Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Agenda Packet 12-06-2016M RA N WON N MARANA TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Council Chambers, December 6, 2016, at or after 7:00 PM Ed Honea, Mayor Jon Post, Vice Mayor David Bowen, Council Member Patti Comerford, Council Member Herb Kai, Council Member Carol McGorray, Council Member Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member Pursuant to A.R. S. § 3 8- 431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Marana Town Council and to the general public that the Town Council will hold a meeting open to the public on December 6, 2016, at or after 7:00 PM located in the Council Chambers of the Marana Municipal Complex, 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona. ACTION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. Revisions to the agenda can occur up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. Revised agenda items appear in italics. As a courtesy to others, please turn off or put in silent mode all pagers and cell phones. Meeting Times Welcome to this Marana Town Council meeting. Regular Council meetings are usually held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 PM at the Marana Municipal Complex, although the date or time may change and additional meetings may be called at other times and /or places. Contact the Town Clerk or watch for posted agendas for other meetings. This agenda may be revised up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. In such a case a new agenda will be posted in place of this agenda. Speaking at Meetings If you are interested in speaking to the Council during the Call to the Public or Public Hearings, you must fill out a speaker card (located in the lobby outside the Council Chambers) and deliver it to the Town Clerk prior to the convening of the meeting. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Pagel of 279 All persons attending the Council meeting, whether speaking to the Council or not, are expected to observe the Council rules, as well as the rules of politeness, propriety, decorum and good conduct. Any person interfering with the meeting in any way, or acting rudely or loudly will be removed from the meeting and will not be allowed to return. Accessibility To better serve the citizens of Marana and others attending our meetings, the Council Chambers are wheelchair and handicapped accessible. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation, such as a sign language interpreter, by contacting the Town Clerk at (520) 3 82 -1999. Requests should be made as early as possible to arrange the accommodation. Agendas Copies of the agenda are available the day of the meeting in the lobby outside the Council Chambers or online at www.marana.com, by linking to the Town Clerk page under Agendas, Minutes and Recent Actions. For questions about the Council meetings, special services or procedures, please contact the Town Clerk, at 382 -1999, Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. This Notice and Agenda Posted no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting, at the Marana Municipal Complex, 115 5 5 W. Civic Center Drive, the Marana Operations Center, 5100 W. Ina Road, and at www.maranaaz.gov under Agendas and Minutes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE /INVOCATION /MOMENT OF SILENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA CALL TO THE PUBLIC At this time any member of the public is allowed to address the Town Council on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Town Council, except for items scheduled for a Public Hearing at this meeting. The speaker may have up to three minutes to speak. Any persons wishing to address the Council must complete a speaker card located outside the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Town Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. Individuals addressing a meeting at the Call to the Public will not be provided with electronic technology capabilities beyond the existing voice amplification and recording capabilities in the facilities. Pursuant to the Arizona Open Meeting Law, at the conclusion of Call to the Public, individual members of the Council may respond to criticism made by those who have addressed the Council, and may ask staff to review the matter, or may ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda. PROCLAMATIONS PC A proclamation honoring the service of Marana Police Officer Bryant Brewer (Jocelyn C. Bronson) MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 2 of 279 MANAGER'S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS PRESENTATIONS CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda contains items requiring action by the Council which are generally routine items not requiring Council discussion. A single motion and affirmative vote will approve all items on the Consent Agenda, including any resolutions or ordinances. Prior to a motion to approve the Consent Agenda, any Council member may remove any item from the Consent Agenda and that item will be discussed and voted upon separately. C1 Resolution No. 2016 -129: Relating to Community Development; approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the management and implementation of the 2016 -2017 Community Development Block Grant Program (Lisa Shafer) C2 Resolution No. 2016-130: Relating to Personnel; approving one additional paid floating holiday for eligible Town of Marana employees, to be used during the time period of December 23, 2016 through January 3, 2017 (Curry C. Hale) C3 Approval of the November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Meeting Minutes with the Marana Town Council and Marana Planning Commission; approval of the November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes; and approval of the November 29, 2016 Special Council Meeting Minutes (Jocelyn C. Bronson) LIQUOR LICENSES BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES B1 Resolution No. 2016 -131: Relating to the Utilities Board; appointing a chair and selecting Council - appointed members to the Town of Marana Utilities Board (John Kmiec) COUNCIL ACTION Al PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2016.023; Relating to Development; Approving a rezoning of approximately 45 acres of land located east of Camino de Manana approximately 1/8 mile south of the Desert Falcon Lane alignment from "R -36" Single- Family Residential to "R -6" Single- Family Residential. (Brian D. Varney) A2 Resolution No. 2016 -132: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement (Frank Cassidy) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 3 of 279 A3 Resolution No. 2016 -133: Relating to Utilities; approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign an Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana (John Kmiec) A4 Resolution No. 2016 -134: Relating to Development; Amending the infrastructure improvements plan supporting development impact fees for parks and recreation facilities by revising the projects included in the infrastructure improvements plan and shifting the anticipated development impact fee funding among those projects without changing the amount of the fee or the level of service (Frank Cassidy) AS Resolution No. 2016 -135: Relating to Intergovernmental Relations; adopting a 2017 Town of Marana legislative program and authorizing and directing those authorized to lobby on behalf of the Town of Marana to represent and pursue it (Tony Hunter) ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION /POSSIBLE ACTION D1 Relating to Finance; presentation, discussion and possible direction on proposed changes to the Town of Marana comprehensive fee schedule and other various rate and fee adjustments (Jamsheed Mehta) D2 Relating to Legislation and Government Actions; discussion and possible action regarding all pending state, federal, and local legislation /government actions and on recent and upcoming meetings of the other governmental bodies (Gilbert Davidson) EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Pursuant to A.R. S. § 38-431.03, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, to discuss certain matters. El Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38- 431.03 (A)(3), Council may ask for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter listed on this agenda. E2 Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. § 38- 431.03 (A)(1) for discussion, consideration and possible interviews of candidates for appointment to the Town of Marana Utilities Board. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Notwithstanding the mayor's discretion regarding the items to be placed on the agenda, if three or more Council members request that an item be placed on the agenda, it must be placed on the agenda for the second regular Town Council meeting after the date of the request, pursuant to Marana Town Code Section 2- 4 -2(B). ADJOURNMENT Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 4 of 279 N O 0 / n.. - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting PC1 Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 Submitted For: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk From: Hilary Hiser, Deputy Town Clerk Date: December 6, 2016 Subject: A proclamation honoring the service of Marana Police Officer Bryant Brewer (Jocelyn C. Bronson) Attachments Proclamation for Bryant Brewer Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 5 of 279 PROCLAMATION Honorin Br Brewer WHEREAS Br Brewer has served the Marana communit as a police officer since December 4, 2000; was promoted to Lead Police Officer in 2011; and takes g reat pride in buildin g ood relationships between the police and the citizens and WHEREAS prior to joinin the Marana. team, Br served in the U.S. Air Force from 1980-1988 where he received a number of commendation and achievement medals in law enforcement and securit trainin before bein honorabl dischar and WHEREAS he then commenced a career as a corrections and securit officer for a number of law enforcement a in Arizona and Bucks Count Penns where he had returned to take care of his terminall ill mother in 1990; and WHEREAS Br has accumulated nearl 500 hours of industrial securit incipient fire, emer tactical response, firearms and correctional officer trainin and WHEREAS Br and his wife J ohanna have raised four children in the Marana communit and now plans to relax a little and si improve his g olf g ame when he retires on December 30, 2016 in addition to continuin to contribute his talents where needed as he has done throu his professional life. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ma and Council of the Town of Marana reco the personal and career contributions and exemplar service of BRYANT BREWER and wish him continued g ood health and happiness in the next phase of his life. Dated this 6th da of December, 2016. ATTEST: L -L""4-" "L A 4111 ocel Bronson, Town Clerk Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 400 Ed Honea, Ma if 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council From: Lisa Shafer, Community Development Director Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -129: Relating to Community Development; approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the management and implementation of the 2016 -2017 Community Development Block Grant Program (Lisa Shafer) Discussion: C1 The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, established by Congress in 1974, provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. Administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the CDBG program provides annual grant funding, on a formula basis, to 1209 general units of local government and states. HUD awards grants to entitlement community grantees to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and services. Entitlement communities develop their own programs and funding priorities. However, grantees must give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low- and moderate - income persons. A grantee may also carry out activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. Additionally, grantees may fund activities when the grantee certifies that the activities meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. CDBG funds may not be used for activities which do not meet these broad national objectives. Eligible grantees include: principal cities of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs); other metropolitan cities with populations of at least 50,000; and qualified urban counties with populations of at least 200,000 (excluding the population of entitled cities). HUD determines the Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 7 of 279 amount of each entitlement grant by a statutory dual formula which uses several obj ective measures of community needs, including the extent of poverty, population, housing overcrowding, age of housing and population growth lag in relationship to other metropolitan areas. Because the Town does not meet the entitled communities criteria, any CDBG funding received by the Town must be allocated by Pima County. These funds are subject to both the federal CDBG guidelines and the HUD - approved plan developed by Pima County. The Town is able to apply for use of a portion of Pima County's CDBG funding through an annual proposal process. Earlier this year the Town applied for funding in four specific programs (Colonia Neighborhood Cleanup, Emergency Home Repair, Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation and Colonia Neighborhood Re- Investment Program) and for funding to cover the cost of administering programs that address the needs of low -to moderate - income families. Pima County awarded the Town of Marana $94,800 from the 2016 -2017 Community Development Block Grant Program. The grant provided funding for Administration ($14,800), Colonic Clean -up ($10,000), Emergency Home Repair ($20,000), Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation ($25,000) and Colonic Neighborhood Re- Investment Program ($25,000 for Honea Heights Park construction). This is a significant increase in funding from the 2015 -2016 award of $76,700. This award term is from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Financial Impact: Fiscal Year: 2017 Budgeted Y/N: Yes Amount: $94,800 This funding does not require any match or leveraged funding. All services will be provided with direct cost reimbursement. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the intergovernmental agreement with Pima County for the management and implementation of the 2016 -2017 Community Development Block Grant Program. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2016 -129, approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the management and implementation of the 2016 -2017 Community Development Block Grant Program. Attachments Resolution 2016 -129 Approving CDBG IGA with Pima County Exhibit A -IGA CDBG FY2016 -17 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 8 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-129 RELATING TO COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIMA COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF MARANA FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2016 -2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS the Town of Marana recognizes the need to provide safe affordable housing and neighborhood infrastructure for its citizens and has applied for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for these purposes; and WHEREAS Pima County has been awarded funding from the U.S. Department for Hous- ing and Urban Development under the CDBG program for the 2016 -2017 federal fiscal year; and WHEREAS the Town of Marana has been selected as a sub - grantee through Pima Coun- ty's proposal process; and WHEREAS Pima County and the Town of Marana may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. §11 -952 et seq.; and WHEREAS the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana find it is in the best interests of its citizens to enter into this intergovernmental agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The intergovernmental agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana, in substantially the form attached to and incorporated by this reference in this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute it for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 2. The Town's Manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to under- take all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms, obligations, and ob- jectives of the Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement. 00049797.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -129 - 1 - Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 9 of 279 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6th day of December, 2016. ATTEST: Mayor Ed Honea APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 00049797.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -129 -2- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 10 of 279 PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Program Name: Management and Implementation of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Subrecipient: Town of Marana 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ 85653 DUNS No.: 098034143 Project Description: Funds will be used for the management of the Town of Marana CDBG Program including: Administration; Colonia Neighborhood Re- investment; Emergency Home Repair; Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation; and, Colonia Neighborhood Cleanup activities. Contract Term: October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017 Amount: $9400.00 Funding: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Contract No. B- 16 -UC -04 -0502 Award Date: July 1, 2016 CFDA Program Description Nation Funding Pima County Award Community Development Block 14.218 Grant /Entitlement Communities FY16 $3,014,354,773.97 $2,613,490.00 (CDBG) Is this a Research and Development Contract: F Yes Fq No This Intergovernmental Agreement is entered into by and between Pima County, a body politic and corporate of the State of Arizona ( "County ") and Town of Marana, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona ( "Subrecipient "). RECITALS A. County and Subrecipient may contract for services and enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative action pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -951, et seq. B. Subrecipient is authorized by A.R.S. § 9- 500.11 to expend public monies for and in connection with economic development activities. C. County is authorized by A.R.S. §§ 11- 254.04, 11 -251 (5) and 11 -251 (17), to spend public monies to improve and enhance the economic welfare and health of the inhabitants of the County. D. County applied for and received Community Development Block Grant ( "CDBG ") funds in the amount of $2,613,490.00 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ( "HUD "), under Title I of the Housin and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (Public Law 93 -383). M r '' f 2/ 6/2016 Pa e of 279 �(����/ V� Page o E. Under solicitation number CDNC- 10- 30 -15- CDBG -ESG ( "the Community Planning Application "), County sought proposals for programs and activities that would qualify for CDBG funding during Federal Fiscal Year 2016 -2017. F. Subrecipient submitted a response to the Community Planning Application. G. County has determined that the services or activities proposed in Subrecipient's response to the Community Planning Application are eligible for CDBG funding and in the best interests of the residents of Pima County. H. On May 3, 2016, the Pima County Board of Supervisors authorized inclusion of Subrecipient's proposal for use of CDBG funds for in the 2016 -2017 Annual Action Plan that County submitted to HUD. I. On May 3, 2016, the Pima County Board of Supervisors passed Resolution No. 2016 -32 approving an allocation of CDBG funds to Subrecipient. 1. CDBG funds in the amount of $94,800.00 have been allocated to Subrecipient for management and implementation of the Town of Marana CDBG Program. NOW THEREFORE, County and Subrecipient, pursuant to the above, and in consideration of the matters and things hereinafter set forth, do mutually agree as follows: 1.0 TERM AND EXTENSIONS 1.1 This Agreement, as awarded by County, will commence on October 1, 2016 and will terminate on September 30, 2017 unless sooner terminated or further extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. County may extend this Agreement for an additional one -year period or any portion thereof if necessary to complete the Program or if required by HUD. 1.2 Except as set forth in Paragraph 1.4 below, any modification or extension of the contract termination date must be by formal written amendment executed by the parties hereto. 1.3 Any amendments to the Agreement must be approved by the County before any services under the amendment commences. 1.4 Minor modifications may be made by written memorandum approved and signed by the Director of the Pima County Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation Department or designee. Minor modifications are changes in the scope, which do not change the specified purpose, outcomes or the total compensation provided through this Agreement and do not in any way increase the direct or indirect liability of the County under this Agreement. 1.5 Notwithstanding paragraph 1.1 above, the terms of this Agreement will survive and remain in effect during any period that Subrecipient has control over CDBG funds, including program income. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 Subrecipient will: 2. 1.1 Provide the County with the services described in the attached Exhibit A. 2.1.2 Employ suitably trained and skilled personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. 2.1.3 Perform its duties in a humane and respectful manner and in accordance with any applicable professional standards. Subrecipient must obtain and maintain all applicable licenses, permits and authority required for its performance under this Agreement. V9 Pa Page o�i�9f 279 2.1.4 Unless otherwise provided for herein, the personnel delivering Agreement services will: 2.1.4.1 Be employees or volunteers of the Subrecipient; 2.1.4.2 Satisfy any qualifications set forth in this Agreement; and 2.1.4.3 Be covered by personnel policies and practices of Subrecipient. 2.1.5 Obtain and maintain all required licenses, permits and authority required for performance under this Agreement. 2.1.6 Maintain an accounting manual that describes its financial procedures in sufficient detail to ensure that its financial practices are easily understood. 2.1.7 Undertake the same obligations to the County, as the County does to HUD pursuant to the 2016 — 2017 Annual Action Plan and assurances. Subrecipient will hold County harmless against any injury that County may suffer with respect to HUD on account of any failure on the part of Subrecipient to fulfill obligations to HUD. 2.2 Confidentiality Subrecipient: 2.2.1 Understands that client and applicant files and information collected pursuant to the terms of this Agreement are private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration of County's or Subrecipient's responsibilities with respect to services provided under this Agreement is prohibited, unless written consent is obtained from the individual or in the case of a minor, from the responsible parent or guardian. 2.2.2 Will provide access to these files only to persons properly authorized. 2.2.3 Will observe and abide by all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations regarding use or disclosure of information including, but not limited to, information concerning applicants for and recipients of contract services. 2.3 Subrecipient certifi that no individual or agent has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Agreement for commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee except a bona fide employee whose job duties include securing business. 2.4 No program funded under this Agreement may impair existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements or be inconsistent with the terms of a collective bargaining agreement without the written concurrence of the labor organization and employer concerned. 2.5 Subrecipient warrants compliance with the Urban County Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between Pima County and the Town of Marana for the Community Development Block Grant Program and HOME Investment Partnership Program, contract CTN- CD -16* 187 as amended. 3.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 3.1 County will monitor all activities and information sources in the management, fiscal, and services systems of Subrecipient and any subcontracted parties relating to performance of duties and obligations under this Agreement to ensure that Subrecipient is: 3. 1.1 Making adequate and acceptable progress in the provision of services; 3.1.2 Maintaining adequate and acceptable systems to document services and expenditures; 3.1.3 Using the funds provided pursuant to this Agreement effectively and efficiently to accomplish the purposes for which funds were made available; and 3.1.4 Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 35, for projects on homes built prior to 1978, comply with regulations for disclosure and lead -safe work practices. v9612016 Page o�9f 279 3.2 For monitoring and evaluation, Subrecipient must provide source documentation for payroll which may include, but is not limited to: 3.2.1 Employment letters; 3.2.2 Authorization for rates of pay, benefits, and withholding; 3.2.3 Minutes from Board of Directors' meetings establishing salary schedules and benefit packages; 3.2.4 Copies of written policies; 3.2.5 W -4 forms and associated time and attendance records; 3.2.6 Employee certifications of time spent: 3.2.6.1 If an employee of Subrecipient works solely on the services being funded by CDBG, the employee and the employee's supervisor must sign a statement every six months certifying that the employee worked only on the CDBG- funded services. 3.2.6.2 If an employee's time is split between the services being funded by CDBG and non -CDBG services and funding sources, Subrecipient must have time distribution records supporting the allocation of charges among the various funding sources. 3.3 Subrecipient must cooperate in the monitoring and evaluation process by County and /or HUD. 3.4 Subrecipient must assist County in providing reports and documentation related to Subrecipient's performance and, where applicable, the impact of the CDBG - funded activities on the community, to HUD. 3.5 If monitoring and evaluation finds that Subrecipient's performance is substandard, Subrecipient will be in default of this Agreement. If Subrecipient fails to take appropriate actions to correct the default within fifteen (15) calendar days from date of notice, this Agreement may be suspended or terminated. 3.6 To the greatest extent permissible by law, County, and any authorized federal, state or local agency, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Comptroller of the United States will at all reasonable times have the right of access to Subrecipient's facility, books, documents, papers, or other records which are pertinent to this Agreement, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts and transcripts for the purpose of evaluating Subrecipient's performance and Subrecipient's compliance with this Agreement. 4.0 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT 4.1 In consideration for services specified in Exhibit A of this Agreement, County agrees to pay Subrecipient up to $94,800.00 ( "the Maximum Allocated Amount "). 4.2 Payment will be made from the CDBG Grant County has received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ( "the awarding agency "). 4.3 Payment of the full Maximum Allocated Amount is subject to the CDBG funds being made available to County for this Agreement. The Maximum Allocated Amount may be decreased at any time due to reduction, termination, or any other changes in funding. Unless specifically authorized by County, unexpended funds will not be carried over into another fiscal year. 4.4 Pursuant to the agreement between HUD and County (Pima County Contract No. B- 16- UC -04- 0502) and the Pima County Board of Supervisor's approval of this allocation of CDBG funds to Subrecipient on May 3, 2016, Subrecipient may be reimbursed for eligible costs associated with activities under this Agreement from and after October 1, 2016. Notwithstanding the limitations above, Subrecipient may be reimbursed for administrative costs incurred for performance under this Agreement between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. v9612016 Page oj�9f 279 4.5 Subrecipient must submit a request for reimbursement every month even if no funds are being requested for the prior month. Requests for reimbursement are due as follows: Contract Month Due date for Request for Reimbursement January through April & July through December 30 calendar days from end of month May June 15 June July 7 4.6 Each monthly Requests for reimbursement must: 4.6.1 Reference this contract number. 4.6.2 Be approved and signed by the person or persons that prepared the request and an authorized manager, supervisor or executive of the Subrecipient to insure proper internal financial controls. 4.6.3 Be for services and costs as identified in Exhibit A. 4.6.4 Be accompanied by documentation which must include, but is not limited to: 4.6.4.1 A summary report of monthly expenditures by expense categories as shown in approved budget in Exhibit A of this Agreement. 4.6.4.2 Copies of invoices and checks (front and back) to support all purchases of goods or services. 4.6.4.3 If reimbursement is authorized for travel, detailed travel reports to support all travel expenses. 4.6.4.4 If reimbursement is authorized for personnel costs, time sheets or other records that specify the hours worked on the grants) and the total hours worked in the pay period. Time sheets must show the days and hours worked and should be signed by the employee and authorizing supervisor. 4.6.4.5 Fringe benefit calculations at the rate as shown in the approved budget in Exhibit A. 4.6.4.6 Any other documentation requested by County. 4.6.5 Be accompanied by a hardcopy, with original signatures, of the Financial Status Report and Request for Funds attached hereto as Exhibit B. 4.7 If Subrecipient is required to provide matching funds under the terms of the awarding agency, Subrecipient must also provide the documentation described in Paragraph 4.6 for the matching funds. 4.8 Subrecipient must utilize funds available under this Agreement to supplement rather than supplant funds otherwise available. Subrecipient may not bill the County for costs which are paid by another source. Subrecipient must notify County within ten (10) days of receipt of alternative funding for costs which would otherwise be subject to payment pursuant to this Agreement. 4.9 If each request for payment includes adequate and accurate documentation, County will generally pay Subrecipient within thirty (30) days from the date invoice is received. Subrecipient should budget cash needs accordingly. 4.10 County may, at its sole discretion: 4.10.1 Determine the acceptability and progress of work performed and determine the resulting entitlement to payment of each request for reimbursement. 4.10.2 Liquidate funds available under this Agreement for costs incurred by County on behalf of Subrecipient. �12v9612016 Page 0�1 of 279 4.10.3 Deny full payment for requests for reimbursement that are submitted to County after the date set forth in Paragraph 4.5. County may deduct its processing costs or delay - related damages in connection with a request for payment submitted after that date. 4.10.4 Deny payment for any request for reimbursement received after the following dates: Month Expense Incurred Denial date January through March July and August October through December More than 60 days after the end of the month in which the expense was incurred April and May June 21 June July 15 September October 31 If payment is made on such a delinquent request, County will deduct its processing costs or delay - related damages. 4.11 Pursuant to A.R.S. § 11 -622, County will deny reimbursement completely for requests for payment made later than six months after the last item of the account accrues. 4.12 REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT for compensation earned and /or eligible costs incurred will be submitted to the County within 15 working days after the end of the contract term. The request must meet the requirements set forth in Paragraph 4.6 and include a report summarizing Subrecipient's performance during the term of the Agreement. 4.13 No payments will be made to Subrecipient, until all of the following conditions are met: 4.13.1 Subrecipient has completed and submitted a W -9 Taxpayer Identification Number form; 4.13.2 Subrecipient has registered as a Pima County Vendor at the following web address -- https:// secure .pima. /procurement /vramp /lo 1 naspx 4.13.3 This Agreement is fully executed; and 4.13.4 Adequate and accurate documentation is provided with each request for payment or invoice. 4.14 Subrecipient will report to County: 4.14.1 Accrued expenditures; 4.14.2 Program income, as defined by the awarding agency; and 4.14.3 All other fiscal resources applied to expenses incurred in providing services under this Agreement. 4.15 Changes between budget line items may only be made as follows: 4.15.1 Changes that do not increase or decrease the total budget amount may be granted by and at the sole discretion of the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation or designee, so long as the specified purpose, metrics, or outcomes are not affected by the change in the budget. Subrecipient must submit a written request and show that any proposed increase is offset by a decrease of equal value to the remaining line items. No increase to the total operating budget will be allowed. The change will not be effective, nor will compensation under the change be provided, until the date set forth in the written approval of the Director or designee. 4.15.2 Changes that increase or decrease the total budget amount require a contract amendment. The change will not be effective, nor will compensation under the change be provided, until the contract amendment is fully executed by both parties. �12v9612016 Page 0�gyl279 4.16 Disallowed Charges or Cost principles will be as follows: 4.16.1 The cost principle set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 48, Chapter 1, Part 31.201 -6, (October 1, 1991), as modified by amendments and additions, on file with the Secretary of State and incorporated herein by reference, will be used to determine whether reimbursement of an incurred cost will be allowed under this Agreement. Those costs which are specifically defined as unallowable therein cannot be submitted for reimbursement by the Subrecipient and will not be reimbursed with Department funds. 4.16.2 Subrecipient must reimburse County for improper, unallowable or unsubstantiated costs discovered as a result of audit or otherwise within thirty (30) days following demand for reimbursement by County. 4.17 For the period of record retention required under Section 20.0 -- Books and Records County reserves the right to question any payment made under this Section 20.0 and to require reimbursement by setoff or otherwise for payments determined to be improper or contrary to the Agreement or law. 5.0 PROGRAM INCOME 5.1 County does not anticipate that Subrecipient will generate program income, as defined by the awarding agency, will be generated under the activities of this Agreement. 5.2 In the event that activities under this Agreement do generate program income or program income is authorized, Subrecipient must: 5.2.1 Report to County all program income, as defined at 24 CFR 570.500(a), generated and received as a result of activities carried out with the CDBG -funds provided pursuant to this Agreement. These reports are due quarterly. 5.2.2 Return program income to County within 15 days of the end of each month, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit A. 6.0 INSURANCE 6.1 Subrecipient will procure and maintain at its own expense insurance policies (the "Required Insurance ") satisfying the below requirements (the "Insurance Requirements ") until all of its obligations under this Contract have been met. The below Insurance Requirements are minimum requirements for this Contract and in no way limit Subrecipient's indemnity obligations under this Contract. The County in no way warrants that the required insurance is sufficient to protect the Subrecipient for liabilities that may arise from or relate to this Contract. If necessary, Subrecipient may obtain commercial umbrella or excess insurance to satisfy the Insurance Requirements. 6.2 Insurance Coverages and Limits 6.2.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL) Occurrence Form covering liability arising from premises, independent contractors, personal injury, bodily injury, broad form contractual liability and products - completed operations with minimum limits not less than $2,000,000 Each Occurrence and $2,000,000 General Aggregate. 6.2.2 Business Automobile Liability Coverage for any owned, leased, hired, and /or non -owned autos assigned to or used in the performance of this Contract with minimum limits not less than $1,000,000 Each Accident. 6.2.3 Workers' Compensation (WC) and Employers' Liability 6.2.3.1 Workers' Compensation with Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 each accident and $1,000,000 each employee — disease. Workers' Compensation statutory coverage is compulsory for employers of one or more employees. �12v9612016 Page oT l l 279 62.32 Note: The Workers' Compensation requirement does not apply if Subrecipient is exempt under A.R.S. § 23 -901, and has executed the appropriate Pima County Sole Proprietor (Independent Contractor) Waiver form. 6.3 Additional Insurance Requirements: 6.3.1 Insurer Financial Ratings Coverage must be placed with insurers acceptable to the County with A.M. Best rating of not less than A- VII, unless otherwise approved by the County. 6.3.2 Additional Insured The General Liability policy must be endorsed to include Pima County and all its related special districts, elected officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively "County and its Agents ") as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of the activities performed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient. The full policy limits and scope of protection must apply to the County and its Agents as an additional insured, even if they exceed the Insurance Requirements. 6.3.3 Wavier of Subrogation _ Commercial General Liability and Workers' Compensation coverages must each contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of County and its Agents for losses arising from work performed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient. 6.3.4 Primary Insurance The Required Insurance policies, with respect to any claims related to this Contract, must be primary and must treat any insurance carried by County as excess and not contributory insurance. The Required Insurance policies may not obligate the County to pay any portion of a Subrecipient's deductible or Self Insurance Retention (SIR). 6.3.5 Subcontractors Subrecipient must either (a) include all subcontractors as additional insureds under its Required Insurance policies, or (b) require each subcontractor to separately meet all Insurance Requirements and verify that each subcontractor has done so, Subrecipient must furnish, if requested by County, appropriate insurance certificates for each subcontractor. Subrecipient must obtain County's approval of any subcontractor request to modify the Insurance Requirements as to that subcontractor. 6.4 Verification of Coverage 6.4.1 Insurer or Broker of Subrecipient must evidence compliance with the Insurance Requirements by furnishing certificates of insurance executed by a duly authorized representative of each insurer. Each certificate must include: 6.4.1.1 The Pima County tracking number for this Contract, which is shown on the first page of the Contract, and a project description, in the body of the Certificate, 6.4.1.2 A notation of policy deductibles or SIRs relating to the specific policy, and 6.4.1.3 Certificates must specify that the appropriate policies are endorsed to include additional insured and subrogation wavier endorsements for the County and its Agents. 6.4.2 Each Required Insurance policy and appropriate endorsements must be in effect not less than 15 days prior to commencement of work under this Contract. A renewal certificate must be provided to County not less than 15 days prior to the policy's expiration date to include actual copies of the additional insured and wavier of subrogation endorsements. Failure to maintain the Required Insurance, or to provide evidence of renewal, is a material breach of this Contract. 6.4.3 County reserves the right to, at any time, require complete copies of any or all Required Insurance policies. �12v9612016 Page OTq' 1279 6.4.4 Cancellation Notice: Subrecipient's insurance policies and endorsements shall not be permitted to expire, be cancelled, suspended or materially changed from the agreed upon Insurance Requirements for any reason without thirty (30) days advance written notice to the County of the policy cancellation, suspension or material change. Subrecipient must provide written notice to County within 2 business days of receipt of notice. For cancellation of non - payment, Insurer is to provide County with written notice 10 days prior to cancellation of policy. 6.5 Approval and Modifications The Pima County Risk Manager may approve a modification of the Insurance Requirements without the necessity of a formal Contract amendment, but the approval must be in writing. Neither the County's failure to obtain a required insurance certificate or endorsement, the County's failure to object to a non - complying insurance certificate or endorsement, or the County's receipt of any other information from the Subrecipient, its insurance broker(s) and /or insurer(s), constitutes a waiver of any of the Insurance Requirements. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 Subrecipient will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless County, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, legal administrative proceedings, claims or demands and costs attendant thereto, arising out of any act, omission, fault or negligence by the Subrecipient, its agents, employees or anyone under its direction or control or on its behalf in connection with performance of this Agreement. 7.2 Subrecipient warrants that services provided under this Agreement are non - infringing. Subrecipient will indemnify, defend and hold County harmless from any claim of infringement arising from services provided under this Agreement or from the provision, license, transfer or use for their intended purpose of any products provided under this Agreement. 8.0 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 8.1 Subrecipient will comply with all federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, standards and Executive Orders, without limitation to those designated within this Agreement. The laws and regulations of the State of Arizona will govern the rights of the parties, the performance of this Agreement, and any disputes hereunder. Any action relating to this Agreement must be brought in a court of the State of Arizona in Pima County. Any changes in the governing laws, rules, and regulations during the terms of this Agreement will apply, but do not require an amendment. 8.2 Subrecipient will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR 570, including subpart K of these regulations, except the Subrecipient does not assume: 8.2.1 County's environmental responsibilities described in 24 CFR 570.604; and 8.2.2 County's responsibility for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. 8.3 Subrecipient warrants that CDBG funds provided or personnel employed in the administration of the program funded under this Agreement will not be used for: 8.3.1 Political activities; 8.3.2 Inherently religious activities; 8.3.3 Lobbying; 8.3.4 Political patronage; or 8.3.5 Nepotism activities. v9612016 Page � oq�9f 279 8.4 Subrecipient will comply with the applicable provisions of 8.4.1 Davis -Bacon Act (Public Law 107 -217), as amended; 8.4.2 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 USC 327 et seq.); 8.4.3 Copeland Anti -Kick Back Act (18 USC 874 et seq.); 8.4.4 Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968 as amended; and 8.4.5 All rules and regulations applicable to the Acts set forth above. 8.5 Subrecipient will fully cooperate with County, HUD and any other federal agency in the review and determination of compliance with the above provisions. 9.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The status of Subrecipient will be that of an independent contractor. Neither Subrecipient nor Subrecipient's officers, agents, or employees will be considered an employee of Pima County or be entitled to receive any employment - related fringe benefits under the Pima County Merit System. Subrecipient will be responsible for payment of all federal, state and local taxes associated with the compensation received pursuant to this Agreement and will indemnify and hold County harmless from any and all liability which County may incur because of Subrecipient's failure to pay such taxes. Subrecipient will be solely responsible for its program development, operation, and performance. 10.0 SUBCONTRACTORS 10.1 Except as provided in paragraph 10.2, Subrecipient will not enter into any subcontracts for any services to be performed under this Agreement without County's prior written approval of the subcontract. Subrecipient must follow all applicable Federal, State, and County rules and regulations for obtaining subcontractor services. 10.2 Prior written approval is not required for the purchase of supplies that are necessary and incidental to Subrecipient's performance under this Agreement. 10.3 Subrecipient will be fully responsible for all acts and omissions of any subcontractor and of persons directly or indirectly employed by any subcontractor and of persons for whose acts, any of them, may be liable to the same extent that the Subrecipient is responsible for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by it. Nothing in this contract will create any obligation on the part of County to pay or see to the payment of any money due any subcontractor, except as may be required by law. 10.4 Subrecipient must include the provision set forth in paragraph 3.6 in all contracts between Subrecipient and its subcontractors providing goods or services pursuant to this Agreement. Subrecipient will be responsible for subcontractors' compliance with that provision and for any disallowances or withholding of reimbursements resulting from noncompliance of said subcontractors with the provision. 11.0 ASSIGNMENT Subrecipient will not assign its rights to this Agreement in whole or in part, without prior written approval of the County. Approval may be withheld at the sole discretion of the County, provided that such approval will not be unreasonably withheld. 12.0 NON - DISCRIMINATION 12.1 Subrecipient agrees to comply with all provisions and requirements of Arizona Executive Order 2009 -09 including flow down of all provisions and requirements to any subcontractors. V9 Page Page��off�9f279 12.2 During the performance of this contract, Subrecipient will not discriminate against any employee, client or any other individual in any way because of that person's age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin. 13.0 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Subrecipient will comply with all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101 - 12213) and all applicable federal regulations under the Act, including 28 CFR Parts 35 and 36. If Subrecipient is carrying out a government program or services on behalf of County, then Subrecipient will maintain accessibility to the program to the same extent and degree that would be required by the County under 28 CFR Sections 35.130, 3 5.13 3 , 35.149 through 35.151, 35.160, 35.161 and 35.163. Failure to do so could result in the termination of this Agreement. 14.0 AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT Subrecipient warrants its right and power to enter into this Agreement. If any court or administrative agency determines that County does not have authority to enter into this Agreement, County will not be liable to Subrecipient or any third party by reason of such determination or by reason of this Agreement. 15.0 FULL AND COMPLETE PERFORMANCE The failure of either party to insist on one or more instances upon the full and complete performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement to be performed on the part of the other, or to take any action permitted as a result thereof, will not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the right to insist upon full and complete performance of the same, or any other covenant or condition, either in the past or in the future. The acceptance by either party of sums less than may be due and owing it at any time will not be construed as an accord and satisfaction. 16.0 CANCELLATION FOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST 16.1 This Agreement is subject to cancellation for conflict of interest pursuant to ARS § 38 -51 1, the pertinent provisions of which are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 16.2 Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable conflict of interest provisions contained in Federal laws and regulations that govern the awarding agency including 24 CFR 84.42 and 570.611. 17.0 TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION 17.1 Termination for Convenience: County reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time and without cause by serving upon Subrecipient thirty (30) days advance written notice of such intent to terminate. In the event of such termination, the County's only obligation to Subrecipient will be payment for services rendered prior to the date of termination. 17.2 Insufficient Funds: Notwithstanding Paragraph 17.1 above, if any state or federal grant monies used to pay for performance under this Agreement are reduced or withdrawn, County will have the right to either reduce the services to be provided and the total dollar amount payable under this Agreement or terminate the Agreement. To the extent possible, County will endeavor to provide fifteen (15) days written notice of such reduction or termination. In the event of a reduction in the amount payable, County will not be liable to Subrecipient for more than the reduced amount. In the event of a termination under this paragraph, County's only obligation to Subrecipient will be payment for services rendered prior to the date of termination to the extent that grant funds are available. / 12x96/2016 Pag jq o 279 17.3 Termination for Cause This Agreement may be terminated at any time without advance notice and without further obligation by the County when the Subrecipient is found by County to be in default of any provision of this Agreement. 17.4 Non - Appropriation Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated if for any reason, there are not sufficient appropriated and available monies for the purpose of maintaining County or other public entity obligations under this Agreement. In the event of such termination, County will have no further obligation to Subrecipient, other than for services rendered prior to termination. 17.5 Suspension County reserves the right to suspend Subrecipient's performance and payments under this Agreement immediately upon notice delivered to Subrecipient's designated agent in order to investigate Subrecipient's activities and compliance with this Agreement. In the event of an investigation by County, Subrecipient will cooperate fully and provide all requested information and documentation. At the conclusion of the investigation, or within forty- (45) days, whichever is sooner, Subrecipient will be notifi in writing that the contract will be immediately terminated or that performance may be resumed. 18.0 NOTICE 18.1 Subrecipient must give written notice of any change of corporate or entity status as promptly as possible and, in any event, within fifteen (15) days after the change is effective. A change in corporate or entity status includes, but is not limited to, change from unincorporated to incorporated status and vice versa and any suspension or termination of corporate status based on failure to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local reporting requirements. 18.2 Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be in writing and must be served by delivery or by certified mail upon the other party as follows: Count Margaret Kish, Director Pima County Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation 2797 E. Aj o Way Tucson, AZ 85713 Subrecipient Ed Honea, Town Mayor Town of Marana 115 5 5 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ. 85653 19.0 OTHER DOCUMENTS 19.1 In entering into this Agreement, Subrecipient and County have relied upon information provided in Subrecipient's proposal submitted in response to Pima County Solicitation identified in the recitals of this Agreement ( "the Community Planning Application ") including the Instructions to Bidders, Standard Terms and Conditions, Specific Terms and Conditions, Solicitation Addenda, Subrecipient's Proposal, other information and documents submitted by the Subrecipient in its' response to said Solicitation. 19.2 The documents set forth in Paragraph 19.1 are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement as if set forth in full herein, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, including all exhibits. Subrecipient will promptly bring any provisions which Subrecipient believes are inconsistent to County's attention, and County will provide Subrecipient with its interpretation of the provisions in question. In the event of an irreconcilable inconsistency, the provisions of the awarding agency documents will govern over the conditions of this Agreement, unless otherwise required by law. V 9 Page Page�� o�f�19f 279 20.0 BOOKS AND RECORDS 20.1 Subrecipient will keep and maintain all records specified in 24 CFR 570.506 which are pertinent to the activities funded under this Agreement. All such records will be open for inspection and audit by duly authorized representatives of County during normal business hours. Records include, but are not limited to: 20. 1.1 A full description of each action or activity taken to comply with this Agreement; 20.1.2 Demonstration that the actions and activities meet one or more of the National Objectives of the CDB G program; 20.1.3 Eligibility documentation and determination; 20.1.4 Documentation of compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDB G program; 20.1.5 Disbursements of funds; 20.1.6 Financial records required under 24 CFR 570.502 and 24 CFR 84.21 — 28; and 20.1.7 Documentation of compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570. 20.2 Subrecipient must retain all records pertaining to this Agreement for four (4) years after County submits the annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the CDBG- funded activities under this Agreement are reported on for the final time or until completion of any action and resolution of all issues which arise from any related litigation, claim, negotiations, audit or other action involving the records that was started before the expiration of the 4 -year period, whichever is later. 21.0 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS 21.1 Subrecipient will: 21.1.1 Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Parts 200 and 2400). 21.1.2 Establish and maintain a separate, identifiable accounting of all funds provided by County under this Agreement. The accounting must record all expenditures which are used to support invoices and requests for payment from the County. 21.1.3 Establish and maintain accounting records which identify the source and application of any funds not provided under this Agreement used to support these Agreement activities. 21.1.4 Ensure that all accounting records meet the requirements of the Federal, State, County, and generally accepted accounting principles laws and regulations. 21.1.5 Upon written notice from County, provide a program - specific or financial audit. Such notice from County will specify the period to be covered by the audit, the type of audit and the deadline for completion and submission of the audit. 21.1.6 Assure that any audit conducted pursuant to this Agreement is performed by a qualified, independent accounting firm and submitted to County within six (6) months of completion of the audit required pursuant to this Section 21.0, unless a different time is specified by County. The audit submitted must include Subrecipient responses, if any, concerning any audit findings. 21.1.7 Pay all costs for any audit required or requested pursuant to this Section 21.0, unless the cost is allowable for payment with the grant funds provided pursuant to this Agreement under the appropriate federal or state grant law and the cost was specifically included in the Subrecipient grant budget approved by County. V 9 Page Page�� o�fJ9f279 21.2 Subrecipient status: 21.2.1 If Subrecipient is a "nonprofit corporation" that meets the definition of "corporation" in A.R.S. § 10 -3140, Subrecipient will comply with the applicable audit requirements set forth in A.R.S. § 11 -624, "Audit of Non - Profit Corporations Receiving County Monies." 21.2.2 If Subrecipient meets or exceeds the single audit threshold set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subrecipient will comply with federal single audit requirements and, upon request from County, provide County with a copy of the required audit document within ninety (90) days following the end of Subrecipient's fiscal year. 21.3 Subrecipient must timely submit the required or requested audit(s) to: Denise Sauer, Contract Specialist Pima County Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation 2797 E. Aj o Way, 3 rd Floor Tucson, AZ 85713 22.0 COPYRIGHT Neither, Subrecipient nor its officers, agents or employees will copyright any materials or products developed through contract services provided or contract expenditures made under this Agreement without prior written approval by the County. Upon approval, the County will have a non - exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use or authorize the use of any copyrighted material. 23.0 PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY 23.1 Subrecipient is not the agent of County for any purpose and will not purchase any materials, equipment or supplies on the credit of County. 23.2 Any materials, including reports, computer programs and other deliverables, created under this Agreement are the sole property of County. Subrecipient is not entitled to a patent or copyright on those materials and may not transfer the patent or copyright to anyone else. Subrecipient will not use or release these materials without the prior written consent of County. 24.0 DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY Termination of this Agreement will not relieve any party from liabilities or costs already incurred under this Agreement, nor affect any ownership of property pursuant to this Agreement. 25.0 COORDINATION On matters relating to the administration of this Agreement, County will be Subrecipient's contact with all Federal, State and local agencies that provide funding for this Agreement. 26.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION 26.1 Pursuant to Arizona Public Records law, A.R.S. § 39 -121 et seq., documents submitted by Subrecipient to County may be considered public records and may be subject to release to any member of the public. Records subject to release may include, but are not limited to: pricing, product or program specifications, work plans, and any supporting data. 26.2 In the event that County receives a public records request pursuant to A.R.S. § 39 -121 et seq. for documents Subrecipient submitted to County, County will notify Subrecipient on the same day the request is made or as soon as possible thereafter. 26.3 County will release Subrecipient's records ten (10) business days after the date of notice to the Subrecipient, unless Subrecipient has secured a protective order, injunctive relief or other appropriate /12x96/2016 Pager o ?Jy1 279 order from a court of competent jurisdiction, enj oining the release of the records. For the purposes of this paragraph, the day of the request for release will not be counted in the time calculation. 26.4 County will not, under any circumstances, be responsible for securing a protective order or other relief enjoining the release of records submitted to County by Subrecipient nor will County be in any way financially responsible for any costs associated with securing such an order. 27.0 ELIGIBILITY FOR PUBLIC BENEFITS Subrecipient will comply with applicable provisions of A.R.S. §§ 1 -501 and 1 -502 regarding public benefits, which are hereby incorporated as provisions of this Agreement. 28.0 LEGAL ARIZONA WORKERS ACT COMPLIANCE 28.1 Subrecipient hereby warrants that it will at all times during the term of this Agreement comply with all federal immigration laws applicable to Subrecipient's employment of its employees, and with the requirements of A.R.S. § 23-214 (A) (together the "State and Federal Immigration Laws "). Subrecipient will further ensure that each subcontractor who performs any work for Subrecipient under this contract likewise complies with the State and Federal Immigration Laws. 28.2 County will have the right at anytime to inspect the books and records of Subrecipient and any subcontractor in order to verify such party's compliance with the State and Federal Immigration Laws. 28.3 Any breach of Subrecipient's or any subcontractor's warranty of compliance with the State and Federal Immigration Laws, or of any other provision of this section, will be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement subjecting Subrecipient to penalties up to and including suspension or termination of this Agreement. If the breach is by a subcontractor, and the subcontract is suspended or terminated as a result, Subrecipient will be required to take such steps as may be necessary to either self - perform the services that would have been provided under the subcontract or retain a replacement subcontractor, (subject to County approval if Minority and Women Business E preferences apply) as soon as possible so as not to delay project completion. 28.4 Subrecipient will advise each subcontractor of County's rights, and the Subcontractor's obligations, under this Article (or Section?) by including a provision in each subcontract substantially in the following form: "Subcontractor hereby warrants that it will at all times during the term of this contract comply with all federal immigration laws applicable to Subcontractor's employees, and with the requirements ofA.R.S. § 23 -214 (A). Subcontractor further agrees that County may inspect the Subcontractor's books and records to ensure that Subcontractor is in compliance with these requirements. Any breach of this paragraph by Subcontractor will be deemed to be a material breach of this contract subjecting Subcontractor to penalties up to and including suspension or termination of this contract. " 28.5 Any additional costs attributable directly or indirectly to remedial action under this Section will be the responsibility of Subrecipient. In the event that remedial action under this Article (or Section?) results in delay to one or more tasks on the critical path of Subrecipient's approved construction or critical milestones schedule, such period of delay will be deemed excusable delay for which Subrecipient will be entitled to an extension of time, but not costs. V 9 Page Pag e�� o�fq9f 279 29.0 REMEDIES Either party may pursue any remedies provided by law for the breach of this Agreement. No right or remedy is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy and each will be cumulative and in addition to any other right or remedy existing at law or at equity or by virtue of this Agreement. 30.0 SEVERABILITY Each provision of this Agreement stands alone, and any provision of this Agreement found to be prohibited by law will be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition without invalidating the remainder of this Agreement. 31.0 NON - EXCLUSIVE AGREEMENT Subrecipient understands that this Agreement is nonexclusive and is for the sole convenience of County. County reserves the right to obtain like services from other sources for any reason. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2V 96/2016 Pag e�� o�fq9f 279 32.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT 32.1 This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof. 32.2 No verbal agreements or conversations with any officer, agent or employee of County prior to or after the execution of this Agreement will affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in any documents comprising this Agreement. Any such verbal agreement will be considered as unofficial information and in no way binding upon County and all prior or contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, are hereby superseded and merged herein. 32.3 This Agreement may be modified, amended, altered or extended only by a written amendment signed by the parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have affixed their signatures to this Agreement on the date written below. THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTERPARTS PIMA COUNTY SUBRECIPIENT Chair, Board of Supervisors Signature Date: ATTEST Clerk of the Board Date: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Director, Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation Printed name and title Date: The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement between Pima County and Town of Marana has been reviewed pursuant to A.R.S. §11 -952 by the undersigned Deputy County Attorney and the Town of Marana Attorney, who have determined that it is in proper form and is within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to those parties to the Agreement represented by Pima County and Town of Marana. PIMA COUNTY: Karen S. Friar, Deputy County Attorney Town of Marana: Town Attorney V9 Page Pag of 279 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 1. Program Title: Management and Implementation of the Town of Marana Community Development Block Grant Program ( "the CDBG Program ") . 2. Program Purpose: The Program will provide the following eligible CDBG activities for income - qualified persons and households in Marana, Arizona: 2.1. Program Administration; 2.2. Colonia Neighborhood Re- investment -- Public Facility Improvements; 2.3. Emergency Home Repair and Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation; and, 2.4. Colonia Neighborhood Cleanup, Public Service activities. 3. Program Activities: 3.1. Program Administration. Subrecipient will provide general CDBG program administration functions and activities for the management and implementation of the CDBG program to the extent allowed under 24 CFR 570.206. 3.2. Colonia Neighborhood Reinvestment. Subrecipient will provide CDBG public facility improvements in Colonia communities and neighborhoods as allowable per 24 CFR 570.201(c). Staff salaries and benefits for direct time and effort associated with Colonia Neighborhood Reinvestment activities may be reimbursed, as appropriate. Reinvestment activities undertaken in Colonia Neighborhoods may include, but are not limited to: 3.2.1. Assessing Colonia neighborhoods to determine public facility needs. 3.2.2. Engaging professional architectural and engineering services, as appropriate to address the public facility needs. 3.2.3. Coordinating with County to complete Environmental Review Record ( "ERR "). 3.2.4. Purchasing, by competitive bidding, and installing neighborhood facility improvements, including, but not limited to: 3.2.4.1. Benches 3.2.4.2. Basketball backboards /hoops 3.2.4.3. Water fountains 3.2.4.4. Lighting 3.2.4.5. Ground cover 3.2.4.6. Ramada installation 3.2.4.7. Playsets and playground equipment 3.2.4.8. Sidewalks 3.2.4.9. Fencing 3.2.4.10. Shade structures 3.2.4.11. Handicapped accessibility features 3.2.5. Staff salaries and benefits for direct time and effort associated with the installation of the items purchased pursuant to paragraph 3.2.4 above, as appropriate. v9 6 12016 Page 28 of 279 3.3 . Emergency Home Repair & Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation. Subrecipient will provide CDBG housing activities, as allowable per 24 CFR 570.202, as follows: 3.3.1. Rank eligible applicants based on severity of health and safety issues in the home. Give priority to applicants most in need with special consideration given to households with elderly and /or disabled persons and with children 6 years of age and younger. 3.3.2. Complete an ERR for each home scheduled to be modified and secure County's Environmental Officer Clearance prior to committing funds and carrying out work. 3.3.3. Prepare written scope of work detailing home repairs, adaptive construction, and safety hardware work to be completed in each home. 3.3.4. For projects on homes built prior to 1978, comply with HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule (24 CFR Part 35), including, but not limited to: 3.3.4.1. Providing household occupants with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "The Lead -Safe Certified Guide to Renovate Right," brochure available at: < www. cpsc. gov /s3 fs- public /renovateright.pd 3.3.4.2. Securing a signed disclosure from applicant seeking assistance confirming that they have received a copy of the brochure detailed in 3.3.4.1. 3.3.4.3. Obtaining a copy of the certificate from agency staff or contractors that demonstrates their familiarity with EPA's Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP Rule) (40 CFR Part 745, Subpart E) training on lead safe work practices. 3.3.4.4. Conducting a visual inspection of the property for chipping, peeling or cracking paint. 3.3.4.5. Informing Pima County if the repair work will disturb more than two square feet of painted surface per room and conduct the following lead remediation activities: 3.3.4.5.1. Testing for lead; 3.3.4.5.2. Mitigating lead, if applicable, through the use of interim controls and other lead safe work practices; 3.3.4.5.3. Securing signed form from the occupant acknowledging they understand the lead identification and work that will be completed to eliminate the risk. 3.3.5. Obtain all required permits. 3.3.6. Create a file for each applicant and retain for 4 years after completion of the repairs: 3.3.6.1. Copies of all agreements and authorizations obtained from applicant; 3.3.6.2. Records of disbursements made for work approved and completed; 3.3.6.3. Copies of onsite inspections by rehabilitation specialists, approvals of rehabilitation work, and the final inspection; 3.3.6.4. Completed ERR; 3.3.6.5. Signed lead disclosure forms, contractor(s) certifications, and occupant acknowledgements as applicable under 3.3.4. V9 Pa Page o of 279 3.3.7. Procure, by competitive quotes: 3.3.7.1. Eligible professional and outside services, as needed; and 3.3.7.2. Materials and supplies for emergency home repair, adaptive construction, and safety hardware including, but not limited to: 3.3.7.2.1. Plumbing; 3.3.7.2.2. Heating and cooling; 3.3.7.2.3. Electrical; 3.3.7.2.4. Flooring; 3.3.7.2.5. Exterior (roofing, windows, doors,); 3.3.7.2.6. Accessibility /Safety hardware; and 3.3.7.2.7. Lead renovation, repair and painting 3.3.8. Verify eligibility of applicants. Each household receiving assistance under this program must meet all of the following criteria: 3.3.8.1. Be owner - occupant of a site built or legally affixed manufactured home; 3.3.8.2. Have and provide a copy of recorded Property Deed to show evidence of property ownership, or provide a copy of the recorded Affidavit of Affixture, if the property is a manufactured home; 3.3.8.3. Have a household income at or below 80% Area Median Income (AMI); 3.3.8.4. Live in Town of Marana or surrounding incorporated communities in Pima County. 3.3.8.5. Have proof of flood insurance if the home is located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency Special Flood Hazard Area. 3.3.9. Accept and prioritize referrals from Community Development & Neighborhood Conservation Department. 3.4. Colonia Neighborhood Cleanup. Provide eligible, CDBG public service, neighborhood cleanups in Colonias as allowable per 24 CFR 570.201(e). Activities may be including, but not limited to: 3.4.1. Select and identify Colonia communities or neighborhoods where cleanup activities will take place. For each area selected: 3.4.1.1. Reach out to community representatives and groups to identify specific community cleanup needs; 3.4.1.2. Complete a thorough needs assessment for each suggested community cleanup activity; 3.4.1.3. Organize and hold or attend established community meetings to organize and plan a Colonia Cleanups as appropriate; 3.4.1.4. Conduct activities; and 3.4.1.5. Provide and install address numbers on houses, as needed, to assist with the physical addressing for homes. 3.4.2. Procure, by competitive bidding and quotes, required materials, supplies and services to conduct the community cleanup activities, including, but not limited to: v9 6 12016 Page 30 of 279 3.4.2. 1. Roll -off dumpsters; 3.4.2.2. Heavy equipment rental or operations costs, e.g. backhoes, front loaders, skid steers, and augers; 3.4.2.3. Trailers; 3.4.2.4. Safety equipment for workers and volunteers; 3.4.2.5. Hand and power tools; 3.4.2.6. T- shirts; and 3.4.2.7. Marketing flyers and posters promoting the project. 3.4.3. Purchase trees and vegetation from the Pima County Nursery, if available efforts. If County nursery is unavailable or does not have the appropriate plants; procure trees and vegetation, by competitive bidding and quotes, from local providers. 4. Project coal /predicted outcomes: 4.1. Goal To create viable communities that assist the needs of low- and moderate - income persons and households via CDBG activities that promote decent housing, suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities. 4.2. Predicted outcome Person and households participating in the Program will have new or improved access to public services, facilities, and home repair opportunities. 5. Public benefit — CDBG National Objective and Eligible Activity: Upon completion, the Town of Marana CDBG Program will meet the HUD CDBG National Objective to assist low- and moderate - income persons and households. 6. Metrics available to measure performance: At minimum, 6.1. One (1) neighborhood public facility in a Colonia community will be improved; 6.2. Five (5) low- to moderate - income households will receive emergency home repair or owner - occupied housing rehabilitation that address livability, safety, and accessibility needs; and 6.3. Fourteen (14) neighborhood cleanups will be conducted in Colonia communities. 7. Reports: 7.1. Provide quarterly reports to County for submission to HUD. The reports must include, but are not limited to, the following: 7.1.1. An accomplishment narrative describing program successes and challenges; 7.1.2. Number of persons benefiting from public facility improvement(s); 7.1.3. Number of emergency home repair and owner - occupied housing rehabilitation activities conducted including but not limit to the follow information as applicable: 7.1.3.1. Physical address of each housing unit assisted. 7.1.3.2. Household income calculated and identified by appropriate cohort per household as follows: 7.1.3.2.1. Extremely Low Income, at or below 30% Area Median Income ( "AMI ") 7.1.3.2.2. Low Income, at or below 50% AMI v96 12016 Pa�aae ?� of 279 7.1.3.2.3. Moderate Income, at or below 80% AMI 7.1.3.3. Racial and Ethnic information of applicant or head of household only. 7.1.3.4. Number of Female- headed households assisted. 7.1.3.5. Number ofclients62 years of age or older assisted. 7.1.3.6. Number of disabled clients assisted. 7.1.3.7. Lead paint requirements, as applicable, but not limited to: 7.1.3.7.1. Housing units constructed before 1978; 7.1.3.7.2. Exempt: housing units constructed 1978 or later; 7.1.3.7.3. Exempt: hard costs <$5,000.00; 7.1.3.7.4. Otherwise exempt; and 7.1.3.7.5. Lead hazard remediation actions, including: 7.1.3.7.5.1. Lead Hazard Work Practices (hard costs < $5,000) 7.1.3.7.5.2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices (hard costs $500 - $2500) 7.1.3.7.5.3. Abatement (hard costs > $25,000) 7.1.4. Number of persons benefiting from neighborhood cleanup activities. 7.2. All reporting provisions will survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Budget: Home Repair Program F u n Activities Funded B udget Administration 1400.00 Colonia Neighborhood Re- Investment Program 2500.00 Emergency Home Repair 2000.00 Owner - Occupied Housing 2500.00 Colonia- Neighborhood Cleanup 1000.00 Total $94,800.00 END OF EXHIBIT A v9 6 12016 Page 32 of 279 EXHIBIT B PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FY2016 -2017 CONTRACT # /PROGRAM CODEs: # GCDOOxxx Tow of Marana Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Town of Marana 11555 W. Civic Center Drive Marana, AZ 85653 FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT AND REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR THE MONTH OF REQUEST # Home Repair Activit y Budgeted Amount Expenditures This Month Cumulative Expenditures Balance Available Administration 1400.00 [:]YES [:]NO Colonia Neighborhood Re- Investment Program 2500.00 Emergency Home Repair 2000.00 Owner - Occupied Housing 2500.00 Colonia- Neighborhood Cleanup 1000.00 Total Budget $94,800.00 Funds requested this month for Home Repair Program For December Invoice has quarterly report been submitted? [:]YES F - INO For March Invoice has quarterly report been submitted? [:]YES FINO For June Invoice has quarterly report been submitted? [:]YES FINO For September Invoice has quarterly report and annual impact narrative been submitted? [:]YES [:]NO By signing this report: I certify that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the information reported represents actual receipts and actual expenditures which have been incurred in accordance with the agreement for management and implementation of the CDBG Program and are based on official accounting records and supporting documents which will be maintained by us for purposes of audit; and (2) the report is true, complete and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and obj ectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material face, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statement, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729 -3730 and 3801 - 3812). REQUIRED SUBRECIPIENT SIGNATURES: REVIEWED BY TITLE DATE PREPARED BY TITLE PHONE NUMBER DATE 20 v9 6 12016 Page 33 of 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council From: Curry C. Hale, Human Resources Director Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Progress & Innovation Strategic Plan Focus Area Additional Info: C2 PRINCIPLE STATEMENT 1 / We will explore bold ideas and best practices as a catalyst for forward- thinking and visionary community leadership. INITIATIVES: 1. Encourage, Reward and Facilitate Innovative Ideas. Subject: Resolution No. 2016-130 Relating to Personnel; approving one additional paid floating holiday for eligible Town of Marana employees, to be used during the time period of December 23, 2016 through January 3, 2017 (Curry C. Hale) Discussion: This item proposes to give all eligible Town employees one additional paid floating holiday to be taken between the dates of December 23, 2016 through January 3, 2017. This floating holiday would be subject to all established Town policies relating to paid holidays. Per Personnel Policy 4 -4 -1 eligible employees include all regular full- and part -time classified and unclassified employees, including those serving in an initial evaluation period and term - limited employees. Employees must request a specific day off for the floating holiday and receive approval from their supervisor prior to taking the day off. Supervisors will review requests based on a number of factors, including Town needs and staffing requirements, but must make every effort to ensure that every Town employee receives the benefit of the additional paid holiday. An employee's failure to take the paid holiday during the allotted time period will result in the employee's forfeiture of the paid holiday. This one -time floating holiday proposal is sought as a way to demonstrate appreciation for the Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 34 of 279 excellent work provided by the Town of Marana workforce. Financial Impact: Fiscal Year: 2017 Budgeted Y/N: Y Amount: $98,966 The cost above is not additional cost to the Town; it illustrates the value of loss in productivity. The additional floating holiday would be a normal working day, so no additional cost is incurred. Again, the only loss to the Town is productivity. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2016-130 approving a paid floating holiday from December 23, 2016 - January 3, 2017 for eligible Town of Marana employees as a one -time floating holiday. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2016-130, approving one additional paid holiday for eligible Town of Marana employees, to be taken as a floating holiday during the time period of December 23, 2016 through January 3, 2017. Attachments Resolution 2016 -130 Approving an Additional Floating Holiday Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 35 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-130 RELATING TO PERSONNEL; APPROVING ONE ADDITIONAL PAID FLOATING HOLIDAY FOR ELIGIBLE TOWN OF MARANA EMPLOYEES, TO BE USED DURING THE TIME PERIOD OF DECEMBER 23, 2016 THROUGH JANUARY 3, 2017 WHEREAS Section 3 -3 -1 of the Marana Town Code provides that the Town Council may adopt rules, regulations and directives to give effect to the Town's Personnel Policies and Procedures; and WHEREAS the Town Council adopted Personnel Policies and Procedures via Town of Marana Ordinance 99.12 and Resolution 99-38 on May 18, 1999, which policies have been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS Section 4- 4 -2(A) of the Personnel Policies and Procedures designates ten days as Town - approved holidays; and WHEREAS Section 4- 4 -2(B) of the Personnel Policies and Procedures provides that the Council may approve additional holidays in any given calendar year; and WHEREAS the Council finds that approving an additional paid holiday for eligible Town employees is in the best interests of the Town and its employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, as follows: SECTION 1. One additional paid floating holiday for eligible Town employees is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: A. Employees must use the floating holiday during the time period of December 23, 2016 through January 3, 2017. B. Employees must request a specific day off during the applicable time period for the floating holiday and receive approval from their supervisor prior to taking the day off. C. Supervisors shall review requests based on a number of factors, including Town needs and staffing requirements, but must make every effort to ensure that every Town employee receives the benefit of the additional paid holiday. D. An employee's failure to take the paid holiday during the allotted time period will result in the employee's forfeiture of the paid holiday. E. Except as otherwise provided herein, the holiday established by this resolution shall be subject to all established Personnel Policies and Procedures relating to Town - approved paid holidays. 00049817.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -130 - 1 - Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 36 of 279 SECTION 2. The Town's manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to under- take all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms, obligations, and ob- jectives of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6th day of December, 2016. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 00049817.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -130 -2- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 37 of 279 N O 0 / n.. - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting C3 Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council Submitted For: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk From: Hilary Hiser, Deputy Town Clerk Date: December 6, 2016 Subject: Approval of the November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Meeting Minutes with the Marana Town Council and Marana Planning Commission; approval of the November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes; and approval of the November 29, 2016 Special Council Meeting Minutes (Jocelyn C. Bronson) Attachments 11/15/2016 Joint Session Meeting Minutes 11 / 15/2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 11/29/2016 Special Council Meeting Minutes Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 38 of 279 �pW N 0 1 7 9 MARANA 7 �R ►ZON� MARANA TOWN COUNCIL AND MARANA PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION NOTICE AND AGENDA 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Conference Center, November 15, 2016, at or after 6:00 PM Ed Honea, Mayor Jon Post, Vice Mayor David Bowen, Council Member Patti Comerford, Council Membe. Herb Kai, Council Member Carol McGorray, Council Member Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member 14 7 Planning Commission 14 01 Tom Schnee, Chairman Don Duncan, Vice Chair Terry Fehrmann, Commissioner Marcia Jakab, Commissioner teve Miklosi, Commissioner ichard Miller, Commissioner John Officer, Commissioner JOINT STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. Mayor Honea called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. Town Clerk Bronson called roll for the Council and the Commission. All Council and Commissioners were in attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE /INVOCATION /MOMENT OF SILENCE. Led by Mayor Honea. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion to approve by Council Member McGorray, second by Council Member Ziegler. Passed unanimously. CALL TO THE PUBLIC. Mayor Honea asked that Call to the Public be dispensed with until the regular meeting following the study session. November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Minutes 1 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 39 of 279 DISCUSSION /DIRECTION /POSSIBLE ACTION DI Relating to Development; presentation, discussion and direction regarding the update to the Town of Marana Land Development Code (Ryan Mahoney). Ryan Mahoney welcomed everyone and thanked them for their participation in updating the Land Development Code. There have been several iterations of the Code dating back to incorporation in 1977. The Code was substantially changed in 1993, and since that time it has been modified to meet various needs. Because the town is changing rapidly, we want to consider the current market demands are as well as what we might anticipate in the future in terms of demographics, both in Marana and nationally as trends. We want as much feedback from our stakeholder groups as we can, but our ultimate objective is to find a balance in what we develop. The development team of Placemakers has been hired to help us meet our objectives and reach our goals. They come from a variety of disciplines: planning professionals, economic experience, traffic experience with design, media communications to reach the broadest audience, and engineering. Mr. Mahoney introduced Susan Henderson from the consulting team who noted that tonight's session is meant to be interactive, and we will have an opportunity to get some initial feedback, but we will have a number of other opportunities throughout the week. We have a schedule posted that you should have received which details where the consultants will be. She explained that throughout her presentation, there will be opportunities to vote at a very high level on various topics. Ms. Henderson showed the group the hand -held remote voting instruments. Some very important issues have already come about and need to be considered. Many of these issues can directly out of the General Plan and the Strategic Plan. She again noted that the voting results are not meant to be scientific, but are designed to give them a general idea of where thoughts are on the topics. The primary goal is to make sure all of the ordinances are in compliance with the town's policy documents. One of the underlying frameworks for the General Plan is Arizona's Growing Smarter legislation which gives some very clear criteria for environmental responsibility, transportation - related issues and community development in general. The five big items covered under the organization or framework of the General Plan are: natural systems, land management, the built environment, resource management, and people and community. Land management is the primary concern of the land development ordinance. But there are ways that the land development ordinance can cover a lot of other issues because it has impact on all of those topics. Ms. Henderson led the Council, Commission and audience through a series of questions using the voting devices. A big topic is the historic zoning districts, referred to as alphabet districts. This tends to suppress development. If there is too much flexibility, the potential developer for the adjacent parcel is not going to invest in it because there's too much unpredictability about what is going to happen, and development follows predictability. As a landowner you may want the flexibility, but if you don't know what your neighbor is going to do, that can have some really negative impacts. The question is where on the scale between flexible and predictable should those zones fall? The next big topic is the downtown area. The town is already getting some applications that aren't in line with the vision in the General Plan. Due to lack of specificity in the current zoning, these applicants were able to get what they want. One of the voting suggestions is whether there is support for compact mixed use development. November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Minutes 2 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 40 of 279 Other issues were discussed and voted on such as integrating storm water with transportation, ensuring that new development pays for infrastructure extension, integrating walking and biking paths with development transportation alternatives, making land use appropriate for active transportation, how we develop street standards, and revising pavement width. A question to ask is whether there is support for a palette of street standards. All of the standards currently are geared toward the arterial, collector and local development, which doesn't necessarily work well for mixed use development. Wider pavement widths are necessary for major linkages, but you don't need those same lane widths when you are in a single family residential neighborhood. Another topic is variances in lot size in residential areas. The local development community has indicated that as market pressures change, what they can sell changes a little. One strategy used is to make a wider range of lot types so that developers do a specific plan for every subdivision. The question will come back as to what zoning districts can be consolidated for a minimal amount of development. Another big is issue is how to deal with parking. Current best practice nationally is for municipalities to get out of the business of regulating parking. Bankers are ready to finance projects that have parking per use, so that is already regulated when they are getting their loans, and the market regulates it. A developer won't build a project with fewer parking spaces than it takes to make the project profitable. So the question arises of whether you want to drop some of the regulations that are already being regulated elsewhere. Ms. Henderson concluded by noting that her group will be in Marana all week. Anyone can go to the website www.maranaldc.com to offer ideas and comments on the revisions. Market issues, homeowner association issues, environmental topics and farming community issues are among those areas being addressed by the consultants. They are looking for as much information as they can gather to add to their data base. In answer to a question about how much buffer is required, Mr. Mahoney responded that typically there is a setback between a transition of uses, and the town did one along the Twin Peaks corridor that required additional plantings of certain densities, but we don't have a lot of discussion on what that transition looks like between smaller and larger lots. During the rezoning process is when we talk a lot about that and come up with what is appropriate for the given property. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-431.03, the Town Council or Planning Commission may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, to discuss certain matters. E1 Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38- 431.03 (A)(3), Council or Commission may ask for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter listed on this agenda. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Notwithstanding the mayor's discretion regarding the items to be placed on the agenda, if three or more Council members request that an item be placed on the agenda, it must be placed on the agenda for the second regular Town Council meeting after the date of the request, pursuant to Marana Town Code Section 2- 4 -2(B). November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Minutes 3 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 41 of 279 ADJOURNMENT. Motion to adjourn at 6:55 p.m. by Council Member McGorray, second by Council Member Ziegler. Passed unanimously. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Town Council and Marana Planning Commission Joint Study Session meeting held on November 15, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present. Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk November 15, 2016 Joint Study Session Minutes 4 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 42 of 279 1 7 � MARANA � MARANA TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Council Chambers, November 15, 2016, at or after 7:00 PM Ed Honea, Mayor Jon Post, Vice Mayor David Bowen, Council Member Patti Comerford, Council Member Herb Kai, Council Member Carol McGorray, Council Member Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member V6. II qVI REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. Mayor Honea called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Town Clerk Bronson called roll. All Council Members were present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE /INVOCATION /MOMENT OF SILENCE. Led by Mayor Honea. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion to approve the agenda as amended by removing items A2 and L2 and moving Item PI before Call to the Public by Vice Mayor Post, second by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously. CALL TO THE PUBLIC. Relating to their concerns regarding the Tapestry development, the speakers were Randy Shepherd, Michael Jones, Jack Peil, Phyliss Salmond, Robert Irwin, Bill Brannon, Michael Morgan, William Janski, Greg Norwick, and Ed Reap. PROCLAMATIONS 1 Proclaiming Davis - Monthan Air Force Base is "America's Asset and a Regional Treasure" located in Tucson, Arizona (Jocelyn C. Bronson). The proclamation was not read but was made a part of the permanent record. November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 1 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 43 of 279 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Mayor Honea noted that last Friday he and Council Member Comerford attended the YMCA Military Ball at the Tucson Convention Center. MANAGER'S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Gilbert Davidson reported that the monthly executive report of the departmental activities is available on the town's website. He also noted that one of the town's signature events, the Holiday Tree Lighting, will be at the turnaround north of the municipal complex from 3 -8 p.m. on Saturday, December 3, 2016. There will be food trucks, entertainment and activities for youth as well as the official tree lighting. PRESENTATIONS Pi Relating to Boards, Commissions and Committees; discussion, consideration and possible direction regarding recommendations from the Fall 2016 Marana Citizens' Forum on the topic "Complex Multi -Event Plan" (Jocelyn C. Bronson). Ms. Bronson introduced the delegates from the Citizens' Forum, and Heath Vescovi- Chiordi introduced the topic and the presenter, Don Winfield. Mr. Winfield began with the delegates deciding to focus on the recently adopted Parks & Recreation Master Plan and requested data to help them compile an extensive list of issues, goals and objectives. They began with current assets, where the infrastructure exists, demographics, gaps in the current program, programs and services to be offered, accessibility, placement and connectivity, technology implementation, a tourism focus, current CIP projects and promotion and marketing efforts. Delegates then pared that information down to the four most immediately actionable items: asset augmentation, connectivity and technology implementation, parking and accessibility and recreation programs. The first recommendation included facility additions and improvements such as a performance venue at the Heritage Park, partnerships with the school district, the University of Arizona, Pima Community College and Arizona Theater Company, protection of existing revenue streams and explore new ones as well as improve bathrooms at park facilities. The second recommendation was to connect parks through technological and physical means. Parking and accessibility was the third recommendation, and the fourth recommendation was to elevate and enhance Parks & Recreation programming. Mr. Winfield concluded with next steps such as survey the public on ideas they may consider vital to this effort. He thanked staff and the Council for allowing the delegates to have this opportunity to participate in their community. CONSENT AGENDA. Motion by Council Member Ziegler, second by Vice Mayor Post to approve the Consent Agenda. Passed unanimously. Cl Ordinance No. 2016.022 Relating to Personnel; ratifying the approval and adoption of Policy 3 -11 ( "Severance Benefits ") of the Town's Personnel Policies and Procedures as previously adopted by Marana Resolution No. 2016 -105 (Jane Fairall) C2 Resolution No. 2016 -122: Relating to Special Events; adding the Marana Founders' Day event to the Town of Marana Signature Event Series (Vickie Hathaway) November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 2 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 44 of 279 C3 Resolution No. 2016 -123: Relating to Public Works; approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement between the State of Arizona and the Town of Marana relating to traffic signal communication and management (Scott Leska) C4 Resolution No. 2016 -124: Relating to the Police Department; approving and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Subgrantee Agreement with the Arizona Department of Homeland Security for purposes of receiving funds under the 2016 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program (Lisa Shafer) CS Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes from November 1, 2016 (Jocelyn C. Bronson) LIQUOR LICENSES L 1 Relating to Liquor Licenses; recommendation to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control regarding a Location Transfer Series #7 Beer and Wine Bar liquor license application submitted by John Edward Baxla on behalf of Peter Piper Pizza #58, located at 3 741 W. Ina Road #125, Tucson, Arizona 85741. (Jocelyn C. Bronson). Ms. Bronson noted that this application was properly posted and reviewed, and staff recommends approval. Motion to approve by Vice Mayor Post, second by Council Member Kai. Passed unanimously. L2 Relating to Liquor Licenses; recommendation to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control regarding a special event liquor license application submitted by Stephanie Beate Hunter on behalf of Humane Society of Southern Arizona for Bikes, Barks & Brews to be held on December 10, 2016 (Jocelyn C. Bronson). Withdrawn by the applicant. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES COUNCIL ACTION Al Resolution No. 2016 -125: Relating to Administration; approving the transfer of $370,000 in budgeted expenditure authority from the General Fund contingency line item to the restricted budget line items within the Police Department for unanticipated costs in the fiscal year 2015 -2016 budget (Erik Montague). Mr. Montague provided a financial update on the preliminary result of the FY 2016 general fund as part of the basis for the budget adjustment under consideration. The focus will be on the general fund. The audit will be finalized and the opinion rendered in December. He discussed some of the anomalies or variances which mostly have to do with some of the budgeted numbers based on past reports from the Arizona Department of Revenue. When the tax journals were changed in 2015, we only had a limited amount of data to budget for. Overall for all general fund revenues, sales taxes are a little over six percent of what had been budgeted. State shared revenues are in line with what we had budgeted for the year. There was a variance in the HURF for additional gas tax collected. From licenses, permits and fees, we collected more than we anticipated, so year over year the numbers are reasonably consistent. In summarizing the general fund, we had anticipated dipping into reserves up to $10M, and within that number is contingency and contributions to one time projects and programs such as the downtown sewer conveyance system. Next, Mr. Montague November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 3 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 45 of 279 discussed reserves and fund balances. We still exceed the targeted and required 25 percent in reserves. Lastly, he discussed moving $370K from contingency to the police department primarily for two reasons. One has to do with a year -end accrual or 13 month closing. This adjustment is a normal adjustment and not unusual but is outside the control of the department. The second is the rate for the workers' compensation insurance. The increase wasn't due to any significant event or issues, just the overall insurance rate. There were a couple of significant events in earlier years which drove the risk factor up to recoup some of those claims. The Human Resources department, along with other departments, has been working over the past year to identify opportunities such as additional safety training to get those claims down, and we are seeing a positive trend as the number of claims has decreased, but it will take an additional year to transition out. The numbers he just showed Council incorporate those adjustments and do not increase expenditures. Motion to approve by Vice Mayor Post, second by Council Member Bowen. Passed unanimously. A2 Resolution No. 2016 -126 Relating to Elections; declaring and adopting the results of the Town of Marana general election held on November 8, 2016 (Jocelyn C. Bronson). This item was pulled from the agenda as noted in APPROVAL OF AGENDA, as the Official Canvass was not completed. The item will be scheduled for Council approval upon receipt of the official election results. A3 Relating to Mayor and Council; selection of the Vice Mayor (Jocelyn C. Bronson). Ms. Bronson read from the Town Code, Title 2 -3 -1 regarding the procedure to choose a vice mayor from their number by majority vote. Motion by Council Member McGorray, and second by Council Member Ziegler to select Jon Post as Vice Mayor. Ms. Bronson was asked to poll the Council. Mr. Post was unanimously selected as Vice Mayor for another two-year term. A4 Resolution No. 2016 -127 Relating to Heritage; approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute a First Amendment to Community Partner and License Agreement between the Town of Marana and the Marana Heritage Conservancy (Vickie Hathaway). Gilbert Davidson presented this item and noted that members of the Conservancy were present including the president, Patrick Nilz. The sole purpose of this group is to represent and showcase the history of this community. Over the years, they have participated in some way in almost every community event. The agreement outlines the basis of the partnership and what the town does to support the community through the Conservancy. The overall change deals with special events. The conservancy had previously been tasked with putting on the annual Founders' Day event, which will now be coming back into the town under the umbrella of the town's signatures events. However, the Conservancy will still play a critical role in putting that event together. Patrick Nilz addressed Council and thanked them for allowing the Conservancy to continue to participate in an event that after five years essentially outgrew their capacity to promote it as a signature event. He thanked Mr. Davidson and Vickie Hathaway's team who helped support the Conservancy's efforts regarding Founders' Day and for letting them make their home at the Heritage River Park so that they can bring in groups to talk about and witness Marana's heritage. He also gifted each Council Member with one of their eight featured videos they developed — A Moment in Time Columbine. He recited a number of things the Conservancy has done to help preserve Marana's rich culture and history and concluded by thanking Council for their November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 4 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 46 of 279 continued support. Motion to approve by Vice Mayor Post, second by Council Member Kai. Passed unanimously. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION /POSSIBLE ACTION DI Presentation: Relating to Transaction Privilege Tax; update and discussion regarding potential modifications to the state construction sales tax and the activities of the Construction Sales Tax Task Force (Erik Montague). Erik Montague gave a brief update on the Construction Sales Tax Task Force. Over the last few legislative sessions, a number of bills have been submitted to simplify, modify or eliminate contracting or construction sales tax or replace it with something else. The League has been successful in helping to hold some of that off until a task force or work group could be established to identify possible solutions. A series of simplification legislation has had the opposite effect, and as a result additional cleanup legislation was required in 2013, 2014 and 2015. He illustrated continued concerns from the business community. Beginning January 1, everyone will be reporting to the Arizona Department of Revenue for all taxes. The complexity of current rules and the fact that the current 35% labor deduction is inadequate keeps the task force going forward. The proposed solution is to eliminate contracting sales tax and replace it with retail sales excise tax at point of purchase (POP). This is not new legislation as Governor Symington vetoed a similar bill back in 1995. Mr. Montague then enumerated the challenges which will exist by eliminating construction sales tax and going to point of purchase. Out of the 91 Arizona cities and town, only a handful have the major retailers or distribution centers for these, and out of those most of them are not getting all of the construction supplies. A lot of them are coming out of state so that in addition to POP, we have out of state transactions in play. The impact of that for Marana, which doesn't have large distribution centers, is that we wouldn't receive the benefit of a lot of those revenues and it would hurt us significantly. For Marana, construction sales tax is the major source for transportation funding or CIP that is not funded by other sources through grants or the Regional Transportation Authority. Seventy -five percent of construction tax is dedicated to transportation. The Principles of a Construction Tax System should be tax to the job site to ensure revenues are remitted to the jurisdiction in which the activity occurs; that the tax is revenue neutral, maintains the overall integrity of the tax system; provides taxpayer fairness for all similarly situated taxpayers; eases compliance and puts in place a system which prevents tax avoidance by relocating or restructuring the businesses. He then summarized the task force meetings which began in June 2016 and gave an overview of proposals under review as well as some illustrations of what the town could expect given various scenarios. Right now from a task force perspective, they are reviewing all of these scenarios which will be included in an overall task force report prepared by the League. The task force is very focused on the modified prime contracting #2 which provides a significant level of consistency and continuity between what we have now and what is being proposed. D2 Relating to Administration; presentation, discussion and consideration of the survey results regarding proposed designs for the Town of Marana's new logo /seal (Vickie Hathaway). Ms. Hathaway referred Council to a meeting approximately a month ago where she unveiled some possible new town logo designs which are being contemplated in preparation for the town's 40 anniversary next year. The goal was to look for ways to modernize the town brand as well as centralized the town's two current marks into one strong mark. She gave a brief November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 5 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 47 of 279 overview of the previous presentation. The primary outreach effort to the community was through multiple list serves for people currently tapped into the town and wanted to get information from the town. We used social media, the various news media outlets, and homeowner associations. Today is the presentation to Council of the survey results and to get your thoughts on moving forward. Depending on the Council's decision between now and the end of the year, staff will begin updating the graphic standards manual to be more representative of the new look and to work with the departments to prepare for a new logo update. That means talking with every department, understanding where the logos are used currently and understanding what assets need to be considered and what is their typical recycle period. January 1, 2017 is the projected date for this to go live. Our plan is to put out 40 anniversary celebration banners during January. The new logo will be celebrated in all of our public events including Founders' Day. The formal roll out of the logo will be during the State of the Town luncheon in April. Before she presented the top three favorite logos to Council, she noted there were over 1,000 responses to the survey which is quite high for a survey. The first selection was a modernization of the current logo enclosed in a circle. The second selection was a high tech rendition of the current logo with a more organic free flowing design. The third selection was similar to the first design but not enclosed. Mr. Davidson noted that the Council could take action tonight if there is a particular mark they would like to move forward with. Staff can also bring this back at a future meeting. Motion to approve the first selection (far left) by Vice Mayor Post, second by Council Member Comerford. Mayor Honea asked for a poll of the Council. Motion failed 4 -3 with Council Members Ziegler, Kai, Bowen and Mayor Honea voting nay. Council Member Kai made a motion to approve the third selection (far right), second by Council Member Ziegler. Mayor Honea again asked for a poll of the Council. Motion passed 6 -1, with Council Member Bowen voting nay. D3 Relating to Legislation and Government Actions; discussion and possible action regarding all pending state, federal, and local legislation/government actions and on recent and upcoming meetings of the other governmental bodies (Gilbert Davidson) EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-431.03, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, to discuss certain matters. E1 Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. §38- 431.03 (A)(3), Council may ask for discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter listed on this agenda. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Vice Mayor Post asked for consideration on a former House Bill that removed sales tax from animal feeds, namely horses and cows. The measure did pass, but he would like to make sure that the Town of Marana fee schedule follows along with that. If it doesn't, he would like the item on the agenda to make sure it follows with that particular House Bill. Mayor Honea noted that three Council Members concurred to put the item on a future agenda. November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 6 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 48 of 279 Notwithstanding the mayor's discretion regarding the items to be placed on the agenda, if three or more Council members request that an item be placed on the agenda, it must be placed on the agenda for the second regular Town Council meeting after the date of the request, pursuant to Marana Town Code Section 2- 4 -2(B). ADJOURNMENT. Motion to adjourn at 8:36 p.m. by Council Member McGorray, second by Vice Mayor Post. Passed unanimously. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Town Council meeting held on November 15, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present. Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk November 15, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 7 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 49 of 279 MARANA TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Council Chambers, November 29, 2016 at or after 6:00 P.M. Ed Honea, Mayor " '1 Jon Post, Vice Mayor David Bowen, Council Member Patti Comerford, Council Member Herb Kai, Council Member Carol McGorray, Council Member Roxanne Ziegler, Council Member SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. Mayor Honea called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. Town Clerk Bronson called roll. Vice Mayor Post and Council Member Ziegler were excused; there was a quorum present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA /INVOCA / OF SILENCE. Led by Mayor Honea 1 *t4L ' L . �� ...., 1111 � I a . APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion by Council Member McGorray, second by Council Member Bowen to approve the agenda excluding the Council Reports and the Manager's Report Passed S -0. Aik A& p CALL TO THE PUBLIC. No speaker cards were presented. aw 'A* PROCLAMATIONS. None JIB' MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Dispensed. MANAGER'S REPORT: SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS. Dispensed. PRESENTATIONS. None CONSENT AGENDA. None LIQUOR LICENSES. None Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes November 29, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 1 Page 50 of 279 BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES COUNCIL ACTION Cl Resolution No. 2016 -128 Relating to Elections; declaring and adopting the results of the Town of Marana general election held on November 8, 2016 (Jocelyn C. Bronson). Ms. Bronson explained that the Official Canvass was not available at the time the Council packets were distributed. She does have the Canvass available for Council to review, and a copy of the resolution showing the results was placed on the dais for each Council Member. She noted that the Canvass looks a little different this time because the data encompasses all county ballots. However, the data for Proposition 440 shows 12,759 votes in favor and 6,416 votes against. Staff is recommending approval. Motion to approve by Council Member Bowen, second by Council Member Kai. Passed 5-0. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION /POSSIBLE ACTION DI Relating to Administration; presentation, discussion, reconsideration and possible selection of the new Town of Marana logo (Vickie Hathaway). Mr. Davidson noted that he had brought this item to the last Council meeting which was placed at the end of a long agenda that had a number of complex issues, and he wanted to bring it back with consideration by the Council. Ms. Hathaway then highlighted the choices again for Council. Ms. Hathaway again noted that the three marks out of the original five being presented to Council were the top results of the region -wide survey. Mayor Honea stated that he had asked for reconsideration of the item because as Mr. Davidson indicated, the item didn't receive the proper consideration due to the length of the agenda and the long list of items to be discussed. Mayor Honea indicated his choice was the modern logo and heard that others liked it as well, which is why he wanted to bring the item back for reconsideration, as it was not the top choice at the previous meeting. He then asked for comments from Council. Council Member Kai spoke and said he does like the modern logo; however, the one on the right does show crops and water use for Marana. That attracted him initially, but he could live with either one. Ms. Hathaway said that the middle mark does have fields and water, just with a more abstract interpretation. Council Member McGorray said that was what she didn't like — the abstract look and without the words "Marana, Arizona." She doesn't believe the modern mark is as distinctive of our location as the mark on the right which exemplifies Marana. Council Member Bowen indicated he was in favor of the modern mark during the previous vote because he thinks the town needs to be thinking of its future in the branding as well as not ignoring elements of its past. He believes the modern, contemporary look of the middle mark will carry us well into the next 20 years and the next generation. Motion to approve the modern mark, the center logo, by Council Member Bowen, second by Mayor Honea. Town Clerk Bronson polled the Council. The motion passed 4 -1 with Council Member McGorray voting nay. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT. Motion to adjourn at 6:11 p.m. by Council Member Bowen, second by council Member Kai. Passed 5-0. 2 Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes November 29, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 51 of 279 CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the public session of the Special Council Meeting held on November 29, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present. Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk lip Marana Council Special Meeting Minutes November 29, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 3 Page 52 of 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k 4 0 Council - Regular Meeting Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council Submitted For: John Kmiec, Utilities Director From: Amanda Jones, Management Assistant Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Community B1 Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -131: Relating to the Utilities Board; appointing a chair and selecting Council- appointed members to the Town of Marana Utilities Board (John Kmiec) Discussion: Marana Town Code 16 -1 -1 establishes the Town of Marana Utilities Board. The Board consists of the Town Water Director, two Town employees appointed by the Town Manager, the Town Finance Director, and three Council - appointed members. The Council - appointed members hold four year terms. The Town advertised and solicited for applications from October 10 - November 10, 2016. The attached applications were reviewed by Town staff, and are attached for Council review. The terms for these three appointments expire December 31, 2020. The draft resolution presented with the agenda materials includes the names of the three individuals who have applied to serve on the Utilities Board, and includes the Water Director as chair of the Board. Town Manager- appointed Utilities Board members are Erik Montague, Ryan B enavides, and Jamsheed Mehta. At tonight's meeting, the Town Council may do one or more of the following: 1. Interview one or more applicants either in public or in an executive sessions scheduled for that purpose. 2. Make one or more appointments. 3. Order the solicitation of additional applications. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 53 of 279 4. Take any other action it deems appropriate. Staff Recommendation: Council's pleasure Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2016 -131, appointing Water Director John Kmiec as chair and appointing Julie Mette, Jeff Biggs, and Doug Emans to the Utilities Board with terms expiring December 31, 2020. Attachments Resolution 2016 -131 Appointing Utilities Board Appointments Application Jeff Biggs Biggs Application Supplement Application Doug Emans Emans Application Supplement Application Julie Mette Mette Application Supplement Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 54 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-131 RELATING TO THE UTILITIES BOARD; APPOINTING A CHAIR AND SELECTING COUNCIL- APPOINTED MEMBERS TO THE TOWN OF MARANA UTILITIES BOARD and WHEREAS Marana Town Code Title 16 establishes the Town of Marana Utilities Board; WHEREAS Marana Town Code section 16 -1 -2 provides for Town Council appointment to the Utilities Board of three members who are either town residents or utility customers of the Town; and WHEREAS Marana Town Code section 16 -1 -2 provides for the Town Council to choose the chair of the Utilities Board from among its membership. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, as follows: SECTION 1. Jeff Biggs, Doug Emans, and Julie Mette are hereby appointed to the Utilities Board, each to serve for a term of four years or until a replacement is appointed by the Marana Town Council. SECTION 2. Marana Water Director John Kmiec is hereby appointed as the Chair of the Town of Marana Utilities Board, to serve unless and until a replacement is appointed by the Marana Town Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6 th day of December, 2016. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk 00049683.DOCX /2 Resolution No. 2016 -131 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 11/17/2016 9:21 AM Page 55 of 279 Board and Commission Application ... ....... . ... .. ... . .. . ............. . ..... .. .... u mitt . : Oct � z 2616. � 1 g:04AM �. Ott . ... . ... .. . . . ... . ... ... .... .... ... ... ....... Board or Utilities Board Commission: Pleese upload .... . . ... your: resume .. here.: First Name: Jeff Last Name: Biggs Email: FOR res How many years have you 15 lived at this address ?: Hvw many `years h y ou ...... lived in . Marana? Phone Number (Daytime): Phone Number ... .... ... .......... . . . . . . .......... ......... cell or home �... . . .. .... .. .. .... ............... Occupation: Administrator ................. rr�plcsyer. City: of Tucson I�VaeC;7epartmen What is your vision for the Smart growth with environmental sensitivity. Town ?: Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 56 of 279 .. .... .... ... . . ...... . ......... . .. .. . Qerson with ... .... . ..... NrA Interest: Type of NIA interesMarana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 57 of 279 compensated lobbyist with whom you, or a relative, or a member of your household shares any N/A direct economic interest such as a partnership, joint venture or similar business relationship -0: Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 58 of 279 Full Date: J28 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 59 of 279 Home phone Cell phon E -mai Jeff B. Biggs Summary of ■ Nearly 36 years of experience in the water profession qualifications ■ Managed staffs from 4 to 550 associates ■ Licensed in Arizona as a Grade 4 Water Treatment Operator and a Grade 3 Water Distribution System Operator. ■ Member of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) since 1980 ■ Member of AZ Water since 2001 ■ AZ Water Utility Council Committee Chair since 2013 ■ Member of Water Environment Federation (WEF) since 2015 ■ WateReuse Arizona Southern Arizona Trustee since 2014 ■ WateReuse Arizona Symposium Planning Committee — 2015 & 2016 ■ Member of Tucson Active Management Area Groundwater Users Advisory Committee from 2010 - 2016 ■ AZWARN Board Member since 2015 ■ Board of Directors for the Multi-States Salinity Coalition since 2010 ■ Member of the Marana Water Utility Board since 2013 ■ WateReuse Association National Legislative & Regulatory Committee since 2015 Achievements ■ AWWA Missouri Section Meritorious Operator Award - 1993 • Water For People Kenneth J. Miller Award - 2010 • AWWA Life Member Award — 2011 • Select Society of Sanitary Sludge Shovelers (5S) — 2014 • Arizona Chapter APWA, Southern Arizona Branch, Outstanding Public Works Employee — 2016 • Arizona Chapter APWA 2016 Outstanding Public Works Employee Project Management ■ Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) Water Treatment Facility. This innovative 8.4 million gallon per day (MGD) UV- hydrogen peroxide facility removes 1,4- dioxane and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) to non - detect levels and has restored the TARP facilities to full production capacity without the need for additional blending water supplies. This facility has won the following awards: 1. 2016 Environmental Excellence Award in Energy and Technology Innovation /Arizona Forward 2. 2015 National Grand Prize (Design) / American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists (AAEES) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 60 of 279 3. 2015 National Recognition Award / American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) 4. 2015 Judge's Choice Award (top award) / American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) of Arizona 5. 2014 Water Treatment Project of the Year / AZ Water Association • Decision H2O. High - profile and multi- faceted technical and public outreach program that assessed customer's preferences for utilization of renewable Colorado River water supplies and set the course for continued monitoring of factors affecting the decision to defer treatment of this supply for mineral content reduction, construct facilities for recharge and recovery of the City's full CAP water allocation, and embark on plans for beneficial use of all recycled water available to the City. • Recycled Water Master Plan. A comprehensive master plan for total reuse of Tucson's effluent entitlement from Pima County metropolitan area wastewater treatment facilities. This includes expansion /upgrade of Tucson Water's non - potable reclaimed water distribution system and development and implementation of a phased program for potable reuse as a locally - controlled renewable water supply. • Recycled Water Program. Advancement of early technical and public outreach program implementation efforts that will lead to full -scale facilities for potable reuse. • Strategic Plan. Development and implementation based on department business val ues /standards and staff behavior values. • Maintenance Management Program (MMP) Pilot. Managed the MMP Pilot for 15 months. During the 15 months, I introduced and initiated the Synergen Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and other innovative programs and procedures, which the department has implemented in the Maintenance division. Work experience August 2015 — Present Tucson, AZ Water Department Strategic Initiatives Administrator Managed a staff of 16 employees performing various activities within the Strategic Initiatives division of Tucson, AZ Water Department. The Intergovernmental Affairs (IGA) section handles intergovernmental coordination and provides professional level support to special projects within the utility. Main responsibilities include IGA creation and compliance tracking, representation of utility to outside groups and organizations, Mayor & Council agenda coordination, and Citizen's Water Advisory Committee administrative staffing. Public Information & Conservation (PICO) section is comprised of two units. The Public Information Unit coordinates community outreach efforts, utility information and education programs, and maintains media relations. The Conservation Unit plans, develops, and implements all water conservation programs. The Technical Innovations unit coordinates all department research activities with outside agencies. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 61 of 279 These outside agencies include, but are not limited to the University of Arizona, the Water Research Foundation, and the WateReuse Research Foundation. The majority of research involves In -Kind services from Tucson Water, with a few involving some monetary funding. February 2014 — August 2015 Tucson, AZ Water Department Interim Deputy Director Managed a staff of 400 employees performing various activities. In addition to Strategic Initiatives, I oversaw the following areas: Customer Service: Responsible for water service- related activities including meter reading, service connection and disconnection, and issuing monthly water, sewer, and refuse bills. The Solution Center and Front Counter Clerks serve as the primary customer contact for most Tucson Water customers. In addition, the office conducts high bill investigations, investigates water waste complaints, and provides other customer assistance services. Specialized staff responds to water waste complaint issues and provide water audit services to customers with high bills and high water -use landscaping. Maintenance: Responsible for maintaining the department's potable and reclaimed water facilities including wells, boosters, and reservoirs. Staff maintains the pipelines and components of the distribution systems, installs new services, and fire hydrants, and constructs minor system modifications. Staff also maintains utility construction equipment, provides radio communications, and is responsible for the "Blue Stake" program, which locates water system lines. The division manages the utility - owned Avra Valley Central Arizona Project (CAP) water recharge basins and recovery wells. In addition, staff oversees a comprehensive computerized preventive maintenance management system to ensure overall water system integrity. Water Quality & Operations: Responsible for operating treatment facilities as well as the state - certified laboratory and water quality permit compliance section. Staff operates a reclaimed water treatment facility, a treatment facility to treat recovered Colorado River water, and two groundwater remediation facilities for treating and disinfecting potable water supplies. Staff ensures all potable water delivered to customers meets all applicable drinking water standards. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 62 of 279 March 2013 — February 2014 Tucson, AZ Water Department Strategic Initiatives Administrator Managed a staff of 16 employees performing various activities within the Strategic Initiatives division of Tucson, AZ Water Department. The Intergovernmental Affairs (IGA) section handles intergovernmental coordination and provides professional level support to special projects within the utility. Main responsibilities include IGA creation and compliance tracking, representation of utility to outside groups and organizations, Mayor & Council agenda coordination, and Citizen's Water Advisory Committee administrative staffing. Public Information & Conservation (PICO) section is comprised of two units. The Public Information Unit coordinates community outreach efforts, utility information and education programs, and maintains media relations. The Conservation Unit plans, develops, and implements all water conservation programs. The Technical Innovations unit coordinates all department research activities with outside agencies. These outside agencies include, but are not limited to the University of Arizona, the Water Research Foundation, and the WateReuse Research Foundation. The majority of research involves In -Kind services from Tucson Water, with a few involving come monetary funding. January 2011 — March 2013 Tucson, AZ Water Department Water Quality & Operations Administrator Managed a staff of 70 employees performing various activities within the Water Quality & Operations division of the Tucson, AZ Water Department. The division is responsible for operating three (3) water source facilities as well as a state certified laboratory. Division personnel operate a reclaimed water treatment plant, which includes a tertiary treatment facility and an on -site recharge and recovery facility. A 160 MGD surface water treatment facility is utilized for treating recharged and recovered groundwater, which is supplied from the Colorado River through the Central Arizona Project canal. Also, a groundwater TCE remediation treatment facility supplies potable water to the distribution system. Additionally, staff operates the potable distribution system for the main Tucson Water system and the 10 isolated water systems. Also, staff is responsible for the drinking water regulatory compliance; AZPDES discharge permits, Aquifer Protection Permits, air quality permits and is the lead for the departments Water Loss Program. The Customer Concerns Unit is housed within the Water Quality Management division. This unit responds to customer complaints ranging from water quality to water pressure concerns. I serve as a liaison with state and federal water quality regulatory agencies, including the management of the TARP facility, which is an USEPA TCE Superfund site. Responsible for a $40 million O &M budget. Involved in numerous departmental Capital Improvement Projects, including a Reservoir Rehabilitation Program, an Effluent Master Plan, Advanced Oxidation Process Facility and a SCADA Master Plan. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 63 of 279 September 2008 — January 2011 Tucson, AZ Water Department Department Director Managed an enterprise department with a current operating budget of $130 million and a capital budget of $50 million and with a highly qualified staff of 575. The Director is responsible for complete management of operations, maintenance, securing water resources and strategic planning. This includes financial, engineering, water quality assurance, and customer service functions. I took a leading role in regional water management issues and work collaboratively with other local utilities and city government organizations. Other responsibilities included, but were not limited to, coordination of activities with government officials, community leaders, businesses and the press; develop regional collaboration in the water quality and supply issues; direct utility financial functions to include bond sales, revenue projections, and annual budgets for O &M and capital improvements; financial planning for continuous infrastructure maintenance, replacement and any necessary expansion; communicate with employees at all levels on a quarterly basis to share information and to promote performance expectations; direct hiring, discipline, evaluating, training, and coordinating other human resource activities; resource planning and capital improvement programs for long -term sustainability of water supplies; maintain a dialogue with the customer base and the larger community to retain consumer confidence and satisfaction; oversee the water rate development process; and leadership of an efficient community water conservation effort. June 2001 — September 2008 Tucson, AZ Water Department Water Quality Management Administrator Managed a staff of 63 employees performing various activities within the Water Quality Management division of the Tucson, AZ Water Department. The division is responsible for operating three (3) water source facilities as well as a state certified laboratory. Division personnel operate a reclaimed water treatment plant, which includes a tertiary treatment facility and an on -site recharge and recovery facility. A 160 MGD surface water treatment facility is utilized for treating recharged and recovered groundwater, which is supplied from the Colorado River through the Central Arizona Project canal. Also, a groundwater TCE remediation treatment facility supplies potable water to the distribution system. Additionally, staff operates the potable distribution system for the main Tucson Water system and the 10 isolated water systems. Also, staff is responsible for the drinking water regulatory compliance; AZPDES discharge permits, Aquifer Protection Permits, air quality permits and is the lead for the departments Water Loss Program. The Customer Concerns Unit is housed within the Water Quality Management division. This unit responds to customer complaints ranging from water quality to water pressure concerns. Within the last 2 years I reorganized the Water Quality Management division to better meet the needs of the division and department. I served as a liaison with state and federal water quality regulatory Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 64 of 279 agencies, including the management of the TARP facility, which is an USEPA TCE Superfund site. I was responsible for a $30 million O &M budget. Involved in numerous departmental Capital Improvement Projects, including the upcoming chemical feed modifications at Plant 9. 1 was involved in the departments Security Program and also worked with a team of Tucson Water staff in preparations for the potential of electrical interruptions by TEP and TRICO. Heavily involved in the development and implementation of the Maintenance Management Program (MMP). In addition, I was invited to participate in various American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AwwaRF) projects dealing with water quality and water treatment. I gave presentations on Decision H2O and the MMP at seminars, to Mayor and Council study sessions, and the Citizens Water Advisory Committee (CWAC). 1993-2001 Water Services Department, City of Kansas City, MO Treatment Plant Superintendent Managed a staff of 36 treatment plant operators and 6 shift supervisors performing various activities at the water treatment facility. These activities included chemical treatment and finished water distribution by use of a SCADA system. Prepared requisitions and specifications. Coordinated with contractors and consulting engineers. Prepared and managed section budget. Updated Standard Operating Procedures for the water treatment facility. Reviewed daily laboratory analysis and correlated results with treatment parameters and cost. Analyzed chemical and process efficiency. Advised, recommended and implemented needed changes. Human resource management activities included associate motivation, grievances and necessary disciplinary actions. Attended seminars and training classes; remained aware of current standards, innovative ideas and methods of water treatment, associate management and other related subjects. 1987-1993 Water Services Department, City of Kansas City, MO Chief Plant Operator Supervised 4 -5 person crews in activities pertaining to water treatment and pumping facility operation. Interpretation of laboratory analysis, decision making on chemical treatment and operation of chemical feed equipment. Trained associates in safe handling of hazardous chemicals, proper filtration practices and troubleshooting equipment. Ensured proper water pressure in the distribution system and efficient control of electrical power. 1980-1986 Burlington Municipal Waterworks, Burlington, IA Plant Operator Operated 15 MGD surface and well water treatment plant on rotating shifts. Responsibilities included computing chemical feed dosages and adjusting chemical feed equipment. Performed various laboratory quality control tests. Maintained correct water distribution pressure utilizing elevated storage tanks and booster pumps. Operated rapid sand filters and performed well drawdowns. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 65 of 279 Board and Commission Application Person with None tntrest Type of :None Interest: Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 68 of 279 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 69 of 279 Doug Emans Assistant Fire Chief Employer Northwest Fire District 5225 W. Massingale Rd. Tucson, AZ 85743 Northwest Fire District provides professional fire protection, emergency medical services and related public education to 110,000 residents and 3,300 commercial occupancies in a 140 square mile area. Ten fire stations are staffed 365 days a year by 192 firefighters, who are also Paramedics or Emergency Medical Technicians. Experience Assistant Chief • Provide oversight, feedback and strategic direction to Support and Administrative Divisions • Community Liaison representing the District in various events. • Government Liaison fostering relationships between the District and surrounding governmental organizations. Logistics Section Chief 2008 -2012 • Managing the Service, Supply and Procurement Branches of the Logistics Section. • Served as Chairman of the Apparatus Working Group to determine Apparatus needs, develop specifications, conduct equipment reviews and ensure compliance. • Currently serving as Support Services Subcommittee Co -Chair in Labor /Management Leadership Team based approach. Battalion Chief 2000 -2008 • Shift Commander for Operations Division in both single Battalion and two - Battalion per shift configuration. • Served as Technical Rescue Team Director prior to significant UASI and other grant funded program contributions. • Served as Emergency Medical Services Chief Officer. • Successfully implemented computer aided staffing program for entire operations section. • Served as Communications Liaison between City of Tucson Dispatch Center and five members of the Northwest Communications Consortium. Assistant Chief 1994 -2000 • Served as both Operations and Support Services Divisions of a rapidly growing and extremely forward thinking Fire District. • Successfully introduced Battalion Chief Position following merger and integration of personnel. • Successfully integrated operations personnel following a merger with Flowing Wells Fire District. Education University of Phoenix Tucson Arizona Campus Bachelor of Science in Business Administration March 1999 Other Experience Southwest Area Incident Management Team Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 70 of 279 • Liaison Officer working in the Incident Commanders General Staff coordinating incident information and intelligence between cooperating agencies including law enforcement, public works officials, transportation officials and contractors. • Large incident experience in both rural and range settings as well as highly urbanized areas with multiple agency and jurisdictional influence. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 71 of 279 Board and Commission Application S.u.bm itte . On: Nov 9.2.016 @ 12 1 4.A.M u m fitte d : Last Name: . ..... . . ............ .. ........ . .. .... Niette .. .. .. Email: Full Addres s . . . .. . - ... . .... . .. .. . .. . .... . How many years have you 1 lived at this address ?: How mein .....: Y ............ ..... .. .... ... .... . ..... .......... ..... ... .. . . .. .. .... . ... ... . .. ears have ou ................ : .. .. ..... .... .. .. . . .......... ...... .. .... .... lived in - . . .... .. :: . . .... . .. .. ... . ........ Ma ana ?. r .. ......... ... ....................... ... ... . . ...... . .:.. . . .. ........ ..... ... ... . . . . . . ... . .. Phone Number (Daytime): .... . ...... h r + one.Numbe ..... . .. ... .... .. . . . . ...... ........... . . .... . .... .. . ... . . . . ... .........:................. ....................:.......... . ...... ....... ... ..... (cell .or home) .. .. . .. .. ... ... ... . . . ...... . . ...... . . ... . . ..... . .... ............. . .. Occupation: SAHM /Real Estate Agent Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 72 of 279 Describe your experience working with a Council- I have no experience at this time. appointed board or commission: If appointed by the Council you will be representing all of the Town of Marana in your decisions. Describe how I strive to be fair and balanced in my decisions. I make great effort in trying to understand the perspectives of other people, and feel this is one of my strengths. you will maintain your objectivity in making decisions for locations other than your own residence.: ..... ...... . ..... :. .. ..... .. . ....... ........ ... . . . . .. .... .... . . .. ... .. ........... .... ....... ch . : Y, ... ..... . Full Name: ... . ... . ......... Tamfllillo Full Address: ... ..... . .... ....... R atlonshi eI . p r: ....... . ... ... ................ .... . . .... . .. ..... ..... . . ....... .. ..... 0o -vrker . . .... ..... Phone Number: ... .. .......... ...... .... . . .. .... tt t . FuII Name: . . .... ... . ............. Lan Mire : % .. .. ... . .. . ....... 9 .. .... . . ... . .... . . . . .. . .... .. .. . ...... . ............ . .. r. Full Address: Relationship... . . . .. .... .. .. . .. ........ 1= mend ............. . .. . Phone Number: Phone Number. ... ....... . . . .... .... ... .. .. .... . .... .. .... ... ..... . . .......... . .... . .. .. .. .. Name of n/a Business: erson W t . ........:.. . .. .. n/a. Interest: Type of Interest: nla Additional. .%:....... Information: . . .. . .... ..... .. . . .. .... Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 73 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates A Background Twin Peaks Estates is a residential development consisting of approximately 45 acres located along the Twin Peaks Corridor at the south end of Camino de Mariana, before the intersection at Twin Peaks Road. The subject property was included in preliminary drafts of the specific plan (formerly, Twin Peaks 145), and was removed prior to approval by the Town Council as The Preserve at Twin Peaks Specific Plan. Like the Preserve, Twin Peaks Estates utilizes cluster development to set aside the riparian areas on -site. The Town's Draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) calls for 40 -70% undisturbed natural open space. This project will preserve approximately 53% of the site as natural open space in perpetuity. The proposed lots for Twin Peaks Estates are configured to preserve riparian areas and maintain connectivity with the open space corridors throughout the site. This project will feature two distinct lot sizes utilizing 50' and 60' wide lots, which were also approved in the Preserve adjacent to the southern boundary. This plan contains slightly more lots on the property than were contemplated and which garnered approval by the Marana Planning Commission during the Twin Peaks 145 Specific Plan. These two single - family detached home lot sizes respond to current market demand for housing in the northwest Tucson metropolitan area. The density proposed by this rezoning request is 1.8 residences per acre and the maximum number of units is 82. The Marana General Plan establishes a designation of 0.5 to 2.0 residences per acre (RAC) along the Twin Peaks Corridor, including the subject property, due in part to the recent completion of the major four -lane divided arterial roadway, Twin Peaks Road. The Twin Peaks Corridor Study further solidifies the vision for a maximum of 2 RAC along the corridor. This development not only fulfills the Town of Marana's vision for future development by proposing 1.8 RAC, but also leaves approximately 53% of the site as open space. The Twin Peaks Estates development is an optimal design both for people and for native Sonoran Desert biological resources. By setting aside large swaths of undisturbed natural open space onsite that coincide with the wildlife corridors in the Preserve, native species will be able to traverse the neighborhood and continue their foraging and migration patterns. This is a comprehensive rezoning document to guide development that maintains a healthy living environment for both the residents and native wildlife. See Exhibit I.A. 1: Regional Context. Section I: Introduction 2 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 94 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit I A 1: Re Context Ama w n i 1.1 - It- g iome-da 2 VPL Ot rmi 1- cojr .N° GIS. 2015 ., -. % Section 1: Introduction 3 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 95 of 279 LEGEND 0 Ada Location TuCson Nl eau nuiin F'-1 725( 1250a Town of Marana Mu nicival Jumell - *,! On,5 i r, +w + . ► � A `4 . +" !' 44 4 Ike Aw AOW r • w • . r ALI I A � r .;J� w 1 A e a* R r 4 f t F � e t4 .s i y � r t n e ! o • � t Twin Peaks Estates A xisting and ses This section of the Development Capability Report identifies existing zoning, land use and structures on -site and on surrounding properties, as well as other proposed development in the project vicinity. 1 Site ocation The project is situated in the East - Central portion of the Town of Marana, within Township 12 South, Range 12 East, Section 12, at the intersection of Camino de Mariana and Twin Peaks Road. The property lies approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Interstate 10. In total, the site area is approximately 45- acres. See Exhibit II.A.1: Site Location. The Pima County tax assessor designates the subject property as parcels: • 216-25-0160 Manana Property LLC Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 5 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 97 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates LEGEND Notes: Sde Boun y Project Sde is located at. NNW$ or 5DO 1000 dar Township 12S, Ran 12E, and Section 12 � � � Township, Ran Section Acrea Approx. 45AG Parcel 10 # 216-25-0160, 0170 & 0180 DICE MPL-Q1-""o8rV* Jurts(kctions SOURCE PWM Quirity GIS. 2015 % Section 11. Inventor & Anal 6 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 98 of 279 xhibit 11 A 1: Site ovation Twin Peaks Estates 2 xisting On Site and se and Zoning The site is currently vacant with no existing structures on -site. The current zoning designation on the property is "R -36," Single Family Residential. See Exhibit II.A.3.b: Existing Zoning. The Town of Marana General Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residential (LDR: 0.5 - 2.0 residences per acre). As stated in the Marana 2010 General Plan, large areas of significant natural resources have been identified in the Tortolita Fan in northeast Marana that have a range of development constraints. These factors allow and promote clustered housing projects. Twin Peaks Estates follows its recommendations to build relatively low- density residential cluster development that minimizes disturbance to the on -site riparian areas. See Exhibit II.A.3.c.1: Existing Land Uses. 3 xisting Conditions on Properties within a One Quarter Mile Radius a. General Plan Land Use The general plan land used designations of surrounding properties are shown on Exhibit II.A. 3. a: General Plan Land Use. b. Zoning The zoning designations of surrounding properties, as depicted in Exhibitll.A.3.b: Existing Zoning are as follows: North: Town of Marana R -36 (Single - Family Residential), Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch Zone) and GR -1 (Rural Residential Zone) South: Town of Marana F (The Preserve at Twin Peaks Specific Plan) East: Town of Marana R -36 (Single - Family Residential), R -144 (Single - Family Residential) and Pima County SR (Suburban Ranch Zone) West: Town of Marana R -36 (Single - Family Residential) and F (Twin Peaks Vista Specific Plan Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 7 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 99 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates c. Land Use The land uses of surrounding properties within one - quarter mile, as depicted in Exhibit II.A. 3. c.1: Existing Land Uses are as follows: North: Vacant & Un- subdivided Single - Family Residential South: Vacant & Un- subdivided Single - Family Residential East: Vacant & Un- subdivided Single - Family Residential West: Vacant & Un- subdivided Single - Family Residential Also, as shown on Exhibit II.A. 3. c. 2: Existing Nearby Developments, the site is nearby the recently approved Twin Peaks Vistas and adjacent to the northern boundary of The Preserve at Twin Peaks. d. Number of Stories of Existing Structures There are no existing structures currently on the site. Adjacent to the southern boundary of the site, The Preserve at Twin Peaks is planned to develop one- and two -story homes with nearly identical lot sizes. However, more two -story development is possible within the Twin Peaks Vistas Specific Plan as well as further south along the Twin Peaks Corridor, especially near the new outlet mall at 1 -10 scheduled to open Fall 2015. e. Pending and Conditional Rezonings According to the Town of Marana's Planning and Zoning Activity most recent map dated June 2014, there are no pending or conditional rezonings within a one - quarter mile radius of the project site. Two recent rezonings along the Twin Peaks Corridor are located nearby, Twin Peaks Vistas Specific Plan and The Preserve at Twin Peaks Specific Plan. This project was a part of the latter, which is adjacent to the southern boundary of the project area. f. Subdivision /Development Plans Approved The Sky Ranch subdivision is within a half -mile of the property. Additionally, the Casa Sevilla subdivision and Cascada and Dove Mountain master planned communities are within a mile of the property. g. Architectural Styles of Adjacent Development Homes in the area are a mixture of manufactured and site -built homes. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 8 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 100 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates 4 Well Sites within 100 Feet of the property According to Pima County Geographic Information Systems and the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), two wells are located onsite near Camino de Mariana: well #635468 and #635469. These wells will be abandoned prior to construction commencement. There are no other wells located on or within 100 feet of the property. See Exhibit II.A.3.b: Existing Land Uses. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 9 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 101 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 11 A 3 a: eneral Plan and se % Section 11. Inventor & Anal 10 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 102 of 279 LEGEND General Plan Land Use Desi L7.1 Site Boundary Law Donsty Residinunhal 400 No F =114 Mile Radius JurtsOctions 1:3 FILE-NAME ZOOn rfvl SOURCE Pima County GIS 2015 Twin Peaks Estates =moon Rft 0) Sweet Haven Driv a Cr Tain ?hilt 4000 -4m 1 9 7- M V Me., TI PM 0 p V xhibit 11 A 3 b: xistinq Zoninq - 0 LEGEND Site Boundar r � 1 1'4 M fle R ado ij% C:3 Jurr5dictions Town of Marana Zonin � F R-H Pima Count Zonin GR-1 = s R Ly 4L J �6 j FILE KkrAE: zcnrj_5k6_VFL-( I. Tp. a q0LJR['?-' 2(1 t, % Section 11. Inventor & Anal y sis 11 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 103 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II A 3 c 1: xisting and ses jr - . • r-aarra.a�. ,.r •��!•l.Ii l.li li!!•r!� #!�!!. •- �ilff,�ifilfliir �rr-a. � � . +..�4 - . O p I. 1 • �` - •' r' 582323 54738$ 51 76 orl IL •" >l i a t I Ad U a i •. • tirE 8013N .,' vACAN , z t ♦ 'V UNSUBDIVIDED S AK ! F ° 60631613 = y 683+633 \ - _ - +r+ � � � ,rJ ' 6 3546 6 36468 n •- '. R � 67010 C A N Tit& ,�' -- ►s •, ; r .``" UN' U BDIVIDE R • - _ . 4 : vA C A N'f 2 The P reserve at in Peaks CAN A C Alif1 Peaks � Vi $ti s _ I I? �C1 c Plan ' r 4 r „� �aifl�sf� � _ 7. •��_�.1� �f� � yM �►�`�' -• k•'� �a � ♦ �'� b I _ 'Alp - ♦ .:_ _ - _ ] •• r�lfl �A!l.w� !f �1 rf a�.a.ai laa�trlli Tif• a s n,rr .. . ��! - � ��•aaf.• aala a a a� a r Y - 1i� +•aroma. a� t a• l •' r S ss: may_ _M EL `♦ s LEGEND S4 a Boo n da r`y 10D Foot Radius V4 Mile R Hdstjs Jurisdictions 0 Wells (Registry I D (Number labeled) WWI Cr 4i 0 MCI y 1 w.� nL.E UA ME !x _COAd_8x8_MPL -01.rx d SOURCS Perm Gauunt - i CIS. 2 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 12 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 104 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 11 A 3 c 2: xistin earb Developments DOVE MOUNTAIN CASCADA NORTH CASCADA I 4L CASCADA LEGEND ASA • SEVI �tA - � SKY RANCH A0 SOI`.1BRA— MOO DEL TECOLOTE CASCADA I I CASA DE MIGUEL Boom_- G RANGE __ RA H ESTATES, OASIS STONE ,� HILLS, CREEK C 7, r--% Core 1 1 -8 JI SUNSET Ste Boo n da ry Jurisdictions Washes 1 U U20 10D Foot Radius Approved Subdivision Plat Weils ( Re g istty ID a" N umber iatie4ed nuttAmF_ *x_cori,3jsxe_mPL-01.fMd V4 Mile Riidstjs Appcoved Development Plan SOURCE Perm Count-r CIS- 2015 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventor & Anal 13 Pa 105 of 279 CREEK 3-- H A R TM AN -VISTAS, ICOUN TRY S I DE-." & Ste Boo n da ry Jurisdictions Washes 1 U U20 10D Foot Radius Approved Subdivision Plat Weils ( Re g istty ID a" N umber iatie4ed nuttAmF_ *x_cori,3jsxe_mPL-01.fMd V4 Mile Riidstjs Appcoved Development Plan SOURCE Perm Count-r CIS- 2015 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventor & Anal 13 Pa 105 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates B Topography and Slope The topography of the project area is characterized by relatively flat terrain. The subject property generally slopes evenly from northeast to southwest. The elevations on the property range from approximately 2480 feet above sea level at the northeastern corner to approximately 2430 feet above sea level at the southwestern corner. Three un -named washes with flows under 500 CFS enter along the north and eastern boundaries and converge near the middle of the site before exiting along the western boundary. Existing topography at 2' contour intervals is shown on Exhibit 11.6.1: Topography and Slope. 1 Hillside Conservation Areas There are no Hillside Conservation areas on the subject property. 2 Rock Outcrops There are no rock outcrops on the subject site. 3 Slopes of 15 or reater There are no areas of 15% or greater slopes. 4 Other Significant Topographic Features There are no other significant topographic features such as peaks or ridges on the project site. 5 Pre Development Cross Slope The average cross -slope of the property is approximately 4.1 % from the northeast boundary of the site to the southwest corner. The pre - development cross slope calculation and values used are as follows: Cross -slope = (I x L x 0.0023) / A Where: = contour interval (2) L = total length of contours (40,168) 0.0023 = conversion of "square feet" into "acres x 100" A = total site area in acres (45 AC) EB Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 14 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 106 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II 6 1: Topography and Slope < Ilk% 1 lo wry Uft 7AIeN 0 ► N6, Wdso e 1 .—• l 1 / �I 4b 40 so 140�4 S qu 1 + I e. 1 t '� ► 2 436 N -.. � , 1. 1 `4 do, 01 a b AO 40P IL s f I r ! LEGEND .. Site Boundary Washes �"��' � v 115or 3ao" Parcels pj 7 Elevation Contours H LE NAML t I f c8_PJ�PL -tit rnxd SOURCE . Pare GAY GIS, 2016 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 15 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 107 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates C Hydrology, Water Resources and Drainage 1 Off Site Features Affecting the Site Upstream of the site, the low density nature of existing development allows most drainage to flow naturally. Drainage in the area is typically concentrated within the numerous braided washes crisscrossing the Tortolita Fan. Drainage flows over Camino de Mariana which is downstream of the subject property. Drainage then continues downstream of the subject properties in the same manner that is exhibited in the upstream watershed. 2 Acreage of pstream Off site Watersheds Several off -site watersheds affect this property, the largest of which is approximately 518 acres. Contributing watersheds have overall downward slope of approximately 1.5% to 2.0 % from the top of the watershed to the subject property. The washes associated with the offsite watersheds enter the property at five points of concentration along the east and north boundaries. The area and boundary of offsite watersheds that contribute storm water runoff to the property are shown on Exhibit II. C.2: Offsite Watersheds. 3 On Site Hydrology Characteristics a 100 ear Flood plains with Discharges >_ 50 CFS: Estimated 100 -year floodplains for washes having a 100 -Year discharge greater than 50 cfs are shown on Exhibit ll. C. 2: Onsite Hydrology. b Federally Mapped Floodways and Floodplains: Federally mapped floodplains exist onsite, but are avoided. The project site is located within FEMA zones A01 and shaded Zone X according to FEMA FIRM Panel #04019C1 05L, effective June 16, 2011. FEMA mapped floodplains are shown on Exhibit II. C.2: Onsite Hydrology along with floodplain areas mapped to comply with Town of Marana requirements. c Areas of Sheet Flooding with Average Depths: The existing floodplain boundaries shown on Exhibit II. C.2: Onsite Hydrology reflect the finding that sheet flooding occurs over a large portion of the property. Sheet flow depths average 0.5 feet. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 16 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 108 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates d 100 ear Peak Discharge xceeding 50 cfs: Estimated 100 -year peak discharges are shown on Exhibit II. C.2: Offsite Watersheds. 4 xisting Drainage Conditions along Downstream Property Boundary Stormwater associated with washes exiting along the west boundary is conveyed across Camino de Mariana in dip sections. Drainage structures are not present along this section of public road. All downstream washes exist in a natural condition. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 17 Page 109 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II C 2: Offsite Watersheds SUMMARY OF 100 -YEAR PEAK DISCHARGE RATES _ r I r� , CONCE NTRATION DRAINAGE AREAS 100 -YEAR POINT (ACRES) DISCKARGE (CFS) f f SCALE t '= 12011 = Y _: _. _ , • i �l / / !f �, f �f2�f f f r f 1 397.0 888 2 30.0 820 3 41.8 150 4 146 63 5 87;0 228 5 90.4 241 7 518.0 1139 8 9.4 9 109 a9 7 10 9.2 46 Section II. Inventory & Analysis 18 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 110 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 11 C 3: Onsite H Lr, r; NJ C Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 . . ................... " � 4 '. . I . " . 'JO 14. . s�� +� � - t } �. it � f � 5G \ Fi AZA R D 5 E E A!L. K yr LIMIT U NIT - tl fe" 11 . . ....... 77 44, LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMIT EROSION HAZARD SETBACK LIMIT FEMA FLOODPLAIN LIMIT PW%CMG DRAINAGE A11101IMENGINEERING, INC. 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN LIMITS & EROSION HAZARD SET8ACKS SHEET 1 OF Section 11. I nventor y & Anal 19 Pa 111 of 279 v v O UNI n rn rn c� N 0 rn N 0 rn U) CD O CD rF O �MM X l < U) U• T cn N O N O M K M c C1 lqc CD c a� r C - r rn v r_ t Q z C e ti t7� � 4 11 vp 4p Alms MW 4m w ► # # # #► # # # # !► •i !►• # ,,+ r ,fir'. r► ' # # �► # #► # 4b 06 AL Ad II 1_ AL IF Or il k W. "• � � � ' . -• � � �- �" �.:. +�, �► ## « , ,� ,�`,�•� • :fie .� #�",�� �"�►��,�►"� '�, `� AL a ..a ma f ^ - l ei r _ s y a P A ' � � .• , '. « � . r r . �. - - � • � • V �. ; ? ' -�`` +'" a �� �J� ,Sir i° - r AI SMlt H aven dace • ' - r n wo. Z (ft OI All Air up �* wu 1 • 1 I cr m n 41 4 " m n f •+ r O O CL m V \V Q Q N CO Twin Peaks Estates D egetation The property is located on the Tortolita Fan approximately 3.5 miles from the nearest slopes of the Tortolita Mountains. The Town's draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) places the subject property within Conservation Zone 3, which would require the protection of between 40 and 70 percent as open space. As such, riparian areas should be given the highest conservation priority, as they have been in this rezoning document. The subject property is not within the planned habitat ranges of any species mapped in the draft HCP. 1 egetative Communities and Associations On Site From Floerchinger Sadler Steele Baker, Inc. 2006 report, Job #20502 "Site vegetation substantially consists of undisturbed Arizona Upland Sonoran Desert Scrub Biotic Community. The dominant plant association is the Paloverde -mixed cacti community. Species include mesquite, acacia, ironwood, foothills paloverde, creosote bush, and ocotillo, prickly pear, and fishhook barrel cactus. A large number of mature saguaro exists within the subject site. Ironwood trees, 12 -inch caliper and larger, and other large trees are also prevalent. Night blooming cereus are scattered throughout the project site." 2 Significant, Threatened or ndangered Species The property contains a variety of significant vegetative species. A number of mature saguaro with multiple arms ranging from 10 -feet to greater than 18 -feet exist on the subject property. Additionally, a number of Ironwood trees, 12 -inch caliper and larger are present throughout the site. Night Blooming Cereus are dispersed throughout the proposed site. A variety of other tree species, larger than Ironwoods, are located on the site. Adverse impacts to these significant vegetative species may be avoided to the greatest extent possible. 3 egetative Densities by Percentage of Plant Cover "Novak Environmental approximates the vegetative density of the subject site at 35 percent plant cover." Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 21 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 113 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 11 D: e Communities L am ", Site Soncran Desertwub (45 acres Xeroriparian C ( 4.7 acres) I MY ;lid F Boundary IRA (19.3 acres) � - Parcels Fit r NAmr ,,N1RC.F % Section 11. Inventor & Anal 22 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 114 of 279 LEGEND V on - Xerodparlan Habitat Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II D 2: Site Resource Inventory SITE RESOURCE INVENTORY TWIN PEAKS ESTATES _ J j M i r r � r' of i r:: ":vA rfd E - r ■ f i I + yam+ 1 `rr, � � �rs■e . R ' / �+. _�" - ��r• r..�,� •rim a�r " � :.. n. • 1 � ■ i ar�rrw�aw ..... ■■ wwP-MINEW- r0 ar�+rr��r�a��rt�arr�wa 4. - s � �• Ec I4A E EN DR VL wit LOCATION MAP 7T 4' it s 'll? Nk Itlt "9 .� 4yU "rxxs aUUSy�" {-Myl. 71c rryi3ir� o' it�e SLo is ,ilsi5ibtiCG. PJ,1ir7,K of IMF ■Iv arr U�Wlnilm0 19n'f la r aiq�IfA�ly rht.f IJ+'ib ?'��I No "foxv %,mrc canmm " La for Inauu " II N i Iir4KS BTA Ev [ 1 i. " �, r ' i. s " ,., " - "-•� �f vw !` LI fA _ ti ':snares #°AI,aIIkV 3'IWAA&I Z:rivltff 1^4;.G:h:�'1�.YlY Ft: ^li:7G�'°iL ar..v rl�:f ":w :�t5r:ir,Y1. Y:t'M:ro YS'aL 14"iV- t'- Nhis'N. fllft;fV. 1 .r " evN Section II. Inventory & Analysis 23 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 115 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Wildlife 1 etter from Habitat Specialist a Presence of any State listed Threatened or ndangered Species There are no known occurrences of State - listed threatened or endangered species within the project area. The project lies within a half mile of an identified wildlife corridor. Arizona Game and Fish Department recommends that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service be consulted due to the proximity to listed species and a wildlife corridor. Proper steps should be taken during development to mitigate the occurrence of any listed fauna, should they be found onsite. See Table II.D.2: Special Status Species for more information. Table II D 2: Special Status Species Common ame Scientific ame FWS SFS B M State Antilocapra americans 10J area for Sonoran sonoriensis Pronghorn Aquila chrysaetos Golden Eagle BGA S Glaucidium brasilianum Cactus Ferruginous SC S S WSC cactorum Pygmy -owl Gopherus morafkai Sonoran Desert Tortoise C* S WSC Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae Lesser Long -nosed Bat LE WSC Tucson - Tortolita - Santa Catalina Mountains Linkage Wildlife Corridor Design Tumamoca macdougalii I Tumamoc Globeberry S S SR Source: Arizona State vame ana risn uepartment Definitions: FWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), USFS (U.S. Forest Service), BLM (U.S. Bureau of Land Management), State (Arizona Department of Agriculture), BGA (Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act), SC (Species of Concern), S (Sensitive those occurring on National Forests in Arizona which are considered sensitive by the Regional Forests), SR (Salvage Restricted: collection only with permit.), WSC (Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona). Species whose occurrence in Arizona is or may be in jeopardy, or with known or perceived threats or population declines, as described by the Arizona Game and Fish Department's listing of Wildlife of Special Concern in Arizona (WSCA) b High Densities of Wildlife Species There is no evidence that unusually high densities of any wildlife species occur on the property. 2 Ad ona ame and Fish Department (A FD) nvironmental Review In support of this analysis, the AGFD Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) was accessed via their On -line Environmental Review Tool, to locate records of occurrence Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 24 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 116 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates within 3 miles of the property for these species. The report from the HDMS review has been included as Appendix A. According to the AGFD, the Lesser Long -nosed Bat has been known to occur within 3 miles of the property and is listed endangered (LE). The lesser long -nosed bat also carries a designation of wildlife of special concern (WSC). The Sonoran Desert Tortoise (Gopherus morafkai) is a candidate for ESA protection. The HDMS search found that the tortoise occurs within 3 miles of the property. The tortoise carries a sensitive (S) designation. The species also is listed by the State as WSC (wildlife of special concern.) The Golden Eagle (Aquila crysaetos) occurs within 3 miles of the rezoning area and falls under the federal protection of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668(a); 50 CFR 22) which prohibits the taking of any Golden Eagle without a permit. The eagle also carries a sensitive (S) designation from the BLM. The Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy -owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) has been identified by the HDMS as occurring within three miles of the project site. The owl carries SC, S and WSC designations. The property has been identified by the HDMS as a part of the Tucson — Tortolita — Santa Catalina Mountains Linkage Design wildlife corridor. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 25 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 117 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates F Soils and eology 1 Soils The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) classifies the subject property as "Hayhook Sandy Loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes and Palos Verdes- Sahuarita Complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes ". These designations are typical of the Tortolita Fan area and are characterized by well- draining sandy soil on the surface, with gravelly soil several feet below. A detailed geotechnical investigation will be performed prior to development. 2 eology The project lies within the Tortolita Fan area, which falls into the Santa Cruz River basin valley. The U.S. Geological Survey further describes this area as, "QTa: Alluvium & Sedimentary Rock. Unconsolidated to well - consolidated and caliche - cemented sand, silt, and gravel and dissected basin -fill deposits of conglomerate, sandstone, and siltstone with minor lacustrine rocks." iewsheds From Floerchinger Sadler Steele Baker, Inc. 2006 report, Job #20502: 1 iewsheds Onto and Across the Site "Predominant views are Tortolita Mountains to the north, Pusch Ridge and Catalina Mountains to the east, Wasson Peak to the south, and Safford Peak to the west. Development of the subject property will not block these views for the existing homes in the area." 2 Areas of High isibility from Ad acent Off Site ses "Views into the subject site are restricted due to existing vegetation. Also, views from Camino de Mariana are further hampered due to its depressed condition adjacent to the subject site. " Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 26 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 118 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II F: Soil De sert Fa lc o n Lane I � I i try ev LIM 0 Sw eet Haven D rive v CL LEGEND Ste Boundary Parceis c RIN 0 250 500* FILE to PA E M PL- 01' — S+ OS-64 SO URGE. P I m, CourO G1 S. 2415 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 27 Page 119 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II 1 a: iewsheds AW 'K4 - t' 1�4 00 _ i ''rte 4, �� T� r � - `� - �" � � �� .Y• . P � ti � ! � • ' � � �_. �.. •�' *" �' � �_ ! s �. • •,�4« • s w , + � I "�•_ jr i y r. �- •!' s •` • _ . • • . r - , r a 1 � �a • • tad d` f f i •. � r � �• « r I WA Ak IP Im It Cj 4r wi t i lk, !` -�r , a x _ a +�r '. •. ,�.� i �+ ° +'�., - la N o IF IF Vj jr 1 ,!« • . � , ' � � - # , • _ .r �{ � • • • - . u • 1 I !, - � � � I ET CKI P1 Parcels Photo ID and L vcaban Whewe Ph Weie Taken r OR N FILENAME 1a PL -] 1_ phdCftCWon_ -6ju8. IM SOURCE Psme Cound GIS 2915 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 28 Page 120 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II 1 b: iewsheds (Site Photos), continued R Y i i a Photo 2: View looking southeast across the site from the northwest corner of the property boundary. fT , i� Photo I View from the northeast corner of the site looking north at overhead power lines adjacent to the eastern property boundary. r.. ` r "' W Photo 5: View looking west along the southern property boundary from the southeast corner of the site. T T 7 4 \. Photo 4: View looking directly east from the northeast corner of the site. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 29 Page 121 of 279 Photo 1: View looking east from the northwest corner of the property. Photo 6: View looking south from the southeast corner of the property. Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II 1 b: iewsheds (Site Photos), continued eA Photo 7: View looking east along the southern property boundary from Camino de Mariana near the southwest corner of the site. k Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 30 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 122 of 279 Photo 9: View from the western boundary looking east - northeast across the site and up the main wash through the property. Photo 8: View looking north along the western property boundary from the southwest corner of the site. Photo 10: View from the western boundary looking east - northeast across the site and up the northern wash through the property. Twin Peaks Estates H Traffic Circulation and Road System 1 xisting and Proposed Off Site Streets The development will have two entries, both of which are onto Camino de Mariana, which is adjacent to the western boundary of the project area. No off -site roads are proposed as a part of this project. Existing roadways within the project area are shown on Exhibit 11. H.1: Traffic. 2 earby Arterial Streets Twin Peaks Road and Camino de Mariana will accommodate all traffic generated by this project. An analysis of capacity was prepared by Southwest Traffic Engineering as part of the Twin Peaks 145 Specific Plan, ultimately approved as The Preserve at Twin Peaks Specific Plan. Twin Peaks Road Twin Peaks Road is a 4 -lane principal arterial with a 150' right -of -way (ROW) that includes a landscape median, bicycle lanes and a shared -use path along the western edge of the ROW. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH. The current average daily trip (AIDT) generation is approximately 12,000 with a projected ADT of 28,500 in the year 2040. It would be expected that the Town of Marana would have already evaluated future development immediate to the proposed site, and therefore, would have accounted for the impact associated with the site. It is anticipated that no additional studies are necessary. Camino de Ma ana Camino de Mariana is a 2 -lane paved street with a 60' ROW. The posted speed limit varies from 35 -45 MPH and the roadway is at or below surrounding grade. 3 Roadway Improvements Following the completion of the Twin Peaks Road improvements, the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) 2040 Regional Transportation Plan proposes no additional roadway improvements within one -mile of the project area. Tangerine Road, located approximately 1.5 miles away from the proposed rezoning is currently underway with improvements that play a significant role in accessing the Twin Peaks Road corridor and future development within the Town. The Tangerine Road Corridor Project facilitates vehicles access north of the project, as well as enhances pedestrian movement given additional facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. The Tangerine Road Corridor Project proposes the development of a shared -path and new community park significantly improving circulation and safety for all users within close proximity to the site. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 31 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 123 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates 4 xisting and Proposed Intersections on Arterials within One Mile and Most ikely to be sed by Traffic from this Site Arterial intersections within one -mile of the site that will likely carry traffic generated by this development include Twin Peaks Road at Camino de Mariana, and Camino de Mariana at Camino de Oeste. 5 xisting Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways Ad acent to the Site and Their Connections with Arterial Streets, Parks and Schools Twin Peaks Road has a shared -use path on the west side of the ROW with sidewalks and a bike route with a striped shoulder on both sides of the ROW. The Town of Marana has required the developer of The Preserve at Twin Peaks to provide an asphalt shared - path, in accordance with the Town's standards, for the project's entire frontage along Camino de Mariana connecting to the pedestrian network on Twin Peaks Road. Camino de Mariana is listed as a `Key Connecting Street' in the Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan. See Exhibit H.H. 1: Traffic. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 32 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 124 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II H 1: Traffic LEGEND Site Boundary One-Mile Raous Jurisdittwa! Boundary Bicycle Routes o5amo) ExisfingFuture Right. of -ilia r• IF 200 VW Fit F rArAF MPI -0 tn _ftA "s0 SOURCE, Pima CounRr GI S, 2015 88 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 33 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 125 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Recreation and Trails 1 Open Space, Recreation Facilities, Parks and Trails According to Pima County GIS and as shown in Exhibit H.H.1, there are no existing parks within one -mile of the project site. The Tortolita State Land Reform Addition, located northwest of the site, is a proposal to set aside 12,470 additional acres of park land between the Tortolita Mountains and the Central Arizona Project (CAP). This proposed park space is located less than 0.5 -miles from the project area. Two regional or district parks with a combined area of 72.8 acres have been planned but not yet developed at the nearby Cascada subdivision development at Twin Peaks Road and I- 10. This is in addition to the several neighborhood parks planned within the Cascada development. Active recreation areas are also planned within The Preserve at Twin Peaks and Twin Peaks Vistas. The surrounding area currently contains passive recreational opportunities, including open space areas and three Pima County trails. To the south, The Preserve at Twin Peaks will provide an easement and connection for the Tortolita Road Trail (Pima County Trail #176) to traverse through that site. Additionally, El Camino de Mariana Wash Trail (Pima County Trail #158) and Ironwood Trail (Pima County Trail #172) are located within a mile of the property. A trail easement will be provided as a link to The Preserve at Twin Peaks, ultimately strengthening connectivity to the regional trail network. A connection to the future shared -use path along Camino de Mariana will also be provided. Planned as a part of the Tangerine Road Corridor Project, the Town of Marana will develop the Tangerine Corridor Community Park located at the intersection of Tangerine Road and Camino de Oeste. This installation will provide the future residents of the proposed rezoning with recreational opportunities and open space. Twin Peaks Estates supports the goals of the Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan and the Town of Marana Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Master Plan by creating trail easements and appropriate trail signage. See Exhibit 11.1.1: Recreation and Schools. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 34 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 126 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 1111: Recreation and Schools Tan Road � Tortolita State Land Reform Addition 0 >k 0 001* 40 F- At 1b 4 0O 0 00 Oasis Road or Tan Corridor Communit P arkd 0 <) 0 0 MEM Sweet Haven Drive ■ ■ Potvin Lane The Preserve and Twin'P. eaksVista Specific Plan Recreation Areas W) Ri 0 oe CY 00000 000 EL Wft I Sumter Drive LEGEND Site Boundar Proposed Parks NORTH One-Mile Radius El Camino de Mariana Wash Trail (#158) 01 1000, 2000' L Jurisdictional Boundar i Tortolita Road Trail (#176) FILE NAME- schools _sec _6x8_MPL-01_mxd Marana Unified School District ■ ■ — Ironwood Trail (#172 SOURCE- Pima Count GIS, 2015 88 Section 11. Inventor & Anal 35 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 127 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates J Cultural Resources 1 ocation of Resources On Site None. 2 etter from a Qualified Archaeologist No archaeological resources are known to exist on -site. An archaeological survey was conducted on the subject property in 2006 by Professional Archaeological Services of Tucson (P.A.S.T.), and the investigator determined in the report titled "Archaeological Survey of the Camino de Mariana Section 12 Project near Marana, Pima County, Arizona" that no further cultural resource studies are warranted. Based on the archival information, field methods, the observable surface indications, and because none of the materials observed on the subject property have potential to provide important archaeological or historical information beyond what has been obtained for this resource, P.A.S.T. supports approving the Twin Peaks Estates application. If any cultural resources are discovered during construction, State and local rules will be followed regarding handling and treatment of cultural resources. See Exhibit I1.J: P.A. S. T. Report Cover for reference information. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 36 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 128 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 11 J: P A S T Report Cover ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE CAMINO DE MA&ANA SECTION 12 PROJECT NEAR MARANA, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA Submitted to: ABIGER Marano 25409 N- CornpbO 0186 Tucson AZ 85719 Submitted by Ptolessicnol Archaeolo Sefvlces of Tucson 5036 Golder Ranch Rd, Tucson, Al 85739.4265 Prepared b David V.M. Stephen Ph.D. Principal Investi State Anti Pwmlt No. 2006-34bi P.A.S.T. Cultural Resoorces Repod No. 061779 6/19/2006 % Section 11. Inventor & Anal 37 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 129 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates K xisting Infrastructure and Public Facilities 1 Sewer The Twin Peaks corridor, including this property, is tributary to Pima County's Ina Road wastewater treatment plant. The project will connect to the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department sewer system near the intersection of Linda Vista Boulevard and Blue Bonnet Road or at a point closer to the site if public sewer infrastructure is extended north to serve The Preserve at Twin Peaks development. Capacity to connect at this location has been confirmed. See Exhibit H. K. Existing Utility Infrastructure. 2 Water This project is within the Town of Marana water service area. A 16 -inch water main exists within the Twin Peaks Road right -of -way. Initial discussions with Marana Water suggest that a temporary in -line booster may be necessary to serve this project until the planned Blue Bonnet reservoir and booster station are constructed. 3 Fire Service The property has been annexed into the Mountain Vista Fire District, which has indicated that they may locate a new facility in the area in the future, but at this point are unsure. The closest fire station is at Tangerine Road and Thornydale Road. The nearest Mountain Vista Fire District station is located at Shannon and Overton. 4 Police Service Although the project site is located in the vicinity of the Pima County Sheriff jurisdiction in the Foothills District Beat 1 patrol zone, police protection will be provided by the Marana Police Department at 11555 West Civic Center Drive. 5 ti l ity Providers The subject property is located within the service areas for the following utility providers: Electricity: Trico Electric Cooperative Natural Gas: Southwest Gas Company Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 38 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 130 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Xhibit 11 K: xistin till t Intrastructurc 0 0 00 0 0 o6-- 0 A F1 0-- 0 1 1 � 1 O ', 4 Manh ID 5175-34 \j - __ am's, As-Built ID - S-665-3 Diameter - 8" 1 I 'ill 0 � '0 0 c5 § , 9 10 0 LEGEND L M M M M I Site Boundary NORTH 0 , 750 1500' 0 Manhole Covers Existin Sewer Network FILE NAME- MPL-01 sewer.mxd Future Sewer Line SOURCE- Pima Count GIs, 2015 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Section 11. Inventor & Anal 39 Pa 131 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates McHarg Composite Map Information regarding topography, hydrology, vegetation, wildlife and views has been combined to form the McHarg Composite Map, displayed as Exhibit ILL. The purpose of the McHarg Composite Map is to highlight areas that are available for development. Refer to Section III Development Plan for more information on how the site plan responds to the site's physical constraints. Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 40 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 132 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit II : McHarg Composite Map LEGEND � = = � PROPERTY BOUNDARY - - - - - -- SETBACK FEMA FLOODPLAIN 140 YEAR FLOOOPLAIN (CMG) EHS x� ' s 404 JURISDICTION CONTOUR (Z INTERVAL) D' IpQ ?_zr fu wpm hFL010WFCffM-RD%19A.S,115-�3 Section 11. Inventory & Analysis 41 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 133 of 279 RF •- r IL dIL r- _ L - i . - r 1 lb �, �, •. + 1 ob I r 4 40. 1 G „ l V N I I WAS WNW- 41 w.. w i i 9 ice► � ` ` !y �� . •� � .mss s � ♦ , , � ob IL Y 3� o 9 - 9 fit' .., .�• , ,, - IVY Twin Peaks Estates A Purpose and Intent The Twin Peaks Estates rezoning document, referred to as "Twin Peaks Estates ", establishes the framework for the development of a 45 -acre residential community within the Town of Marana, Pima County, Arizona. The document provides a method for applying standards and guidance to ensure that this development meets the needs of the community while appropriately responding to and considering adopted plans, adjacent development, the environment and site - specific conditions. This Development Plan responds to the site analysis, technical research, and community values through the use of regulations or controls to resolve any potential development - related issues. Once approved, the Twin Peaks Estates rezoning document describes the planning considerations for parcels, imposes controls on the development of such parcels and is detailed accordingly in the final plat. The boundaries of this plan are shown on Exhibit III.D.1. B Relationship to Adopted Plans 1 Marana eneral Plan The proposed subdivision will conform to the Town of Marana General Plan and the recommendations set forth by regulatory agencies involved in permitting. Twin Peaks Estates is located within the Planning Area boundary of the Town's General Plan. Designed to help meet the current and future needs of the Town, the Twin Peaks Estates plan establishes goals and polices that are in line with the Town's General Plan and Strategic Plan. The Marana General Plan designates this property as Low Density Residential: 0.5 -2.0 homes per acre. This project complies with that guideline and is in agreement with the overall General Plan, including the following highlighted goals, policies and actions: eneral Plan oal, and se and rowth lement: Adopt sustainable development as a unifying goal to secure Marana's future Marana's quality of life must be sustained for many generations to come. This can be accomplished through the preservation of open space and natural resources that provide valuable scenic and recreational amenities to residents in the community. Often this means protecting native plant species, especially in areas of denser riparian habitat. Safeguarding the community's natural resources also plays a vital role in minimizing urban heat island effect, creating wildlife habitat connectivity and promoting water conservation and land stewardship. General Plan Policy Preserve and protect our natural resources in order to promote a sustainable community. Section III. Land Use Plan 43 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 135 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates General Plan Action Preserve the Sonoran Desert character by evaluating appropriate site disturbance standards and preserving native plants. General Plan Action Provide opportunities for both onsite and offsite riparian habitat restoration. Plan Conformance: Twin Peaks Estates leaves a considerable amount of the site in a natural state, preserving over 40% of the native vegetation on -site and minimizing the impact on washes. Development of the property will occur in between washes with minimal disturbance for roadway and utility crossings. eneral Plan oal, and se and rowth lement: Provide opportunities for diverse developments that maximi a the benefits to the community The provision of a range of housing types and affordability is necessary to create a thriving community that can accommodate residents of any socio- economic class. By providing a variety of housing types for residents of all income levels, land uses such as industrial, commercial and office space are complemented with both a diverse and skilled workforce; thus, attracting future development and employment opportunities in the Town. General Plan Policy Promote new development that is compatible with existing land uses. General Plan Action Establish appropriate land development designations with densities and intensities that complement existing natural conditions and residential areas. General Plan Action Develop guidelines for enhancing new development and mitigating potential impacts on existing neighborhoods. General Plan Policy Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types and economic levels. General Plan Action Designate a wide range of residential development densities from low density rural to multifamily urban. Plan Conformance: Twin Peaks Estates is located within the designated Planning Area Boundary of the Town of Marana's 2010 General Plan in the Northeast Growth Area and is listed as Low Density Residential, 0.5 -2.0 residences per acre (RAC). The proposed RAC for Twin Peaks Estates is 2 residences units per acre, which is also consistent with the Twin Peaks Corridor Study. Twin Peaks Estates will feature a mixture of 50' wide and 60' wide lots similar to those offered in The Preserve at Twin Peaks. eneral Plan oal, Open Space and Trails lement: Protect and preserve natural open space Section III. Land Use Plan 44 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 136 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates The vast array of wildlife species that persist along the Tortolita Fan of the Sonoran Desert help to create the unique desert landscape so beloved by those in the Town of Marana. Maintaining critical wildlife habitat and linkages for species movement is an important part of their persistence in the future, especially considering that each species has its own unique habitat requirements, migration patterns and range. General Plan Policy Develop a connected system of natural open space preserves that protect wildlife habitat, wildlife linkages, and cultural resources. General Plan Action Preserve, protect, or conserve areas of high -value habitat and wildlife movement linkages as identified in the Marana Draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and the Marana Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan. General Plan Action Preserve Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) to maintain wildlife access and movement within and through development sites that are subject to discretionary land use actions, as described in the Draft HCP. General Plan Action Preserve and protect existing natural drainage systems as identified in the Marana Draft HCP riparian map. General Plan Policy Create protected continuous open space linkages and viable wildlife corridors throughout the community. General Plan Action Protect the viability of wildlife corridors mapped in the Draft HCP, using innovative site planning and design. Plan Conformance: Twin Peaks Estates is a residential cluster design with lots situated in between two on -site washes in order to protect the densest pockets of native vegetation and provide open space amenity to residents. Therefore, large concentrations of natural vegetation are being preserved on -site, as shown on Exhibit III.D.1: Conceptual Development Plan. The total amount of natural open space in Twin Peaks Estates is approximately 53% and consists of natural undisturbed open space and some minimally disturbed areas. 2 Marana Strategic Plan III The Twin Peaks Estate Specific Plan supports the following areas of the Marana Strategic Plan: Commerce — Construction of the proposed residential units will provide jobs as well as revenues to the Town through construction sales tax and development service fees. Community — This new residential development will provide additional housing choice in the scenic foothills, attracting new residents to the Town. Offering different lot sizes to accommodate homebuyers at varying income levels will create a diverse community, satisfying goals outlined in the Town of Marana General Plan as well. Careful development of the site to be clustered will ensure the preservation of the more environmentally sensitive features within and beyond the site. Section III. Land Use Plan 45 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 137 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Progress Innovation — Dedication to a conscientious approach to responsible development, high - performing homes and cost savings for potential future homebuyers reflects the intent of the Twin Peaks Estates Specific Plan. The community will strive to incorporate sustainable building practices such as the use of energy efficient construction material and appliances as well as innovative and compact site design to decrease energy usage, minimize impact to environment, conserve water and promote healthy lifestyles. Recreation — Approximately 53 percent of the site will be provided as open space including a community park located within the residential community. 3 Twin Peaks Corridor Study The Twin Peaks Corridor Study establishes design guidelines to create a cohesive theme for the parcels along Twin Peaks Road and Camino de Mariana between Linda Vista Boulevard and Tangerine Road. Twin Peaks Estates is located within this area and will adhere to the Twin Peaks Corridor Study in its entirety. This plan meets the goals outlined in the study by: • Providing recreational amenities and design standards that encourages the use of desert landscaping and a color palette consist with the surrounding development. • Preserving the viewsheds (on- and off - site), to the extent possible, of the surrounding natural environment. • Incorporating necessary native desert landscaping within the proposed development and buffer zone to enhance the overall aesthetic of the corridor. 4 Draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) The Town's Draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) calls for between 40% and 70% open space in Zone 3 areas such as this one, with the lower percentages of open space relating to the acquisition and preservation of off -site mitigation. The Draft HCP is not an adopted document at this time, although it is used as a guidance document. Over fifty percent (50 %) natural open space (NOS) has been proposed for this development. C Compatibility with Ad oining Development and ocation Restrictions 1 Ad oining Development Compatibility Historically, development in the Town of Marana and unincorporated Pima County has largely been single - family homes on large lots. Today, the region is undergoing a significant growth change, especially in the southern and eastern parts of the Town. For instance, the Cascada Specific Plan, located to the south and west of Twin Peaks Estates, is a planned 1,454 -acre mixed -use development with 3,806 proposed Section III. Land Use Plan 46 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 138 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates residential units and a gross density of 2.6 residences per acre. Cascada features a variety of land uses and intensities. In terms of residential land uses, it consists of Low Density Residential (LDR) up to High Density Residential (HDR) and Village Center (VC) which is intended to be a mixed -use zone with community- oriented commercial, retail, employment, residential, live /work units, civic, cultural, entertainment, daycare and recreational uses connected by pedestrian walkways, gathering places and courtyards. Cascada also features an Employment Center land use designation and large areas of open space. The density /intensity of development within Cascada gradually increases as it approaches the mixed -use village center. Twin Peaks Estates is adjacent to the northern boundary of The Preserve at Twin Peaks, which proposes nearly identical lot sizes. Twin Peaks Estates is located on vacant land, east of the southern terminus of Camino de Mariana, near the 4 -lane major arterial, Twin Peaks Road. There is unsubdivided single - family residential development to the north and east. Twin Peaks Estates seeks to be compatible with surrounding land uses while maintaining appropriate and sufficient residential density to offset the cost of extending water and other utilities to the vicinity. As a result, Twin Peaks Estates features a density that is in line with the Twin Peaks Corridor Study and Marana General Plan, a 100' wide natural undisturbed open space buffer to adjacent larger lot land owners to the north and east, and a substantial amount of open space. Utilizing a cluster development approach, the design maintains vast amounts of open space, which demonstrates sensitivity to the environmental value of the area. D Conceptual Development Plan The Twin Peaks Estates conceptual land use plan responds to site - specific conditions and environmental constraints as identified in the site analysis. The plan consists of 82 single - family residential units with a density less than 2 designated units per acre (See Exhibit III.D.1: Conceptual Development Plan). Lot sizes will vary slightly, but the typical lot sizes are 7,200 and 6,000 square feet with dimensions of 60'x120' and 50'x120', respectively. Lots will accommodate both one- and two -story homes. All homes along the perimeter of the site will be single story. The site for Twin Peaks Estates consists of two large washes with designated riparian areas. The proposed development of Twin Peaks Estates includes setting aside a large portion of land, over 15 -acres or 41.8% of the site; the total open space value is over 53% including the natural open space (NOS), active open space (AOS) park and 10' trail area. This development has been designed such that the washes running through the site will be largely avoided, and approximately 15 acres will remain natural undisturbed open space. Other areas of the development that will remain natural open space will include on -site trails and common areas throughout the site, and will total roughly 9.2 acres. The active open space area provided in the form of a neighborhood park will have an area of approximately 0.2 acres. Native vegetation 88 Section III. Land Use Plan 47 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 139 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates along the washes will remain undisturbed and will be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association to ensure future preservation. Almost all lots will have their backyards facing natural desert open space. This is important because backyards facing a more open and natural environment give residents a sense of place, in addition to staying cooler during warmer parts of the year. These open space areas along the backs of homes also allow for species migration and opportunities for wildlife viewing. Section III. Land Use Plan 48 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 140 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates 77 EXISTING RESIDENCE 'J VACANT //� VACANT (1 STORY) SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ' RESIDENTIAL 100' SETBACK W1 RESIDENTIAL 20 LANDSCAPE BUFFER O (75% VEGETATIVE SCREENING) �p + + + + + `�+ + + + + �+ + j ,� + + + 4r + + +- +lf+ + ++ } 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER A� + + + E� + r+ + + + } ,4 + + l � S i 1 f + j� r ♦ s ♦ *S , / r VACANT S + ( �(' s ©' S S S 10' SHARED USE PATH REQUIRED ALONG S- �* * * SQI f I +' CAMINO DE MANANA, SEE NOTE #t ^/ j S ��' S ESQ' S S. r *S r + *. 24eo r S +r 381' - 7H + + i r + S� `S + + _ • y / r + + I + + + I + Qt4� + CS ► + + r + t + + ; A, ++ + + ++ O� 1 i 1 + r r + + . + + + ` H + J 1 I VACANT O `U . S ♦ r _ I , ♦ + + 2,470 1 + + + _:. � T - ��-- ~�} �i- } + i._.. it � 1 i- t + + t 1+ 7' � Cs� e PARK + T + �'r50 +" ROW l + + + r + + + + -- I t� -- + + , + + - � `� %% + +, ;+ + + 2aaa if *S 1 r l F ± _ + + + 1 ,Ac + _ s �o + + + :'+ + + f + +i zoos ,_ + + T + + + + + +�/ ! t + ♦S + + +'I + + F + + + ,H 1. + + + + P 1 i + f �. +- ♦ r r r 1 �S -- � 15' PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT - f . G 1+ + t ♦ TO BE DEDICATED BY FINAL PLAT 1 \/ /✓ � VACANT PRIMARY ACCESS r1 S . � _ ` I 1 r ♦ VACANT 50' ROW _ _ r� % ♦S I,7 + f _ -- • r � - , # 100' SETBACK _ f } IC 2430 ♦ ♦ -. /f = ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ` ♦ ♦ ♦ �I ♦ 174' -3 " ? R E S IDENCIE r` I EY.ISTI 5TR fl STDRYI ea ae 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER I 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER & 3 f� PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT END OF PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT PROPOSED UTILITY (SEWER & WATER) STUB OUTS I L� VACANT h / ! THE PRESERVE r'+ AT TWIN PEAKS 1 THE PRESERVE ATTWIN PEAKS /711 Ir .1 vacANr TWIN PEAKS ESTATES xhibit III D 1: Conceptual Development Plan LEGEND - ■ ■ - PROPERTY BOUNDARY - - ROW LOT LINE ........................... TRAIL ON ADJACENT PROPERTY -------- - - - - -- SETBACK -------- - - - - -- TRAILS S LIMITED TO SINGLE STORY CONTOUR (5' INTERVAL) EASEMENT 404 JURISDICTION + + + + + + + + ++ RIPARIAN AREA V ENOM ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (PARK) NATURAL OPEN SPACE (NOS) 4' OPAQUE SCREEN (MASONRY WALL). 5' MASONRY SCREEN WALL AREAS /QUANTITIES: 1, Area of Subject Property = 44.96 acres 2. Natural Open Space (NOS) = approximately 24.3 acres (54 %) 2.1. Riparian Area = 15.1 acres (33 %) 3. Active Open Space (Park) = approximately 0.2 acres (0.4 %) 4. Single Family Residences: ♦ (50'x120') = 48 (60'x120') = 34 Total = 82 NOTES: 1. A 10' wide asphalt shared -use path, constructed to Town standards, shall be required to be constructed along the project's entire frontage along Camino de Manana. HIS EXHIBIT WAS CREATED USING 1HE MOST RECENT d 100' 790' AVAILABLE BOUNDARIES, ROAD ALIGNMENT, AND EA5EVENT �� DATA PROVIDED BY THE LVFfERENE (ECARNMENTAL ENTITIES AND ENGN ERNG FIRMS AND 15 FOR PANNING PURPOSES THE PWNNINGCENTER ONLY. FINAL AREA TOTAL5 BASED ON ENGINEERED DATA PRCVECT. MPL -CI DATE. 11 /17 I/e H'v'� ! FPC G� u !nc- MAY VARY FROM THO5E SHOWN ON THI5 EM011 FILE NAME: UP01 SIIE PIAf K_ 11616. DWG ie �� 68 Section III. Land Use Plan 49 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 141 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Circulation Plan Ingress /Egress will be provided via two locations along Camino de Mariana. The access points are located in areas that minimize impacts to existing washes, the available right -of -way frontage, roadway geometry, and also to minimize traffic impacts to the neighboring property owners to the north, south and east. The internal streets are considered public and will be maintained by the Town of Marana. If the developer builds a gated community, the interior roadways shall be private and maintained by the homeowner's association. In the event of an update to the Town of Marana Subdivision Street Standards manual, the proposed roadways will be designed and built to comply with the requirements for a "local street" section. The proposed right -of -way width is 50 -feet but the streets may be narrowed to the Town's minimum local street section width at platting. The developer will also construct the section of the proposed shared use path along Camino de Manana that abuts the western boundary of the rezoning area. Interstate 10 is approximately 3 miles west of the site and can be accessed by traveling southwest from the property to Twin Peaks Road or by travelling west on Tangerine Road which is located approximately 2 miles north of Twin Peaks Estates. Tangerine Road can be accessed by traveling southwest on Camino de Manana, then north on Twin Peaks Road or by travelling directly northeast on Camino de Manana. Tangerine is currently undergoing an improvement project in which the corridor will be widened to 4 traffic lanes to accommodate future traffic demands. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Southwest Traffic Engineering, LLC and submitted under separate cover is intended to support the land -use proposal for this rezoning project. The study addresses the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed Twin Peaks Estates. The results of the TIS indicate that the proposed project will generate an average of 65 -86 weekday peak hour trips; this limited amount of trips utilizing appropriately spaced access points is not expected to have a significant impact on the surrounding roads. Any roadway improvements required by the Town based on the findings of the Traffic Impact Statement (as approved by the Town) will be the responsibility of the developer. Trip generation for this project was determined using data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation publication, 9t Edition. This project is expected to generate approximately 820 vehicular average daily trips (AIDT). Section III. Land Use Plan 50 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 142 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates F rading lement Grading will take place on selected areas in order to preserve the sensitive areas of the site. The overall allowable grading and related disturbance includes internal roadways and their right -of -way, building pads, driveways, accessory structures, utility crossings of natural washes, emergency access and other areas needed for infrastructure and utilities. Site grading improvements within this project will be located at or near existing grade in order to avoid excessive alteration of the site's gently sloping terrain. Additionally, clustering the lots allows 53% of the site to remain as active, passive and /or undisturbed open space. In accordance with Title 25 of the Town of Marana Land Development Code, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Notice of Intent (NOI) to ADEQ for coverage under the Arizona Pollution Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) Construction General Permit is required to be submitted to the Town for review and acceptance prior to commencement of grading activities. Post Development Hydrology 1 Conceptual Development Plan Response to Hydrologic Characteristics Significant washes will be preserved in their natural state within the common area open space designated as NOS, which consists of natural undisturbed open space (NUOS) and some minimally disturbed areas. Development will occur within some overbank sheet flow areas. These areas are only subject to flooding during infrequent, high magnitude storms. Building pads within sheet flow areas will be raised on fill to comply with Town of Marana development standards. 2 ncroachment and Modification of Drainage Patterns Minor encroachments are proposed along the floodplain fringes in several overbank areas subject to shallow sheet flow during the 100 -year storm. These encroachments will occur for the purpose of constructing raised building pads and for roadway crossings. Construction within the FEMA floodplain will only occur where streets cross washes. 3 ngineering and Design Features to be sed to Address Drainage and rosion Problems Drainage impacts to offsite land uses upstream and downstream of this project will not occur because the primary washes will remain natural and floodplain encroachments will be limited to areas of infrequent sheet flooding. 4 Potential Drainage Impacts to Off site and ses pstream and Downstream Erosion mitigation measures such as bank protection and scour walls will be used to protect building pads and streets where construction occurs within erosion hazard areas. Section III. Land Use Plan 51 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 143 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Building pads will be raised on fill to elevate floors a minimum of one foot above 100 -year flood stage. Additional stormwater runoff created by new homes and roadways will be collected in small landscaped detention basins throughout the development. These basins will have sufficient capacity to comply with the Town of Marana requirements for development within a critical basin area. By largely avoiding disturbance of existing drainageways, and incorporating stormwater detention throughout the project, impacts to up- and downstream drainage patterns are mitigated, and erosion issues will be prevented. 5 Conceptual Development Plan Conformance with Area Plan, Basin Management Plan, and Town Policies The Town of Marana Title 21 of the Land Development Code Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management will govern the drainage design element of this project. Applicable provisions of the Pima County Detention /Retention Manual and the Town of Marana Northwest Area Drainage Policies will also guide the drainage design requirements. Section III. Land Use Plan 52 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 144 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit III 1: Post Development Hydrology 1 �i,_� t � °"r 1 1 ;•3. _ ,I , , 5 ;� f t r , i Nr —r 1 i r + i 6 2P Ilk If } 1 & t �7 CMG DRAINAGE LEGEND ENGINEERING, INC. PROPERTY BOUNDARY 9 "` i: ' 100 -YEAR FLOODIPLAI N LIMIT c:rc POST PROJECT 110 vE . . . . . EROSION HAZARD SETBACK LIMIT ^^ FLC7QDPLAIN L4Mi7$ Section III. Land Use Plan 53 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 145 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates H nvironmental Resources 1 Waters of the nited States A preliminary jurisdictional determination on the property was completed in September, 2005 by CMG Drainage Engineering for the purpose of compliance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) requirements for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The results of the survey indicate that there are a total of 2.1 acres of Jurisdictional Waters of the United States on the subject property. The presence of Waters on the property specify that the property is subject to mitigation of impacts as required by Section 404 of the CWA. See Exhibit H.H. 1: Jurisdictional Wash Limits Map 2 Wildlife By preserving the major washes on -site through the Riparian Area and other open space, the primary wildlife corridors through the property are also protected. The proposed primary open space corridors on -site provide ample visual and acoustical buffering for wildlife traversing the site. At least 30 days before grading, a 100% area survey must be completed by a qualified wildlife biologist, for the Sonoran Desert Tortoise, with a copy of the survey form sent to the Town prior to issuance of a grading permit. 88 Section III. Land Use Plan 54 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 146 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit III H 1: Jurisdictional Wash imits Map r 4, & A 4et a U -A i5 - ' ; kt?- v , t rL � y *f � �1 +I!+Ip�� _r "y`r J'� '. A. 'r l y. � r .. 50 40 -, tn N OR 1L I a. U) LU < CL Z 0 < Q) C)f 0 C r- LI) < Fj Oy Is — 00%ft tz Section 111. Land Use Plan 55 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 147 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates iewsheds Extraordinary views are not available from or across the property due to existing, relatively flat topography coupled with the distance to surrounding mountain ranges. However, the wide open space corridors and perimeter buffer areas mitigate the project's minimal impacts to surrounding viewsheds. Single story homes are proposed along much of the perimeter of the development and significant buffers are proposed to soften the impact of views from the adjacent properties. J andscape &Buffering The overall landscape theme for Twin Peaks Estates will reflect the natural attributes of the Sonoran Desert and the site's surrounding environment. Native and desert- adapted plant material as well as regionally appropriate hardscape materials will be used within the landscape buffers, and common areas. The total open space within Twin Peaks Estates is over 53 %. Buffers and common areas will reflect the plant palette and appearance of the native desert that dominates the site. A 20' landscape buffer will be provided along the south boundary and between the western site boundary and the Camino de Mariana alignment. A 100' open space buffer is proposed along the subject property's northern and eastern boundaries to mitigate any privacy concerns from adjacent properties. The southernmost 20' of the northern 100' open space buffer and the westernmost 20' of the eastern 100' open space buffer will be landscaped in accordance with the Twin Peaks Corridor Study to achieve 75% screening. A four -foot opaque screen (masonry wall) will also be provided at the end of each of the proposed cul -de- sacs to prevent vehicular light trespass onto adjacent properties to the north. Most significant vegetation found on -site is within the sizeable on -site washes, all of which are preserved as open space except for the minor encroachments depicted on the Conceptual Development Plan. As part of the platting process, a native plant inventory will be prepared for the entire site, identifying vegetation to be preserved in place or transplanted on -site. The development will also feature drought tolerant landscaping, which further increases how well the project fits within the context of lower density surrounding development in this arid region. K tilities 1 Water The Town of Marana provides water service to the surrounding area, although the development site is not currently serviced. Water service for this project will be extended from the existing 16 -inch main that terminates near the intersection of Blue Bonnet Road and Twin Peaks Road. The developer is responsible for the construction of a water distribution system to serve the development and will be required to transfer Section III. Land Use Plan 56 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 148 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates title of the system to the Town of Marana. A Water Service Agreement is required to establish service to the property. Please see Exhibit 111.K. 1: Water Service Letter. Section III. Land Use Plan 57 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 149 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit III K 1: Water Service etter MARANA OUtIES DEPAP' 11*0 I hebntat-' 2 4 f �k)15 h ffiiiu to dt 1 - rN'LX)d Project ` i im ager lbo Planning Center 1 til South Church Avenue TuL'sttt AZ 85701 SUB) LC : Water Availahif ity tic'rr the .Spec if it flan for 4; aET(ws can Camino h1artana at 1'w in Pmt► Road; Part el No&:216-2. "160, 216-25.0170 and 216-25-0180: 1'12�, RRE, Section 12 Ptmr . t hidem cxxl:. I10 ATETZ S['PPT.N° Me- To` it d Nhu "told lttts 11t.en designated by tfve State Ld , Niiztxta Deptu of Waler Forces (AT WR) as Navin? an a5mitvd water stipply. The development lip =s within the h of the Town Llt `- larana water seti "fi p area and water sup 1 i s a_ssured. However, this dtws not mpini that WtitOT' 'ic p i_s currentl av tilal ►lp to the xiwd devv - It4 Trent. 11r A?TTZ SFTEVIC F. Me appic)w of %% ester uietuv al.}phLdl.tc4t�, IS SU11.Lt tO tltcV dsicalttl N t-4 %VcAC1' !iO'%FiLk! at tltC time an appb a ion is made. The dcveloper s:talI tv w -qulml to sign a w ater development agreement with the 'lb%r% A pfd elan identifying way use, lire tleav requirements and all major on - rite and oft - sate w titer fad l - it ies ni % i st be sitbtni"ed for a hydrattlir review. lbe develcVer shall txnstruci a wv ater dwrihution system to seTve the development Turd trcutster title of the system to the Town d Mmina. In c"isideration, the Town of % tarana shall +L:perdtty. maiii lain and seivice t The Lievelolvr shad ha,% the cost responsibility to ccuistnict txrth the oTisite d nd otisite facilities recluitrpd to serve the pc#cible ,ti AWF ancf tire. prc*et- ion demands ttr Yonr d e`•plcImment. Thi ti I otter snarl l re ;rl din V41 i(I fix- a T `w] of cme year f rinn Clip (leat? cat issn an. e. It vcmt h4vil 471N que5ttv.t s. p1+ Luw .all Lnu- efface tit 520 -38 -2.a6fl. SinL+er+ v. Scott 5cl11at1We1kr, 1 Utilities Vn f i1r1Per '5 'CID VVEST thtA F? Ar'- 0 w)P.RANA.ARQONA85743 i 3 '? 74 •S� "- � "' "" r'. Section III. Land Use Plan 58 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 150 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates 2 Wastewater The plan is to be served by public sewer. The project site is tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Reclamation Facility via the Continental Ranch Interceptor. The 8" gravity main sewer line, S- 665 -003, within the right of way of Blue Bonnet Road at Linda Vista Boulevard is proposed to be extended approximately 1.25 miles north along Blue Bonnet to serve The Preserve at Twin Peaks development adjacent to the southern boundary. The line will then need to be constructed within the right of way and easements approximately 1,800 feet to serve the site. A Sewer Service Agreement will be needed prior to development, see Exhibit III.K.2: Wastewater Capacity Response. 3 Other tilities Electricity and telecommunications will be extended to the project site at the time of development through agreements with individual utility companies. The following utility companies currently serve this area: Electricity: Trico Electric Cooperative (TRICO) Natural Gas: Southwest Gas Corporation Telephone: Century Link Cable: Comcast Trico Electric Cooperative (TRICO) provides electricity to this area of Pima County. It is anticipated that TRICO will provide power to the site. It is anticipated that Century Link will extend phone service to the site. Alternatively, the site may use wireless communications that can be provided by any number of service providers. Natural gas service will not be required at the site. Should natural gas service be required in the future, it is anticipated that service would be provided by Southwest Gas located within the Oasis Road right of way. 4 Sanitation and Recycling Services A number of private sanitation service providers may be contracted to serve the site with comprehensive trash and waste removal, recycling and environmentally safe waste management services. Section III. Land Use Plan 59 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 151 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit III K 2: Wastewater Capacit Response pTMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT .,-Ul NICIRIH SIONL AVENUE Tur-wi, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON H144a"S DIRE=;k Febmwr 26. 2015 Won Underwood The Plannin Center 110 S Church Avonue, Suite 6320 TLICSon., Arizona 8570' Sewera Capacit Investi- No. 2015-53 T I RF - Twin Peaks Estates, Parcel 216250160, 216250170, 216250180 Estimated Flow 13,824 g pd (ADWF). Greetin PH: (5►0) 724-6500 FAX, (520) 724-9635 The above referenced pro is tributar tc the Tres Rios VNIater Roclamat on Facilit via the Gontinental Ranch Imerceptor Capacit is cirrentl available for this pro in the public sewer S-6654)03, dovmstream from nwhole 5175-34. This letter -is not a reservation or comnitrmint of treatment or conve capacA for this project. It is an anal of the s as of this date and valid for one y ear. Allocation of capacit is made b the T III Capacit Response. If further information is needed, please feel free to contact us at (520) 724-4266 Reviewed b Kurt Stenyn. CEA % Section 111. Land Use Plan 60 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 152 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates O Public Services 1 Police Service The project site will utilize the Town of Marana's police service. The nearest Town of Marana police station is the Town of Marana Police Headquarters located approximately 8.5 miles northwest of the project site at 11555 West Civic Center Drive. As a relatively low density residential project, impacts to Marana's police services are expected to be minimal. 2 Schools It is anticipated that this project will generate approximately 64 residential units if fully developed at the target residential densities. Twin Peaks Estates is located within the Marana Unified School District (MUSD). There are no schools located within one -mile of the project site. See Exhibit 11.1.1: Recreation and Schools. The nearest school, DeGrazia Elementary School, is a K -6 public school approximately 2.2 miles south of the site at 5051 West Overton Road. Ironwood Elementary school is also located in the vicinity. The nearest public middle and high schools in the Marana Unified School District are Tortolita Middle School, approximately 3 miles south of the site at 4101 West Hardy Road and Mountain View High School, approximately 2.2 miles southwest of the site at 3901 West Linda Vista Boulevard. MUSD uses the following multipliers for student enrollment projections. (MUSD multipliers do not distinguish between different housing products): Elementary: 0.25 students per home (0.25 x 82) = 21 students Junior High &High School: 0.10 students per home (0.10 x 82) = 9 students Mountain View High School, Tortolita Middle School and DeGrazia and Ironwood Elementary Schools will serve the site. In the future, other school sites could serve the Twin Peaks Estates. Per preliminary discussions with MUSD, there are plans for a school site in the Dove Mountain area and /or along the Tangerine Road Corridor. MUSD is also considering the establishment of a district sponsored charter school to help serve the need for quality schools in this growing area of town. There is adequate existing school capacity within Ironwood Elementary School and the DeGrazia Elementary School site. Additionally, there is capacity available within Tortolita Middle School and Mountain View High School to absorb the anticipated number of students generated by this development Section III. Land Use Plan 61 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 153 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates 3 Fire Service The entire project site is currently within the Mountain Vista Fire District. As depicted in Exhibit 111.0.3: Fire Service, there are no fire stations within one mile of the project site. The nearest fire station (Northwest Fire District Station #339) is located approximately 2 miles northeast of the site at Thornydale Road and Tangerine Road. The nearest Mountain Vista Fire District Station ( #620) is located at 9310 North Shannon Road, approximately 2 miles southeast of the site. Section III. Land Use Plan 62 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 154 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates xhibit 1110 3: Fire Service LEGEND Ste em "wr Mountain V6ta Fite District fA, to rl I one mis Radius Nodhwes! Fire District � � { Goidef Ranch Fire District FILE NAWE MPL-01 Fire &O.nd 90 FomaC*un1yG1S,2Q15 % Section 111. Land Use Plan 63 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 155 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates P Recreation and Trails The majority of the development's open space will be owned and maintained by the HOA (with approximately 53% of the site as NOS and 0.4% as AOS). Approximately 24 acres of the subject property consists of natural open space (NOS), 0.2 acres of the property consists of active open space (AOS). The active open space is a neighborhood park adjacent to and visible from Camino de Manana near the north entry to the subdivision, providing easy access to all residents of Twin Peaks Estates through the internal sidewalk and trail network. This park is expected to be the recreation focal point of the neighborhood due to its visibility from Camino de Manana, as well as connectivity to the regional trail system. It will include play equipment, a shade structure, and seating. A trail connection to The Preserve at Twin Peaks will be constructed providing a connection for the region's trail users. The shared -use path required along Camino de Manana will also connect to the segment required to be built by the developer of The Preserve. An easement for the trail, internal to the project, will be provided to the Town of Marana for public access through the development, and signage will be provided. All plants shall be on an underground drip irrigation system. If turf is used, it must be irrigated from a secondary non - potable source as long as the non - potable source is available at the boundary of the rezoning area at the time that of development. However, much of the land is proposed to remain as Natural Undisturbed Open Space and shall not be irrigated. These actions meet the recommendations in the Town of Marana's Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan and the Marana 2010 General Plan. Q Cultural, Archaeological and Historic Resources No archaeological resources exist on -site. An archaeological survey was conducted on the subject property by Professional Archaeological Services of Tucson (P.A.S.T.), and the investigator determined in the report, titled Archaeological Survey of the Camino de Manana Section 12 Project near Marana, Pima County, Arizona, that no further cultural resource studies are warranted. If any are discovered during construction, State and local rules will be followed regarding handling and treatment of cultural resources. See Exhibit 11.J: PAST Report Cover. Section III. Land Use Plan 64 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 156 of 279 wq%hok-, %, " 7' �Ad s � t •• r JAW- E ' w• �r .r r • 6. gjp t s mo ` t�. r �+�.. � } "r �. ,, • I ;elf y' � *� N F ■ ' r � y i l k �* -�t y F +w a r s i N 1 t tae 5� of 9 r s � t •• r JAW- E ' w• �r .r r • 6. gjp t s mo ` t�. r �+�.. � } "r �. ,, • I ;elf y' � *� N F ■ ' r � y i l k �* -�t y F +w a r s i N 1 t tae 5� of 9 Appendix A Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report A rizona Game and Fish Department Mssion To conser�,e A rizonafs di verse wiAd He resources and man a For safe, compatible outdoor recreation opportunities far current and Future g enerations. Project N arne: Twin Pe aks Estates S p ecif c P la n Pro Description: 45 acr es p rop os ed fro r 64 s in g le-ta mil r es id e noes Pro T D evelo p ment With in M un icip alit es ( U rba n 0 r mift), R es i de rdia I s ub d " io n a nd ass o ciate d infrastructure. New construction Contact Person: Brian Underwood Or ani zati on: The Plannin Center On Behalf Of: CONSULTING Project ID: HOIS-00548 Rease re qe w the entire reporf for project t andlor V ecies recommendations for the locafio n information entered. Please refs n a cop for future reference. Pa I ol 11 Appendices Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 158 of 279 Appendix A Aiir-on a 6; a me a rod F ci� h 1) ep, artm en t p r co.1 e ot r e p, ci rt b.,-o' r, e ta t -EnF p, -1 2f C61 1 25E., 4. p If -1 'CI -1 51--14-.4*7' 4D P Nil P r c- 1 e --:t IC:, .' H 3- 1 CO C, zf-j P. P-if ' 4 ifi ['I j t P ' I - - ,D i I :� n-, P- r - 1 Thy. E rof I r c t h e p r -j.i e o.:t i n m e rit a I R. e+oI I ei.fo itS to as e od on the p r o.1 e --.-t -S t u a r e a t h at vs) a -S e nt e r e d. T h e r e po rt m u �S t toe u p, d ate d 0 - - t u ol a • r P a, I o c: at I cl n, ci r th e t p P -A p r c-c- a n g .' Th i:E: I• a porefirnina r r- rfi., -ir cinr'ne nta I = c-:re en in too 1. It is not a tibstitute fo r the potential knowled q a 1 n e d to'1 h .3i.f 1 n a b in g i I ri t r; ci n d u a � e I d -:-. u r -,.f e-�( c- f t h r- p, r o i e ct area. e a � T h i r eu" e vo 1 3 1 - ci not I. . - t:-. t :-. I t S S inten ded ti) r ep, la e ri'vir :on me rita I cons ultatio n (i ri-::Ilj di n to- IJ e ra I e-: I rc-. 1i It at i i--- n u n -J e r ti r-- E n +d 3 ri P r P d -D e I D I e'S i kd), I a n d i-E e pie r rTt I ti 1 ri g , o r t h e D e p a r t m e n t,--7 r ev I eom o s I to- - ---- P e ':: I ti C P , r co.'I e ot--- • I - IS I - - nt:: H er"t.3 g P Data Nola na me nt ;'11'--tem i MS) data '-- not inten iJr d to i ni::l d Th e D c - artm c Ij C- p ot e rit 1 a I d I -.:- tr i to u t I o n ci f ---. p e +_ i a I --- t at ij:---: s- •p e e i Es . Arb!ona large an dirverF. e wi p, lar,L-7, a ni maL--:, and e ri'v I r 1-.1 n m e rit a I c. r-I n d d i ---- n --I- t-i a t a r e e -m- e r c; h U o r[:-. e q u e rit t rn 3 Fl"� 3 T r-- J-'- M.T c. 11 n t3 1 n I I-: ' $Ef. th a t birl P I r e I" I-i Ij -7 to. I i ----: t-� d o n of k. n c-P o-o a to ci ut o r r i e i--.- I I i, n cite d I n a pi a rt K: u I a r a r ea m z n o I c, n ij e r C. Ij r th e r e. H tul d 3t -.: c, rit a 1 n ' -:-. 1 rif r m a t 1 c, n a to o u t s p e c i oEf. cs r., c u r r n+ C- -:-. th at h 'Tv e a 'A 'i a I ty. to e e n r e p -:1 r to- d 1:1 t fo r S pe e u rn -- rit e d F , t co t h e Dep artment N o t ,I o f .1"k r iz- ce n a h a-7 L. P- e n --:, u vo, e d c-: I a I --:, t at i-r-- P f' j e7 -. . a r, id e b e e n e. o n d u h .3 )." e 3 T I e IJ r P.3 t I%o' e. o P e a n d 1 rit e s, v. S u c h s u r v e m ay, r e'i.� e al p, r e' I i ro.i t h at h a'k, .1 - i n s a t I I I if r., u .--- t 1i :1 � 1:1 pi ii r --1 i p, e :: i Ef-- of Z- p e i a I c-. 1:1 n :: e r n n 4. H a to Il'ola p Arb!o na d 1 ata, o pie off loa 11F,,( S. P e CIc-s cof 0 r eates-.t C' ons e ri.fab on N eed (S G C N) un de r ou r State i I d I if e rs P I a n P) a r, d ':i" p, e o.-JI e c-1 f E co ri co m 1 c.- a ri d R :-, c; r e at 1 1) n a I I rn V , o rt an C. P- ("S' E F: I) re ps Te----: ent r, c-ite ritia I iS pe ditE tr ibution mode L f or th e '31tote of ArIzon a I.Wh ich, a re .- u b I e ct ti t o n q o i rig - - - -f a kf-.i* Idl �e res ou rce can cha ri e i ui c�. ty-, a ri id the han - m, id M11-ation an d r efin ern ent. Th e --tabj-- i I 3*1.1'ai lab ilit of n J ata i.roill n date a ref in Pd as, Pssmpnt. Loo-Alor-rF. A cam: cura cam: y- Merl Pr 1--iji e t--:t I o i-.: a t ir.- r-c-- a re .3 11m e lf to--, b e b o t h p, r e ci SI C- 3 r, IJ a 1i r ff--- r t p, u r V j cc- e ---- of w-- n'v i r --i n m rit .3 1 re I.i I E i1'1) The c r e at --- u'r-d.co Me r cof the Pro 'c--::t R E'kelevoj Report is leh.,- r Es p,:,n----: Ible f ci r the project locati c-on and thuz the i-:clr relAn ei:s. of th P- P ro lect Review Rep c-irt content P ie 2 oy 11 Appendices 2 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 159 of 279 Appendix A Aiir-on a 6; a me a nd F ci� h 1) ep, artm en t p r co.1 e ot r e p c, rt 1 25 p, -1 2 b.i-o' r, -EnF f C6, E., 4. p d f I _peak__ e ta t H R. Plfi) ['I a t ' CI-15 1 I 4: 4 P r c- 1 ec l I D .' ,: � 1 - CI '--; D C, zf-j I- Q121 - 3- 4D P Nil F, e c* rr, m e r, id -at I :, r, s D I s d a i n', e r : -1 The C e P a rt m e rt t '-s nt e r es t e d 1 n Ifi e- c: c, re e ri.c a fici n cif all f i h and vo) I I d 10 e r +='= o u r ic: ine.luding t h cis t :_1 - I G. e n cA to P e n d o c: u m re rit C- d vo it h t h p r co e cA 'k i, 1 c. 1 n t i I i t p d in th i r P V ic- rt an d th cc, e t a t m a ha ko I a = ooel I as cith er ija me a nd no n ga me vo 11d Ir e. the zy cl n a E! �1'1` e d t at I jt r, R e c: c, m m e ri d at i r:, rrs. h a'v e t, e e rt m a d e tr - D e p a rt m e nt, u n iJ e r a ut h ci r 1 t -1 T F I t Tit p 5 (A"m i_r, e me nt an d S'poc, rts), 17 (0 a me a nil F _t�7 h), and i"T rans p c rtation). id r vidl rte rc---- ,:iijrc:e -- m j ti p- minim i p d c? Hkc cs c- d tc%f the F + :,t it e rit' a I I im p a ot, t co 1`C=. h a n d i., I l r e 1:: 1:1 m rn e n d a b c, n .-- g ;- n e ra te d f r :, rn 1 n f ci r ma b :, n Z. Ij to m itt e d fc, r 1:1 11 r p r c, p o S E! d pi r 1:1.i e, cA. T h e re c*o mme nil A cins. are pr ell min av i n s- i:-.ci pe, d E!s i ed to pr ,:,'vi de ea rf r co re id er atici n---- co n; a 11 po ec-le• of lirll I d I 4. Nil ak i n q t h 'tS 1'rif :- r rn a t I c, n d1 re c:t -y' a' a 11 a to d ci n :it ---- u to ----: t ft iA e f co r th I'lepartment' -s rc--o.cj'C4.coI ., t proje c:t P I r Q P I cl .7 a n FIi r u I d n c, t d e , r e a:- e c, 1i r co p p cl rt ii n I t,c t co r eii I e i,rki a n e v a I 1i a t e .3 d d ft I ci n a I p r e r i n f ci r m a b on a n co r n e o-o p r coj e -A p r c, p cos- a L~ 5, F u rt h er c: c, ci r d i n a b c- n no the D e P , a rt m e nt re q u Ii r e t h e -S. ji to m itt a I c, f t:h t'-:. E ro.c i t ce n rn c- rit a I F: e'i.c I evi., F: e p co r t a r::r:r'! = I e .3 r, d F ir o' r:t p I a ny I :, p r d c u , :: m e rit a t c, ri ti at in c: I 1i d e r c j e el n a r r a t ry e, a c: r ea g e t c, b e eat r - j - J rn p a cl e d , h ci.rki c: co n `= tr u et i ci n c3 r p r o e cl a ctrii.f i tiq ---. "i a r p t co to e a c: c: ci r7i p I I= h e d. a n d r i r c, I i e c:t I o c- a I itif Inforr'nAcin (includin -.:-.do- map). Once AGFD had rer.-erved the infcormaticin, plea-_�C- allcivo :-ZC I da"is tc'r c:cirnpleficin of pro ' ier-4 r Send re .- tcj F'r ci-I e--:t E -v--=j I 11 .1 ics r"I P r ciq r -a m, H -=t b I t,-=jt Br -=(-i cl-i A iz, -'- n', a rid R t, -s D 7�i rt rr, ef-, t r I Z --, ri a 1_11-d I 5 F-1-3 F-I ',Net--t C -=i r ef re e H I.q Fi • F*i -D e r-i i I Ar i Z. , ri 8 50 86 - 5 IXI 0 P icirie Nu rnber 623) Z3& Nu n-b u - I-C-23) 1Jr P E N�d) a z r� c, 13 r n m e n t a I F c, I i 4:4 1' N E P A) a n di'c' r C n cor m a -if a L-7 o b e n e o�_-7 a ry lind er the N ti-In I E n Endanilered *'-`kc:ti`ESA). Site ---. P e c: 0'1 c. r e C. 1:1 M M e ri d 3 ti cs re M 3'% to e p ro pt cis, e d d ur ing tj rth er N E R E a n a tv , i:-. cl r ft-i r c. liq h co ct r d i r, a t I co n wi 3 ffe i:.t P d a P r, :: i e - P a:)"-. -3 :IT 11 Appendices 3 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 160 of 279 Appendix A Ari7nna Cv.=.-np. arr, Fir* nPpalmeri pm -9r)ort Nvin peFlks esta-pm 9 pd- Proocft ID HGIS-OC►+13 Review Date 21191201504-43-49P!,A 0 P-U L] B-j Pro Eoindar Pi,ijact Site (vacs) 4:5 48 I af!� i', 37 4361, -111 0743 1 Cmril Arm A,:iF Z) Rejicri:z , Tucson T.-A,vrQNp'RA,i T 17 R17F 1. Guadf* i. RUE LA 5 CAWON 6 L41�-*r Crwo". 3varmo twt. "E-ft. DOLOW0, lor"W.". "trwap. ws,cn-fif P Cafp. G'EOW OWIS FAG NIPS. NRCAN Cs 06m. IGN. Ked*sLwrN- Dodrante 6uNwy, E-w—tpen, MEV. Eso Chn&(Hw Kor Pa 4 Q= AO 4 r - < . Appendices Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 161 of 279 Twin Peaks Estates Specific Plan Aerial ima Basemap %,)ith Locamr Map Appendix A Ari7nna Cv.=.-np. arr, Fir-.h nPpalmeri pm -port Nvin peFlks esta-pm 9 .12.W pd- Proocft ID HGIS-OC►+13 Review Date 21191201504-43-49P!,A Twin Peaks Estates Spec-Ific Plan VVeb Map As Submitt.ed b User 1 on gm me WIF cowm A01fau Pw.* 6 'J om:)r fteomno P vk Omni TUCScr is$ i1rc ;A111-1 I Nalma ^ A ------ Was jo 0 J* dd 49 .*40 W Lmd3 VlWir f4t r ro*od C) P-niact Doundar C] R-Awed Pit Soiridary Prt�od S17 (acrpr.'I. 4Z.4a LBVL& IDDY 32.4C63; -, 11.0743 0:)Urwt Porm AC,FD Rj-,4 -acson T0mm"v T'25. RI.2r-- USGS Qu=, s) RUF-LAS CANYON - dre,% - sm 6 r, . I'm - a viv twig r r ** w marme i C . - .. IrC 'Ok.: 1% Ir S. k 04 a aw 0'3*. so a }.L C is IL• is sw Coll .&Nd Wr, VAO OL. 1-14 -; IAAWWWWLUJ" Mane ES -- — I Appendices 5 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 162 of 279 Appendix A An17ona (ramp. aid Fi�-i Roo- prv)jP.0 -pporl Kvin pop.4r, Rstates sp 12 r vtl Froject 113 ReA-r=,*-@, Date 2 1902015 N 43,49 P'%4 Twin Peaks Estates Specific Plan Tope 3asemap 'Nith Townshipt'Ran and Lard -Ownership 9% AM 4$00 p 1 .4 Fy 0 0.4.7 ;5 1.1 1-65W &.2 N Mllla& P 5 -J " I Appendices 6 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 163 of 279 I -rc Ho.t•dar Mwedi0tivr ProJect Sae iecre9j, 45.4.6. EJ^npl Fv * ct boutyJary Nab Far-Aton LuLLc,-v t DD * l 32 4r-,33.' 11 * D743 L -:won%h F ,Rn.-- q r rtIvWC Count Pirm AT Gam ano Fivo tea: t stma anti Ra Pa6m AGFD Rapp oiio- -IILSUrl RI 161 SlAa T a a.: R ar; T,,2S R12C DOR US Forest 54evica ILISV:5 QU84$:6.4 RIkitLA5 ZOANYON -.in U ,cLxvrK ►wrtt•r, rrvrup, r;*,p vo: r -4t- 6 L& ' )&9;KA %.A*AL " V.WW'044, C tG 'A . = i L:vrm I* P 5 -J " I Appendices 6 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 163 of 279 Appendix A At i:zon a 0 a me a nd F is h D ep artment project—report tvoin—peaks_estates—sp_12505-12584pdf Project ID: HOIS-OD645 R evi ew D ate: 2J1 9V2015 0443:49 P M Spec i al St at us sped es and Sped al Areas Doou ment ed v4thi n 3 Mil es of Project Yi ci pit Scierdific Name Common Name FWS USFS BLM State SGCN Antilo cap ra a me rica n a s o no rie ns is 10J area for Sonoran Pron 18 A ui la ch r a etos Golden Ea B GA S 18 01 au cid ium b ras ili an um ca ctor urn C actus F e rr u in ous P m owl S C S S WSC 1 B Go ph e rus m or afk ai Sonoran Desert Tortoise C X S WSC 1A Le pto rr ris our as o a e Less er Lon g - nos e d B at LE WSC 1 A v erb a bu en ae Golden Ea B GA S 18 Tucs o n - To rto Ida - S a rda C atal ina W ild life C or rid or S C S 18 Mou nta ins Link a e D es i n Western Burrowin Owl Sc S S 18 Turn am oca m acd ou g ali i Tumarnoc Globeberr S S SR WSC 18 Note: Status code defien4ions can be ;band at htip:/AmAm-az tug — o efinitiol n -shtm. Sped es of Great est Conservat i on Need Predi cted \AAh in Project Vici nit b ased on Predi cted Ran e Nbd el s Scierdifio Name Common NaMe FWS USFS BL M State SGCN Aix s p ons a Wood Duck 18 Am mos pe rmo ph ilus ha rr is ii H ar ris' Antel op e S q u irr el 10 An ax us retifor mis Sonoran Green Toad S 18 Anthus spra S p ra g u ens P ipit C X WSC 1 A Antrostomus rid B of coil are d N i h tja r S 18 A chr Golden Ea B GA S 18 As p id ots ce lis sticto ra mm a 0 is nt S potte d W hi pta it S C S 18 Athene cu nice laria h Western Burrowin Owl Sc S S 18 Botaurus lenti nos us Ame ri can B itter n WSC 18 Buteo re Ferru Hajvk Sc S WSC 18 C hi lom en is cus str ami ne us Variable Sandsnake 18 Chionactin occipitalis klauberi Tucson Shovel-nosed Snake C X 1A Colaptes chr Gilded Flicker S 18 Coluber bilineatus Sonoran Whipsnake 18 Cor towns endii p all escens Pale Towns ends Bi Bat Sc S S 18 Crotalus ti Ti Ratilesnake 18 Crotaph nebrius Sonoran Collared Lizard 18 C nth us latirostris Broad- billed Hummin S 1B C macularius Desert Pupfish LE WSC 1A D ip od om s p e cta bi lis Banner - tailed Ka n g a ro o Rat S 18 Eu de rm a ma cul atu m Spotted Bat SC S S WSC 10 Eurnops perotis cal ifornicus 0 re ate r W ester n 8 on n eted Bat S C S 18 Falco pere anaturn American Pere Falcon SC S S WSC 1A Glaucidium brasilianum cactorurn C actus F e rr u in ous, P m owl S C S S WSC 18 Go ph e rus m or afk ai Sonoran Desert Tortoise C X S WSC 1A Haliaeetus leu co cep ha lus Bald Ea Sc. S S WSC 1A 8 GA H el od er ma s us pe ctum Gila Monster 1A H i g le n a s p. n ov. Hooded Ni nake 18 pa 7 of 11 Appendices Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 164 of 279 Appendix A Ar izon a 0 a me a nd F is h D ep artment project report twin —peaks_estates—sp_12505-12E.'--:4pdf Project ID: HOIS-00645 R evi ew D ate: V1 W2015 04-43:49 P M Species of Greatest Conservat i on Need Predi cted -oAh in Pro Vici nit b ased on Predi ated Ran e Nbd el Sciwdffio Name omrnon Name F U�;FS Kt-A State SGCN In cili us a 1v ar ius Sonoran Desert Toad 18 Kinosternon sonoriense sonoriense Desert Mud Turtle = 18 Las iurus b loss evil lii W este rn Red Bat WSC 113 Las iurus xa nth inns Western Yellow Bat = WS 18 Le op ar dus pa rd alis 0 ce lot L E WS I A Le pto n ris cur asoae Less er Lon g - nos e d B at L E WS 1 A v erb abuenae Le pus all en i Ante to pe J ack r ab bit I B Macrotus californicus California Leaf-nosed Bat SIC S WS 1B Mel anerpes urop Gila Woodpecker 1 B Mel os p, iza I into In ii Lin colds Sparrow 1B Mel ozone aberti Aberts Towhee S 1B Micru ro id es e ur us Sonoran Cora lsnake 1B M 0 ocultus Arizona M Sc S 1B M ve Iffe r C ave w atis Sc S 1B M y u ma ne ns is Yuma M S C I B N femorosaccus Pocketed Free- tailed Bat 1 B Pa r4h er a o nca Ja LE WSC 1A Pass erculus sandwich ens is Savannah Sparrow 1 B Per,--- g riathus amplus Arizon a P ock et M ous e 1 B Pero lon Little Pocket Mouse 18 Peucaea botterii ari2:onae Arizona B otter i's Sparrow S 1B Pe uca e a car pa lis R Ldo us-w in e d s parrow 1 B Phr solare Re Horned Lizard I B Ph rh us b rows i Saddled Leaf nosed Snake 1B Poeciliopsis occidentalis Gila Topm inn cw LE WS 1A occid e rdal is Pr o ne s ub is hes pe ri a Desert Purple Martin S 18 Setop, ha g a petech is Yellow Wa rb ler i B So no re Ila pa pa g o ru m B la ck Mo unta in Tal uss in ail 1 B Tad ar id a br as i lie ns is B razili an F re e-ta ile d 9 at 1 B Thomom umbrinus intermedius Southern Pocket Gopher 1 B Tro pacificus P a chic Wren 1B Vireo bellii arizonae Arizona Bel Is V ir eo 16 Vulpes macrotis Kit Fox Speci es of Eco no mi o an d R ecreati on I mportance Predi of ed --Athi n Prn- Ject \4 dry 4 soi&-itfic- Name - 1 � , o rri m ci n N aj me FVV S USFS BLM '3-t ate SI-31CN C al, lip ep la g am be Iii Oambels Quail Od oc oil eus h e mio nus Mule Deer Pe car i taja cu J ave lin a Pu ma con solo r M ou r-da in Lio n Pa 3 of ii Appendices 8 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 165 of 279 Appendix A l u c, n a r.7 a me a n d F 'G' h Cr e P , a r t Fri e n t p r cije ct r e p I:, rt ti.cki 1 n ak. s _ e -- . tat s- pi -125 Fff, 1 fbD 4. P t df F'r cile A 11.1 : H 0' I•-1--f-lill R E�ke I ei.(ki D a t 2V -1 !Al271 Cl -1 fo Cl 4: 43 A!D Pll F ri ,_ I-If Es F) FA Eir-j I I J R e-.- r eat i o n I m p o rt -=i n c3:- F*r e iJ I It eJ t l­i 1 r-i Prcs -'P- -A "-A '--: I F-1 it Sc; i ef-it if i c: N -=j rn e ci Fri Fri c, n N a r1 e Fif V So US P3 BLM State S G C N n -da a h i te - e C1 D .31 1 111: 1 r_ Fr c, 1 e ct T -i.i p e - Ei e -ve I ci p rri r-4-it 'VVI t h 1 ri Il ri 1 c- I p;A I t I ila-:. I . r L, a ri 1_3 r rj h 'I, Re Eli iJ e r-it i .A -S. u b J I -,.I 'S 11:1 r) :-d F`i 1J -a c, at e J 1 rif r as:t r u ct u r e I N e - -N c3D r, --=7t r ii ct i ce ri Prci-il Ti.cpie Re;R-,orrn­,&-,,J.AiciriS' F e n c: e r e m m e n d a ti on= ifi) I I b P d S NF, Ij 3 F, t Ij F ri i F, t h P 3 L of t h r- fe n C; P p cij r, 1-1 an d t h P 1.1-11 1 1 d I if s 1 -tro tr -1 be Impacted trif the project. :'7'eneral cj ulidelines. for ereurinq fencill Inc ludill barbll ifkiire con the to a n d b ott I--, m vi) it h t il rn a,:.:, i Fri ii m f P n :: e h e i g h t 4.2` , m 1 n i m ii Fri he iq tit f -1 r bc- ti I--. m 16". Kill -A if ic ati I--- ris, t ---I th i:-. -1 = ig n ma- b e con s I C! e r ed f c, r f en d ril i ant t c, b E! e ro ut ne t en c:ciij nte r J tc l bi g h cir n sheil f i r pron 1 corn (e. g ., Pron!1 1-111-1 rn fe not nQ vkicoi ld re ii ire TE:" mi nim urn h ill I n th e b ottom"j. Ple a,---: e refer to th e D e p artrn l F e nci nq l id eli Fill 1 1:1 1�., a t e d C, n t) e h C, Fri P V ia! 3 P Cif th i:­ applic:latiliDn at C, urin the pla nn In st a of 'Ii oijr pr il, p I e a e cons lid er th e lo I r re q ion all ne PAS Cif 1.fi. ill d I ife iri re to g move rile Fit ocin n e,-A'rkf il an d a el= tc, h ab itat n ee it. Loc-S of till == P e Tme ab Ilit,i p r events rru,i I life f ro Fri a ocess in r il o u r c: e 1 n d 1 n q rn at es , r ed ii I,-. e q e n e fl cj.fi), p r Ill e n t. wi I d I if e f r ce m re c: ij I I:, n it in q a re x (1,I) h e re I c, :: a I eA 1 r p a ts o n = Fri ha *i.,, e r-i C: I--, ii r r , an d u It i n-i a t e � p re'; e r, L7 kel., i 1 111 if e f r m rit r i b ii b ri to e cos y s t e m f lil n ct i I) rc-- u C: h x p I--, I I I n at I ci n P P d d't:-. pi e rs a I , c: ci Fit r ci I o f p r e' n u Fri b e r,-:. , a n d r es I S, ta n c., E! to 1 Fiv a-:. O.i e s p le e. I e s n m a n % f 0. a-: e 'S , 1. tT E 3 FFG a Ff IJ 1.1") a-F h Il pe r 1:1 's.1 I d e natij ra I moern e ec- -vnt rr id f c, r kfkiild life a r, d h 1:11_1 ld b Fri aintain e d in th l r natural state. 11 pla n It al ji pp ort a lar dr'vers ilb� of S e6e:-:, and -- h coild tie c.,cintJ in ed 'j-0ithir-i irri pc, rtant ko., ild life Fri il me Fit cor rid rYs - In a d ditic, n, Fria intain in g b I o d i -I., e r:-- it a n d e I:: o sys. t e Frt fu n CA I o n -1 c: a n b e f a I--. I I it 3 te d t h r ci ij!j h 1 Fri p r c(o, I n q d E:F I q n s of ---. tr act ii r e -S . f e n c: e r o a sl a a r, d I - - : ii tu, P r ts t o p r C, Fri ci t e p, a-: .-. a q P fir a 'i.c a r i ety, F-If 1.1111 1 f I I d I I till C c-srrT III er 1 rnp ae.t. of coutdc, cer I1!j Ming o n vvil dlife an Id 11 eve Ice r i Frie a,---: ur ► or afte rn ativill that c: a n be tak e n to In ,: a,--: e i n g p - t e nt ia I i Fri p a e1s t I d I K e. C C. n d ii C1 ki-ti i Id I i fe s ii r,,.,, il fs t :, I - t P PC: i ef 1.1) 1 h ii Frian a fe t 1A., ti i I e Fri i n i m b 1, j rrnin il ithin p r cs.1 e- of a re a, a n d e -ki a I ii a t le p r o p os ed a ctii,f itil e b e d on ---. p e c., lie ---- bil o I f, gy - a rid n a tij r a I his-to ri,f to d etc- rml ne if a rtifid al I iq rain q rn a -y- d1 = r u p, t b e h a -if lic, r p a tte rn I) r h .3 b it a t us e. U e -1 n fi,r ti e rn In i Fri ji n, a Fn co ii rit ci f II q h t n e e d ed f o r at e ty- 1A e d b -v I' hfin g I I r a r e 1-1 t P er- A Es. aff c I I a r r o vki sl p e rA r ii Fn b ii I ts. h c, 1i Id b e 1i S e Cl a ce fte n a::--. p I--, I I t c , I c d-I-I j P r tri 1 1 , ht'n q ---. h ou lid b e a h'e Ide d,. i::a rite re Cl, or r.-iit to ens. of e that hqht re ar-h ►f , o n tv a fe a� n e e din q I I I ii min at i o n. Kill I Fi I Fn'z e p, c, t e n t I a I I Fit r cl d u j i ci n c, r - , , - . p r e d ci f e x cit'l c 1 ri •if 3 S " ri• E a P , E c: I c - S . a,-:. 'rkf e --I-. P e C; I I:: a n ti e pi I a n t- a n I Fri a L. j ll ti I-: ria 'L a rid othe r re rij an rre: (e.g. m ob -1 i(i.ill mail l ice, P alto ration to ec:o logi cal fu nottil re o r com P ill IfI.Ifth i-I r p r e'y' 1i p n n a t'rkf e p - 1 E!E • aria ca ri ,� a u s e s o I a 1 i m p a C�ts e . ij I i -v tc, l f I-, r a !? P r e d uction, ini--rea P 1 -ail dfir e ril . Tri term---. vi.il or invasive plants are often iced interchanijeatity'. PrecaiAlons should betakc-n to all 1 1 11 1 p m e n t ii ti HE e d in b-i e p rope ct a Me s b efc. re I e a-1 I at i re (Ai in, it A r' o n a h a n I:, Pq ii o o n a h E I I-I I �7 1 ' A ' I P P d r F: owl I" Pd '-;tabjtkz:, R 1i I Ef- R 3 -4- 4-4 a rt Cl R'__1 - e e . il r 1 �­ o ri a C- P T , a rt Fn e n t sl t'.A' r'c: ii ft u r e vill., e bs, I te f I) r r -1 t r ct e d plant- Aid ditIo If the 1-1. "D. ', e pa men of A lcu Iture ha,---: into rrn atic, n re g arid in p est am d p il:_---ticid P, h Pr tl de, bic, Iol iC:a I contro I ac ent., a nd me .-:hj ni C�31 ::i-i ritro 1, in-vasKfe V ilarit control methoi±z includin - - - I .? - - - htt o us d a - -3 ct 'u-!t-v i c , il o r ta 1 6 - r - , d a h c, Fn e , The D e P a; r tm e n t r e q u I at e s . tyr i rn p c, rt at I ci n , p u r c h a i n q . a n d tr 3r,'' p o rt a ti o n of ko., i Id I K e a n d f L:• h f R tr i ct e d Lji.e P I id I i fe' il, plea -se refer to tie hunting regulations for further infr-irmation aunting rwL�-:i-,Ltrrij T t, e t r ii --*t i ce n r:1 r m3 int a n P r:1 c i f i.o.i at P r d e v e I ci p ril nt• ho lild in - Wde: in co rpo ration of .3,_ I t of th e n atij r3 e n'sl I f 1:1 n m il n t a n d t h ii a I re Zs. ce iii r1 -e1 Fn a 1 rata 1 ri 1 Fig tr, e Iirl a t e r f c, r a -v a r 1 e t;( of e r'- i il s. a t e r ii rf a e. e a re a i" e a ril u lre a qr Ill a re a d ue t:, In -f liq ht dr ink inij), accpssibflitii-, -y'ea ou n d a-if all at, ility-, Fnin i'mizinq potential fir r to.iate r I I q 1i li at,,i Cr ro til n of f I ir-- h i n g , - h a din 1: 1 7 : 1 P rrG r e q ii if natural fe at r- r li res, re g lila r a n - u f C1 e b, r I P'__ C: a P I e r 3 FFI P IS FrilriffrizIng cib-z-Aacdol and minim'uinq accumulation of sill and Froid. P a:)"-. 9 of 11 Appendices 9 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 166 of 279 Appendix A Ai t c, n a d a me a nil Fir. h D e p a r t m e rt t p r oJe ot r e p o rt tl.cki 1 ri s e ---. ta t E:-:. -125 Fff, 12f: :-,. 4. p df F'r ole cl 11.1 : H (7' IS-COPJ-�F_s R E�ke I ei.(ki D at 2V -1 !Al271 Cl -1 fo Cl 4 43 A!D F1.4 1`0 I rribl_ a t lo n a nd rn it I at I c- ri c, f 1 m p a otsr to vkp i I d 10 art d fi:--• h species -. d lie to r-;ha n, in ifkiater q iia Ift q uantit y . c, he m't:-. t ro,,, t e rTi P ic- rats re, art d a Iteratio n to f lcpkiri.i re calm eF ijim in q, rna qndiide, duration, and fre of filer cidz_-) -sholild b e a I ii a t e d . tiA I n I rnitz e I rn ro .3 1::L:� t ci s p fin r, ir. i n - s t r e a m f I kei.i. a n d '�- c, rr-:: i d e r i r ri g at i o r, I rn p r 171.1, P M P rits t o d e c: r e as e kor-.i a to- r i-c- e . If d r r S S irk e r t I'm Inc cif t he e p r ci I e c.t I n o r d e r t o m in I MU E I Ft P a C;t,-:. t Q p n in g d I i n g I is a pro 1-:cimpiliriprit, rrin� I G fl and other a c -,-: T, e c i e s ( in c. I u d e S p aij-ki ri I n g ­7 r" a7� o ns- an d t"_" r d ii :: e �S p r E! a d co f e ot 13:: i ri,ko, aF 1`!i e ---: p e c: I e -T r e c� ci rr, m e n d e a r I%( d 1 r ect c o o r d i n at io in kf-.i i t h F' ro or-- ot E-kf a I li at I o r, F' r ci gr arn to:, r P ; IJ P i;ts th li I d Im A a t P r r or- i ii ri:: ko., et I a ri dar . :--- tr ea rrisz. p r In g s . ant Yco r rl p a r lan h a t, itaL--• . it I t I �-. t I- — c: - r, c u r k(ki hi rl The D e p a rt m e rit r e c: c, m m e ri d t h at t+i-i., I I d I i to- s ii r --. - - - a ( -. o in d ur-A e d t --., d et e r m 1 n e if n o e- e n S. it Kr e -S- p er�- I e- - � the P r o J e ct a rea. d a n c: e ci r rri i. n i m iz at i cs ri m p as u r e-7 o , o u I d 1 n c: I ii d e o:: co ri d ii ct n g p r o J e ot a c:t ii.1- it I i e ---. o ii t - - I d e o f b r e e d I Fl 11 s eas ons. E3 = e d ,_ctrl th e p r co.j e ct tdf p e ent e d . c: co o r d 1 n a t I co n i.ei.i it h ':_:; t H t'7: to r I --* P r es e ri.r a ti 1:1 n C" I e m a to e re q u i r e 'tittri k, . g a ':: " H F OA - ri � � - ti . ti$Ti f 1. Trenches should be covered or back-filled as soon a-T r ic-i-s-sitile. Incorporate escape ramps in ditches or fencinq alonq Z Z. the perimeter to - deter mall marnmal -. and herptefauna I ards, tcrtco' t - : e• from enter in n d iti-he -s'. C o i ife P il art ni n ii rito th eir t, p ciratin g to-ijil d1l - rin mu an active - up the sA r- Aiina b ilit an d rn obilit f cof u ,, o-llldlif�_ . inc:rir I re a Vecorripreh ens ive p I arts., their re a I trans = portaticin pl art:---, a rid their open s-paoile/conservat I or, land s proq r ms. An eff ec.firkf e ap pr cia ch to wii Idl ife p Ian ril ni be .ill re (ei.iith th e id e ritificat ---on of the i.AJ ild life r es c ur in ne ed cif p r c, t e --A Al n , a n a_ m e n t o f 1 m p o rt a fit h a b it it tol I i k- a n d 1-: Y ri n e c Vo e c: 1:1 r r 1 d c- a n d th I ri c: 1) r p Q T at 1 cl ri co f t h kirl life I c o rn p on e nt---. intro th e c: o rn m u n it p1 3 riz 3 n d pr og r a ME . C 0 M Ft u n it p Ian n e r---. ---. h ci u Id I de rit if r o e n p a c: e -S a n d h b ft a t b I o ck S ti at c: a r, ti e ma i n ta in ed 1 r, th e i r a re a , a n d th e n e c, e --- s a r :: ci n in e c:t I ci w. ti e ti.ei.i e e- r, th crS e to I co o r - t o b p e rue d or p r c, t e ct e d. 1_� 1:1 m m u n 1 ti.c p 1.3 nn e r-,--. S. h ---I u ld 3 1 .:- c, tf..lr, &. ukifth S-tate and loc.al trarri;portation planning entiti-ZI, an d p I a n n e r,-,-: f r o m o th e r c: co m robin it I t co ter c: ce o r d I n a t I o n an d co cop eratio n in de lop in i co mp atit, le d ewi.i,e lo prn ent p I a r r : - - t ci e ris l o r e ife., I I d 14 e ha to i ta t --. co n ro -A Ke it T h e 1) ► p a r trn e n V s g li i d P lin i-Z f i-, r in -: r - - --idr - Z. -1 I — - I -, r p o rst i n g if-� i I d 10 e 1_: o rE: I erations into- ccirrim tin It pl art ning a n d de-m-e lop me rits ca n Lie f clu rid cin t-i e h cirri e p aq e of tht'S ap pl ictatio n at azaf d.o o-v-A, ais.,'a 11 ide lir, ez _3:-:7 ClEnFiql-i i-.0ki-erts. to rninirnizze irripactsto c.hannel gecirrietry', cif de,11iiin channel 11 e 1:1 M et r (I 011ft.1 f 10 1,A), Ulf e ( t" 3 rl a-: t m at;-7 o c- a i ns--) an d ­ li tr:t r a t e-: t , C:J r r e x p e ot e d d i:--. h a rg p ir­ i rig I c, Z. al draina of ap pr op riate R er p tin lmc'�:e to ar rie is to a llcofki move irrie rit cif a rTip hlb la rr, c, r fiG h ( e- g -, el iminate fa IL; Als o to r ter re-s.tria I ko,illd life if-.i aF h e = an -S t r e a m :* o r r I d o rs oft p r ceif i d e i m p r-, r t3r& corridor"--- for irricii.orement. &ferall height, and rs it, - 1:1 f p e c: i e ri 19t h S h i c li I d to c, F . t I rr, i zz ed f cp r m crui e m e n t of th e g r e ate t r, ii m to r a rt d d ri c- p e c; to- d t I I IJ I U - ki P tf, - P J' nil :: I car ki-itz: at to --it h e n iJ::-: to p --- aq e . u Ki, e ft d w' I il n h o u I d c: o ns-. I d e r m oG' t u r e 1!1 ht, a ri d n oci­ e trki hil I p p ( O'ks, I I I I m al.:: i rn iz e ut I I I z- at i c, n. F 1) r ma rfy- S p e ! ems , f e n c, i n - * I .1 t7� a n I rn p c, r ta rot d �t-7 n f e at ii fie t h at c; a n ice iA i I i z ed it h K,- e r ts t o fiii-irtel to)ildlife Intco the :,e ares-s. and, ml n I M 'E.: e the p ci t e n t I a I fc, r r ce a d ifti a - c; co I I 'G. ics r[:- . G u I d E! I I n e-:. f cl r c: li [if e rt d e I g rE:- t ci fa C�lllt3te III-011dlife P 3 2-7-S: a g e Cart tie to und o n the tic, me page of this. on applicati at F.': j Z! d. . i;i " , g U lin ef .jz Bas ed i-,in th e P , rci.je --:t t e enter ed, c:ci o roll nation i.i-i)ith Ariz-cin a D e pa rtirne rit c E ri-,.6ro rim enta 1 1:1 iia lit rria- tie rei u ire d E _ e d ci n th e p r cp.i e ::t bi p e e nt e r e d , c co ci r d i n a t I ci n it h .4 r I z- ci n a D e p rt rTi e r, t of Vii at r R e -S o u r c. e .-- m a ti P r 1 li If e d tAt p, ZA -a znfdi a t e r z ojio 1 1,-'d e f a u It re I li red P IA birp e enter ed, c-co o rdi nation U S. rrf�e Corps of E rigin r- er, m all ti e I B a ed c, n ti e p ro i . 1 - - - - fitt Z, j ti - u:E a c_e- afMu_ t F B a Z.-; ed cl n th e p r co J e cwt t",, ,� e e nt e r e d . c; o ci r d I n a t I ci n if,j it h C o ii nt,,i IF lo o d C7 n t r ci I di t r I i c-t"­ "i rTi a ' toe r c li r P d Development plans should provide for open natural space for wildlife mo--ferrie rot; while aL.,:. minimizin the pate ntla I to r i,rki I I d I rt e- h ii m 1 n te r a rA I o n t h r o it il h d e ---. Ira f e a bi re Fl e a e c o n t a cA F r o.1 e c:t E -ki- a I ii a t ci ri P r co !; fa rTi fc, r rn o r I rif o r m a t I o n ci n IT',.f I n g kfo.i it h ii r b a n I I d I if e. Palo,'-. 101:111 1 Appendices 10 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 167 of 279 Appendix A Arizona Game and Fish Department p ro rttvoi n— pe * s_ estates _s p_1 25051 2534 p df N * ct ID � H I S-cl?" R ev i eva D at# Z� 1 9/201 6 04:43. - PM V4 restoration pro (includin tr*jtfn*rAs of invasive or exotic species) should haw* a completed sl* evaluation P lan (id en*in environmenta c4ndlions necessar to re- estab lis h nati-tee ve a r eve g etation P U n (species, d e rL7 it method of est3 bl L- h ment). a s hort and lon mio rAo rin g p, Ian, includin adaptive man a g e rr* nt g uidelines to address needs for replacerrientve 07011WY14-44-4 Proped Location andbr Spiedes Reoc>mmwidtfons: HDMS indicate that one cor more natwe pLants listed on the Arizona NaVoe Flar-d Law and Anti , have b een d oc-ij me rite d voithin the vicinit Of * PtO.14-- 1:1 Te a. PI ease co nta ct At izon a D e p at trn ent of A ricu R it e INS W Ad S1. Ph** nk. AZ 85007 Phon : 14012 3 bft 11ja r ie U ft I [ e Z gg WJ&ftV If 0 [1[[ 6LL HDMS records indicate that one or more h5ted, proposed, or oanckdale species or Critical Habitat (Desi or Proposed) have been dogwmented in thevicink of project The Endan Sped Act(ESA) g ives the US Fish and Wildlife Senoice(! SFINS) re authorit over all federall bted species. Please contact USFWS E,colo Strviou Offices at or; Pho-en6< Main OfIllot Tucson Sub. Offloe Fla Sub•Offlot 2321 W, Ro Palm Rd, Suite 103 201 N, 9orAj Suit 141 SW Forest Science Complex Phoenb<,AZ95021 TucsomAZ85746 25DO S. Pine Knoll D r. Ph one: 6 02 - 2=C - P ho n e: 52- C� G7 0. e. 1 J4 Fla AZ 8 O 01 Fa 602- 242 -25 Fay 52D-670-ep 155 Phone: 928-5615-2157 Fax: 92&55&2121 HDMS itcov do indioAe that Sonoran D es art ToolDioe have been docoinwnted within the v*nt d y our project at#& Flats* review th Tortoa* Handlin Ouidelints tound at An al- i n d I e. a t -Es t hat y o u r pr Og le of i l ocated -in the v icin it of an ide n1lil ed wild 10 e h a bitat fruit co r rid or. P r o je ct plannin a nod imp, 1e m*rtati►n efforts should focus on maint3inin ade oppo rtiin dies for rwAdW- pe rmeabil4. For rdormatio n pe rta iron 1b the I" a g e ass essffwnt and tivildige species that ma toe affected, pleas refer to- =, _ A 26 - 'L_Q 111 J6 1 d Q :AAAA49LffA&U P lease t o r4i ct y o u r loca Adz * na flame a r, d Fish D * pa rtme n t R Office for specOlc projeot iteomff*nditions: htb� a ALOgi&g difula P3 110111 Appendices 11 Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 168 of 279 Appendix B Bibliography Aerial Photographs, Pima Association of Governments, Pictometry, 2014. Town of Marana Land Development Code, Title 8 - General Development Regulations, revised May 2011. Town of Marana Land Development Code, Title 6 - Subdivision Requirements, revised March 2011. Town of Marana Land Development Code, Title 5 - Zoning, revised May 2011. Town of Marana General Plan, 2010. Town of Marana Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan, 2010. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Pima County, Arizona. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manuals, 7th Edition, Volumes 1 & 3 MapGuide, Pima County Department of Transportation, 2015. Appendices 12 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 169 of 279 �wN cy 1 7 9 MARANA 7 \RIZO!r PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653 Council Chambers, October 26, 2016, at or after 6:30 p.m. Thomas Schnee, Chairman Don Duncan, Vice Chair Terry Fehrmann, Commissioner Marcia Jakab, Commissioner Steve Miklosi, Commissioner Richard Miller, Commissioner John Officer, Commissioner REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER. Chairman Schnee called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION /MOMENT OF SILENCE. Led by Chairman Schnee. ROLL CALL. Terri Byler, Planning Commission Secretary, called roll. All Commission Members were present. A quorum was present. CALL TO THE PUBLIC. Several Dove Mountain residents expressed their concerns with the future proposed rezoning of the Tapestry Specific Plan. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Motion to approve by Commissioner Jakab, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A work session for the Land Development Code Update has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. Both Planning Commission and Town Council are invited to attend. (Ryan Mahoney) GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS. Approval of September 28, 2016 meeting minutes. Motion to approve by Commissioner Miklosi, seconded by Commissioner Officer. Passed unanimously. 1 Page Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 170 of 279 PUBLIC HEARINGS. 1. PCM1609 -001 Amendment to the Marana Land Development Code Title 16 (Signs), adding Section 16 -14 -37 Road Construction Area Sign. Recommendation to the Town Council to approve an amendment to the Marana Land Development Code, Title 16 (Signs) consisting of new regulations pertaining to temporary signs for land uses located within a commercial or industrial zoning district and within an area subject to roadway related construction activity. (Brian D. Varney) Presented by Ryan Mahoney, who noted this item is a proposed change to the current sign code and was in response to the upcoming construction on Ina Road. Since the project is estimated to last two years, the Town set out to help mitigate some of the impact to those businesses. Staff came up with a variety of ideas, including signage, that would guide people from Thornydale Road to the construction area and a phone app that would provide live feeds on the status of the project, as well as information on the businesses in the area. The other component is to allow a change in the code, not limited to Ina Road, for future construction projects that create similar impacts to businesses. Commissioner Jakab asked where would the Town - branded signs be located Mr. Mahoney replied the signs would be placed at "decision points" on Thornydale Road; as you are approaching Ina Road from the north and from the south, and on Ina Road heading west. Commissioner Miklosi was in favor of this because it would help the businesses along Ina Road. Motion to approve by Commissioner Jakab, seconded by Commissioner Miklosi. Passed unanimously. 7 -0 2. PCZ1512 -001 Twin Peaks Estates Rezoning; A request for recommendation to the Marana Town Council for approval to rezone approximately 45 acres of land from R -36 (single- family residential) to R -6 (single - family residential). The property is generally located east of Camino de Manana approximately 1/8 mile south of the Desert Falcon Lane alignment within a portion of Section 12, Township 12 S, Range 12 E. (Brian D. Varney) Presented by Mr. Mahoney, this is a proposal for a rezoning, located east of Camino de Manana and south of Desert Falcon Lane and north of the recently entitled property - the Preserve at Twin Peaks. The subject property is approximately 45 acres. Roughly 14.5 acres will be developed as residential lots with the remainder reserved for roadways, infrastructure, open space and a neighborhood park. A proposed 10- foot -wide shared -use path along Camino de Manana would connect to the path provided by the Preserve at Twin Peaks. 82 lots comprised of one -story and two -story homes have been proposed. The lots would be subject to the Residential Design Standards as well as the Twin Peaks Corridor Study requirements. Access to the site would be provided at two locations off of Camino de Manana. A few comment letters were received, namely from the owners of the Twin Peaks Vistas and the Preserve at Twin Peaks regarding the sewer and seeking the cooperation to share in the cost of extending the sewer. Because of this, they are asking for a zoning condition. Typically we don't involve ourselves directly, but we can help facilitate a discussion; preferably prior to this item going before the Town Council. 2 Page Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 171 of 279 Brian Underwood - Planning Center - stated the plan proposes 82 one- and two -story single - family homes. 53% of the site would be designated as open space. In addition to the proposed homes, several walking paths are also planned as well as a 100 -foot natural open space buffer along the eastern boundary. Single -story homes are planned along Camino de Mariana and a 4- foot wall along the backside of the cul -de -sacs would be installed to mitigate any light trespass from vehicles. Commissioner Jakab wanted to know if the two access locations were chosen because of the topography. Mr. Underwood Yes, the location options were limited because of topography and onsite washes. Commissioner Officer wanted to know if it would be possible to add landscape buffers, instead of the 4 -foot walls, to the end of the cul -de -sacs. Mr. Underwood replied that they would be willing to look at a vegetative screen as opposed to a wall. Chairman Schnee opened up the public portion of the hearing. Paul Udorvich — was opposed to the rezoning. He currently owns property directly north of the subject property. Mr. Udorvich has requested a 100 -foot setback. Pat Lee — was opposed to the rezoning. He was concerned about the light trespass from the development and would like to see single -story homes throughout. Mr. Lee was also concerned about the condition of Camino de Mariana and the possible increase in traffic. Chairman Schnee asked if there were any future plans to address the issues on Camino de Mariana. Mr. Mahoney stated that there were no current plans to rebuild the road. The main issue is that a portion of the road is in Pima County. Richard Neter — property owner of the Twin Peaks Vista project, and Joel Abrams — who represents the two partnerships that own the Preserve at Twin Peaks, stated there were some obstacles that needed to be addressed before they could develop their properties; namely water and sewer. Both Mr. Neter and Mr. Abrams agreed to cooperate in the share the cost of bringing the sewer in. They requested an added condition that would require all those who rezone, participate in the offsite costs. Jeff Corbin was opposed to the rezone. He requested a 100 -foot buffer and maximum elevation on the rooflines. Len Paradise, Grey Carpenter and Patty Miller were opposed to the rezoning. Ms. Miller had a concern regarding the watershed. Mr. Underwood stated, by the Town Code they were not allowed to increase the flow or velocity of water outside of the property. All potential increases and flow would need to be retained onsite. Culverts and drainage basins would be added to convey those flows. Chairman Schnee closed the public portion of the hearing. Vice Chair Duncan asked for an update on the plans for the sewer line. Mr. Underwood given the timing in the coordination with the individuals at the Preserve at Twin Peaks, they weren't able to get an agreement in place but would like to negotiate with them on extending the sewer infrastructure prior to Town Council. Directing his question to Frank Cassidy, Chairman Schnee asked for guidance on adding an appropriate condition regarding the sewer extension, should the Commission approve the rezoning. Mr. Cassidy mentioned that the other two properties don't have a similar condition. The rules have changed over time at the county. Until a year ago the first person in would acquire a protected line agreement that would require participation from anyone connecting into that line for a number of years. 3�Page Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 172 of 279 The county has discontinued that option so those affected are left to try to work these things out on their own. At this point, from the staff's perspective, we think it would be better to let the marketplace work itself out. If you chose, you could recommend a condition to Council that if an agreement hasn't been reached by the time this item comes before them, they would not move forward with the rezoning. Another alternative is to state in the conditions of rezoning, "This developer shall participate in a fair share basis in the cost of constructing sewer infrastructure to serve not only this property, but the regional infrastructure necessary to serve this area." Commissioner Miklosi in other words, if any of the other parties choose not to participate they could still benefit? Mr. Cassidy that is true. That has always been the problem and why we came up with development impact fees. But in 2011, the legislature strongly limited our ability so now we are back to the old rules of first person in has to construct the entire infrastructure and with the county taking away the protected main provision, it limits it even further. Chairman Schnee your legal advice is to let the free market take care of this? Mr. Cassidy that is my practical advice, my legal advice is you are legally authorized to impose a condition that they pay their fair share for sewer and you can make it as part of your recommendation to the Council, that they not approve it if there is not an agreement by the time this item is in front of them. Chairman Schnee stated he was leaning towards letting the two developers resolve this prior to Council and not add a condition as this time. Commissioner Miklosi agreed with Chairman Schnee. Commissioner Miller, Fehrmann and Officer felt that the developers should work it out between themselves. Chairman Schnee liked the park, the path and the 100 -foot setback. He had no issues with the 4 -foot barrier (wall or vegetation,) as long as it was functional. Chairman Schnee had no concerns regarding the single story. He liked the idea of a 75 -foot setback and a 90% vegetation screening along the northern border. Commissioner Officer liked the layout and the location of the two -story lots. Commissioner Miklosi wanted to know if there were any options with relocating the top three lots. Mr. Underwood it would be difficult to relocate the lots due to the washes that run through the property. Commissioner Miller preferred a 100 -foot setback but would accept a 75 -foot setback. Commissioner Jakab preferred the 100 -foot setback because it would benefit both those who live in as well as outside the subdivision. Vice Chair Duncan preferred a minimum of 75 -foot setback. Commissioner Fehrmann would like to see 50% single -story homes, 75 -100 -foot setback and 90% vegetative screening remain. Motion to approve, subject to the following added conditions; include a 100 foot setback with a 75% vegetative buffer along the northern border of the project, add 4-foot buffer walls to the end of the three cul -de -sacs, and all homes along Camino de Mariana be limited to single story, by Vice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Miller. Passed unanimously. 7 -0 COMMISSION ACTION. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS /POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS. Recommendation to move the following Planning Commission meeting; December 28, 2016 to December 21, 2016. (Ryan Mahoney) Motion to move December Planning Commission meeting to December 21, 2015 by Vice Chair Duncan, seconded by Commissioner Jakab. Passed unanimously. 7 -0 4 Page Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 173 of 279 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. ADJOURNMENT. Motion to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. by Commissioner Jakab, seconded by Commissioner Fehrmann. Passed unanimously. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing are the true and correct minutes of the Marana Planning Commission meeting held on October 26, 2016. I further certify that a quorum was present. Terri Byler, Planning Commission Secretary 51Page Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 174 of 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k 4 0 Council - Regular Meeting A2 Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council From: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -132: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement (Frank Cassidy) Discussion: In late 2005, the Town and the then - developer of Fianchetto Farms subdivision entered into a development agreement that locked in then - existing development regulations and established financial commitments for the property based on the then - assumed facts. Several unexpected things occurred after the Fianchetto Farms development agreement was entered into. First, Payson Farms was not developed. Fianchetto Farms was approved based on the assumption that water, sewer, and drainage would flow through Payson Farms, located immediately to the north. Without Payson Farms, the Fianchetto Farms developer re- routed water and sewer lines away from Payson Farms, and installed dry wells for drainage. The financial crisis was the second unexpected thing. Five homes were built in Fianchetto Farms before the financial crisis occurred. The remaining lots in Fianchetto Farms remained undeveloped until this year. A third unexpected occurrence was the change in development impact fees. In 2011, the Arizona Legislature completely amended the municipal impact fee statute, leading the Town to eliminate transportation impact fees and significantly modify the Town's other development impact fees applicable to the subregion that includes Payson Farms. This affected various developer financial commitments found in the 2005 Fianchetto Farms development agreement. In August 2016, the current Fianchetto Farms developer began selling lots in Fianchetto pursuant Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 175 of 279 to an option agreement with DR Horton, who is now building homes in Fianchetto Farms. The current Fianchetto Farms developer, DR Horton, and Town staff agree that terminating the 2005 Fianchetto Farms development agreement is the best way to clear the record. If adopted, the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement will wipe the slate clean and will treat Fianchetto Farms as if the 2005 development agreement never occurred. All current generally applicable rules, regulations, fees, and requirements for development will apply to Fianchetto Farms. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2016 -132, approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2016 -132, approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement. Attachments Resolution 2016 -132 Approving the Fianchetto DA Termination ExhA to Reso Fianchetto DA termination Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 176 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-132 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE FIANCHETTO FARMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS the Town entered into the Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement (the "Original DA "), recorded in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, on August 25, 2005, at Docket 12624, Page 2871 (Sequence 20051650918); and WHEREAS the land subject to the Original DA was the Fianchetto Farms development project, being the property more specifically described as Fianchetto Farms Lots 1 -114, recorded in the office of the Pima County Recorder on March 10, 2006, at Book 60 of Maps and Plats, Page 97 (Sequence 20060470609) (the "Fianchetto Subdivision "); and WHEREAS certain financial obligations under the Original DA that would otherwise appear to remain as obligations of the owners of the remaining undeveloped lots of Fianchetto Subdivision have been mooted as a result of planned infrastructure not being installed as contemplated under the Original DA; and WHEREAS the Town and the owners of the remaining undeveloped lots of Fianchetto Subdivision desire to clear the record of certain financial commitments under the Original DA, and to replace them with the normal financial obligations that would otherwise exist for development within the Town if the Original DA did not exist; and WHEREAS the Mayor and Council find the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement to be in the best interest of the Town and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Town hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Agreement to Terminate Fianchetto Farms Development Agreement in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. SECTION 2. The various Town officers and employees are authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution. 00049702.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -132 - 1 - 11/17/2016 10:13 AM Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 177 of 279 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6 th day of December, 2016. ATTEST: Mayor Ed Honea APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 00049702.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -132 -2- 11/17/2016 10:13 AM Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 178 of 279 AGRE4 MENT To TERMINAT E FIANCHETTo FARMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TOWN OF MARAN,A, ARIZONA TH is .AGREEMENT To TERMINATE FIANCHETTo FARMS DEVELOP AGREEMENT (this "Ter - mination Agreement ") is made by and among the TOW OF MARANA (th "Town "), an. Arizona municipal corporation; F ANct,mrrm FARMS, L.L.C. ( "Developer"), an Arizona 1.i n-iited l.i.abil .i ty c om-panya L ANDMARK Tn , .AsSURAI�c L: AGENCY OF .ARIZONA, L.L.C. an Arizona limited liability company ( "Trustee "), as T rustee under Trust No. 18363 - and not otherwise; and D.R. HORTON, INC. ( "Horton "), a De l aware corporation. Developer, Trustee, and Horton. are sorn.etimes collec- tively referred to as the "Owners." The Town and the Owners are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Parties," any of which is sometimes individually referred to as a "Party." RECITALS A. This Termination Agreement addresses the termination of the Fianchetto Farms Develop- ment Agreement (the "original DA "), recorded in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, on August 25, 2005, at Docket 12624, Page 2871 (Sequence 20051.55091.8). _ ! ' Y . r �r �1.:��.:(t ( -) 1 � g��1.'t ' T 1 ' ) . was � ��� �C���1:����.�.�� � "��� �� k� �..�.��l��.�.��_�����;��I. ]1 �.)i���. i� C.)�'1.���x the property more specifically described as Fianchetto Farms sots 1- 1.1.4, recorded in the office of the Pima County Recorder on March 1.0, 2006 at Book 60 of Maps and Plats, Page 97 (Sequence 20060470609) (the "Fianchetto Subdivision "). C. By operation of paragraph 9.9.2 ("Termination upon sale to end purchaser or user ") of the Original DA, the original DA has already been terminated with respect to Lots 62, 63, 64 65, and 70 of the Fianchetto Subdivision. D. Together, the owners own the "Subject Property," which is the entire portion of the Fian- chetto Subdivision still subject to the original DA. F. Certain financial obligations under the original DA that would otherwise appear to remain as obligations of the owners have been mooted as a result of planned infrastructure not being installed as contemplated under the original DA. F. The Parties desire to clear the record of certain financial commitments under the original DA., and to replace them. with the normal financial obligations that would otherwise exist for de- velopment within the Town if the original DA did not exist. G. The original DA as amended by this Termination Agreement is consistent with the Town's general plan and with the zoning conditions and entitlements applicable to the Subject Property on the date this Termination Agreement is executed. 000 49017,DOCX /4 A GRIJI INIE,NT ` O T ERMINATI, F IANCiiE'i" ro FAItfNIS 1) E V E L0 FTVIEN A GREEMENT 11 /2/201 6 2.2 PM Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 179 of 279 21GRI-r NT Now, YBfDlEFOBE"in considerat of the foregoi prem ises and the nluiuu) promises and agreenjeu{saet f"orthinthis Terniivatioo Agreenient, the Parties hereby agree asfolYows: ]. Termination of Original DA. The Original D]AisternmiuuLedamofibo]BDeuhve[)ateo[Udu Terozbnudon Agreement. 2. . The [}vvuora absd) comply with all Town regulations applicable to the Subject Property, inclodiogwithuuLi\miiatiou any zoning ordinances and regulations and Fianchetto Subdivision plat conditions (all. as they may have been and may be amended from time to time) that may apply @the Subject Property at the time of its development. 3. . i. ne()vvners, shall pay Town fees �p]io����Soject ��di����m�,�dsb�|he�d1���\��ts��oa{ such fees, as i[� Original DA never existed, which fees and credits are the same as the fees curreuUy being charged and credits currently being allowed with respect to the umstruobOn of homes within the Subject Property. 4. CooDeration for conversion of water rights. Two separate historic irrigation gruudfo<hered groundwater rights are associated with the Subject Property: 58-1-01965.0003 and 58-1-01956.0005. The Owners shall cooperate in good faith with the Town in converting all. irriga- tion water rights for the Flauobetto Subdivision to and for the benefit of the Town. By way of inclusion and not limitation, this shall include the following: 4.]. Not later than December 31-, 201 6, the ()vvoors uhuU Ole with the Arizona Department of Water Resources uppcVpdu1e JoCumueotudou necessar y to oX1iuguiSh irrigation water right 58-1-01.958.0003 of the Suljeoi Property and 10 transfer extinguishment credits associated with the extioguiuho/uuiiu the Town. 4.2. Not later than December 3}, 2017, the Owners sbuU O}c with the Arizona Department of Water Resources appropriate documentation necessary to extinguish irdgu1ion vvu1er hgb( 58-]0]956.0005 of the Subject Property and to iruoo[er extinguishment credits associated with the extinguishment iu the Town. 5. . The ()vvuery are relieved ofthe financial obligations under paragraph 2.8 of the [)hginu} [)A, which identifies water delivery in- frastructure that was anticipated 1u serve the liuocbcito Subdivision when the Original Z}/\ was enturudioto.ThePuriieouuknovvleJgc1hutihevvu(ordeliveryin[rastruciurcideotiUediuparugrapb 2.6 of the Original [)/\ did not iu fact become connected to or serve 1beFiuouheLLn Suhdjviuion. 8. Acknowled of completion of potable water infrastructure servin,(4 the Fianchetto Sub-, division The Padjco acknowledge that all po1oh]o water infrastructure needed to serve the Fian- chetto Subdivision has been constructed, is in place, and has been turned over to the Town's Water Department from ownership and operation. 7. Effective date. Tbiu].ernoioudoo/\greecneu1sbal|becoomecffecdvoopooi(aorccutiooby all o[the Parties and the effective date of the Town Council resolution approving this Termination Agreement; specifically, the 3) after the Mayor , m signature date below (the '`EffeoLiveDu1c''). 00049017.mOCX14 A( ACYREEMENT /1. /2/ 2016 2 -.2/1) M -2- Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 180 of 279 8. Counterparts. This Termination A ma be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an ori but all of which to shall constitute one and the same instrument. The si pa from one or more counterparts ma be removed from the counterparts and attached to a sin instrument so that the si of all Parties ma be ph call attached to a sin document. 9. Interpretation. This Termination A has been ne b the Town and the Own- ers, and no Part shall be deemed to have drafted this A for purposes of construin an portion of this Termination A for or a an Part 10. Recordation. The Town shall record this Termination A in the office of the Pima Count Recorder after it has been executed b the Parties. 11. Conflict of interest. This Termination A is subject to A.R.S. § 38-511, which pro- vides for cancellation of contracts in certain instances involvin conflicts of interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Termination A as of the last Part si date below. THE "TOWN": THE TOWN OF MARANA, an Arizona municipal corporation B Ed Honea, Ma Date: ATTEST: Jocel C. Bronson, Clerk APPROVED AS To FORM: Frank Cassid Town Attorne THE "OWNERS"'. FIANCHETTo FARMS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liabilit compan B y : FIANCHETTO MANAGEMENT, L. L. C. , an Arizona limited liabilit compan its Mana B SAUNDERS & Amos MANAGEMENT, INC., an Arizona corporation, its Mana B �'rk L. Saunders, President LANDMARK TITLE AsSURANCE AGENCY OF ARIZONA, L.L.C. an Arizona limited liabilit compan as Trustee under Trust No. 18363-T and not otherwise Its 10 00049017.DOCX /4 AGREEMENT To TERMINATE FIANCHETTo FARMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -3- 11/2/2016 2:21 PM Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 181 of 279 D.R. HORTON, INC%, a Delaware corporation B Its: STATE OF ARIZONA Count of Pima ss The fore instrument was acknowled before me on 2016, b Kirk L. Saunders, President Of SAUNDERS & Amos MANAGEMENT, INC., an Arizona corporation, Man- a of FIANCHETTO MANAGEMENT,, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liabilit compan Mana of FIANCHETTO FARMS, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liabil ' y vorppan g , on its behalf. - 1.4 / on A ► - (Seal) KOLBY CHRISTINA KOUTS ' /' Notar Public.6tate of Arizona Notar Public Pima Count M Commission Expires October 14, 2019 STATE OF ARIZONA Count of Pima ;&I Th fore g oin g .- k nst ment was acknowled before me on bLm^�W 2O1 b C A A the of LANDMARK s v AGE NCY TITLE)k SURANCE OF ARIZONA, L.L.C. an Arizona IiYited liab* it compan as T st e under Trust No. 18363-T and not otherwise. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ARIZONA Pima Count RACHEL L. TURNIPSEED M Commission Expires Jul 02, 2020 1 STATE OF AT ( ss Count of. Notar Publd The fore instrument was acknowled before me this a qA_ - da of X Lcm:�_:62_ — 2016, b � Rc't'41 06'�Jks , the msw)4 O tec ? C-S, of D.R. HOR'TON, INC., a Del a- ware corporation, on behalf of the corpot-ati can . ( Seal ) Roberta A Murra Notar Public - Arizona Plrna Count My Commi Expim April 11, 2018 Not Public 00049017-T)OCX /4 AGREEMENT To TERMINATE FIANCHETTO FARMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -4- 1 1/2/2016 2:21 PM Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 Pa 182 of 279 N O 0 / n.. - tn. A k 4 0 Council - Regular Meeting Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council Submitted For: John Kmiec, Utilities Director From: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Not Applicable A3 Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -133: Relating to Utilities; approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign an Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana (John Kmiec) Discussion: Since 2000, Tucson Water has extended new water service within the Marana town limits but outside contracted Tucson Water service areas under the terms of a 2000 IGA that was retroactively extended in 2010. The term of the retroactively extended IGA lapsed in December 2012. If approved, the amended and restated IGA proposed by this agenda item will true -up water resource and financial obligations between Tucson and Marana relating to Tucson Water's service to new connections in Marana, and will again put in place an IGA addressing new Tucson Water service connections in Marana. Included with the backup materials for this item is a water service area map showing the geographic areas where service will be available under the amended and restated IGA. The map identifies: • Tucson Water contracted service areas (yellow cross - hatched areas), which are unaffected by the amended and restated IGA -- Tucson Water will continue to serve there in accordance with the respective water service contracts • Areas already served by Tucson Water (dark blue areas), where Marana provides water credits for service connections since 2000 and new service connections will be governed by the amended and restated IGA • Tucson Water Future Service areas (light blue areas), where new service connections will be Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 183 of 279 made so long as they are consistent with Tucson's Water Service Area Policy, and governed by the amended and restated IGA Areas in the town that do not meet Tucson's Water Service Area Policy but that would be more easily reached by Tucson Water pipes than Marana pipes can potentially be served pursuant to a future wheeling agreement between Tucson and Marana. The amended and restated IGA mentions but does not address wheeling agreements, which will be brought forward individually as future water service needs arise. As has been the case since 2000, the amended and restated IGA requires the town to transfer water or water credits to Tucson for water used by Tucson Water connections in the town limits. Now that both entities have fees and rates that cover water resources, the amended and restated IGA now takes those fees and rates into account. Financial Impact: Fiscal Year: 2017 Budgeted Y/N: Y Amount: Unknown Costs associated with this amended agreement, if approved, will be partially offset by credits received from the City of Tucson. It is extremely problematic to calculate a net impact due to the complexity of calculations. Any net cost impact would be absorbed within the Water department's budget. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2016-133, approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the amended and restated Tucson /Marana IGA regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution 2016 -133, approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the amended and restated Tucson /Marana IGA regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana. Attachments Resolution 2016 -133 Approving the 2016 Tucson Water Service Extension IGA ExhA to Reso_Tucson Water IGA Map Water Service Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 184 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-133 RELATING TO UTILITIES; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS OF MARANA WHEREAS the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana entered into an "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE MARANA TOWN BOUNDARIES" dated December 5, 2000 (the "2000 Water Service IGA "); and WHEREAS Tucson and Marana entered into an "AMENDMENT TO AND EXTENSION OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF MARANA" dated May 18, 2010 (the "2010 Water Service IGA Amendment "); and WHEREAS, among other things, the 2000 Water Service IGA as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment set forth the terms for Tucson to provide new water service within the Marana town limits but outside contracted Tucson Water service areas; and WHEREAS the 2000 Water Service IGA as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment terminated on December 13, 2012, but Tucson and Marana have been operating under the good faith assumption that they would enter into a retroactive extension addressing Tucson's continued provision of water service in Marana; and WHEREAS the "Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana" presented for approval supersedes and takes the place of the 2000 Water Service IGA as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, and trues -up water credits and other obligations for the period no Tucson/Marana water service agreement was in effect; and WHEREAS the Town Council finds that the proposed extension is in the best interests of the Town and its residents and landowners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The "Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana regarding Tucson Water service within the town limits of Marana" attached as Exhibit A to and incorporated by this reference in this resolution is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign it for and on behalf of the Town of Marana. 00049595.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -133 - 1 - 11/18/2016 12:12 PM Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 185 of 279 SECTION 2. The Town's Manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms, obligations, and objectives of the intergovernmental agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6 th day of December, 2016. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney 00049595.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -133 -2- 11/18/2016 12:12 PM Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 186 of 279 AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS OF MARANA This intergovernmental agreement ( "this IGA ") is entered into by and between the CITY OF TUCSON ( "Tucson "), an Arizona municipal corporation, and the TOWN OF MARANA ( "Marana "), an Arizona municipal corporation. Tucson and Marana are sometimes collectively referred to as the "Parties" and each individually referred to as a "Party." Section I. Recitals The following recitals represent the Parties' general principles of agreement, which are incorporated in the specific covenants that follow. 1.1 Tucson and Marana entered into an "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE MARANA TOWN BOUNDARIES" dated December 5, 2000 and recorded in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, on December 13, 2000 at Docket 11444 Page 1792, Sequence 20002400529 (the "2000 Water Service IGA "). 1.2 Tucson and Marana entered into an "AMENDMENT TO AND EXTENSION OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUCSON AND THE TOWN OF MARANA REGARDING TUCSON WATER SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF MARANA" dated May 18, 2010 and recorded in the office of the Recorder of Pima County, Arizona, on May 21, 2010 at Docket 13 814 Page 4119, Sequence 20100980943 (the "2010 Water Service IGA Amendment "). 1.3 On August 4, 2010, Tucson adopted a Water Service Area Policy, which established a water service boundary for Tucson Water. On July 9, 2013, Tucson approved nine refinements to the Policy. The policy limits Tucson Water's approval of new services outside its legally- contracted areas in unincorporated Pima County to parcels of less than 20 (residential) or 50 (commercial) net developable acres in size, which are surrounded on three (3) sides by parcels with Tucson Water service. By this IGA, the Parties intend for these rules also to apply, on a consistent basis, within the Town of Marana, in conformance with the water resource obligations embodied in the above agreements. Tucson will notify Marana of any proposed changes to the Policy and this IGA will be subject to amendment pursuant to any approved changes to the Policy. 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -1- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 187 of 279 1.4 The Parties desire to amend, restate, and extend the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment. 1.5 Tucson and Marana are empowered by A.R.S. Title 11, Chapter 7, Article 3 to enter into this IGA. 1.6 Marana owns and operates a water utility within and outside Marana's town boundaries. 1.7 Tucson is authorized by the Tucson Charter, Chapter IV, Section 1(7) "...to establish, maintain, equip, own and operate, works and appliances within and without city for supplying Tucson and its inhabitants also persons, firms and corporations outside Tucson, including other municipal corporations, with water...." 1.8 Tucson owns and operates a water utility within and outside the city limits of Tucson, and provides water service to certain customers within Marana's town limits, and has for all relevant times been charging its customers, including those within Marana's town limits, fee and rate elements associated with the cost to acquire renewable water resources. 1.9 When the Parties entered into the 2000 Water Service IGA, Tucson was legally obligated to serve customers within the town limits of Marana who were then - existing Tucson Water customers and those located within the Continental Ranch Service Area, the Dove Mountain Service Area, and the Thornydale Plaza Service Area. 1.10 Since the 2000 Water Service IGA, Tucson has entered into additional water service agreements in connection with the reimbursement of Tucson's costs for construction and operation of its water infrastructure in the vicinity of Thornydale and Tangerine Roads (T2 Service Area). As a result, Tucson is now also legally obligated to serve portions of the T2 Service Area. 1.11 For various reasons, the Parties were unable to timely provide certain water usage and mapping data required under the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment; the Parties now desire to confirm, agree upon, and use the Water Service Area Map and the MT Meter Data to track Marana's water resource obligations to Tucson pursuant to the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, and as further amended and clarified by this IGA. 1.12 The 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, terminated on December 13, 2012; the Parties have been operating under the good faith assumption that the Parties would enter into a retroactive extension addressing Tucson's continued provision of water service in Marana an assumption now implemented by this IGA. 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -2- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 188 of 279 1. 13 Although this IGA is for a set term of years, the Parties intend for water connection and water resource obligations undertaken by the Parties pursuant to this IGA to be permanent, unless later modified by mutual agreement of the Parties. 1.14 The Parties desire to establish a framework for determining costs associated with the relocation of Tucson -owned water infrastructure in connection with Marana public works projects. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this IGA, the Parties covenant and agree as follows: Section II. Statement of purpose This IGA is intended to create, set forth, and define the relationships between Marana and Tucson regarding the extent and terms of Tucson's provision of water service within the town limits of Marana. Section III. Definitions Notwithstanding any similarities as may appear when compared to the definitions in the 1980 Groundwater Management Act or elsewhere in Arizona Revised Statutes Title 45, or any other statute, the following words and phrases shall have the following defined meanings for the purpose of this IGA: 3.1 2000 Water Service IGA See paragraph 1.1 above. 3.2 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment See paragraph 1.2 above. 3.3 2010 Water Credit Transfer Marana's 2010 transfer of 1,043.3 acre -feet of Central Arizona Proj ect long -term storage credits to Tucson, consisting of an April 1, 2010 transfer of 414.8 acre -feet and a June 8, 2010 transfer of 628.5 acre - feet, pursuant to ADWR Long -Term Storage Credit Transfer Forms by the Parties and received by the ADWR Water Management Section. 3.4 ADWR Arizona Department of Water Resources. 3.5 Default An act or omission by a Party that violates this IGA. 3.6 Directors The Directors of the City of Tucson or Town of Marana Water Departments. 3.7 MT Meter Data The meter data and shapefile (or other data formats, as agreed by the Directors) of all water customers and associated water delivery information within the town limits of Marana, for whom Marana is obligated to provide water resources pursuant to the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, as further amended and clarified by this IGA. 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -3- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 189 of 279 3.8 MT Customer. A Customer for whom Marana is obligated to provide water resources pursuant to the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, as further amended and clarified by this IGA. 3.9 Marana Service Area. The Marana Service Area shall include all areas within the Marana town limits less the Tucson Contracted Service Areas, areas where Marana and Tucson mutually agree Tucson will serve, and areas served by other water providers. 3.10 Potential Wheelin Areas. Areas within the Marana town limits that may be identified by both Parties as having the potential to be served by Marana with one or more water interconnects to Tucson's water system with terms to be defined by the Parties. 3.11 This IGA. This Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tucson and the Town of Marana regarding Tucson water service within the Town Limits of Marana. 3.12 Tucson Contracted Service Area. That portion within the Marana town limits served by Tucson, including the Continental Ranch area, the Dove Mountain area, the T2 Contractual Service area, all areas where Tucson is obligated to provide water service and resources as a result of a written service commitment acknowledged by Tucson Water that, in many cases, predates Marana annexations. Marana has no obligation to provide resources in these areas. 3.13 Tucson Non - Contracted Service Area. That portion within the Marana Town limits where Tucson provides water service for which Marana has certain obligations to Tucson under this IGA. This area includes MT Meter Data customers and the land area within the Marana town limits where Tucson Water's existing potable water system would be capable of providing service pursuant to the Tucson Service Area Policy, upon confirmation by the Town of Marana that those connections are subject to transfer of water or water credits per section IV. 3.14 Tucson's Water Service Area Map. The map reflecting Tucson Water's Contracted, and Non - Contracted areas, attached as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference in this IGA. As with all maps referenced in this Agreement, the parties recognize that maps are large -scale representations and may not be accurate to the parcel level. Section IV. Marana's transfer of water or water credits 4.1 General Marana shall transfer water or water credits to Tucson in amounts set forth in this Section. The water or water credits shall be of a type mutually acceptable to the Directors. The transfer to satisfy Marana's water resource obligations for calendar years 2010 through 2015 (see paragraph 4.3 below) shall be completed no later than 60 days after the execution of this IGA. Transfers to satisfy Marana's water resource obligations for calendar years 2016 and later shall occur on the later of: 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -4- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 190 of 279 4. 1.1 August 1 of the following year, or 4.1.2 Sixty days after Tucson Water delivers to the Marana Water Department the MT Meter Data containing the applicable year's water consumption data (see paragraph 6.3 below) 4.2 Water resource obligations before 2010 The Parties acknowledge and agree that the 2010 Water Credit Transfer satisfied Marana's water resource obligations to Tucson under the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, for the period ending December 31, 2009. 4.3 Water resource obligations for 2010 throu h 2015 The Parties acknowledge and agree that Marana's water resource obligations to Tucson under the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, and as amended and restated by this IGA, are correctly set forth through the MT Meter Data for calendar years 2010 through 2015; specifically: Calendar year Acre -feet Total Duplicate Water Resource Fees Collected After August 1, 2014, for Refund to Applicant (see Section VIII.1) 2010 308.82 N/A 2011 327.57 N/A 2012 305.23 N/A 2013 337.48 N/A 2014 358.89 $7 2015 350.16 $18 2016 TBD $6 TOTAL 1 $32 Section V. Tucson's Water Service Area Map 5.1 Adopted The Parties hereby adopt and confirm the accuracy of the Water Service Area Map as a representation of Tucson Water's provision of service within the Town of Marana. 5.2 Modifications Modifications of the Water Service Area Map that do not expand the Prospective Tucson Water Service Area may be made by mutual written agreement of the Directors. Any modification that expands the Prospective Tucson Water Service Area shall be effective only upon amendment of this IGA approved by the Tucson City Council and the Marana Town Council. 5.3 Data Sharing Parties shall provide copies of all files necessary to produce an updated map upon any modification to the Water Service Area Map. Section VI. MT Meter Data 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -5- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 191 of 279 6.1 Adopted The Parties hereby adopt and confirm the accuracy of the MT Meter Data for calendar years 2010 through 2015, prepared by Tucson Water staff and checked for accuracy by Marana Water Department staff. 6.2 Maintenance and update Tucson Water staff shall maintain and update the MT Meter Data tracking water usage of all customers for whom Marana is obligated to provide water resources pursuant to the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, as further amended and clarified by this IGA. 6.3 MT Meter Data Delivery to Marana Before March 31 of each calendar year, Tucson shall send to the Marana Water Department the MT Meter Data updated with the prior calendar year's water consumption data. 6.4 Corrections Marana shall promptly notify Tucson in writing of any apparent errors or corrections to the MT Meter Data, and the Parties shall promptly collaborate on an agreement to reflect an accurate representation of MT Meter Data. Section VII. Water Service Scenarios 7.1 New customer inside the Town limits in the existing Marana Water service area. Customer applies for service from Marana Water and would become a Marana Water customer. Tucson is not involved. 7.2 New customer inside the Town limits in the Tucson Contracted Service Area. Customer applies for service to Tucson Water and would become a Tucson Water customer; Marana is not involved. 7.3 New customer inside the Town limits in the Prospective Tucson Water Service Area, but outside the Contracted Service area, (those areas listed as blue and light blue on Tucson's Water Service Area Map The following shall be required: 7.3.1 Customer applies for service from the Town of Marana. If Marana makes a good -faith determination that the customer may be eligible for service as an MT Customer, Marana will forward a conditional approval to Tucson Water staff before issuing a final approval to the MT Customer. If Tucson Water determines that it is able to provide service under the governing principles of the then - current Tucson Water Service Policy, Tucson will forward its approval to Marana. The customer becomes a Tucson Water customer and pays Tucson's infrastructure fees, and monthly commodity and service rates and charges, but does not pay the Tucson CAP Water Resource fee or any other Tucson Water resource fee or charge. 7.3.2 Marana Water charges and collects from customer the "Water Resources Development Fee" it has established for water resources; and 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -6- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 192 of 279 7.3.3 Marana Water transfers water or water credits pursuant to Section IV and is reimbursed renewable resource rates by Tucson Water pursuant to Section VIII, governing MT customers. 7.4 New customer inside the Town limits and outside the Prospective Tucson Water Service Area and Marana's Service Area. Tucson and Marana may adopt an IGA that any such new customers may be located within a Potential Wheeling Area and define the terms and conditions of service for any Potential Wheeling Area 7.5 Any existing Tucson Water customers that are annexed in to the Town of Marana shall remain Tucson Water customers. Marana Water will not collect any fees or have any obligation to provide water resources for these services; Section VIII. Water resource fees and rates 8.1 Refund of water resource fees collected by Tucson Water Tucson shall provide an accounting of all water resource fees it has collected since August 1, 2014, from all Tucson Water customers located in the Marana town limits for whom Marana is obligated to provide water resources pursuant to the 2000 Water Service IGA, as amended by the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment, as further amended and clarified by this IGA. Within 90 days after completion of the accounting, Tucson shall issue refunds of Tucson fees to all original applicants who paid both Tucson fees and Marana fees and provide a list of such payments to Marana. 8.2 Collection of water resource development fee. After August 1, 2014, Tucson shall not collect any water resource fees to establish service in the Tucson Non - Contracted Service Area. Marana shall collect all water resource fees for service establishment in the Tucson Non - Contracted Service Area. 8.3 Marana water resource rate After the effective date of this Agreement, in lieu of charging the adopted Marana "Groundwater Resource Acquisition Fee" on monthly bills, Tucson Water will refund to Marana, at no cost, the monies equal to the Marana "Groundwater Resources Acquisition Fee," currently $0.48 per 1000 gallons for all services identified in the MT Meter Data. Tucson shall transfer funds on the same schedule as Marana transfers water or water credits pursuant to Section IV of This IGA. 8.4 Good faith negotiation. Tucson and Marana agree to negotiate in good faith regarding the use of each party's recharge, treatment, and distribution infrastructure improvements as might prove necessary to deliver water to the MT customers and to satisfy the water resources obligations established in this agreement, and to allocate appropriate credit for water resources and infrastructure fees collected by the parties. Section IX. Effect of prior agreements 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -7- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 193 of 279 This IGA supersedes and takes the place of the 2000 Water Service IGA and the 2010 Water Service IGA Amendment. Section X. Water facilities relocation costs 10.1 Coordination The Parties shall coordinate their respective public works projects within the town limits of Marana to minimize costs of relocating their respective water facilities. 10.2 Cost sharing The Parties shall equally split all costs associated with relocating their respective water facilities when the relocation is made necessary by a public works project undertaken by or on behalf of either Party. Section XI. Miscellaneous and general provisions 11.1 Force maj eure If any Party is rendered unable, wholly or in part, by force maj eure reasons to carry out its obligations under this IGA, the obligations of both Marana and Tucson so far as they are affected by such force maj eure shall be suspended during the continuance of any inability so caused, but for no longer period; and such cause shall be so far as possible remedied with the best efforts of the disabled Party and with all reasonable dispatch. The term "force maj eure" as employed in this IGA shall mean acts of God, strikes, lockouts or other industrial or labor disturbances, acts of the public enemy, wars, blockades, insurrections, riots, epidemics, landslides, lightning, earthquakes, fires, storms, floods, washouts, droughts, unavoidable interruptions in electric power to drive pumps, interruptions by government not due to the fault of the Parties, including injunctions, civil disturbances, explosions, well collapses, breakage or accident to machinery or transmission facilities, or action or non - action by governmental bodies in approving or failing to act upon applications for approvals or permits which are not due to the negligence or willful action of the Parties. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as requiring either Party to settle a strike or labor dispute against its will or as prohibiting either Party at its own expense from using whatever self -help remedies may be available to it. 11.2 Alternative dispute resolution The following non - binding alternative dispute resolution process shall be followed for any dispute arising under this IGA: 11.2.1 Tucson and Marana shall meet and confer about any controversy or claim arising out of or related to this IGA, or Default under this IGA, in an attempt to resolve the matter. If the matter that cannot be resolved by Tucson and Marana, each shall appoint one arbitrator to a three party panel of arbitrators which will decide the dispute. The appointment of the two arbitrators will occur within 30 days of the meeting referred to above. 11.2.2 Arbitrators appointed to the arbitration panel shall be skilled and experienced in the field or fields pertaining to the dispute. The two selected arbitrators shall meet within 30 days of the later of the two arbitrators' appointment, and at their first meeting they shall appoint a third neutral 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -8- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 194 of 279 arbitrator to complete the arbitration panel. The third arbitrator shall act as a chairperson of the arbitration panel and shall direct the arbitration proceedings. 11.2.3 The arbitration process shall be limited to the matter submitted by Tucson or Marana. The arbitration panel shall not rewrite, amend, or modify this IGA or any other agreement between the Parties or to which either of the Parties is a party. 11.2.4 There shall be no discovery beyond the information and documents made available during the informal meet and confer process provided for in this section and the exchange of information or documentation provided for in this IGA. 11.2.5 No formal evidentiary hearing shall be provided unless one is requested by either Tucson or Marana in writing no later than the conclusion of the meeting where the neutral arbitrator is appointed. If no hearing has been requested, the arbitration panel will meet as deemed necessary by the panel and shall, in a manner it deems appropriate, receive evidence, receive argument or written briefs from Tucson and Marana, and otherwise gather whatever information is deemed helpful by the panel. The arbitration process to be followed shall be informal in nature, and Tucson and Marana shall not be entitled to trial -type proceedings under, for example, formal rules of evidence. 11.2.6 If Tucson or Marana requests a hearing, the arbitration panel shall meet to receive evidence and receive arguments and written briefs from Tucson and Marana as follows: 11.2.6.1 The arbitration panel shall, within five days of the appointment of the neutral arbitrator, schedule a date for a hearing, which shall be held within 60 days of the appointment of the neutral arbitrator. 11.2.6.2 Within ten days of the appointment of the neutral arbitrator, Tucson and Marana shall each submit a brief of no longer than 15 pages setting forth its case. The brief shall include discussion of all issues relevant to the Party's case. Each Party shall, as an attachment to its brief, include declarations of not more than two experts and any relevant factual witness. Declarations of expert witnesses must include all opinions to be elicited upon direct testimony and a complete explanation of the basis of these opinions. Disputes with respect to the sufficiency of declarations or the appropriateness of the testimony shall be resolved by the witnesses available for cross - examination at the time of the arbitration hearing. Factual witnesses for which a declaration is prepared shall be made available for cross - examination at the time of the arbitration hearing only if requested by the other Party. 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA - 9 - Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 195 of 279 11.2.6.3 Each Party shall have the opportunity, within five days of the close of hearing, to submit a closing brief not to exceed ten pages. The closing brief shall be argument with no additional factual evidence to be submitted. 11.2.6.4 Factual witnesses shall not be permitted to give testimony under direct examination. 11.2.6.5 Each Party shall have a maximum of four hours to present its case in total. This time shall include opening and closing statements, direct presentation and any cross - examination of the other party's witnesses. Each Party shall have the right to reserve part of its time to present up to one hour of rebuttal testimony. 11.2.6.6 The matter shall be deemed submitted at the submission of closing briefs. 11.2.6.7 The panel of arbitrators shall render its final decision in the dispute within 60 days after the date of naming the third arbitrator. If the arbitrators disagree as to the determination, any two of the three arbitrators may join to form a majority and the decision of those two arbitrators will be final for the panel. The panel will issue a written decision. 11.2.7 If a Party declines to accept the decision of the arbitration panel, it may initiate an action in the appropriate court within 60 days of the issuance of the panel's written decision to obtain a judicial determination of the underlying dispute. If an action is not filed within 60 days of the panel's decision, the decision of the panel shall be deemed to be final and not subject to judicial review. The decision of the panel and record of the arbitration shall not be privileged and may be submitted as part of the record by either Party in support of its case. 11.2.8 All costs incurred by the arbitration panel shall be shared equally by Tucson and Marana, and the expenses of the arbitration panel shall be paid expeditiously. 11.2.9 A Party shall not be considered in Default for an issue being addressed in the alternative dispute resolution process or appropriate judicial proceeding until a final decision has been rendered. 11.3 Information exchange Upon reasonable request, Tucson and Marana will provide to each other all necessary information and documentation required for purposes of this IGA, to the extent the information and documentation is reasonably in its possession. The requesting Party will reimburse the other Party for all costs of providing the information and documentation, including staff time and reproduction costs. 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -10- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 196 of 279 11.4 Attorneys' fees In the event of any litigation between the Parties to enforce any provision of this IGA or any right of either Party under this IGA, the unsuccessful Party agrees to pay to the successful Party all reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in the litigation by the successful Party, all of which shall be included in and as part of the judgment rendered in the proceeding. 11.5 Assignment of this IGA No Party shall have the right to assign this IGA or any interest in this IGA except to their respective successors. This IGA shall be binding on the successors of the Parties. 11.6 Notices All notices shall be in writing and together with other mailings pertaining to this IGA shall be made to: FOR MARANA: Town Manager Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Bldg. A Marana, Arizona 85653 WITH COPIES TO: Marana Water Director Town of Marana 5100 West Ina Road Tucson, Arizona 85743 Marana Town Attorney & Marana Town Engineer Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Bldg. A Marana, Arizona 85653 FOR TUCSON: Director Tucson Water P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 WITH COPY TO: City Attorney City of Tucson P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 or as otherwise specified from time to time by each Party 11.7 Waiver Waiver by either Party of any breach of any term, covenant or condition contained in this IGA shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant or condition, or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this IGA. 11.8 Amendment This IGA shall not be amended except by written instrument mutually agreed upon and executed by the Parties. 11.9 Entire IGA This IGA, its exhibits, and its recitals constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties regarding the subject matter of this IGA, and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements of the Parties regarding the subject matter of this 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -11- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 197 of 279 IGA. All warranties and guarantees and representations shall survive during the life of this IGA. 11.10 Construction and interpretation All provisions of this IGA shall be construed to be consistent with the intention of the Parties expressed in the recitals of this IGA. 11.11 Term The term of this IGA shall be ten years from the Effective Date, and shall be automatically renewed for successive five -year periods unless a Party gives the other Party notice of termination at least six months before the end of a respective term. 11.12 Authority Marana represents and warrants that it has legal authority and capacity to enter into this IGA upon the terms and conditions provided within this IGA, and has properly and legally authorized and executed this IGA. Tucson represents and warrants that it has the legal authority and capacity to enter into this IGA upon the terms and conditions provided within this IGA, and has properly and legally authorized and executed this IGA. 11.13 Legal jurisdiction Nothing in this IGA shall be considered as either limiting or extending the legal jurisdiction of either Marana or Tucson. 11.14 Non- severability If any provision of this IGA is held by a court of law to be in violation in whole or in part of any applicable local, state or federal ordinance, statute, law, administrative or judicial decision, or public policy, and to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable as written, then the Parties shall make good faith efforts to modify the provision to the minimum extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable; however, if the Parties are unable to agree to modify the provision to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, this entire IGA shall be of no force and effect. 11.15 Effective date This IGA shall be effective upon filing of the original executed IGA with the office of the Pima County Recorder. [Remainder of this page left intentionally blank. Signatures on following page] 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -12- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 198 of 279 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this IGA as of the signature date below. CITY OF TUCSON Mayor Jonathan Rothschild Date: ATTEST: TOWN OF MARANA Mayor Ed Honea Date: ATTEST: City Clerk Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION The foregoing intergovernmental agreement between the Town of Marana and the City of Tucson, has been reviewed on the date set forth below pursuant to A.R. S. § 11 -952 by the undersigned attorneys, each of whom has determined that it is in proper form and within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona to the Party represented by the respective undersigned attorney. Mike Rankin, City Attorney City of Tucson Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Town of Marana Date: Date: 2015 TUCSON /MARANA WATER SERVICE IGA -13- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 199 of 279 CITY ucs WATER T UCSON Tucson Water / Town of Marana Potable Water Service Areas � T PINAL COUNTY Tortolita Mountain ----------------- - - - - -- a Park lop i--- 9,0 0� Aj olk- TOM All %_W i r: 0 III �.- LYN -LEE /4!/ � ® ®/ g o WATER CO MARANA RD - rte,,•/ %' MARANA Tortolita �I 0 1 Preserve • • `� San ta Cry 9 TORTOTA % LI j A j Rive WATER CO y d' TANGERINE RD IJ L—I W ■ ■ �^�.� j '. C 6 z ~ CAP / AIRPORT 42�i`Pr C.n1J AVRA VALLEY RD TAFF 1 o F S AIRLINE/ LA r LAMBERT 1 PUERTA 11 ,` y ♦ o . HARTMAN A % Q�P� VISTAS PALO TWIN PEAKS RD + ' 0��� ���. LINDA VISTA BL i �, _ ORO VERDE - �i���% / / AC VALLEY GP ,� �j ' � • �i PICTURE /,/ R OC K S 'w �,��' %L ORO %' ��.� • 0 VALLEY `': �, j ,♦O .0 CORTARO FARMS RD MAGEE RD OSHRIN _+ LA T /ERRA I � � I.I � LINDA 3 0 0.5 1 2 r Mlles f ns • , INA RD INA RD I � � ■ Served by Tucson Water ICTURE ■ j/ MDWID Tucson Water Future Service ROCKS Served by Town of Marana Saguaro Town of Marana Intended Service Area Other Water Provider Tucson Water Contractual Area (MA) National Town of Marana Park /Preserved Land TU � CAP Aqueduct Par SUNSET RD ...... Major Road Major Wash 11/7/2016 P all, TUCSON Page 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k 4 0 Council - Regular Meeting Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council Submitted For: Cynthia Nemeth- Briehn, Parks & Recreation Director From: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Recreation A4 Strategic Plan Focus Area Additional Info: Principle Statement 1 / We will design, build and maintain appropriate high quality recreational amenities to enhance the quality of life for Marana residents and visitors. Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -134: Relating to Development; Amending the infrastructure improvements plan supporting development impact fees for parks and recreation facilities by revising the projects included in the infrastructure improvements plan and shifting the anticipated development impact fee funding among those projects without changing the amount of the fee or the level of service (Frank Cassidy) Discussion: The Town's parks and recreation development impact fee was established based on an infrastructure improvements plan adopted by and attached as Exhibit C to Marana Resolution No. 2014 -010 dated February 11, 2014. Figure 6 of the 2014 Parks IIP listed the projects and funding projections for the Parks DIF . If this agenda item is approved, the projects and funding projections for the Parks DIF will be amended to take into consideration new citizen demand for Town parks and recreation facilities, emerging opportunities and development patterns, and newer cost projections. The most notable changes include significantly decreased funding allocations for Barnett Linear Park and Cascada District Park, significantly increased funding for North Marana Soccer Park, and new allocations for six projects -- CAP Canal Trail Improvements, Crossroads Park Play Area Addition, Santa Cruz Shared Use Path, Phase III, Santa Cruz Shared Use Path El Rio to Avra Valley, Tortolita Trail Extension, and Twin Peaks Road Shared Use Path Access. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 201 of 279 The 2014 Parks IIP used an incremental expansion method for calculating the Parks DIF -- a standards -based method that established the then - current park service standard by analyzing the value of the then - existing park infrastructure relative to the then - existing level of community development. As explained in the 2014 Parks IIP, this method is more flexible than a plan -based method because the fee is based on the existing level of service instead of the estimated cost of the proposed elements in the capital plan or most recent park master plan. This allows the Town to adjust the projects on the capital plan to meet changing needs without having to also go through the process of recalculating the fees or a master plan update. The resolution presented for consideration and approval today does exactly as the 2014 Parks IIP predicted. It adjusts the projects, but does not change the overall cost of the projects funded with the Parks DIF and maintains the level of service funded with the Parks DIF. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2016 -134, amending the Parks IIP by revising the projects included in the IIP and shifting the anticipated Parks DIF funding among those projects. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution 2016 -134, amending the Parks IIP by revising the projects included in the IIP and shifting the anticipated Parks DIF funding among those projects. Attachments Resolution 2016 -134 Approving Parks DIF IIP Adjustment Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 202 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-134 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT; AMENDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR AND PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES BY REVISING THE PROJECTS INCLUDED IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND SHIFTING THE ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUNDING AMONG THOSE PROJECTS WITHOUT CHANGING THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE OR THE LEVEL OF SERVICE WHEREAS the Town is authorized by the Arizona municipal development impact fee enabling statute, A.R.S. § 9- 463.05, to assess and collect development impact fees to offset costs to the Town associated with providing necessary public services to a development; and WHEREAS the Town adopted Marana Ordinance No. 2014.012 to, among other things, revise development impact fees for and parks and recreation facilities to conform to Laws 2011 Chapter 243 (now codified at A.R.S. § 9- 463.05); and WHEREAS the parks and recreation facilities development impact fee adopted by Ordinance No. 2014.012 relied on the parks and recreation infrastructure improvement plan adopted by and attached as Exhibit C to Marana Resolution No. 2014 -010 dated February 11, 2014 (the "2014 Parks IIP "); and WHEREAS the 2014 Parks IIP used an incremental expansion methodology, which "allows the Town to adjust the projects on the capital plan to meet changing needs without having to also go through the process of re- calculating the fees or a master plan update" (2014 Parks IIP, page 2); and WHEREAS new citizen demand for Town parks and recreation facilities and emerging opportunities make it prudent to revise the projects included in the 2014 Parks IIP and shift the anticipated development impact fee funding among those projects; and WHEREAS the revisions to the 2014 Parks IIP supporting development impact fees for and parks and recreation facilities will not result in any change in the amount of the parks and recreation development impact fee or the level of service provided to payers of the fee, and therefore fall within the authorization found at A.R.S. § 9- 463.05(D)(10), allowing the revisions to be adopted upon 30 days' notice without a public hearing; and WHEREAS notice of the proposed revisions to the parks and recreation infrastructure improvements plan was published in the Daily Territorial on November 1 -4, 2016; and 00049332.DOCX /2 Resolution No. 2016 -134 - 1 - 12/1/2016 11:32 AM/FC /CNB Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 203 of 279 WHEREAS the Town Council finds this ordinance to be in the best interests of the Town and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, that Exhibit 6 of the 2014 Parks IIP is hereby amended as follows (with the "Original Allocation" and corresponding projects being those set forth in the 2014 Parks IIP and the "Amended Allocation" and corresponding projects being those funded pursuant to this resolution): Project Original Allocation FY FY Original 2014 -18 2019 -23 10 yr Total Barnett Linear Park 200,000 2,505,120 2,505,120 Cascada District Park 5,700,000 5 Impact Fee Study Update 2 45,000 45,000 North Marana Soccer Park 350,000 459,000 459,000 Parks, Recreation, Trails, & Open Space Master Plan Update 90,000 180,480 180,480 Saguaro Bloom Community Park 3,377,800 3,500,000 3,377,800 Santa Cruz SUP Avra Valley Connection 578,000 578,000 Tangerine Sky Community Park 2,840,000 2 Tangerine District Park Land Acquisition 900,000 900,000 CAP Canal Trail Improvements 1 385,000 Crossroads Park Play Area Addition 78,000 78,000 Santa Cruz Shared Use Path, Phase III 300,000 Santa Cruz SUP El Rio to Avra Valley Tortolita Trail Extension Twin Peaks Rd Shared Use Path Access Adult Softball Field at Ora Mae Harn Park Tota I : 16,585,400 Total : 16,585,400 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this 6th day of December, 2016. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Amended Allocation FY FY Amended 2014 -18 2019 -23 10 yr Total 200,000 200,000 600,000 600,000 100,000 100,000 2 2 350,000 350,000 3,377,800 3,377,800 90,000 634,000 724,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 1 1,200,000 120,000 120,000 100,000 100,000 1 1 1 1 385,000 385,000 78,000 78,000 300,000 300,000 00049332.DOCX /2 Resolution No. 2016 -134 -2- 12/1/2016 11:32 AM/FC /CNB Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 204 of 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting A5 Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council From: Anthony Hunter, Management Assistant Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Community Subject: Resolution No. 2016 -135: Relating to Intergovernmental Relations; adopting a 2017 Town of Marana legislative program and authorizing and directing those authorized to lobby on behalf of the Town of Marana to represent and pursue it (Tony Hunter) Discussion: Annually, the Marana Town Council adopts a set of legislative priorities for the upcoming session of the state legislature, known commonly as a "legislative agenda." As the legislative priorities of previous years offer sufficient coverage for the upcoming session, this year's recommended agenda does not include any changes or additions. The passage of this agenda will give guidance to staff and the Town's lobbyists in their efforts to represent the Town's interests at the legislature. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the 2017 legislative agenda. Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. 2016-135, adopting a 2017 Town of Marana legislative program and authorizing and directing those authorized to lobby on behalf of the Town of Marana to represent and pursue it. Attachments Resolution 2016-135 Approving the 2017 Legislative Agenda Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 205 of 279 MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-135 RELATING TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS; ADOPTING A 2017 TOWN OF MARANA LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THOSE AUTHORIZED TO LOBBY ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN OF MARANA TO REPRESENT AND PURSUE IT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Those persons authorized by the Town of Marana to lobby on its behalf and registered as such with the Secretary of the State of Arizona pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes § 41 -1231 et seq. (the "Town Lobbyists ") are hereby authorized and directed, subject to the continuing supervision of the Town Manager and the Town Council, to represent and pursue the legislative, executive and intergovernmental interests of the Town of Marana by supporting legislation that embodies any of the following basic principles: A. Protects state - shared revenues that fund essential services and strengthen local economies. B. Maintains local control while seeking partnership between municipalities and the State. C. Empowers the Town of Marana with sufficient flexibility to address an expanding and changing variety of local needs and conditions. D. Establishes appropriate means to adequately compensate the Town for the costs of complying with state - mandated requirements. E. Provides the Town with the means to cope with unfunded mandates, cost increases, population growth and escalating service requirements. F. Enables the Town to provide public services in a more responsive, efficient and cost- effective manner. G. Ensures that the Town has the ability to provide, manage or operate critical infrastructure necessary to promote or maintain the health and safety of residents, preserve and direct land use and ensure the future sustainability of the community. SECTION 2. In addition to those basic principles set forth in Section 1 of this resolution, the Town Lobbyists are authorized and directed to pursue the following specific objectives: A. Support the maintenance and/or restoration of existing sources of transportation funding for municipalities, including the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) and Local Transportation Assistance Fund (LTAF) I and II. 00049770.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -135 - 1 - Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 206 of 279 B. Support the maintenance, restoration and /or expansion of existing economic development programs and funding and the creation of new programs and tools to support local economic development. C. Support efforts to preserve access to water for municipal governments, including continuation of statutory responsibility to develop and manage water resources in order to provide existing and future residents with appropriate levels of service. D. Support legislation that simplifies Arizona's tax codes while protecting the Town's state - shared revenue allocations, contracting sales tax and other tax revenue sources. E. Support efforts that develop mutually beneficial solutions to state land use issues, including expedited land acquisition processes and timely resolutions to issues regarding protected land. SECTION 3. Legislation that is inconsistent with any of the basic principles or objectives set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above should be opposed or appropriate amendments pursued. SECTION 4. The Town Manager and staff are hereby directed and authorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the terms, obligations and objectives of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, this 6 th day of December, 2016. Mayor Ed Honea ATTEST: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk 00049770.DOCX /1 Resolution No. 2016 -135 -2- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney Page 207 of 279 N O 0 / m - tn. A k Council - Regular Meeting D1 Meeting Date: 12/06/2016 To: Mayor and Council From: Jamsheed Mehta, Deputy Town Manager Date: December 6, 2016 Strategic Plan Focus Area: Commerce Strategic Plan Focus Area Additional Info: Commerce, Principle 1, We will support commerce and business by being creative and flexible in order to produce innovative solutions that exceed customer expectations Subject: Relating to Finance; presentation, discussion and possible direction on proposed changes to the Town of Marana comprehensive fee schedule and other various rate and fee adjustments (Jamsheed Mehta) Discussion: For many years, the Town of Marana has compiled a Comprehensive Fee Schedule and standardized fees for municipal services across all departments. These fees are traditionally reviewed and adjusted annually to ensure that the Town continues to cover its costs, where appropriate, and that the fees are fair and equitable to its customers. The Comprehensive Fee Schedule was last approved by Council in May 2016 and was made effective in July 2016. Since that time, staff has identified opportunities to strengthen our interdepartmental teams, consolidate fee categories, and streamline review and approval processes, with the ultimate goal of providing excellent customer service. This mid -year fee adjustment reduces the total number of listed fees in the schedule from 535 to 350; a 35% reduction. The number of listed fees associated with development (planning, engineering, and building) is reduced by 51 %. Most of the reduction is achieved by consolidating several fees into fewer, broadly described categories, making it easier for the Town's customers to navigate the detailed schedule of fees. Additionally, the proposed fee structure conforms to the Town's initiative to simplify multi- departmental reviews and approval processes. The fee Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 208 of 279 schedule with proposed changes is attached (see Proposed Changes, Comprehensive Fee Schedule). Examples of these efficiencies and new one - stop -shop experiences are attached (see Presentation) and will be presented to the Council at the evening meeting. This evening we are only asking Mayor and Council to review the list of proposed changes and provide staff with feedback and direction regarding proposed changes. Information received tonight will be incorporated into the proposed changes which will be brought back for consideration and possible approval on February 7, 2017. Pursuant to A.R. S Section 9- 499.15, the Town will properly post notice of possible changes to the Comprehensive Fee Schedule. This statute requires that the Town provide notice on its website of any new or increased fees for businesses at least 60 days before the meeting is scheduled to consider approving the new fees and /or fee increases. As we have in the past, staff will work with representatives from the Southern Arizona Home Builders Association (SAHBA) and Metropolitan Pima Alliance (MPA), to provide them the opportunity to review the proposed changes to the Comprehensive Fee Schedule and clarify any issues or areas of concern. Financial Impact: There is no foreseeable or significant impact to the Town's revenue. Staff Recommendation: Presentation, discussion and possible direction only. Suggested Motion: Presentation, discussion and possible direction only. Attachments Proposed Changes, Comprehensive Fee Schedule Presentation Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 209 of 279 j et eR Tee 99WR <12 599 11r (9@ T4e e'pQPe Tie I I9WR <12 11r (449nth1") He Gpe , Tee 99,. ,r 412 999 lhr /9&4 , \ 4 ( PeR Tires I1eWR 1 7 999 r to 2 999 1h TT1T 1Z , 1h �. l7QTrJT 4 GaZ , r / .l .l .l " 9p R Tire fl /" W R 11 7 �99 l b s. t 9 24 1 h r / fl a i y i nr,.r-, i 4 npeR Tie n ao 29 1 n,T�- m- c- v�SR, -„�Pe o o5;- �Tbs. �e 49 o4e " QPe T- fl 29 1hr t 49 1hr (I A QPeR Tie I e;A'R 99 11�1-hS. t9 99 11r (N49Rtkl\') A G)peR Tie fl9WR 59 11�1-ht99 11r /flai y AiFGF@ + ( PeR Tires I I!lWR 1 nnn 11r +r- 249 , 999 11r /MeRthl"\ peR Tire 9 WR 1 nnn 1hr +A- 2Q 11r (9 PeR Tire I1e'A,n 299 , 999 11r (449Rtkl\') QP n Tires 9, YAR. 299 1hr (Pai y -- pA p e� a F y G) p e R Ramp V eT i e l e--P a F ki rrg 44 h A i F e F ode K i e l e--L P - Fie inrli GliRg 2n f,,,,+ in 1eRgth (f�/lr,r,+hl�') rrrcn�z oTCCZ rrrTCrr� �, I., � � �+ ��, /� � � �--� �} � �,�, I,., T ekh gW 7T Vek HP t� nr1 T eR R@R�p Vek l e P@ F `i'g db''Ft1 L_Te e t_ leRgth (( 49Rthl„) T m rA 9 r@ r�, n rA e R R ' P@Fky' jL A i i t� T T 7 Y'�P l e e v e'pL�Te e t_ 7 1r Rg , h /fl �� T T - em e pen �G e I h F Rg W i ., ' iel e P@ �'�/"� iF er-@f� }t GTQ�', T �ITe '(Me TT� T �e k GG l e P@ F k g �C i t t'I �, " � I'7' � 'f' � h�G , ' , I"� � i � T ai T , 9 @ } T ��G l e P @ F` i R gad i t'I - F -- T- ( M e n t h I i T T - emp e F@ rA , pen R amp p e h ir�� O p O ii +�rF@47 1 (n ,) Airship Parking (Monthly) Airship Parking (Daily) D_ Ain F@tienr C-iGili+" Pee (With @iPpeF+ l9 S lease) G Rge r,-i I Dh e . eg r-,ph,, D (P iI �rm mrrri -,1 CilmiRg Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 99 nn D`r tie dr\, A , n jti l yT , 22014 / (l G N 1 A­_2 Q_ 14Q16 TL ti P ,-d 4H 1, 22916 // n G'_Q At 2Q_rd Q_ Q_ 6 ��2 re r ti „ r1 r„ . , r Jam; =y=TZ C 44 / e e 8 . 2 TL r ti r_ _- 9 � A, n i i i I z,�,- yTZ // n 2 Q_ I6. Q_ Q_ O/I nn Der tin P1r�, PAAPr QPPIi r� ��T n �1 CR A l . I1 �1 G / n r rJ i r r ee-� Czarv- vav Dr�r tires PJAIA,n li �1" � / (lrA^1in - �n r� �4E RI - ��4 n1 CR R � Te r ti e ,-d Ay n �H I i"yTZ `l"�tF7 // n R e e N 8. 2 91 O/1 nn Dr�r tires dAIA,n li 1" / (lr tin �n �Q r� �HT �4 Ee- RI•co-Z ;14 n Q 1 CR Al , r ; H ! 2914 /wee- Pjo-2914.916 r tin ,-d n , n 7H y' r,z214 / G , _ Q 4 -co-Z �4�1� 2 n n n P PP t i r-i _ n n, n �H' i 1� // n el a Ee - z��6�v6 � 29 P e r +i „ ,1 A4 A , r Jam ;= y ' gFdiReRee e . 2 $ 2 ,�J J�4 T� r t i r PI A, A n �H I �Z�� / n it C-I dt­ 2Q_1 64 Qa6 ��� nn Dr r tin ,^1 A,A,n li (lrrliAAA r� ��,�Z� �4 Pd co-Z �j4. 1� Te r t e i , - d n A, n j H H I H 1 rz �$1.6 // n rr�z91 �1, 11g De t d A r 7ti'' -y- rz �4 / _ Ao- 2Q14 Q1 CR 1 nnn P PP t _ _ A, H 1 i 2916 / (l Cwt A­ 2 Q_ Q_ 6 Der tires ,^1 Ay li 1" � / I lrr✓Ir @ , r� ��T A­ ;!Q1 4 n1 CR �R , Q - 294 nn Dr`r ir`hiP P Ii 1" (lrllin �n n �Q � 4 H' y ' 2214 Ee-4 Ao- _ _ _ Q 1 FR 22 nn Pee ,r�hir�1 P li 1„ (lrllin �n n T- crv- c�-rrc�c ��T Ee-R1 Ao- _ _ _ 4�1� ;99 D n r at 7� /mac P_ NA­ ___ �_6 nn nn Der ye �1 li 1" / (lr lin �n n T- cr- ccrrtc�t 4 H' y ' 2214 Ee-4 co-Z__4_1_ 294. D err t 7H ' iy' ,, z214 / n EL Ne. 2014 016 ;2 nn r� yehiele li 1„ � / I FGl @ �� D T- cr - cc�-rc�t ��,T Pd- co-2 Q_ 14 n _1 � C 294 D nn r`r h l eh Ii 1" � / I FGl @ �Q �� ��T Pd- co-2 9 1- 4 n _1 C-4 D e r te_ j H' ' , 2 914 / e L- N 8. 2(44.916 $ 500.00 Per airship July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 50.00 Per airship July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 99 nn Der d , H'T / Ee -RI•c 2 Q_ 14. Q_ 1 C_R 299 n n PeF peFR�4 D 1 , s e r+ r r+ i r, r, r fee ;1-i,'- 'y' 2 91 /wee -Pd e. 2914 Qli; 999 nn Dor ,J A, i i DIt itpert er�er r tiAn fr`r` 7H' 2014 / n i tt `t 14 Q 6 r 1 Y � Page 210 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 cncn Q ARA ^r T^ 44 D ^rmit (nr r H ,ii cncn nir r + r r+ r�T .,i��ni rhir� Plights R Imo �ing D^rmit n nni i@11� Commercial Self Fueling Permit (Monthly) � $ 29 nn PeFR� � � Per permit D ^r r @k^n� ar i^ a Dpi it r�-irr or � nn D ^r ��� 7H ��4 � �Z��4�1� yeaF D nr r-� ^nder �i^ar PPP 29n nn '�QQ 7Hly 2014 Ee-Ne. 2914 016 '�(� 7H ' ,-' 2914 � EP_ WA 4 Q1 6 50.00 ­ July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Commercial Self Fueling Permit (Annually) n l n „r cncn n r, i i, ,) $ 500.00 nn Per permit Per calendar year. DD l�f�^ -i r C�J� 9TGT July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 / n ;2 Q_ 14 Q I CR Te FC �H e R @ Fuel Flowage Fee; FBO or SASO with ground lease $ 9nn 0.09 Per gallon �' ^'i�eel 4 H',- Ee-Pk March 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.005 TGTe. Wea0p0�ge Pe e ; Se Ci i^l^r Qpr^� n irp Tp 1 n C pumped D^r lum z 8, jHly' C / (1r d in a R Ee 2C Fuel Flowage Fee; Commercial Self - Fueler with Permit $ 0.20 g all on pi Per gallon � ^'i Plus initial fee. -6 - N e. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 pumped ni irinrr nArm Al h iri nr 29 14 �Ee- Pd- co-2 Q_ 14 Q I CR h rrA Alrr^rt G) peFe +i e% c^^ l^^^ h ,ri^^rr h ^ ,rr� 1�5 °,- t^— r -,hoHT D r,r h„ .r �T aPr' Ji;,'- 14 %ee �5 nn �/linimiim ,- h ^rrr^ ref � (�/linimiim i- h- �rrrr� ref y --�rZ -Pdco-2914.916 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 i i" / nr,�i ^-,r Pd- 16 -�� ��,- yT Z��4ee- o-2914. , h ^ r Q , t^ n i rr^ r+ r , $ 1�5 °r-m; D^ r --, ^ � -+ 7�',- / Ee-PJ �4�� y TZ214 co-Z �i;',- / Ee �4�� y TZ214 -P�co-Z Runway /Taxiway Light Replacement Per light July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 AiFpeFt Damage 500.00 D r. r i C i rd r, ^+ Dpi it -irti i-� it ^m -inr� / ^r '-,h ^r c_ t^ FeP@ir 1 s n n n 2 914 /wee -N 9. 2014.916 Airp^rt se Cry^ (neF9R HtiG@I) ^ AirP94 Ir^ Pee (NeR Airport Access ID Card -New $ 299 nn 999 nn P eF P Per card 1P te S Cy D^rmlt f^^ In - r�r�iti ^n t^ cr�r�r�i -�� Ci ^nt D ^rmit f nn 6, 2919 / QFdin@RG 4 A­2 Q_ I SQrz -fin I r 7� '�' 6 291 C / QFdin-�n "Z,��12 10.00 Z July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 Airport Access ID Card - Replacement $ 25.00 Per card July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 SASO (banner towing, aircraft maintenance, etc.) $ 25.00 Daily July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 Temporary Storage Container Parking $ 200.00 Monthly July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 Airport Use Fee (Non - Aeronautical Government - Local, State, Federal) $ 350.00 Per Day In addition to Special July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 Event Permit Fee Aircraft Parking <5,000 Lbs (Daily) 7.00 Per Day Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 2 Page 211 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Aircraft Parking <5,000 Lbs. (Monthly) 50.00 Monthly 10.00 2L L Aircraft Parking 5,000 — 7,499 Lbs. (Daily) 72.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 5,000 — 7,499 Lbs. (Monthly) 15.00 2L L Aircraft Parking 7,500 — 12,499 Lbs. (Daily) 116.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 7,500 — 12,499 Lbs. (Monthly) 30.00 2L L Aircraft Parking 12,500 — 24,999 Lbs. (Daily) 172.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 12,500 — 24,999 Lbs. (Monthly) 35.00 Daily Aircraft Parking 25,000 — 49,999 Lbs. (Daily) 284.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 25,000 — 49,999 Lbs.(Monthly) 75.00 2 .a I L Aircraft Parking 50,000 — 99,999 Lbs. (Daily) 562.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 50,000 — 99,999 Lbs. (Monthly) 150.00 Daily Aircraft Parking 100,000 — 200,000 Lbs. (Daily) 1,119.00 Monthly Aircraft Parking 100,000 — 200,000 Lbs. (Monthly) 32.00 2 .a I L Non-Airport Tenant Only Vehicle/Trailer/Fuel Truck Parking (Daily) 284.00 Monthly Non-Airport Tenant Only Vehicle/-Frailer/Fuel Truck Parking (Monthly) In Addition to Special Event Permit & Airport 250.00 Per Day Airport Aeronautical Use Fee/Commercial Photograph Operation's Fees In Addition to Special 500.00 Per Da Event Permit & Airport Airport Non-Aeronautical Use Fee/Commercial Filmin Operation's Fees 500.00 Per Year SASO Permit (Banner Towing, Aircraft Maintenance, etc.) Marana Council Meetin 12/06/2016 3 Pa 212 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Airport Operations Fee /Labor Rate (non- business hours, weekends, holidays) 125.00 Per Hour Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 4 Page 213 of 279 Airport Operations Fee /Labor Rate (normal business hours) 75.00 Per Hour COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Liquor License Application: Original License; Location Transfer; Person Transfer $ 500.00 Liquor License Application; Extension of Patio Premises; permanent or 25.00 temporary $ Liquor License Application; Acquisition of Control Change or Change of Agent $ 150.00 Fireworks Permit Application Ballot Argument Fee (Deposit) Bingo License; Class A Bingo License; Class B Bingo License; Class C Special Event Liquor License Application Special Event Liquor License Late Application Fee Fee is in addition to any fees payable to the State of Per application Arizona Department of July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 Liquor Licenses and Control. Fee is in addition to any fees payable to the State of Per application Arizona Department of July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 Liquor Licenses and Control. Fee is in addition to any fees payable to the State of Per application Arizona Department of July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 Liquor Licenses and Control. $ 100.00 Per application July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 250.00 Per ballot argument July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 5.00 Per license Plus applicable State of July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Arizona fees. $ 25.00 Per license Plus applicable State of July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Arizona fees. $ 50.00 Per license Plus applicable State of July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Arizona fees. Fee is in addition to any fees payable to the State of $ 25.00 Per application Arizona Department of July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Liquor Licenses and Control. Does not apply to events produced by the Town. Plus any other applicable fees. Applies if application $ 25.00 Per application submitted less than 30 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 calendar days before event. Does not apply to events produced by the Town. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 5 Page 214 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Fee for Taking Default Judgment $ 65.00 Per judgment July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is the actual cost to Jail Reimbursement Fee See note Per sentence July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 the Town. Prosecution Fee $ 40.00 Per citation July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Administrative Warrant Fee $ 30.00 Per warrant July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Court Improvement Fee $ 35.00 Per citation July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is the actual cost to Jury Cancellation Fee See note Per incidence July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 the Town. Community Service Monitoring Fee $ 5.00 Per sentence July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is the actual cost to Court - Monitored Probation Fees See note Per sentence the Town. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 6 Page 215 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Does not apply to events produced by the Town or where park exclusive use Special Event Permit $ 50.00 Per application fee is paid. Includes safety July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 inspection. Right -of -way and traffic control review if applicable to event. Plus any other applicable fees. Applies if application submitted less than 7 Special Event Expedited Review Fee $ 25.00 Per application calendar days before July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 event. Does not apply to events produced by the Town. eVeR nrmi+ �r - nr nI n July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 P eFFAit it rr�rvi iir�r^� i� r+ri et irn it'nrr th@R 290 ?n� �^i i-'�r P Special Event Building Permit $ 30.00 Per permit July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 applicable special event permit fees. This permit is required if structure is greater than 400 square feet. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 7 Page 216 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Right -of -Way Abandonment Q—�e $ 2,500.00 Release of Easement Q—�e $ 655.00 License Agreement —Base �ee $ 1,000.00 License Agreement; Amendment of use $ 250.00 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 $2500.00 + actual cost for Per submittal appraisal, title, closing July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 PP P r i i h m i + +- PP P r i i h m i ++ , and /or survey fees CP,Q it Apt,'A� PAr '-` 7 H l T ' T, � c-e- 9. 2 Q_ 14Q1 FR 'l'��4 -W �Ee-Pd _ $655.00 + actual cost for yTZ14 co-Z14.016 �c_- �d- o-Z�4�1� 7� I ,- y TZ�14 Per submittal appraisal, title, closing July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 D ri ihmi ++ r r i i h m i + +-� and /or survey fees r } Pee �r Cl,l, it -irti i- � r�rt t� 7H r2(4 /� QFG Ne. 291 4.016 � l T ' 14�1� Cr�r� ir - r+ii-� r�r+ +rte $1,000.00 + actual cost for 7 H 2 C) 1 4 c�-- Pd-co-Z ;14 Q1 FR appraisal and /or survey D`r ri ihmi + +-,1 See fees. Fee for new license July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 note agreements; landscaping exempt. P ee n i t -� r-+ i i -� e r n r+ t r-� Tl_ �. '�('� 4 ' 2"91 � c-e- �4�1� -Pd-o-Z D, r r Iz m Cruel, it - ire +ii-� r�r + +� Fee for changing area or 44 TZ214 %se- Pie. Z214 .916 adding covered uses (no Per submittal July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 fee for removing covered D h m i ++ , uses) Pee may b higheF r� r, r� r� n r^� i n rr i i r r n -i r�minir +r- � +i�i� r�r\r +r +� ffeGe SS - PPliG@ti9R 44 2014 %Ee -Pie. Z214 .916 Pe yea F 8 P ee i 8I ,- -, I-,t h r erJ A_ T'l_ -i rte+ i i A r n r+ +rte A r-1 m i n i r +Q r @r ee R� el ,+ nninimiim 7H l 2 914 c-e 2Q1 4 Q1 9 y -W-e Page 217 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 9 Page 218 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Planning Director has Annexation; Processing Fee $ 500.00 Per annexation authority to waive fee in the July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 case of a Town initiated Map MejeF AR�eRdFAeR� Base Pee 2, 6@g . nn D „ r , r, r1 m e r,+ PA annexation. 7T;,l y 2914 %Ee-N e . 2914.916 C or-,I DI-,n n/@p M8j , 4e� e+�_ General Plan Map Amendment -Major 4 nn 9 �Q 2600. 00 + 40 D rc� -�c�e Per amendment n I. I� � � QFGliR@R WA— CR ��,- yT Z 2 ��4Ee- Z �1 4e ° r-�I ;21@ n /l @ n /li R r - � r /� ' l -1 m e n+; 9@ C per acre S` 1 nnn nn P P -. P - imr-inrlmen+ �(� 7H 2, 2 914 � Ee-WA— ;=�4Q� (= P - r -�I DI@ n /l@ n /li R r -� /gy _ 4�'� p r t"1"F"l.F' 'rh'hC7'F'L �Yt � General Plan Map Amendment -Minor S` n nn Y��" QQ 2 1000.00+20 D T ��� Per amendment n I�l � , 22914 n � � 1 7L �r B per acre 'I � nnn nn TT $ 99 n n DPr riiI mi + +�I o c�c�e ernrn M ` �� n $� - nnn n n i miim n f nn r\ r\ r` 4@ + + jpeefie Dl@ D e s id en om +i� I -anrl Hp to 4 n res ideRees pea c r SpeG4 - Dl@n; D -Anl-1 1i to 4 r e r i de n `ccTPe @GFej A Fe @ rr 7H 7, 2 � r' Ee Ne. 2 16 ' ev r fi 8; s ) 2 nnn nn I,- y TZ 2 � �4 n 4 � Ee- Pd- co-Z 4�1� ?pcG4 D I@ n; D e s i l e n+ i -p l l -A n ,-d 441 +„ ; � }year r�-A r�C n n n 2 ,99 �9 nn � 1400.00+ r D P r r i i Iq m i tt A I D P r- M ; ;4 imi im fzQ PA to P 4 rp f it to r - nn - m i i m �� n nvrnn '° 7 H I Ty 2 914 � Ee-Pd o-Z r ' -14�� 'I $ ; g nnn n n Maximum fee not to exceed -, ,- r„ r ) Ii il„ / CR ��,- y- TZ2��4 9FG1iR@R Ee- P�co-Z2��4 n �� Specific Plan; Residential Land 50.00 per acre S` inn nn , per application DP ri iI-�mitt-�I r`- P $35,000.00. n /1 vimi im f�� nit t� �vr nn Ii ili 29 C (lrl- lin-n Z Ee- Pd- c�Z -�.��� i� 2500.00+ D r, r rT�rE e n /1A4 4PA im f i n P try nvrnn l TO ,�,.�,�,�,�� AeFe ge Pe , (if ryeF fide ^�eFes) $2S nnn nn Maximum fee not to exceed l�Z 916 / � '� a a Specific Plan; Commercial, Industrial and /or Mixed use 100.00 per acre per application $35,000.00. Specific Plan Minor Amendment; Administrative Process $ 500.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Specific Plan Text Amendment $ 1,500.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is same as total Specific Plan Land Use Designation Amendment See note Per submittal application fee for specific July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 plan as calculated. Significant Land Use Change; Up to 1.00 Acre $ 550.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Significant Land Use Change; 1.01 Acres to 10.00 Acres $ 1,250.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Significant Land Use Change; Over 10.01 Acres $ 1,750.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 10 Page 219 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Rei�eRiR t / frem R �/ in tr AG / � RP 190 9 -14n / Q 90 94 I R 2 9 , 16; Q �PCz Q� ninrr T. rr� n n r_rr�r t�' 4 9R� @R n ' � n Qfl R n Q 4n - tizZe,- rt,-r�- row -e iZ9 �- �-v�se � e- o-�-cv - �����- �C -�4� / Rr T9 y �reFA - C In D 4 D D G nnLJ ,•,tz� 6,= rmr�rv�z��= � �arv�s� + r, � , ���9 M LJ C n r1 QV• n n 9 r e t h n 4' - A r�6Fp@p e TR i�9 nin g7 Tr\ rP_7� -4 i f em @n�i i �9Re nnuc @R d Rai• Base r,, TO , , B P T Rezoning; from any zone to AG, RD -180, R -144, R -80, R -36, R -20, R -16, R -12, R -10, R -8, R -7, R -6, MH, MHS, and RV Q e Z� Rims • :Pe re Re ffep � t�' 4eRm @Rn ' e QQ I I M 1 I nnQ 1 I nnQ 2 , rn TR1 I NG, V9 RG c� r 999 61 R d H r +h Ff� 4 FA k ipl e g ,sir +ri - inr�i ir�inrr rr,rir- �r,nti -i�• h-irr� fr, r� rQc�z7� n i n, m r 9�L7e nr rrc- cp cr i_ i s t� �e R e t e RP 449 I 'I n /1 Q�T d ir+, r rT/- +�rliiding rer ideRti@ 1• n /1r-re +h fide @ /-r�GFeap �ep Rezoning; from any zone to RR, MU -1, MR -1, MR -2, CO, NC, VC, RC, SC, VRC, CBC, and LI HI and /or the mixing of multiple zoning districts including Modification or Waiver of Rezoning Conditions Site Analysis Review (Not associated with a rezoning); Base fee Site Analysis Review (Not associated with a rezoning); Re- submittal or revision fee Land Development Code Amendment Tile keper+ Q/l\ /Ill \AI Temporary Use Permit; Administrative Process, no Council Action required Planning Miscellaneous Hourly Review Fee nn�Q n n n � Qnn nn 1400.00+ Der rii hm CTCre � De �E� -`T oer r. ihmi + +-, i r ` nn - ;vimi im All+ to iQvi -r`iQ� n ^i mi im r r� fi Ret to e) .'- nnn nn '�° $ 2 g nnn n n n -�vimi im fr nit t r�vr��r�rI ro n � 2 g nnn n n Maximum fee not to exceed I G n �,,� nl,� 4Hlyi 1, 2916 9 4 - Ne. 2 ' H z i 2 ( 4 / n nee- P�Z$16�0 50.00 per acre inn nn per application o„ r r h r,-, i ++ I $35,000.00. 54- i44mi im 4pp PAt to P4ip p TO 4 1 1z'a16 / Ee-N e- Z i99 2500.00+ r F@ e F e n 4A44 m' im ipp PAt t P rpp $2 nnn nn Maximum fee not to exceed 4 d ry- rza 6/ n F d i r, -, r, ee-N e. 2916.996 100.00 per acre per application $35,000.00. Per condition or $ 250.00 condition July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 subsection $ 1,200.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 150.00 Per re- submittal or revision July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 1,500.00 � 299. Per submittal o„ r , r, +i r July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 44 2 9 14 @FdeReRee N e . 2 . 914 16 $ 2 99. D`r ri ihi-iI PA ++ Applies to Christmas tree lots 7H 2914 / n G_P_ Nl� L $ X99 and other seasonal/holiday- Per application July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 75.00 related sales lots and includes safety inspection $ 70.00 Per Hour Minimum of one hour and to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 $ ;'C��vg. Y De r S' hmitt A � the newest hour after P I i i rl r, r 'I r+ Q. �Ppl ?�hmi+ 2 d r Q. ,Hhr��°r�hmi + +- r -Arr, 7 Hl i� 6 � nrr�i p- An�Z��Q Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 11 Page 220 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 12 Page 221 of 279 o- i-I - i- I- - rrrr`� �n0% r\ f r\rirrin -I rilmittIr r 2rl S?. �Deyelepnrr-r,+ DI nage fee n nn D@� eF C'CT�CTCC T 4� I �� 1,2016 %cam-- Pd- o-z916.996 o- G Gh @F 9 ref 9F 4 g 4 R@l n Miscellaneous Document and /or Report Review $ 280.00 rr�ii rii ti mr �f fr�i it l - , 1, irr Per submittal ,I f, ,r r,,,, h hir� nr ,+ July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 I 1 Fate o $79 p l-, ni it Includes 1st & 2nd submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal and revisions $3500 Base + to accepted plans are each Development Plan Package $70 per acre Per submittal charged 30% of original fee. Additionally this includes development plan, landscape plan, and improvement plans Fee includes new business Welcome to Marana business Package $100.00 Per submittal license, 1 banner sign permit and occupancy compliance inspection. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 12 Page 221 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 rii i tt -i1r T i PI Z Dr i i gl DI 29 @GFes; 1 i rn f nn �� PQ ri iI-, j�hr� - 1;PAi #AIr -irr` 4Hly ]g j4l / n p W 4 n�ICR rill - mitt -iIr T1- iirr S?. Drr,lepAe ;le D-,+• n r•rr,r• � �C nn Dr,r I. I" � / nr�in ,n F, -, �Z�9 -�� c e ge e� ��-�� ,-i c e 4 H l y 2914 Ee-N o-Z214 .9 16 r�ri rsin fr�r� I ppl , o �i ril . -�1r T�1- i i ` rr , 1 Q. P PP 1 4PA4PqP , Bleek P 20.91 129 ee r„r, b f„„ oCn nn nr r , rV,i + +,I I a ;z;,l- "' 2914 /wee -Ne. 2914 916 rill - mitt -�Ir T1- iiri -I S?. Drr Iimin r i Q1r, D1 ,t• i-rer• a Cn nn SH@SegH 1-�mi #AIr App, 7 / I 1pd ,--r ����- ; � cue D rep -�c�e l ���Qe� -�� � �,- yT Z��4Ee- RI•co-Z�Ql 4 n �1 �4 e -e r 1-, nri rsin - f nn ril , - �1r T1 , ir r , 1 Q. Tr Iimin - 91 9 4 DI ^- r,LT 7 QYE? -F1229 @G rey• 198rP fryP D 2 Cnn nn p r ri ihmittpI ri i1-�r �on 1 mi +tAIr @re Ii iI� / (l � n1 � Z 'Z,Q14 r� ��� h �� Iry r- h -e r e d 9 4 ril , -�1r T1- , ir r , 1 Q. Dr lirY it Qlr D-,+• g eFes C 7C nn D I / 1 G ,--r c�F ,- ,- �- QVe���9- ���c��age�e ��� re�c�e �� ,- yT Z��4 GFd ee- Pd- o-Z��4� r _ h -ur 9 4 C �TAP AfS r - � ' � ' � '' ��� ril , -i1r T1- , ir r , 1 Q. Dr P Iimin -A QIe Gk DI@t% A m end m r-n+ r-r n4 A 4 fi p pti An D` -h PA ?H1,r�Hon� hm @re 7H 2914 / G- WA-. 2Q- 14Q1 F;i C� n r 1 r- .h-gr ge d 9 4 'FCC 9rigiR@I f& $600 Base + Not to exceed $35,000.00 Preliminary Block Plat Per submittal Includes 1st & 2nd $40 per acre _..� Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 13 Page 222 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 2nd submittal and revisions to accepted plans are each charged 30% of original fee. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 14 Page 223 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Ci. A' STQP1` Pl • $Vonan +r I r- Gendi+inr 2. Der+rirte +i�eV4ew C`�299. T� o Final Block Plat; Assurance Agreement Review $ 150.00 , C -�mr-� as (lrirsin ApplieetieR Pee Ci. Al - D1-,t Amen Arin+r-r (\/lr�rli ire- tir�n hmitt A1r TI iF Q. PP ri ihmi +t i1 jHhSe Hen�hmi + +-AIr re 7H'T' 2914 � c-'-Q Wo-Z��4�1� r�ri rsin - fr�r� �hrY,i + + Thir, - I 9. TD er - A P jH � .J'1 h m i t+ IS - i r p 4 H I T9T2 9 14 Ee co-2 Q- 1- 4. Q- oA p har ge d 9904r4 /" F Trlrl I n r 1 S - rte �hrni + +-,Ir Thir, -I Q. 5tia Tr rv� jH h r9Ho n� r i t 7� I T9TZ`t��4 �Ee-Pd o-Z�4�1� P Arch Pha rged 9 90% r,f eFm fee. riihmitt -�1r Thirr�l Q. D eF @EF e s H h r�H° n� h m i+ +8 1 r -Are H I ' 7, 2 914 � Ee-N o-Z214.016 oA P h r- h@r g ed 99 qFe fee. n P I i P1 r, r 1 riihmitt -�1r Thirr -1 Q. D ri ihmi ++ 1 jHbsegHen�hmi+ +-A1r -irr- 7H 7, 2014 � @FG1 - No-2014 .016 a A G h G h @ r g e 9 9 r-4 9F fr r h�Y,i + +-,I ThirrJ Q. �tia Trirv� D eF A PR ?H h r �HeRt- -1;1-1 h m i+ +-A 1 r AF - p -, 7H 1 Ty 2 914 1 c-e- -N o-2Q-1-4416 oA r- h@ r g nd 99 n ri rsin - fr-P Per submittal m , � i Der �ff�rt�r1 1At j,Hhm4.4-Alr Thir�-2, s h rg -off h m i + +@ 1 r -A r rQ July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 4H' , 2914 � G-P- WA— 2Q-1-441-69 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 15 Page 224 of 279 Final Rlnck Plat COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 $375 Base + $25 per acre e@ C_- aFge 4 9FIgIR@1 4P Not to exceed $22,500.00. Includes 1st & 2nd siihmittalq RP \ /IP \A /G after Per submittal 2nd submittal and revisions to accepted plans are each charged 30% of original fee. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 16 Page 225 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 12 FP FA R - i r�i DI8 C i i 19 rl i Y i ri e n H ninr, Ir- +r �� / (1�� ri 19 P i tt -�Ir - Th ird S?. D`r rii19PA ittAI ?H�S S AP Dr ,lirY it r" DI , +. C hrJi"iri ,r rJ Ji +i. r I l f (,,"„r r „ l ;9 rlrl e-A C h a r g e qFM fee. S i i 19 PA - I r rPI S?. C -, �zrmP A r }� QF - "O "' a A P I-, r- I-, a r e rI C (10% o f r r i rs i ri � I f r r rill - mitt -iIr TI- iirr� Q I S?. �� nrr r rt A-F � e difi - 4 - - i I pp p pl . - A r,r,I ir�- � +ir,r� R 'mac .-. Dr riihrri ++ I n ri rsin - f nn Includes 1st & 2nd submittals. Reviews after $3000 Base + 2nd submittal and Preliminary Plat 30 per lot Per Submittal revisions to accepted plans are each charged 30% of original fee. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 17 Page 226 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 1 @ Th iFd S?, CiR@I Dl-,t• HP to ninrQ C I nnn nn D`r ri i19PA t �I ?��s 1-�mi + +- S, -Ar � �IH , � � (l-A n � � .� r n ,�- r Z��4Ee- Pd�co-Z��4. o-q C h - ag g rigir,aI fe e. T l, r n r i r r� ri,19 �Ir Thirr-1 Q. P i n I P c,, h rl i, , i r i n rl rl i+ i n I I i„,, r n I , +r 4Q ;H,I - yT� Z %Ee—Pd co-Z?$14$16 oA r- 1 h . aFg l C 4 r,ri giR @ f nn Clnel Pi ( eReRtr ('r-nr�litir-nr S?. Restri , - ,}i, - ,,. s R 1 m itt�I li l„ 7 � C)Fdin^�n c$� CLtl77TYPfe�O�+e�G� �� Bt7�1717 D e r r i i ,�„- y- TZ��4Ee- Pd- co-2C)14. 16 Final Plat; Assurance Agreement Review $ 150.00 Per submittal July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 C - , �zrmc -cri ri 1 PA ITh 2, Cir, DI +. n r,r D r h i ++ I 74y �,Z gFd - Ne. 2914.916 C� a-r- C ha ag 9 o f eF 4g4n @l fr-r Includes 1st & 2nd Final Plat $1000 Base + Per submittal 2nd submittal and 10 per lot revisions to accepted plans are each charged 30% of original fee. Includes 1 & 2 nd submittals. Reviews after 2 submittals and d o accep tte Minor Land Division;4ee $ 500.00 Per submittal revisions s t Q, r h t o n+ July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 pd � r' , ham are each charged X30% of original fee. '1 o rmi A r Ir TThi r-1 S?. geve P t e t we sr-es ef Ee EF a I A- I +i f ,; b ase fir 7 nnn nn Dr,r r h I 44yT20 14 se - Pie. 2 o-q r h r 9 o f eF4g4n@l Trlrl Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 18 Page 227 of 279 Development Plan Site Plan /Architectural Review Residential Design Plan Residential Model Home Design Review Pre - Application Conference Conditional Use Permit; Application Fee Temporary Use Permit; Administrative Process with Council Action Landscape Plans Base Fee COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 n rv- vv r ��� riihmitt@Ir ThiFd S?. �ti �i ,, eq_ep'r.J'� ++ @re n 'I F9 I� I T'9T 291 (l c--P_ `� `^ o-„-h Ch - age 1 990% 4 gF egir,-,I f CPp it hArQPI ran Pr +im;#,Q,;I n co-z�14 �� Iry 1 g n n n n D` r h m i + A I D` r r r�ii r,i timr, , fl, it h�i irr A c-4-H81 ,. + �. -, I fir, r, r rv, h r, h i ,z h r, r A + th Fate ref $ 9 Pep h�i in rvG r,ffr it h rre hrv,i + +-,Ir T�hi -J 4. �tia Trirv� i i h e r� t_ @ r r - 7H I T9TZ`t��4 � 9 FG1 R R G d Ao- 2 Q 14 Q I CR 7� I T9T2914 � c-e-Pd o-24-14Q1FR � e�c�e e@ C har rr e C 4 l,rir:ir 14e riihmitt -iIr Thiri -I S?. hsegHePt_ - A Fe ��;�a � G)Fdn-�n Hly '2014 i ��ry- 7 , 2014 . 016 a-i -h Charged 9 o eFegir,-,I 4e Includes 1st & 2nd submittals. Reviews after $2000 Base + 2nd submittal and $40 per acre Per submittal revisions to accepted plans are each charged 30% of original fee. $ 400.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 1,250.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 100.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 250.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 1,000.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 500.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Includes 1 & 2 submittals. Reviews after 2 submittals $ 600.00 Per submittal and revisions to accepted July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 I pans 4irl -I Q. riihrrrvHeRt riihmi++ are each charged Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 19 Page 228 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 20 Page 229 of 279 -S(14 .-.f erigiR@l fee 180.00. Includes 1 St & 2 nd submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittals and Native Plant Permit Q��e $ 300.00 Per submittal revisions to accepted July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 I ans Thir,l Q, r1 1hr„ �„r,+ rill mi + +,Ir are each charged 99, 4 eFig4e4 #e - 90.00. Native Plant Permit; Exception Fee Q r @ rd r f n d i i i s+ m ; Ap pea l P & $ � 50.00 2 5 9 n n Per submittal D r-� r m i++ I July 7, 201 ra 4 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 j lr ' 7, 2 � nee -Pd-e . 2914.916 DI@ Pe +m I P $ Plan Review: New SFR with pre - $ 99. 40.00 Der inr Perte +i ri Per submittal 7Hly 2 n Ee- Wo-2 Q- 14 . Q- 1 C-R July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 appoved model Zoning Compliance Letter n /i l fAr Z9RiRg Viel@t �e TLTfT�TGT� i t r- l,I I n DI- A nriing $ - iAn $ - Cr,r` 75.00 195- 9 :RsQ Qn nn Per letter D„ r r ,1, FA i ++- I Dllr rl l I-. rrmi + +-iI TL D`r July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 ;H ; 2 %se -N e. 2914.916 Ii iI, Z 2�'�4 n Z ;414 . n1 CR 7L Iry n 44 A ('r) R G - t i . : Peme -EA n Ce ram; d . pA iRir +r -i+iye E AeRSir.n Ti�PEA- n P (;9mmirri Variance Request R p, / I r l A p r +rte /� p p r 9� i p pj D I p n r R $ Aii nr- + � $ 299 is() nn 299 nn 550.00 C rtc Der exten D nr n.,+ nrinn Per submittal D` r r i i I-, PA i ++ -� I Crr it C(10% Ai initi �k�F"T� L i n n f n n f r r n -� r� I-, - q' - ' l-, A i++@ I T H 22914 G-'-z NA- .Z2Q14�n16 JHl ' 7,2 � Ee-Ne. 2 7H 2914 � c- e-- NA- Z 14 Q 1 �4 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 7� -y' rz � Ee- Pd- o-Z -I4Q16 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 20 Page 229 of 279 Sign Review Fee Sign Review Fee: 3 or more signs S i , � �_S� R ` ' '� 4 8Sec ec b� b Signs; Temporary sign; Pee fe-r r,-,r.h s Signs; Renewal Fee; Billboard SigRS Raee ory Pe rigR (fer r� -�r�h e_i-ei irrenee) S 46 94e r � i Pee - �r�r�iti�r� -�� Siff (fAr' -ir-h A_r_Gi irreRGe STg%7 ReF d feel si l„rr th -ap eF eqHe t t„ f i h i Signs• Dr r�r rip ter^�rrr� fr�r�• Siff r, i r +ra n fr�rte+ in hr�irrht orb- rrr- r- crcrr rrr��cc , Signs; Planned sign program S lgRS• /\FA/1AdFA/1At t e PI anRed rirrri prr,gr S+gRS7 Change of Copy Fee COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Fee is $75.00 for up to 2 $ 75.00 Per plan signs and $150.00 for 3 or July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 more signs. $ 150.00 Total fee for 3 or July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 $ i g more signs PeF JH l r' WA_ 414 . per-PAit Fee does not apply for y TZ214 Ee- Z�14 $ 10.00 Per sign construction zones per July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Town Sign Code $ 500.00 25 . $ i g . � S $�. 944 Per sign R e F S i gR Rey -Siff e-s+gR Rey -Siff (Non- conforming) July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 JH 1 , ' 7, 2214 Ee-N 9. 2914.916 JH' Ee-R'c ;41416 y TZ214 ' JH;= %Ee-N 2914.916 yTZ214 e. JH' y' 2 914 n Ee-Pd co-2 Q_ 14 Q 16 Includes 1st & 2nd submittals. Reviews after $ 560.00 Per submittal 2nd submittal and revisions to accepted July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 plans are each charged 30% of original fee. �,,,, it 99 „f r, S ee P` r r i i h mitt � r2014 r' N e. 2014 Si 1 PA � fQiz $ 15.00 Per Submittal July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 25 nn P e F peF jH lyTZ 2 014 � C)Fd - Ne. 2 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 21 Page 230 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 22 Page 231 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 23 Page 232 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 New Address for Residential Plats, Condominiums , Apartments & Commercial $ 10.00 Per lot /unit July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 Suites Change in Existing Street Name $ 42� Q9 Per street July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 500.00 ,4c4pl.pe re s ReqHiFed ge be G ge d P H e-�e GheRge ; r S +Fee+ Pi 49. o„ r 2 ,- ,1 r„r r 4 H! - ' 2C)14 %Ee-N 9. 2914 .916 Add /Change an Address Number $ 60 Per address July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 e� N e FA e GheRge Appeal 4- � ( p Jam; 2014 %s e-N o-Z214 916 n r r r n i i m r( h n rr n r r � v De Ji;', - 914 1 QFdipappe -W We 2 Q 14Q16 44 . iriimi im �� �n� hA, it 9r t th t ftPr Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 24 Page 233 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 PF@ir Ctt @ge a eW 9@1; P Q19 ...��e�e+� -�e��+ n itir n -;1 P C+- A +om i -Q n+ S 14 PA4 44 - A IS _p4e + I-,e 2ni� S IB 1 Q ri �nr n to ed 9F@ir @ge Ct- i +PmPnt ,�c�e� n nn � Cn0% �� rri rrin -I f r TCtTGF - A Ga Ic 90% 4 r -,1 fee fAr -� i pp I ie ,�- ro,- -�c�,� D r r ri illm,1 r� D`r ri 14 PA �I D Pr ri i14PA i1 r� Appl try 'I r+ ty ri ihmitt -�lr li il�i 7 � I lFdiR@A In ��„- y - T Z��4Ee- P�Z 4 0 �1 CR �� � n G-e- PA-.Z Q1 FR li i1 i � � (lr lin ire ��,- yT Z��4Ee- Pd- co-Z 4 n �1 6 Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Drainage Statement 280 per statement and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $80 each. nai r,., g i $96n• ro , inrli itl �r ) ri ilmitt i1r „T�,,�s kepeFt Dr�iir,ir - f +r,r 7nl-1 rill - mitt -1 C noi 4 e aFe Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Drainage Report 560 per report and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $170 (r nrliti�n i1 I rtt�r ef �9 nn DrhT each. N4 im �ee it $;99 C inr liirlrr rii�segHr,n+ I r- + +r,r Af 1 n 44P ReVirieR R eV i eW 499 i 4Hly 22914 p M R (I G)MR) Fey Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Conditional Letter of Map Revision with Letter of Map Revision 350 P(21 and reviews of revisions to (CLOMR /LOMR) CLOMR /LOMB accepted submittals are $170 I n + +r r Lle\ /Ir 4 9R (I nnaR)• (?r,,i „e, Pr,r, �n nn De hASCiF each. im fee is nn 9 Af 44r, 1P T 5A 4r,irr, $24n P-e PdA 4H z21 Applies to first 2 submittals. Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) 280 per LOMR Reviews after 2nd submittal „ + • u„ r1,, Q ,+ �9 nn DS are $100 per submittal. na inimi i �ee it $2Qn nn Rm 4Hly 22914 ce- Pdco-Z�14�� Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Geotechnical Report 280 per report and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $80 per submittal. Resubmittals to Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 25 Page 234 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 reconfirm expired report are 4 I AT�pR' on� A- s +I - n@ n nr a n@ge C� " " i " `^ �.' �.' i CTTT A A or +h P 9r G_ r• ni�1 crn T n n n Pep hA,,T not charged a review fee. i n i m i i m �e i i s n n. 1 2Q 14 Q I CR Qri rrrtr• LJ�i irli r-i +� Nn e $29P 7z1i 2914 P-e- ( Ao- Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Review of Miscellaneous Report 280 per report and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $80 per submittal. Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal Review of Structural Calculations 560 per report and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $170 C` py h,� i� iir iAn D E)(cE -- Re N `-'' } (i r+ 4 @ @ rpr,� +r PI@n)• Q@r f r 2nn nn P eF r per submittal. ��;', Z �4 � 94pappe - -Pdco-Z I 4 Q1 64 b--r rE( C`" N " "' ' `" N "' C'(ITTTQ p a 4 4 a s fee ITC'Cn'RTb 2 Per h e @ r i n rr ��;',- y TZ214 � G_ P_ WA­ 24 -14 Q1 6 Subdivision Design Exception Report Rc� 4 ^ � n ee , r@ d ing oI @nr' C_ @r yes , b ase f�� (_ . n C r r r7T G F e @ g � F@ d i n g D I @ R r @ ee , o f (_r.,dir o 91 2 a er„s. be se f„„ ReY4e� r� f (_ r @ d in g D I @ n r i 9 .. 91 2 9 @ G e r, ?GF e Q i Af ( F@diRg DI-inr• 29 0 rrr,r• I _ASr� frr e�4e� D i r� f (= r @ d in g D I@ R r% 2 n n � n n @ e r e s, a eFeceg2 fee ,TcX I X Q� ,R iri p f 9r@ d in g DI@ 4 n 1 199 8G re r/ 14 -� rri f r,r` �e�0�T v-- A cmT- rv--mr Q p f 9r@d in g DI@nr• 199 @ G rey• a a@ �er� � l�J��O E�'eT , 2'C'lrCh�'_'ITT,?TC�CLTSCTCC 140 779. 999 e ( ( ��`�l'rt717 999 nn ��� . n $ 1 non nn �mrv--vv $ ���Q per report Der ri i - hi++ I m ° iQp PC-pp o„r s t,FAi + +,I p PPP P e ri il-�mitt I T� o e�EF =e D e ri i -, PAi + t-iI TL r I o TC - l�C�e �(� (�� l� � l , 20 n 'tl jH 7 14 / ee F L`014.01 7H 1��4 / n CP_ . � � tl Q_ 14. Q_ 164 �i;,'- yy -- �rZ� $�4 Ee-N9. 2C)14 � 16 7H � Ee-Pd co-2 Q_ 14. Q_ 169 liil i 7 � QFdiR@A ��,�- T Z��4Ee co-2 Q_ 14� n 1 C_R ; I� i non �n �4 Ee-Pd co-Z �4. 1 Ii i'I�z214 � n � n � 7L a �� �I� � n � F9 7L �r� (_ r @ din g D I a n r • GA, e F 100 a e r e r' h a v e fee e�4ee „f (= r.,dir o g , eF199 asFes; asFeege fee Arlrli ti r\n AI � r@d DI -A Ci iI mi tt 9 Ir -Af +I-,e 2 .A P Ci i- h Dr_Y ir i A_ . A r , t A 9 r @d i Rg P4-+ $ 2� /l�Q ig. 9904 ref erirri4� f eet A_ r Tapp i Te@ �!e t Cn0% rf r)rirriR f e e fA a pp I i e@ �!e D r, r r i i h m i tt PeF eEiFe D`r - q, - , 19mitt �I T DPr ri iIgmitt I 4H! 29-4 %Ee -Ne. 2914 .916 � � n G_e- PdA- .Z Q I CR 7�'T9TZ` �4 � Ee- P�o-Z214 Q1 64 Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal $400 + 95 /Sheet per plan and reviews of revisions to Grading Plan Review accepted submittals are 30% of original fee per submittal. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 26 Page 235 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 n S na Fa try 19 f e eQ it rr�rvi iirr�rl fr�r ., - - pia I rrv\ /i rv\A/ vv RP-Vi.E'� / r\f rvnrtri it +irvn P' nr, Q rr- f„ P- 4 99 P r r 1 9 PA � R61i i��1 nrv+ Simi + �r� 7� \ T9TZ1��4 � F R R E A- Q- 14 Q- I F-R tr\• rry ^\r�\Al^\\/ n^\\ /inrr rrv\A lr�r r ' 7" r ^\r^\try h r- r frvry it r J Feq ii Fed fer e@4 Pie- t R r ry p tr\• rry ^\r�\Al^\ \/ n^\ \ /inrr rrv\A/rvr Re�4e � /" 1 f � ry r\ r r + i e r\ P � 9 9 . P r I ii I \ T� ,, 2914 W A;414 QICR sheet, sheet, ex e ! Hd i Rg eeveF sheet, e)(Gept in th r^\rr� r,f 9RE? s h ee t pI A f„ r- it r r\rvi iiFed f9 e@4 nI-\ 9904 ry f e r i g i n � it -lee r TT I 1 i i r GTI T i �t R g, SH t TT t 4„„ 4„r r,ii P„r r 1 PA i ++ i Feed 7Hiy 2 %Ee -N e. 2914 .916 i +PA ?� e},/eF i tili +\/ @Rd S4 141 IFAI r'M"v' 99 04 rv f g FeVieW t\/�Tr1iir� i�Ht ReC feee,=- arc -able PPP r, h r i ++ , 4 H l y 2 %Ee - Pie. Z -14 01 i +p ?S . I W -' W - W},/eF i tiii +\/ -Rd r + ri ire +i iFAI r'M"v' Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are 30% Construction Plan Review $400 + 95 /Sheet per plan type of original fee per submittal. A separate fee is required for each plan review type including, but not limited to: paving, sewer, and utility p J. ,II P I i� i icr��.rraTr h e s -i n P h ry v g Feater ref ` nnn r +r ry 'I re �TCZrc , e , applies t n �I c r $n Cn /sf 1,f D r c 18 ry i ++ 4H ly 1, 2 / mac ^ Pie. zarv.C)ao hr ahmitt -\� - Arr- �n4 r\ f Sri rrin^\� frvry n e ge of n c h r,i ++ it f+„ r+h„ 7 r, rl c h i ++ i n ot rf r i o„r r h + +-,I ee-Ne. 2 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 27 Page 236 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal greater of $1,000 and reviews of revisions to Bridge Plan Review or $0.50 /sf of per bridge plan accepted submittals are 30% bridge of original fee per submittal. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 28 Page 237 of 279 Wastewater infrastructure Plan Review R , i i r � T g e Apr, tq A I p r - 1 i i i r-1i !S i 6 Sirt PIA nr �e�4e� i �� In�iiirli i-I C tip om DI- inr• n/��nit�r D�r�I -iti�n Tr`rti n-r Re44e' i A f l n f i4 i r-1 11 -A I C t i��e m D� �i- h A r1 r•I i t i 9 n a I I n r P ei- +A Re iey o f 1Pdi , -AI C ti�yp� ±II ` em Rla Rr• Assurances; Substitute Assurance Assurances; Partial Release of Assurance T ,pe 1 GFe diRg Dnrmi +• Ba f� T�i 1 Dermit• DI@ (;hPG PPP Type 1 grading permit Type 1 Grading Permit; Violation Fee Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 greater of $500 or $100 per sheet Applied to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal per plan and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are 50% of original fee per submittal. $ 1 g g$g f P - P - �Av r � I c t Cn0% �f �rirrin f r- P - f r- r a r r I i Ge e �n nn $ Q D e r h m i t t i I ° r r� iTrrP--P r r- r- f 9 R e Sh eet /�rrl t y . ,A ri ihmi D, r r i i 1q m i ++ -� I D e r h m oT oT 11 4 r ri i + Der riihmi +t -,I Per 7H ' ,�Z214 / 9 F G1 4 R @ R Ee co-2 Q- 14 Q Itd P I@ R r. 7H ` T9T 2914 / n C 2Q1 4Q16 +tA 7�' `T9TZ`t��4 � Ee- P�o-Z214 Q1 CR o-�Ql 4 Q1 Fm, Jam',- y TZ�$�4 QFdipap o-Z2$�4�� J�',Z�4 nEe- R�co-ZI 4 Q1 6 7H ,,z21 Ee-Ne. 2214 016 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 150.00 Assurance $ 20.00 1 nn nn � �Q Per submittal Pr,r r. hmi + I D r r i i h m i ++ , I n z h- re -gpeate �r 7 n04 n th PAnr July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 ��„- y „ TZ��4 n Ee- Pd- o-2914. G � I .I / r,�i ;�;',- y T2914 � Ee- P1co-2 Q- 14 Q I CR r „f 2 n n n n +ri'P4An time CC c 500 eej Pees p aid D`r ri ihm �I � rr l ir M inn h er per permit at o f 1 n n rn rt ��I i 2 2916 � (l 9- WA- Z��Q SL 500.00 Stir Per violation nQ P- H e +h R n meRdm„R+ new 204 r,f +h peFRr 4 t f e ;HI�y 2914 n fie. 2Q- 144 it j 1, 2016 GFd -Ne. 20!6-C)C)6 29 Page 238 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 r +r� ii -tine rnr+ ' � ( 14 ' 9-z W "� T i rn "� (= r �rlin Permit• fnn 'LQ�QQ PPr ri ihm 4 rz2 o-Z�1 4 Q� , 9@ re rv�Qv nPlo r r f nn nn nr 104 „f th., PAPrtri ir•tiAn eests eF ;. the i- r�r�rt ri ir•ti r�r� r�r�rt fr�r thr, T��nin - �r�tinrr @S Gnrtin�r�r A4 :P i'P e 2 (= r- irlinrr PeFRm t• �r�rtri �rt Pee Ceram r�r\4 Der q-,-, hmitt -�� , cvrrrcrcr � , vtz- rrc�cc r� ��Ty -rz �rv--vvv D r.J Pees p a t ti FA r, .-,� - ppliGatiep ha ran Gent ertim -itr, 4 Ap "A' PASCY9 b " I r-iirl r�ri r�r try r r��r�rr�r�i it Fee is the greater of $500.00 or 1% of the construction costs or 3.5% of the construction cost for the Type 2 Grading Permit; Residential Subdivisions see note per permit Town acting as Engineer of Record. Fees paid at time of application based on cost nigner, remaining balance is paid prior to permit closeout. Fee is the greater of $800.00 or 1% of the construction costs or 3.5% of the construction cost for the Town acting as Engineer of Type 2 Grading Permit; Commercial Developments see note per permit Record. Includes multi - family housing developments. Fees paid at time of application based on cost estimate. If actual cost is higher, remaining balance is paid prior to permit closeout. Fee is the greater of $800.00 or 1% of the construction Type 2 Grading Permit; Construction Cost Fee; Commercial Developments See note Per submittal costs or 3.5% of the July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 construction cost for the Town acting as Engineer of Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 30 Page 239 of 279 Type 2 Grading Permit; At -Risk Grading Fee Type 2 Grading Permit; Violation Fee Type 2 Grading Permit; Amendment Form B Permit; Public Infrastructure Form B Permit; Violation Fee Form B Permit; Amendmen Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Record. Includes multi - family housing developments. Fees paid at time of application based on cost estimate. If actual cost is higher, remaining balance is paid prior to permit closeout. $ 500.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 See note Per violation Fee is double the permit fee. July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is 1% of the increased construction cost or 3.5% of See Note Per Amendment the increased construction July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 cost for the Town acting as $ 99 . n n $ 1 gg D r r i i h m i ++ , engineer of record r�riir�n t � Tir� Cr,r� it in - � � t ,��� �Pp e rz�Pgfeate r 4 nn nn nr 14% „f +h„ r_r_nrtri etir)n pA ., r 4 C04 „f +h„ , rt f.,r th ;Hl ' 2214 Ee- WA­ 2Q-1-4. Q_ 16 Jam',- y T2914 n Ee- PNo-2 Q_ 14 Q I CR �L r ZT GTC D ` r r i i h m i tt -i e r, R s tr e ti e r, T�nin - �r�ti nrr @S Cnrrinr� Qr ref � Qr�rr\rr� C�r�r r^ir� - times r,f r r fir ti �r h err r� r_n e9St o rtim -qtr - f - i - +�� it hirrhor rr�m- ininrr h- �- c n r r�r� it paid pFieF to permit ele it Fee is the greater of $500.00 �,,� nl,� � H l � ' 1 2 916 � (l C�t� 2Q_ Q46 or 1.0% of the construction costs or 4.5% of the construction cost for the Town acting as Engineer of see note per permit Record. Fees paid at time of application based on cost estimate. If actual cost is higher, remaining balance is paid prior to permit closeout. See note Per violation Fee is double the permit fee. July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 See Note Per Amendment Fee is 1% of the increased July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 31 Page 240 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 construction cost or 4.5% of the increased construction cost for the Town acting as i9 g. D„ r r ,1. P i ++ I engineer of record �P 4,; zhrcffeato r,f $999 nr 'I n04 „f +hr, C iPtiAn ee4s r, r 2 C O% e4 h r, eepstri irztiep Pert fee the �nin r Tr� - �r�tinrr Cnrtinr�r� A4 j H l y 2 914 %Ee -Pie. 2914.916 Sties -Rev e- D hry i ++ I @S D C P At t o f a has r,n G e st e r+i Fvge e If rae_4 i s T h r ��yo r re m @ini Rg h@l- i nr-P it b I r -irl rrin t Pe FR it G A- Fee is the greater of $500.00 j 1, 2916 gFd -Ne. 2016.0C)6 or 1.0% of the construction costs or 2.5% of the construction cost for the Town acting as Engineer of Form A Permit; Major Utilities see note per permit Record. Fees paid at time of application based on cost estimate. If actual cost is higher, remaining balance is paid prior to permit closeout. Form A Permit - Major Utilities; Violation Fee See note Per violation Fee is double the permit fee. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is 1% of the increased construction cost or 2.5% of Form A Permit; Amendment See Note Per Amendment the increased construction July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 cost for the Town acting as C r, /A Dormlt . 44 -AF- R@ \A/@4 P 1 4AP - ee T'L r A-R 4 S + C I�Ir, D r� r ApAppjl engineer of record C nn it "� C0% o t in ^� rnd Pee 2.9 liil� 1 i '�("� � (lr in s,�,,,,-�, ((��I�,,-�, 2Q -1-69 4 Q - 6 9 4 l yTZ"'l'�td t C"r'd' " " Cr,r�� Do rmi+ n n - ,r - ,r, - �p or; /�mnnpJmpnt ?�r�c $ x-99 Pp r A m p n pJ nnt C nn i "� C0% o th e in ^�rn� Pew rr rt ri irtir�n rrrt Fee only applies when for �Hl�i� �(l p We. 2Q Floodplain; Floodplain Hazard Sheet Per report July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 20.00 commercial use Floodplain; Floodplain Use Permit $ 100.00 D`r riihmi +t -,l Per July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Permit Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 32 Page 241 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Floodplain; Floodplain Variance 1;pAittAl Per $ 1,000.00 Variance July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 33 Page 242 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 r,f T r@ffir` 'R rP@Gt Sty d I-e FI„ R@tr, �9 nn Dr, T'CTTCL7T nAi im 4ee it $960 nn jzl - 2014 / n , - �Z�14 n1 CR Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal and Traffic Impact Study 560 Per Report reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are $170 per R -4i , r-f Tr-�ffir� Imr, -� i ' D-i +r, pe hr,..r submittal. nnir,im, m it // n n-I C i I I FIl rcL�rEua �� , Y $ r c1 rTVZ�r ro 4 $2994Q 2214 Ee- R�o-z�14 Iry Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews after 2nd submittal and Traffic Impact Statement 280 Per Statement reviews of revisions to accepted ♦ , Dr,IIii \/eRtIrlR DI@n RP r, f C t/"1rm \I\lrl r Dre n�Q DP-r riihmi ++ I submittals are $80 per submittal. m irl�r fi rr t'cvTrQ -,r,rJ firr+ i ,- +ir,r, r pspe / @t r -Vi.& 4 7, 2014 ee- No-Z214.016 n rI rIitir�r riihmitt -iIr rr,ii r�eir, rI at r a t e 94 $2 1 9 . 99 per ri ihmi+t Applies to first 2 submittals and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 280 Per Plan first inspection. Reviews after 2nd S rlrm �ei-i �r Drllh itiep Pr r�n Pl@Rn Di irr h rr A T9WR Tr�m i4 n nn �� Dr,r teMpl submittal are $80 per submittal. Inr Ii irlr r t sir` eepies of template 44 8 � ' , l I c�- f ialcrG l -1 st e l et, f r s id +ha, i a s i R g ie A -A G A-m MeR PI@R ref r in 'nihir-h th , m rtr r deyei h��pe - iel�i stahiIized - inrl the i�Ir�tir�� �f A rl +i r-n r-r ,hear th C \A /DDD Trl m rl - A Tl_ fe th PAmmeR PI@R ref Ctrrm \A /^trr DrIliitir,n Drrl\/rlrl R DI@R L eV d . rl \AI r-f C -- A - M eted :Pew R ;eMpl@te @Rd InrPer# Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); review based on Town $ i4 g. D` r r h m -i n n A rJ \ � 4 . A - n r-f th Arl ; -i u TCr -v I1eP^ 4M L Qnt A4 Erl\/i (li i Iit i (�nrtri ir-tiAn (= rQnQP;gI m i r r f i r r t Sep q,hittp1r, A j �IitiAppl g,hm -� i++Ir , �L m 7� I ,- y T2914 // r Ee- RI•co-2Q-1 4 Q1 6 re4� ie at pate r,f $ten nn PeF h m i + +-, l T Applies to first 2 submittals and 140 Per Plan Template site inspection. Reviews after 2nd Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 34 Page 243 of 279 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan; Re- inspection COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 submittal are $40 per submittal. Includes two copies of template. May be used for a custom lot, single family residence that is part of a common plan of development in which the master developer has already stabilized and submitted the Notice of Termination or where the SWPPP for the common plan of development was prepared under an old version of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Construction General Permit. I - ie n /� iAimi i m nnn 50.00 Per inspection Fee to reinspect after failed inspection July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 35 Page 244 of 279 Right of Way permit, base fee Right -of -Way Permit; Construction Plan Check Fee Right -of -Way Permit; Additional Extension Fee Right -of -Way Permit; Late Fee COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 right -of -way permit after work has already started Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 36 Page 245 of 279 review, and /or hauling 250 Per Permit within ROW of 7 or more trucks. Town projects subject to provisions of Marana ORD 2016.002 1n de eX Pt E) R f&F W h P A h -,\ P- h., +hr., ncr 2% cost of g h PFgGe SF, CPp AAt �ete•E4 applicable Per submittal July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 construction when plans are reviewed through the Development Services process. Town projects subject to provisions of Marana ORD 2016.002 ir fries $ 50.00 Per extension P.Pst P-44 epsiAn Applies to second July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 extension and beyond Late fee is $1,500 plus double the permit fee. See note Per violation Applies when obtaining a July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 right -of -way permit after work has already started Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 36 Page 245 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 or failure to obtain a right - of -way permit within two days after emergency right -of -way work is eeFApl commenced Calculated on construction in ROW costs, does not Greater of 2% apply if no construction. of Includes two inspections Right -of -Way Permit; Weekly Inspection Fee construction Per submittal per week and close -out July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 cost or inspection (not applied to $200.00 per every permit). Town week projects subject to provisions of Marana ORD 2016.002 Right of Way Abandonment - Legal Noticing See Note Per Notice Fee is actual cost to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 licant pp Release of Easement - Legal Notice See Note Per Notice Fee is actual cost to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 licant pp Release of No- Access Easement $ 150.00 Per Easement July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 Fee is for dedications as a result of development and does not apply in cases where the Town requests ROW or easement absent New Easements and /or dedications by separate instrument See Note Per easement or of development. $350.00 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 dedication for one easement and /or dedication (includes title review). $100.00 for each additional easement and /or dedication relating to the same property. Dedication of right of way or easement by separate instrument -title report & See Note Per ROW /Easement Fee is actual cost to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 closing fees applicant Dedication of right of way or easement by separate instrument - surveyor fees See Note Per ROW /Easement Fee is actual cost to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 licant pp Dedication of right of way or easement by separate instrument - appraisal See Note Per ROW /Easement Fee is actual cost to July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 fees applicant Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 37 Page 246 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 38 Page 247 of 279 Initial permit includes 1 and 2 nd Re- inspection Fee $ 75.00 Per inspection July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 inspections. Inspection After Normal Work Hours $ 75.00 Per hour $75 per hour with a minimum of two July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 S i i i P n irS 9 n nn hours ($150). jH l, 2014 � C461 2(44.016 � e t� Plan Review submittals after 2 submittal and °,- ;96eSsir i. R S Pe Gti 94 $ 50.00 Per hour Plan review fee will be charged $50 7, -Ne. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Revisions to Approved Plans w 4h N ^d Pee + eFAs per hour to the nearest hour. Expedited Plan Review Option 1: Additional 50% of the submittal plan review fee (Plan Review Fee + additional 50% of plan review fee). Expedited fee will be paid in full at the time of submittal. The initial review of the submittal will be completed in half of the prescribed plan review timeframe. Expedited Plan Review Option 2: Additional 100% of the submittal plan review fee Expedited Building Plan Review See note Per submittal (Plan Review Fee +additional 100% of July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 plan review fee). Expedited fee will be paid in full at the time of submittal. The review timeframe for this option will be mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the building official prior to granting status to the submittal. Both of the town's expedited plan review service options, require the completion and approval of the expedited review request form by the building official prior to granting status. Fee determined per State of Arizona schedule. IGA indicates base fee for the installation of a Manufactured July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 Manufactured Home or Factory -built Building See note Per submittal Home $350. Factory -built Building permitting fees are charged per State requirements. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 38 Page 247 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Construction Trailers $ 244.00 Per submittal Flat fee July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is $50 per submittal, plus $50 per Demolition Permit See note Per permit utility (electrical, gas, water, sewer). July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Individual permit required for each structure. Prefabricated Spas and Above - ground Pools 1 . 4 . 1 - Ate l c e� +ten �r Inr +-iII ^r Qpyy@�eRt /f� ,- +� �'G CITCT - rTRfL� `' r' `" � r d reI r\ ga �Clpr�trir� -�I r�pnnpr�t Clpr� +rir�pI Dprlprt- �I Qp $ � 75.00 � n n n � nnn Per permit � P eF Pe � V� R 4 QAe +imp All in hi f ve ee ey ^n L�� h" r, � P eer She a pl +e s Y FA i+ . (lee temp All in iris^ �ee Qp" � � p r r f e h i I I n e t i p p I , t9 p ^^ r CT TT R time 811 in 1rive fleee. Rv July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 �� I 2916 �E2- Pdt�Z410 Iiil�,'I "fin �(lrr- Iin- �n - ,, - , nI, 241 7L ,- y - Ee-Pd co- � Cinrsle C Emil , Qerirlpnti I / �( pr �, r pr ti ,e (ppI ^r Q Q,I�,. { I Q rhpri ie Cirpr r e pr Other ( r / r r I i r r e Photovoltaic System; Commercial $ gQ nn n nn 750.00 � � Per permit �ppr rhII net - �r�r� r� I�, tp this erm �� -� � � De p+ i i ,.I e ,�,., i I+ i �-, ,�,., i I", h p rl ^V^I ^r RmeRtr QAP temp -III in ri"e �pe Qe"iripr ° rI CTITJT °ZTC�RZ�TJTL'TT �e r h -, I I r, a Y, p+ +p +her � Includes multi - family developments. � nn 29 6 (l d � y �n �Zn� 6 ��,••yTZa � r v--vQv I � I" rz 2916 / 9 nn �'�� c�z 2 a � 6 �° July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Photovoltaic System; Single Family Residential $ 150.00 Per permit July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Includes structural review of loading Fee based on on roof, backflow preventer and Photovoltaic System for pool heater; Commercial project Per permit pump; Includes multi - family July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 valuation developments; Fee based on project valuation. Includes structural review of loading Photovoltaic System for pool heater; Residential $ 50.00 Per permit on roof, backflow preventer and July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 pump Interior Water Re -pipe $ 150.00 Per permit Flat fee, only for like- for -like pipe July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 sizing installation Site or Plot Plan Review; " ^ rAr ^ ^d Si te Q. Ail+ Hoer -IpI Custom Home or $ 100.00 Per permit Inrpe, -teen r�prtr I- �- ir er�I i ir�pn �i iII July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Model Plan „ ^I Consultant Plan Review Fees See note Per submittal Fees determined per contract with July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Town. Registered Plant Annual Permit; Less than 1,000,000 square feet $ 700.00 Per permit July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Registered Plant Annual Permit; Greater than 1,000,000 square feet $ 1,400.00 Per permit July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $200 i_ Does not apply to fire sprinkler Deferred Building Permit Submittals Per submittal systems, ventilation hoods, and fire July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 I Arlrl i +ipe 9 iIdin Dp It S FA 4 . 4 - A 1 S -A4 the 2 P ci ihmitt -AI $ 4•e sn nn Dp�T alarms. DI�pl T r O A JPC XAll I I h@ ^d CCn ��I, 2914 WA 2414 Q16 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 39 Page 248 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 I r�r hr\i it try the r�^rr`rt hr\i it After initial 3 year timeframe, or at Building Model Plan Renewal Fee $ 50.00 Per hour the Town's discretion. Plan review fee July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 will be $50 per hour to the nearest hour. Wayfinding Plate - Application Fee $ 50.00 Each July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Wayfind ing Plate - Plate Fee $ 600.00 Each Fee includes a proration of the sign July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 cost in addition to the plate cost. Wayfinding Plate - Annual Renewal / Maintenance Fee 1 i inr` fee Ci ily $ 50.00 nn Per year July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 li ly � I IrlYll'l'll'1ee Rt E tr`rieF WateF Family Sepy l� trrc TO'TC�LTITCTOT����� $ � go Pee eAit T'ITTTTTTL PFF One time all- inclusive fee including Pie. 006 z� �av 7L ry-r z �rrct - rv� n 1 , inspections and revisions. Does not Plan review fee for miscellaneous permits or occupancy compliance 50.00 Per Permit apply to valuation based miscellaneous permits and /or permits separately identified in the fee schedule. Conversion; Garage to sales office 300.00 Per Permit Conversion; sales office to garage 150.00 Per Permit Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 40 Page 249 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 41 Page 250 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 This is the proposed base fee. The Town Manager has the authority to Development Agreement Preparation Fee $ 500.00 Per agreement waive this fee for agreements the July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Manager believes provide substantial economic development benefits to the Town. Or actual fees and costs charged by outside counsel, if the Town determines outside counsel is needed for the particular agreement. This fee is in addition to the "Development agreement preparation fee," and is for time spent by attorneys beyond either (1) the first five hours of if the agreement is Development Agreement Supplemental Fee $ 100.00 Per hour attorney time, July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 being prepared by in -house attorneys, or (2) the first $500 of outside counsel fees and costs, if the agreement is being prepared by outside counsel. The Town Manager has the authority to waive this fee for agreements the Manager believes provide substantial economic development be nefits to the Town. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 42 Page 251 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Surface Mining License Business License; Full Year, Initial Fee Business License; Full Year; Annual Renewal Fee 5,000.00 $ 50.00 $ 40.00 Per license N Non refundable $40.00 Refundable if Per license l license application is denied Per year N Non refundable License available only for Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants, Per license T License is valid for a maximum period of 10 days. Per license N Non refundable $40.00 Refundable if Per license l license application is Der Iir�nrr� �JC e denied nn nn Rem '_'r,ela1 1e if Iir�nr� - rrIir-+inn it � nnio rl If te i se aFe rI A p r y e a A ern @+r r eFe r�ry Business License; Temporary Business License; Short -Term Vendor (Events 10 consecutive days or less); Peddlers; Solicitors; Transient Merchants $ 20.00 Business License; Sexually Oriented Business; Initial or Annual Renewal Fee $ 500.00 Employee License; Sexually Oriented Business; Initial or Annual Renewal Fee $ 50.00 � (\ Qiir� i ? onre; eGI46@I f� @Fiii @R@ PirpeRS@ 9. F i7 �-}� S` 4 Massage Establishment License; Application Fee Y 200.00 Massage Establishment Manager License; Application Fee $ 75.00 Massage Establishment License, Full Year; Initial Fee $ 100.00 Massage Establishment Manager License; Full Year; Initial Fee $ 50.00 Massage Establishment License; Full Year; Annual Renewal Fee $ 100.00 Massage Establishment Manager License; Full Year; Annual Renewal Fee $ 50.00 Massage Establishment Location Change Application Fee $ 25.00 Cable Television Franchise License; Application Fee $ 1,000.00 Greater of Late License Renewal $10.00 or 25% of annual license fee July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 7H I � i� 919 r rI i n -A n tom' - We. i�r6�v July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 43 Page 252 of 279 July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 7H I � i� 919 r rI i n -A n tom' - We. i�r6�v July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 43 Page 252 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Dog License Fees; Unaltered Dog; Standard Fee Dog License Fees; Unaltered Dog; Senior /Disabled Fee Dog License Fees; Altered Dog; Standard Fee Dog License Fees; Altered Dog; Senior /Disabled Fee Dog License Fees; Dog Declared Vicious, Destructive, and /or Dangerous Dog License Fees; Duplicate License Fee Dog License Fees; Delinquent Payment /Licensing Fee; Between 30 days and 1 Year After Due Date Dog License Fees; Delinquent Payment /Licensing Fee; Between 1 Year and 2 Years After Due Date Dog License Fees; Delinquent Payment /Licensing Fee; More than 2 Years After Due Date Dog License Fees; License Transfer Fee Notary Fee Diil-�lir- D� Frs kegHe-ts• 4 C4 " x !I" ep `-"`"� S7. \A/ 4e A- r GA seele r rcc�rcrs _. _ _ , . _�c; ^"" N Y , `-' � `'' Di iI Tl I �T�TC RcE Degi jests; 9 . 9" x 14 (;e'py7 R- l" -z ,� S2. \/� /hite A- r C- rA�is Dill -,li D FdS kegH • x 14 (c6�c9I$F TI�JTTCTTCC�T'CI'J'TT� - � _. _ _ , fir , Di l l� I ee - RegHests7 !I " x i P r-r Qpaysea TIaTJTTCTCCE 9T'CI'J'TTr - q - ' , , GeleF D l� la ^Fd RegHests; 24 x;6" epy; Ql,AP-14 2. \A /l-iite A - - P Cqr-i irG a e Conv; Black & White or Grayscale; 8.5" x 11" - 11" x 17" $ 60.00 Per animal $ 17.00 Per animal $ 15.00 Per animal $ 10.00 Per animal $ 100.00 Per animal $ 10.00 Per license $ 10.00 Per animal $ 22.00 Per animal $ 36.00 $ 10.00 $ 2.00 i. � nn 9n 2. 99 4. 2 nn 4. $ 0.50 Copy; Color; 8.5" x 11" - 11" x 17" Copy; Black & White or Grayscale; 18" x 24" - 24" x 36" Copy; Color; 18" x 24" - 24" x 36" D' e eg He4s-,-C Document Larger than 24" x 36" Copy; Black & White or Grayscale Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 $ 1.00 $ 2.00 $ 4.00 $ 3.00 44 Per animal Per transfer Per notary certification TL -';h eCT ReFsheR P P rr s e e-t TL r �CCT D e r TZTsheet R e-F s h e R P ` rr r �CCT D`P she4 PeFsheR Applies but not limited to Per sheet Public Records Requests Applies but not limited to Per sheet Public Records Requests Applies but not limited to Per sheet Public Records Requests Applies but not limited to Per sheet Public Records Requests Applies but not limited to Per sheet Public Records Requests July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 JH l,- 2 914 Ee -PEA— ;414 Q1 CR Jam; =Y' 2914 94ReRee N o-Z214.916 JH l,y 2914 Ee-N A— ;414 Q1 CR J H',y ,Z214 � QFGliR@ Ee-Pd A' Z Q l 4 JH l ,-yTZ214 n Ee-Pd co-Z�1-4Q16 JH l ,-yTZ214 � nEe-Pd co-Z214 Q1 C:, JH ;y 2014 %Ee -N o-Z214 916 J� l y -T2914 GP '4 ' 2 Q 14 16 J� l y TZ214 n P-p- N co-Z�14Q1� 4 H l y 2 914 %Ee -N e. 2914.916 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Page 253 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 D. ihlir- Rerzr,rr•1r Reg ir,r Lgp ;Document Larger than 24" x 36" Copy; Color $ 5.00 Per sheet Applies but not limited to July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Public Records Requests Public Records Requests; Documents Used for Commercial (for - profit) $ 10.00 Per hour Plus Commercial Value July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Purposes; Base Search Fee Dii1 -1ir Dr�rr�rrlr Dr�rviir�rtr• (l�riimr�ntr I Irr�r1 fir /��mmr�rri^ /��r rrr��it� D er regi inrt Fee. Cr r the n�� seFAe es ^'QPPIi C@ h1 r_ r-A +r, fr, R r`n mn rr`i ^i r er- r,r el r , -fin � P ii46 regi i e s+s , is i rreR + Files Sent Out for Copying /Scanning Ser�c See note Per submittal p 1i th e ei r�r�m mr�rr Al % / l .- ,f +hr, infr�rm -+inn ^r �� +rrminr jH 1 ,y 7, 2 Ee-Ne. 2(44 .916 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 T _AX A/A Fee is actual cost to Town. Shipping /Mailing Services See note Per submittal Fee is actual cost to Town. July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 DI d r,+ r # Any external data Data CD and other external data formats $ 10.00 Per disc formats such as but not July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 limited to Data CD, USB, A,$ i g PPP etc. 4 2 n NA­ 2 Q_ 14 Q I CR 44B . 2 9. -dtr' p E H', , G_ P_ J� 1 , 2214 � GP_ WA­ 2Q_1 4Q1 64 If required by the Town Facility Use; Council Chambers; Security Deposit $ 500.00 based on nature of event, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 number of participants, and past use. If required by the Town Facility Use; Conference Center; Security Deposit $ 200.00 based on nature of event, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 number of participants, and past use. If required by the Town Facility Use; Municipal Complex Atrium, Security Deposit $ 500.00 based on nature of event, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 number of participants, and past use. If required by the Town Facility Use; Marana Operations Center Community Room; Security Deposit $ 50.00 based on nature of event, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 number of participants, and past use. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 45 Page 254 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Fees determined per Pima Document Recording Fees See note Per recording or Pinal County schedule (as appropriate). Includes revisions and Document Conversion Fee $ 4.00 Per submittal deferred submittals. Fee is in addition to permit base fees. NSF (for online and phone Online Returned Check Fee $ 10.00 Per Violation check /savings transactions with insufficient funds) July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 46 Page 255 of 279 Late Payment Fee $ 15.00 Per late payment July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Returned Check Fee $ 25.00 Per returned check July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Parks & Recreation Activity Registration or Facility Cancellation or Refund Administration Fee Recreation Activity, Lesson or Special Interest Class Registration Fee Non - Resident Fee Activity Registration Late Fee Late Payment Fee COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 47 Page 256 of 279 Charged only when 10% of cancellation is due to fault of Refund Per cancellation or client prior to program start. If July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 refund refunds are required & no Amount fault of client - charge is waived. Rates are set by Parks & Charged once per Recreation Department See note participant per according to program or July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 activity. activity. Fees may differ for residents and non - residents. This additional charge is 25% of Per applied to established class /program /lesson classes /lessons /programs July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 cost /facility rental. where there is a limited number of participants. If an activity has space Per registration if an available, a late (last minute) 25% of activity has a late registration may be offered. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 original fee The fee is determined based registration. on the cost of the activity offered. Payments are due within 30 days of issuing invoice. Late $ 15.00 Per Late Payment fee applies for each 30 -day July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 period an invoice remains C 7� 99 ReF ey ant �,� Derem D e r T'C F e �P'CT7L unpaid. r T.�, l-,., i ire rl Anil -inn -� �.� i-Ammr r l h. irin�rr it �rtinrr r in t r ^rli Applies +rte eye A ,4 4h r aFk P e rRv it ;A h n i irnr - 1 vei - A n9n Gem 1_911rinL-rr er ReR liit i (lr lin in 16 Pd- -�� �;2 Z��4Ee- co-Z��4� � 4H'� 2914 � n G_P_ NA­ 220 Q_ 16- _s�nn -14. j H l ' 2 914 � c-e- N e 2(44416- � PF44 /�r�r-�l�nin Cr�er�i ier enl�i te T9 [ � ,� " l } �.. t b"l'.`1 t r ' . Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 47 Page 256 of 279 Vendor Electrical Fee Town Parks Personnel Labor Rate Park Facility Rental; Multi- Purpose, Baseball, Softball Field, Basketball I Court, Tennis Court or Volleyball Court and available tuff areas Park Facility Rental; Multi- Purpose, Baseball, Softball Field, Basketball Court, Tennis Court or Volleyball Court (Premium Hour Fee) I D-A 7 r -A r1/ ReRt@1 Llorit@ge Crm EY AF Tl7T�TCf ! _. COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 $ 25.00 Per application Applies to events with park July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 � _Q 4(4)44) D er @PplieptiAn R e c permit A r�r�lier try r�r r�i- eve ntr r 7Hl I , , 2214 � G_P_ WA­ Z�144� /'lr(T'll'l4eGl h":PeWR AR r, r,+ i „� jHl - 7, 2 (44 � c-e No- Z214416 +firer, days exe! Hive ref set HP Q _ Q Q _ Q 30.00 $ 30.00 De r�QT Per hour D efiinr1 -Ah1E 7H I `T'' 2914 / n G_P_ WA­ 2Q_14. Q_ IC_R Re with sta PeRt-81 : PeWR miirt ffeSeRt @t 911 +im'r ­' jHly 914 %Ee- No-2914916 st a g e Hs e Generic use, if needed for support of private $ �98-�9 $ 1Q-Q9 1 -99 -Bay DST D ST events in Town facilities. L!eq I Fed W4 rt@ge rllrlt'l1- TeWn r��rr�nnr�� miirt +r.,r stage +r, a nd ir„ eVeRt C­Ppt nrr\A 54-44 ,., r � r D i-- Hp6se- Piety, :Pe �tr � ) ,�Z 916 � Ee- R�co-ZQI�o / J� �', 2214 Ee -RI•Ao- ;414 Q1 FR Jam, - �4 r' Ee- RI•co-Z2I4 Q1 CR �i99 2 n nn �� $� -Qe $ 5.00 DST D, T Per hour Jz;, y , 2 914 Ee-N 9. 2914.916 T 2914 n Ee-Pd co-Z ;14 Q1 CR Cyr r -err , - �rr� -i h�hinr -� 1ihr -�r�i rr jHly 2914 %r_P Wo-Z2j4.gj& ��i has pe l I IT E r,+ ,- I P_1 r,+ - Ar� ohin�p _ FY �D - �m - �r� - �reiir� - �m - �r� - i C Q rr JH l y 2 914 P Q NIA. ;414 Q1 CR yelieyl�ali Ge it +r Cer +iv -- GFess A p l@yg F9HA -And- hA-rrerhAe r i +� For daytime field use before 5 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 PM $ 8.00 Per hour For field use during premium July 7, /Ordinance No. 2014.016 �`C'C'rtYl7 ay ' 2014 hours after 5 PM. r- E y P_ A- -T�� I e r @ + h r e n 7 H l y- , 2214 WA_ 2 Q -14411 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 48 Page 257 of 279 Park Facility Rental; Community Garden Plot Refundable Deposit for Community Garden Plot Senior Program Membership Fee Senior Program 4 Month Membership Fee Senior Membership Trial Lost Membership Card Fee Deer S , \A /inn Dnrmit QpeR S iim Ca M SWIM Reel R@rr @Rd R-Ar14 C@r_ Reel Dent feet Commercial Activity Permit Fee Standard Ramada Rental (All Parks) Standard Ramada Rental including Beer /Wine Permit (All Parks) COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 49 Page 258 of 279 r- m- r�-r r�irnl -i rt- rr�r`n -nr� (�emmiiniti �' rrlon Dl�tr - r� CCTTRTCITTTI�"GL7TCr $ 24.00 Per plot /year rirrne l /�rlrli +i �n I PAR r�ri lout fees apply, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Senior Program. Expires 30 July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 Vie- 8'x40' plot, days from date of activation. Includes: self - watering garden 9 S7. Der to additional fees. � beds, tools and programing nrin G enii Per lost card Der Hermit Her i -l-i $ 50.00 Per plot access. Refund returned at the end of July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 75.00 Per Permit agreement if in good standing. $ 40.00 Per year 12.00 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 20.00 4 consecutive Seasonal rate for part -time July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 months visitors Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 49 Page 258 of 279 Valid for 5 single days of attendance to the Marana Free Per Trial Period Senior Program. Expires 30 July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 days from date of activation. Certain activities are subject 9 S7. Der to additional fees. � 11A 444 �n �n C „1 A r $ 5.00 "�� nn nrin G enii Per lost card Der Hermit Her i -l-i 7 H ll �Z214 Ee-PNc 2Q_14 Q I FR July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 D -nr -1 \A /inr� �nli• rniri +r li i1i� / n�Zn� nn� Pet @11n A ( n. 4H' 2214 � G_P_ WA_ 2Q 14 Q I CR Upon approval, permits shall $ 75.00 Per Permit be issued per activity and shall July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 be valid for up to 6 months. 12.00 Per Hour 17.00 Per Hour Revise beer permits to an hourly rate and packages the Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 49 Page 258 of 279 F\iont Rnm :nHn QontnI Event Ramada Rental including Beer /Wine Permit Park Rental- Exclusive Use Bundle COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 50 Page 259 of 279 ramada rental and Beer Permit into one fee. Now available at all park ramadas Updated fee description. 30.00 Per Hour Previously Group Ramada Rental Revise beer permits to an 35.00 Per Hour hourly rate and packages the group /event ramada rental and Beer Permit into one fee. Bundle Includes: Heritage, Crossroads or Ora Mae Event 300.00 Per Date Space Reservation, Utilities, Event Application Fee, Beer & Wine Permit. (Additional fees for liquor license may apply). Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 50 Page 259 of 279 Fingerprint Identification Card; Livescan Fee Towed Vehicle Release; Administration Fee Police Records; Photographs (printed) Police Records; Photographs (digital, burned to CD) Police Records; Digital conversion fee Police Records; In -car Videos, Audio Recordings Police Records; Transcription Service Vehicle Storage Fee; Base Fee Vehicle Storage Fee; Daily Rate Extra -duty Police Services; Lieutenant; Hourly Rate Extra -duty Police Services; Sergeant; Hourly Rate Extra -duty Police Services; Officer; Hourly Rate Extra -duty Police Services; Dispatcher; Hourly Rate Extra -duty Police Services; Surcharge for 72 Hours or Less Advance Notice of Need for Police Services Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 $ 10.00 Per card July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 150.00 Per vehicle July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 2.00 Per photograph July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Digital conversion fee may $ 10.00 apply if images have to be Per CD July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 converted into a usable format. $ 4.00 Per folder /batch July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 25-99 Per DVD /CD copy July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 10.00. $ 2.00 Per page July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 25.00 Per vehicle Applies to vehicles stored July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 on Town property. Applies to vehicles stored on Town property. $ 10.00 Per day Fractions of a day are July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 rounded up to the cost of a full day. Per extra -duty police $ 50.00 services agreement. Per hour July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Applies to police services hired for private events. Per extra -duty police $ 45.00 services agreement. Per hour July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Applies to police services hired for private events. Per extra -duty police $ 40.00 services agreement. Per hour July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Applies to police services hired for private events. Per extra -duty police $ 30.00 services agreement. Per hour July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Applies to police services hired for private events. Fee is $10.00 per hour for See note Per hour each type of police worker July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 51 Page 260 of 279 Extra -duty Police Services; Police Vehicles; Per Vehicle Daily Rate COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 in addition to established hourly rates. Per extra - duty police services agreement. Applies to police services hired for private events. Per extra -duty police 50.00 Per day services agreement. Applies to police services hired for private events. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 52 Page 261 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 53 Page 262 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 5/8" and 3/4" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 18.18 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Rate also applies to single family residences that could have been served by a 5/8" x Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 3/4" and 1" Fire Meter (effective April 1, 3/4" meter but for fire 2014) $ 18.18 Per meter suppression facilities that July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 make the larger meter necessary. Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate ; 1" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 44.14 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 1.5" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 48.08 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 2" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 55.83 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 3" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 75.30 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate; 4" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 132.43 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate: 6" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 262.26 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate: 8" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 449.40 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate: 10" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 674.10 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Water Meter Monthly Base Rate: 12" Meter (effective April 1, 2014) $ 1,067.33 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Standpipe Setup Fee (effective April 1, 2014) $ 35.00 Per standpipe July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Hydrant meter minimum Water Use Charge; Standpipe /Hydrant Meters (Billed Monthly) (effective April $ 4.12 monthly fee is $65.00; Per Per 1,000 gallons July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 1, 2014) Ordinance No. 2014.005, effective April 1, 2014 Water Use Charge; Multi- family, Commercial, Industrial, Government and $ 3.64 Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, Per 1,000 gallons July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Irrigation Uses (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) effective April 1, 2014 Water Use Charge; Single Family Residences, Consumption between 0 and $ 2.96 Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, Per 1,000 gallons July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 10,000 gallons (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) effective April 1, 2014 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 54 Page 263 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Water Use Charge; Single Family Residences, Consumption between 10,001 and 20,000 gallons (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) Water Use Charge; Single Family Residences, Consumption between 20,001 and 30,000 gallons (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) Water Use Charge; Single Family Residences, Consumption between 30,001 and 40,000 gallons (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) Water Use Charge; Single Family Residences, Consumption over 40,000 gallons (Monthly) (effective April 1, 2014) Groundwater Resource /Acquisition Fee (effective April 1, 2014) 4.12 5.36 6.61 9.50 0.48 Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Per meter effective April 1, 2014 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 1" Meter Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 $ Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 2" Meter effective April 1, 2014 1,040.00 Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ effective April 1, 2014 Per meter Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 3,250.00 effective April 1, 2014 July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 6" Meter Rate also applies to single 6,500.00 Per meter family residences that could Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; Residential Bulk Meter $ have been served by a 5/8" x Monthly Standpipe account July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 3/4" meter but for fire $ Per meter suppression facilities that July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 make the larger meter account necessary. Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; Hydrant Meter $ Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 $ Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 5/8" x 3/4" Meter (effective April 130.00 1, 2014) $ Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 3/4" Meter 130.00 Per meter July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 1" Meter $ 337.50 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 1.5" Meter $ 650.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 2" Meter $ 1,040.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 3" Meter $ 1,950.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 4" Meter $ 3,250.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; 6" Meter $ 6,500.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; Residential Bulk Meter $ 50.00 Monthly Standpipe account July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; Commercial Bulk Meter $ 100.00 Monthly Commercial standpipe July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 account Utilities New Service Refundable Deposit Fee; Hydrant Meter $ 1,300.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Hydrant Setup Fee $ 225.00 Per hydrant July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 New Water Meter; 5/8" Meter $ 360.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 New Water Meter; 3/4" Meter $ 400.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 New Water Meter; 1" Meter $ 460.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 New Water Meter; 1.5" Meter $ 920.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 55 Page 264 of 279 New Water Meter; 2" Meter New Water Meter; 3" Meter New Water Meter; 4" Meter New Water Meter; 6" Meter Utilities Return Trip Charge Utilities New Service Establishment Fee Utilities Same Day New Service Establishment Fee Utilities Potable Water Disconnect Fee Utilities Potable Water Reconnect Fee Utilities After -hours Reconnect Fee Customer - requested Meter Re -read COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 $ 1,840.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 3,080.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 4,800.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 8,660.00 Per meter July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 For customers requiring $ 52.50 Per return trip miscellaneous trips by July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Utilities' personnel. Applies to new accounts established between the $ 90.00 hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 Per customer July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 PM, Monday through Friday, with 24 hours notice. Does not apply to holidays. For customers who want water service transferred or $ 142.50 Per customer turned on the same day they July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 contact the Utilities department. For customers who fail to $ 52.50 Per disconnect keep account current within July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 specified time frames. For customers who desire to have potable water turned back on from disconnect. $ 52.50 Customer must also make Per reconnect July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 the account current on payments. Same conditions apply as with new service establishment fee. Only assessed if customer contacts and $ 160.00 Per customer reconnect /work is done July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 after -hours which is outside of typical business hours. $ 35.00 Done one time per year as a Per re -read July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 courtesy. Each additional re- Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 56 Page 265 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 read subject to fee. Fee is refundable if meter is found to be inaccurate, defined as an error of greater than 3% General Service Inspection Fee $ 35.00 Per hour For miscellaneous inspection July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 services and related work Done one time per year as a courtesy. Each additional re- Customer - requested Meter Test $ 110.00 Per test read subject to fee. Fee is F July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 refundable if meter found to be inaccurate, defined as an error of greater than 3% Hydrant Meter Relocation $ 120.00 Per hydrant July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Standpipe Card Replacement Fee $ 10.00 Per standpipe July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee assessed when a current customer requests to halt Vacation Service Fee $ 14.00 Per service service billing cycle due to July 6, 2015 / Ordinance No. 2015.012 vacation or seasonal residence. Interruption good up to 6 months. Initial fee and annual renewal. For wastewater Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit (Regular Use) $ 75.00 Per permit discharge less than 25,000 July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 per month (based on inspection and analysis) Initial fee and annual renewal. For wastewater Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit (Significant Use) $ 600.00 Per permit discharge greater than July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 25,000 per month (based on inspection and analysis) Fee applies to non - Marana Sewer Service Establishment Fee $ 15.00 Per connection sewer customers. Pass July 6, 2015 /Ordinance No. 2015.012 through. Fees may be higher Sewer Capacity Assurance & Conveyance Modeling Review $ $ 950.00 Per submittal depending on size of July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 development and time needed to review. Fee is the Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 57 Page 266 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 58 Page 267 of 279 greater of $950 or the pass through of consultant fees. Wastewater Monthly Service Fee (effective April 1, 2014) $ 12.63 Per meter Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Wastewater Volume Charge (effective April 1, 2014) $ 4.71 Per 1,000 gallons Per Ordinance No. 2014.005, July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 effective April 1, 2014 Fees may be higher depending on size of Water Hydraulic Modeling Review $ 1,500.00 Per submittal development and time July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 needed to review. Fee is the greater of $1,500 or the pass through of consultant fees. Replacement Backflow Permit Fee $ 35.00 Per permit July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Applies to any backflow prevention and cross - Miscellaneous Backflow Prevention and Cross - Connection Permit Fee $ 80.00 Per permit connection - related permit July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 not covered under another fee. $inn r �r h �i it nii +h S @ R d t F r' Se ni Pr CIA ni M@ g PAP WAR Cr�c Der ri,19PA �I minimum AS f e_,P h 7Z.'I ' 2214 /mac_P_ WAo-2 Q_ 14. Q_ A separate fee is required for Utilities Preliminary Plat /Development Plan Review; Base Fee $ 200.00 Per submittal each plan review type water July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 or wastewater. Additional Preliminary Plat /Development Plan Review Submittals After the 2nd A separate fee is required for $ 100.00 Per submittal each plan review type water July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Submittal (Water or Wastewater) or wastewater. Form A Permit - Marana Water; Base Fee $ 100.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is the greater of $200 or November 18, 2014 /Ordinance No. Form A Permit - Marana Water; Construction Cost Fee See note Per submittal 2.5% of the construction 2014.027 cost. Form A Permit - Marana Water; Violation Fee See note Per violation Fee is double the permit fee. July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 For customers who desire or Non - Potable Disconnect Fee $ 52.50 Per disconnect require the Backflow to be July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 turned off and locked. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 58 Page 267 of 279 Non - Potable Reconnect Fee Form MS Permit - Marana Wastewater, Base Fee Form MS Permit - Marana Wastewater, Construction Cost Fee I-eHse GeRRe eti�eweF (HGS) Tap of 12" nr � Cm-AlTlor� &Sanitary Sewer Tap Wey 11A_AnhA_li ( V E i StiRg C /1WE?F (W49 H A GASrrr S ffetE?Gtir\n� �(\ p , Mpph„l„ (l,i EX 5 +inrr C /lWeF (W4 Ge -esie- PF9teGtieR) nn - ,r, h�lr� Cr -mr� - rrl ('�ior /�i- liiirtmontr nn- inhr�lr, Dry r,, i -tir�n (�/1- rh�lr, Sewer Account Activation Fee Review of Existing CCTV video for sewer connection locations Acquire CCTV video for connection location Public /Semi - Public Water System Plan Review; 1 sheet Public /Semi - Public Water System Plan Review; subsequent sheets COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 59 Page 268 of 279 For customer who desires to $ 52.50 Per reconnect have the non - potable water July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 turned on from disconnect. $ 100.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 / Ordinance No. 2014.016 Fee is the greater of $1,000 Minimum or 2.5% of construction cost $1,000; see Per submittal includes flow management July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 note plan, submittal, inspections, etc. Cr\r inrl�r�nr- Iran+ t@PS n9+ inrlii lrll iitl rleyelepmr,n +r $ 125.00 Per tap (C9rm MS PeFRm +) I nA-+ Y l y feF t i ,-I ded with deve lepRm r, +r Any July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 connection to the sanitary sewer system that is not included with a development plan Cr_ in rle p end en+ ta pr n rte+ inrliirlrll YA41P H -,_Q ie'9Pmr,n +r (cr, PAS o„rmi +) P ees r„+ 8r PIS ' fer t@PS 4 RG i l �rl 'nii +h r +r Cr_r ip r,le p endent t@ n9+ inrliil- lr�r -1 eiith r +r ;Hly 2 %Ee -Pie. 291416 YY 29 S ;2 Y i� g 10.00 D e r PA A nh n l n D m @ n hA-l e De m - A Der mAAhA- per connection (C g rRr nnS D e rRr i+) D ee s Pet @Ppl�' fer t@PS iReli ir-lr_Ed Aii +h H1 y 22914 n P-e- A­2 Q_ 1-4.nI F9 7H 2 appe-Ne. 2 -14 Q1 CR 7H 2 1 Ee-Ne. 2 -I4Q16 7H 2 / r' P_e Ne. ;!Q14Q16 88.00 per review 404.00 per review $ 400.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 $ 95.00 Per sheet Excluding cover sheet, July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 except in case of one -sheet Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 59 Page 268 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 60 Page 269 of 279 Ip ans. Review of Plans for Wastewater Treatment Facilities; St sheet $ 400.00 Per submittal July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 Excluding cover sheet, except in the case of one - Review of Plans for Wastewater Treatment Facilities; subsequent sheets $ 95.00 Per sheet July 7, 2014 /Ordinance No. 2014.016 sheet plans. Applies to 1st two submittals. Fee is 2.5% of the increased Form A Permit - Marana Water; Amendment See Note Per Amendment July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 construction cost Fee is 2.5% of the increased Form MS Permit - Marana Wastewater; Amendment See Note Per Amendment -- .-4- ; -- -- -4- July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 60 Page 269 of 279 COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE As of September 6, 2016 S g R 8 t H F eE t- V o n 91 A r C P- r- PAP D r 4 i t 'I C n n n D e r�,R 71H i1, Z2 916 ' 1 9 e A 2 Q 1 F9. Q Includes electricity and Signature Event Vendor Fee - For Profit $100.00 Per Event cost for 10 day tempo business license Signature Event Vendor Fee - Nonprofit $ 50.00 Per Event Includes vendor space and July 1, 2016 / Ordinance No. 2016.006 electricity. No Community Event Vendor Fee (For profit and nonprofit) $ 25.00 Per Event Includes vendor space. July 1, 2016 /Ordinance No. 2016.006 power provided. Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 61 Page 270 of 279 MARANA Z�Z / I \ Comprehensive Fee Schedule Mid -Year Update Jamsheed Mehta Deputy Town Manager Mara [g&tU" "pV2!2®'3C66 Page 271 of 279 • Adopted annually since 2009 • General Goals ■ Deliver a new customer supportive Fee Schedule, highlighting the consumers experience ■ Ensure that fees reflect the value of services provided to customers ■ Eliminate inconsistencies and unused items within the existing comprehensive fee schedule Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 272 of 279 ■ Identify opportunities to streamline, package, and modernize the application and use our fees to encourage /facilitate development ■ Standardize fees across all departments • Ensure fees reflect the value of services provided to customers • Charge fair and equitable fees to its customers Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 273 of 279 ■ Notice of intent to consider changes posted at least 60 days prior to meeting(ARS § 9- 499.15) ■ Outreach to SAHBA & MPA ■ Initial contact via letter ■ Follow -up contact, as required Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 274 of 279 Comprehensive Fee Schedule Review Timeline � Proposed Notice of Possible Depart- Changes Fee Intent to Review Consider Possible Effective ment to Town with Proposed Council Date of Review Manager Depart- Changes Adoption New Fee s Office & menu Posted by 2/7/17 Structure Finance 12/6/16 3/6/17 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March ■ Notice of intent to consider changes posted at least 60 days prior to meeting(ARS § 9- 499.15) ■ Outreach to SAHBA & MPA ■ Initial contact via letter ■ Follow -up contact, as required Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 274 of 279 • Number of Lines: from 535 to 350 ( -3s%) • Consolidation: 170 fees replaced by 66 fees • Fee Chang es: 384 • Added Fees - 71 • Modification to Existing Fees - 24 • Clarifications - 36 • Increases -I • Decreases - 5 • Eliminated Fees - 247 Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 275 of 279 Example — Simplified Fee Schedule by Engineering Department Streamling and Improving Unit of Measure New Calculation Method Grading Plan Review (1 Line) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews $400 + 95 /Sheet per plan after 2nd submittal and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are 30% of original fee per submittal. F Page 276 of 2799 Review of Grading Plans; 0 -5 acres, base fee $ 770.00 Per submittal Review of Grading Plans; 0 -5 acres; acreage fee $ 25.00 Per acre Review of Grading Plans; 5.01 -20 acres; base fee $ 800.00 Per submittal Review of Grading Plans; 5.01 -20 acres; acreage fee $ 20.00 Per acre Review of Grading Plans; 20.01 -40 acres; base fee $ 900.00 Per submittal Old Review of Grading Plans; 20.01 -40 acres; acreage fee $ 15.00 Per acre Calculation Review of Grading Plans; 40.01 -100 acres; base fee $ 1,010.00 Per submittal Method (12 Lines) Review of Grading Plans; 40.01 -100 acres; acreage fee $ 13.00 Per acre Review of Grading Plans; Over 100 acres; base fee I $ 1,340.00 Per submittal Per acre Review of Grading Plans; Over 100 acres; acreage fee $ 10.00 Additional Grading Plan Submittals after the 2nd Submittal 50% of original fee for applicable items Per submittal Revisions to Accepted Grading Plan 50% of original fee for applicable items Per submittal New Calculation Method Grading Plan Review (1 Line) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Applies to first 2 submittals. Reviews $400 + 95 /Sheet per plan after 2nd submittal and reviews of revisions to accepted submittals are 30% of original fee per submittal. F Page 276 of 2799 ■ Welcome to Marano Business Package - Fee includes new business license, 1 banner sign permit and occupancy compliance inspection. ($100 /Per submittal) ■ Development Plan Package - Includes 1st & 2nd submittals. Reviews /revisions after 2nd submittal are each charged 30% of original fee; includes development plan, landscape plan, and improvement plan. ($3500 Base + $70 per acre /Per Submittal) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 277 of 279 ■ Park Rental - Exclusive Use Bundle — At Heritage, Crossroads and Ora Mae parks. Includes event space reservation, utilities, beer &wine Permit. ($300 /Per Day) ■ Signature Event Vendor Fee -For Profit — Includes space, electricity and a 10 -day temporary business license. ($100 /Per Event) Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 278 of 279 Discussion Marana Council Meeting 12/06/2016 Page 279 of 279