HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/10/2007 Special Council Meeting Agenda Packet ~owN oF SPECIAL SESSION NOTICE AND AGENDA
Marana Municipal Complex
9 M~t~~l~ ~ Council Chambers
11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
qRlZONP
July 10, 2007, at or after 6:00 p.m.
Town Council
Ed Honea, Mayor
Herb Kai, Vice Mayor
Russell Clanagan
Patti Comerford
Tim Escobedo
Carol McGorray
Roxanne Ziegler
ACTION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL ON ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. Revisions to the
agenda can occur up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. Revised agenda items appear in italics.
As a courtesy to others, please turn off or put in silent mode all pagers and cell phones.
Welcome to this Marana Council meeting. Regular Council meetings are usually held the first and third
Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Marana Town Hall, although the date or time may change, or
Special Meetings may be called at other times and/or places. Contact Town Hall or watch for posted
agendas for other meetings. This agenda may be revised up to 24 hours prior to the meeting. In such a
case a new agenda will be posted in place of this agenda.
If you are interested in speaking to the Council during Call to the Public, Public Hearings, or other agenda
items, you must fill out a speaker card (located in the lobby outside the Council Chambers) and deliver it
to the Town Clerk prior to the convening of the meeting.
All persons attending the Council meeting, whether speaking to the Council or not, are expected to
observe the Council Rules, as well as the rules of politeness, propriety, decorum and good conduct. Any
person interfering with the meeting in any way, or acting rudely or loudly will be removed from the
meeting and will not be allowed to return.
To better serve the citizens of Marana and others attending our meetings, the Council Chambers are
wheelchair and handicapped accessible. Any person who, by reason of any disability, is in need of
special services as a result of their disability, such as assistive listening devices, agenda materials printed
in Braille or large print, a signer for the hearing impaired, etc., will be accommodated. Such special
services are available upon prior request to the Town Clerk at least 10 working days prior to the Council
meeting.
Copies of the agenda are available the day of the meeting in the lobby outside the Council Chambers or
online at www.marana.com, by linking to the Town Clerk page under Agendas, Minutes and Ordinances.
For questions about the Council meetings, special services or procedures, please contact the Town Clerk,
at 382-1999, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Posted no later than July 9, 2007, 6:00 p.m., at the Marana Municipal Complex, the Marana Operations
Center and at wwu~.marana.com under Town Clerk, Agendas, Minutes and Ordinances.
~pWN p~ SPECIAL SESSION NOTICE AND AGENDA
Marana Municipal Complex
~ ~ ~ ~ ' Council Chambers
9 Mi~RA~li~' ,
` 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
qRIZON~`
July 10, 2007, at or after 6:00 p.m.
SPECIAL SESSION
A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D. CALL TO THE PUBLIC
At this time any member of the public is allowed to address the Town Council on
any issue not already on tonight's agenda. The speaker may have up to three
minutes to speak. Any persons wishing to address the Council must complete a
speaker card located outside the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Town
Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. Pursuant to the Arizona Open
Meeting Law, at the conclusion of Call to the Public, individual members of the
council may respond to criticism made by those who have addressed the Council,
may ask staff to review the matter, or may ask that the matter be placed on a
future agenda.
GENERAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
E. PRESENTATIONS
1. Discussion and direction concerning proposed implementation of Town of Marana
procedures related to addressing previously done for the Town by Pima County
Development Services (Joe Lettrick)
F. ACTION/DISCUSSION
2. Resolution No. 2007-124: Relating to Development; approving and authorizing a
preliminary plat for Marana 59 (Barbara Johnson)
3. Resolution No. 2007-125: Relating to Economic Development; establishing Core
Values for Economic Development within the Town of Marana (Jim DeGrood)
4. Presentation on the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan and development agreement
(Kevin Kish/Frank Cassidy)
5. Presentation on Northeast Benefit Area transportation impact fee (Jim DeGrood)
6. Presentations by prospective applicants for Planning & Zoning Commission,
Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory Commission, and Board of
Adjustment (Jocelyn Bronson)
_ . ~.~,~....w~.~.~~_~
.
. . .~~.~.M~~w._.~.,~., _
v .}.~~:~.....~u~,~~.~.~~;~..~~~...R.~.~.~~~.__
~pWN p~. SPECIAL SESSION NOTICE AND AGENDA
Marana Municipal Complex
9 ~~I~ ' ~
~ y ~ Council Chambers
A 11555 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, Arizona 85653
qRIZONP
July 10, 2007, at or after 6:00 p.m.
G. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS. Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(3), Council may ask for
discussion or consultation for legal advice with the Town Attorney concerning any matter
listed on this agenda.
1. Executive Session pursuant A.R.S. §38-431.03 (A)(1) for the purpose of
interviewing candidates for the vacancies on the Planning & Zoning
Commission, Board of Adjustment and Business and Economic Development
Citizen Advisory Commission (Frank Cassidy)
H. ADJOURNMENT
p'HN OF
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING TOVVN ~F MAR.ANA 9~
INFORMATION
qR1ZON~`
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: E. 1
T4: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ~
FROM: Joe Lettrick, GIS Director
SUBJECT: . Discussion and direction concerning proposed implementation of
Town of Marana procedures related to addressing previously done
for the Town by Pima County Development Services
DISCUSSION
Historically the Town of Marana has contracted and relied on Addressing services to be provided
by Pima County Development Services. The County had an annual Addressing service agree-
ment with the Town to provide Addressing services at a cost more then $20,000 as of 2006. In
2006 the County reviewed its Addressing service costs based on a full recover cost model that
would have increased our annual Addressing service cost to more then $100,000 annually. The
Addressing contract was not renewed in 2006 and Town staff starting reviewing the possibilities
of performing our own addressing for the Town.
It is proposed that the Town's GIS staff will take over addressing through our own internal proc-
ess which would mirror the County's, using the same County wide addressing grid and proce-
dures they have already defined. The Town will be able to generate the same addressing data as
the County and have defined a method of supplying addressing data back to the County so the
County could update Marana address data into their system like we use to do when we received
Marana address data from the County. The major change, in addition to the cost savings, will be
that Town residents and members of the development community will no longer have to make
the 48 mile trip to downtown Tucson for addressing services.
The proposed ordinance will codify the procedures to be followed by the Town's GIS staff.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends authorization to bring to Council for adoption the proposed code revisions.
ATTACHMENT
No attachment. Draft code revisions which would codify the proposed procedures will be pre-
sented at the meeting.
SUGGESTED MOTION
I move to direct staff to bring to Council for adoption the proposed code revisions relating to ad-
dressing services to be handled by the Town's GIS staff.
{00005356.DOC/} CIH 7/02/07
_4~_~.~,~..
~ mz~.~ ~~:.~~ri~..~ a.
W~_.~_
pWN O~'
TOWN CUUNCIL
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA Q~~ ;
INFORMATI~N
'~k1ZON~'
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F. 2
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FR~M: Kevin Kish, AICP, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2007-124: Relating to Development; approving and
authorizing a preliminary plat for Marana 59.
DISCUSSI4N
The item was continued from the regularly scheduled May 16, 2007 Town Council meeting
based upon neighborhood concerns regarding drainage and traffic. Following the Town Council
meeting the owners and their representatives held a neighborhood meeting on May 30, 2007 at
Degrazia Elementary School to discuss neighborhood concerns. Subsequently the item was
forwarded to the June Sth Town Council meeting during which Town Council requested staff to
conduct an independent traffic and drainage study. The result of the traffic study is contained in
this report.
Request
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a 58-lot single family detached residential
subdivision.
Location
The property is generally located west of Hartman Road and 1/2 mile south of Linda Vista
Boulevard.
Zo_ nin~
On July 19, 1994 Town Council approved Ordinance 94.09, which rezoned 100 acres (including
the subject property) of vacant land located near Hartman Lane and Overton Road (a parcel of
land located today between the Hartman Vistas and Hartman Ten Subdivision) from "E"
(Transportation) to "R-8" (Single Family Residential, minimum 5,000 square foot lot size). The
rezoning was subject to six conditions (Ordinance No. 94.09) and adherence to the tentative
development plan.
On February 21, 2006 Town Council approved resolution 2006-32 that modified Ordinance
94.09 by removing conditions one (1) and six (6) and altered the lot layout shown on the
tentative development plan. The purpose of the ordinance modification was to allow for the
reconfiguration of the lots and adjustment of open space designation.
The proposed subdivision has fewer lots than originally planned, reduced from 172 (3 RAC) to
58 (.99 RAC). The preliminary plat proposes a mix of lot sizes with the smallest lot equaling
8,015 square and the average lot size equaling 9,012 square feet. All residential units will be
subject to the Town of Marana residential design standards.
071707 Marana 59 PP TC.doc
.
~ __~.x~~~.:~~ud_ - ~ , ~
~..~,.~v~wM ~ .,.wra,~W~_.. _ _ .
Transportation
The project proposes one point of ingress/egress off Hartman. The internal circulation will
contain private streets with a gated entrance. The Planning Commission approved a design
exception for the single point of access and modification of the Town's typical local street cross
section at the April 25, 2007 meeting.
During discussions of the proposed preliminary plat fro Marana 59 subdivision, many concerns
were raised regarding traffic conditions along Hartman Lane and the potential impacts from
proposed Marana 59 subdivision. In response to these concerns staff contracted PSOMAS, an
independent engineering firm, to study the segment of Hartman Lane from the southern
intersection of Eaglestone Loop to Whipsnake Way. The independent study confirmed that the
project does not warrant off-site improvements i.e. right and or left had turn lanes. However, the
study did include recommendations for improving traffic safety of Hartman Lane of which, the
Town and Pima County will be coordinating efforts to implement.
Archeolo~y
The archeological survey report submitted for this property does not cover the entire property.
As such, a survey for the entire property shall be submitted prior to any ground disturbance.
Should archaeological sites be present in areas that are to be set aside as open space, these must
be identified and protected formally. Further, it is still undetermined if 404 permit is required by
the Army Corp of Engineers for this project. Should a 404 permit be required then the applicant
shall adhere to all federal standards.
Drainage
The property may require a 404 permit by the Army Corp of Engineers should amount of
disturbance within delineated wash areas exceed federal standards. Town staff reviewed and
accepted the hydrological report for this proj ect and concurs with the recommendations for
acceptance of on-site and off-site drainage.
Open Space and Benefit Fee Area
The subdivision provides approximately 34 acres (approximately 59% of the net area of the
project) for natural and functional open space. The subdivision is subject to the Park and South
Transportation impact fees.
ATTACHMENTS
Location map and plat reduction
RECOMMENDATIUN
Staff has reviewed the request against the requirements of the Marana Land Development Code,
Ordinance 94.09, Resolution 2006-32 and the General Plan. This preliminary plat is in
substantial conformance with all required development regulations. Staff recommends approval
of a preliminary plat for Marana 59 subject to the following conditions
1. Compliance with all provisions of the Town's codes, ordinances and policies of the General
Plan as current at the time of any subsequent development, including, but not limited to,
requirements for public improvements.
_2_
071707 Marana 59 PP TC.doc
2. No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any
federal or state law or regulation or relieves the applicant or the land owner from
responsibility to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations,
including the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. Appropriate experts should
be retained and appropriate federal and state agencies should be consulted to determine any
action necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
3. An archeological survey shall be approved prior to any ground disturbing activity.
SUGGESTED M~TION
I move to approve Resolution No. 2007-124 subj ect to staff conditions.
-3-
071707 Marana 59 PP TC.doc
. . . ,a.~~.~~,~..,.~..,
. ,.~.w~... _
MARANA RES4LUTION NO. 2007-124 ~
RELATING TU DEVELOPMENT; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A
PRELIMINARY PLAT FUR MARANA 59.
WHEREAS, Marana 59, L.L.C., the owner of Marana 59, has applied for approval of a
preliminary plat for an 58-lot single-family home subdivision on 58.8 acres, including lots 1
through 58 and common areas "A" "B" and "C", and is generally located west of Hartman Road
and %2 mile south of Linda Vista Boulevard within a portion of Section 23, Township 12 south,
Range 12 east.; and
WHEREAS, the Marana Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on April 25,
2007, and at said meeting voted 6-0 (Winger excused) to recommend that the Town Council
approve said preliminary plat;
WHEREAS, the Marana Town Council, continued the item at their regular meeting on
June 5, 2007.
WHEREAS, the Marana Town Council, at their regular meeting on July 10, 2007,
determined that the Marana 59 preliminary plat should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Marana, Arizona, that Marana 59 preliminary plat is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
l. Compliance with all provisions of the Town's codes, ordinances and policies of the General
Plan as current at the time of any subsequent development, including, but not limited to,
requirements for public improvements.
2. No approval, permit or authorization by the Town of Marana authorizes violation of any
federal or state law or regulation or relieves the applicant or the land owner from
responsibility to ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations,
including the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. Appropriate experts should
be retained and appropriate federal and state agencies should be consulted to determine any
action necessary to assure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
3. An archeological survey shall be approved prior to any ground disturbing activity.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
this 10~' day of July, 2007.
Marana Resolution No. 2007-124
_
_ .~.v.x.:,~~.~~.~..~~..r:.~,..~~.,~~..,
ATTEST: Ed Honea, Mayor
Jocelyn C. Bronson
Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney
Marana Resolution No. 2007-124
The Marana 59 Preliminary Plat is on file and available for
viewing from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday excluding holidays, at the office of the Town Clerk,
115 S 5 W. Civic Center Drive, Marana, AZ 8 5 6 5 3.
1 p o
~ ~ ~ a ~ r~
c~ _ ~ O N o~ ~
~ ~ t~ ~,1 ~ a
a o 3 ~
~ a'
~ ~ ° ~
~ _ ~ ^
4~ _ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
L ~ ~
~ ~ ~
R3
= s W
i
'
fr
h ~
i
~
u ~ ~ S ~,'i !I
I
.,;,~y , xl , '
~
t
- ~
- } ;;i ~
~ R,a~
~
~I '
~ ~
N
H
.N
~
O
C
Q
~
v
H
a,
c
v
J
G
v
E
~
0
t
~ N
~ ~
~
~ ~
4~ -p
t ~
W ~ 4- ~
p ~ ~
Z u ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
J O ~ V
~ ~ c~ i.L ~
~ ' ' ' '
- N M
O
M
H
~
_
~
~ ~ v
m
~ ' c
.
~~t~ Q
~ ;
- -
= o Q~ o
~ Y
O
U .u = ~ • ~ ~ C
~ ~ J
~ ~ ~.,,~4 4, ,s, au N _ ~ . ~ C
~ ~ THORNYDALE. D W
. ~a ; A ~ ~
~ ~ J ~ ~ 0
A~ O .~r`~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V/
~ , ` ; , ~ ,
J L .~n ~ - ~ ,._.w x,
~ , ; .
~ -p ~ ~
~ v~ ~ - t~. _~y .
c O ~ ~ n.. .
i~ ~ O o r~ ' 'g p~;Sfi a~ ; .
~ ~ L ~ Q , ~ L ~ 4 ; ~ a., .
:
O ~ m r , ~4 ~ ~
2 o e ~ = 4-
O ,•naa. } x t
~ ~ ~
~ c.~ . _.w. ~ 5
N ~ . "-g°" - ~
v> > ~ w~ °~F„ ~
O ~ a ~ 4~ °
~ ~ , o ; g , t a ~
.x
y ~ ~ C cn . . Z : ~ ~ ~
n J; y
•
~ ~ ~ ~ L t _ : ~ ~y ; ~
'
O O O ~ ' F Y`n..'~ ~ n3 ls
~ ~ ~ . ..a~w~.-.~,a _ ~'9 ° 11/1RTNANLN_
N ~ " - ~ ~ '
W ~ ~ Q ~ o ~ ;
O ~ L ~ c o _
~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~~~3
~ ~ ~ p ; d
~o• cU ° ; _ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .7 . :1 "fi
V j '
v~i ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~
~ ~
;
c~ ~ ~ :
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ t5~ d.
W ~ ~ ~ ~ tl ~ ~ ~
~ N ~ L ~ ~ .
~ 0- p ~ L ~ Q
~ ~ rr ~
[I1~' ~ F
~ ^ r , ~ ~ ~'.?5l.L~.s ~ \ \ ~ " ty? ~
~ ~ ¢ t ~
i ~ ,r,.
C ~ R~.~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ , ~ ~
~ W ~ ~r~C ~ ~ ~
~ ~.~~,N. ~
~ 4 4'
~t
F h
N
~ ~ : ~
; o
. ~t~
~ c
~ $ ~ ~ Q
. ` 3~
~~i8 ~ ~ ~
~}y ~
P - f ~'.rl` ~>`rv ~
~ . - k ~ d~;~, O
3~~_ _ r„ v~r °-FtwJ.' _I
~ r...:~ ~ ~t >~;+F~~+ ~
? ~
v
4 J
G
~
~ v
~ ~ 2
O
~ ~ ~
Q > ~
u a~
~ ~ N ~
O
~ ~ ~ ~ >
O ~
V~ ~ ~ ~ a
W ~ ° o
~ ~ -v ~ ~ "
= a~ a~ ~ o ~ ~
v
-v ~ vi :v ~ ~ v
~ °L' o o ~ o.~ a~
~ j N~ ~ ~ ~ o~
O = ~ ~ ~ v~'i ~ ~ cn
v ~ ~ ~ N O
~ 3 ~ d
W ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a o~ ~ O' v~ Q> a~~_'
~ o > ~ ~ ~ a
U w Q~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~o -v
V
~ . . . . . .
~
~
~~~I i ~~~~i ~~p
~
;
~
{ 'v
c
, Q
~
~
' ~ ~
~ . cn°
~ a~
~ , o
O c
• ~ ~ ~ b
~ c
~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
, ~
_ _
> ~ ~
~ ~ ~
V y ...~r
~ ~
c~ ~ ~ ~
L ~ ~
3
o ~ _ .
~ ~ ~ s
~ ~
o ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o
c o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a~o ~
~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ o
V~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ o ° ~ s o ~ c ~ ° U
~ ~ ~ N = ~ ~ ~ c ai
Z ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c
c ~ o c a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •
~ c ~ c~ > L ~ > ~ ~ ~ O
~ ~
p ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v
Z ~ o U ~ o o~ a ~ a~o
I- U o U Z Z~.~ Q~ ~ w
L~.
. . . . . . . .
CO
~ ~ H
~ ~ •N
~
Q - 'v
L ~ c
~ ~ N ~ Q
N
~ ~ ~ ~
i ~
N ~ > ~
W ~ Q C
s ~ ~ ~ J
~ ~ ~
~ ~L O > ~ a
Q N ~N o ~
S' ~ ~ a~ u U v
V u p~ x~ t
T3 ~ ~ W ~ ~
L ~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~
~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,w. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
~ ~ > ~ v O u
~ ~ ~r > a~ L
L ~ I~ ~ ~ Ll~ i -C
~ ~ ~ ~n ° ~ Do ~ ~
O Q I ~ c~ ~ N v,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~
.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ d-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V O ~
~ ~ ~
cC3 O ~ L ~ ~ ~
V ~ O 0 ~ ~ L
Z c~ ~ ~ ~ ; a~ ~ N
~ C ~ v~ N c~
O ~ L ~
Q ~ cn Z w ~ ~ ~n U
~ I I I= ~ I I
Z
~
Ij, • . .
~
~1 N
T~
V ~
O _ _ ___r _ _ _ . ~
•L' ~ Wd 00~1.6 Q
N ~
~ ~
~ Wd 00=06 ~
°-'°_'dm°' ~
. o. a w o~ Wd 00~6 ~
~ t t ` ` N ~
~ ' u~ v~ > j~~ Wd 00~8 C
~ ao 0o Q Q+r C
m m m a0 0~ Wd OO~L
C z ~n z ~n a i
~i N ~ i Wd 00~9 ~
~ "v ~ i I( I~ Wd OO~S
~ , ~ , _ _ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Wd OO~b 0 =
~
~ O ~ ~ Wd 00=£ p
~ 'L ~ ~ ' Wd OO~Z ~
~ ~ N ~ , ' Wd 00~ 6 j-
~
0 ~ ~ ~ Wd OO~Z6
~ ~
~ V~ O ; Wb~ 00~ 1.6
~ ~ -0
~ ~ ~ ; ~ weoo~o~
~ ~ a~o
~ ~ ~ ~ we oo:s
~ ~ ~L W`d 00=8
~ ~ ~ Wt/ 00=L
O ' ~ ~ Wb~ 00=9
~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ L ~ W~d 00~9
~ ~ ~ , WHOO~t~
r/ - N N ;
~ ~ Wb~ OO~E
~ ~ . V ~ W`d OO~Z
~ ~
Z ~ a ~ brO W`d 00~ 6
~ ~ ~ ..C _ ~ ' Wd OO~Z6
Q ~ ~ O ^ N ~ ~ M M N N
~ ~
; \ ~ ~4dw) P~S
Z ~
r~ Q - v~
. . . .
~
~ N
N
~
v
s- c
~ Q
~ ~
~ ~
v, c
~ c ~ ~
o ~ ~
~ ' ~ L ~ J
~ 3 ~ v
L ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ o
~ _
~ = v
~ L ~
O ~ ~ W
. V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
a~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ L
Z. ~ v p~ ~ U ~ ~
~ s ^ L
~ > > 00 L ~ ~
~
~ ~ o o a ~ ~ 3 ~
V. L v~ o~ c ~ 3 ~~n
~n ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
~ c~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ ~ c~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L
V~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ L
~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~
u o~ > > ~ c~ c~ ~
Z ~ O O ~ O ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ • b~-„~ L ~ O N ~ ~ c~ > >
Q u ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ p
~
Z i- ° L~'- o o ~ a c~ ~ X X
~~n I- 0 Z c r~ Q w ~ w w
~ ~ I I Q I I I ~ I a I I
• • . .
O)
T~ y
V
N N v
o ~ ~ .c a Q
N ~ ~ 0 ~ N ~
~ L L ~ N v
~ ~ ~ ~ > cn
~ ~ O ~ i- ~ °
~ ~ O ~ J
~ ° ~ 2 ~ o
W ~ ~v N p ~ ~
~
N -p ~ ~ L =
O ~ ~ ~ ~ O
~ ~
L
c _v ~ ~ ~ a~o
° ~ ~ ~ c~i~ c
Z ~ .
p ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~o
Q U ~ ~ u ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ u ~ ~ N
~ N ~ ~ O _ ~
Q ~ ~ -p ~ v ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ Vf L
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~
~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~
Z ~ o a~o ~
~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
W ~ ~ o ~ ~ -v ~o -o ~
~ ~
~-0 N~ v cn O c~i~
i¦¦ ~ > . "v ~ ~
~ N ~ ~ L ~ L ~ O
a
O > > o- a~
a~
0 0 'L ~ ~ ~ c u
V ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ a ~
W ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ p -v
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U w U ~ ~
~
~ • • . . .
0
~
~ ° '
~ ~
~ N ,
v
1~31 M0~38 33S ~ ~ c
~ ~ Q
~ U u ~
u ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 5~ ~ # ~ ' L c
~ ; ~ a
i ~ ~ ~ ~ c
[ s ~ o
.in 8. t,,. S i,`'
9 t ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ` ~ ' ~ 4s Q~ ~J ~
~ ~ ~
R`a`a~, 9 fs~ ~ ^
s ` L
~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~
Z - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f ~
a g ~ ~ ~
~ ~ cd
~ ~s• ~ ,..f ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ v
~ W
~ ~ ~4.. ~ ~ ~Y. ~ ~ ~
Q ~ ~ ~ ~N
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
` ~n~ ~ C ~ i~
N O ~
.
a
.
Z ~ ro,~ ~ E ~ 3,, ~ a U v
.
. , .
w r~ . , ~ o
W ~ `
v ~
~ a- c
~ r ~
c~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ ~3 ~
~ ~ ~ N =
V 1HJIt~ 3n09tJ ~~S O u~
~ ~ • `n ~
W ~ o~
~ ~
. .
TOWN COUNCIL `°w"
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA ~ ~
INFORMATION 9 ~ ~
'~RIZON~`
MEETING DATE: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F. 3
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: James DeGrood, Assistant Town Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2007-125: Relating to Economic Development;
establishing Core Values for Economic Development within the
Town of Marana
DISCUSSION
With the establishment of the Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory
Commission (BEDCAC), the Town initiated new efforts in economic development. One of the
first efforts of the BEDCAC has been to begin work with Tucson Regional Economic
Opportunities (TREO) on the development of the Marana Economic Blueprint. As part of this
effort, the BEDCAC has developed, and is recommending approval of, Core Values for
Economic Development in the Town. The proposed values are:
1. Partner with Business
The Town will be proactive in addressing the evolving needs of the business community
through open dialogue and a spirit of partnering.
2. Realistic Business Incentives
The Town is in a competitive business environment and must provide realistic business
incentives to make Marana a world class place to do business.
3. Develop a First Class Workforce
The Town believes in developing a world class workforce and will collaborate with
educational institutions of all types and levels to ensure all workforce needs can be met.
4. Recruit. Attract, & Retain Diverse Emqlovment Onnortunities
The Town will partner with other organizations engaged in economic development to
leverage resources and maximize opportunities to create a strong and diverse business
community.
5. Livable Communitv
The Town will create a climate to encourage a wide range of living opportunities for all
and a unique sense of place.
6. Hi~hest Oualitv of Customer Service
The Town will provide expeditious and effective responses to business needs.
JRD/07/03/2007/12.20 PM
The BEDCAC considered these values for adoption at their June 18, 2007 regular
meeting. The Core Values for Economic Development were approved by a vote of 5-0
(Commissioner Parsons was absent).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the proposed Core Values for Economic Development.
SUGGESTED MOTION
I move to approve Resolution No. 2007-125.
-2-
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-125
RELATING TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ESTABLISHING CORE VALUES FOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TOWN OF MARANA
WHEREAS, the Marana Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory
Commission was established to assist, promote and advise the Town Council on policies relating
to economic development within the Town of Marana; and,
WHEREAS, the Town of Marana recognizes the benefit of establishing Core Values for
Economic Development within the Town; and,
WHEREAS, the Marana Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory
Commission has developed a set of Core Values for Economic Development in the Town, which
the Commission believes will advance the Town's economic development efforts; and,
WHEREAS, the Marana Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisory
Commission on June 18, 2007, voted 5-0 to recommend the adoption of Core Values for
Economic Development by the Town Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, that the following shall be the Core Values for Economic Development
of the Town of Marana:
1. Partner with Business
The Town will be proactive in addressing the evolving needs of the business community
through open dialogue and a spirit of partnering.
2. Realistic Business Incentives
The Town is in a competitive business environment and must provide realistic business
incentives to make Marana a world class place to do business.
3. Develop a First Class Workforce
The Town believes in developing a world class workforce and will collaborate with
educational institutions of all types and levels to ensure all workforce needs can be met.
4. Recruit, Attract, & Retain Diverse Em~loyment Opportunities
The Town will partner with other organizations engaged in economic development to
leverage resources and maximize opportunities to create a strong and diverse business
community.
5. Livable Communitv
The Town will create a climate to encourage a wide range of living opportunities for all
and a unique sense of place.
6. Hi~hest Oualitv of Customer Service
The Town will provide expeditious and effective responses to business needs.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Manager and staff are hereby directed and
authorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the Core
Values for Economic Development of the Town of Marana.
PASSED and ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona,
this l Oth day of July, 2007.
Ed Honea, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney
TOWN COUNCIL °NN
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA ~ ~
9 ?7
INFORMATION
'~RIZON~'
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F. 4
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Kevin Kish, AICP, Planning Director
Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Presentation on the Marana Spectrum Specific Plan and
development agreement
DISCUSSION
This presentation is intended to familiarize the Council with a proposed specific plan and
development agreement prior to public hearing. The applicant proposes a change of zoning from
"C" (Large Lot) to "F" (Marana Spectrum Specific Plan) for the purpose of developing a large
scale commercial center east of I-10 and south of the new Twin Peaks Road alignment. This
request is a direct response to the impending Twin Peaks interchange construction, which will
provide a regionally significant east/west arterial capable of handling this large-scale retail
center.
The specific plan proposes a mix of commercial uses including retail, office, financial, medical,
and entertainment (theaters), and provides the opportunity to add a residential component on the
second or third stories in conjunction with a ground-floor commercial use.
The proposed development agreement provides for Town reimbursement for applicant's costs of
public infrastructure engineering and construction out of 45% of the sales tax proceeds generated
from the project. Reimbursements would begin upon completion of the first 120,000 square feet
of retail building space and related parking, supporting infrastructure and amenities, and would
continue for a period of fifteen years thereafter. The development agreement provides for
reimbursement out of sales tax on amusements, hotels, rentals, restaurants, bars and retail sales.
In addition, reimbursement out of 45% of the construction sales tax proceeds generated by the
project will be paid if and to the extent the applicant contributes to Twin Peaks interchange
construction costs not directly required to accommodate this project.
Among other things, the proposed agreement also restricts the application of new development
impact fees to the project and provides for the accrual of interest on reimbursable items at the
rate of 6.5%.
Town staff and applicant representatives will be available to answer Council questions and
concerns.
{oooos3sa.DOC i}
7/3/2007 9:22 AM KK/FC
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the proposed specific plan and development agreement be forwarded for
Council consideration at an August 7, 2007 public hearing.
SUGGESTED MOTION
Council's pleasure.
{oooos3ss.ooc i} _2_
The Marana Spectrum Specific Plan and Development
Agreement are on file and available for viewing from 8:00
a.m, to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday excluding
holidays, at the office of the Town Clerk, 11555 W. Civic
Center Drive, Marana, AZ 85653.
.a.~~~. _,~_~~.~.~,.~.m~__ _
~ow" oF
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA q, ' ;
INFORMATION
'~RIZON~'
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F. 5
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: James R. DeGrood, Assistant Town Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation on Northeast Benefit Area transportation impact fee
DISCUSSION
In late 2005, the Town initiated a study of the transportation needs for northeast Marana.
Northeast Marana, for the purposes of this study, is bounded by the Central Arizona Project
canal and Interstate 10 on the west, the Pinal County line on the north, the Lambert Lane
alignment on the south and the Marana Town Limit on the east. This region is not contained
within any of the transportation benefit areas currently established by the Town of Marana. This
area contains a number of significant transportation corridors which will require improvement as
the area grows.
In May 2006, the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) was approved along with a
transportation funding program. The RTA funding program included both Camino de Manana
and Tangerine Road, with 30% of the project costs coming from impact fees or other local funds.
This further reinforces the need for a Northeast Benefit Area (Benefit Area) transportation
impact fee.
The biggest challenge of this study was the determination of future land uses and the potential
residential population for the area. The majority of the land in the study area is owned by the
Arizona State Land Department, and has been identified by conservation groups as desirable for
preservation; however, recent preservation initiatives have failed. Given the uncertainty of the
ultimate land use densities, staff looked at potential low, medium and high densities for
development of the area and constraints to development.
The land use study projected total dwelling units ranging from 10,500 for the low density
estimate to 31,700 dwellings in the high estimate. For the purpose of the Benefit Area, the
preferred land use assumption is for 14,115 dwelling units.
Upon completion of the land use study, the Town engaged Curtis Lueck and Associates (CLA) to
perform a traffic model and estimate the transportation impact fee for the Benefit Area. The
impact fee methodology looked only at the demand associated with residential development. No
development impact fee is proposed for non-residential development, and no costs associated
with non-residential development are ascribed to the residential development fee.
JRD/07/03/2007/1220 PM
were associated with development activity both inside the Benefit Area and external growth.
This report documents the "Infrastructure Improvements Plan" associated with the Benefit Area
in accordance with recently adopted SB 1423.
The CLA report recommends a transportation development fee of $6,872 per single family
detached residence, and recommends reduced amounts for multi-family developments and age
restricted developments. The study further recommends that the development fee be indexed to
the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for annual fee adjustment.
The process for adoption of a new impact fee is as follows:
1. The Town must release the Impact Fee Report and an "Infrastructure Improvements Plan" at
least 60 days prior to a public hearing.
2. After the Town conducts a hearing on the Impact Fee Report and Infrastructure Improvements
Plan, the Town must wait at least 30 days to adopt the impact fee.
3. Once the impact fee is adopted, the Town shall begin collection of the assessments after 75
days
ATTACHMENTS
Northeast Benefit Area Residential Roadway Impact Fee Analysis and Infrastructure
Improvements Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the release of the Northeast Benefit Area Residential Roadway Impact Fee
Analysis and Infrastructure Improvements Plan.
SUGGESTED MOTION
I move to direct staff to release the Northeast Benefit Area Residential Roadway Impact Fee
Analysis and Infrastructure Improvements Plan.
-2-
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
}J ~
4) U
~ C6
4) Q.
m ti
~
O
~ ~ O
~ ~ C~I
t~ O '
~ o
C~ ~
~ .
~ ~ ti
O
cn ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ C~
~ ~
F--
O
Z
~ _ .
- ~ . ~
0
~ .
~ ~l ~ _
5 - -`y ~ e~'; ~ 4 . t T r ~ _
'f { t ~.a v~.~,"^ ° 1 ~s~. t ~ ;~~if4
~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ f ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~{Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~
~ f~`. b~r~ ~y~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~M .:J~' ~ .
a~ ~ ~ I I ~ p
~ ~ c ri
M n~~r r ~
~ ~y,~ > ~_.,;'ij ti r t r
g ~ a..i g
{~~j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t. ~ k' , I .5-~'
~ b I ~
y, it ~
k"i~ 3'~z~. `~~~~~f ` ~_~i~~r r~ ~'~,J ~ - _ y
T' "'Y~e r ~ 1 . _ ~`M1 ~ ,
ti y , '
- ~i, ~ ~ ~ R ' • ~ ~ ~s
~ r ~ ~ - ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~
j ° ~Y y ~ ~ ' y ' ; ' }
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~i;
_ . ~.T'`H t^ ~ y.~:~~ k ' ~ ~~s ~ ,~yr
c ryi
~.ai - , ,t r z.~ c ~ ` ~ I - ~ t .ti
,y~ . ,.T ~ .S~ e~ a~~ P i ~ ..,y IR.ec uy- r
; ~g, wLT•
'~S '-2 y~~~~ y i '~i ' ~ ~'7 't (s 'c~ ~ ~
~ S ~9'~, . ~ . ~ l`^`~ - '~~"-'b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I , '~`,`i* •
y
~ ,~,.9 ~ G.~`~ ~ `l ~ ~.rt i~' Sj3' ~-~y ~ ~ °t.C~ ~
~
" b- i
- ` 1F~ - $ h~ \
~ _ I
'_'7 ~ a ~
b ~ + ~ ~ta ~ - ~ ~ I
f ~ ~
~ ( ~ ~ 'E ~
x ~ ~ bfi~;[ ~ ~ g 4
~ ~ .
~ . ii~ _ = r z z
g~? Yy_ ' ~ _ z ~r . :i'
kF ~.-.'s 4. .'g . ~ F
2 ~
~ ~ ~k 4j Z 4. ~ /
rz A~~ ,
~ I l ~ ~ ~ K-, _ ,
_ ~ .
- - ~f `f',~, _ _
~ ~ ~ ~ >
~x.E~ fa~"a~
. . ~ ~ -~e .
"P' ~„~'~q"
x
t ~ -
~ ~ ` ~ `
~ 4 ~
t ~ ~ gr'! - ~ / =-l.~ r-.`~.
t ~ ~t
~ 'Tr"~~~, ' _ ~ , ~ '
M : ~ / Art~x A ~r
~ ~ ~ r~ z .
$ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ L~~{ ~ ~ j `~~e -
~
~ ~.I ' .
~ ~ ~
~ ~
4^~-~.
W~ f • -
~ b~ . .
\ 4 f - 3'd
~
: Y ~ i:~'
i 1__ a~ k'[ F .
~ ~ r `4
,
i4. k . ~
~ li - v " ' ' ' .
~ t''~ „ - j :te~ _
i' ~Y ' . ' ~ - _
y^l . . . - .
. . . .
. . - j - . y- ~ . ..r'.
~ - o„~-^s_: ~ .e
z -v ~ . . . . . ~ .
Y ~ If~
n:YY i". ,Z
T~~ ~ " f+~
~ t. ~ ~ - F 9 ~ .
~ ~ ~
~ s ;
~ ~ ; W
~ a . . _ ~ ~
.
a I.
z -r 3 w m
f ` ; I . . ~ - - r '.1:' ` v
S i~. t? . (7 ~ 3 ~ 4
4 4 , ~ ~'tt ~2Y . ~ ~ K '_"7G... _ C IE z p
't 1e~ . ' _ ~ ' . ~ d NV G E K
5 b , o~ , s ` ~ 5
~ ~ , ~ - < = ~ ~v i m m 8
, q a p
- y r_ : _ -~i~ ! ~ - ~ ~ LL t > ~O ~ y
F~' xJ~. J . ~ ~ ~ 'r .ii ~ ~ ~ q ~ J C p
4 O 4
s; a _ ~ m _~y ' , • '3M. ~l E ~ 2 m ` Qi :
lx ~ _ ~ ?i~' Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~
`a
i ~ . g. p~ C _
~v' .':t ` - f 7$~~. 1 : ~ G ~ Z ~p W C q c~~ A :
~ m ~ •
` ` - - - F . _ c,,~'x- t; ~ ~ S ~
,
,
F N
~"K f M1 L E
,
_ , ~
1 ~ - ~ ~ 2° ~ a 9 -
~ m ~ , _ _ 5
.
~ .
'N~ .~2; _ . J Uj LL
~
a , c " . . :r,~? - _ a
? . ~ ~ o
. ~s ; w,,, ..rr~.~~ - 6~~:. ~ ~ ~x _ ~ e o
i~ ~ - _ _ -
/ . - ' ~k_~i. . ~ - - )
V/
W
~
V/
~
~
W
L
~
~
~
~
L
~ - ~
~ ~ .O
C
N ~
Cn ~ ~ p
~ ~ ~ c.~
~ o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
p w ~ ~
z . . . :
-
s
,
k.
4
~
, f
's .
I
e
" I
r~
d
'1 `
T ~
~ ' I - ~
~ ~ rW
~ > ~ ~
~ _ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ a ~
O ~ ~
.L c~ ~
> ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ °o ~
W o v? o ~ o a~
~ j N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CC~ tn ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ , o ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L
O ~ o ~mc~ - v~ ~
• - cn ~ ~ ~ p cn
(6 p N N p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ L U~W~~ W•~~o
C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CU ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ~ O ~ ~ . ~ >
_ ~
'L ~ > ~ a~
~ a~~ ~~J
~ i~~ i ~ x~ i i
O O = -J QwQ w ~
zU . . . . .
_ _.~.r . - ~ . ~
____e.,__-~ ,
~
i ~~.,:~,~i _
: ~a _ ~ ~ :
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
.
r
y
qku ~ ~.1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - l
~ . 'R~~~Y~~ J~'.SF~~~-: . _ _ . ~F ~ i
~ -y' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - 1
~ ~ ~
~ ~ j
U~ - a i
~ A~ ` ~J~~ s - ~
~ ~r ~
:
p~~ ~ ~
~ . ..:~r , ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ r ' ~ n,,,, ` ' n~ ;
~
CC~ ~ : ~ ~ 4 ~ ` :
~ ~
.
J ~ ~ ~ :
,
~ ~ ~
f l~" ~ ~ _ a
~ ~ ; _
~
~
.
~ ~
b ~
~F~ : ~ ~
? ^ . ~ 5 ~ t1~
V r . su
. ~ : c
x ~ ~
w ~ ~C
: ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ,
..°~r - $ - - ' ~
t/~
~ ` , , ~ ~
• ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~
`____.£_"~_.r. _ - . ~ ~ ~ 6
_ ~
~
~
~ _ ~ ~ ,
L c ~ ~ 3}=~~~, ~
, ~ t~ .
r ~ ~ ~ ~ !
- ~ ~ E (v- ~ ~ - ~
. - ~ 1:J ~ ~ 34" . ~~fi . .
~ ~ ~ U ~ _
j
~u tV !8 . C7 ~r-;~ Q7 . . . g _
/ - . ' n C ..a C ~ . -
. C ~y`~ l ~ ~ _ i
V U E ~ ~ ' a;-'. , I
y `n ~ ~ ~ ~ °
~ ~ a _ ~ : ` . ' _ '_d~
~
~
,
0
~ ~
~
~ ~
U ~
~
~
~ Q
O ~ ~
~ V O
~ ~
~ ~ v ~
~ ~ ~ ~ V ~
~ U ~ ~ ~ ~
~ - ~ ,o ~ o ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~
~ Q ~ ~ ~ V t6
~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U
CL~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-I ~ ~ ~
CC~ ~ c~.~ ~ c~ Cn
~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ c'~ U o cn
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ >
o c ~
Q ~ ~ ~ • L ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~
~ O ~C O ~ ~ p
~ ~ C~ C~ 0 m
~ I I I I I I
O ~
Z ^
~
~
W
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
O ~ ~
U ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ U
~ ~
~
-
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ o ~ ~ v~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ N U ~
~ ~ d. ~ ~ ~
~ a' ~ O >
~ V p C) ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~v ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ ° ~ ~ = c~n ~
Q j ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~
~ tn ~ C • L ~ ~
Q - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U
~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Q (~3 ~ J
~ ~ ~ U = ~ ~ op
~ ~ I I I i~ I
O w ~
z N M
F
~ ~Tf'3s~ 't .
r~
, ~ r. ~ r..~ - .
. . . - . . . !
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~~4Y~~ F:.: _
~ ~ ~
~ I
W
y . ~e~T.a.~' ~
~ ' ~
O - '=g- r""~~+ ~ ~ `x i
~ ~ .ArJ . ..:~1 _ ~ ~R.'' : ~ _ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ , - . ~ ~ i
s ?,i' F
ti~~ W ~ ~ ~ ~
W ~c t9-' i
_ / ~ e Y'i~ ."i ~ M w ~ ~ .
f ` ~ kt i1~ ,'i: ~ f~ z ~ ~
~ ~ ~ y 2
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! t
'r'~ ~ _ _ _ Z Z ~~i~ ~
~i ..:L
~ M ^ 1 ~
~ ~ ~ , . . ~ ~
.1~~~'# ~
1 ~~~x4i ~ ~ ~
~ +~p ; f_~~' . . , ~ .
_J ~ . ~ -
4 ~ ~G t
f~
~ N ~
^ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ a
L .Q ~ ~ W
L ~ , ~ ~
W ~ . _ . ~ ; r
~ ~ ` ,y4 ~ Z4 ~
~ , : , tj _
£ r ~ ;
~ - - - - W i
~ _ ~
~
~ 1~,~~y~~
_ n ° c~ ~ ~
a ~ot~
- ~ O" di -q-~ ~
^ .
,Cy O v
n` d1 4`~- t~ t ~ C iA
G ~ ~ 9, ~ ~ C U 6+ ~ ~ Q' ~ w~ 5~.
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ L _ ~ ` ~ - ~
- i7 c ts :e a r o a a
; ;.1. ~ ~ {3~ ~ ~ ~ m o` ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ; .
o ~4 6~°f-~~frs~Oen;~mLa~ ~ ~7 ~
~ ~ 4~c0 CJOtilt~~C7S ~~-~Y_i
!
g'
~
_ ;
. ~
: ~
I
f
,~ks.y,~~ -+~s :f~, . ~ . . . - .
5 '
.
~ . ! ,.,lo
{ ~'.r~ s : ` ' ~ I I
t , ~ n~ ~ '
-
1 '
. „
"'°,Y-.. ~ 1,'.~ - . . ; s,~ I
~
- - ~
>s~''t = . ~ ~ ~ ~ _
. E . . . . . _ -
~
. . ~ .
a~~ ~ ~ ,
.x - ~ $ ~ ~ ~ '
,~.y , .t; s
t ~ ~ ~ ~ti~% ~r n
.~.;a, s ~ ~ ' sm
x ~ t
r-~`~ ~y~~~`~` i ~ ~
-
,
,r
~4 . . .
~ ~
~
S
: , ~
~y.:~ 4
_ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ .
~ Z , ~
u~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
y Y
Nr _,4 .r . . '~f(-
i,~ _ ~ ~ "%at.~ ^ -
- . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ F . .~p ~ ~ ~
~
. ~ .3~"$`~.~ ~ l .
} 's
Y# .4 k r '
~ ; ~
, ~ Y
~c~ ~ ~ ~ . w s
`u~}~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . z
r~ ~
~ ~
- ~ : _ ! ~ ~
~~h~~,~.~~, _ .
~
~ ~ ~
.Q ~
~ ~
~ U Cn
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ U
~
Q ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O LL, I~-
~
~ • ~ U cn cn
~ ~ o ~ ~
~ Q ~ o 0
~ L c~ ~ ~
~ ~ V ~ N
~ ~ i ~ C ~
_ ~
~ (n ~ ~ V 4~ +r N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ L- V~ t~
Q ~ Q I-
z ~ ~
- N M d-
~w 1
~ 4 ~ .js ~ ~ Y ~ i Wt ~1 I~ -
v ~ _'e ~ _ ~ s , ;1 ~ ~ .Q ,f i } ( t[ iy 4, '~,-il' `
\ ~ qy ~ t.A ~ i~ '~.s . I ~ 1'~ ~ ~ 7,~-.: t
<i~'l.. F~ ~ :3`~,~.Y 4- A~~r~ - ~ -t~ i~ y1.y~'~t~ ~ke, ~ A ~_-.-f.,~_. ~y-,~,~
E 3 f ~ ~ ~ -;~r~~ " ~ ; ~ r~f ~
~ ~ s ~ ~
/ - , _ _ ..a$ - r u } `i~,
M
. T ,~o l\ xf ~ F" V~~~~ ~"~i ~5'3.~.k"~I
4 f ~ " ~ ~ ~ ,~'~J.F , --~"ti
~-~n ~~;~I , ~ t ~T ,:~'`+~"s,s;,~ ' 1;i..
z
~ ~ ~ , t '
' ~ I ~ ~ - ~ A~. ~ ~ S ~~...~:Q~C']j _
~ ~ ~ : ~ f o.~. ~ _ ~
t , ~ , ~
~ ~ I ~ ~t"..
2;
t r~ . ~ :;C ~ u'
r-' S
j:a ~ " :4 i. Z,_ ; ^-s lz TLk;,,~.
i s ~ ~N 0{~~ 'i ~ `'3 .
~ ~,~`S ry~i~ x~`: l f4 .~y~ ' :
~ ~ `,`~'•----T - ~ N d 1 J ~ ~ .+.rx+~'': t
~yc'~. ~ ~ w. r ~-3 a . ~ "C.. X d' # ` p~.,~,_~.st+,lp ;i is P ~ i
. _ 6'''' 'r " "'Z-l a f~ t ~ W a . f M~-~., _ t ~
, ~ ~ ` , ' , ~
1 ~ ~ , ' ~q;~ I ' C d ~ ~ ~
[ ~ ~~s~w_ . ~ . o.¢._. ~ ~h 'g~.~ w, O f • ~'i'.
~ f.. ~ ~ ~v ~`,,C.:~O ~ ~ 3~
t " ' s .Si` ~ . ;"4 ~..z . ~ ~2~ OI` `'~j\.~ '2..
- ~ ~o-ar a ~
~ ~I;~~ Ar~~( ,r..,sy~ ~ i. h ~Y ~ V...,..J, . ' ,~'y~~ 1' I
vr ~ ! `F f~-j.. ' a r ~ ii ~ ~ v: ? ` i
~.~t~,~-~"L'~.- Yc ~ ~ i f
~ s,~.=~~\ r 4{ i ~
_ : ~ k-• ~y ~n~ ~ l~~i._~~ ' k t
_ ~q . ~ e. ~
e., ` ~ ~ t a ~ a.'~:' ~~S ' `'~l:t F_;
~
~ ~ k S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4tr~ _ 5. .k £
~~~/I ~4'. +~w ~ ~ m 7 ~ ~
~ . ~ w~~ ti
. ~ t ~ 1 ' ~ ~
~f~~~ x ' ~ ~x~~ .n;~ - .a>
1 @-.~ S;~ ,yg,,'' S b~," T''` y
`~4~ _ l _ ,
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ t` ~
-
. ~ ~ , ' i ,
. '
,~`A'~'~.~~;: ~i ~ ,~s. ~ }
" L~ ~
yC~4k ~ ~ _ ~ : .~a,.
1 ~ ?
. . - i I~ ~ . ~ ~S
k~~~r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~
. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
„o~v ~i ; 7,7 r: ? k, ,
c - i ~1 ~ i \
- .N ~ { ~ti.: ` _ t ~ ~:~p t~".~~}~~ ~ ~
:
a ' ~ ~ R ~ ~ . 1 t ` ,.5' _
,
~r. 'N ~t-~ ~
O '~~d ~ . " - _ _ ~
~ ~ ~
~ .'hr~} r ~ia
N - ~ ` i:
r _
M
~
, ~ F ~C i,~f _.r ~ . _ _ .
~
. ~ ' . . ~ 1
~ ' - . . , .
~
. _ . V. . ~ ~ ~
. . . : ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ '
Q
. . ~ _ _ vr ~ ~ 1 N n
~ LL ~
~ ~ ~ F ~ ; ' \ (a a ~ _
~ 4 ~ o ~ a e
e'h~!:~ ~,~'':aa~ ~ ier ~ ~n w a N;9 jg
. . 4 - I; ~_t, ~ ~ A:7;~.~ A, ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ 3~
y~, y~ . ~ a o v q~ t 4
. ~ ~ r ~ P :i •yi V z ~ ~i ~ ~3 ~ :
k~ , r t~ x' t~ G~ m 0~~~ s
~ y ~ : p1 ~ ~ d n
~ ft u m m x
` k ~ ~ °a
'o~ ~ y ~ ~ a` c~ m ~i f ~ ~
- x ~1~IA =
- ; ~ e:_ o
~
`4 ~ ~
a~
~ OZZ9 gu
~ 8L4 o P~IB ~IIo4~ el
a
eo o~
o M
~ a~
~ ~ a~
N J peo~ ouue4S
v! ti ~ ~
W ~ c ~
o ~ ~E m
~ eMa ~ OLL9L 5Z£LZ Z ~ SL£OZ J S48LZ
~ peo a~ep u.aoyl
~ ~
~ _ ~
0 ~
6~~ ~ ~ M
> ~0 en ~ 96LI~
i
~ ~ ~
163 Og ~ `c'.c~ o m
~ ~o
~
~ ~E' S6L8Z >
~ N pn18 use? naW enoQ W p 8L ~°G ~
~
M
~ ~ s~ ~
O ~ ~
~n a ~
~ eh ~ o
0
~ ~ _ "
o
~ ~ m
~ ~ ~
~
° o o ~
o ~ ~
~ Q
~ ~ ~
M
o °
J ~ ' ~ p L ~
U ~ ~ o ° ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ti
~ ° ~ " ^ a~i rya
~ ro Q
Q
Q U c
m
~ o 0 0 ~
:N - - rn
~ U U U U ~
~ y N m N ~
~ a ~ ~ II
~ V U U U a ~
~ ~ ~ N N
~ tCC C C C ~
J J ~ ~ ~
- - - A
N N N N N
> > > > > ~
~ (`9 CLQ N (`C ~
~ N M V ~
>
~ n ~ ~ ~ _ ~
~ , t w~ f .
a' L . ~
~ .r,' 4..,4 . F ,~e , f~,?~y.
~ . t ,
.S ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~
~ - _ ~ s?t ~ • f'~e
. ' ~ . . { . ~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ `~1..~~~ _
- i',s ~ . .y'~. .
,,x~
~'P... ~ . - ~.~'s
~
:::~t
,y~; _
_ " ~
_ _ ~S: ^.'a
`~Y
~ .
. . ~M1*. `
. . ~ ~ . ^ " . :
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ V
~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~
U ~ N ~ L L ~ ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 O(~ 0~~ ~,i ~ O
~ ~m ~ ~ ~ . ~
d, ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U •L ~ c~ ~ L ~ Cj
cn Q~`~ ~ oc~
~ ~ ~ ~ o ~Q~-~
~ a~~~~~~~~~~-oc
~ ~~o~~~~~~~~c~
~ ~o~o~~~~_ oa~
- ~ v L ~ c~~ c~.~ ~•L ~
- ~ > ~ ~ ~ +r ~ L. ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
. _ ~ . ~ 0 ~ Q- ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~.L., ~ (~3
i~
U ~ ~ L U U ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ L ~ ~~S ~ > Z.~ ~Q
~ ~ I I ~ i I
~ U ~
~ ~
~ N
c a
~ c U
E E ~ c
E o ~0
o > p
c a o ~ r ~ m~ ~
o ~ ~
E ° rn c°~ c n ¢ c°i :o v,
E wo r> c o~ fn =
~ t ~ m
° Hc:i o0 3'~ _ " o -°a
U y> 1- O -o m a`~ ~a
o C
H Qo o~ n~ ~.~3 '~Q
2~ H O y ~'O N d
O ~ ~
O
LL C Z~ W~ E H N
~
Q G
R~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o Q ~
a A O ~ O O o O O ~ O ~ N N ~
~ ~ N M N 00 (O N O ~ p CO 1~ h
~ Q ~ OD N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M OD ~
? c0 ~ I~ ~ 10 p.
LL y U ~ 6~9 ~ 6~9 ~ ~ ~ ~ p N N O
O C ~
N ~
W m O
N 61
Q ~
~ a m ~
° ° ~ d ~
~ N O O O O O ~ O O O LL d ~
r
W U 0~0 [~O (O ~V f~V ~ O O ~ G W Vl
~ri rn c~ v oo ui ~ri E ~'u ~
~ N ~
Q ,'«_R v~ ~n v~ vi v~ ~ ~ N E E
W ci ~ z ~
~ ~
Q
~
a~
~
t~ ~ a o 0 0 0 0 o e o ~
Z m~ ~ ~ tD V M M c'~') ~ F
'O
W/~/~ e q
W G.'
~ _
, a a .E rn ~ ~ ~ v ~ a ¢
W y sT N (V Z Z
J
= O
1-~ a ~
~ og~
O M ~ V~ N N N N tn N
Z Q y p~ C C C C C C Q Q
N m N m m N Z Z
Q N~'~ f0 c0 < V ~ R
Z V ~
~
Q ~
c c
6 > m
o ~ Z
~ ~
~ J
C ~ 'O C y~
~ C C 3
~ W W ~ J 2 Z
~ C
f° a~i aTi m 3
~ ~ - - o
°c'3 ~ > > ~ ~
E a m m ~ ~
~ U~ w ¢ Q w in
N N
L L
U U
~ O O
' ~ O. O
a m c°-o caa ~ °o
~ ^
9 ~ ~o ~o m m o rn
c rn rn iA
~ ~ C C C C C
LL O C fO f9 y
C y d ~ L L ~
O ~ C1 p1 O ~ ~ ~ j
~ ~ ~
1i - U H F~- _ F- c ~ ~
d y
~ a
o m u y
T V _ ~ ~ C
~ ~ O
~ l9 ~ ~ ~
C f` N y 0 "O
q N N ry ~ p ~ J~ 3 ~ I I
C ~ ~ r2 Q)~ C N V y C Np
~ N N ~ N ~ J ~ y ~1 Q N ? p(J
'C C O 'C C V C N ~i' C ~ ',N
rn rn ~ rnc ~ E a~? /O y E
~ ~ ~ ~ o E o c~ E~ a c a~
I- H U H U ..~.i H H ~ ~ F- W C~J ~
N ~ ~
~ ~ a ~ ~
~ a ~ N'~ c~
0 V CMO ~ ~ Cfl M ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~
~ h ~ h ~
~ i y ~ M ~ O O y ~ ~t N ~ O ~
~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a~
~ a~
~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q cv a~~i
V a Q N J o- ~
~ ~ ~ ,c ° ~
~ ~ _ ~ a~i a ° ~ ~ m
~ ^ • e~
~ LL ~ ~ v~
L/ J Q ~ J V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ C~ . ~
~ v~ ~ vr Z7 ~ ~
a~ i y a y c~ co a~ ~ ~
Q~ d ayi `n r~ p ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° c~ ~
Oi co W r- o A cfl ~ ~ a`~i
~ a a~ Q 3 Q~ ~
Q o e~v o ~ o~a~i
o ~ ~ Q ~ 'c r~.
Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° a~'i c ~ ~
L
~ ~ ~ ~ E n
0 ~ ~ ~ p
~ a~i a~i a~i .c' = W
O c~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ c~~a ~ o ~ 4
^ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~
H ~ ~ ~ ~
t~ ~
,4 ~ u ~
~ Q
~ L
L (~6 lL ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ LL ~ LL ~ LL W ~
i ,
H ~ ~ ~ ~ N M
~ C ~ C ~ C ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
' I
~
~
~
~ ~
~ V U
O O ~
~ ~ ~
N
U ~ Q
O V-
~ U
O ~ ~
~ Q ~
~ ~
O ~ ~
U
~ ~ U
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
O ~ ~
L ~ ~
Q ~
~ ~ a~
~ U ~ ~
~ Q ~
-
~ O ~ ~
~ U ~ cn
~ ~ ~
o op o
~ N N
~ w ¦ ~ ~ w
_ / O ~ ~
O ~ ~ C~
~ ~ ~ o ~
O ~Z ~
~
. .
~
~
~ ~
~ ~ U
O ~ ~
Q ~ ~
~ ~
O ~ ~ ~
~ ~ o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ V
> C~ 4=
U 0 ~ ~ Q
_ Q ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ a
_
Q) ~ ~ ~ p
~ O U ~ ~ U
~
~ L ~ ~ ~
-r--~
~ ~V ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~
~ O ~ .V N ~
~ ~
~ U ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I` C~ ~ > (CS
o ~ U o ~
- c~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ti Q ,
~ N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O , N ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ ~ N C~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C
O ~ ~ ~ c ~
~
~ . . .
Ii
~
~
O
•
~
~
~
~
~ ~
I
~
TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA
RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
FINAL REPORT
~ _ ~,~x`~` ~ s- ' ~
, ~i 4 ~ ;
~ ~~.~P ~ ~ ~t ~ ~M i
~ - ~
~
. .r~=~.~ o . : 4t~ .k~; .
I HE'sICC1" . ,~i?"`~ ,i~
I ~
I ' _ ~ . '~f ~
~1 ./r ye '~~r.
I~:,..~ S~CIt~~Y~Y,~.• ¢ "~~r~.'~~~ ~~j .
~~~1Y~~Y~i ~,-~Fe7~ ~~j~ ~ E.~~ ~ .
~ ~ . :
1Poa~~neaDe~iq~!;ier! , .
f a ~,t r.hwna i
'E. :t;ubK:2s ~ ~t . ~
i i Ta^ys^ reThor .vdak cpy„ . a N£22
f o, rd~~,~~ `4 E ,
IE..Sk~~('is~l~ ~ ,
~RTa,~mRat~ ' . - ~ ~ , . , .
~r, .dn~iraH<g Y , , . @ . ,
~Hj~.s*xm~rxc-. . . ~ l1~ ~
~i ^osa4~ - i NP5 ~ 8? I
fJ $aguar7~.a^-.6 ~f N@6 '.i , ~ ~
o,
~K~ .~auaii~~ ` . 8~ f1/18.RQ N' ~ ~ ~ f
f . ne Fc~lYulls y. _ . . . . . . . . ~ _ . ~ -
I
_ .
.
~ yKAk~ ~ NE _ . . ~L1 i
NE +6 i ~ ~ . ~ ` j ~
' ~ ~ .
~ ,
' . ~
` ~ +~lk t2~.~~. ~ ''f ` l~`tiG~Bi 6rt+
_ ~ ~ I ±~~AA> ,r.: 2i ~
c
g ~a.,
i
~..A.~ :
~ , FOCUS AREA-~
~
.
i TwittFeak Rrsa.- ~ y~~ 1 Cus~k~ r+aR fl~v~
~ , _ _ _ - - - - i, - - - -
~ ~
5460 W. FOUR BARREL CT.
Tucson~, AZ 85743
JuNE 25, 2007
~
TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA
RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Prepared for:
Town of Marana
Town Manager's Office
11555 W. Civic Center Dr.
Marana, AZ 85653
Prepared by:
Curtis Lueck & Associates
5460 W. Four Barrel Ct.
Tucson, AZ 85743
FINAL REPORT
J u ne 25, 2007
CLA Project # 2006.02
NOTICE
This study has been prepared using available traffic data and forecasts, as w~ell as limited field data collected specifically for this study. It is
inter~ded for use in making a determination regarding the transportation infrastrudure needs of the study area. It is not intended for use as a
design documer~t, nor dces it represent a standard or specification. The document is copyrighted by Town of Marana, AZ and by Curtis Luedc
8 Associates, 5460 W. Four Barrel Court, Tucson, AZ 85743, telephone 520-743-8748. All rights are reserved pursuant to United States
copyright law. The document may not be reproduced digitally or mechanically, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of the
Town of Marana or CLA, except as noted in the following. (1) Limited quotations may be made, for technical purposes only, as long as proper
atation to the authors is provided. (2) Govemmental agenaes to which this report is submitted for review may make limited copies for irrtemal
use, and to fulfill public requests under the Freedom of Information Act. i
I
~ Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 1
Purpose of the Report 1
Methodology ......................................................................................................................1
Recommendations 2
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 3
The Northeast Marana Benefit Area 3
3. FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NET1/VORK 8
4. ROADWAY COSTS AND IMPACT FEE CALCULATION ..............................................10
Impact Fee Analysis 10
Sensitivity Analysis 10
Recommended Fee Structure .........................................................................................10
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Existing Study Area Conditions ..........................................................................4
Exhibit 2 Future Study Area Conditions ............................................................................5
Exhibit 3A Summary of Socioeconomics (Based on Marana Plans) ..................................6 '
xhibit 36 Summary of Socioeconomics (Based on PAG TAZ's) ......................................7
~
Exhibit 3C Summary of Differences .....................................................................................7 '
i
Exhibit 4 Tra~c Forecasts .................................................................................................8 ~
Exhibit 5 Demand-Based Facility Needs ...........................................................................9 !
Exhibit 6 Roadway Cost and Impact Fee Summary 11 I
Exhibit 7 Recommended Northeast Benefit Area Fees 12 I
I
I
i
i
•
Purpose o~f the Report
The Town of Marana is considering implementing a roadway impact fee for
residential development' in the northeast area of the community. The area is bounded by
an east-west projection of Lambert Lane on the south, the CAP canal and I-10 on the
west, and the Town limits on the east and north. There are two other existing benefit
areas already in place. The South Benefit Area includes the portion of the Town south of
Lambert Lane. The Northwest Benefit Area encompasses the rapidly growing Old Town
Marana area. Adding this third area will result in the entire Town being covered by
residential impact fees for roadways. ~
According to Arizona Revised Statutes, impa~t fees can only be used for new
capacity required to support new development. (§9-463.05, see Appendix) The fees can
not be used to cure current deficiencies or for non-capacity improvements, and there
must be a"nexus" or connection befinreen where the fees are collected and how they are
used.
Marana's impact fee program is based on "equivalent demand units" or EDUs,
which is the amount of roadway capacity needed for or consumed by the new traffic
generated by a typical single family detached residence. Multi-family housing units and
age restricted communities generate less traffic and pay a proportionately lower impact
fee.
This report documents the results of a micro-simulation of future traffic votumes
associated with future land uses and transportation system improvements in Marana's
Northeast sul~region. The analysis is pertormed for the 2030 horizon year, which is
considered the "buildouY' horizon for the area. It is based on the future land use and
transportation elements provided by Town staff, the Town's adopted General Plan, and
changes to the General Plan currently proposed by staff. The calculation of the fee is
based on residential traffic impacts only; impacts from non-residential uses are excluded
from the fee.
The report provides future roadway needs and associated capital costs, and i
documents the assumptions and parameters used in the analysis. These costs are used ;
to provide the consultant's recommendations for a roadway development impact fee for
the Northeast Benefit Area. i
Analytical Method
The traffic analysis uses the Quick Response System II (QRSII) travel demand
model that was originally developed by CLA more than 10-years ago for the Town's Dove ~
Mountain Transportation Study. CLA has maintained the model and updated the !
software over the years, adding new development and roadways, and recalibrating the ~
model with recorded traffic data as it becomes available.
A major model update was performed for this report. The original buildout model ~
has been expanded to include planned and potential development surrounding the
primary study area including Pinal County and unincorporated Pima County because of
their influence on travel patterns in the study area. The land uses along the Tangerine
Corridor were also updated to conform to new plans provided by Town staff. This '
includes an east-west band finro-mile wide stretching from I-10 to the east Town limits and !
centered on Tangerine Road i
I
' Town i redudes nonresidential im act fees at this time.
C L A OO 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates paye ~
Tucson, Arizona
_
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA - RESIDENT/AL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYS/S
The output from the travel demand model was used to determine roadway cross-
section requirements, which are then reflected in project capital costs. Roadway
improvements are defined at the horizon year, and improvement costs are then estimated
for the new and expanded roadway segments. The costs are expressed in constant 2006
dollars. These capital costs are then used to calculate the gross and net Northeast
Benefit Area impact fee per EDU, which is also in 2006 dollars. The Town will need to
index the fee to inflation or make periodical adjustments to keep pace with ever
increasing construction costs.
We also compared the socio-economic inform~tion coded into the model based
on Marana's plans with the information used by the Pima Association of Govemments in
its travel demand modeling for the Regional Transportation Plan. The differences are
identified and explained in the text.
Recommendations
Based on our analysis of residential traffic impacts, we recommend that the Town !
adopt a fee structure for residential development in the Northeast Benefit Area as follows:
Single Family, not age-restricted: $6,872
Multi-Family, not age-restricted: $4,826
Single Family, age-restricted: $4,187
Multi-Family, age-restricted: $2,4gg
The Town should also provide for annual indexing or periodic fee adjustment to
account for inflation and other changes in construction costs. We recommend using the
Engineering News Record's Construction Cost Index for this purpose.
If the Town chooses to adopt a roadway impact fee for the Northeast Benefit Area,
ARS §9-463.05 (C) establishes a schedule of notification and public hearing requirements
that the Town must follow.
~
i
i
;
I
C L ^ ~O 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates paye 2
Tucson, Arizona
~
NORTHEAST BENEF/T AREA - RES/DENT/AL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYSIS
~ • • ~ ~ • ~
The Northeast Marana Benefit Area
The Benefit Area is bounded by I-10/CAP canal on the west, Lambert Lane
(extended) on the south, and the Town limits on the North and east. This benefit area
encompasses about 31,600 acres and now contains about 4,500 homes. We estimate
that the businesses in the subregion currently employ about 150 people. At buildout, the
area is projected to contain roughly 14,115 homes, 35,300 residents, and S,OOOjobs.
~ This area is the primary focus of the study, although the travel demand model
extends significantly beyond these boundaries. Much of the study area is now
undeveloped, vacant property. The existing development in this focus area is now mostly
residential with some commerciaUlight industrial uses. Dove Mountain, a master planned
community in the benefit area, was approved in the early 1990's and is over 50 percent
complete at this time. Other approved commercial and residential uses in the study area
are in various phases of planning and development. ~
Town staff anticipates revisions to the General Plan incorporating a band of ~
undeveloped land two miles wide, and centered along Tangerine Road. Some of this
land is State-owned, and it is expected to be sold for urban development in the coming
years. This area is considered a major growth corridor because of the transportation
infrastructure planned for Tangerine Road area, and due to possible lessening of
environmental res#rictions regarding the cactus ferruginous pygmy owl.2
Exhibit 1 illustrates existing conditions in the study area and includes all of the
planned development and existing land uses in and surrounding the focus area. The map
shows that a large portion of the study area is owned by the State of Arizona, particularly
between I-10 and Dove Mountain Blvd. The Town's planning staff provided preliminary
future land use estimates for a two-mile corridor extending one mile each side of
Tangerine Road within the focus area. These land uses and the planned future roadway .
system were coded into the future (buildout conditions) model. The future conditions,
including new planned major roadways are illustrated in Exhibit 2. The map in Exhibit 2
indicates subregions of the Northeast Area that were used by the planning department to
estimate future densities. Exhibit 3A summarizes land uses in the study area by
subregion and compares the current residential uses and densities to the future condition.
Based on the Town's land use plans, the summary shows that there are currently about
3,372 housing units in the study area and about 14,113 are projected in the area at
buildout, for an increase of 10,741. These forecasts were used in the fee calculations. '
Exhibit 36 summarizes the socio-economics for the study area based on the ~
transportation analysis zones (TAZs) in PAG's travel demand model, which utilizes the
Towns sub-allocation of the State-generated population and employment forecasts.
These forecasts must be used by PAG, but are not mandatory for the Town. This table
shows that about 9,453 homes would be added to the study area, compared to 10,741
using the Town's plans. Exhibit 3C shows there is a difference of 1288 homes, or about
14%, which we consider reasonably close given the disparate forecasting methods.
Since there are fevuer projected homes in PAG's forecasts, using them would result in a
higher impact fee than using the Town's forecasts.
i
i
I
2 The owl was recentty de-list by the USEPA, and iGs habitat area is no longer resVicted by the owl's presence. However, the
a en s ruli is curre bein contested an environmental rou .
~ L A ~ 2~~7 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 3
Tucson, Arizona ~
,
~
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA - RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Exhibit 1 Existing Study Area Conditions
, 11:f:fi.''; 9. 5~:_:.Si 1, t,. ;
_ ~
~ ~ - ' ~ .
t.
m~
~ ~r ; _ a
~ ~ Y . iF~~~.
~ne4!ie S ~
~ ~;t„ ~ ~
, ~ ~
~
Resiaer•5z Su~,~n~is~~n ~ _ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `f
~ ~ _ ~~~~WY ~x.i R'A 3' e"' y~ -
Ftesicertial lc~ 5pl!is ~ ~ -s _ •
~ ~
Commercia; - .
; s~t~ t~~n~ ~ ~ _ ~
Insb~_ ~
~ ~ ` ~ i
Pianne velcgr?e~t t ~ ; ~ ~:~:~n~ . _s~ _
t
~ ~ . ~s , ~ ~ ,
y; ~,~~~~'w H~22 i
, ~ ~ ,
` ` f ~"Y
¢ . 'C
_ ~ rt~} r' . ~ ~ . . . i
~ q !
~ .F1~ a `t ' ~3. ~ ~ t
~ - _ ,
I ~ _ _ 'S ~ ~ ~~.R~ ~ ~
= ;
'fi~n er#ne Roat} ' . `
~,r. A, ~
.;a - ~
t
a, t s : ~
~ . ,
; , ,
_ €i ,,,r~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ , ..i
. . " -i'°;-" 'a ~a'YS£~ C~#T~'~ 4>E~"
` . ~ ~c, - -
x
. ~.'Y~CcY ~ET4{~Y` Fan;{r~ ~ s~
~ ~
.wc.~. . ~ ~
,
-
; . ~ . ~ , t ~
. ;e~,' ~ ~ ~ ~
Facus AREa--~"
~
: ~
~ ~ ~
~ _ , _ ~ n . ~ ~ - ; .
~ L ^ OO 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 4
Tucson, Arizona
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA - RES/DENTIAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Exhibit 2 Future Study Area Conditions
, f ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' R ~ ~ ~ !
§
' ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~
i ~ ~
Jne'.4de I~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ''3; . , ' ~S~
12e°icenua F _ ~ ~ ~K~
; , . ti ,
~ .
,
. . ~
i . . rg°'~
Cam~ ~ ~
~ ~~.3t@ ~C3t~ ~ t"' r ~ `
fu.r~t RuatlAtiay ~ r ~ ~-'s? 3 w
~ i f ~ ~ r ' } ~ i ~.'t
! ~ r ~
~ t_. ~ .,r,. ~ a~".~s~~•'`+.,~~: .
Ptanned fl~reloprtten!_ ( `j ~
§
a; Cc.ve 6~run!a.;? ~ . •
° ~ ;
E: Tcrt~ .~5 tilis•:ss w~~ , .
~~7a~`y~c~n~=Tharr.yAe~eSpaa'. ~~;I ~ ~ N~
D~Ta,x,~r.re,c~i;~ss.rr~ I ~ ~ ~ ~8tiN6is:~ r
C Sk ~^ch , "
9 * ; ~ ~ - ~ . , 2 i
Fi Ta s,~ w Ridt~c i ~ ~
L . ?any~1 n~ H,E;i r ' I i ~ , ~ ~
Hi~.1~tBh~rgc_E;~.~C i !I` . ~
~I I.~1Sd ~ 14.{ I ` + ! ' ;t~` ~
Jj Sagua~a ~a^ch ~ i . t+tE~ h E d r!
K: Ca:..a~., ~_'~'a QNne Ftoa HE r (
L' `n~• €GU~uliS _ ~ _ , ~ Y_~
r~ is ' ~ ,~r C
~ NE 16 rtl_ ' 1' ~
a ~~F ` ~
~ , °,;.w.. ~ ~ ; . . ~ E ; . 1
g
~ " ~ t ~ . ~ ` , ~t2"it~3 i~~,«'t Li~`~
1
£ "~°"`r ~ ~ ~°n+-~-.-. . ~ _
t'~tYf i `~3 ~ 3 '~~l;l.~_j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~
_ _ ~ 2t ~ ~ ~ <<~``
~ ~ ~
~ . ~ FOCUS AREA--~ : , _ ~
_ = ~
~
_~t , ; 8 ~
T~+a~~ Pe~k t~~ad ~ , - ; # l.s~r~1~ ~i~~ ~ ~Iyci - -
~ ~
~ L ^ OO 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 5
Tucson, Arizona
NORTHEAST BENEF/T AREA - RES/DENTIAL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYS/S
Exhibit 3A Summary of Socioeconomics (Based on Marana Plans)
Planned DevelopmentAreas
Housin Units
Area S ecific Plan Planned Existin
NE A Dove Mountain (Total Pro'ect 5,000 2,950
NE B Tortolita Vistas 150 0
NE C Tan erinelThorn dale S ecific Plan 115 0
NE D Tan erine Crossin 347 0
NE E Sk Ranch 365 365
NE F Tan erine Rid e 61 0
NE G Tan erine Hills 25 0
NE H Sonoran Preserve 29 0
NE I Casa Sevilla 34 p
NE J Sa uaro Ranch 180 0
NE K Cascada In Focus Area 641 0
NE L The Foothills 200 0
TOTAL 7,147 3,315
Existing housing units are platted lots as of this study date
Una/anned Acreaqe
Housin Units
TAZ Land Use Acres Planned Existin
NE 1 Residential 270 912 0
NE 2 Residential 110 748 0
NE 3 Commercial 75 0 0
NE 4 Commercial 220 0 0
NE 5 Preserve 1460 0 0 ~
NE 6 Residential 895 3,021 0
NE 7 Residential 40 50 0
NE 8 Residential 205 154 0
NE 12 Residential 40 30 2
NE 13 Residential 80 60 2
NE 14 Residential 20 5 0
NE 15 Residential 400 100 0
NE 16 Residential 622 1,028 0
NE 17 Residential 140 ~ 473 0
NE 18 Industrial 210 0 0
NE 19 Industrial 100 0 0
NE 20 Residential 300 75 17
NE 21 Residential 600 150 11
NE 22 Residential 640 160 25 i
TOTAL 6,966 57 ~
I
Areas 2q 21, and 22 estimated at .25 homes/acre
I
In P/anninq Area/Outside Existinq Town Limits '
NE 9 Residential 290 363 0 I
NE 10 Residential 580 725 0 ~
NE 11 Residential 40 50 0
TOTAL 1,138 0 i
C L ^ O 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 6
Tucson, Arizona ~
I
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA - RES/DENTIAL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Exhibit 3B Summary of Socioeconomics (Based on PAG TAZ's)
2005 Data 2030 Data Growth
erson erson
Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling
TAZ Population Units Unit Population Units Unit Population Units
658 26 11 2.39 26 11 2.40 0 0
670 309 107 2.89 1, 578 548 2.88 1, 269 441
673 0 0 0.00 902 365 2.47 902 365
687 24 10 2.40 418 174 2.40 394 164 ~
689 190 59 3.22 1,663 515 3.23 1,473 456 ~
692 0 0 0.00 1,370 548 2.50 1,370 548
696 139 44 3.16 1,094 345 3.17 955 301
697 0 0 0.00 2,710 1,097 2.47 2,710 1,097
703 104 43 2.42 742 304 2.44 638 261 j
710 407 169 2.41 1,918 799 2.40 1, 510 630 I
713 24 10 2.40 420 175 2.40 396 165
720 282 97 2.91 792 272 2.91 509 175
731 • 2,544 1,151 2.21 8,579 3,882 2.21 6,036 2,731
761 42 17 2.47 5,340 2,136 2.50 5,298 2,119
Total 4,092 1,718 2.06 27,551 11,171 2.62 23,459 9,453
~
I
Exhibit 3C Summary of Differences
Summary of Dwelling Units
i
Basis 2005 2030 Increase
i
Marana Plans 3372 14113 10741 I
i
PAG 1718 11171 9453 i
Difference 1654 2942 1288 ;
% Difference 196% 126% 114% i
C L ^ ~ 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 7
Tucson, Arizona
I
~
~
¦ -
NORTHEAST BENEF/T AREA - RES/DENT/AL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYSIS
- • •
The buildout model was run with the planned and projected land uses and
roadways shown in the map in Exhibit 2, above. The results of the model run identify the
roadway capaciry needs at buildout of the area. The projected average daily traffic (AD~
and required capacity based on maintaining LOS D are shown in Exhibit 4, Future
Transportation Nefinrork.
Exhibit 4 Traffic Forecasts
Trave! Lanes Required: Capacity @ LOS D(ADT)
1 travel Lane each direclion 0- 15.500
2 travel lanes each direction 15,501 - 3Q600 One btile
3320
3 fravel lanes each direction 30.601 - 46.100
4 travel lanes each direction > 46. 100 w
ae
A = Segment Identifier .o
m o
c ~y
Moore Road ~'Lh 345p 2320 2255
~ F M ~
~ ~ ~
0
B3435 ~ N ,~,~pgp ~ 43370
Tangerine Road 1 J K e'"~, ~
E y~~
y ~ N -
A o 130 ° 11035
p u, Camin de rte
m
a
• a c t~.
vra Vall y Road 3 ~ ~ N ~
H 329T0 ~
31015 Lambert La e
~a
C ~a ~ o >
oae a ~ ~D
B G~ Linda Vista Blvd c U
m
L f0
(n J
Some of the traffic on these roadways merely passes through from outside of the
Study Area. We were able to extract this information from the model output to analyze
impacts from within the area. Exhibit 5 summarizes the area roadways included in the
travel demand model. The table identifies the roadway segment volumes and required
cross section based on forecasts. The table also provides the estimated daily trips
generated from within the focus area and the proportion of those trips to the total. These
trips have either an origin or destination, or both, in the study area, therefore through trips
are excluded. The capacity costs to accommodate through traffic would be funded with
C L A O 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 8
Tucson, Arizona
NORTHEAST BENEFIT AREA - RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
other sources available from the Regional Transportation Authority, Pima Association of
Governments, or other Town of Marana funds. The table does not include two traffic
interchanges, which are addressed separately in the fee calculations. Note that segments
of Tangerine Road and Lambert Lane identified as needing eight through lanes will be
capped at six through lanes. The segments near I-10, where demand is the greatest,
would have auxiliary lanes to accommodate turning movements.
Exhibit 5 Demand-Based Facility Needs
Forecasts Including Land Uses in Tangerine Without Tangerine Belt
Development Corridor Development
Cross Focus Percent Cross
Total Trips Section Area Trips Focus Total Trips Section
Link ROADWAY SEGMENT on Link Required on Link ArealTotal on Link Re uired
A New Link btw Tangerine/Lambert 15,650 4 Lanes 8,950 57% 4,150 2 Lanes
B Twin PeakslLinda Vista e% WB Frontage Road 40,400 6 Lanes 3,250 8% 14,100 2 Lanes
C Camino de Manana s/o Lambert Road 14,300 2 Lanes 3,150 22% 27,000 4 Lanes
D Camino de Manana n/o Lambert 18,550 4 Lanes 6,000 32°/, 27,150 4 Lanes
E Camino de Manana s/o Tangerine Road 11,050 2 Lanes 4,350 39°k 20,300 4 Lanes
F Dove Mountain Blvd No tangerine 28,200 4 Lanes 21,250 75% 40,200 6 Lanes
G Lambert Lane w/o Cmo de Manana 30,050 4 Lanes 6,300 21% 43,500 6 Lanes
H Lambert Lane e/o Cmo de Manana 31,300 6 Lanes 4,850 15°/a 59,200 8 Lanes*
I Tangerine Road w/o Dove Mountain Blvd 63,350 8 Lanes* 30,350 48% 42,650 6 Lanes
J Tangerine Rd e/o Dove Mountain Blvd 44,250 6 Lanes 14,150 32°/a 1T,300 4 Lanes
K Tangerine Road w/o Thornydale Road 46,950 8 Lanes* 13,300 28% 20,450 4 Lanes
L Tangerine Rd e/o Thornydale Road 44,350 6 Lanes 11,100 25% 44,700 6 Lanes
M Thomydale Road n/o Tangerine Road 15,150 2 Lanes 7,400 49% 16,850 4 Lanes
N Thornydale Road s/o Tangerine Road 21,100 4 Lanes 7,450 35% 9,650 2 Lanes
Segments in BOLD to be funded with Northeast Area Impact Fee.
' Eight-lane arterials are impracticable and will be capped at six-lanes.
I
• I
I
~ I
i
i
i
~
~ L ^ ~ 2~~7 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page. 9
Tucson, Arizona i
~
. ~
I
NORTHEAST BENEF/T AREA - RES/DENTIAL ROADWAY /MPACT FEE ANALYSIS
' • • ~
We analyzed the costs for new roadway construction for the Northeast Benefit
Area needed to serve additional travel demand associated with the area. The Town
identified the major roadway projects to be funded by the fee; not all of the necessary
capacity projects shown in Exhibit 5 are included.
The capital costs for the identified roadway projects are based on unit costs by
facility type, and are an approximation, not a precise engineering estimate. These costs
are $1.9 million per lane mile, as derived ftom recent experience in the region and from
Town projects set for construction. The cost for new and reconstructed service
interchanges is $45 million each.
We then factored the costs to attribute an appropriate portion to the benefit area,
based on the link-by-link analysis.. As mentioned, the balance of the project costs would
need to come from other sources such as the RTA or State Highway Users Revenue
Fund (HURF) allocations to the Town.
The data and calculations are all summarized in Exhibit 6.
Residential Impact Fee Analysis
Roadway impact fees can be derived in iwo ways. The first is based on the cost
of new roadway capacity needed for new development; the second is based on the
capacity consumed by new development. For this study, we used the second strategy,
which is consistent with Town policy in the other two benefit areas. Using the capital cost
method, there would be 10,741 new homes paying for $79 million (or 34%) of the total
$230 million in capital costs for the defined projects. The gross fee would be $7,372 per
EDU. Since each new home would also be contributing some funding indirectly through
gas taxes, we credited $500 against the gross fee, resulting in a net fee of $6,872 per
EDU. The calculations are summarized in Exhibit 6.
Note that roadway life cycle costs also include operation and maintenance.
These O&M costs are deliberately excluded ftom our analysis because impact fees can
not be used legally for these purposes. The Town will pay for new facility 08M costs ~
using HURF and other federal, State, and local revenue sources available to the Town,
just as they do for existing roadways. Additionally, the Town will pay the capital and O&M ~
costs associated with nonresidential growth.
Sensitivity Analysis ~
We also conducted a sensitivity analysis of the fee implications associated with '
the Town's vision for the Tangerine Road growth corridor. The analysis removes most of I~
the growth in the two-mile wide belt, redefines the funded improvements, and ~
recalculates the fee. The results, summarized in the appendix, show that the fee would '
be slightly higher than the recommended fee with the growth corridor. .
Recommended Fee Structure
The traffic impact of residential development varies by the type and density of the I
development. Marana, like other jurisdictions, uses a fee structure that considers both
density and age restrictions. These are derived from tfie Institute of Transportation ~
Engineers trip generation rates for the various categories of development, except as !
noted in the Exhibit 7. i
i
~ L ^ O 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates paye ~p i
Tucson, Arizona I
II
~ a
~ E ~ y U
C
~ O O ; O
C p O ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~
41 V p p C f0 > ~ C .
E rn u ~ a Q c m
p O~ ~ lC O ~ V C Q!V
V ~w Ho° ~ m - y ° ~a
o C
1¢- Qo o n ~ ~Q ~
W ~ ~ co ~ m " o o n~° '
~ z.. u'S~ E F~- m ~
F- ~ a
Q a
ry N O
a q O ~ O O O O O ~ O ~ N {V ~
C O O o h 1r W
C a N f~ a0 N ~ V (~o ~ ~ ~ 1: tp ~
O y U y H ~N ~ W bN9 ~ ~ H w w O
C N
m ~
W m o
Q w' m ~
a d ~
~ a ~
H = °o o° o °o °o °o °o °o a ~ y ~
~C y p a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ _
G W V W t~D c~0 ~ N ~ O O ~ O. ~ N
~ ~ N N ~ ~ 00 n tn In N E W a W W
' ,a~~. Vi Vi iA fA f9 ~ ~ ~ N tll ~ j
N
vI ~ U ~ Z y
Q
~
LL a y >
V ~
w
~ A o 0 0 0 0 o a o
Q. W c c ~°n r°> c°o °c c°o m r°> ~ o
~ W m~ ~
-v Gp ° m
c ~
~ ~
~ a ~•E rn ~o ~ ~ v ~ Q a
0 W J v c~i ~ ~ ~i Z 2 .
U = O
~ ~ G C
'C
3 ~j, N
c
~ Z m N m N m N a a ~
Q v
y - - - -
Z Z
~ Z U~~ co m v v a v ~ O
~ a Q
~
Q N V C
~ C ' N ~ = 0
~
~ E m J 7
?
L ~ -mo~ a ~ ? ~
~
c d d H E ~ ~ U
W ~ ~ ~ ~ J
~ ~ m ;
~ ~ o
~ m m m F
~ > > ~ t
E ~ ~ m y ~
i~- U~ W Q Q W (7
N 07
L
V
~ O O
P ~ a a
m m ~ o
a m
~ ~ o m m ~ o°, p
c y ~ w m o
LL ~ C C C C~ C ~ N
O ~ ~ N ~
E OI Ol p~ U U ~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ p C ~ ~ N
LL - U F- F _ ~ c c m
v
m
~ ~ ~
o m u ~y
a. ~ a~ ~ - ~ o
" ~ ~ ~ m o ~ J
q o ~ ~0 > d ~ r 3 a n
~ R R ~ Q c 2' m v m c in t y
C C V ~ Q J ~ ~ Ol Q N ~ ~ V V
C 'C U 'C ~ c l0 1C ~ m ~ C)
N N ~ W t ~ V ~ ` E
~ ~ E E p c°id E~ E c m
F- F- U F- U J F F 5 J F- W U!~
and at least fourteen days prior to the scheduled date of adoption of the new or
increased fee by the governing body. A development fee assessed pursuant to
this section shall not be effective until ninety days after its formal adoption by the
governing body of the municipality. Nothing in this subsection shall affect any
development fee adopted prior to July 24, 1982.
D. Each municipality that assesses development fees shall submit an annual
report accounting for the collection and use of the fees. The annual report shall
include the following:
1. The amount assessed by the municipality for each type of development fee.
2. The balance of each fund maintained for each type of development fee
assessed as of the beginning and end of the fiscal year.
3. The amount of interest or other earnings on the monies in each fund as of the
. end of the fiscal year.
4. The amount of development fee monies used to repay:
(a) Bonds issued. by the municipality to pay the cost of a capital improvement
project that is the subject of a development fee assessment.
(b) Monies advanced by the municipality from funds other than the funds
established for development fees in order to pay the cost of a capital
improvement project that is the subject of a development fee assessment.
5. The amount of development fee monies spent on each capital improvement
project that is the subject of a development fee assessment and the physical ~
location of each capital improvement project. ,
~
6. The amount of development fee monies spent for each purpose other than a I
capital improvement project that is the subject of a development fee assessment.
~
E. Within ninety days following the end of each fiscal year, each municipality shall I
submit a copy of the annual report to the city clerk. Copies shall be made ;
available to the public on request. The annual report may contain financial
information that has not been audited.
- i
F. A municipality that fails to file the report required by this section shall not collect I'~
development fees until the report is filed.
I
I
~
Exhibit 7 Recommended Northeast Benefit Area Fees
Average Daily Trip Generation
Residential Type Not Age Restricted (1) Age Restricted (1,2)
Single Family Detached 9.57 5.83
Multi-Family 6.72 3.48
EDU by Land Use Type (3)
Not Age Restricted Age Restricted
Single Family Detached 1.00 0.61
Multi-Family 0.70 0.36
Roadway Impact Fee by Land Use Type (4)
Not Age Restricted Age Restricted
Single Family Detached $6,872 $4,187
Multi-Family $4,826 $2,499
1: Trip Generation base on ITE Categories 210, 200, 251, and 252
2: Trip rates for single family, age restricted residential based on special
studies prepared for Marana.
3: EDU = equivalent demand unit from a single family detached, non-age
restricted residence.
4: Net Fee per EDU = 6, 872
G L ^ O 2007 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 12
Tucson, Arizona
APPENDIX
,
~
;
. ~
;
;
;
~
. ;
, ~
~ ~
;
~
- ~
~
. ~
~
. 9-463.05. Development fees; imposition by cities and towns; annual report
A. A municipality may assess development fees to offset costs to the municipality
associated with providing necessary public services to a development.
B. Development fees assessed by a municipality under this section are subject to
the following requirements:
1. Development fees shall result in a beneficial use to the development.
2. Monies received from development fees assessed pursuant to this section
shall be placed in a separate fund and accounted for separately and may only be
used for the purposes autharized by this section. Interest earned on monies in the
separate fund shall be credited to the fund. ~
3. The schedule for payment of fees shall be provided by the municipality. The
municipality shall provide a credit toward the payment of a development fee for
. the required dedication of public sites and improvements provided by the
developer for which that development fee is assessed. The developer of
residential dwelling units shall be required to pay development fees when
construction permits for the dwelling units are issued. ~
4. The amount of any development fees assessed pursuant to this section must
~ bear a reasonable relationship to the burden imposed upon the municipality to
provide additional necessary public services to the development. The
municipality, in determining the extent of the burden imposed by the
development, shall consider, among other things, the contribution made or to be
made in the future in cash or by taxes, fees or assessments by the property
owner towards the capital costs of the necessary public service covered by the
. development fee.
5. If development fees are assessed by a municipality, such fees shall be ;
assessed in a non-discriminatory manr~er. ~
6. In determining and assessing a development fee applying to land in a I
community facilities district established under title 48, chapter 4, article 6, the
municipality shall take into account all public infrastructure provided by the district
and capital costs paid by the district for necessary public services and shall not
assess a portion of the development fee based on the infrastructure or costs.
C. A municipality shall give at least sixty days' advance notice of intention to
assess a new or increased development fee and shall release to the public a
written report including all documentation that supports the assessment of a new '
or increased development fee. The municipality shall conduct a public hearing on I
the proposed new or increased development fee at any time after the expiration ~
of the sixty day notice of intention to assess a new or increased development fee ~
I
C
N C
E v ~
E
c ~ °o E ~ ~
E a~
E ~ rn c~i ~ Q' c
O O M ~ 7 ~ V C
F- N O a ~ v _ O
V ~ ~ ~ > y ~
Q ~ ~Q; N C 1p
LLJ Q' FO ~ ~ U
R' ~ d U N ~
LL ~ z m w~ E
H ~
V •a
a U~ o °o °o p o° o g =
c ~ ~ O O O ~ O ~ P'7 M ~
GO CD O N ~ ~
G ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ a W
a O~i N ~ a N ~ ~ OD OD
LL d ~ ~ ~ ~ N~9 ~ ~ H t!i N O
O .r t ~ ~
~
w = ~ o
~
a~ ~ ~
~ Q' ~ a a ~
G~ N O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~
V/ ~ p O O O 0 O O O ~ V~ LL~ _
W C~ V O~D n f~0 ~ N O O ~ O. W ~ W V~i
~ Q 1A O~ M W 1l~ Uj ~ ~ ?
Q ~ w ~ f9 f9 t9 ~ ~ y
W d R O N t~i
~ m c> ~ z ¢
Q a~ "
~ a ~i°
LL G~ A o aa a° o 0 o a ~
Z = C~ ~V M t~D a M N ~ ~
~ m ~
W ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
y Q L~+
Q ~ DI W tD QO ~ ~ Q Q
W ~ J E V N ~ ~ (V Z ~
~ 'j O
O.
~ V O ~
Z ~ J Y C C C C C ~
6 fA U ~ l0 f0 fC f0 (p Q ~Q
Q y~ o~ T T T T T Z 2
tD V' V' O 7
Z U
L~L ~
~ ~ N
O ~
~ N N J
C ~ ~ ~
Q Q
~ W W ~ Z ~
~ .y. ~ N ~
~ E m m m
c ~ ~ > > ~
E 7 Vl ~ ~ j/j
~ U~ w Q Q W
a~'i N
U(p U
~ O O
~ f0 a a ~
a m ~0 ~ rn °o
o°
~ ~ ~ ~ m m rn
a
c w v ~
LL O C C l0 N y 69
C d y L U ~
~ ~
ri o V F~- F o c c ~
- - - - ~
N
~ ~ u
~ V _ d' y O
~ ~ m m ~ m o -o
A o o ~ ~ ° ~ L 3
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ` c~
~ C C D C O {d ~ C Q~ Z 0 O
J U
'C O 'C ~ 'C ~ N ~C C ~ ~ N
a E ~c ~ n~ E~£
m m m ~ o ~ E~ - c m
F- H U I- U ~ F ~ F W U~
' I
I
I
~
~
I
I
I
~owN oF
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA q MARANA ~
INFORMATION
qRiZONP
MEETING DATE: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F. 6
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk
SUBJECT: Presentations by prospective applicants for Planning & Zoning
Commission, Business and Economic Development Citizen
Advisory Commission, and Board of Adjustment
DISCUSSION
The candidates listed below will make brief presentations to Council regarding their
qualifications to serve on several of the Town's advisory commissions.
Planning & Zonin~ Commission (2)
Richard Benner
Lois Bursuk
Dan Cross
Normal Fogel
Nancy Hash
Marcia Jakab
Bret Summers
Business and Economic Development Citizen Advisorv Commission (1)
Thomas Dunn
Sharon Dvorkin-Solotky
Kate Lawson
Stephen "Mike" Rebro
Terry Tometich
Board of Adjustment (1)
John P. McIntyre
Council may wish to interview candidates in an executive session following the
presentations. The final selection of candidates will be made at the July 17, 2007 regular
Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
The list of candidates was distributed prior to tonight's meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Council's pleasure
SUGGESTED MOTION
None required.
-2-
~pWN OF
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING TOWN OF MARANA q Ma~~~,~ ;
INFORMATION
qRIZONP
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: F.7
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Resolution No.2007-126: Relating to utilities; authorizing the
Mayor to execute and Town staff to carry out a six-month notice
of termination of the Apri123, 1979 intergovernmental agreement
with Pima County relating to sewer service in the Marana town
limits, and declaring an emergency
DISCUSSION
This item is intended to provide an open and public forum to discuss and grant authority to carry
out a six-month notice of termination of the April 23, 1979 intergovernmental agreement (IGA)
with Pima County relating to sewer service. This is the optimum time to give the notice of termi-
nation under the terms of the IGA, because the portions of the sewer system that currently serve
Marana and that will be owned by the Town upon termination are clearly defined. Town owner-
ship of the Marana sewer system allows the Town to control its destiny and its water resources.
Town staff believes that now is the logical time to give notice of termination, before more sig-
nificant growth again occurs.
According to County representatives, the County must, by bond covenant, oppose any partition
of the existing system and, therefore, cannot discuss any compromise that may result in the
Town's ownership of any portion of the sewer system. Pima County's position creates an im-
passe, because the Town cannot make sewer infrastructure decisions and cannot own the benefi-
cial right to effluent unless it owns the sewer collection system and treatment process that serves
the Town.
An emergency clause is included in the proposed resolution so that it may go into effect imme-
diately and not be subject to referendum.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2007-126, authorizing the Mayor to execute and
Town staff to carry out a six-month notice of termination of the April 23, 1979 intergovernmen-
tal agreement with Pima County relating to sewer service in the Marana town limits, and declar-
ing an emergency.
{00005421.DOC - 1- 7/9/2007 2:08 PM FJC
ATTACHMENT(S)
Resolution No. 2007-126 and the proposed notice of termination attached as Exhibit A to the
resolution.
SUGGESTED MOTION
I move to adopt Resolution No. 2007-126.
{00005421.DOC - 2- 7/9/2007 2:08 PM FJC
MARANA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-126
RELATING TO UTILITIES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND TOWN STAFF
TO CARRY OUT A SIX-MONTH NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF THE APRIL 23, 1979
1NTERGOVERNNIENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PIMA COUNTY RELATING TO SEWER
SERVICE 1N THE MARANA TOWN LIMITS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS the intergovernmental agreement dated Apri123, 1979 by and between the Town
of Marana and Pima County relating to sewer service (the "IGA") authorizes the County to operate
and manage a sewer collection and treatment system in the Town while the IGA is in effect; and
WHEREAS the IGA gives either party the right to terminate the IGA upon six months' no-
tice; and
WHEREAS the Town's ownership of sewer infrastructure within and serving the Town upon
termination of the IGA will allow the Town to control its destiny and ma~mize its water resources;
and
WHEREAS the Town Council finds that adoption of this resolution is in the best interests of
the Town and its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF MARANA, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a notice of termination of the
IGA in substantially the form attached to and incorporated by this reference in this resolution as Ex-
hibit A for and on behalf of the Town of Marana.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town's Manager and staffare hereby directed and au-
thorized to undertake all other and further tasks required or beneficial to carry out the termination of
the IGA.
IT IS ALSO FURTHER RESOLVED THAT since it is necessary for the preservation of the
peace, health and safety of the Town of Marana that this resolution become immediately effective, an
emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this resolution shall be effective immediately upon its pas-
sage and adoption.
{00005422.DOC 7/9/2007 2:14 PM
PASSED and ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Marana, Arizona, this
l Ot'` day of July, 2007.
Mayor Ed Honea
ATTEST:
Jocelyn C. Bronson, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Frank Cassidy, Town Attorney
{00005422.DOC 7/9/2007 2:14 PM
July 11, 2007
Richard Elias, Chairman
Pima County Board of Supervisors
Pima County Governmental Center
130 West Congress, lOth Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1317
Re: Notice of Termination of the Apri123, 1979, Intergovernmental Agreement
between Town of Marana and Pima County (the "IGA")
Dear Chairman Elias:
The Town of Marana has concluded that it needs to own and operate the sewer utility
serving its jurisdictional boundaries to control its own destiny and maximize its available water
resources. To that end, the Town has elected to terminate the above-referenced IGA pursuant to
Paragraph 2 of the IGA, which states:
this Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by either
party hereto at will upon the giving of six months' written notice.
This termination shall be effective, pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 2, six months from the
date of this letter.
The Town wishes to express its thanks to Pima County for its efforts from 1979 forward,
and looks forward to working with Pima County elected officials and staff to accomplish a
logical implementation of its decision.
The Town is prepared to work and negotiate with Pima County on areas of mutual
concern, including division of existing indebtedness and obligations and participating in
discussions concerning the creation of a regional water and wastewater authority.
Sincerely,
TOWN OF MARANA
Ed Honea, Mayor
cc: Marana Town Council
Members of Pima County Board of Supervisors
C. H. Huckelberry, Pima County Administrator
Michael A. Reuwsaat, Marana Town Manager
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Frank Cassidy, Marana Town Attorney
{00005329.DOC / 3}