Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 93-001 IGA with pima county for the maintenance of the santa cruz riverRESOLUTION NO. 93-01 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MARANA, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF MARANA, ARIZONA, AND PIMA COUNTY, WHICH AGREEMENT WILLPROVIDE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SANTA CRUZ RIVER. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Supervisors of Pima County and the Town Council of Marana to have unitary and clear lines of responsibility for the design, construction and maintenance of the Santa Cruz River as it passes through the bounds of the Town of Marana, and WHEREAS, Pima. County is willing to administer the design, construction and maintenance of the said project. NOW, THEREFORE, UPON MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Marana enter into an intergovernmental agreement, which is attached hereto, with Pima County which agreement will provide for the design, construction and mainte- nance of the Santa Cruz River, and That the Mayor is hereby instructed and authorized to sign the said Intergovernmental Agreement for the Town of Mararia. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this 19th day of January, 1993. LOWER SA/~TA CRUZ R!VEE FLOOD CONTROL SU~-~APJ OF NEGOTi~TZNG POSITIONS Intergovernmental Agreements: The Town of Marsha would like complete all IGA agreements as soon as possible. Puna~-n~/Rl:nt of W~ believes there should be no ~ther o~!igation placed l~downers to i~iuian~ this project. o~ property ~ur ba~k protection =nd the ~1oo~-ay. Pima Comfy would a~nistar this process, providing o~fer ~avorable long-=e~ te~s~s or negotiate f!oo~wa~ a~sements wi~h o~ers o~ agriculture! l~s gr~u~th~red water rigkt~ ~d whi=h will remain the pe~ent f!oo~a~. control within the floodplain area and has prepared a. revised fo_-m of agreement which reflects this position. The Town of ~ar~na is open ~ ~i$cussing Pima Count¥'s prozimity o~ flood control structures ~nd how the Town work with Pima County to ensure the continued integrity of such structures. Complete design work on Phase I and immediately begin to construct as much bank protection as possible with currently designated funds. Marsha should become involved in the design process and have an opportul%ity to review and comment a~ important decision points. Request the Flood Control District make a presentation on the ~esign and current status o~ this project before the Marina Town Council. Until b=nk protection is in place, conduct a plan of channel maintenance a!on~ the Santa C-,,z ~iver in ~arana. This ~re ~-~ ~ pa ......... ? ...... =. such as +'~ .... ~ of ~_v_~ between Trlco Road aria the Pinai County line. Mmrana believes it is improper to include the Tankers!eI property situation just north of Ina Road in negotiations related to the Lower S~nta Cruz River project. Marsha is willing to meet with the Flood Control District on this matter as a separate issue to disc,uss what can be done to address the Cottuty's ccncer~s. ~arana believes there may be other concerns regarding the adequacy of existing protection for the !ns Road bridge. Marsha should restate its position and support for the Plood Control District priorit~ of addressing solutions to flood control problems along the major drainagewHys in Fima County. The increasing diversion of limited ~unds and sta~ to other types o~ projects, activities and'mitigati~ measures are o~ great cotter:. Other arguments which might b~'incorporated to explain the non- ~participation position could inc.l~t~de: (a) Negative influences and increased flood potential related to massive urban development, drainage improvements, effluent disposal and so on, j~st upstream of Marana; (b) History (including recent history) o~ landowner participation in flood control projects in Oro ~al!ey and other arsas in Tucson and Pima County~ {c) Comparison of estimated onst to repair damage from another !983 or even smaller flood in Marsha {Federal, State, Cotfury, Cit~, School District, Irrigation District, privet= property, utilities, crop losses, etc, etc.).