HomeMy WebLinkAboutAmended Council Packet 08-02-2016Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 1 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 2 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 3 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 4 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 5 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 6 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 7 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-075
RELATING TO MUNICIPAL COURT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY
AND THE TOWN OF MARANA FOR PAYMENT FOR THE INCARCERATION OF MU-
NICIPAL PRISONERSFOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2016THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017
WHEREAS the Town of Marana requires the use of an appropriate facility for the incar-
ceration of its prisoners; and
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana have determined that the Pi-
ma County Adult Detention Center (PCADC), owned and operated by Pima County, Arizona,
will fulfill the Town’s needs; and
WHEREAS the Town of Marana and Pima County desire to enter into an agreement to
provide for payment by the Town for the costs of incarcerating Town municipal prisoners at
PCADC; and
WHEREAS the parties may contract for services and enter into agreements with one an-
other for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-952, et seq.; and
WHEREASthe Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find it is in the best interests
of its citizens to enter into this intergovernmental agreement(IGA).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, approving the intergovernmental agreement for the incarceration of mu-
nicipal prisoners for the period of July 1,2016through June 30, 2017,attached to this resolution
as Exhibit A, and authorizing the Mayorto execute it for and onbehalf of the Town of Marana.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Manager and staff are hereby directed and
authorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms,
obligations, conditions and objectives of the IGA.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
this 2ndday of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
Marana Resolution No. 2016-075
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 8 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 9 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 10 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 11 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 12 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 13 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 14 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 15 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 16 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 17 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 18 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 19 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-076
RELATING TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES;REVISINGTHE
PROCEDURE FORREAPPOINTMENT OFAT-LARGE DELEGATESTOTHE MARANA
CITIZENS’ FORUM
WHEREAS Section 2-6-1(A) of the Marana Town Code authorizes the Town Council to
create and dissolve those special and standing boards, commissions and committees as the
Council deems necessary; and
WHEREAS Section 2-6-1(B) of the Marana Town Code provides that theresolution
creating a board, commission or committee shall describe the powers and purpose of the board,
commission or committee and shall establish the number and qualifications of its membership;
and
WHEREAS Section 2-6-2 of the Marana Town Code sets forth procedures for the
application, recommendation, appointment and removal of board, commission or committee
members; and
WHEREAS Section 2-6-3 of the Marana Town Code provides that the resolution creating
a special board, commission or committee shall establish the terms of office for its members; and
WHEREAS Section 2-6-4 of the Marana Town Code provides that the Council may by
resolution modify any of the procedures set forth in Section 2-6-2 related to the application,
recommendation, appointment and removal of board, commission or committee members for a
particular board, commission or committee; and
WHEREAS on November 15, 2011, the Town Council adopted Resolution
No.2011-100, creating the Marana Citizens’ Forum as a special committee of the Town of
Marana, describing the powers, purposes and processes of the Forum, establishing the number
and qualification of its membership, the terms of office of its members, and the application,
recommendation, appointment and removal processes for Forum members; and
WHEREAS on March 5, 2013, November 18, 2014, and December 1, 2015, the Town
Council adopted revisions to the Forum process, including revising the number of members, the
member terms of office, and the appointment, reappointment and removal procedures for Forum
members; and
WHEREASthe Town Council finds that revisingthe procedure for reappointment of
at-large delegates tothe Marana Citizens’ Forum as addressed by this resolution is in the best
interest of the Town.
Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 20 of 473
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, as follows:
SECTION 1.Theprocedure for reappointment of at-large delegates to the Marana
Citizens’ Forum is hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated by this
reference in this resolution.
SECTION 2.The Town’s Manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to
undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms, obligations, and
objectives of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
this 2ndday of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 21 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
Marana Citizens’Forum
Introduction
The Marana Citizens’Forum is created as a special committee of the Town of
Marana. The Forum is aninnovative method for increasing citizen engagement
and fostering community participation in Town functions and activities in an
effective and sustainable manner.
Powers
The Marana Citizens’ Forum is vested with the power to discuss,developand
recommendto the Town Council feasible action plans and solutionsthat are
aligned with the Town’s Strategic Planregarding Town-wide, multi-disciplinary
issues.
Purpose
The purpose of the Marana Citizens’ Forum is as follows:
Increase citizen engagementin a meaningful way
Advisethe Council by developing and recommending action plans on
issues of importance
Tie ideas and action plans to the Strategic Plan
Establish a positive feedback loop between the Forum delegates and the
Council
Number and Qualifications of Delegates
To maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the Marana Citizens’ Forum, it is
important to have a Forum fully staffed with delegates who have diverse areas of
interest. To that end, the Forum willhaveno less than 15 and no more than 32
delegates at any one time, with the optimal number being25 delegates. These
delegates will comefrom various backgrounds and experiences and maybe:
1
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 22 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
Marana residents or business owners;or
Appointeesof Marana Regional Partners: theMarana Unified School
District(MUSD), the Northwest Fire District (NWFD), the Marana Health
Center (MHC), andthe Marana Chamber of Commerce(these appointees
may be Marana residents or business owners, but are not required to be);
or
Other experts from the greater Marana area
Atleast 51% of the membership of the Forum at any one time must be made up
of Marana residents and business owners.
DelegateTerms of Office
Each Marana Citizens’ Forum delegateshall serve for six consecutive Forum
sessionsof approximately 12 weeks each, and is subject to reappointment as set
forth herein.
Councilmember and Marana Regional PartnerDelegateAppointmentand
Reappointment
Each Town of Marana Councilmembermay appoint up to two delegatesand
each Marana Regional Partner may appoint onedelegate to the Forum. These
Councilmember and Regional Partner appointees do not require consideration
and approval by the full Town Council.Councilmember and Regional Partner
delegates can be reappointed for an indefinite number of consecutive terms.
Councilmember and Regional Partner appointments can be made at any time
thereis a vacancy. If made during an active session, the appointment will
become effective at the next scheduled session.
If a Councilmember or Regional Partner delegateresigns,is removedor declines
reappointment, the Town will seek a new appointment fromthe Regional
Partner or Councilmember that appointed the resigning/removeddelegate.
If a Councilmember or a Regional Partner does not appoint a delegate or, when
applicable, a replacement delegate, the Town may fill that spot through the
at-large appointment process described below.
At-Large Delegate Appointment and Reappointment
To reach and maintain the optimal goal of 25 delegates,the Town may appoint
delegates through anat-largeappointmentprocess open to the public. The Town
will solicit applications that will be reviewed and vetted by the Town Manager
and/or designated staff. The Town Manager or designee will then make at-large
2
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 23 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
appointments to the Forumbased on qualifications and interests of the
applicants. At-largedelegate appointmentsdo not require consideration and
approval by the Town Council. The Town Manager or designated staff may
make at-large delegate appointments at any time as determined necessary to
maintain the appropriate number and diversity of delegates as described herein.
Upon the expiration of an at-large delegate’s term, the delegate may reapply to
serve on the Forum under the at-large appointment process described in this
section. The reappointment of an at-large delegate is not automatic; the delegate
must re-apply and be selected as described in this section.
Removal of Delegates
Removal of Marana Citizens’ Forum delegates shall be in accordance with
Section 2-6-2(G) of the Marana Town Code, except for removal of delegates due
to poor attendance at Forum meetings. Forum delegates who are absent without
prior excuse from twoor more meetings during a Forum sessionshall be
considered to have resigned and the Town shall not be required to take any
further action to remove the delegatefrom the Forum membership.
Marana Citizens’ Forum Process
Forum Sessions
Town staff will determine the number of Forum sessions that will take place in
anygiven calendar year, but generally it will be threesessions per year. Each
Forum session will encompass fivemeetings of the full membership as described
herein and will takeapproximately12weeksto complete.
Topic Selection
Potential Forum session topics may be submitted by Forum delegates,
Councilmembers,and Town staff. The Council will consider potential topics,
and each Councilmember will be asked at a Council meeting to identify his or
her top three preferences which will then be tallied to arrive at the top three
topics. Town staff will prepare a brief background report for each of thethree
Council-approved topics to provide context for the topics, and the topics and
background reports will be presented tothe Forum at the orientation meeting.
Atopic will be selected by a vote of the Forum. Topics not selected will be
returned to the topic list, if applicable.
Phase 1: OrientationMeeting
3
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 24 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
During the Orientation Meeting, Forum delegates will be introduced or
re-introducedto the Forum process. Additionally, Forum delegates will be
provided with background information and written materials regarding the
Town. Forum delegates will also be provided with expectations regarding
attendance at Forum meetings and guidelines for meetings, and will be asked to
sign a pledge committingto the Forum process.
Forum delegates will then be presented with theCouncil-approvedpotential
session topics and background reports discussed above. Delegates will engage in
full discussion of the potential topics and will then select onetopic for the Forum
session via a majority vote of the delegates present at the Orientation Meeting.
Phase2: Namingthe Issues
The Phase 2 meeting will consist of an introduction to the topic selected for the
session, followed by a high-level discussion identifying and naming the
Forum
various issues associated with the topic.
At the end of thismeeting, the Forum may request quantitative data regarding
the agenda issues from Town of Marana staff. This data is meant to provide
background and support for the delegates’decision-makingand should be data
that is readily accessible.
Phase3:Data Presentation/Framing the Issues
In this phase, the full Forum willmeet and Town staff will present any
previouslyrequested data. Staff will be available to answer questionsfrom
Forum delegates.
If theForum delegates chooseto do so, they may form subgroups to focus on a
specific portion of the issuesunder discussion. These meetings would be
independent from the Forum process meetings.
Once the data is presented,the Forum delegates shall finalize the issues for
discussion and deliberation in Phase 4: Public Deliberation, described below,
based on the direction previously provided in the background report. Townstaff
will develop strong guiding questions to lead the Forum delegates though the
Phase4 discussion.
Phase 4: Public Deliberation
4
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 25 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
The Phase 4:Public Deliberation meetingwill be facilitatedby a trained
facilitator
and will be recorded by a trained scribe. The facilitator is vital to this
process by keeping the Forum discussion on topic and encouraging participation
and commitment in suggested projects. The scribe will summarize and
synthesize the opinions of the Forum delegates on the issuesat handand create a
consensus statement from these opinions.
Forum delegates will discuss the identified issues with the collected and
presented data. TheMarana Citizens’ Forum istasked with developingspecific,
detailedaction plans to present totheMarana Town Council. The plans and
projects that are discussed within this meeting should be feasible and aligned
with the Town’s StrategicPlan. Forum delegates are asked to commit to
implement their chosen action plans.
The goal of the process is to reach consensus regarding the action plans and
projects to be presented to the Town Council. Consensus does not mean
unanimity in this context, but general agreement among the Forum delegates.
Generally, consensus is reached when no one wants to add anything and no one
objects strongly to the wordingof the consensus statement drafted by the scribe
and read back to the Forum delegates.
At the end of the meeting, adelegatewill be selected to design and construct the
presentation to Councilas described below.
Phase5:Construction
The delegate selected at the end of the Public Deliberation meeting will meet
withthe Forum administrators and other Town staff asnecessary to design and
construct the presentation to Council. The presentation will be based upon the
consensus statement created in the Public Deliberation meeting as well as other
relevant information and recommendations generated during the Forum session.
Phase6:Review
The draft presentation to Council that was created in Phase 5will be reviewed by
the full Forummembership for edits, changes or additions.
Phase 7:Presentation
After Phase6: Review, the Forum recommendations will be presented to Council
for consideration during a regular Council meeting.
5
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 26 of 473
Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-076
Phase 8: Reviewand Follow-up
After the presentation to the Council, Town staff will review the Forum
recommendationsandidentify which recommendations require Councilpolicy
direction and decision, which are operational or administrative in nature, and
those that may not be feasible due to financial, legal or other reasons. At the next
Orientation Meeting, Town staff will advise the Forum what actions, if any, will
beor have beentaken to implement the Forum recommendations.
Advisory ReviewMeetings
Ad Hoc
In addition to the formal Marana Citizens’ Forum Process described above, from
time to time the Town may utilize the Forum as an advisory review
ad hoc
committeefor various Town issues and concerns. Town staff may convene the
full Forum for a “lightning round” in which the Forum process will be
condensed to one meeting for review, discussion and recommendations on the
issue or issues as presented by Town staff.
Alternatively, Town staff may convene 5 to7 Forum delegates, chosen by Town
staff based on the delegates’ backgrounds and knowledge base as well as their
availability, to meet as many times as necessary to discuss an issue selected by
theCouncil or theTown Manager, based on matters of immediate interest or
significance, and render an advisory opinion and recommendations to the
Council,Town Manager,and staff.
As with all meetings of the Forum, these advisory review meetings shall be
ad hoc
held incompliance with the Arizona open meeting law.
6
00047662.DOC /1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 27 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 28 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 29 of 473
MARANA ORDINANCE NO.2016.012
RELATING TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL; AMENDING ALL PREVIOUS TOWN OF
MARANA ORDINANCES THAT ADOPTED A CODE OR PUBLIC RECORD BY
REFERENCE PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 9-802 TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT
REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTE REGARDING THE NUMBER OF COPIES OF THE
CODE OR PUBLIC RECORD THAT MUST BE MAINTAINEDBY THE TOWN; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREASthe Mayor and Council have from time to time adopted codes or public
records by reference pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-802; and
WHEREAS prior to July 3, 2015, A.R.S. § 9-802required a municipality adopting a code
or public record by reference to file at least three paper copies of the code or public record in the
office of the clerk of the municipality to be kept available for public use and inspection; and
WHEREAS effective July 3, 2015, the legislature amended A.R.S. § 9-802 to allow a
municipality adopting a code or public record by reference to file one paper copy and one
electronic copywith the municipality’s clerkin lieu of the three paper copies; and
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find that amending all
previous Town of Marana adopting ordinancesto conform to the current requirements of A.R.S.
§ 9-802 is in the best interests of the Town of Marana.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, as follows:
SECTION 1. All previous Town of Marana ordinances that adopted a code or public
record by reference pursuant to A.R.S. § 9-802 are hereby amended to provide that at least three
paper copies or one paper copy and one electronic copy of the code or public record shall be filed
in the Town Clerk’s Office and kept available for public use and inspection.
SECTION 2. The various Town officers and employees are authorized and directed to
perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this ordinance.
SECTION 3. This ordinance is administrative, and shall be effective immediately.
00047684.DOCX /1
-1 -
Marana OrdinanceNo.2016.012
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 30 of 473
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
MARANA, ARIZONA, this 2ndday of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
00047684.DOCX /1
-2 -
Marana OrdinanceNo.2016.012
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 31 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 32 of 473
MARANA TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES
11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
Council Chambers, June 28, 2016 at or after 6:00 P.M.
Ed Honea, Mayor
Jon Post, Vice Mayor
David Bowen, Council Member
Patti Comerford, Council Member
Herb Kai, Council Member
Carol McGorray, Council Member
Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. Mayor Honea
called the meeting to order at
Town Clerk Bronson
6:03 p.m. called roll. Council Members Kai and McGorray were
excused. There was a quorum present.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE.
Led by
Mayor Honea.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion to approve by Council Member Ziegler, second
by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 5-0.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC.
No speaker cards were presented.
PROCLAMATIONS
P1 Proclaiming August 2016 as Drowning Impact Awareness Month. Introduced by
Jocelyn Bronson.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS.
Council Member Ziegler
announced the upcoming Star Spangled Spectacular on July
th
4at Crossroads Park.
MANAGER’S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS.
No report.
PRESENTATIONS
1
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 33 of 473
P1 Presentation: Relating to the Marana Regional Airport; presentation and
discussion regarding updates to the Marana Regional Airport Master Plan and Business
Steve Miller
Plan.presented this item, noting that the processes for both the Master Plan
and the Business Plan development beganin August, 2015. Armstrong Consultants and
Genesis Consultingwere the firms working on these plans. The last time a master plan
update was done was 2007. His goal for this plan is to right-size the future goalsfor the
airport in the hope that the projects will be more fundable by the FAA and ADOT. A lot
of what we have is fixing existing infrastructure as opposed to adding more pavement and
CharlieMcDermott,
runways.project managerfrom Armstrong Consultantsintroduced
Jenny Watts from Armstrong and thenbegan by briefing Councilon the Master Plan. He
noted that the goal of a master plan is to meet the FAA’s design standards and that
provides a safe and efficient airport to accommodate existing and future demand. A
master plan is a 20-year development plan for an airport and includes forecasts in
aviation demand and expected demand at the airfield. It also identifies the assets and any
deficiencies that are present. Also taken into consideration are variousdevelopment
alternatives to improve and enhance the airfield. Along with this is a financial
development plan that includes a capital improvement plan that shows how the project
will be phased over the planning period. One of the most important elements is the
layout plan which shows all of the anticipated development over the life of the master
plan. The plan is a funding tool for the town to decide how to proceed over time. The
layout plan is ultimately what the FAA approves for eligibility of funding.
Mr. McDermott then identified the project committees and their various 30 members. The
committeesincluded a Planning Advisory Committee, a Technical Advisory Committee,
and a Strategic Business Plan Advisory Committee. He followed with data on aviation
demands for current and projected operations through 2035, noting that the FAA has
approved the forecasts. Projected operations by 2035 are expected to increase 41% and
projected based aircraft increasing to 30%. Because ofthe clientele Marana serves, he
also believes there will be more jet traffic at the airport. Over time, the jet fuel sales could
also increase. With respect to the runways, Runway 12-30 is the primary runway. The
master plan will suggest that the Challenger 600 which is the design aircraft todaywill
remain the design aircraftfor the future of the primary runway. For the cross-wind
runway 3-21, the design aircraft is the King Air 100, and the master plan will recommend
continuing with that design aircraft standard for that runway at least for the short term.
Next, he discussed the three planned development areas. The first is the specialty
aviation services complex such as engine shops, airframe and refurbishing and
maintenance and repair. The second is the general aviation complex for hangar
development and flight training and charter services. The third area is a new area -the
corporate development complex -tohouse the fixed based operator, corporate hangar
development.
Some of the proposed infrastructure is a new terminal building in the corporate
development area. The plan will recommend that a second terminal building be
constructed to serve that clientele. Also proposed will be additional aircraft parking,
2
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 34 of 473
Runway 3-21 extension and a parallel taxiway to Runway 3-21, and air traffic control
tower, conventional hangars, maintenance building, a new fuel facility and vehicle
parking. A lot of the projects being proposed are eligible under FAA legislation.
Currently, the FAA funds airport improvement projects at 91%, 4.47% from ADOT and
4.47% will be required from the town. A lot of the development projects will be eligible
under the FAA and ADOT programs.
The final committee meeting was held May 24, the draft final report will be ready for
Council approval in July; FAA approval is expected at some point in the third quarter of
2016 and the final report after addressing FAA comments in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Richard Crossman,
senior vice president for the Genesis Consulting group then
presented the business plan. He thencovered the elements of the business plan and how
it interfaces with the master plan, beginning with the scope of the business plan and what
the business plan offers. The master plan is looking after the formation of the long-term
physical needs of the airport based on the forecasts which are predicated on the past
business. It covers the 5, 10 and 20 year time frame and determines aviation needs based
on forecasts, and it addresses concerns of the development plan.The strategic business
plan on the other hand establishes strategies to achieve the business goals and objectives.
That is to bring in newbusiness, new types of business, establishes the mission and
vision of the airport, and establish strategies to maximize revenue at the airport. The
business plan will develop a situational analysis based on where you are and where you
want to go. The business plan will look at current financials and will share information
with the master plan. It provides direction for coordinated growth and developmentof
the airport. The major elements will include best practices, aviation trends analysis,
vision and goals, identifying target markets, financial strategies and an action plan for
success.
Mr. Crossman then moved on to the establishment of the planned development areas.
There are three“on airport” development areasencompassing the specialty aviation
services complex, the general aviation complex and the corporate development complex.
The adjacent “off airport” area is property equal in importance tothe “on airport” area. It
includes the current industrial zones around the airport, the town-owned property and
privately owned properties. The third area is infrastructure upgrades. The business plan
will looks at what the airport supports today versus what it will be able to support in the
future.Upgrades will be necessary for the taxiway and apron areas as well as sewer,
water, electrical and associated utilities in the next five to 10 years. Those are not
currently in the CIP.
The Specialty Aviation Services Complex is one of the three “on airport” development
areas. The general aviation complex is another area for hangar development and flight
training and charter services, and the third is the corporate development complex, as
noted in the master plan. “Off airport” business development will include trucking and
logistics, airfreight facilities, warehouse, aviation and general manufacturing, office park
development, a flight museum, education and training facilities not associated with a
3
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 35 of 473
school district, restaurants and retail facilities and engineering and research facilities. He
again reiterated the infrastructure upgrades needed.
The next steps are the deliverables, or what you come away with from the business plan.
First is a capital improvement program which comes from the master plan and some
additional recommendations from the consultants to better prepare for how to best meet
those expenses over the next 5-20 years. Next you look at the operations and how they
work and how the management works so that the direction for the future is the most
beneficial to development and business you are trying to attract. In addition, it identifies a
number of goals and objectives such as more corporate traffic, a control tower, and with
an eye to toward economic development we want to upgrade the infrastructure. The
action plan will address each of those goals and objectives. The next point will be to do a
financial analysis and put costs to each of these items based on what has been done and
what future development might bring. Items such as fuel sales could double to what we
have nowwithin the next five years. So, knowing what things costs, when you are going
to need the money for the infrastructure and where it comes from are going to be very
important to consider in your plan. The final item under deliverables will be to follow a
marketing plan to address a specific course of action to achieve each of the goals. We
believe that the business plan and the analysis we have done that the next big push for the
Marana airport is starting now. We have seen increased air traffic within the last couple
of years, and it’s anticipated to see bigger jumps in the next three to five years. So the
infrastructure needs will need to be met sooner rather than later.
The presentations concluded after discussions between the consultants and Council on
clarifications. It was noted that in regard to the control tower which was put on hold prior
to the recession, the town should begin having discussions with the FAA to get that item
Mr. McDermott
back on the table. noted that the unique position that Marana is in is that
it helps to have Pinal Air Park close because of the air space issues that could be helped
with a control tower. It is shown on the airport layout plan because it could be beneficial.
Mr. Miller
That will be a long-term project to get in place.also noted that the town was
just awarded its first FAA grant since 2009.
CONSENT AGENDA.Motion to approve by Council Member Bowen, second by Vice
Mayor Post. Passed unanimously 5-0.
C1 Ordinance No. 2016.009: Relating to Building; amending Town Code Title 7
(Building) by revising section 7-5-1 (Sewage disposal) to update and clarify wastewater
utility and regulatory review references (Frank Cassidy)
C2 Resolution No. 2016-069: Relating to Development: accepting for maintenance
certain public water improvements serving Marana Center Parcel 4 (Keith Brann)
C3 Resolution No. 2016-070: Relating to Development; accepting for maintenance
certain public water improvements serving Marana Main Street Block 1 (Keith Brann)
4
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 36 of 473
C4 Resolution No. 2016-071: Relating to Development; approving a release of
assurances for Del Webb at Dove Mountain III subdivision and accepting public
improvements for maintenance (Keith Brann)
C5 Resolution No. 2016-072: Relating to Marana Regional Airport; authorizing the
Town Manager to execute a grant agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration
for funding in an amount not to exceed $375,664for design of the Apron and Taxiway
Rehabilitation project, FAA 21 Grant (Lisa Shafer)
C6 Ordinance No. 2016.010: Relating to Business Regulations; amending Town
Code Title 9 (Business Regulations) by revising section 9-4-9 (Massage establishment
license application; separate license; husband and wife; additional requirements) to
amend requirements for proof of land ownership in massage establishment license
applications; and designating an effective date (Jane Fairall)
LIQUOR LICENSES
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
COUNCIL ACTION
A1 Ordinance No. 2016.011: Relating to Development; adopting the 2016 Marana
Subdivision Street Standards and the 2016 Marana Standard Details; and establishing an
effective date .
Resolution No. 2016-073: Relating to Development; declaring as a public record
filed with the Town Clerk the amendments adopted by Ordinance No. 2016.011, adopting
the 2016 Marana Subdivision Street Standards and the 2016 Marana Standard Details.
Gilbert Davidson
presented on behalf of Keith Brann. This is as presented from last
week’s Council meeting with the additions for flexibility with various builders as they
work through their projects. Staff is recommending approval based on the presentation
Motion to approve both the ordinance and the resolution as
provided previously.
presented by Council Member Bowen, second by Council Member Ziegler. Passed
unanimously 5-0.
A2PUBLIC HEARING: Relating to Alternative Expenditure Limitation (Home Rule
Option); public hearing pursuant to A.R.S. section 41-563.01 regarding the proposed
extension of the alternative expenditure limitation for the Town of Marana.
:
Resolution No. 2016-074Relating to Alternative Expenditure Limitation;
proposing an extension of the alternative expenditure limitation for the Town of Marana.
Mayor HoneaErik Montague
opened the public hearing. presented, noting that thisis
the second public hearing required by statute before the item can be placed before the
voters and is basically the same presentation that was provided at the first public hearing
on June 21, 2016. All required notices have been properly posted. He then gave the
5
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 37 of 473
overall background on the alternative expenditure limitation and why it provides
challenges for certain types of governmental agencies, especially high-growth cities and
towns, the impact of some of the consolidated election changes that have happened in
2012 and with an overall timeline. There were no speakers from the public. Mayor
Council Member Bowen
Honea closed the public hearing. asked if the expenditure
Mr. Montague
limits were on the general fund or the total budget.responded that they
are over all local revenues. So for the town that would be sales tax, items collected
through the utility system and enterprise funds –basically any revenue. Sales tax alone
exceeds our expenditure limit. Paying for debt service or issuing debt to fund certain
Council Member Bowen
types of projects would be exempt.asked if the League or any
Mr. Montague
effort to modify this formula to bring it up to date.statedthat the League
would tell us that an option available to us would be a permanent base adjustment which
would still have to go before thevoters based on what we believe our current service
level or capacity is. This would be eachindividual municipality’sdecision. There are
Motion to approve
about a dozen cities or towns that have a permanent based adjustment.
extending the alternative expenditure limitation by Council Member Ziegler, second by
Vice Mayor Post. Passed unanimously 5-0.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT.The meeting was adjourned at 6:59 p.m. by Vice Mayor Post,
second by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 5-0.
CERTIFICATION
.I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes
ofthe public session of the Special Council Meeting held on June 28, 2016. I further
certify that a quorum was present.
_______________________________________
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk
6
Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes June 28, 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 38 of 473
MARANATOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGMINUTES
11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
Council Chambers, June 21, 2016, at or after 7:00 PM
Ed Honea, Mayor
Jon Post, Vice Mayor
David Bowen, Council Member
Patti Comerford, Council Member
Herb Kai, Council Member
Carol McGorray, Council Member
Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. Mayor Honea
called the meeting to order at7:03
Town Clerk Bronson
p.m.called roll. All Council Member were present except Vice Mayor
Post, who was excused.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE. Let by Mayor
Honea.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion to approve by Council MemberBowen, second by
Council Member Ziegler. Passed unanimously 6-0.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC.
No speaker cards were presented.
PROCLAMATIONS
Jocelyn Bronson.
1 Proclaiming July, 2016 as Parks and Recreation Month. Read by
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Mayor
Honea
reported on the All-America City competitionin Denver. He noted that the 23 students
who participatedfrom Marana High Schoolwere a great representation of the future of our
community.He noted the several private sponsors and the presence of MUSD Superintendent
Doug Wilson at the competition, along with Sarah Ross, Choir Director, and Heidi Barton,
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 39 of 473
Council Member Comerford
Drama Teacher,also thanked Vickie Hathaway for keeping the
social media sites up to date for the citizens who were following the route from Marana to
Denver.
MANAGER’S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Gilbert Davidson
echoed
the All-America City experience. He also noted the upcoming Star Spangled Spectacular event
th
on July 4at Crossroads Park from 5:00 to 9:30 p.m. This is a free family event with a variety
of activities, music and fireworks.
PRESENTATIONS
P1 Relating to Intergovernmental Relations; report from the Town’s lobbyist, Triadvocates,
regarding the 2016 session of the Arizona state legislature and related intergovernmental affairs,
Mr. Davidson
including current and future legislative trends (Gilbert Davidson).introduced
Ryan Harper
of Triadvocates, who gave an overview of the legislative session and details of
some of the more controversial bills and bills of interest to the Town as well as billswhich failed
and those that made it to the Governor’s desk.
He then gave an overview of the 2016 candidate elections. All 90 seats in the legislature are on
the ballot. Republicans are expected to maintain the majorities in both the House and Senate.
There will be new House leadership teams on the Republican and Democrat side, along with a
new Senate leadership team. Specifically to the town, the majority of the town sits in LD 11, a
strong Republican district, and the current delegation is seeking re-election and isunopposed in
the primary election but face opposition from the Democrats in the general election. A small
portion of thetown is in District 9 now represented by Democrat Steve Farley, who faces no
opposition.In the House, the incumbents face challengers in the primary and general election.
He noted that it is unusual to see challengers to incumbents in the primary election. He then
commented on the federal races for the Congressional delegation and “turbulence” at the top of
the ballot. There are four potential ballot propositions with the most likelihood of making it to
the ballot: recreational marijuana, increase in the state minimum wage, caps on healthcare
executive pay and campaign finance referral.
Council Member Bowen
In response to a question from regarding $86M HURF and how that
Mr. Harper
was categorized –as a reinstatement or reimbursement, responded that it was one-
time funding, so many legislators recognized the need to reinstate HURF funding to the full
formula, but the Governor and the legislature are taking a very judicious approach to adding back
spending and having a balanced budget, and the goal is to have a structurally balanced budget by
next year. That has been the regulator in putting spending back into various formulae, of which
Council Member Ziegler
HURF is a part. asked if there was any talkedabout clean elections
Mr. Harper
being brought down to the municipal level.stated that there is always discussion
and there are some clean elections initiatives floating around, but no one expects them to qualify
for the ballot. Getting 220,000 signatures during the summer in Arizona isvery hard to do.
Mayor HoneaMr. Harper
asked about the recreational marijuana issue getting on the ballot.
noted that there are two initiatives. One is being proposed by a national group, the Marijuana
Policy Project, and the other is a local group. The local group has given up their effort as they
were not well-funded. The national group is actually getting signatures and hopesto qualify for
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 40 of 473
the ballot. The business community has taken an interest in recreational marijuana and they are
gearing up to challenge the signatures and knock it off the ballot. But the indication now is that
th
Mayor Honea
they will file signatures on July 7.thanked Mr. Harper for coming down to
present.
CONSENT AGENDA.Motion to approve by Council MemberZiegler, secondby Council
Member McGorray. Passed unanimously 6-0.
C1 Resolution No. 2016-059: Relating to Elections; approving and authorizing the Mayor to
execute an intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and Pima County on
behalf of the Pima County Recorder for election services (Jocelyn C. Bronson)
C2 Resolution No. 2016-060: Relating to Development; approving a release of assurances
for Marana 59 subdivision and accepting public improvements for maintenance (Keith Brann)
C3 Resolution No. 2016-061: Relating to Development; approving a release of assurances
for Saguaro Springs Block 4 as modified by Saguaro Bloom Block 4 and accepting public
improvements for maintenance (Keith Brann)
C4 Resolution No. 2016-062: Relating to Intergovernmental Relations; approving and
authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Lobbying Services Agreement with Triadvocates,
LLC for fiscal years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 (Tony Hunter)
C5 Resolution No. 2016-063: Relating to Municipal Court; approving and authorizing the
Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and Pima
County for provision of video-court hearings of municipal prisoners for 2016-2017 (Laine Sklar)
C6 Resolution No. 2016-064: Relating to Economic Development; approving and
authorizing the Mayor to execute a funding agreement between the Town of Marana and the
Marana Chamber of Commerce, Inc. for fiscal year 2016-2017 to support operation of the
Marana Visitor Center and provision of services to the Marana community (Curt Woody)
C7 Resolution No. 2016-065: Relating to the Police Department; exempting undercover
vehicles used by the Marana Police Department in felony investigations or activities of a
confidential nature from Arizona state laws related to the designation of political subdivision
motor vehicles; authorizing the Chief of Police to renew existing vehicle registrations for these
undercover police vehicles and to obtain vehicle registrations for new undercover police vehicles
to be used in felony investigations or activities of a confidential nature (Libby Shelton)
C8 Approval of June 7, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes (Jocelyn C. Bronson)
LIQUOR LICENSES
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
COUNCIL ACTION
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 41 of 473
A1 PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-066: Relating to Budget; adopting the Town
Mayor Honea
of Marana's fiscal year 2016-2017 final budget.opened the public hearing.
Erik Montague
Presented by , who noted that the overall budget has not changed since the
presentation of the tentative budget
on May 17, which established the overall expenditure
limitation. The budget before Council this evening has the exact expenditure amount. There
were some minor reallocations within certain categories and between certain funds. The budget
does include an increase of just under eight new positions, so beginning July 1 we will be at
346.6 full time equivalent positions. In addition to the positions, that does include a team
performance pay adjustment of up to a 3.5 percent team pay performance awardadjusted to base
pay. Thoseindividualsat the top of the rangewho are eligible for an award would be eligible for
a lump sum; we wouldn’t be able to add to their base pay, but it is consistent with the town’s pay
for performance philosophy. The budget was noticed for public hearing as statutorily required.
Should Council approve the budget, staff will work to compile the comprehensive budget,the
published document and will submit that to the Government Finance Officers Association of
America for consideration of another budget award. There were no speakers from the public.
Mayor HoneaMotion to approve by Council Member Ziegler,
closed the public hearing.
second by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 6-0.
A2 PUBLIC HEARING: Relating to Alternative Expenditure Limitation (Home Rule
Option); public hearing pursuant to A.R.S. section 41-563.01 regarding the proposed extension
Mayor
of the alternative expenditure limitation for the Townof Marana (Erik Montague).
HoneaMr. Montague
opened the public hearing.provided some background for reference on
the state imposed expenditure limitationas well as some of the options we have as a municipality
related to that state imposed limitation, specifically, adopting an alternative expenditure
limitation.He then gave Council an example of how the limitation is factored calculated on the
1979-80 formula-based limitwhen our annual budget was just above $202,000 and our
population was 1,425. The limitation doesn’t take into consideration our current service levels
which we might not have provided then. The Alternative Expenditure Limitation, also known as
the Home Rule Option, allows the town to create a local spending limit as part of theannual
public budgeting process. The annual expenditure limit is based on available revenues and the
set spending limit based on service levels. This doesn’t increase new revenues through a tax.
The current Home Rule Option expires at the end of next fiscal year, June 30, 2017. To extend
that, we are required send a request for extension to the voters. That process requires two public
hearings. This is the first public hearing, and no action will be taken this evening. After the
second public hearing, Council may consider sending the item to the voters. Home Rule Option
elections must take place at the same time as the regular elections. He concluded with a piece on
the outreach and education component to inform voters about the importance of the Home Rule
Option and then provided an example election calendar of dates for illustration. There were no
Mayor Honea
questions or speakers.declared the public hearing closed.
A3 Ordinance No. 2016.007: Relating to Finance; exempting the Community Food Bank,
Inc.’s Marana Community Food Bank expansion project from certain Town of Marana
Lisa Shafer
development and building fees.presented a request for Council to waive
development and permit fees of up to $5,000 to support the construction of two donated modular
unitsfrom Cottonwood Propertiesto expand the current facilities. The estimated cost of
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 42 of 473
construction currently is about $40,000. Council Member Kai asked how the private funding is
coming along for the construction. Ms. Shafer noted that they will be the recipient of some
Linda Hampton
CDBG grant money and other groups. They hope to reach their goal soon.,
CEO of the Marana Food Bank, noted that they are the recipient of the $40,000 CDBG grant
which is the approximate cost of transporting the portable units.The additional costs of about
$30,000 for electricity and miscellaneous repairs to the units will be solicited from other sources.
Council Member McGorray
abstained from the vote as she sits on the Food Bank Advisory
CouncilMember Ziegler
Committee.asked if the Town could provide additional financial
Mr. Davidson
support should there be a gap in the funding sources currently anticipated.noted
that funds were not budgeted for this purpose, but should Council choose to provide additional
financial support, they could do so through a contingency fee processfor Council consideration.
Council Member Kai moved to approve, Council Member Bowen seconded. Motion passed5-
0, with Council Member McGorray abstaining as noted above.
A4 Ordinance No. 2016.008: Relating to Development; adopting the 2016 Marana
Subdivision Street Standards and the 2016 Marana Standard Details; and establishing an
effective date.
Resolution No. 2016-067: Relating to Development; declaring as a public record filed
with the Town Clerk the amendments adopted by Ordinance No. 2016.008, adopting the 2016
Keith
Marana Subdivision Street Standards and the 2016 Marana Standard Details. Presented by
Brann.
He noted that since he came before Council severalweeks ago, staff has met with
SAHBA and MPA and also given specific stakeholder briefings. Some comments have been
received andstaff has made a couple of refinements. The first refinement wasto reducethe
width of a parking aisle by reducing from an eight foot to a six-foot minimum which will take
four feet out of the street section. One of the concerns SAHBA raised was due to our increasing
the pavement thickness from two inches to three inches which is an additional cost, they hoped
we would find ways to save money in other directions. So we kept the increased thickness but we
have taken four feet out of the street. That would reduce the cost from about $350 per rooftop to
$148 per rooftop, about a 60 percent reduction. In those cases where a developer may be asking
for parking on a single side of the street, the curb section will not be considered part of their
driving lane.
Another change was tono longer consider the curb part of the cul-de-sac radius for the area
where a fire truck needs toturn around. The cul-de-sacs got about two feet bigger to comply with
the fire code. The standard drawings have been pulled out of the standards manual and are now
in a separate booklet being adopted tonight. Tonight’s action will bring all of the standardsinto
compliance.
There was a change to the code that was going to allow design exceptions to only be heard by the
town engineer which would have been a final decision. There was concern that there was no real
appeal authority, so we will add the Boardof Adjustment as an appeal body to design exceptions
should the town engineernot grant them. Another clarification based on developer comments
was making sure we clarified the middle distance needed between the back of the sidewalk and
the garage face asbeing 20 feet. That does exist elsewhere in our Land Development Code but it
wasn’t clear in the street standards. Another clarification addressed a concern that we are making
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 43 of 473
sure we only have a two percent cross slope as a standard slope on a crowned street. The last
clarification dealt with landscapingto protect our curb line from irrigation and root infestation
and things that can cause heaving and other damage to our pavement systems. We had specified
root barriers in several locations. The clarification is that we will require the root barriers, but
they will only be required at trees, not for shrubbery. We came to a consistency on how long the
root barrier needs to be, which is ten feet, centered on the tree, and the main irrigation lines are to
be placed as far away from the pavement as possible.
The final issue has to do with curbing. In the original draft, we suggested the possibility of using
a wedge curb in addition to our standard rolled curb. Wedge curb is used throughout the
community except for Marana, although rolled curb is predominantly used in the Phoenix area as
a Maricopa standard. We were going to remove the option to use the five-inch curb height and
only hold to the Maricopa standard. This caused a lot of concern to the engineering community
which made its way up through the development community and through SAHBA. The concern
is that less drainage carrying capacity in the street means that water has to offshoot in drainage
channels between lots or they have to put in a stormdrain system, both of which have costs to
the development community. We have received a formal request from SAHBA to work with
them more on this issue, and Mr. Brann believes it is a reasonable request. A possible
modification to the ordinance may be to allow the town engineer some discretion to make
modifications to the standards as needed to deal with drainage issues, perhaps for developments
Council Member Ziegler
already in progress which have made application.asked about a
Mr. Brann
three-month compliant phase which was contained in SAHBA’s letter.responded
that as the ordinance is written, it has grandfathered periods for those projects already in play.
As it was written, if a project was approved before the effective date which is about 30 daysout,
then the grandfathering allows them three months to pull permits and build. If thepermits are
not pulled, then they are not compliant and have to go back and comply with these street
standards. For subdivisions that are not approved before the effective date as written, the
ordinance would say they have to be approved at that point. So the drainage issue goes to that
grandfather issue, and Mr. Brann would be asking for more time to work with the developments
that are in process only to address drainage concerns.Council Member Bowen moved to adopt
Ordinance No. 2016.008 and Resolution No. 2016-067 declaring as a public record the
Mr. Brann
amendments adopted by that ordinance. Second by Council Member Kai.asked if
there was any consideration on whether there was discretion on dealing with the drainage design.
Member Bowen
Councilamended the motion to allow the town engineer to have discretion in
Council Member KaiFrank Cassidy
drainage design.concurred. Motion carried.stated that
the ordinance was completely written, and he will need some time to physically change the
ordinance before the Mayor signs it. He asked for clarification that the discretion is only for the
drainage issue and for what period of time is the discretion allowed and is the town engineer
given complete discretion for existing projects, for projects that have a preliminary plat. There
may be too much leeway to decide for ourselves how to change an ordinance. Mr. Cassidy noted
that unbridled discretion cannot be given to any staff member because this is a legislative
Council Member Bowen
determination.asked if it would be better to have the ordinance
brought back to Council. After discussion, it was determined to bring the item back to Council
forconsideration at the June 28, 2016 special meeting. Council Member Bowen withdrew the
A motion to continue the item to June 28, 2016 was made by Council Member
motion.
McGorray and seconded by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 6-0.
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 44 of 473
A5 Resolution No. 2016-068: Relating to Utilities; adopting the Marana Water Reclamation
John Kmiec
Facility Master Plan. Presented by who summarized the Master Plan prepared with
Corollo Engineers.He went over the projections that helped guide them to where they are today.
He began by discussing the Biolac Treatment System which has a current average flow of 0.370
million gallons per day, noting that the sludge disposal costs are increasing. He then reviewed
the growth assumptions, treatment technologies and long-term operational costs. The option
approved by Council was to build a 1.5 MGD conventional activated sludge facility. The total
estimated cost isabout $17.5M withan additional 20 percent for design, permitting and
construction, or a total of $21M. The design and permitting process is anticipated to be
completed by the spring of 2017. Construction will begin upon completion of the design, and the
Motion to approve by Council Member
plant should be ready for use by the spring of 2018.
Ziegler, second by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 6-0.
A6 PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. GFCFD 2016-02: [Marana Town Council acting as
the Gladden Farms Community Facilities District Board of Directors]: A Resolution of the
District Board of the Gladden Farms Community Facilities District, Pima County, Arizona,
approving the final budget for the Gladden Farms Community Facilities District for the fiscal
Board Chair Honea
year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.opened the public
Mr. Montague
hearing.presented, noting that the tentative budget was adopted on May 17, and
established an overall limit of approximately $2.2M. District staff ensured proper noticing of
Chair Honea
this hearing as required.No member of the public asked to speak.declared the
Motion to approve by Board Member Bowen, second by Board Member
public hearing closed.
McGorray. Passed unanimously 6-0.
A7 PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. GFCFD2 2016-02: [Marana Town Council acting
as the Gladden Farms (Phase II) Community Facilities District Board of Directors]: A
Resolution of the District Board of the Gladden Farms (Phase II) Community Facilities District,
Pima County, Arizona, approving the final budget for the Gladden Farms (Phase II) Community
Board
FacilitiesDistrict for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.
Chair HoneaMr. Montague
opened the public hearing.presented, noting that the tentative
budget was adopted on May 17, and established an ad valorem tax of $.30 per $100of assessed
valuation. That is not anticipated based on the district’s current status and level of activity.
District staff ensured proper noticing of this hearing as required.No member of the public asked
Chair HoneaMotion to approve by Board Member
to speak.closed the public hearing.
Bowen, second by Board Member Ziegler. Passed unanimously 6-0.
A8 PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. SSCFD 2016-02: [Marana Town Council acting as
the Saguaro Springs Community Facilities District Board of Directors]: A Resolution of the
District Board of the Saguaro Springs Community Facilities District, Pima County, Arizona,
approving the final budget for the Saguaro Springs Community Facilities District for the fiscal
Board Chair Honea
year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.opened the public
Mr. Montague
hearing.presented, noting that the tentative budget was adopted on May 17, and
shortly thereafter district staff worked to ensure that the public hearing was properly noticed.
The district board is asked to consider the adoption of the final budget which would maintain an
ad valorem property tax of $.30 per $100 of assessed valuation. Currently, the district does not
Chair
anticipate the issuance of debt immediately. There were no speakers from the public.
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 45 of 473
HoneaMotion to approve by Board Member Bowen, second by
closed the public hearing.
Board Member McGorray. Passed unanimously 6-0.
A9 PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. VFCFD 2016-02: [Marana Town Council acting as
the Vanderbilt Farms Community Facilities District Board of Directors]: A Resolution of the
District Board of the Vanderbilt Farms Community Facilities District, Pima County, Arizona,
approving the final budget for the Vanderbilt Farms Community Facilities District for the fiscal
Board Chair Honea
year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.opened the public
Mr. Montague
hearing.presented, noting that the tentative budget was adopted on May 17, and
shortly thereafter district staff worked to ensure that the public hearing was properly noticed.
The district board is asked to consider the adoption of the final budget which would maintain an
ad valorem property tax of $.30 per $100 of assessed valuation to pay for certain operations and
Chair Honea
maintenance costs. There were no speakers from the public.closed the public
Motion to approve by Board Member Bowen, second by Board Member Ziegler.
hearing.
Passed unanimously 6-0.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/POSSIBLE ACTION
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT.
Motion to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. by Council Member McGorray, second by
Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously 6-0.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Town Council
meeting held on June 21, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present.
_______________________________________
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk
June 21, 2016 RegularCouncil Meeting Minutes8
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 46 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 47 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 48 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 49 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 50 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 51 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 52 of 473
MARANA ORDINANCENO. 2016.013
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING A REZONINGOF APPROXIMATELY
36.79ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
TWIN PEAKS ROAD AND OASIS ROAD, FROM 'R-144' RESIDENTIAL TO 'F' SPECIFIC
PLANFOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING THE TWIN PEAKS OASIS SPECIFIC PLAN;
AND APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS AJS OASIS, LLC(collectively the “Property Owners”) own approximately
36.79acres of land located on the Northeast corner ofTwin Peaks Road and Oasis Road, in
Section 14, Township 12South, Range 12East, described and depicted on Exhibit “A” attached
to and incorporated in this ordinance by this reference (the “Rezoning Area”); and
WHEREAS the Property Owners have submitted an application to rezone the Rezoning
Area from 'R-144' Residentialto 'F' Specific Plan(“this Rezoning”), and to amend the 2010
Marana General Plan from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Master Planning Area(MPA); and
WHEREAS the Marana Planning Commission held a public hearing onthis Rezoning on
June 29, 2016, and voted 6 to 0 with one Commissioner absent,torecommend that the Town
Council approve this Rezoning, subject to the recommended conditions; and
WHEREAS the Marana Town Council held a public hearing on this Rezoning on August
2, 2016and determined that the requested Specific Plan amendment should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, as follows:
Section 1.
The zoning of the Rezoning Area is hereby changed from 'R-144' Residential
to 'F' Specific Plan.
Section 2.
A minor amendment to the General Plan is hereby approved, changing the
GeneralPlan designation of the Rezoning Area from LowDensity Residential (LDR) to Master
Planning Area (MPA).
Section 3.
This Rezoning is subject to the following conditions, the violation of which
be treated in the same manner as a violation of the Town of Marana Land Development
shall
Code (but which shall not cause a reversion of this Rezoning), and which shall be binding on the
Property Owners,and their successors in interest (all of whom are collectively included in the
term “Property Owners” in the following conditions):
1.Themaximum number of residential lots within the Rezoning Area shall not exceed 74.
2.Homes on lots 1-7, 22, 23, 37-58, 68, 69 and 74 as designated on Exhibit III.D.1: Tentative
Development Plan shallbe single-story.
3.The maximum number of two-story homeswithin the Rezoning Area shall not exceed25.
-1 -
Marana OrdinanceNo. 2016.013[7/11/16 2:10][CR]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 53 of 473
4.The maximum building height of single-story homes within the Rezoning Area shall not
exceed20 feet.
5.This Rezoning is subject to the design standards outlined in the Twin Peaks Corridor Study
adopted by Marana Resolution 2014-013.
6.The Property Owners shall dedicate land at the southwest corner of the Rezoning Area to the
Town for the purpose of siting the Twin Peaks Gateway Monument, approximate location as
depicted on Exhibit III.D.1: Tentative Development Plan.
7.The Property Owners shall construct the Twin Peaks Gateway Monument.
8.Before the Town issues the first residential building permit for the Rezoning Area, the
Property Owners shall make pavement structural section improvements to that portion of
Oasis Road located within the “AnnexationArea” as defined in Marana Ordinance 2013.024.
The pavement structural section improvements to Oasis Road shall be consistent with the
Town-approved findings of a site geotechnical investigation submitted by the Property
Owners.
9.The Property Owners shall install a four (4)foot wall at the south end of Street E, at the edge
of the cul-de-sac, and afive (5) foot wall on the south side of Lot 58 extending to and
adjoining the four (4)foot wall, as shown on Exhibit III.D.1 -Tentative Development Plan.
10.The Property Owners shall provide enhanced landscaping on Oasis Road, as shown on
Exhibit III.D.1: Tentative Development Plan. The number of landscape buffer plantings shall
be greater than the required plantings cited in the Town of Marana Land Development Code
17.03.07.This enhanced vegetation shallbe achieved through consultation with the
Landscape Architect prior to the Landscape Plan submittal.
11.Compliance with all applicable provisions of the Town’s codes and ordinances current at the
time of any subsequent development including, but not limited to, requirements for public
improvements and payment of application fees and applicable development impact fees.
12.Any preliminary plat or development plan for any portion of the Rezoning Area shall be in
general conformance with the tentative development plan presented to and approved by the
Town Council as part of this Rezoning.
13.The Property Owners must design and construct any roadway, drainage, water, and
wastewater improvements, and dedicate or acquire any property rights associated with those
improvements, that the Town requires based on the data and findings of the accepted traffic
impact analysis, the accepted master drainage study, the accepted WIP, the accepted master
sewer plan, and other studies approved in connection with the approval of a preliminary plat
or development plan for any portion of the Rezoning Area.
14.The final design of all streets and circulation facilities, including gated access (if applicable)
and emergency access, must be accepted by the Mountain Vista Fire District prior to Town
Council consideration of a final plat for any portion of the Rezoning Area.
15.The Property Owners shall not cause any lot split of any kind without the written consent of
the Town of Marana.
16.No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any
federal or state law or regulation or relieves the Property Owners from responsibility to
-2 -
Marana OrdinanceNo. 2016.013[7/11/16 2:10][CR]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 54 of 473
ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including the
Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. The Property Owners should retain
appropriate experts and consult appropriate federal and state agencies to determine any action
necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
17.A water infrastructure and phasing plan (WIP) must be submitted by the Property Owners
and accepted by the Marana Utilities Department (the “water provider”) prior to approval of
a preliminary plat for any portion of the Rezoning Area. The WIP shall identify all on-site
and off-site water facilities needed to serve the proposed development. The WIP shall include
all information required by the water provider, such as (but not limited to) analysis of water
use and fire flow requirements, and well source, reservoir, and booster station infrastructure
needed to serve the proposed development. If the water provider requires a water service
agreement as a condition of service to the proposed development, the Property Owners must
enter into a water service agreement with the water provider consistent with the accepted
WIP.
18.The Property Owners shall transfer to Marana, by the appropriate Arizona Department of
Water Resources form, those water rights being IGR, Type I or Type II for the Town
providing designation of assured water supply and water service to the Rezoning Area. If
Type I or Type II is needed on the Rezoning Area, the Town and the Property Owners shall
arrive at an agreeable solution to the use of those water rights appurtenant to the affected
portionof the Rezoning Area.
19.A master sewer plan must be submitted by the Property Owners and accepted by Pima
County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (the “wastewater utility”) prior to the
approval of any final plat or development plan for the Rezoning Area. The master sewer plan
shall identify all on-site and off-site wastewater facilities needed to serve the proposed
development, and shall include all information required by the wastewater utility. If the
wastewater utility requires a sewer service agreement as a condition of service to the
proposed development, the Property Owners must enter into a sewer service agreement with
the wastewater utility consistent with the accepted master sewer plan.
20.Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Property Owners shall submit evidence to
the Town that all federal permit requirements have been met through the Corps of Engineers
and the State Historic Preservation Office, if federal permits are required for the development
of the Rezoning Area.
21.A 100% desert tortoise survey shall be completed by a qualified biologist at the Property
Owners’ expense and approved by the Town prior to the issuance of any grading permits in
the Rezoning Area. Any Sonoran Desert tortoises found on the Rezoning Area shall be
relocated at the Property Owners’ expense.
22.The Property Owners shall submit an annual report within 30 days of the anniversary of the
Town Council’s approval of the Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan in accordance with the
requirements defined in the Land Development Code.
23.A master drainage study must be submitted by the Property Owners and accepted by the
Town Engineer prior to Town approval of a preliminary plat or development plan for any
portion of the Rezoning Area.
-3 -
Marana OrdinanceNo. 2016.013[7/11/16 2:10][CR]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 55 of 473
24.A detailed traffic impact analysis must besubmitted by the Property Owners and accepted by
Town staff prior to approval of a preliminary plat or development plan for any portion of the
Rezoning Area.
25.Within 60 days after the adoption of this ordinance, the Property Owners shall provide the
Planning Department with10 bound copies, three electronic CD copies in PDF format which
will also include graphics of the tentative development plan in JPEG or other suitable format
of the Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan as amended by this ordinance.
Section 4.
All ordinances, resolutions and motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions,
andmotions of the Marana Town Council in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are
hereby repealed, effective as of the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 5.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance
isfor any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
this 2ndday of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
-4 -
Marana OrdinanceNo. 2016.013[7/11/16 2:10][CR]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 56 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 57 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 58 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 59 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 60 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 61 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 62 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 63 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan and
Minor General Plan Amendment
PCZ1606-001 and GPA1606-001
Subject
Property
®
A request by AJS Oasis LLC to rezone approximately 36.79
acres from "R-144" to "F" Specific Plan. This case includes a
request for a Minor General Plan Amendment from "LDR"
(Low Density Residential) to "MPA" (Master Plan Area).
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 64 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 65 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis
Specific Plan
Marana, Arizona
Submitted to:
Town of Marana
Planning Department
11555 West Civic Center Drive
Marana, Arizona 85653
Prepared for:
AJS Oasis LLC
905 West Calle Catavinos
Tucson, Arizona 85704
Prepared by:
The Planning Center
110 South Church Avenue, Suite 6320
Tucson, Arizona 85701
With assistance from:
WestLand Resources, Inc.
4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive
Tucson, Arizona 85712
And:
APEX Development Consultants, PC
2141 N. Alvernon Way, Suite C
Tucson, Arizona 85712
June 2016
Town of Marana Case No. PCZ1606-001
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 66 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 67 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 68 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 69 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Table of Contents
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 70 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 71 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit I.A.1: Regional Context
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 72 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 73 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 74 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit II.A.1:
Site Location
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 75 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 76 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit II.A.3.a: Existing Zoning
Exhibit
II.A.3.a: Existing Zoning
Exhibit II.A.3.b: Existing Land Uses
Exhibit II.A.3.b: Existing Land Uses
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 77 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit II.A.3.b: Existing Land Uses
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 78 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 79 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 80 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.B.1: Topography
and Slope
Exhibit II.B.1:
Topography and Slope
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 81 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 82 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 83 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.C.2.a: On-Site Hydrology
Please see Exhibit II.C.2.b
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 84 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.C.2.a
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 85 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 97 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit: II.E.1: AGFD Online Environmental Review
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum
Aquila chrysaetos
Dendrocygna bicolor
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 98 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Leptonycteris curasoae
yerbabuenae
Gopherus morafkai
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens
Peromyscus merriami
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 99 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Sonorella eremita
Sonorella
Cyprinodon macularius
Gila intermedia
Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis
Sonora semiannulata
Thamnophis eques megalops
Gopherus morafkai
Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale
Chionactis occipitalis klauberi
Lithobates [Rana] yavapaiensis
Lithobates [Rana] chiricahuensis
Falco peregrinus anatum
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum
Sterna antillarum browni
Colinus virginianus ridgwayi
Strix occidentalis lucida
Empidonax traillii extimus
Athene cunicularia hypugaea
Coccyzus americanus
Panther onca
Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae
Peromyscus merriami
Leopardus pardalis
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens
Antilocapra americana sonoriensis
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 100 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 101 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.F.1.a: Photo Key MapExhibit II.F.1.b: Site Photos
See Exhibit II.F.2: Visibility.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 103 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 104 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 105 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 106 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 107 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit I.G.1: Traffic
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 108 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 109 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 110 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit II.G.1: Traffic.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 111 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.H.1
See Exhibit II.H.1: Recreation and Schools.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 112 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 113 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 114 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 115 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit II.J.1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 116 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 117 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 118 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit III.D.1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 119 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 120 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 121 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit III.D.1: Tentative Development Plan
Guideline #2 – Trail alignments may be located in landscape buffer yards so long as
the required screening can be achieved and access easements are obtained.
Guideline #3 – Paved access from each new development shall connect with the
existing pedestrian improvements (sidewalk, multi-use path) along Twin Peaks Road.
Guideline #4 – Recreation features should be designed to front onto Twin Peaks
Road.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 122 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Overall Guideline – Monument entry signage shall be comprised of a combination of
natural, desert themed materials and should be designed to complement the natural
desert surroundings. Monument design shall be approved by the Planning Director
prior to construction.
Guideline #1 – Development shall incorporate open space that avoids interference
with and maintains functionality of wildlife crossings.
Guideline #2 – Development shall incorporate continuous open space within
developments and with adjacent properties and/or developments.
Guideline #1 – Landscaped buffer yards shall be a minimum depth of twenty (20) feet
with a target screening effect of approximately seventy-five percent of the objects
behind the buffer yard.
Guideline #2 – Plants, shrubs and trees shall be of substantial enough size such that
the desired screening effect can be achieved in a reasonable amount of time.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 123 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Guideline #1 – The maximum LRV for perimeter walls, utility cabinets and perimeter
houses shall not exceed 35%.
Guideline #2 – The color palette used to achieve the LRV limit shall be earth tone
colors. Trim colors shall not exceed an LRV of 40%.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 124 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
(See Exhibit III.D.1:
Tentative Development Plan
Exhibit III.D.2:
Homesite Lotting
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 125 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 128 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 129 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibits II.C.1.a II.C.1.b, II.C.2.a and II.C.2.b
Exhibit III.G.1: Post Development Hydrology)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 130 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 132 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 133 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit III.K.1: Water Service Letter.
Exhibit II.B.2 Existing Land Uses
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 134 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 135 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit
III.K.2.a: Existing Sewer FacilitiesExhibit III.K.2.b: Wastewater Capacity
Response
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 136 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 137 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 138 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
See Exhibit II.H.1:
Recreation and Schools
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 139 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit III.O.3: Fire Service
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 140 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 141 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 142 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 143 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 144 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
o
o
o
o
Exhibit III.D.1:
Tentative Development Plan
Land Development Code
o
o
o
o
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 145 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 146 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development CodeTitle 22 Off-Street Parking
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 147 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Exhibit IV.E.4: Public Street Section
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 148 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 149 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 150 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development Code
Land Development Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 151 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development
Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 152 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Land Development Code
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 153 of 473
Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 154 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 155 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 156 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 157 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 158 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 160 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 161 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 162 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 163 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 164 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 165 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 166 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 167 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 168 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 169 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 170 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 171 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 172 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 173 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 174 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 175 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 176 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 177 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 178 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 179 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 180 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 181 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 182 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 183 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 184 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 185 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 186 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 187 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 188 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 189 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 190 of 473
MARANA ORDINANCENO. 2016.014
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING A REZONINGOF APPROXIMATELY 72
ACRES OF LAND LOCATEDA QUARTER MILE NORTHOF CORTARO FARMS ROAD,
BORDERED BY HARTMAN LANE AND CAMINO DE OESTE, FROM “C” LARGE LOT
ZONE TO “R-6” SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS Laura J. Harshbarger and Redwing Investments, LLC, an Arizona limited
liability company, collectively referred to in this ordinance as the “Property Owners”,own
approximately 72acres ofland located a quarter mile north of Cortaro Farms Road, bordered by
Hartman Lane and Camino de Oeste in Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 12East,
described and depicted on Exhibit “A” attached to and incorporated in this ordinance by this
reference (the “Rezoning Area”); and
WHEREAS the Property Owners have authorized Pulte Groupto submitan application to
rezone the Rezoning Area from “C” Large Lot Zoneto “R-6” Single-Family Residential(“this
Rezoning”); and
WHEREAS the Marana Planning Commission held a public hearing onthis Rezoning on
June 29, 2016, and voted 6 to 0 with one Commissioner absent,torecommend that the Town
Council approve this Rezoning, subject to the recommended conditions; and
WHEREAS the Marana Town Council held a public hearing on this Rezoning on August
2, 2016and determined that the requested Rezoning should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, as follows:
Section 1.
The zoning of the Rezoning Area is hereby changed from “C” Large Lot Zone
to “R-6” Single-Family Residential.
Section 2.
This Rezoning is subject to the following conditions, the violation of which
shallbe treated in the same manner as a violation of the Town of Marana Land Development
Code (but which shall not cause a reversion of this Rezoning), and which shall be binding on the
Property Owners, and their successors in interest (all of whom are collectively included in the
term “Property Owners” in the following conditions):
1.Compliance with all applicable provisions of the Town’s codes and ordinances current at the
time of any subsequent development including, but not limited to, requirements for public
improvementsand payment of application fees and applicable development impact fees.
2.Anypreliminary plat or development plan for any portion of the Rezoning Areashall be in
general conformance with the tentative development planpresented to and approved by the
Town Council as part of this Rezoning.
-1 -
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.014
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 191 of 473
3.A master drainage study must be submitted by the Property Ownersand accepted by the
Town Engineer prior to Town approval of a preliminary plat or development planfor any
portion of the Rezoning Area.
4.A water infrastructure and phasing plan (WIP)must be submitted by the Property Owners
and accepted by the Marana WaterDepartment(the “water provider”) prior to approval of a
preliminary platfor any portion of the Rezoning Area. The WIP shallidentify all on-site and
off-site water facilities needed to servethe proposeddevelopment. The WIP shallinclude all
information required by the water provider, such as (but not limited to) analysis of water use
andfire flow requirements, and well source, reservoir, and booster station infrastructure
needed to serve the proposed development. If the water provider requires a water service
agreement as a condition of service to the proposed development, the Property Owners must
enter into a water service agreement with the water provider consistent with the accepted
WIP.
5.A master sewer plan mustbe submitted by the Property Ownersand accepted by the Pima
County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department(the “wastewater utility”) prior to the
approval of any final plat or development planfor the Rezoning Area.The master sewer plan
shallidentify all on-site and off-site wastewater facilities needed to servethe proposed
development, and shall include all information required by the wastewater utility. If the
wastewater utility requires a sewer service agreement as a condition of service to the
proposed development, the Property Owners must enter into a sewer service agreement with
the wastewater utility consistent with the accepted master sewer plan.
6.The Property Owners mustdesign and construct any roadway,drainage, water, and
wastewaterimprovements, and dedicate or acquire any property rightsassociated with those
improvements, that the Town requires based on the data and findings of the accepted traffic
impact analysis, the accepted master drainage study,the accepted WIP, the accepted master
sewer plan, and other studies approved in connection with the approval of a preliminary plat
or development plan for any portion of the Rezoning Area.
7.The final design of all streets and circulation facilities, includinggated access (if applicable)
and emergency access, must be accepted by the Northwest Fire Districtprior to Town
Council consideration of a final platfor any portion of the Rezoning Area.
8.The maximum number of residentiallots within the Rezoning Area shall not exceed 144.
9.No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any
federal or state law or regulation or relieves the Property Owners from responsibility to
ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, including the
Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act.The Property Owners should retain
appropriate experts and consult appropriate federal and state agencies to determine any action
necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
10.The Property Ownersshall transfer to Marana, by the appropriate Arizona Department of
Water Resources form, those water rights being IGR, Type I or Type II for the Town
providing designation of assured water supply and water service to the Rezoning Area. If
Type I or Type II is needed on the Rezoning Area, the Town and the Property Owners shall
arrive at an agreeable solution to the use of those water rights appurtenant to the affected
portion of the Rezoning Area.
-2 -
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.014
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 192 of 473
11.Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Property Ownersshall submit evidence to
the Town that all federal permit requirements have been met through the Corps of Engineers
and the State Historic Preservation Office,if federal permits are required for the development
of the Rezoning Area.
12.A 100% clearancesurvey for the desert tortoise shall be completed by a qualified biologist at
the Property Owners’ expense and a survey report shall be submitted to the Town and to the
Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) prior to issuance of any grading permits. If a
desert tortoise is found during the survey or at any time during construction, the Property
Owners shall immediately notify the Town and AZGFD, and the tortoise shallbe moved in
accordance with the most current AZGFD Tortoise Handling Guidelinesat the Property
Owners’ expense.
13.The Property Owners shall not cause any lot split of any kind without the written consent of
the Town of Marana.
14.All homes constructed in the Rezoning Area shall be one story.
Section 3.
All ordinances, resolutions and motions and parts of ordinances, resolutions,
andmotions of the Marana Town Council in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are
hereby repealed, effective as of the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 4.
Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance
isfor any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of theTown of Marana, Arizona,
nd
this 2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
-3 -
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.014
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 193 of 473
— Legal Description
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET AS CONVEYED TO PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA BY DEED RECORDED IN
DOCKET 4474, PAGE 335.
PARCEL 2;
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
PARCEL 3;
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12
SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF; AND
FURTHER EXCEPT LYING WITHIN THE PROPER1Y TAKEN IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION
CASE NO. C20001137 RECORDED APRIL 30, 2001 IN DOCKET 11538, PAGE 2589.
PARCEL 4;
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET AS CONVEYED TO PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, IN DOCKET 4474 AT PAGE
339.
Camino de Oeste
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 194 of 473
'EQMRSHI3IWXI
6I^SRMRK7MXI%REP]WMWERH
0ERH9WI4PER6ITSVX
7YFQMXXIHXS
8S[RSJ1EVERE
11555 W. Civic Center Dr.
Marana, AZ 85753
4VITEVIHJSV
4YPXI,SQIW
3011 West Ina Road
Tucson, AZ 85741
Project Number: PCZ1602-001
*IFVYEV]
6IZMWIH .YP]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 195 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 196 of 473
Table of Contents
1
..............................................
1. Anticipated Bene¿ ts to the Community
1
.....................................................
2. Adherence to Town Plans
1
................................................................
3. Proposed Densities and Maximum Number of Units
2
..........................................
4. Mitigation to Adjacent Uses
2
...............................................................
5. Anticipated Employment Numbers
2
.........................................................
5
1. Site Location
5
...........................................................................
2. Existing Land Uses
5
.....................................................................
3. Contextual Information on Property Within a 1/4 Mile
5
.........................................
a. Existing Zoning5
......................................................................
b. General Plan Land Use5
................................................................
c. Existing Land Use5
....................................................................
d. Number of Stories of Existing Structures5
...................................................
e. Pending Rezoning Cases5
..............................................................
f. Conditional Rezoning Cases (approved)6
...................................................
g. Subdivisions/Development Plans (approved)6
................................................
h. Adjacent Architectural Styles6
............................................................
4. Locations of Wells/Well Sites Within 100’ of the Site6
..........................................
5. Topography7
............................................................................
a. Signi¿ cant Site Topography7
.............................................................
i. Hillside Conservation Areas7
.........................................................
ii. Rock Outcrops7
....................................................................
iii. Slopes of 15% or Greater7
...........................................................
iv. All Other Signi¿ cant Topographic Features7
..............................................
v. Pre-Development Cross-Slope7
.......................................................
6. Hydrology
16
.............................................................................
a. Signi¿ cant Hydrology16
.................................................................
i. Off-Site Watersheds Affecting or Affected by the Site16
.....................................
ii. Signi¿ cant Off-Site Features, Natural or Man-Made16
......................................
iii. On-Site Hydrology16
................................................................
iv. Downstream Conditions21
............................................................
7. Vegetation
21
............................................................................
a. Vegetative Communities & Associations on Site21
............................................
b. Signi¿ cant Cacti, Groups of Trees, & Federally-listed Threatened / Endangered Species23
.............
c. Vegetative Densities by Percentage of Plant Cover25
..........................................
8. Wildlife
27
...............................................................................
9. Soils and Geology
29
......................................................................
i
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 197 of 473
Table of Contents
a. Geotechnical Site Conditions29
...........................................................
10. Viewsheds
43
...........................................................................
a. Property Viewsheds43
..................................................................
i. Viewsheds Onto & Across the Site43
....................................................
ii. Views which may be Blocked by Proposed Development43
...................................
iii. Areas of High Visibility from Adjacent Off-Site Locations43
...................................
b. Photo Key Map and Viewsheds43
.........................................................
11. Traf¿ c
48
................................................................................
a. Existing Roads and Access48
............................................................
i. Existing / Proposed Off-Site Streets between the Development & Nearest Arterial48
................
ii. Arterial Streets within 1 Mile of the Project Site48
..........................................
b. Existing / Proposed Intersections on Arterials within 1 Mile of the Site49
............................
c. Existing Bicycle / Pedestrian Ways Adjacent to the Site49
.......................................
12. Recreation and Trails
51
...................................................................
a. Description of Trails, Parks, and Recreation Areas within 1 Mile of the Site51
........................
i. Trails51
...........................................................................
ii. Santa Cruz River Park51
..............................................................
iii. Bicycle Routes53
...................................................................
13. Cultural, Archaeological, & Historic Resources
53
.............................................
a. Archaeological Resources53
.............................................................
b. State Museum Letter53
.................................................................
14. Existing Infrastructure & Public Facilities
53
..................................................
a. Water53
.............................................................................
b. Sewer53
............................................................................
c. Schools & Libraries53
..................................................................
d. Police, Fire & Emergency Services57
......................................................
e. Solid Waste Disposal & Recycling57
.......................................................
f. Other Utilities57
.......................................................................
i. Existing Power57
...................................................................
ii. Existing Gas57
.....................................................................
iii. Existing Communications57
...........................................................
iv. Existing Cable57
....................................................................
15. Composite Constraints (MCHARG) Map
57
...................................................
63
......................................................
1. Project Narrative
63
.......................................................................
2. Conformance / Consistency to Adopted Plans
63
..............................................
a. Marana 2010 General Plan63
............................................................
b. Marana Strategic Plan64
................................................................
ii
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 198 of 473
Table of Contents
3. Compatibility with Adjoining Development
64
..................................................
4. Land Use Concept Plan
64
.................................................................
5. Topography
65
...........................................................................
a. Conceptual Land Use Plan Response to Existing Topographic Characteristics65
.....................
b. Encroachment onto Slopes 15 Percent or Greater65
...........................................
c. New Average Cross-Slope65
.............................................................
d. Perimeter Area Used in New Cross-Slope65
.................................................
6. Hydrology
71
............................................................................
a. CDP Response to Existing Hydrologic Characteristics71
........................................
b. Encroachment / Modi¿ cation of Drainage Patterns71
..........................................
c. Potential Drainage Impacts to Off-Site Land Uses71
...........................................
d. Engineering and Design Features71
.......................................................
e. Conformance with Area Plan, Basin Management Plans & Town Policies71
.........................
7. Vegetation
72
............................................................................
a. Response to Existing Vegetative Characteristics 72
...........................................
b. Response to the Native Plant Ordinance and Habitat Disturbance72
..............................
c. Techniques Used to Mitigate Sound, Visibility, Lighting and Traf¿ c72
..............................
d. Cross-Section Illustrations of Proposed Buffers to be Used Adjacent to Existing Development72
.........
8. Wildlife
72
...............................................................................
9. Viewsheds
77
............................................................................
a. Mitigative Measures 77
.................................................................
b. Areas of High Visibility77
................................................................
10. Traf¿ c
77
................................................................................
11. Public Utilities
79
.........................................................................
a. Sewer79
............................................................................
b. Water79
.............................................................................
c. Gas79
..............................................................................
d. Electric79
............................................................................
12. Public Services
79
........................................................................
a. Police Service79
......................................................................
b. Fire Service79
........................................................................
c. Sanitary Pick-up Service79
..............................................................
d. Schools and Parks87
...................................................................
13. Recreation & Trails
87
....................................................................
a. Recreation Areas to be Provided within the Development87
.....................................
b. Ownership of Natural / Modi¿ ed Open Space within the Development87
...........................
c. Access to Off-Site Trails & How Access will be Maintained88
....................................
iii
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 199 of 473
Table of Contents
14. Cultural, Archaeological & Historic Resources
88
..............................................
a. Measures Used for Protection of all Cultural and Historical Resources on the Site88
..................
b. Resources to be Incorporated into Development88
............................................
c. Measures to be Taken88
................................................................
PART I — PROJECT INTRODUCTION
Exhibit I: A.1 - Regional Context
3
..............................................................
Exhibit I: A.2 - Aerial Context
4
.................................................................
PART II — DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY REPORT/INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS REPORT
Exhibit II: B.1 - Context Plan
8
.................................................................
Exhibit II: B.2 - Existing Land Use
9
.............................................................
Exhibit II: B.3.a.1 - Existing Zoning
10
...........................................................
Exhibit II: B.3.a.2 - Adjacent Speci¿ c Plan Land Use
11
.............................................
Exhibit II: B.3.b - General Plan Land Use
12
......................................................
Exhibit II: B.3.g - Existing/Approved Subdivisions
13
...............................................
Exhibit II: B.4 - Wells within 100’ of Site
14
.......................................................
Exhibit II: B.5 - Existing Topographic Features
15
.................................................
Exhibit II: B.6.a - On-Site Hydrology
17
..........................................................
Exhibit II: B.6.b - Off-Site Watersheds
19
.........................................................
Exhibit II: B.7.a - Vegetative Communities
22
.....................................................
Exhibit II: B.7.b - Signi¿ cant Vegetation
24
.......................................................
Exhibit II: B.7.c - Vegetative Densities
26
........................................................
Exhibit II: B.8.a - Wildlife Corridors
28
...........................................................
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
30
......................................
Exhibit II: B.9 - Soils Map
42
...................................................................
Exhibit II: B.10.a - Viewsheds
44
...............................................................
Exhibit II: B.10.b - Photo Key Map
45
............................................................
Exhibit II: B.10.c - Views from/into the Site
46
.....................................................
Exhibit II: B.11.a - Existing Roads and Access
50
..................................................
Exhibit II: B.12.a - Trails, Parks, & Recreation Areas
52
............................................
Exhibit II: B.13.b - Arizona State Museum Letter
54
................................................
Exhibit II: B.14.a - Water Facilities
58
............................................................
Exhibit II: B.14.b - Existing Sewer Service
59
.....................................................
iv
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 200 of 473
Table of Contents
Exhibit II: B.14.c-e - Public Facilities within 1 Mile Radius
60
........................................
Exhibit II: B.14.f - Other Utilities
61
..............................................................
Exhibit II: B.15 - Composite Constraints Map
62
...................................................
PART III — LAND USE PLAN
Exhibit III: C.1 - Conceptual Land Use Plan
67
...................................................
Exhibit III: C.5.a - Encroachment onto Slopes of 15% or Greater
69
..................................
Exhibit III: C.6 - Post-Project Drainage Map
73
...................................................
Exhibit III: C.7.d - Bufferyard Cross-Sections
75
..................................................
Exhibit III: C.10.f - Typical Street Sections
78
....................................................
Exhibit III: C.11.a.1 - Proposed Sewer Service
81
.................................................
Exhibit III: C.11.a.2 - Sewer Capacity Investigation Letter
83
........................................
Exhibit III: C.11.b.1 - Proposed Water Service
85
.................................................
PART II — DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY REPORT/INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS REPORT
Table II: B.3 - Contextual Information on Property within 1/4 Mile
6
...................................
Table II: B.7.a - Vegetative Communities
23
......................................................
Table II: B.7.b.1 - Plant Species of Special Status
25
...............................................
Table II: B.7.b.2 - Status De¿ nitions
25
..........................................................
Table II: B.8.a.1 - Species of Special Status
27
...................................................
Table II: B.8.a.2 - Status De¿ nitions
29
..........................................................
Table II: B.11.a.ii - Nearest Arterial and Collector Streets
49
.........................................
PART III — LAND USE PLAN
Table III: C.12 - School Capacity
87
.............................................................
APPENDIX A — SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY MAP
A-1
..................................
APPENDIX B — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
B-1
................................................
APPENDIX C — TITLE REPORT
C-1
.......................................................
APPENDIX D — TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
D-1
..........................................
v
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 201 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 202 of 473
Part I — Project Introduction
INTRODUCTION
The Camino de Oeste project is a 72-acre site located a quarter mile north of Cortaro Farms
Road, bordered on the west by Hartman Lane and on the east by Camino de Oeste. The purpose
of this analysis is to identify factors directly or indirectly inÀ uencing a rezoning of this property
from Zone C (Large Lot Zone) to R-6 (Single-Family Residential).
The Harshbarger family has owned and operated 52.2 acres of this property as a working ranch
for decades. Once surrounded by sparse development, the Harshbarger’s property is now one
of the last large lot remnant parcels in the area (See Exhibit I: A.1 - Regional Context). The
remaining 20 acres of the project site are vacant. Recent development, including the approved
DeAnza Speci¿ c Plan, surround the property to the north, west, and east, with medium density
residential homes. In order to provide the best use for the land, this rezone will provide a
residential subdivision that will complement the surrounding communities and provide new
residential opportunities for the area (See Exhibit I: A.2 - Aerial Context).
The property owner’s vision for this site is to create an exclusive residential neighborhood
that takes advantage of the surrounding mountain views and is compatible with adjacent
development. The roads and homesites are arranged in such a way to maintain and preserve
large areas of natural undisturbed open space (NUOS). The Hardy Wash runs along the northern
edge of the project site and will remain intact to provide for an unimpeded wildlife corridor. Lot
orientation and location was designed to take advantage of views onto the open space and
distant mountain views. The proposed development will provide a density of 2 residences per
acre (RAC) that is consistent with surrounding single family residential subdivisions (ranging in
density from 2 RAC to 6 RAC).
1. Anticipated Bene¿ ts to the Community
Camino de Oeste will provide 144 new residential lots to the area. The site plan preserves
and enhances on-site natural open space features, while promoting an ef¿ cient use of land,
energy and natural resources. This development will attract new residents and provide housing
opportunities to accommodate the future growth and jobs anticipated in Marana.
2. Adherence to Town Plans
Adopted plans that play a role in the design approval and development of the Camino de Oeste
project are the Town of Marana 2010 General Plan and the Marana Strategic Plan. It is the intent
of this rezoning to integrate both of these governing plans. This project is in conformance with the
intent of the Town of Marana 2010 General Plan and the Marana Strategic Plan.
The Camino de Oeste project is designed to follow the growth area goals of low density
residential development and open space preservation. The land set aside as open space,
1
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 203 of 473
Part I — Project Introduction
including the Hardy Wash (a riparian area) and on-site drainageways, are the most
environmentally sensitive areas of the site. As a result, the proposed site plan provides a
signi¿ cant amount of open space in the form of NUOS and common area open space.
The project site is located within the in¿ ll area of the southern limits of the General Plan. The
land use designation on the property is Low Density Residential, 0.5-2.0 residences per acre
(RAC). The proposed density is 2 RAC; therefore, no amendments will be necessary for this
development to be in conformance with the General Plan. Camino de Oeste will feature high-
quality design and development that is compatible with what exists in the area and will provide
new housing opportunities in proximity to neighborhood services, including schools, churches and
the Southern Growth Area near I-10 and Cortaro Farms Road. According to the 2010 General
Plan Land Use Designation Map, the vast majority of land surrounding the site is either Low
Density Residential or Medium Density Residential.
The Camino de Oeste project is in conformance with the Marana Strategic Plan that was adopted
January 6, 2015. The vision aligns with the 2015 Town of Marana Strategic Plan providing
opportunities for community and recreation in a key growth area for the Town. Camino de Oeste
is located at the emerging Cortaro Farms Road Interchange along Interstate 10 (I-10), providing
signi¿ cant residential opportunities to enhance the vitality of this growth area.
3. Proposed Densities and Maximum Number of Units
Camino de Oeste proposes a density of 2.0 RAC, ¿ tting its Low Density Residential Land Use
designation. The maximum number of units on this property will be 144.
4. Mitigation to Adjacent Uses
The Camino de Oeste project site is characterized by gently rolling topography. There are views
of the major mountain ranges in every direction. Setbacks from adjacent properties, changes
in topography, and existing privacy walls make it dif¿ cult to have a complete view across the
property from any adjacent property boundary. As part of the mitigation techniques for viewshed
impact to these views and vistas, Camino de Oeste will incorporate landscape bufferyards and
¿ ve foot property walls. One-story homes may be considered in key areas of high visibility. Please
see Part III: C - Land Use Plan for a complete analysis of the project’s viewsheds and mitigation
techniques.
5. Anticipated Employment Numbers
This residential development is not expected to create permanent employment opportunities for
the Town of Marana, but will however create and support temporary construction jobs during the
construction of this project.
2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 204 of 473
Part I — Project Introduction
Exhibit I: A.1 - Regional Context
10
TANGERINE ROAD
ORO
VALLEY
MARANA
LINDA VISTA BOULEVARD
10
CORTARO FARMS ROAD
SAGUARO
NATIONAL
PARK WEST
10
PIMA COUNTY
TUCSON
Source: Pima County GIS
0124
Miles
1 inch = 2 miles
LEGEND
Project SiteOro ValleyMajor Road
Tucson
Marana
Saguaro National Park West
Pima County
3
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 205 of 473
Part I — Project Introduction
Exhibit I: A.2 - Aerial Context
COUNTRYSIDE
MARANA 59
COUNTRYSIDE
CROSSINGS
HARTMAN
COUNTRYSIDE
TEN
TERRACE
COUNTRYSIDE
MANOR
COUNTRYSIDECOUNTRYSIDE
HEIGHTSSHADOWS
DE ANZA
SPECIFIC PLAN
PROJECT SITE
VISTA
71.9 acres
OESTE
SUNSET
ESTATES
POINT
CORTARO RANCH
UNSUBDIVIDED
WILLOW RIDGE
OSHRIN PARK
I10
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
LEGEND
Project Site
Marana Town Limits
Parcel Boundary
4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 206 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
1. SITE LOCATION
The 72-acre project site is located in the Town of Marana within Township 12S, Range
12E, Section 25. The project site sits one quarter mile north of Cortaro Farms Road and is bound
by Hartman Lane on the west, Camino de Oeste on the east and the Hardy Wash to the north
(see Exhibit II.B.1). The project site is bordered by Unincorporated Pima County on the north and
east sides of the property.
2. EXISTING LAND USES
Per the Town of Marana General Plan, the subject property has a land use designation of Low
Density Residential. The main 37-acre parcel is currently, and has historically, been used as a
private residence and ranch with an unpaved driveway to the existing residence, a horse barn,
corrals, storage areas and several other ranch associated uses. The remaining parcels are
vacant with several curb cuts and associated drainage improvements along the east and west
boundaries (see Exhibit II.B.2).
3. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION ON PROPERTY WITHIN A 1/4 MILE
a. Existing Zoning
See Table II: B.3 - Contextual Information on Property within 1/4 Mile and Exhibit II: B.3.a.1
- Existing Zoning. Per the Town of Marana Zoning Map, parcel ID’s 221-14-011B, 221-
14-0100, 221-14-002F, and 221-14-009A are zoned as Zone C (Large Lot). See Exhibit
II: B.3.a.2 - Adjacent Speci¿ c Plan Land Use for land use designations of surrounding
Speci¿ c Plan areas.
b. General Plan Land Use
See Table II: B.3 - Contextual Information on Property within 1/4 Mile and Exhibit II: B.3.b -
General Plan Land Use.
c. Existing Land Use
See Table II: B.3 - Contextual Information on Property within 1/4 Mile and Exhibit II.B.2 -
Existing Land Uses.
d. Number of Stories of Existing Structures
See Table II: B.3 - Contextual Information on Property within 1/4 Mile.
e. Pending Rezoning Cases
Per Town of Marana Planning there are no pending rezoning cases within a 1/4 mile of the
site.
5
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 207 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
f. Conditional Rezoning Cases Approved
Per Town of Marana Planning, the DeAnza Speci¿ c Plan is within a 1/4 mile of the site.
See Exhibit II: B.3.a.1 - Existing Zoning. The De Anza Speci¿ c Plan was approved by
the Town Council in October 2007. In June of 2015, Red Point Development submitted
a residential plat for DeAnza for the 131.6 acres / 265 lots located on the west side of
Hartman Lane. The preliminary plat was approved by Council on April 19th, 2016. The
project is anticipated to start construction within the year.
g. Subdivisions and/or Development Plans Approved
See Exhibit II: B.3.g - Existing/Approved Subdivisions.
h. Adjacent Architectural Styles
The majority of the structures within 1/4 mile of the project site are existing homes that
include single-family detached residential units with southwest and ranch architectural
styles.
4. LOCATION OF WELLS / WELL SITES WITHIN 100’ FROM SITE
According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there are two well sites on the property
(to be abandoned), but no additional well sites within 100 feet of the site. See Exhibit II: B.4 Wells
within 100’ of Site.
T II: B.3 C I P 1/4 .
ABLEONTEXTUALNFORMATIONONROPERTYWITHINMILE
# of
PropertyZoningGeneral Plan Land UseExisting Land Use
Stories
Zone C Large Lot, Single Family
Camino de OesteLow Density Residential1
(Large Lot)Residential, Ranch Property
SR, CR-4, Hardy Wash, Pima County Open Space,
North1 & 2
CR-5Medium Intensity UrbanSingle Family Residential
Pima County Medium
R-36, CR-4,
EastIntensity Urban, Low Density Single-Family Residential1 & 2
R-144
Residential
Single-Family Residential,
C, R-144,
SouthLow Density ResidentialCommercial, Community 1
R-36, NC
Church
Medium Density Residential, Single-Family Residential,
WestR-8, F1 & 2
Master Plan AreaPartially Developed
7 4'+-7 81+43
396')-1%3928=3;23*%6%2%)2)6%00%2'83&)6
6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 208 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
5. TOPOGRAPHY
a. Signi¿ cant Site Topography
The topography of the site is characteristic of the Tortolita Mountains Alluvial Fan. The site
is on the far downstream portion of the Tortolita Mountains Alluvial Fan. The site slopes
from the northeast corner to the southwest corner of the site. The low areas are typically
found within drainage areas and the high points are located in the central portion of the site
where the existing ranch house currently sits. The site contains no hillside conservation
areas or restricted peaks and ridges. There are no rock outcroppings located on the project
site. The elevation ranges from approximately 2,188 feet at the southwest corner of the site
to 2,270 feet at the northeast corner. Existing topography at two foot contour intervals is
shown on Exhibit II: B.5.a - Existing Topographic Features.
i. Hillside Conservation Areas
No known Hillside Conservation Areas exist on the site.
ii. Rock Outcrops
No known rock outcroppings exist on the site.
iii. Slopes of 15% or Greater
The site includes a number of areas with 15% or greater slopes as delineated in
Exhibit II: B.5.a - Existing Topographic Features.
iv. All Other Signi¿ cant Topographic Features
The site does not contain any other signi¿ cant topographic features.
v. Pre-development Cross-Slope
The pre-development average cross slope was calculated using a Digital Terrain
Model contours (DTM) with one foot intervals. The average cross slope is 13.27%.
Average Cross-slope Calculation
Area = 71.87 Acres
Contour Interval = 1 Foot
Length of Contours = 415,276.21 Linear Feet
Average Cross Slope = (Interval) x (Length of Contour) x (0.0023)
Area
(1) x (415,276.21) x (0.0023)
71.87 = 13.27%
7
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 209 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.1 - Context Plan
CASCADA
SPECIFIC
PLAN
ARTHUR PACK
MARANA
HARTMAN
REGIONAL
SPECTRUM
VISTAS
LINDA VISTA
PARK
COUNTRYSIDE
SPECIFIC
VILLAGE
VISTA
PLAN
SPECIFIC PLAN
MARANA 59
COUNTRYSIDE
TERRACE
0
1
DEANZA
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUNSET
POINTE
CORTARO
RIDGE
CORTARO
RANCH
CONTINENTAL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN
QUAIL
WILLOW
OSHRIN
COVE
RIDGE
PARK
ORANGEWOOD
COUNTRY
0
1
HIGHLANDS
MARANA
PIMA COUNTY
GATEWOOD
RANCH
0
1
Source: Pima County GIS
00.250.51
Miles
SCALE: 1" = 1/2 Mile
LEGEND
Project SiteDeAnza Specific PlanContinental Ranch Specific Plan
Marana Town LimitsLinda Vista Village Specific PlanCascada Specific Plan
Major RoadMarana Spectrum Specific Plan
8
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 210 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.2 - Existing Land Use
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
LEGEND
LAND USE
Project SiteSingle Family ResidentialOpen Space
CommercialUtility
Marana Town Limits
InstitutionVacant
9
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 211 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.3.a.1 - Existing Zoning
R-6
CR-3
SR
R-8
TR
CR-4
SR
R-36
CB-1
C
CR-5
F
DEANZA
SPECIFIC
PLAN
R-36
CCR-4
C
R-8
R-144
R-36
NC
VC
R-36
NC
NC
NC
VC
LI
SR
R-16
R-6
SH
LI
R-144
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
LEGEND
Marana ZoningPima County Zoning
Project SiteCR-16CB-1SH
FR-8CR-3SR
1/4 mile radius
LIR-6CR-4TR
Marana Town Limits
R-144VCCR-5
R-36NC
10
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 212 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.3.a.2 - Adjacent Speci¿ c Plan Land Use
DEANZA
SPECIFIC PLAN
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
LEGEND
Project SiteResidential
1/4 mile radius
Marana Town Limits
11
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 213 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.3.b - General Plan Land Use
LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
MIU
RT
MHIU
MIU
NAC
LIU-0.3
MHIU
RT
LIU-0.3
RT
DEANZA
SPECIFIC
PLAN
MIU
LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM
DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
MARANA
COMMERCIAL
LIU-0.3
PIMA
COUNTY
MEDIUM
DENSITY
LOW DENSITY
LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
LEGEND
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
Project SiteMarana General Plan 2010Pima County Comprehensive Plan 2015
CommercialLow Intensity Urban-0.3 (LIU-0.3)
1/4 mile radius
Low Density ResidentialMedium Intensity Urban (MIU)
Marana Town Limits
Medium Density ResidentialMedium High Iintensity Urban (MHIU)
Master Plan AreaNeighborhood Activity Center (NAC)
I-10 CorridorResource Transition (RT)
12
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 214 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.3.g Existing/Approved Subdivisions
COUNTRYSIDE
(1-190)
MARANA 59
(1-58)COUNTRYSIDE
TERRACE
(240-398)
COUNTRYSIDE
COUNTRYSIDE
CROSSINGS
HARTMAN
COUNTRYSIDE
COUNT
BLOCKS 1 & 10
(1-51)
TEN
TERRACE
SIDE
(1-10)
(1-239)
VILLAG
(1-80)
COUNTRYSIDE
COUNTRYSIDE
MANOR
HEIGHTS
(1-52)
(1-125)
COUNTRYSIDE
COUNTRY-
SHADOWS (1-72)
UNSUBDIVIDEDSIDE
VALLEY
(1-123)
FUTURE
DEANZA
SUNSET
SUBDIVISION
POINT
(265 PROPOSED)
(112-267)
VISTA
SUNSET
OESTE
POINTE
ESTATES
(1-111)
(1-37)
SUNSET
POINT
NORTH-
NO. 2A
VILLAGE
WEST
CENTER
FIRE
AT
QWEST
STATION
CORTARO
MARANA
#38
RANCHCORTARO
FACILITY
RANCH
UNSUBDIVIDED
(1-297)
NEW LIFE BAPTIST
CHURCH
IHOP
QUIK TRIP
WILLOW RIDGE
OSHRIN PARK (1-30)
BLKS A-F
WILLOW RIDGE
WILLOW RIDGE
COMMONS
BOB'S AUTO
CUSTOM LOTS
(1-155)
SPA, INC.
(1-35)
OSHRIN PARK
& WENDY'S
(31-113)
TUCSON COMMUNITY
CHURCH REVISION #1
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
1 " = 1,000 '
SCALE:
LEGEND
Project SiteSubdivision
1/4 mile radiusApproved Development Plan
Marana Town Limits
13
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 215 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.4 - Wells within 100’ of Site
506548
100ft radius
630136
640759
630041
601698
597339
647542
650582
636872
640009
Source: Pima County GIS
02505001,000
LEGEND
1 " = 500 '
SCALE:
Existing Well with Identification Number
Project Site
100ft radius
Marana Town Limits
14
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 216 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.5.a - Existing Topographic Features
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project Site2 ft ContourSlope 15-25%
10 ft ContourSlope 25% or greater
Marana Town Limits
15
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 217 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
6. HYDROLOGY
a. Signi¿ cant Hydrology
This section of the Camino de Oeste rezoning submittal includes pre-development on-site
and off-site hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics. CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc.
(CMG) conducted a preliminary drainage assessment for the project site based on the
results of recent hydrologic computations using the PC Hydro method.
i. Off-site Watersheds Affecting or Affected by the Site
Exhibits II: B.6.a and Exhibit II: B.6.b show the boundaries of off-site watersheds that
impact the subject property. The project is located within a critical hydrologic basin as
de¿ ned by the Town of Marana. The upstream watersheds impact the subject property
at¿ ve points. The ¿ rst point is at the extreme northeast corner of the property where
Hardy Wash À ows partially onto the site and along the northern boundary. Hardy Wash
is a regional watercourse with a design 100-year discharge of 3,205 cfs and a water-
shed area of 6,080 acres. The other four points where off-site stormwater enters the
project emanate from small local watersheds upstream along the east property bound-
ary. These À ow Concentration Points, identi¿ ed as CP8, CP9, CP10 and CP11 are
labeled numerically on Exhibit II: B.6.a, and their respective 100-year discharges and
watershed acreages are listed in tabular form on the exhibit.
ii. Signi¿ cant Off-site Features, Natural or Man-made
The most signi¿ cant off-site feature that affects the project site is Hardy Wash, which
drains east to west along the northern project boundary. Just upstream of the project,
Hardy Wash drains under Camino de Oeste through a 25-cell 6’x4’ corrugated metal
pipe arch culvert. CMG has determined that the 3,205 cfs Hardy Wash 100-year dis-
charge is conveyed beneath the roadway through the existing culverts.
iii. On-site Hydrology
Exhibit II: B.6.a shows the boundaries of on-site watersheds that impact the subject
property. There are two onsite watersheds that produce 100-year discharges in
excess of 50 cfs at CP3 (90 cfs) and at CP5 (160 cfs).
a. 100-year peak discharges exceeding 50 cfs.
The corresponding 100-year À oodplains for Wash #3 (CP3) and Wash #5 (CP5),
along with their 25-foot erosion hazard setback (EHS) limits, have been mapped on
Exhibit II: B.6.a. The 25 foot dimensions are based on Section 17-15-10.K of the
Marana Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Code, January 2016.
b. Areas of sheet À ooding and average depth.
There are no areas of sheet À ooding on the project site.
c. Federally mapped À oodways and À oodplains.
Hardy Wash is a Federally-mapped watercourse. The Hardy Wash À oodplains
adjacent to the Camino de Oeste property are depicted on FEMA Flood Insurance
Rate Map Panel 04019C1655L, which became effective on June 16, 2011. The
effective FEMA À oodplain limits and zone designations have also been shown on
Exhibit II: B.6.a. For this project, CMG performed an updated hydraulic analysis
16
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 218 of 473
HARTMAN LN
REV. DATE:
AREA BOUNDARY
TORTOLITA STUDY FLO-2D MODELING
REV. DATE:
03/30/2016
SCALE: N.T.S.
REV. DATE:
SUB-WATERSHED BOUNDARY
02/03/2016
DATE:
OFF-SITE WATERSHED MAP
WATERSHED BOUNDARY
BJK
DRAWN:
HARDY WASH
JLC
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
CHECKED:
JKW
DESIGN:
EXHIBIT II: B.6.b
LEGEND
15-037
PROJECT NO.:
Phone (520) 882-4244 Fax (520) 888-1421
3555 N. Mountain Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85719
WATERSHEDS & FLO-2D STUDY LIMITS - OCT 2008
REFERENCE: FROM TOWN OF MARANA TORTOLITA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING STUDY - HEC1
PROJECT SITE
CAMINO DE OESTE
CFS
Q100=3205
- 6080 ACRES
HARDY WASH WATERSHED
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
andÀ oodplain mapping for Hardy Wash based on new and more detailed
topography than was used in the 2008 FEMA À oodplain study. This analysis
produced slightly different À oodplain limits, which are considered more accurate
than the effective FEMA À oodplain. The updated CMG 100-year À oodplain limits,
along with the associated 75-foot EHS for Hardy Wash are shown on Exhibit II:
B.6.a.
d. All peak discharges entering and exiting the site, as well as their contributing
drainage areas have been shown on Exhibit II: B.6.a.
iv. Downstream Conditions
Other than the previously described Hardy Wash, drainage exits the property along
its south and west boundaries as depicted on Exhibit II: B.6.a. Flows draining off
the property to the west, primarily turn south and drain along Hartman Lane within a
roadside ditch and the road right-of-way. In larger storms, a portion of these À ows
cross Hartman Lane and are conveyed within channels constructed along the north
and east boundaries of the Cortaro Ranch subdivision. Stormwater runoff leaving the
project site along the south boundary, drains within natural watercourses across the
un-subdivided property to the south. In compliance with Title 25 of the Marana Land
Development Code, a SWPPP will need to be submitted with the fee, and reviewed by
the Town prior to issuance of a grading permit.
7. VEGETATION
a. Vegetative Communities & Associations on Site
The vegetation on the site has been relatively disturbed due to development and use of the
property as a ranch and corrals. The property includes a residence, barns, riding rings and
other uses found on a ranch. This use over the years has disturbed the existing vegetation.
The vegetative density and composition vary relative to proximity to slopes and drainage.
Refer to Appendix A: Site Resource Inventory Map.
On-site vegetation is dominated by foothills palo verde, ironwood, saguaro, and creosote.
Other, less frequently occurring species include desert hackberry, barrel cactus, white
thorn acacia and triangle-leaf bursage. This vegetation is classi¿ ed by Brown (1994) as
part of the Sonoran Desert-Scrub - Paloverde-Mixed Cacti (Arizona Uplands) Series of
the Tropical-Subtropical Desertlands. They are further sub-classi¿ ed as part of the Larrea
divaricata-mixed scrub Association.
The off-site vegetation in Hardy Wash is classi¿ ed by Brown (1994) as part of the Mixed
Scrub Series of the Tropical-Subtropical Swamp and Riparian Scrub. They are further sub-
classi¿ ed as part of the Prosopis velutina (velvet mesquite)-mixed scrub Association. The
Velvet Mesquite Association includes Velvet Mesquite, Ironwood, Foothills Palo Verde, Cat
Claw and Whitethorn Acacia, Desert Hackberry, and Saguaro. It is dominated by Ironwood
and Cat Claw Acacia. See Table II: B.7.a - Vegetative Communities, and Exhibit II: B.7.a -
Vegetative Communities.
21
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 221 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.7.a - Vegetative Communities
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Sonoran Desert-Scrub; Paloverde-Mixed Cacti (Arizona
Project Site
Uplands) Series; Larrea divaricata-mixed scrub Association
Marana Town Limits
Sonoran Deciduous Riparian Scrub; Mixed Scrub Series;
Prosopis velutina (velvet mesquite)-mixed scrub Association
Washes
22
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 222 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
T II: B.7. - V C
ABLEAEGETATIVEOMMUNITIES
Drainage - Mixed Scrub Series
TreesShrubsCacti
• Ironwood (Olneya tesota)• White Thorn Acacia • Saguaro
• Velvet Mesquite (Acacia constricta) (Carnegiea gigantea)
(Prosopis velutina)• Desert Hackberry
• Foothills Palo Verde (Celtis pallida)
(Parkinsonia aculeata)• Canyon Ragweed
• Catclaw Acacia (Acacia greggii) (Ambrosia ambrosiodes)
Uplands - Paloverde-Mixed Cacti (Arizona Uplands) Series
TreesShrubsCacti
• Ironwood (Olneya tesota)• Creosote (Larrea divaricata)• Saguaro
• Foothills Palo Verde • Triangle-leaf Bursage (Carnegiea gigantea)
(Parkinsonia aculeata) (Ambrosia deltoidea)• Cholla (Opunita spp.)
7 73(
396')-8)&7)6:%8-32)')1&)6
References: Brown, D.E. (Ed.). (1994). Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. Salt Lake City,
UT: University of Utah Press.
b. Signi¿ cant Cacti, Groups of Trees, & Federally-listed Threatened / Endangered Species
Given the natural characteristics and existing vegetative composition of the site, and in
compliance with the Town of Marana Land Development Code (Section 17.02 Native Plant
Protection), Exhibit II: B.7.b – Signi¿ cant Vegetation depicts the locations of vegetation
inventoried as “signi¿ cant”. Signi¿ cant vegetation on the site consists of large Saguaro
specimens. Several of the Saguaros on the site are large (approximately 20’ tall) and
have arms indicative of age. Although the site overall does not have a signi¿ cant density
of Saguaros, a small area in the southwest corner of the property has close to 1/3 of the
saguaros on site. Ironwood trees, and Foothills Palo Verde are the dominant species on
the site and large specimens of Ironwood can be found in the riparian areas that are shown
on the Signi¿ cant Vegetation Exhibit.
Per Section 17.01.02 of the Town of Marana Land Development Code, the following is
listed as criteria for identifying Signi¿ cant Vegetation:
1. Plant species are native to the area.
2. Plant species composition is typical for the area.
3. Plants are generally healthy and will survive for 5 or more years.
4. Plant density is unusually high for the conditions (soil, slope, orientation, water
availability).
5. An unusually large number of mature specimens of individual trees and/or columnar
cactus species are present.
6. Noxious/invasive species are few and not visually prominent, such as Desert Broom,
Tamarisk, Mexican Palo Verde and Tree of Heaven.
7. Grading or clearing has not substantially altered the landscape in the area.
8. Constructed non-native landscapes do not qualify as unique signi¿ cant vegetation.
23
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 223 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.7.b - Signi¿ cant Vegetation
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project SiteSignificant Vegetation
Marana Town LimitsSignificant Vegetation (Saguaro)
24
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 224 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
The Arizona Game and Fish Department’s Heritage Data Management System (HDMS)
identi¿ es two (2) plant species of Special Status within three (3) miles of the project
vicinity, the Stag-horn Cholla (Opunita versicolor) and Tumamoc Globeberry (Tumamoca
macdougalii). See Table II: B.7.b1 - Plant Species of Special Status and Table II: B.7b.2 -
Status De¿ nitions, and Exhibit II: B.2 - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter.
T II: B.7..1 - P S S S
ABLEBLANTPECIESOFPECIALTATUS
Scienti¿ c NameCommon NameFSWUSFSBLMState
Opuntia versicolorStag-horn ChollaSR
Tumamoca macdougaliiTumamoc GlobeberrySSSR
Carnegiea giganteaSaguaroHS
7 %+*3)68(
396')6->32%%1)%2(-7,20-2)2:-6321)28%0):-);330)')1&)6
T II: B.7..2 - S D
ABLEBTATUSEFINITIONS
AgencyStatusDe¿ nition
USFS (US Forest Service, US S: SensitiveThose taxa occurring on National Forests in Arizona which are
Department of Agriculture)considered sensitive by the Regional Forester.
BLM (US Bureau of Land S: SensitiveThose taxa occurring on BLM Field Of¿ ce Lands in Arizona which are
Management, US Department considered sensitive by the Arizona State Of¿ ce.
of the Interior)
State - NPL Arizona Native SR: Salvage Collection only with permit.
Plant Law (2008), Arizona Restricted
Department of Agriculture
HS: Highly No collection allowed.
Safeguarded
7 (
396');;;%>+*('31)')1&)6
c. Vegetative Densities by Percentage of Plant Cover
Existing vegetative densities found on the project site are related to the existing landforms
which can be broadly classi¿ ed as drainage areas, slopes, and alluvial fans. The slopes
are characterized by rocky soils and smaller washes and have the greatest densities
ranging from 51-75% cover. The cover is primarily smaller Ironwood and Foothills Palo
Verde trees and the greatest densities of Saguaros are found on the slopes. The drainage
and riparian areas are less dense with densities ranging from 26-50%. These areas have
the greatest diversity of tree species on the site and are characterized by large trees in
larger drainage areas. The alluvial fans have signi¿ cantly less vegetative densities ranging
from 0-25% cover. These areas are À at, sandy, and dominated by creosote and bursage.
See Exhibit II: B.7.c - Vegetative Densities.
25
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 225 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.7.c - Vegetative Densities
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project SiteLow Density - 0-25%
Medium-Low Density - 26-50%
Marana Town Limits
High-Medium Density - 51-75%
26
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 226 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
8. WILDLIFE
The Tucson-Tortolita-Santa Catalina Mountains Linkage is a major wildlife corridor that is within
three miles of this project site. Previous planning and development along the Hardy Wash
provided drainage solutions that enhanced a signi¿ cant corridor proving wildlife connectivity north
of the study area for this project. See Exhibit II: B.8.a - Wildlife Corridors.
According to the Environmental Review On-Line Tools provided by the Arizona Game and Fish
Department’s Heritage Data Management and Project Evaluation Program, there are eight
occurrences of species identi¿ ed as Special Status Species within a three mile radius of the
project site: Bat Colony, Fulvous Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna bicolor), Cactus Ferruginous
Pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum), Lesser Long-nosed Bat (Leptonycteris curasoae
yerbabuenae), Cave Myotis (Myotis velifer), and Wildlife Corridor (Tucson - Torolita - Santa
Catalina Mountains Linkage Design). A quali¿ ed biologist will perform a 100% clearance survey
for the Sonoran Desert Tortoise prior to ground disturbance, using the Desert Tortoise Survey
Guidelines for Environmental Consultants (Oct 2007) and the Guidelnes for Handling Sonoran
Desert Tortoises Encountered on Development Projects (Jan 1997). In addition, the Cactus
Ferruginous Pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) is delisted from endangered species
protection. See Table II: B.8.a.1 - Species of Special Status, and Table II: B.8.a.2 - Status
De¿ nitions, and Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter.
T II: B.8..1 - S S S
ABLEAPECIESOFPECIALTATUS
Scienti¿ c NameCommon NameFSWUSFSBLMState
Bat Colony
Dendrocygna bicolorFulvous Whistling-DuckSC
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorumCactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owlSCSS
Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenaeLesser Long-nosed BatLE
Myotis veliferCave MyotisSCS
Tucson-Tortolita-Santa Catalina Mountains Wildlife Corridor
Linkage Design
7 %+*3)68(
396')6->32%%1)%2(-7,20-2)2:-6321)28%0):-);330)')1&)6
27
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 227 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.a - Wildlife Corridors
Tortolita Fan -
Canada del Oro
Linkage
Tucson - Tortolita -
Santa Catalina
Mountains Linkage
0
1
Coyote - Ironwood -
Tucson Linkage
CORTARO FARMS ROAD
0
1
INA ROAD
Saguaro National
Park West
0
1
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geog
CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Source: Pima County GIS
0124
Miles
1 " = 2 miles
LEGEND
Project SiteMajor WashWildlife Corridors
3 Mile RadiusSanta Cruz RiverSaguaro National Park West
28
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 228 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
T II: B.8..2 - S D
ABLEATATUSEFINITIONS
AgencyStatusDe¿ nition
FWSLE: Listed Imminent jeopardy of extinction.
(Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered
Federal US Status;
Endangered Species Act, 1973
SC: Species of The terms “Species of Concern” or “Species at Risk” should be
as amended)
Concernconsidered as terms-of-art that describe the entire realm of taxa whose
conservation status may be of concern to the US Fish and Wildlife
Service, but neither term has of¿ cial status (currently all former C2
species).
USFS (US Forest Service, US S: SensitiveThose taxa occurring on National Forests in Arizona which are
Department of Agriculture)considered sensitive by the Regional Forester.
BLM (US Bureau of Land S: SensitiveThose taxa occurring on BLM Field Of¿ ce Lands in Arizona which are
Management, US Department considered sensitive by the Arizona State Of¿ ce.
of the Interior)
7 (
396');;;%>+*('31)')1&)6
9. SOILS & GEOLOGY
a. Geotechnical Site Conditions
The project site is comprised of multiple soil types. See Exhibit II: B.9 - Soils Map. The
predominant soil types found within the project site are Group A, Group B, and Group C.
Group A: (low runoff potential). Soils having high in¿ ltration rates even when thoroughly
wetted and consisting chieÀ y of deep, well to excessively well drainage sands or gravels.
These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B: Soils have moderate in¿ ltration rates when thoroughly wetted, consisting
chieÀ y of soils of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well drained soils with
moderately¿ ne to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water
transmission.
Group C: Soils having slow in¿ ltration rates when thoroughly wetted, consisting chieÀ y of
soils with a layer that impedes the downward movement of water, or soils with moderately
¿ ne to ¿ ne texture and a slow in¿ ltration rate. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
29
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 229 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report
Arizona Game and Fish Department Mission
To conserve Arizona's diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, compatible outdoor recreation
opportunities for current and future generations.
Project Name:
Camino De Oeste Project
Project Description:
Single-family new home development.
Project Type:
Development Within Municipalities (Urban Growth), Residential subdivision and associated infrastructure,
New construction
Contact Person:
Hillary Turby
Organization:
Norris Design
On Behalf Of:
CONSULTING
Project ID:
HGIS-01462
Please review the entire report for project type and/or species recommendations for the location
information entered. Please retain a copy for future reference.
Page 1 of 12
30
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 230 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Disclaimer:
1.This Environmental Review is based on the project study area that was entered. The report must be
updated if the project study area, location, or the type of project changes.
2.This is a preliminary environmental screening tool. It is not a substitute for the potential knowledge
gained by having a biologist conduct a field survey of the project area. This review is also not intended to
replace environmental consultation (including federal consultation under the Endangered Species Act),
land use permitting, or the Departments review of site-specific projects.
3.The Departments Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) data is not intended to include potential
distribution of special status species. Arizona is large and diverse with plants, animals, and
environmental conditions that are ever changing. Consequently, many areas may contain species that
biologists do not know about or species previously noted in a particular area may no longer occur there.
HDMS data contains information about species occurrences that have actually been reported to the
Department. Not all of Arizona has been surveyed for special status species, and surveys that have been
conducted have varied greatl in scope and intensit. Such surves ma reveal reviously
gypyyyp
undocumented popuation of species of special concern. population o species
ffiaial
l
ospspspspececcoconcncern.n.n
sper
lncer
o
f
f
ooffe
oia
o
4.HabiMap Arizo ically Species of Greatest Conservatin Need (SGCN) under our State icn Need
fallySScifGrCCio(SGCN
tetstststat
lySf
lylyfGrte
lypeesesoeaeaonononseservrvv
oat
essservatat
alCat
al
al
aci
eci
Wildlife Action (SWAP) and Species of Economic and Recreationa Importance (SERI), representWAP Importanc
(S)dSpSpSpieofofofoffEmimimidReRetitia
dieEd
n
aaandececsscoconnonomiccanananandcrcreaeaononon
sniancreatonon
d
ied
))EEEcococor
))cies
c
potential species distrbution models for the State of Arizona wich are subject to ongoing change,s distrect to o
ebutiododelelfofooothStStStStaatatofoffAAAAArririhichchubjn
foathi
onononmmssrrrreeezozzozonnanannwwaareresss
tiorthththeeezoress
timthe
tihi
tiww
Stau
rc
hu
uu
h
modification and refinement. The status of a wildlife resource can change quickly, and the availability ofd reinickl
nft.tThehehehehetatatutuofofillldldldlifhahaa
Ttaoillif
t.
ememememenenensssssaaaaawweeerereeeesosososoouuururucecececcaananananccngngngeeeququququy,
Tssswwdlifchhqu
ssd
Tu
te
tue
cch
e
Tw
new data will nssitate a efined assessment.
itititatatffifiddddntntntnt
itatnt
sseeeareeeeneneneeasasasassesessssssssssme
itfde
fi
as
m
ssesem
s.
s
Locations Accuracy isclaimer:
issssclclaai
clai
mememememer:r:rr:r:
is
Project locations are asumed to be bth precise and accurate for te purposes of environmental review. The of
dtotobbbbbbobobobobothcicindndatatatatatfofoothvivi
thov
ao
ssussummeeepprereeciseseseseaaaaccccccccururururureerrrrrepppupuprprprppposososoosesesenroronnm
ma
eeeppreeciseccro
ci
heee
thaandndete
tt
ant
sd
creator/owner of the Project Review Report is oley responsible for the project loation and thus the correctnesslatio
jejejeRieieReReReileleleeyiblelelefhehehehehejejelld
cctctrtletttctctct
iele
t
rooooevevevwwpppppossososososorresesespopopooonsnsnsnsororrppproloococnnannn
estctnan
oiewesibctl
ibln
vviensibp
ibo
iisssero
cwrtttif
sp
Rt
of the Project Review Report content.rt c
RRReReRettetent
ppopoonon
.
t.
Page 2 of 12
31
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 231 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Recommendations Disclaimer:
1.The Department is interested in the conservation of all fish and wildlife resources, including those
species listed in this report and those that may have not been documented within the project vicinity as
well as other game and nongame wildlife.
2.Recommendations have been made by the Department, under authority of Arizona Revised Statutes
Title 5 (Amusements and Sports), 17 (Game and Fish), and 28 (Transportation).
3.Potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources may be minimized or avoided by the recommendations
generated from information submitted for your proposed project. These recommendations are preliminary
in scope, designed to provide early considerations on all species of wildlife.
4.Making this information directly available does not substitute for the Department's review of project
proposals, and should not decrease our opportunity to review and evaluate additional project information
and/or new project proposals.
5.Further coordination with the Department requires the submittal of this Environmental Review Report with
a cover letter and roect lans or documentation that includes roect narrative acreage to be impacted,
pjppj,
how construction or project ativity(s) are to be accomplished, and projct lcalty information (includingn or proect activit,and proect localit i
ojy(s)tbbblishedjyn
tob
toto
tolilili
areeacaccompmp
esh
eelishsh
arecompsh
ecco
ararare
eeded
ed
)
))
site map). Onc AGFD had received the information, please aow 30 days for completion of project AFD had rec30 dasor com
Geiddtthininnfofoatioleleleaaalololololoyfp
d
atio
vvevevveermrmn,n,pasaseeww
foasw
fpww
ei
eie
ei
eee
reviews. Send requests to:requests to
:
Project Evaluation Program, Habitat Branchtion Pro
aHaHabibitaatttBrBrBrchchchchch
tatt
grgrgramamaman
grgrBrananan
Bran
,
,
Arizona Game and Fish Department and F
eisisshhhDeDeDertrtrtrntnt
srt
is
papapamememememe
pa
pa
t
t
5000 West Caefree Highwayefr
HHigigghhwh
H
eeayayayayy
e
e
ee
H
Phoenix, Arizona 85086-5000na
o88850505088686-5000000
0
8
8
-
Phone Number: (623) 236-7600r:
e((6(6(6(6232323))23232366-76760000
23236-6-76
6-
76
00
76
00
00
Fax Number: (623) 236-7366
(6222323))2323236-6-6-6-73737366666666
236-737366
)3
Or
PEP@azgfd.gov
oovvvv
v
v
6.Coordination may also be ncessary under the Nationa Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and/orlsor thelic
mbebebyndndndndNNNatatatatatioEnEnEnEnEnvivitallPPoPoyAAActctct((
NtaP
aaaN
ayayaaneccesesssasasasauuuuerererernarororoonmnmnmnmnmenen
underioioonanannaoen
saio
vv
v
ta
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Site specific recommendaton may be proposed during further
ciciAActct((ESESESA)A)ASiSiSitetetecicifififififidadadatbebedddd
(ESESAASitetecicidada
ppeeeeesesessspepepecccccrerecocommmmmmmmenenenenenononononsssssmmamamamapppropopoposesese
ctSisssperemmprororoopo
(pereonyyyy
A(cey
c
ctp
ctcocbeb
AAcobe
.
.
p
NEPA/ESA anaysis or through coordination with affected agencies
ayyysisitthrhrhrghghghghrdrdininininatatatatioioioiowiwwwiwiththffteteteteddddcici
tatiothththtec
sghrdincici
y
sssoooororouououcccooooordnnnaaecagagagagagenenenenenesesesess
rdncccd
yhrhrnc
ou
ou
o
ta
Page 3 of 12
32
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 232 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Page 4 of 12
33
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 233 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Page 5 of 12
34
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 234 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Page 6 of 12
35
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 235 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Special Status Species and Special Areas Documented within 3 Miles of Project Vicinity
Scientific NameCommon NameFWSUSFSBLMNPLSGCN
Bat Colony
Dendrocygna bicolorFulvous Whistling-DuckSC
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorumCactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owlSCSS1B
Leptonycteris curasoaeLesser Long-nosed BatLE1A
yerbabuenae
Myotis veliferCave MyotisSCS1B
Opuntia versicolorStag-horn ChollaSR
Tucson - Tortolita - Santa CatalinaWildlife Corridor
Mountains Linkage Design
Tumamoca macdougaliiTumamoc GlobeberrySSSR
http://www.azgfd.gov/w_c/edits/hdms_status_definitions.shtml
Note: Status code definitions can be found at ns can be ound a.
oft
hthtttptptptp:/://w/wfdfd/w/w/w/w/e/ediditsts/h/hdms_status_de
tp
wwwwwwww.azg.g.g.govov_c_c_cc
ht//www.a.azgfd.g/wc/e/e
ht://wad/e
t/waovov/e
zgfdg
v
h
dd
ttd
Species of Greatest Conservation Need
SpSpSpofofofofGGtCoCooo
ieieatatatatattttiNNNddd
ofo
eececsreesesesnnsnsnseeerervvavvavononeeeeee
esns
eser
S
sti
GGreree
Gre
oon
Predicted within Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Modelsredicte Mod
dwiwwiwithththininPPPjejectctcttVVVicicicicicinininititttbabadddPdddididictctedededRRe
in
rororoVinyyyseseseseseonononononrererereananannnge
VreR
PProroyPed
yg
g
bag
d
djPg
dnbct
d
c
j
Scientific NameCommon NameFWSUSFSBLMNPLSGCNF
CoCoCoCooNNFFWFWSSUSUSUSSS
mmmmmmmmonononononamamamammeUS
mm
NN
Aix sponsaWood Duck1B
WoWoodododddDDDDDkkkk
uucuc
u
u
Amazilia violicepsVolet-crowned HummngbirdS1B
VVololetetetedededededHHHmmbibibibibirdrdrdrdrdSSS
HH
V--c-c-c-crorororoownumumngngngngg
VV
wn
wnwnwn
ol
et
let
l
Ammospermophilus harrsiHarris' Antelope Squirrel1B
HaHaHaisis'AnAnAnAnAntetetetetelololoSSirl
siiloirir
Ha'loir
Harrrrrrpepepepeqquurerere
rre
rel
l
rl
rr
s
ispe
SS
Anaxyrus retiformisSnoran Green ToadToS1B
SSGrGradadadadad
GrGr
nonoorrannnneeeeeeeeeennn
rGr
nn
n
r
o
o
r
Anthus spragueiiSprague's PipitC*1A
SpSpe'PiPiPiPipipitttC*C*C*
pit
Ppipit
rararagugugugugusss
s
SpsC*C*
e
SpSpeee
Antrostomus ridgwayiBuff-collared NightjarS1B
BuBuBuBuBufffffffoololaadddddNiNiNiNighghghghtjSS
ffoNigh
-c-c-ccrerererearararar
aretjar
atjtj
j
a
c
S
Aquila chrysaetosGolden EagleBGAS1B
GoGoldldEEEllellBGBGBGBGBGAAA
GoE
E
lddenenenagagagagag
ldA
Goeen
Go
A
Aspidoscelis stictogrammaGant Spotted WhiptailaSCS1B
mGGGGGttSpSpSpotottttetetetetedWhWhWhWhWhipipipipiptaaaaailllSCSCSCSCSCSSS
t
tdill
ananananant
tddd
S
Athene cunicularia hypugaeaWestern Burrowing OwlaeaSCSS1B
gWWeWeWeWeststBuBuBuBuBuininOwOwOwOwOwlllSCSCSCCCSSSS
l
in
eererernnrrrrowowggg
stwnS
rr
st
st
rr
g
Botaurus lentiginosusAmerican Bittern1B
AmAmAmicicicicBBiititititetee
c
erererananrrnrrn
rn
nB
nB
n
r
Buteo regalisFerruginous HawkSCS1B
SCSCSC
FeFeFeininHaHHaHaHawkwkwkwk
rrrrugugugouououououssss
wk
rr
Chilomeniscus stramineuariable Sandsnake1B
aaaariririabableleleSdsdsdskkeke
abSk
a
aanannananana
rS
r
Chionactis occipitalis klauberber Shovel-nosed Snake1A
uSSShohol-l-dddSnSnSnakak
hol-
vevenosesee
Sveno
Sake
se
e
no
hoho
Coccyzus americanuseow-e ucoo Western DPS)LTS1A
YllbilldCk(WtDPS)S
LT
Colaptes chrysoidesGilded FlickerS1B
Coluber bilineatusSonoran Whipsnake1B
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescensPale Townsend's Big-eared BatSCSS1B
Crotalus tigrisTiger Rattlesnake1B
Crotaphytus nebriusSonoran Collared Lizard1B
Cynanthus latirostrisBroad-billed HummingbirdS1B
Cyprinodon maculariusDesert PupfishLE1A
Dipodomys spectabilisBanner-tailed Kangaroo RatS1B
Euderma maculatumSpotted BatSCSS1B
Eumops perotis californicusGreater Western Bonneted BatSCS1B
Page 7 of 12
36
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 236 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Species of Greatest Conservation Need
Predicted within Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Models
Scientific NameCommon NameFWSUSFSBLMNPLSGCN
Falco peregrinus anatumAmerican Peregrine FalconSCSS1A
Glaucidium brasilianum cactorumCactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owlSCSS1B
Gopherus morafkaiSonoran Desert TortoiseCCAS1A
Haliaeetus leucocephalusBald EagleSC,SS1A
BGA
Heloderma suspectumGila Monster1A
Incilius alvariusSonoran Desert Toad1B
Kinosternon sonoriense sonorienseDesert Mud TurtleS1B
Lasiurus blossevilliiWestern Red BatS1B
Lasiurus xanthinusWestern Yellow BatS1B
WesternYellowBatS
at
Bt
Leopardus pardaliscelotcel1A
ot
t
t
t
Leptonycteris curasoaeLesser Long-nosed BatLE1A
LeLLLdBBBaBaBatLE
d
LeLessssssereronong-nononoseseseLE
t
LeLeg-noLELELE
erse
se
g-
dd
ng
g
yerbabuenae
Lepus alleniAntelope Jackrabbit1B
AnAnteteteteteloloJJkrababbbbbibibibitt
n
pepepepepeacaccc
lolobi
k
nlo
nk
k
ck
Lithobates yavapaiensisowland Leopard FrogdSS1A
oowlwlwlwlwlddLeLeLeLeFrFrFrFrrSSS
ddLeS
ananananopopopopararararogogogogog
S
d
ar
an
p
Macrotus californicusCalifornia Leaf-nosed BatSCS1B
CaCalifofoiaiaiaiaLLLf-f-f-dddddBaBaBaBaBatSCSCSC
iaf-
Ca
lif-
rnrnrnneaeaeaeaeanononononosesesesese
LL
CaC
CaliSC
fo
lili
f
Melanerpes uropygialisGla Woodpecker1B
GGGGGlalalalaaWWWdpdpdpkkekke
dpdp
ooooooooececececrr
eck
W
Meleagris gallopavo mexcanaGoud's TurkeysTuS1B
GoGoGoGoouuuud'd'd'd'rkrkrkrkkSS
u
d'
ccacacanananaeyeyeyeyey
c
Melospiza lincolniincon's Sparrows1B
ooooonn'SpSpSpSp
nn
ncncararararrororororow
Sp
n
ar
w
Melozone abertiAbert's TowheeS1B
AbAbt't't'ToToTowhwhwhwhwhSS
To
To
ereerssseeeeee
e'ss
eeee
AAAb
e
Micruroides euryxanthusSonoran Coralsnake1B
SoSoSoSoSoCoCoCoColssskeke
sske
nnononorararaaanCorararananananakeke
nna
nnra
n
r
Myotis occultusArizona MyotisisSCS1B
ArArizizMyMyMyMyMyotSCSCSCC
izizSC
iz
onononononaaa
Ar
Aro
Ar
o
o
ao
Myotis veliferCave MyotisSCS1B
CaCaMMtitiSCSCSC
vvevevevyoyoyosssSC
CaMC
aayoyo
s
M
M
Myotis yumanensisYuma MyotsSC1B
SC
YuYuYuMMMttSC
MM
mamamayoyoyoyossss
umayos
u
ma
Nyctinomops femorosaccusPocketed Free-taied Batus1B
c
PoPockckketeteteededeFFFtataaaiiedededBBBatatatatat
eted
etFrrereeeee-e-a
F
Pi
e
i
i
Panthera oncaJaguarLE1A
JaJaJaLELELE
J
guguguarar
E
E
ar
J
Passerculus sandwichenisiavannah Sparrowa1B
sahahahSS
vaaaannnnnnSparrrrowow
apa
nnpa
nn
rr
Perognathus amplusrizona Pocket Mouserizn P1B
oaockckckckketetMM
M
ouousese
etet
et
ou
se
M
Mou
ou
se
se
Perognathus longimembrisLittle Pocket Mouse1B
Peucaea botterii arizonaeArizona Botteri's SparrowS1B
Peucaea carpalisRufous-winged Sparrow1B
Phrynosoma solareRegal Horned Lizard1B
Phyllorhynchus browniSaddled Leaf-nosed Snake1B
Poeciliopsis occidentalisGila TopminnowLE1A
occidentalis
Progne subis hesperiaDesert Purple MartinS1B
Setophaga petechiaYellow Warbler1B
Sonorella papagorumBlack Mountain Talussnail1B
Tadarida brasiliensisBrazilian Free-tailed Bat1B
Page 8 of 12
37
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 237 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Species of Greatest Conservation Need
Predicted within Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Models
Scientific NameCommon NameFWSUSFSBLMNPLSGCN
Terrapene ornataOrnate Box Turtle1A
Troglodytes pacificusPacific Wren1B
Vireo bellii arizonaeArizona Bell's Vireo1B
Vulpes macrotisKit Fox1B
Species of Economic and Recreation Importance Predicted within Project Vicinity
Scientific NameCommon NameFWSUSFSBLMNPLSGCN
Callipepla gambeliiGambel's Quail
Odocoileus hemionusMule Deer
Pecari tajacuavelinaavelina
Puma concoloruntain Lion
tatatatainininLio
ta
unn
n
n
n
noonn
Zenaida asiaticaWhite-wnged Dove
WWWhWhWhitititwwededDDD
ed
e-e-ngngovovee
e-ovoveee
gedD
gge
Project Type: Development Wtin Municipalities (Urban Growth), Residential sbdivision and associatedentivisi
WitththinininMicicicicipipipipaalalalitieieee(UrbrbrbrbrbGGGGwtwtwth)h)h)ReResisisisisidedededentniaalllbdbdo
WiWiMipitwtntbdbd
Wiwtdeb
WithReRe
unununununsssssananananrorororosusu
ro)
su
anRe
ic
)
al,,
(
i(
infrastructure, New contructiontr
ttititit
uccccononon
c
Project Type Recommentions:d
naataatioio
io
atnsnssss:
:
Fence recommendations will b dependant upon the gols of the fence project and the wldlfe species expected to beone
wwwiwillbbdedendndddttttttttheheheheheglslsfffththfefeojojojojtdthwwldldldllfffe
tf
wiblstht
lllsththojtd
cc
eepeananananauupupupoaoaoaoaoencnceeeeeprprprprprecececanan
peoaoth
upoof
lsffed
toffn
pef
ed
llpeendt
en
pe
impacted by the project. General gudelines for ensuring wildlife-friendly fencs include: barbless wire on the top andallire:
Guuuudddedforiririildlififififfrfrfrfrieieiendndndndlylyfininnclclcllududubblbllle
dliffriefcl
urdlndfbl
eeneneneereggdenenesssssenenenensususususungwildle-e-e-e-e-fenccececesararar
w
idlief
feni
ffrinb
s
fe
ien
enc
en
bottom with the maximum fence height 42", mnimum height for bottom 16". Modifications to this design may be
ffefefeheightht442"2"mnininiheheheheheighthththtfbbbototto16161616".".MMMoodododifficicatatiotttttttth
ni".ic
ncncnceheig4nimumumummmmorororororotmm16".odationsnsoo
emmubotm"ifif
ht2mbmifo
fto
muftoicicio
f
ight44igfottotoat
hehtmmmigationn
,,g
igio
h
ig
considered for fencing anicipated to be routinely encuntered by ek, bighorn sheep or proghorn (e.g., Pronghorn
icccipipaatateedeededtbebebebetititilylylyntntnttededbbbbbek,bbigigigighohohohoheheheggggh
ctlyededigho
oooorrouououneencncncncncouououououeredyyyyrnrnrnrnssepepepeppoorrprprprono
tootilyeernon
ttnt
ciptoeeeerereeebbbheog
eeyk,k,k,sr
ek,
e
s
e
ehe
fencing would require 18" minmum height on the bottom). Plese refr to the Department's ncing Guidelines located
mmmiminnhheheheheigigigighhthththtthththbbobobotttttttt).).).).PPlelelelefefefetototototttheheheheDDDDDtmtmtmtmmt'tt'FFe
)lefet
thtohe
mumumuummooonnneeeeomomomomomaserererererrepepepeparareenenss
ubPrefeepF
nnnthePt
PasF
asar
maasarar
mF
mme
ee
on the home page of this pplicaton at http://www.azgfd.gov/hgis/guidelines.aspx.
lilittttt
http:/:/:///w/w/wfdfdfd/h/h/hgiggs/s/s/s/ididididdeli
ittfdhgigi
ppppppppcacacononaaaa/wwwwwww.azgzg.g.goovovovgguguguelinesss.aaspspspspx
ona.agf/hguelinesx
.aaspx
tp/wwgg.axx
/
hththttptwwov
ononhtte
h/e
..
pp.
tu
g
g
During the planning stages of your project, pease conser the local or regional need of willife in regards to movement,s oildl
efjejejectctctppppsssdedeththththlolololollioioioleededededofofof
jejesethll
yoyoyourururpprororororoeaeaeaeaasesesecconononnreeeeecacaorororrrregegegegegnananenenenessswwww
yderrorne
ypserio
rcaorio
rlr
lo
a
p,n
c
t
,,
,
,
connectivity, and access to habtat needs. Loss of this pemeablity prevents wildlife from accessing resources, findingo haacc
tbbtatatattededdLLLofofoftthibbbbblilitytyyntntnttwwiwiwildldlifefffe
bLthiwfe
t
nnenes.s.s.oosososssssssspepepepermrmrmmmeaeaeaeaeapprererererevevessssrororommmmm
i
ddLossspe
ives
sli
t
tfp
ple
s.vev
tsp
mates, reduces gene flow, prevents wildife from re-colonizing areas where local extirpations may have occurred, and, prevtions
wtststsililddiffrfrlololololonininizizihehhehehelalalxtxtxtiririrm
if
ennnwwweeeomomomomomrrree-e-cccocongngngaaaarrererreasaswwwwrereococeeppap
ncwp
ntsrace
p
trzi
ilfr
rr
rnr
ultimately prevents wildlife from contribting to ecosystem functions, such as pollnaton, seed dispersal, control of preyrom coon, seed
efririribubutifufufutitihhhhhololollltt
nttttttitteteti
butititil
ngngooecececececosossysysysysmmmncncncnccononononons,ss,ssucucucucucasppnananana
tysna
ritep
rb
ng
m
t
ss
numbers, and resistance o invasive species. In many cases, srams and washes provide natural movement corridorso invasive provide na
ieIstststtdshshsht
ieI
d
spppecececs.s.s.nnmamaanynynynynycccaasaasesesesrereamamssanwawawaeesee
a
ececre
ieansh
csh
d
Ic
n
,,
n
for wildlife and should be maintained in their natura state Upands also support a large ivesity of species, and shouldmaintained in trt a lare diver
heiriratatataatatateUpUpUplalalandalalgs
aal
nnurursssosososssuppo
irirurndupp
sup
rupup
n
ss
tand
e
n
n
.
nte
.
a
be contained within important wildlife movement corridors. In addition, mintaining biodiversity and ecosystem functionstant wildlie movemen, maintainin biodiversit
rftidididIadaddidiititigy
oo
cooorrororss.nntiononon
rronon
rrrrorI
rr
a
id
s.Inti
iddi
ororaddi
can be facilitated through improving designs of structures, fences, roadways, and culverts to promote passage for a
variety of wildlife.
Consider impacts of outdoor lighting on wildlife and develop measures or alternatives that can be taken to increase
human safety while minimizing potential impacts to wildlife. Conduct wildlife surveys to determine species within project
area, and evaluate proposed activities based on species biology and natural history to determine if artificial lighting may
disrupt behavior patterns or habitat use. Use only the minimum amount of light needed for safety. Narrow spectrum bulbs
should be used as often as possible to lower the range of species affected by lighting. All lighting should be shielded,
cantered, or cut to ensure that light reaches only areas needing illumination.
Page 9 of 12
38
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 238 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Minimize potential introduction or spread of exotic invasive species. Invasive species can be plants, animals (exotic
snails), and other organisms (e.g., microbes), which may cause alteration to ecological functions or compete with or prey
upon native species and can cause social impacts (e.g., livestock forage reduction, increase wildfire risk). The terms
noxious weed or invasive plants are often used interchangeably. Precautions should be taken to wash all equipment
utilized in the project activities before leaving the site. Arizona has noxious weed regulations (Arizona Revised Statutes,
Rules R3-4-244 and R3-4-245). See Arizona Department of Agriculture website for restricted plants,
https://agriculture.az.gov/. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has information regarding pest and invasive
plant control methods including: pesticide, herbicide, biological control agents, and mechanical control,
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome. The Department regulates the importation, purchasing, and transportation of
wildlife and fish (Restricted Live Wildlife), please refer to the hunting regulations for further information
http://www.azgfd.gov/hf/huntingrules.shtml
The construction or maintenance of water developments should include: incorporation of aspects of the natural
environment and the visual resources, maintaining the water for a variety of species, water surface area (e.g., bats
require a greater area due to in-flight drinking), accessibility, year-round availability, minimizing potential for water quality
problems, frequency of flushing, shading of natural features, regular clean-u of debris escae ramps, minimizing
g,g,gp,p
obstacles, and minimizing accumulation of silt and mud. accumulation of silt a
gndd
udud
udud
m
m
mmm
nd
ndndnd
.
.
.
Minimization and mitigation of impacts to wildlife and fish specis ue to changes in water quality, quantity, chemistry,n o impacts in water qu
oftwildldldliffefendndndfffisisisishieieedududutotohahahaa
f
wih
wliliedudu
ooooaaspsppeececsseeecccngngeseses
onges
ndees
tpe
t
taise
t
sp
hhh
a
temperature, and alteration to flow regmes (timing, mgnitude, duraton, and frequency of floods) should be evaluated.n to flow of flo
oggg(t(timinnnnnininininittututudededuddududuttttddfrfryo
iminttfr
rerememessg,g,g,g,g,magrararaaaoononananeqeqequeueueeenc
rerememmagag
agagan
rean
mm
,,,an
,
,
(
Minimize impacts to sprins in-stream flow, and conside irrigation improvements to decrease water use. If dredging is as, in-reas
stflolondndsisiidedededeiririrrirititiiintnttototoddddde
fsiide
rererereamamamaaaaccconoonrrgagagaaononononmpmpmpmprororororoveveeeememesssec
lonin
w,w,w,w,
co
coirrrimeme
w,airaimp
o
i
ie
ttonimene
tie
n
te
project component, consider timing of the project in order to mnimize mpacts to spawning fish and other aquatic specieser tif fis
dmimithhhoojojottinininrdttmmmnininiimimitstststttninininih
miojnitsni
mits
ngngngooeeeeprprprprecececececooooererroooozezezezempmpmpmacacacacospawawng
einermimimpacaw
miprrtomiop
o
h
tn
tme
r
nn
(include spawning seasons), and to reduce spread of exotic invasive species. We recommed early direct coordinations,en
n)ffffd
ddttotoedaadadadadototototiciciciciivivieieieieW
oticiiv
aaananandrucuceeeeespspspspsprererereoooexnvnvnvnvnvasasaseespspspececececies.s.ererecococommmmmm
ooivmm
fec
isp
iasasWe
eiprere
r
e
e
r
with Project Evaluation Program for projects that could impact water resources, wetands, streams, springs, and/orr
rfofooojojojtstststtthahahahatulululululdddimimimimctctctctctatatatatttdsdsdsssste
ograrararammmrrrrprprprprprecectthatcocococodimpapapapapaaterrresesesouourcrcrceesesesesweweaaananans
rrectesurcwes
w
ojerwe
ojrrrouwe
todert
otererrc
ececwt
ow,,,,
wes
w,t
ts,,
riparian habitats.
The Department recommends that wildlife surveys are conducted to determine f noise-sensitive species occur within theee-i
enndndndthatilildlififfnndndntedtotoddetetetetetmimimimifisisitttv
tt
n
ssswwweesusussusurveysssssararararcooooucucucerereeernenenononosensnns
natildleucuctetotomino
arotoit
ildnoi
wwteteedfe
tvveyeyeyd
v
sveyd
project area. Avoidance or minimization measures could include conducting projec activities outside of breedingimnurld iactivi
ininizatatiioioluuuuudededududuductctttininojttttitio
atdedutininojt
rrmmemeeeasasaaesesesesesccccouououncccdedeconingggprprprececeseses
mcououcggpr
ac
onononon
c
oj
seasons.
Based on the project type entered, coordination with State Historic Preservation Office may be required
tetetedddrdrdinininatatatioioioiowiwiwiwiwitthttSSSSStatatatatateteteteteHHHisisisisistoriPrPrPrPrPrtitititiOOOOffffiicbbbbe
rdiotototiffff
d,rdinHHtotoicicic
e
eeenenenrererecccoooooonceseeeserererervavavavaononononmamaayy
d,ntriervaoney
nriesee
nriricffeb
incc
at
aO
nc
d
(http://azstateparks.com/SHPO/index.html).
SHHPOPOPO/i//indndnd.hl).).
tmtmtmtm
POPOtm
ex
el).
ndl
l
h
hh).
h
P
l
/
Trenches should be coveed or bac-filed as soon as possibe. Incorporae escpe ramps in ditches or fencing along theed osin
bababackckck-f-f-fiileleleledsisisisbbbbbIIteteteted
i
iiIte
de
rrrk-fasasasasasssoooooooonnasaspppososose.ee.e.ncncncorororororpopopopoporararaeeescscapappeerararampmpmpp
rddse.e
r-fsnnnepp
scr
o
ds
o
perimeter to deter small mammals and herptefana (snakes, lizards, tortoise) rom enterin ditches.amn di
mlslsndndhhhhptptptefefff(((aakakakaklilililrdrdttttototoisise)e)e)e)fffteteterigt
lslite)fr
ef
ptfe
maaaaaaeererereauaunnnananasnssnsnesesessszazazas,s,s,s,orororrromenenene
aorttrom
or
pt
nhsnza
au
au,,
llau
,
Communities can actively he sustainabiity and mobility of wldlfe by incorporating wldlife planning into theiroratin wi
heeeetataininabababbbiiiiiititddbibibiilililiitytytytyffffwwldlddlffefefebiningl
etyffein
ilidl
sssusususanannnnmomommooocococorprpr
lrprp
dol
yyyy
staol
y
d
yo
owbo
d
s
regional/comprehensive plans, their regonal transportation pans, and their ope sace/conservation land systemlans, their ren spacecons
pgalalalttrtatatatattiioioppndtheheheirir/e
rtp
ir
ononononrararanspoportnnananas,saandooopepepepep
ns
oni
tt
ns
t
p
programs. An effective approach to willife panin begins with the dentification of the wildlife resources in need ofproach to wildlife ation of the wildlif
pppninibbinwiwiwithththtthehehedededentntifififiice
tici
anananngngegegeginsh
if
ansnt
anningbinif
s
ntnt
e
protection, an assessmen f important habitat blocks and connective corridors, and the incorporation of these critical iortant habitat blove corridorsand the inco
fckkkkkddti
mpttiirp
anancoconnnnnnec
sanandcoececececti
an
nn
d
dconn
co
,
wildlife components into the community plans and programs. Community planners should identify open spaces and
habitat blocks that can be maintained in their area, and the necessary connections between those blocks to be preserved
or protected. Community planners should also work with State and local transportation planning entities, and planners
from other communities, to foster coordination and cooperation in developing compatble development plans to ensure
wildlife habitat connectivity. The Department's guidelines for incorporating wildlife considerations into community
planning and developments can be found on the home page of this application at
http://www.azgfd.gov/hgis/guidelines.aspx.
39
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 239 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
Design culverts to minimize impacts to channel geometry, or design channel geometry (low flow, overbank, floodplains)
and substrates to carry expected discharge using local drainages of appropriate size as templates. Reduce/minimize
barriers to allow movement of amphibians or fish (e.g., eliminate falls). Also for terrestrial wildlife, washes and stream
corridors often provide important corridors for movement. Overall culvert width, height, and length should be optimized
for movement of the greatest number and diversity of species expected to utilize the passage. Culvert designs should
consider moisture, light, and noise, while providing clear views at both ends to maximize utilization. For many species,
fencing is an important design feature that can be utilized with culverts to funnel wildlife into these areas and minimize
the potential for roadway collisions. Guidelines for culvert designs to facilitate wildlife passage can be found on the home
page of this application at http://wwwazgfdgov/hgis/guidelinesaspx.
Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality may be required
(http://www.azdeq.gov/).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Water Resources may be required
(http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/default.aspx).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with U.S. Army Corps o Engineers may be requiredentered, coordination f Enineers ma be r
withU.S.S.SSArCCgye
UC
UUCC
UArAr
mymyororororrpso
ththththpsps
myps
ps
wi
wi
wiwi.
oo
o
o
(http://www.usace.army.m)
m)
Based on the project type coordination with County Flood Contol district(s) may be required.ma be r
rdrdrddinininatatioiowiwiwiwththCnntntFlFldddCoCoCoCoContldidistststririctctct(s(ss)ye
cooooooonnwiouountoooooooooontrorolri(ss
othCCC
ththCyy
coul
couroo
ccoul
dd
l))
l)
o)
Development plans shoul provde for open natural pace fo ildlife movement, whe also inimizing the potential for proom
vdedeffflllfofofofowiwiwiiildldliliffefefehhhleleels
tutut,t
vdefof
oc
orooopepepennnnnanananarararaspspspspacceeeerrmmmmovovovovovemememememeenenenewaaaa
vnacldldma
vpenrasceld
w
vpeli
tutulili
o
r
dtu
l
wildlife-human interactions through design features. Please contact Projet Evaluaton Proram for more information on thsilera
shhhdeftututututuPPPPntntntttPrPrPProjojojojttEEvEvEaltPPg
fPntPrj
ntt
rororouguggngnneaeaeaearerereres.s.s.asasasaseeeeecococococoacacacececuaonononrororo
rorougeare.actPo
astuatro
f
fac
defco
cuat
c
al
.tua
t
living with urban wildlife.
Vegetation restoration projects (including treatments of nvasive or exoti spcies) should have a completed site-itihoul
ojeee(luudididididiofofivieieieies)s)sddhahahaa
ctctttaatatatntntntnt
ecntivda
ssncngngngngreremememememessssnvnvvvasasasaseeororeeexoxoxoxocspsspssececececcsve
cs
ngasiveexoie
evv
s
te
ate
oo
ev
tocc
rec
tofoc
ofsv
evaluation plan (identifying environmental codtions necessary to re-esablih native vegetaton), a revegetation planne vei
irntntalalaldtitototootatatatatablblblblisishhtitigetetetatatto
t
to
ggeenvnvnononmememecccoononononononssssscecececeessssssarararyrre-e-esesesessnanaaveveve
goonaraybltitiv
enmeisatiat
yav
gmoy
c
gcdtiy
ddtiti
nv
dtirri
i
sre
e
(species, density, method of establishment), a short and long-erm monitorng plan, including adaptive managementst a s lcl
ooofofofablililishshhntntt),),),),),hohohortrtrtndteteitittininininplinuddininna
eemeehohoaaaaonnng-g-g-termmmonononontorororingggananinggg
rtrtatermrmrmonororpl
nr
nteg
g
ng-mm
n,
n
ng
m
pl
,
guidelines to address needs for replacement vegetation.
edddddfofooplplttttatatatiti
ti
plttati
t
sssrrereaacacacacememememenenenvevevevevegegegegeononononon
rreregetati
em
pl
pl
ren...
..
The Department requests further coordination to provide project/species specific recommendations, please
tfufufurrtrtheheheheedididitititititttoidididojt/t/t/t/ieieieieifiicicicic
tiidt/
s
sscococoororornananaonononononprprprprovovovovoveeeprprprececeececspspspecececececssssspspspspspececececrrreececoooom
rrrditprideepriesifif
srornanaprojspifif
o
ojojoj
s
di
or
p
PEP@azgfdgov
contact Project Evaluation Program directly.
PEPEP@P@@@@ggfgffd.d.
iPPPddiriririrtltl
ddirtPazazgfgogogo
dgogogo
onnnrororogrgrgrgramamececececy.y.vvvv
d
ngrecP
PE
tazazd
naz
az
@v
Project Location and/or Species Recommndations:Sp
ieieReReReReedadadati
ti
ecccccsssccococommmmmmmmenenenenons:s:s:
commtion
en
daat
t
n
HDMS records indicate that one or more native plants listed on the Arizona Native Pant Law and Antiquities Act haveat one otLaw
atatatatativivivplplplttststlisisisteteteddttthheheheAAAAriririNativivPPPa
rrrmomomorerenniviveeeplanananonononnnrizozozozozonanaeeaan
a
ltaa
rl
a
rtistrive
repllis
dtn
P
P
been documented within the vicinity of your project area. Please contact:he vicinit
tyofofofofofojojojojjttPlPlPltatactctctct
ct
P
yyyououourrprpreecececarararareaeaeaeaeaeaeaeasesesesesecccononon:
earacc
:
o
ro:
..
yp
Arizona Department of Agriculturericultur
ge
1688 W Adams St.
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Phone: 602.542.4373
https://agriculture.az.gov/environmental-services/np1
Page 11 of 12
40
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 240 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.8.b - Arizona Game and Fish Department Letter
Arizona Game and Fish Departmentproject_report_camino_de_oeste_project_14278_17289.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-01462Review Date: 12/9/2015 10:43:05 AM
HDMS records indicate that one or more listed, proposed, or candidate species or Critical Habitat (Designated or
Proposed) have been documented in the vicinity of your project. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) gives the US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regulatory authority over all federally listed species. Please contact USFWS Ecological
Services Offices at http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/ or:
Phoenix Main OfficeTucson Sub-OfficeFlagstaff Sub-Office
2321 W. Royal Palm Rd, Suite 103201 N. Bonita Suite 141SW Forest Science Complex
Phoenix, AZ 85021Tucson, AZ 857452500 S. Pine Knoll Dr.
Phone: 602-242-0210Phone: 520-670-6144Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Fax: 602-242-2513Fax: 520-670-6155Phone: 928-556-2157
Fax: 928-556-2121
Analysis indicates that yor project is located in the vcinity of an identied wildlife habitat linkage corridor. Projectr proect is located in ed wildlife habitat link
jthevcicincincinityityofidifa
ent
cinidid
an
vvvofofanidident
vententent
thetyan
he
hehe
if
if
if
planning and implementation efforts should focus on maintaining adequate opportunities for ildlife permeability. Forion efforts shoportunities for
tuldfoiingingadadateatetew
fointain
fofofoadate
intaining
cuscucuonmamamaequequequop
m
op
opop
dop
dd
don
information pertaining to t ge assessment and wildlife species that may be affected, please refer to: e a affected, pl
gentententd wd wd wd wwildliflifffiesiesesththatattbebee
ssessessessessessmssmananildeepecpecpecpececmaymaymaybebe
ssmeiesies
be
ft
t
an
ildild
ildm
an
http://www.corridordesignzona. Please contact your loca Arizona Gam nd Fsh Department Regional Office forFish Dep
. P. P. Plealealeatactactactact ylolocacaaaaAArArArArizoizoizoizoizoGamGamGamndndndda
P
zonzonaaaaseseconconononnourououroururnanaeand
t yt yt y
atact y
aG
nn
nG
specific project recommendations: datiohttp://wwwazgfdgov/inside_azgfd/agency_directoryshtml.
nhtthtthtthttp:/p:/p:/p://ww/ww/ww/wwzgfzgfgffdgdgdgdgov/ov/oinsnsnsnsnsideidegfdgfdgfdgfd/ag/ag/agy_dy_direirereshtml
ctoctoctocto
gffov/iderecto
ns:wawawa_az_az_azazencncncncryry
:ovshtm
s:htwdovagy_dy_d
s:ry
azr
ry
de
sa
/wwnsr.
e
Page 12 of 12
41
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 241 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.9 - Soils Map
Soil Group A
Gravelly
Alluvial Land
Soil Group B
Anthony Soils,
0-3% slopes
Soil Group C
Rough Broken Land
PIMA
Palo Verde Complex,
COUNTY
0-60% slopes
MARANA
Soil Group A
Gravelly
Alluvial Land
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project SiteSoil Group A
Soil Group B
Marana Town Limits
Soil Group C
42
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 242 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
10. VIEWSHEDS
a. Property Viewsheds
i. Viewsheds Onto & Across the Site
The project site consists of gently rolling topography that slopes from northeast to
southwest. Views and vistas beyond adjacent properties are of the Tortolita Mountains
to the north, Baboquivari Peak and Kitt Peak to the southwest, the Tucson Mountains
to the south, the Silverbell Mountains to the west, and Mount Lemmon and Pusch
Ridge (in the Santa Catalina Mountains) to the east. See Exhibit II: B.10.c - Views
from/into the Site.
ii. Views which may be Blocked by Proposed Development
Views that may be blocked by the proposed development are concentrated around
the four out parcels located within the northeast corner of the project site. These
parcels will be most directly impacted by the development of Camino de Oeste. Since
these adjacent parcels are set at a higher elevation than the Camino de Oeste project
site, it is anticipated that impacts to their views will be minor. One of the four lots also
has a pre-existing perimeter wall that blocks views to the south.
iii. Areas of High Visibility from Adjacent Off-site Locations
As illustrated by Exhibit II:B.10.a - Viewsheds, the perimeter of the property is highly
visible from the adjacent collector roadways, however the interior portions of the
property are obstructed due to topography changes and low to medium density
vegetation. The higher elevations of the property can be seen from Interstate 10,
although development plans for property west of the site might obscure some of these
views in the future.
b. Photo Key Map and Viewsheds
Various photographs were taken of views from across the project site. Exhibit II:B.10.b -
Photo Key Map indicates the locations and direction from which the photos were taken.
43
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 243 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.10.a - Viewsheds
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project SiteAreas of High Visibility
Marana Town Limits
44
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 244 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.10.b - Photo Key Map
10
1
12
6
4
3
2
11
9
7
5
8
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
View
Project Site
Marana Town Limits
45
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 245 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.10.c - Views from/into the Site
View looking south.
View looking north.
1
2
View looking east.View looking west.
34
View looking southwest.View looking northwest.
56
46
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 246 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.10.c - Views from/into the Site
View looking northeast from the southern boundary.
View looking east into the property from the existing
78
residential entry on Hartman Lane.
View looking northwest from proposed entry on Camino View looking west from the property’s northeast
10
9
de Oeste.corner.
View looking north from proposed entry on Camino de View looking north from the property’s northwest corner.
1112
Oeste.
47
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 247 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
11. TRAFFIC
a. Existing Roads and Access
The subject property is located one quarter mile north of the Cortaro Farms Road/Hartman
Lane intersection in the Town of Marana. The site is bounded by Hartman Lane to the
west, Camino de Oeste to the east and Hardy Wash to the north.
Additionally, Interstate 10 is located approximately one mile west of the project site.
This portion of Interstate 10 is divided and consists of three lanes in each direction, and
includes a frontage road that consists of two lanes in each direction.
i. Existing / Proposed Off-site Streets between the Development & Nearest Arterial
Streets
Hartman Lane and Camino de Oeste border the project on the west and east
respectively. These two collector roadways directly feed into the nearest arterial,
Cortaro Farms Road.
ii. Arterial Streets within 1 Mile of the Project Site
Cortaro Farms Road is an urban arterial with a posted speed limit of 40 mph. It has
four lanes (divided with a raised median) from Interstate 10 to about a 1/4 mile east
of Camino de Oeste. It then transitions to a two-lane undivided roadway. It contin-
ues east about two miles to its terminus east of Shannon Road. In the vicinity of the
project, Cortaro Farms Road has paved shoulders with sidewalks in both directions.
It is designated on the Tucson Bike Map as a Key Connecting Street. Its theoretical
level of service (LOS) E capacity is 32,900 vehicles per day (vpd) on its 4-lane section
and 15,600 vpd along its 2-lane section. See Exhibit II: B.11.a - Existing Roads and
Access.
A roadway inventory of all major roadways within one-mile of the subject property was
conducted to obtain the following information:
1. Existing and proposed right-of-way widths.
2. Whether or not said widths conform to minimum requirements.
3. Ownership
4. Number of travel lanes and theoretical capacity and posted speed for existing
roads.
5. Current average daily traf¿ c volumes for existing streets.
6. Proposed roadway improvements to be provided by the applicant.
See Table II: B.11.a.ii - Nearest Arterial and Collector Streets.
48
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 248 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
T II: B.11.. - N A C S
ABLEAIIEARESTRTERIALANDOLLECTORTREETS
Cortaro Farms RoadCamino de OesteHartman Lane
Major Routes Classi¿ cationArterialMinor CollectorMinor Collector
Existing R.O.W. (Feet) 100-200 (narrows east of 60-105 (narrows south 90-160 (narrows north
Camino de Oeste)of the project site toward and south of the project
Cortaro Farms Road) site)
Future R.O.W. (Feet)* 150 (Town of Marana and 80 (Pima County)90 (Town of Marana)
Pima County)80 (Pima County)
Current Number of Lanes (proposed)2-422
Speed Limit403535
OwnershipMarana/Pima CountyPima CountyMarana
ADT (Source, Year)I-10 WB Frontage to 8,032 (PAG, 2011)5,849 (PAG, 2013)
Hartman Lane - 27,592
(PAG, 2012)
Hartman Lane to
Thornydale Road -
20,721 (PAG, 2012)
Capacity (Florida Dept. of 15,600-32,90015,60015,600
Transportation, 2002)
Conforms to Width StandardsNoNoYes
Surface Conditions Paved Paved/Dirt PavedPaved/Dirt Paved
Paved
Proposed Improvements (See Part III - NANorthbound Left-Turn LaneNA
Land Use Plan)
7
814'1+
1764
396')3;23*%6%2%-1%3928=%49-()%.3686))87%2(398)70%2
763;
31)*9896);-(8,7,%:)6)')280=&))26)(9')(*63146):-3970=3:)6()(-'%8)(63%(;%=7
b. Existing / Proposed Intersections on Arterials within 1 Mile of the Site
Existing intersections on arterials within one-mile of the site include the signalized
intersection of Cortaro Farms Road at Hartman Lane, Cortaro Farms Road at Camino De
Oeste, and Cortaro Farms Road at Interstate 10.
c. Existing Bicycle / Pedestrian Ways Adjacent to the Site
Four of the project area roads within one-mile of the project site are designated on the
Tucson Bike Map as bike routes. Cortaro Farms Road and Hardy Road have bike routes
with a striped shoulder that connect to bike routes on Hartman Lane and Interstate 10
49
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 249 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.11.a - Existing Roads and Access
PIMA
COUNTY
ARTHUR PACK
REGIONAL
PARK
100'-200' (150')
Source: Pima County GIS
00.250.51
Miles
LEGEND
SCALE: 1" = 1/2 Mile
Bus/Shuttle RouteMajor Road - Right of Way
Project Site
School
(Future Right of Way)
104X
1 Mile Radius
Intersection
Bicycle Route
411
Marana Town Limits
Bus/Shuttle Stops
Railroad
413
Park
50
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 250 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Frontage Road, as well as the bike routes/trails within Arthur Pack Regional Park. There
are pedestrian sidewalks along both sides of Cortaro Farms Road. Refer to Part II: B.12,
Recreation and Trails, and Exhibit II: B.12.a: Trails, Parks & Recreation Areas for locations
of existing bicycle routes, pedestrian ways, and parks within a one-mile radius.
12. RECREATION AND TRAILS
a. Description of Trails, Parks, and Recreation Areas within 1 Mile of the Site
As shown on Exhibit II: B.12.a - Recreation and Trails, there are three existing parks,
Arthur Pack Regional Park, Sunset Point Neighborhood Park and Denny Dunn
Neighborhood Park, within one-mile of the project site.
Arthur Pack Regional Park, located at Thornydale Road and Hardy Road, features multi-
purpose ball ¿ elds, batting cages, basketball courts, playgrounds with and without shade
structures, picnic areas, ramadas, restrooms, grills and hiking trails. Additionally, Arthur
Pack Regional Park is home to the Crooked Tree Golf Course. Sunset Point Neighborhood
Park, located northwest of the site on Star Grass Drive, has a baseball ¿ eld, playground,
picnic area and restrooms.
Denny Dunn Neighborhood Park, located west of Oldfather Drive along Massingale
Road, includes two baseball ¿ elds, two soccer ¿ elds, a basketball court, playground,
picnic area and restrooms. See Exhibit II: B.12.a - Trails, Parks & Recreation Areas.
i. Trails:
According to the Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan, there are two existing trails
within one-mile of the project site. The Hardy Wash Trail (Pima County Trail #160) is
an existing east-west trail, that follows the northern edge of the Hardy Wash adjacent
to the subject property. The trail features both paved and unpaved portions as well
as a second branch from Arthur Pack Regional Park northeast to Lambert Lane. The
Cortaro Farms Road Path, almost seven miles long, connects the Silverbell Road Path
to the La Cañada Drive Trail. It intersects the Santa Cruz and Cañada Del Oro River
Parks.
ii. Santa Cruz River Park:
Southwest of the site are additional shared-use paths belonging to the Santa Cruz
River Park. A combination of asphalt and gravel paths on both sides of the river, this
scenic and recreational route stretches approximately 9.5 miles connecting small parks
and other amenities located near the river. The River Park also features opportunities
for bicycles, as both sides of the river between Grant Road and 29th Street are paved,
while from Grant Street north the trail is paved on the west side only.
51
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 251 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.12.a - Trails, Parks, & Recreation Areas
PIMA COUNTY
ARTHUR PACK
REGIONAL
PARK
513 AC
SUNSET POINTE
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK - 4 AC
QUARRY
PINE
GOLF
CLUB
DENNY DUNN
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK
CROSSROADS
5 AC
AT SILVERBELL
DISTRICT PARK
48 AC
Source: Pima County GIS 00.250.51
Miles
SCALE: 1" = 1/2 Mile
LEGEND
Project SiteParkTrailPath
Singletrack Trail
1 Mile RadiusGolf CourseBicycle Route
Marana Town Limits
52
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 252 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
iii. Bicycle Routes
Striped-shoulder bicycle routes are present along most major road segments, such as
Cortaro Farms Road, however the collector roads bordering the site, Hartman Lane
and Camino de Oeste, do not include striped-shoulder bicycle lanes.
13. CULTURAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, & HISTORICAL RESOURCES
a. Archaeological Resources
Portions of the site were previously surveyed for cultural resources in 1981. Fifty
archaeology survey projects have been conducted within a one-mile radius of the site
between 1953 and 2015. Twenty-nine archaeological sites have been identi¿ ed within a
one-mile radius of the project area. No sites are crossed by the project area; however,
the eastern boundary of AZ AA:12:285(ASM) is adjacent to the project area. This site
may extend into the project area. The Arizona State Museum recommends, but not
required, that the Property be inspected for cultural resources by a quali¿ ed archaeological
professional prior to any ground disturbing construction (see Exhibit II: B.13.b).
Per the Town of Marana Land Development Code Title 20.05A, a complete Class III
archaeological survey is required. If a 404 Permit or other federal nexus is associated with
the project, the archaeological report shall be submitted to the State Historic Preservation
Of¿ ce. If there is no federal nexus for the project, the archaeological report shall be
submitted to the Town or Marana along with a review fee.
b. State Museum Letter
See Exhibit II: B.13.b - Arizona State Museum Letter.
14. EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE & PUBLIC FACILITIES
a. Water
The project site is located within the Marana Water service area. Currently, the closest
Town of Marana Municipal Water system facilities are located south of the project site
along Hartman Lane and south of Cortaro Farms Road. Oro Valley Water is also in close
proximity to the site with a waterline located in Camino de Oeste. See Exhibit II: B.14.a -
Water Facilities.
b. Sewer
Pima County will provide sewer service for the site. See Exhibit II: B.14.b - Existing Sewer
Service.
c. Schools & Libraries
The site is located within the Marana Uni¿ ed School District. There are three schools
located within a one-mile radius of the project boundary, Quail Run Elementary School,
Tortolita Middle School, and DeGrazia Elementary School. There are no libraries within
a one-mile radius of the project boundary. See Exhibit II: B.14.a: Public Facilities within 1
Mile Radius.
53
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 253 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.13.b - Arizona State Museum Letter
1013E.UB.
NIVERSITYLVD
T,AZ85721
UCSON
ASRS
RCHAEOLOGICAL ITEECORDS EARCH
*This report documents the results of an archaeological site-records check.
It does not constitute a cultural resources clearance.
Date: 1/11/2016
Requester Name: Hillary Turby
Company: Norris Design
Address: 418 N. Toole Ave.
City, State, Zip Code: Tucson, AZ, 85701
Phone / E-mail: 520-622-9565 / hturby@norris-design.com
Project Name and/or Number: Camino De Oeste Project Description: Single family home residential development
Project Area Location: Parcels 221-14-011B, 221-14-0100, 221-14-002F, 221-14-009A
Legal Description: T12S, R12E, S25
Search Results:
According to a search of the archaeological records retained at the Arizona State Museum (ASM), 50 survey projects have
been conducted within a one-mile radius of the project area between 1953 and 2015. Previous survey work was conducted
in support of residential and commercial development; golf course construction; road construction and improvement; river
bank stabilization; canal construction; storm water management; geotechnical study; and the installation and maintenance
of fiber-optic, gas, pipe, and telephone lines. Portions of the project area were previously surveyed in 1981 (Fish et al. 1992;
Madsen et al. 1993) and 2002 (Jones and Dart 2002). Twenty-nine archaeological sites have been identified within a 1-mile
radius of the project area. No sites are crossed by the project area; however, the eastern boundary of AZ AA:12:285(ASM)
is adjacent to the project area (Brack 2004; Howell 2009; Huntington 2002; Jones 2008; Jones and Klucas 2010; Moses
2003; Thurtle 2003). This site may extend into the project area.
Sites in Project Area:
None are recorded, but the project area has not been entirely surveyed. Additionally, nearby site AZ AA:12:285(ASM) may
extend into the project area.
Recommendations:
1. Although portions of the project area have been previously surveyed, the work was conducted 14 to 35 years ago. It is
standard archaeological practice for a property to be re-surveyed if the previous survey was conducted 10 or more years
ago, as there is a possibility for unidentified archaeological properties to have since been exposed. Furthermore, the
potential for AZ AA:12:285(ASM) to extend into the project area warrants further investigation.
ASM recommends, but it is not required by ASM, that a qualified archaeological contractor be consulted before any ground
disturbance begins. A list of archaeological contractors is available on the ASM website at:
http://www.statemuseum.arizona.edu/crservices/permits/index.shtml.
2. Pursuant to §41-865 ., if any human remains or funerary objects are discovered during
Arizona Revised Statutes et seq
your project work, all work will stop within the area of the remains and Dr. Todd Pitezel, ASM assistant curator of
archaeology, will be contacted immediately at 520-621-4795.
3. City, county, or municipal governments may have requirements, therefore ASM recommends that the relevant
jurisdiction(s) be consulted.
If you have any questions about the results of this records search, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Shannon Twilling, M.A.
Shannon D. Twilling, M.A.
Research Specialist
Archaeological Permits Office
Arizona State Museum
(520) 621-1271
twilling@email.arizona.edu
Page 1 of 3
54
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 254 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.13.b - Arizona State Museum Letter
References
Brack, M.L.
2004
Cultural Resources Assessment of Cortaro Farms Road Between Interstate 10 and Stargrass Drive, Marana, Pima
Project Report No. 04-143. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson.
County, Arizona.
Fish, Suzanne K., Paul R. Fish, and John Madsen (editors)
1992 . Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 56. University
The Marana Community in the Hohokam World
of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Howell, Joseph
2009 .
Results of Archaeological Monitoring at AZ AA:12:285(ASM), the Dairy Site, in Marana, Pima County, Arizona
Report No. 2009-80. Tierra Right of Way Services, Tucson.
Huntington, Fred
2002
Results of Archaeological Monitoring of the Sewer Installation on the Cortaro Ranch Development in Marana, Pima
Archaeological Report No. 2002-032A. Tierra Right of Way Services, Tucson.
County, Arizona.
Jones, Jeffrey T.
2008
Archaeological Testing at AZ AA:12:285(ASM) (The Dairy Site) and AZ AA:12:780 (the Canada Canal) in Marana,
. Report No. 2008-126. Tierra Right of Way Services, Tucson.
Pima County, Arizona
Jones, Jeffrey T. and Allen Dart
2002
Cultural Resources Survey of a 20-Acre Parcel along Camino de Oeste Near Cortaro Farms Road in Marana,
Letter Report No. 2002.029. Old Pueblo Archaeology Center, Tucson.
Arizona.
Jones, Jeffrey T. and Eric E. Klucas (editors)
2010
Results of Archaeological Data Recovery Investigations at the Portion of AZ AA:12:285(ASM), the Dairy Site,
. Report No. 2010-22. Tierra Right of
within the Proposed Qwest Expansion Locus in Marana, Pima County, Arizona
Way Services, Tucson.
Madsen, John N., Paul R. Fish and Suzanne K. Fish (editors)
1993 . Arizona State Museum
The Northern Tucson Basin Survey: Research Directions and Background Studies
Archaeological Series 182. University of Arizona, Tucson.
Moses, James
2003
A Class III Cultural Resources Assessment Survey of 40 Acres at Joplin Road and Interstate 10 in Tucson, Pima
. Archaeological Report No. 2003-41. Tierra Right of Way Services, Tucson.
County, Arizona
Thurtle, Mary Charlotte (editor)
2003
Archaeological Monitoring and Sampling of Deeply Buried Late Archaic-Early Agricultural Deposits at the Dairy Site,
. Archaeological Research Series, no. 1. Tierra Right of
AZ AA:12:285(ASM), in the Town of Marana, Arizona
Way Services, Tucson.
Page 2 of 3
55
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 255 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.13.b - Arizona State Museum Letter
Project Area
W. Cortaro Farms Rd.
Proposed Project Area
Company
Map generated by the Arizona State Museum
Norris Design
Project Location:
T12S, R12E, S25
02655301,060
Project
Camino de Oeste
Feet
Page 3 of 3
56
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 256 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
d. Police, Fire & Emergency Services
The site is located in and protected by the Northwest Fire District. The closest ¿ re station is
just over a half mile from the project area at 8475 North Star Grass Drive. The project site
is within the Town of Marana’s police jurisdiction. The Town of Marana Police Headquarters
is located at 11555 W. Civic Center Drive. See Exhibit II: B.14.a Public Facilities with 1 Mile
Radius.
e. Solid Waste Disposal & Recycling
Waste disposal and recycling will be provided by private companies.
f. Other Utilities
i. Existing Power
Currently, the site is located within the service area of Tucson Electric Power (TEP).
See Exhibit II: B.14.f - Other Utilities, for the locations of these lines.
ii. Existing Gas
Currently, Southwest Gas Corporation serves this area. See Exhibit II: B.14.f - Other
Utilities, for the location of this line.
iii. Existing Communications
CenturyLink currently provides service to the area.
iv. Existing Cable
The site is located within the Comcast service area.
15. COMPOSITE CONSTRAINTS (MCHARG) MAP
A composite map depicting the site’s Topography, Hydrology, and Vegetation, is shown in
Exhibit B: M.1, Composite Constraints Map. There is no signi¿ cant wildlife habitat on-site.
57
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 257 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.14.a - Water Facilities
CORTARO FARMS ROAD
Source: Pima County GIS
05001,0002,000
SCALE:
1 " = 1,000 '
LEGEND
Project SiteMarana Intended Service Area
Marana Water Service Area
Marana Town Limits
Tucson Water Service Area
Town of Oro Valley Water Service Area
58
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 258 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.14.b - Existing Sewer Service
5175-33
4678-25
5175-01A
1728-27
4678-24
1728-26
4163-01
4678-23
6659-04
1728-25
4678-22
1728-24
4678-214678-21
4678-20
1728-23
1728-22
4678-19
4678-18
1728-21
4163-26
6867-0A
6867-01
1728-20
4678-14
4678-116867-B4678-124678-134678-154678-164678-17
4678-084678-10
4678-09
05001,0002,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 1,000 '
LEGEND
Existing Sewer Line -Manhole with
Project Site
Pipe Diameter & PlanIdentifcation Number
Marana Town Limits
Number
Pima County Regional
Private Sewer Line
Wastewater Lift Station
59
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 259 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.14.c-e - Public Facilities within 1 Mile Radius
MOUNTAIN
PIMA
VIEW HIGH
COUNTY
SCHOOL
MARANA
ARTHUR PACK
REGIONAL
PARK
DEGRAZIA
513 AC
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
10
TORTOLITA
MIDDLE
SUNSET POINTE
SCHOOL
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK - 4 AC
QUAIL RUN
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
MARANA
PIMA
COUNTY
CROSSROADS
DENNY DUNN
AT SILVERBELL
NEIGHBORHOOD
THORNYDALE
DISTRICT PARK
PARK
ELEMENTARY
48 AC
5 AC
SCHOOL
10
Source: Pima County GIS
00.250.51
Miles
LEGEND
SCALE: 1" = 1/2 Mile
School
Project Site
Police Station
1 Mile Radius
Fire Station
Marana Town Limits
Park
60
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 260 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.14.f - Other Utilities
2" PB
2" PB
2" PB
2" PB
05001,0002,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 1,039 '
LEGEND
Project SiteGas Main
Marana Town LimitsTucson Electric Power Lines
61
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 261 of 473
Part II — Development Capability Report/Inventory and Analysis Report
Exhibit II: B.15 - Composite Constraints Map
PIMA
COUNTY
02505001,000
Source: Pima County GIS
SCALE:
1 " = 500 '
LEGEND
Project Site2 ft ContourSignificant Vegetation (Saguaro)
10 ft Contour
Marana TownSignificant Vegetation
Slope 15-25%
Sonoran Desert-Scrub; Paloverde-
Wash
Mixed Cacti
Slope 25% or greater
FEMA Floodplain
Sonoran Deciduous Riparian
Areas of High Visibility
62
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 262 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
1. PROJECT NARRATIVE
This is a request to rezone the 72-acre project site from Zone C (Large Lot Zone) to R-6 (Single-
Family Residential) for a proposed single family residential community consisting of 144 lots. The
Camino de Oeste project will have a proposed residential density of 2 RAC that is consistent with
neighboring properties to the west, north and east with density ranges from 2 RAC to 6 RAC.
Lots will be a minimum of 6,000 square feet in size with a minimum width of ¿ fty feet. All homes
will be single-story. Residential will be the predominate land use within the Camino de Oeste
development, with supplemental project open space provided in the form of NUOS and common
area open space. Exhibit III: C.1 Conceptual Land Use Plan illustrates the property owner’s vision
to create an exclusive neighborhood that incorporates large amounts of continuous open space
and takes advantage of surrounding mountain views.
2. CONFORMANCE / CONSISTENCY TO ADOPTED PLANS
The proposed Camino de Oeste project will conform to the Town of Marana General Plan and
the recommendations set forth by regulatory agencies involved in permitting. Camino de Oeste
is located within the Planning Area boundary of the Town’s General Plan within the Southern
Growth – In¿ ll Opportunities Area. The southern growth area contains several master planned
communities and residential subdivisions. Commercial facilities to serve these areas are located
along the major transportation corridors such as Cortaro Farms Road. This area is primarily an
in¿ ll area for residential development including planned developments, such as DeAnza.
The Marana General Plan designates the land within the proposed rezoning area as Low
Density Residential (LDR). The Low Density Residential designation is typically characterized by
single-family detached homes on relatively large lots with a density range of 0.5 to 2.0 residences
per acre.
a. Marana 2010 General Plan
The Camino de Oeste project is designed to follow the growth area goals of low density
residential development and open space preservation. The land set aside as open
space, including the Hardy Wash (a riparian area) and drainageways, are the most
environmentally sensitive areas of the site. As a result, the site plan sets aside a signi¿ cant
amount of open space.
Camino de Oeste is also located within the in¿ ll area of the southern limits of the General
Plan. The land use designation on the property is Low Density Residential, 0.5-2.0
residences per acre (RAC). The proposed density is 2 RAC; therefore, no amendments
will be necessary for this development to be in conformance with the General Plan.
The Camino de Oeste project will feature high-quality design and development that is
compatible with what exists in the area and will provide new housing opportunities in
proximity to neighborhood services, including schools, churches and the Southern Growth
63
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 263 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
- In¿ ll Opportunities Areanear I-10 and Cortaro Farms Road. According to the 2010
General Plan Land Use Designation Map, the vast majority of land surrounding the site is
either Low Density Residential or Medium Density Residential.
b. Marana Strategic Plan
Camino de Oeste is in conformance with the Marana Strategic Plan that was adopted
January 6, 2015. The vision for the project aligns with the 2015 Town of Marana Strategic
Plan, supporting opportunities for commerce, community and recreation in a key growth
area for the Town. The Camino de Oeste project is located within the Town’s Southern
Growth– In¿ ll Opportunities Area and meets the goals and vision for the area.
3. COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJOINING DEVELOPMENT
Development surrounding the Camino de Oeste project is predominately residential to the
north, south, and east, with the planned residential DeAnza development located directly
west of the project site. Neighboring the property’s northern and eastern boundaries are the
existing Countryside Terrace, Sunset Pointe, and Vista Oeste Estates residential subdivisions.
Adjacent to the property’s western boundary is the DeAnza Speci¿ c Plan (265 lots) and the
existing Cortaro Ranch subdivision. Camino de Oeste complements the future and ongoing
development activity in the general vicinity. In addition, the compatibility between this project and
neighboring developments is further strengthened by incorporating buffers between the proposed
development and existing residential communities. For a map of adjoining development refer to
Exhibit II: B.3.g Existing/Approved Subdivisions.
4. LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN
The land use concept plan for Camino de Oeste is illustrated in Exhibit III: C.1 - Conceptual Land
Use Plan. As shown on this exhibit, 144 single family residential lots are proposed on the property
providing an overall residential density of 2 RAC. All lots will be a minimum of 6,000 square
feet and be subject to the Town of Marana R-6 zoning development standards as outlined in the
Town of Marana Land Development Code Title 5 - Zoning, Section 05.10.12 - R-6 Residential.
It is anticipated that four different lot sizes will be offered, 50’x120’, 55’x120’, 60’x120’, and
65’x120’. Homesites are grouped in such a way to preserve larger areas of continuous open
space, providing corridors for wildlife habitat, less back to back neighbor conditions, and better
opportunities for residents for mountain views. The majority of the open space provided within
the project will be NUOS, accounting for 30% (22 acres) of the project area. Additional open
space has been programed into the Concept Plan as common area open space consisting of a
neighborhood park, bufferyards, and areas for grading and drainage. Total open space provided
within Camino de Oeste will be approximately 36 acres (50%). All open space and common areas
will be owned and maintained by the homeowners associations.
The site is bordered on the east and west by existing collector roadways, Camino de Oeste
and Hartman Lane respectively, providing two access points for project residents. Both project
entry roads are located to line up with proposed (as shown on the Preliminary Plat for DeAnza)
64
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 264 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
and existing (Rosebay Drive) intersections. Each project entry will have entry monumentation
to create a sense of arrival. Although the entrance off Hartman Lane will be the primary project
entry for Camino de Oeste, both entries will be understated and located so as not to interfere with
traf¿ c. Internal roadways will be forty-two feet in width and follow the Town of Marana typical local
roadway section.
Roads and lots were designed to be clustered in order to preserve larger, continuous areas
of NUOS and limit the number of homes directly backing adjacent collector roadways and
residential uses. Bufferyards are provided along the perimeter of the property that will meet and
in most cases exceed those required by the Town of Marana Land Development Code, Title 17
- Environmental Resource Preservation, Native Plant Protection and Landscape Requirements,
Section 17.03.07 - Landscape Buffer Standards. The bufferyards will include a combination
of landscape and property walls to serve as landscape screens to mitigate noise and visual
impacts from adjacent properties and roadways. Property walls used within the project site will
be predominantly view walls to capture the surrounding mountain views. In areas where greater
privacy or screening is needed, ¿ ve foot solid masonry walls will be used.
Camino de Oeste will be subject to the Marana Town Code, Title 17 - Land Development, Chapter
17-5 Subdivisions, Section 17-5-4 Design Standards.
5. TOPOGRAPHY
a. Conceptual Land Use Plan Response to Existing Topographic Characteristics
There are no restricted peaks or ridges on the site, nor are there any rock outcrops.
The project in its existing condition has an Average Cross Slope (ACS) of 13.27%.
Because the ACS is less than 15%, grading is allowed per the proposed R- 6 zoning
regulations. Approximately 70% of the project site will be graded to allow for the
development of local roadways, residential lots, utilities, and site amenities. The remaining
area, approximately 30% of the project site, will be set aside as NUOS.
b. Encroachment onto Slopes 15 Percent or Greater
Due to the unique topography of the project site, the conceptual land use plan for
the property includes encroachment into areas with slopes of 15% or greater. Lots
are clustered where possible to maximize contiguous NUOS area, preserve existing
drainageways, and allow for potential wildlife corridors through the site.
c. New Average Cross-Slope
New cross-slope calculations are not required as the existing ACS was found to be
less than 15%. There are considerable areas to remain natural on the site as designated
on the Conceptual Land Use Plan (see Exhibit III: C.5.a - Encroachment onto Slopes of
15% or Greater).
d. Perimeter Area used in New Cross-Slope
Not applicable.
65
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 265 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
66
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 266 of 473
CAMINO DE OESTE
31’22” W 659.46’N 00
31’22” W 329.72’N 00
•
35’57” W 328.88’N 00
•
37’34” W 1319.50’N 00
HARTMAN LANE
ENCROACHMENT ONTO 15% OR GREATER SLOPES
MARANA, ARIZONA
CAMINO DE OESTE
Part III — Land Use Plan
6. HYDROLOGY
a. Conceptual Development Plan Response to Existing Hydrological Characteristics
The conceptual land use plan maintains historical drainage patterns draining into and out
of the site. The larger water courses remain essentially as is, draining within common
areas/open space. Off-site storm water will be conveyed through the project site within
drainage features/open space areas or via constructed channels.
b. Encroachment/Modi¿ cation of Drainage Patterns
There are slight encroachments planned within Hardy Wash and the two on-site washes
(#3 & #5 shown on Exhibit III: C.6) that convey over 50 cfs. The encroachments are
planned such that regulatory increases to water surface elevations in the respective
watercourses will not exceed allowable limits, or adversely impact adjacent properties.
The proposed encroachment into Hardy Wash will not extend into the FEMA À oodplain and
thus no Letter of Map Change (LOMC) is proposed. Existing and proposed À oodplain and
erosion hazard setback (EHS) limits are shown on the Post-Project Drainage Conditions
Exhibit III: C.6 for each of the proposed encroachments.
c. Potential Drainage Impact to Off-Site Land Uses
The project will not produce any adverse drainage impacts to upstream or downstream
properties. Post-development discharges À owing onto the site will remain the same as
under pre-development conditions. Due to the critical basin detention requirements,
overall discharge rates exiting the site from on-site developed watersheds will be reduced
in accordance with critical basin criteria in the Marana Floodplain & Erosion Hazard
Management Code, Chapter 17-15.
d. Engineering and Design Features
All building pads will be designed to be a minimum of one foot above adjacent 100-
yearÀ ood elevations. Where subdivision improvements encroach into regulatory
À oodplains, stabilized bank protection with adequate scour protection measures will be
provided to protect from erosion and scour. This will effectively reduce the EHS along
those improvements to be coincident with the new bank line. As part of the subdivision
improvements that are proposed along Hardy Wash, a constructed re-alignment of a low-
À ow channel braid is proposed for a short distance along the toe of the new bank. This
channel will redirect À ows around the new improvements and will help maintain adequate
conveyance capacity in Hardy Wash, so that increases to 100-year water surfaces are kept
below the 0.1 foot regulatory maximum.
e. Conformance with Area Plan, Basin Management Plans and Town Policies
This project will provide on-site retention/detention in accordance with the Marana
Floodplain & Erosion Hazard Management Code, Chapter 17-15 and the Pima County
detention/retention manual. On-site stormwater À ows will be detained down to below
existing (predevelopment) conditions per critical basin requirements. The retention/
detention basin(s) will likely be integrated within the open space corridors and the locations
71
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 269 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
of the basin(s) will be determined in conjunction with preparation of the subdivision plats.
On-site stormwater conveyance will adhere to current Town of Marana Land Development
Code and applicable basin management plans. The total detention/retention volume for
this project has been estimated to be 3.9 acre-feet. The Town of Marana Northwest Area
Drainage Policy is not applicable to this site. In compliance with Title 25 of the Marana
Land Development Code, a SWPPP will need to be submitted with the fee, and reviewed
by the Town prior to issuance of a grading permit.
7. VEGETATION
a. Response to Existing Vegetative Characteristics
The majority of on-site vegetation consists of Sonoran Desert Scrub. The conceptual land
use plan provides for 30% of the project site to be set aside as NUOS and additional open
space will be provided in the form of common area open space. A Site Resource Inventory
(SRI) has been submitted as part of this rezone application, identifying signi¿ cant on-site
vegetation such as saguaros and ironwoods (see Appendix A - SRI Map).
b. Response to the Native Plant Ordinance and Habitat Disturbance
The project will comply with the Town of Marana’s Native Plant Preservation Ordinance,
Title 17 of the Marana Town Code. The NUOS will satisfy the Native Plant Preservation
requirements. When practical, viable vegetation that exists on-site may be considered
for transplanting on-site, when feasible, into designated common areas or bufferyards
requiring re-vegetation. Plants that cannot be preserved in place or salvaged for use in
common areas of the project will be made available for use in Marana’s existing parks,
community centers or natural preserve areas.
c. Techniques Used to Mitigate Sound, Visibility, Lighting and Traf¿ c
The land use concept plan for Camino de Oeste promotes exclusivity and minimizes
homes backing to the property boundary. In areas where lots back to existing residential
properties or the adjacent collector roadways, a bufferyard is incorporated to mitigate
visibility, lighting and sound. The proposed bufferyards will be landscaped and perimeter
lot walls provided. See Exhibit III: C.1 - Conceptual Land Use Plan. Two project entries are
provided, splitting traf¿ c volumes to either Hartman Lane or Camino de Oeste.
d. Cross-section Illustrations of Proposed Buffers to be Used Adjacent to Existing
Development (See Exhibit III: C.7.d - Bufferyard Cross-Sections).
8. WILDLIFE
As described above in Section 7. Vegetation, existing site vegetation will be preserved in-place,
where possible, in the NUOS. NUOS area located in and adjacent to ephemeral drainageways
include an increased density of plants, a more diverse assemblage of plants, and larger plant
specimens than occur in adjacent upland areas. The Hardy Wash will also be preserved as
NUOS and will contribute greatly to the unimpeded movement of wildlife across the northern
boundary of the site. By protecting these important areas as NUOS, impacts to wildlife species
and their habitats are minimized, while maintaining wildlife corridors and connectivity through the
site and across the region.
72
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 270 of 473
HARTMAN LN
Camino de Oeste
BOUNDARY
SITE
BOUNDARY
LOT
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY
LOT
SITE
Part III — Land Use Plan
9. VIEWSHEDS
As described in Part II - B: Development Capability Report, the topography of the Camino de
Oeste project site is gently rolling with views of the region’s mountains in all directions. Where
possible, the development of Camino de Oeste shall maximize view corridors and vistas to the
major mountain ranges. Alignments and locations of roads, homesites, and gathering spaces
shall take advantage of these abundant mountain views, when possible. Setbacks from adjacent
properties, changes in topography, and existing privacy walls, however, make it dif¿ cult to have a
complete view across the property from any adjacent property boundary.
a. Mitigation Measures
The four parcels located within the northeast corner of the project site, that are not a part of
the Camino de Oeste project, will be most directly impacted by this development, however,
these homes are set at a higher elevation than the Camino de Oeste project causing
minimal impact to mountain views. One of the four lots also has a pre-existing perimeter
wall that blocks views to the south. The conceptual land use plan includes bufferyards
that will include landscaping and property walls in order to assist in mitigating views of the
Camino de Oeste project from the existing adjacent lots.
b. Areas of High Visibility
The perimeter of the site is highly visible from directly adjacent properties and collector
roadways. These areas will be mitigated via landscape bufferyards and ¿ ve foot property
walls in key areas of high visibility. Additionally, all homes are planned to be single-story,
reducing the visual impact to neighboring properties.
10. TRAFFIC
The proposed Camino De Oeste development site will have direct site access from Hartman
Lane and Camino De Oeste. The proposed site access from Hartman Lane is located at the
crest of a vertical curve. This is an ideal site access location on this road because it provides
good sight visibility for left-turning vehicles into and out of the site as well as right-turning
vehicles into the site. Based on the available traf¿ c data and anticipated trips into this access
point, the northbound right-turn and southbound left-turn volumes into the site from Hartman
Lane would not warrant a right-turn lane or left-turn lane for the projected opening / build-out
year of 2019. Therefore, no improvements are anticipated for Hartman Lane as part of the
Camino De Oeste development.
The proposed site access from Camino De Oeste was positioned to line up with the Rosebay
Drive, a site access for the residential development across Camino De Oeste. Based on
the available traf¿ c data and anticipated trips into this access point, the northbound left-turn
volumes into the site from Camino De Oeste would warrant a left-turn lane, however, the
southbound right-turn volumes would not warrant a right-turn lane for the projected opening /
build-out year of 2019. Therefore, the only improvements anticipated for Camino De Oeste as
part of the Camino De Oeste development is the addition of a northbound left-turn lane.
77
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 273 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
Typical Street Sections
Exhibit III: C.10.f -
78
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 274 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
Local residential streets proposed within the Camino de Oeste project will follow the Town of
Marana’s typical forty-two foot local roadway section (see Exhibit III: C.10.f - Typical Street
Sections).
See Camino de Oeste Traf¿ c Impact Analysis dated February 2016 (see Appendix D - Traf¿ c
Impact Analysis) for more detailed information regarding traf¿ c.
11. PUBLIC UTILITIES
a. Sewer
Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation District has indicated capacity available
for this project in the public sewer G-2001-158, downstream from manhole 4271-01
(See Exhibit III: C.11.a.1 and Exhibit III.C.11.a.2). Sewer capacity investigation No.
2016-14, dated January 25, 2016, from Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation
Department, indicates that there is currently capacity in the downstream public sewer
system.
b. Water
The property site lies within the boundary of the Town of Marana Municipal Water service
area, however, Marana does not currently have service for the elevation zone that this
project will require. The Developer will coordinate with Town of Marana Municipal Water to
provide water service to the project.
c. Gas
Southwest Gas currently serves this area.
d. Electric
Tucson Electric Power currently serves this area.
12. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Police Service
Camino de Oeste is located within the incorporated limits of the Town of Marana and shall
be served by the Town of Marana Police Department.
b. Fire Service
The Camino de Oeste property is located in and protected by the Northwest Fire District.
The closest ¿ re station is just south of the site at 8475 North Star Grass Drive.
c. Sanitary Pick-up Services
Sanitary pick-up will be provided through a contract with a private solid-waste collection
service.
79
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 275 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
80
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 276 of 473
PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE
MARANA, ARIZONA
CAMINO DE OESTE
Part III — Land Use Plan
Exhibit III: C.11.a.2 - Sewer Capacity Investigation Letter
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 724-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 724-9635
January 25, 2016
Ben Zismann
EPS Group, Inc.
8710 N Thornydale Road, Suite 140
Tucson, AZ 85742
Sewerage Capacity Investigation No. 2016-14 Type I
Pulte Camino de Oeste, Parcel 22114011B, 221140100, 22114009A,
RE:
22114002F
Estimated Flow 31,320 gpd (ADWF).
Greetings:
The above referenced project is tributary to the Tres Rios Water Reclamation Facility via
the Continental Ranch Interceptor
.
Capacity is currently available for this project in the public sewer G-2001-158,
downstream from manhole 4271-01
This letter is not a reservation or commitment of treatment or conveyance capacity for
this project. It is not an approval of point and method of connection. It is an analysis of
the system as of this date and valid for one year. Allocation of capacity is made by the
Type III Capacity Response.
If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 724-6642.
Reviewed by: Kurt Stemm, CEA Sr.
83
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 278 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
84
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 279 of 473
PROPOSED WATER SERVICE
MARANA, ARIZONA
CAMINO DE OESTE
Part III — Land Use Plan
d. Schools and Parks
Camino de Oeste is located within the Marana Uni¿ ed School District (MUSD). Degrazia
Elementary School, Quail Run Elementary School, Tortolita Middle School, and Mountain
View High School are expected to serve the site. The development will not generate
a suf¿ cient population of students to warrant the location of a school site within the
community. Contribution fees, if any, shall be determined prior to the approval of a Final
Plat and shall be set forth in a Development Agreement. With a total of 144 residential lots,
it is anticipated that approximately 51 students will be generated by the development of
Camino de Oeste. MUSD provided the following multipliers to use for student enrollment
projections. (MUSD multipliers do not distinguish between different housing products):
Elementary School: 0.25 students per home (0.25 x 144) = 36 students
Junior High & High School: 0.10 students per home (0.10 x 144) = 15 students
T III: C.12 School Capacity
ABLE
2015/2016 School
SchoolsAddressSchool Capacity
Enrollment
DeGrazia
5051 West Overton Road1,248502
Elementary
Quail Run 4600 West Cortaro
1,204558
ElementaryFarms Road
Tortolita Middle 4101 West Hardy1,577
841
SchoolRoad
Mountain View
3901 West Linda Vista2,4001,875
High School
13. RECREATION & TRAILS
a. Recreation Areas to be Provided within the Development
A neighborhood park is planned for Camino de Oeste in the west portion of the site,
providing for active and passive recreation opportunities. The interior roadways will also
include sidewalks on both side of the road. This will allow for pedestrian access throughout
the site as well as provide pedestrian connections to Hartman Lane and Camino de Oeste.
b. Ownership of Natural / Modi¿ ed Open Space within the Development
A Homeowners Association regulated by CC&R’s shall manage all NUOS and common
area open space, including the neighborhood park. Proposed designated NUOS and
common area open space can be found on Exhibit III: C.1.
87
Camino de OesteJuly2016
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 281 of 473
Part III — Land Use Plan
c. Access to Off-site Trails & How Access will be Maintained
Camino de Oeste residents will have access to off-site trails, including the Hardy Wash
Trail, via Hartman Lane or Camino de Oeste.
14. CULTURAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, & HISTORICAL RESOURCES
a. Measures Used for Protection of All Cultural and Historical Resources on the Site
As shown on Exhibit II: B.13.b: Arizona State Museum Letter, portions of the site have
been surveyed for cultural resources. Twenty-nine archaeology sites are recorded within a
one-mile radius of the site; none of which are located on the subject property.
b. Resources to be incorporated into Development
There are no known resources to be incorporated into the development. A cultural
resource report for the project area will be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit
for the site. If a cultural resources report is older than ten years for this site, a quali¿ ed
archaeologist will perform a site visit and review the cultural report to determine whether it
is still accurate.
c. Measures to be Taken
Per the Town of Marana Land Development Code Title 20.05A, a complete Class III
archaeological survey is required. If a 404 Permit or other federal nexus is associated with
the project, the archaeological report shall be submitted to the State Historic Preservation
Of¿ ce. If there is no federal nexus for the project, the archaeological report shall be
submitted to the Town or Marana along with a review fee.
If any human remains or funerary items are discovered anywhere during construction, or at
any time, all work must stop in the area of the remains and Mr. John Madsen, Repatriation
Coordinator, must be contacted immediately at (520) 621-4795, pursuant to A.R.S. §41-
865.
88
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 282 of 473
Appendix A — Site Resource Inventory Map
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
%
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 283 of 473
Appendix A — Site Resource Inventory Map
Camino de OesteJuly 2016
%
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 284 of 473
662’
CAMINO DE OESTE
324’
328’
1,322’
HARTMAN LANE
Appendix B — Legal Description and ALTA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET AS CONVEYED TO PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA BY DEED RECORDED IN
DOCKET 4474, PAGE 335.
PARCEL 2;
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
PARCEL 3;
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12
SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF; AND
FURTHER EXCEPT LYING WITHIN THE PROPER1Y TAKEN IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION
CASE NO. C20001137 RECORDED APRIL 30, 2001 IN DOCKET 11538, PAGE 2589.
PARCEL 4;
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 12 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, PIMA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET AS CONVEYED TO PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, IN DOCKET 4474 AT PAGE
339.
Camino de Oeste July 2016
&
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 286 of 473
Appendix B — Legal Description and ALTA
Camino de Oeste July 2016
&
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 287 of 473
Appendix C — Title Report
Camino de OesteJuly2016
'
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 291 of 473
Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Commitment
First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation (“Company”), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of
title insurance, as identified in ScheduleA, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in ScheduleA, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in
the land described or referred to in ScheduleA, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to
the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been
inserted in ScheduleA by the Company.
All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate 180 days after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies
committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
In Witness Whereof, First American Title Insurance Companyhas caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on
the date shown in Schedule A.
First American Title Insurance Company
Dennis J. Gilmore
President
Jeffrey S. Robinson
Secretary
(This Commitment is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached)
Copyright 2006-2009American Land Title Association.All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date ofuse.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5011600 (7-1-14)Page 1ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 292 of 473
CONDITIONS
1.The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
2.If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or
other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those
shown in ScheduleB hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company
shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the
Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such
knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend ScheduleB of this
Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred
pursuant to paragraph3 ofthese Conditions.
3.Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties
included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss
incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to
eliminate exceptions shown in ScheduleB, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in ScheduleA for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions
from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4.This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of titleor a
report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may
bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this
Commitment.
5.The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is
$2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy
of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at< http://www.alta.org/>.
Form 5011600 (7-1-14)Page 2ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 293 of 473
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American TitleInsurance Company
Schedule A
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
December 28, 2015, Amendment Date: January 8, 2016, Amendment No.: 4
1.Effective Date:
2.Policy or Policies to be issued:Amount
ALTA 2006 Extended Owner's Policy$2,350,000.00
a.
Proposed Insured:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation
None$0.00
b.
Proposed Insured:
None$0.00
c.
Proposed Insured:
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is
FEE
4.Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in:
LAURA J. HARSHBARGER, AKA JEAN HARSHBARGER, a married woman as her sole and separate
property as to Parcels 1 and 2; and
LAURA HARSHBARGER, AKA LAURA JEAN HARSHBARGER, a married woman as her sole and separate
property as to Parcel 3
5.The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
By:
Authorized Countersignature
Note: Please direct all inquiries and correspondence to
Title Security Agency, LLC
, issuing agent for First
Title Security Agency, LLC
American Title Insurance Company
Pam Tighe, Escrow Officer
Barbara Whipple, Title Officer
1 S. Church Avenue2040
Phone: (520) 740-0424
Tucson, AZ 85701
Email: barbara.whipple@titlesecurity.com
Phone: (520) 740-0424
mc1
Email: Pamela.tighe@titlesecurity.com
Typist
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 3ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 294 of 473
Schedule A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Exhibit A
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Land referred to herein belowis situated in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and is described as follows:
Parcel 1:
The North half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 12
South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona.
EXCEPT the East 30 feet as conveyed to Pima County, Arizona by Deed recorded in Docket 4474, page 335.
(JV Arb 80)
Parcel 2:
The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 12
East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona.
(JV Arb 33)
Parcel 3:
The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian,Pima County, Arizona.
EXCEPT the West 30 feet thereof; and
FURTHER EXCEPT lying within the property taken in Final Order of Condemnation Case No. C20001137 recorded April
30, 2001 in Docket 11538, page 2589.
(JV Arb 79)
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 4ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 295 of 473
Exhibit A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements must be satisfied:
A. Payment of the necessary consideration for the estate or interest to be insured.
B. Pay all premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
C. Documents creating the estate or interest to be insured, must be properly executed, delivered and recorded.
D. Payment of all taxes and/or assessments levied against the subject premises which are due and payable.
1. PAY full year 2015 taxes in the amount of $2,021.81 plus interest; Tax Parcel No. 221-14-002F (Parcel 1).
2. PAY full year 2015 taxes in theamount of $4,229.75 plus interest; Tax Parcel No. 221-14-0010 (Parcel 2).
3. NOTE: Taxes for the first half 2015 taxes are shown paid in the amount of $8,767.95; Tax Parcel No. 221-14-
011B (Parcel 3).
3a,PAY FULL YEAR 2016TAXES for Parcels 1, 2 and 3. Amounts not available at this time.
4. RECORD Release and Reconveyance of Deed of Trust:
Amount$95,000.00
DatedDecember 17, 2002
RecordedDecember 27, 2002
Docket11955
Page3178
TrustorLaura Harshbarger, aka Laura Jean Harshbarger, a married woman
TrusteeFidelity National Title Insurance Company
BeneficiaryMortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as nominee for Capital Commerce
Mortgage Co., a California Corporation
(Parcel 3)
Beneficial interest was assigned to New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2014-1, U.S. Bank National Association,
as Indenture Trustee by mesne assignments of record, the last of which recorded at Sequence No. 20142650416
5. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)Inspection made.
6. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)Survey provided.
7. FURNISH the Company with Owner’s Affidavit executed by LAURA J. HARSHBARGER, AKA JEAN
HARSHBARGER, AKA LAURA JEANHARSHBARGER
Said Owner’s Affidavit to include an itemization of all leases (if any) including Lessee, date and terms, and shall
indicate if any of said leases contain rights of first refusal or options to purchase. Said owner’s Affidavit to also
include a statement that the wells located on the subject property are not shared with any other parties.
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 5ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 296 of 473
Exhibit A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI
(Continued)
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
8. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
9. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
10.RECORD Deed from LAURA J. HARSHBARGER, AKA JEAN HARSHBARGER, a married woman as her sole
and separate property as to Parcels 1 and 2; and LAURA HARSHBARGER, AKA LAURA JEAN HARSHBARGER,
a married woman as her sole and separate property as to Parcel 3toPULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan
corporation.
NOTE: ARS 11:1133 may require the completion and filing of an Affidavit of Value.
NOTE: Vesting deeds recorded in Docket 11257 at pages 2207, 2205 and 2222
End of Schedule BI
Form 5011600-BI (7-1-14)Page 6ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 297 of 473
Schedule BI
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BII
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
EXCEPTIONS
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. RESERVATIONS contained in the Patent from the United States of America, in Book 326 of Deeds, page 209,
reading as follows:
RESERVED from the lands hereby granted a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the
authority of the United States of America. Excepting and reserving, however, to the United States all the coal and
other minerals in the lands so entered and patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the
same pursuant to the provisions and limitations of the Act of December 20, 1916 (30 Stat., 862)
(Parcels 1 and 2)
2. RESERVATIONS contained in the Patent from the United States of America, in Book 61 of Deeds at page 392,
reading as follows:
SUBJECT to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing or other purposes, and
rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized and
acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of courts; and there is reserved from the lands hereby
granted, a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States of America.
(Parcel 3)
3. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS collectible by the County Treasurer, a lien not yet due and payable for the following
year:
2017
4. WATER RIGHTS, claims or title to water, and agreements, covenants, conditions or rights incidentthereto,
whether or not shown by the public records.
This exception is not limited by reason of the disclosure of any matter relating to Water Rights as may be set forth
elsewhere in Schedule B.
5. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
6. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
7. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
8. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
Form 5011600-BII (7-1-14)Page 7ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 298 of 473
Schedule BII
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BII
(Continued)
60013702-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
9. EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument:
Recorded in Docket6135
Page880
Re-recorded in Docket 6266
Page846
Purposeelectric lines and appurtenant facilities
10.EASEMENT and rights incident thereto, as set forth in instrument:
Recorded in Docket6137
Page983
Purposecommunication and other facilities and associated matters
11.(INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
12.Any matters arising by reason of the inclusion of said land within the boundaries of the Town of Marana General
Plan as set forth in instrument recorded April 22, 1997 in Docket 10529, page 1892.
13.RIGHTS OF PARTIES in possession.
NOTE: This exception will be amended or deleted upon the submission of the corresponding documents required
in Schedule B, Part I.
14.The following matters as set forth on that certain survey made by Ashby Surveying & Drafting, Inc., dated
December 14, 2015, Job No. 5919:
a. Encroachment of wire fence from Parcels 1, 2 and 3 onto property to the north by from 0.1 feet to 15.4 feet;
b.Telephone pedestal located outside of easement area;
c.Intentionally Omitted;
d.Encroachment of gate from subject Parcel 1 onto property to the south by 0.6 feet.
e.Intentionally Omitted.
END OF SCHEDULE BII
Form 5011600-BII (7-1-14)Page 8ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 299 of 473
Schedule BII
Privacy Information
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with
such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore,
together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information.
Applicability
This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source,
such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information
regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values.
Types of Information
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include:
Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means;
Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Use of Information
We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we willnot release your information to
nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information
indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer
analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial
service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal
companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform
marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements.
Former Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you.
Confidentiality and Security
We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal informationabout you to those
individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure
that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic,
and
procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
Information Obtained Through Our Web Site
First American Financial Corporation is sensitive to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the information about you we receive on the Internet.
In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates’ Web sites on the World Wide Web without telling us who you are or revealing any information about yourself.Our Web servers
collect the domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages viewed and similar
information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop ideas to improve the content of our site.
There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at
the time of collection how we will use the personal information. Usually, the personal information we collect is used only by us to respond to your inquiry, process an order or allow
you to
access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal information with us, we will only use it in accordance with the policies outlined above.
Business Relationships
First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect
for
privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites.
Cookies
Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data
that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive.
FirstAm.comuses stored cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful
and productive Web site experience.
Fair Information Values
FairnessWe consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits
and consumer privacy.
Public RecordWe believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open
public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy.
UseWe believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of
data.
AccuracyWe will take reasonable steps to helpassure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct inaccurate
information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in identifying the source of the erroneous
data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections.
EducationWe endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our
employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our industry to collect and use information in a responsible
manner.
SecurityWe will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain.
Form 50-PRIVACY (7-1-14)Page 1 of 1Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 300 of 473
NOTICE OF TITLE POLICY DISCOUNTS
Residential Resale and Refinance Transactions – Arizona
Escrow No.: 60013702
Please note certain discounts sometimes apply to reduce title insurance premiums. You should review the
possible discounts listed below and tell your escrow officer if you think any apply. For some of the discounts,
you may be asked to provide additional information to allow us to verify that the discount is applicable. The
discount will be subject to specific formulas filed by the Underwriter with the Arizona Department of Insurance
and the location of the property.
SHORT/LONG TERM RESALE RATE:
There are certain discounts available if your purchase was within last 5 years and insured by us or another title
company. The discount will vary depending on when you purchased your property and who insured it.
REFINANCE RATE:
There are certain discounts available if your current transaction is a refinance of a prior loan that was insured
by us, or another title insurance company. This rate is subject to determination of loan balances in some
instances, depending on the formula filed by the Underwriter being used to insure the current transaction.
Please acknowledge your understanding of the foregoing disclosure, even if no discount applies, by
signing below.
Date: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Signature of Seller/BorrowerSignature of Seller/Borrower
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Print NamePrint Name
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 301 of 473
DISCLOSURE NOTICES
Good Funds Law
Arizona Revised Statutes Section 6-843 regulates the disbursement of escrow funds by an escrow agent.
The law requires that funds be deposited in the escrow agent’s escrow account and available for
withdrawal prior to disbursement. Funds deposited with the Company by wire transfer may be disbursed
upon receipt. Funds deposited with the Company in the form of cashier’s checks, certified checks or
teller’s checks, or checks which are made by an affiliate of a state or federally regulated depository
institution when the check is drawn on that institution, may be disbursed the same day as deposited. If
funds are deposited with the Company by other methods, recording and/or disbursement may be delayed.
PURCHASER DWELLING ACTIONS NOTICE
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 12-1363.N, notice is hereby provided to the purchaser of a
dwelling of the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Sections 12-1361, 1362 and 1363. These statutory
sections set forth the requirements to be met by a purchaser prior to bringing an action against the seller
of a dwelling arising out of or related to the design, construction, condition or sale of the dwelling.
“Dwelling” means a single or multifamily unit designed for residential use and common areas and
improvements owned or maintained by an association or its members. “Seller” means any person, firm,
partnership, corporation, association or other organization engaged in the business of designing,
constructing or selling dwellings. The complete statutory sections can be viewed on the Arizona State
Legislature’s web site: www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/ars.htm.
NOTICE:
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 11-480, effective January 1, 1991, the County Recorder may not
accept documents for recording that do not comply with the following:
aPrint must be ten-point type (pica) or larger.
bMargins of at least one-half inch along the left and right sides one-half inch across the bottom and
at least two inches on top for recording and return address information.
cEach instrument shall be no larger than 8 ½ inchesin width and 14 inches in length.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 302 of 473
NOTICE
OF
IMPORTANT CHANGE TO ARIZONA NOTARY LAWS
If your client is a foreign citizen, you will want to be aware of this
change.
Arizona law currently provides that "satisfactory evidence of identity" for purposes ofa notary's acknowledging
signatures or performing jurats includes a "current form of identification issued by a federal, state or tribal
government…." (A.R.S. 41-311.11.) Effective August 25, 2004, however, this provision has been amended to
provided that the current form of identification must be issued by "the United States government or a state or
tribal government…." This change means that a current form of identification issued by a foreign government,
NOT
such as a foreign driver's license, will meet the statutory identification requirements.
To avoid delays in closing transactions involving foreign citizens who may not have appropriate identification,
you should determine as soon as possible what form(s) of identification your clients have. If they do not have
appropriate identification, then you may wish to suggest, depending on their circumstances, that they apply for
and obtain an appropriate form of U.S. or state identification.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 303 of 473
AFFILIATION DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to ARS 6-840
This is to give you notice that Title Security Agency of Arizona, a Delaware limited liability company, doing business in the
State of Arizona as Title Security Agency, LLC (“Title Security”), has a business relationship with First American Title
Insurance Company (“FATCO”), a company that provides title insurance policies. Title Security is also affiliated with and
has business relationships with Long Title Agency, LLC (“Long Title”), Catalina Title Agency, LLC (“Catalina Title”), and
Signature Title Agency, LLC ("Signature Title") to provide title services. Title Security is a Title Agent for and has business
relationships with First American Title Insurance Company, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company and Title
Resources Guaranty Company, which underwrite the policies issued by Title Security. Because of these relationships, this
referral may provide Title Security with a financial or other benefit.
You are not required to use Title Security, Long Title, Catalina Title, Signature Title, First American Title Insurance
Company, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company or Title Resources Guaranty Company, as part of the real
estate transaction for this subject property.
THERE ARE FREQUENTLY OTHER SETTLEMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS AVAILABLE WITH SIMILAR SERVICES.
YOU ARE FREE TO SHOP AROUND TO DETERMINE THAT YOU ARE RECEIVING THE BEST SERVICES AND THE
BEST RATE FOR THESE SERVICES.
The rates for escrow agencies that are also title insurers or title insurance agents are filed with the Arizona Department of
Financial Institutions and the escrow agency may not deviate from those filed rates. Title insurance rates are filed with the
Arizona Department of Insurance by each title insurer, and the rates are the same for all title insurance issuing agents for
each particular insurer. The premium you are charged for your title insurance policy is based upon the purchase price for
the property you are purchasing/selling. If you are refinancing, the premium you are charged for your title insurance policy
is based upon the loan amount. You may request to review the title insurance rate card which establishes the premium
amount from the escrow agent handling your transaction.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 304 of 473
Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Commitment
First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation (“Company”), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of
title insurance, as identified in ScheduleA, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in ScheduleA, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in
the land described or referred to in ScheduleA, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to
the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been
inserted in ScheduleA by the Company.
All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate 180 days after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies
committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
In Witness Whereof, First American Title Insurance Companyhas caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on
the date shown in Schedule A.
First American Title Insurance Company
Dennis J. Gilmore
President
Jeffrey S. Robinson
Secretary
(This Commitment is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached)
Copyright 2006-2009American Land Title Association.All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date ofuse.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5011600 (7-1-14)Page 1ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 305 of 473
CONDITIONS
1.The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
2.If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or
other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those
shown in ScheduleB hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company
shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the
Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such
knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend ScheduleB of this
Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred
pursuant to paragraph3 ofthese Conditions.
3.Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties
included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss
incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to
eliminate exceptions shown in ScheduleB, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in ScheduleA for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions
from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4.This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of titleor a
report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may
bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this
Commitment.
5.The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is
$2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy
of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at< http://www.alta.org/>.
Form 5011600 (7-1-14)Page 2ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 306 of 473
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American TitleInsurance Company
Schedule A
60013703-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
December 28, 2015, Amendment Date: January 8, 2016, Amendment No.: 5
1.Effective Date:
2.Policy or Policies to be issued:Amount
ALTA 2006 Extended Owner's Policy$888,000.00
a.
Proposed Insured:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation
None$0.00
b.
Proposed Insured:
None$0.00
c.
Proposed Insured:
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is
A FEE
4.Title to the FEEestate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in:
REDWING INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
5.The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
By:
Authorized Countersignature
Note: Please direct all inquiries and correspondence to Title Security Agency, LLC
, issuing agent for First
Title Security Agency, LLC
American Title Insurance Company
Pam Tighe, Escrow Officer
Barbara Whipple, Title Officer
1 S. Church Avenue2040
Phone: (520) 740-0424
Tucson, AZ 85701
Email: barbara.whipple@titlesecurity.com
Phone: (520) 740-0424
mc1
Email: Pamela.tighe@titlesecurity.com
Typist
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 3ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 307 of 473
Schedule A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Exhibit A
60013703-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Pima, State of Arizona, and is described as follows:
The South half of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pima County, Arizona.
EXCEPT the East 30 feet as conveyed to Pima County, Arizona, in Docket 4474 at page 339.
(JV Arb 26)
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 4ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 308 of 473
Exhibit A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI
60013703-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements must be satisfied:
A. Payment of the necessary consideration for the estate or interestto be insured.
B. Pay all premiums, fees and charges for the policy.
C. Documents creating the estate or interest to be insured, must be properly executed, delivered and recorded.
D. Payment of all taxes and/or assessments levied against the subject premises which are due and payable.
1. NOTE: Full year 2015 taxes are shown paid in the amount of $10,809.30; Tax Parcel No. 221-14-009A
1a.PAYtaxesfor the full year 2016. Amounts unavailable at this time.
2. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED) Release recorded December 16, 2015 as Sequence No. 2015-3500537.
3. SUBMIT fully executed copy of the Operating Agreement (and all amendments) of the limited liability company
named below for examination. The right is reserved to make additional requirements upon said examination.
REDWING INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
4. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)Inspection done.
5. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)Survey provided.
6. FURNISH the Company with Owner’s Affidavit executed by REDWING INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited
liability company
Said Owner’s Affidavit to include an itemization of all leases (if any) including Lessee, date and terms, and shall
indicate if any of said leases contain rights of first refusal or options to purchase.
7. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
8. RECORD Deed from REDWING INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability companytoPULTE HOME
CORPORATION, a Michigancorporation, in accordance with the terms of that certain Purchase and Sale
Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated October 26, 2015, disclosed by Memorandum of Agreement
recorded October 26, 2013 at Sequence No. 20152990535.
NOTE: ARS 11:1133 may require the completion and filing of an Affidavit of Value.
NOTE: Vesting deed recorded in Docket 12864 at page 2914
End of Schedule BI
Form 5011600-A (7-1-14)Page 5ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 309 of 473
Exhibit A
Commitment for Title Insurance
BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BII
60013703-001-P13-BW
Order No.:
EXCEPTIONS
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. RESERVATIONS contained in the Patent from the United States of America, in Book 326 of Deeds, page 209,
reading as follows:
RESERVED from the lands hereby granted a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the
authority of the United States of America. Excepting and reserving, however, to the United States all the coal and
other minerals in the lands so entered and patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the
same pursuant to the provisions and limitations of the Act of December 20, 1916 (30 Stat., 862)
2. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS collectible by the County Treasurer, a lien not yet due and payable for the following
year:
2017
3. WATER RIGHTS, claims or title to water, and agreements, covenants, conditions or rights incident thereto,
whether or not shown by the public records.
This exception is not limited by reasonof the disclosure of any matter relating to Water Rights as may be set forth
elsewhere in Schedule B.
4. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
5. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
6. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED)
7. Any matters arising by reason of the inclusion of said land within the boundaries of the Town of Marana General
Plan as set forth in instrument recorded April 22, 1997 in Docket 10529, page 1892.
8. RIGHTS OF PARTIES in possession.
NOTE: This exception will be amended or deleted upon the submission of the corresponding documents required
in Schedule B, Part I.
9. The following matter as set forth on that certain survey made by Ashby Surveying & Drafting, Inc., dated
December 14, 2015:
a. Dirt road and the rights of others to use said dirt road near the north line of subject property.
END OF SCHEDULE BII
Form 5011600-BII (7-1-14)Page 6ALTA Commitment (6-17-06)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 310 of 473
Schedule BII
Privacy Information
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with
such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore,
together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information.
Applicability
This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source,
such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information
regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values.
Types of Information
Depending upon whichof our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include:
Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means;
Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Use of Information
We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and notfor the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to
nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information
indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer
analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial
service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal
companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform
marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies havejoint marketing agreements.
Former Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you.
Confidentiality and Security
We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those
individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure
that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic,
and
procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
Information Obtained Through Our Web Site
First American Financial Corporationis sensitive to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the information about you wereceive on the Internet.
In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates’ Web sites on the World Wide Web without telling us who you are or revealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers
collect the domain names, not the e-mail addresses, of visitors. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the site, pages viewed and similar
information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our site and to develop ideas to improve the content of our site.
There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at
the time of collection how we will use the personal information. Usually, the personal information we collect is used only byus to respond to your inquiry, process an order or allow
youto
access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal information with us, we will only use it in accordance with the policies outlined above.
Business Relationships
First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respectfor
privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites.
Cookies
Some of First American's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data
that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive.
FirstAm.comuses stored cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful
and productive Web site experience.
Fair Information Values
FairnessWe consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits
and consumer privacy.
Public RecordWe believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open
public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy.
UseWe believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing the collection, use and dissemination of
data.
AccuracyWe will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct inaccurate
information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in identifying the source of the erroneous
data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections.
EducationWe endeavor to educate the users of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our
employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our industry to collect and use information in a responsible
manner.
SecurityWe will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain.
Form 50-PRIVACY (7-1-14)Page 1 of 1Privacy Information (2001-2010 First American Financial Corporation)
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 311 of 473
NOTICE OF TITLE POLICY DISCOUNTS
Residential Resale and Refinance Transactions – Arizona
Escrow No.: 60013703
Please note certain discounts sometimes apply to reduce title insurance premiums. You should review the
possible discounts listed below and tell your escrow officer if you think any apply. For some of the discounts,
you may be asked to provide additional information to allow us to verify that the discount is applicable. The
discount will be subject to specific formulas filed by the Underwriter with the Arizona Department of Insurance
and the location of the property.
SHORT/LONG TERM RESALE RATE:
There are certain discounts available if your purchase was within last 5 years and insured by us or another title
company. The discount will vary depending on when you purchased your property and who insured it.
REFINANCE RATE:
There are certain discounts available if your current transaction is a refinance of a prior loan that was insured
by us, or another title insurance company. This rate is subject to determination of loan balances in some
instances, depending on the formula filed by the Underwriter being used to insure the current transaction.
Please acknowledge your understanding ofthe foregoing disclosure, even if no discount applies, by
signing below.
Date: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Signature of Seller/BorrowerSignature of Seller/Borrower
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Print NamePrint Name
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 312 of 473
DISCLOSURE NOTICES
Good Funds Law
Arizona Revised Statutes Section 6-843 regulates the disbursement of escrow funds by an escrow agent.
The law requires that funds be deposited in the escrow agent’s escrow account and available for
withdrawal prior to disbursement. Funds deposited with the Company by wire transfer may be disbursed
upon receipt. Funds deposited with the Companyin the form of cashier’s checks, certified checks or
teller’s checks, or checks which are made by an affiliate of a state or federally regulated depository
institution when the check is drawn on that institution, may be disbursed the same day as deposited. If
funds are deposited with the Company by other methods, recording and/or disbursement may be delayed.
PURCHASER DWELLING ACTIONS NOTICE
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 12-1363.N, notice is hereby provided to the purchaser of a
dwelling of the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Sections 12-1361, 1362 and 1363. These statutory
sections set forth the requirements to be met by a purchaser prior to bringing an action against the seller
of a dwelling arising out of or related to the design, construction, condition or sale of the dwelling.
“Dwelling” means a single or multifamily unit designed for residential use and common areas and
improvements owned or maintained by an association or its members. “Seller” means any person, firm,
partnership, corporation, association or other organization engaged in the business of designing,
constructing or selling dwellings. The complete statutory sections can be viewed on the Arizona State
Legislature’s web site: www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/ars.htm.
NOTICE:
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 11-480, effective January 1, 1991, the County Recorder may not
accept documents for recording that do not comply with the following:
aPrint must be ten-point type (pica) or larger.
bMargins of at least one-half inch along the left and right sides one-half inch across the bottom and
at least two inches on top for recording and return address information.
cEach instrument shall be no larger than 8 ½ inches in width and 14 inches in length.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 313 of 473
NOTICE
OF
IMPORTANT CHANGE TO ARIZONA NOTARY LAWS
If your client is a foreign citizen, you will want to be aware of this
change.
Arizona law currently provides that "satisfactory evidence of identity" for purposes of a notary's acknowledging
signatures or performing jurats includes a "current form of identification issued by a federal, state or tribal
government…." (A.R.S. 41-311.11.) Effective August 25, 2004, however, this provision has been amended to
provided that the current form of identification must be issued by "the United States government or a state or
tribal government…." This change means that a current form of identification issued by a foreign government,
NOT
such as a foreign driver's license, will meet the statutory identification requirements.
To avoid delaysin closing transactions involving foreign citizens who may not have appropriate identification,
you should determine as soon as possible what form(s) of identification your clients have. If they do not have
appropriate identification, then you may wish to suggest, depending on their circumstances, that they apply for
and obtain an appropriate form of U.S. or state identification.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 314 of 473
AFFILIATION DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to ARS 6-840
This is to give you notice that Title Security Agency of Arizona, a Delaware limited liability company, doing business in the
State of Arizona as Title Security Agency, LLC (“Title Security”), has a business relationship with First American Title
Insurance Company (“FATCO”), a company that provides title insurance policies. Title Security is also affiliated with and
has business relationships with Long Title Agency, LLC (“Long Title”), Catalina Title Agency, LLC (“Catalina Title”), and
Signature Title Agency, LLC ("Signature Title") to provide title services. Title Security is a Title Agent for and has business
relationships with First American Title Insurance Company, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company and Title
Resources Guaranty Company, which underwrite the policies issued by Title Security. Because of these relationships, this
referral may provide Title Security with a financial or other benefit.
You are not required to use Title Security, Long Title, Catalina Title, Signature Title, First American Title Insurance
Company, Old Republic National Title Insurance Companyor Title Resources Guaranty Company, as part of the real
estate transaction for this subject property.
THERE ARE FREQUENTLY OTHER SETTLEMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS AVAILABLE WITH SIMILAR SERVICES.
YOU ARE FREE TO SHOP AROUND TO DETERMINE THAT YOU ARE RECEIVING THE BEST SERVICES AND THE
BEST RATE FOR THESE SERVICES.
The rates for escrow agencies that are also title insurers or title insurance agents are filed with the Arizona Department of
Financial Institutions and the escrow agency may not deviate from those filed rates. Title insurance rates are filed with the
Arizona Department of Insurance by each title insurer, and the rates are the same for all title insurance issuing agents for
each particular insurer. The premium you are charged for your title insurance policy is based upon the purchase price for
the property you are purchasing/selling. If you are refinancing, the premium you are charged for your title insurance policy
is based upon the loan amount. You may request to review the title insurance rate card which establishes the premium
amount from the escrow agent handling your transaction.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 315 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 316 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 317 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 318 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 319 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 320 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 321 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 322 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 323 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 324 of 473
Appendix D — Traf¿ c Impact Analysis
Camino de Oeste July 2016
(
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 325 of 473
Appendix D — Traf¿ c Impact Analysis
Camino de Oeste July 2016
(
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 326 of 473
-XO\
TransportationImpactStudy
CaminoDeOesteResidential
Development
Preparedfor
PulteHomesʹArizona(Tucson)
3011W.InaRoad
Tucson,AZ85741
And
TheTownofMarana,AZ
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 327 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 328 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 329 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 330 of 473
TABLEOFCONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTIONANDPROJECTSUMMARY1
Access1
Zoning1
AnticipatedDevelopmentPhasingandTiming1
LandUse1
SummaryofMajorFindingsandRecommendations2
STUDYAREACONDITIONS4
StudyArea/AreaofSignificantTrafficImpact4
LandUsesAdjoiningtheProject4
InventoryofPhysicalCharacteristics4
TransitServiceandBusStopLocations9
BikeLanes9
Sidewalks,SchoolCrossings,PedestrianCrossings9
RoadwayLighting9
IntersectionSightDistance9
ProgrammedRoadwayImprovements9
CurrentTrafficVolumesandSystemPerformance9
PROJECTEDTRAFFIC12
SiteTripGeneration12
SiteTrafficDistribution12
BackgroundTrafficVolumes14
TotalTraffic14
TRANSPORTATIONIMPROVEMENTANALYSIS16
RoadwayPerformance16
SiteAccessandConnectivity16
IntersectionPerformance17
TurnLaneWarrantAnalysis19
IntersectionandStoppingSightDistance21
PavementCondition21
CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS22
APPENDIX
TownofMaranaTIAChecklist
TrafficCountData
s
SynchroHCMTrafficPerformanceReport
SynchroQueueReports
PimaCountyTurnLaneWarrantSheet
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 331 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 332 of 473
LISTOFEXHIBITS
Page
Exhibit1ProjectSitePlan2
Exhibit2HartmanLaneGroundPhotosatNewSiteAccess5
Exhibit3CaminoDeOesteGroundPhotosatNewSiteAccess6
Exhibit4CurrentLaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane
Intersection7
Exhibit5CurrentLaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
Intersection7
Exhibit6CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneIntersectionGroundPhotos8
Exhibit7CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteIntersectionGroundPhotos8
Exhibit8ExistingStudyAreaTrafficVolumes10
Exhibit9ExistingRoadwayInventory11
Exhibit10ExistingIntersectionPerformance11
Exhibit11SiteTripGenerationRatesandTrips12
Exhibit12DirectionalDistributionofSiteTrafficinStudyArea13
Exhibit13SiteTrafficVolumesinStudyArea13
Exhibit14Year2019BackgroundTrafficEstimates14
Exhibit15Year2019EstimatedTotalTraffic(Background+Site)15
Exhibit16Year2019RoadwayVolumesandCapacity16
Exhibit17LaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforProposedSiteAccessIntersections17
Exhibit18IntersectionDelay&LevelofServiceResultsfor2019BackgroundTraffic18
Exhibit19IntersectionDelay&LevelofServiceResultsfor2019TotalTraffic18
th
Exhibit2095PercentileQueueLengthsfor2019TotalTraffic19
Exhibit21TurnLaneVolumeWarrants20
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 333 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 334 of 473
INTRODUCTIONANDPROJECTSUMMARY
ThisTransportationImpactStudy(TIS)waspreparedforPulteHomesʹArizona(Tucson)fortheCaminoDeOeste
subdivisionlocatednorthofCortaroFarmsRoadbetweenHartmanLaneonthewestandCaminodeOesteonthe
east.ThedevelopmentitselfiscompletelywithintheTownofMarana,Arizona;however,CaminodeOesteon
theeastsideofthedevelopmentisPimaCountyownedrightofwayattheaccesspointintothesite.ThisTIS
1
waspreparedaccordingtotheproceduresestablishedbytheTownofMarana.APreSubmittalConferencewith
theTownofMaranawasheldonFebruary1,2016.TheTownofMaranaTISChecklistwasdevelopedasaresult
ofthatmeetingandwassubmittedtoandapprovedbytheTown.Thischecklist,whichprovidesthebasisof
analysisforthisstudy,isprovidedintheappendix.Basedonthenumberoftripsestimatedforthepeakhours
andtheTownofMaranaproceduresforpreparingaTIS,thisisaCategoryAStudy,withaStudyHorizonofOpening
Year(year2019buildout).
Thespecificstudyobjectivesare:
Evaluateintersectionsinthevicinityoftheinterse
ctionsincluding:
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane(Signalized)
o
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste(Signalized)
o
Evaluatetheimpactoftheprojectonthefollowingstreets:
HartmanLane
o
CaminoDeOeste
o
CortaroFarmsBoulevard
o
Evaluatetheoperationsandsafetyoftheproposeddrivewaylocationswithregardtotheirimpactson
HartmanLaneandCaminoDeOeste;
Evaluatetheeffectstheproposeddevelopmentwillhaveonpedestrian,bicycleandtransitactivityin
thearea.
Providerecommendationstomitigate(ifnecessary)undesirabletrafficconditionsthattheprojectmay
create.
Access
ThesitewillaccessHartmanLaneonthewestsideandCaminodeOesteontheeastside.
Zoning
Theprojectsiteiscurrentlyzonedas(C)LargeLotResidential,andisproposedtobezonedas(R6)Residential.
AnticipatedDevelopmentPhasingandTiming
Thesiteisanticipatedtobedevelopedinasinglephasewithbuildoutcompletedinyear2019.
LandUse
TheCaminoDeOestedevelopmentsiteisa72acresitewhichisproposedforasingleuseas144unitsofsingle
familydetachedhousing.Thecurrentlanduseisalargepropertywitharesidenceandportionsofundisturbed,
naturaldesert.TherearethreeexistinghomesthathaveaccessviaCaminoDeOestethatwillbeenvelopedby
theproposedproject.TheProjectSitePlanisprovidedinExhibit1.Thesitehasbeenlaidoutinawaythat
discouragescutthroughtrafficbyincorporatingculdesacsandnotprovidingaroadwaythatdirectlyconnects
thetwositeaccesspoints.
1
ProceduresforPreparationof:TransportationImpactStudies,July2006,TownofMarana,Arizona.
1
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 335 of 473
Exhibit1
ProjectSitePlan
N
NewSiteAccess
NewSiteAccess
CortaroFarmsRoad
SummaryofMajorFindingsandRecommendations
TheproposedCaminoDeOesteResidentialdevelopmentprojectisprojectedtogenerateapproximately:
108morningpeakhourtrips,
o
144eveningpeakhourtrips,
o
1,372dailyweekdaytrips.
o
Theproposedsitehasbeenlaidoutinawaythatdiscouragescutthroughtrafficbyincorporatingculde
sacsandnotprovidingaroadwaythatdirectlyconnectsthetwositeaccesspoints.Thisshouldeffectively
͞ĐĂůŵ͟traffic.
Bothofthesiteaccessintersectionsareproposedtobestopcontrolledonboththeeastboundand
westboundsinglelaneapproaches.Neitheroftheseintersectionswillhaveturnrestrictions.
AϭϭϬ͛northboundleftturnlaneiswarrantedattheCaminoDeOeste/SiteAccessintersection.
Nootherturnlanesarewarrantedatthetwositeaccesslocations.
Allprojectintersectionsareexpectedtooperatesufficientlyatprojectbuildout(2019)withthesignalized
intersectionsoperatingatLOSBorbetterandallmovementsoperatingatLOSDorbetter
CortaroFarmsRoadtotheeastofthestudyareafromThornydaleRoadto500feeteastofCaminoDe
dedroadwaywitharaisedmedianbytheendof2018.
Oesteisprogrammedtobewidenedtoa4lanedivi
Thisiscurrentlythelastsegmentofthisroadwaythathasyettobeimproved.Whilenotwithintheimpact
2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 336 of 473
areaofthisdevelopment,itispossiblethatthisimprovementcouldincreasevolumesonCortaroFarms
Roadinthefutureoncetheroadwaycapacityisincreasedonthissegment.
The95thpercentilequeueforthesouthboundapproachattheCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane
intersectionexceedstheexistingstoragelanelengthintheAMpeakhour.ThisisaTintersectionwhere
anyspillbackofthequeuewouldnotimpedeanadjacentthroughmovement.Thisconditionexistswith
andwithoutthisproposeddevelopmentfortheyear2019.Additionally,signaltimingmodificationsmay
bemadetoreducethequeuesduringtheampeakhourifnecessary.
The95thpercentilequeueforthesouthboundleftturnlaneattheCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
intersectionexceedstheexistingstoragelanelengthintheAMpeakhour.Althoughthesouthbound
throughmovementvolumesarenotveryhighatthislocation,spillbackoftheleftturnqueuemayoccur
impedingtheadjacentsouthboundthroughmovement.Thisconditionexistswithandwithoutthis
proposeddevelopmentfortheyear2019.Signaltimingmodificationsmaybemadetoreducethisqueue
duringtheampeakhourifnecessary.
Nosightdistanceissueswereobservedatthetwoproposedsiteaccessintersectionsandavailablesight
visibilityisexpectedtobeadequate.However,sightdistanceatthesiteaccessintersectionsshouldbe
confirmedaccordingtocriteriaintheTownofMaranaSubdivisionStreetStandards.
AllsignsandpavementmarkingsaccompanyingtherecommendedimprovementsshallfollowtheMUTCD
andTownofMaranarequirementsandstandards.
3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 337 of 473
STUDYAREACONDITIONS
StudyArea/AreaofSignificantTrafficImpact
BasedontheresultsofthePreSubmittalConferenceheldonFebruary1,2016,thestudyareafortrafficimpacts
includesonlytheanalysisoftheproposedintersectionaccesspointsforthesitetoHartmanLaneandCamino
DeOesteaswellasthesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandCortaroFarms
Road/CaminoDeOeste.
LandUsesAdjoiningtheProject
Northoftheproposedprojectsitetherearepredominantlyresidentiallandusesaswellasanelementaryschool
andacommunitycenter.Southoftheproposedsitethereareafewlowdensityresidentialproperties,achurch
andautilitycompanyoffice.Tothewesttherearemoreresidentiallandusesandanewresidential
developmentthatisintheplanningstagesdirectlyacrossHartmanLanefromtheproposedprojectsite.Tothe
easttherearemoreresidentiallandusesaswellastwochurches,apark,andanelementaryschool.
InventoryofPhysicalCharacteristics
TheproposedCaminoDeOestedevelopmentsitewillhavedirectsiteaccessfromHartmanLaneandCaminoDe
OesteasshowninExhibit1.Thesetwoaccesspointsareproposedtobestopcontrolledontheirapproachto
themainroadway.
HartmanLane
Neartheproposeddevelopmentsite,HartmanLaneisatwolanecollectorroadway(SeeExhibit2groundlevel
photosatnewsiteaccesspoint)withthefollowingcharacteristics:
Typicalcrosssectionofapproximately40feetinwidthconsistingof:
One12foottravellaneineachdirection.
o
Paintedwhiteϲ͟edgelinejustinsideofedgeofpavementineachdirection.
o
8footmaintaineddirtshoulderineachdirection.
o
Fairpavementconditioninthevicinityoftheprojectsite.
35MPHpostedspeedlimit.
isisanidealsiteaccess
TheproposedsiteaccessfromHartmanLaneislocatedatthecrestofaverticalcurve.Th
locationonthisroadbecauseitprovidesgoodsightvisibilityforleftturningvehiclesintoandoutofthesiteas
wellasrightturningvehiclesintothesite.TherearecurrentlynoplanstoimproveHartmanLanenearthe
projectsiteinthenearfuture.
CaminoDeOeste
Neartheproposeddevelopmentsite,CaminoDeOesteisatwolanecollectorroadway(SeeExhibit3ground
levelphotosatnewsiteaccesspoint)withthefollowingcharacteristics:
Typicalcrosssectionofapproximately40feetinwidthconsistingof:
One12foottravellaneineachdirection.
o
eϲ͟edgelinejustinsideofedgeofpavementineachdirection.
Paintedwhit
o
8footmaintaineddirtshoulderineachdirection.
o
Fairtopoorpavementconditioninthevicinityoftheprojectsite.
35MPHpostedspeedlimit.
SouthoftheproposedaccessonCaminoDeOestethereisasagintheverticalprofileoftheroadwhichlimits
theavailablesightdistancetoapproximately550feet.Thisisgreaterthantheminimumstoppingsightdistance
4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 338 of 473
of250feetforthedesignspeedof35MPHaccordingtotheAASHTOGreenBook 2.Therearecurrentlynoplans
toimproveCaminoDeOesteneartheprojectsiteinthenearfuture.
Exhibit2
HartmanLaneGroundPhotosatNewSiteAccess
HartmanLane@ProposedSiteAccesslookingwestHartmanLane@ProposedSiteAccesslookingeast
HartmanLane@ProposedSiteAccesslookingsouthHartmanLane@ProposedSiteAccesslookingnorth
2
APolicyonGeometricDesignofHighwaysandStreets,AmericanAssociationofStateHighwayandTransportation
Officials,SixthEdition,2011,PageNo.34.
5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 339 of 473
Exhibit3
CaminoDeOesteGroundPhotosatNewSiteAccess
CaminoDeOeste@ProposedSiteAccesslookingwestCaminoDeOeste@ProposedSiteAccesslookingeast
CaminoDeOeste@ProposedSiteAccesslookingsouthCaminoDeOeste@ProposedSiteAccesslookingnorth
CortaroFarmsRoad
ThisstudywillalsoevaluatethesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandCortaro
FarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste.Theexistinglaneconfigurationsofthesetwosignalizedintersectionareshown
inExhibits4and5.Inthevicinityoftheprojectsite,CortaroFarmsRoadisa4laneurbanarterialwitharaised
20footmedian,12footlanesand6footpavedshoulders(SeeExhibits6and7groundlevelphotos).Thereare
alsosidewalksandADAcompliantpedestrianrampsalongbothsidesofCortaroFarmsRoad.Thepostedspeed
limitalongCortaroFarmsRoadinthestudyareais40MPH.Thereareplannedcapacityimprovementsto
CortaroFarmsRoada500feeteastofCaminoDeOestetoThornydaleRoadtobecompletedin2018.Whilenot
withintheimpactareaofthisdevelopment,itispossiblethatthisimprovementcouldresultinincreasedtraffic
ureoncetheroadwaycapacityisincreasedonthissegmentandusers
volumesonCortaroFarmsRoadinthefut
redistributetothisnewer,highercapacitycorridor.
6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 340 of 473
Exhibit4
CurrentLaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneIntersection
N
160
160
CortaroFarmsRoad
Legend
LaneUse
TrafficControl
StorageLength(ft.)
XXX
Exhibit5
CurrentLaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteIntersection
N
CortaroFarmsRoad
175
175
Legend
LaneUse
TrafficControl
StorageLength(ft.)
XXX
7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 341 of 473
Exhibit6
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneIntersectionGroundPhotos
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLanelookingwestCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLanelookingeast
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLanelookingsouthCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLanelookingnorth
Exhibit7
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteIntersectionGroundPhotos
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestelookingwestCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestelookingeast
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestelookingsouthCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestelookingnorth
8
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 342 of 473
TransitServiceandBusStopLocations
Thereisnotransitserviceandtherearenobusstoplocationsinthestudyarea.
BikeLanes
CortaroFarmsRoadwithinthestudyareahas6footpavedbikelanesineachdirectionoftravelandisshownas
abikerouteonthePimaCountyRegionalBikeMap.BothHartmanLaneandCaminoDeOestelackpavedbike
lanes,buttheyarebothclassifiedas͞ŬĞLJconnectingƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͟onthePimaCountyRegionalBikeMap.
Sidewalks,SchoolCrossings,PedestrianCrossings
TherearenosidewalksorschoolcrossingsormarkedpedestriancrossingsalongHartmanLaneorCaminoDe
Oestewithinthestudyarea.Northoftheproposeddevelopmentsitebothoftheseroadwayshavesidewalks
adjacenttotheexistingresidentialdevelopments.CortaroFarmsRoadhassidewalksalongbothsidesofthe
roadwaywithintheprojectarea.ThesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandof
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestebothprovidemarkedpedestriancrosswalksacrosseachlegofeach
intersection.Therearenoschoolcrossingswithinthestudyarea.
RoadwayLighting
Thereisnoroadwaylightingalongtheroadwayswithinthestudyarea,exceptatthesignalizedintersectionsof
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandofCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste.
IntersectionSightDistance
Basedonareviewofaerialimageryandfieldreview,therearenoexistingintersectionorroadwaysightdistance
deficiencieswithinthestudyarea.Asnotedpreviouslyinthisreport,southoftheproposedsiteaccessth
eCamino
sightdistancetoabout550feet.Thisissufficientsightdistance
DeOesteverticalprofilesagslimitingtheavailable
forthepostedspeedlimit.
ProgrammedRoadwayImprovements
CortaroFarmsRoadtotheeastofthestudyareafromThornydaleRoadto500feeteastofCaminoDeOesteis
programmedtobewidenedtoa4lanedividedroadwaywitharaisedmedianinthenextfewyears.Thisis
currentlythelastsegmentofthisroadwaythathasyettobeimproved.CortaroFarmsRoadreconstructionnear
thestudyareaisanticipatedtobeginconstructioninearly2017andbecompletedduringyear2018,
approximatelyoneyearbeforetheanticipatedbuildoutoftheproposedsite.
CurrentTrafficVolumesandSystemPerformance
Currenttrafficvolumeswerecompiledfromvarioussourcesfortheroadwaysandintersectionswithinthestudy
area.TheAverageDailyTraffic(ADT)countsforCortaroFarmsRoad,HartmanLane,andCaminoDeOestewere
takenfromthePimaAssociationofGovernments(PAG)InteractiveTrafficCountMapontheirTravelDataand
Forecastingwebpage.Thesewere48hourtwowayweekdaytrafficcountsfromthefollowingdates.
CortaroFarmsRoadʹ9/19/2012to9/20/2012
HartmanLaneʹ11/13/2013to11/14/2013
CaminoDeOesteʹ10/18/2011to10/19/2011
ThesecountsproducedADTsforthesethreeroadwaysegmentsasshowninExhibit8.Thesecountswereused
toprojecttheADTvolumesforthestudyhorizonyear(fullbuildout)of2019usinganannualgrowthrateof3%
asdirectedbytheTownofMaranaduringthePreSubmittalConferenceheldonFebruary1,2016.Thesevolumes
3
werethencomparedtotheTownofMaranaRoadwayLevelofService(LOS)Thresholdsfor2019withandwithout
thedevelopmentsite.The48hourdirectionalcountswerealsousedtoestimatethepeakhourtrafficatthe
proposedsiteaccesspointsonHartmanLaneandCaminoDeOeste.
3
ProceduresforPreparationof:TransportationImpactStudies,July2006,TownofMarana,Arizona.
9
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 343 of 473
ThesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandofCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
willbeanalyzedaspartofthisstudyforthepeakhours,thereforepeakhourturningmovementcounts(TMCs)
werenecessaryattheselocations(seeExhibit8).TheTMCsusedfortheCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane
4
intersectionweretakenfromtheDeAnzaResidentialTrafficImpactStudyforthedevelopmentthatisplanned
onthewestsideoftheHartmanLane.TheTMCsfortheCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteintersectionwere
collectedforthisstudy.ThedatesoftheTMCsforthesetwointersectionsarelistedbelow.Alltrafficcountdata
obtainedandcollectedforthisTISisprovidedintheappendix.
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneʹTuesday,February3,2015.
CortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteʹWednesday,February10,2016.
Exhibit8
ExistingStudyAreaTrafficVolumes
ExistingRoadwayPerformance
TheavailabletwowayADTvolumesforthestudyarearoadwaysaresummarizedinExhibit9.Thistableshows
theADTs,theyeartheADTswerecollected,thenumberoflanesoneachroadway,theprojectedADTforthe
studyhorizonyearof2019(anticipatedfullbuildout),theTownofMaranaroadwaycapacitythresholds,and
5
thepostedspeedlimitforeachroadway.TheLOSEthresholdsshowninthistableareanapproximationofthe
capacityoftheroadway.Iftheroadwayvolumeexceedsthesevalues,itisoperatingatLOSFandtheroadway
couldexperienceextremelycongestedconditionswithinconsistent,unstableflowsandexcessivedelay.LOSA
city(E).Itshouldbe
throughEoperaterangingfromfreeflowconditions(A)tounstableflowoperatingatcapa
notedthatinurbanconditionswithahigherdensityoftrafficsignals,theLOSandprogressionofthesignals
typicallydictatetheperformanceofaroadwaysegment.
4
DeAnzaResidentialTrafficImpactStudy,March2015,MEsparzaEngineering,LLC,TownofMarana,Arizona.
5
ProceduresforPreparationof:TransportationImpactStudies,July2006,TownofMarana,Arizona.
10
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 344 of 473
Basedontheprojected2019ADTvolumes,CortaroFarmsRoadisexpectedtooperateatLOSFfromI10WB
FrontageRoadtoHartmanLaneandLOSEfromHartmanLanetoThornydaleRoad.HartmanLanenorthof
CortaroFarmsRoadisexpectedtooperateatLOSCin2019andCaminoDeOesteisexpectedtooperateatLOS
D.
Exhibit9
ExistingRoadwayInventory
ExistingIntersectionPerformance
Usingthe2015and2016TMCscollectedatthesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane
andofCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste(showninExhibit8),ananalysisofthe͞ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ͟conditionswas
conductedfortheAMandPMpeakhours.Exhibit10showstheresultsofthisanalysis.TheCortaroFarms
Road/HartmanLaneintersectionoperatesatLOSBintheAMpeakhourandLOSAforthePMpeakhourwithall
movementsoperatingatLOSDorbetterfortheexistingconditions.TheCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
intersectionoperatesatLOSBinboththeAMandPMpeakhourswithallmovementsoperatingatLOSDor
fortheexistingconditions.
better
Exhibit10
ExistingIntersectionPerformance
11
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 345 of 473
PROJECTEDTRAFFIC
SiteTripGeneration
Theestimationofthetrafficgeneratedbytheproposeddevelopmentisbasedontheinformationcontainedin
theITETripGenerationManual,9thEdition,2012for144unitsofSingleFamilyDetachedHousing.Thesitetraffic
estimatesweredevelopedfortheAMandPMpeakhoursoftheadjacentstreettraffic.Thenumberoftrips
generatedisthemathematicalproductoflanduseintensity(numberofdwellingunits)andthetripgeneration
rate.Theresultisthetotalnumberofonewaytrips(notroundtrips)expectedtobegeneratedbytheproject.
Thesetripsrepresentthenumberofvehiclesestimatedtoenterandleavetheproject.Alloftheestimatesare
basedonaveragetriprates.ThetripgenerationestimatesforthesiteareprovidedinExhibit11.Theadjustment
ofthesitetrafficforpasserbytripsisnotapplicableandwasnotconsidered.
Exhibit11
SiteTripGenerationRatesandTrips
AMPeakHourPMPeakhourDaily
PerDU0.751.009.52
Entering27(25%)91(63%)686(50%)
Exiting81(75%)53(37%)686(50%)
TotalTrips1081441,372
SiteTrafficDistribution
SitetrafficwasdistributedtoHartmanLane,CaminodeOeste,andCortaroFarmsRoadbasedondirection
receivedfromtheTownofMaranaduringthePreSubmittalConferenceonFebruary1,2016.Thetripdistribution
thatwasestablishedforthisstudyalsoreflectedwhatwasusedfortheDeAnzaTrafficStudyforthedevelopment
acrossHartmanLanefromthisprojectsite.Thisdistributionassumed50%ofsitetrafficinandoutofeachsite
accesspoint,15%ofenteringandexitingtrafficcomingfrom/goingtothenorthonHartmanLaneandCaminoDe
Oeste.Thetrafficcomingfrom/goingtoCortaroFarmsRoadwasassumedtobe65%tothewestand35%tothe
east.AdditionallydirectionwasgiventodistributeasmallpercentageoftraffictothesouthlegoftheCortaro
FarmsRoad/CaminoDeOesteintersection(SandyDesertTrail).Basedonthedirectionreceivedandverifyingthe
tripdistributionpercentagesaddup,thedirectionaldistributionofthesitetrafficinthestudyareawasdeveloped
asshowninExhibit12.TheresultantsitetrafficvolumesareprovidedinExhibit13.
12
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 346 of 473
Exhibit12
DirectionalDistributionofSiteTrafficinStudyArea
% Site Traffic In/Out Via
55%
Hartman Lane
% Site Traffic In/Out Via
55%
Camino De Oeste
Exhibit13
SiteTrafficVolumesinStudyArea
13
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 347 of 473
BackgroundTrafficVolumes
Backgroundtrafficvolumesforthetwositeaccesspointswereestimatedforthesitebuildoutyearof2019based
ontheavailabletrafficvolumesthatweretakenfromPAGfortheroadwaysegments.Thepeakhourapproach
volumesonHartmanLaneandCaminoDeOestewereextractedfromthese48hourapproachcounts.These
volumeswereincreasedfromtheyeartheywerecollectedto2019usinga3%annualgrowthrate.Additionally,
6
thesitetrafficvolumesfortheDeAnzadevelopmentdrivewayacrossHartmanLanefromthisproposed
developmentaccesswereaddedinsincethatdevelopmentisexpectedtobebuiltoutin2018.FortheCamino
DeOestesiteaccesspointthevolumesinandoutofRosebayDrive,acrossCaminoDeOestefromthisproposed
development,wereestimatedbasedonthenumberofrooftopsandthetriprateforSingleFamilyDetached
HousingusingtheITETripGenerationManual,9thEdition,2012.
ThebackgroundtrafficvolumesforthesignalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandCortaro
FarmsRoad/CaminoDeOestewereestimatedforthesitebuildoutyearof2019.Thiswasaccomplishedusing
theturningmovementcounts(TMCs)fromtheDeAnzadevelopmenttrafficstudyforCortaroFarms
Road/HartmanLaneintersectionandthosecollectedforthisstudyattheCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
intersection.TheseTMCswerethenincreasedusinga3%annualgrowthrate.Theresultant2019background
trafficvolumesareprovidedinExhibit14.
TotalTraffic
Thetotaltrafficfortheanalysisisthecombinationofthesitetrafficandtheestimatedbackgroundtraffic.The
estimatedtotaltrafficisprovidedinExhibit15,whichisusedinthetrafficperformanceanalysisforthetwosite
accessintersectionsaswenalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandCortaro
llasthesig
FarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste.
Exhibit14
Year2019BackgroundTrafficEstimates
N
LEGEND
xx (xx) AM (PM) Turning
Movement Volume
CortaroFarmsRoad
6
DeAnzaResidentialTrafficImpactStudy,March2015,MEsparzaEngineering,LLC,TownofMarana,Arizona.
14
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 348 of 473
Exhibit15
Year2019EstimatedTotalTraffic(Background+Site)
N
LEGEND
xx (xx) AM (PM) Turning
Movement Volume
CortaroFarmsRoad
15
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 349 of 473
TRANSPORTATIONIMPROVEMENTANALYSIS
RoadwayPerformance
Exhibit16showstheroadwaysegmentsthatareinthestudyareaandsummarizestheADTanddailyvolume
capacity(LOSE)oftheseroadwaysegmentswithandwithouttheprojectin2019.Thetableshowstheprojected
volumesandLOSEdailyvolumethresholdsfromtheTownofDĂƌĂŶĂ͛ƐProceduresforPreparationof
7
TransportationImpactStudies.ThetableindicatesthatthesegmentofCortaroFarmsRoadwestofHartman
LanewillexceeditsLOSEdailyvolumecapacityin2019bothwithandwithouttheinclusionofthebuiltoutsite
traffic.Thissitetrafficrepresentsapproximately2%oftheprojecteddailytrafficonthissegmentofCortaroFarms
Roadin2019.
Exhibit16
Year2019RoadwayVolumesandCapacity
SiteAccessandConnectivity
AsshowninExhibit1ʹProjectSitePlan,accesstothedevelopmentwillbefromHartmanLaneandCaminoDe
Oeste.Theproposedaccesswillhavethefollowingcharacteristics:
TheHartmanLaneaccesspointisapproximately2,200feetnorthofCortaroFarmsRoadandlinesupwith
aproposedaccessoftheplannedDeAnzaresidentialdevelopmentonthewestsideofHartmanLane.
ThisHartmanLaneaccesspointhasbeenidentifiedtoneedanorthboundleftturnlaneintotheDeAnza
8
siteaccessintheDeAnzadevelopmentTrafficStudy.Thisleftturnlanewasincludedinthistraffic
analysis.
TheCaminoDeOesteaccesspointisapproximately1,800feetnorthofCortaroFarmsRoadandlinesup
withtheexistingresidentialstreetacrossCaminoDeOeste,RosebayDrive.
TheturnlanewarrantanalysisfortheCaminoDeOestesiteaccesspointindicatesthatanorthboundleft
turnlaneiswarrantedforthisdevelopment(seeTurnLaneWarrantAnalysissectionofthisstudy).This
leftturnlanewasincludedinthistrafficanalysis.
BothHartmanLaneandCaminoDeOesteare2laneroadwayswith35mphpostedspeedlimits.
ccessroadatHartmanLanewillhaveasinglewestboundapproachlanewhichwillbeashared
Thesitea
left/through/rightturnlane.Therewillbenoturnrestrictionsatthislocation.Thewestboundand
eastboundapproachesareproposedtobestopcontrolled.
7
ProceduresforPreparationof:TransportationImpactStudies,July2006,TownofMarana,Arizona.
8
DeAnzaResidentialTrafficImpactStudy,March2015,MEsparzaEngineering,LLC,TownofMarana,Arizona.
16
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 350 of 473
ThesiteaccessroadatCaminoDeOestewillhaveasingleeastboundapproachlanewhichwillbeashared
left/through/rightturnlane.Therewillbenoturnrestrictionsatthislocation.Thewestboundand
eastboundapproachesareproposedtobestopcontrolled.
IntersectionPerformance
TheintersectiontrafficoperationsperformancefortheunsignalizedintersectionsofHartmanLane/siteaccess
andCaminoDeOeste/siteaccesswasconductedusingtheSynchro9softwarewhichemploystheHighway
CapacityManual2010proceduresforstopcontrolledintersections.Theintersectiontrafficoperations
performanceforthesi
gnalizedintersectionsofCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneandCortaroFarms
Road/CaminoDeOestewasconductedusingtheSynchro9softwarealso,howevertheHighwayCapacityManual
2000proceduresforsignalizedintersectionswasusedbecausethe2010versionwasnotabletoanalyzeuturn
tions.Thesignaltimingplanswereobtainedfromtheregional
volumeswhichwerepresentatbothintersec
SynchroModelforthesetwosignalizedintersections.
ThetrafficoperationsanalysiswasconductedfortheAMandPMpeakhoursforthe2019BackgroundTraffic
usingthetrafficvolumesprovidedinExhibit14aswellasthe2019TotalTrafficusingthetrafficvolumesprovided
inExhibit15.Exhibit17indicatesthelaneconfigurationandtrafficcontrolforeachoftheproposedstop
controlledsiteaccessintersectionsusedinthetrafficoperationsanalysis.Forthesignalizedintersections,the
existinglaneconfigurationsshowninExhibits4&5wereusedinthetrafficoperationsanalysis.
Exhibit17
LaneConfigurationandTrafficControlforProposedSiteAccessIntersections
SiteAccess
DeAnza
SiteAccess
RosebayDrive
SiteAccess
NN
Theintersectionlevelofservice(LOS)anddelayestimatesaresummarizedinExhibit18forthe2019Background
TrafficvolumesandinExhibit19forthe2019TotalTrafficvolumes.ThedetailedSynchroHCMperformance
analysisreportsareprovidedintheappendixfortheAMandPMpeakhoursforallvolumesscenarios.Thetraffic
operationsresultsindicatethatalloftheintersectionswilloperatesufficientlywiththe2019TotalTrafficvolumes
withthesignalizedintersectionsoperatingatLOSBorbetterandallmovementsoperatingatLOSDorbetter.
TheproposedsiteaccessintersectionsonHartmanLaneandCaminoDeOestearebothexpectedtooperate
sufficientlywithallmovementsoperatingatLOSDorbetter.
17
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 351 of 473
Exhibit18
IntersectionDelay&LevelofServiceResultsfor2019BackgroundTraffic
Exhibit19
IntersectionDelay&LevelofServiceResultsfor2019TotalTraffic
18
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 352 of 473
Exhibit19(continued)
IntersectionDelay&LevelofServiceResultsfor2019TotalTraffic
th
The95PercentileQueuelengthsfortheunsignalizedintersectionsshowninExhibit19suggestthatanorthbound
leftturnlaneonCaminodeOestemeetingtheminimumTownofMaranarequirementsshouldbesufficient.
Therefore,aturnbaywithϭϭϬ͛ofstorageisrecommendedforthenorthboundleftturnlaneatthislocation.The
th
95percentilequeuelengthsforthetwosignalizedintersectionsareshowninExhibit20below.TheSynchro
queuereportsforthesignalizedintersectionsareprovidedintheappendix.
Exhibit20
95 th PercentileQueueLengthsfor2019TotalTraffic
th
The95percentilequeuesshownaboveindicatethatthesouthboundleftturnandrightturnqueuesatthe
CortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLaneintersectionwillexceedtheavailablestorageduringtheAMpeakhour,
howeverthisisaTintersectionsothequeueswillspillbackwithoutmuchconsequence(notimpedingathrough
movement).Forcomparison,thequeuesfortheSBL&SBRatthisintersectionforthe2019backgroundtraffic
volumesareestimatedbySynchrotobeϭϴϳ͛andϭϲϵ͛respectivelysothisconditionisexpectedtoexistbothwith
andwithoutsitetrafficfromtheproposeddevelopment.Thisapproachisexpectedtooperateatanacceptable
LOSduringtheAMpeakhourwherethequeuesshouldclearnearlyeverycycle.
SimilarlythesouthboundleftturnqueueisexpectedtoexceedtheavailablestorageattheCortaroFarms
Road/CaminoDeOesteintersectionintheAMpeakhourandequaltheavailablestorageinthePMpeakhour.
Forcomparison,thequeuesfortheSBLatthisintersectionforthe2019backgroundtrafficvolumesareestimated
bySynchrotobeϭϵϱ͛intheAMpeakhourandϭϬϳ͛intheAMpeakhoursothisconditionisexpectedtoexist
bothwithandwithoutsitetrafficfromtheproposeddevelopment.Thisapproachisexpectedtooperateatan
acceptableLOSduringtheAMpeakhourwherethequeuesshouldclearnearlyeverycycle.
TurnLaneWarrantAnalysis
Aturnlanewarrantanalysiswasconductedtodeterminewhetherrightturnlanesorleftturnlanesarewarranted
atboththeHartmanLane/siteaccessintersectionandtheCaminoDeOeste/siteaccessintersection.TheTown
ofMaranaappliesturnlanewarrantguidelinesfromPimaCountySubdivisionandDevelopmentStreetStandards
19
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 353 of 473
fortwolaneroadways.ThewarrantanalysisisbasedonthesetrafficvolumewarrantsprovidedinExhibit21.
Additionally,aPimaCountyturnlanewarrantsheetisprovidedintheappendix.
Exhibit21
TurnLaneVolumeWarrants
Theturnlanewarrantanalysisconditionsandresultsareasfollows:
Hartm
anLane/siteaccess
SouthboundLeftTurnLane
-
Postedspeed=35mph
ADT(2way)ʹ5,000to10,000
Maximumleftturnvolumeinpeakhourwithoutleftturnlane=30
Estimatedmaximumpeakhoursouthboundleftturnvolume=7
Isleftturnlanewarrantedbasedonvolumewarrant?ʹNo.
NorthboundRightTurnLane
-
ADT(2way)ʹ5,000to10,000
Maximumpeakhourrightturnvolumewithoutrightturnlane=70
Estimatedmaximumpeakhournorthboundrightturnvolume=38
Isrightturnlanewarrantedbasedonvolumewarrant?ʹNo.
CaminoDeOeste/siteaccess
NorthboundLeftTurnLane
-
Postedspeed=35mph
ADT(2way)>10,000
Maximumleftturnvolumeinpeakhourwithoutleftturnlane=15
Estimatedmaximumpeakhournorthboundleftturnvolume=39
Isleftturnlanewarrantedbasedonvolumewarrant?ʹYes.
SouthboundRightTurnLane
-
ADT(2way)>10,000
Maximumpeakhourrightturnvolumewithoutrightturnlane=40
Estimatedmaximumpeakhoursouthboundrightturnvolume=7
Isrightturnlanewarrantedbasedonvolumewarrant?ʹNo.
20
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 354 of 473
TurnLaneRecommendations:
AnorthboundleftturnlaneshouldbeprovidedattheCaminodeOeste/siteaccessintersection
-
foropeningdayofthedevelopment.Thetrafficanalysisinthisstudyassumedtheprovisionof
9
thisleftturnlane.Thequeuinganalysisindicatestheminimumallowablestorageof110feet
wouldbesufficientforthisrequiredleftturnlane.
Nootherturnlanesatthetwositeaccessintersectionsarewarranted.
-
IntersectionandStoppingSightDistance
Avisualfieldinspectionandreviewofaerialandgroundphotographsdidnotrevealanyintersectionorstopping
sightdistanceissueswithinthestudyarzontalorverticalgeometryoftheexistingroadway.
earelatedtothehori
However,asnotedpreviouslyinthisreport,theverticalprofileonCaminoDeOestesouthoftheproposedsite
accesshasasagwhichlimitssightdistancetoapproximately550feetwhichisgreaterthantheminimumstopping
sightdistanceof250feetforthedesignspeedof35MPHaccordingtotheAASHTOGreenBook 10
͛͘
PavementCondition
Therearenoextremepavementconditionissueswithinthestudyarea,howeverbothHartmanLaneandCamino
DeOestehavepavementthatisinfairtopoorcondition.ThepavementonCaminodeOestewillrequirewidening
fortheprovisionofthenewnorthboundleftturnlane.
9 PavementMarkingandDesignManual,PimaCountyDepartmentofTransportationandCityofTucsonDepartmentof
Transportation,SecondEdition,August2008,SheetNo.46.
10
APolicyonGeometricDesignofHighwaysandStreets,AmericanAssociationofStateHighwayandTransportation
Officials,SixthEdition,2011,PageNo.34.
21
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 355 of 473
CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS
TheproposedCaminoDeOesteResidentialdevelopmentprojectisprojectedtogenerateapproximately:
108morningpeakhourtrips,
o
144eveningpeakhourtrips,
o
1,372dailyweekdaytrips.
o
Theproposedsitehasbeenlaidoutinawaythatdiscouragescutthroughtrafficbyincorporatingculde
sacsandnotprovidingaroadwaythatdirectlyconnectsthetwositeaccesspoints.Thisshouldeffectively
͞ĐĂůŵ͟traffic.
Bothofthesiteaccessintersectionsareproposedtobestopcontrolledonboththeeastboundand
westboundsinglelaneapproaches.Neitheroftheseintersectionswillhaveturnrestrictions.
AϭϭϬ͛northboundleftturnlaneiswarrantedattheCaminoDeOeste/SiteAccessintersection.
Nootherturnlanesarewarrantedatthetwositeaccesslocations.
Allprojectintersectionsareexpectedtooperatesufficientlyatprojectbuildout(2019)withthesignalized
vementsoperatingatLOSDorbetter
intersectionsoperatingatLOSBorbetterandallmo
CortaroFarmsRoadtotheeastofthestudyareafromThornydaleRoadto500feeteastofCaminoDe
Oesteisprogrammedtobewidenedtoa4lanedividedroadwaywitharaisedmedianbytheendof2018.
Thisiscurrentlythelastsegmentofthisroadwaythathasyettobeimproved.Whilenotwithintheimpact
areaofthisdevelopment,itispossiblethatthisimprovementcouldincreasevolumesonCortaroFarms
Roadinthefutureoncetheroadwaycapacityisincreasedonthissegment.
The95thpercentilequeueforthesouthboundapproachattheCortaroFarmsRoad/HartmanLane
intersectionexceedstheexistingstoragelanelengthintheAMpeakhour.ThisisaTintersectionwhere
anyspillbackofthequeuewouldnotimpedeanadjacentthroughmovement.Thisconditionexistswith
andwithoutthisproposeddevelopmentfortheyear2019.Additionally,signaltimingmodificationsmay
bemadetoreducethequeuesduringtheampeakhourifnecessary.
The95thpercentilequeueforthesouthboundleftturnlaneattheCortaroFarmsRoad/CaminoDeOeste
intersectionexceedstheexistingstoragelanelengthintheAMpeakhour.Althoughthesouthbound
throughmovementvolumesarenotveryhighatthislocation,spillbackoftheleftturnqueuemayoccur
impedingtheadjacentsouthboundthroughmovement.Thisconditionexistswithandwithoutthis
proposeddevelopmentfortheyear2019.Signaltimingmodificationsmaybemadetoreducethisqueue
duringtheampeakhourifnecessary.
Nosightdistanceissueswereobservedatthetwoproposedsiteaccessintersectionsandavailablesight
visibilityisexpectedtobeadequate.However,sightdistanceatthesiteaccessintersectionsshouldbe
confirmedaccordingtocriteriaintheTownofMaranaSubdivisionStreetStandards.
AllsignsandpavementmarkingsaccompanyingtherecommendedimprovementsshallfollowtheMUTCD
andTownofMaranarequirementsandstandards.
22
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 356 of 473
APPENDIX
TownofMaranaTIAChecklist
TrafficCountData
SynchroHCMTrafficPerformanceReports
SynchroQueueReports
PimaCountyTurnLaneWarrantSheet
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 357 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 358 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 359 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate10/18/2011
N5_NB
TypeEndDate10/19/2011
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CAMINODEOESTE
BetweenDirectionNB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
NB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00949729
01:0002:00573520
02:0003:00554317
03:0004:00241310
04:0005:0041218
05:0006:00277824
06:0007:001012141854
07:0008:0022342958143
08:0009:0067513426178
09:0010:0036333139139
10:0011:0031413728137
11:0012:0031433744155
12:0013:0041454946181
13:0014:0056475169223
14:0015:0033635452202
15:0016:0082829978341
16:0017:00829310195371
17:0018:0099123130135487
18:0019:0012013310692451
19:0020:0079637948269
20:0021:0062505253217
21:0022:0037383538148
22:0023:0031212724103
23:0024:00152311958
TOTAL3965
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 362 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate10/19/2011
N5_NB
TypeEndDate10/20/2011
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CAMINODEOESTE
BetweenDirectionNB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
NB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:0081415744
01:0002:002108222
02:0003:0030328
03:0004:00440412
04:0005:00134210
05:0006:003361022
06:0007:00710192662
07:0008:0025282949131
08:0009:0066703136203
09:0010:0026373832133
10:0011:0029404136146
11:0012:0034413443152
12:0013:0045486147201
13:0014:0051494354197
14:0015:0047705363233
15:0016:0069787982308
16:0017:008199101105386
17:0018:0099112129109449
18:0019:0011912384108434
19:0020:0097958474350
20:0021:0089666062277
21:0022:0061626046229
22:0023:0023312726107
23:0024:002317101767
TOTAL4183
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 363 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate10/18/2011
N5_SB
TypeEndDate10/19/2011
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CAMINODEOESTE
BetweenDirectionSB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
SB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00552113
01:0002:00351615
02:0003:00262212
03:0004:00234514
04:0005:0056141540
05:0006:001120243388
06:0007:0038446165208
07:0008:0088111124155478
08:0009:00131869282391
09:0010:0058564854216
10:0011:0051505956216
11:0012:0046434853190
12:0013:0042476149199
13:0014:0044464445179
14:0015:0056666254238
15:0016:0054455267218
16:0017:0066545556231
17:0018:0050555553213
18:0019:0059566268245
19:0020:0052363627151
20:0021:002616332499
21:0022:002113171162
22:0023:001616131560
23:0024:001275226
TOTAL3802
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 364 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate10/19/2011
N5_SB
TypeEndDate10/20/2011
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CAMINODEOESTE
BetweenDirectionSB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
SB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00445417
01:0002:002110215
02:0003:0013239
03:0004:0011169
04:0005:0091491547
05:0006:0017222838105
06:0007:0047637677263
07:0008:00108130141178557
08:0009:00128999278397
09:0010:0081494565240
10:0011:0068496148226
11:0012:0053573851199
12:0013:0055405542192
13:0014:0057534743200
14:0015:0054667045235
15:0016:0049585660223
16:0017:0065444653208
17:0018:0068625354237
18:0019:0044466667223
19:0020:0056494237184
20:0021:0047253231135
21:0022:002720242394
22:0023:002613171268
23:0024:00594927
TOTAL4110
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 365 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate11/13/2013
B100_NB
TypeEndDate11/14/2013
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
HARTMANLN
BetweenDirectionNB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
NB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00653216
01:0002:0031149
02:0003:00059519
03:0004:00225211
04:0005:00946625
05:0006:00248721
06:0007:008881943
07:0008:002126232595
08:0009:002322141574
09:0010:002318211779
10:0011:0015243630105
11:0012:002023332399
12:0013:0035303648149
13:0014:0053385143185
14:0015:0045383241156
15:0016:0045584972224
16:0017:0072839198344
17:0018:0085879691359
18:0019:0085907876329
19:0020:0064544745210
20:0021:0037414646170
21:0022:003223201489
22:0023:00151415549
23:0024:00455620
TOTAL2880
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 366 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate11/14/2013
B100_NB
TypeEndDate11/15/2013
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
HARTMANLN
BetweenDirectionNB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
NB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00335112
01:0002:00317516
02:0003:00326314
03:0004:00416314
04:0005:00612312
05:0006:00339621
06:0007:00914142158
07:0008:0024263335118
08:0009:0034372824123
09:0010:002115192681
10:0011:0024263125106
11:0012:0033314143148
12:0013:0037374645165
13:0014:0039474538169
14:0015:0041454747180
15:0016:0050636883264
16:0017:0086787583322
17:0018:0090918582348
18:0019:0075817971306
19:0020:0060534831192
20:0021:0034272517103
21:0022:001012161351
22:0023:00182017560
23:0024:00789832
TOTAL2915
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 367 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate11/13/2013
B100_SB
TypeEndDate11/14/2013
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
HARTMANLN
BetweenDirectionSB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
SB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:003314222
01:0002:00332513
02:0003:00315312
03:0004:003251424
04:0005:00108121747
05:0006:001316233385
06:0007:0041466065212
07:0008:0079957786337
08:0009:0085806458287
09:0010:0049353937160
10:0011:0053323332150
11:0012:0033353237137
12:0013:0040323837147
13:0014:0045545057206
14:0015:0074564031201
15:0016:0041334346163
16:0017:0041414348173
17:0018:0043494147180
18:0019:0048524037177
19:0020:0026362632120
20:0021:002623231991
21:0022:00151411747
22:0023:0091410538
23:0024:00445518
3047
TOTA
L
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 368 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate11/14/2013
B100_SB
TypeEndDate11/15/2013
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
HARTMANLN
BetweenDirectionSB
LINDAVISTABLANDCORTAROFARMSRD
DirectionNotes
SB
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:00337316
01:0002:00334212
02:0003:00385319
03:0004:00536519
04:0005:0079111037
05:0006:001215233787
06:0007:0045516569230
07:0008:0078828896344
08:0009:0071665952248
09:0010:0042433337155
10:0011:0039373129136
11:0012:0040332734134
12:0013:0050433331157
13:0014:0043434030156
14:0015:0027243134116
15:0016:0037443754172
16:0017:0051434745186
17:0018:0039435644182
18:0019:0059454333180
19:0020:0031312026108
20:0021:00171814958
21:0022:00161311747
22:0023:0014910437
23:0024:00445619
TOTAL2855
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 369 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate9/19/2012
A348
TypeEndDate9/20/2012
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CORTAROFARMSRD
BetweenDirection2WAY
I10WBFRONTAGERDANDHARTMANLN
DirectionNotes
2WAY
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:0039322627124
01:0002:002320161978
02:0003:002223252696
03:0004:0024282337112
04:0005:0049587689272
05:0006:00103135236233707
06:0007:002623263774531418
07:0008:005585415445762219
08:0009:004945004083881790
09:0010:003923283273151362
10:0011:003082953282901221
11:0012:002493313093351224
12:0013:003123333463961387
13:0014:002983593114021370
14:0015:004283754074921702
15:0016:004604855405162001
16:0017:005225466246062298
17:0018:005276615586092355
18:0019:005145404244231901
19:0020:003473922963091344
20:0021:003152982892391141
21:0022:00237214175151777
22:0023:0011710697100420
23:0024:0076585953246
27565
TOTA
L
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 370 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate9/20/2012
A348
TypeEndDate9/21/2012
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CORTAROFARMSRD
BetweenDirection2WAY
I10WBFRONTAGERDANDHARTMANLN
DirectionNotes
2WAY
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:0034282521108
01:0002:001818191772
02:0003:001718262788
03:0004:0021273342123
04:0005:00486686108308
05:0006:00126217219235797
06:0007:003013744365651676
07:0008:006085876345352364
08:0009:004994513623651677
09:0010:004023363403411419
10:0011:002943013092801184
11:0012:002553352983201208
12:0013:002953383623521347
13:0014:003243563574251462
14:0015:003793714314931674
15:0016:004675085135091997
16:0017:005115416286052285
17:0018:005486095385682263
18:0019:004915093724171789
19:0020:003703673343181389
20:0021:003072942602241085
21:0022:00232190163123708
22:0023:00107879499387
23:0024:0069535433209
27619
TOTA
L
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 371 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate9/25/2012
A241
TypeEndDate9/26/2012
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CORTAROFARMSRD
BetweenDirection2WAY
HARTMANLNANDTHORNYDALERD
DirectionNotes
2WAY
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:0039362320118
01:0002:00917151455
02:0003:001914151866
03:0004:002116192379
04:0005:0032283343136
05:0006:00415678117292
06:0007:00105140148225618
07:0008:002533273763601316
08:0009:003973313103131351
09:0010:003163012652571139
10:0011:002432492582691019
11:0012:002512443052661066
12:0013:003012623112881162
13:0014:002742652713271137
14:0015:003073283313501316
15:0016:003623583334221475
16:0017:004104024354191666
17:0018:003974725344141817
18:0019:004394043573611561
19:0020:002682802572181023
20:0021:00218209217210854
21:0022:00197165148148658
22:0023:00127988590400
23:0024:0067544431196
20520
TOTA
L
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 372 of 473
LocationInfoCountDataInfo
LocationIDStartDate9/26/2012
A241
TypeEndDate9/27/2012
LINK
FunctionalClassStartTime12:00AM
LocatedOnEndTime12:00AM
CORTAROFARMSRD
BetweenDirection2WAY
HARTMANLNANDTHORNYDALERD
DirectionNotes
2WAY
CommunityCountSource
MPO_IDFileName
HPMSIDWeather
AgencyStudy
PimaAssociationofGovernments
Ownerpag
Interval:15mins
15Min
TimeHourlyCount
1st2nd3rd4th
00:0001:0040372719123
01:0002:00917161860
02:0003:002015182275
03:0004:002418232792
04:0005:0032364043151
05:0006:00475885125315
06:0007:00122145170227664
07:0008:002803314084081427
08:0009:004233633113161413
09:0010:002892892842651127
10:0011:002342652772761052
11:0012:002622583112891120
12:0013:003112863112651173
13:0014:002672742813161138
14:0015:002973013203581276
15:0016:003233443573811405
16:0017:004104194284221679
17:0018:003774675294411814
18:0019:004584193273941598
19:0020:003033052731921073
20:0021:00210221216200847
21:0022:00203159151169682
22:0023:00141868689402
23:0024:0066574944216
20922
TOTA
L
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 373 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/12/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)108851170761214324
Future Volume (vph)108851170761214324
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.311.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)570353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)117925176866233352
RTOR Reduction (vph)0000330194
Lane Group Flow (vph)117925176833233158
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)59.952.41.244.344.317.717.7
Effective Green, g (s)60.953.42.245.345.318.718.7
Actuated g/C Ratio0.680.590.020.500.500.210.21
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)5232099431781796367328
v/s Ratio Protc0.03c0.260.000.22c0.13
v/s Ratio Perm0.130.020.10
v/c Ratio0.220.440.020.430.040.630.48
Uniform Delay, d19.110.142.914.211.332.531.4
Progression Factor1.001.000.970.560.301.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.10.70.10.30.03.61.1
Delay (s)9.210.841.58.23.436.132.5
Level of ServiceABDAADC
Approach Delay (s)10.67.933.9
Approach LOSBAC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay15.2HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.49
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization53.5%ICU Level of ServiceA
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO Existing AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 374 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/12/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)178767851144256882274124226
Future Volume (vph)178767851144256882274124226
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.951.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177017601770
Flt Permitted0.371.001.000.951.001.000.381.000.71
Satd. Flow (perm)6923539158317703539158370317601324
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)189573755154661789294526246
RTOR Reduction (vph)000270004601900
Lane Group Flow (vph)0113737280616174329520246
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)51.344.244.25.842.942.922.222.222.2
Effective Green, g (s)53.345.245.26.843.943.923.223.223.2
Actuated g/C Ratio0.590.500.500.080.490.490.260.260.26
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)50617777951331726772181453341
v/s Ratio Prot0.02c0.21c0.030.170.03
v/s Ratio Perm0.110.020.030.04c0.19
v/c Ratio0.220.410.030.460.360.060.160.110.72
Uniform Delay, d111.314.111.339.814.312.125.925.530.5
Progression Factor1.080.821.500.891.081.651.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.10.70.10.90.50.10.40.17.3
Delay (s)12.312.217.236.315.920.226.325.737.8
Level of ServiceBBBDBCCCD
Approach Delay (s)12.618.025.8
Approach LOSBBC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay19.5HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.51
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization57.7%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO Existing AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 375 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/12/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)55211
Future Volume (vph)55211
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.88
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1641
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1641
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)60229
RTOR Reduction (vph)1700
Lane Group Flow (vph)1190
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)22.2
Effective Green, g (s)23.2
Actuated g/C Ratio0.26
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)423
v/s Ratio Prot0.07
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.28
Uniform Delay, d126.7
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.4
Delay (s)27.1
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)32.0
Approach LOSC
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO Existing AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 376 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/12/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)315878168014468156
Future Volume (vph)315878168014468156
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.311.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)578353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)342954173915774170
RTOR Reduction (vph)0000830150
Lane Group Flow (vph)3429541739747420
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)67.959.62.041.441.49.79.7
Effective Green, g (s)68.960.63.042.442.410.710.7
Actuated g/C Ratio0.770.670.030.470.470.120.12
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)7232382591667745210188
v/s Ratio Protc0.110.270.000.21c0.04
v/s Ratio Permc0.250.050.01
v/c Ratio0.470.400.020.440.100.350.11
Uniform Delay, d19.26.642.115.913.236.535.4
Progression Factor1.001.001.250.340.211.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.20.50.00.80.31.00.3
Delay (s)9.47.152.46.23.037.535.6
Level of ServiceAADAADD
Approach Delay (s)7.75.736.2
Approach LOSAAD
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay9.8HCM 2000 Level of ServiceA
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.48
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization56.0%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO Existing PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 377 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/12/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)7254662293166561822948698
Future Volume (vph)7254662293166561822948698
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.981.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177018301770
Flt Permitted0.331.001.000.951.001.000.601.000.72
Satd. Flow (perm)61735391583177035391583111218301338
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)82767203231771319832527107
RTOR Reduction (vph)00012000970600
Lane Group Flow (vph)02847202002071310132530107
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)65.555.455.44.044.744.712.812.812.8
Effective Green, g (s)66.556.456.45.045.745.713.813.813.8
Actuated g/C Ratio0.740.630.630.060.510.510.150.150.15
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)6572217992981797803170280205
v/s Ratio Protc0.080.200.010.200.03
v/s Ratio Permc0.240.010.060.03c0.08
v/c Ratio0.430.320.020.200.400.130.190.190.52
Uniform Delay, d18.47.96.440.613.711.633.233.235.1
Progression Factor0.910.491.000.920.820.611.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.20.40.00.30.50.30.50.32.4
Delay (s)7.84.26.437.711.87.333.833.637.5
Level of ServiceAAADBACCD
Approach Delay (s)5.311.433.6
Approach LOSABC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay12.0HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.47
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization62.7%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO Existing PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 378 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/12/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)3192
Future Volume (vph)3192
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.89
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1654
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1654
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)34100
RTOR Reduction (vph)850
Lane Group Flow (vph)490
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)12.8
Effective Green, g (s)13.8
Actuated g/C Ratio0.15
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)253
v/s Ratio Prot0.03
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.19
Uniform Delay, d133.3
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.4
Delay (s)33.6
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)35.3
Approach LOSD
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO Existing PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 379 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)122958179669241365
Future Volume (vph)122958179669241365
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.251.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)465353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)1331041186575262397
RTOR Reduction (vph)0000400174
Lane Group Flow (vph)1331041186535262223
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)57.950.31.340.540.519.719.7
Effective Green, g (s)58.951.32.341.541.520.720.7
Actuated g/C Ratio0.650.570.030.460.460.230.23
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)4792017451631729407364
v/s Ratio Protc0.04c0.290.000.24c0.15
v/s Ratio Perm0.140.020.14
v/c Ratio0.280.520.020.530.050.640.61
Uniform Delay, d112.711.842.817.313.431.331.1
Progression Factor1.001.000.970.460.241.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.10.90.10.60.13.53.0
Delay (s)12.812.741.78.63.234.834.1
Level of ServiceBBDAACC
Approach Delay (s)12.78.234.4
Approach LOSBAC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay16.3HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.55
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization57.9%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Background AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 380 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)199574156154662190304526247
Future Volume (vph)199574156154662190304526247
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.951.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177017611770
Flt Permitted0.331.001.000.951.001.000.361.000.71
Satd. Flow (perm)6143539158317703539158366517611317
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)2110380561165067598334928268
RTOR Reduction (vph)000310005502000
Lane Group Flow (vph)0124805300666754333570268
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)52.142.742.75.638.938.923.923.923.9
Effective Green, g (s)54.143.743.76.639.939.924.924.924.9
Actuated g/C Ratio0.600.490.490.070.440.440.280.280.28
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)50217187681291568701183487364
v/s Ratio Protc0.03c0.23c0.040.190.03
v/s Ratio Perm0.120.020.030.05c0.20
v/c Ratio0.250.470.040.510.430.060.180.120.74
Uniform Delay, d112.415.412.140.117.214.324.824.329.6
Progression Factor0.980.740.610.901.011.331.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.10.80.11.40.80.20.50.17.6
Delay (s)12.212.27.437.518.219.325.324.437.1
Level of ServiceBBADBBCCD
Approach Delay (s)11.919.824.7
Approach LOSBBC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay19.6HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.56
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization61.9%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Background AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 381 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)60231
Future Volume (vph)60231
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.88
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1641
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1641
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)65251
RTOR Reduction (vph)1740
Lane Group Flow (vph)1420
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)23.9
Effective Green, g (s)24.9
Actuated g/C Ratio0.28
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)454
v/s Ratio Prot0.09
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.31
Uniform Delay, d125.8
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.4
Delay (s)26.2
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)31.2
Approach LOSC
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO 2019 Background AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 382 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9668: Camino De Oeste & CDO Access #2/Rosebay Dr 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh0.2
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h0009020225316950
Future Vol, veh/h0009020225316950
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow00010020245317550
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All10051006755100410042467550024800
Stage 1758758-246246-------
Stage 2247248-758758-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver220241409220242793855--1318--
Stage 1399415-758703-------
Stage 2757701-399415-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver219241409220242793855--1318--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver219241-220242-------
Stage 1399415-758703-------
Stage 2755701-399415-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s019.900
HCM LOSAC
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)855---2531318--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio----0.0470.001--
HCM Control Delay (s)0--019.97.70-
HCM Lane LOSA--ACAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0---0.10--
Pulte CDO 2019 Background AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 383 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9671: Hartman Ln & DeAnza Dwy/CDO Access #1 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh2.5
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h1709600032140004146
Future Vol, veh/h1709600032140004146
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow18010400035152004507
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All6756754537276791524570015200
Stage 1453453-222222-------
Stage 2222222-505457-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver3683766073393748941104--1429--
Stage 1586570-780720-------
Stage 2780720-549568-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver3593646072743628941104--1429--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver359364-274362-------
Stage 1567570-755697-------
Stage 2755697-455568-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s13.401.60
HCM LOSBA
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1104--550-1429--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.032--0.223----
HCM Control Delay (s)8.4--13.400--
HCM Lane LOSA--BAA--
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1--0.8-0--
Pulte CDO 2019 Background AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 384 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)355988176516277176
Future Volume (vph)355988176516277176
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.271.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)502353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)3861074183217684191
RTOR Reduction (vph)0000920167
Lane Group Flow (vph)38610741832848424
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)67.559.91.342.042.010.110.1
Effective Green, g (s)68.560.92.343.043.011.111.1
Actuated g/C Ratio0.760.680.030.480.480.120.12
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)6662394451690756218195
v/s Ratio Protc0.130.300.000.24c0.05
v/s Ratio Permc0.310.050.01
v/c Ratio0.580.450.020.490.110.390.12
Uniform Delay, d112.46.842.816.013.036.335.1
Progression Factor1.001.001.270.330.141.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.80.60.11.00.31.10.3
Delay (s)13.27.454.36.32.237.435.4
Level of ServiceBADAADD
Approach Delay (s)8.95.636.0
Approach LOSAAD
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay10.4HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization60.6%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Background PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 385 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)82787233231771719932527107
Future Volume (vph)82787233231771719932527107
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.981.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177018281770
Flt Permitted0.301.001.000.951.001.000.571.000.71
Satd. Flow (perm)55235391583177035391583105418281331
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)93027863531877921635578116
RTOR Reduction (vph)000130001100700
Lane Group Flow (vph)03117862202177910635580116
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)64.955.455.43.443.343.313.413.413.4
Effective Green, g (s)65.956.456.44.444.344.314.414.414.4
Actuated g/C Ratio0.730.630.630.050.490.490.160.160.16
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)6272217992861741779168292212
v/s Ratio Protc0.090.220.010.220.03
v/s Ratio Permc0.270.010.070.03c0.09
v/c Ratio0.500.350.020.240.450.140.210.200.55
Uniform Delay, d111.08.16.441.214.912.432.832.834.8
Progression Factor0.880.501.000.940.850.641.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.20.40.00.50.70.30.60.32.9
Delay (s)9.94.46.439.013.48.333.533.137.7
Level of ServiceAAADBACCD
Approach Delay (s)6.012.833.3
Approach LOSABC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay12.9HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.53
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization66.5%ICU Level of ServiceC
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Background PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 386 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)34101
Future Volume (vph)34101
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.89
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1654
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1654
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)37110
RTOR Reduction (vph)920
Lane Group Flow (vph)550
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)13.4
Effective Green, g (s)14.4
Actuated g/C Ratio0.16
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)264
v/s Ratio Prot0.03
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.21
Uniform Delay, d132.8
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.4
Delay (s)33.2
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)35.2
Approach LOSD
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO 2019 Background PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 387 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9668: Camino De Oeste & CDO Access #2/Rosebay Dr 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh0.2
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h00060105831022840
Future Vol, veh/h00060105831022840
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------150-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow00070106341123090
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All9539583099529526393090064500
Stage 1313313-639639-------
Stage 2640645-313313-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver2392577312392594761252--940--
Stage 1698657-464470-------
Stage 2464467-698657-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver2382567312382584761252--940--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver238256-238258-------
Stage 1698655-464470-------
Stage 2463467-696655-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s019.500.1
HCM LOSAC
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1252---256940--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio----0.030.002--
HCM Control Delay (s)0--019.58.80-
HCM Lane LOSA--ACAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0---0.10--
Pulte CDO 2019 Background PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 388 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9671: Hartman Ln & DeAnza Dwy/CDO Access #1 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh2.1
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h110630001084320022519
Future Vol, veh/h110630001084320022519
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow120680001174700024521
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All9599592559939694702650047000
Stage 1255255-704704-------
Stage 2704704-289265-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver2372577842242545941299--1092--
Stage 1749696-428440-------
Stage 2428440-719689-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver2212347841902315941299--1092--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver221234-190231-------
Stage 1682696-389400-------
Stage 2389400-656689-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s12.401.60
HCM LOSBA
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1299--569-1092--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.09--0.141----
HCM Control Delay (s)8--12.400--
HCM Lane LOSA--BAA--
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3--0.5-0--
Pulte CDO 2019 Background PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 389 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)129965181973253388
Future Volume (vph)129965181973253388
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.231.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)435353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)1401049189079275422
RTOR Reduction (vph)0000430168
Lane Group Flow (vph)1401049189036275254
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)56.949.31.339.139.120.720.7
Effective Green, g (s)57.950.32.340.140.121.721.7
Actuated g/C Ratio0.640.560.030.450.450.240.24
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)4651977451576705426381
v/s Ratio Protc0.04c0.300.000.250.16
v/s Ratio Perm0.150.02c0.16
v/c Ratio0.300.530.020.560.050.650.67
Uniform Delay, d114.312.442.818.514.230.730.9
Progression Factor1.001.000.930.460.241.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.11.00.10.70.13.34.3
Delay (s)14.413.539.79.23.434.035.2
Level of ServiceBBDAACD
Approach Delay (s)13.68.834.8
Approach LOSBAC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay17.1HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.57
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization58.8%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 390 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)1910275356154662594304626256
Future Volume (vph)1910275356154662594304626256
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.951.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177017621770
Flt Permitted0.331.001.000.951.001.000.321.000.71
Satd. Flow (perm)6053539158317703539158360417621316
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)21111818611650679102335028278
RTOR Reduction (vph)000320005802000
Lane Group Flow (vph)0132818290666794433580278
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)51.442.042.05.638.238.224.624.624.6
Effective Green, g (s)53.443.043.06.639.239.225.625.625.6
Actuated g/C Ratio0.590.480.480.070.440.440.280.280.28
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)49316907561291541689171501374
v/s Ratio Protc0.03c0.23c0.040.190.03
v/s Ratio Perm0.130.020.030.05c0.21
v/c Ratio0.270.480.040.510.440.060.190.120.74
Uniform Delay, d113.216.012.540.117.714.824.423.829.2
Progression Factor0.950.710.330.901.001.271.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.10.90.11.40.90.20.60.17.8
Delay (s)12.612.24.237.518.619.024.923.937.0
Level of ServiceBBADBBCCD
Approach Delay (s)11.820.124.2
Approach LOSBCC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay19.7HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.57
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization62.2%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 391 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)63254
Future Volume (vph)63254
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.88
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1639
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1639
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)68276
RTOR Reduction (vph)1720
Lane Group Flow (vph)1720
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)24.6
Effective Green, g (s)25.6
Actuated g/C Ratio0.28
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)466
v/s Ratio Prot0.11
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.37
Uniform Delay, d125.7
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.5
Delay (s)26.2
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)31.1
Approach LOSC
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 392 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9668: Camino De Oeste & CDO Access #2/Rosebay Dr 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh1.1
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h603590212225316952
Future Vol, veh/h603590212225316952
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow7038100213245317552
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All10321033757105010322467580024800
Stage 1759759-272272-------
Stage 2273274-778760-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver211232408205233793853--1318--
Stage 1399415-734685-------
Stage 2733683-389414-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver208228408184229793853--1318--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver208228-184229-------
Stage 1393415-723675-------
Stage 2720673-352414-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s16.522.80.50
HCM LOSCC
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)853--3582141318--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.015--0.1240.0560.001--
HCM Control Delay (s)9.3--16.522.87.70-
HCM Lane LOSA--CCAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0--0.40.20--
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 393 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9671: Hartman Ln & DeAnza Dwy/CDO Access #1 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh3.4
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h170963506321401124146
Future Vol, veh/h170963506321401124146
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow1801043807351521224507
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All6896924537386891584570016400
Stage 1458458-228228-------
Stage 2231234-510461-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver3603676073343698871104--1414--
Stage 1583567-775715-------
Stage 2772711-546565-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver3483556072693578871104--1414--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver348355-269357-------
Stage 1565566-750692-------
Stage 2742688-451564-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s13.519.11.50
HCM LOSBC
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1104--5463001414--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.032--0.2250.1490.002--
HCM Control Delay (s)8.4--13.519.17.50-
HCM Lane LOSA--BCAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1--0.90.50--
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 394 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
MovementEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)3801013178017585191
Future Volume (vph)3801013178017585191
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.35.35.35.35.35.15.1
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.000.951.001.001.00
Frt1.001.001.001.000.851.000.85
Flt Protected0.951.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1770353917703539158317701583
Flt Permitted0.261.000.951.001.000.951.00
Satd. Flow (perm)487353917703539158317701583
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)4131101184819092208
RTOR Reduction (vph)00001000182
Lane Group Flow (vph)41311011848909226
Turn Typepm+ptNAProtNAPermProtPerm
Protected Phases52164
Permitted Phases264
Actuated Green, G (s)67.259.61.341.641.610.410.4
Effective Green, g (s)68.260.62.342.642.611.411.4
Actuated g/C Ratio0.760.670.030.470.470.130.13
Clearance Time (s)6.36.36.36.36.36.16.1
Vehicle Extension (s)2.05.02.05.05.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)6582382451675749224200
v/s Ratio Protc0.140.310.000.24c0.05
v/s Ratio Permc0.330.060.02
v/c Ratio0.630.460.020.510.120.410.13
Uniform Delay, d112.97.042.816.413.236.234.9
Progression Factor1.001.001.200.350.131.001.00
Incremental Delay, d21.40.60.11.00.31.20.3
Delay (s)14.37.651.56.82.137.435.2
Level of ServiceBADAADD
Approach Delay (s)9.45.935.9
Approach LOSAAD
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay11.0HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.62
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)15.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization62.4%ICU Level of ServiceB
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 395 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementEBUEBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)83037313231773020932567113
Future Volume (vph)83037313231773020932567113
Ideal Flow (vphpl)190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900
Total Lost time (s)5.15.15.15.15.15.14.64.64.6
Lane Util. Factor1.000.951.001.000.951.001.001.001.00
Frt1.001.000.851.001.000.851.000.981.00
Flt Protected0.951.001.000.951.001.000.951.000.95
Satd. Flow (prot)177035391583177035391583177018301770
Flt Permitted0.291.001.000.951.001.000.521.000.71
Satd. Flow (perm)5383539158317703539158397318301326
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)93297953531879322735618123
RTOR Reduction (vph)000130001160700
Lane Group Flow (vph)03387952202179311135620123
Turn Typepm+ptpm+ptNAPermpm+ptProtNAPermPermNAPerm
Protected Phases5521168
Permitted Phases2226684
Actuated Green, G (s)64.455.055.03.343.043.013.913.913.9
Effective Green, g (s)65.456.056.04.344.044.014.914.914.9
Actuated g/C Ratio0.730.620.620.050.490.490.170.170.17
Clearance Time (s)6.16.16.16.16.16.15.65.65.6
Vehicle Extension (s)2.06.06.02.06.06.03.03.03.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)6142202984841730773161302219
v/s Ratio Protc0.100.220.010.220.03
v/s Ratio Permc0.300.010.070.04c0.09
v/c Ratio0.550.360.020.250.460.140.220.210.56
Uniform Delay, d112.88.36.541.315.212.632.532.434.5
Progression Factor0.890.501.000.940.860.641.001.001.00
Incremental Delay, d20.60.40.00.50.80.30.70.33.3
Delay (s)11.94.66.639.313.78.433.232.837.8
Level of ServiceBAADBACCD
Approach Delay (s)6.713.132.9
Approach LOSABC
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay13.5HCM 2000 Level of ServiceB
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0Sum of lost time (s)14.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization69.3%ICU Level of ServiceC
Analysis Period (min)15
c Critical Lane Group
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 396 of 473
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
MovementSBTSBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)36116
Future Volume (vph)36116
Ideal Flow (vphpl)19001900
Total Lost time (s)4.6
Lane Util. Factor1.00
Frt0.89
Flt Protected1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)1649
Flt Permitted1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)1649
Peak-hour factor, PHF0.920.92
Adj. Flow (vph)39126
RTOR Reduction (vph)1050
Lane Group Flow (vph)600
Turn TypeNA
Protected Phases4
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)13.9
Effective Green, g (s)14.9
Actuated g/C Ratio0.17
Clearance Time (s)5.6
Vehicle Extension (s)3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)273
v/s Ratio Prot0.04
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio0.22
Uniform Delay, d132.5
Progression Factor1.00
Incremental Delay, d20.4
Delay (s)32.9
Level of ServiceC
Approach Delay (s)35.0
Approach LOSD
Intersection Summary
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 4
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 397 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9668: Camino De Oeste & CDO Access #2/Rosebay Dr 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh0.9
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h4023601395831022847
Future Vol, veh/h4023601395831022847
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------150-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow4025701426341123098
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All10411046312105310456393160064500
Stage 1317317-724724-------
Stage 2724729-329321-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver2082287282042294761244--940--
Stage 1694654-417430-------
Stage 2417428-684652-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver2022207281912214761244--940--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver202220-191221-------
Stage 1671652-403415-------
Stage 2402414-659650-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s12.322.90.50.1
HCM LOSBC
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1244--525209940--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.034--0.0560.0360.002--
HCM Control Delay (s)8--12.322.98.80-
HCM Lane LOSA--BCAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1--0.20.10--
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 398 of 473
HCM 2010 TWSC
9671: Hartman Ln & DeAnza Dwy/CDO Access #1 2/15/2016
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh2.7
MovementEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR
Traffic Vol, veh/h11063230410843238722519
Future Vol, veh/h11063230410843238722519
Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000
Sign Control StopStopStopStopStopStopFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
RT Channelized--None--None--None--None
Storage Length------110-----
Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0-
Grade, %-0--0--0--0-
Peak Hour Factor929292929292929292929292
Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222
Mvmt Flow12068250411747041824521
Major/MinorMinor2Minor1Major1Major2
Conflicting Flow All9971016255102910054902650051100
Stage 1270270-725725-------
Stage 2727746-304280-------
Critical Hdwy7.126.526.227.126.526.224.12--4.12--
Critical Hdwy Stg 16.125.52-6.125.52-------
Critical Hdwy Stg 26.125.52-6.125.52-------
Follow-up Hdwy3.5184.0183.3183.5184.0183.3182.218--2.218--
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver2232387842122415781299--1054--
Stage 1736686-416430-------
Stage 2415421-705679-------
Platoon blocked, %----
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver2052157841792175781299--1054--
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver205215-179217-------
Stage 1670680-379391-------
Stage 2375383-638673-------
ApproachEBWBNBSB
HCM Control Delay, s12.626.21.50.2
HCM LOSBD
Minor Lane/Major MvmtNBLNBTNBREBLn1WBLn1SBLSBTSBR
Capacity (veh/h)1299--5521991054--
HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.09--0.1460.1470.007--
HCM Control Delay (s)8--12.626.28.40-
HCM Lane LOSA--BDAA-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.3--0.50.50--
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 7
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 399 of 473
Queues
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
Lane GroupEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Group Flow (vph)1401049189079275422
v/c Ratio0.360.480.010.500.100.640.77
Control Delay15.612.935.08.61.336.823.6
Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Delay15.612.935.08.61.336.823.6
Queue Length 50th (ft)271401720142107
Queue Length 95th (ft)68344m21055190186
Internal Link Dist (ft)119525902204
Turn Bay Length (ft)360150150125
Base Capacity (vph)39321731511773831627704
Starvation Cap Reductn0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn0000000
Storage Cap Reductn0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio0.360.480.010.500.100.440.60
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 400 of 473
Queues
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
Lane GroupEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTSBLSBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)13281861666791023378278344
v/c Ratio0.280.470.070.440.430.130.190.150.750.54
Control Delay12.813.40.544.419.45.524.215.040.810.7
Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Delay12.813.40.544.419.45.524.215.040.810.7
Queue Length 50th (ft)331942371320142114345
Queue Length 95th (ft)33144m175213333346200103
Internal Link Dist (ft)25904574201726
Turn Bay Length (ft)450650175175125125
Base Capacity (vph)47617388311591590769244729531805
Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio0.280.470.070.420.430.130.140.110.520.43
Intersection Summary
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Pulte CDO 2019 Total AMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 401 of 473
Queues
611: Cortaro Farms Rd & Hartman Ln 2/15/2016
Lane GroupEBLEBTWBUWBTWBRSBLSBR
Lane Group Flow (vph)4131101184819092208
v/c Ratio0.710.430.010.450.200.410.54
Control Delay22.76.546.05.30.741.210.9
Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Delay22.76.546.05.30.741.210.9
Queue Length 50th (ft)58900380490
Queue Length 95th (ft)#188244m26129259
Internal Link Dist (ft)119525902204
Turn Bay Length (ft)360150150125
Base Capacity (vph)58525781511872927627695
Starvation Cap Reductn0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn0000000
Storage Cap Reductn0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio0.710.430.010.450.200.150.30
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 2
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 402 of 473
Queues
621: Camino De Oeste & Cortaro Farms Rd 2/15/2016
Lane GroupEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTSBLSBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)33879535217932273569123165
v/c Ratio0.620.340.030.140.420.240.220.220.560.44
Control Delay17.44.70.137.411.71.633.829.243.613.3
Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Delay17.44.70.137.411.71.633.829.243.613.3
Queue Length 50th (ft)363201296318306519
Queue Length 95th (ft)#18139m1m2113714426211269
Internal Link Dist (ft)25904574201726
Turn Bay Length (ft)450650175175125125
Base Capacity (vph)548234510841661877946393745536741
Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio0.620.340.030.130.420.240.090.090.230.22
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Pulte CDO 2019 Total PMSynchro 9 Report
James BeierPage 3
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 403 of 473
Pima County
Turn Lane Warrant Calculator for Traffic Memorandum Only
Per SDSS 3.13.1 & 3.13.2
Last Revision10/31/2013
Instructions:Fillintheinformationrequestedinthewhiteboxes.ForLandUseinrows9,20and31thereisadropdownlisttoselectfrom.Important:ifthereisnolanduse2or3,leave"SelectFrom
DropDown"inthebox.Forthenumberof"units"intheproject(spreadsheetrows11,22,and33),enterthetotalsquarefeetofthelanduse,e.g.ifLandUse1isa24hourConvenienceStorewith
4,500squarefeet,enter4,500.IfLandUse2isanapartmentcomplexwith120dwellingunits(DU),enter120.Acompletedsampleformcanbefoundonthesampleformtabofthisexcelfile
Street1Street2Street3Street4
NameofStreetAdjacenttoDevelopment
HartmanLaneCaminoDeOeste
PostedSpeedLimitofStreet(mph)
35MPH35MPHMPHMPH
ADTofStreet:2way
6980VPD10170VPDVPDVPD
ProjectLandUse1
LandUsePerSDSSTable3.2
SingleFamily
LandUseCode
210
TotalDevelopmentUnitsinProject
145DU
LandUseUnit
1DU
PeakHrTrips/LandUseUnit
1.02
TotalPeakHourTrips(Row11/Row12*Row13)
148
%EnteringPerTripGenerationManual9edition
63%
th
TotalPeakHourEnteringTrips
93
Enter%ofLandUseusingthisstreet
50%50%
PeakHourEnteringTripsthisstreet
474700
ProjectLandUse2
LandUsePerSDSSTable3.2
SelectFromDropDown
LandUseCode
TotalDevelopmentUnitsinProject
0
LandUseUnit
00
PeakHrTrips/LandUseUnit
0
TotalPeakHourTrips(Row22/Row23*Row24)
0
%EnteringPerTripGenerationManual9edition
0%
th
TotalPeakHourEnteringTrips
0
Enter%ofLandUseusingthisstreet
PeakHourEnteringTripsThisStreet
0000
ProjectLandUse3
LandUsePerSDSSTable3.2
SelectFromDropDown
LandUseCode
TotalDevelopmentUnitsinProject
0
LandUseUnit
00
PeakHrTrips/LandUseUnit
0
TotalPeakHourTrips(Row33/Row34*Row35)
0
%EnteringPerTripGenerationManual9edition
0%
th
TotalPeakHourEnteringTrips
0
Enter%ofLandUseusingthisstreet
PeakHourEnteringTripsThisStreet
0000
GrandTotalPeakHourEnteringTripsperStreet474700
YourTripGenerationis100orgreaterandaTrafficImpactStudyisRequired
TripDistributionAssumptions
PercentageofVehiclesEnteringthe
85%15%60%60%
DevelopmentbyMakingaRightTurn
PercentageofVehiclesEnteringthe
15%85%40%40%
DevelopmentbyMakingaLeftTurn
Note:ApplicantmaydeviatefromtheTripDistributionAssumptionsabovebyprovidingjustification.
Results
TotalNumberofVehiclesEnteringthe
40700
DevelopmentbyMakingaRightTurn
RightTurnLaneWarrantThreshold
7040n/an/a
RightTurnLaneRequired?
No
Non/an/a
TotalNumberofVehiclesEnteringthe
74000
DevelopmentbyMakingaLeftTurn
LeftTurnLaneWarrantThreshold
30n/a
15n/a
LeftTurnLaneRequired?
NoYesn/an/a
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 404 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 406 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 407 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 408 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 409 of 473
MARANA ORDINANCENO. 2016.015
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; AMENDING THE MARANA TOWN CODE TITLE 17
(LAND DEVELOPMENT), CHAPTER 17-5 (SUBDIVISIONS), SECTION 17-5-2
(PROCEDURE), REVISING THE PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING
SUBDIVISION PLATS INCLUDING THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE
SUBMITTAL, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLATS;
AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find that the revisions
adopted by this ordinance are in the best interest of the Town of Marana and the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, as follows:
Section 1.
Theamendments to the Marana Town Code Title 17 (Land Development),
Chapter17-5 (Subdivisions), revising the provisions and procedures for processing subdivision
plats including the pre-application conference and the submittal, review, and approval of
preliminary subdivision plats, one electronic and one paper copy of which are on file in the
office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Marana, Arizona, and which were made a public record
by and are attached as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2016-077 of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
are hereby referred to, adopted and made a part of thisordinance as if fully set out here.
Section 2.
All ordinancesor parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinanceare repealedas of the effective date of this ordinance; provided, however, that this
repeal shall not affect the rights and duties that matured or penalties that were incurred and
proceedings that were begun before the effective date of the repeal.
Section 3.
If any section, subsection,sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance
isfor any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, the decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4.
This ordinance is effective on September 2, 2016.
PASSEDAND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
nd
this 2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrankCassidy, Town Attorney
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.0157/21/2016 7:52 PMBDV/FC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 410 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTIONNO. 2016-077
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD FILED WITH
THE TOWN CLERK THE AMENDMENTS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCENO.2016.015,
AMENDING MARANA TOWN CODE TITLE 17 (LAND DEVELOPMENT), CHAPTER 17-
5 (SUBDIVISIONS), SECTION 17-5-2 (PROCEDURE)BYREVISING THE PROVISIONS
AND PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING SUBDIVISION PLATS INCLUDING THE PRE-
APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE SUBMITTAL, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLATS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
MARANA, ARIZONA, that the amendments to the Marana Town Code Title 17 (Land
Development), Chapter 17-5 (Subdivisions)adopted by Ordinance No.2016.015, attached to and
incorporated in this resolution as Exhibit A, and one electronic and one paper copy of which are
on file in the office of the Town Clerk, are hereby declared to be a public record and ordered to
remain on file with the Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
nd
this 2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
Marana ResolutionNo. 2016-0777/21/2016 8:04 PMBDV/FC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 411 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5 (Subdivisions),
section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana OrdinanceNo.2016.015
Marana Town Code Title 17 (Land Development), Chapter 17-5 (Subdivisions), section
17-5-2 (Procedure)is hereby revised as follows (with added text shown with double underlining
and deletions shown with strike-out text):
17-5-2Procedure
A.Overview.
1.Except as provided otherwise elsewhere in this code, theThepreparation,
submittal, review and approval of all subdivisions located within the town limits
subdivision plats shallproceed through the following progressive steps, except
when otherwise provided by approval of the town:
a.Pre-application meetingconferencewith the town.
b.Preliminary plat submittal, review, and approval.
c.The submittal and approval of engineering plans for the required subdivision
improvements.
d.Final plat submittal, review, and approvalonly after the preliminary plat is
approved by the council.
e.Recordation of the approved final plat with the county recorder.
2.The following subdivision acts shall not be deemed a subdivision within the
context of sections 17-5-2 and 17-5-3, and shall, thereforeshallbe processed in
accordance with section 17-5-6:
a.Land splits.
b.Minor land divisions.
B.Pre-application meetingconference
1.The pre-application conference for subdivision meeting provides an opportunity
for the town and the applicant toreview is an investigatory and exchange
information exchange period regarding a proposed subdivisionprior to the
preparation and formal submittal of a preliminary subdivisionplat applicationby
the subdivider. Pre-application review shall proceed in the manner set forth in this
section.
2.At least seven days before the pre-application meeting, the subdivider shall request
a pre-application meeting with the planning department and shall submit at least
five copies of the general concept of the proposal, which shall include: All
applications for subdivision plats shall be prepared and processed in accordance
withprocedures and requirementsdefined in the preliminary plat application
checklist, which town staff will provide to the applicant at the pre-application
meeting.
a.Sketch plans at no larger scale than one inch equals 100 feet;
b.Narrative ideas regarding land use, street and lot arrangement, lot sizes and
dimensions;
c.Tentative proposals regarding water supply, sewage disposal, grading and
drainage, stormwater retention, and street improvements;
-1 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 412 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5
(Subdivisions), section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana
OrdinanceNo.2016.015
d.The site resource inventory (section 17.01.02, “site resource inventory,” of the
Marana land development code); and
e.A vicinity plan, showing streets and utilities in the surrounding area within at
least one-quarter mile of the proposed subdivision.
3.Planning staff shall advise the subdivider of:
a.Specific town objectives, standards, and regulations related to the subject
property;
b.The subdivision design expectations; details and suggestions regarding
subdivision plattingprocedures and requirements;
c.Citizen participation requirements; and
d.Related issues.
4.If appropriate, planning staff may request the subdivider to revise the initial
proposal and present the revised proposal to the planning department for additional
review.
5.Following the pre-application conference with the planning department, the
subdivider may prepare a preliminary plat containing the information and data
required for preliminary plats specified in subsection 17-5-2 C below.
C.Preliminary plat
1.Preliminary plat submittal: The subdivider shall submit the following materials to
the planning department The applicant shall submit a preliminary plat application
in accordance with the preliminary plat application checklist.
a.Twelve copies of the preliminary plat reproduced in the form of blue or black
line prints on awhite background. Plan sheets shall not exceed 24 inches by 36
inches in overall size.
b.A completed application and supplemental forms. If the subdivider is not the
current land owner of all of the subject real property, a signed and notarized
statementshall also be filed attesting that the owner grants to the subdivider
authority to represent the owner in this matter.
c.A nonrefundable preliminary plat filing fee to compensate the Town for the
costs of examining and processing the subdivision plat andsubsequent field
investigations. The required fee for subdivision plats shall be approved by
resolution of the council. The fees shall cover the cost of the filing of one
amended or revised preliminary plat handled as the same case. If preliminary
plat approval expires prior to application for final plat approval, the plat shall
be resubmitted for preliminary approval as a new case, and the subdivider shall
pay the required fee.
d.Twenty-eight copies of 11 inch by 17 inch reductions of the preliminary plat.
e.Three copies of a preliminary grading plan.
f.All submittals shall be reviewed by the development coordinator for
completeness and assigned a project number. If incomplete as to the
-2 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 413 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5
(Subdivisions), section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana
OrdinanceNo.2016.015
requirements set forth in this chapter, the submittal will be rejected and
returned to the subdivider for completion and submittal.
g.The development coordinator will send copies of the preliminary plat to
applicable town staff members for review and comment. In addition the
development coordinator will send copies of the preliminary plat to applicable
reviewing agencies, including utilities, cable television companies, school
districts, county offices, state and federal offices, and any adjacent
municipalities. Written recommendations from the review agencies shall be
transmitted to the development coordinator.
2.Preliminary plat approval The procedures for review and approval of a preliminary
plat shall be as follows, as supplemented by the preliminary plat application
checklist.
a.An applicant shall submit all of the documents, information, data, and other
requirements for preliminary plat approval to the planning department, and
shall furnish all information and materials required to satisfy the requirements
of this chapter.
b.An applicant shall also submit a plan showing proposed conceptual landscape
and streetscape proposals. The conceptual streetscape and landscape plans shall
be for open spaces, entryways and streets, and shall note the requirementto
obtain a license agreement if any materials are installed in the public right-of-
way.
c.In addition to the requirements of the preceding subsections, the applicant shall
provide to the planning department any additional information, documents, or
other material relevant to the application that planning staff reasonably believes
is necessary for the planning commission to evaluate, analyze, and understand
the subject matter of the application.
d.An application for preliminary plat approval shall not bedeemed to have been
filed or properly submitted until payment of all fees and compliance with all of
the above listed requirements. Compliance shall be determined by the planning
director.
e.A preliminary plat application may be denied if the town determines that all or
part of the subject property has adverse topography, periodic inundation,
adverse soils, subsidence of the earth’s surface, high water table, lack of water,
or other natural or manmade hazards to life or property.
f.The town may approve apreliminary plat for land with adverse topography,
periodic inundation, adverse soils, subsidence of the earth’s surface, high water
table, lack of water, or other natural or manmade hazards to life or property
subject to special requirements relating to lot size, special grading and drainage
requirements, or other conditions the town deems reasonable and necessary for
the public health, safety or general welfare.
g.The procedure for approval, amendment, or denial of preliminary plat
applications shall beas follows:
i. The planning commission shall recommend to the council that a preliminary
plat be conditionally approved or denied no more than 45 days after initial
-3 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 414 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5
(Subdivisions), section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana
OrdinanceNo.2016.015
consideration. The planning commission shall recommend that a preliminary
plat be conditionally approved or denied after reviewing the application and
conducting a public meeting. In cases of conditional approval, the specific
conditions shall be included by reference in the minutes of the planning
commission meeting. If the preliminary plat isdenied, the planning
commission shall cite specific reasons for doing so. This will not be
construed, however, to preclude the planning commission from rejecting
plans for other or additional reasons. If the preliminary plat is denied, the
subdivider may resubmit revised preliminary plats until approval is obtained
from the planning commission or may move forward to the council with a
recommendation of denial. If the council upholds the planning
commission’s rejection, then the subdivider must file a new application for
the preliminary plat for that specific subdivision.
a.Once a preliminary plat has been accepted by town staff and the appropriate
review agencies, the planning commission shall consider the plat and make a
recommendation to the council thatthe preliminary plat be approved, approved
with conditions, or denied.
b.ii. Within 60 days After the planning commission’s consideration, the council
shall review and consider the preliminary plat and the planning commission’s
recommendationand hold its own public meeting hearing regarding the
preliminary plat. The council may uphold, deny or modify the planning
commission action shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
preliminary plat application. Decisions of the council shall be final.
iii.Upon approval of a preliminary plat, by the council, the applicant shall
provide copies of the plat on mylars, signed by all applicable agencies
within 45 days. If, not submitted, such approval shall be deemed to have
expired.
iv.The approved preliminary plat shall be submitted to the town engineer and
the public utilities that will serve the subdivision for their review and the
preparation of cost estimates for the improvements required under section
17-5-3 of this code. The town engineer shall reviewthe preliminary plat for
consistency with accepted engineering standards and the requirements of
this code, and shall prepare an estimate of the cost of all required
improvements that are not to be installed by or for public utilities.
v.A newpreliminary plat applicationcan be refiled at any time. Revisions to
the plat will need to resolve the reasons for the denial as originally
proposed, if substantially the same. The new filing of a preliminary plat
application for the same area, or any portion thereof, shall follow the
procedures and requirements specified in this section.
3.Significance of preliminary Preliminaryplat approval. The preliminary plat
approval by the council, with the completion of the required signatures,constitutes
authorization for the subdivider applicantto proceed with preparation and
submittal of the final plat, landscape plan,and engineering improvement plans and
specifications(may be done concurrently).
4.Preliminarypreliminaryplat approval is subject to the following conditions:
-4 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 415 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5
(Subdivisions), section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana
OrdinanceNo.2016.015
a.The conditions under which approval of the preliminary plat is granted will not
be changed prior to expiration date unless by application for a Changes in
conditions such as the land’s physical attributes, title conditions, ownership and
similar changes that make development of the affected land in accordance with
the approved plat infeasible shall require the submission of a new orrevised
preliminary plat.The application shall follow the same procedures as the
original approval.
b.Approval is validfor a period of two years from the date of approval. After two
years, the approval shall be deemed to have expired if a final plat is not
recorded. A preliminary plat expires two years from the date of council
approval unless:
i.A final plat has been submitted for all or a portion of the property included
in the preliminary plat, or
ii.The council grants an extension.
c.Upon the subdivider’s written application to the council and payment of the
applicable application fee, preliminary plat approval may be extended for an
additional one year if, in the opinion of the council, there is no change in
conditions within or adjoining the preliminary plat which would warrant its
revision and the applicant demonstrates to the council’s satisfaction that
substantial effort is being applied to create a final plat. The applicant may
submit a written request for a two-year extension of a preliminary plat
approval, which shall be reviewed and considered as follows:
i.The planningdirector and the town engineer shall evaluate whether the
preliminary plat and supporting documents remain in compliance with all
applicable town standards and requirements. and shall make a written
recommendation to the council based upon their evaluation.
ii.The request for extension shall be considered by the council, whose decision
shall be final.
d.In no case shall Preliminary plat approval shall be automatically extendedfor a
period of two years upon submission of a final plat application for any portion
of the land area shown on apreliminary platapprovals exceed a total of three
years.
e.Once a final plat has been approved for a portion of the land area included
within an approved preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat shall
be extended for the balance of the land area for a period of two years from the
date of council approval of the final plat.
f.e. If a preliminary platapprovalexpires prior to the submittal of an application
for a final plat or prior to the submittal of a request for an extension of the
preliminary plat approval, thepreliminaryplat shall be resubmitted for
preliminary approval as a new case and the subdivider shall be required to pay a
new fee.as a new application. If the resubmitted preliminary plat has
substantially the same design and configuration as the previously approved plat
and no substantive changes have occurred in the standards and requirements,
-5 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 416 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-077
Amendmentsto Marana Town CodeTitle 17(Land Development), Chapter 17-5
(Subdivisions), section 17-5-2 (Procedure)pursuant to Marana
OrdinanceNo.2016.015
the fees associated with the new application shall be 50% of the original
application fees.
g.f.The preliminary plat shall not be recorded.
D.Final plat [No revisions]
-6 -
00047729.DOCX /17/21/2016 8:44 PM
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 417 of 473
17-5-2Procedure
A.Overview.
1.Except as provided otherwise elsewhere in this code, the preparation, submittal, review
and approval of subdivisionplats shallproceed through the following progressive steps:
a.Pre-application meeting with the town.
b.Preliminary plat submittal, review, and approval.
c.The submittal and approval of engineering plans for the required subdivision
improvements.
d.Final plat submittal, review, and approval.
e.Recordation of the approved final plat with the county recorder.
2.The following shall be processed in accordance with section 17-5-6:
a.Land splits.
b.Minor land divisions.
B.Pre-application meeting
1.The pre-application meeting provides an opportunity for the town and the applicant to
review and exchange information regarding a proposed subdivision prior to the
preparation and formal submittal of a subdivision plat application.
2.All applications for subdivision plats shall be prepared and processed in accordance
with procedures and requirements defined in the preliminary plat application checklist,
which town staff will provide to the applicant at the pre-application meeting.
C.Preliminary plat
1.The applicantshall submit a preliminary plat application in accordance with the
preliminary plat application checklist.
2.The procedures for review and approval ofa preliminary plat shall be as follows, as
supplemented bythe preliminary plat application checklist.
a.Once a preliminary plat has been accepted by town staff and the appropriate review
agencies, the planningcommission shall consider the plat and make a
recommendation to the council that the preliminary plat be approved, approved
with conditions, or denied.
b.After the planning commission’s consideration, the council shall review and
consider the preliminary plat and the planning commission’s recommendation. The
council shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the preliminary plat
application.Decisions of the council shall be final.
3.Preliminary plat approval constitutes authorization for the applicant to proceed with
preparation and submittal of the final plat, landscape plan, andengineering
improvement plans and specifications.
4.Preliminary plat approval is subject to the following conditions:
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 418 of 473
a.Changes in conditionssuch as the land’s physical attributes, title conditions,
ownership and similar changes thatmake development of the affected land in
accordance with the approved plat infeasible shall requirethe submission of a new
or revised preliminary plat.
b.A preliminary platexpires two yearsfrom the date of council approval unless:
i.A final plat has been submitted for all or a portion of the property included in
the preliminary plat, or
ii.The council grantsan extension.
c.The applicant may submit a written request for a two-year extension of a
preliminary plat approval, which shall be reviewed and considered as follows:
i.The planning director and the town engineershall evaluate whether the
preliminary plat and supporting documents remain in compliance with all
applicable town standards and requirements.and shall make a written
recommendation to the council based upon their evaluation.
ii.The request for extension shall be considered by thecouncil, whose decision shall
befinal.
d.Preliminary plat approval shall be automatically extended for a period of two years
upon submission of a final plat applicationfor any portion of the land area shown on
a preliminary plat.
e.Once a final plat has been approved for aportion of the landarea included within an
approved preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat shall be extended
for the balance of the land area for a period of two years from the date of council
approval of the final plat.
f.If a preliminary plat expires prior to the submittal of an application for a final plat or
prior to the submittal of a request for an extension of the preliminary plat approval,
thepreliminary plat shall be resubmitted as a new application. If the resubmitted
preliminary plat has substantially the same design and configuration as the
previously approved platand no substantive changes have occurred in the
standards and requirements, the fees associated with the new application shall be
50% of the original application fees.
g.The preliminary plat shall not be recorded.
D.Final plat[No revisions]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 419 of 473
17-5-2Procedure
A.Overview.
1.TheExceptas provided otherwise elsewhere in this code, thepreparation, submittal,
review and approval of all subdivisions located within the town limitssubdivision plats
shallproceed through the following progressive steps, except when otherwise provided
by approval of the town:
a.Pre-application conferencemeetingwith the town.
b.Preliminary plat submittal, review, and approval.
c.The submittal and approval of engineering plans for the required subdivision
improvements.
d.Final plat submittal, review, and approvalonly after the preliminary plat is approved
by the council.
e.Recordation of the approved final plat with the county recorder.
2.The following subdivision acts shall not be deemed a subdivision within the context of
sections 17-5-2 and 17-5-3, and shall, therefore,shallbe processed in accordance with
section 17-5-6:
a.Land splits.
b.Minor land divisions.
B.Pre-application conferencemeeting
1.The pre-application conference for subdivisionmeeting provides an opportunity for the
town and the applicant toreviewis an investigatoryand exchangeinformationexchange
periodregarding a proposed subdivisionprior to the preparation and formal submittal of
apreliminarysubdivisionplat applicationby the subdivider. Pre-application review shall
proceed in the manner set forth in this section.
2.At least seven days before the pre-application meeting, the subdivider shall request a
pre-application meeting with the planning department and shall submit at least five
copies of the general concept of the proposal, which shall include:All applications for
subdivision plats shall be prepared and processed in accordance withprocedures and
requirementsdefined in the preliminary plat application checklist, which town staff will
provide to the applicant at the pre-application meeting.
a.Sketch plans at no larger scale than one inch equals 100 feet;
b.Narrative ideas regarding land use, street and lot arrangement, lot sizes and
dimensions;
c.Tentative proposals regarding water supply, sewage disposal, grading and
drainage, stormwater retention, and street improvements;
d.The site resource inventory (section 17.01.02, “site resource inventory,” of the
Marana land development code); and
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 420 of 473
e.A vicinity plan, showing streets and utilities in the surrounding area within at
least one-quarter mile of the proposed subdivision.
3.Planning staff shall advise the subdivider of:
a.Specific town objectives, standards, and regulations related to the subject
property;
b.The subdivision design expectations; details and suggestions regarding
subdivision plattingprocedures and requirements;
c.Citizen participation requirements; and
d.Related issues.
4.If appropriate, planning staff may request the subdivider to revise the initial
proposal and present the revised proposal to the planning department for additional
review.
5.Following the pre-application conference with the planning department, the
subdivider may prepare a preliminary plat containing the information and data required
for preliminary plats specified in subsection 17-5-2 C below.
C.Preliminary plat
1.Preliminary plat submittal: The subdivider shall submit the following materials to the
planning departmentThe applicant shall submit a preliminary plat application in
accordance with the preliminary plat application checklist.
a.Twelve copies of the preliminary plat reproduced in the form of blue or black line
prints on a white background. Plan sheets shall not exceed 24 inches by 36 inches in
overall size.
b.A completed application and supplemental forms. If the subdivideris not the
current land owner of all of the subject real property, a signed and notarized
statement shall also be filed attesting that the owner grants to the subdivider
authority to represent the owner in this matter.
c.A nonrefundable preliminary plat filing fee to compensate the Town for the costs
of examining and processing the subdivision plat and subsequent field
investigations. The required fee for subdivision plats shall be approved by resolution
of the council. The fees shall cover the cost of the filing of one amended or revised
preliminary plat handled as the same case. If preliminary plat approval expires prior
to application for final plat approval, the plat shall be resubmitted for preliminary
approval as a new case, and the subdivider shall pay the required fee.
d.Twenty-eight copies of 11 inch by 17 inch reductions of the preliminary plat.
e.Three copies of a preliminary grading plan.
f.All submittals shall be reviewed by the development coordinator for
completeness and assigned a projectnumber. If incomplete as to the requirements set
forth in this chapter, the submittal will be rejected and returned to the subdivider for
completion and submittal.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 421 of 473
g.The development coordinator will send copies of the preliminary plat to
applicable town staff members for review and comment. In addition the development
coordinator will send copies of the preliminary plat to applicable reviewing agencies,
including utilities, cable television companies, school districts, county offices, state
and federal offices, and any adjacent municipalities. Written recommendations from
the review agencies shall be transmitted to the development coordinator.
2.Preliminary plat approvalThe procedures for review and approval of a preliminary plat
shall be as follows, as supplemented by the preliminary plat application checklist.
a.An applicant shall submit all of the documents, information, data, and other
requirements for preliminary plat approval to the planning department, and shall
furnish all information and materialsrequired to satisfy the requirements of this
chapter.
b.An applicant shall also submit a plan showing proposed conceptual landscape
and streetscape proposals. The conceptual streetscape and landscape plans shall be
for open spaces, entryways and streets,and shall note the requirement to obtain a
license agreement if any materials are installed in the public right-of-way.
c.In addition to the requirements of the preceding subsections, the applicant shall
provide to the planning department any additional information, documents, or other
material relevant to the application that planning staff reasonably believes is
necessary for the planning commission to evaluate, analyze, and understand the
subject matter of the application.
d.An application for preliminary plat approval shall not be deemed to have been
filed or properly submitted until payment of all fees and compliance with all of the
above listed requirements. Compliance shall be determined by the planning director.
e.A preliminary plat application may be denied if the town determines that all or
part of the subject property has adverse topography, periodic inundation, adverse
soils, subsidence of the earth’s surface, high water table, lack of water, or other
natural or manmade hazards to life or property.
f.The town may approve a preliminary plat for land with adverse topography,
periodic inundation, adverse soils, subsidence of the earth’s surface, high water table,
lack of water, or other natural or manmade hazards to life or property subject to
special requirements relating to lot size, special grading and drainage requirements,
or other conditions the town deems reasonable and necessary for the public health,
safety or general welfare.
g.The procedure for approval, amendment, or denial of preliminary plat
applications shall be as follows:
a.i. The planning commission shall recommend to the council that a preliminary plat be
conditionally approved or denied no more than 45 days after initial consideration.
The planning commission shall recommend thata preliminary plat be conditionally
approved or denied after reviewing the application and conducting a public meeting.
In cases of conditional approval, the specific conditions shall be included by reference
in the minutes of the planning commission meeting. If the preliminary plat is denied,
the planning commission shall cite specific reasons for doing so. This will not be
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 422 of 473
construed, however, to preclude the planning commission from rejecting plans for
other or additional reasons. If the preliminary platis denied, the subdivider may
resubmit revised preliminary plats until approval is obtained from the planning
commission or may move forward to the council with a recommendation of denial. If
the council upholds the planning commission’s rejection, then the subdivider must
file a new application for the preliminary plat for that specific subdivision.Once a
preliminary plat has been accepted by town staff and the appropriate review
agencies, the planningcommission shall consider the plat and make a
recommendation to the council that the preliminary plat be approved, approved with
conditions, or denied.
b.ii. Within 60 daysAfter the planning commission’s consideration, the council shall
reviewand consider the preliminary plat and the planning commission’s
recommendationand hold its own public meeting hearing regarding the preliminary
plat. The council may uphold, deny or modify the planning commission actionshall
approve, approve with conditions, or deny thepreliminary plat application.
Decisions of the council shall be final.
iii.Upon approval of a preliminary plat, by the council, the applicant shall
provide copies of the plat on mylars, signed by all applicable agencies within 45
days. If, not submitted, such approval shall be deemedto have expired.
iv.The approved preliminary plat shall be submitted to the town engineer
and the public utilities that will serve the subdivision for their review and the
preparation of cost estimates for the improvements required under section 17-5-3
of this code. The town engineer shall review the preliminary plat for consistency
with accepted engineering standards and the requirements of this code, and shall
prepare an estimate of the cost of all required improvements that are not to be
installed by or for public utilities.
v.A newpreliminary plat applicationcan be refiled at any time. Revisions to
the plat will need to resolve the reasons for the denial as originally proposed, if
substantially the same. The new filing of a preliminary plat application for the
same area, or any portion thereof, shall follow the procedures and requirements
specified in this section.
3.Significance of preliminaryPreliminaryplat approval. The preliminary plat approval by
the council, with the completion of the required signatures,constitutes authorization for
thesubdividerapplicantto proceed with preparation and submittal of the final plat,
landscape plan,andengineering improvement plans and specifications(may be done
concurrently). preliminary.
4.Preliminaryplat approval is subject to the following conditions:
a.The conditions under which approval of the preliminary plat is granted will not be
changed prior to expiration date unless by application for aChanges in conditions
such as the land’s physical attributes, title conditions, ownership and similar changes
that make development of the affected land in accordance with the approved plat
infeasible shall require the submission of a new orrevised preliminary plat.The
application shall follow the same procedures as the original approval.
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 423 of 473
b.Approval is validfor a period of two years from the date of approval. After two
years, the approval shall be deemed to have expired if a final plat is not recorded.A
preliminary platexpires two yearsfrom the date of council approval unless:
i.A final plat has been submitted for all or a portion of the property included in the
preliminary plat, or
ii.The council grants an extension.
c.Upon the subdivider’s written application to the council and payment of the
applicable application fee, preliminary plat approval may be extended for an
additional one year if, in the opinion of the council, there is no change in conditions
within or adjoining the preliminary plat which would warrant its revision and the
applicant demonstrates to the council’s satisfaction that substantial effort is being
applied to create a final plat.The applicant may submit a written request for a
two-year extension of a preliminary plat approval, which shall be reviewed and
considered as follows:
i.The planning director and the town engineershall evaluate whether the
preliminary plat and supporting documents remain in compliance with all
applicable town standards and requirements.and shall make a written
recommendation to the council based upon their evaluation.
ii.The request for extension shall be considered by the council, whose decision shall
be final.
d.In no case shallPreliminary plat approval shall be automatically extendedfor a period
of two years upon submission of a final plat application for any portion of the land
area shown on apreliminary platapprovals exceed a total of three years.
e.Once a final plat has been approved for aportion of the land area included within an
approved preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat shall be extended for
the balance of the land area for a period of two years from the date of council
approval of the final plat.
f.e.Ifapreliminary platapprovalexpires prior to the submittal of an application for a
final plat or prior to the submittal of a request for an extension of the preliminary plat
approval, thepreliminaryplat shall be resubmitted for preliminary approval as a
new case and the subdivider shall be required to pay a new fee.as a new application.
If the resubmitted preliminary plat has substantially the same design and
configuration as the previously approved platand no substantive changes have
occurred in the standards and requirements, the fees associated with the new
application shall be 50% of the original application fees.
g.f.The preliminary plat shall not be recorded.
D.Final plat[No revisions]
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 424 of 473
Document comparison by Workshare Compare on Friday, June 17, 2016 8:57:55
AM
Input:
Document
file://X:\WDOX\TNATDOCS\DEVELOP\LDC\00047087.DOCX
1 ID
Descriptio
00047087
n
file://C:\Users\fcassidy\AppData\Local\Temp\WDGX\6748\OPEN\001\
Document
MSC 20160616 Preliminary plat LDC revision clean
2 ID
(00047086-2xA96C7).docx
DescriptioMSC 20160616 Preliminary plat LDC revision clean
n(00047086-2xA96C7)
Rendering
Standard
set
Legend:
Insertion
Deletion
Moved from
Moved to
Style change
Format change
Moved deletion
Inserted cell
Deleted cell
Moved cell
Split/Merged cell
Padding cell
Statistics:
Count
Insertions44
Deletions67
Moved from3
Moved to3
Style change0
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 425 of 473
Format changed0
Total changes117
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 426 of 473
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES
11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
Council Chambers, June 29, 2016, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Thomas Schnee, Chairman
Don Duncan, Vice Chair
Terry Fehrmann, Commissioner
Marcia Jakab, Commissioner
Steve Miklosi, Commissioner
Richard Miller, Commissioner
John Officer, Commissioner
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER.Chairman Schnee
called the meetingto order at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE.
Chairman Schnee
Led by .
ROLL CALL.Terri Byler
, Planning Commission Secretary,called roll. Commissioner Jakab was
absent. A quorum was present.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC.
No speaker cards presented.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
Motion to approve as amended -movingitem C1: SPA1605-001
Amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Planto B:4. ApprovedbyCommissioner Miklosi,
seconded by Vice Chair Duncan. Passed unanimously.
ANNOUNCEMENTS.
GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS.
Approval of May 25, 2016meeting minutes.
Motion to approve,as amended,byCommissioner Fehrmann, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi.
Passed unanimously.
1| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 427 of 473
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1.PCZ1602-001Camino de OesteRezoning
Recommendation to Town Council regarding a
requestfor approval to rezone approximately72 acres of land from 'C'-Large Lot Zoneto 'R-6' -
Single-FamilyResidential. The property is generally located approximately a quarter mile north of
Cortaro Farms Road,bordered by Hartman Lane and Camino de Oeste.(Steve Cheslak)
Steve Cheslak
presented an overall summary of the project. Staff received a revised concept plan after
Mr. Cheslak
theoriginal plan was distributed to the Commissionearlier in the week. indicatedthe
originalplan depicted72 acres, 145 lots, 40% open spaceandtwo lot sizes.In the revised plan, the
cud-de-sac wasremoved, the lot count went from 145 to 144, there are a total of four lot sizes, plus
seven additional acres of open space, the Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS)has been
rearranged to protect the Hardy Washand the buffer yards have been increased. Staff received four
letters of protest and one letter of support.The project is in compliance with the Land Development
Code and the General Plan.
Stacey Weaks
–Norris Design –shared some highlights about the project.The R-6 designation
allowed for the cluster development and fourlot sizes. All of the homes will be limited to single story.
The size of the internal park will be just under oneacre. 30% of the site is set aside asNUOS and an
additional 14 acres as plannedcommon area. A northbound turn lane will be constructed on Camino de
Oeste.Western access is aligned with the future De Anza project and a northbound left turn laneinto
De Anza on Hartman Lane will be constructed by the De Anza project.
Chairman Schnee
was pleased thatthe homes in the northeast corner of the project were rearranged
andthe buffers were increased. He also liked that fact that all of the homes are limited tosinglestory.
Commissioner Miller Chairman Schnee.Commissioner Officer
concurred with likedthe expansion
near the Hardy Wash.
Chairman Schnee
opened the public portion of the hearing.
Darlene Snyderand Susan Kramer
wereopposed to the project.They also had traffic concerns.
Rudolph Ariliaga
had aconcern with the traffic, as well, though he was not opposed to the project.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Chairman Schnee
was confident that staff will continue to monitor the traffic situation. He liked the
Commissioner Miller Chairman Schnee
increasedbuffers and the 50% open space. concurredwith .
Commissioner Miller Commissioner Miklosi
liked the revisions, but he hada concern with traffic.
Vice
liked the layout of the project and hoped the town will continue to monitorthe traffic situation.
Chair Duncan
waspleased with the overall layout of the subdivision.
Motion to approve, to includethe modified conceptual useplan and a modificationto Condition 8,
changingthe maximum number of residential lots from 145 to 144,by Vice Chair Duncan,
seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed unanimously. 6-0
2.PCZ1606-001 Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Recommendation to the Town Council regarding
arequest to rezone approximately 36.79 acres of land from"R-144 Residential"to "F Specific Plan"
for the purpose of establishing the Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan, a master-planned single-family
residential development. The request will be accompanied by a minor General Plan amendment to
amend the current land use category from "LDR Low Density Residential" to "MPA Master Plan
Area," to accommodate the proposed Specific Plan. The property is located at the northeast corner of
Twin Peaks Road and Oasis Road. (Cynthia Ross)
2| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 428 of 473
Cynthia Ross
specifiedthe project was previously heard by the Planning Commission in October
2014.The project was scheduled to go to Council in November 2014, but the applicant withdrew the
project prior to the scheduled meeting. The specific plan proposes 74 single-family residential homes.
Lots will accommodate both one and two-story homes. All the homes along the perimeter of the site
will be one story. 53% of the plan is designated open space (41% -NUOS). This project is essentially
the same as whatwas approved in 2014, but with added measures to address the concerns of the
neighbors. The plan has two access points; the firston Oasis Road and the secondon Twin Peaks
Road. A neighborhood park, a small reflection area and number of trails have also been planned. A
monument at the southeast corner of the site will be built by the developer to mark the entry into the
Twin Peaks Corridor. Measures to address the concerns of the neighbors include the addition of
screened walls and enhanced vegetation. Staff has received 22 letters of protest and one phone call in
favorof the project.
Linda Morales –Planning Center –Ms. Morales
gave a brief summary of the project. , along with
Greg Wexler
, met with the neighbors. Privacy was amainconcern, and as a result, the site planwas
adjusted.The vegetation and landscape buffers will be increased along Oasis Road.The homes along
the eastern boundaryof the projectwill be restricted to single story.
Chairman Schnee
appreciated Ms. Morales and staff meeting with the residents. He felt the plan has
improved each time it has come before the Commission.
Chairman Schnee
opened the public portion of the hearing.
Gordon PrentisRon Isaacson, Keith Arnold, Susan Parrish and Richard Amdahl
,spoke in
Jo Jenott
oppositionto the project, urging the Commission to keep the current zoning. spoke in
opposition to the project. She had concerns about the property value and watershed.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Withthe single-story homes, the increased vegetation, adding the walls to stop the encroaching lights,
Chairman Schnee Commissioner Officer
feltthis was going to be a nice subdivision. concurred with
Chairman Schnee. Commissioner Miller
liked the reduction in the number of houses.
Commissioner Fehrmann
would like to see all single-storyhomes. She didn’tfeel that keeping it at
Commissioner Miklosi
thecurrent zoning would work for the area. wanted to knowthe maximum
Ryan Mahoney
numberof two-storyhomes allowed.statedout of the 74 homes, half (37 homes)
Commissioner Miklosi
couldbe two-story. felt the project,in its current state,is the best suited for
Vice Chair Duncan
the area. felt this project waswell-thought out.
Chairman Schnee
reopened the public portion of the hearing.
Mr. Prentis Chairman Schnee
urged the Commission to limit the homes to one story. stated he
lookedat the topographyof the property and the existing homes to the east are elevated. Because the
Chairman Schnee
terrain drops to the west, felt that the new homes, when built, would not be in
Mr. Prentis
anyone’s sightline.repeated his requestfor single-storyhomesfor aesthetic purposes, not
sightlines.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Motion to approvewith added condition to limit two-story homes, in the subdivision to no more than
25byVice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Officer. Passed unanimously. 6-0
3| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 429 of 473
3.PCM1605-001 Amendment to Marana Town Code Title 17 (Land Development), Chapter
17-5 Subdivisions.
Recommendation to the Town Council to amend the Marana Town Code, Title 17
Development) to revise the provisions and procedures identified within the Land Development
(Land
Code forthe pre-applicationconference, as well as the provisions and procedures for submittal,
review, and approval of a preliminary subdivision plat. The proposedrevisions eliminate redundant,
unnecessary, and outdated provisions and procedures and consolidateduplicative language. (Brian
Varney)
Brian Varney
indicatedthis wasa proposed text amendment to the Land Development Code. Staff is
amendingthe procedural requirements for the process in preliminary plats. The motivation is toallow
greater flexibility with the development industry. The proposed revisionsinclude:
1)Grammatical revisions and clarifications in the text throughout.
2)Deletion of most of the procedural requirements from the text, some of which are outdated or
obsolete, and incorporated them into a separate procedural checklist document provided to each
applicant at a pre-application meeting.
3)Significance of approval of a preliminary plat to allow greater flexibility to applicants and
subdividers with respect to the duration of preliminary plat approval.
Existing:
A preliminary plat approved by the Town Council shall be valid for a period of two years, and
thereafteris considered to be expired if a final plat has not recorded within that period of time. An
applicant may submit a written request to the Town Council to extend the approval of a preliminary
plat for a period of one year. In no case shall a preliminary plat be valid for more thanthree years.
Proposed:
A preliminary plat expires two years from the date of approval unless:
1.A final plat has been submitted for all or a portion of the preliminary plat area, which will
automatically extend the approval of the preliminary plat for a period of two years;or
2.The Town Council grants an extension, upon written request by the applicant, for a period of two
years.
(This provision requires a review by the Planning Director and the TownEngineer to confirm that the
approved preliminary plat and supporting documents remain in compliance with Town standardsand
requirements).
3Once a final plat had been approved for any portion of the land area included in an approved
preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat for the remaining land area shall be extended for
a period of two years from the date of approval of the final plat.
4.If a preliminary plat expires prior to the submittal of an application for a final plat or a request for
an extension, the preliminary plat shall be resubmitted as a new application. If the resubmitted plat is
in substantial conformance with the previously approved plat, the application and review fees shall be
reduced to 50% of the original application fees.
Chairman Schnee
Seeing there were no speaker cards, opened and closed the public portion of the
hearing.
4| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 430 of 473
Commissioner Miller -Mr. Varney to
why not use “100%”,instead of“Substantial Conformance?
Mr. Mahoney
allow for moreflexibility. mentionedthis is an issue staff deals with all the time,and as
Mr. Varney pointed out, the substantial conformancerule is in place and iscurrently practiced by staff.
It ultimately comes down to the judgement of the Planning Directoron what is substantial
conformance.
Motion to approve by Vice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Officer. Passed unanimously.
6-0
4SPA1605-001 Amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Plan
Recommendation to the Town Council to amend the Continental Ranch Specific Plan to include health
clinics, urgent care facilities and similaruses aspermitted uses in the Commercial land use
care
category, and to revise the General Provisions to allow the Planning Director to interpretthe
provisions of the specific plan. (Brian Varney)
Brian Varney specifiedthis wasa text amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Plan (CRSP).
The planning department has encountered some recurring challenges with the document for a number
of years. The authority for administrative changes in the document was given to either the Town
Manager or Town Council. We are proposing these decisions be placed in the hands of the Planning
Director.
The Planning Department has identified a number of recurring challenges as well as outdated
administrative provisions within the Continental RanchSpecific Plan, and is recommending approval
of the following amendments to address these issues:
General Provisions
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Council to make interpretations concerning unclear
or ambiguous provisions of the specific plan.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director
to be made administratively. The Planning Director’s decision would be appealable to the Board of
Adjustment.
Existing: Existing regulations authorize the Town Councilto determine whether or not a proposed use,
not currently listed as a permitted use, is consistent with the intent of the land use designation,as well
as with the listed permitted uses in that land use designation. The Council’s action may be appealed to
the Planning Commission.
Proposed:This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director to
be made administratively. The Planning Director’s determination is appealable to the Board of
Adjustment.
Commercial Site Development Standards
Commercial Use/Permitted Uses
Addition of medical clinics, urgent care facilities, medical/dental offices, and similar low
Proposed:
intensity medical related uses. This revision is essentially a text clarification, as similar uses including
‘minute clinics’ have been allowed to be located within Walgreens and CVS in the Commercial land
use designation inrecent years.
Site Plan Review Procedures
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Manager to administratively approve minor
revisions to approved site plans.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director.
5| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 431 of 473
General Administration
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Manager to make certain administrative changes to
explicit provisions in the specific plan.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director.
Chairman Schnee
Seeing there were no speaker cards, opened and closed the public portion of the
hearing.
Chairman Schnee
askedTown Attorney, Frank Cassidy, if he found the above requests to be legally
Mr. Cassidy Commissioner Miller
sufficient.stated yes. asked if the Town Council was in support of
Brian Varney
this request. statedyes. It will make thedevelopment process easier for the applicant.
Commissioner Miklosi
commented that the verbiage “Low intensity medical related uses,” seemed
Brian Varney
somewhatgeneral. this wouldallow forflexibility in cases andgive the Planning
Commissioner Officer
Directorthe authority to make the decision on what a low intensity use is.
appreciated staffmaking the effort to clean up the language.
Motion to approve by Commissioner Officer, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed
unanimously. 6-0
COMMISSION ACTION.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.
ADJOURNMENT.
Motion to adjourn at 8:42p.m.by Vice Chair Duncan,seconded byCommissioner Officer. Passed
unanimously.
CERTIFICATION.
I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Planning
Commission meeting held on June 29, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present.
Terri Byler, Planning Commission Secretary
6| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 432 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 433 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 434 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 435 of 473
MARANA ORDINANCENO. 2016.016
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; AMENDING THE CONTINENTAL RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN REVISING THE AUTHORIZATION AND PROCEDURES FOR THE
INTERPRETATION OF UNCLEAR REGULATIONS, APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE
CHANGES, DETERMININGTHE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED ADDITIONAL
PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, AND SPECIFICALLY
INCLUDING LOW-INTENSITY MEDICAL RELATED USES AS PERMITTED USES IN
THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION; ANDESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find that the revisions
adopted by this ordinance are in the best interest of the Town of Marana and the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, as follows:
Section 1.
Theamendments to the Continental Ranch Specific Plan revising the
authorizationand procedures for the interpretation of unclear regulations, approving
administrative changes, determining the suitability of proposed additional permitted uses within
the land use designations, and specifically including low-intensity medical related uses as
permitted uses in the commercial land use designation, one electronic and one printed copy of
which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Marana, Arizona, which were
made a public record by and are attached as Exhibit A to Marana Resolution No. 2016-078, are
hereby referred to, adopted and made a part of thisordinance as if fully set out here.
Section 2.
All ordinancesor parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinanceare repealedas of the effective date of this ordinance; provided, however, that this
repeal shall not affect the rights and duties that matured or penalties that were incurred and
proceedings that were begun before the effective date of the repeal.
Section 3.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance
isfor any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, the decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4.
This ordinance is effective on September 2, 2016.
-1 -
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.0167/22/2016 8:20 AMBDV/FC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 436 of 473
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
nd
this 2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
-2 -
Marana Ordinance No. 2016.0167/22/2016 8:20 AMBDV/FC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 437 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTIONNO. 2016-078
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD FILED WITH
THE TOWN CLERK THE AMENDMENTS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCENO.2016.016,
AMENDING THE CONTINENTAL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN BY REVISING THE
AUTHORIZATION AND PROCEDURES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF UNCLEAR
REGULATIONS, APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES, DETERMINING THE
SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PERMITTEDUSES WITHIN THE LAND
USE DESIGNATIONS, AND SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING LOW-INTENSITY MEDICAL
RELATED USES AS PERMITTED USES IN THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE
DESIGNATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
MARANA, ARIZONA, that the amendments to the Continental Ranch Specific Planadopted by
Ordinance No.2016.016and attached to and incorporated in this resolution as Exhibit A, one
electronic and one paper copy of which are on file in the office of the Town Clerk, are hereby
declared to be a public record and ordered to remain on filewith the Town Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
nd
this 2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
Marana ResolutionNo. 2016-0787/22/2016 9:40 AMBDV/FC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 438 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-078
Amendmentsto pursuant to
Continental Ranch Specific Plan
MaranaOrdinanceNo.2016.016
is hereby revised as follows (with added
The Continental Ranch Specific Plan
text shown with double underliningand deletions shown with strike-out text
; note
that only paragraphs and text which are affected by the proposed revisions are included
):
in this exhibit—textnot included in this exhibit remains unchanged
ChapterV. Development Regulations
C.General Provisions[Page V-2]
3.If an issue, condition, or situation arises or occursthat is not sufficiently covered or
provided foraddressed by this specific plan, or to be clearly understandableif
regulations are not clear and understandable, those the regulations of the Marana
Land Development Code that are applicable for the most similar issue, condition, or
situation shall be used by the Town CouncilPlanning Director as guidelinesguidance
to in resolvingethe unclear issue, condition, or situation.Anypersonaggrieved by
the Planning Director’s interpretation may requestan appeal to the Board of
Adjustment within 15 days from the date of the interpretation.
6.Whenever a use has not been specifically beenlisted as beinga permitted use in a
particular zone classificationland use designation within the Specific Plan, it shall be
the duty of the Town CouncilPlanning Director to determine if saidthe use is (1)
consistent with the intent of the zoneland use designation and (2) the said use is
compatible with other the listed permitted uses. Any person aggrieved by the
Planning Director’s determination may request an appeal that decisionto the
Planning CommissionBoard of Adjustment within 15 days from the date of the
determination.
F.Commercial Site Development Standards [Page V-7]
1.Commercial Use
a)Permitted Uses:
Commercial
Retail Commercial
Commercial Recreation
Office
Financial Institutions
Tourist Commercial
Restaurant
Medical clinics; urgent care facilities; medical / dental offices, and similar
low-intensity medicalrelated uses
ChapterVII. Specific Plan Implementation
D. Site Plan Review Procedures [Revisions, Page VII-7]
Revisions that are minor in nature or reasonable extensions other than those applied as
a condition of approval shall be submitted for review and approval administratively by the
Town ManagerPlanningDirector. Significant changes, additions or omissions shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission.
-1 -
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 439 of 473
EXHIBIT A TO MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-078
Amendmentsto pursuant to
Continental Ranch Specific Plan
MaranaOrdinanceNo.2016.016
E. General Administration [Page VII-8]
Certain changes to explicit provisions in the Specific Plan may be made administratively
by the Town ManagerPlanning Director, subject to appeal to the Board of Adjustment.
Authorized administrative changes to the specific plan may include the following:
a.The addition ofnew information to the specific plan maps or text that does not
change the effect of any regulationsorguidelines.
b.Changes to the community infrastructure, such as drainage, water, and sewer
systems which do not have the effect of increasing or decreasing development
capacity in the Specific Plan area, nor change the concepts or the Plan.
c.The determination that a use be allowed which is not specifically listed as
permitted but which may be determined to be similar in nature to those uses
explicitly listed as permitted.
Anypersonaggrieved by the Planning Director’s determination may request an appeal
to the Board of Adjustment within 15 days from the date of the determination.
-2 -
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 440 of 473
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES
11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
Council Chambers, June 29, 2016, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Thomas Schnee, Chairman
Don Duncan, Vice Chair
Terry Fehrmann, Commissioner
Marcia Jakab, Commissioner
Steve Miklosi, Commissioner
Richard Miller, Commissioner
John Officer, Commissioner
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER.Chairman Schnee
called the meetingto order at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE.
Chairman Schnee
Led by .
ROLL CALL.Terri Byler
, Planning Commission Secretary,called roll. Commissioner Jakab was
absent. A quorum was present.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC.
No speaker cards presented.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
Motion to approve as amended -movingitem C1: SPA1605-001
Amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Planto B:4. ApprovedbyCommissioner Miklosi,
seconded by Vice Chair Duncan. Passed unanimously.
ANNOUNCEMENTS.
GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS.
Approval of May 25, 2016meeting minutes.
Motion to approve,as amended,byCommissioner Fehrmann, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi.
Passed unanimously.
1| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 441 of 473
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1.PCZ1602-001Camino de OesteRezoning
Recommendation to Town Council regarding a
requestfor approval to rezone approximately72 acres of land from 'C'-Large Lot Zoneto 'R-6' -
Single-FamilyResidential. The property is generally located approximately a quarter mile north of
Cortaro Farms Road,bordered by Hartman Lane and Camino de Oeste.(Steve Cheslak)
Steve Cheslak
presented an overall summary of the project. Staff received a revised concept plan after
Mr. Cheslak
theoriginal plan was distributed to the Commissionearlier in the week. indicatedthe
originalplan depicted72 acres, 145 lots, 40% open spaceandtwo lot sizes.In the revised plan, the
cud-de-sac wasremoved, the lot count went from 145 to 144, there are a total of four lot sizes, plus
seven additional acres of open space, the Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS)has been
rearranged to protect the Hardy Washand the buffer yards have been increased. Staff received four
letters of protest and one letter of support.The project is in compliance with the Land Development
Code and the General Plan.
Stacey Weaks
–Norris Design –shared some highlights about the project.The R-6 designation
allowed for the cluster development and fourlot sizes. All of the homes will be limited to single story.
The size of the internal park will be just under oneacre. 30% of the site is set aside asNUOS and an
additional 14 acres as plannedcommon area. A northbound turn lane will be constructed on Camino de
Oeste.Western access is aligned with the future De Anza project and a northbound left turn laneinto
De Anza on Hartman Lane will be constructed by the De Anza project.
Chairman Schnee
was pleased thatthe homes in the northeast corner of the project were rearranged
andthe buffers were increased. He also liked that fact that all of the homes are limited tosinglestory.
Commissioner Miller Chairman Schnee.Commissioner Officer
concurred with likedthe expansion
near the Hardy Wash.
Chairman Schnee
opened the public portion of the hearing.
Darlene Snyderand Susan Kramer
wereopposed to the project.They also had traffic concerns.
Rudolph Ariliaga
had aconcern with the traffic, as well, though he was not opposed to the project.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Chairman Schnee
was confident that staff will continue to monitor the traffic situation. He liked the
Commissioner Miller Chairman Schnee
increasedbuffers and the 50% open space. concurredwith .
Commissioner Miller Commissioner Miklosi
liked the revisions, but he hada concern with traffic.
Vice
liked the layout of the project and hoped the town will continue to monitorthe traffic situation.
Chair Duncan
waspleased with the overall layout of the subdivision.
Motion to approve, to includethe modified conceptual useplan and a modificationto Condition 8,
changingthe maximum number of residential lots from 145 to 144,by Vice Chair Duncan,
seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed unanimously. 6-0
2.PCZ1606-001 Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan
Recommendation to the Town Council regarding
arequest to rezone approximately 36.79 acres of land from"R-144 Residential"to "F Specific Plan"
for the purpose of establishing the Twin Peaks Oasis Specific Plan, a master-planned single-family
residential development. The request will be accompanied by a minor General Plan amendment to
amend the current land use category from "LDR Low Density Residential" to "MPA Master Plan
Area," to accommodate the proposed Specific Plan. The property is located at the northeast corner of
Twin Peaks Road and Oasis Road. (Cynthia Ross)
2| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 442 of 473
Cynthia Ross
specifiedthe project was previously heard by the Planning Commission in October
2014.The project was scheduled to go to Council in November 2014, but the applicant withdrew the
project prior to the scheduled meeting. The specific plan proposes 74 single-family residential homes.
Lots will accommodate both one and two-story homes. All the homes along the perimeter of the site
will be one story. 53% of the plan is designated open space (41% -NUOS). This project is essentially
the same as whatwas approved in 2014, but with added measures to address the concerns of the
neighbors. The plan has two access points; the firston Oasis Road and the secondon Twin Peaks
Road. A neighborhood park, a small reflection area and number of trails have also been planned. A
monument at the southeast corner of the site will be built by the developer to mark the entry into the
Twin Peaks Corridor. Measures to address the concerns of the neighbors include the addition of
screened walls and enhanced vegetation. Staff has received 22 letters of protest and one phone call in
favorof the project.
Linda Morales –Planning Center –Ms. Morales
gave a brief summary of the project. , along with
Greg Wexler
, met with the neighbors. Privacy was amainconcern, and as a result, the site planwas
adjusted.The vegetation and landscape buffers will be increased along Oasis Road.The homes along
the eastern boundaryof the projectwill be restricted to single story.
Chairman Schnee
appreciated Ms. Morales and staff meeting with the residents. He felt the plan has
improved each time it has come before the Commission.
Chairman Schnee
opened the public portion of the hearing.
Gordon PrentisRon Isaacson, Keith Arnold, Susan Parrish and Richard Amdahl
,spoke in
Jo Jenott
oppositionto the project, urging the Commission to keep the current zoning. spoke in
opposition to the project. She had concerns about the property value and watershed.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Withthe single-story homes, the increased vegetation, adding the walls to stop the encroaching lights,
Chairman Schnee Commissioner Officer
feltthis was going to be a nice subdivision. concurred with
Chairman Schnee. Commissioner Miller
liked the reduction in the number of houses.
Commissioner Fehrmann
would like to see all single-storyhomes. She didn’tfeel that keeping it at
Commissioner Miklosi
thecurrent zoning would work for the area. wanted to knowthe maximum
Ryan Mahoney
numberof two-storyhomes allowed.statedout of the 74 homes, half (37 homes)
Commissioner Miklosi
couldbe two-story. felt the project,in its current state,is the best suited for
Vice Chair Duncan
the area. felt this project waswell-thought out.
Chairman Schnee
reopened the public portion of the hearing.
Mr. Prentis Chairman Schnee
urged the Commission to limit the homes to one story. stated he
lookedat the topographyof the property and the existing homes to the east are elevated. Because the
Chairman Schnee
terrain drops to the west, felt that the new homes, when built, would not be in
Mr. Prentis
anyone’s sightline.repeated his requestfor single-storyhomesfor aesthetic purposes, not
sightlines.
Chairman Schnee
closed the public portion of the hearing.
Motion to approvewith added condition to limit two-story homes, in the subdivision to no more than
25byVice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Officer. Passed unanimously. 6-0
3| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 443 of 473
3.PCM1605-001 Amendment to Marana Town Code Title 17 (Land Development), Chapter
17-5 Subdivisions.
Recommendation to the Town Council to amend the Marana Town Code, Title 17
Development) to revise the provisions and procedures identified within the Land Development
(Land
Code forthe pre-applicationconference, as well as the provisions and procedures for submittal,
review, and approval of a preliminary subdivision plat. The proposedrevisions eliminate redundant,
unnecessary, and outdated provisions and procedures and consolidateduplicative language. (Brian
Varney)
Brian Varney
indicatedthis wasa proposed text amendment to the Land Development Code. Staff is
amendingthe procedural requirements for the process in preliminary plats. The motivation is toallow
greater flexibility with the development industry. The proposed revisionsinclude:
1)Grammatical revisions and clarifications in the text throughout.
2)Deletion of most of the procedural requirements from the text, some of which are outdated or
obsolete, and incorporated them into a separate procedural checklist document provided to each
applicant at a pre-application meeting.
3)Significance of approval of a preliminary plat to allow greater flexibility to applicants and
subdividers with respect to the duration of preliminary plat approval.
Existing:
A preliminary plat approved by the Town Council shall be valid for a period of two years, and
thereafteris considered to be expired if a final plat has not recorded within that period of time. An
applicant may submit a written request to the Town Council to extend the approval of a preliminary
plat for a period of one year. In no case shall a preliminary plat be valid for more thanthree years.
Proposed:
A preliminary plat expires two years from the date of approval unless:
1.A final plat has been submitted for all or a portion of the preliminary plat area, which will
automatically extend the approval of the preliminary plat for a period of two years;or
2.The Town Council grants an extension, upon written request by the applicant, for a period of two
years.
(This provision requires a review by the Planning Director and the TownEngineer to confirm that the
approved preliminary plat and supporting documents remain in compliance with Town standardsand
requirements).
3Once a final plat had been approved for any portion of the land area included in an approved
preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat for the remaining land area shall be extended for
a period of two years from the date of approval of the final plat.
4.If a preliminary plat expires prior to the submittal of an application for a final plat or a request for
an extension, the preliminary plat shall be resubmitted as a new application. If the resubmitted plat is
in substantial conformance with the previously approved plat, the application and review fees shall be
reduced to 50% of the original application fees.
Chairman Schnee
Seeing there were no speaker cards, opened and closed the public portion of the
hearing.
4| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 444 of 473
Commissioner Miller -Mr. Varney to
why not use “100%”,instead of“Substantial Conformance?
Mr. Mahoney
allow for moreflexibility. mentionedthis is an issue staff deals with all the time,and as
Mr. Varney pointed out, the substantial conformancerule is in place and iscurrently practiced by staff.
It ultimately comes down to the judgement of the Planning Directoron what is substantial
conformance.
Motion to approve by Vice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Officer. Passed unanimously.
6-0
4SPA1605-001 Amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Plan
Recommendation to the Town Council to amend the Continental Ranch Specific Plan to include health
clinics, urgent care facilities and similaruses aspermitted uses in the Commercial land use
care
category, and to revise the General Provisions to allow the Planning Director to interpretthe
provisions of the specific plan. (Brian Varney)
Brian Varney specifiedthis wasa text amendment to the Continental Ranch Specific Plan (CRSP).
The planning department has encountered some recurring challenges with the document for a number
of years. The authority for administrative changes in the document was given to either the Town
Manager or Town Council. We are proposing these decisions be placed in the hands of the Planning
Director.
The Planning Department has identified a number of recurring challenges as well as outdated
administrative provisions within the Continental RanchSpecific Plan, and is recommending approval
of the following amendments to address these issues:
General Provisions
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Council to make interpretations concerning unclear
or ambiguous provisions of the specific plan.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director
to be made administratively. The Planning Director’s decision would be appealable to the Board of
Adjustment.
Existing: Existing regulations authorize the Town Councilto determine whether or not a proposed use,
not currently listed as a permitted use, is consistent with the intent of the land use designation,as well
as with the listed permitted uses in that land use designation. The Council’s action may be appealed to
the Planning Commission.
Proposed:This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director to
be made administratively. The Planning Director’s determination is appealable to the Board of
Adjustment.
Commercial Site Development Standards
Commercial Use/Permitted Uses
Addition of medical clinics, urgent care facilities, medical/dental offices, and similar low
Proposed:
intensity medical related uses. This revision is essentially a text clarification, as similar uses including
‘minute clinics’ have been allowed to be located within Walgreens and CVS in the Commercial land
use designation inrecent years.
Site Plan Review Procedures
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Manager to administratively approve minor
revisions to approved site plans.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director.
5| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 445 of 473
General Administration
Existing:Existing regulations authorize the Town Manager to make certain administrative changes to
explicit provisions in the specific plan.
Proposed: This authority is typically granted in contemporary specific plans to the Planning Director.
Chairman Schnee
Seeing there were no speaker cards, opened and closed the public portion of the
hearing.
Chairman Schnee
askedTown Attorney, Frank Cassidy, if he found the above requests to be legally
Mr. Cassidy Commissioner Miller
sufficient.stated yes. asked if the Town Council was in support of
Brian Varney
this request. statedyes. It will make thedevelopment process easier for the applicant.
Commissioner Miklosi
commented that the verbiage “Low intensity medical related uses,” seemed
Brian Varney
somewhatgeneral. this wouldallow forflexibility in cases andgive the Planning
Commissioner Officer
Directorthe authority to make the decision on what a low intensity use is.
appreciated staffmaking the effort to clean up the language.
Motion to approve by Commissioner Officer, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed
unanimously. 6-0
COMMISSION ACTION.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.
ADJOURNMENT.
Motion to adjourn at 8:42p.m.by Vice Chair Duncan,seconded byCommissioner Officer. Passed
unanimously.
CERTIFICATION.
I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Planning
Commission meeting held on June 29, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present.
Terri Byler, Planning Commission Secretary
6| Page
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 446 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 447 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 448 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-079
RELATING TO UTILITIES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN “ASSIGNMENT
OF RIGHTS AND ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE SUBCONTRACT” BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF MARANA AND AVRA WATER CO-OP, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO SIGN AN “AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SUBCONTRACT NO. 07-XX-30-W0470” AMONG
THE UNITED STATES, THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
AND THE TOWN OF MARANA; AND AUTHORIZING TOWN STAFF TO UNDERTAKE
ALL OTHER NECESSARY OR PRUDENT STEPS TO FINALIZE THE TRANSFER OF
AVRA WATER CO-OP’SENTIRE 808 ACRE-FOOT PER ANNUM ALLOCATIONOF
CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIALWATER
ENTITLEMENT
WHEREASthe Town of Marana’s current Central Arizona Project (CAP) water
allocation is significantly smaller than the quantity of water delivered to Marana Water
Department customers; and
WHEREASthe Town’s Strategic Plan III adopted in January 2015 includes Community
focus area initiative 25, “Continually seek and evaluate new water resources to increase the
Town’s water portfolio”; and
WHEREAS the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-107 on October 6, 2015,
approving an agreement to purchase has an 808 acre-foot allocation of CAPAvra Water Co-op,
Inc., and authorizing the Town Manager and Town staff to take the necessary and appropriate
steps to acquire Avra Water Co-op’s full 808 acre-foot CAP subcontract entitlement; and
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council find that acquisition of Avra Water Co-op’s CAP
subcontract entitlements is the best interests of the Town and its citizens and businesses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The “Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations of Central
Arizona Project Municipal and Industrial Water Service Subcontract” between the Town of
Marana and Avra Water Co-op, Inc. (the “Assignment”) is hereby approved, and the Mayor is
authorized and directed to sign it in substantially the form as set forth in the agenda materials for
this meeting.
SECTION 2. “Amendment No. 2 to SubcontractNo. 07-XX-30-W0470” among the
United States, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the Town of Marana
(“Subcontract Amendment 2”) is hereby approved, and the Mayor is authorized and directed to
sign it in substantially the form as set forthin the agenda materials for this meeting.
00047686.DOCX /1
-1 -
Marana Resolution No. 2016-0797/19/2016 9:21 PMFJC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 449 of 473
SECTION 3. The Town Manager and Town staff are authorized to carry out the terms of
the Assignment and Subcontract Amendment 2,to undertake all other necessary or prudent steps
to finalize the transfer of Avra Water Co-op’sentire 808 acre-foot per annum allocation of CAP
municipal and industrialwater entitlement, and to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give
effect to this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
nd
MARANA, ARIZONA, this 2day of August,2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
00047686.DOCX /1
-2 -
Marana Resolution No. 2016-0797/19/2016 9:21 PMFJC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 450 of 473
ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS AND ASSUMPTION OFOBLIGATIONS OF
CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECTMUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL
WATER SERVICE SUBCONTRACT
THISASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ______________,
2016, by and betweenAvra Water Co-op, Inc.,an Arizona non-profit corporation (“Avra”),and
the Town ofMarana, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona(the “Town”).
RECITALS
A.On
or about March 29, 2007, Avra, the United States of America (the “United
States”), acting throughthe Secretary of the Interior, and the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District(“CAWCD”),entered into a subcontract for the delivery of municipal and
industrial (“M&I”) water from the Central Arizona Project (“CAP”) in the amount of 808 acre-
feet per annum titled “Subcontract Among the United States, the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District and Avra Water Co-op, Inc., Providing for Water Service, Central Arizona
Project” Subcontract No. 07-XX-30-W0459 (“Avra’sOriginalSubcontract”).
B.On or about April 6, 1999, Cortaro-Marana Irrigation District, an Irrigation
District and political subdivision of the State of Arizona assigned its entitlement of 47 acre-feet
of CAP M&I water to the Town.
C.On or about October 12, 1999, the Town, the United States, acting through the
Secretary of the Interior, and CAWCD, entered into a subcontract for the delivery of M&I water
from the CAP in the amount of 47 acre-feet per annum titled, “Subcontract Amongthe United
States, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the Town of Marana, Providing for
Water Service, Central Arizona Project,” Subcontract No. 00-XX-30-0003 (the “Town’s Original
Subcontract”).
Page 1of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 451 of 473
D.On or about March 29, 2007, the Town,the United States, acting through the
Secretary of the Interior, and CAWCD, entered into an amended subcontract for the delivery of
M&I water from the CAP in the amount of 47 acre-feet per annum, titled “Subcontract Among
the United States, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the Town of Marana,
Providing for Water Service, Central Arizona Project,” Subcontract No. 07-XX-30-W0470 (the
“Amended Subcontract”). This Amended Subcontract superseded and replaced the Town’s
Original Subcontract.
E.On or about December 28, 2009, the Town, the United States, acting through the
Secretary of the Interior, and CAWCD,entered into an amended subcontract for the delivery of
M&I water from the CAP titled “Amendment No. 1 to Amended Water Service Subcontract”,
Subcontract No. 07-XX-30-W470 to reflect the assignment of 1,481 acre-feet per annum of CAP
M&I water from Flowing Wells Irrigation District to the Town, increasing the Town’s
entitlement from 47 acre-feet per annum of CAP M&I water to 1,528 acre-feet per annum.
F.On or about November 3, 2015, the Parties jointly requested to transfer Avra’s
CAP M&I entitlement of 808 acre-feet per year to the Town.
G.By letter dated June 15, 2016, the Arizona Department of Water Resources
recommended that the Secretary of the Interior approve the assignment of Avra’s entire CAP
M&I entitlement of 808 acre-feet to the Townfor use within its municipal service area.
H.This assignment and transfer would (1) increase the Town's entitlement from
1,528 acre-feet per annum to 2,336 acre-feet per annumand (2) eliminate Avra's entitlement and
terminate Avra’s Original Subcontract.
I.Article 6.7 of Avra’sOriginalSubcontract provides that the provisions of the
subcontract shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties to the subcontract,
Page 2of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 452 of 473
but that no assignment of any portion of, or interest in, the subcontract will be valid until
approved by the United States.
NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual and dependent covenants herein
contained, it is agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
1.Avrahereby assigns,transfers,and conveys to the Townall its rights, title, and
interest in and to808acre-feet per annum of CAP M&I waterto which Avrais entitled under the
terms of Avra’sOriginalSubcontract.
2.The Townhas read the Assignment, knows the contents and requirements thereof,
and accepts the assignment of808acre-feet per annum of CAP M&I water under the terms of
Avra’sOriginalSubcontract, assumes the obligations thereof, including without limitation the
obligation to pay any and all amounts due under the CAWCD's Policy Regarding the
Relinquishment and Transfer of CAP M&I Subcontract Allocations with respect to the 808acre-
feet per annum of CAP M&I water assigned.
3.The Townagrees to execute an amendment to the Town’sAmended Subcontract
increasing its annual entitlement to CAP M&I water by 808acre-feet per annum, thereby
increasing its entitlement from 1,528acre-feet per annum to 2,336acre-feet per annum.
4.This Assignmentshall not become effective untilall of the following conditions
have occurred:
(a)This Assignmenthasbeen fully executed by all parties.
(b)This Assignmentand related documents have been reviewed by the
Arizona Department of Water Resources as provided by law.
Page 3of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 453 of 473
(c)CAWCDand the United States, acting through the Secretary of the
Interior, have both approved this Assignment, which shall be evidenced by the signatures of their
respective representatives on the attached Approval.
(d)The Townhas paid CAWCD all payments due under CAWCD's Policy
Regarding the Relinquishment and Transfer of CAP M&I Subcontract Allocations.
(e)The Townhas executed an amendment to the Town’sAmended
Subcontract, increasing its annual entitlement to CAP M&I water by 808acre-feetper annum to
2,336acre-feet per annum.
(f)The amendment of the Town’sAmended Subcontract has been validated
in accordance withA.R.S. §48-3731.
5.Notwithstanding Section 4 of this Assignment, for purposes of the entitlement to
CAP M&I water and payment of CAP M&I capital charges, this Assignment shall be effective
upon its execution by Avraandthe Town.
6.Upon this Assignmentbecoming effective, Avra's Original Subcontract shall be
terminated and have no further force and effect.
7.The parties have complied with A.R.S. §45.107(D).
8.Except as amended herein, all terms, conditions, and provisions of the Town’s
Amended Subcontract shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
(Signatures follow)
Page 4of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 454 of 473
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment the day
and year first above-written.
AVRA WATER CO-OP, INC.
Attest:By:
Title:Title:
TOWN OF MARANA
Attest:By:
Title:Title:
Approved as to form:
(Approval signatures follow)
Page 5of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 455 of 473
APPROVAL
The undersigned, pursuant to Article 6.7 of the Subcontract, on behalf of the United
States of America, acting through the Secretary of the Interior, and the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District hereby approves the foregoingAssignment in accordancewith its terms.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
By:
Regional Director
Lower Colorado Region
Bureau of Reclamation
CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Attest:By:
Secretary President
wpdocs\cv\AvraAssignmentofRightstoMarana
221
Page 6of 6
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 456 of 473
AGREEMENT AMONG THE UNITED STATES,
THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
AND THE TOWN OF MARANA
AMENDMENT NO. 2TO SUBCONTRACTNO. 07-XX-30-W0470
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2016,
by and among the United States of America, hereinafter referred to as the “United States,” acting
through the Secretary of the Interior, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (the
“Contractor”), and the Town of Marana(the “Subcontractor”).
RECITALS
A.On or about March 29, 2007, AvraWater Co-Op, Inc. (“Avra”), the United States,
acting through the Secretary of the Interior, and the Contractor,entered into a subcontract for the
delivery of municipal and industrial (“M&I”) water from the Central Arizona Project (“CAP”) in
the amount of 808 acre-feet per annum titled “Subcontract Among the United States, the Central
Arizona Water Conservation District and Avra Water Co-op, Inc., Providing for Water Service,
Central Arizona Project” Subcontract No. 07-XX-30-W0459 (“Avra’sOriginalSubcontract”).
B.On or about April 6, 1999, Cortaro-Marana Irrigation District, an Irrigation
District and political subdivision of the State of Arizona assigned its entitlement of 47 acre-feet
of CAP M&I water to the Subcontractor.
C.On or about October 12, 1999, the Subcontractor, the United States, acting
through the Secretary of the Interior, and the Contractor, entered into a subcontract for the
delivery of M&I water from the CAP in the amount of 47 acre-feet per annum titled,
“Subcontract Among the United States, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the
Town of Marana, Providing for Water Service, Central Arizona Project,” Subcontract No. 00-
XX-30-0003 (the “Town’s Original Subcontract”).
Page 1of 5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 457 of 473
D.On or about March 29, 2007, the Subcontractor, the United States, acting through
the Secretary of the Interior, and the Contractor, entered into an amended subcontract for the
delivery of M&I water from the CAP in the amount of 47 acre-feet per annum, titled
“Subcontract Among the United States, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the
Town of Marana, Providing for Water Service, Central Arizona Project,” Subcontract No. 07-
XX-30-W0470 (the “Amended Subcontract”). This Amended Subcontract superseded and
replaced the Town’s Original Subcontract.
E.On or about December 28, 2009, the Subcontractor, the United States, acting
through the Secretary of the Interior, and the Contractorentered into an amended subcontract for
the delivery of M&I water from the CAP titled “Amendment No. 1 to Amended Water Service
Subcontract”, Subcontract No. 07-XX-30-W470 to reflect the assignment of 1,481 acre-feet per
annum of CAP M&I water from Flowing Wells Irrigation District to the Subcontractor,
increasing the Subcontractor’s entitlement from 47 acre-feet per annum of CAP M&I water to
1,528 acre-feet per annum.
F.On or about November 3, 2015, the Subcontractor and Avrajointly requested to
transfer Avra’s CAP M&Isubcontract entitlement of 808 acre-feet per year to the Subcontractor.
G.OnJune 15, 2016, the Arizona Department of Water Resources recommended that
the Secretary of the Interior approve the assignment of Avra’s CAP M&I entitlement of 808
acre-feet to the Subcontractor for use within its municipal service area.
H. Avra and the Subcontractorentered into an Assignment of Rights and Assumption
of Obligations of Central Arizona Project Municipal and Industrial Water Service Subcontract
which has been approved by the Secretary of the Interior and the Contractor, and which,when
effective,will terminate Avra’sOriginal Subcontract.
Page 2of 5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 458 of 473
I.The finalization of the transfer of Avra’s entire 808 acre-foot of CAP M&I
entitlement to the Subcontractor will (1) increase the Subcontractor’s CAP M&I entitlement
from 1,528 acre-feet per annum to 2,336 acre-feet per annum and (2) eliminate Avra’s
entitlement and terminate Avra’sOriginalSubcontract.
NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual and dependent covenants herein
contained, it is agreed as follows.
AGREEMENT
1.Amendment of Subarticle4.12(a). Subarticle4.12(a) of the Amended
Subcontract is hereby amended to read as follows:
“4.12 Entitlementto Project M&I Water.
(a)The Subcontractor is entitled to take a maximum of 2,336acre-feet of Project
Water for M&I uses including but not limited to underground storage.”
2.Amendment of Subarticle5.2(a). Subarticle5.2(a) of the AmendedSubcontract is
hereby amended to read as follows:
“5.2 M&I Water Service Charges.
(a) Subject to the provisions of Article 5.4 hereof and in addition to the OM&R
payments required in Article 5.1 hereof, the Subcontractor shall, in advance
of the delivery of Project M&I Water by the United States or the Operating
Agency, make payment to the Contractor inequal semiannual installments of
an M&I water service capital charge based on a maximum entitlement of
2,336 acre-feet per year multiplied by the rate established by the Contractor
for that year.”
3.The Subcontractor shall promptly seek a final decree of the proper court of the
State of Arizona decreeing and adjudging this Agreement to be valid,binding upon,and
enforceable against the Subcontractorin accordance with A.R.S. §48-3731. The Subcontractor
shall furnish the United States and the Contractor a certified copy of such decree and of all
Page 3of 5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 459 of 473
pertinent supporting records. This Agreement shall not become effective until such final decree
has been entered and no further appeal of that decree is possible.
4.This Agreement shall not become effective until all of the following conditions
have occurred:
(a)This Agreement has been fully executed by all parties.
(b)This Agreement and related documents have been reviewed by the
Arizona Department of Water Resources as provided by law.
(c)The Contractorand the United States, acting through the Secretary of the
Interior, have both approved this Agreement, which shall be evidenced by the signatures of their
respective representatives on the attached Approval.
(d)The Subcontractorhas paid the Contractorall payments due under the
Contractor’sPolicy Regarding the Relinquishment and Transfer of CAP M&I Subcontract
Allocations.
(e)This Agreement has been validated in accordance with A.R.S. §48-3731,
as provided in paragraph 3 above.
5. Except as amended herein, all terms, conditions, and provisions of the Amended
Subcontract shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
[Signatures follow]
Page 4of 5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 460 of 473
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
TOWN OF MARANA
Attest:By:
Title:Title:
CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Attest:By:
Lisa Atkins, Secretary Pamela Pickard,President
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
By: ______________________________
Regional Director
Lower Colorado Region
Bureau of Reclamation
Page 5of 5
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 461 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 462 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 463 of 473
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-080
RELATING TO PUBLIC WORKS; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN
ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE
SETTLEMENT AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTATION NECESSARY FOR THE
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS NEEDED FROM THE SHANER FAMILY
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED APRIL 1, 2006FOR THE TANGERINE
CORRIDOR/TANGERINE ROAD, TWIN PEAKS TO LA CAÑADA DRIVE, TOWN OF
MARANA PROJECT NO. ST021
WHEREAS the Town of Marana is constructingthe Tangerine Corridor/Tangerine Road,
Twin Peaks to La Cañada Drive, Town of Marana Project No. 2005-061 (RTA ST021), (the
“Tangerine Road Project”); and
WHEREAS the Town of Marana needs to acquire property rights (the “Needed
Property”) from The Shaner Family Revocable Living Trust dated April 1, 2006(the “Shaner
Family Trust”) to construct the improvements needed for the Tangerine RoadProject; and
WHEREAS Town representatives have negotiated an Acquisition Agreement &
Administrative Settlement with the Shaner Family Trustfor acquisition of the Needed Property,
the terms of which exceed Town staff’s general authority for acquisition of property rights
needed for the Tangerine Road Project; and
WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find that the acquisition or
condemnation of the Needed Property is necessary for the public health, safety and welfare of the
citizens of Marana.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, authorizing the Town Engineer to execute the Acquisition Agreement &
Administrative Settlement in substantially the form attached to and incorporated in this
resolution as Exhibit A, and to execute all other documentation necessary for the purchase of the
Needed Property from the Shaner Family Trust for the Tangerine RoadProject.
PASSED AND ADOPTEDBY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
nd
MARANA, ARIZONA, this2day of August, 2016.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town ClerkFrank Cassidy, Town Attorney
00047817.DOCX /1
Marana Resolution No. 2016-0807/25/2016 4:09 PM FJC
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 464 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 465 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 466 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 467 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 468 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 469 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 470 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 471 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 472 of 473
Marana Regular Council Meeting 08/02/2016Page 473 of 473