood would so they've discounted the impact fee for that. They also recognize that multi- family units don't contribute traffic to our road network the way single family detached do. They have come up with a schedule that ranges from $6,872 10 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 for a single family detached house to $2,500 for a multi - family dwelling within an age restricted community. In terms of the time line, he suggested they release it next week. They have received a request from Southern Arizona Homebuilders to consider delaying it a couple weeks and would recommend modifying the time line accordingly. Once we have released the report we have by statute a minimum period of time that we have to have for public review prior to holding a public that is 60 days. Once they have the public hearing then at that point in time Council must wait at least 30 days under the new statute before Council can adopt the impact fee and then it would be another 75 days beyond that before impact fees could be collected. The earliest we might expect to begin collecting these fees would be in early 2008. Vice Mayor Kai asked if commercial developments were addies.sed and what contribution they could make. Mr. DeGrood stated they ascribed a percentage to residential travel. They had their traffic consultant create a traffic model for the region; input commercial uses, r idential uses, looked at what other models from around the -on were saying would be contributing traffic to Tangerine Road and the other roads that pass through our community. Using those models he came up with percentages of travel that would be coming from the residential community within the benefit area. Based upon that they came up with, a percentage that was used to reduce th&$23 0 million of improvements that are necessary down to $79 million that we would be assessing. Upon motion by Council Member Comerford, seconded by Council Member McGorray, direct staff to release the Northwest Benefit Area Residential Roadway Impact Fee Analysis and In- &astructure Improvement Plan two weeks from today was unanimously approved. 6. Presentations by prosFf applicants; for Planning & Zoning Commission, Bus iness Beonom e l evelo went citizen Advisor y Commission and Board of .. .... .... . Adjustment (Jocelyn Br n) Richard Benner addressed Council and stated he has lived in and around Marana for the ............. .......... last 14. years. He is currently employed with the Arizona Air National Guard. He is a 21 year veteran of the National Guard and will be retiring August 18 He currently has two y g � Y local bar and grills on the south side of Tucson. He is currently owns and operates Benner's Gn*1 He stated it is significant since he operates several different businesses, av . although they he similar goals they arrived there in many different ways, having dealt with the agencies for the last 12 years gives him insight. He stated being a resident and business owner, being able to see the issues from both sides and his common sense attitude he will be as asset to the commission and the town. Lois Bursuk addressed Council and stated she has lived in Tucson since 1980, born and raised in New York. She has lived in Marana for 24 years. She is married with an eleven year old daughter. She has a bachelor's degree in psychology. She has a master's degree in education from the U of A and a PhD in educational psychology from the U of A. She has been employed by the Flowing Wells School District for the past 16 years as a 11 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 certified school psychologist. She stated she is passionate about the direction of the town. As a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission this is what she brings; professionally a team player, she works in a collaborative, impartial manner, not beholden to development and not beholden to environmentalists. Dan Cross addressed Council and stated he has submitted his application for the Planning Commission. He has lived in Tucson since 1956. He was educated in the Catholic school system and graduated from the U of A and NAU. He worked at UMC post graduation, later began his career with the Tucson Fire Department and is in. his 26 year with them. He will retire in one year. He is interested in the Planning Commission for several reasons. He has always been a grunt level volunteer mostly constructing cabinets, furniture, widgets for the various organizations and churches he and his family have been associated with. They have also been in the adopt a road program: for over ten years. He was a fund raiser for his high school football W.am. overseeing a booster function that raised over $40,000 in four years. He stated h e and his wife have built three custom homes and as owner/builders and have been-somewhat exposed to the world of zoning issues and development. All homes were to different local governmental entities. He believes he can benefit the organization by a commitment to learning his job, being a constantly, consistently prepared member and fairly balancing the needs of all the stakeholders. Norman Fogel addressed Council and stated h.e grew up in Los Angeles and moved to Marana three years ago. He worked in non -profit management. He was the Chairman and a member of the Planning Commission in semia ey for four years. At that time, the city was about 50,0 30 members. He served on neighborhood councils in Los Angeles. He served on two different commissions He stated it would be a pleasure to use his retirement to serve the city. Marcia Jakab addressed c ........... . .. .. .. . ... ... ouncil d stated she moved to Marana from Cleveland, Ohio ...... ....... in June 20061, She stated e feels strongly about preserving the history and heritage. Her work experience includes almost thirty years in sales and management positions associated with large fortune boo companies. She stated she knows about red tape, how ...... . Cork on a team ar' strateg For the past six years she sold residential real estate. She receti . affiliated wiffi,, Long Realty, Twin Peaks office. Though change can cause resentment and resistance she stated we cannot afford to ignore it and there can be a lot of positive outcomes. Brett Summers addressed Council and stated he put in an application for the Planning and Zoning Commission. He is a strong advocate of proper and responsible growth for the town. He stated he worked for the Tucson Police Department for just over five years. He was injured in the line of duty and forced to take a medical retirement after having reconstructive wrist surgery. For the past three years he has volunteered leadership for the Hartman Visa Neighborhood Association since its conception three years ago. He has run for Council and is well versed in state, constitutional and local law. He wants to be a strong advocate for the public. As much as he wants growth for the community he will uphold his values to the laws of the nation, the state and the town when making his decisions. He stated we need a Planning and Zoning Commission that can be forward 12 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY lo, 2007 looking and see an impact of even a two percent of the vehicles at Marana Spectrum are going to add to the Hartman project so we can think about widening roadways, understanding infrastructure and thinking about those impacts for the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thomas Dunn addressed Council and stated he has been self-employed as an entrepreneur for 15 years in the mortgage banking, real estate finance industry. He has gotten involved with local politics at the county and state levels. He was Chairman at the Pima County Republican 72 hour task force in the last election : cycle. He is a member of the Marana Chamber of Commerce and an active volunteer where he has helped with the TREO business outreach. He would like to be appointed to the Economic Development Committee because he likes to think big. He stated we can work together to bring both. small and big business to Marana to stay. Mike Rebro addressed Council and stated he has lived in the town for one year. He graduated from the Citizen Resource and Education workshop. He is an oasis volunteer at Twin Peaks School. He is a member of the: senior citizens of Continental Ranch. He belongs to the VIPs. He has been a volunteer in the Continental Ranch fall festival. He was instrumental in the Circle K citizens committee which brought some concerns to Council earlier this year. He has : worked with a large .group of people from different countries. He has an extensive background working with people from Japan, India, Mexico and Europe. He stated he has v ..good communication skills. He has strong ... .......... project management skills. He was active in-thee Ignited way on the budget committee. He is a retired computer manager from doh Deere where he worked for thirty years. Terry Tometich addressed Council and stated he has lived in Heritage Highlands approximately one year. H has been in southern Arizona since 1972. He was with the Arizona Department of Public Safety for 32 years. He was Commander, Southern Bureau Chief in charge of the southern eit counties in Arizona. He is retired. He and his wife have opened two businesses at the Dove Mountain Retail Center; Fitness Together and soon to be open &d::.. therapd is massage called Elements. He has attended the LED in He and his wife hav :'tined the Chamber of Commerce. In his experience in .... M gs. e p later enforceme nt and dealing with community leaders, citizen groups in eight counties along with governmeal officials and being successful in that time period shows he can help and 4ork with mny types of individuals. John McIntyre addressed Council and stated he is retired. He can bring to Marana over 30 years of professional business experience in a wide variety of areas including finance, dealing with people and national and international organizations. He is also on the board of interfaith community services and he is also on their finance committee. He is willing to do whatever is necessary to help Marana grow and progress. 7. Resolution No. 2007 -126 Relating to utilities; authorizing the Mayor to execute and Town staff to carry out a six -month notice of termination of the April 23, 1979 intergovernmental agreement with Pima County relating to sewer service in the Marana town limits, and declaring an emergency (Frank Cassidy) 13 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 10 2007 Vice Mayor Kai declared a conflict of interest. Mr. Cassidy stated as discussed at length, including the Marana 101 presentation, ownership of the sewer system and the treatment plant will give us self determination and also will maximize our ownership of water resources. The county has made it clear based on his bond covenants that it is not in a position to voluntarily negotiate with the town concerning the division of assets as provided by in the IGA. Upon motion by Council Member Comerford, seconded by Council Member Clanagan, Resolution No. 2007 -126 was approved 6 -0. G. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Upon motion by Council Member McGorray, seconded by Council Member Ziegler, Council voted to go into Executive Session. 1. Executive Session pursuant A.R.S. X38- 431.03 (A )(1) for the purpose of interviewing candidates for the vacancies on the Planning & Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory Commission (Frank Cassidy) Mr. Cassidy stated this kind of Executive Session falls within the personnel section of the Executive Session so any of the interviewees can choose to be interviewed in the public session if they prefer. Council adjourned`to executive session. Returning to the dais,: Mayor Honea stated they have decided not to do any interviews and they will make the selection on he: Council meeting on the 17 for the individuals to be appointed t the positions. H. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Council Member Clanagan, seconded by Council Member Escobedo, Council voted to adjourn. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Town Council meeting held on July 10, 2007. I further certify that a quorum was present. Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk 14 MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 17 PLACE AND DATE Marana Municipal Complex A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL By Mayor Honea at 7:15 p.m. COUNCIL Ed Honea Herb Kai Russell Clanagan Patti Comerford Tim Escobedo Carol McGorray Roxanne Ziegler STAFF Mike Reuwsaat Gilbert Davidson Jim DeGrood Frank Cassidy Jocelyn Bronson B. PLEDGE OF AL] Mayor Vice Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Town Manager Present Dept ' Town Manager Present Assisri n Manag g ont ..... . ... . . .. .. .. .. Town ; xtorn .. ....... 'resent Town Clerk Present [AN AND INV� ATION /MOMENT OF SILENCE Mr. Kish addressed Council and reviewed a map representing the approved plans to date in terms of the specific plans and how they fit in with the master planning area. In the south/southwest area they are looking at lowering the land use designations. The previous general plan has that as a low density residential which is the category of up to three units per acre which relies on municipal services for it. At this point, this area has not extended those sewer systems and some of the water lines to it. They are going to begin to recommend the rural density residential on it which. would be the one unit per two acres. If someone assembled some land, came together with a specific plan, extended the services needed for MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 17 that then they could transition that plan into a master planning area to accommodate that if it seemed appropriate and all the infrastructure and utilities were there. With the noise contours and the influence zone at the airport they are trying to appropriately put the land use designations in place that will not conflict with the airport. They are looking at employment, businesses, potentially some hospitality uses. There have been discussions with state land. They are a major land owner in this area. We may be looking at adding a land use designation to the general plan as a mixed use rural development. They are creating a special planning area for the downtown district that they are establishing through the general plan. It is going to have its own section in the general plan to establish some of the guidelines and establish the direction and complexity. with the Pinal Airpark they are working with Pinal County. Their update is expected to be done in 2008 and are `doing a much more in depth analysis and overall planning. The I -10 corridor has a significant _mount of state land. There are some areas off the current Pinal Airpark interchange they mad looking at increasing some commerce in that area. Vice Mayor Kai asked what the far north bound .XY of the planning area Mr. Kish stated the planning boundary is going approximately six miles north into Pinal County. They are incorporating the Red Rock area in their planning area. Mr. Reuwsaat stated on August 3 rd all senior staff will travel to Florence to meet with senior ........ staff of Pinal County to go over planning sss Mr. Dish stated recent work has focused o mapping o land use plan. They are finalizing the text for several o the elements, the lard use, circulation, the environment, recreation, open space and con mic deg el pment and housing elements. Other plans they are working on is public facili:es and buildl s, owth areas existing conditions and the implementation p g g p ........... ........... ........... ....... ............. section of the plan. Recent state legislation has required that an energy element be prepared for general : p1aas and co r rehenst e l ip the counties. They are looking at bringing in that ................ element into tle u date as Drell. The are vorkin on the public outreach. The have .............. 7 Y g p y e started aligning several foeus groups. They have been meeting with the Habitat Conversation Plan Qxnittee, the Econo Development and Business meat Commission the Affordable Housin g p Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission to make sure they are involved, get comments .nd feedback from them. They have been working with the homeowners associations t get information into their newsletters, especially about dates of open houses. The website as . the ability to provide comments, questions or concerns directly to the .. .. planning d ep arti e t staff. 2. Presentation on Marana Citizen Request Tracker (CRT) System (Josh Wright) Mr. Wright addressed Council and gave a presentation on the new tool recently added to the Marana website. When the website was switched to a new provider last year, the IT director received as promotional giveaway a module called the Citizen Request Tracker that allowed us to put this fully integrated into our website. It allowed us to track citizen requests by means of a form based system and allowed us to quantify that into statistical reports on a monthly basis so we could see what types of requests citizens had for town staff. Currently, the Town only pays a small monthly maintenance fee of $200 to keep it. 2 MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 17 2007 Mr. Wright stated they have been updating it as they have gotten different types of requests and suggestions. When a request comes in they are notified by e -mail. They have centralized it in the Manager's Office. The intention was to have a consistent response. To have one person who would take the initiative over that and make sure it was seen all the way through until the citizen had their issue addressed. To date they have gotten 39 requests. They started the system in February. They have done a lot of marketing to make sure people know about it. He stated 94 hours is their current response time to fully close an issue out. That is about 3.9 days. As soon as the request comes in they send an immediate response saying it was received and they are working on the problem. They have noticed people asking about CIP projects so they will be adding a CIP request/questionnaire form So people: can get that to the proper staff. Vice Mayor Kai asked if there was a way the information could b Tnade available for people that do not have computer access. Mr. Reuwsaat stated the information is provided i our newsletters and all printed material .. . we put out. He stated a request is a request whether i comes in telephone or by email. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES.. PROCLAMATIONS Council Member Escobedo stated he along with 34 legislative officials throughout the U.S. will be attending the 49 IME informative conference. This will take place in Mexico City th h on August 5 _81 . This is an invitation by the Mexican government, paid for by the Mexican government. The objectives of the conference is to establish and reinforce a closer relation with U.S. public officials and legislatures interested in public policies, issues related to the Mexican communities living in - the United States, disseminate information concerning Mexican public policies addressed to Mexicans living in the U.S. particularly in the health and education sectors, as well as investment opportunities that can improve the living 3 MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX I DATE: JULY 17, 2007 standards of migrant communities, establish fluent communication channels that contribute to promote actions in favor of the Mexican communities in the U.S. This conference will focus on the different cooperation programs that the Mexican government has set in place to benefit the Mexican communities living abroad. Mayor Honea stated they are trying to get the message out as to what we are doing right now. They have ten to twelve meetings scheduled in the next few weeks. They want people to know Marana is a transparent community, why we are doing what we are doing and the reasoning behind it. G. MANAGE REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT E H. STAFF REPORTS GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS I. CONSENT AGENDA 3. Minutes of the June 5, 2007 and June 19, 2007 regular meetings and June 12, 2007 special meeting. Upon motion by Council Member Escobedo, seconded by Council Member McGorray, the Consent Agenda was unanimously approved. J. COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARANA MUNICIPAL COMPLEX DATE: JULY 17 K. BOARDS COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA INFORMATION " gRIzoN" MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: J. 10 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Cedric Hay, Senior Assistant Town Attorney SUBJECT: ordinance 2007.18: Relating to Special Events; establishing procedures for permitting of special events; amending Marana Town Code Title to (Health and Sanitation) by adopting Section 10-6; and establishing an effective date. Resolution No. 2007 -135 Relating to Special Events; declaring as public record that certain document entitled "Special Events Ordinance" adopted by ordinance No. 2007.18, filed with the Town Clerk; and declaring an emergency. DISCUSSION There are a wide range of special events which occur within the Town, ranging from bicycle races to concerts. These special events are required to be permitted by the Town, but there is relatively little language in the Town Code to rely on for permit requirements and conditions. Town staff has identified the need to develop a Special Events ordinance to address these current code deficiencies and to give guidance to the public on Special Events Permit requirements. Representatives from the Police, Public works, Parks and Recreation, Legal, Town Clerk and Town Manager departments have been meeting regularly to identify concerns and review draft ordinance language. One of the primary areas of concern involves the identification of what kinds of events would require permits, resulting in creation of definitions for Special Event, Major Event and Spillover. The proposed ordinance includes the following definition: "Special Event" means any public or private function which: * Requires temporary parking areas; or • Is held in a public park or on public right of way; or • Has amplified music or voices which can be heard outside of the event location; or • Requires temporary traffic control to provide for safe ingress or egress to the event venue; or • Requires a Special Event Liquor License; or • Requires temporary sanitation facilities; or {00005623.DOC 1} JRD108101/2007/4:02 PM • Requires the installation of temporary structures or tents of more than 120 square feet; or • Has other adverse impact on public health, safety and welfare. Exemptions: • School functions at school facilities, unless spillover is anticipated • Ordinary and customary events at a venue designed to accommodate them. Issues which are addressed within the Special Event Ordinance include: • The permit process and application requirements • Permit Conditions for: Noise Sanitation Security Medical Services Lighting Parking Traffic Control Appropriate Zoning Signage Sales Insurance • Grounds For Denial • Waivers • Violations, Penalties Staff presented a draft of this ordinance at the July 24' Council meeting, and at the July Business and Economic Development Advisory Commission meeting. Staff has received no further comment on the draft ordinance since these presentations were made. ATTACHMENT Proposed amendment to Chapter 10 of the Marana Town Code relating to Special Events Permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Ordinance No. 2007.18. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2007.18. {00005623.DQC I} -2- MARANA ORDINANCE NO, 2007,18 RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENTS; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR PERMITTING OF SPECIAL EVENTS; AMENDING MARANA TOWN CODE TITLE 10 (HEALTH AND SANITATION) BY ADOPTING SECTION 10 -6; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, while special events conducted within the Town can enrich the quality of life within a community and add to the community's economic prosperity, they also can pose public health, safety and welfare concerns for the participants and nearby property owners; and WHEREAS, the Town reviews and issues permits for the conduct of events when public safety is potentially impacted; and WHEREAS, the Marana Town Code contains Title - 10 (Health and Sanitation), which provides general regulations for the control of health, safety and welfare of activities conducted within the Town of Marana; and WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9 and Title 36 provide for the Town and its appropriate officers to regulate activities which may affect the health, safety and welfare of the public; and WHEREAS, a public presentation of the proposed Special Events ordinance was made to the Town Council on July 24, 2007, to obtain input from the Council and the public on the proposed ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council find that approval of the proposed amendment is in the best interests of the residents and businesses of the Town of Marana. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, as follows: Section 1: Title 10 of the Marana Town Code is hereby amended by adding Section 10 -6, Special Events Permit, three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Marana, Arizona, having been declared a public record by adoption of Resolution 2007-135. Section 2: Title 10 of the Town Code is hereby amended by adding the new text as presented by staff. Section 3: The various town officers and employees are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this Ordinance and portion of the Code. Marana ordinance No. 2007.18 Page 1 of 2 Section 4. All ordinances, resolutions, or motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed, effective as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section G: This ordinance shall become effective on the 7"' day of August, 2007. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 7th day of August, 2007. ATTEST: Mayor ED HONEA Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Marana Ordinance No. 2007.18 Page 2 of 2 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-135 RELATING TO SPECIAL EVENTS; DECLARING THE AMENDMENT TO TOWN CODE TITLE 10 (HEALTH AND SANITATION), ADDING SECTION 10 -6, ADOPTED BY MARANA ORDINANCE NO. 2007.18, AS A PUBLIC RECORD FILED WITH THE TOWN CLERK; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, as follows: SECTION 1. The amendment to Town Code Title 10 (Health and Sanitation), adding Section 10 -6, adopted by Marana Ordinance No. 2007.18, a copy of which is attached to and incorporated in this resolution as Exhibit A and three copies of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record and ordered to remain on file with the Town Clerk. SECTION 2. Since it is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the Town of Marana that this resolution become immediately effective, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 7 th day of August, 2007. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Special Events Title 14, Section 10-6 Chapter 10 -6 Special Events Permit Section 10 -6 -1 Purpose; Definitions (A) The purpose of this chapter is to establish a process for permitting and regulating certain temporary activities conducted on public property or private property when public safety is potentially impacted. This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of A.R.S. § 9 -240, as amended, and is intended to provide fair and reasonable regulations governing the time, place, and manner in which a special event may take place, and in doing so, provide for the health safety and welfare of the public and assist the town and its appropriate officers in enforcing the applicable provisions of A.R.S. Tale 9 and Title 30. (B) For the purpose of this chapter, the following de'itions shall apply ........... ..... .... ........... unless the context clearly indicates or requires different meag. 2. "Major Event" is defined as a special event where: • Extra -duty law enforcement officers or other security services are used; and ■ Temporary traffic control is used. 3. "Spillover" occurs when participants of, or spectators to, a special event congregate on, park, or move to any property or right of way not associated with the event venue. f00005330.DOC 1} Section 10 -6-2 Permit Required Any person wishing to operate, maintain or conduct a Special Event within the town must first obtain a permit to do so. No permit shall be issued until all conditions required pursuant to this chapter have been met and fulfilled. The maximum number of people permitted at any event will be based upon the nature of the event and the physical capacity of the site where the event will take place. Section 10-6-3 Application Process (6) A site map or sketch showing the location of the property in relation to surrounding properties, the area to be used, the access to the property and the location of any proposed facilities, parking areas, vending areas, stages and other principal features of the venue. €oo005330.DOc /} (C) Upon receipt of the Major Event / Special Event application, the Town Clerk shall circulate the application for review by the following Town departments: Public works, Police, Building Services, Planning, Town Attorney, Parks and Recreation, and Town Manager; and by the Northwest Fire Rescue District. These departments shall review the application and may impose conditions related to the potential impact of the event upon the Town's resources and pursuant to Section 10 - -4 of this chapter. (D) The Town Clerk shall respond to the applicant with an approval, approval with conditions, denial or request r additional information within ten(10) business days of the submis :n. of application. (E) The applicant shall demonstr.adherence with all conditions or requests for additional information no later than ten (10) days prior to the event and no permit shall be issued until this has been done. Section ' -6-4 Conditions . (A) Noise st h irds It shall be unlawful for any person, entity or operation at any speci .i. Ovent to create any amplified noise, or to allow the creation of any amplified noise, whicheauses the noise level measured on .... . . ... ... any residential property outside of the special event venue to exceed the noise standards found in table '1 : a t on 11 -5.3 D. .. (B) Sanitat ion. 1. The applicant shall provide and maintain toilet and hand wash i facilities that are adequate for the anticipated maxim attendance and event duration as directed by the Town Clerk. .... 2 The applicant shall provide and maintain an adequate number f'� trash receptacles as directed by the Town clerk. 3. All food vendors shall comply with the requirements of the Pima County Health Department for permits and food handling practices. (C) Security The applicant may be required, at the applicant's expense, to provide security services, and/or extra -duty law enforcement officers for event security, as determined by the Chief of Police. In making the determination of the need for security services, the Chief of Police shall consider the event nature, anticipated attendance, access to alcohol, ticket or money handling and any other factors deemed relevant.. If private f O0005330.DOC 11 security services are to be used, the chief of Police must approve the security service provider and the security plan for the event. If extra -duty law enforcement will be used, the town will coordinate the hiring of officers and the security plan preparation. (D) Medical services The applicant may be required to furnish medical services to the event. Conditions which may warrant this requirement include the expected temperatures during the event, the nature of the event, expected attendance, age of the expected attendees, and accessibility of the event venue to emergency vehicles. In the event medical services are used at the event, the medical services plan shall be approved by the Chief of Police and Northwest Fire Rescue District. (E) Lighting Events which will take Vace or where attendees may still be present after dark will be require'to provide adequate illumination of all use areas, sanitation facilities, parking areas and areas of pedestrian travel. If lighting is required for the event .. lightng plan shall be submitted to the Town's Building official to ensure compliance with the Title 18 of the Land Development Code: outdoor Lighting. (F) Parking Adequate :parking shall be pro ided for all special events, without spillover. In the event temporary parking areas are to be used, a parking layout and circulation :plan shall be prepared and submitted for approval by the t wn's Traffic Engineering Division. In temporary parking areas, all parking spaces shall be adequately marked and dust control measures shall be performed. �Grffc Carl Adu to access to the event venue shall be ................... ..... . .. . ... . ............ . . .. regrrd far `t general public and emergency vehicles. If the access points to the event venue do not have adequate capacity for the expected ingresslegress traffic volumes', temporary traffic control measures will be .. ..... ...... required.. Where temporary traffic control measures are to be employed, a Traffic o:ntrol Plan gust be submitted for approval by the town's Traffic Engineering Division. (H) Appropriate Zoning The venue for a special event shall have the appropriate zoning for the proposed event. (I) Signage All signage to be employed in the advertisement of the Special Event shall be in compliance with Title 16 of the Marana Land Development Code: Signage, and is subject to approval by the Planning Director. (J) Sales All event vendors shall hold a current Marana Business License. This includes the applicant if tickets are to be sold. All €00005330.DDC 1) merchandise and ticket sales are taxable in accordance with the laws of the state. Tickets to an event shall not be sold prior to approval of the Special Event Permit. (K) Insurance The amount and type of insurance required fora special event shall be determined on a case by case basis, based upon the recommendation of the Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool (AMRRP) or other insurance provider to the Town. The applicant shall provide at a minimum $1,000,000.00 in liability insurance and name the Town of Marana as an additional insured. Insurance certificates must be provided to the Town Clerk prior to the event date. Section 10 — 5 -- 5 Grounds for Dental (A) After reviewing the application material, the Town Clerk may deny issuance of a license if any of the foi o' wing apply: (1) That the applicant failed to meet the conditions imposed pursuant to this subchapter; (2) That the proposed event is intendd to be conducted in a manner or location not meeting the health, zoning, fire or safety standards established by rules or regulations of the Town, the laws of the State of Arizona or rules and regulations adopted by any of its agencies; ( That. the applicant has knowingly made any false, . rr sleading or fraudulent tatement of material fact in the application for permit or in another document required pursuant to this section; () That the applicant, his or her employee, agent or any person asciated with the applicant as partner, director, officer, stockholder. associate or manager, has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction, by final judgment, of an offense: (a) Involving the presentation, exhibition or performance of an obscene production, motion picture or play, or of selling obscene matter; (b) Involving lewd conduct; (c) Involving the use of force and violence upon the person of another; fao005330 -sac i} (d) Involving misconduct with children; or (e) An offense against the provisions of Arizona law respecting narcotics and dangerous drugs, or of any equivalent offense under the law of any other state which if committed in Arizona would have been a violation of the Arizona statutory provisions. (5) That the scheduled date of the event conflicts with other previously scheduled events such that it will result in an undue impact on the town's resources and staff. (B) Where the application is denied, the Tow Clerk shall mail to the applicant written notice of denial within three (3)...,days of the action, said notice to include a statement of. the'..:: reasons the application was denied. The applicant mad request a review of this denial by the Town Manager who will schedule a meeting dr'ng which the applicant may present evidence in support of his /her application, Section 10 — 6 — 6 00005330.noc /) Waivers. .. .. .. .. ..... �0 N v TOWN COUNCIL MEETING TOWN OF MARANA 7 INFORMATION R rroN MEETING DATE: August 7, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: J. 2 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: Kevin Kish, AICP, Planning Director AGENDA TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: ordinance No. 2007.19: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a rezoning to create The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan. HISTORY The subject property was part of the 1,325 acre Cortaro Vista annexation approved by Town Council in 1990 (Ordinance 90.22). March 25, 2007 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this specific plan to the Town Council. REZONING REQUEST The applicant proposes a change of zoning from "C" (Large Lot) to "F" (Marana Spectrum Specific Plan) for the purpose of developing a regional commercial center. This rezone request is a direct response to the future Twin Peaks interchange. The new interchange provides viable east and west access for residents in addition to creating a functional intersection capable of handling this proposal. The specific plan proposes a mix of commercial uses including retail, office, financial, medical, and entertainment (theaters), and provides the opportunity to add a residential component on the second or third stories in conjunction with a ground -floor commercial use. The surrounding zonings include, the Cascada Specific Plan and vacant "C" (Large Lot) zoning to the north, vacant "LI" (Light Industrial) zoning to the west, vacant "R -6" (Single Family Residential minimum 6,000 square foot lot size) zoning to the west and vacant "C" (Large Lot) and "E" (Transportation Corridor) zoning to the south. Approval of this proposed rezoning would rezone the subject area from "C" (large lot zone) to "F" Specific Plan and adopt The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan. The purpose of "F" zoning is generally to provide functionality and creativity in site planning and design that the development cannot achieve with conventional zoning. GENERAL PLAN The General Plan's Future Development Plan designates the subject property as "CC" (Corridor Commerce). This designation is typically applied to areas with traffic volumes supportive of a variety of commercial enterprises. Per the Town's policy a minor general plan amendment is required for this proposed rezoning to change the General Plan designation from the current "CC" designation to "MPA" (Master Planning Area). Based upon the amendment procedures outlined in the general plan this change in land use designation may be processed as a minor general plan amendment. Further, the minor general plan amendment request may be processed concurrently with a rezoning request. Staff finds The Marana Spectrum Tortolita Specific Plan meets the goals and intent of the Master Planning land use designation of the adopted Marana General Plan. Right -of- way /Access The new Twin Peaks interchange is scheduled to begin construction in 2008. As a condition of approval, issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy will be contingent upon the Twin Peaks interchange being open to serve the site. Further, the developer shall be responsible for roadway, drainage, and utility costs of the Twin Peaks interchange as described in the Development Agreement. Upon completion of the Twin Peaks interchange, access to the site will be provided off of Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard. The main point of access will be provided off of Camino de Manana and is proposed to be signalized. The Developer shall dedicate, or cause to have dedicated, the necessary rights -of -way in addition to the necessary roadway improvements for Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard as agreed upon in the Development Agreement. Sewer The project will need to connect to the current Pima County waste water line approximately 1.4 miles north of the property. A sewer service agreement will outline the details of this connection. Design Criteria The specific plan proposes a range of architectural and site design guidelines to be enforced by the Barclay Group via the centers CC &R's. Staff finds the proposed architectural and site design guidelines generally meet the Town of Marana's adopted Commercial Design Requirements. However, as a condition of approval staff requests that additional details be provided along with minor grammatical changes to clean up any potential conflicts in the document. Environmental The site analysis proposes open space in the form of large retention areas along the eastern and southern portion of the property. These retention areas will be landscaped. The applicant has retained Westland Resources, Inc. to provide additional environmental consulting work on the proposed project. Based on findings by Westland Resources the majority of the property consists of upland areas that support widely scattered creosote bush - dominated habitat with other common Arizona upland species (i.e. triangle leaf bursage, barrel cactus, cholla and prickly pear) that are few and scattered. They also found that the xeronpanan habitat -2- associated with a braided ephemeral drainage system is not a well developed habitat when compared with other washes in the region. The site is also identified to contain approximately seventeen acres within an area that the current Natural Resource section of the General Plan designates as Environmentally Sensitive. In order to develop the site as a cohesive regional development the project will accept the off -site drainage and redirect it through an interceptor channel and necessary retention basins. The applicant is proposing to provide the Town of Marana with an environmental mitigation fee as outlined in the Development Agreement. Cultural Resources According the site analysis two archaeological sites are located within the project boundaries. No ground disturbance of any kind may occur until the Town of Marana receives notification from the Army Corps of Engineers that the required archaeological work has been completed to their satisfaction. Staff has included a condition that prior to any site disturbance the final archaeological clearance shall be secured. Fire Protection The Development Agreement contains the requirement that prior to performing a final Building Department inspection, the owner shall have completed or shall provide evidence to the Town's satisfaction that a diligent effort to complete the process of having the property annexed into a fire district or otherwise provide for fire protection service. Waiver of Potential Arizona Property Rights Protection Act Compensation Claims To protect the Town against potential claims filed under the Arizona Property Rights Protection Act as a result of changes in the land use laws that apply to the rezoning areas by the Town's adoption of this ordinance, staff requires the applicant waive any rights to compensation for diminution in value by execution and recordation of the attached waiver instrument: the Consent to Conditions of Rezoning and Waiver of Claims for Possible Diminution of Value Resulting from Town of Marana Ordinance No. 2007.19. Ordinance No. 2007.19 is not operative unless and until the applicant waives any potential compensation claims. If the applicant doesn't forward the waiver in time to record it within 90 days after the ordinance is passed, the ordinance becomes null and void, as if no action were ever taken to pass the ordinance. ATTACHMENTS Summary application, location map and specific plan document. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan subject to the conditions below. -3- RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Compliance with all applicable provisions of the Town's Codes, and Ordinances current at the time of any subsequent development including, but not limited to, requirements for public improvements. 2. The ultimate development proposed by this rezoning shall be consistent with the adopted Development Agreement. 3. Issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy will be contingent upon the Twin Peaks interchange being open to serve the site. 4. No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any federal or state law or regulation or relieves the applicant or the land owner from responsibility to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. Appropriate experts should be retained and appropriate federal and state agencies should be consulted to determine any action necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. S. The Developer shall dedicate, or cause to have dedicated, the necessary rights -of -way for Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard as agreed upon in the Development Agreement. d. The developer will be responsible for the funding or the design and construction of all roadway improvements that the Town finds are required based on the data and findings of the accepted traffic impact analysis and other traffic studies that will be required at the platting or development plan stages of this project. 7. Before a certificate of occupancy is issued for the Property, the Developer shall have completed or shall provide evidence to the Town's satisfaction that Developer has made a diligent effort to complete the process of having the Property annexed into a fire district or otherwise provide for fire protection service 8. A native plant permit must be obtained prior to any site distrubance. 9. Developer shall assign to Marana, as a condition of Marana providing water utility service, every portion of its Irrigation and Type 1 Non irrigation Grandfathered Groundwater Rights, as those terms are defined by law, as may be appurtenant to lands conveyed and dedicated to Marana in connection with the development of the Property. Developer shall to execute and deliver all forms necessary to affect the transfer of these water rights to Marana concurrently with such dedication, pursuant to the projects phasing. 10. All buildings associated with the project shall comply with the Town's Commercial Design Standards (Ordinance 2007.07). 11. The final archeological survey shall be approved prior to any ground disturbing activity. 12. Minor grammar and technical changes as required by the Town of Marana shall be made to the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan prior to Final copies being copied. 10 13. Upon adoption of the ordinance by the Mayor and Council approving the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide the planning department with the following final edition of the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan: one non -bound original, forty bound copies; and, one digital copy in Microsoft Word or other acceptable format, within sixty days of the adoption. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to approve Ordinance No. 2007.19, adopting The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan with conditions. -5- MARANA ORDINANCE NO. 2007,19 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A REZONING TO CREATE THE MARANA SPECTRUM SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, The Planning Center, represents the property owners of approximately 170 acres of land located on the east side of Interstate to at the southeast corner of Linda Vista and Camino de MananalTwin Peaks alignments within portions of Sections 15 and 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, as depicted on Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and, WHEREAS, the Marana Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 28, 2007, and at said meeting voted unanimously to recommend that the Town Council approve said rezoning, adopting the recommended conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Marana Town Council heard from representatives of the owner, staff and members of the public at the regular Town Council meeting held August 7, 2007 and has determined that the rezoning meets the criteria for a minor amendment to the General Plan, changing the land use designation from Corridor Commerce to Master Planning Area, and should be approved. NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, as follows: Section 1. A minor amendment to the General Plan of approximately 170 acres of land located on the east side of Interstate 10 at the southeast corner of Linda Vista and Camino de MananalTwin Peaks alignments within portions of Sections 15 and 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, changing the General Plan designation from Corridor Commerce to Master Planning Area. Section 2. The zoning of approximately 170 acres of land located on the east side of Interstate to at the southeast corner of Linda Vista and Camino de MananalTwin Peaks alignments within portions of Sections 15 and 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, is hereby changed from "E" (Transportation Corridor) to "F" (Specific Plan) creating The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan. Section 3. The purpose of this rezoning is to allow the use of the Rezoning Area for a regional commercial center, subject to the following conditions, the violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a Violation of the Town of Marana Land Development Code (but which shall not cause a reversion of this rezoning ordinance): Marana ordinance No. 2007.19 1. Compliance with all applicable provisions of the Town's Codes, and Ordinances current at the time of any subsequent development including, but not limited to, requirements for public improvements. 2. The ultimate development proposed by this rezoning shall be consistent with the adopted Development Agreement. 3. Issuance of any Certificate of occupancy will be contingent upon the Twin Peaks interchange being open to serve the site. 4. No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any federal or state law or regulation or relieves the applicant or the land owner from responsibility to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. Appropriate experts should be retained and appropriate federal and state agencies should be consulted to determine any action necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 5. The Developer shall dedicate, or cause to have dedicated, the necessary rights-of-way for Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard as agreed upon in the Development Agreement. 6. The developer will be responsible for the funding or the design and construction of all roadway improvements that the Town finds are required based on the data and findings of the accepted traffic impact analysis and other traffic studies that will be required at the platting or development plan stages of this project. 7. Before a certificate of occupancy is issued for the Property, the Developer shall have completed or shall provide evidence to the Town's satisfaction that Developer has made a diligent effort to complete the process of having the Property annexed into a fire district or otherwise provide for fire protection service 8. A native plant permit must be obtained prior to any site distrubance. 9. Developer shall assign to Marana, as a condition of Marana providing. water utility service, every portion of its Irrigation and Type 1 Non irrigation Grandfathered Groundwater Rights, as those terms are defined by law, as may be appurtenant to lands conveyed and dedicated to Marana in connection with the development of the Property. Developer shall to execute and deliver all forms necessary to affect the transfer of these water rights to Marana concurrently with such dedication, pursuant to the projects phasing. 10. All buildings associated with the project shall comply with the Town's Commercial Design Standards (Ordinance 2007.07). 116 The final archeological survey shall be approved prior to any ground disturbing activity. 12. Minor grammar and technical changes as required by the Town of Marana shall be made to the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan prior to Final copies being copied. 13. Upon adoption of the ordinance by the Mayor and Council approving the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide the planning department with the following final edition of the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan: one non -bound original; forty bound copies; and, one digital copy in Microsoft Word or other acceptable format, within sixty days of the adoption. Marana ordinance No. 2007.19 Section 4. This Ordinance shall be treated as having been adopted and the 30 -day referendum period established by Arizona Revised Statutes section ( "A.R.S. §") 19- 142(D) shall begin when the Town files with the county recorder an instrument (in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney), executed by the Developer and any other party having any title interest in the Rezoning Area, that waives any potential claims against the Town under the Arizona Property Rights Protection Act (A.R.S. § 12 -1131 et seq., and specifically A.R.S. § 12 -1134) resulting from changes in the land use laws that apply to the Rezoning Area as a result of the Town's adoption of this Ordinance. If this waiver instrument is not recorded within 90 calendar days after the motion approving this Ordinance, this Ordinance shall be void and of no force and effect. Section 5. All Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions and parts of Ordinances, Resolutions, and Motions of the Marana Town Council in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed, effective as of the effective date of Ordinance No. 2007.19. Section G. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 7� day of August, 2007. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Marana ordinance No. 2007.19 ' TOWN OF MARANA MARACA Planning Department ,.,.,,- , � � � � 11555 'VLF. Civic tenter Dr. Marana AZ- $553 . .O" Of MAAKM (520) 382-2600 Fax: (520) 382-2639 APPLICATI PLANNING& ZONING .+c- awe -:Pr•- s - -� .�'••'- °s- Ty . $ c. t' ?t- o Preliminary Plat o Final Plat o Development Plan .o_..._.Landscae Plan o Native Plant Permit o General Plan Amendment o Variance o Specific Plan Amendment o Conditional Use Permit ^ezone /Specific Plan o Other o $ ignific ant -Lan U se Change o Minor Land Division Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 1 �! General Plan Designation a • o. be confmned b y staff) E►o�'"�+�! d Gross Area (Acre /Sq. Ft.) 00-ft Current Zoning I's 'i (To be confirmed by staff) of xouo JeO40 T Development/Project Name 0 S Proposed .Zonning '94f *0 PA; AP AI Project Location ,,� og � . d j(& & Description of Project , Property Owner Street Address • �f .0 c O � I City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E -Mail Address d S P01 A ft 'Oft Cwitact Person Phone Number �9J1"AJ Applicant P DD it 649 so, Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E --Mail Address a 4*WO.00V& Contact Person Phone Number Agent/Representative Street Address City State ,Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number E -Mail Address Contact Person Town of Marana Business License No. i=- �sY °p;t�.:.� Y,o•e•. ." . r` - ' . : e ` e �?�� ° a•.•L?�:a z`� '�$3 -r >�' ar' _ _ evF.i "' f `'x� ��_,^'1£ - ' `i . f �..s 'i"'::4,= rrE...af' �yy" S:''- %`•L!�. Apr _ �:.C• ..�. t3�3 �'c �i "s: - t , `s :, � - 5ic �°:k" ` ." :� R. P;." . •"--.;Er,v. �n •• 1 :�:' `$rc:rxF- x;•..;:.. . ':Y . 'R Ytn S ' � Y ' .' � w } V e i. 0.a S " � g T J. . -F F .n:. -,ca .r'�° .roT.� .c +P?F • cis s. _ 6: t, the undersigned, certify that all o the facts set forth in this application are true tv the best of my knowledge and that 1 am either the owner of the property or that 1 have been authorized in writing by the owner to file this application and checklist. (If not owner of record, attach written authorization from the owner.) -0,0e 40A.; �F— Print Name of A hcant/A ent Si ature Date X:ISHARED FtLESIReview Checklist\Application.doc May 2005 - . l k , ARANA, Neu g TOWN OF M Marana Spectrum Specific Plan Case No. PCZ -0 6087 REQUEST A request a change in zoning from "C" (Large Lot Zone) to "F" (Specific Plan) for a large scale commercial development on approximately 170 acres. tv *&* RA N A i SPECTRUM Marana Spectrum Specific Plan Marana Case Number PCZ July 28, 2006 Revised October 2, 2006 Revised February, 2007 Prepared by pLanningresources planning urban design development consultants 270 North Church Avenue, Tucson Arizona 85701 ■ (520) 628 -1118 fax: 628 -7637 PR Job# 06002.00 THE PLANNINGCENTER a division of TPC Group, Inc. The Planning Center BAR -01 PCZ -06087 MARANA SPECTRUM PROJECT TEAM T�F�IFT .C1T�FT� Kimco Barclay Marana, L.P. Barclay Group Trey Eakin, Senior Vice President Development 7702 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Suite 220 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 CONSULTANTS The Planning Center /Planning Resources Linda Morales, Project Manager/ Principal Robert Conant, Project Manager Lester Longino, Graphics 110 South Church Avenue, Suite 6320 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Ashby Engineering (Survey) Wayne Ashby 717 North Swan Road Tucson, Arizona 85711 CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc. Clinton Glass, PE P.O. Box 64880 Tucson, Arizona 85728 -4880 WRG Design, Inc. (Civil) Steve Hader, PE 9977 North 90t Street, Suite 350 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 Westland Resources (Cultural Resources and Environmental) James Tress Amanda Best 2343 East Broadway Boulevard, Suite 202 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Arendt Law Group, PLC Thomas Arendt, Esq. 5009 East Washington Street, Suite 125 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Acura Engineering (Geotechnical) Peter Rupal 5235 South 39t Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Western Technologies, Inc. (Environmental Phase I) Stephen G. Collins, REPA 3480 South Dodge Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85713 KDRA Architects Trish Flower 7400 East McDonald Drive, Suite 101 Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. (Traffic) David Perkins, PE Scott Beck 1860 East River Road, Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85718 JRC Design (Environmental Graphics) Jamie Cowgill 4634 North 44t' Street Phoenix, Arizona 85018 Arc Studios (Landscape) Ted Marshal, ASLA 820 North 3r Street Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Desert Archaeology, Inc. (Cultural Resources) William H. Doelle 3975 North Tucson Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85716 Table of Contents MARANA SPECTRUM 1 Introduction 1 PART I - DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITY REPORT 2 Introduction 2 Purpose 2 Project Location and Description 2 Topography and Slope Analysis 13 Hydrology and Water Resources 14 Existing Conditions 14 Existing Development and Adjacent Land Uses 23 Physical resources 23 Vegetation and Habitat 26 Observed Vegetation and Habitat 26 Special Status Plant Species 26 Wildlife 33 Observed Wildlife 33 Special Status Wildlife Species 33 Geology and Soils 34 Paleontological and Cultural Resources 84 Existing Land Uses 84 Existing Infrastructure 84 Water 84 Well Sites 84 Sewer 84 Electricity 92 Roadways 92 PART II - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STANDARDS 95 Introduction 95 Land Use Proposal 95 Development 95 Transportation and Circulation 102 Public Facilities 102 Water 102 Sewer 107 Natural Gas 107 Telecommunications 107 Grading 107 Hydrology Plan 111 Design Guidelines 117 General Provisions 117 Introduction and Purpose 117 Site Design 117 Architectural Guidelines 118 Design 118 Forms and Mass 118 Heights 118 Materials 118 Roof Form 119 Color 119 Exterior Spaces 119 Landscape 127 General Guidelines 127 Materials and Colors 127 Plant Palette 127 Hardscape and Paving 133 Lighting 133 Walls and Fences 133 Entries 133 Primary Project Entry 139 Secondary Project Entries 139 Streetscapes 139 Parking 139 Buffers 140 Retention and Detention Area 140 Irrigation 140 Signage 140 Functional Requirements 141 Phasing, Construction and Maintenance 181 Introduction 181 Phasing Plan 181 Construction and Maintenance Responsibilities 181 Drainage 181 Circulation System and Parking 181 Landscaping 181 Sewer System 182 Water Distribution 182 Specific Plan Implementation 183 General Procedures 183 Plan Review Procedures 183 General Administration 183 Amendments 183 Requirements 184 Administration 184 MARANA SPECTRUM Introduction The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan is a link between the Marana General Plan, the Marana Land De- velopment Code and the characteristics of the project site. The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan con- tains policies and regulations to create land use regulations, capital improvement programs, detailed development standards and other development regulations into one document. The plan established a "Power Center" at the southwest corner of Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard. The center will contain a number of major retailers, various smaller national and regional retailers, restaurants and a movie theater. The main street area which contains minor 3, 8, and 9, shops 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, pads 14, 15, 16, and 17, and is intended to create a village atmosphere within the Power Center setting. This area will attract visitors because of its pedestrian friendly walkways and smaller shops. The area will serve as a gathering place for outdoor entertainment venues and special programs. The size, relative isolation of the site and its proximity to major road connections create unique devel- opment opportunities. The project and the Town of Marana will best be served by an overall Specific Plan for the property versus piece meal rezoning. The Specific Plan will give planning and design guid- ance for the public and private investment needed for the improvements critical to the success of this private /public effort. The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan, when adopted by the Marana Town Council, will be the regula- tory document for the property. All development approvals shall be consistent with the regulations included in the adopted Specific Plan. The authority for preparation of Specific Plans is found in the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 9- 461.08 and in the Town of Marana Land Development Code, Title 05.06. The Specific Plan is broken into two sections. The first section contains the Development Capability Report, which assesses the existing conditions of the property and the surrounding area. The second part of the Specific Plan contains the Land Use Plan and regulatory controls. These regulations may enhance the existing Town of Marana zones and other land use regulations or, in some cases, pre -empt the Town regulations. 1 PART I - DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITY REPORT Introduction Purpose The purpose of the Development Capability Report is to measure the impact of the proposed develop- ment on the site and the surrounding area. Project Location and Description The project site is located east of Interstate 10 and the southwest corner of Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard (see location map). The site is approximately 170.04 acres. 2 n16 1' 1 Iry I N \ F 0 it � ) F:J "� 1 e�l - F —� —� / Id 0 1!v l- 1 F. _/ F, l � F,\ F, l � _ i ��, J t V ;r< ,4 F,) F,) T ;�- '44 I ' N � O � s � O O / <tr'J F. r 1 `� o � , ) , "N , rT�c►.<���, rTc►. �' F � _Ti "r' J �_ "r' J �_ tit 14V `r tit 1 ) � 1 ) � 1 ) A ,� F � .� F �, ce�,, F; ,rT.c� <�,rT.c� F, � � -��, � I , F � A ,� -��, T - _T1 J 1 r' J r / - -At r l , r t f / __1? l l � T / — 1 / T , c o del T Linda Vista Boulevard 4 NORTH V = 600' Exhibit i Location Map Exhibit 2 Aerial LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ORDER NO. 60017179 —JK —C (Cascada) Parcel 1: (See Sheet 2 Drawing) A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows: COMMENCING at the North quarter corner of said Section 22, being a railroad spike with punch; THENCE South 0'25'06" East along the East line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 51.89 feet; THENCE South 89'34'54" West a distance of 30.00 feet the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING on the Westerly right —of —way line of Camino de Manana as recorded in Book 2 of Road Maps at Page 1, Pima County Recorder's Office, Pima County, Arizona; THENCE South 0'25'06" East along said right —of —way line a distance of 1224.76 feet; THENCE North 34'51'57" West a distance of 871.55 feet to a point on the arc of a non — tangent curve concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said point having a bearing of South 35'27'41" East; THENCE northeasterly along the arc of said curve, to the left, having a radius of 7829.44 feet and a central angle of 0'25'33" for an arc distance of 58.19 feet to a non — tangent line; THENCE North 42'16'10" East along said non — tangent line a distance of 593.87 feet to a point on the arc of a non — tangent curve concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said point having a bearing of South 40'11'58" East; THENCE northeasterly along the arc of said curve, to the left, having a radius of 7729.44 feet and a central angle of 0'24'52" for an arc distance of 55.91 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE BOUNDARIES AND AREAS DESCRIBED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON THE FINAL ALIGNMENTS OF CAMINO DE MANANA, THE TWIN PEAKS INTERCHANGE AND LINDA VISTA BOULEVARD. Parcel 2: (See Sheet 3 Drawing) A portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, described as follows; COMMENCING at the South quarter corner of said Section 15, being a railroad spike with punch; THENCE North 89'45'16" East along the South line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 65.02 feet; THENCE North 0'14'44" West a distance of 30.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING on the northerly right —of —way line of Linda Vista Blvd. as recorded in Book 2 of Road Maps at Page 64, Pima County Recorder's Office, Pima County, Arizona, said point also being on the arc of non — tangent curve concave to the northwest, a radial line of said curve through said point having a bearing of South 41'32'37" East; THENCE northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 7729.44 feet and a central angle of 0'56'56" for an arc distance 128.01 feet to a point of reverse curvature of a tangent curve concave to the southeast; THENCE northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 7549.44 feet and a central angle of 4'00'46 ", for an arc distance of 528.73 feet to a point of tangency, THENCE North 51'31'13" East a distance of 610.78 feet to a point of curvature of a tangent curve concave to the south; THENCE easterly along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 40.00 feet and a central angle of 90'10'00" for an arc distance of 62.95 feet to a point of tangency, THENCE South 38'18'47" East a distance of 412.88 feet to a point of curvature of a tangent curve concave to the northeast; THENCE southeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 1507.39 feet and a central angle of 30'25'15" for an arc distance of 800.34 feet to a point on the said northerly right —of —way line of Linda Vista Blvd.; THENCE South 89'45'16" West along said right —of —way line a distance of 1923.56 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCLUDING any part that lies within the existing right —of —way of Camino de Mariana as recorded in Book 2 of Road Maps at Page 1, Pima County Recorder's Office, Pima County, Arizona; Containing 16.583 acres net. THE BOUNDARIES AND AREAS DESCRIBED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON THE FINAL ALIGNMENTS OF CAMINO DE MANANA, THE TWIN PEAKS INTERCHANGE AND LINDA VISTA BOULEVARD. NOTES A. This survey is based upon the legal description contained in the commitment for title insurance issued by Fidelity National Title Agency, Order No. 60017179 —JK —C, (Cascada) dated October 27, 2006 at 7:59 a.m. B. Easements shown are per the title report of Note A above. C. This property is subject to or benefits from the following instruments of record as listed in the title report of Note A above. 1. NOT SURVEY RELATED 2. NOT SURVEY RELATED NOTES (CONT' D� THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AFFECT PARCEL 1: 3. Reservations, exceptions and provisions contained in the patent from the United States of America, or in the acts authorizing the issuance thereof, as follows: Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized by local customs, laws and decisions of courts. And there is reserved from the lands hereby granted a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States. Recorded: September 19, 1913 in Book 56 of Deeds, Page 189 4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 5. The conveyance to Cortaro Water User's Association of all underground or percolating waters, except such water as may be used by the owners and inhabitants of said land for domestic purposes, in the deed. Recorded:June 22, 1947 in Book 314 of Deeds, Page 445. 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: American Telephone and Telegraph Company of Wyoming Purpose: communication systems Recorded: November 2, 1946, Book 103, Page 225, of Miscellaneous Records Affects: a one rod wide strip which is undefined as to its exact location. Surveyor's Note: Not plotted on survey — undefined specific location. Affects all of Section 22. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS AFFECT PARCEL 2: 7. Reservations, exceptions and provisions contained in the patent from the United States of America, or in the acts authorizing the issuance thereof, as follows: Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized by local customs, laws and decisions of courts. And there is reserved from the lands hereby granted a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States. Recorded: December 16, 1952 in Docket 545, Page 23. 8. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: Pima County Purpose: sewer lines, manholes and appurtenances Recorded: December 7, 2004, Docket 12443, Page 901 Affects: the area shown on the drawing attached thereto. Surveyor's Note: Plotted — Does not affect the subject parcel (see sheet 3) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ORDER NO. 40004461 —RD —D (McRae) Parcel I: All of the following described parcel of land in the North half of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East to wit: The West 330 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22 and that portion of the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, lying North and East of the Southern Pacific Railroad right —of —way in Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pi County, Arizona; EXCEPT THEREFROM a parcel of land 200 feet in width lying Northeasterly and adjacent to and parallel with the Northeasterly right —of —way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad, said 200 feet being measured perpendicular to the said Northeasterly right —of —way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad; and FURTHER EXCEPT there from those portions of the above parcel located within Camino De Manana and Palo Fierro, as shown on the maps recorded in Book 2 of Road Maps, Pages 1 through 4, and in Book 2 of Road Maps, Pages 64 through 66. Parce The Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, *X83:12 7iT7�5 • u177 f1iT��i'C f��iff74�7iTa775� NOTES A. This survey is based upon the legal description contained in the commitment for title insurance issued by Fidelity National Title Agency, Order No. 40004461 —RD —D, dated October 13, 2006 at 7:59 a.m. B. Easements shown are per the title report of Note A above. NOTES (CONT'D) ORDER NO. 40004461 —RD —D (McRae) C. This property is subject to or benefits from the following instruments of record as listed in the title report of Note A above. 1. NOT SURVEY RELATED 2. DELETED 3. NOT SURVEY RELATED 4. Reservations, exceptions and provisions contained in the patent from the United States of America, or in the acts authorizing the issuance thereof, as follows: Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized by local customs, laws and decisions of courts. And there is reserved from the lands hereby granted a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States. Recorded: March 22, 1913 in Book 52 of Deeds, Page 241; and Recorded: September 19, 1913 in Book 56 of Deeds, Page 189 5. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 6. The conveyance to Cortaro Water User's Association of all underground or percolating waters, except such water as may be used by the owners and inhabitants of said land for domestic purposes, in the deed. Recorded:June 22, 1947 in Book 314 of Deeds. Page 445. 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document. Granted to: American Telephone and Telegraph Company of Wyoming Purpose: communication systems Recorded: November 2, 1946, Book 103, Page 225, of Miscellaneous Records Affects: a one rod wide strip which is undefined as to its exact location. Surveyor's Note: Not plotted on survey — undefined specific location. Affects all of Section 22. 8. The following matters shown on the map of a survey by G. Brian Goetzenberger, R.L.S., of Alliance Land Surveying, Inc., dated April 12, 2006, Job No. 060307: a. A dirt ditch which a concrete headwall at the North end runs North and South in the Southeast corner of said land and extends South of the South line thereof. b. A down guy wire from a pole which lies South of said land extends into the South line thereof. ORDER NO. 60017184 —JK —B (LEE) The Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona; EXCEPT the North 30 feet thereof lying within Linda Vista Boulevard, formerly Palo Fierro, as shown on the map recorded in Book 2 of Road Maps, Page 64; FURTHER EXCEPTING the following described parcel: A portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Pima County, Arizona, said portion being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast section corner of Section 22; Thence South 0'19'58" East along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the southerly right —of —way line of Linda Vista Road as shown in Book 2 of Roadmaps at Page 64, records of Pima County, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 8945'16" West, along said southerly right —of —way line, a distance of 814.03 feet; Thence, departing said southerly right —of —way line, South 0'10'45" West a distance of 59.80 feet; Thence South 3642'50" East a distance of 388.37 feet; Thence South 89'49'15" East a distance of 102.61 feet; Thence South 010'45" West a distance of 24.26 feet; Thence South 89'49'15" East a distance of 399.92 feet; Thence North 34'56'07" East a distance of 141.85 feet to a point on said East line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; Thence North 0'19'58" West, along said East line, a distance of 284.16 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 32.495 acres. BEARING BASIS THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 15, T -12 —S, R -12 —E, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF CAMINO DE MANANA ESTATES RECORDED IN BOOK 27 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 79. N 89'50'29" E N Do — rn N 06 L6 N N N N fn Q O P X 3 3 3 �Olf Q� J L P� o) w 1615 1514 06 ui u_ 1 : ' -%UND VISTA:. , a O 0 FO M �� THIS P OJECT :. N U w 0 40 0 _ 3 L o o 0 LD a z LOCATION MAP \ J J a_ o LU a SECTIONS 15 & 22, N L) 0 a x LLJ T. 12 S., R. 12 E., G. & S.R.M. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA a a w F I ° W SCALE: 3" = 1 MILE Z w w w N N to N Z o w w \w o N a: o: p a: M w .. .. \.� Q: Q m NU NOTES ORDER NO. 60017184 —JK —B (LEE) A. This survey is based upon the legal description contained in the commitment for title insurance issued by Fidelity National Title Agency, Order No. 60017184 —JK —B dated October 13, 2006 at 7:59 a.m. B. Easements shown are per the title report of Note A above. Q C. This property is subject to or benefits from the following instruments of record as listed in the title report of Note A above. 1. NOT SURVEY RELATED C\2 Si 2. DELETED ' E 3. NOT SURVEY RELATED °�8 4. Reservations, exceptions and provisions contained in the patent from the United States of America, or in the acts authorizing the issuance thereof, as follows: Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, W 1 E ~ manufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs � Oti used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized by local �, customs, laws and decisions of courts. And there is reserved from the lands hereby granted a right of way V thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United W E, States. N Recorded: May 8, 1916 in Book 61 of Deeds, Page 302. 5. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records. 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto V �, as granted in a document. \ Q n Granted to: American Telephone and Telegraph Company of Wyoming 1 Purpose: communication systems 6O Recorded: November 2, 1946, Book 103, Page 225, of Miscellaneous Records Affects: a one rod wide strip which is undefined as to its exact location. Surveyor's Note: Not plotted on survey — undefined specific location. Affects all of Section 22. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION TO: BARCLAY GROUP VENTURE CAPITAL, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, KIMCO BARCLAY MARANA, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; v KIMCO DEVELOPERS, INC., a Delaware corporation; WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., a national banking association; 3 LINDA VISTA & 1 -10 SEC PROPERTY, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; LEE FAMILY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; GREGORY LEE and LAN —ING JULIA LEE MICHAEL A. LEE and MEI —GEE LEE; DAVID RICHARD LEE and CATHY THOMSSEN LEE, as trustees of the David & Cathy LEE Revocable Trust and their respective successors and assigns, dated U. January 23, 2002; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NO. 10,789; Fidelity National Title Insurance Company; Fidelity National Title Agency. ma M .. This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with "MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS for ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys," jointly established and adopted by ALTA, ACSM and NSPS in 2005, and includes items 1,2,4,6,8,9,10,11(a),14,15 and 16 of Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA, NSPS, and ACSM and in effect on the date of this certification, the undersigned further certifies that proper field procedures, instrumentation, and adequate survey personnel were employed in order to achieve results comparable to those outlined in the "Minimum Angle, Distance, and Closure Requirements for Survey Measurements Which Control Land Boundaries for ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys." DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 Exhibit 3 JOB N0: 4226 S urvey SHEET: 1 / N N.W. COR. ON RE FOUND 5/8" DIA. IRON \REBAR FND 1/2" IRON REBAR TAGGED "RLS 23956" TAGGED RLS 13187 (BENT) ALSO FOUND 1.5" AC REBAR STAMPED RLS 7599 S/S 2.25' N., 0.14' W. S 89'451 W S 89'4618" W 100 0 100 200 243.03' / 1" = 100' FOUND 1/2" DIA. IR 0.67' S., 0.. 455' ' E. . J FOUND 2.5 TAGGED "LS 6715 (BENT) 0.21' N., 1.49' W. CURVE TABLE N 1' = 16.666' S 89'4618 W 856.9 N 88'50'09" W -- 8.56' (1999) 8.41' ( 2000) FOUND 1.5" OD OIP 11/1999) REPLACED BY P.C.H. Do o Do Li ul ul . W /RAILROAD SPIKE W /PUNCH (5/2000) N.W. COR. SEC.22 WELLSITE R= 439.26' S 89'4 29• PALO FIERRO ROAD A= 3'46 39 L= 28.96' \ ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 Donrrrnimr_c mr) )lg - S 89'4618 W 856.9 DETAIL " n 99 'y � rn z STAMPED "RLS 19316" /� O �i r'2� 9� ���'p y r Y 0 ♦ FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED 9. 0 '. A m� O Oyu S�'� 0 N $, ni • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED - 9 A �O 9d�0o�! �� s I0 AC ALUMINUM CAP AZ 0 c � Os o ,. �, °' U7, s OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER ' 0� rr DIP OPEN IRON PIPE �0 Y 4i CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET 1 0 0 �y, /0 PCHD PIMA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT O cP� 60' PP O UTILITY POLE . PPR-0 UTILITY POLE W /RISER q C I N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE W /PUNCH S 89'4516" W 262414' -- / ' - � N.E. COR. SEC. 22 '18" W )5 D - 022-6 PALO FIERRO ROAD L= 2$,87' ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 7 0 0 D N � O D iG m D Z o N O Z W o TP08 S 89'34'54" W m PARCEL 1 30.00 z N y o z I N D O I 30' 24'± WIDE CHIP SEAL PAVEMENT I SEE SHEET 4 I N rn W O I CENTER OF SECTION 22 T -12 -S, R -12 -E FOUND 1/2" IP W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "RLS 29873" ti q W � � W W � h � � V co co C w ^ co ^ 2! %d LL A DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 JOB NO: 4226 SHEET: 2 / -- ti� �o Do o Do Li ul ul FOUND 1/2" IRON REBAR WELLSITE I SEE SHEET 4 \ s TAGGED "LS 8024" 0.07' N., 0.15' W. DKT. 11709 PG. 1752 w O rn O <° G1 / SEE DETAIL "A \� / SEE SHEET 3 3 3 c� rn = 6.893 ACRES LA I o ` / 8 LEGEND 'Z�,�o'��c \ ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 00 ul ul 45' LINDA VISTA ROAD DK. 7387, PG. 555 - S ® SET 1/2" DIA. IRON REBAR WITH AC PALO FIERRO ROAD O O FIERRO ROAD _ s_89'45'16" W _ 26_28 _ - - i _26 _PA ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PPR PRO CEEDINGS NO. 212 pp OHE PP OHE O w - S 89'45'18" W 856.97 TPOB PP N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 N.E. COR. SEC. 22 O O m _ PARCEL 1 FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE W /PUNCH T - 12 - S, R - 12 - E ALSO FOUND 1.5" DIP AND R/R SPIKE WESTERLY (SEE DETAIL "A ") FOUND 2" ACP STAMPED 23 to p APN 221 -04 -0048 22 W � DKT. 11979, PG. 1617 FI NATIONAL TITLE TR 10789 ATT'N: RED POINT DEVELOPMENT INC. \ 0 ° / / / a a ° w ww 8710 N. THORNYDALE ROAD SUITE 120 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85742 cb D z o _N _N DETAIL " n 99 'y � rn z STAMPED "RLS 19316" /� O �i r'2� 9� ���'p y r Y 0 ♦ FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED 9. 0 '. A m� O Oyu S�'� 0 N $, ni • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED - 9 A �O 9d�0o�! �� s I0 AC ALUMINUM CAP AZ 0 c � Os o ,. �, °' U7, s OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER ' 0� rr DIP OPEN IRON PIPE �0 Y 4i CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET 1 0 0 �y, /0 PCHD PIMA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT O cP� 60' PP O UTILITY POLE . PPR-0 UTILITY POLE W /RISER q C I N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE W /PUNCH S 89'4516" W 262414' -- / ' - � N.E. COR. SEC. 22 '18" W )5 D - 022-6 PALO FIERRO ROAD L= 2$,87' ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 7 0 0 D N � O D iG m D Z o N O Z W o TP08 S 89'34'54" W m PARCEL 1 30.00 z N y o z I N D O I 30' 24'± WIDE CHIP SEAL PAVEMENT I SEE SHEET 4 I N rn W O I CENTER OF SECTION 22 T -12 -S, R -12 -E FOUND 1/2" IP W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "RLS 29873" ti q W � � W W � h � � V co co C w ^ co ^ 2! %d LL A DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 JOB NO: 4226 SHEET: 2 / ti� �o b �IK I SEE SHEET 4 o m a m s g Va <° G1 AREA = 300,272± SQ. FT. o G 2 = 6.893 ACRES LA I o ` 8 LEGEND 'Z�,�o'��c "NO BUILDINGS" 0 G,L o y Jn *f - S ® SET 1/2" DIA. IRON REBAR WITH AC DETAIL " n 99 'y � rn z STAMPED "RLS 19316" /� O �i r'2� 9� ���'p y r Y 0 ♦ FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED 9. 0 '. A m� O Oyu S�'� 0 N $, ni • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED - 9 A �O 9d�0o�! �� s I0 AC ALUMINUM CAP AZ 0 c � Os o ,. �, °' U7, s OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER ' 0� rr DIP OPEN IRON PIPE �0 Y 4i CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET 1 0 0 �y, /0 PCHD PIMA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT O cP� 60' PP O UTILITY POLE . PPR-0 UTILITY POLE W /RISER q C I N. 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE W /PUNCH S 89'4516" W 262414' -- / ' - � N.E. COR. SEC. 22 '18" W )5 D - 022-6 PALO FIERRO ROAD L= 2$,87' ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 7 0 0 D N � O D iG m D Z o N O Z W o TP08 S 89'34'54" W m PARCEL 1 30.00 z N y o z I N D O I 30' 24'± WIDE CHIP SEAL PAVEMENT I SEE SHEET 4 I N rn W O I CENTER OF SECTION 22 T -12 -S, R -12 -E FOUND 1/2" IP W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "RLS 29873" ti q W � � W W � h � � V co co C w ^ co ^ 2! %d LL A DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 JOB NO: 4226 SHEET: 2 / 1/16 COR. SEC. 14 FOUND 1.5" AC REBAR STAMPED LS 4785 S 89'4756" W 1318.71' (M) 1/16 COR. SEC. 14 FOUND 1.5" AC REBAR STAMPED LS 4785 1/16 COR. SEC. 14 S 89'4740" W 1318.77 (M) FOUND 1.5" AC REBAR - - - - STAMPED LS 4785 0 0 IK Q� �'� 11� APN 216- 36 -019A RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT rytio �� PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES LLP DOCKET 928, PAGE 202 �a' e� �, yyQ �� " NO BUILDINGS" J 3550 NORTH 1st AVENUE SUITE 100 Q TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 �j "'p Cf' 4+' Nd,1 Q ey'��p�PP�P� �1 (TITLE REPORT ORDER NUMBER: 60017179- JK -C) a Sj AREA OF PARCEL 2 EXCLUSIVE OF CAMINO DE MANANA = 722,357 SQ. FTf sy ® ®✓ D� = 16.5830 ACRES o` Ada C i�%^ ` � R= 7729.44' 0 0 0= 0 . 5 , x „ - - 30.53' L= 121101'(M) iTPOB S 89'4516" W 1923.56' (M) 'o O.H.E. O.H.E. S 894516" W 2914' M O.H.E. O.H.E. - - PP PP PP PP PP PP S. 1/4 COR. SEC. 15 _ _ _ _ - - U0 ALSO FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE WESTERLY PALO FIERRO ROAD (LINDA VISTA) (SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET 2/4) � ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 ti r� ti Ga T/1 47 SEE SHEET NO. 4 — < I 40' WIDE PUBLIC SEWER ESM'T DKT. 12443 PG. 00.901 I z I S/E COR. SEC. 15 LEGEND I 60, PP O.H.E. R - 1� 5 cY' • � D° 2 00.6 7 � cY' STAMPED "RLS 19316" ♦ s ro FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED AC ALUMINUM CAP OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER DIP 2 g 871013" W �14 , lJ• fig °`ti��� 6 21217 CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET PCHD 110. 4 2 n 92 1283d(� 6 �S a z R L 12 •� SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES 30' sa i � 4 1 Q� �'� 11� APN 216- 36 -019A RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT rytio �� PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES LLP DOCKET 928, PAGE 202 �a' e� �, yyQ �� " NO BUILDINGS" J 3550 NORTH 1st AVENUE SUITE 100 Q TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 �j "'p Cf' 4+' Nd,1 Q ey'��p�PP�P� �1 (TITLE REPORT ORDER NUMBER: 60017179- JK -C) a Sj AREA OF PARCEL 2 EXCLUSIVE OF CAMINO DE MANANA = 722,357 SQ. FTf sy ® ®✓ D� = 16.5830 ACRES o` Ada C i�%^ ` � R= 7729.44' 0 0 0= 0 . 5 , x „ - - 30.53' L= 121101'(M) iTPOB S 89'4516" W 1923.56' (M) 'o O.H.E. O.H.E. S 894516" W 2914' M O.H.E. O.H.E. - - PP PP PP PP PP PP S. 1/4 COR. SEC. 15 _ _ _ _ - - U0 ALSO FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE WESTERLY PALO FIERRO ROAD (LINDA VISTA) (SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET 2/4) � ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 ti r� ti Ga T/1 47 SEE SHEET NO. 4 — < I 40' WIDE PUBLIC SEWER ESM'T DKT. 12443 PG. 00.901 I z I S/E COR. SEC. 15 LEGEND FOUND 2" ALUM. CAP PP O.H.E. STAMPED STAMPED "RLS 19316" ♦ s • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED AC Q W clq w �11 Lo �I O Q w 4 8 E, Q � Q C3�W �oC co 1 N h J V ! W F IQ I DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 JOB NO: 4226 SHEET: 3 / LEGEND ® SET 1/2" DIA. IRON REBAR WITH AC STAMPED "RLS 19316" ♦ FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED AC ALUMINUM CAP OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER DIP OPEN IRON PIPE • CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET PCHD PIMA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT PP O UTILITY POLE ® O.H.E. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES PALO FIERRO ROAD (LINDA VISTA BLVD.) ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 i N 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 F1 T 12 =S, R -12 -E SEE SHEET 3 FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE W/PUNCH N/E COR. SEC. 22 LINDA VISTA ROAD DK. 7387, PG. 555 ALSO FOUND R/R SPIKE WESTERLY (SEE DETAIL "A" - SHEET 2) T -12 -8, R -12 -E _ - , FOUND 2" ACP PAL FIERRO ROAD _ � C R4' W 7Fi79 . 14' ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 64 PROCEEDINGS NO. 212 STAMPED t FOUND 1 /2" IP N 89'45'16" E 1284.55(M) N 89'45'16" E 500.52'(M) I N 89'45'16" E 814.03' (M) FOUND 1/2" IP J 14 15 I BURIED 3' FOUND 1/2" IP TAGGED RLS 14145 Z 22 23 \ AFFIXED TAG "RLS 19316" TAGGED LS 8024 y m o CAMINO DE MANANA I o N \ ROAD MAPS, BK. 2, PG. 1 -4 60' ` '�� EXCLUDED PARCEL PROCEEDINGS NO. 220 I \ 30' \ I $ m 2- lfi � AREA = 275,299 SQ. FT. � = 6.3200 ACRES COURSE TABLE L - 3 L - 2 NO. BEARING/DELTA DISTANCE N 89'4115" W L -1 S 3456'07" W 141.85' (M) L -2 N 0'10'45" E 24.26' 399 92" (M) 150 0 150 300 v L -3 N 89'49'15" W 102.61' 1" = 150' L -4 N 0'10'45" E 59.60' Z O G � 3 NO BUILDINGS \ o m NO BUILDINGS N LEGEND \ 2 W 1 8 AREA = 2,753,950± SQ. FT. N AREA = 1,415,484± SQ. FT. ® SET 1/2 DIA. IRON REBAR WITH AC I z = 63.2220 ACRES o = 32.4950 ACRES ►� STAMPED "RLS 19316" \ I 9 o \ \ I ALSO FOUND 1/2" IP W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED LS 31021 S 33'47'40" E 0.17' G �9� I % fT 9, 9 I G2 �s \ OG�p � cR A l I O A\ 0 G+ C��s �p�A T610 I \ ti S�o��so '9 p2 I I I \ I CENTER OF SEC. 22 T -12 -8, R -12 -E _ FOUND 1/2" IP W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED LS 29673 Z ` p ♦ FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTED • FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED 3 AC ALUMINUM CAP OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OIP OPEN IRON PIPE • CALCULATED POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET PCHD PIMA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ALSO FOUND 1" DIP N 89'45'32" E 1313.58'(M) FOUND 1/2" IP 0.13' NORTH, 1.50' WEST 3M.00' FOUND 1/2" IP 983.58'(M) TAGGED LS 8024 W /PLASTIC CAP STAMPED LS 31021 APN 221 -06 -0040 STEWART TITLE & TRUST TR 3638 P.O. BOX 42200 NO TUCSON, AZ. 85733 BUILDINGS NO B UILDINGS AREA = 1,294,427± SQ. FT. z = 29.7160 ACRES r . M M � 3 , 3 C,r M O) N "bi O N 3 z O .. Z y on AREA II = 434,493± SQ. FT. II = 9.9746 ACRES II EARTHEN CHANNEL II & HEADWALLS II (OLD IRRIGATION DITCH) II II II II I I I I \ N 89'4549" E N 89'4549" E II - - - 308.55'(M) 330.00' N 89'4549" E 982.59' II E 1/4 COR. SEC. 22 \ N 89'45'49" E FOUND 1 " IP FOUND 1/2" IP ALSO FOUND 1/2" IP 2625.19' (M) —�' T -12 -8, R -12 -E \ W/PLASTI CAP W/PLASTIC CAP FOUND O ID, E OD W/PLASTIC CAP STAMPED LS 1021 STAMPED LS 31021 STAMPED LS 31021 OPEN IRON PIPE OUND 1 2" IP 0.10' NORTH, 0.18' E AST APN 221 -04 -0250 APN 221 -06 -0100 ALSO FOUND ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS INTERSTATE INDUSTRIAL TAGGED LS 8024 800 E. UNIVERSITY BLVD. ASSOCIATES APN 221 -04 -0230 0.09' NORTH, 0.20' EAST TUCSON, AZ. 85721 ATTN: SEARS FINANCIAL CORP. DAVIS, RODNEY & DAWN M. CP /RS APN 221 -04 -0240 6340 N. CAMPBELL AVE. # 278 P.O. BOX 934 INTERSTATE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATES TUCSON, AZ. 85718 CORTARD, AZ. 85652 ATTN: SEARS FINANCIAL CORP. 6340 N. CAMPBELL AVE. # 278 TUCSON, AZ. 85718 Q ad kA0 ti I r4 c) , N O En w � � V V \oC\ - Q4 co E--4 IL Y A LL m g a 111� I -Ar rr DATE: DECEMBER 01, 2006 JOB NO: 4226 SHEET: ^ / 4j Topography and Slope Analysis The Marana Spectrum property lies within the northern portion of the Tucson Basin and has relatively level and gently sloping terrain. The surface elevation within the project site slopes gently away from the existing Linda Vista Boulevard towards the southwest from approximately 2200 feet to 2125 feet above mean sea level. The property's cross slope is as follows: C x L x 0.0023 x N-1 A N where C = Contour Interval = 10 L = Length of all contour lines = 25,800' A = Area of site = 170 acres 0.0023 = conversation factor N = Number of contour lines = 9 ACS = 3.1% 13 Hydrology and Water Resources Existing Conditions The project site is located at the lower end of the Canada Agua East watershed. The entire area of the property is located within a FEMA Zone AO (depth = 1 foot). A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) ap- plication filed by CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc., proposes to amend the effective FEMA floodplain boundaries for the Canada Agua East alluvial fan. This revision, when adopted by FEMA, would have the effect of removing most of the property from Zone AO (depth = 1 foot). Areas removed from the Zone AO designation would be replaced with a shaded Zone X which indicates areas of 100 -year flooding at a depth of 1 foot or less. About 5% of the property area would remain designated as a Zone AO (depth = 1 foot). Exhibit 4 shows the effective FEMA floodplain delineation. This map will be re- vised once the LOMR filed by CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc., is approved by FEMA. There are four points of concentration for flows along the north and east property boundaries. These points of concentration are associated with the distributary channel system that exists on the Canada Agua watershed. There have been two different studies to determine the peak discharge rates in the vicinity of the project site. The first methodology is based upon an HEC -1 model that was developed by Arroyo Engineering, Inc., in conjunction with preparation of the Town of Marana Master Drainage Study (TMMDS). Discharge rates yielded by this study were for points of concentration along the Union Pacific Railroad embankment. The second methodology is based upon hydrologic computations conducted by CMG Drainage Engi- neering, Inc., using the Pima County method. This methodology produces the highest peak discharge rates than the TMMDS methodology and it is based upon fixed watershed boundaries. A map showing these watershed boundaries is provided on Exhibit 5. The study by CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc. determined that 400 cfs of the 100 -year discharge draining the CP #2 may break out of the channel and drain to a wash crossing Linda Vista Boulevard about 200 feet east of the northeast property corner. This flow will combine with flows at CP #1 and enter the site along the east property boundary. The combined flow discharge for CP #1 and the breakout from the wash draining to CP #2 is 1312 cfs. The Canada Agua East is mapped by FEMA as an alluvial fan. Studies by the Arizona Geologic So- ciety (AGS) concluded that the Canada Agua East is an inactive alluvial fan because soils other than those within the washes have been aged at 5000 years or more. Hydraulic modeling with the FLO -21) program has been used in conjunction with previous LOMR applications to support the AGS find- ings and to accurately define the floodplain boundaries for flows emanating from Canada Agua East. These studies have concluded that the sheet flow conditions on the property occur at depths less than 0.5 feet. The natural washes crossing the project site have limited capacity. Storms with a frequency greater than the 5- to 10 -year return period event will overtop the banks of the channels, causing shal- low sheetflow over broad areas of the site. The area along the west boundary of the property adjoining the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) is designated on the effective FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps as a Zone AH. This floodplain zone designation is associated with the accumulation of stormwater along the UPRR embankment. The wa- tershed area for flows accumulating along the UPRR embankment extends as far south as the Canada Del Oro Wash. There are several culverts beneath the UPRR that discharge stormwater toward In- terstate 10 and the Santa Cruz River. These culverts are undersized, so flows in excess of the culvert capacity continue north along the UPRR embankment to the next culvert structure. The hydrologic 14 computations completed by Arroyo Engineering, Inc., in conjunction with preparation of the Town of Marana Master Drainage Study determined the 100 -year peak discharge rate at the southwest corner of the project site (CP -4 on Exhibit 6) to be 1812 cfs. The TMMDS determined that 728 cfs overtops the UPRR between the southwest property corner and Camino de Manana. The remainder of the flow (740 cfs) continues north (primarily within the UPRR right -of -way) to the next culvert structure which is located just south of the existing Camino de Manana crossing of the railroad. Another 384 cfs drains to the UPRR between these points yielding a 100 -year discharge at Camino de Manana of 1124 cfs. The capacity of the culvert at Camino de Manana was determined to be 736 cfs. The remainder of the flow drains to another UPRR culvert located about 1 /4 mile northwest. 15 `� r OY k' , ? 4� {: ::.: . , -, . } .:�..;; . t)i v . �. h .. :... :.'.., ... .. ... �ti s ;t T ! ...+...:. :...:. ' .::...... . 'Y . ' (k 3 h .::. ' . '. 1" ': .. ... . .::' .' .. r ..x .::.. ........ .{ .. s M1 . .. . .. : .. ... .. , '." .,. :. ... �� . .'. ... ry, ...... . :... : : 1..: . '�� i ... ....... .: . ti.: .. .., - .... ." .: . .. ... ... , .. . .... .. .. . . .. . , .. .:.... .. .:..' .. ' . '... .. :.' .. h :... , "' :: ..... . .... ., ti.' .. . M1 :. . .. .. ... . ... . .: ... .... .. .. .. . : %- s 'h p s .... ." , ..:..... .a.t t: . s . ,.. ........ ... .... n .. .. .. .. ".' :.' . �. .. . + .. . .. .. .. , .. .. ..... :. :...... .,.::..... .. .. f; .... :.:: . ::. :.. ,' ... . e :... .. ,: ,., . .. .. *' .. , ..'.. ..' .:.': .... , .. ... .. .., " . ' ... .. , " ... :... k . .. .. .. x . .... .. ,.. .... ., '. x, .: ,' .:' ... ... .. : ,........ . .. :... . . ... .,. . :. .' ...♦ , .: ... .,, ..: : " ... .. .. ... ....... . s .., ,, .. .:.. .. .. . .� ... .:�. . :. ,.�... .,. . , ,�l �'l ." ."" ...... .. ry. . :... {�}'[ .. .. . l f� .. .,.. .. .. .. s ' .. ". .. . .:. . .. . ... .... .. .. .. .. .. ..... .: ,. ... ... .. , . :. .. : ' . ,. :. ,.. .. x , ,. „ . ....... x.. ..x: . ,.:.'.. .. .. .n..: 1 ...: ,: . , :...:. -, ,.... �r ^ �'x> .... .... :., .,....,. .... n , .. .... .. . � t .,'n .., ,':::'.': ..: ,..'..: .. . ,. v ..... , ... ....- :: :' -. ,�,.,. ... :. .: ... .. ... .. n�.. ...:. ..: : .... . . n. 'k,. .. ,'.. .n... ,.. .: :.'... ... ... .:,.: nN .. s.Y :.'.. ,: :.. t ..... .. ....... :.,: + x...:':: :,.. :. * s ':: .'.:, :.. :� .. : :.: .M. .... t. . . , .. .: ,..'...' , "' t n ....'. ,..: :'. :., .. .. .... .., ,- :..... :. ... ... .. .,t .: .::s: :' .....:':: ::': :.. s ... . .. ... .. - ai .......... .. . .... ,. .t. �,\ 4 \. 0 ... .. ., .. .. ... .... ..,-: t, .. ... .. s ' "t ::. ti.:.. . , .. ,,. .... o. , .. , .... ..:. �. ....y .,.:.. ... :: :. ....... ,:n... t n. i' '1 t �,. ,�. r, f :. .. ... ...... :�,: '1 .. ,:... ,.. , .. .... - ... .. , : ,... .. n., :! M :....... ...... . ;. ::, :....... ". . :: y c'.' ?. # k' } Y �'x : ;:::: ..,:. :..:.: ...... .. .., . ..., ,.':' .. %. . .: .. tn.. :..., „ :, .... :... , ..,......,'.' ' . . 'j .. ...� n :.... .......:. :. ....:,:.: k� .. :'.:. :... :::r, k . t..., ...... .....: .":.. . :.:' . ,: ... ... . ....." ... .. ;.;... .: .. :... _. . :...., ' .,....:. ' ,:.,. ..: :, .... .......:.'-..: . t ...r . .....'.; x.' :' :: :. ,... .. ., . t, .., ..: , :' ,...`..: . ' .. :..,:.. t: ... .. . ,.. .. ... ... ,. r :.. ... :. .. :'•' ,' .... ....... .......... ... ,K. , .. �, .. k :. .. ... .., : ....:.s.`..: L, i44' .. :. ., :- n:: iL �..... - ,.. V .....,.. { ,. n.. ...... .'.:: :.. �,t, Y 4 { 2 ": h :' . . t •' *' { ::.: . . .... :.... ,. .. :. . . '. �' :. ". .:.., ... i .. b ".. ti ' . ... ... n... .. y $ , } "' F ' ,s: r L' "i .w •' * h . . . e x,s r S.r> .. .. '.6 .. '�' % 7 , .. �' x {4. S: % d.¢ n . ,4`Kra ' r . SA �Y' fi n: tn'" \ �. §t ' c ..x "ta'� :a: } Cm /• .'�° 1 ttt.'w �, 'x . u." " ��: h { ?: ..... y� V .' a �Y5 ��?xn',� .g. �� .. :. , :W ,fX ' °� 1 :' "'I M1 p ro- 1 , 1 ;y} "'.. 2 k "4 .� : o- zkx ¢¢ ai .... ,yY�� : .� �� M5 �� . .. m Lk a{#9 "k� ✓a nail �. . t n" c :f ' ' t{ # Y v'�� :� : ° � : Jar �'� n. . , �: i,a 4 s,+, �s$'. ,: Y,f; -,.. },k"� '{ +}+' N f # y ; . Ar ��?k:: kClxr 'iyn > ' "�v `¢�� Y ' . .,a'#� bS " : k � ` nw7 t4 Rhr °uS #3a� ,k . ... .. 5 Yn tl' R 9"`. 'f.. ^l. . ., :' .: '. .. ', � f s ?., .. ' }. 4 ' t 'r" 4 Q 7. x # a �a L fi �n n � a r +�a n : hr� h a' k .. ,C� k�. 'ki �C ' 4 { d 4 } p Jh. h r' I on l ^# � � 5 � �h �Sn. r� � '1N k V \ ki' . � �' s ice} �L� Q't J .. i r 7 r t' .n s r °s k Y 5 5 :} C z� " 1. lh� r °} n J' 'a � ..fin .1 . " t .... x 'S r} n s � /"/ .. .. .. .. rk' P5 w o ' z. s L n`.M1. $ x . r�wrr � , fnXY.S �'i`� �# ° y ��77++ vi4n+Fr :.. . '�: 'n {rri s .:. : . tY+ As, : :. .,,..,w �: �, �.: .} :. /: � ,� # } :i, n}, ",a,.,..+a r� +� � +. �" �t, kt �' J C� �,+' Y. 's.' f ' C Vii' S 4 x }n / ry 'N � '^c .� U � P t 5S t � k �ry & ' }x $C C 5 M . � l` � V .: n � { 11f �'�. M1 I ry C, 5 i0.' ,5 r.. s " %'k5 5 } I �� f y� }.n: a , }' . ... �+ � k u p � ;�^ .n °f ; °i # f fib'^ w k 5 },� c # tr �x �: �3 3 } , ' '. �. ° ' . .. , ''yR;}'t ,�k'* . " \ ,' 'S #kxh�.f >, *1 ,' ': `,': .. ' /F t ilk f•' # ;{� �S %' . �f ° �{ �' k k rya � t '. { 4 - :a s k. oz ,�. ",fir un b. �5 I. 'R R �`.. 4 eP R ..Y : v . 5 $:. >C ' 1 r �n .t ry . " F" # . {• w } n `1r 5 to n�2o x '""' �' Y ?" � :� , h.��Y 'ii i }V.� :5 €, S, { >1 t WE . '., � :,{ 'i'r,e' , °xr �,o? '4kC' �r X. '" \:��` r t ,� , x € a z �* � h5 OY 1' � �+ � �* 6 x l9 f 0 :k i#Y h ��� �rY2. .;.G� } r r �. ,n.. ,�r x :�' �p� �x' : ¢x S "s �, ;� '}? .k }5 ".1*$ '^��' } 'Y' 50- "¢� 7 sa; fi . n f, r' T o "u ' '�" 4, .rye t , 3�� . ` x , �¢ �* } x n fi e . * " �' r :n a K n �, y a x n > # r r n ,ti' .P ^'i X c Y 5. ".� L. 't> 4. .S s � ,.� Y �' ) r •� ?�{ i 'fir: n y 'k' .r , k , . �' '�.'*',�'.'' : � '�} rT � a xe ,: °'}r' , f 'i " t ng� Hsa�rt4 r° r k ° . .e.> ..: } i �' { 'X .S. *.9f Q h ,f I .* ']C. iCY ..,45 rs {lY} �. # t"/'{+C'�" •.? � 5 'o ,: '¢,:t 0', }4s '.-: -. �+,t s ��''r C l � 'k i'A— ,�$ .»..A h' N� xA �i4{ �. �� �i . #.�<#,'SCC�}J.<1r5�,'x �...s�o-'iC�o N,r��ix'.trx„3�Xrf a�� ^�ih�€dB,v:Cd o�4.t'a _ v "a.^x,',^xY,+!,V{k, .C�Vx:ak�,x. i,n.�x'x w,� ,x.tw 'h 'R. '. !r: �4 �'� fit' V �` Y t �. L" ' J ? 'o. Y �x �ci l` � n�: � ��c�' �k? �> al' raxf. a`. �: i' a�i§ C�.' �A�4iE�. � �4'.. v' rr. � �° ��..' 45, 5��% frr��k':. s+ �' s. �' �' 5 ,�"r"c oo "I V � : .... .." 4 �, } :.1. , :. . ,: . :� ' ' . ... ry k . h. .'h+ }:' Y{ . . a' ? : �I 1}`}.y.1+� F '»,5 W x t5 .,,, :r . Y. {n fi .a�. 'fir � �. ..' k ..r ^c.� a �' t`a.' L. .. }' cr„' zt x� ! J 6 � 5/.'{5 ry r }+ Y p° i h yr,�, r,{. n ' i ' n5. i r �4 , C {� t ° . ° :'w i if ,fit" { ': "{i , -b; %I :r sk k.'ti , 1 ' ` 4 �!ti " ht: #,: ;�'<r .s ' ' a3 + ' .,?.. 5 *G' \ r� M a?� # n >� .v ry , x 3 � I %Wk : ? %, A , W- P'sg .'Ji M1 ,A ' 'b . n U �. t r s„ ;�,; z 'YFY 9 5 .hx ri } r' } ) o , n .fY. � 'kr .xM ..x:�: ;': /zx' '$. sx h�� .:'f' 6 h ; :.x'' f a, "�' .&b.. t. 'ih�j:�.yw "'4'S? '.. , k ::o-i ° r;. U t+.:? ° �> k�' .". 'wt �'�'1'� { �*�} k'{e , r , S 1. :'k *4 ¢fi r w }: t,�' '"^' '?�^ .x,�r} c[ fy,y;.. ' � . y : : §V ,5... •,�,u. k£r K � <`{ , .' ,r :y€ w ' t0�'i" ,.)''r*' .. +.{,�:: w,6 y M1 A} . y..� ��yy.'.�,�}" w �' �cg'�: ;.t.QG � f � �. �� � ..5 x ?! 4 T. +k M1 , `+ n� %: "' ��,�' ;�iir,] L: ,.l w' >. .Y i $,._ 'L' ++„ �. x .i x t ^�� : 5 { <'. ,1..,: 'f;] ,r ui' '.I� X r� ?3 �'ih 'i e # :5' { J nwx, �9{. t •�, ��d, ., �n v{ ' : n'f ,t t ;y ^' '.,, .: { 7 .' :fs• „:r?f , t x' k �,., ' .x^ °t x � . x t;, . W. ;:*� '}.* k roll - ° "� n ";' ,ah:4 ask,. _:;�£{1r' :h$ '�.nfk,:3,Y't y � .;�Y'- k3E" *n.:, £'y,#a`'.�;. #� . ` 55? :v .rd.Y :. V # r ;{'.. :StxM d .R.;''" '«,5' ' Y' rf3 ' #;�'{ *M'Y 'J'dX �r'l?3 a,� �. } ' 4 y. * ? . :; _M r k �¢,, k :w .x . '£: 1 � � ��� t C ^c { +.. {"rY,p' && O eC .1.: i Y Y" 'l' ,J: L n 'xx �'x n`� €� �. �.. * ry9 - r. s t rM xi." ! . ��>e� Xx c. 'c . �{ :i '; ' x. i .L r• i' ': y � 't�'� ''Fib,^ r.�$: A 'k -..'�. � L 1,1, %k" .; .t , ��i;.' h »�'.; {fr,5 ''1 �. 1,R� ..�c`. ryf,t� :e �k #4 :'J ' S� ' +A ,� I § 4. d \ �• Z s { 5 .. k fi ��' ' 4 Z's ''Y. zr .ten' : �. �x•' x ;f v .fin. '� :� �" : m e x• x r, 2 x �,�# fi $' ;k % , �� , off. o ¢' dry. ,�`, : s• N ".' " :€ r: �d J '} � . 2'' �:'�dx" .,r°� ,{, "� ^t"J'M1 "d' d�' :i C4 M1 },� ,k�y r: 5 M1rry V °i w }»S"ti5 ¢' }, m. a ¢�" L� rG 1 > Z . .�' s+,, J k r :�, '� sk k ..�M1n x w',�sr '4hh i� .;,'i az { r �'�> 5¢ r7 k' "l 5 � r : fi,t x R , 'T "J tik 4' �? k �, it ? '1:ys*� . ry '1 , } "iS5 }.' Y � �> �, n �' "i. �fi 1 *. M1 � y M1 'YS.' 3! °} ry h x �� ti 1. . ,'` „. i x ,.� , S +h !h. , k,. h N �*. .S ,[ 4 ',',' f . ' i i 4} ., l , ' X5,5 t > N *;" bv{.a.r � k4�. n� ,�; x �� to " �; .... ,�5. S 'a .., :� y �' ". , 4�. N' ,y, (*� - n n :' }t 00.0 ff ��§¢ kkX .; • . 1 k #^ t,� �}, x.i* l s _ . n .CN. ;:C * f "t } },:S Y?': Y I tii S'�€. #f 'Y: '# s n��d: rs'R'}�� t ,6'"s. Jkh x ., g '' } , r&e, ��"'" . t S�, #:, u1h 7 " „k . L.: .� mss.. �� 0 � ] q tr . 4 ` §n k � � %� �' t s Kx. ' i kl� �4 :c "� X65 m ,� G�.� x^4;4.. a c N.5 .'4x:' " ' ,fir s. ' . �'a tv. :?,' 3 ry .#1" g3¢xk Carr' a7 : „*{ �' 's''. � .. # 1 c' R �5' '??sc v¢t r[{5: off: N: �' ,kSk' ” �'�E r:�tt C� x 5 K. . . 4 M �" L nq "Y n�" n� .'i' k�,$., 1 ', �X 4 :CC. :,G. Sh ++i'f'h �052�sL. 'n >E x � I. 4 '�{x ' � '�. k x x T{ 7... 1 5,'9 �.h� \ k5 oY ,A : i m S r "� r �k W f 5 ). +l � h : 'n 5i5: ¢s,( Y' 1 j 6 �0� . { : * } 5 4 r{ Y . Y. YN� ).. . . M1 1 'N , s "l z "0. . ' i �e }n, � y +4 ' 'J a^ 4R ?r '' SY 11 . �'� d . p' 4. � v " .. . 2 �. J {. x .. g w 1, , ,: , a r ' ;, ex x, . ? d 5 °. o t"` .y„ ±� k t 4 ts, �• y, nj .' „ks..k .x�,:Sf: m4C $f�A'l " . , . . . .a', . ,. �.'��5�yg ??f,ms�x`.�,�d:�: :�.. e�^x*:t�.,�, .. ��..:: .. .Y "'` war.. ,.. •.. 1' .1 : :.. .. : ''. .. . : Y � :d 1r K • • ' .,. .'.max..'.... - � -.. ..�.. ... ��>'. "., . .: tJ i ., r ... -.1 r :" .`y�4� r °,r•. .--- ','�.' _4 >`:� •. �� �5.. `a.::,r'e° _ .s. ,... _] a[. �� - �TM�o .�•. I- ... - i; '.• .:.. .. .. v .. ,. . r : ; •t 'M1T ,'"",,.,�: �..""'. ,� _ L`r�r� .r-• x.r i. -�E. '14 - ;... _ ,. ,. .. ,.Ya "';• ,., y^ 'll•• L: :�', rs.�;� <s% ,.x yr. �s. >1 °� r.,�:�• '. � I. - r . 3 ,.r,.. r. � br `..�- . >.`� �-` ,>~. �[`• ' 1 .,� �.... �° � 7x ~� �s. . y . ° �r f .�' a `°�;�" � � �" • �° �:�) 1:•1., fi 'f'. '.:�t•., ! : r � � « . ;.R �l "' Wd _ n. /; b' �s' r� .�7 z'✓e ..Qr::r' .l�N "..:- r "'��� „1 �ee••��'+ ...!'�- , � C �I1.� ��•� - �.� e:r ..� S "' � , Y•tiit. J "• 5.. ..f• ;!.' `�. �. .l.z L -Y •:� �.r'F; ax" -,_. ^v �. e,w _ F �rn '.spy. _ "S"'" _ +r 1 r�� I.[. .�: �c .�r.%' �.' _�i.�• .n. �'= '.t- = -�i', :-r ': "="`x-�"""-`� 'i "� r a �, "�, •r' ' "c: ��'• w -.,,' •f�J ` 'i .t ,f :�'•:" � '1'�i..:r. f I ' f 1.• _ i �.,.�, - „', �. •� }� �, ¢.. "[ =;..� F.i • ✓' . � - 3 ^ , . r >i: t i¢aN" I:: � �'� % > ' i , .N ',. ? y • > - aY •.+r 'fix' r'�: J ,r :e.. ",s " " -r'r4k vw' ,� v°�,�" • f ,r': u .�`. r .i � ,:� � ^�.._.. "'�..:r. .`s•� r{ -� i•. '�Irr= �.. �'' ter; a. .s.+ _ ::ys _I _'f; • =7 : i`'^. = .T� r .r g r. 7il'I.- .s^ riY_;` .: °_'.S. mM�C : -'�� r.£'`: "- �, ..J ' " '.�•a �• •, -S l.. '!� ..� • r / �. � r`r. .� _ :: "..-, s.. h r -ice.,_ .�• '•+. �.'. r r> a te... 'a� :.1. v�••, _ %'• _�,. �. .,,�, r.: i ... us�:;¢x�: = ;te .��.^' <� aJ� t ;, �� . I'• " v _v"'• o-a..:s; �`ts •A r- t . � a .may.,:.'_ .r:'� .I;•'. "' �`.. � ;w ^ _r_� m.y w `<C °Yre. J �i r -: „^l E. ' " ": � j - 7: rx !a " •w�' � x 1!� _ � .7 . 3.' }.: _ F'• `� _. _ ' /. {`) .".,,1� ° ""� Ki� ' �e •Yi.� _ �...1 , x„ ^K - ".. :.r^'. 'y ° Ci =iCr ° ' ^�•_. �. fin �'�.. :R g „.x�� - •.� J' � 46' . . •ti.. . I • ._ �•�" °"' •••m�' ° -.. - :9•a F _ Y. ice; .•ti. €� ,. ly .R.p�', } .f • � Sr t. '''.::.. •� - K r.'� w .fie• rk ",} . ( 'J '#. t �•� ' e, .J �Y7 _ of - , :4 �4;`:j+�• .b•,°'R•�. " � _ .`r E. �.- �. ?�? .■{ '1, ',r. � .� a f � .,1 i_ t �� t °•�•- 4, i' ^1r 7 fi:. �.. �'' 4! L , �'w" . �•., _ _.S Z $ `'._::. ° " i' Y .I L' IJy;r �'� f•. " "• , .-1'' "- - Y,. :ti tel: �'• .C�' . },+ .• p - ` C, , _�� � 'r' "�� -. } `y� 77 � °rr �`° f.. -.�, r .•'Y�a " ,.e +,x - ''<:� :s . �,� . .x • if . s'= ..aia�e." I' r ; . �..•. .:5:" � . .�..r•.,�E� 1 ^ q, >�F.. .+ .n.:.. .'�' . _ - :'t:':.•" �,, " "s�'ys : - vtn �., v ; . � .ePr "':r ..S sv n " ..^.'.., _.. '•: 1 - r i J. "i: �°. 1 C . � `�, . c ' � '� . i ^` .�� « � "•..a.; . � ��i.'�� .r' � i'' - S i� Kh�`±" � ''.0 ei.. " - � - _ �.•� . J. ` '.:e .f2 ''a+.w�" -. .:a"� � 7wcr . __ •,_•`•z"'° ° :? _", n`'"'v Y� I . � 11'.' � -_.J-! _.s .:.I' - •�' ! it •J : w � ° " �.,` � uli; .Ra3e _ - r-"" r= ��.';a_�7 ^ �� "..^ � � ....� •# tR�'`,`,5.s�^:uS.. -•.-? -� 'iY �r �' � i r' 1^rti" r� .�.: 1 -. �- •, f '-] . ,� ° •.�`�� �...:. sr.. _ �, :`i.'.: �.: ;r'� "'�.� .1., J •-�[ 'r, °i� '�'���.' ^���.`.r f .J •�• } d.. *3�.v^"° �} r �.<.,.. .; r .r_ sf !�]]. x . 1'x `s. ^ Y•<. ..� " , ' ... ..r` -�. �F �� :" r ._.. �.. _ '7s1� * °'!: � "� .0 � • ti°l i/' .�'I •a�.M•. -r. -• - ''^�:-k'"= -. r- ��..W - .::. =•4.s .� -- � ...T r _ _�7 ....:�,1; w.'�•. :+ s��'• ^.nar, . �''. V ,! ` d •">a, • . r . ate _ _...... .. � .. ... A ... ..... < ,r ........ - ,.,. :� w. �,�, '.r.:; "i' - A "! -;", ,. � ..�} w / t ^v, � ...• :+. ' 4 .. hr: �:w aifsi° ` ':.,s]�+.. �' "� - .:�!' . {,.z �.,� - 77 tiR.r{ .. t .DER° .� • J .,} '_ ��. �+ ::s��:'��° --� ,r � . y. N '�,: ",'r"� -- a. t f` -a�. • .S� - r i ..:.� fy `\ : , v . � .tii r :;s' : r ' i � r , - h 1 . .,'n x • ,�, : '�.. �. ,F- rar a• '-• ' ..:r.- .`a.� "•;. ;r ;..� �" ,�; • - "'ti � { �' , ' , r,'s � �. - r.?t7p"� • F:;�' !: -1 ',11 � r---- �� lui+.� , r. e,�i.a °.i. �i" L;.•:' --1,` `"t •f. c .;�.,.� - ,, .. �. �,' •S�`' ' �.x� '/"`_".•' ,�• :..a*.^r"_ _ �•_ f.. _.l. '�" °.v ry Aiif ".r'�'r I'�" ,;'.: =+:' ,\ ��'��'�.'= '�i ,�: �: =' '� °�_ :,'f .�` •x .,= ,��:":�;..." - _ � � 'i• .p °.•.�; ..- _:,,'". �.:.. x'.."T. , R5 .,-. ^.; �: -,,F. i' �.r .,...�•> v^� .-.1,• .�w°! � ;' - , {�,:a ^� •.7 .1, a �� "�' �� s•ir "� V' �,� y� ~•�' °'�- : i �+,S " -y- 1e P5, . .`]Y .s L : s... � }_� , 1 = J f -. Y =-'s . {- Y. -rr ik _ :.Yt •��'." 1 • d h � �.f.r~ L o .Y: C,n'' . Y- u,h f :;• F;.1 .�f" � � .� '�'w I I( ,��" ,� I M rr, � l : �.,• ,.r�,.�_7i• "xc {r �> ♦ .� '_ f ��. � y. : �.. �ioi. _ -T:.r�", I � � ".:l�f� (^' s=' � '"°`:"._� �� � " ` �.f` �'. •• J �. r"!P _ ,rr 7• F. .-.(.. .�. - �� � •. �.y' w :� n r f_, s p:..�.,!° C n kr i `'• J 1• ! ' :� Jw...+.�.4a .E• :1 •i." 't . ,•. � 4 i , '°I y T , '�! C:. ..sa�,Y �:e',.A. ..J 77', :Y ' > 3 a ^. , .` r � " w� " L4P' �.:J - xI Lti�� 5'� � i •:fj1 �. 3". " 1 1 �?• � ' r �•F � "fix a , ,.1- ... -� i° '.1 a 8o-. n - - � ' r : 1. � �^•. /• a. •x r. Y f ��,._�a� �� it ► .7' . .._ � � ti .:�f' e G f �F� n�'!. 1 ..yt.. ° - .V J a - ^'�" ' / � -r- l ' .�1 � F . r " ! :.�q :�`` e , ,.. ,.. _, � .�... .... .. .. ..•. . .!I��e. .Y ..yam r •�: « ._ •c •�•�7' r � �•a� .. # - i - .l ❑ _ =,... V ,.. , °,4.�7,�i�� Y .. .. .. .,, J . �. k.y� f {W �•, �f ' i '#. !YJ/i ",�� k.�i � 3._ ,�\ !w /. .. r J�. .. -� .... ....•' -..... .. .,. ,. �. .. f..f, � � •• -w_ � � V� .l. '1 "x -�d.L "�� �i'.>"..N .} c _ j ° i'� + „ �{`_ � . .• •* °r C �: z r � ,,,.� =7 t3 ` °' '�. �,r - .A: ! -! � r� : � ,--• t.: � f v • i t y € � 1 :^�:. r` 5r � " �; _ .i :ra .� � w tip_ r_�. �'a�' :,h .. =.�. ..r� 'F^:i' - r �_, � �,•;!y [ ,: t � .=4•� . �`'¢;:^^ ��• t .� °,.° °�, . r " _ l- P=�� .�":.� �' s'y -..fix "�•-.: S� ;i 1 • :r.°. • 4�. r; ='�' • � � ., .y F' l " Y - jl "J.{ rT" I1 •b,.r, .:'." -.�•. t "�•! '�•. l - � _ �'c i•. - F 'c -�. t . b ::.f.; a . :!' . [r. au., � s.,.a_ -�. -��'' N ?w.::;•,`r _ �.�:rC '�;, l' -- .,� - C : . 4 , e�•-'� .y^ .:�";. • .."; �.'�•<� ;K„ � �"..;' a €. �} ti';cr 2 L... °� „+s:.•'�•� � '.=,r"�. � - 5. ::`ter .� •.�y , r . �' } "°.:' r5 • 'L Et`i -�'; 7W 1` � �. �,: �• �'. ,..,Y " = - ^,.. T ,, sC'f .Z` J. y n•„ :'� y ".S_,. L i r� . 't.' '.'.: ^. :• ,. °i- ` ".4 ".., •_M1,_� r .r' p.` ! { ° �S.- xi.S .r•'s --- r�,�.• � r .-._' •F �._`''^"..'L .�. 'd.:. ... ..:. .. .. :' .� _:.,..7 .. .. -.�. ..a tl , r_ � ;I f .I' _ C I � �' "..(J '�. A•].S � � a + r-�' I� .'1� '.'..1' •y " . •r •k t � f ° °::• .t s` 'J ..I �Y � fs'. ,.5�� � ".L %""� .l (� -�-•• - �Se•�.� yLl£x�: Y="^ ,� .3;. 4 .;�.,. ,� �✓ • �) _ i.� •�� ". .i`. �,. � .ef, Fr�.roF_:e i !. r y am.• _ `J.'�,.�- _ r _ .,.r'+E 7 [: • �k-. I < • • 1 - : °t . •gr .��.. if.' .:•c'.. �' °. �t :. 4 .r'i r-. a 4 ter:. :�:: !'- �9-°"• (i ;- °f �'' +- Y : 1 ..7 •�it.� •���c �' ..z rY �+, •['�+` ,f• �,yr . -F" fr . a,.; ./' 1 1�$:' 1: L "�. �,.,,,,�w - � 77 f r ;.-^t. rjar �, Y•' ,Y .t S , r � - ' f' �: f �: r .►- 1� -F .�� .. � %n ' - �3'• - "" ° s.,. e'�.. , s ...$ "�' p -. ,••~ 7s9I .a' , G. t.\ '� ..I `` • � r ... t r� :.� f ' _�° r + • `=C rC �•. `,' • ;� �# •' � � ><a . K 1 �. "+1`' `� 1 ^ t M1 •�, . ?"'... ,.yr 1' r - .�, ti : I I vtr � � ih''. r .Y t' ! .fir �d •z - .7r., °I : r'. .a< _J. � } �T> � n. ..f�„'•'�r .n,r r �'a.�,�]..., r te,. .�;`_t. .;, 5. 7 5 7, •:/ -.'.,d ALL:. `.r`r.' :.� � `� ter -.G, CF'��'. +. ,: .` r'...•��.r• i, „. ��'' 11 s Ft 1 : '�:- _ .: C...'.' .r.. _ €. I r ..�?n.; ^=; k:;•J: '" °�!� ' � `= - �'�`y w "cf','. !�k..a. , , � .` ,..3. ''�•�:s, �,'. � rte• ':C � ,�•�• cf I° -;`�e� 1. ^ -Y,: �.: " r. , �= ``� � d t •�, c'"` ape l ..n. � - �If "� .�r �iy . fr. r � . .6 , t. ;� '�"'- '.v... �...w....... 'a: ,ter; � X912 '� 'y.:" :,!"`•'� .=- `':� "�•.- €.. "! E ��.�� ] •,.. �rr� �,'. - r�.r:f- r.� 4,� ...�., -)- �� _ r`, - -.: �...• ._ a '3 +I ; °�`�„ m.,�+ � - e `•.° r�'' �'..;t - #.=J, ut,.��, ....r''' =_.�� 5....... ' rI " n,�� ,:t.' +�' {•� .a•�_. • r' .� r-.l =.r :Y � / l.> "Z �a[ ♦v^o° • �� " - 1 ?��%T ..il �' ,•. •oi.r•5';7. r , .r - ^ �... r Y •- �: !t :'.� - '' S^ - 3.. "��- { • { ,} , >wt•' + L- ` 7" � , , � -. '!f 1 •, 'Li . °�C.�... "..rr •.&ry'^ ; - 7 ----- ' --=- I r �-': rr..- •�: a � • ••j•� .�'.. ��� I�.' ; ^ •�� Vii•', ]' � �,• •� @�' .J r � d • a w f s ...< `� •'��'Elt ,..�{ I .r , .t. '.�•� '� " I1�, >L�ti' E, +u. ? � .'� }.-_�• _ ."� ..i ;.;..," •7a:� .�... t�:� °> 4 ' A • Y � L � - � } '�S .k m - " 1 .1 r:l t + '� �- '• � ".� . c - J.. -� � 5 _ "` _ , i• � I i } r J t' _ r s.. { ' a y °' � -.. 's• "art 5 • • �s••.• 4 � - •�>t . t•. � r' y ' � . M_�r '�+P r `t ^ �. `Y' ..: �, - �' ]� �», , yy'' �'....t °�' •' L' • '+3. ^il. I ,� °J :i• �i 'k ; 7" � .i sT 7 •i •� � 5: � T.J. J '!' .. �'� �� -•, �//�_ W. .:S' J � -... • .r A ' 7 "./ � •� J...� .L E }. '�: ".,+'re`s T ..4 S• .ti.'ti "" n�•.1>• � • .C ` Z?.. .Z.'�. , }, f ' "L. r r a {[[ �` a " •F i r haul ] -1 �� • r, _ W t`..z ^�r^°�� r'. d c� ,t;� .. - _•y� .Lo- • - ,E;�. } � '1 � ! c!. -i {yj � � x 1. i?�'. "•f - 1 _ w.s_.. F '�g ¢ ' a[S, .�5.. �7F. `H ., a - ' 9' � �� 1! - 7 J ..' �7.: �° .'^i: :dw` �rosP •�' �r } � �+ >2A • ' k � _• i "]" '.o` ' I : , r L ,.•�: .., - � a " "' . + ` • s . J. F_ r r J J I �„ Y <: ,.;^ '' 7 1 `� ([ R�`I��tYS• 6.✓• .I,.7 '.t. ta. . 2i �. .t:. P � .. ->;1 St�, °��. i �.{ ri .� •. ,,, A• "� �'• .:1 .. I I.� •t �.J "h1. f iM i • E v � , sv i r- .. ,. r..... .. '. - , .a r ' z':µ� .� I { W4RSTL1 a169 [• 't �.,F .�� � 4;.. r ��� •t t" :i � - ri' . , -I , _ r' - - -r -_ �•...� - - .ter -•r ...::�.. . a , - ,`�..� °. 7 - ti "'.ti'`-ic..ibGrsi .. � "��ri, "e r•` } a.� �: � . t" .: •� ::. J . .� '�,1 1� • ,a. t. �cPm+a ' I t �.;,• ti "°?,•., -.a (r ; � y .�•`, , � : ;• •, e. �` F! r ti , , 7 >i. J � � � �r � .: �x max:= ;.s • t �_ - � S� , -� �,, s•' ,� r oomy • i �.: , i� f '1- L � ° a, �. .� t �rf �. .0 t �l "• �T - - �, .._.�. ..... -.� .w.•�.- .1�.+- �- ':a., -:' may] ` rI 'I a�4 '�I R� !`• /.',M1 =l I�.: , K <L' r P �":I • q LLL i 5 _ . -I 1 1 ti L ti r 1 r r � jff 7 f t . .� .E �° <- ::':E- Z 'Q �. � '.� 7 i� '-T; � -- �afd } °_. .,ce :t , ••�'qq .a „1' :, ( � r {s -• /. •f. 1 ] / l r •�°$. .:f sr . y _ -7 -a to �: 'tit � w r , y• F 4 E?5 >r' c 1 • w • a !. , J , >v. I r t.cs x s Pr. f � :: ( ! ia�l 1 i rc>R7sy►�� � ' iao..o r �. � � � uan - f .r •i I .fir -. :� �i. TABLE OF DISCHARGES Z � CP DA (SQ MI) Q100 (C f5) 1 1.172 912 2 1.500 772 3 0.091 310 4 20.000 1 8 12 5* 22.89 1937 LEGEND �1 CONCENTRATION POINT LOCATION SCALE: 1 " = 3500' Exhibit 5 OFFSITE WATERSHED MAP MG JOB No. 26028 1 I ' `;;,.} '` r i � � 1 r i �3 FL f -..s s � . , i r r - / 1.: ;""�:. - dr j � � J t our -t J' .. } � I f z ' �► I k L. '► i 1 _ :. r �:_ f � - ...,! � � r✓� j . �4 rt F •�: r c. � � ,� [ � y . tit i , 5 f 6 , L1 - � Jr j� �_ I f.. • �r.� F . �f,_.� �. l.s•.t. 1� fl �� � I I.. tJ J�1r � � � L �1 1 LEGEND �1 CONCENTRATION POINT LOCATION SCALE: 1 " = 3500' Exhibit 5 OFFSITE WATERSHED MAP MG JOB No. 26028 Existing Development and Adjacent Land Uses The approximately 170.04 acre property is located in the Town of Marana, approximately five miles northwest of the Tucson city limits, northeast of Interstate Highway 10 (I -10) and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and south of Linda Vista Boulevard. The Santa Cruz River corridor is southwest of the property, west of I -10. The property is undeveloped with evidence of human activity consisting of wildcat dumping and ex- tensive use by ofd road vehicles. There are several dirt roads within the property and sizable portions of the property have been completely cleared of vegetation for the creation of a system of ATV trails and ramps. The Continental Ranch Master - Planned Community is located west of the property, west of I -10. Un- developed lands occur south of the property and lands north and east of the property are planned for a master planned community and single family residential development, respectively. The property is zoned "C" (Large Lot). Zoning that occurs in the property vicinity within the Town of Marana consists of "C" (Large Lot), "E" (Transportation Corridor Zone), "F" (Specific Plan), "MR -1" (Multi- Family [High Density] ), "R -6" and "R -8" (Single Family Residential), "VC" (Village Commer- cial), and designated Floodplain Zone that is associated with the Santa Cruz River. Zoning that occurs in the property vicinity within unincorporated Pima County consists of "RH" (Rural Homestead), "GR- 1" (Rural Residential), "SR" (Suburban Ranch), "CR -1" and "CR -3" (Single Residence), "CR -4" (Mixed Dwelling Type), "TR" (Transitional), "CB -2" (General Business) and "CI -2" (General Industrial). See Exhibits 7 and 8. Physical resources The property lies within the northern portion of the Tucson basin within an alluvial fan of the Tortolita Mountains. In general, the property has a relatively level terrain except for a gently sloping ridgeline that occurs within the northeast corner of the property. Surface elevation within the property ranges from approximately 2,120 feet within southwestern portions of the property to 2,200 feet above mean sea level along the northeastern ridgeline. The washes that traverse the property are ephemeral in nature and are located approximately 2,800 feet east of the Santa Cruz River, which occurs west of I -10. The ephemeral drainages traverse the property generally in a northeast to southwest direction. Runoff along the downstream portion of the property drains as sheetflow until intercepted by the UPRR where flows concentrate at the culvert system and drain beneath the railroad and I -10 before ultimately discharging to the Santa Cruz River. A preliminary jurisdictional waters delineation for the property was submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers for approval on April 26, 2006. This delineation consists of four ephemeral channels that are basically evenly distributed across the property in a northeast - southwest direction. There are no rocky outcrops, caves or mine adits, shafts or perennial or intermittent water sources or other special aquatic sites with the property. 23 IIII 111 11 i 4 NORTH NTS c 3N"I fit Exhibit 7 Existing Land Uses Within 1 Mile 24 4 NORTH NTS Marana Zoning A Small Lot Zone C Large Lot Zone VC Village Commercial LI Light Industrial E Transportation Corridor Zone D Designated Floodplain Zone R -6 Single Family Residential R -8 Single Family Residential R -36 Single Family Residential MR -1 Multi Family (High Density) F Specific Plan Pima County Zoning CB -2 General Business CI -2 General Industrial RH Rural Homestead GR -1 Rural Residential SR Suburban Ranch CR -4 Mixed - Dwelling Type Exhibit 8 Existing Zoning Surrounding Site 25 Vegetation and Habitat Observed Vegetation and Habitat Vegetation within the property is consistent with the Arizona Upland subdivision of the Sonoran des - ertscrub biotic community (Brown 1994). Plant species noted on this site include creosote bush (Lar- rea tridentata), velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina), foothill palo verde (Cercidium microphyllum), ironwood (01neya tesota), desert hackberry (Celtis spinosa), whitethorn acacia (Acacia constricta), tri- angle -leaf bursage (Ambrosia deltoidea) and burroweed (1socoma tenuesecta). Upland habitats within the property are very sparsely vegetated, creosote bush dominated habitat with other species that are few and widely scattered. Few cacti occur on the property. Cacti noted during field reconnaissance of the property were noted mainly along the ridgeline within the northeast portion of the property. Cacti noted include fish -hook barrel (Ferocactus wislizenii), cholla and prickly pear (Opuntia spp.) and saguaro (Carneglea gigan- tea). Xeroriparian habitat within the property is found along the ephemeral washes that traverse the site. The dominant species present in these areas are mesquite, foothill palo verde, whitethorn acacia and ironwood. The xeroriparian habitats on the property consist mainly of vegetated corridors that are two to four trees in width. There are no perennial aquatic, hydroriparian, or mesoriparian habitats within the property. Special Status Plant Species The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identifies five (5) threatened or endangered (T &E) plant species as potentially occurring in Pima County. Published and unpublished literature on the flora of the Sonoran Desert was reviewed, focusing on the presence or likely presence of threatened or endan- gered plant species in Pima County and in particular on those with some possibility of occurring on or in the vicinity of the property. The review indicated that there are no federally listed endangered plant species with the potential to occur within the property and there is no designated or proposed critical habitat for any protected plant species within the property. A letter was sent to Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) on April 13, 2006 requesting a search of the Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) for any records of occurrence of species of concern or significant habitat that may occur in the area (Exhibit 9). AGFD accessed the HDMS and their records show two special status plant species as having been recorded within a 3 -mile buffer of the property, the Tucson Mountain spiderling (Boerhavia megaptera) and the Tumamoc globeberry (Tumamoca macdougalii). The Tucson Mountain spiderling is a summer annual that occurs on rocky slopes and along washes and canyons. It is presently known from the Tucson Mountains, Tumamoc Hill, Wasson Peak Ridge, Ajo Mountains, Baboquivari Mountains, Santa Rita Mountains and the Tohono O'odham Nation west of Tucson. The property does not support the habitat required for this species and occurs outside the species' known range. Tumamoc globeberry occurs within xeric situations in the shade of nurse plants along gullies and sandy washes of hills and valleys in Sonoran desertscrub and Sinaloan thornscrub communities. Its range occurs within southern Arizona and Mexico (Sinaloa and Sonora). Based on this species' known range and habitat, the property has some potential to support Tumamoc globeberry. No species spe- cific survey has been conducted for this species. 26 W THE STATE OF ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT 2221 WEST GREENWAY ROAD PHOENIX, AZ 85023-4399 (602) 942-3000 & AZGFD-GOV GOVERN - .. J�%NFT NAPOLITANO COMMISSIONERS CHAIRMAN, JOE MELTON. YUMA MICHAEL M. GOLIGHTLY. FL.AGsTAFF WILLIAM H. MCLEAN, GOLD CANYON BOB HERNBRODE. TuCSON W- HAys GILSTRAP, PHOENIX DIRECTOR 1 910 OUANE L. SHROUFE DEPUTY DIRECTOR STEVE K FERRELL April 17, 2006 Ms. Susan Phillips Plannin Resources 270 N. Church Ave. Tueson, AZ 85701 Re Special Status Species Inforniation for Township 12 South, Ran 12 East, Sections 23 and 26 Proposed Development. Dear Ms, Phillips: The Arizona Game and Fish Department ( Department ) has reviewed y our re dated April 13# 2006, re. special status species inforniation associated with the above-re ferenced project area The Department's Herita Data Mana S ( HDMS ) has been accessed and CUrrent record s show that the special status species listed on the attachment have been documented as occurrin in the project vicinit (3-mile buffer In addition this pro does not occur within an Proposed or Desi Critical Habitats. The Department's HDMS data are not intended to include potential distribution of special status species. Arizona is lar and diverse with plants, aninials, and environniental, conditions that are ever chan Conse man areas ma contani speci es that biolo do not know -about or species previousl noted in a particular area ni..-t no lon occur .there. Not all of Arizona has been-s-urve for s ccial stanis species, and Surve th-Lit have been conducted have varied g reatl y in scope and intensit M ikin avadable this information does not substitute for flie Department's review of pro'ect proposals, and should not decrease our opportunities to review and evaluate new project proposals and sites. The Departnient is also concemed about other resource vakleS, such as other wildlife, illClUdin g ame species, and w*lldlife- related recreation. Tlie Department would appreciate the opportUnit to provide an evaluation of impacts to wildlife or wildlife habitats associated with project activities occurrin in the subject area, when specific details become avallable. A rizona p i o'neor Exhibit 9 Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter T 4UUa Keupient 27' AN EoUAL OPPORTUNITY REASU-iABLE ACCOMMODATION s AGENCY MS. SUlan Plilflips April 17, 2006 1 I f y ou have an q uestions re this letter, please contact me at ( 602 ) 789-36 1. S. Gencral SLALIS infoniiatioll, count and watershed distribution lists, distribution maps, photos, mid abstracts for some special status species are also available on our web site at litt -roy/lidnis. j& — S,-Incerel Sabra S. Schwartz Henta Data Mana S Pro Supervisor S.SS-Fss Attachment cc: Rebecca Davidson , ro P 'ect Evaluation Pro Supervisor, Habitat Branch Habitat Pror c ram Tana r, R ion g ee g V Joan Scott'. =0 A D #M06-04171248 W1166 Special Status Species within 3 Mies of T12S,R'12E Sec 23, Zfi Arizona Game and Fish Department, Herita Data Mana S April 17, 2006 Scientific Name Common Name ESA USFS BLM State Boerhavie me Tucson Mountain Spiderlin S ❑endrac bicolor Fulvous Whistlin -Duck SC S Glaticiditim brasifianum cactorum Cactus Ferru P SC WSC Macrotus californicus California Leaf -nosed Bat SC S WSC M Y OUS Velifer Cave M SC S Tamamoca macdou Tumannoc Globeberr S S SR No CrItical Hab[tats In project area. AGF W06-04171248, Proposed development. 29 STATUS DEFINITIONS ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT ( AGED] HERITAGE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM . FEDERAL US STATUS ESA Endan Species Act (1 973 as a semen dcd) US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (http://ar,izonaes.fws.gov) Listed LE Listed Endan imminent jeopard of extinction. LT Listed Threatened: imminent jeopard of becomin Endan XN Experimental Nonessential population. Proposed for Listin PF, Proposed Endan PT Proposed Threatened. Candidate (Notice of Review: 1999) C Candidate. Species for which USFWS has sufficient information on biolo vulnerabilit and threats to support proposals to list as Endan or Threatened under ESA. However, proposed rules have not y et been Issued because such actions are precluded at present b other listin activit SC Species of Concern. The terins "Species of Concern" or "Species at Risk" should be c ons) +dered as terms-of-art that describe the entire realm of taxi. whose conservation status ma be of concern to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, but neither term has official status ( currentl y all former C2 species . Critical Habitat (check with state or re USFWS office for location details) y Yes: Critical Habitat has been. desi P Proposed: Critical Habitat has been pro-posed. \N No Status: certain populations of this taxon do not have desi status (check with state or re USFWS office for details about which populations have desi status)). USFS US Forest Service (1999 Animals, 1999 Plants: corrected 2000) US Department of A Forest Service, Re 3 ( http://www. fs. fed. us/r3/) S Sensitive: those to occurrin on National Forests in Arizona which are considered sensitive b the Re Forester. BLM US Bureau of Land Mana (2000 Animals, 2000 Plants) US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Mana Arizona State Office ( http - //az w w w. az. h I m. g S Sensitive - those taxa occurrin on BLM Field Office Lands in Arizona which are considered sensitive b the Arizona State Office. P Population- onl those populations of Banded Gila monster ( Helodernia suspectuni c1liclunt) that occur north and west of the Colorado River, are considered sensitive b the Arizona State Office. 30 Status Definitions 2 AGFD,, HDMS TRIBAL STATUS NESL Navajo Endan Species List ( 2005 ) Nava Nation, Nava Fish and Wildlife Departnient (htt p://www.heritaee.tnc.or,g/nhp/us/nava htm] The Navajo Endan Species List contains to with status from the entire Navajo Nation which includes parts of Arizona, Utah, and New Mexico. In this notebook. we provide NESL status for onl those taxa whose distribution includes part or all of the Arizona portion of the Nava Nation. Groups I Those species or subspecies that no lon occur on the Navajo Nation. 2 An -species or subspecies which is in dan of bein eliminated from all or a si portion of its ran on the Nava Nation, 3 An species or subspecies which is likel to become an endan species, within the foreseeable future,, throu all or a si portion of its ran ort the Navajo Nation. 4 An species or subspecies for which the Navajo Fish and Wildlife Department (NF&WD does not currentl have sufficient information to support their bein listed in Group 2 or Group 3 but has reason to consider them. The NF&WD will activel seek information on these species to determine if the warrant inclusion in a different g roup or removal from the list. MEXICAN STATUS MEX Mexican Federal Endan Species List ( .October 16, 2000 Pro de Norma Oficial Mexicana PRO Y-NOM-059-ECOL-2000 The Mexican Federal Endan Species List contains to with status from the entire Mexican Republic and waters under its j urisdiction. In this notebook we provide M EX desi for onl those ma occurrin in Arizona and also in Mexico. P En Peli de Extincio"n (Determined Endan in Mexico in dan of extinction. A Amenazada (Determined Threatened in Mexico) : could become endan if factors causin habitat deterioration or population decline continue. Pr Sujeta a Protecc ion Fispecial (Deterinined Subject to Special Protection in Mexico): utilization limited due to reduced populations, restricted distribution, or to favor recover and conservation of the taxon or associated taxa. E Probablemente extinta en el inedio slivestre (Probabl extinct in the wild of Mexico A native species whose individuals in the wild have disappeared, based on pertinent documentation and studies that prove it. The onl existin individuals of the species are in captivit or outside the Mexican territor [ 1= One or more subspec ies of th is species has status i n Mexico, but the H DMS does not track it at the subspecies level (most of these subspecies are endemic to Mexico). Please consult the NOR MA Oficial Mexicana PROP -NOM-059-ECOL-2000 for details.1 31 Status Definitions 3 AGFD, HDMS STATE STATUS ELF_IJPF Plants - NPL Arizona Native Plant Law (1999) Arizona Department of A (ht HS Hi Safe no collection allowed - SR Salva Restricted: collection onl with permit. ER Export Restricted: transport out of State prohibited. SA Salva Assessed. permits re to remove live trees. HR Harvest Restricted: permits re to remove plant b Wildlife - W Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona (in prep) Arizona Game and Fish Department ( http://www.azgt'd. ov) WSC Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona. Species whose occurrence in Arizona is or ma be in jeopard or with known or perceived threats or population declines, as described b the Arizona Game and Fish Department's listin of Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona in prep) . Species indicated on printouts as WSC are currentl the same as those in Threatened Native Wildlife in Arizona (1988). Revised 8/24/04, AGFD HDMS J.-�HDMS\DOCUMENT�NBOOKs\'rE,\4PLATE�EORDEFS�STATDEF 32 Wildlife Observed Wildlife Wildlife observed within the property during field reconnaissance consisted mainly of avian species including curve - billed thrasher (Toxostoma curvirostre), Gambel's quail (Call*epla gambelii), white- winged dove (Zenaida asiatica), morning dove (Z. macroura), Gila woodpecker (Melanerpes uropy- gialis), house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus), greater roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus), northern mockingbird (Mimus polglottos), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), pyrrhuloxia (C. sinuatus), verdin (Auriparusflaviceps), ash - throated flycatch- er (Mylarchus cinerascens), black - tailed gnatcatcher (Polloptila rnelanura), Lucy's warbler (Vermivora luciae), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), house sparrow (Passer dornesticus), white - crowned spar- row (Zonotrichia leucophrys), great - tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicannus), lesser nighthawk (Chor- dellies acutipennis) and elf owl (Micrathene whineyii). Other wildlife noted on the property includes desert cottontail (Sylvilagus auduboni), desert spiny lizard (Sceloporus magister) and whiptail species (Cnemidophorus sp.). Special Status Wildlife Species The USFWS identifies 12 T &E wildlife species as potentially occurring in Pima County. Published and unpublished literature on the flora and fauna of the Sonoran Desert was reviewed, focusing on the presence or likely presence of threatened or endangered species in Pima County and, in particular, on those with some possibility of occurring on or in the vicinity of the property. The review indicated that one federally listed endangered wildlife species, the lesser long nosed bat (LLNB; Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae), occupies a range that includes the property. The project will not likely affect the LLNB because the property does not contain any roosting habitat and contains limited forage (saguaro). There is no designated or proposed critical habitat within the property. AGFD HDMS records show four special status wildlife species as having been recorded within a 3- mile buffer of the property, the fulvous whistling duck (Dendrocygna bicolor), CFPO, California leaf- nosed bat (Macrotus californicus) and cave myotis (Myotis velifer). The fulvous whistling duck occurs rarely in southwestern Arizona eastward to Phoenix and Picacho Lake. This species requires breeding habitat that includes freshwater wetlands, shallow impoundments managed for rice production, temporally flooded grasslands and pasture, haylands, and small grain fields adjacent to rice fields. The property does not support breeding habitat for this species. The recently de- listed cactus ferruginous pygmy -owl (CFPO, Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) was identified as having potential for occurrence On the property (discussed below). Even though this spe- cies has been removed from the endangered species list, project impacts to this species are being considered as part of this project's planning process. A site visit was conducted with Scott Richardson of USFWS to identify potentially suitable CFPO habitat with the property. The sparse creosote -domi- nated upland habitat within the property is considered unsuitable for CFPO. There is limited poten- tially suitable dispersing habitat along the ridgeline and within the denser xeroriparian vegetation within northern portions of the property. Surveys were conducted on the property for CFPO during the spring 2006 survey season using the USFWS recommended survey protocol and no CFPO were detected. Technical assistance with USFWS will be requested to evaluate the project's potential effects to the CFPO. 33 The California leaf -nosed bat and cave myotis are species of insectivorous bat that generally roosts in caves, mines, rock shelters and tunnels and under bridges. These bats may potentially fly over and forage on the site; however, the site does not support roosting habitat for this species and the develop- ment of the site would not appreciably affect its foraging opportunities. Geology and Soils The site, as mapped by the Soil Conservation Service, is 95% Anthony Sandy Loam with small areas of Gravelly Alluvial Land and Rough Broken Land -Palos Verde Complex (see Exhibit 10). A Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation of property was conducted by Acura Engineering, Project A06- 0033G, dated May 8, 2006. 34 I , I 1 I i i i { l 1 r I i F 7 �r h i I I 1 3` 1 1 I I � May 8, 2006 Ms. Samantha Rosenberg Barclay Group 7702 E Doubletree Ranch Road Suite 220 Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 LINDA VISTA & I -10 SEC PROPERTY LLC Geotechnical Report Proposed Retail Development I -10 & Linda Vista Marana, Arizona Project No. A06 -0033G 4 �► ►rr�r►r►w�r rrwr►�rrr� •w ►►�r�rr►r _ Fa t _ ENGINEERING I Ms. Samantha Rosenberg Barclay Group Venture Capital, LLC 7702 E Doubletree Ranch Road, #220 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 LINDA VISTA & 1 -10 SEC PROPERTY LLC Geotechnical Report Proposed Retail development 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, Arizona Dear Ms. Rosenberg: Project A05 -0033G May 8, 2000 Submitted herewith is the report of the geotechnical investigation for the subject project. In brief, the report includes a plan of borings, boring logs, laboratory test results, and a description of subsurface conditions. Based on the findings, recommendations are set forth for the design and construction of foundations and pavement. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, ACURA ENGINEERING ARIZ Prabhakar (Peter Ru , P.E. President Enclosures Copies submitted: 4cc A ssional F� 30524 1 •� P RAB HAKAR CC a RUPAL ne...• 2 gNA, v Q 5235 S. 39th Street O 13276 E. Fremont Place Z Phoenix, AZ 85040 Centennial, CO 80 112 p: 602.458.7484 p: 303.799.8378 E 602.458.9246 u f. 303.799.8392 geotechnical engineering and construction materials testing 1 f t i r f'1 , TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE I J1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION i; F FIELD EXPLORATION SUBSURFACE PROFILE AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES f r Subsurface Profile E Laboratory Test Results r ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 'i Anal J Foundation Recommendations F Lateral Design Parameters SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING Site Preparation Fill and Backfill Surface Drainage UTILITY INSTALLATION t FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT DESIGN Recommended Pavement Sections i Asphalt Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Base Course CONTINUING SERVICE BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIMITATIONS APPENDIX A: APPENDIX B: r , 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 6 6 6 7 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 FIELD RESULTS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS � 3 Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report presents the results of a geotechnical engineering study for a proposed retail development 1 to be constructed at the corner of Interstate 10 and Linda Vista in Marana, Arizona. The study was conducted for the purpose of developing foundation and pavement recommendations for.design and construction, and was conducted in general accordance with Proposal Number P06 -016 dated January 19, 2005. Our field exploration program consisted of exploratory borings drilled to obtain information on subsurface conditions. A large are in the center of the site could not be accessed as it was designated as a "pre- historic area ". The locations of the borings are shown on the Site .Plan included in Appendix A. Samples were tested to determine physical and engineering characteristics. Results of the field r - exploration and laboratory tests were analyzed to develop earthwork and foundation design recommendations for the ro'ect, and to determine a ropriate bearing pressures for foundations p 1 pp supporting the new structure. our results and recommendations are presented herein. { This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained during this study, and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of eotechnical engineering � g p g g g considerations related to construction are included - in the report. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Development of the 144 -acre parcel is to consist of the construction of a commercial /retail center. The buildings are presumed to be single story (some with high bays), conventional concrete slab -on- grade, and wood frame, masonry and/or tilt panel walls. Structural loads are presumed to be light to moderately heavy and settlement tolerances are not known at this time. Paved areas will support a moderate volume of passenger traffic and truck traffic. Landscaped area will be used for storm water retention and disposal. If locations or conditions are significantly different from those described, or as depicted in this report, we should be notified so that we may re- evaluate the recommendations provided herein. SITE DESCRIPTION At the time of this investigation the site was disturbed native desert located at the southeast corner of Camino de Manana and Linda Vista. Ground cover consisted of native cactus, weeds, grasses, trees and shrubs. Two dry (at the time of investigation) washes enter the property near the northeast corner and run to the west - southwest. These washes�are located on either side of a hill that protrudes into the IJ 1 Project No. A06-0033G Proposed Retail Development site from the northeast, trending in a southwesterly direction. The hill is about 15 to 20 feet high and appears to be composed of silty sands, sands and gravels and cobbles, possibly cemented. Linda Vista Road signage indicates these washes are prone to flash flooding. Areas of "wildcat" dumping were noted throughout the property and generally consisted of miscellaneous debris, appliances, and autos. Recreational dirt roads were also noted throughout the site. Transients were observed with a car and camper parked on site. It appeared that the transients live on the site and generate household type debris. The property is located in a desert/residential setting. The property is bound on the north by Linda Vista Road followed by native desert land and a rural residence to the northwest, to the east is native desert, to the south .is native desert and commercial development - including KFIF radio transmitter tower, and to the west are utility easements, Union Pacific Railroad tracks, Interstate 10 and commercial and residential developments. J FIELD EXPLORATION Borings were drilled at the locations shown on the Site Plan included in Appendix A to explore the subsurface conditions. Locations of the exploratory borings were established by standard taping and/or pacing techniques. The drill crew advanced the borings through the on -site soils with a CME -75 truck - mounted drill rig using a 7 -inch diameter hollow stem auger. our field technician fogged the borings and obtained samples for laboratory analysis. The exploratory borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of all drilling activities. Samples of the subsurface materials were obtained with either a 2.0 -inch standard split spoon sampler or a 2.42 -inch inside diameter, ring -lined barrel sampler in general accordance with ASTM Method ❑1586 Split Barrel Sampling. The samplers were driven into the various strata using a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance each respective sampler was recorded as the penetration resistance (SPT or N) value. Penetration resistance values provide an indication of the relative density of granular soils or consistency of fine- grained soils. Depths at which the samples were obtained and the penetration resistance values are shown on the attached exploratory boring logs. SUBSURFACE PROFILE AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES Subsurface Profile r The subsurface profile is dominated by vesicular silty sand and clayey sand with subordinate amounts gravel and calcareous cementing. Discontinuous well graded sand and sandy clay units were noted interbedded with the silty sand. The borings terminated within these stratig raph ic units at depths of 11.5 2 Project No. A06-0033G Proposed Retail Development 1 to 20 feet below existing grade. Standard penetration resistance (N) values ranged from about 3 to 22 with exception of one count of 50+ blows per foot. The subsoils sampled are described as being `damp to based on visual and tactile evaluation at the time of investigation. Groundwater was not encountered in the test borings during the investigation. The boring logs should be referenced for complete soil descriptions and classifications, interpolated thickness of the strata, and penetration resistance (N) values. Laboratory Test Results Samples of soil obtained during the field exploration were observed and visually classified in ' accordance with ASTM D2487, which is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Samples were selected for testing to determine the engineering and physical properties in general accordance with ASTM or other generally recognized procedures. Results of all laboratory tests are presented in Appendix B. In summary, in -place dry densities of the soils in the upper 5 feet are on the order of 99 to '111 pcf, at natural water contents of about 1.5 to 3 percent at the time of investigation. The soils tested classified as non - plastic. Two undisturbed samples of the upper soils displayed additional compression due to inundation under typical foundation loading conditions. A sample of the upper silty sand, remolded to density and moisture levels typically expected during construction, displayed negligible volume increase due to wetting of 0.2 percent under a 100 psf surcharge load. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Analysis Analysis of the field and laboratory data indicates that subsoils at the site are suitable for support of the proposed structure on shallow spread foundations and for slab --on -grade construction subject to remedial work. Field and laboratory testing show that the upper soils, that is those at the anticipated founding level, are of low density. Laboratory testing indicates that the upper soils are capable of post- construction consolidation when subjected to inundation. This could cause excessive settlement resulting in cracking problems. Accordingly, recommendations are made to over - excavate and re- compact the bearing soils to increase density and reduce the potential for collapse. The balance of the site will require re- compacting the plowed soils prior to placing fills. F 3 3 4 Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development I i Positive drainage away from the structure will be imperative to limit the potential post construction settlement due to water infiltration of bearing soils. Roof drains must be directed away from the building in paved scuppers to discharge to the pavement. This will prevent accumulation of water between the wall and the sidewalk/curb at the pavement. Planters must be designed to allow drainage to the pavement for the same purpose. Stem wall and footings must be backfilled and compacted to reduce the permeability of the soil. The swell potential of the fine portion of the upper clayey soils may be a concern, while the results of ' laboratory testing on the non - plastic silty sands indicate a low degree of swell, there are more clayey soils on the site that may exhibit higher degrees of volume increase due to wetting. It is recommended F 1 that the clayey soils be removed from within the upper foot pad fill and be replaced with the site- available low to non - plastic, non - expansive soils. Attention must be paid to provide proper drainage to limit the potential for water infiltrating under slabs. A minimum slope of, at least 5 percent for a distance of 10 feet is recommended for unpaved landscaped areas. n For exterior slabs on grade, frequent jointing is recommended to control cracking and reduce tripping hazards should differential movement occur.' It is also recommended to pin the landing slab to the building floor /stem wall. This will reduce the potential for the exterior slab lifting and blocking the operation of out - swinging doors. Pinning typically consists of 24 inch long No. 4 reinforcing steel � dowels placed at 12 inch centers. For the most part, excavation operations are expected to be relatively problem -free. The hill located in the northeast quadrant is presumably to be removed to accommodate development., gravels, cobbles and potential boulders, as well as cementation may make removal a challenge. Sloughing may occur in fills (compacted and uncompacted), sandy or loose deposits, requiring the laying back of side slopes. The contractor should make his own independent assessment in regard to excavation methods. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with relevant governmental regulations including but not limited to OSHA. Maintenance of safe trenches is considered solely the responsibility of the contractor. Groundwater is not expected to be a factor in the design and construction of foundations and underground utilities to the depths anticipated. Footings (including retaining wall footings) located within 5 feet of a retention basin should be lowered such that they are located at least 2 feet below the channel invert as softening of subsoils may occur should they become wet or saturated during rainfall events. In the case of retaining walls adjacent retention basins, it is recommended that the basins sides be sloped so that water does not sit LJ immediately against the wall for long periods of time. 4 � 1 Project No. A66 -6033G j Proposed Retail development Foundation Recommendations We determined a foundation depth and bearing pressure for the design of footings that should provide against bearing failure and excessive settlement. We estimate the total settlement for the shallow footings on engineered fill will be less than 1 inch for the conditions presented below. We estimate differential settlement will be about half the total settlement. Additional localized settlements of the ` same magnitude or more could occur if supporting soils were to experience a significant increase in moisture content. Positive drainage away from structures,' and controlled routing of roof runoff, must be provided to prevent ponding adjacent to foundations. f 1 It is recommended that the structures be founded on shallow spread footings bearing a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest finished exterior grade within 5 feet of the structure, on at least 2 feet of r i engineered fill (plus 8 inches of scarified and recompacted soil). If site preparation is carried out as set forth herein, an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf may be utilized for design purposes. This bearing pressure refers to the total of all loads, dead and live, and is a net pressure. It may be increased one -third for wind, seismic or other loads of short duration. All footing excavations should be level and cleaned of all loose or disturbed materials. Positive drainage away from the proposed building must be maintained at all times. � g Wetting of the footing base excavation before setting concrete tilt panels could result in excessive settlement when setting the panels on leveling pads. It is imperative that footing base excavations be dry, and cleaned of loose /disturbed soil. l Although borings were not advanced to 100 feet, Soil Profile Type S (per Table 1.6 -J, 1997 UBC) or f Soil Site Class a (per Table 1615-1.1, 2000 IBC) may be used for design of the structure based on the nature of the subsoils encountered in the borings and geology in the area. Continuous wall footings and isolated rectangular footings should be designed with minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively, regardless of the resultant bearing pressure. Lightly loaded interior partitions (less than 800 pounds per linear foot) may be supported on reinforced thickened slab sections (minimum 12 inches of bearing width). Continuous masonry wall footings and stem walls should be reinforced to distribute stresses arising from small differential movements, and long walls should be provided with control 'joints to accommodate these movements. Reinforcement and frequent control joints are suggested to allow slight movement and prevent minor floor slab cracking especially in floor areas to be covered with hard tile. F �l 5 U [ �7 I i Project No. A06 -6633G Proposed Retail Development Lateral Design Parameters The following tabulation presents recommendations for lateral stability analyses: 'Foundation Toe Pressures 1.33 x max. allowable 2 Equivalent Fluid Pressures (Drained Condition): V Restrained walls 60 psf /ft Unrestrained walls 35 psf /ft Lateral Passive Pressures: Continuous footings 350 psf /ft Spread footings 400 psf /ft Coefficient of Base Friction: Independent of passive resistance 0.45 In conjunction with passive resistance 0.35 a increase in allowable foundation bearing pressure previously tabulated for foundation toe pressures due to eccentric or lateral loading. The entire bearing surface of the footing should remain in compression. 2 Equivalent fluid pressures for vertical walls and horizontal backfill surfaces (maximum 10 feet in height). Backfill material must be well- graded, free - draining gravel with less than 8 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Pressures do not include temporary forces imposed during compaction of the backfill, swelling pressures developed by over - compacted clayey backfill, hydrostatic pressures from inundation of backfill, or surcharge loads. walls should be suitably braced during backf lling to prevent damage and excessive deflection. Compaction of the backfill soils against embedded footings or walls designed to provide passive resistance should be accomplished to a minimum of 95 percent of the material's maximum dry density (ASTM D -698) to develop this resistance with low strains. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING Site Preparation The entire area to be occupied by the proposed construction should be stripped of all vegetation, debris, rubble, obviously loose surface soils, and other undesirable conditions that may have not been revealed by this investigation. Trees, stumps and major root systems should be removed and grubbed. Special attention must be paid to areas where depressions from natural stream channels (washes) appear to trend. In areas where loose channel fills occur, the loose material should be removed, generally to a depth of 1 to 2 feet, be re-- placed and compacted. z I a� 1 - V � I IL Project No. A06 -0033G _ Proposed Retail Development Infill of washes with debris and fill is not an uncommon occurrence, some of which can require , considerable debris removal. Accordingly, extra caution should be taken in wash areas to ensure complete removal of fill if encountered. Subsoils directly beneath shallow foundation elements should be over-excavated to a depth of at least 2 feet below proposed footing bottom elevation, or existing grade, whichever results in the deeper excavation, extending at least 5 feet beyond footing edges and recompacted as set forth herein. An entire building pad does not require deep over-excavation provided that footing lines can be accurately located during earthwork operations. Prior to placing structural fill below footing bottom elevation, scarify the exposed grade to a depth of 8 inches moisture -- condition too timum (±2 ercent and com act to at least 95 ercent of maximum d r p p } p P rY density as determined by ASTM D -898.. Asphalt pavement areas should be scarified, moisture conditioned and recompacted in a similar manner. All cut areas and areas above footing bottom elevation that are to receive only floor slab fill should be t scarified 8 inches, moisture- conditioned to at least optimum and uniformly compacted to 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D --598. Fill and Backfill The native soils are considered suitable for use in general grading fills, as pad fill, and as engineered fill. clayey soils (CL or SC class) should not be used in the upper foot of pad fill. It is preferable that the top 12 inches of pad fill be completed with an approved low or non -- expansive soil. This may include the low to non- plastic, non -- expansive native site soils or import. Import can be common borrow (as specified below) or select granular soil. If select granular is used, the 4 inches of under slab aggregate base maybe included as part of the 12 inches. otherwise, a full .1 2 inches of common borrow should. be used in addition to the normal 4 inches of aggregate base. Retaining walls should be backfilled with a well-graded granular material with no particles greater than 3 inches in size and not less than 8 percent passing the No. Zoo sieve. if retaining walls are anticipated, this office should be consulted for additional details. � I If import material is required to' achieve the desired finished ground surface elevations, it should consist L 11 of non-expansive, imported fill free of organics and deleterious material, meeting all of the following p p g g. g specification requirements: `—' Maximum particle size 3 inches Maximum percent passing #200 sieve - 50 u 7 Project No. A06- -0033G Proposed Retail Development Maximum plasticity index (PI) 10 Maximum liquid limit (LL) 30 Maximum swell (under 100 psf surcharge) 1.5 percent Fill should be placed on subgrade that has been properly prepared and approved by a Soils Engineer. Fill must be wetted and thoroughly mixed to achieve moisture content within 2 percent of optimum moisture. .Fill should be placed in horizontal lifts of 8 -inch thickness (or as dictated by compaction equipment) and compacted to the percent of its maximum dry density per ASTM D -598 set forth as follows: A. Building Areas 1. Below footing level 95 2. Below slabs -on- grade, non - expansive soils 95 3. Exterior foundation wall backfill 95 6 I` I � kl + 1_7 1` �l f 1 R B. Pavement Subgrade or Fill 95 C. Utility Trench Backfill 1. More than 2.0 feet below finish subgrade 95 2. Within 2.0 feet of finish subgrade (non - granular) 95 3. Within 2.0 feet of finish subgrade (granular) 100 D. Aggregate Base Course 1. Below floor slabs 95 2. Below asphalt paving 100 E. Landscape Areas 1: Miscellaneous fill 90 2. Utility trench - more than 1.0 foot below finish grade 85 3. Utility trench - within 1.0 foot of finish grade 90 Surface Drainage The ground surface adjacent to the exterior foundations should be sloped to drain away from 'the foundation in all directions. we recommend a minimum slope of 5 inches in the first 10 feet in landscaped areas, and 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Planters requiring heavy watering should not be placed adjacent to or within 5 feet of the structure. Hardscape adjacent the structure can be useful in promoting runoff and minimizing infiltration of water. Roof downspouts and drains should Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development ,I discharge well beyond the limits of all foundation backfill. Care should be taken in design and construction to insure that domestic and interior storm drain water is contained to prevent seepage. In the case of retaining walls adjacent retention basins, it is recommended that the basins sides be sloped so that water does not sit immediately against the wall for long periods of time. UTILITY INSTALLATION All trench excavations should be constructed in accordance with relevant governmental regulations including but not limited to OSHA. Maintenance of safe trenches is considered solely the responsibility of the contractor. Slouging may occur in fills (uncompacted and compacted), sandy or loose deposits, requiring the laying .back of side slopes. The contractor should make his own independent assessment in regard to excavation methods. Backfill of utility trenches outside of the pipe bedding zone may be carried out with native excavated material provided particles in excess of 3 inches are first removed. This material should be moisture - conditioned, placed in 8 -inch lifts and mechanically compacted. Compaction requirements are summarized in the "Fill and Backfill" section of this report. FLOOR SLAB CONSTRUCTION To facilitate fine grading operations and aid in concrete curing, a 4 -inch thick layer of granular material conforming to the gradation for Aggregate Base (AB) as per M.A.G. Specification Section 702 should be utilized beneath the slab. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints, which allow unrestrained vertical movement. The joints should be sealed. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. Joints should be spaced in accordance with ACI guidelines. The joints should be sealed. The requirements for slab reinforcement and thickness should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended use of the slabs. If moisture sensitive flooring and/or adhesive are planned, the use of a vapor barrier or low permeability concrete should be considered. Vapor barriers do increase the potential for slab curling and water entrapment under the slab. Accordingly, if a vapor barrier is used, additional precautions such as low slump concrete, frequent jointing and proper curing will be required and detailed to reduce curling s potential and prevent the entrapment of outside water sources. Placement of moisture sensitive materials should be delayed until concrete floor slabs have dried to a very low moisture condition that is J verified by testing. E J 9 Project No. A06 -0033G 1 r - Proposed Retail Development i PAVEMENT DESIGN The primary purpose of a pavement section is the distribution of concentrated wheel loads to the subgrade in a manner such that the subgrade is not over -- stressed. 'Performance of the pavement section is directly related to the strength of the subgrade soils, and the characteristics of the traffic loading. For purposes of designing a pavement section, subgrade soils are represented by a soil support value for flexible pavements (asphalt concrete) or by a modulus of subgrade reaction value for rigid pavements (Portland cement concrete). Both of these - representative values are empirically related to strength. Pavement design procedures are based upon strength properties of the subgrade soils and pavement materials, along with the design traffic conditions (especially truck traffic). Sub-grade strength decreases when the subgrade is wetted, and is further reduced when saturated. Therefore, proper drainage both surface and subsurface, ' is essential for adequate pavement performance on such a subgrade. We analyzed pavement requirements for anticipated uses within the parking lots and driveways.. We anticipate that traffic will consist of cars, pickups, . and delivery trucks. Recommended Pavement Sections If earthwork in paved areas is carried out to finish subgrade elevation as set forth herein, the subgrade will provide adequate support for pavements. For lot pavement areas to be used primarily for automobile traffic and parking, our experience in the area indicates that a minimum of 2.0 inches of asphalt over 4.0 inches of aggregate base course will provide satisfactory service. Heavy duty areas subject to truck traffic (such as delivery and refuse trucks) should be 3.0 inches of asphalt over 6.0 inches of base. We recommend a rigid section made up of 6.0 inches of concrete (PCCP) on 4 inches of aggregate base for dumpster pads and their approaches. This assumes that all subgrades are prepared in accordance with the recommendations contained in the "Site Preparation" and "Fill and Backfill" sections of this report, and paving operations carried out in a proper manner. If pavement subgrade preparation is not carried out immediately prior to paving, the entire area should be proof - rolled at that time with a heavy pneumatic -tired roller to identify locally unstable areas for repair. 1 f lg x Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development i Asphalt Pavement Pavement materials should be in accordance with the requirements of the Maricopa Association of Governments Standard Specifications for Asphalt Concrete (Section 710, MAG Type C-% inch or 19 mm). While a % inch (11 9.Omm) mix may have a somewhat rougher texture, it offers more stability and resistance to scuffing, particularly in truck turning areas. Pavement installation should be carried out under applicable portions of M.A.G. Section 321 and municipality standards. The asphalt supplier should be informed of the pavement use and required to provide a mix that will provide stability and be aesthetically acceptable. Some of the newer M.A.G. mixes are very coarse and could cause placing and finish problems. A mix design should be submitted for review to determine if it will be acceptable for the intended use. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Pavement materials should be in accordance with the requirements of the Maricopa Association of Governments Standard Specifications for Portland Cement Concrete (Section 725, MAG Class AA). Placement requirements for rigid paving should be in general conformance with the Arizona Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (Section 401). Base Course Base course materials for use beneath i nterior floo r slabs and pavements should be we[ l- graded sand and gravel materials meeting the Maricopa Association of Governments Specifications for Aggregate Base Materials (Section 702, MAG AB). CONTINUING SERVICE Two additional elements of geotechnical engineering service are important to the successful completion of this project. Consultation with design professionals during the design phases. This is important to ensure that the intentions of our recommendations are properly incorporated in the design, and that any changes in the design concept properly consider geotechnical aspects. Observation and monitoring during construction. A geotechnical engineer or technician from our firm should observe the excavation, earthwork, and foundation phases of the work to determine that subsurface conditions are compatible with those used in the analysis and design. During site grading, 11 Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development placement of structural fill should be observed and tested to confirm that the proper density has been achieved. BUILDING MAINTENANCE It is extremely critical that proper maintenance be performed over the life of the structure. It is very important that positive site drainage be maintained to ensure overall performance of the foundation and floor systems as presented herein. The owner must be provided with a copy of this report. Maintaining positive site drainage will require periodic maintenance to ensure roof gutters and roof downspouts are properly maintained and properly discharged away from the foundation in all directions. All landscaping or surface re- grading must take into consideration the positive drainage recommendations presented herein. changing the surface drainage could have a negative impact on surface flow and create a source of water and the development of perched water conditions. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the design data submitted to Acura Engineering, data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the location indicated on the Site Plan included in Appendix A, and the proposed construction discussed in this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice set forth. Acura's scope of work does not include the investigation, detection, or design related to the presence of any biological pollutants. The term `biological pollutants' includes, but is not limited to mold, fungi, spores, bacteria, and viruses, and the byproducts of any such biological organisms. The scope of this investigation and report does not include regional considerations such as seismic activity and ground fissures resulting from subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal, nor any considerations of hazardous r releases or toxic contamination of any type. � The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become evident until construction. During construction, if fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so that we may re- evaluate the E recommendations made. F This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our exploratory information that has not been described or documented in this report. This report should not be used by the contractor as the sole r tool for bidding quantities or establishing construction /excavation methods. The contractor should 12 r i { i� Project No. A06 -0033G Proposed Retail Development make his own independent assessment in these regards. As the protect evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. f Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications of the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. I t L I' i 4i is 13 M� "M Appendix Field Result] . III ld ,� Ni b p Lot wl IL 1A AnOor not �A Mar- I X X ell BaO AnOtot El," LEGEND BORING LOCATION BORING LOCATION PLAN ura PROPOSED RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1-10 & LINDA VISTA MARANA, ARIZONA ENGINEERING DRAWN BY: JJP CHECKED BY. MU SCALE: VERTICAL N/A HORIZONTAL NTS ACURA PROJECT NO. A06-0033G DATE: 04/13/2006 i i I � ��* c 0 N I F_ I z .. o � x U I� r c- -z 4 LEGEND AND NOTES SOIL TYPE SAMPLER TYPES GW, Well- Graded Gravel SW, Well- Gradcd Sand ML, Silt ° GP, Poorly- Graded Gravel SP, Poorly- Graded Sand CL, Lean CIay lo GM, Silty Gravel SM, Silty Sand CH, Fat Clay GC, Clayey Gravel SC, Clayey Sand DOO Fill, Unclassified Split -Spoon Modified Dames and Moore Auger Shelby Tube GROUNDWATER Groundwater Level SOIL GRAIN SIZE U.S. STANDARD SIEVE Aft -1 1d66 a i n an inn BOULDERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY COURSE FINE COURSE MEDIUM FINE I ' III �I LJ J 1 _52 76.2 19.1 4.76 . 2.0U U.4/.0 U.074 SOIL GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS U.VVL STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOILS DENSITY OF NON- COHESIVE SOILS CONSISTENCY NUMBER OF BLOWS UNDRAINED NUMBER OF BLOWS RELATIVE PER FT., N SHEAR STRENGTH PER FT., N DENSITY Kips Per'Sq. Ft. Very Soft 0-2 Less Than 0.25 0-4 Very Loose Soft 3-4 0.25 to 0.50 4-10 Loose Firm 5-8 0.50 to 1.00 11-30 Medium Dense Stiff 9-15 1.00 to 2.00 31 -50 Dense Very Stiff' 16-30 2.00 to 4.00 Over 50 Very. Dense Hard Over 30 Greater Than.4.00 Criteria for Describing Moisture Condition ASTM D 2488 Note 16 Criteria for Describing Percentages of Gravel, Sand and Fines Description Criteria Description Criteria Damp Dusty, dry to the touch Trace Particles are present but estimated to be less than 5 % Few 5 to 10 /o Moist Damp but no visible of water Little 15 to 25 % Some 30 to 45 /o Wet Visible free water, usually soil is below water table Mostly 50 to 100 % t i I r f � i I � { f I i f - -r r i t � r� k t f - 1 . l i i u i Li Exploratory Boring Lou Boring N B -1 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: , Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation {ft }: Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth : 20 p � ft } Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4111/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft ): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot LL J 0 Moisture Content Z Q i Plastic Limit I"w Q rL W a CL 0 Liquid Limit Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve IL v � w SOIL DESCRIPTION m Q CO a� CD 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty to Clayey Sand (SM /SC ), light brown, damp, trace fine to coarse gravel Silty Sand (SM ), light brown, loose, damp, `'••• ' trace fine to coarse gravel 5 •• - Interbedded Well Graded Sand (SW), light brown, damp, trace fine gravel ' 10 •. - Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL ), damp, trace ' fine gravel Silty to Clayey Sand (SMISC), light brown, 15 medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel Silty Sand (SM ), light brown, damp 20 Boring Terminated at 20 feet 25 30 Utnology Ilnes represent approximate oounoanes oeEween son ano rourc iayers; in - situ, Ene Erdnsition may ur! yniuuai. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 f �1 II j f I� Exploratory gnrina Lea Boring No. B=2 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SW F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Co Type: Hollow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 16.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4111/2006 Date Completed: 411112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ 0 Blows Per Foot LL J 0 � Moisture Content Z a 1 Plastic Limit. LL �• l„_, J = 0 Liquid Limit CL p ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve w ❑ w SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q rtn 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light brown, damp, trace fine gravel tan t Ty�Tay 'Cj; camp sFFto eeTsT �' Tr`ace fine gravel, roots 5 — — — — — -- — — -Interbedded Clayey Sand (SC), damp 10 - - - - - - - - - - Clayey Sand (SC), light brown, medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel Sandy Clay (CL), light brown, very stiff, damp 15 Boring Terminated at 16.5 feet 20 25 30 Utnoiogy lines represent approxi oounoaries oetween soil anu rac layers; in snu, 'Ene transition may ve grauuai. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 �{f E j I t �J Exploratory gnrina Lea Boring No. B -3 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SW F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista I`A a ra n a, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4111/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ! Blows Per Foot J 0 Moisture Content Z f Plastic Limit L "' 0 Liquid Limit = Q (L a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a a. W o W �, W SOIL DESCRIPTION D m 2 Q cn 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose to medium dense, damp, trace fine to coarse ; gravel 5 •' ONO - Interbedded Clayey Sand (SC), damp, trace : %X7 fine to coarse gravel 10 - Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL), damp : Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 — -- — — — — -- — — — 20 — — — — — — -- — — — 25 30 Lnnoiogy nnes represent approxmidle uuunudiieb wemeen buii ana rock layers, ire -WLU, U ild LICUMIuuii iiedy ue yiduuM. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 I t Explo ratory i gonna Loa i i Boring No. 6.4 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, Az Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/1112006 Date Completed: 4/11/2096 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No !Dater ^ 0 Blows Per Foot u- J 0 0 Moisture Content Z o CL J Plastic Limit � —� U) J = n Liquid Limit �e a a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a. © W SOIL DESCRIPTION m cn 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Sandy Clay (CL), light yellow brown, damp, trace fine gravel Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose, ` damp, trace fine gravel 5 ------------------ - - - - -- Sandy Clay (CL), brown, firm, damp 10 - Interbedded Clayey Sand (SC), brown to yellow brown, damp B oring Terminated at ee 15 — — — — -- — -- — — — 20 — — --- — — — -- — — -- 25 _ ... _ _ 30 Liinoiogy lines represent approximate Dounoaries Detween s ana roc layers; in-situ, ine transition may De graoual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85440 - 602,458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 F 1 �I L I Lj Exploratory gerina Loa Boring No. B -5 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SIN F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 16.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ■ Blows Per Foot U. %ft-00 J (L 0 � Moisture Content Z 1 Plastic Limit U. _ ~ Q w a Liquid Limit IL p ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve w v w SOIL DESCRIPTION m us 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel 5 _ _ _ Silty to Clayey Sand (SMISC), light yellow brown, loose, damp; trace fine to coarse gravel Clayey Sand (SC), yellow brown to brown, 10 medium dense, damp 15 - Interbedded Silty Clay (SM), yellow brown, damp Boring Terminated at 16.5 feet 20 25 30 Utnoiogy lines represent approximate oounaanes oetween soil ana rocK iayers; in -situ, ine transition may oe grauuai. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7 484 - Fax 602.458.9246 1 i - f i �I Exploratory Boren Lo �f r i7 i �i i r j Boring No. B -6 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SW F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1 -10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/1112006 Date Completed: 411112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ■ Blows Per Foot LL J 0 -J � Moisture Content Z i Plastic Limit _ H ~ � Q w IL �? a 0 Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve ❑ w SOIL DESCRIPTION J 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel Interbedded Sandy to Silty Clay (CL -ML), light ■ yellow brown, damp 5 Sandy Clay (CL), brown to yellow brown, firm JI -- -- - - -- --- - -- to very stiff, damp, trace fine gravel 10 Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 - - -- - - - -_ .- - - 20 25 �o LI Lithology lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and rock layers; in -situ, the transition may be gradual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 i 3 i r � r� I L II I' L R T I { E LI ii I Exploratory Boring No. B =7 .••. . r% V _ ..L of . - A uorinq L O SJ __ Logged By: J Householder Driller: Geomechanics SW Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft ): Not Available Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Project No.: A06 -0033G Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 411112006 Depth to Groundwater {ft }: No Water Silty Sand (SM ), light brown to light yellow brown, damp Clayey Sand (SC }, light yellow brown, medium dense, damp 5 Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL ), light yellow brown, damp Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM ), light 10 yellow brown to light red brown, medium dense, damp Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 1 15 I 2 0 1 25 Lithology lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and rock layers; in -situ, the transition may be gradual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 ^ ! Blows Per Foot ' J 0 Moisture Content Z Q a I Plastic Limit U. CO W U d Liquid Limit a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a W W .� w SOIL DESCRIPTION m 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM ), light brown to light yellow brown, damp Clayey Sand (SC }, light yellow brown, medium dense, damp 5 Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL ), light yellow brown, damp Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM ), light 10 yellow brown to light red brown, medium dense, damp Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 1 15 I 2 0 1 25 Lithology lines represent approximate boundaries between soil and rock layers; in -situ, the transition may be gradual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 Exploratory Rnrinn I nn Boring No. B -8 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 20 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 411112006 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ W 0 Blows Per Foot LL O 0 Moisture Content Z I Plastic Limit = Q Q W a a 0 Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve W ❑ J W SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q cn 0 10 20 . 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM ), brown to yellow brown, loose to medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel, vesicular 5 _ _ ... ... ... ....... ... — — Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose, :.- damp 10 Silty to Clayey Sand (SM /SC), light yellow 15 brown, medium dense, damp 20 — — — — — — —_ -- — — Boring Terminated at 20 feet 25 30 Liinoiogy tines represent approximate oounoanes uetween svn an roeK iayers; in -situ, the transutnvn may ue grauuai. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 I r I i r. f i f f� H Exploratory Bnrina Lea Boring No. Bs-9 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: 'A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 411112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No water ^ ! Blows Per Foot .� CL 0 0 Moisture Content Z o i Plastic Limit U J _ 0 Liquid Limit p p„ ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve W o J w SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q sn 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, damp, trace fine gravel tfy ( CTayey�'aFcR79/9C) gM ye ow' brown, medium dense, damp �• �' �� X . 5 Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, loose, -•;'• . damp, trace fine to coarse gravel •. . - Interbedded Silty Sand (SM), light yellow ' •; •• brown, damp, trace fine- gravel 10 Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 20 25 — — — — — — —_ — -- -- 30 Litnoiogy lines represent approximate oounuaries Detween soil ano rocK layers; in -situ, the transition may oe graoual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 �i r �i Exploratory 13nrinh Lna Boring No. B -10 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1 -10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring. Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4111/2006 Date Completed: 4111/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot LU 0 0 Moisture Content Z 0 -1 1 Plastic Limit ~ Q w V 0 Liquid Limit 2 Q a a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a. a w w SOIL DESCRIPTION m c c3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose to '• medium dense, damp, trace to few fine to coarse gravel '= — — — — — -- — — - -weak calcareous cementing �"' K. 10 •' �' Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 — — — — — — -- — — — 20 25 30 LuLnuivgy tines represem apprvxtrridLe LJUUI ivai idb UUMU'di i ball M iu i u'Un idyui a, II ^7ILU, U lt: U aE IaILIU11 ,flay uG yI Q uua1. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 E r - i i I I I i I i I � i k 1 s F tl 1 , E 1 F { > u Exploratory Boring No. B -11 Bnrina Lna Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft ): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 16.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No water ^ 1 0 Blows Per Foot U. %".00 J 0 0 0 Moisture Content Z o 1 Plastic Limit ur `► = Q Liquid Limit Y a d ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve v w SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM ), light r O. yellow brown to light red brown, medium •° ° 5 dense, damp, trace fine gravel, weak I I °• • °• calcareous cementing • O O i O • O ' 10 • ' • O O O O a • a a • • a e a 0 • • • T '''''7' T wew -.w Silty nd GSM }, Iight rown to light yellow O O • O a • 15 brown, damp, trace fine to coarse gravel Minim Boring Terminated at 16.5 feet 20 r �• r r -- r r r 25 30 L.itnmagy iines represent approximate ovunaaries vetween Soil allu ruc:n iayelb, ni - s,tu, LIM UdiIsitiuz� 111dy W"- grduudI. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 i r ^j �j I i I l k � f k R � r -- I r`� 1 If LJ , i� I r } Exploratory 6erina Lea Boring No. B -12 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SW F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Core Type: HoIIow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:I -10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/1112006 Date Completed: 4/1112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot J (L 0 0 Moisture Content -1 ^ Z 1 Plastic Limit U. Q CO w — 0 Liquid Limit 5G a a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 sieve w ❑ J w SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q CO 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), brown to light brown, damp, trace fine gravel Sil Sand (SM), light yellow brown, very loose =.. to loose, damp, trace fine gravel 5 • : •• 1 0 Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 1 5 20 2 5 30 Lnnoiogy lines represent approxzmaTe uounuanes 4etween soil anu roert layers; in -SIXU, Free udrisit«rri rridy rye yrauudi. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 � I �E r i } LI Exploratory Rnrinn I_nn Boring No. B -13 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development' Auger /Core Type; Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 411112006 Date Completed: 411112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot U.0 � 0 Moisture Content 2 a -1 Plastic Limit LL ' _ ` �- Q w d a 0 Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve w o w SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q (0 . 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light brown to light yellow brown, medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel, vesicular 5 Silty Sand (SM), fight yellow brown, very loose, damp, trace fine gravel Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM), light e 'e 10 yellow brown, medium dense, damp, trace fine 0 to coarse gravel ° o ° a 0 Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 — — — — — — -- — — — 20 2 5 30 Litnoiogy lines represent approximate oounaaries oetween .5011 dFIU ULH:IL Id yelb ; ,n - 51LU, Me LrdnssLIU11 11Edy Lie 91 The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 Exploratory Rnrinn Lea Boring No. Bo-14 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -00330 Driller: Oeomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4/1112006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ 0 Blows Per Foot J 0 Moisture Content �. Z 0 Q / Plastic Limit U. J = 0 Liquid Limit J a a, ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a. v w SOIL DESCRIPTI m (0 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, medium dense, damp, trace fine gravel - Interbedded Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, damp, trace fine gravel, vesicular 5 10 Boring Terminated at 11.5 fleet 15 — ._ — — — — -- — — -- 25 30 I ithnInrnr line rpnr� sent aanroximate boundaries hetw¢pn snit and rock iavers: in -situ. the transition mate be aradua[. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 502.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 F Exploratory 6erina Lea Li Boring No. B -15 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics Sw F Project Name: Proposed ' Retail Development /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft ): Not Available Location:1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft ): 16.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 411112006 Date Completed: 4111/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot U. -J 0 0 Moisture Content H Z 0 1 Plastic Limit U. Q W t? 0 Liquid Limit CL a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve. CL v J w SOIL DESCRIPTION D m Q CO 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC ), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel 5 — — — — — — -- — — — Sandy Clay (CL }, brown, very stiff, damp 1 15 r Silty to Clayey Sand (SMISC ), light yellow brown, medium dense, damp Boring Terminated at 16.5 feet 20 25 30 Litholoav lines renresent annroximate boundaries between soil and rock lavers: in -situ. the transition may be gradual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 • � I I � ' I l � 1 i �J J Exploratory Rnrinn Lea Boring No. B -16 Sheet 1 of 1 d By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G : Geomechanics SW F Project Name: Proposed Retail Development /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger ximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.6 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2096 Date Completed: 4/11/2966 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot LU ., J � 0 Moisture Content IL 0 Z 0 i Plastic Limit LL Q W D Liquid Limit = Q a a. ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve W o J w SOIL DESCRIPTION D Q m CO 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel, Vesicular 5 Sandy Clay (CL), brown, medium dense, damp — — — — — — -- — — — 10 — — — — — -- — — -- Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 20 _.. _ _ ... .,... _ _... ... ..,. _ 25 30 Lnnoiogy lines represent approximate uounuaries oetween soii anu roue, iQyers; iri -aitu, URI LIMEWLIU11 111dy Ufa ysauum. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 f 1� i y � 7 i f �1 _a i I LI� z r i� � I . I 'I Exploratory Bnrina Lna Boring No. B -17 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hallow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ■ Blows Per Foot � J 0 0 Moisture Content Z I Plastic Limit ~ Q W v 0 Liquid Limit _ Q a, a ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve a w SOIL DESCRIPTION m CO 0 10 20 34 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, loose, ••' damp, trace fine gravel 5 Sandy Clay (CL), light yellow brown to light brown, loose to medium dense, damp 10 - Interbedded Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow . brown, damp Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 20 — — — — — — -- — — — 25 30 Uinology on represent approximate Dounuarle5 U etween Sou ail FOCK layers; ill -51LU, UK! srdFI51UUFI inay Ue yrdUUdI. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 I 1 I i E I f L� r Li i �J Exploratory Bnrinn Lna Boring No. B -18 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 11.5 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2006 Date Comp leted: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot U. J 0 Moisture Content j Z J I Plastic Limit P Q Q W a 0 a 0 Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve 4. o W W SOIL DESCRIPTION m CO 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel 5 Silty to Clayey Sand (SM1SC), light yellow brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel - Clayey Sand (SC), light yellow brown, medium 10 dense, damp, trace fine gravel. - Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL) Boring Terminated at 11.5 feet 15 20 •– — — — — — —_ — _ _ 30 Uxnotogy ones represent approxtmate oounuaries oexween son anu rvoK layers; to -airu, «ie a dt tsntut t tndy ue YI dUuat. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 l � I f ik f r d (7-1 i 1; s� f i LI Exploratory Berina Lea Boring No. B -19 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location:1 -10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 15.75 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 4/11/2096 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water ^ ! Blows Per Foot U. %%.WO J 0 0 Moisture Content Z a I Plastic Limit U. Q w v 0 Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve ❑ w SOIL DESCRIPTION m cn C7 10 29 30 49 50 60 70 89 99 Silty Sand (SM), light yellow brown, medium dense, damp, trace to few fine to coarse gravel ■ 5 Sandy Clay (SC), light yellow brown, medium dense, damp, few fine to coarse gravel 10 Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM), light yellow brown, loose to very dense, damp, few 0 fine to coarse gravel a° O O a e 0 a 6 O 8 15 ' O O O 6 O a 0 o 6 O a �. 13' - Interbedded Sandy Clay (CL), damp, trace °� 5 fine gravel Boring Terminated at 15.75 feet 20 — — — — — — -- — — — 25 30 Litholoav lines renresent anoroximate boundaries between soil and rock lavers: in -situ. the transition may be gradual. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 502.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 s � i r � 1j," i i I Exploratory Bnrina Lea Boring No. B -20 Sheet 1 of 1 Logged By: J Householder Project No.: A06 -0033G Driller: Geomechanics SW Project Name: Proposed Retail Development Auger /Core Type: Hollow Stem Auger Approximate Elevation (ft): Not Available Location: 1-10 & Linda Vista Marana, AZ Total Boring Depth (ft): 20 Special Requirements: None Date Started: 411112006 Date Completed: 4/11/2006 Depth to Groundwater (ft): No Water f ^ ! Blows Per Foot L J D 0 Moisture Content Z 1 Plastic Limit LL ' 2 ~ . a W Q Liquid Limit ■ Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve v w SOIL DESCRIPTION m CO 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Well Graded Sand with Silt (SW -SM), light a ° ° e -0 yellow brown to light red brown, loose to 0 ° 0 medium dense, damp,, trace fine gravel O a O a a ♦ ° 5 ' * -P ilo a a 10.0 e a e ° ° * e e e HN 0 Silty Sand (SM ), yellow brown, loose, damp, a XN e a trace fine gravel 10 15 - interbedded Sandy Clay (CL), damp — — — — — -- — — — F W " eIF6raded Sand with Silt (SW -SM), yellow ° a a e brown, loose, damp, trace fine gravel a° a ♦ a ° a e a 20 P O O ♦ ° ° a . Boring Terminated at 20 feet 25 30 Utnoiogy ernes represent approximate oounuaries oetween soil anu root layers; in -situ, the transition may oe grauum. The Exploratory Boring Log should not be used separately from the interpretations and recommendations presented in the report. Acura Engineering - 5235 S. 39th Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040 - 602.458.7484 - Fax 602.458.9246 J LJ IJ an A:•? E:�:: IP Laborator Test Results I j s f REPORT ON SIEVE ANALYSIS AND PLASTICITY INDEX Proposed Retail Development 1 -10 & Linda Vista Marana, Arizona Acura Project No. A66 -0033G SAMPLE: Source: Type: Material: Sampled By: As Noted Below As Noted On -site Soils JH Test Results I f f� r Sample Natural Moisture N In -Place Dry Density (Pcf) Atterberg Limits Si eve Size -Accumulative % Passing LL PI #200 #40 #10 #4 318" 314" 1.0" CLASS` B -2 @ 2 -3' 3.0 98.8 - - - - - - - - - CL B -5 @ 2 -3' 2.0 111.3 NV NP 27 50 89 98 100 - - SM B -8 @ 0 -5' 2.2 - 18 1 33 53 88 97 99 99 100 SM B -8 @ 2-3' 2.0 111.2 - - - - - - - - - S M B -13 a7 2 -3' 2.5 102.2 - - _ - - - - - - SC B -14 a7 2 -3' 1.7 105.8 NV NP 22 39 85 99 100 - - SM B -10 @ 2 -3' 2.5 99.4 NV NP 32 53 90 98 100 - - SM B -19 @ 2 -3' 1.4 107.2 NV NP 20 45 83 96 100 - - SM 0 - Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) NV — no value NP — non-plastic NOTE: Sieve analysis results do not include particle sizes greater than 3" in diameter. Refer to boring logs for notes on presence of cobble and boulder -sized particles. ACURA ENGINEERING I I I� 2 v I. I I I' I; _ I I w 4 i i I SAMPLE: Project: Project No.: Source: Type: Material: Sampled By: TESTED: RESULTS: r, L•J 100 0 ip- RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATION TEST Proposed Retail Development A05 -0033G B--O a@ 2-3' Driven Ring; 111.3 pcf Dry Density; 2.0 Field Moisture Silty Sand (SM) JH ASTM D2435: Sample soaked at approximately 2,500 psf. 1000 10000 w 4 W E 0 0 V ■ Surcharge (psf) ' ACURA ENGINEERING i { i t k � I 1 j } �f S i Fi i I . 2 0 L _J I 1� F l Li SAMPLE: Project: Project No.: Source: Type: Material: Sampled By: TESTED: RESULTS: 0 Cn in 4 L Q E 0 0 100 0 -�F- RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATION TEST Proposed Retail Development A05 -0033G B -14 a@ 2 -3' Driven Ring; 105.8 pcf Dry Density; 1.7% Field Moisture Silty Sand (SM) JH ASTM D2435: Sample soaked at approximately 2,500 psf. 1000 1nnnn �f 8 Surcharge (psf) ACURA ENGINEERING i i �a iF- t i u I! REPORT ON REMOLDED EXPANSION TEST Proposed Retail Development 1--10 & Linda Vista Marana, Arizona Acura Project No. A06 -0033G �'IbJAUTWJ14 Source: B -8 a@ 0 -5 Type: Bulk Grab Sample from Auger cuttings Material: Silty Sand (SM) Sampled by: JH TESTED: Percent expansion upon soaking of a remolded sample compacted to approximately 95 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 density, at about 2% less than optimum moisture content, with a 100 psf surcharge. Test Results Sample Dry Density Initial Moisture Surcharge Expansion % ` I.D. (Pcf) Content Pressure (psf) Upon Soaking B--8 a@ 0 -5 122.4 6.0 100 0.2 w f f 1 � I 3 �r I; i A moisture- density relations test (ASTM D698, Method A) was conducted on the minus #4 portion of the above sample to qualify the results of the expansion test. The results were determined to be: B -8 (0.0' -5.0') —128.8 pcf a@ 8.0% moisture ACURA ENGINEERING i F f I � I ! i F3 a �4 r I' i L- J I � L I I i .I 1 I L i l l ., f Li MAXIMUM DENSITY - OPTIMUM MOISTURE (ASTM D698, METHOD A) SAMPLE: Project: Proposed Retail Development Source: B -8 a7 0 -5 feet Type: Bulk Sample Material: Silty Sand (SM) Sampled By: J H 04 -11 -05 RESULTS: Maximum Dry Density (pcf) = 128.8 Optimum Moisture Content N = 8.0 135.Q ! I I I 1 ! I I I I i I I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I F Z Air Voids 130.0 - - - - - - - - - - -I - } -_ _ __ _- -- ! ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -! - - - - ! 1 T ! CY7 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4-0 ! I I I 125.0 -- — — - — - — - - - i - - - 1 ---- - — — — —— I — --- - --- - — — - ————— — — - - - - - -- ! I I • +�] I F ! I i ! I 1 I I I I i I I I i i I I � I I •I ! I ❑ - I I I f� I I I I I I 120.0 ---------- I---- - - - - - -- I I T --- - - - - -- I I ----- - - - - -I - - - - - -- I E I t ! ! I ! I 1 k I Z I I ! ! I I I I l I 115. 4 5 8 10 12 14 Moisture Content °Io} * Assumed Gs = 2.65 Project No. A05 -002OG e - ACURA ENGINEERING SOIL SURVEY OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, EASTERN PART; TUCSON -AVRA VALLEY AREA, ARIZONA Marana Spectrum Cl� O M C� �7' C �t �C O " Meters Feet " E 0 50 100 200 0 250 500 1 1 2 s USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey 1.1 National Cooperative Soil Survey 1/23/2007 Page 1 of 3 SOIL SURVEY OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, EASTERN PART; TUCSON -AVRA VALLEY AREA, ARIZONA Marana Spectrum MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Soil Map Units o Cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service I Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Detailed States Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 12 Roads Soil Survey Area: Pima County, Arizona, Eastern Part Rails Spatial Version of Data: 1 Water Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000 Hydrography Oceans Soil Survey Area: Tucson -Avra Valley Area, Arizona AYAYAYAY Escarpment, bedrock Spatial Version of Data: 1 vAvAvAvA Escarpment, non - bedrock Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:20000 Gulley Levee N ......•••• Slope 00 v Blowout ® Borrow Pit Clay Spot ♦ Depression, closed Eroded Spot Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Gulley Lava Flow ® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates: .1 Marsh or Swamp 5/16/1992 O Miscellaneous Water Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot Slide or Slip Q Sinkhole )or Sodic Spot Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and 6 Stony Spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. oZs As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. at Very-ft p Perennial Water USDA Natural Resources Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 1/23/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Survey of Pima County, Arizona, Eastern Part; Tucson -Avra Valley Area, Arizona Marana Spectrum Map Unit Legend Summary Pima County, Arizona, Eastern Part Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 5 ARIZO - RIVERWASH 7.7 1.5 COMPLEX, 0 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES 35 HAYHOOK SANDY LOAM, 1 5.4 1.1 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES 54 PALOS VERDES - JAYNES 15.0 3.0 COMPLEX, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES Tucson -Avra Valley Area, Arizona Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AhA ANTHONY SANDY LOAM, 0 13.0 2.6 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES AhB ANTHONY SANDY LOAM, 1 18.0 3.5 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES AnB ANTHONY GRAVELLY 234.8 46.2 SANDY LOAM,1 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES Az ARIZO GRAVELLY SANDY 1.1 0.2 LOAM Bt BRAZITO SANDY LOAM 10.4 2.0 Cm COMORO SANDY LOAM 0.1 0.0 Co COMORO LOAM 0.5 0.1 Gh GRABE LOAM 123.9 24.4 Gr GRAVELLY ALLUVIAL 21.6 4.2 LAND Pm PIMA SILTY CLAY LOAM 3.8 0.7 Ru RIVERWASH 9.8 1.9 RxD ROUGH BROKEN 43.5 8.6 LAND - PALOS VERDES COMPLEX, 0 TO 60 PERCENT SLOPES USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 1/23/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Paleontological and Cultural Resources According to the Arizona State Museum, this property was surveyed by students in 1981. Two ar- chaeological sites are located within the project area (see Exhibit 11). A Class III Cultural Resources Survey has been conducted by Westland Resources, Inc. The report and findings have been submitted under separate cover. Existing Land Uses Currently the site is vacant. The existing land uses within one mile of the pro)ect site are shown on Exhibit 7 and are as follows: North: Vacant lands and scattered large lot residential development. South: Railroad and I -10, vacant land and scattered development. East: vacant land and a residential subdivision at Hartman Lane. West: Railroad, I -10, Industrial/ Commercial development west of the Interstate and east of the Santa Cruz River, west of the river is Continental Ranch. Exhibit 8 shows the current zoning surrounding the site. Existing Infrastructure Water: The Town of Marana will provide water service for the site. Currently there is a trunk line in the exist- ing Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard. Well Sites: There are no registered wells on the site. Exhibit 12 depicts all well locations within the area of the site. A list of the wells in the Registry of the Arizona Department of Water Resources around the area of development is included as Exhibit 13. Sewer: According to the March 31, 2006 capacity response letter from Pima County Wastewater Manage- ment Department "there is capacity for the proposed development" (see Exhibit 14). There is an 18- inch public sewer 6- 200 -048, at manhole #3911 -11, approximately 1.4 miles north and west along the I -10 Frontage Road. The Cascada Pro)ect (Red Point Development) has extended the sewer line from the above referenced manhole south on the Frontage Road and east along Camino de Manana. There may be the ability to connect into this sewer line with an agreement between Red Point Development, Barclay Croup and Pima County Wastewater Management. rno Arizona State Museum P.O. Fox 210026 Tucson, AZ 8 5) 72) 1, -00 0 2 6 (520) 621-6302 FAX, (520) 621-2976 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA,,IJ TUCSON ARIZONA �F ch March 141,2006 Susan Phillips Plannin Resources, Inc. 270 N. Church Ave Tucson, Ari zon a 8 5 7 0 1 Re: Archaeolo records check for Retail Power Center (job no. 06007.00), 'includin parcel A 216-36- 0 1 9A; 221-04-004 & 004B, -00.3101 -0020, & -001 , located in T 1 2 S, R 1 2 E, in the SE SE and port lon of SW SE Sec 15, and E,1- N El/-,� N W '/4NE'/4, and portions of SWI/-4 1 EI/4& NEI/4NWIC, G&SRBL&M. Dear Ms. Phillips: On March 13, we received a re for wt archaeolo records check for the above- referenced propert I have consulted our records with the followin results. The propert has not been inspected for ,irchaeolo or historical resources snice students exw-nined the area as part of the Northem Tucson Basis Stud in 198 1. In addition, two archaeolo si tes are I ocated w ithi n the project area, mid one i s located on adjacent propert ASM therefore recommends that professional archaeolo perform a surface surve to evaluate the known sites mid make recommendations on testin or data recover plans as appropriate, acrd to determine whether additional archaeolo or lei stotical resources are present on the propert A list of q ualified archaeolo can be found on our website at: 111t :// WW. SW tC III Ll SCU In . ari zona. ed LL'D W f-svcs: 1 ) � 2 r i l l I t S! lie Fill I t lcesoasio The archaeolo y ou select should prepare y our report usin the standards titled- Standartiv For Conductin cmd Re.,poi-lln Cultural Re.,,vource Surve ;v. Most contractors in Arizona have a cop of these standards. You are responsible for providin the report to the appropriate effi ce re the inspection. When surface inspections are re on private lands under cit or count ordinance the archaeolo will also submitted copies of y our report to the appropriate archaeolo site file office. If y ou have selected an archaeolo from the list provided, that contractor knows where and when to submit reports. 'If y ou have q uestions or need fuilher assistance please contact 111C. Sincerel Su Berg ion Arizona State Museuin Assistant Pen-nits Adin inistrator Phone/fax 520-621-2096 sbe ii aro ti ei i i ai 1. a ri zoi i a. c d i i Exhi 11 Arizona State Museum Letter A 1 NORTH NTS Exhibit 12 Well Sites 0 0311411?6 Arizona Departm en of Water Resources W ells-55 Registry' .,�_ -- +via ��� _ 1�ar�r� R rsf Typ P DEPT �# L �' -- — I NAM _ _� -- • P � tj� D- 1i2 -12 1 AL ON JIMMY' & LINDA _ 639765 F E 20 0 8 1 I a � 1 � i W 0 V Q) `LONG FAMILY PT 63936 � E 1 201 0• o 8� • ..._, . _ a �- • - 0:8 w . INGLETON, DE E , E 0. 185 0 • 7 ACAROL • �..I..� - I ; B0450 0' 15 0. 7 8 C AR O L 2l3/8 D-1 1 5 C B `J ARRE LL SAM MY 594939 E 1 6! 2 20 ! 9 5 10104102 517 W D ,r ��++ -�- ti..r k Yom•- �_�_._$ 4Y� -- ��+� �LXI I d er _ . 10 6 �� -y r+y � - -- I LJI�C' j f .. .. D 1 1 5 CDD I TOWN OF MARANA '587027 T 4 63 1 _ 1 30 16 i 11 1 as; w E 01 1022 CL I i F . C 12 -12 15 DAB FIDELITY NAIL TITLE. 801 037 E 1 8 • 172.. 13 TRUST 11 4f 0 W - • - D -- . , 01101155 D -1 -12 15 O C i1L5UNG LAWRENCE C 80 , 6367 F 1 30 I 01 0 _ i 07109192 a w 1 1 2131 160 CIP ICI, I ICI --- - - -... D -1 -1 2 N CITY OF. 1527933 0• 139a 1 18! 0 :5- L. =: /24190 473_ U �A 0 - 12 - B F W MA1 SI 1 T ..�,..�.._.�., . 80132 7 S ..._ , , 0 ., 0 ' :� 1 4 01 w :F 01/01/76 _ . �_ _ D -12-12 22 BR BARNES ROBERT C 30100 I E � 0' 200 ' 110 R DMA ,� JT 8 R �.., _ r 11 0 __ -D D - 1 BSA S O UTHWE S T MI NIN41 E 5 F 280 147x _ 5 -- .f1v 1 13103 587 '1J1l' DEVELOPMENT I NI I i F D-12-12 2 BBC P IMA CO UNTY, 1604773 I N 60 302 10� 1 $ PMA C TY PROP+ MG MT X3#1 8 2 0 A ' _ }aQ 0� • F , . •� _ . -- __ . - - D 03 /03/80 0- -12 22 GBD ORTAFtO- N 1125: 24 3 , 1 + U A _ __�._ • -_— 03M &W a . _... W .. -A ' � - - 01101148 CIRRI , I I 1 r F E 01 /01148 .. _ 1 0 1101/48 f -- - - -- —�- — -- - -- 612548 - �.. _ 0 1 0 0 0 w G a ii[1 1/69 �]' - 1 - 1 �I� � J11� I N�IESTh1EfVT TRU 1 � W d� , ' #�ELIER _ — - -- - F T . — ^ X14 0 W F 2000 ' D -1i -1 BDD A E I AMERICAN CORP. '51 I D 6, 1213 6 � i 10 17/87 80 w .0 111021 �'� 2 CAA �$ F $ 1 � F I 4 1 1_ i 111 1 04182 Uj T CSON rTU SON VVATEF } ,F 388. U E 11/04182 0 - 12 E PIMA COUNTY 520132 I X 3 1 ��' 102 ! 1i� M AMT, �E�''T. 011 188 34 0 M 04/1 88 WASTEWTR, co ... 04 - flo CD r'11,I `oa 1 1 1 veld, brw `Mforr ation -contained in Wells-56 Registry has been submi Ilo d by M weY a ri er or duller. This data has gL-poralfy nal be en varifie af fo accura by AD Imo. 1 03/14M6 Arizona Department of Water Resources Wells-55 Re cr� Ln LI) cc cv 4-D 0 IN '-n a I -D 1 wel b rw *information contained in ePs-55 Pe has been submi Its d b the well owner or drillerr. Thi-S data has generall not been v6fified for accurac b AC)WR. 2 Name 2294! JUn GPAf DEP TH WTR L. D AM COMMENTS C ApAVReaDate Drakf WLL H20 DriffDate a M 04112/88 D-12-12 22 CDA MARANA GOLF INC. 561433 T 350 1 D2 12 -T;561433 0411119 -- 3,23 W D-12-12 22 DAA 'AZ BOARD OF REGENTS, 618722 F 30 183; 110 6 P H Y' S' R E S 6­6 R --- 6 E S 06110182 0 W [-1 -12 2 2 DA C ICORTARO-MANNA -604826 N 3375 101. 20 CWUA 03118182 0 W ,m_ 'A .._,., IRRIGI 09124/79 E 09/24179 D-12-12 22 OBB UNITED METRO 594066 T 09/24/79 Y 10103/02 185 W F WATERIALS INC 0 -1 `1. 22 DCD TUCSON. CITY OF 619942 N 1 720! 316: 119 12 06/=82 0 W E 04101124 3881 W E 04101124 cr� Ln LI) cc cv 4-D 0 IN '-n a I -D 1 wel b rw *information contained in ePs-55 Pe has been submi Its d b the well owner or drillerr. Thi-S data has generall not been v6fified for accurac b AC)WR. 2 03114fO6 I Arizona Depanmerat of Water Resources GVVSI Records WEL_ SITE, Roo. ID LeVhfde LoPg- Owner of Record Own. Date Site Use I Water Us I 4a LO-1 e- 41A- t D - 22256111[62 15 CDO 3222 55111062 101 32-22-54.4 11 1-6-20.4 - D -1 2- 22 ADC 322227111055901 32-2-2-28.3 CWUA -1 I 1 - 1 10-FES-42 UNUSED UNUSED :UNUSED UNUSED 315: D-12-12 22 BIBB 322249111064701 D-12-12 '32-2-2-49 CMID .----L AN-6:5 UN R DETE MINEC. UNDETER MINE04 24' 22 BBC ;3222411110&4601 55-612548 32-22-41 Ili-&46 CARL MOK 1 B-APR-69 WITHDRAWAL RECREATION - 0 200 D- 1 2-12 22 8BD1 32224 1 111063801 '55-604825 GARY SCHNLJRR -- -- - 1. - . - — — - - - - .-- .27-FEM1 1 WITHDRAWAL :FtECREATION 2. 00 • 32-22-41 111-6-36 FRANK RENDON 23-JUN-48 WTHDRAWAL 'IRRIGATION 245, D- 1 2-12 22 :3 0 1 -AP R-92 MITH&�4�'L I fi �i(i�i.ION --- 245: 8 B D2 222319111 0M801 55-801 0- 1 2-12 2 66i 32224311106'3701 .32-22-39 32-22-43 1 1-6-38 111-8-37 'ROBERT BARNES T �WYiFt 0 1 -AP R-92 'UNUSED u NUSED TITLE OF 01 - APR. -92 MITHDRAWAL PUBLIC SUPPLY :ARIZONA D-12-12 22 8D8 3222 331110 3101 55-613783 3 - -3 r 111-6-31 LAWYER S TIT OF "02-APR-92 WiTHDRAWAL INDUSTRIAL - ARIZONA 0-12-12 22 CCS 322212111064201 -55-520132 a2-22-12.2 111-6423 PIMA COUNTY 12-APR-88 OBSERVATION OBSERVATION 170' WASTEWATER - D-12-12 22 DACI '322213111060201 D-1 -12 22 DAC2 32 22121110-60 ' '32-22-13 .111-6-2 Cw UA 01-APR-24 UNUSED 'UNUSED 31& 101 55-6M26 32-22-12�5 1111 -6-1 A CMID 24-SEP-79 !WITHDRAWAL IRRI TI OIL 1033' 0- 1 2-12 22 DCD 322200111060401 .55-619942 :32-22-0 1 11164 ICITY OF TUCSON __ IMTHDRAWAL PUBLIC SUP 316 UD Lh �0 14 g wSixw55,bF-w Note that sorma welt data ma b e a utdated and �o lon a c;cuf-a re- WELLS REGISTRY REPORT — COD D Ln (ARIZONA, DEPAF TM E OF WATER RESOURCES * LOCATION: location of well given as Quad Township-Range Section Q1 02 Q3 Qua (Arizona) Quad: B = Towrlshii�p NORTH, Range WEST A = Township NORTH, Range EAST - Township SOUTH, Range WEST D = Township SOUTH Range EAST IN 1 i a Quarter Section (1 S 0 acres) B A is a Qua of a Quarte Section (Q uarter /Quarter Section) (0 acres T ownship norl Township North C5 Q 3 is a Q of a Qu arter/ uar't r Section (10 acres) RON B Wev Rangy East Q uarter = N E B= N W C= SW D= SE C D AEG I T: ADW R wefl registr tic n number (Search http : / /imagedre .water.a .gov for records.) owrishp tai Townshi South rt angs Wes Range East ■ NAM name of current well owner reoard ed in we registry T17S R12"E r TYPE: WELL TYPE codes A = RECOVERY Y A = AIR SPARGING B = INJECTION C = CATHODIC D= DOMEST(C STOCK EXEMPT E = EXEMPT F = NON-EXEMPT SLAM P PU SIP, TIDE N DH OR SAND POINTS G = GE OTEOH N I AL H = H EAT P M P I = M I NEI AL E PLO ATI ON MN = MONITOR N R NON-EXEMPT EMP'T = NON- 130MESTIC EXEMPT OT = OTH EFL P = WITH DRAWAL PERMIT PZ = PIEZOMETER Q _ REPLACEMENT EM.EiNT WEL L I N NEW LO AT[ N R = GROUN DIN = SERVICE SV = SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION T = NON-SERVICE = MONITOR R PIEZOMETER D 1 7 11 VFW: = VADOSE ZONE FOR RECHARGE VZ = VAB SE ZONE Z t EXPLORATION (40 a G PM: pumping capacity of well (gallons per minute) s DEPTH: depth of well (feet) i DID : d iameter of cas i ng (inches) ■ wTR L' L: distance from land surface to water (feet) COMM ENTS include additiona notes about the wall. Note that ICO stands for "in Care f *, but may includ ether helpful metes; also note that "1P ,` 'L F Indicates the we was not d or was aban� oni d and the registration has been cancelled, ■ CK 'Y' demotes well regi stration has been cance 0171 __ . , ■ APP /RE DATE: On e i sting wel Is, the date the well waS reg Gst red with A IOW P. -OR- On n ew wel Is, the date the owner a ppli ed to thrill the new wel I. 0 DRILLER: ADD R Driller License num (Lookup Driller name & contact info by Driller# at h ttp : / /www.water. a .gov /adwr /co me nt/Dril lers/Li tB L io um. asp) C CL 0 0 awes) WLL: W ELUSITE USE cedes A► ANODE B = G ROUNDING C = CAPPED D = DRAINAGE E = UNKNOWN = GEOTECHNICAL H = HEAT RESERVOIR M = MINERAL EXPLORATION N = CATHODIC Q = OBSERVATION P = PIEZOMETER Q = M N ITCR R T P E HAR E S = SEiSMIC T = TEST D a ABANDONED V = RECOVERY = WATER PRODUCTION WASTE TE DISPOSAL t = DESTROYED S ection N umbering 0�.,.�da i *'> C "4 6 mile T17S R 1 E Section 28 It H20; W ATER USE cede A = a! PI GATI ON B T UTILITY (WATER CO) C = COMMIE FACIAL D = DOMESTIC E = MUNI C [PAL F = INDUSTRIAL = RE RE TI0 N H = SUE DIVISION I = M IN INS; J = STOC K K = OTH E R -MI N E.RAL EXPLORE L = DRAINAGE M = MON ITORING N = NONE 0 = OTHER-PRODUCTION P = UNKNOWN WN = UN KN 0VVN R = RECHARGE S 7 UNKNOWN T - TEST U = UNKNOWN DEwATr=RIN W � UNKNOWN Y = RE MEO I;AT I ON 14/4)20051 10 11 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 19 20 21 22 23 2 4 0 2902-7 26 25 3, 32 1 33 1 34 1 3 5 1 36] 6 mile T17S R 1 E Section 28 It H20; W ATER USE cede A = a! PI GATI ON B T UTILITY (WATER CO) C = COMMIE FACIAL D = DOMESTIC E = MUNI C [PAL F = INDUSTRIAL = RE RE TI0 N H = SUE DIVISION I = M IN INS; J = STOC K K = OTH E R -MI N E.RAL EXPLORE L = DRAINAGE M = MON ITORING N = NONE 0 = OTHER-PRODUCTION P = UNKNOWN WN = UN KN 0VVN R = RECHARGE S 7 UNKNOWN T - TEST U = UNKNOWN DEwATr=RIN W � UNKNOWN Y = RE MEO I;AT I ON 14/4)20051 O* �ZD Pima County Wastewater Management Depart 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Michael Gritzuk, P.E. Tucson, Arizona 85701 Director (520) 740 -6500 ent Visit our website: http://www.pima,gov/wwm March 31, 2006 Sue Bromley Stantec Consulting 7373 E. Doubletree Ranch Road, #B155 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Capacity Response No. 06 -08 RE: Linda Vista & 1 -10, 100 Acres on Parcels # 221 -04 -002 , 221 -04 -0030, and 221 - 04 -004A. Greetings: The above referenced project is tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility (IRWPCF) via the Canada Del Oro Interceptor. A 12.5 MGD expansion of treatment capacity is currently under construction at the Ina Road Water Pollution control Facility. Completion of this expansion is anticipated later this year. In addition, operational improvements at the Roger Road Wastewa er Treatment Plant and the startup of the Randolph Park Wastewater Reclamation Facility Nave reduced demand on the RWPCF, making more capacity available. Capacity is available for this development in the 18 -inch publics wer G -200-048, at manhole # 3911 -11, approximately 1.4 miles to the north and west along the 1 -10 Frontage Road. Gffsite construction should be coordinated with the other developers alo g the way. This response should not be construed as a commitment for seN ice or an allocation of capacity. It is an analysis of the existing system as of this date, and is valic for one year. If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 740 -6500. Respectfully, Q OOO "M"M=%ftWW-W- Robert G. Decker, P.E_ Development Services Manager RD:ks c: Subhash Raval, DSD Ilene Deckard T12, R12, Sec. 22 Exhibit 14 Pima County Wastewater Capacity Response M Electricity: Electrical power will be provided by Tucson Electric Power (TEP). Existing transmission and distri- bution lines are adequate to service current and future needs. Part of the property along Camino de Manana is serviced by Trico Electric. Agreement will have to be worked out between the two electric providers and the development for service. Roadways: The site is served by Camino de Manana and the I -10 frontage road on the northwest and by Linda Vista Boulevard on the north which is an east /west arterial. No other major roads are within one mile of the site. The future Twin Peaks Road is indicated as 150 -foot Right -of -Way. Currently, Camino de Manana is a 2 -lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Interstate 10, west of the site is 6- lanes, three lanes in each direction separated by a wide median. The posted speed limit is 75 mph. The eastern Interstate 10 frontage road is a one -way (north) two lane roadway that parallels I -10. The western Interstate 10 frontage road is a two lane, two way roadway that parallels I -10. Several major roadway improvements within the study area are in the planning stages — the most significant being the Twin Peaks Interchange with I -10 and the realignment and reconstruction of Camino de Manana to Tangerine Road. Linda Vista Boulevard will be realigned through the Cascada project to the north and forms a new intersection with Camino de Manana with signalization. The map excerpt shown in Exhibit 15 is taken from Marana's Circulation /2025 Transportation Fore- cast Map. According to the map Camino de Manana is forecasted to be 4 -lanes between I -10 and Tangerine Road. 92 Marana Town Limits N � S 1 � 1 2 M11CS mmi Exhibit 15 Town of Marana 2025 Transportation Forecast Excerpt 93 PART II - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STANDARDS Introduction The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan establishes guidance and regulatory measures for the develop- ment of approximately 170.04 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of I -10 and the Twin Peaks /Camino de Manana Interchange in the Town of Marana, Arizona. This Specific Plan document provides all development regulations, programs, policies, and process for implementation of the plan and its elements. The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan, when adopted, replaces the current property zoning with the development standards contained in this specific plan. The development proposed under the Specific Plan is consistent with the Town of Marana General Land Use Plan, Exhibit 17. Land Use Proposal This site, as noted in the Development Capability Report portion of the Specific Plan, is especially well located. It is located at the intersection of the Freeway and two major roads (Twin Peaks and Camino de Manana) drawing people from both Continental Ranch to the west and development occurring along Linda Vista Boulevard to the east, Hartman Lane to the south and Tangerine Road to the north. The draw will also be from the surrounding community in general. The uses proposed for the plan are based on the anticipation of the market's current and foreseen de- mands while maximizing the development opportunities. The development proposal is the consum- mation of the site analysis, technical information, Town of Marana guidance and market research. Development The development scenario focuses on regional opportunities. Because of the site's central location in the Town of Marana, it is well located for regional commercial opportunities. The property will be de- veloped as a "Power Center" offering opportunities for large -scale retailers. A typical "Power Center" includes a variety of uses clustered together and generally features one or more "Big Box" stores such as Target, Home Depot, Lowe's or any number of other major retail or wholesale stores. Exhibit 16 shows the development concept. Commercial Center (CC) There is a developing "Power Center" at Cortaro Farms Road and Interstate 10, approximately 1.56 miles to the south, and there are a growing number of housing developments planned and under construction in the immediate area. Given the development at Gladden Farms, Rancho Marana, Dove Mountain, Cascada and others north and in the immediate area a "Power Center" development on this site is justified. AN / \ MAINT. � 70' �I 10' 15' �� • , ` PAD 9 ^ RIPRAP APRON 6" GUNITE GROUTED ® @° RO K RIPRAP OR CROSS- SECTION A -A OTHER APPROVED =� EAST INTERCEPTOR CHANNEL STRUCTURAL PROTECTION / PY \ `: \ N.T.S. EXHIBIT. 4.4 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL CNO JOB No. 26028 x' 0 .LECTpR CJ CHANNEL � ' I 5 >wo P ii (> 1111 I \ UIII IIUI �\` / MAJOR 1 / I .200 S.F. -10161 111111 Y I MAJOR 2 I 0.SS0 Sf. I I RETENTION No 1 \ MAJOR 3 � i 23,500 SF. `� ,`\ , nIIIIIIIIIT111111111111111116f111111 .f �,p i \ / I I � aEiENnoN MAJOR 4 ^P \ I zA,os1 sr. I \` ;,MASONRY SITE WALLY� I ` i MAJORS \ 20.101 S.F. ' MAJOR 6 \ fl 1 +H fl* 1 1 1 1 Lfl* MAJOR 7 \ , •i. 8.319 Sf. \ I � N" \ I' Qb \ V S PYLON SIGN 9 \ \\\\\\ MASONR \ \ SITE WALL 1h. `.\ \ PYLON SIGN \ \ A ! P \ ANCHOR \ 03.525 S.F. -- b O yq ANCHOR 2� SITE DATA: ZONING: COMMERCIAL CENTER PARKING REQUIRED. LAND AREA: ANCHOR 1 648,161 S.F. ±14.88 AC. [RETAIL FACTOR = 1/200 S.F.]: [RESTAURANT FACTOR = 60% @ 1/50 & 40 @ 1/200 S.F.]: ANCHOR 2 ANCHOR 3 339,234 S.F. ±7.79 AC. 619,909 S.F. ±14.23 AC. [THEATER FACTOR = 1/3 SEATS]: REQUIRED PROVIDED ANCHOR 4 LEE PARCEL 509,678 S.F. ±11.70 AC. 275,138 S.F. ±6.32 AC. ANCHOR 1 950 SPACES ANCHOR 2 518 SPACES 963 SPACES 518 SPACES MAIN STREET RETAIL 1 898,730 S.F. 120.63 AC. 332,236 S.F. ±7.63 AC. ANCHOR 3 1,033 SPACES ANCHOR 4 697 SPACES 1,068 SPACES 697 SPACES RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 1,407,053 S.F. ±32.30 AC. 294,157 S.F. ±6.75 AC. LEE PARCEL 236 SPACES MAIN STREET 1,098 SPACES 336 SPACES 1,098 SPACES MAJOR 8 PAD 1 91,893 S.F. ±2.11 AC. 104,821 S.F. ±2.41 AC. MAJOR 8 96 SPACES PAD 1 22 SPACES 120 SPACES 78 SPACES PAD 3 PAD 4 36,590 S.F. ±0.84 AC. 35,439 S.F. ±0.81 AC. PAD 3 25 SPACES PAD 4 25 SPACES 38 SPACES 29 SPACES PAD 5 PAD 6 40,837 S.F. ±0.94 AC. 33,548 S.F. ±0.77 AC. PAD 5 25 SPACES PAD 6 27 SPACES 52 SPACES 27 SPACES PAD 7 PAD 8 31,102 S.F. ±0.71 AC. 27,041 S.F. ±0.62 AC. PAD 7 28 SPACES PAD 8 25 SPACES 28 SPACES 29 SPACES PAD 9 PAD 10 83,654 S.F. ±1.92 AC. 48,378 S.F. ±1.11 AC. PAD 9 74 SPACES PAD 10 26 SPACES 82 SPACES 43 SPACES PAD 11 -12 PAD 13 71,971 S.F. ±1.65 AC. 52,126 S.F. ±1.20 AC. PAD 11 -12 50 SPACES PAD 13 70 SPACES 87 SPACES 70 SPACES PAD 18 SHOPS 3 53,770 S.F. ±1.23 AC. 80,385 S.F. ±1.85 AC. PAD 18 70 SPACES RETAIL 1 251 SPACES 73 SPACES 509 SPACES SHOPS 4 SHOPS 5 104,599 S.F. ±2.40 AC. 65,000 S.F. ±1.49 AC. RETAIL 2 1,651 SPACES RETAIL 3 302 SPACES 1,664 SPACES 399 SPACES SHOPS 14 -15 RETENTION No 1 95,954 S.F. ±2.20 AC. 338,378 S.F. ±7.77 AC. SHOPS 3 61 SPACES SHOPS 4 77 SPACES 89 SPACES 107 SPACES RETENTION No 2 TOTAL LAND AREA: 686,946 S.F. ±15.77 AC. 7,406,728 S.F. ±170.04 AC. SHOPS 5 67 SPACES SHOPS 14 -15 94 SPACES 72 SPACES 98 SPACES BUILDING AREA: ANCHOR 1 ANCHOR 1 (G.C.) 178,598 S.F. 11,400 S.F. TOTAL PROVIDED: 7,598 SPACES PARKING RATIO: 1 SPACE PER 8,374 SPACES 152.44 S.F. ANCHOR 2 ANCHOR 3 103,525 S.F. 57,000 S.F. ANCHOR 4 ANCHOR 4 (G.C.) 104,886 S.F. 34,643 S.F. LEE PARCEL MAIN STREET RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 20,067 S.F. 178,963 S.F. 50,258 S.F. 330,061 S.F. 60,370 S.F. MAJOR 8 PAD 1 PAD 3 PAD 4 PAD 5 PAD 6 19,234 S.F. 4,307 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F. Restaurant PAD 7 Restaurant 2,024 S.F. 2,024 S.F. PAD 8 PAD 110 5,000 S.F. 1 5,1 8 10 S.F. Exhibit 1 1 PAD 11 -12 PAD 13 5,000 S.F. north Restaurant 5,000 S.F. PAD 18 Restaurant 5,000 S.F. SHOPS 3 SHOPS 4 SHOPS 12,141 S.F. 15,420 S.F. 13,300 S.F. 5 SHOPS 14 -15 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 18,800 S.F. 1,276,951 S.F. �� //�� `' CONCE S ITE P S PLAN BUILDING / LAND COVERAGE: 20.0 SCALE: 1" = 160' -0" 0 80 160 320 NOTE: THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED WITHOUT COMPLETE INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. SURVEY ILDING COVERAGE TD BE 25%. S P T R U M 0 1 -10 & Linda Vista - Marana, Arizona BMW C: KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC. 7400 E. McDonald Drive, Suite 1 D1 o� f 0 Scottsdale, 0• .0 Job No. 052572 Uses Permitted: • Large Scale Retail • Specialty Retail including liquor sales • Restaurants including alcohol service • Fast Food Restaurants including drive -thru service • Banking/ Financial Institutions, including drive -thru tellers and ATM machines, not including non - chartered financial institutions • Hotel /Motel including those with restaurant and bar • Parking Structures • Gasoline Service Station with convenience store and car wash but without repair services • Automobile service center connected with retail store • Offices • Medical Offices • Theaters, not including drive -ins • Department Stores • Retail Warehouse Outlets • Home Improvement Centers • Drug Store with drive -thru • Pet and Pet Supply Stores including veterinary services, grooming, and boarding small ani- mals • Appliance Stores • Barber and Beauty Shops • Bicycle Shops • Florist Shop • Furniture Stores • Grocery Stores with liquor sales • Fitness Center /Gym • Hardware and inside lumber sales • Residential to be located on the 2nd and 3rd stories only • Similar uses as determined by the Planning Director 0141 Development Standards: Minimum Lot Area None. Minimum Lot Width None. Minimum Distance Between Main Buildings None. (Per local building and fire codes) Maximum Building Height 50 feet, Theater 65 feet, Hotel /Motel 75 feet and buildings within the project which have 2nd and 3rd story offices /office. Minimum Building Setbacks 25 feet from Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Boulevard future ROW. 30 feet from the Power line easement and Drainage Channel. 10 feet from internal streets (PAALs). Minimum Landscape Coverage 10% of site Minimum Parking and Loading Require- As required by the Town of Marana Develop- ments ment Code Maximum Building Coverage 1 25% 100 0 CONSERVATION /MITIGATION FLOODWAY TOWN CORE RESORT Marana Town Limits N Q jj � ' � ' W ` /' \, -E S 1 0 1 2 Miles Exhibit 17 Town of Marana Future Development Plan 101 Transportation and Circulation The site is accessed via Camino de Manana along the north and Linda Vista Boulevard along the northeast. The main access to the site will be provided from Camino de Manana and it is proposed to be signalized. Signalized intersections will also occur along the Linda Vista Boulevard frontage of the property. Kimley -Horn and Associates completed a Traffic Analysis for the site. The report is attached and made a part of the Specific Plan but is under separate cover. Truck Circulation Exhibit 18 shows the truck circulation through the site. Trucks will enter and exit via Camino de Ma- nana and Linda Vista Boulevard. Truck traffic will be able to make a single circulation of the perimeter of the site, entering from Camino de Manana and exiting onto Linda Vista Boulevard. This will keep trucks from impeding automobile traffic in the center of the site, if deliveries are made during normal store hours. For the main street area trucks enter and exit onto Camino de Manana making a loop on the outer edge of the main street. This circulation may conflict with vehicle traffic during normal store hours, but there are any number of escape routes for vehicles to avoid the truck traffic in this area. From the other access points to the site trucks will enter for deliveries to specific stores and leave without having to traverse the entire site. Pedestrian Circulation The pedestrian plan for the site (Exhibit 19) is based on park once and walk. There are pedestrian links within and close to all parking fields linking the inline stores with the main street and theater. Public Art Public Art shall be installed within the project at locations determined through the Development Plan. Public Facilities Water Water service for the Specific Plan will be available along the Camino de Manana and Linda Vista Right -of -Way. Based on current capacity of the water mains in the area, storage to meet fire -flow requirements may be necessary on site or off-site. Final determination of capacity will be made at De- velopment Plan review. The Town of Marana will provide water for domestic and fire flow to the site. All improvements will be the responsibility of the developer. 102 i 1 \ / II ■ S�O� \ l PY / I ■ SHOPS 1 �� � ' ■ Ugllllllllu / �' � ■ MAJOR 1 ■ zoo ss. \ // I i ■ MAJOR 2 . ��``� I ■ O,B80 S.F. ,) I O I C I RETENTION No 1 I MAJOR 3 _ y f 1Hiffl11d ffli1111J 111116 11111.(7 s� '�;'v' \ I I \ 1 RETENTION ePb MAJOR 4 ■ �. � °�,,r'` I 29.053 S.F. U �� \;MASONRY SITE WALL,% /// ■ .'-,. '\ O l MAJOR 5 \ 26,11 6i s.r. 1 �♦ I MAJOR 6 8.963 S.F. ♦. r s I ';.1. MAJOR 7 • T. 1` I ' PYLON SIGN ♦ 1\ \ ♦ � Pry & ys . MASONRY ,� ♦• 'L \ \ SITE WALL \ 1 %. \\ PYLON SIGN G � ANCHOR 01,5255.E AICHOR 0 1�1 / •� J d I �d ° p 0� "� ` � I �� 1 I III I I��■ ffvv 1 f + 1 T Imo u ul 0 p ■ \ � ��� •` ♦ I III I .' O ♦ o F •' Ei1I1, .i9�1111i �ii ��' � � �� • 1111 1 I� a 11 i lls 11■ IulYvn l 1 111 11 11 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 • • MIMI! 11 11111111111111111 11 111 LEGEND: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Truck Circulation Path Exhibit 18 north TRUCK CIRCULATION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1" = 160' -0" 0 80 160 320 NOTE: THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED WITHOUT COMPLETE SURVEY INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. R A N A AAA CD O N 1 -10 Linda Vista - Marana, Arizona ch KURT D. REED ASS INC. 7400 E. McDonald Drive, Suite 1 D1 4 8D . 941 . 1440 Job No. 052572 i 4 V I I � IIli1 l: I I Ilol' II 1 L 611 IIIII'l1II 0 vim MY MAJOR 3 ' / � �! I I Alin / • �� • / - _ , I pl'I 14 o I III III I I I �� IIJIIIIIII II I Illpl! IIFIII II4 � ♦, l�lll IIIII1�1!III Illl l p ipll' `/ � p" ° %PO° `�x°1�'�� Q�I\ � 1 1 NMI \ ' to u I I I 1 • � / � � � � \ �It NININNNNNNINNMI A �� r. I � 1 . `• o .-1 4� � � � ,. � �,��� � 1�eI11�Y�A -111 .1 . 1 - 1 °II\ • �j, // � III`IIII � 1j1 ` , ` 111, � I I I II rl y lal q 1 � t ANCHOR4 Ir I N W ."WEN •, , � ♦ °,00v , � � � , , ,� �� � : o �o�,' ,,I .,, III�OI�NI�I��I�II�O�I��IIMII�I���I n_� � ��I ��' -, ♦ I IIII,�IIIIIIIII IIIIIINII 1 .. \ i� : • / 1 M� I � I �' ♦. �\ oa �/ \ ` � ,� 1111 .1^r.� 1 •., , II II //i ♦ \I I IIIIII �� � �� • � � ` ; % � \�,, IIIIII. \III�1111jII1I111�IIIn �� �� �� .. o ° ° o ° °a . ,\ • '. V ��P � \ �.',� IIII III 1' ° O LEGEND: • • • • Pedestrian Circulation Path AlL ARML Pedestrian Node Exhibit 19 north PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1" = 160' -0" 0 80 160 320 NOTE: THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED WITHOUT COMPLETE SURVEY INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. R A N A O N 1 -10 Linda Vista - Marana, Arizona M KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC. 7400 E. McDonald Drive, Suite 1 D1 0 ', . , , Job No. .; Sewer The developer will need to provide a line connecting to the current Pima County WWM line approxi- mately 1.4 miles north of the property. An agreement will be entered into for development of on -site and off -site lines in accordance with current Pima county requirements for sewer service. The Cascada Project (Red Point Development) has extended the sewer line from the manhole #3911 -11 south along the Frontage Road and east along Camino de Manana. There may be the ability to connect into this sewer with an agreement between Red Point Development, Barclay Group and Pima County Waste- water Management. Natural Gas Southwest Natural Gas Company will provide natural gas services in the Specific Plan Area. Develop- ers may be required to install or relocate gas facilities concurrent with the development of the proj- ect. Telecommunications Telephone service to the Specific Plan Area is provided by Qwest Communications. The developer will coordinate with Qwest for the relocation (if necessary) of existing facilities and installation of new service. Comcast Cable provides cable television service within the Town of Marana. Grading This property does not contain a significant amount of vegetation that is worthy of salvage, except a few saguaros. Any significant vegetation found at the time of the preparation of the Native Plant Preservation Plan shall be handled per the Town of Marana Land Development Code and Arizona State law. Any plants salvaged shall be placed in an on -site nursery and be used to revegetate areas within the project. 107 PaD 9 20 SF. 9 � PY - � NORTH G 40 0 _- ti� v I 0 � s - y RETENTION B IN TOP ELEVATIO = 2125.00 v l _ BOTTOM EL EVA ON'' \ \ - = 2115.00 \ I I MA�QNRY SITE WRL I OR 6 I \\ Q Q \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` - SITE R LL \ - PYLON S s \ �2 2 \ W: \active\181506004\drawings\06004 site.dwg v v v 2007 -01 -17 04:1 1 PM By: Itruong m Stantec Consulting Inc. 8211 South 48th Street Phoenix AZ U.S.A. 85044 Tel. 602.438.2200 StantK Fax. 602.431.9562 0 www.stantec.com LEGEND x FG = FUTURE GRADE o EG = EXISTING GRADE o� r � OR 4 FF = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 3 f I • \ 1 A le #CFS OFFSITE STORMWATER r 00or ; v �r ,I PEAK DISCHARGE III '00 pr V ANpasz 2 RETENTION B SIN I TOP EL T N - - _ �' = 2140.0 PYLON SIGN - OTTOM ELEVA - - p �- -- - -- -- = - - - - - - _ — - -_— JANUARY 2007 181506004 Client /Project BARCLAY GROUP 1 -10 & LINDA VISTA MARANA, AR IZONA Exhibit 20 0 400' 600' 800 Title 1:400 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRELIMINARY GRADING CONCEPT SPECIFIC PLAN EXHIBIT Hydrology Plan Removing the project site from the floodplain area will require drainage structures along the north and east property boundaries to collect stormwater and convey it through or around the site to the UPRR. the analysis to develop a preliminary drainage design concept for this project was conducted assuming the presence of an improved roadway section along the segment of Linda Vista Boulevard adjoining the north property boundary. this analysis assumes that drainage culverts with capacity adequate to convey the 100 -year discharge beneath the roadway will be constructed in conjunction with the roadway improvements and that these culverts will provide a control point for collecting stormwater flows along the north property boundary. The locations and sizes of the culverts will con- form to the roadway design requirements. The analysis also assumes that drainage improvements to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the Twin Peals interchange will be in place and will provide a functional connection for discharge of flows at the downstream property boundary (where applicable). Flows entering the project site at CP #2 (772 cfs) along the north property boundary will be conveyed beneath Linda Vista Boulevard in a new 2 -6'x6' concrete box culvert (CBC) or equivalent (See Exhibit 21). This storm water will be collected at the culvert outlet by a drainage channel having a topwidth of 20 to 40 feet and depth of 4 to 5 feet. This channel will convey flow west along the south side of Linda Vista Boulevard, to a point of confluence with the CP #3. Both flows will be conveyed west by a 2 -7'x5' CSC beneath the project to the west side of the Camino de Manana TI. This underground drainage structure will outlet within the Linda Vista right of way west of Camino de Manana, then be conveyed via a new channel to an existing culvert beneath the UPRR. Flows entering the project site at CP #3 (310 cfs) along the north property boundary will be conveyed beneath Linda Vista Boulevard in a new 8'x4' CBC or equivalent. This culvert will be adequate to convey the 100 -year discharge beneath the roadway surface. The project improvements will include continuation of the 8'x4' CBC or CONARCH culvert beneath the project site to a point of confluence with the culvert constructed to convey storm water emanating from CP #2. A channel is proposed on the east project boundary to intercept flow along the wash draining to CP #1 (up to 1312 cfs). The north end of this channel will begin about 200 feet south of Linda Vista Road. Flows entering the property at CP #1 will be collected within the channel along the east property boundary and directed south to a UPRR trestle bridge. Minor sheetflow entering the property south of CP #1 will also be collected within the interceptor channel and directed south. This channel will ter- minate at the UPRR right of way and will be aligned to direct flows toward the existing trestle bridge at the southeast property corner. The interceptor channel will have a topwidth of up to 70 feet, depth of 2 to 4 feet, and 1 horizontal to 1 vertical sideslopes. The channel bottom will be earthen, but a concrete or riprap lining may be provided where concentrated flows enter the channel (such as at CP #1). A riprap apron may also be included to line the section of the channel bottom adjoining the east bank. The purpose of this riprap apron is to control erosion where side flows will spill over the bank. A typical cross section of the chan- nel is provided on Exhibit 22. This channel will be designed to conform to interceptor channel design standards which include a channel depth along the west bank that is two times the depth of flow. In addition, the design capacity for the channel will include 1 to 2 feet of sediment storage, the purpose of which is to comply with FEMA standards for flows emanating from an alluvial fan. 111 The existing UPRR trestle bridge at the southwest property corner has adequate capacity to convey 470 cfs. Additional flows will arrive at this location as a result of stormwater accumulating along the UPRR from watersheds south of the project site. Flows in excess of the capacity of the trestle bridge will be conveyed north along the UPRR within railroad and TEP right of way and within a portion of the project site. A 30 foot setback from the west property line will be provided for drainage convey- ance. The area to be provided for conveyance of flow along the UPRR will be adequate to contain flows between the railroad embankment and the limit of development without resulting in an increase in the water surface elevation of more than 0.1 feet. Slope stabilization will be provided along the edge of development to control potential erosion. the threat of erosion along this embankment is minimal because flow velocities do not exceed 4 feet per second (fps) except during the 100 year return period storm. Stormwater being conveyed within the railroad right of way will drain north to the next drain- age structure (Culvert #13 on Exhibit 21) beneath the UPRR where an additional 384 cfs will be con- veyed through 2 - 17'x4' timber bridge to Interstate 10. Flows in excess of the capacity of this culvert will drain north and be intercepted by the drainage improvements being constructed in conjunction with the Twin Peals Road interchange. Onsite stormwater runoff from the project area will be directed to two retention/ detention basins. One is located at the northwest corner of the property, and the second will be located at the southeast corner of the property. Onsite stormwater will be conveyed to these locations via underground storm drain systems and within the driveways and parking lots to be constructed throughout the project. The total estimated peals flow generated from onsite (developed conditions) runoff is estimated to be about 830 cfs. The total stormwater retention/ detention volume is estimated to be about 830 cfs. The total stormwater retention/ detention volume needed to comply with critical basin criteria is estimated to be about 20 acre -feet. The basins have a total area of approximately 13 acres, so the anticipated re- tention /detention storage depth will be about 2.5 to 3 feet. Stormwater collected within these basins will be outlet to the UPRR and TEP right of way which is where flows currently concentrate. The peals outlet discharge from the basins is anticipated to be about 610 cfs during the 100 -year return period storm. The location of the proposed retention/ detention basins are provided on Exhibit 22 of this re- port. The estimated peals inflow to the basin is 830 cfs which assumes a 90% impervious cover over the project area. The peals outflow from the basin during the 100 -year return period storm will be 85% or less of the existing conditions peals runoff rate in compliance with critical basin criteria. 112